1

1

Developments Downunder- current trends in science and policyfor managing Australian landscapes

Andrew Campbellwww.triplehelix.com.au

NCEAS Santa Barbara13 September 2007

2

Outline• Australian context

• Learning for Sustainability

• The role of knowledge

• Improving knowledge systems

• Introducing AEON

2

3

My perspectives• Farming background south-eastern Australia

• Forestry & rural sociology training

• Extension officer

• National Landcare Facilitator

• Post-grad studies, Holland & France

• Senior Executive, Australian Government

• 7 years as CEO of Land & Water Australia

• Triple Helix Consulting– landscapes, lifestyles & livelihoods

Australia: the continent• Area comparable to mainland US• 7% to 10% of world’s species• oldest, most isolated continent• oldest living life forms, tallest flowering plants• largest areas of coral reef and sea-grass• Mega-diverse, extraordinary endemism

1350 endemic vertebrate spp

• 37,000km coastline• 3rd largest fishing zone

3

5

The driest, flattest, most poorly drained, nutrientdepleted and geologically stable continent

Based on Puckridge et al (1998)

0

Australian lowland rivers

Means that Australian lowland riversMeans that Australian lowland riversare the most variable on Earthare the most variable on Earth(Martin (Martin ThomsThoms))

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

amaz

on

sao

syr

vis

mis

sis

sth

yang

tze

nth

colo

rado

son

god

ree

hua

ura fit

vaa

limpo

po

coop

er

Index ofIndex ofVariabilityVariability

High

Low

Mississippi

Colorado

The lowest run-off and The lowest run-off and streamflow streamflow of any continent,of any continent,and the worldand the world’’s most variable climates most variable climate

4

Perth’s Annual Storage Inflow GL (1911-2005)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

19

11

19

14

19

17

19

20

19

23

19

26

19

29

19

32

19

35

19

38

19

41

19

44

19

47

19

50

19

53

19

56

19

59

19

62

19

65

19

68

19

71

19

74

19

77

19

80

19

83

19

86

19

89

19

92

19

95

19

98

20

01

20

04

To

tal

an

nu

al*

in

flo

w**

to

Pe

rth

da

ms

(G

L)

Annual inflow 1911–1974 (338 GL av) 1975–1996 (177 GL av) 1997–2004 (115 GL av)

Notes: * year is taken as May to April and labelled year is beginning (winter) of year

** inflow is simulated based on Perth dams in 2001 and 2005 is total until 3 August 2005

8

•• a small young nation in a vast ancient continenta small young nation in a vast ancient continent

•• unique biological & cultural richness and diversityunique biological & cultural richness and diversityin a highly variable climatein a highly variable climate

•• at the sharp end of global climate changeat the sharp end of global climate change

•• communities on-sidecommunities on-side

•• few people and dollars per unit landscapefew people and dollars per unit landscape

•• malleable institutions, an open economymalleable institutions, an open economy

•• sufficient know-how to make progresssufficient know-how to make progress

•• the sustainability journey is the challenge of our agethe sustainability journey is the challenge of our age

through the through the macroscopemacroscope

5

9

• highly variable spatial and temporal scales• the possibility of absolute ecological limits• irreversible impacts and related policy urgency• complexity, connectivity, uncertainty & ambiguity• cumulative rather than discrete impacts• value-laden issues & new moral dimensions• systemic problem causes• contested methods and instruments• ill-defined property rights and responsibilities• expectation of stakeholder/citizen participation

Sustainability issues are typicallycharacterised by (after Dovers):

10

The integration challenge•• Managing Managing wholewhole landscapes landscapes

- - ““where nature meets culturewhere nature meets culture”” ( (SchamaSchama))- landscapes are socially constructed- landscapes are socially constructed- beyond - beyond ‘‘ecological apartheidecological apartheid’’- - sustainabilitysustainability means means peoplepeople management management- engage values, perceptions, aspirations, behaviour- engage values, perceptions, aspirations, behaviour

•• IntegrationIntegration--across issues across issues –– e.g climate, energy & water e.g climate, energy & water--across scalesacross scales--across the triple helixacross the triple helix

--landscapes, lifestyles & livelihoodslandscapes, lifestyles & livelihoods

6

11

The Australian Natural ResourceManagement (NRM) Policy Context

Lots to like about the overall approach:• Agreement on the big issues & need for coordinated, ‘joined up government’

• Unprecedented commitment from PM down, reflected in CoAG agenda & $$

• Primary industries increasingly seeing NRM as their business (if not yet ‘core’)

• Grassroots farmer and community participation – Landcare and the regionalmodel comprise a wonderful platform

• Hard issues like property rights finally on the table

• Innovative measures to allocate resources – e.g. Bush/Plains Tender

• Leading new approaches to landscape ecology that recognise that landscapesare socially constructed and people are integral

• Vibrant NRM research scene, rural R&D model,some outstanding researchers and exciting research

12

Fitzgerald wilderness

Wholelandscapecommunity ledconservation

7

13

Bush wisdom with the community

• Information collection on an area basis, notsubject or species

• Research hot wired to action

• Information stored in and spread from aregional base

• Continuity of work, staff and population

14

A big policy agenda• Defining environmental deliverables - leadership• Fostering innovation

– Breakthrough technologies

– Smarter institutions, including markets

• Best-practice regulation

• Sorting out the planning hierarchy (i.e. the Federation)

• Juicier carrots and smarter sticks• Monitoring and evaluating impact

• Continental scale analysis and prediction

• Bringing the community along

8

15

The role of knowledge• Knowledge (along with commitment and capacity) is one

of three essential conditions for the development of moresustainable systems of resource use and management

• We need better knowledge for three reasons:– To help make better decisions– To underpin the innovation process– To learn as we go along

(so that at least we make new mistakes)

16

Knowledge 101• Knowledge happens between the ears

• An individual cognitive process and highly contextual:– “I only know what I know when I need to know it”

• Revealed in artifacts (writing, art, formulae, products etc), skills, experience,rules of thumb and natural talent (Dave Snowden)

• Across quite different domains:– Including local, Indigenous, scientific, strategic (organisational)

• And different sectors:– research, policy, management, planning, extension, education, monitoring

• people default to known, trusted, accessible sources:– credibility, dialogue, easy access & honesty all critical– timing is crucial:

knowledge is most useful when it is needed

• The organisation of research is thus critical

9

17

Knowledge Systems• At societal and professional levels, we must think about how the

knowledge system as a whole works to serve three key purposes:– Better decision making

– Fomenting and supporting innovation

– Longer term evaluation, learning and adaptive management

• The NRM knowledge system is a classic ‘human activity system’ (‘soft’) as

opposed to natural or designed systems (‘hard’)

• No-one set out to design and build national or international NRM knowledgesystems

• But they exist, and we invest a lot of money in them

• There is value in analysing the whole system toidentify ways of helping it to work better

18

Analysing knowledge systems• Description

– Boundaries: defining the scope of analysis– Components: describing the elements within these boundaries

• Purpose– How well the system as a whole can be directed to serve priorities at

the relevant scale (sub-national, national, regional, international etc)

• Function (performance)– How well it serves the knowledge needs for more sustainable

management of natural resources: decisions, innovation, learning

• Cohesion– How well the various components of the system

work together in delivering intended functionstowards a desired purpose

10

Some components of the AustNRM Knowledge System

UniversitiesKnowledgeGeneration and

Management

RegionalNRM Bodies

CommunityLandcaregroups

HobbyFarmers

Cooperative Research Centres

•E-Water•Plant based Management ofDryland Salinity•Irrigation Futures•Weed Management•Tropical Savannas Management•Australasian Invasive Animals•Coastal Zone, Estuary andWaterway Management•Cotton Catchment Communities•Desert Knowledge•Greenhouse Accounting•Sustainable Forest Landscapes•Landscape Environments andMineral Exploration

KnowledgeAdoption

Policy andPrograms

Department of Environmentand Heritage

Department ofAgricultureFisheries

and Forestry

AustralianGovt NRMFacilitators

NationalAction Planfor Salinityand Water

Quality

NaturalHeritage Trust

CommunityWater Grants

Envirofund

NationalLandcareProgram

Bushcare

Coastcare

R&D Corporations•Cotton•Fisheries•Forest and Wood Products•Grains•Grape and Wine

•Land & Water Australia•Rural Industries•Sugar

Bureau ofRural

Sciences

CSIRO ANU

National Land andWater Resources

Audit

GeoscienceAustralia

IndigenousLand

Corporation

LegendDepartments of State (FMA Act)Statutory Agencies (FMA Act) within portfolios

Statutory Agencies (CAC Act) within portfoliosCorporatised R&D Corporations (Statutory FundingAgreement)Funding Programs

National Water Commission

AustralianBureau ofStatistics

HorticultureAustralia

DairyAustralia

AustralianWool

Innovation

AustralianPork

Limited

Meat andLivestockAustralia

LocalGovernments

State NRM &Ag Agencies

ProductivityCommission

National WaterInitiative

CommercialFarmers

WaterAuthorities

Ruralresidential

CommercialAdvisoryServices

AustralianGreenhouse

Office

IndigenousCommunities

20

The Australian NRM knowledge system• Total Ag & NRM research spend nationally exceeds $1B per year

• Crowded, fragmented scene– 40 ‘core’ agencies in the NRM knowledge business at Commonwealth level

– >80 agencies in wider NRM knowledge system at national level

– not counting their equivalents in eight other jurisdictions

• Relevant knowledge for a given decision is rarely dictated by agency,

regional, commodity or state boundaries– or temporal boundaries – a 20 year old project (especially maps, surveys etc)

can still be highly pertinent

• ‘grey’ literature (consultancy reports etc) poorly recorded,

lots of wheels being reinvented

• How to get the whole system working better?

11

21

Analysing the NRM Knowledge System- purpose and cohesion

• The system does not currently appear to be purposeful– no capacity to comprehend or analyse the whole

– plenty of helicopters, no air traffic control or satellites

• A Cohesion hierarchy:communication < coordination < synthesis < synergy– Linkages between sectors are generally poor

– Ditto knowledge domains: local, indigenous, scientific, strategic

– We tend to fund the boxes, not the arrows

– There are no effective system-level communicationor coordination mechanisms

22

Analysing the NRM Knowledge System- function

• How well does the system as a whole meet and respond to the needs ofits users? How does it help us to make better decisions and to learn ourway to more sustainable NRM?– Generally not as well as it could or should– OK on nature, cause and extent of problems– Poor on predicting impact of interventions or continental change,

and on generating practical, profitable, adoptable solutions– Very poor on monitoring resource extent and condition, and management

practices– Consequently poor at servicing monitoring and evaluation needs– Very poor at sharing information on what is happening

where and lessons learned across the whole system;

– amnesia is systemic, built in, guaranteed…

12

23

Improvingthe Australian NRM Knowledge System

Function – helping us to learn at all levels• Memory aids – making stuff easy to find and access

• M&E tools that pull out and underline the lessons

• Ways of honouring, retaining and tapping into elders

• Centres of Excellence

• Lift the game on Monitoring & Evaluation

• A long term research, monitoring & analysis network

24

Enter AEONAustralian Ecosystem Observing Network

• High level question: “how are Australian ecosystems changing andwhat does this mean for the services they provide”

• $20m start-up grant from the National Collaborative ResearchInfrastructure Strategy, aiming to deliver:

• Improved understanding of cause and effect in landscapes

• Foundation for innovation along the value chain– Research knowledge to practice, management tools and policy– Pro-active adaptation

• Systems thinking, integration across disciplines, trans-disciplinaryresearch

• Continental scale analysis and synthesis

13

25

AEON elements1. National centre focused on analysis, integration, synthesis and

prediction (probably based at University of Queensland);

2. Regional hubs linked to national issues and communities of users

and managers – catchments and regions;

3. Technical, ‘hard systems’ infrastructure such as new high resolution

data sets, wireless networks, sensors and systems– nationally distributed sensor networks linked by state of the art ICT;– Long term ecological research sites,

integrating water, soils & biodiversity data streams;– Integrating and building on the LTER and OzFlux network

– Supported by environmental genomicscapability

26

Tropical-AridTransect

C, N, H2OBiodiversityFireInvasives

South-east QLDC, N, H2OBiodiversityNutrientsDevelopment vswater yield

South-westWA

C, N, H2OBiodiversityGroundwaterFire

IrrigatedMDB

C, N, H2OGroundwaterNutrientsSoil health

SouthernForests

C, N, H2OBiodiversityFireWater yield

Other(TBC)

C, N, H2O etc

ENABLINGTECHNOLOGIES

ICTData management

Environmental genetics & genomicsSensors, metering & telemetry

Remote sensing & high res imageryCitizen science tools

Data serviceslink to NCRIS 5.16

Platforms forCollaboration

AEON HUBS

RELATED NCRISCOMPONENTS

PFCIMOSLiving AtlasPopulation HealthAUSCOPEBiological Systems

National Centrefor Analysis &

Synthesis

IMPROVED POLICY & PRACTICE

RESPONSEMEASUREMENT

InternationalLinks

NCEAS, NEON (US)ECN (UK)

LTER networkFlux network

GTOS

SCIENTIFICKNOWLEDGE

Australian Ecosystem Observing NetworkCORE DATASETSANZLICAUSCOPE(Geospatial Reference Framework& Earth Systems Model)Govt Datasets (ASRIS, NCAS,NVIS, NLWRA, FireWatch etc)PRIVATES(SKM, ESRI, Google, Telstra,Leica)BoM(New water accounting system)CSIRO/BoM(Climate models)GLOBAL(GTOS, LTER, MEA)

14

27

The regional model:an integrated approach

• The regional model (56 catchment bodies) is an ambitiousattempt to implement sustainable NRM at a landscape scale:– Devolve decision making & resource allocation to appropriate scale

– Tap into and build on deep local knowledge and connection to place– Work across issues and industries in an integrated way

• integration means making whole– across scales, issues, land tenures and land uses– in the users’ context

• that requires excellent relationships

• And comprehensive knowledge

28

Making the system more Cohesive• First ensure that activities are transparent and accessible

across the whole system

• Fund the arrows, not just the boxes

– Especially between knowledge sectors & knowledge domains

– Mandate, train and resource brokers and boundary spanners

– Interconnected knowledge networks – exploit new technologies

– A First Stop Knowledge Shop for the regional model

• Reward collaborative behaviour

15

Research directory•Programs•Projects•Specialist contactsfor advice

Publications•Reference books•Journal articles•Research reports•Pamphlets•Magazines•Conference proceedings

Spatial datasets

Researchreport

Conferenceproceedings

Journal articles

Magazines

Anecdotal evidence

Reference books (Guidelines and

manuals etc)

Decision support tools•Models•Decision frameworks•Spreadsheets

Knowledge assets of interest

Current research projects

Specialistadvice

Models

Decision frameworks

Spreadsheets

Knowledge needs

Current research programs

Funding opportunities

NRM Toolbar interface

NRM searchGoogle AustraliaOrganisationassetsAdvanced

[Searches onselection]

Square iconindicateswhichsearchengine isselected

[Click to see currentalerts plus accessalert settings]

[Click name tosee librarianservices]

Includes formfor requestinginformation fromthe librarian

[Click to logout orlogin as someoneelse]

[Click name toopen My library]

Click dropdownto view list offolders(Playlists) thatstays open toallow drag anddrop fromsearch results

R&D Directory

This Worked Here!

Knowledge needs

Events and funding

Decision tools

Knowledge market

reportAdd/Deletedatabases

My profileCustomise mytoolbarUpdate toolbarUninstall toolbarHelpContact us

16

31

In summary• Knowledge is fundamental for sustainability

• Public science is fundamental for sustainability knowledge

• Research investors are ‘keepers of the long view’

• The R&D (scientific inquiry) process itself must be nestedwithin an appropriate framework of governance,management, adoption and legacy effort

• We need better prediction, analysis and synthesiscapabilities - AEON should help– Lots of scope for international partnerships!

• Understanding the knowledge need is crucial

http://www.clw.csiro.au/tern/http://www.ncris.dest.gov.au/capabilities/tern.htm

ContactsContacts

Facilitator: Prof Paul J Perkins AMEmail: pjperkins@cres.anu.edu.au

Andrew Campbell andrew@triplehelix.com.au

Science Adviser: Prof Graham Harris AMEmail: graham.harris@ozemail.com.au