scales and motion in the universe investigating astronomy, slater & freedman chapter 3

110
Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy , Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Upload: ruth-wheeler

Post on 11-Jan-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Scales and Motion in the Universe

Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman

Chapter 3

Page 2: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

In this chapter you will discover…

• What makes a theory scientific• The scientific revolution that changed the

idea of an unmoving Earth and allowed the Earth to move

• Copernicus’s argument that the planets orbit the Sun

• Why the direction of motion of the planets on the celestial sphere sometimes appears to change

• That Kepler’s determination of the shapes of planetary orbits depended on the careful observations of his mentor Tycho Brahe

• How Isaac Newton formulated an equation to describe the force of gravity and how he thereby explained why the planets and moons remain in orbit

Page 3: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

The Ancient Mystery of the Planets

• What was once so mysterious about the movement of planets in our sky?

• Why did the ancient Greeks reject the real explanation for planetary motion?

Our goals for learning:

Page 4: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Planets Known in Ancient Times

• Mercury – difficult to see; always

close to Sun in sky

• Venus – very bright when visible

— morning or evening “star”

• Mars – noticeably red

• Jupiter – very bright

• Saturn – moderately bright

Page 5: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Eratosthenes and Aristarchus (310-~230 BC)

Using simple tools and basic geometry to measure: 1. the size of the Earth, Moon, and Sun2. the distances to the Moon and Sun

1st heliocentric theory

Sun 18 to 20 x Moon distance

Size of sun ~ 7x earth

220? – 143? BC

Page 6: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

What was once so mysterious about planetary motion in our

sky?

• Planets usually move eastward from night to night relative to the stars. – You cannot see this motion on a

single night; rather, planets rise in the east and set in the west.

• But sometimes they go westward for a few weeks or months: retrograde motion

Page 7: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Early models of the universe attempted to explain the motion of the five visible planets against the background of “fixed” stars. The main problem was that the planets do not move uniformly against the background of stars, but at times appear to stop, move backward, then move forward again. This backward motion is referred to as retrograde motion.Time-lapse images of Mars

during retrograde

Jupiter retrograde motion

Page 8: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

The retrograde motion of Mars as shown in a series of images taken on the same photographic plate.

Page 9: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Explaining Apparent Retrograde Motion

• Easy for us to explain: occurs when we “lap” another planet (or when Mercury or Venus lap us)

• But very difficult to explain if you think the solar system is geocentric and the Earth is unmoving

• In fact, ancients considered but rejected the correct explanation…

Page 10: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

We see apparent retrograde motion when we pass by a

planet in its orbit.

Page 11: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Why did the ancient Greeks reject the real explanation for planetary

motion?• Their inability to observe stellar parallax was a major factor.

Page 12: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

The Greeks knew that the lack of observable parallax could mean one of

two things:

1. Stars are so far away that stellar parallax is too small to notice with the naked eye

2. Earth does not orbit Sun; it is at the bottom of the universe

With rare exceptions such as Aristarchus, the Greeks rejected the correct explanation (1) because they did not think the stars could be that far away…

Thus setting the stage for the long, historical showdown between Earth-centered and Sun-centered systems.

Page 13: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

• Sufficiently accurate to remain in use for 1,500 years.

• Arabic translation of Ptolemy’s work named Almagest (“the greatest compilation”) •Greeks also tended to Believe that planets were living beings influencing man’s life..

•Ptolemy’s book, Tetrabiblios, is the bible of astrology.

Ptolemy

The most sophisticated geocentric model was that of Ptolemy (A.D. 100-170) — the Ptolemaic model:

Page 14: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

An Earth-centered, or geocentric, model of the universe

The Ancient Greek Model

Page 15: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Ptolemy’s model used a geocentric (Earth-centered) model of the solar system in which the planets orbited the Earth indirectly by moving on epicycles which in turn orbited the earth.

Page 16: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

The Ptolemaic system was an ingenious and complicated system of circular orbits centered on other circular orbits called epicycles. It remained the best model for over 1500 years (with many modifications).

Celestial sphere

Earth Centered

Page 17: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

TheThe assumptions for this model were commonly accepted:

1. the earth did not move

2. the earth was the center of the system

3. the stars were located at a fixed distance on a transparent celestial sphere that rotated from E to W

4. the celestial realm was unchanging, and celestial motion was perfect, i.e. circular!

Page 18: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3
Page 19: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

The Marriage of Aristotle and Christianity

• In the 13th century St. Thomas Aquinas blended the natural philosophy of Aristotle, which included the Ptolemaic model, with Christian beliefs.

• A central, unmoving Earth fit perfectly with prevalent Christian thinking, and various scriptures where found, whose literal interpretation, seemed to agree with this model.o 1 Chronicles 16:30: “He has fixed the earth firm,

immovable.”o Psalm 96:10: “He has fixed the earth firm, immovable ...”o Psalm 104:5: “Thou didst fix the earth on its foundation

so that it never can be shaken.”o Isaiah 45:18: “...who made the earth and fashioned it,

and himself fixed it fast...”

Page 20: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Timeline of Ancient Astronomy

Page 21: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Ptolemy’s system worked well in general detail. It was used to create tables predicting the occurrence of astronomical events....

eclipses

conjunctions

etc.Over several hundred years, small errors in the tables accumulated to produce large error in the timing of events - as much as a month by 1200 AD

Page 22: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

A major revision was done in 1250 by a group of scholars under King Alfonso of Spain. Ptolemaic system was modified to include deferents (off center circles).

They produced the Alfonsine Tables

By 1500 even these tables were in error by several hours and even days in some cases

Page 23: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

epicycle Epicycle with deferent

center of epicycle

Page 24: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

(1) Ptolemy’s predicted positions for celestial objects had become less accurate over time.

(2) The Ptolemaic model was not aesthetically pleasing enough. He wanted to restore perfect” or circular motion and get rid of off-center circles!

Copernicus, a contemporary of Columbus, worked 40 years on a heliocentric—sun-centered—model for two reasons:

Page 25: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Because both models (Ptolemaic & Copernican) were based on the assumption that the planets move at constant speed, Copernicus was forced to add small epicycles of his own to improve accuracy.

Copernicus would not abandon the circle as the preferred planetary orbit because he thought circles are the best representation of the perfect motions of the heavens.

Page 26: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Simpler! [not more accurate!]

simple explanation of retrograde motion

explained the phases of Venus

explained why Mercury & Venus always close to the sun

Using trigonometry was able to calculate the relative

distances to all visible planets

Advantages of Copernican System:

Page 27: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Timeline of Renaissance Astronomy

Page 28: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

But What about the Scriptural Evidence for the Geocentric

Model?• As more and more evidence began to build

which indicated the correctness of Copernicus’ model, faithful Christians had to ask some fundamental questions about their interpretation of scripture.

• By the end of the 17th century, most Christians had come to accept the heliocentric model.

• These Christians had to make adjustments to their interpretation of certain scriptures: the Earth being “fixed” must be interpreted differently.

Page 29: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

The re-examination of scripture continues even today as we seek the message of scripture that God intended to deliver – which we have discovered is almost never scientific information.

The basic scriptural re-interpretation typically involved asking the question, “What is the scripture talking about in the verses interpreted previously as a fixed Earth”?

Page 30: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Comparing The Two Models

There were strong argument against Copernican idea of a moving earth:

Inertia-if earth is moving, why don’t objects thrown upward fall behind as the earth rotates under the object?

Parallax-if earth moves, one should see stellar parallaxes (stars seem to move as viewed from different locations)

Page 31: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Celestial Sphere

Page 32: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Stellar parallax, the apparent annual shifting of nearby stars with respect to background stars, was not observed until 1838.

Stellar parallax is quite small- 0.75 arcseconds for largest shift detected — because the stars are so far away from us.

Page 33: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

A good model (or theory) will make verifiable predictions that might allow the the theory to be disproved.

Using the Astronomical Unit (AU)—the average distance between Earth and Sun— Copernicus predicted with amazing accuracy the Sun-to-planet distances for the 5 planets visible from Earth in the 1500s.

The Copernican Model had good Predictive Power

Page 34: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Planetary Distances in AU

Copernicus Value Actual Value

Mercury 0.38 0.39

Venus 0.72 0.72

Earth 1.001.00

Mars 1.52 1.52

Jupiter 5.22 5.20

Saturn 9.17 9.54

Page 35: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

16

The Copernican model was more aesthetic since it could explain the motions of Mercury and Venus without resorting to special rules needed by the Ptolemaic model.

Copernicus offered a simpler explanation for retrograde motion that required no use of epicycles.

Page 36: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3
Page 37: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

17

Copernicus, who died in 1543 just as his book De Revolutionibus was published, started such an upheaval in people’s thinking that the word “revolution” took on a second meaning that is so familiar to us today.

Tycho BraheTycho was born 3 years after Copernicus died.

Page 38: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

18

Tycho Brahe

Tycho built the largest and most accurate naked-eye instruments yet constructed.

He could measure angles to within 0.1º, close to the limit the human eye can observe.

Page 39: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

19

1563 close conjunction of Jupiter & Saturn. Alfonsine tables were off by a month, while Copernican tables were off by several days.

Tycho wanted to correct the tables

He not only made careful measurements, but he recorded the accuracy of each measurement.

Page 40: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Woodcut of Tycho

Silver nosepiece is visible in the picture

Tycho lost the tip of his nose in a duel at age 20 over a question in math.

Page 41: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

a. no apparent parallax, therefore the nova was not inside celestial sphere

b. thus an obvious change in the unchanging celestial sphere

Tycho writings about the Nova gained the attention/approval of Frederick, king of Denmark who built Tycho the world’s best observatory (Uraniborg) on island of Ven

11/11/1572 Nova appeared in the sky and was closely observed by Brahe: he observed....

Page 42: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Tycho’s supernova today

Woodcut of Tycho’s Stella Noveau

Page 43: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Woodcut of the inside of Brahe’s observatory

Blaeu ´s Atlas , 1663

Stjerneborg, 1584, partly underground

Page 44: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Aerial view of site of Uraniborg on the Island Ven

Page 45: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Sweden

Denmark

Poland

Page 46: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

His commission was to revise Alfonsine tables

Hired several mathematicians to handle the drudgery of the computations, one of whom was Johannes Kepler

After Frederick’s death, Tycho fell out of favor and thus disassembled his observatory and moved it to Prague under HRE Rudolph II

Castle Benatky

Page 47: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Tycho’s model

Page 48: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Tycho Brahe died 24th October 1601 of a urinary bladder infection that he may have tried to cure himself, with a medicine containing mercury

Teyn Church in Prague where Tycho was buried

Body exhumed in 1901 to determine cause of death

1996 Particle Induced X-ray Emission (PIXE) showed recent high levels of Mercury in Brahe’s hair samples implying mercury poisoning.

Page 49: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Johannes Kepler

1610 painting by unknown artist

Born 1571

Died 1630 (58)

Page 50: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Got scholarship to become Lutheran minister, but liked math better. Had influential teacher who was a Copernican.

Became Math teacher at Graz (not very good, only had 1 student last year)

1595 wrote almanac with astronomical & astrological weather predictions. They were correct and got reputation as astrologer

Kepler was a sickly child of a protestant family living in predominantly catholic area.

Page 51: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Tycho’s best data had been gathered for Mars.

Based on circles and epicycles Kepler’s best Copernican model for Mars matched Tycho’s data to within 0.13º (8 arcminutes) [less than the accuracy of Tycho’s measurements].

In 1600, a year before Tycho died, Kepler accepted a position as Tycho’s assistant, working on calculations

Page 52: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

When Brahe died in 1601, Kepler got his job, and after a fight with Brahe’s widow, got possession of Brahe’s notebooks of dataThe error in the position of Mars exceeded the error in Tycho’s measurements, which continued to bothered Kepler. Could get agreement within 8 arcmin, > Tycho data had a maximum error of 6 arcmin.Kepler was lifelong mystic, enamored with numbers (we would say a numerologist)

Page 53: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Kepler’s persistence finally led him to abandon circles and try other shapes. The shape that worked for Mars and all other planets was the ellipse.

In possession of Brahe’s data, Kepler spent more than 5 years pouring over the details, trying to reconcile the error.

Page 54: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

The ellipse is a geometrical shape every point of which is the same total distance from two fixed points (the foci).

Eccentricity is the distance between the foci and its center divided by half the longest distance across (semi-major axis).

The Ellipse

Page 55: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

focus

focus

minor axis

major axis All the planet orbits have e ~ 0.1 except Pluto (.248) and Mercury (.206)

The center of force occupies one focus of the ellipse, while the other focus is usually empty

planet

sun

The eccentricity of the ellipse measures the difference between the major and minor axes. e = c/aIf the axes are equal, then e=0 and the ellipse becomes a circle.

c

a

Page 56: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3
Page 57: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Kepler also discovered what we call the Law of Equal Areas which showed that planets did NOT move at constant speeds in their orbits

Page 58: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Kepler’s 2nd Law – the law of equal areas

1 month

1 month

Page 59: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

After more than 10 years further work, Kepler wrote a rather obscure and mystical book that showed a relationship between a planet’s orbit radius (a in AU) and its orbital period (P in years)

All of his discoveries are called Kepler’s 3 Laws of Motion

P2 = a3

Page 60: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3
Page 61: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

In addition to the Laws of Motion, Kepler is also one of the 1st to try to give a physical reason for planets orbiting the sun. He thought that some type of magnetic force was responsible

Page 62: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Born in Italy (1564), a contemporary of Copernicus. He was a Prof. at Padua in the Venetian Republic, & a Prof. at the University of FlorenceStrong believer in experimentationStrong, abrasive personality, popular writer who wrote in common Italian rather than Latin. He was very free to criticize and ridicule any who differed with him on any matter.

Galileo Galilei

Page 63: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

1

Galileo Galilei and the Telescope

• Galileo built his first telescope in 1609, shortly after hearing about telescopes being constructed in the Netherlands.

• Galileo was perhaps the first person to use a telescope to systematically study the sky and record his observations.

Page 64: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Galileo made 5 important observations:

Mountains and valleys on the MoonSunspotsMore stars than can be observed with the naked eyeFour moons orbiting JupiterComplete cycle of phases of Venus

Page 65: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

• Though Galileo’s first three observations do not disprove the geocentric theory, they cast doubt on the the assumption of perfection in the heavens.

The existence of stars too dim to be seen with the naked eye also cast doubt on the the fact that stars were all the same.

Page 66: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

In 1610, Galileo discovered four “stars” that move back and forth across Jupiter. He concluded that they are four moons that orbit Jupiter just as our Moon orbits Earth. These observations madeby Jesuits in 1620 of Jupiter and its four visible moons.

Page 67: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Venus’s full set of phases can be explained by the heliocentric theory.

The Ptolemaic theory predicts that Venus will always appear in a crescent phase, which is not borne out by the observations.

Galileo observed that Venus goes through a full set of phases: full, gibbous, quarter, crescent.

Page 68: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Venus’ Phases in Ptolemy’s

Model

Page 69: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Galileo is also the first person to do any systematic study of motion and was the first person to understand the concept of inertia

Galileo did a wide variety of experiments, even attempting to measure the speed of light by using lanterns on distant hilltops (concl. either infinite or too large to measure)

Page 70: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

6

Isaac Newton

• Galileo is credited with setting the standard for studying nature through reliance on observation and experimentation to test hypotheses.

• The year Galileo died—1642—is the year Isaac Newton was born.

• Newton took the work of Galileo and Kepler and created an expansive theory of motion.

Page 71: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Isaac Newton was undeniably one of the greatest/most influential scientists that ever lived.

Isaac Newton (1642–1727)

Very religious man who believed the order in the universe was representative of God

Page 72: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

• 1665-67 plague in London, Newton left the university and went to his country home for a year. While there he:– developed basic ideas of mechanics– basic concepts of gravity– beginning ideas on light and optics

Very cautious person who had to be persuaded by his friends to publish ANY of his work

Page 73: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

1687 published Principia ( perhaps the most influential scientific book ever published)

In it he explained the motion of the planets, comets using his law of gravity and his 3 Laws of Motion. He also derived Kepler’s Laws

Page 74: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Could not solve the problem of gravitational attraction on a planet so he invented Calculus to solve it

Published a book Optiks giving the basic ideas of geometrical optics, light, and color, including the fact that white light is made up of different colors

Page 75: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

To understand the motion of objects under the influence of gravity, we use the ideas of Isaac Newton and his 3 Laws of motion.

The first concept needed is the idea of INERTIA. This was the concept not understood by ancient observers in their arguments against a moving earth.....

“toss object in the air, if the earth is moving then the object will fall behind its launch point...”

Page 76: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

While not the first person to properly conceive of inertia, Galileo was the first to arrive at his views based on actual experiments he performed.

Galileo’s work provided the basis for Newton’s formulation of the Law of Inertia.

Page 77: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

7

• Newton’s First Law (Law of Inertia): Unless an object is acted upon by a net, outside force, the object will maintain a constant speed in a straight line. Note: a speed of zero (rest) is a constant speed.

Inertia is the property of an object whereby it tends to maintain whatever velocity it has. The inertia of an object is determined by it MASS.

Page 78: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Block continues to move when the cart suddenly stops due to the inertia of the block!

Page 79: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

10

• Acceleration is inversely proportional to the mass being accelerated.

• What does “inversely proportional” mean?– As the mass gets bigger, the

acceleration gets smaller

Newton’s Second Law says that the acceleration of an object

depends on the force applied to it and on its mass!

Page 80: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

8

• Acceleration is a measure of how rapidly the speed or direction of motion of an object is changing.

• An object at rest has a speed of zero.• Newton’s first law says that a force is

needed to change the speed and/or direction of an object’s motion.

If an objects speed or direction of motion changes (like the block) - we say that the

object is accelerated!

Page 81: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

No force means no acceleration!

Car remains at rest (law of inertia)

V=0

V>>0F

F If an unbalanced force is applied, the car accelerates and its speed increases >0

V>0

The longer the force acts, the longer the car accelerates and the faster it goes

FV>>>0

Page 82: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

9

Mass is the quantity of inertia an object has. Produced by particles from which it is made

• Mass is NOT volume or weight.• Weight is the force of gravity.• The international (SI) unit of mass

is the kilogram.• A kilogram on Earth weighs about

2.2 pounds.

An Important Digression — Mass & Weight

Page 83: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Thus when the net force is zero, there is no acceleration.

Acceleration = force divided by massIn symbols A = F/mOften as Force = mass X acceleration or F = mAIf the left side = 0 then right side is also = 0

Page 84: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

A = F / m

if the force is large then Acceleration is large:

A = F m

if the mass is large then acceleration is small

A = F m

Page 85: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

11

Newton’s Third Law

• Third Law: When object X exerts a force on object Y, then object Y exerts an equal and opposite force back on X.

X Y

X pushes on Y

Y pushes on X

The forces are equal in size and opposite in direction

X Y

Page 86: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

The Third Law is sometimes stated as “For every action there is an opposite and equal reaction,” but the first statement is more precise in terms of physical forces.

REMEMBER: The two forces ALWAYS act on DIFFERENT objects.

Also there is no such thing as a single force!!

Page 87: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

13

Motion in a Circle

• Motion of an object in a circle at constant speed (uniform circular motion) is an example of acceleration by changing direction.

• Centripetal (“center-seeking”) force is the force directed toward the center of the curve along which the object is moving.

Page 88: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

The most common force to discuss while studying the motion of planets, comets, stars, galaxies, and other such objects (including balls, etc. on the Earth) is GRAVITY.

Page 89: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

As the Earth orbits the sun, the force of gravitational attraction from the Sun pulls on the Earth

The Earth is accelerated continuously in its orbit!

velocity

velocity

a

b

Velocity at a and velocity at b are NOT the same – have diff. directions

Page 90: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

14

The Law of Universal Gravitation

• This law states that between every two objects there is an attractive force, the magnitude of which is directly proportional to the mass of each object and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the centers of the objects.

Page 91: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

In equation form:

G is a constant, m1 and m2 are the masses, and d is the distance between their centers.

2

12

D

MGMF

Page 92: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

M1 M2

D

F1 F2

F1 & F2 are equal except for direction!

Two objects that have mass are attracted to each other.

Page 93: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Earth

Weight : pull of planet on object

mass

Weight is the gravitational force between an object and the planetary body on which the object is located.

mass

W = mg

Page 94: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Pull of gravity on a mass on Earth – known as weight

Points approx. toward the center of the Earth or what we call DOWN

Page 95: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

–According to Newton, gravity…. --- makes objects fall to Earth --- keeps the Moon in orbit around the Earth ----- keeps the planets in orbit around the Sun –He could therefore explain the planets’ motions and why Kepler’s laws worked.

Page 96: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

The pull of the Earth’s gravity could be tied in with the orbit of satellites (such as the Moon) around the Earth.

Newton made an argument to show this that is now known as Newton’s Cannon!

Page 97: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Applet

Page 98: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

20

Newton’s Laws and Kepler’s Laws

• Kepler’s first law—the planets move in elliptical orbits—can be derived from Newton’s laws but requires calculus.

• Kepler’s second law—planets sweep out equal areas in equal times—can also be derived from Newton’s laws. As planets orbit the Sun they show a change in both speed and direction.

Page 99: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

21

• Newton showed mathematically that Kepler’s third law—the period-distance relationship—derives from the inverse square law for gravitation.

• Newton modified Kepler’s third law, showing that mass is an important factor.

Newton and Kepler’s 3rd Law

a3p2

Where a is in meters and p is in seconds k is a constant and M is mass in kilograms

= k M

Page 100: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

22

The Center of MassSeesaw principle

• Center of mass is the average location of the various masses in a system, weighted according to how far each is from that point. The CM is sometimes called the center of gravity.

• Barycenter is the center of mass of two astronomical objects revolving around one another.

Page 101: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

23

• The location of the center of mass of the Earth-Moon system was determined by observing parallax of nearby planets due to the Earth’s motion as the Moon went around.

•The barycenter for the Earth-Moon system is inside the Earth, 4641 km from its center and inside its 6378 km radius

Page 102: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Using Newton’s Laws of Motion allows us to understand the general features of satellite motion, such as the moon, or any other orbiting satellite.Careful measurements of the orbits and periods of satellites (natural and man-made) allow one to accurately determine the mass of the body being orbited.

Page 103: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

One of the crowning achievements of Newton’s gravitational law was the discovery of Neptune.

After it’s accidental discovery, the orbit of Uranus was analyzed using Newton’s Laws and the Law of Gravity.

Page 104: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Uranus & 3 moons

Despite careful measurements, the observed orbit did not match the one predicted by Newton’s Laws.

Page 105: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

The discrepancies were attributed to another unknown mass orbiting outside Uranus’ orbit. Using these results, the mass and location of the unknown object was predicted.

Assuming Newton was correct, the discrepancies could only be explained by another planet, about the same size, orbiting outside of the orbit of Uranus.

Neptune & 1 moon

Page 106: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

Gravity Works at All Scales This figure shows a few of the effects of gravity here on Earth, in the solar system, in our Milky Way Galaxy, and beyond.

Page 107: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

32

The Importance of Newton’s Laws

• Kepler’s laws can be derived from them.

• They explain tides and precession.• Their use predicted the existence of

the planet Neptune.• They provide a way to measure

things quantitatively and predict the motion of things.

• Newton laid the foundation for our concept of the Universe.

Page 108: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

33

Beyond Newton: How Science Progresses

• Newton proposed that inertial mass was equivalent to gravitational mass, but he had no idea why. Subsequent measurements confirmed this coincidence.

• Einstein in his General Theory of Relativity showed mathematically that the two types of masses are indeed equivalent.

Page 109: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

This coincidence was one of the seeds leading Einstein to the development of the General Theory of Relativity

Page 110: Scales and Motion in the Universe Investigating Astronomy, Slater & Freedman Chapter 3

The End

Next, Chpt. 4Exploring Our Evolving Solar System