sap community intervention
TRANSCRIPT
WHEN WE UNITE A COMMUNITY… WE ALL WIN
Each of us know our own field of expertise very well…;
yet, most of us don’t develop ongoing relationships with others in the various
disciplines… so we encounter a bureaucratic nightmare when we try to
accomplish our goals… and we don’t know the GATEKEEPERS.
WHEN WE WORK SMART
1. We collaborate, build partnerships, increase productivity, and
deliver quality results… to help intervene on the various addictions
and mental illnesses with at risk children, adolescents and adults.
2. We used the same principles that Dr. Vernon Johnson used when
he educated his Board of Directors about Intervention( when many
of the members themselves were practicing alcoholics) and
Family Systems Theory.
COMMUNITY COMPONENTS
LEGAL… POLICE/SHERIFF… PROBATION
MEDICAL… DOCTORS, NURSES, HOSPITALS, CLINICS
SCHOOL… K-‐12, UNIVERSITY, PRIVATE/PUBLIC
SOCIAL SERVICE. MENTAL HEALTH WORKERS/AGENCIES
THE MAGIC: FINDING THE GATEKEEPERS
The Gate Keeper is the “power source” to the Component System.
Identify the Gate Keeper and connect with that person.
They will guide you through their unique system…
who is important… who to watch for.
“It took me 20 years to unify the first SAP Community in North Dakota… You can do it quicker!”
~Dick Shaeffer of “Choices and Consequences”
WE ARE EITHER THE GATEKEEPERS TO OUR SYSTEMS, OR WE KNOW WHO THEY ARE
Our ability to bond and create ongoing relationships to other gatekeepers of the various systems is what speeds up the community intervention work.
INTERVENTION
• Identify problems by a Core Team
• Intervene with standard protocol
• Refer to appropriate person (not agency)
Identify
Refer Intervene
SERIES OF WORKSHOPS AIMED AT UNITING SYSTEMS
Each system sends a key representative to the educational workshop. • Basic generic starter kits with form letters advising of the need/call to action • Basic education re: addiction/mental health/resources/research and peer
contact Goal is to create education and sensitivity to the unique problems within the system and for “Doing the Right Thing”. First, role play an in vivo re-enactment of a “referral” -- each system or group must attempt to “do the right thing”. This leads to an understanding of the confusion and problems within that system. Then, repeat the role playing with an actual “consultant” from that system, and analyze/process this.
BASIC STEPS FOR ESTABLISHING A SAP CORE GROUP
Can be ANYONE who wants to be involved… from
educator, administrator, nursing assistant or teacher’s aide,
librarian, probation officer, etc…
(KEY: they are teachable, and willing.)
22 STEPS TO FINALIZING THE COMMUNITY SAP
1. Investigate the power sources within the system 2. Establish a relationship 3. Investigate the monetary, budgetary and fiscal constraints 4. Investigate current procedures, policies, legalities and work already existing
or in place. 5. Evaluate team members most effective and advantageous 6. Actively solicit, market, sell advantages for being part of the team. 7. Connect and maintain connections with other core team members. 8. Establish resource contacts during this time 9. Introduce your team to what you know and who you know 10. Define various roles/jobs
CONTINUED BASIC STEPS TO CORE TEAM 11. Outline various components to start with (e.g. referral system) 12. Establish a philosophy and Master Goal List. 13. Document it and have a foundation for the policy and procedure manual 14. Investigate -- search and compare with what others have done. 15. Establish a priority system 16. Establish a time line 17. Define a documentation, collection and assessment system. 18. Materialize some forms for these systems. 19. Define an in-system support… start with biggest problems first. 20. Establish an in-house communication and referral system. 21. Investigate resources for community referral and an evaluation system. 22. Create a grading system from the referral and assessment systems in-house to outside
systems and connect all documentation, contracts, policies and procedures together.
ADVICE TO CORE PARTICIPANTS
1. Guiding not controlling 2. Can’t be all things to all people… Give self a break. 3. Use resources creatively… don’t overlook what’s closest to home. 4. Delegate whenever possible. 5. Have a philosophy/spiritual base to work from even if it’s group power process
(which gives meaning during tough times). 6. Never try to do it alone or without support. 7. Steer away from negativity, doom, and gloom. Stick with the winners. 8. Remain teachable. 9. Work on the footwork. Work with the plan, not for the outcome. 10. Know what’s in it for YOU (examine motives & expectations, prevent burn-out!)
THE SAP PROCESS: INTERVENTION STEP ONE
Contract A
• “We want to see XYZ by ___ date, or PQRS consequences will occur.” • “We have seen ABC behaviors and documentation.” • “You have __ period of time to change these behaviors, or we perceive this
as a cry for help.” • “If PQRS consequences and ABC behaviors occur consistently for ___
period of time then Contract B will go into effect.”
Contract B
• “Since the following behaviors and documentation have occurred, we are concerned.”
• “We have been recommended to do XYZ by ABC authorities.” • “Therefore, we’d like to see XYZ by ___ date, or PQRS consequences will
occur and ABC privileges will be removed.” • “If PQRS consequences due to ABC behaviors (listed) continue over __
period of time then, Contract C will go into effect.
THE SAP PROCESS: INTERVENTION STEP TWO
THE SAP PROCESS: INTERVENTION STEP THREE
Contract C
• “Since the following contracts, behaviors, and documentations have occurred, we are concerned.”
• “We have been recommended to do XYZ by ABC authorities.” • “We are following through on XYZ consequences and recommending your
parents do XYZ in order to help you, and help themselves.” • “…and you need to do XYZ to prevent Contract D from occurring.” • (Lots of in-house groups, education and support.)
THE SAP PROCESS: INTERVENTION STEP FOUR
Contract D
• Out of house (maybe they could come on campus to your facility) • Outpatient or free assessment…
THE SAP PROCESS: INTERVENTION STEP FIVE
Contract E
• 12 step meetings associated with the problem(s) and/or peer support. • Outpatient support, and other items such as counseling.
THE SAP PROCESS: INTERVENTION STEP SEVEN
Contract G
• Inpatient locked (again), state facility, or foster home, etc… • …or other alternative.
A NATURAL PROGRESSION OF CONSEQUENCES
• Truancy, failing grades, make-up classes, don’t graduate on time, summer school make-up, suspension, expulsion, juvenile referrals, probation, home trouble, consequences, physical health failing, more trouble, legal, physical, mental, financial, spiritual consequences… pregnancy, accidents, abortions, disease, death, etc…
• Pain from doing it the same way, over and over again, expecting different results; more pain and more consequences; trying something different; less pain; trying something different out of desperation or forced… less pain… accepting… less pain… surrender.
A NATURAL PROGRESSION OF TREATMENT
• Meetings with goals, treatment plans, expectations, concerns, documentation and a follow-up meeting.
• Recommendations on how to meet expectations. • Follow up appointment… to praise; or to send to the next level Contract B. • Increased support for efforts at home or school; increased obligation to work on
the problem; tangible things to look for as evidence of change. • Listen to what they DO, not what they SAY. • Increased support for finding additional types of help/resources; first in schools,
then in community, for both student(s), and then for family. • Follow through on rules and regulations. Explain “why” to parents (“tough love"). • Suspension and expulsion, but with a plan for re-entry to the system if XYZ
happens. • Re-entering the system after treatment, with expectation for them to assist
helping others with the same problem, in groups or service activities, as a condition for re-entry.
RESULTS: 20 YEARS LATER IN IMPERIAL COUNTY
• The Core Genesis Groups are ongoing today 20 years later within all 32 separate schools and 14 school districts.
• Relationships were established, and have been ongoing within all the systems. • All the community components were connected within a two year period. • Interventions at all levels occurred as we were doing the workshops; not just
with the school systems, but also among the participants.
Some high level administrators recognized their own problems with alcohol/addictions, co-dependency, or mental health issues; some within their family systems. These were given resources to get the help they needed, and to protect their privacy at the same time. They were thus better able to help those with whom they worked or served.