science ethics

34
Science Ethics Ideal Models from history Human subject research Examples from SF

Upload: leanne

Post on 24-Feb-2016

30 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Science Ethics. Ideal Models from history Human subject research Examples from SF. The Ideal Scientist:. Neutral observer, reporting on their findings without bias Works past personality conflicts Serves the greater good: increased knowledge. The Real Scientist. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Science Ethics

Science Ethics

• Ideal• Models from history• Human subject research• Examples from SF

Page 2: Science Ethics

The Ideal Scientist:

• Neutral observer, reporting on their findings without bias

• Works past personality conflicts• Serves the greater good: increased

knowledge

Page 3: Science Ethics

The Real Scientist

• Human beings with all our flaws• Like all other fields, famous people are

more likely to be outrageous• In some fields we have regulations to

try and compensate for our human flaws

Page 4: Science Ethics

Science, including astronomy, is rife with conflicts

Page 5: Science Ethics

Galileo GalileiItaly

1564-1642

Page 6: Science Ethics

Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems

Page 7: Science Ethics

“Galileo’s Daughter”

by Dava Sobel

Suor Maria Celeste

Page 8: Science Ethics

Tycho BraheGermany

1546-1601

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Tycho_Brahe.JPG

Page 9: Science Ethics

Tycho Brahe = Geocentric

Best measurements of planets

Page 10: Science Ethics
Page 11: Science Ethics

Tycho Brahe’s Elk or Moose

Page 12: Science Ethics

Tycho Brahe’s Nose

Page 13: Science Ethics
Page 14: Science Ethics

Tycho BraheGermany

1546-1601

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Tycho_Brahe.JPG

Page 15: Science Ethics

Tycho Brahe = Geocentric

Best measurements of planets

Page 16: Science Ethics

Johannes Kepler

Germany1571-1630

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Johannes_Kepler_1610.jpg

Page 17: Science Ethics

Kepler = Heliocentric

Tycho Brahe’s student, used his data to support

heliocentric

Page 18: Science Ethics

Sir Isaac NewtonEngland

1643-1727

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:GodfreyKneller-IsaacNewton-1689.jpg

Page 19: Science Ethics

Newton’s “Principia”

Written in Latin

Page 20: Science Ethics

Gottfried Wilhelm von

Leibniz1646-1716

Page 21: Science Ethics

Who invented Calculus?

• Newton worked on it in 1666, but didn’t publish

• Leibniz started his work in 1674 and published in 1684

• Newton’s Principia in 1687 used geometric calculus

• Newton published fluxions in 1693 & 1704

Page 22: Science Ethics

Modern Calculus

• Applications to physics from Newton• Notation from Leibniz• Debate exists over whether one copied

the other• Current consensus is that they

developed their work independently

Page 23: Science Ethics

HaumeaMike Brown (USA, @plutokiller)

José Luis Ortiz Moreno (Spain)

Page 24: Science Ethics

Haumea

Page 25: Science Ethics

What we know

• 2003 Ortiz images include the object • 2004 Brown images include the object • 2005

– Brown announces he found a new object, but no details

– Ortiz’s group accesses Brown’s observing logs (legal, but ethics unclear, depend on motive)

– Ortiz announces his discovery with details

Page 26: Science Ethics

Final word?

• International Astronomical Union (IAU)• Discovery date and provisionary name

(2003 EL61) from Ortiz observations• Name (Haumea) from Brown’s

suggestion• Discoverer left blank

Page 27: Science Ethics

The Bone Wars, 1877-1892

Edward Drinker Cope, Philly

Othniel Charles Marsh, Yale

Page 28: Science Ethics

The Bone Wars, 1877-1892

• Paid off each other’s workers to not tell their respective boss of finds

• Misdirect bones to the other researcher• Even dynamited sites so the other

couldn’t dig there! • Financially bankrupt, and socially ruined• Discovered 142 dinosaur species in

Montana, Wyoming, and Colorado

Page 29: Science Ethics

So those were bad examples. What about a good one?

Human Subject Research

Page 30: Science Ethics

Guiding Principles

• Informed consent• Voluntary (no coercion)• Do no harm

– Benefits must outweigh risk– Chance of harm and severity of harm– Benefits to self or others

Page 31: Science Ethics

Institutional Review Board (IRB)

• Each institution (university, company, hospital, etc.) has one

• Approves, monitors, and reviews all research involving humans (and animals)– Similar bodies review new drugs and

medical procedures• Conducts risk-benefit analysis

Page 32: Science Ethics

• A one-way trip to Mars• Ethical issues?

– We don’t know what the risks are, so can’t have fully informed consent

– Risk is 100%: you will die on this mission, the only questions are when and how

– Benefits??

Human Spaceflight

Page 33: Science Ethics

Sci-Fi Examples

• Star Trek’s Prime Directive – No interference with other civilizations

• Avatar (2009)– RDA is searching out “unobtainium” on

Pandora, and doesn’t care about killing the native people

Page 34: Science Ethics