scientific conference on understanding and managing sweetness
DESCRIPTION
The key role of sweetness in health-promoting diets and lifestyles. Adam Drewnowski, PhD Director, Center for Public Health Nutrition Director, UW Center for Obesity Research School of Public Health and Community Medicine University of Washington Seattle, WA. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Scientific Conference on Understanding and Managing SweetnessScientific Conference on Understanding and Managing SweetnessOldways Scientific Program for New Delhi, India • 17 September 2009Oldways Scientific Program for New Delhi, India • 17 September 2009
The key role of sweetnessin health-promoting diets and lifestyles
Adam Drewnowski, PhDAdam Drewnowski, PhDDirector, Center for Public Health NutritionDirector, Center for Public Health NutritionDirector, UW Center for Obesity ResearchDirector, UW Center for Obesity Research
School of Public Health and Community MedicineSchool of Public Health and Community MedicineUniversity of WashingtonUniversity of Washington
Seattle, WASeattle, WA
• If the human body is healthy, then all the foods that taste the best are also the most nutritiousAldebrandin of Siena 1606
• Whatever is the most delicious is also the most nutritious
Magninus of Milan 17th C
Basic principles of gastronomy and science
Jean-Pierre Flandrin Histoire de l’Alimentation, Paris, 1996
• Sugar is the universal flavoring; its applications have an infinite variety…
• Mixed with water, sugar produces sugar water, a refreshing, healthy pleasant drink.
Jean Anthelme Brillat-Savarin 1825
What is more delicious than sugar? What is more delicious than sugar? France 1825France 1825
What is more nutritious than sugar? US 1948
The energy of sunshine is crystallized in Dextrose sugar
The sugar phobia: UK 1975The sugar phobia: UK 1975
An addictive destructive drug William Dufty 1975 Even fruit juices are
addictive Heller & Heller 1991
Sugar is the world’s most dangerous food additive. Sugar addiction is more common than alcoholism
Robert Atkins 1977
Consumer
Cost
Variety
FoodBehavior
How people choose foodsHow people choose foods
Pleasure Energy density
Health
Taste
Access/time
Taste
Physiology of sweet taste
• SaltySalty NaNa+ + ions enter via ions enter via ion ion channelschannels
• SourSour Acid HAcid H++ ions block K ions block K++ outflow via channels outflow via channels
• Sweet Sweet 3-4 types of sweet 3-4 types of sweet receptorsreceptors on cell on cell surface surface
• Bitter Bitter 40-60 types of bitter 40-60 types of bitter receptorsreceptors on cell on cell
surface linked to surface linked to many many transduction transduction systemssystems
Sweetness equals nutritionBitterness equals dietary danger
• A single taste cell has many receptors for bitter and sweet
• Humans have 3-4 different taste receptors for sweet
• Sugars and intense sweeteners are structurally related
• Humans have 40-80 different taste receptors for bitter
• Compounds that elicit bitter taste are completely unrelated
• Bitter compounds are often toxic Bitter compounds are often toxic
Density of papillae can vary
PROP nontaster
PROP supertaster
What do infants like?What do infants like?
Infants like sweetInfants like sweet
Sweetness preferences are innateSweetness preferences are innate
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0.05 0.1 0.2 0.3
Sugar concentration (mol/L)M
ean
volu
me
cons
umed
(ml)
Sucrose
Water
Desor, Maller and Greene, 1978
Infants prefer sweet liquidsInfants prefer sweet liquidsto plain waterto plain water
Sweet Sour Bitter
Facial expressions of 3-day old infants Steiner, 1977
Facial expressions of 3-day-old infants: the reflex taste response
Mennella and Beauchamp, Nutr Rev 1998
Liking
for sweetRejectionof bitter
What do children like?What do children like?
Foods that are familiar and sweetFoods that are familiar and sweet
Dimensions of children’s food preferences - a classic study (Birch 1979)
• Children ages 3-4 y tasted open faced sandwiches on whole wheat bread– margarine, margarine and mint jelly, peanut
butter, peanut butter and grape jelly, cream cheese, cream cheese and honey, cream cheese and caviar, cheddar cheese spread
• “Point to the sandwich you would like to eat the very best”– Sandwiches removed one by one - to give a
metric scale
Children also liked high calorie foods (Birch, 1979)
Peanut butter
Cream cheese+caviarMargarine+mint jelly
Cream cheese
The most preferred foods contained sugar and fat
Child 2
Cream cheese+honey
Cheddar cheese
Peanut butter+jelly
Margarine
Consumer
Cost
Variety
FoodBehavior
How people choose foodsHow people choose foods
Health
Taste
Access/time
Taste Pleasure Energy
density
0
10
20
30
40
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
water content (g/100g)
En
erg
y d
en
sit
y (
MJ
/kg
)
Fats Sweets
Energy density (MJ/kg) and water content
oil
butter
sugar
Soft drinks
candy
0
10
20
30
40
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
water content (g/100g)
En
erg
y d
en
sit
y (
MJ
/kg
)
Fats Sweets Dairy
oil
butter
sugar
candy
cheese
yogurtmilk
ice cream
Soft drinks
Energy density (MJ/kg) and water content
0
10
20
30
40
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
water content (g/100g)
En
erg
y d
en
sit
y (
MJ
/kg
)
Fats Sweets Meat Dairy
oil
ice cream
milk
meat
cheese
butter
sugar
Soft drinks
Energy density (MJ/kg) and water content
0
10
20
30
40
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
water content (g/100g)
En
erg
y d
en
sit
y (
MJ
/kg
)
Fats Sweets Grains Meat Dairy
oil
grains
milk
meat
cheese
butter
sugar
Soft drinks
Energy density (MJ/kg) and water content
0
10
20
30
40
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
water content (g/100g)
En
erg
y d
en
sit
y (
MJ
/kg
)
Fats Sweets Grains Vegetables Fruit Meat Dairy
milk
cheese
butter
sugar
meat
Soft drinks
Energy density (MJ/kg) and water content
What do children like?What do children like?
Foods that are energy-dense, Foods that are energy-dense, familiar, and sweetfamiliar, and sweet
Children like foods that are energy-dense and sweet!
(Wardle et al., Appetite 2001;37:217-223)
Best liked (-2 to +2) Least liked (-2 to +2)
1.91 Chocolate
1.88 Chocolate biscuits
1.88 Crisps (=chips)
1.88 Yogurt
1.84 Ice cream
1.83 Ice lolly (popsicle)
1.83 Fruit squash
1.77 Bread
1.67 Chicken
1.63 Plain biscuits
-0.62 Avocado
-0.59 Leeks
-0.56 Zucchini squash
-0.49 Melon
-0.45 Cottage cheese
-0.44 Sweet peppers
-0.31 Onion
-0.29 Liver
-0.25 Cabbage
-0.05 Parsnips
Saturday Evening Post 1948Saturday Evening Post 1948
Children like the foods they knowChildren like the foods they knowI don’t like it; I never tried it!I don’t like it; I never tried it!
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
0 20 40 60 80 100 120Have tried the food before (%)
Pre
fere
nc
e
tofu
avocado cottagecheese leeks
melon
chocolate
R2=0.4
Data from Wardle et al., 2001Data from Wardle et al., 2001
crisps
Children like sweet energy-dense Children like sweet energy-dense foodsfoods
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
0 2 4 6 8 10Energy density (kcal/g)
Pre
fere
nce
buttermargarine
chocolate
crisps
ice lollyfruit squash
tomatoesgreen beanscabbage
R2=0.14
Data from Wardle et al., 2001Data from Wardle et al., 2001
Preference Score (range -2 to +2)
2.01.51.0.50.0-.5-1.0
Ene
rgy
Den
sity
(kJ
/g)
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
strawb/raspberries
peach/pear/plum
melon
grapes
banana
apricot
apple
leeks
lettuce/cuc/celery
tomatoes
pars/turnip/swede
brocc/spin/greens
peas
green/runner/broad
potatoes
citrus
carrot
cabbage
red peppercauliflower
marrow/courgette
beans
Banana
Potatoes
Grapes
Apple
Children like energy-dense fruit best Children like energy-dense fruit best
(Wardle al, Appetite 2003)(Wardle al, Appetite 2003)
Is sugar to blame?
Is there something about sugars and satiety?
What is satiety?
• Satiety is defined as a state of fullness following a meal. Measures include:– Ratings of fullness after the meal– Ratings of hunger or desire to eat again– Food consumption at the next meal– Timing (onset) of the next meal
• Satiation is the state of fullness before the meal even ends– Size of that meal is the main measure
Next meal
time
Solid
Appetitive ratingsHunger, fullness, desire to eat, thirst
Liquid
Satiation
This meal
Satiation
Food records
Expectation: Subjects ingesting a preload will eat less at this/next meal
Variable interval: 15 min – 6h
Satiety
The satiety sequence
Research on sweetness and satiety
• Are liquids less satiating than solids?– Soft drinks vs. cookies
• Are liquid sugars not satiating?– Soft drinks vs. juices or milk
• Do intense sweeteners promote hunger?– Aspartame vs. milk
Compare liquids and solids
Next Meal
time
Solid
desire to eat
Same calories – different volume
Liquid
hunger
fullness
thirst
Liquids, solids and satiety:A direct test
Composition Cola Raspberry cookie
Carbohydrate (g) 81.5 69.0
Sugar (g) 81.5 48.0
Protein (g) 0 3.0
Fat (g) 0 0
Fiber (g) 0 1.5
Serving size 710 ml
(24 oz)
87 g
(6 units)
Total kcal 300 300
Almiron-Roig, Flores, Drewnowski, Physiol & Behav 2004;82:671
Beverage vs. cookie
Keep energy constant (300 kcal)– vary texture and time lag
Lunch
Lunch
Lunch
Lunch
2h
2h
20 min
20 min
Study design: 2 time delays
Breakfast
Breakfast
Breakfast
Breakfast
1.5h
1.5h
3.5 h
3.5 h
Almiron-Roig, Flores, Drewnowski, Physiol&Behav 2004;82:671
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300
Hu
ng
er
(9-p
oin
t s
ca
le)
Early cola Early cookie Late cola Late cookie
Time (h)
Breakfast Lunch
Temporal profile of hunger ratings
Almiron-Roig, Flores, Drewnowski, Physiol&Behav 2004;82:671
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300
Hu
ng
er
(9-p
oin
t s
ca
le)
Early cola Early cookie Late cola Late cookie
Time (h)
Breakfast Lunch
Temporal profile of desire to eat
Almiron-Roig, Flores, Drewnowski, Physiol&Behav 2004;82:671
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300
Hu
ng
er
(9-p
oin
t s
ca
le)
Early cola Early cookie Late cola Late cookie
Time (h)
Breakfast Lunch
Temporal profile of fulness
Almiron-Roig, Flores, Drewnowski, Physiol&Behav 2004;82:671
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300
Hu
ng
er
(9-p
oin
t s
ca
le)
Early cola Early cookie Late cola Late cookie
Time (h)
Breakfast Lunch
Temporal profile of thirst
Almiron-Roig, Flores, Drewnowski, Physiol&Behav 2004;82:671
Will cola spoil appetite for lunch?
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Early cola Early cookies Late cola Late cookies
kcal
Lunch (kcal)
Yes – if consumed just before lunch*
* *
Compare cola, juice and milk
ED=0.42 kcal/g
ED=0.42kcal/g
ED=0.42kcal/g
ED=0.0kcal/g
Orange juice
1% milk
Regular cola
Sparkling water
248 kcal
248 kcal
248 kcal
0 kcal
Almiron-Roig, Drewnowski Physiol Behav 2003;79:767
Same calories and volume – different beverage
Orange juice 1% milk Cola Water
Energy (kcal) 248 248 248 0
Volume (ml) 591 591 591 591
Carbs (g) 62 29 67 0
Sugar (g) 55 28 67 0
Protein (g) 0 20 0 0
Fat (g) 0 6 0 0
E.D. (kcal/g) 0.42 0.42 0.42 0
Study design• Thirty-two volunteers (14 men; 18 women) • Breakfast preload: beverage (248 or 0 kcal) and slice of dry
toast (100 kcal) at 9:35 am• Hunger, thirst, fullness, nausea and desire to eat measured
every 20 min (9-point scale)• Tray lunch served at noon (1,734 kcal)• Foods pre-weighed and plate waste measured
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
935 1000 1020 1040 1100 1120 1140 1200 1230
Hu
ng
er
(9-p
oin
t s
ca
le)
Orange juice 1% milk Cola Water
Time (h)
Breakfast Lunch
Temporal profile of hunger ratings
Almiron-Roig, Drewnowski. Physiol Behav 2003;79:767
Temporal profile of desire to eat
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
935 1000 1020 1040 1100 1120 1140 1200 1230
De
sir
e t
o E
at
(9-p
oin
t s
ca
le)
Orange juice Milk (1%) Cola Water
Time (h)
Beverage LunchAlmiron-Roig, Drewnowski Physiol Behav 2003;79:767
Time (h)
Breakfast Lunch
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
935 1000 1020 1040 1100 1120 1140 1200 1230
Fu
llne
ss
(9
-po
int
sc
ale
)Orange juice Milk (1%) Cola Water
Temporal profile of fullness ratings
Almiron-Roig, Drewnowski Physiol Behav 2003;79:767
Temporal profile of thirst ratings
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
935 1000 1020 1040 1100 1120 1140 1200 1230
Th
irs
t (9
-po
int
sc
ale
)Orange juice 1% milk Cola Water
Time (h)
Beverage LunchAlmiron-Roig Drewnowski Physiol Behav 2003;79:767
Lunch meal: 1734 kcalAdditional servings of the same foods
available from a side buffet
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
OJ Milk Cola Water
En
erg
y in
tak
e (
kJ
)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
OJ Milk Cola Water
En
erg
y in
take
(kJ
)
Preload Lunch
Men Women
aa a b
c cd
Energy intakes at lunch were all the same – no compensation
Almiron-Roig Drewnowski Physiol Behav 2003;79:767
Conclusions
• Orange juice, 1% milk, and cola behaved in exactly the same way
• Calories reduced hunger more than did water; all four beverages quenched thirst
• There was no downward adjustment for energy consumed at breakfast for any of the caloric beverages tested
Final question:Final question:
Do intense sweeteners Do intense sweeteners promote hunger?promote hunger?
Sugars Study: Methods• N = 37 volunteers (19 men; 18 women), age 23y• Body mass index: 23.4 (men), 21.9 (women)• Hunger, thirst, fullness, and desire to eat measured
every 30 min (9-point scale)• Lunch foods pre-weighed by experimenters. Plate and
water waste measured.
Beverage Volume Calories
Aspartame 475 4
1% milk 495 213
No beverage 0 0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Hu
ng
er
(9-p
oin
t s
ca
le)
Aspartame Milk no bev
Time (h)
Breakfast Lunch
Temporal profile of hunger ratings
Almiron-Roig, Flores, Drewnowski, Physiol&Behav 2004;82:671
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Hu
ng
er
(9-p
oin
t s
ca
le)
Aspartame Milk no bev
Time (h)
Breakfast Lunch
Temporal profile of fulness ratings
Almiron-Roig, Flores, Drewnowski, Physiol&Behav 2004;82:671
Energy Intakes at lunch
700
750
800
850
900
950
1000
1050
1100
kc
al
1% milk Aspartame No Bev
Perrigue et al. Presentation at Experimental Biology 2006 in San Francisco April 2006
Final question:Final question:
So what causes obesity?So what causes obesity?
Dietary fat
Sucrose
Eating in restaurants
Large meals
Fast foods
Eating too much
High GI carbs
High fructose corn syrup
Eating at home
Between-meal snacks
Vending machines
Walking too little
Liquid beverages Energy dense (solid) foods
Simple sugars Non-caloric sweeteners
Gluttony Sloth
What causes of obesity?Science has many answers
From fat… to sugar… to….
““Obesity is caused by eating too much fat, sugar, Obesity is caused by eating too much fat, sugar, starch and protein, by caloric and non-caloric starch and protein, by caloric and non-caloric
sweeteners; by meals and by snacks; by beverages sweeteners; by meals and by snacks; by beverages and by solid foods; by eating at fast foods and by solid foods; by eating at fast foods
restaurants and by eating at home”restaurants and by eating at home”
Drewnowski & Darmon AJCN 2005Drewnowski & Darmon AJCN 2005
Some recent publicationsSome recent publications
• We need studies on the satiating power of novel beverages
• Look at beverages consumed before, with, or after meals
Conclusions