san francisco county transportation authority...m:\cac\meetings\agendas\2015\05 may 27 cac pg.docx...

$: San Francisco County Transportation Authority...M:\CAC\Meetings\Agendas\2015\05 May 27 CAC pg.docx Page 1 of 5 AGENDA CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Meeting Notice Date: 6:00 p.m., Wednesday,$
M:\CAC\Meetings\Agendas\2015\05 May 27 CAC pg.docx Page 1 of 5

AGENDA

CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Meeting Notice

Date: 6:00 p.m., Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Location: 1455 Market Street, 22nd Floor

Members: Christopher Waddling (Chair), Wells Whitney (Vice Chair), Myla Ablog, Brian Larkin, John Larson, Santiago Lerma, John Morrison, Eric Rutledge, Jacqualine Sachs, Raymon Smith and Peter Tannen

Page

6:00 1. Committee Meeting Call to Order

6:01 2. Chair’s Report – INFORMATION

6:05 Consent Calendar

3. Approve the Minutes of the April 22, 2015 Meeting – ACTION* 7

4. Adopt a Motion of Support to Authorize the Executive Director to ExecuteAnnual Contract Renewals and Options for Various Annual ProfessionalServices in an Amount Not to Exceed $1,950,000 and to Modify ContractPayment Terms and Non-Material Contract Terms and Conditions –ACTION* 11

The Transportation Authority contracts with City and County of San Francisco (City) departmentsand outside firms for certain specialized professional services in areas where factors like costs, workvolume, or the degree of specialization required would not justify the use of in-house staff. Assummarized in Attachment 1, we are recommending renewing annual contracts for general legalcounsel, video production services for Transportation Authority Board and Committee meetings, andexercising an option for on-call program management oversight and general engineering consultingservices, in an amount not to exceed $1,950,000.

5. Adopt a Motion of Support for the Award of a Three-Year ProfessionalServices Contract, with an Option to Extend for Two Additional One-YearPeriods, to Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP in an Amount Not to Exceed$300,000 for Annual Audit Services, and Authorizing the Executive Director toNegotiate Contract Payment Terms and Non-Material Contract Terms andConditions – ACTION* 15

Under its fiscal policy, Transportation Authority financial transactions and records are to be auditedby an independent certified public accountant (CPA) firm at least annually and a report be submittedto the Transportation Authority Board on the results of the audit. The prior auditing services contractwith Macias, Gini & O’Connell LLP will expire on June 30, 2015. The Transportation Authority’spolicy is to competitively re-bid professional services contracts after five years. Therefore on March13, 2015, we issued a Request for Proposals (RFP 14/15-04) for annual audit services for a three-yearcontract covering audit for Fiscal Years 2014/15 through 2016/17, with two additional one-yearextension options. By the due date of April 22, we received three responsive bids, which included

1

CAC Meeting Agenda


both a technical and cost component. Interviews were conducted on May 6 by a selection panel comprised of staff from the Transportation Authority and the City’s Controller’s Office. Based on this competitive process, the selection panel recommended award of an annual audit services contract to the highest-ranking firm, Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP.

6. Adopt a Motion of Support to Increase the Amount of the ProfessionalServices Contract with Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. by $224,600 for a TotalAmount Not to Exceed $596,600, for Planning and Engineering Services forthe 19th Avenue/M-Ocean View Project Pre-Environmental Study Phase andto Authorize the Executive Director to Modify Contract Payment Terms andNon-Material Contract Terms and Conditions – ACTION* 19

The Transportation Authority is serving as the procuring agency for the 19th Avenue/M-Ocean ViewProject Pre-Environmental Study Phase being led by the San Francisco Municipal TransportationAgency (SFMTA). This phase of work continues work started in the Transportation Authority-led19th Avenue Transit Study (Feasibility Study). The major objectives of this phase are to advanceproject development to the 5-10% level of engineering and prepare California Department ofTransportation (Caltrans) Project Study Report-Project Development Support (PSR-PDS)documentation required given the project’s location within Caltrans-owned right-of-way. Substantialprogress has been made since initiation of this phase in Summer 2014 with the project teamanticipating submittal of the draft PSR-PDS package to Caltrans for review in early Summer 2015.Additional funding is being sought primarily for two reasons: 1) to cover additional costs incurred as aresult of an incorrect assumption that the level of engineering work completed in the Feasibility Studywas adequate to carry directly into the PSR-PDS; and 2) to conduct additional conceptual engineeringwork to consider refinements to the southern grade-separated crossing that is essential to conduct inadvance of the subsequent environmental review phase of the project. Amendment of the ParsonsBrinckerhoff contract is contingent on the approval of additional Prop K funds (a separate item onthe CAC’s agenda) and on the amendment of Contract No. SFMTA-2014-44 between theTransportation Authority and the SFMTA that provides budget for all Transportation Authority staffand consultant costs dedicated to this phase of the project.

7. Internal Accounting Report and Investment Report for the Nine MonthsEnding March 31, 2015 – INFORMATION* 25

The Transportation Authority’s Fiscal Policy directs staff to give a quarterly report of expendituresincluding a comparison to the approved budget. The Transportation Authority’s Investment Policydirects that a review of portfolio compliance be presented along with the quarterly report. TheInternal Accounting Report for the nine months ending March 31, 2015 is presented for information.

8. State and Federal Legislative Update – INFORMATION* 51

Every month, we provide an update on state and federal legislation and, when appropriate, seekrecommendations to adopt new positions on active legislation. The attached matrix tracks the latestactivity on state bills and the positions previously adopted by the Transportation Authority. At its May12 meeting, the Finance Committee recommended a support position on Assembly Bill (AB) 35(Chiu), AB 1335 (Atkins) and Senate Bill (SB) 413 (Wieckowski), and an oppose position on AB 156(Perea), AB 1176 (Perea), AB 1336 (Salas) and SB 760 (Mendoza).

9. Plan Bay Area 2040 and Call for Projects – INFORMATION

The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and the Association of Bay Area Governmentshave kicked off their update of Plan Bay Area, the regional transportation plan/sustainablecommunities strategy adopted in 2013. Plan Bay Area 2040 is a roadmap to help Bay Area cities andcounties preserve the character of our diverse communities while adapting to the challenges of futurepopulation growth. It is a state-mandated, integrated long-range transportation, land-use and housingplan that will support a growing economy, provide more housing and transportation choices andreduce transportation-related pollution in the nine-county Bay Area. (See planbayarea.org for moredetails.) As the Congestion Management Agency for San Francisco, the Transportation Authorityleads the City’s involvement in the effort and is charged with submitting San Francisco’s projectpriorities through a call for projects. Public agencies will submit projects for consideration andmembers of the public are encouraged to share their own ideas at www.sfcta.org/rtp by July 17, 2015.At the June CAC meeting we will provide an overview of Plan Bay Area and the call for projects

2

CAC Meeting Agenda


process. We will bring a proposed list of initial project priorities to the CAC in September prior to submitting it to MTC. This list will be refined over the coming year as our initial funding target will be pared down to a fiscally constrained list as part of development of the preferred scenario for Plan Bay Area 2040.

10. Update of Citizens Advisory Committee By-Laws – INFORMATION*

At the April 22, 2015 Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) meeting, Chair Waddling established asubcommittee to review and propose amendments to the CAC’s By-Laws. On May 14, 2015 thesubcommittee met and proposed amendments, which consisted of changes needed to align the by-laws with the Transportation Authority’s Administrative Code and other non-substantive changes. Thesub-committee was chaired by Raymon Smith and included Santiago Lerma and Chris Waddling, aswell. A red-lined version of the proposed amendments is attached for information, and will beconsidered for adoption by the CAC at its June 24 meeting.

11. Minutes of the May 14, 2015 Subcommittee Meeting – INFORMATION*

End of Consent Calendar

6:15 12. Adopt a Motion of Support for the Adoption of the Potrero HillNeighborhood Transportation Plan Final Report – ACTION* 89

The Potrero Hill Neighborhood Transportation Plan (NTP) is the result of a community-basedplanning effort in the southern Potrero Hill neighborhood of San Francisco, and was funded by aCalifornia Department of Transportation Environmental Justice Planning grant and a MetropolitanTransportation Commission Community Based Transportation Planning grant. The technical team,led by the Transportation Authority, collaborated with community stakeholders to identify multimodaltransportation priorities at the neighborhood scale, prioritizing near-term improvements to improveconnectivity across the site and to the broader neighborhood, city, and region. The finalrecommendations focus on low-cost improvements that could be implemented before the site isredeveloped wholesale through the Rebuild Potrero project. Prioritized projects include pedestriansafety and transit stop enhancements, including transit bulbouts that would be built using non-infrastructure materials (i.e., construction that does not require regrading the street or moving sewercatchbasins). If successful, this innovative feature could be replicated throughout the city, bringingbenefits to transit riders more quickly and cost effectively, particularly on streets that are notscheduled for near term repaving. The NTP includes complete funding plans for these enhancements,with allocations from all sources (including Lifeline Transportation Program funds from theTransportation Authority) anticipated by July 2015 and implementation anticipated by early 2016. TheNTP also studied a potential shuttle route to improve access across the site and to connect residentswith nearby amenities.

6:25 13. Adopt a Motion of Support for the Allocation of $40,678,143 in Prop K Funds,with Conditions, and Appropriation of $162,400 in Prop K funds, Subject tothe Attached Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution Schedules – ACTION*

As summarized in Attachments 1 and 2, we have sixteen requests totaling $40,840,543 in Prop K salestax funds to present to the Citizens Advisory Committee. We are requesting $12.3 million forallocation to Caltrans as the Prop K portion of a $276.4 million milestone payment due to the PublicPrivate Partnership concessionaire upon substantial completion of the Presidio Parkway project,which is anticipated this September. There are two NTIP requests. One is for $150,000 for SanFrancisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) and Transportation Authority staff to provideNTIP program support and the other is for $100,000 for concept development and evaluation of anew north-south multimodal pathway connecting San Bruno Avenue to the Alemany Farmer’sMarket, and new bicycle lanes along Alemany Boulevard between Putnam Street and BayshoreBoulevard. This is the District 9 NTIP planning project. The remaining projects include ten from theSFMTA: additional funds for pre-environmental work for the proposed Southwest Subway (19th

Avenue/M Ocean View); procurement of 26 60-ft articulated hybrid-diesel buses; 5 traffic signalrelated projects, replacement or upgrade of safe-hit posts, green bike lanes and bike boxes; planningfunds for the Fiscal Year 2015/16 local-track Traffic Calming program; and an environmental impactreport for the 6th Street Pedestrian Safety Improvement Project. San Francisco Public Works isrequesting Prop K funds for repair of sidewalks damaged by city street trees ($514,349) andreplacement, establishment, and maintenance of about 1,700 street trees. BART is requesting

3

83

87

93

CAC Meeting Agenda


$160,000 for design of replacement cross-passage doors in the Transbay Tube.

6:40 14. Adopt a Motion of Support to Approve the Fiscal Year 2015/16 Transportation Fund for Clean Air Program of Projects – ACTION* 105

The Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA) Program was established to fund the most effective transportation projects that achieve emission reductions from motor vehicles in accordance with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s (Air District’s) Clean Air Plan. Funds are generated from a $4 surcharge on the vehicle registration fee collected by the Department of Motor Vehicles. As the San Francisco TFCA County Program Manager, the Transportation Authority annually develops the Program of Projects for the TFCA Program Manager funds. In February we issued the call for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 TFCA applications. We received six project applications by the April 30, 2015 deadline, requesting $1,490,986 in TFCA funds compared to $857,723 in available funds. We reviewed the projects for eligibility, then evaluated eligible projects following the Board-adopted local expenditure criteria which include project type (e.g., first priority to zero emission projects), cost effectiveness of emissions reduced, program diversity, project readiness, and other considerations (e.g., a sponsor’s track record for delivering prior TFCA projects). Based on this review, we are recommending awarding TFCA funds to the five projects shown in Attachment 3. We’ve recommended partial funding for one scale-able project to allow us to fund five of the six projects. Two projects are recommended for slightly less funding than requested to comply with Air District cost effectiveness requirements.

6:45 15. Adopt a Motion of Support for the Adoption of the Proposed Fiscal Year 2015/16 Annual Budget and Work Program – ACTION* 115

Pursuant to State statutes (PUC Code Sections 131000 et seq.) and the Transportation Authority’s Fiscal Policy, the Transportation Authority Board must adopt an annual budget for the following fiscal year by June 30. The proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2015/16 Annual Budget includes projections of sales tax revenues; federal, state and regional grants; investment income for the fiscal period; and projections of operating and administrative costs, capital expenditures, and associated financing costs. The proposed FY 2015/16 Annual Budget also includes a description of the Transportation Authority’s proposed Work Program for the coming fiscal year. Total revenues are project to be $214.8 million, including $101.3 million in sales tax revenues. Total expenditures are project to be $273.1 million. Capital project expenditures are projected to be $241.4 million or about 88.4% of total expenditures. The final proposed FY 2015/16 Annual Budget and Work Program will be presented to the Finance Committee and Transportation Authority Board in June for approval. A public hearing will precede consideration of the FY 2015/16 Annual Budget and Work Program at the Transportation Authority Board’s June meeting.

6:55 16. Update on Caltrain and High Speed Rail Compatibility – INFORMATON*

The Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board’s (PCJPB’s) electrification project will replace Caltrain’s existing diesel service with a fully electrified service from the 4th and King station in San Francisco to San Jose. The electrification project, which includes the installation of infrastructure and the acquisition of electric rolling stock, known as electric multiple units (EMUs), is a necessary investment to support a blended Caltrain and high-speed rail system. Before PCJPB proceeds with issuing an request for proposals for the vehicle procurement (planned for July), PCJPB and the California High-Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) have committed to work together to reach an agreement on how to achieve compatibility between the two systems, an essential requirement to provide maximum interoperability, resiliency, and flexibility for the two systems, supporting more reliable travel times and the ability to recover more quickly from unexpected delays and incidents. At the request of Chris Wadding, CAC Chair, representatives from PCJPB and CHSRA will present on the progress made on compatibility to date.

7:30 17. Transportation Sustainability Program Update – INFORMATION* 167

The Transportation Sustainability Program (TSP) is a joint effort between the San Francisco Planning Department, the San Francisco County Transportation Authority, the Office of Economic and Workforce Development, and the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency. The program aims to take a comprehensive approach to new development’s role in supporting the transportation needs of San Francisco. The TSP is comprised of three components: 1) In coordination with State reforms, make the development review process align with the City’s longstanding environmental policies by

4

137

CAC Meeting Agenda


changing how we analyze the impacts of new development on the transportation system under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); 2) Ensure developers include on-site transportation amenities (transportation demand management) that reduce reliance on driving; and 3) Expand the transportation development fee to help fund transit and safer streets. Implementation of the three TSP components is anticipated by the end of 2015.

7:45 18. Introduction of New Business – INFORMATION

During this segment of the meeting, CAC members may make comments on items not specifically listed above, or introduce or request items for future consideration.

7:50 19. Public Comment

8:00 20. Adjournment

* Additional materials

Next Regular Meeting: June 24, 2015

CAC MEMBERS WHO ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND SHOULD CONTACT THE CLERK OF THE AUTHORITY AT (415) 522-4817

The Hearing Room at the Transportation Authority offices is wheelchair accessible. To request sign language interpreters, readers, large print agendas or other accommodations, please contact the Clerk of the Authority at (415) 522-4800. Requests made at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting will help to ensure availability.

The nearest accessible BART station is Civic Center (Market/Grove/Hyde Streets). Accessible MUNI Metro lines are the F, J, K, L, M, N, T (exit at Civic Center or Van Ness Stations). MUNI bus lines also serving the area are the 6, 9, 9L, 14, 14L, 21, 47, 49, 71, 71L, and 90. For more information about MUNI accessible services, call (415) 701-4485.

There is accessible parking in the vicinity of City Hall at Civic Center Plaza and adjacent to Davies Hall and the War Memorial Complex. Accessible curbside parking is available on 11th Street.

In order to accommodate persons with severe allergies, environmental illnesses, multiple chemical sensitivity or related disabilities, attendees at all public meetings are reminded that other attendees may be sensitive to various chemical based products. Please help the Transportation Authority accommodate these individuals.

If any materials related to an item on this agenda have been distributed to the Citizens Advisory Committee after distribution of the agenda packet, those materials are available for public inspection at the Transportation Authority at 1455 Market Street, Floor 22, San Francisco, CA 94103, during normal office hours.

Individuals and entities that influence or attempt to influence local legislative or administrative action may be required by the San Francisco Lobbyist Ordinance [SF Campaign & Governmental Conduct Code Sec. 2.100] to register and report lobbying activity. For more information about the Lobbyist Ordinance, please contact the San Francisco Ethics Commission at 25 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 220, San Francisco, CA 94102; telephone (415) 252-3100; fax (415) 252-3112; website www.sfethics.org.

5

http://www.sfethics.org/

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

6

DRAFT MINUTES

CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE

April 22, 2015 MEETING

1. Committee Meeting Call to Order

The meeting was called to order by Chair Christopher Waddling at 6:02 p.m. CAC memberspresent were Myla Ablog, John Larson, Santiago Lerma, Eric Rutledge, Jacqualine Sachs,Raymon Smith, Peter Tannen, Chris Waddling and Wells Whitney. Transportation Authoritystaff members present were Cynthia Fong, Anna LaForte, Vanessa Lauf, Maria Lombardo,Mike Pickford, Chad Rathmann and Steve Rehn.

2. Chair’s Report – INFORMATION

Chair Waddling announced that votes would now be taken by roll call.

Consent Calendar

3. Approve the Minutes of the March 25, 2015 Meeting and the April 8, 2015 SpecialMeeting – ACTION

4. State and Federal Legislative Update – INFORMATION

5. Citizens Advisory Committee Appointment – INFORMATON

Raymon Smith requested that the April 8 Special Meeting minutes be amended to correct his statement on Item 3 from ‘the community might want to know how individual members of the CAC voted’ to ‘the community has a right to know’. Myla Ablog commented on Item 5, saying she encouraged the Plans and Programs Committee to continue to cultivate diversity on the CAC. Ms. Sachs echoed Ms. Ablog’s comments.

There was no public comment on the Consent Calendar.

The Consent Calendar was approved by the following vote:

Ayes: CAC Members Ablog, Larson, Lerma, Rutledge, Sachs, Smith, Tannen and Waddling

Abstained: CAC Member Whitney

Absent: CAC Member Larkin

End of Consent Calendar

6. Adopt a Motion of Support for the Allocation of $772,900 in Prop K Funds, withConditions, and Appropriation of $90,000 in Prop K Funds, Subject to the AttachedFiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution Schedules – ACTION

Mike Pickford, Transportation Planner, presented the item per the staff memorandum. Hestated that the staff recommendation had since changed to include an additional location to thescope of the Chavez/Bayshore/Potrero NTIP Capital project as requested by the SanFrancisco Municipal Transportation Agency.

7

During public comment, Roland Lebrun asked if the presentation, including the revised staff recommendation, could be attached to the agenda packet and uploaded to the Transportation Authority’s website.

Chair Waddling moved to amend the item to include the additional location in the scope, seconded by Wells Whitney.

The motion to amend the item was approved by the following vote:

Ayes: CAC Members Ablog, Larson, Lerma, Rutledge, Sachs, Smith, Tannen, Waddling and Whitney


The amended item was approved by the following vote:

Ayes: CAC Members Ablog, Larson, Lerma, Rutledge, Sachs, Smith, Tannen, Waddling and Whitney


7. Major Capital Projects Update – Presidio Parkway – INFORMATION

Lee Saage, Deputy Director for Capital Projects, introduced the item and John Fisher, Assistant Vice President at Parsons Brinckerhoff, presented the item.

Wells Whitney said it was clear the park would not be finished by June 1st but asked for confirmation that all traffic would be transferred to the newly constructed roadways by that date. Mr. Fisher confirmed that was correct. Mr. Whitney asked if work on the park would continue while traffic was flowing. Mr. Fisher said that it would.

Myla Ablog said that she had worked on Crissy Field and that there was currently a big outreach effort underway to seek public input on the parkland.

Jacqualine Sachs asked why there were not many workers on the project from Marin and Napa Counties. Mr. Fisher responded that the San Francisco Office of Economic and Workforce Development fielded requests from contractors for workers and had made an effort to utilize local workers. He noted that to some extent the statistics reflect who was available with the right skills when needed for the job.

There was no public comment.

8. Adopt a Motion of Support for Authorizing the Executive Director to: Replace the Transportation Authority’s Commercial Paper Program with a Revolving Credit Agreement (Revolver); Enter into an up-to-$140 Million Revolver with State Street Public Lending Corporation; Enter into an Alternate Credit Facility if Negotiations with State Street are Not Successful; Amend or Enter into the Associated Legal Documents; Take All Necessary Related Actions; and Negotiate the Agreement Payment Terms and Non-Material Agreement Terms and Conditions – ACTION

Cynthia Fong, Deputy Director for Finance & Administration, presented the item per the staff memorandum.

Mr. Waddling asked if the $600,000 in savings from implementing the new credit agreement was an annual savings or accrued over the life of the agreement. Ms. Fong responded that it was an annual savings, totaling $1.8 million over the life of the agreement.

Santiago Lerma asked if the Transportation Authority had consulted outside financial advisors. Ms. Fong responded that both the Transportation Authority’s financial advisors and bond

8

counsel were consulted and agreed with the proposed recommendation.

Wells Whitney asked if there were reasons besides reduced risk and cost for implementing the new instrument, such as expiration of the current letter of credit agreement. Ms. Fong responded in the affirmative.

Mr. Lerma asked why, if the new loan was such a good deal, staff was not recommending a longer term. Ms. Fong responded that interest rates were substantially higher for the longer term options.

During public comment, Ed Mason noted that the proposed credit instrument was linked to the LIBOR index, and asked if the recent LIBOR scandal should be considered. Ms. Fong responded that any agreement the Transportation Authority enters includes a back-door exit or termination clause. Mr. Lerma commented that the City and County of San Francisco had analyzed the effect of the scandal on its finances and concluded that the net loss was low, as City investments included both winners and losers as a result of manipulation of the index. Raymon Smith asked for clarification if there would be a termination clause. Ms. Fong responded in the affirmative.

The motion was approved by the following vote:

Ayes: CAC Members Ablog, Larson, Lerma, Rutledge, Sachs, Tannen, Waddling and Whitney

Abstained: CAC Member Smith


9. Preliminary Fiscal Year 2015/16 Annual Budget and Work Program– INFORMATION

Cynthia Fong, Deputy Director for Finance & Administration, presented the item per the staffmemorandum.

Chair Waddling asked about sales tax revenue projections. Ms. Fong responded that revenueshad been increasing steadily since the recession, but that the budget and work program assumeda conservative three percent increase over the course of Fiscal Year 2015/16. Maria Lombardo,Chief Deputy, added that the Prop K Strategic Plan incorporated conservative projection forincreasing revenues over the entire 30-year life of the Prop K program and that current budgetprojections exceeded Strategic Plan projections.

Santiago Lerma asked how expenditures could exceed revenues by approximately $55 million.Ms. Fong responded that the difference reflected grant-funded capital projects expenditurescommitted for Fiscal Year 2015/16 and that the Transportation Authority did not hold or retaintitle for the projects it had constructed or for the vehicles and system improvements purchasedwith sales tax funds. Ms. Lombardo pointed out that Transportation Authority services werecategorized into Plan, Fund and Deliver to try and make the work program more digestible.

Jacqualine Sachs asked if the Folsom and Fremont Off-Ramp Realignment project was part ofthe Transbay Transit Center project. Ms. Lombardo responded that it was a separate project,but that it supported the Transbay Redevelopment Plan. She offered to provide a map of theTransbay Redevelopment Plan improvements made possible by the Folsom Ramps project.

Eric Rutledge asked about the relationship between the budget and the Prop K and Prop AA 5-year prioritization programs. Ms. Lombardo responded that the Prop K and Prop AA 5-YearPrioritization Programs provided a 5-year road map of which projects would be funded inwhich year. She said the budget focused on projects with funds programmed in Fiscal Year

9

2015/16 and carryover funds from prior years.

During public comment, Roland Lebrun commented that some Transportation Authority projects include funding from City revenue bonds. He suggested that the presentation slide for the work program include costs.

11. Introduction of New Business – INFORMATION

Chair Waddling announced that Eric Rutledge would be leaving the CAC for graduate school at Portland State University. Mr. Rutledge said that he had enjoyed working with the CAC, along with the Transportation Authority Board and staff.

Raymon Smith requested that the CAC revisit its by-laws, since they appeared to not have been updated since their adoption. He mentioned the rules on meeting attendance as one area where the by-laws might be refined. Chair Waddling said that he could appoint a subcommittee of three members to review the by-laws if there was interest. Mr. Smith and Santiago Lerma volunteered for the subcommittee and Chair Waddling volunteered to be the third member. Chair Waddling said that the subcommittee would schedule a meeting in the near future. Mr. Smith said that in the meantime, he would review the by-laws to identify specific issues.

Wells Whitney suggested that the Transportation Authority provide legal advice to the subcommittee. Chair Waddling asked whether Transportation Authority council could attend the subcommittee meeting. Maria Lombardo, Chief Deputy, responded in the affirmative.

Raymon Smith requested that the courier who delivered the CAC packets enter his building to drop the materials off and provided instructions.

Jacqualine Sachs stated that Jerry Lee, a former CAC member and former San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency board member, had passed away.

Peter Tannen said that Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) and Muni were looking for input on changes to the Civic Center station and that he had spoken with a planner at BART who would be willing to present to the CAC on the project.

Raymon Smith said that he participated in Walk to Work Day and felt it was a big success.


12. Public Comment

During public comment, Ed Mason asked about the issue of floor height compatibility between the vehicles planned for the California High-Speed Rail project and the new vehicles planned for the Caltrain system, and asked if the issue had been resolved yet. Maria Lombardo, Chief Deputy, said a decision was expected by the end of June. Roland Lebrun commented that the amount of passenger seating in draft designs for the new Caltrain vehicles had been reduced from 900 to 600 in an effort to resolve the issue of the floor height compatibility with high-speed rail trains, and recommended finding a solution with less impact on capacity.

13. Adjournment

The meeting was adjourned at 7:35 p.m.

10

M:\CAC\Meetings\Memos\2015\05 May\Annual Contract Renewals.docx

Memorandum

05.19.15 Citizens Advisory Committee

May 27, 2014

Citizens Advisory Committee

Cynthia Fong – Deputy Director for Finance and Administration

– Adopt a Motion of Support to Authorize the Executive Director to ExecuteAnnual Contract Renewals and Options for Various Annual Professional Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $1,950,000 and to Modify Contract Payment Terms and Non-Material Contract Terms and Conditions

The Transportation Authority contracts with City and County of San Francisco (City) departments and outside firms for certain specialized professional services in areas where factors like costs, work volume, or the degree of specialization required would not justify the use of in-house staff. As summarized in Attachment 1, we are recommending renewing annual contracts for general legal counsel, video production services for Transportation Authority Board and Committee meetings, and exercising an option for on-call program management oversight and general engineering consulting services, in an amount not to exceed $1,950,000.

The Transportation Authority manages administrative costs through successful contract negotiations and through the transfer of certain routine professional service tasks to in-house staff. The Transportation Authority annually contracts for certain professional support services in areas where factors like cost, work volume, or the degree of specialization required would not justify the use of permanent in-house staff. Services requested from outside firms include general legal counsel, video production services for Transportation Authority Board and Committee meetings, and on-call program management oversight (PMO) and general engineering consulting (GEC) services. The contract amounts proposed are annual limitations, as these professional support services are provided through contracts where costs are incurred only when the specific services are used.

The purpose of this memorandum is to brief the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) on the annual contract renewals and options for Fiscal Year (FY) 2015/16 and to seek a motion of support to authorize the Executive Director to modify contract payment terms and non-material terms and conditions and execute those contract renewals and options.

Attachment A provides summary information for the proposed contracts for FY 2015/16. Below are brief descriptions of the recommended services and amounts.

Page 1 of 3

11

M:\CAC\Meetings\Memos\2015\05 May\Annual Contract Renewals.docx Page 2 of 3

The Office of the City Attorney (City Attorney) provides verbal and written legal representation, advice and counsel on matters related to the routine operations of the Transportation Authority, contracts and interagency agreements, and labor matters. The Transportation Authority also utilizes the City Attorney for litigation activities when appropriate.

The Department of Technology records and telecasts all Transportation Authority Board and Committee meetings held at City Hall with a regularly scheduled playback date and time for public review. In FY 2015/16, we will utilize additional services for the record and telecast of Vision Zero Committee (established in February 2014 through Resolution 14-58) meetings to support the City’s efforts to take comprehensive and coordinated actions to improve pedestrian and cyclist safety in the near-term. We also anticipate additional services for the record and telecast of the Treasure Island Mobility Management Agency (established in February 2014 through Resolution 14-53) meetings to implement elements of the Treasure Island Transportation Implementation Plan in support of the Treasure Island/Yerba Buena Island Development Project.

The Transportation Authority makes use of on-call PMO and GEC services, which are intended to augment and complement the Transportation Authority’s existing resources by providing specialized expertise, serving as an on-call supplement to staff particularly for oversight and delivery support for major capital projects, handling tasks during peak workloads, and taking on tasks requiring quicker response times than existing staff resources alone would permit. In July 2013, through Resolution 14-03, the Transportation Authority awarded one-year consultant contracts, with options to extend for two additional one year periods, to C/Z and VSCE, Inc., in a combined total not to exceed $1,800,000, for on-call PMO and GEC services. Given the wide range of desired proficiencies and experience, the amount and complexity of the Transportation Authority’s activities, and possibility for conflicts of interest to arise for specific tasks, the Transportation Authority contracted with multiple consultant teams on a task order basis.

Since then, the consultant teams have provided oversight services for the Transportation Authority’s major capital projects, such as the Central Subway, Transbay Transit Center, and Caltrain Modernization (e.g. Electrification). In addition, the consultant teams have provided technical support for planning projects for which the Transportation Authority is the lead agency or an active participant in the planning and preliminary project development phases, including Van Ness Avenue BRT and Geary Corridor BRT and provided program management services for the I-80/Yerba Buena Island Interchange Improvement Project and Yerba Buena Island Bridge Structures (collectively known as YBI Project) and the Folsom Street Ramp Realignment projects, for which the Transportation Authority is taking the lead on behalf of the Treasure Island Development Authority and the Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure, respectively. The consultant teams have also provided project management support for the development and implementation documents for the Treasure Island Mobility Management Program.

For the coming year, we forecast continuous need for project delivery oversight and delivery support as a large number of major projects are simultaneously moving into more advanced phases. For example, the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency’s (SFMTA’s) Central Subway and the Transbay Joint Powers Board’s Transbay Transit Center are under construction; the SFMTA’s Radio Communications System and Computer-Aided Dispatch Replacement continues to move forward with implementation,

12

M:\CAC\Meetings\Memos\2015\05 May\Annual Contract Renewals.docx Page 3 of 3

and the YBI Project has moved into the construction phase. Other anticipated PMO and GEC services during Fiscal Year 2015/16 include continued support for the following projects: 19th Avenue Combined City Project Study Report, Treasure Island Mobility Management Agency, Caltrain Electrification and High-Speed Rail. The proposed action will exercise the second of two options of the initial contract and maintain the annual contract amount.

1. Adopt a motion of support to authorize the Executive Director to execute annual contract renewals and options for various annual professional services in an amount not to exceed $1,950,000, and to modify contract payment terms and non-material contract terms and conditions, as requested.

2. Adopt a motion of support to authorize the Executive Director to execute annual contract renewals and options for various annual professional services in an amount not to exceed $1,950,000, and to modify contract payment terms and non-material contract terms and conditions, with modifications.

3. Defer action, pending additional information or further staff analysis.

Sufficient funds have been identified for these contracts in the proposed FY 2015/16 work program and budget. The proposed contracts will be funded by a combination of federal and state grants, funding from other agencies through memoranda of agreement, and Prop K funds.

Adopt a motion of support to authorize the Executive Director to execute annual contract renewals and options for various annual professional services in an amount not to exceed $1,950,000, and to modify contract payment terms and non-material contract terms and conditions.

Attachment:

1. Proposed Fiscal Year 2015/16 Professional Services Expenditures

13

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs

\Me

mo

s\2

01

5\0

5 M

ay\

An

nu

al

Co

ntr

act

Re

ne

wa

ls.d

ocx

Att

ach

men

t 1:

Pro

po

sed

Fis

cal

Year

2015

/16

Pro

fess

ion

al

Serv

ices

Exp

en

dit

ure

s

Pro

fess

ion

al

Serv

ices

An

nu

al

Serv

ices

Pre

vio

us

Year

Co

ntr

act

Incre

ase

/

(Decre

ase

)

Pro

po

sed

F

iscal

Year

2015

/16

C

on

tract

Pro

cu

rem

en

t T

yp

e/

Co

ntr

act

Op

tio

ns

DB

E G

oal

DB

E

Perc

en

tag

e

to D

ate

CC

SF

-Off

ice

of

the

Cit

y A

tto

rney

G

ener

al C

oun

sel Ser

vic

es

$ 100,0

00

$ -

$ 100,0

00

So

le S

ourc

e N

/A

N

/A

CC

SF

-Dep

artm

ent

of

Tec

hn

olo

gy

Vid

eo P

rod

uct

ion

Ser

vic

es f

or

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n A

uth

ori

ty

Co

mm

itte

e an

d B

oar

d M

eeti

ngs

$

40,0

00

$ 10,0

00

$ 50,0

00

So

le S

ourc

e N

/A

N

/A

Co

rdo

ba/

Zuri

nag

a Jo

int

Ven

ture

an

d V

SC

E, In

c.

On

-Cal

l P

rogr

am M

anag

emen

t O

ver

sigh

t an

d G

ener

al

En

gin

eeri

ng

Co

nsu

ltin

g Ser

vic

es

$ 1,8

00,0

00

$ -

$ 1,8

00,0

00

Co

mp

etit

ivel

y b

id. Sec

on

d o

f tw

o r

enew

al

op

tio

ns.

22%

DB

E

76%

DB

E

To

tal

$ 1

,940,0

00

$ 1

0,0

00

$ 1

,950,0

00

14

M:\CAC\Meetings\Memos\2015\05 May\Audit Services Contract Award Memo.docx Page 1 of 2

Memorandum


May 27, 2015



– Adopt a Motion of Support for the Award of a Three-Year Professional ServicesContract, with an Option to Extend for Two Additional One-Year Periods, to Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP in an Amount Not to Exceed $300,000 for Annual Audit Services, and Authorizing the Executive Director to Negotiate Contract Payment Terms and Non-Material Contract Terms and Conditions

Under its fiscal policy, Transportation Authority financial transactions and records are to be audited by an independent certified public accountant (CPA) firm at least annually and a report be submitted to the Transportation Authority Board on the results of the audit. The prior auditing services contract with Macias, Gini & O’Connell LLP will expire on June 30, 2015. The Transportation Authority’s policy is to competitively re-bid professional services contracts after five years. Therefore on March 13, 2015, we issued a Request for Proposals (RFP 14/15-04) for annual audit services for a three-year contract covering audit for Fiscal Years 2014/15 through 2016/17, with two additional one-year extension options. By the due date of April 22, we received three responsive bids, which included both a technical and cost component. Interviews were conducted on May 6 by a selection panel comprised of staff from the Transportation Authority and the City’s Controller’s Office. Based on this competitive process, the selection panel recommended award of an annual audit services contract to the highest-ranking firm, Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP.

Under its fiscal policy, Transportation Authority financial transactions and records are to be audited by an independent certified public accountants (CPA) firm at least annually and a report be submitted to the Transportation Authority’s Board on the results of the audit. The Transportation Authority’s prior auditing services contract with Macias, Gini & O’Connell LLP will expire on June 30, 2015. The Transportation Authority’s policy is to competitively re-bid professional services contracts after five years.

The purpose of this memorandum is to describe the procurement process and recommend award of the annual audit services contract to Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP. The contract will be for three years covering audits for Fiscal Years 2014/15, 2015/16 and 2016/17, with two additional one-year extension options.

On March 13, 2015, the Transportation Authority issued a Request for Proposals (RFP 14/15-04) for annual audit services. By the due date of April 22, 2015, we received three proposals in response to the

15

M:\CAC\Meetings\Memos\2015\05 May\Audit Services Contract Award Memo.docx Page 2 of 2

RFP. The review panel, consisting of Transportation Authority staff and the City’s Controller’s Office staff, reviewed the proposals based on the qualifications and other criteria detailed in the RFP. The panel interviewed all three firms on May 6, 2015. Based on the selection panel’s evaluation of the proposals, the review panel recommended award of the contract to the highest-ranked firm of Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP. The recommended team distinguished itself on the basis of its strong audit approach and its extensive experience working with transportation agencies. Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP has provided auditing services for the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority since 2005, the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District since 2008, the Transbay Joint Powers Authority since 2009, the Orange County Transportation Authority since 2011, and the Alameda County Transportation Commission since 2012.

We will receive federal financing assistance to fund a portion of this procurement, and will adhere to federal regulations pertaining to Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE). For this contract, we have established a DBE goal of 10%, accepting certifications by the Transportation Authority and the California Unified Certification Program. We took steps to encourage participation from small and disadvantaged business enterprises, including advertising in eight local newspapers: El Reportero, Nichi Bei Weekly, San Francisco Bay View, San Francisco Examiner, San Francisco Chronicle, Small Business Exchange, the Western Edition and the World Journal. We also distributed the RFP to certified small, disadvantaged and local businesses, the Bay Area and cultural Chambers of Commerce, and the Small Business Councils. The Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP team has pledged a total DBE utilization of 10% through its DBE-certified contractor, Calvin Y. Louie.

1. Adopt a motion of support for the award of a three-year professional services contract, with an option to extend for two additional one-year periods, to Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP in an amount not to exceed $300,000 for annual audit services, and authorizing the Executive Director to negotiate contract payment terms and non-material contract terms and conditions, as requested.

2. Adopt a motion of support for the award of a three-year professional services contract, with an option to extend for two additional one-year periods, to Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP in an amount not to exceed $300,000 for annual audit services, and authorizing the Executive Director to negotiate contract payment terms and non-material contract terms and conditions.


The contract will be funded from a combination of federal, state, regional and Prop K funds. The first year’s activity is included in the Transportation Authority’s proposed Fiscal Year 2015/16 Budget. Sufficient funds will be included in future budgets to cover the remaining cost of the contract.

Adopt a motion of support for the award of a three-year professional services contract, with an option to extend for two additional one-year periods, to Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP in an amount not to exceed $300,000 for annual audit services, and authorizing the Executive Director to negotiate contract payment terms and non-material contract terms and conditions.

Attachment: 1. Annual Audit Scope of Services

16

M:\CAC\Meetings\Memos\2015\05 May\Annual Audit Scope of Services Attachment.docx 1 of 2

Attachment 1: Annual Audit Scope of Services

Audit services will be requested on an hourly reimbursable basis, plus expenses, and may include, but are not limited to, the following categories of action:

Conduct an annual audit of all the Transportation Authority’s funds in accordance withgenerally accepted auditing standards as promulgated by the American Institute of CertifiedPublic Accountants (AICPA) and the GASB with the objectives of expressing an opinion onthe financial statements. The successful proposer (the Auditor) will deliver an independentauditor’s report;

Perform the procedures necessary to ensure that the Transportation Authority may use theAuditor’s opinion on the basic financial statements in connection with any officialstatements for public debt issuance. The Auditor will issue a debt service certificate;

Perform a single audit on the expenditures of federal grants in accordance with U.S. Officeof Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133 and render the appropriate audit reportson Internal Control Over Financial Reporting based upon the audit of the TransportationAuthority’s financial statements in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and theappropriate reports on compliance with Requirements Applicable to each Major Program,Internal Control over Compliance and on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awardsin Accordance with OMB Circular A-133. The single audit will include appropriate scheduleof expenditures of federal awards, footnotes, findings and questioned costs, includingreportable conditions and material weaknesses, and follow up on prior audit findings whererequired. In additions, completion and filing of the federal Data Collection Form. If theTransportation Authority does not meet the minimum requirements to necessitate a singleaudit, the fees shall be adjusted accordingly;

Prepare a separate audit report on TIMMA;

Issue a Management Letter that includes a listing of all non-material items, which wereidentified during the audit, as well as a listing of the status of resolved and unresolvedManagement Letter comments from prior audits will be submitted to TransportationAuthority staff; and

Present audit results and Management Letter to the Citizens Advisory Committee, FinanceCommittee, and Board.

The following auditing standards will be followed:

Accounting principles and auditing standards generally accepted in the United States;

Standards for financial audits contained in the Government Auditing Standards, issued bythe Comptroller General of the United States; and

Provisions of U.S. OMB Circular A-133.

The Transportation Authority assumes the responsibility to prepare the Management Discussion and Analysis, the basic financial statements, other required supplementary information, schedule of expenditures of federal awards, and footnotes. The Auditor may then be asked to produce the final published financial statements and single audit. Any costs for this production should be built into the cost estimate. The following assistance will be available to the Auditor:

17

M:\CAC\Meetings\Memos\2015\05 May\Annual Audit Scope of Services Attachment.docx 2 of 2

The Transportation Authority’s staff will be available to work with the selected firm toensure a smooth implementation for the year ending June 30, 2015; and

The Auditor will be provided workspace within the Transportation Authority’s offices.Please note that the Transportation Authority has limited office space. All spacerequirements and other miscellaneous requirements and concerns should be made known tothe Transportation Authority in the response and during contract negotiations.

From time to time the Transportation Authority may require additional or special auditing and/or audit related services such as compliance audits of recipients of Prop K funds. Where it can be demonstrated that it is to the Transportation Authority’s benefit to engage the Auditor for such services, the Transportation Authority may amend the Auditor’s contract by task orders to include said services without a subsequent formal bid process, provided that the cost of the amendments is less than $75,000 in a fiscal year. Proposals submitted should address the proposer’s ability and willingness to provide special support services upon request and provide reasonable estimates of hourly rates, by fiscal year, to be anticipated by the Transportation Authority should such services be required. These additional audit services may also be bid separately, at the sole discretion of the Transportation Authority.

Examples of additional or special accounting and/or audit services are:

Proposition K Compliance Agreed-Upon Procedures;

Proposition K Compliance Audit Procedures;

Debt Consent Agreed-Upon Procedures;

Management Audit; and

Reviews or audits as required by any grantors.

18

M:\CAC\Meetings\Memos\2015\05 May\19th Ave M Ocean View Contract Amendment PB.docx Page 1 of 4

Memorandum


May 27, 2015


Lee Saage – Deputy Director for Capital Projects

– Adopt a Motion of Support to Increase the Amount of the Professional ServicesContract with Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. by $224,600 for a Total Amount Not to Exceed $596,600, for Planning and Engineering Services for the 19th Avenue/M-Ocean View Project Pre-Environmental Study Phase and to Authorize the Executive Director to Modify Contract Payment Terms and Non-Material Contract Terms and Conditions

The Transportation Authority is serving as the procuring agency for the 19th Avenue/M-Ocean View Project Pre-Environmental Study Phase being led by the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA). This phase of work continues work started in the Transportation Authority-led 19th Avenue Transit Study (Feasibility Study). The major objectives of this phase are to advance project development to the 5-10% level of engineering and prepare California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Project Study Report-Project Development Support (PSR-PDS) documentation required given the project’s location within Caltrans-owned right-of-way. Substantial progress has been made since initiation of this phase in Summer 2014 with the project team anticipating submittal of the draft PSR-PDS package to Caltrans for review in early Summer 2015. Additional funding is being sought primarily for two reasons: 1) to cover additional costs incurred as a result of an incorrect assumption that the level of engineering work completed in the Feasibility Study was adequate to carry directly into the PSR-PDS; and 2) to conduct additional conceptual engineering work to consider refinements to the southern grade-separated crossing that is essential to conduct in advance of the subsequent environmental review phase of the project. Amendment of the Parsons Brinckerhoff contract is contingent on the approval of additional Prop K funds (a separate item on the CAC’s agenda) and on the amendment of Contract No. SFMTA-2014-44 between the Transportation Authority and the SFMTA that provides budget for all Transportation Authority staff and consultant costs dedicated to this phase of the project.

On May 24, 2011, the Parkmerced project was approved by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. The Parkmerced development will add more than 5,600 net new housing units and supportive mixed uses, approximately tripling the density of the site. Instrumental to that plan’s vision of a transit-oriented development was bringing the M-Ocean View line out of the median of 19th Avenue and through the heart of the Parkmerced site to provide strong transit access to new residents. As a condition of the Development Agreement between Parkmerced and the City and County of San Francisco, Parkmerced is committed to implementing a re-location of the M-Ocean View line through the site via one of two options: 1) introducing new at-grade crossings of 19th Avenue at Holloway and Junipero Serra; or 2) grade-separating (subway or bridge) the M-Ocean View crossings of 19th Avenue.

19


If the City and County of San Francisco wishes to move forward with the second option, Parkmerced would be required to contribute approximately $70 million as a local match contribution to this larger project. The Development Agreement further specifies that the second option would need to receive project approvals by July 2018.

To provide additional information about the potential to pursue the second grade-separated option, the Transportation Authority led the 19th Avenue Transit Study (Feasibility Study) in partnership with the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) and other partner agencies and stakeholders. This Feasibility Study was conducted between 2012 and 2014 and identified high-performing options to advance to a subsequent phase of Pre-Environmental Study. On March 25, 2014, through Resolution 14-67, the Transportation Authority Board unanimously approved the Feasibility Study Final Report, concluding this phase of work.

Under agreement between the Transportation Authority and the SFMTA, SFMTA has taken over leadership of the project and launched the Pre-Environmental Study phase in continued partnership with the Transportation Authority and other stakeholders. The Transportation Authority is serving as the contracting agency for the planning and engineering professional services needed for this phase as one of its roles and responsibilities as agreed to in Contract No. SFMTA-2014-44 executed in May 2014.

On June 24, 2014, through Resolution 14-83, the Transportation Authority Board unanimously awarded an 18-month contract for planning and engineering services for the 19th Avenue/M-Ocean View Project to Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $372,000.

The purpose of this memo is to seek a motion of support to increase the amount of the professional services contract with Parsons Brinckerhoff by $224,600, for a total not to exceed $596,600 for planning and engineering services for the 19th Avenue/M-Ocean View Project and to authorize the Executive Director to modify contract payment terms and non-material contract terms and conditions.

Consistent with the agreement between SFMTA and the Transportation Authority, we have undertaken management of the professional consultant services to provide the necessary scoped planning and engineering services to prepare California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Project Study Report-Project Development Support (PSR-PDS) documentation and other necessary activities. The PSR-PDS scopes the level of effort needed for the environmental review phase, and engages Caltrans staff in early review of conceptual plans, profiles, and cross-sections of Build Alternatives to be further engineered and undergo environmental review in the subsequent phase. The project team has made substantial progress in moving this work forward. The project schedule anticipates the full Draft Caltrans PSR-PDS documentation package to be submitted to Caltrans for review in June 2015. During Project Development Team meetings, Caltrans staff gave the project a “medium-low” risk of any of the non-standard features proposed by the project threatening its ultimate approval by Caltrans in the next phase.

Attachment 1 describes the scope additions and rationale for each in detail, but the need for additional budget can be summarized by two major reasons:

1) The consultant scope of work for this phase assumed that the engineering work conducted duringthe Feasibility Study was sufficient to carry directly into the PSR-PDS; however, major re-work was needed to adhere to SFMTA, Caltrans, and Parkmerced design criteria. This work represents approximately half of the overall contract amendment increase and is further described in Task 4 in

20


Attachment 1. Also, the additional engineering required for this task has necessitated additional and more frequent meetings than initially anticipated, requiring an increase in Task 1 project management, approximately another 25% of the budget addition.

2) While not essential to the Caltrans process, the SFMTA wishes to have certainty that a first phase ofthe project can move forward in a timeframe that supports the City and County of San Francisco’s Parkmerced Development Agreement responsibilities, which would require full funding and project approvals on a timeframe much faster than would be typical for a project of this scale. To this end, Task 3 includes engineering study of new alternative variations where the southern grade-separated crossing is a tunnel instead of a bridge. This concept development work is prudent because consideration of a southern tunnel may enable new phasing options that would allow a first phase to move forward before full funding for the larger project is identified and may also allow for fewer community impacts and constructability challenges than would likely occur with the proposed bridge.

The additional work would commence as soon as the contract amendment has been executed and be completed within the original contract period that extends through December 2015.

In order to fund the additional work, SFMTA has requested a Prop K allocation that is a separate item on the Citizens Advisory Committee’s agenda. The contract amendment is contingent on approval of this allocation as well as amendment of Contract No. SFMTA-2014-44 between the Transportation Authority and the SFMTA that provides budget for all Transportation Authority staff and consultant costs dedicated to this phase of the project.

Since a portion of this contract is funded with federal financial assistance, the Transportation Authority will adhere to federal regulations pertaining to disadvantaged business enterprises (DBEs). To date, Parsons Brinckerhoff is close to achieving the 13% DBE goal established for this project with 10% DBE participation from three firms: Asian Pacific-owned firms, CHS Consulting Group and WRECO; and Women-owned firm, Merrill Morris Partners. CHS Consulting Group and Merrill Morris Partners are also based in San Francisco. The proposed contract amendment includes $15,838 in additional funds to one of the DBE firms, Merrill Morris Partners, however with the extension of the contract to include the additional work the expected DBE participation will drop to 12% at the completion of the contract.

1. Adopt a motion of support to increase the amount of the professional services contract withParsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. by $224,600, for a total not to exceed $596,600 for planning andengineering services for the 19th Avenue/M-Ocean View Project, and to authorize the ExecutiveDirector to modify contract payment terms and non-material contract terms and conditions, asrequested.

2. Adopt a motion of support to increase the amount of the professional services contract withParsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. by $224,600, for a total not to exceed $596,600 for planning andengineering services for the 19th Avenue/M-Ocean View Project, and to authorize the ExecutiveDirector to modify contract payment terms and non-material contract terms and conditions, withmodifications.


21


The proposed contract amendment will be 100% reimbursed by SFMTA. Budget for these activities will be included in the Transportation Authority’s budget amendment.

Adopt a motion of support to increase the amount of the professional services contract with Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. by $224,600, for a total not to exceed $596,600 for planning and engineering services for the 19th Avenue/M-Ocean View Project, and to authorize the Executive Director to modify contract payment terms and non-material contract terms and conditions.

Attachment:

1. 19th Avenue/M-Ocean View Pre-Environmental Study Phase Contract Amendment Scope ofServices

22

Attachment 1

19th Avenue/M-Ocean View Pre-Environmental Study Phase Contract Amendment Draft

Scope of Additional Services

Task 1 – Project Management

The consultant contract scope assumed a streamlined management effort, including limited coordination and meetings in an effort to be as cost-effective as possible in developing the Caltrans required Project Study Report – Project Development Support (PSR-PDS). However, longer and more frequent meetings have been neededto adequately review project progress and make decisions. Also, this phase will continue approximately four months longer than originally budgeted.

This effort includes a minimum of 10 additional meetings – by phone and in person – for the purpose of reporting progress, seeking direction and input from SFMTA, SFCTA, SF Planning, Parkmerced, and other stakeholders, providing updates on engineering issues, and generally coordinating to ensure smooth progress of the project.

Deliverables: On-going project management through completion of the effort in November 2015.

Task 2 – Communications/Outreach Strategy and Implementation

Engineering work completed during this phase has revealed a need for more intensive and focused outreach in the Oceanview-Merced-Ingleside Heights (OMI) neighborhood. This outreach will allow for adequate community dialogue and input to inform the refined project definition used in the next phase of environmental review. The team is anticipating to contract with a community-based organization to support this work which would include a variety of activities such as Chinese translation, joining existing community-building activities in the neighborhood, organizing special meetings and events, and documenting the input.

Deliverables: Outreach notices, meetings/events/activities, and summary documentation.

Task 3 – Build Alternative Options Development, Screening, and Evaluation

This task includes work that is not essential to the Caltrans PSR-PDS, but that SFMTA needs to complete in

advance of commencement of environmental review. Specifically it includes concept level engineering of a low-

cost alternative that is a standard requirement for environmental review to compare the higher cost project

alternatives against. In addition, this task includes engineering study of a new alternative variation where the

southern grade-separated crossing is a tunnel instead of a bridge. This concept development work is prudent

because 1) additional engineering work of the bridge has revealed technical constructability challenges; 2) additional

engineering work of the bridge has revealed potential community impacts; 3) consideration of a southern tunnel

may enable new phasing options that would allow a first phase to move forward before full funding for the larger

project is identified.

Deliverables: two additional sets of planning-level design drawings, including plan and profiles, for a lowest-cost

option and a southern tunnel option.

Task 4 – Project Development

Sub-Task 4.1 Plans and Cross-Sections: This task covers additional engineering work that was not anticipated during initiation of this phase. The original scope assumed the alignment and profile prepared during the Feasibility Study

23

would be carried directly into the PSR-PDS but in reality major additional work was needed to adhere to SFMTA, Caltrans, and Parkmerced design criteria. This task allows for the additional engineering work that will be needed to develop the main Build Alternative being scoped in the PSR-PDS.

Sub-Task 4.2 Conceptual Design for Stations

This task covers production of conceptual station designs additional to those initially scoped, including underground stations at St. Francis Circle, two locations for Stonestown, SF State, and within Parkmerced. While originally three station concept designs were scoped that included two Stonestown and one SF State location, two of these designs must be re-worked to work with underground median-running rather than west-side running tracks. This task also covers production of conceptual illustrations of two concepts for a new surface station in the OMI. This additional effort will result in conceptual station designs that reflect the most likely future configuration that future project development will focus on, and is prudent to invest in now rather in the subsequent phase of work as it will result in a more streamlined Caltrans review. This effort will also be invaluable for the community outreach efforts during this phase, as well as for cooperative discussions with westside property owners.

Sub-Task 4.3 Utility, Research, Coordination, and Mapping

Several utility files have been obtained but are not assembled in one composite map. It is financially prudent to invest in production of this composite map now as it will be needed eventually and can be produced based on the knowledge the project engineer has developed as a result of the work completed this year. This task covers consultant work to update the existing utility mapping to reflect the most current known field conditions.

Deliverables:

Plan and profiles drawings

Five underground station concept designs including locations for pedestrian, bicycle, bus and ADAaccessible access, and conceptual illustrations

Composite utility map

Task 5 – Evaluation

The original scope did not include adequate consultant effort required to provide information to capital cost estimator to support development of station/platform cost estimates. This task covers time from consultant station/platform cost estimator to review conceptual station drawings to estimate station/platform capital costs. This expertise will improve the overall capital cost estimates as stations will be one of the most substantial drivers of the capital costs of the project.

Deliverables: Evaluation Results memorandum, including capital costs (same deliverable as originally scoped).

24

M:\Finance\2015\Memos\05 May\Internal Accounting Report Memo Q3 FY14-15.docx Page 1 of 5

Memorandum

05.04.15 Finance Committee

May 12, 2015

Finance Committee: Commissioners Avalos (Chair), Mar (Vice Chair), Campos, Cohen, Kim and Wiener (Ex Officio)


Tilly Chang – Executive Director

– Accounting Report and Investment Report for the Nine Months EndingMarch 31, 2015

The Transportation Authority’s Fiscal Policy directs staff to give a quarterly report of expenditures including a comparison to the approved budget. The Transportation Authority’s Investment Policy directs that a review of portfolio compliance be presented along with the quarterly report. The Internal Accounting Report for the nine months ending March 31, 2015 is presented for information.

The Transportation Authority’s Fiscal Policy (Resolution 15-31) establishes an annual audit requirement, and also directs staff to report to the Finance Committee, on at least a quarterly basis, the Transportation Authority’s actual expenditures in comparison to the approved budget. The Transportation Authority’s Investment Policy (Resolution 15-31) directs a review of portfolio compliance with the Investment Policy in conjunction with, and in the context of, the quarterly expenditure and budgetary report.

Using the format of the Transportation Authority’s annual financial statements for governmental funds, the Internal Accounting Report includes two tables, a Balance Sheet (Table 1) and a Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances, with Budget Comparison (Table 2). In Table 2, the last two columns show, respectively, the budget values, and the variance of revenues and expenditures as compared to the approved budget. For the nine months ending March 31, 2015, the numbers in the approved budget column are three-fourths of the total proposed amended annual budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2014/15. Although the sales tax (Prop K) and vehicle registration fees (Prop AA) accruals are included for the nine-month total, the Internal Accounting Report does not include the Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement Number 34 adjustments, or the other accruals, that are done at year-end. The Balance Sheet values as of March 31, 2015 are used as the basis for the Investment Policy compliance review.

The investment policies and practices of the Transportation Authority are subject to and limited by applicable provisions of state law, and to prudent money management principles. All investable funds are invested in accordance with the Transportation Authority’s Investment Policy and applicable provisions of Chapter 4 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code (Section 53600 et seq.). Any investment of bond proceeds will be further restricted by the provisions of relevant bond documents.

25


In managing its investment program, the Transportation Authority observes the “Prudent Investor” standard as stated in Government Code Section 53600.3, applied in the context of managing an overall portfolio. Investments are to be made with care, skill, prudence and diligence, taking into account the prevailing circumstances, including, but not limited to general economic conditions, the anticipated needs of the Transportation Authority and other relevant factors that a prudent person acting in a fiduciary capacity and familiar with those matters would use in the stewardship of funds of a like character and purpose.

The primary objectives, in priority order, for the Transportation Authority’s investment activities are:

1) Safety of the principal is the foremost objective of the investment program. Investments of the Transportation Authority will be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure preservation of the principal of the funds under its control.

2) The Transportation Authority’s investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to enable the Transportation Authority to meet its reasonably anticipated cash flow requirements.

3) The Transportation Authority’s investment portfolio will be managed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles commensurate with the Transportation Authority’s investment risk parameters and the cash flow characteristics of the portfolio.

Permitted investment instruments are specifically listed in the Transportation Authority’s Investment Policy, and include the San Francisco City and County Treasury Pool, certificates of deposit, and money market funds.

The purpose of this memorandum is to provide the Finance Committee with the Internal Accounting Report and the Investment Report for the FY 2014/15 period ending March 31, 2015.

The Balance Sheet, Table 1, presents assets, liabilities, and fund balances as of March 31, 2015. Cash, deposits and investments total to $94.3 million as of March 31, 2015. Other assets total $76.4 million and include $20.4 million of program receivables mainly related to grant reimbursements for Yerba Buena Island Interchange Improvement Project and Yerba Buena Island Bridge Structures, $10.6 million in an intergovernmental loan receivable from the Treasure Island Development Authority for the repayment of preliminary engineering and design costs for the Yerba Buena Island Interchange Improvement Project, and $22.9 million in sales tax receivable. Half of the outstanding loan balance will be repaid in June 2015. Liabilities total $185.2 million as of March 31, 2015 and include outstanding commercial paper repayment obligations of $135 million.

There is a negative of $15.4 million in total fund balances, which is largely the result of how multi-year programming commitments are accounted for. Sales tax revenues, grant reimbursements and debt proceeds collected for the remaining months in FY 2014/15 will fully fund this difference. This amount is obtained as follows: $337,564 is restricted for debt service, $11.8 million is restricted for capital projects, and $27.7 million is an unassigned negative fund balance. The unassigned negative fund balance reflects grant-funded capital projects that are scheduled to be implemented over the course of several fiscal years. The commitments are multi-year commitments and are funded with non-current (i.e. future) revenues. Commitments of future revenues are tracked through the grant administration process, and there is no issue with the availability of future revenues to honor them. A negative fund balance is a result of how these commitments are accounted for, and it does not affect the viability of the projects

26


or grants. In addition, the Transportation Authority does not hold or retain title for the projects it has constructed or for the vehicles and system improvements purchased with sales tax funds, which can result in a negative position. This reporting of all legal funding commitments without the corresponding revenue or assets creates or largely contributes to the $27.7 million unassigned negative fund balance.

The Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances, with Budget Comparison, compares budget to actual levels for revenues and expenditures for the first nine months of the fiscal year. Sales tax revenues and vehicle registration fees total $71.6 million and $3.2 million, respectively, for the nine months ending March 31, 2015 and program revenues total $28.2 million.

As of March 31, 2015, the Transportation Authority incurred $74.5 million of expenditures. Expenditures included $67.6 million in capital projects costs, $660,318 of interest and fiscal charges, and $6.3 million for personnel and non-personnel expenditures.

Sales Tax Program

Congestion

Management

Agency Program

Transportation

Fund for Clean Air

Program

Vehicle

Registration Fee

for Transportation

Improvements

Program

Treasure Island

Mobility

Management

Agency Program Total

Assets:

Cash In Bank 2,254,561$ -$ 1,629,391$ 14,660,742$ -$ 18,544,694$

Deposits and Investments with City Treasurer 75,388,064 - - - - 75,388,064

Restricted Investments with F iscal Agent 337,564 - - - - 337,564

Sales Tax Receivable 22,919,334 - - - - 22,919,334

Vehicle Registration Fees Receivable - - - 841,006 - 841,006

Interest Receivable from the City and County of San Francisco 115,678 - - - - 115,678

Program Receivables - Federal - 16,999,968 - - 577,448 17,577,416

Program Receivables - State - 2,605,438 - - - 2,605,438

Program Receivables - Other - 457,511 - - - 457,511

Receivables from the City and County of San Francisco - 1,320,334 - - - 1,320,334

Other Receivable 110,540 - - - - 110,540

Intergovernmental Loan Receivable 10,606,801 - - - - 10,606,801

Due From Other Fund 19,315,795 - - - - 19,315,795

Prepaid Costs and Deposits 112,135 - - - - 112,135

Total Assets 131,160,472$ 21,383,251$ 1,629,391$ 15,501,748$ 577,448$ 170,252,310$

Liabilities:

Accounts Payable 23,664,736$ 4,355,299$ 188,716$ 2,366,990$ 142,148$ 30,717,889$

Accrued Salaries and Taxes 137,774 58,625 1,111 4,267 7,189 208,966

Interest Payable 6,115 - - - - 6,115

Due to Other Fund - 16,969,327 475,111 1,446,057 425,300 19,315,795

Commercial Paper Notes Payable 135,000,000 - - - - 135,000,000

Total Liabilities 158,808,625 21,383,251 664,938 3,817,314 574,637 185,248,765

Deferred Inflows of Resources:

Unavailable Program Revenues 459,409 - - - - 459,409

Fund Balances (Deficit):

Nonspendable 112,135 - - - - 112,135

Restricted for Debt Service 337,564 - - - - 337,564

Restricted for Capital Projects - - 756,482 11,025,549 - 11,782,031

Unassigned (28,533,184) - 207,971 658,885 2,811 (27,663,517)

Total Fund Balances (Deficit) (28,083,485) - 964,453 11,684,434 2,811 (15,431,787)$

Total Liabilities, deferred inflows of resources and fund

balances (deficits) 131,184,549$ 21,383,251$ 1,629,391$ 15,501,748$ 577,448$

San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityInternal Accounting ReportBalance Sheet (Unaudited)

Government FundsMarch 31, 2015

27


For the nine months ending March 31, 2015, revenues were less than budgetary estimates by $14.8 million for all of the Transportation Authority’s programs. Though the variance is rather large, the grant amounts have not changed. The Transportation Authority must receive contractor invoices and pay expenditures before it can submit reimbursements request on local, regional, state or federal grants. The granting agencies do not always reimburse on a schedule matching the budgetary estimates. In addition, the other revenues variance is due to the outstanding first loan repayment from TIDA (repayment expected in June 2015). Total expenditures were less than the budgetary estimates by $72.3 million. This amount includes favorable variances of $242,237 for personnel expenditures since positions from the staff reorganization plan approved by the Board in May 2014 were not all hired, $791,806 for non-personnel expenditures for costs that have not yet been incurred, and $70.5 million in capital project costs due to costs from project sponsors and consultants that have not yet been received by the Transportation Authority’s second and third quarters. Consistent with prior year patterns, Transportation Authority staff anticipates a higher level of reimbursement requests and invoices during the fourth quarter.

As of March 31, 2015, approximately 80% of the Transportation Authority’s investable assets were invested in the City and County of San Francisco Treasury Pool. Other investment assets include a money market investment pool held by US Bank per the terms of the Transportation Authority’s

Sales Tax

Program

Congestion

Management

Agency

Program

Transportation

Fund for Clean

Air Program

Vehicle

Registration Fee

for

Transportation

Improvements

Program

Treasure

Island Mobility

Management

Agency

Program Total

Amended

Budget

Variance With

Final Budget

Positive

(Negative)

Revenues:

Sales Tax 71,632,113$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 71,632,113$ 74,117,250$ (2,485,137)$

Vehicle Registration Fee - - - 3,217,914 - 3,217,914 3,545,789 (327,875)

Investment Income 318,355 - 1,397 2,889 - 322,641 259,643 62,998

Program Revenue 24,077 27,185,638 379,836 - 577,448 28,166,999 36,111,690 (7,944,691)

Other Revenue 129,632 - - - - 129,632 4,252,963 (4,123,331)

Total Revenues 72,104,177 27,185,638 381,233 3,220,803 577,448 103,469,299 118,287,335 (14,818,036)

Expenditures:

Personnel Expenditures 2,730,448 941,072 17,443 63,136 316,234 4,068,333 4,310,570 242,237

Non-personnel Expenditures 2,165,261 29,910 - 84 397 2,195,652 2,987,458 791,806

Capital Project Costs 33,994,071 30,678,663 155,819 2,498,698 258,006 67,585,257 138,125,701 70,540,444

Interest and Fiscal Charges 660,318 - - - - 660,318 1,339,950 679,632

Total Expenditures 39,550,098 31,649,645 173,262 2,561,918 574,637 74,509,560 146,763,679 72,254,119

Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over

(under) Expenditures 32,554,079 (4,464,007) 207,971 658,885 2,811 28,959,739 (28,476,344) 57,436,083

Other Financing Sources (uses):

Transfers In - 4,464,007 - - - 4,464,007 1,008,252 3,455,755

Transfers Out (4,464,007) - - - - (4,464,007) (1,008,252) (3,455,755)

Total Other Financing Sources (uses) (4,464,007) 4,464,007 - - - - - -

Net Change in Fund Balances 28,090,072 - 207,971 658,885 2,811 28,959,739 (28,476,344)$ 57,436,083$

Fund Balances (Deficit), Beginning of

the Period (56,173,557) - 756,482 11,025,549 - (44,391,526)

Fund Balances (Deficit), End of the

Period (28,083,485)$ -$ 964,453$ 11,684,434$ 2,811$ (15,431,787)$

San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityInternal Accounting Report

Statement of Revenues and Changes in Fund Balances with Budget Comparison(Unaudited) Governmental Funds

For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2015

28


Commercial Paper indenture. These investments are in compliance with both the California Government Code and the Transportation Authority’s Board-adopted Investment Policy, and provide sufficient liquidity to meet expenditures requirements for the next six months. Attachment 1 is the most recent investment report furnished by the Office of the Treasurer.

None. This is an information item.




Attachment: 1. Investment Report for March 31, 2015

29

Office of the Treasurer & Tax CollectorCity and County of San Francisco

Pauline Marx, Chief Assistant TreasurerMichelle Durgy, Chief Investment Officer

Investment Report for the month of March 2015

The Honorable Edwin M. Lee The Honorable Board of SupervisorsMayor of San Francisco City and County of San FranicscoCity Hall, Room 200 City Hall, Room 2441 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett PlaceSan Francisco, CA 94102-4638 San Francisco, CA 94102-4638

Ladies and Gentlemen,

In accordance with the provisions of California State Government Code, Section 53646, we forward this report detailingthe City's pooled fund portfolio as of March 31, 2015. These investments provide sufficient liquidity to meet expenditurerequirements for the next six months and are in compliance with our statement of investment policy and California Code.

This correspondence and its attachments show the investment activity for the month of March 2015 for the portfoliosunder the Treasurer's management. All pricing and valuation data is obtained from Interactive Data Corporation.

CCSF Pooled Fund Investment Earnings Statistics *Current Month Prior Month

(in $ million) Fiscal YTD March 2015 Fiscal YTD February 2015Average Daily BalanceNet EarningsEarned Income Yield

CCSF Pooled Fund Statistics *(in $ million) % of Book Market Wtd. Avg. Wtd. Avg.

34.57 0.76%

6,602$ 4.07

0.73%

5,983$ 30.49 0.77%

6,440$ 3.90

0.79%

José Cisneros, Treasurer

April 15, 2015

6,053$

(in $ million) % of Book Market Wtd. Avg. Wtd. Avg.Investment Type Portfolio Value Value Coupon YTM WAMU.S. TreasuriesFederal AgenciesState & Local Government Agency ObligationsPublic Time DepositsNegotiable CDsCommercial PaperMedium Term NotesMoney Market Funds

Totals

In the remainder of this report, we provide additional information and analytics at the security-level and portfolio-level, asrecommended by the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission.

Very truly yours,

José CisnerosTreasurer

cc: Treasury Oversight Committee: Aimee Brown, Ronald Gerhard, Joe Grazioli, Charles PerlBen Rosenfield, Controller, Office of the ControllerTonia Lediju, Internal Audit, Office of the ControllerCynthia Fong, Deputy Director for Finance & Administration, San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityCarol Lu, Budget AnalystSan Francisco Public Library

* Please see last page of this report for non-pooled funds holdings and statistics.

City Hall - Room 140 ● 1 Dr Carlton B. Goodlett Place ● San Francisco, CA 94102-4638

Telephones: 415-554-4487 & 415-554-5210 ● Facsimile: 415-554-4672

7.99% 532.0$ 538.4$ 1.04% 1.14% 54370.18% 4,718.9 4,726.4 0.86% 0.79% 775

0.45% 0.46%

6160.01% 0.5 0.5 0.52%2.76% 187.6 186.2 1.43% 0.89%

183564

0.52%7.88% 530.5 530.5 2.23% 150.0 150.0 0.00% 0.09% 1

0.02% 18.73% 589.4 587.7 0.79% 0.41% 4030.22%

684100.0% 6,723.9$ 6,734.9$ 0.83% 0.74%15.1 15.1 0.02%

30

Po

rtfo

lio S

um

mar

yP

oo

led

Fu

nd

As

of M

arch

31,

201

5

(in $

mill

ion)

Bo

ok

Mar

ket

Mar

ket/

Bo

ok

Cu

rren

t %

Max

. Po

licy

Sec

uri

ty T

ype

Par

Val

ue

Val

ue

Val

ue

Pri

ceA

lloca

tio

nA

lloca

tio

nC

om

plia

nt?

U.S

. Tre

asur

ies

535.

0$

53

2.0

$

538.

4$

10

1.22

7.99

%10

0%Y

esF

eder

al A

genc

ies

4,71

5.2

4,

718.

9

4,72

6.4

10

0.16

70.1

8%10

0%Y

esS

tate

& L

ocal

Gov

ernm

ent

Age

ncy

Obl

igat

ions

185.

5

18

7.6

186.

2

99

.24

2.76

%20

%Y

esP

ublic

Tim

e D

epos

its0.

5

0.5

0.

5

100.

000.

01%

100%

Yes

Neg

otia

ble

CD

s53

0.5

530.

5

53

0.5

100.

017.

88%

30%

Yes

Ban

kers

Acc

epta

nces

-

-

-

-

0.

00%

40%

Yes

Com

mer

cial

Pap

er15

0.0

150.

0

15

0.0

100.

002.

23%

25%

Yes

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

586.

2

58

9.4

587.

7

99

.72

8.73

%25

%Y

esR

epur

chas

e A

gree

men

ts-

-

-

-

0.00

%10

%Y

esR

ever

se R

epur

chas

e/S

ecur

ities

Len

ding

Agr

eem

ents

-

-

-

-

0.

00%

$75m

mY

esM

oney

Mar

ket F

unds

15.1

15

.1

15.1

10

0.00

0.22

%10

%Y

esLA

IF-

-

-

-

0.00

%$5

0mm

Yes

Sup

rana

tiona

ls-

-

-

-

0.00

%5%

Yes

TO

TA

L6,

718.

0$

6,72

3.9

$

6,

734.

9$

100.

1610

0.00

%-

Yes

Mar

ch 3

1, 2

015

City

and

Cou

nty

of S

an F

ranc

isco

2

The

full

Inve

stm

ent P

olic

y ca

n be

foun

d at

http

://w

ww

.sftr

easu

rer.

org/

, in

the

Rep

orts

& P

lans

sec

tion

of th

e A

bout

men

u.

Tot

als

may

not

add

due

to r

ound

ing.

The

City

and

Cou

nty

of S

an F

ranc

isco

use

s th

e fo

llow

ing

met

hodo

logy

to d

eter

min

e co

mpl

ianc

e: C

ompl

ianc

e is

pre

-tra

de a

nd c

alcu

late

d on

bot

h a

par

and

mar

ket v

alue

bas

is, u

sing

the

resu

lt w

ith th

e lo

wes

t per

cent

age

of th

e ov

eral

l por

tfolio

val

ue. C

ash

bala

nces

are

incl

uded

in th

e C

ity's

com

plia

nce

calc

ulat

ions

.

Ple

ase

note

the

info

rmat

ion

in th

is r

epor

t doe

s no

t inc

lude

cas

h ba

lanc

es. D

ue to

fluc

tuat

ions

in th

e m

arke

t val

ue o

f the

sec

uriti

es h

eld

in th

e P

oole

d F

und

and

chan

ges

in th

e C

ity's

cas

h po

sitio

n, th

e al

loca

tion

limits

may

be

exce

eded

on

a po

st-t

rade

com

plia

nce

basi

s. In

thes

e in

stan

ces,

no

com

plia

nce

viol

atio

n ha

s oc

curr

ed, a

s th

e po

licy

limits

wer

e no

t exc

eede

d pr

ior

to tr

ade

exec

utio

n.

Mar

ch 3

1, 2

015

City

and

Cou

nty

of S

an F

ranc

isco

2

31

Portfolio AnalysisPooled Fund

$0

$250

$500

$750

$1,000

$1,250

$1,500

0-6 6-12 12-18 18-24 24-30 30-36 36-42 42-48 48-54 54-60

Par

Val

ue

of

Inve

stm

ents

($

mill

ion

)

Maturity (in months)

Par Value of Investments by Maturity

2/28/20153/31/2015

Asset Allocation by Market Value

Callable bonds shown at maturity date.

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Money Market Funds

Medium Term Notes

Commercial Paper

Negotiable CDs

Public Time Deposits

State & Local GovernmentAgency Obligations

Federal Agencies

U.S. Treasuries

2/28/20153/31/2015

March 31, 2015 City and County of San Francisco 3

32

Yield Curves

2.0

U.S. Treasury Yield Curves

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

Mar. 2014

Apr. 2014

May. 2014

Jun. 2014

Jul. 2014

Aug. 2014

Sep. 2014

Oct. 2014

Nov. 2014

Dec. 2014

Jan. 2015

Feb. 2015

Mar. 2015

Yields (%) on Benchmark Indices

5 Year Treasury Notes3 Month LIBOR3 Month Treasury Bills

Source: Bloomberg

2/27/15 3/31/15 Change3 Month 0.010 0.020 0.01026 Month 0.066 0.132 0.0664

1 Year 0.188 0.229 0.04132 Year 0.618 0.555 -0.06333 Year 0.997 0.879 -0.11825 Year 1.499 1.370 -0.1287

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

3M 6M 1Y 2Y 3Y 5Y

Yie

ld (%

)

Maturity (Y = "Years")

2/27/20153/31/2015

Source: Bloomberg

March 31, 2015 City and County of San Francisco 4

33

Inve

stm

ent

Inve

nto

ryP

oo

led

Fu

nd

As

of

Mar

ch 3

1, 2

015

Typ

e o

f In

vest

men

tC

US

IPIs

sue

Nam

eS

ettl

e D

ate

Mat

uri

ty

Dat

eD

ura

tio

nC

ou

po

nP

ar V

alu

eB

oo

k V

alu

eA

mo

rtiz

edB

oo

k V

alu

eM

arke

t V

alu

eU

.S. T

reas

urie

s91

2828

PE

4U

S T

SY

NT

12/2

3/11

10/3

1/15

0.58

1.25

25,0

00,0

00$

25,6

09,3

75$

25,0

92,1

85$

25,1

54,2

50$

U.S

. Tre

asur

ies

9128

28P

J3U

S T

SY

NT

12/1

6/10

11/3

0/15

0.66

1.38

50,0

00,0

00

49,5

19,5

31

49,9

35,4

95

50,3

86,5

00

U.S

. Tre

asur

ies

9128

28P

J3U

S T

SY

NT

12/1

6/10

11/3

0/15

0.66

1.38

50,0

00,0

00

49,5

19,5

31

49,9

35,4

95

50,3

86,5

00

U.S

. Tre

asur

ies

9128

28P

J3U

S T

SY

NT

12/2

3/10

11/3

0/15

0.66

1.38

50,0

00,0

00

48,5

39,0

63

49,8

03,1

02

50,3

86,5

00

U.S

. Tre

asur

ies

9128

28R

J1U

S T

SY

NT

10/1

1/11

9/30

/16

1.49

1.00

75,0

00,0

00

74,8

30,0

78

74,9

48,7

24

75,6

44,2

50

U.S

. Tre

asur

ies

9128

28R

M4

US

TS

Y N

T12

/26/

1310

/31/

161.

571.

0025

,000

,000

25

,183

,594

25

,102

,212

25

,218

,750

U

.S. T

reas

urie

s91

2828

RX

0U

S T

SY

NT

2/25

/14

12/3

1/16

1.74

0.88

25,0

00,0

00

25,1

45,5

08

25,0

89,5

43

25,1

70,0

00

U.S

. Tre

asur

ies

9128

28S

J0U

S T

SY

NT

3/14

/12

2/28

/17

1.90

0.88

75,0

00,0

00

74,7

71,4

84

74,9

11,8

47

75,4

74,7

50

U.S

. Tre

asur

ies

9128

28S

J0U

S T

SY

NT

3/21

/12

2/28

/17

1.90

0.88

25,0

00,0

00

24,5

99,6

09

24,8

44,9

46

25,1

58,2

50

U.S

. Tre

asur

ies

9128

28S

J0U

S T

SY

NT

3/21

/12

2/28

/17

1.90

0.88

25,0

00,0

00

24,5

99,6

09

24,8

44,9

46

25,1

58,2

50

U.S

. Tre

asur

ies

9128

28S

M3

US

TS

Y N

T4/

4/12

3/31

/17

1.99

1.00

50,0

00,0

00

49,8

35,9

38

49,9

34,2

67

50,4

18,0

00

U.S

. Tre

asur

ies

9128

28T

M2

US

TS

Y N

T9/

17/1

28/

31/1

72.

400.

6360

,000

,000

59

,807

,813

59

,906

,190

59

,892

,000

S

ub

tota

ls1.

481.

0453

5,00

0,00

0$

53

1,96

1,13

3$

53

4,34

8,95

3$

53

8,44

8,00

0$

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

AQ

C5

FF

CB

FLT

NT

1M

L+1

6/8/

125/

14/1

50.

040.

1850

,000

,000

$

49

,985

,500

$

49

,999

,417

$

50

,005

,500

$

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EA

VE

5F

FC

B F

LT N

T 1

ML+

212

/5/1

26/

22/1

50.

060.

1950

,000

,000

49

,987

,300

49

,998

,879

50

,012

,000

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3131

5PD

Z9

FA

MC

A11

/22/

137/

22/1

50.

312.

3815

,000

,000

15

,511

,350

15

,094

,351

15

,100

,350

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EC

VW

1F

FC

B F

LT N

T T

-BIL

L+14

8/5/

138/

5/15

0.10

0.16

62,5

00,0

00

62,4

87,5

00

62,4

97,8

42

62,5

11,2

50

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

3383

V81

FH

LB12

/12/

138/

28/1

50.

410.

389,

000,

000

9,01

4,13

0

9,

003,

374

9,00

6,21

0

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3137

EA

CM

9F

HLM

C B

ON

DS

12/1

5/10

9/10

/15

0.45

1.75

50,0

00,0

00

49,0

50,0

00

49,9

11,0

40

50,3

39,5

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

3370

JB5

FH

LB12

/15/

109/

11/1

50.

451.

7575

,000

,000

73

,587

,000

74

,866

,945

75

,504

,000

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3131

5PG

T0

FA

RM

ER

MA

C9/

15/1

09/

15/1

50.

462.

1345

,000

,000

44

,914

,950

44

,992

,222

45

,365

,850

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EC

JB1

FF

CB

FLT

NT

QT

R T

-BIL

L+16

4/24

/13

9/18

/15

0.22

0.18

16,2

00,0

00

16,1

98,0

73

16,1

99,6

26

16,2

05,1

84

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

398A

3T7

FN

MA

EX

-CA

LL N

T10

/14/

119/

21/1

50.

482.

0025

,000

,000

25

,881

,000

25

,105

,990

25

,211

,750

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EA

JF6

FF

CB

FLT

NT

1M

L+2.

511

/30/

129/

22/1

50.

060.

2027

,953

,000

27

,941

,120

27

,950

,985

27

,966

,138

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3139

8A4M

1F

NM

A12

/15/

1010

/26/

150.

571.

6325

,000

,000

24

,317

,500

24

,920

,068

25

,199

,750

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3139

8A4M

1F

NM

A12

/23/

1010

/26/

150.

571.

6342

,000

,000

40

,924

,380

41

,873

,456

42

,335

,580

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

1J2S

1F

FC

B12

/15/

1011

/16/

150.

621.

5025

,000

,000

24

,186

,981

24

,896

,393

25

,193

,000

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EC

LZ5

FF

CB

FLT

NT

MO

NT

HLY

1M

L+0

5/8/

1311

/19/

150.

050.

1825

,000

,000

24

,997

,000

24

,999

,248

25

,010

,250

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

71Z

Y5

FH

LB12

/3/1

012

/11/

150.

691.

8825

,000

,000

24

,982

,000

24

,997

,507

25

,279

,500

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

71Z

Y5

FH

LB12

/14/

1012

/11/

150.

691.

8850

,000

,000

49

,871

,500

49

,982

,096

50

,559

,000

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

ED

5A6

FF

CB

FLT

12/1

2/13

1/20

/16

0.05

0.18

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

23,0

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

30A

3P81

FH

LB12

/29/

141/

29/1

60.

830.

2525

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

24

,989

,750

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

75R

N9

FH

LB N

T4/

13/1

23/

11/1

60.

941.

0022

,200

,000

22

,357

,620

22

,238

,080

22

,326

,540

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

XX

P43

FH

LB12

/12/

133/

11/1

60.

943.

1314

,000

,000

14

,848

,400

14

,356

,949

14

,364

,000

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EA

JU3

FF

CB

NT

4/12

/12

3/28

/16

0.99

1.05

25,0

00,0

00

25,2

20,7

50

25,0

55,2

64

25,1

72,0

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

35G

0VA

8F

NM

A G

LOB

AL

NT

12/1

3/13

3/30

/16

1.00

0.50

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

22,2

50

25,0

09,6

65

25,0

44,5

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

TF

6F

AM

CA

FLT

MT

N 1

ML+

04/

1/13

4/1/

160.

000.

1750

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,024

,500

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

792Z

1F

HLB

NT

4/18

/12

4/18

/16

1.04

0.81

20,0

00,0

00

19,9

92,2

00

19,9

97,9

55

20,0

87,4

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

CW

T7

FF

CB

NT

11/2

0/13

5/9/

161.

100.

6522

,650

,000

22

,746

,489

22

,693

,265

22

,758

,041

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

ED

B35

FF

CB

FLT

NT

1M

L+3

1/15

/14

6/2/

160.

010.

2050

,000

,000

49

,991

,681

49

,995

,903

50

,040

,000

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3131

5PB

73F

AM

CA

NT

2/9/

126/

9/16

1.18

0.90

10,0

00,0

00

10,0

00,0

00

10,0

00,0

00

10,0

70,2

00

Mar

ch 3

1, 2

015

City

and

Cou

nty

of S

an F

ranc

isco

5

34

Inve

stm

ent

Inve

nto

ryP

oo

led

Fu

nd

Typ

e o

f In

vest

men

tC

US

IPIs

sue

Nam

eS

ettl

e D

ate

Mat

uri

ty

Dat

eD

ura

tio

nC

ou

po

nP

ar V

alu

eB

oo

k V

alu

eA

mo

rtiz

edB

oo

k V

alu

eM

arke

t V

alu

eF

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

73S

Z6

FH

LB10

/23/

146/

10/1

61.

182.

1328

,000

,000

28

,790

,468

28

,578

,262

28

,567

,000

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3137

71A

A5

FH

LB S

UB

NT

5/20

/13

6/13

/16

1.16

5.63

16,9

25,0

00

19,4

72,8

90

17,9

23,6

82

17,9

63,5

18

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

3771

AA

5F

HLB

SU

B N

T5/

30/1

36/

13/1

61.

165.

6314

,195

,000

16

,259

,095

15

,011

,340

15

,066

,005

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3137

71A

A5

FH

LB S

UB

NT

9/4/

146/

13/1

61.

165.

638,

620,

000

9,

380,

715

9,

135,

361

9,

148,

923

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

ED

DP

4F

FC

B N

T2/

11/1

46/

17/1

61.

210.

5250

,000

,000

50

,062

,000

50

,032

,049

50

,059

,500

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3130

A1B

K3

FH

LB E

X-C

ALL

NT

3/24

/14

6/24

/16

1.23

0.50

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

15,7

50

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

35G

0XP

3F

NM

A G

LOB

AL

NT

3/25

/14

7/5/

161.

260.

3850

,000

,000

49

,753

,100

49

,863

,360

49

,969

,500

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3131

5PA

25F

AM

CA

MT

N7/

27/1

17/

27/1

61.

312.

0015

,000

,000

14

,934

,750

14

,982

,750

15

,293

,100

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3131

5PA

25F

AM

CA

MT

N3/

26/1

37/

27/1

61.

312.

0014

,100

,000

14

,735

,205

14

,351

,685

14

,375

,514

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3131

5PA

25F

AM

CA

MT

N3/

26/1

37/

27/1

61.

312.

0011

,900

,000

12

,440

,498

12

,114

,160

12

,132

,526

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3131

5PA

25F

AM

CA

MT

N3/

26/1

47/

27/1

61.

312.

0020

,000

,000

20

,643

,350

20

,363

,862

20

,390

,800

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G4U

C0

FH

LMC

CA

LL N

T11

/20/

147/

29/1

61.

320.

6515

,000

,000

15

,022

,500

15

,017

,686

15

,017

,850

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3135

G0Y

E7

FN

MA

GLO

BA

L N

T3/

17/1

48/

26/1

61.

400.

6350

,000

,000

50

,124

,765

50

,071

,674

50

,132

,500

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3131

5PQ

B8

FA

MC

A N

T10

/29/

139/

1/16

1.41

1.50

7,00

0,00

0

7,15

6,24

0

7,07

8,12

0

7,09

3,17

0

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

3370

TW

8F

HLB

BD

10/1

1/11

9/9/

161.

422.

0025

,000

,000

25

,727

,400

25

,213

,560

25

,548

,250

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

70T

W8

FH

LB11

/5/1

49/

9/16

1.42

2.00

25,0

00,0

00

25,6

62,1

25

25,5

17,7

15

25,5

48,2

50

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

DH

21F

FC

B F

LT N

T 1

ML+

23/

14/1

49/

14/1

60.

040.

1950

,000

,000

49

,993

,612

49

,996

,286

50

,030

,500

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G4X

W3

FH

LMC

EX

-CA

LL M

TN

3/26

/14

9/26

/16

1.48

0.60

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

24,9

57,5

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

30A

1CD

8F

HLB

NT

CA

LL1/

9/15

9/28

/16

1.48

1.13

25,0

00,0

00

25,1

37,5

00

25,0

94,4

66

25,0

85,5

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

3P38

FH

LMC

NT

CA

LL12

/14/

1210

/5/1

61.

500.

7575

,000

,000

75

,071

,250

75

,000

,338

75

,004

,500

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

78U

B5

FH

LB10

/23/

1410

/11/

161.

511.

135,

000,

000

5,

062,

083

5,

048,

687

5,

047,

600

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

ED

JA1

FF

CB

FLT

NT

1M

L+2

4/11

/14

10/1

1/16

0.03

0.20

25,0

00,0

00

24,9

93,7

50

24,9

96,1

78

25,0

14,7

50

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

30A

3CE

2F

HLB

11/3

/14

10/1

4/16

1.53

0.63

40,0

00,0

00

40,0

45,1

94

40,0

38,4

88

40,0

54,8

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

37E

AD

S5

FH

LMC

GLO

BA

L N

T3/

3/14

10/1

4/16

1.52

0.88

25,0

00,0

00

25,2

00,2

50

25,1

17,7

20

25,1

40,0

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

36G

1WP

0F

NM

A C

ALL

NT

11/4

/13

11/4

/16

1.57

1.50

18,0

00,0

00

18,3

50,4

60

18,1

04,1

78

18,1

23,1

20

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

5LS

2F

HLM

C C

ALL

MT

N11

/17/

1411

/17/

161.

620.

6025

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

24

,952

,250

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3130

A3J

70F

HLB

11/1

7/14

11/2

3/16

1.64

0.63

25,0

00,0

00

24,9

90,0

00

24,9

91,8

32

25,0

23,7

50

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

3381

GA

7F

HLB

NT

11/3

0/12

11/3

0/16

1.66

0.57

23,1

00,0

00

23,1

04,3

89

23,1

01,8

30

23,1

04,1

58

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

3371

PV

2F

HLB

11/6

/14

12/9

/16

1.67

1.63

25,0

00,0

00

25,5

13,0

00

25,4

14,9

66

25,4

29,0

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

3371

PV

2F

HLB

12/4

/14

12/9

/16

1.67

1.63

25,0

00,0

00

25,4

86,7

50

25,4

08,7

11

25,4

29,0

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

3371

PV

2F

HLB

12/1

2/14

12/9

/16

1.67

1.63

25,0

00,0

00

25,4

50,8

85

25,3

83,2

69

25,4

29,0

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

30A

12F

4F

HLB

CA

LL N

T3/

19/1

412

/19/

161.

710.

7020

,500

,000

20

,497

,950

20

,498

,720

20

,505

,535

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

81K

R5

FH

LB N

T C

ALL

12/2

8/12

12/2

8/16

1.73

0.63

13,5

00,0

00

13,5

00,0

00

13,5

00,0

00

13,5

15,1

20

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

3381

KR

5F

HLB

NT

CA

LL12

/28/

1212

/28/

161.

730.

639,

000,

000

9,

000,

000

9,

000,

000

9,

010,

080

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G5V

G7

FH

LMC

CA

LL M

TN

12/2

9/14

12/2

9/16

1.73

0.78

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

58,0

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

30A

3QU

1F

HLB

NT

CA

LL12

/30/

1412

/30/

161.

740.

758,

000,

000

8,

000,

000

8,

000,

000

8,

019,

840

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3130

A3Q

U1

FH

LB N

T C

ALL

12/3

0/14

12/3

0/16

1.74

0.75

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,1

24,0

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

33C

2F

HLM

C N

T1/

3/13

1/3/

171.

750.

6050

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,019

,500

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EC

B37

FF

CB

NT

12/2

0/12

1/12

/17

1.77

0.58

14,0

00,0

00

14,0

00,0

00

14,0

00,0

00

13,9

88,2

40

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

WW

5F

AR

ME

R M

AC

MT

N5/

4/12

1/17

/17

1.78

1.01

49,5

00,0

00

49,4

75,2

50

49,4

90,5

41

49,8

36,6

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

DR

D6

FF

CB

FLT

QT

R T

-BIL

L+14

12/1

2/14

1/30

/17

0.08

0.16

50,0

00,0

00

49,9

81,4

00

49,9

84,0

23

50,0

12,0

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

5X91

FH

LMC

CA

LL M

TN

1/30

/15

1/30

/17

1.82

0.90

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

13,7

50

Mar

ch 3

1, 2

015

City

and

Cou

nty

of S

an F

ranc

isco

6

35

Inve

stm

ent

Inve

nto

ryP

oo

led

Fu

nd

Typ

e o

f In

vest

men

tC

US

IPIs

sue

Nam

eS

ettl

e D

ate

Mat

uri

ty

Dat

eD

ura

tio

nC

ou

po

nP

ar V

alu

eB

oo

k V

alu

eA

mo

rtiz

edB

oo

k V

alu

eM

arke

t V

alu

eF

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

786Q

9F

HLB

NT

1/10

/13

2/13

/17

1.85

1.00

67,7

80,0

00

68,5

46,4

56

68,1

30,6

73

68,2

42,9

37

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

30A

45K

4F

HLB

CA

LL N

T2/

27/1

52/

27/1

71.

890.

8030

,000

,000

29

,959

,200

29

,961

,042

30

,030

,300

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3130

A45

K4

FH

LB C

ALL

NT

2/27

/15

2/27

/17

1.89

0.80

19,5

00,0

00

19,4

73,4

80

19,4

74,6

77

19,5

19,6

95

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

DF

W7

FF

CB

FLT

NT

1M

L+5.

52/

27/1

42/

27/1

70.

070.

2350

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,062

,500

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

782N

0F

HLB

12/1

5/14

3/10

/17

1.93

0.88

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

58,5

00

50,0

50,8

29

50,2

50,5

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

DP

30F

AR

ME

R M

AC

FLT

NT

1M

L+4

10/3

/14

3/24

/17

0.07

0.21

26,0

00,0

00

26,0

09,3

47

26,0

07,4

84

26,0

25,4

80

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

4XM

5F

HLM

C C

ALL

MT

N3/

28/1

43/

28/1

71.

980.

7825

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

25

,054

,000

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3136

G1Z

B8

FN

MA

CA

LL N

T3/

28/1

43/

28/1

71.

980.

8825

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

25

,081

,250

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

ED

ZW

5F

FC

B F

LT N

T 1

ML+

210

/29/

143/

29/1

70.

080.

2025

,000

,000

24

,999

,750

24

,999

,794

25

,014

,750

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3131

5PT

Q2

FA

RM

ER

MA

C M

TN

4/10

/12

4/10

/17

1.99

1.26

12,5

00,0

00

12,4

39,2

50

12,4

75,3

81

12,6

21,2

50

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

CLL

6F

FC

B N

T4/

17/1

34/

17/1

72.

030.

6010

,000

,000

10

,000

,000

10

,000

,000

9,

989,

700

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

UQ

0F

AR

ME

R M

AC

MT

N4/

26/1

24/

26/1

72.

041.

1310

,500

,000

10

,500

,000

10

,500

,000

10

,586

,100

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3137

EA

DF

3F

HLM

C N

T5/

14/1

25/

12/1

72.

081.

2525

,000

,000

25

,133

,000

25

,056

,292

25

,298

,250

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3131

5PZ

Q5

FA

RM

ER

MA

C M

TN

12/2

8/12

6/5/

172.

151.

119,

000,

000

9,12

2,13

0

9,

060,

010

9,03

6,72

0

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

79F

W4

FH

LB12

/19/

146/

9/17

2.16

1.00

12,0

00,0

00

12,0

24,0

93

12,0

21,7

25

12,0

72,4

80

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

30A

3SL9

FH

LB12

/30/

146/

15/1

72.

180.

9525

,000

,000

24

,959

,750

24

,963

,874

25

,115

,500

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EA

UW

6F

FC

B F

LT N

T F

F+

226/

19/1

26/

19/1

70.

220.

3450

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,099

,000

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EE

GH

7F

FC

B12

/26/

146/

26/1

72.

210.

938,

400,

000

8,39

7,31

2

8,

397,

595

8,43

1,33

2

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3137

EA

DH

9F

HLM

C G

LOB

AL

NT

3/25

/14

6/29

/17

2.22

1.00

25,0

00,0

00

24,9

20,6

25

24,9

45,3

96

25,1

39,2

50

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

5VV

4F

HLM

C C

ALL

MT

N12

/30/

146/

30/1

72.

231.

0525

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

25

,043

,000

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G5V

V4

FH

LMC

CA

LL M

TN

12/3

0/14

6/30

/17

2.23

1.05

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

43,0

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

5W50

FH

LMC

12/3

0/14

6/30

/17

2.24

1.00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,2

53,0

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

CV

92F

FC

B F

LT N

T 1

ML+

47/

24/1

37/

24/1

70.

070.

2150

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,043

,000

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G3Z

H6

FH

LMC

EX

-CA

LL M

TN

4/15

/14

7/25

/17

2.29

1.00

19,0

00,0

00

18,9

95,2

50

18,9

96,6

43

19,0

76,3

80

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

CV

G6

FF

CB

FLT

NT

3M

L+0

8/5/

137/

26/1

70.

070.

2623

,520

,000

23

,520

,000

23

,520

,000

23

,549

,165

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EE

FX

3F

FC

B F

LT 1

ML+

512

/23/

148/

23/1

70.

060.

2250

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,051

,500

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G6E

R0

FH

LMC

CA

LL M

TN

2/25

/15

8/25

/17

2.38

1.00

18,3

00,0

00

18,3

00,0

00

18,3

00,0

00

18,3

37,5

15

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

5HS

7F

HLM

C C

ALL

MT

N9/

25/1

49/

25/1

72.

461.

1320

,100

,000

20

,079

,900

20

,083

,348

20

,168

,340

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3137

EA

DL0

FH

LMC

GLO

BA

L N

T3/

25/1

49/

29/1

72.

471.

0025

,000

,000

24

,808

,175

24

,863

,750

25

,077

,500

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3136

G0Y

39F

NM

A S

TE

P N

T11

/8/1

211

/8/1

72.

580.

8050

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

49

,904

,000

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EE

BR

0F

FC

B F

LT N

T 1

ML+

311

/18/

1411

/13/

170.

040.

2125

,000

,000

24

,988

,794

24

,990

,170

25

,009

,750

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G44

F2

FH

LMC

CA

LL M

TN

5/21

/13

11/2

1/17

2.61

0.80

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

49,7

54,5

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

5NE

1F

HLM

C C

ALL

ST

EP

11/2

4/14

11/2

4/17

2.63

0.63

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

16,0

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

5NE

1F

HLM

C C

ALL

ST

EP

11/2

4/14

11/2

4/17

2.63

0.63

11,2

00,0

00

11,1

91,6

00

11,1

92,5

81

11,2

07,1

68

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

J83

FA

RM

ER

MA

C F

LT C

ALL

1M

L+17

12/1

/14

12/1

/17

0.00

0.34

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

68,2

50

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

30A

3HF

4F

HLB

12/2

2/14

12/8

/17

2.64

1.13

25,0

00,0

00

24,9

88,3

13

24,9

92,4

25

25,1

47,2

50

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

EF

E5

FF

CB

12/1

8/14

12/1

8/17

2.67

1.13

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

12,5

00

50,0

11,3

14

50,2

11,0

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

EF

E5

FF

CB

12/1

9/14

12/1

8/17

2.67

1.13

50,0

00,0

00

49,9

16,0

63

49,9

24,1

05

50,2

11,0

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

Z28

FA

MC

A M

TN

12/2

2/14

12/2

2/17

2.68

1.20

46,0

00,0

00

46,0

00,0

00

46,0

00,0

00

46,3

40,4

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

36G

13Q

0F

NM

A S

TE

P N

T12

/26/

1212

/26/

172.

710.

7529

,000

,000

29

,000

,000

29

,000

,000

29

,020

,300

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3136

G13

T4

FN

MA

ST

EP

NT

12/2

6/12

12/2

6/17

2.71

0.80

39,0

00,0

00

39,0

00,0

00

39,0

00,0

00

39,0

29,2

50

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

32M

1F

HLM

C C

ALL

NT

12/2

8/12

12/2

8/17

2.71

1.00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

49,8

44,0

00

Mar

ch 3

1, 2

015

City

and

Cou

nty

of S

an F

ranc

isco

7

36

Inve

stm

ent

Inve

nto

ryP

oo

led

Fu

nd

Typ

e o

f In

vest

men

tC

US

IPIs

sue

Nam

eS

ettl

e D

ate

Mat

uri

ty

Dat

eD

ura

tio

nC

ou

po

nP

ar V

alu

eB

oo

k V

alu

eA

mo

rtiz

edB

oo

k V

alu

eM

arke

t V

alu

eF

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G5V

A0

FH

LMC

CA

LL M

TN

12/2

9/14

12/2

9/17

2.70

1.25

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

30,0

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

4S5

FA

RM

ER

MA

C F

LT C

ALL

1M

L+16

1/5/

151/

5/18

0.01

0.33

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

82,0

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

5XM

2F

HLM

C C

ALL

ST

EP

NT

1/30

/15

1/30

/18

2.81

0.50

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

24,9

94,5

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

EM

H0

FF

CB

FLT

NT

1M

L+5

2/2/

152/

2/18

0.01

0.22

35,0

00,0

00

34,9

78,8

93

34,9

80,0

10

35,0

25,9

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

EA

N0

FF

CB

FLT

NT

1M

L+4

11/5

/14

2/5/

180.

010.

2125

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

25

,011

,250

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EE

AN

0F

FC

B F

LT N

T 1

ML+

411

/5/1

42/

5/18

0.01

0.21

25,0

00,0

00

24,9

91,7

50

24,9

92,7

71

25,0

11,2

50

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

EA

N0

FF

CB

FLT

NT

1M

L+4

11/5

/14

2/5/

180.

010.

2150

,000

,000

49

,983

,560

49

,985

,594

50

,022

,500

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G5Z

K4

FH

LMC

ST

EP

CA

LL M

TN

2/6/

152/

6/18

2.82

0.75

24,9

00,0

00

24,9

00,0

00

24,9

00,0

00

24,8

73,6

06

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

6AX

1F

HLM

C C

ALL

MT

N2/

20/1

52/

20/1

82.

860.

7522

,000

,000

22

,000

,000

22

,000

,000

21

,997

,800

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3130

A4A

T9

FH

LB2/

27/1

52/

27/1

82.

870.

8525

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

25

,021

,750

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G6E

D1

FH

LMC

CA

LL S

TE

P2/

27/1

52/

27/1

82.

890.

5025

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

25

,009

,750

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G6E

D1

FH

LMC

CA

LL S

TE

P2/

27/1

52/

27/1

82.

890.

5025

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

25

,009

,750

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3135

G0U

N1

FN

MA

GLO

BA

L N

T C

ALL

2/26

/14

2/28

/18

2.87

1.15

19,0

00,0

00

18,8

77,4

50

18,9

10,8

73

18,9

48,5

10

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

35G

0UN

1F

NM

A G

LOB

AL

NT

CA

LL2/

26/1

42/

28/1

82.

871.

158,

770,

000

8,71

3,43

4

8,

728,

861

8,74

6,23

3

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G6F

R9

FH

LMC

ST

EP

CA

LL M

TN

3/5/

153/

5/18

2.90

0.75

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

11,2

50

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

6JN

4F

HLM

C S

TE

P C

ALL

MT

N3/

16/1

53/

16/1

82.

921.

0050

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,056

,500

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G6L

N1

FH

LMC

ST

EP

CA

LL M

TN

3/26

/15

3/26

/18

2.95

1.00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

29,7

50

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

30A

35B

6F

HLB

FLT

CA

LL N

T 1

ML+

2310

/2/1

44/

2/18

0.01

0.40

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

36G

1KN

8F

NM

A N

T C

ALL

4/24

/13

4/24

/18

2.99

1.50

50,0

00,0

00

50,9

03,0

00

50,0

28,4

51

50,0

35,0

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

36G

1K81

FN

MA

NT

ST

EP

4/30

/13

4/30

/18

3.04

0.75

12,6

00,0

00

12,6

00,0

00

12,6

00,0

00

12,6

04,9

14

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

ZM

4F

AR

ME

R M

AC

ST

EP

NT

5/3/

135/

3/18

3.05

0.70

24,6

00,0

00

24,6

00,0

00

24,6

00,0

00

24,6

12,0

54

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

3382

XK

4F

HLB

ST

EP

NT

5/7/

135/

7/18

3.07

0.75

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

14,5

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

CP

B4

FF

CB

NT

5/23

/13

5/14

/18

3.07

0.88

10,0

00,0

00

9,93

4,60

0

9,

959,

004

9,91

3,30

0

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3135

G0W

J8F

NM

A N

T5/

23/1

35/

21/1

83.

090.

8825

,000

,000

24

,786

,500

24

,865

,860

24

,940

,500

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

834P

3F

HLB

ST

EP

NT

5/22

/13

5/22

/18

3.12

0.50

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

19,5

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

30A

4MX

7F

HLB

CA

LL S

TE

P3/

27/1

56/

25/1

83.

210.

504,

000,

000

4,00

0,11

1

4,

000,

111

4,00

2,12

0

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G52

D6

FH

LMC

CA

LL M

TN

4/17

/14

7/17

/18

3.21

1.64

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

99,5

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

5ZP

3F

HLM

C C

ALL

ST

EP

NT

1/27

/15

7/27

/18

3.28

0.75

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

15,7

50

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

5ZZ

1F

HLM

C S

TE

P C

ALL

MT

N1/

30/1

57/

30/1

83.

281.

0025

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

25

,014

,500

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3130

A4G

L0F

HLB

NT

CA

LL3/

18/1

59/

18/1

83.

401.

3315

,000

,000

15

,000

,000

15

,000

,000

15

,038

,550

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3131

5PS

59F

AR

ME

R M

AC

CA

LL F

LT 3

ML+

143/

3/15

12/3

/18

0.18

0.40

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,1

30,0

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

W96

FA

RM

ER

MA

C F

LT C

ALL

3M

L+12

3/3/

1512

/3/1

80.

180.

3850

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,094

,000

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G4L

Z9

FH

LMC

CA

LL S

TE

P12

/10/

1312

/10/

183.

630.

8850

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,230

,000

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G4M

B1

FH

LMC

CA

LL M

ULT

I-S

TE

P12

/18/

1312

/18/

183.

611.

5025

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

25

,065

,750

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3136

G2C

39F

NM

A C

ALL

NT

12/3

0/14

12/2

8/18

3.63

1.63

15,0

00,0

00

15,0

00,0

00

15,0

00,0

00

15,1

27,0

50

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

Q69

FA

RM

ER

MA

C F

LT C

ALL

NT

3M

L+15

4/3/

144/

3/19

0.01

0.41

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

E47

FA

RM

ER

MA

C F

LT C

ALL

NT

1M

L+31

11/3

/14

5/3/

190.

010.

4825

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

25

,007

,500

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3131

5PS

91F

AR

ME

R M

AC

FLT

CA

LL N

T 3

ML+

128/

12/1

48/

12/1

90.

120.

3850

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,033

,500

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3130

A35

A8

FH

LB F

LT C

ALL

NT

1M

L+40

10/2

/14

10/2

/19

0.01

0.57

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

3586

RC

5F

NM

A 0

CP

N11

/21/

1410

/9/1

94.

530.

0029

,675

,000

26

,700

,081

26

,918

,654

27

,268

,654

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3135

86R

C5

FN

MA

0 C

PN

11/2

4/14

10/9

/19

4.53

0.00

25,0

00,0

00

22,4

98,7

50

22,6

78,6

15

22,9

72,7

50

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

3586

RC

5F

NM

A 0

CP

N11

/24/

1410

/9/1

94.

530.

0010

,000

,000

9,

005,

200

9,07

6,73

6

9,

189,

100

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

J26

FA

RM

ER

MA

C F

LT C

ALL

3M

L+12

12/2

/14

12/2

/19

0.17

0.38

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

27,0

00

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

30A

4HA

3F

HLB

ST

EP

CA

LL N

T3/

18/1

53/

18/2

04.

831.

2525

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

25

,000

,000

25

,033

,250

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G6K

V4

FH

LMC

ST

EP

CA

LL M

TN

3/25

/15

3/25

/20

4.81

1.63

15,0

00,0

00

15,0

00,0

00

15,0

00,0

00

15,0

29,4

00

Su

bto

tals

1.45

0.86

4,71

5,18

8,00

0$

4,71

8,85

2,31

6$

4,71

5,20

6,66

3$

4,72

6,43

1,69

6$

Mar

ch 3

1, 2

015

City

and

Cou

nty

of S

an F

ranc

isco

8

37

Inve

stm

ent

Inve

nto

ryP

oo

led

Fu

nd

Typ

e o

f In

vest

men

tC

US

IPIs

sue

Nam

eS

ettl

e D

ate

Mat

uri

ty

Dat

eD

ura

tio

nC

ou

po

nP

ar V

alu

eB

oo

k V

alu

eA

mo

rtiz

edB

oo

k V

alu

eM

arke

t V

alu

e

Sta

te/L

ocal

Age

ncie

s91

412G

PW

9U

NIV

OF

CA

LIF

OR

NIA

RE

VE

NU

E B

ON

D3/

14/1

35/

15/1

50.

120.

395,

000,

000

$

5,00

0,00

0$

5,

000,

000

$

5,00

1,00

0$

S

tate

/Loc

al A

genc

ies

6125

74D

Q3

MO

NT

ER

EY

CO

MM

CO

LLE

GE

GO

5/7/

138/

1/15

0.34

0.63

315,

000

31

5,00

0

315,

000

31

5,42

8

Sta

te/L

ocal

Age

ncie

s13

063B

HZ

8C

ALI

FO

RN

IA S

T T

AX

AB

LE G

O B

D8/

19/1

411

/1/1

50.

573.

955,

000,

000

5,21

5,30

0

5,

104,

953

5,10

0,30

0

S

tate

/Loc

al A

genc

ies

6496

6GX

S6

NE

W Y

OR

K C

ITY

TA

XA

BLE

GO

4/1/

1312

/1/1

50.

655.

1312

,255

,000

13

,700

,477

12

,617

,111

12

,610

,027

S

tate

/Loc

al A

genc

ies

1306

3BN

73C

ALI

FO

RN

IA S

T T

AX

AB

LE G

O B

D3/

27/1

32/

1/16

0.83

1.05

11,0

00,0

00

11,0

37,1

80

11,0

10,9

29

11,0

46,2

00

Sta

te/L

ocal

Age

ncie

s13

063B

N73

CA

LIF

OR

NIA

ST

GO

BD

12/1

9/14

2/1/

160.

831.

057,

000,

000

7,04

4,31

0

7,

033,

151

7,02

9,40

0

S

tate

/Loc

al A

genc

ies

1306

3BN

73C

ALI

FO

RN

IA S

T G

O B

D3/

31/1

52/

1/16

0.83

1.05

21,0

00,0

00

21,1

50,1

50

21,1

49,7

81

21,0

88,2

00

Sta

te/L

ocal

Age

ncie

s91

412G

UT

0U

NIV

OF

CA

LIF

OR

NIA

RE

VE

NU

E4/

10/1

45/

15/1

61.

120.

632,

500,

000

2,50

0,00

0

2,

500,

000

2,49

9,55

0

S

tate

/Loc

al A

genc

ies

6125

74D

R1

MO

NT

ER

EY

CO

MM

CO

LLE

GE

GO

5/7/

138/

1/16

1.33

0.98

2,67

0,00

0

2,

670,

000

2,67

0,00

0

2,

679,

105

Sta

te/L

ocal

Age

ncie

s13

063C

PM

6C

ALI

FO

RN

IA S

T T

AX

AB

LE G

O B

D12

/9/1

411

/1/1

61.

570.

7544

,000

,000

44

,059

,033

44

,051

,500

43

,946

,760

S

tate

/Loc

al A

genc

ies

9141

2GU

U7

UN

IV O

F C

ALI

FO

RN

IA R

EV

EN

UE

BD

4/10

/14

5/15

/17

2.09

1.22

3,25

0,00

0

3,

250,

000

3,25

0,00

0

3,

262,

968

Sta

te/L

ocal

Age

ncie

s13

063C

FC

9C

ALI

FO

RN

IA S

T G

O B

D11

/5/1

311

/1/1

72.

521.

7516

,500

,000

16

,558

,905

16

,538

,205

16

,688

,595

S

tate

/Loc

al A

genc

ies

1306

3CP

N4

CA

LIF

OR

NIA

ST

GO

BD

11/2

5/14

11/1

/17

2.54

1.25

50,0

00,0

00

50,1

21,5

00

50,1

07,1

06

49,9

42,0

00

Sta

te/L

ocal

Age

ncie

s13

063C

PN

4C

ALI

FO

RN

IA S

T G

O B

D12

/22/

1411

/1/1

72.

551.

255,

000,

000

5,00

9,23

8

5,

008,

802

4,99

4,20

0

S

ub

tota

ls1.

661.

4318

5,49

0,00

0$

18

7,63

1,09

3$

18

6,35

6,53

8$

18

6,20

3,73

3$

Pub

lic T

ime

Dep

osits

BA

NK

OF

SA

N F

RA

NC

ISC

O P

TD

4/9/

144/

9/15

0.03

0.45

240,

000

$

24

0,00

0$

240,

000

$

24

0,00

0$

Pub

lic T

ime

Dep

osits

TR

AN

S P

AC

IFIC

NA

TIO

NA

L B

AN

K P

TD

3/20

/15

3/21

/16

0.97

0.58

240,

000

24

0,00

0

240,

000

24

0,00

0

Su

bto

tals

0.49

0.29

480,

000

$

48

0,00

0$

480,

000

$

48

0,00

0$

Neg

otia

ble

CD

s78

009N

GU

4R

OY

AL

BA

NK

OF

CA

NA

DA

NY

YC

D5/

19/1

46/

25/1

50.

240.

375,

500,

000

$

5,49

7,25

0$

5,

499,

419

$

5,49

8,96

1$

N

egot

iabl

e C

Ds

7800

9NS

A5

RO

YA

L B

AN

K O

F C

AN

AD

A N

Y Y

CD

9/16

/14

3/10

/16

0.03

0.34

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

03,3

00

Neg

otia

ble

CD

s96

121T

WJ3

WE

ST

PA

C F

LT Y

CD

3M

L+15

4/24

/14

4/25

/16

0.07

0.41

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

24,9

94,2

00

Neg

otia

ble

CD

s96

121T

WK

0W

ES

TP

AC

FLT

YC

D 1

ML+

224/

24/1

44/

25/1

60.

070.

3950

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

49

,988

,750

N

egot

iabl

e C

Ds

0641

7HK

T2

BA

NK

OF

NO

VA

SC

OT

IA Y

CD

3M

L+19

5/9/

145/

9/16

0.11

0.45

25,0

00,0

00

24,9

89,5

25

24,9

94,2

11

24,9

93,3

25

Neg

otia

ble

CD

s06

366C

WA

2B

AN

K O

F M

ON

TR

EA

L C

HIC

AG

O Y

CD

2/12

/15

8/12

/16

0.04

0.42

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

24,9

89,8

75

Neg

otia

ble

CD

s06

366C

A32

BA

NK

OF

MO

NT

RE

AL

CH

ICA

GO

YC

D3/

31/1

59/

23/1

60.

060.

4450

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

N

egot

iabl

e C

Ds

0636

6CA

32B

AN

K O

F M

ON

TR

EA

L C

HIC

AG

O Y

CD

3/31

/15

9/23

/16

0.06

0.44

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

Neg

otia

ble

CD

s06

417H

UW

4B

AN

K O

F N

OV

A S

CO

TIA

FLT

3M

L+20

9/25

/14

9/23

/16

0.23

0.46

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

49,9

58,7

50

Neg

otia

ble

CD

s06

417H

VR

4B

AN

K O

F N

OV

A S

CO

TIA

YC

D 3

ML+

2010

/7/1

410

/7/1

60.

020.

4550

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

49

,985

,000

N

egot

iabl

e C

Ds

7800

9NS

X5

RO

YA

L B

AN

K O

F C

AN

AD

A Y

CD

3M

L+181

2/15

/14

12/1

5/16

0.21

0.45

100,

000,

000

100,

000,

000

100,

000,

000

100,

146,

700

Neg

otia

ble

CD

s06

417H

E36

BA

NK

OF

NO

VA

SC

OT

IA Y

CD

3M

L+28

2/23

/15

2/23

/17

0.15

0.54

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

24,9

95,1

50

Neg

otia

ble

CD

s06

417H

E36

BA

NK

OF

NO

VA

SC

OT

IA Y

CD

3M

L+28

2/23

/15

2/23

/17

0.15

0.54

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

25,0

00,0

00

24,9

95,1

50

Neg

otia

ble

CD

s06

417H

UR

5B

AN

K O

F N

OV

A S

CO

TIA

YC

D 3

ML+

279/

25/1

49/

25/1

70.

240.

5450

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

49

,970

,650

S

ub

tota

ls0.

130.

4553

0,50

0,00

0$

53

0,48

6,77

5$

53

0,49

3,62

9$

53

0,51

9,81

1$

Com

mer

cial

Pap

er62

478Y

R18

MU

FG

UN

ION

BA

NK

NA

3/31

/15

4/1/

150.

000.

0010

0,00

0,00

0$

99

,999

,861

$

99

,999

,861

$

10

0,00

0,00

0$

C

omm

erci

al P

aper

0653

8CR

29B

AN

K O

F T

OK

YO

-MIT

SU

BIS

HI U

FJ

CP

3/10

/15

4/2/

150.

000.

0050

,000

,000

49

,994

,569

49

,994

,569

49

,999

,792

S

ub

tota

ls0.

000.

0015

0,00

0,00

0$

14

9,99

4,43

0$

14

9,99

4,43

0$

14

9,99

9,79

2$

Mar

ch 3

1, 2

015

City

and

Cou

nty

of S

an F

ranc

isco

9

38

Inve

stm

ent

Inve

nto

ryP

oo

led

Fu

nd

Typ

e o

f In

vest

men

tC

US

IPIs

sue

Nam

eS

ettl

e D

ate

Mat

uri

ty

Dat

eD

ura

tio

nC

ou

po

nP

ar V

alu

eB

oo

k V

alu

eA

mo

rtiz

edB

oo

k V

alu

eM

arke

t V

alu

e

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

8923

6TA

G0

TO

YO

TA

MO

TO

R C

RE

DIT

CO

RP

3M

L+15

4/12

/13

4/8/

150.

020.

4050

,000

,000

$

50

,000

,000

$

50

,000

,000

$

50

,000

,500

$

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es64

952W

AW

3N

EW

YO

RK

LIF

E M

TN

9/22

/14

5/4/

150.

093.

005,

000,

000

5,08

4,25

0

5,

012,

412

5,01

0,60

0

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es45

9200

HD

6IB

M M

TN

12/1

9/13

5/11

/15

0.11

0.75

5,42

5,00

0

5,

460,

859

5,42

7,82

4

5,

427,

170

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

3696

2G5Z

3G

E C

AP

ITA

L C

OR

P M

TN

8/19

/13

7/2/

150.

261.

635,

000,

000

5,07

5,25

0

5,

010,

151

5,01

5,15

0

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es36

962G

4M3

GE

CA

PIT

AL

CO

RP

FLT

MT

N 3

ML+

7511

/25/

137/

9/15

0.02

1.00

8,56

5,00

0

8,

624,

955

8,57

5,04

3

8,

580,

503

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

8923

3P6J

0T

OY

OT

A M

TN

11/1

5/13

7/17

/15

0.30

0.88

10,0

00,0

00

10,0

72,0

00

10,0

12,6

50

10,0

16,2

00

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

8923

3P6J

0T

OY

OT

A M

TN

3/4/

147/

17/1

50.

300.

886,

100,

000

6,14

7,88

5

6,

110,

247

6,10

9,88

2

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es59

4918

AG

9M

ICR

OS

OF

T M

TN

10/3

0/13

9/25

/15

0.49

1.63

3,18

6,00

0

3,

260,

266

3,20

4,91

4

3,

205,

626

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

9612

14B

W2

WE

ST

PA

C N

T9/

15/1

49/

25/1

50.

491.

1310

,152

,000

10

,232

,201

10

,189

,855

10

,189

,055

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es36

9604

BE

2G

EN

ER

AL

ELE

CT

RIC

MT

N3/

5/14

10/9

/15

0.52

0.85

10,0

00,0

00

10,0

69,0

00

10,0

22,6

05

10,0

31,5

00

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

3696

04B

E2

GE

NE

RA

L E

LEC

TR

IC M

TN

5/7/

1410

/9/1

50.

520.

858,

000,

000

8,04

3,68

0

8,

016,

044

8,02

5,20

0

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es36

9604

BE

2G

EN

ER

AL

ELE

CT

RIC

MT

N5/

19/1

410

/9/1

50.

520.

859,

300,

000

9,35

8,31

1

9,

321,

924

9,32

9,29

5

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es06

366R

JH9

BA

NK

OF

MO

NT

RE

AL

MT

N3/

27/1

411

/6/1

50.

600.

808,

500,

000

8,53

2,47

0

8,

512,

073

8,52

1,76

0

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es36

962G

4T8

GE

CA

PIT

AL

CO

RP

MT

N5/

12/1

411

/9/1

50.

602.

257,

000,

000

7,18

3,89

0

7,

074,

768

7,07

2,73

0

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es74

2718

DS

5P

RO

CT

ER

& G

AM

BLE

MT

N3/

7/14

11/1

5/15

0.62

1.80

23,0

25,0

00

23,5

88,6

52

23,2

32,9

49

23,2

29,6

92

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

7427

18D

S5

PR

OC

TE

R &

GA

MB

LE M

TN

3/12

/14

11/1

5/15

0.62

1.80

10,0

00,0

00

10,2

31,9

00

10,0

86,2

53

10,0

88,9

00

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

4592

00G

U9

IBM

CO

RP

NT

2/11

/14

1/5/

160.

762.

0019

,579

,000

20

,139

,743

19

,804

,754

19

,820

,213

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es46

625H

HW

3JP

MO

RG

AN

CH

AS

E &

CO

2/11

/15

1/15

/16

0.78

2.60

12,8

36,0

00

13,0

79,0

85

13,0

47,3

39

13,0

13,2

65

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

0642

55A

K8

BT

MU

FJ

FLT

MT

N 3

ML+

453/

17/1

42/

26/1

60.

150.

7110

,000

,000

10

,035

,800

10

,016

,666

10

,011

,600

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es36

962G

2V5

GE

FLT

MT

N 3

ML+

205/

19/1

45/

11/1

60.

110.

4617

,689

,000

17

,703

,328

17

,697

,046

17

,708

,635

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es36

962G

7A6

GE

FLT

MT

N 3

ML+

653/

23/1

57/

12/1

60.

040.

9027

,651

,000

27

,902

,111

27

,898

,288

27

,835

,985

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es06

4159

CQ

7B

AN

K O

F N

OV

A S

CO

TIA

2/13

/15

7/15

/16

1.28

1.38

16,4

83,0

00

16,6

39,4

15

16,6

26,8

22

16,6

24,0

94

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

8911

4QA

L2T

OR

ON

TO

-DO

MIN

ION

BA

NK

3M

L+46

12/1

5/14

9/9/

160.

190.

7218

,930

,000

19

,016

,132

19

,001

,595

19

,002

,123

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es89

114Q

AL2

TO

RO

NT

O-D

OM

INIO

N B

AN

K 3

ML+

463/

2/15

9/9/

160.

190.

7224

,000

,000

24

,103

,620

24

,098

,039

24

,091

,440

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es89

236T

BU

8T

OY

OT

A M

OT

OR

CR

ED

IT C

OR

P 3

ML+

109/

23/1

49/

23/1

60.

230.

3650

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

49

,973

,500

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es89

236T

BU

8T

OY

OT

A M

OT

OR

CR

ED

IT C

OR

P 3

ML+

1012

/9/1

49/

23/1

60.

230.

3614

,150

,000

14

,145

,331

14

,146

,137

14

,142

,501

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es89

236T

BU

8T

OY

OT

A M

OT

OR

CR

ED

IT C

OR

P 3

ML+

102/

11/1

59/

23/1

60.

230.

3628

,150

,000

28

,142

,963

28

,143

,547

28

,135

,081

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es89

236T

BV

6T

OY

OT

A M

OT

OR

CR

ED

IT C

OR

P F

F+

259/

25/1

49/

23/1

60.

230.

3747

,500

,000

47

,500

,000

47

,500

,000

47

,486

,225

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es96

12E

0DB

0W

ES

TP

AC

FLT

MT

N 1

ML+

2510

/10/

1410

/7/1

60.

020.

4350

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

50

,000

,000

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es36

967F

AB

7G

EN

ER

AL

ELE

C C

AP

CO

RP

FLT

3M

L+28

1/9/

151/

9/17

0.02

0.53

20,0

00,0

00

20,0

00,0

00

20,0

00,0

00

20,0

24,4

00

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

8923

6TC

C7

TO

YO

TA

MO

TO

R C

RE

DIT

CO

RP

3M

L+19

2/20

/15

2/16

/17

0.13

0.45

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

00,0

00

50,0

08,5

00

Su

bto

tals

0.27

0.79

586,

221,

000

$

589,

373,

095

$

587,

789,

947

$

587,

731,

325

$

Mon

ey M

arke

t Fun

ds09

248U

718

BLA

CK

RO

CK

T-F

UN

D IN

ST

L3/

31/1

54/

1/15

0.00

0.01

5,00

1,49

3$

5,

001,

493

$

5,00

1,49

3$

5,

001,

493

$

Mon

ey M

arke

t Fun

ds31

6175

108

FID

ELI

TY

INS

TL

GO

VT

PO

RT

3/31

/15

4/1/

150.

000.

015,

003,

920

5,00

3,92

0

5,

003,

920

5,00

3,92

0

M

oney

Mar

ket F

unds

6174

7C70

7M

S IN

ST

L G

OV

T F

UN

D3/

31/1

54/

1/15

0.00

0.04

5,09

0,18

6

5,

090,

186

5,09

0,18

6

5,

090,

186

Su

bto

tals

0.00

0.02

15,0

95,5

99$

15,0

95,5

99$

15,0

95,5

99$

15,0

95,5

99$

Gra

nd

To

tals

1.21

0.83

6,71

7,97

4,59

9$

6,72

3,87

4,44

0$

6,71

9,76

5,75

9$

6,73

4,90

9,95

5$

Mar

ch 3

1, 2

015

City

and

Cou

nty

of S

an F

ranc

isco

10

39

Mo

nth

ly In

vest

men

t E

arn

ing

sP

oo

led

Fu

nd

Fo

r m

on

th e

nd

ed M

arch

31,

201

5

Typ

e o

f In

vest

men

tC

US

IPIs

sue

Nam

eP

ar V

alu

eC

ou

po

nY

TM

1S

ettl

e D

ate

Mat

uri

ty

Dat

eE

arn

ed

Inte

rest

Am

ort

. E

xpen

seR

ealiz

ed

Gai

n/(

Lo

ss)

Ear

ned

Inco

me

/Net

Ear

nin

gs

U.S

. Tre

asur

ies

9128

28M

W7

US

TS

Y N

T-

$

2.50

0.48

2/24

/12

3/31

/15

103,

022

$

(82,

373)

$

-

$

20

,649

$

U.S

. Tre

asur

ies

9128

28P

E4

US

TS

Y N

T25

,000

,000

1.25

0.61

12/2

3/11

10/3

1/15

26,7

61

(1

3,41

7)

-

13,3

44

U

.S. T

reas

urie

s91

2828

PJ3

US

TS

Y N

T50

,000

,000

1.38

1.58

12/1

6/10

11/3

0/15

58,5

51

8,

229

-

66,7

80

U

.S. T

reas

urie

s91

2828

PJ3

US

TS

Y N

T50

,000

,000

1.38

1.58

12/1

6/10

11/3

0/15

58,5

51

8,

229

-

66,7

80

U

.S. T

reas

urie

s91

2828

PJ3

US

TS

Y N

T50

,000

,000

1.38

2.00

12/2

3/10

11/3

0/15

58,5

51

25

,119

-

83

,670

U.S

. Tre

asur

ies

9128

28R

J1U

S T

SY

NT

75,0

00,0

00

1.

001.

0510

/11/

119/

30/1

663

,862

2,90

1

-

66

,763

U.S

. Tre

asur

ies

9128

28R

M4

US

TS

Y N

T25

,000

,000

1.00

0.74

12/2

6/13

10/3

1/16

21,4

09

(5

,473

)

-

15

,936

U.S

. Tre

asur

ies

9128

28R

X0

US

TS

Y N

T25

,000

,000

0.88

0.67

2/25

/14

12/3

1/16

18,7

33

(4

,337

)

-

14

,395

U.S

. Tre

asur

ies

9128

28S

J0U

S T

SY

NT

75,0

00,0

00

0.

880.

943/

14/1

22/

28/1

755

,282

3,90

9

-

59

,191

U.S

. Tre

asur

ies

9128

28S

J0U

S T

SY

NT

25,0

00,0

00

0.

881.

213/

21/1

22/

28/1

718

,427

6,87

7

-

25

,304

U.S

. Tre

asur

ies

9128

28S

J0U

S T

SY

NT

25,0

00,0

00

0.

881.

213/

21/1

22/

28/1

718

,427

6,87

7

-

25

,304

U.S

. Tre

asur

ies

9128

28S

M3

US

TS

Y N

T50

,000

,000

1.00

1.07

4/4/

123/

31/1

742

,575

2,79

1

-

45

,366

U.S

. Tre

asur

ies

9128

28T

M2

US

TS

Y N

T60

,000

,000

0.63

0.69

9/17

/12

8/31

/17

31,5

90

3,

293

-

34,8

83

S

ub

tota

ls53

5,00

0,00

0$

575,

741

$

(37,

375)

$

-

$

53

8,36

6$

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

35G

0HG

1F

NM

A G

LOB

AL

-$

0.

380.

201/

13/1

43/

16/1

51,

469

$

(6

71)

$

-

$

79

8$

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

WJ4

FA

RM

ER

MA

C F

LT N

T F

F+

26-

0.37

0.37

5/3/

125/

1/15

4,59

7

-

12,5

00

17,0

97

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EA

QC

5F

FC

B F

LT N

T 1

ML+

150

,000

,000

0.18

0.36

6/8/

125/

14/1

57,

899

42

0

-

8,31

9

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EA

VE

5F

FC

B F

LT N

T 1

ML+

250

,000

,000

0.19

0.29

12/5

/12

6/22

/15

8,32

8

424

-

8,

752

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

DZ

9F

AM

CA

15,0

00,0

00

2.

380.

3211

/22/

137/

22/1

529

,688

(26,

115)

-

3,

572

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

CV

W1

FF

CB

FLT

NT

T-B

ILL+

1462

,500

,000

0.16

0.21

8/5/

138/

5/15

8,65

2

531

-

9,

183

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

3383

V81

FH

LB9,

000,

000

0.

380.

2812

/12/

138/

28/1

52,

813

(7

02)

-

2,

111

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

37E

AC

M9

FH

LMC

BO

ND

S50

,000

,000

1.75

2.17

12/1

5/10

9/10

/15

72,9

17

17

,023

-

89

,940

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

3370

JB5

FH

LB75

,000

,000

1.75

2.31

12/1

5/10

9/11

/15

109,

375

25,3

05

-

134,

680

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3131

5PG

T0

FA

RM

ER

MA

C45

,000

,000

2.13

2.17

9/15

/10

9/15

/15

79,6

88

1,

444

-

81,1

31

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EC

JB1

FF

CB

FLT

NT

QT

R T

-BIL

L+16

16,2

00,0

00

0.

180.

204/

24/1

39/

18/1

52,

456

68

-

2,52

4

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3139

8A3T

7F

NM

A E

X-C

ALL

NT

25,0

00,0

00

2.

001.

0810

/14/

119/

21/1

541

,667

(18,

992)

-

22

,674

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

AJF

6F

FC

B F

LT N

T 1

ML+

2.5

27,9

53,0

00

0.

200.

2811

/30/

129/

22/1

54,

776

35

9

-

5,13

5

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3139

8A4M

1F

NM

A25

,000

,000

1.63

2.22

12/1

5/10

10/2

6/15

33,8

54

11

,913

-

45

,767

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

398A

4M1

FN

MA

42,0

00,0

00

1.

632.

1912

/23/

1010

/26/

1556

,875

18,8

60

-

75,7

35

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

1J2S

1F

FC

B25

,000

,000

1.50

2.20

12/1

5/10

11/1

6/15

31,2

50

14

,025

-

45

,275

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

CLZ

5F

FC

B F

LT N

T M

ON

TH

LY 1

ML+

025

,000

,000

0.18

0.20

5/8/

1311

/19/

153,

771

10

1

-

3,87

2

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

71Z

Y5

FH

LB25

,000

,000

1.88

1.89

12/3

/10

12/1

1/15

39,0

63

30

4

-

39,3

67

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

71Z

Y5

FH

LB50

,000

,000

1.88

1.93

12/1

4/10

12/1

1/15

78,1

25

2,

185

-

80,3

10

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

ED

5A6

FF

CB

FLT

50,0

00,0

00

0.

180.

1812

/12/

131/

20/1

67,

512

-

-

7,

512

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

30A

3P81

FH

LB25

,000

,000

0.25

0.25

12/2

9/14

1/29

/16

5,20

8

-

-

5,20

8

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

75R

N9

FH

LB N

T22

,200

,000

1.00

0.82

4/13

/12

3/11

/16

18,5

00

(3

,422

)

-

15

,078

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33X

XP

43F

HLB

14,0

00,0

00

3.

130.

4112

/12/

133/

11/1

636

,458

(32,

074)

-

4,

385

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

AJU

3F

FC

B N

T25

,000

,000

1.05

0.82

4/12

/12

3/28

/16

21,8

75

(4

,733

)

-

17

,142

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

35G

0VA

8F

NM

A G

LOB

AL

NT

25,0

00,0

00

0.

500.

4612

/13/

133/

30/1

610

,417

(823

)

-

9,59

4

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3131

5PT

F6

FA

MC

A F

LT M

TN

1M

L+0

50,0

00,0

00

0.

170.

174/

1/13

4/1/

167,

401

-

-

7,

401

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

3379

2Z1

FH

LB N

T20

,000

,000

0.81

0.82

4/18

/12

4/18

/16

13,5

00

16

6

-

13,6

66

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EC

WT

7F

FC

B N

T22

,650

,000

0.65

0.48

11/2

0/13

5/9/

1612

,269

(3,3

20)

-

8,94

9

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

ED

B35

FF

CB

FLT

NT

1M

L+3

50,0

00,0

00

0.

200.

221/

15/1

46/

2/16

8,69

2

297

-

8,

988

Mar

ch 3

1, 2

015

City

and

Cou

nty

of S

an F

ranc

isco

11

40

Mo

nth

ly In

vest

men

t E

arn

ing

sP

oo

led

Fu

nd

Typ

e o

f In

vest

men

tC

US

IPIs

sue

Nam

eP

ar V

alu

eC

ou

po

nY

TM

1S

ettl

e D

ate

Mat

uri

ty

Dat

eE

arn

ed

Inte

rest

Am

ort

. E

xpen

seR

ealiz

ed

Gai

n/(

Lo

ss)

Ear

ned

Inco

me

/Net

Ear

nin

gs

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

B73

FA

MC

A N

T10

,000

,000

0.90

0.90

2/9/

126/

9/16

7,50

0

-

-

7,50

0

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

73S

Z6

FH

LB28

,000

,000

2.13

0.39

10/2

3/14

6/10

/16

49,5

83

(4

1,11

5)

-

8,46

8

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3137

71A

A5

FH

LB S

UB

NT

16,9

25,0

00

5.

630.

655/

20/1

36/

13/1

679

,336

(70,

522)

-

8,

814

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

3771

AA

5F

HLB

SU

B N

T14

,195

,000

5.63

0.77

5/30

/13

6/13

/16

66,5

39

(5

7,64

6)

-

8,89

3

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3137

71A

A5

FH

LB S

UB

NT

8,62

0,00

0

5.63

0.62

9/4/

146/

13/1

640

,406

(36,

392)

-

4,

014

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

DD

P4

FF

CB

NT

50,0

00,0

00

0.

520.

442/

11/1

46/

17/1

621

,667

(2,2

43)

-

19,4

24

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3130

A1B

K3

FH

LB E

X-C

ALL

NT

25,0

00,0

00

0.

500.

503/

24/1

46/

24/1

610

,417

-

-

10,4

17

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3135

G0X

P3

FN

MA

GLO

BA

L N

T50

,000

,000

0.38

0.59

3/25

/14

7/5/

1615

,625

9,18

8

-

24

,813

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

A25

FA

MC

A M

TN

15,0

00,0

00

2.

002.

097/

27/1

17/

27/1

625

,000

1,10

7

-

26

,107

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

A25

FA

MC

A M

TN

14,1

00,0

00

2.

000.

633/

26/1

37/

27/1

623

,500

(16,

154)

-

7,

346

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

A25

FA

MC

A M

TN

11,9

00,0

00

2.

000.

623/

26/1

37/

27/1

619

,833

(13,

745)

-

6,

088

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

A25

FA

MC

A M

TN

20,0

00,0

00

2.

000.

613/

26/1

47/

27/1

633

,333

(23,

353)

-

9,

980

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

4UC

0F

HLM

C C

ALL

NT

15,0

00,0

00

0.

650.

5611

/20/

147/

29/1

68,

125

(1

,130

)

-

6,

995

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

35G

0YE

7F

NM

A G

LOB

AL

NT

50,0

00,0

00

0.

630.

523/

17/1

48/

26/1

626

,042

(4,3

31)

-

21,7

11

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3131

5PQ

B8

FA

MC

A N

T7,

000,

000

1.

500.

7010

/29/

139/

1/16

8,75

0

(4,6

66)

-

4,08

4

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

70T

W8

FH

LB B

D25

,000

,000

2.00

1.39

10/1

1/11

9/9/

1641

,667

(12,

562)

-

29

,104

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

3370

TW

8F

HLB

25,0

00,0

00

2.

000.

5511

/5/1

49/

9/16

41,6

67

(3

0,45

4)

-

11,2

13

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

ED

H21

FF

CB

FLT

NT

1M

L+2

50,0

00,0

00

0.

190.

203/

14/1

49/

14/1

68,

329

21

6

-

8,54

6

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G4X

W3

FH

LMC

EX

-CA

LL M

TN

25,0

00,0

00

0.

600.

603/

26/1

49/

26/1

612

,500

-

-

12,5

00

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3130

A1C

D8

FH

LB N

T C

ALL

25,0

00,0

00

1.

130.

801/

9/15

9/28

/16

23,4

38

(1

6,26

9)

-

7,16

8

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G3P

38F

HLM

C N

T C

ALL

75,0

00,0

00

0.

750.

7212

/14/

1210

/5/1

646

,875

(2,6

23)

-

44,2

52

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

78U

B5

FH

LB5,

000,

000

1.

130.

5110

/23/

1410

/11/

164,

708

(2

,596

)

-

2,

113

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

DJA

1F

FC

B F

LT N

T 1

ML+

225

,000

,000

0.20

0.21

4/11

/14

10/1

1/16

4,20

0

212

-

4,

412

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

30A

3CE

2F

HLB

40,0

00,0

00

0.

630.

5811

/3/1

410

/14/

1620

,833

(1,3

95)

-

19,4

38

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3137

EA

DS

5F

HLM

C G

LOB

AL

NT

25,0

00,0

00

0.

880.

573/

3/14

10/1

4/16

18,2

29

(6

,493

)

-

11

,736

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

36G

1WP

0F

NM

A C

ALL

NT

18,0

00,0

00

1.

500.

8411

/4/1

311

/4/1

622

,500

(14,

883)

-

7,

617

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

5LS

2F

HLM

C C

ALL

MT

N25

,000

,000

0.60

0.60

11/1

7/14

11/1

7/16

12,5

00

-

-

12

,500

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

30A

3J70

FH

LB25

,000

,000

0.63

0.64

11/1

7/14

11/2

3/16

13,0

21

42

1

-

13,4

41

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

81G

A7

FH

LB N

T23

,100

,000

0.57

0.57

11/3

0/12

11/3

0/16

10,9

73

(9

3)

-

10,8

79

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

71P

V2

FH

LB25

,000

,000

1.63

0.64

11/6

/14

12/9

/16

33,8

54

(2

0,81

5)

-

13,0

39

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

71P

V2

FH

LB25

,000

,000

1.63

0.64

11/6

/14

12/9

/16

33,8

54

(2

0,81

5)

-

13,0

39

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

71P

V2

FH

LB25

,000

,000

1.63

0.65

12/4

/14

12/9

/16

33,8

54

(2

0,50

2)

-

13,3

52

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

71P

V2

FH

LB25

,000

,000

1.63

0.72

12/1

2/14

12/9

/16

33,8

54

(1

9,05

6)

-

14,7

99

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3130

A12

F4

FH

LB C

ALL

NT

20,5

00,0

00

0.

700.

703/

19/1

412

/19/

1611

,958

63

-

12

,022

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

3381

KR

5F

HLB

NT

CA

LL13

,500

,000

0.63

0.63

12/2

8/12

12/2

8/16

7,03

1

-

-

7,03

1

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

81K

R5

FH

LB N

T C

ALL

9,00

0,00

0

0.63

0.63

12/2

8/12

12/2

8/16

4,68

8

-

-

4,68

8

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G5V

G7

FH

LMC

CA

LL M

TN

50,0

00,0

00

0.

780.

7812

/29/

1412

/29/

1632

,500

-

-

32,5

00

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3130

A3Q

U1

FH

LB N

T C

ALL

8,00

0,00

0

0.75

0.75

12/3

0/14

12/3

0/16

5,00

0

-

-

5,00

0

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3130

A3Q

U1

FH

LB N

T C

ALL

50,0

00,0

00

0.

750.

7512

/30/

1412

/30/

1631

,250

-

-

31,2

50

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G33

C2

FH

LMC

NT

50,0

00,0

00

0.

600.

601/

3/13

1/3/

1725

,000

-

-

25,0

00

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EC

B37

FF

CB

NT

14,0

00,0

00

0.

580.

5812

/20/

121/

12/1

76,

767

-

-

6,

767

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

WW

5F

AR

ME

R M

AC

MT

N49

,500

,000

1.01

1.02

5/4/

121/

17/1

741

,663

446

-

42

,109

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

DR

D6

FF

CB

FLT

QT

R T

-BIL

L+14

50,0

00,0

00

0.

160.

1812

/12/

141/

30/1

76,

922

73

9

-

7,66

1

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G5X

91F

HLM

C C

ALL

MT

N25

,000

,000

0.90

0.90

1/30

/15

1/30

/17

18,7

50

-

-

18

,750

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

3378

6Q9

FH

LB N

T67

,780

,000

1.00

0.72

1/10

/13

2/13

/17

56,4

83

(1

5,89

3)

-

40,5

90

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3130

A45

K4

FH

LB C

ALL

NT

30,0

00,0

00

0.

800.

872/

27/1

52/

27/1

720

,000

1,73

0

-

21

,730

Mar

ch 3

1, 2

015

City

and

Cou

nty

of S

an F

ranc

isco

12

41

Mo

nth

ly In

vest

men

t E

arn

ing

sP

oo

led

Fu

nd

Typ

e o

f In

vest

men

tC

US

IPIs

sue

Nam

eP

ar V

alu

eC

ou

po

nY

TM

1S

ettl

e D

ate

Mat

uri

ty

Dat

eE

arn

ed

Inte

rest

Am

ort

. E

xpen

seR

ealiz

ed

Gai

n/(

Lo

ss)

Ear

ned

Inco

me

/Net

Ear

nin

gs

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

30A

45K

4F

HLB

CA

LL N

T19

,500

,000

0.80

0.87

2/27

/15

2/27

/17

13,0

00

1,

125

-

14,1

25

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

ED

FW

7F

FC

B F

LT N

T 1

ML+

5.5

50,0

00,0

00

0.

230.

232/

27/1

42/

27/1

79,

799

-

-

9,

799

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

3378

2N0

FH

LB50

,000

,000

0.88

0.82

12/1

5/14

3/10

/17

36,4

58

(2

,222

)

-

34

,236

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

DP

30F

AR

ME

R M

AC

FLT

NT

1M

L+4

26,0

00,0

00

0.

210.

2010

/3/1

43/

24/1

74,

750

(3

21)

-

4,

429

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

4XM

5F

HLM

C C

ALL

MT

N25

,000

,000

0.78

0.78

3/28

/14

3/28

/17

16,2

50

-

-

16

,250

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

36G

1ZB

8F

NM

A C

ALL

NT

25,0

00,0

00

0.

880.

883/

28/1

43/

28/1

718

,229

-

-

18,2

29

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

ED

ZW

5F

FC

B F

LT N

T 1

ML+

225

,000

,000

0.20

0.20

10/2

9/14

3/29

/17

4,14

3

9

-

4,

152

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

TQ

2F

AR

ME

R M

AC

MT

N12

,500

,000

1.26

1.36

4/10

/12

4/10

/17

13,1

25

1,

031

-

14,1

56

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EC

LL6

FF

CB

NT

10,0

00,0

00

0.

600.

604/

17/1

34/

17/1

75,

000

-

-

5,

000

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

UQ

0F

AR

ME

R M

AC

MT

N10

,500

,000

1.13

1.13

4/26

/12

4/26

/17

9,84

4

-

-

9,84

4

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3137

EA

DF

3F

HLM

C N

T25

,000

,000

1.25

1.14

5/14

/12

5/12

/17

26,0

42

(2

,260

)

-

23

,781

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

ZQ

5F

AR

ME

R M

AC

MT

N9,

000,

000

1.

110.

8012

/28/

126/

5/17

8,32

5

(2,3

37)

-

5,98

8

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

79F

W4

FH

LB12

,000

,000

1.00

0.93

12/1

9/14

6/9/

1710

,000

(713

)

-

9,28

7

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3130

A3S

L9F

HLB

25,0

00,0

00

0.

951.

0212

/30/

146/

15/1

719

,792

1,38

9

-

21

,181

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

AU

W6

FF

CB

FLT

NT

FF

+22

50,0

00,0

00

0.

340.

346/

19/1

26/

19/1

713

,964

-

-

13,9

64

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EE

GH

7F

FC

B8,

400,

000

0.

930.

9412

/26/

146/

26/1

76,

510

91

-

6,60

1

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3137

EA

DH

9F

HLM

C G

LOB

AL

NT

25,0

00,0

00

1.

001.

103/

25/1

46/

29/1

720

,833

2,06

4

-

22

,898

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

5VV

4F

HLM

C C

ALL

MT

N25

,000

,000

1.05

1.05

12/3

0/14

6/30

/17

21,8

75

-

-

21

,875

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

5VV

4F

HLM

C C

ALL

MT

N25

,000

,000

1.05

1.05

12/3

0/14

6/30

/17

21,8

75

-

-

21

,875

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

5W50

FH

LMC

50,0

00,0

00

1.

001.

0012

/30/

146/

30/1

741

,667

-

-

41,6

67

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EC

V92

FF

CB

FLT

NT

1M

L+4

50,0

00,0

00

0.

210.

217/

24/1

37/

24/1

79,

134

-

-

9,

134

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

3ZH

6F

HLM

C E

X-C

ALL

MT

N19

,000

,000

1.00

1.01

4/15

/14

7/25

/17

15,8

33

12

3

-

15,9

56

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EC

VG

6F

FC

B F

LT N

T 3

ML+

023

,520

,000

0.26

0.26

8/5/

137/

26/1

75,

020

-

-

5,

020

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

EF

X3

FF

CB

FLT

1M

L+5

50,0

00,0

00

0.

220.

2212

/23/

148/

23/1

79,

620

-

-

9,

620

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

6ER

0F

HLM

C C

ALL

MT

N18

,300

,000

1.00

1.00

2/25

/15

8/25

/17

15,2

50

-

-

15

,250

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

5HS

7F

HLM

C C

ALL

MT

N20

,100

,000

1.13

1.16

9/25

/14

9/25

/17

18,8

44

56

9

-

19,4

12

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3136

G0D

81F

NM

A S

TE

P N

T-

0.72

0.72

9/27

/12

9/27

/17

52,0

00

-

-

52

,000

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

37E

AD

L0F

HLM

C G

LOB

AL

NT

25,0

00,0

00

1.

001.

223/

25/1

49/

29/1

720

,833

4,63

1

-

25

,465

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

36G

0Y39

FN

MA

ST

EP

NT

50,0

00,0

00

0.

800.

8011

/8/1

211

/8/1

733

,333

-

-

33,3

33

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EE

BR

0F

FC

B F

LT N

T 1

ML+

325

,000

,000

0.21

0.22

11/1

8/14

11/1

3/17

4,39

9

318

-

4,

717

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

EB

R0

FF

CB

FLT

NT

1M

L+3

25,0

00,0

00

0.

210.

2211

/18/

1411

/13/

174,

399

31

8

-

4,71

7

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G44

F2

FH

LMC

CA

LL M

TN

50,0

00,0

00

0.

800.

805/

21/1

311

/21/

1733

,333

-

-

33,3

33

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G5N

E1

FH

LMC

CA

LL S

TE

P25

,000

,000

0.63

0.63

11/2

4/14

11/2

4/17

13,0

21

-

-

13

,021

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

5NE

1F

HLM

C C

ALL

ST

EP

11,2

00,0

00

0.

630.

6511

/24/

1411

/24/

175,

833

23

8

-

6,07

1

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3131

5PJ8

3F

AR

ME

R M

AC

FLT

CA

LL 1

ML+

1725

,000

,000

0.34

0.34

12/1

/14

12/1

/17

7,12

3

-

-

7,12

3

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3130

A3H

F4

FH

LB25

,000

,000

1.13

1.19

12/2

2/14

12/8

/17

23,4

38

1,

275

-

24,7

12

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EE

FE

5F

FC

B50

,000

,000

1.13

1.12

12/1

8/14

12/1

8/17

46,8

75

(3

54)

-

46

,521

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

EF

E5

FF

CB

50,0

00,0

00

1.

131.

1812

/19/

1412

/18/

1746

,875

2,42

1

-

49

,296

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

Z28

FA

MC

A M

TN

46,0

00,0

00

1.

201.

2012

/22/

1412

/22/

1746

,000

-

-

46,0

00

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3136

G13

Q0

FN

MA

ST

EP

NT

29,0

00,0

00

0.

750.

7512

/26/

1212

/26/

1718

,125

-

-

18,1

25

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3136

G13

T4

FN

MA

ST

EP

NT

39,0

00,0

00

0.

800.

8012

/26/

1212

/26/

1726

,000

-

-

26,0

00

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G32

M1

FH

LMC

CA

LL N

T50

,000

,000

1.00

1.00

12/2

8/12

12/2

8/17

41,6

67

-

-

41

,667

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

5VA

0F

HLM

C C

ALL

MT

N25

,000

,000

1.25

1.25

12/2

9/14

12/2

9/17

26,0

42

-

-

26

,042

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

4S5

FA

RM

ER

MA

C F

LT C

ALL

1M

L+16

50,0

00,0

00

0.

330.

331/

5/15

1/5/

1813

,864

-

-

13,8

64

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G5X

M2

FH

LMC

CA

LL S

TE

P N

T25

,000

,000

0.50

0.50

1/30

/15

1/30

/18

10,4

17

-

-

10

,417

Mar

ch 3

1, 2

015

City

and

Cou

nty

of S

an F

ranc

isco

13

42

Mo

nth

ly In

vest

men

t E

arn

ing

sP

oo

led

Fu

nd

Typ

e o

f In

vest

men

tC

US

IPIs

sue

Nam

eP

ar V

alu

eC

ou

po

nY

TM

1S

ettl

e D

ate

Mat

uri

ty

Dat

eE

arn

ed

Inte

rest

Am

ort

. E

xpen

seR

ealiz

ed

Gai

n/(

Lo

ss)

Ear

ned

Inco

me

/Net

Ear

nin

gs

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

EM

H0

FF

CB

FLT

NT

1M

L+5

35,0

00,0

00

0.

220.

242/

2/15

2/2/

186,

687

59

7

-

7,28

4

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EE

AN

0F

FC

B F

LT N

T 1

ML+

425

,000

,000

0.21

0.21

11/5

/14

2/5/

184,

580

-

-

4,

580

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

EA

N0

FF

CB

FLT

NT

1M

L+4

25,0

00,0

00

0.

210.

2211

/5/1

42/

5/18

4,58

0

215

-

4,

795

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

33E

EA

N0

FF

CB

FLT

NT

1M

L+4

50,0

00,0

00

0.

210.

2211

/5/1

42/

5/18

9,16

0

429

-

9,

589

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

5ZK

4F

HLM

C S

TE

P C

ALL

MT

N24

,900

,000

0.75

0.75

2/6/

152/

6/18

15,5

63

-

-

15

,563

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

6AX

1F

HLM

C C

ALL

MT

N22

,000

,000

0.75

0.75

2/20

/15

2/20

/18

13,7

50

-

-

13

,750

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

30A

4AT

9F

HLB

25,0

00,0

00

0.

850.

852/

27/1

52/

27/1

817

,708

-

-

17,7

08

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G6E

D1

FH

LMC

CA

LL S

TE

P25

,000

,000

0.50

0.50

2/27

/15

2/27

/18

10,4

17

-

-

10

,417

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

6ED

1F

HLM

C C

ALL

ST

EP

25,0

00,0

00

0.

500.

502/

27/1

52/

27/1

810

,417

-

-

10,4

17

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3135

G0U

N1

FN

MA

GLO

BA

L N

T C

ALL

19,0

00,0

00

1.

151.

322/

26/1

42/

28/1

818

,208

2,59

7

-

20

,805

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

35G

0UN

1F

NM

A G

LOB

AL

NT

CA

LL8,

770,

000

1.

151.

322/

26/1

42/

28/1

88,

405

1,

199

-

9,60

3

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G6F

R9

FH

LMC

ST

EP

CA

LL M

TN

25,0

00,0

00

0.

750.

753/

5/15

3/5/

1813

,542

-

-

13,5

42

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G6J

N4

FH

LMC

ST

EP

CA

LL M

TN

50,0

00,0

00

1.

001.

003/

16/1

53/

16/1

820

,833

-

-

20,8

33

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G6L

N1

FH

LMC

ST

EP

CA

LL M

TN

25,0

00,0

00

1.

001.

003/

26/1

53/

26/1

83,

472

-

-

3,

472

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

30A

35B

6F

HLB

FLT

CA

LL N

T 1

ML+

2350

,000

,000

0.40

0.40

10/2

/14

4/2/

1816

,749

-

-

16,7

49

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3136

G1K

N8

FN

MA

NT

CA

LL50

,000

,000

1.50

1.13

4/24

/13

4/24

/18

62,5

00

(3

8,34

7)

-

24,1

53

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3136

G1K

81F

NM

A N

T S

TE

P12

,600

,000

0.75

0.75

4/30

/13

4/30

/18

7,87

5

-

-

7,87

5

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3131

5PZ

M4

FA

RM

ER

MA

C S

TE

P N

T24

,600

,000

0.70

0.70

5/3/

135/

3/18

14,3

50

-

-

14

,350

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

3382

XK

4F

HLB

ST

EP

NT

25,0

00,0

00

0.

750.

755/

7/13

5/7/

1815

,625

-

-

15,6

25

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3133

EC

PB

4F

FC

B N

T10

,000

,000

0.88

1.01

5/23

/13

5/14

/18

7,29

2

1,11

6

-

8,

407

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

35G

0WJ8

FN

MA

NT

25,0

00,0

00

0.

881.

055/

23/1

35/

21/1

818

,229

3,62

9

-

21

,858

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

3383

4P3

FH

LB S

TE

P N

T50

,000

,000

0.50

0.50

5/22

/13

5/22

/18

20,8

33

-

-

20

,833

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

4W6

FA

RM

ER

MA

C F

LT C

ALL

-

0.

370.

376/

6/14

6/6/

181,

269

-

-

1,

269

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

30A

4MX

7F

HLB

CA

LL S

TE

P4,

000,

000

0.

500.

503/

27/1

56/

25/1

822

2

-

-

22

2

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

52D

6F

HLM

C C

ALL

MT

N25

,000

,000

1.64

1.64

4/17

/14

7/17

/18

34,1

67

-

-

34

,167

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

5ZP

3F

HLM

C C

ALL

ST

EP

NT

25,0

00,0

00

0.

750.

751/

27/1

57/

27/1

815

,625

-

-

15,6

25

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G5Z

Z1

FH

LMC

ST

EP

CA

LL M

TN

25,0

00,0

00

1.

001.

001/

30/1

57/

30/1

820

,833

-

-

20,8

33

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3130

A4G

L0F

HLB

NT

CA

LL15

,000

,000

1.33

1.33

3/18

/15

9/18

/18

7,20

4

-

-

7,20

4

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3131

5PS

59F

AR

ME

R M

AC

CA

LL F

LT 3

ML+

1450

,000

,000

0.40

0.40

3/3/

1512

/3/1

816

,186

-

-

16,1

86

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3131

5PW

96F

AR

ME

R M

AC

FLT

CA

LL 3

ML+

1250

,000

,000

0.38

0.38

3/3/

1512

/3/1

814

,850

-

-

14,8

50

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3131

5PW

96F

AR

ME

R M

AC

FLT

CA

LL 3

ML+

1250

,000

,000

0.38

0.38

3/3/

1512

/3/1

814

,850

-

-

14,8

50

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3134

G4L

Z9

FH

LMC

CA

LL S

TE

P50

,000

,000

0.88

0.88

12/1

0/13

12/1

0/18

36,4

58

-

-

36

,458

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

4MB

1F

HLM

C C

ALL

MU

LTI-

ST

EP

25,0

00,0

00

1.

501.

5012

/18/

1312

/18/

1831

,250

-

-

31,2

50

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3136

G2C

39F

NM

A C

ALL

NT

15,0

00,0

00

1.

631.

6312

/30/

1412

/28/

1820

,313

-

-

20,3

13

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3131

5PQ

69F

AR

ME

R M

AC

FLT

CA

LL N

T 3

ML+

1550

,000

,000

0.41

0.41

4/3/

144/

3/19

16,9

00

-

-

16

,900

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

E47

FA

RM

ER

MA

C F

LT C

ALL

NT

1M

L+31

25,0

00,0

00

0.

480.

4811

/3/1

45/

3/19

10,0

60

-

-

10

,060

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

3W7

FA

RM

ER

MA

C F

LT C

ALL

-

0.

380.

386/

3/14

6/3/

191,

068

-

-

1,

068

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

315P

S91

FA

RM

ER

MA

C F

LT C

ALL

NT

3M

L+12

50,0

00,0

00

0.

380.

388/

12/1

48/

12/1

915

,754

-

-

15,7

54

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3130

A35

A8

FH

LB F

LT C

ALL

NT

1M

L+40

50,0

00,0

00

0.

570.

5710

/2/1

410

/2/1

923

,832

-

-

23,8

32

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3135

86R

C5

FN

MA

0 C

PN

29,6

75,0

00

0.

002.

1811

/21/

1410

/9/1

9-

51,7

23

-

51,7

23

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3135

86R

C5

FN

MA

0 C

PN

25,0

00,0

00

0.

002.

1711

/24/

1410

/9/1

9-

43,5

61

-

43,5

61

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3135

86R

C5

FN

MA

0 C

PN

10,0

00,0

00

0.

002.

1611

/24/

1410

/9/1

9-

17,3

25

-

17,3

25

F

eder

al A

genc

ies

3131

5PJ2

6F

AR

ME

R M

AC

FLT

CA

LL 3

ML+

1250

,000

,000

0.38

0.38

12/2

/14

12/2

/19

15,8

61

-

-

15

,861

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

30A

4HA

3F

HLB

ST

EP

CA

LL N

T25

,000

,000

1.25

1.25

3/18

/15

3/18

/20

11,2

85

-

-

11

,285

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

s31

34G

6KV

4F

HLM

C S

TE

P C

ALL

MT

N15

,000

,000

1.63

1.63

3/25

/15

3/25

/20

4,06

3

-

-

4,06

3

S

ub

tota

ls4,

715,

188,

000

$

3,32

8,09

2$

(327

,114

)$

12

,500

$

3,

013,

478

$

Mar

ch 3

1, 2

015

City

and

Cou

nty

of S

an F

ranc

isco

14

43

Mo

nth

ly In

vest

men

t E

arn

ing

sP

oo

led

Fu

nd

Typ

e o

f In

vest

men

tC

US

IPIs

sue

Nam

eP

ar V

alu

eC

ou

po

nY

TM

1S

ettl

e D

ate

Mat

uri

ty

Dat

eE

arn

ed

Inte

rest

Am

ort

. E

xpen

seR

ealiz

ed

Gai

n/(

Lo

ss)

Ear

ned

Inco

me

/Net

Ear

nin

gs

Sta

te/L

ocal

Age

ncie

s64

9791

JS0

NE

W Y

OR

K S

T T

AX

AB

LE G

O-

$

0.39

0.40

3/21

/13

3/1/

15-

$

-$

-$

-$

Sta

te/L

ocal

Age

ncie

s91

412G

PW

9U

NIV

OF

CA

LIF

OR

NIA

RE

VE

NU

E B

ON

D5,

000,

000

0.

390.

393/

14/1

35/

15/1

51,

633

-

-

1,

633

Sta

te/L

ocal

Age

ncie

s61

2574

DQ

3M

ON

TE

RE

Y C

OM

M C

OLL

EG

E G

O31

5,00

0

0.

630.

635/

7/13

8/1/

1516

5

-

-

16

5

Sta

te/L

ocal

Age

ncie

s13

063B

HZ

8C

ALI

FO

RN

IA S

T T

AX

AB

LE G

O B

D5,

000,

000

3.

950.

358/

19/1

411

/1/1

516

,458

(15,

203)

-

1,

255

Sta

te/L

ocal

Age

ncie

s64

966G

XS

6N

EW

YO

RK

CIT

Y T

AX

AB

LE G

O12

,255

,000

5.13

0.66

4/1/

1312

/1/1

552

,390

(46,

006)

-

6,

384

Sta

te/L

ocal

Age

ncie

s13

063B

N73

CA

LIF

OR

NIA

ST

TA

XA

BLE

GO

BD

11,0

00,0

00

1.

050.

913/

27/1

32/

1/16

9,62

5

(1,1

07)

-

8,51

8

S

tate

/Loc

al A

genc

ies

1306

3BN

73C

ALI

FO

RN

IA S

T G

O B

D7,

000,

000

1.

050.

4812

/19/

142/

1/16

6,12

5

(3,3

58)

-

2,76

7

S

tate

/Loc

al A

genc

ies

1306

3BN

73C

ALI

FO

RN

IA S

T G

O B

D21

,000

,000

1.05

0.40

3/31

/15

2/1/

16-

(369

)

-

(369

)

Sta

te/L

ocal

Age

ncie

s91

412G

UT

0U

NIV

OF

CA

LIF

OR

NIA

RE

VE

NU

E2,

500,

000

0.

630.

634/

10/1

45/

15/1

61,

321

-

-

1,

321

Sta

te/L

ocal

Age

ncie

s61

2574

DR

1M

ON

TE

RE

Y C

OM

M C

OLL

EG

E G

O2,

670,

000

0.

980.

985/

7/13

8/1/

162,

185

-

-

2,

185

Sta

te/L

ocal

Age

ncie

s13

063C

PM

6C

ALI

FO

RN

IA S

T T

AX

AB

LE G

O B

D44

,000

,000

0.75

0.69

12/9

/14

11/1

/16

27,5

00

(2

,067

)

-

25

,433

Sta

te/L

ocal

Age

ncie

s91

412G

UU

7U

NIV

OF

CA

LIF

OR

NIA

RE

VE

NU

E B

D3,

250,

000

1.

221.

224/

10/1

45/

15/1

73,

310

-

-

3,

310

Sta

te/L

ocal

Age

ncie

s13

063C

FC

9C

ALI

FO

RN

IA S

T G

O B

D16

,500

,000

1.75

1.66

11/5

/13

11/1

/17

24,0

63

(1

,253

)

-

22

,809

Sta

te/L

ocal

Age

ncie

s13

063C

PN

4C

ALI

FO

RN

IA S

T G

O B

D50

,000

,000

1.25

1.17

11/2

5/14

11/1

/17

52,0

83

(3

,514

)

-

48

,570

Sta

te/L

ocal

Age

ncie

s13

063C

PN

4C

ALI

FO

RN

IA S

T G

O B

D5,

000,

000

1.

251.

2212

/22/

1411

/1/1

75,

208

(1

35)

-

5,

073

Su

bto

tals

185,

490,

000

$

20

2,06

7$

(7

3,01

3)$

-$

129,

054

$

Pub

lic T

ime

Dep

osits

BA

NK

OF

SA

N F

RA

NC

ISC

O P

TD

240,

000

$

0.45

0.45

4/9/

144/

9/15

93$

-$

-$

93$

P

ublic

Tim

e D

epos

itsT

RA

NS

PA

CIF

IC N

AT

ION

AL

BA

NK

PT

D24

0,00

0

0.

580.

583/

20/1

53/

21/1

646

-

-

46

Su

bto

tals

480,

000

$

139

$

-$

-$

139

$

Neg

otia

ble

CD

s78

009N

GU

4R

OY

AL

BA

NK

OF

CA

NA

DA

NY

YC

D5,

500,

000

$

0.

370.

575/

19/1

46/

25/1

51,

636

$

21

2$

-$

1,84

8$

N

egot

iabl

e C

Ds

7800

9NS

A5

RO

YA

L B

AN

K O

F C

AN

AD

A N

Y Y

CD

25,0

00,0

00

0.

340.

349/

16/1

43/

10/1

67,

298

-

-

7,

298

Neg

otia

ble

CD

s96

121T

WJ3

WE

ST

PA

C F

LT Y

CD

3M

L+15

25,0

00,0

00

0.

410.

414/

24/1

44/

25/1

68,

742

-

-

8,

742

Neg

otia

ble

CD

s96

121T

WK

0W

ES

TP

AC

FLT

YC

D 1

ML+

2250

,000

,000

0.39

0.39

4/24

/14

4/25

/16

16,8

84

-

-

16

,884

Neg

otia

ble

CD

s06

417H

KT

2B

AN

K O

F N

OV

A S

CO

TIA

YC

D 3

ML+

1925

,000

,000

0.45

0.48

5/9/

145/

9/16

9,60

4

444

-

10

,048

Neg

otia

ble

CD

s06

366C

WA

2B

AN

K O

F M

ON

TR

EA

L C

HIC

AG

O Y

CD

25,0

00,0

00

0.

420.

422/

12/1

58/

12/1

68,

949

-

-

8,

949

Neg

otia

ble

CD

s06

366C

A32

BA

NK

OF

MO

NT

RE

AL

CH

ICA

GO

YC

D50

,000

,000

0.44

0.44

3/31

/15

9/23

/16

608

-

-

608

N

egot

iabl

e C

Ds

0636

6CA

32B

AN

K O

F M

ON

TR

EA

L C

HIC

AG

O Y

CD

25,0

00,0

00

0.

440.

443/

31/1

59/

23/1

630

4

-

-

30

4

Neg

otia

ble

CD

s06

417H

UW

4B

AN

K O

F N

OV

A S

CO

TIA

FLT

3M

L+20

50,0

00,0

00

0.

460.

469/

25/1

49/

23/1

619

,621

-

-

19,6

21

N

egot

iabl

e C

Ds

0641

7HU

W4

BA

NK

OF

NO

VA

SC

OT

IA F

LT 3

ML+

2050

,000

,000

0.46

0.46

9/25

/14

9/23

/16

19,6

21

-

-

19

,621

Neg

otia

ble

CD

s06

417H

VR

4B

AN

K O

F N

OV

A S

CO

TIA

YC

D 3

ML+

2050

,000

,000

0.45

0.45

10/7

/14

10/7

/16

19,5

30

-

-

19

,530

Neg

otia

ble

CD

s78

009N

SX

5R

OY

AL

BA

NK

OF

CA

NA

DA

YC

D 3

ML+

1810

0,00

0,00

0

0.45

0.45

12/1

5/14

12/1

5/16

37,5

52

-

-

37

,552

Neg

otia

ble

CD

s06

417H

E36

BA

NK

OF

NO

VA

SC

OT

IA Y

CD

3M

L+28

25,0

00,0

00

0.

540.

542/

23/1

52/

23/1

711

,657

-

-

11,6

57

N

egot

iabl

e C

Ds

0641

7HE

36B

AN

K O

F N

OV

A S

CO

TIA

YC

D 3

ML+

2825

,000

,000

0.54

0.54

2/23

/15

2/23

/17

11,6

57

-

-

11

,657

Neg

otia

ble

CD

s06

417H

UR

5B

AN

K O

F N

OV

A S

CO

TIA

YC

D 3

ML+

2750

,000

,000

0.54

0.54

9/25

/14

9/25

/17

22,7

06

-

-

22

,706

Su

bto

tals

530,

500,

000

$

17

6,74

8$

65

6$

-$

177,

405

$

Com

mer

cial

Pap

er06

538C

Q61

BA

NK

OF

TO

KY

O-M

ITS

UB

ISH

I UF

J C

P-

$

0.00

0.13

2/27

/15

3/6/

151,

806

$

-

$

-

$

1,

806

$

Com

mer

cial

Pap

er62

478Y

QX

9M

UF

G U

NIO

N B

AN

K N

A-

0.00

0.06

3/27

/15

3/31

/15

667

-

-

667

C

omm

erci

al P

aper

6247

8YR

18M

UF

G U

NIO

N B

AN

K N

A10

0,00

0,00

0

0.00

0.05

3/31

/15

4/1/

1513

9

-

-

13

9

Com

mer

cial

Pap

er06

538C

R29

BA

NK

OF

TO

KY

O-M

ITS

UB

ISH

I UF

J C

P50

,000

,000

0.00

0.17

3/10

/15

4/2/

155,

194

-

-

5,

194

Su

bto

tals

150,

000,

000

$

7,

806

$

-

$

-

$

7,

806

$

Mar

ch 3

1, 2

015

City

and

Cou

nty

of S

an F

ranc

isco

15

44

Mo

nth

ly In

vest

men

t E

arn

ing

sP

oo

led

Fu

nd

Typ

e o

f In

vest

men

tC

US

IPIs

sue

Nam

eP

ar V

alu

eC

ou

po

nY

TM

1S

ettl

e D

ate

Mat

uri

ty

Dat

eE

arn

ed

Inte

rest

Am

ort

. E

xpen

seR

ealiz

ed

Gai

n/(

Lo

ss)

Ear

ned

Inco

me

/Net

Ear

nin

gs

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

7170

81D

A8

PF

IZE

R M

TN

-$

5.

350.

4412

/9/1

33/

15/1

56,

242

$

(5

,644

)$

-

$

59

8$

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

8923

6TA

G0

TO

YO

TA

MO

TO

R C

RE

DIT

CO

RP

3M

L+15

50,0

00,0

00

0.

400.

404/

12/1

34/

8/15

17,2

70

-

-

17

,270

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

6495

2WA

W3

NE

W Y

OR

K L

IFE

MT

N5,

000,

000

3.

000.

269/

22/1

45/

4/15

12,5

00

(1

1,66

0)

-

840

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es45

9200

HD

6IB

M M

TN

5,42

5,00

0

0.75

0.27

12/1

9/13

5/11

/15

3,39

1

(2,1

88)

-

1,20

2

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es36

962G

5Z3

GE

CA

PIT

AL

CO

RP

MT

N5,

000,

000

1.

630.

818/

19/1

37/

2/15

6,77

1

(3,4

20)

-

3,35

0

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es36

962G

4M3

GE

CA

PIT

AL

CO

RP

FLT

MT

N 3

ML+

758,

565,

000

1.

00-0

.40

11/2

5/13

7/9/

157,

152

(3

,145

)

-

4,

008

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

8923

3P6J

0T

OY

OT

A M

TN

10,0

00,0

00

0.

880.

4411

/15/

137/

17/1

57,

292

(3

,665

)

-

3,

627

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

8923

3P6J

0T

OY

OT

A M

TN

6,10

0,00

0

0.88

0.30

3/4/

147/

17/1

54,

448

(2

,969

)

-

1,

479

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

5949

18A

G9

MIC

RO

SO

FT

MT

N3,

186,

000

1.

630.

3910

/30/

139/

25/1

54,

314

(3

,313

)

-

1,

002

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

9612

14B

W2

WE

ST

PA

C N

T10

,152

,000

1.13

0.35

9/15

/14

9/25

/15

9,51

8

(6,6

30)

-

2,88

8

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es36

9604

BE

2G

EN

ER

AL

ELE

CT

RIC

MT

N10

,000

,000

0.85

0.42

3/5/

1410

/9/1

57,

083

(3

,669

)

-

3,

414

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

3696

04B

E2

GE

NE

RA

L E

LEC

TR

IC M

TN

8,00

0,00

0

0.85

0.46

5/7/

1410

/9/1

55,

667

(2

,604

)

-

3,

063

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

3696

04B

E2

GE

NE

RA

L E

LEC

TR

IC M

TN

9,30

0,00

0

0.85

0.40

5/19

/14

10/9

/15

6,58

8

(3,5

58)

-

3,02

9

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es06

366R

JH9

BA

NK

OF

MO

NT

RE

AL

MT

N8,

500,

000

0.

800.

563/

27/1

411

/6/1

55,

667

(1

,709

)

-

3,

958

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

3696

2G4T

8G

E C

AP

ITA

L C

OR

P M

TN

7,00

0,00

0

2.25

0.48

5/12

/14

11/9

/15

13,1

25

(1

0,44

1)

-

2,68

4

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es74

2718

DS

5P

RO

CT

ER

& G

AM

BLE

MT

N23

,025

,000

1.80

0.34

3/7/

1411

/15/

1534

,538

(28,

274)

-

6,

264

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

7427

18D

S5

PR

OC

TE

R &

GA

MB

LE M

TN

10,0

00,0

00

1.

800.

413/

12/1

411

/15/

1515

,000

(11,

727)

-

3,

273

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

4592

00G

U9

IBM

CO

RP

NT

19,5

79,0

00

2.

000.

482/

11/1

41/

5/16

32,6

32

(2

5,08

4)

-

7,54

8

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es46

625H

HW

3JP

MO

RG

AN

CH

AS

E &

CO

12,8

36,0

00

2.

600.

752/

11/1

51/

15/1

627

,811

(20,

084)

-

7,

727

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

0642

55A

K8

BT

MU

FJ

FLT

MT

N 3

ML+

4510

,000

,000

0.71

0.35

3/17

/14

2/26

/16

6,12

3

(1,5

61)

-

4,56

2

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es36

962G

2V5

GE

FLT

MT

N 3

ML+

2017

,689

,000

0.46

0.39

5/19

/14

5/11

/16

6,98

2

(614

)

-

6,36

7

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es36

962G

7A6

GE

FLT

MT

N 3

ML+

6527

,651

,000

0.90

0.34

3/23

/15

7/12

/16

6,23

6

(3,8

23)

-

2,41

3

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es06

4159

CQ

7B

AN

K O

F N

OV

A S

CO

TIA

16,4

83,0

00

1.

380.

782/

13/1

57/

15/1

618

,887

(8,3

06)

-

10,5

81

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es89

114Q

AL2

TO

RO

NT

O-D

OM

INIO

N B

AN

K 3

ML+

4618

,930

,000

0.72

0.42

12/1

5/14

9/9/

1611

,678

(4,2

11)

-

7,46

6

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es89

114Q

AL2

TO

RO

NT

O-D

OM

INIO

N B

AN

K 3

ML+

4624

,000

,000

0.72

0.44

3/2/

159/

9/16

14,3

41

(5

,581

)

-

8,

760

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

8923

6TB

U8

TO

YO

TA

MO

TO

R C

RE

DIT

CO

RP

3M

L+10

50,0

00,0

00

0.

360.

369/

23/1

49/

23/1

615

,315

-

-

15,3

15

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es89

236T

BU

8T

OY

OT

A M

OT

OR

CR

ED

IT C

OR

P 3

ML+

1014

,150

,000

0.36

0.39

12/9

/14

9/23

/16

4,33

4

221

-

4,

556

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

8923

6TB

U8

TO

YO

TA

MO

TO

R C

RE

DIT

CO

RP

3M

L+10

28,1

50,0

00

0.

360.

382/

11/1

59/

23/1

68,

623

37

0

-

8,99

2

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es89

236T

BV

6T

OY

OT

A M

OT

OR

CR

ED

IT C

OR

P F

F+

2547

,500

,000

0.37

0.37

9/25

/14

9/23

/16

14,8

12

-

-

14

,812

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

9612

E0D

B0

WE

ST

PA

C F

LT M

TN

1M

L+25

50,0

00,0

00

0.

430.

4310

/10/

1410

/7/1

618

,254

-

-

18,2

54

M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

es36

967F

AB

7G

EN

ER

AL

ELE

C C

AP

CO

RP

FLT

3M

L+28

20,0

00,0

00

0.

530.

531/

9/15

1/9/

179,

164

-

-

9,

164

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

8923

6TC

C7

TO

YO

TA

MO

TO

R C

RE

DIT

CO

RP

3M

L+19

50,0

00,0

00

0.

450.

452/

20/1

52/

16/1

719

,401

-

-

19,4

01

S

ub

tota

ls58

6,22

1,00

0$

381,

156

$

(173

,289

)$

-

$

20

7,86

8$

Mon

ey M

arke

t Fun

ds09

248U

718

BLA

CK

RO

CK

T-F

UN

D IN

ST

L5,

001,

493

$

0.

010.

013/

31/1

54/

1/15

42$

-$

-$

42$

M

oney

Mar

ket F

unds

3161

7510

8F

IDE

LIT

Y IN

ST

L G

OV

T P

OR

T5,

003,

920

0.

010.

013/

31/1

54/

1/15

43

-

-

43

M

oney

Mar

ket F

unds

6174

7C70

7M

S IN

ST

L G

OV

T F

UN

D5,

090,

186

0.

040.

043/

31/1

54/

1/15

250

-

-

250

S

ub

tota

ls15

,095

,599

$

335

$

-$

-$

335

$

Gra

nd

To

tals

6,71

7,97

4,59

9$

4,

672,

083

$

(6

10,1

34)

$

12,5

00$

4,07

4,44

9$

1 Y

ield

to m

atur

ity is

cal

cula

ted

at p

urch

ase

Mar

ch 3

1, 2

015

City

and

Cou

nty

of S

an F

ranc

isco

16

45

Inve

stm

ent

Tra

nsa

ctio

ns

Po

ole

d F

un

d

Fo

r m

on

th e

nd

ed M

arch

31,

201

5T

ran

sact

ion

S

ettl

e D

ate

Mat

uri

ty

Typ

e o

f In

vest

men

tIs

suer

Nam

eC

US

IPP

ar V

alu

eC

ou

po

nY

TM

Pri

ceIn

tere

stT

ran

sact

ion

P

urch

ase

3/2/

2015

4/1/

2015

Mon

ey M

arke

t Fun

dsB

LAC

KR

OC

K T

-FU

ND

INS

TL

0924

8U71

815

6$

0.01

0.01

100.

00$

-

$

156

$

P

urch

ase

3/2/

2015

9/9/

2016

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

TO

RO

NT

O-D

OM

INIO

N B

AN

K 3

M89

114Q

AL2

24,0

00,0

00

0.70

0.41

100.

43

38

,490

24,1

42,1

10

Pur

chas

e3/

3/20

1512

/3/2

018

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

AR

ME

R M

AC

CA

LL F

LT 3

ML+

3131

5PS

5950

,000

,000

0.

400.

4010

0.00

-

50

,000

,000

P

urch

ase

3/3/

2015

12/3

/201

8F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FA

RM

ER

MA

C F

LT C

ALL

3M

L+31

315P

W96

50,0

00,0

00

0.26

0.26

100.

00

-

50,0

00,0

00

Pur

chas

e3/

5/20

153/

5/20

18F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FH

LMC

ST

EP

CA

LL M

TN

3134

G6F

R9

25,0

00,0

00

0.75

0.75

100.

00

-

25,0

00,0

00

Pur

chas

e3/

10/2

015

4/2/

2015

Com

mer

cial

Pap

erB

AN

K O

F T

OK

YO

-MIT

SU

BIS

HI

0653

8CR

2950

,000

,000

0.

000.

1799

.99

-

49,9

94,5

69

Pur

chas

e3/

16/2

015

3/16

/201

8F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FH

LMC

ST

EP

CA

LL M

TN

3134

G6J

N4

50,0

00,0

00

1.00

1.00

100.

00

-

50,0

00,0

00

Pur

chas

e3/

18/2

015

9/18

/201

8F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FH

LB N

T C

ALL

3130

A4G

L015

,000

,000

1.

331.

3310

0.00

-

15

,000

,000

P

urch

ase

3/18

/201

53/

18/2

020

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

HLB

ST

EP

CA

LL N

T31

30A

4HA

325

,000

,000

1.

251.

2510

0.00

-

25

,000

,000

P

urch

ase

3/20

/201

53/

21/2

016

Pub

lic T

ime

Dep

osits

TR

AN

S P

AC

IFIC

NA

TIO

NA

L B

XT

PN

B16

0424

0,00

0

0.58

0.58

100.

00

-

240,

000

P

urch

ase

3/23

/201

57/

12/2

016

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

GE

FLT

MT

N 3

ML+

6536

962G

7A6

27,6

51,0

00

0.90

0.34

100.

73

48

,502

27,9

02,1

11

Pur

chas

e3/

25/2

015

3/25

/202

0F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FH

LMC

ST

EP

CA

LL M

TN

3134

G6K

V4

15,0

00,0

00

1.63

1.63

100.

00

-

15,0

00,0

00

Pur

chas

e3/

26/2

015

3/26

/201

8F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FH

LMC

ST

EP

CA

LL M

TN

3134

G6L

N1

25,0

00,0

00

1.00

1.00

100.

00

-

25,0

00,0

00

Pur

chas

e3/

27/2

015

6/25

/201

8F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FH

LB C

ALL

ST

EP

3130

A4M

X7

4,00

0,00

0

0.

500.

5010

0.00

111

4,00

0,11

1

P

urch

ase

3/27

/201

53/

31/2

015

Com

mer

cial

Pap

erM

UF

G U

NIO

N B

AN

K N

A62

478Y

QX

910

0,00

0,00

0

0.00

0.06

100.

00

-

99,9

99,3

33

Pur

chas

e3/

31/2

015

4/1/

2015

Mon

ey M

arke

t Fun

dsM

S IN

ST

L G

OV

T F

UN

D61

747C

707

250

0.

040.

0410

0.00

-

25

0

Pur

chas

e3/

31/2

015

4/1/

2015

Mon

ey M

arke

t Fun

dsF

IDE

LIT

Y IN

ST

L G

OV

T P

OR

T31

6175

108

43

0.

010.

0110

0.00

-

43

Pur

chas

e3/

31/2

015

2/1/

2016

Sta

te/L

ocal

Age

ncie

sC

ALI

FO

RN

IA S

T G

O B

D13

063B

N73

21,0

00,0

00

1.05

0.40

100.

54

36

,750

21,1

50,1

50

Pur

chas

e3/

31/2

015

9/23

/201

6N

egot

iabl

e C

Ds

BA

NK

OF

MO

NT

RE

AL

CH

ICA

GO

0636

6CA

3250

,000

,000

0.

440.

4410

0.00

-

50

,000

,000

P

urch

ase

3/31

/201

59/

23/2

016

Neg

otia

ble

CD

sB

AN

K O

F M

ON

TR

EA

L C

HIC

AG

O06

366C

A32

25,0

00,0

00

0.44

0.44

100.

00

-

25,0

00,0

00

Pur

chas

e3/

31/2

015

4/1/

2015

Com

mer

cial

Pap

erM

UF

G U

NIO

N B

AN

K N

A62

478Y

R18

100,

000,

000

0.

000.

0510

0.00

-

99

,999

,861

S

ub

tota

ls65

6,89

1,44

8$

0.46

0.43

100.

06$

12

3,85

3$

65

7,42

8,69

4$

Sal

e3/

3/20

154/

1/20

15M

oney

Mar

ket F

unds

MS

INS

TL

GO

VT

FU

ND

6174

7C70

735

,000

,000

$

0.

040.

0410

0.00

$

-$

35

,000

,000

$

S

ale

3/10

/201

55/

1/20

15F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FA

RM

ER

MA

C F

LT N

T F

F+

2631

315P

WJ4

50,0

00,0

00

0.37

0.37

100.

03

19

,250

50,0

31,7

50

Su

bto

tals

85,0

00,0

00$

0.23

0.23

100.

01$

19

,250

$

85,0

31,7

50$

Cal

l3/

3/20

156/

3/20

19F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FA

RM

ER

MA

C F

LT C

ALL

3131

5P3W

750

,000

,000

$

0.

390.

3810

0.00

$

-$

50

,000

,000

$

C

all

3/6/

2015

6/6/

2018

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

AR

ME

R M

AC

FLT

CA

LL31

315P

4W6

25,0

00,0

00

0.37

0.37

100.

00

-

25,0

00,0

00

Cal

l3/

27/2

015

9/27

/201

7F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FN

MA

ST

EP

NT

3136

G0D

8110

0,00

0,00

0

0.72

0.72

100.

00

-

100,

000,

000

S

ub

tota

ls17

5,00

0,00

0$

0.41

0.41

100.

00$

-

$

175,

000,

000

$

S

ub

tota

ls17

5,00

0,00

0$

0.41

0.41

100.

00$

-

$

175,

000,

000

$

Mat

urity

3/1/

2015

3/1/

2015

Sta

te/L

ocal

Age

ncie

sN

EW

YO

RK

ST

TA

XA

BLE

GO

6497

91JS

04,

620,

000

$

0.39

0.40

100.

00$

9,

009

$

4,

629,

009

$

Mat

urity

3/6/

2015

3/6/

2015

Com

mer

cial

Pap

erB

AN

K O

F T

OK

YO

-MIT

SU

BIS

HI

0653

8CQ

6110

0,00

0,00

0

0.00

0.13

100.

00

-

100,

000,

000

M

atur

ity3/

15/2

015

3/15

/201

5M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

esP

FIZ

ER

MT

N71

7081

DA

83,

000,

000

5.35

0.44

100.

00

80

,250

3,08

0,25

0

M

atur

ity3/

16/2

015

3/16

/201

5F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FN

MA

GLO

BA

L31

35G

0HG

19,

399,

000

0.38

0.20

100.

00

17

,623

9,41

6,62

3

M

atur

ity3/

31/2

015

3/31

/201

5U

.S. T

reas

urie

sU

S T

SY

NT

9128

28M

W7

50,0

00,0

00

2.50

0.48

100.

00

62

5,00

0

50

,625

,000

M

atur

ity3/

31/2

015

3/31

/201

5C

omm

erci

al P

aper

MU

FG

UN

ION

BA

NK

NA

6247

8YQ

X9

100,

000,

000

0.

000.

0610

0.00

-

10

0,00

0,00

0

Su

bto

tals

267,

019,

000

$

0.

550.

1810

0.00

$

731,

882

$

267,

750,

882

$

Inte

rest

3/1/

2015

4/1/

2016

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

AM

CA

FLT

MT

N 1

ML+

031

315P

TF

650

,000

,000

$

0.

170.

17-

$

-$

6,

646

$

Inte

rest

3/1/

2015

9/1/

2016

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

AM

CA

NT

3131

5PQ

B8

7,00

0,00

0

1.

500.

70-

-

52

,500

Inte

rest

3/1/

2015

12/1

/201

7F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FA

RM

ER

MA

C F

LT C

ALL

1M

L+31

315P

J83

25,0

00,0

00

0.34

0.34

-

-

7,10

2

In

tere

st3/

2/20

156/

2/20

16F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FF

CB

FLT

NT

1M

L+3

3133

ED

B35

50,0

00,0

00

0.20

0.21

-

-

7,81

3

In

tere

st3/

2/20

154/

2/20

18F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FH

LB F

LT C

ALL

NT

1M

L+23

3130

A35

B6

50,0

00,0

00

0.40

0.40

-

-

16,7

08

In

tere

st3/

2/20

1510

/2/2

019

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

HLB

FLT

CA

LL N

T 1

ML+

4031

30A

35A

850

,000

,000

0.

570.

57-

-

23

,792

Inte

rest

3/2/

2015

12/2

/201

9F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FA

RM

ER

MA

C F

LT C

ALL

3M

L+31

315P

J26

50,0

00,0

00

0.35

0.35

-

-

44,2

00

In

tere

st3/

2/20

152/

2/20

18F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FF

CB

FLT

NT

1M

L+5

3133

EE

MH

035

,000

,000

0.

220.

24-

-

6,

013

Inte

rest

3/3/

2015

6/3/

2019

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

AR

ME

R M

AC

FLT

CA

LL31

315P

3W7

50,0

00,0

00

0.39

0.38

-

-

48,0

75

In

tere

st3/

3/20

155/

3/20

19F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FA

RM

ER

MA

C F

LT C

ALL

NT

131

315P

E47

25,0

00,0

00

0.48

0.48

-

-

10,0

26

In

tere

st3/

5/20

152/

5/20

18F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FF

CB

FLT

NT

1M

L+4

3133

EE

AN

025

,000

,000

0.

210.

21-

-

4,

103

Inte

rest

3/5/

2015

2/5/

2018

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

FC

B F

LT N

T 1

ML+

431

33E

EA

N0

25,0

00,0

00

0.21

0.22

-

-

4,10

3

Mar

ch 3

1, 2

015

City

and

Cou

nty

of S

an F

ranc

isco

17

46

Inve

stm

ent

Tra

nsa

ctio

ns

Po

ole

d F

un

d

Tra

nsa

ctio

n

Set

tle

Dat

eM

atu

rity

T

ype

of

Inve

stm

ent

Issu

er N

ame

CU

SIP

Par

Val

ue

Co

up

on

YT

MP

rice

Inte

rest

Tra

nsa

ctio

n

Inte

rest

3/5/

2015

2/5/

2018

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

FC

B F

LT N

T 1

ML+

431

33E

EA

N0

50,0

00,0

00

0.21

0.22

- -

8,20

6

Inte

rest

3/5/

2015

1/5/

2018

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

AR

ME

R M

AC

FLT

CA

LL 1

ML+

3131

5P4S

550

,000

,000

0.

330.

33-

- 13

,792

In

tere

st3/

6/20

156/

6/20

18F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FA

RM

ER

MA

C F

LT C

ALL

3131

5P4W

625

,000

,000

0.

370.

37-

- 22

,834

In

tere

st3/

9/20

159/

9/20

16F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FH

LB B

D31

3370

TW

825

,000

,000

2.

001.

39-

- 25

0,00

0

Inte

rest

3/9/

2015

10/7

/201

6M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

esW

ES

TP

AC

FLT

MT

N 1

ML+

2596

12E

0DB

050

,000

,000

0.

420.

42-

- 16

,372

In

tere

st3/

9/20

159/

9/20

16F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FH

LB31

3370

TW

825

,000

,000

2.

000.

55-

- 25

0,00

0

Inte

rest

3/9/

2015

9/9/

2016

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

TO

RO

NT

O-D

OM

INIO

N B

AN

K 3

M89

114Q

AL2

18,9

30,0

00

0.70

0.43

- -

32,9

19

Inte

rest

3/9/

2015

9/9/

2016

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

TO

RO

NT

O-D

OM

INIO

N B

AN

K 3

M89

114Q

AL2

24,0

00,0

00

0.70

0.41

- -

41,7

36

Inte

rest

3/10

/201

59/

10/2

015

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

HLM

C B

ON

DS

3137

EA

CM

950

,000

,000

1.

752.

17-

- 43

7,50

0

Inte

rest

3/10

/201

53/

10/2

016

Neg

otia

ble

CD

sR

OY

AL

BA

NK

OF

CA

NA

DA

NY

7800

9NS

A5

25,0

00,0

00

0.34

0.34

- -

6,54

3

Inte

rest

3/10

/201

53/

10/2

017

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

HLB

3133

782N

050

,000

,000

0.

880.

82-

- 21

8,75

0

Inte

rest

3/11

/201

59/

11/2

015

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

HLB

3133

70JB

575

,000

,000

1.

752.

31-

- 65

6,25

0

Inte

rest

3/11

/201

53/

11/2

016

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

HLB

NT

3133

75R

N9

22,2

00,0

00

1.00

0.82

- -

111,

000

In

tere

st3/

11/2

015

3/11

/201

6F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FH

LB31

33X

XP

4314

,000

,000

3.

130.

41-

- 21

8,75

0

Inte

rest

3/11

/201

510

/11/

2016

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

FC

B F

LT N

T 1

ML+

231

33E

DJA

125

,000

,000

0.

190.

21-

- 3,

737

In

tere

st3/

12/2

015

8/12

/201

6N

egot

iabl

e C

Ds

BA

NK

OF

MO

NT

RE

AL

CH

ICA

GO

0636

6CW

A2

25,0

00,0

00

0.41

0.41

- -

8,00

5

Inte

rest

3/13

/201

511

/13/

2017

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

FC

B F

LT N

T 1

ML+

331

33E

EB

R0

25,0

00,0

00

0.20

0.22

- -

3,92

2

Inte

rest

3/14

/201

55/

14/2

015

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

FC

B F

LT N

T 1

ML+

131

33E

AQ

C5

50,0

00,0

00

0.18

0.30

- -

7,07

8

Inte

rest

3/14

/201

59/

14/2

016

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

FC

B F

LT N

T 1

ML+

231

33E

DH

2150

,000

,000

0.

190.

20-

- 7,

467

In

tere

st3/

15/2

015

9/15

/201

5F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FA

RM

ER

MA

C31

315P

GT

045

,000

,000

2.

132.

17-

- 47

8,12

5

Inte

rest

3/16

/201

512

/15/

2016

Neg

otia

ble

CD

sR

OY

AL

BA

NK

OF

CA

NA

DA

YC

D78

009N

SX

510

0,00

0,00

0

0.42

0.42

- -

106,

318

In

tere

st3/

18/2

015

9/18

/201

5F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FF

CB

FLT

NT

QT

R T

-BIL

L+1

3133

EC

JB1

16,2

00,0

00

0.18

0.20

- -

7,40

1

Inte

rest

3/19

/201

56/

19/2

017

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

FC

B F

LT N

T F

F+

2231

33E

AU

W6

50,0

00,0

00

0.31

0.31

- -

41,8

06

Inte

rest

3/19

/201

511

/19/

2015

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

FC

B F

LT N

T M

ON

TH

LY 1

ML+

3133

EC

LZ5

25,0

00,0

00

0.17

0.19

- -

3,37

4

Inte

rest

3/20

/201

51/

20/2

016

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

FC

B F

LT31

33E

D5A

650

,000

,000

0.

170.

17-

- 6,

747

In

tere

st3/

21/2

015

9/21

/201

5F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FN

MA

EX

-CA

LL N

T31

398A

3T7

25,0

00,0

00

2.00

1.08

- -

250,

000

In

tere

st3/

22/2

015

9/22

/201

5F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FF

CB

FLT

NT

1M

L+2.

531

33E

AJF

627

,953

,000

0.

200.

27-

- 4,

316

In

tere

st3/

22/2

015

6/22

/201

5F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FF

CB

FLT

NT

1M

L+2

3133

EA

VE

550

,000

,000

0.

190.

27-

- 7,

525

In

tere

st3/

23/2

015

9/23

/201

6M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

esT

OY

OT

A M

OT

OR

CR

ED

IT C

OR

P89

236T

BU

850

,000

,000

0.

350.

35-

- 44

,013

In

tere

st3/

23/2

015

9/23

/201

6N

egot

iabl

e C

Ds

BA

NK

OF

NO

VA

SC

OT

IA F

LT06

417H

UW

450

,000

,000

0.

450.

45-

- 56

,513

In

tere

st3/

23/2

015

9/23

/201

6M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

esT

OY

OT

A M

OT

OR

CR

ED

IT C

OR

P89

236T

BV

647

,500

,000

0.

360.

36-

- 43

,357

In

tere

st3/

23/2

015

9/23

/201

6M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

esT

OY

OT

A M

OT

OR

CR

ED

IT C

OR

P89

236T

BU

814

,150

,000

0.

350.

37-

- 12

,456

In

tere

st3/

23/2

015

9/23

/201

6M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

esT

OY

OT

A M

OT

OR

CR

ED

IT C

OR

P89

236T

BU

814

,150

,000

0.

350.

37-

- 12

,456

In

tere

st3/

23/2

015

8/23

/201

7F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FF

CB

FLT

1M

L+5

3133

EE

FX

350

,000

,000

0.

220.

22-

- 8,

692

In

tere

st3/

23/2

015

9/23

/201

6M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

esT

OY

OT

A M

OT

OR

CR

ED

IT C

OR

P89

236T

BU

828

,150

,000

0.

350.

37-

- 24

,779

In

tere

st3/

24/2

015

7/24

/201

7F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FF

CB

FLT

NT

1M

L+4

3133

EC

V92

50,0

00,0

00

0.21

0.21

- -

8,22

5

Inte

rest

3/24

/201

56/

24/2

016

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

HLB

EX

-CA

LL N

T31

30A

1BK

325

,000

,000

0.

500.

50-

- 62

,500

In

tere

st3/

24/2

015

4/25

/201

6N

egot

iabl

e C

Ds

WE

ST

PA

C F

LT Y

CD

1M

L+22

9612

1TW

K0

50,0

00,0

00

0.39

0.39

- -

15,2

25

Inte

rest

3/24

/201

53/

24/2

017

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

AR

ME

R M

AC

FLT

NT

1M

L+4

3133

ED

P30

26,0

00,0

00

0.21

0.19

- -

4,27

7

Inte

rest

3/25

/201

59/

25/2

015

Med

ium

Ter

m N

otes

MIC

RO

SO

FT

MT

N59

4918

AG

93,

186,

000

1.

630.

39-

- 25

,886

In

tere

st3/

25/2

015

6/25

/201

5N

egot

iabl

e C

Ds

RO

YA

L B

AN

K O

F C

AN

AD

A N

Y78

009N

GU

45,

500,

000

0.

360.

45-

- 4,

876

In

tere

st3/

25/2

015

9/25

/201

7F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FH

LMC

CA

LL M

TN

3134

G5H

S7

20,1

00,0

00

1.13

1.16

- -

113,

063

In

tere

st3/

25/2

015

9/25

/201

5M

ediu

m T

erm

Not

esW

ES

TP

AC

NT

9612

14B

W2

10,1

52,0

00

1.13

0.35

- -

57,1

05

Inte

rest

3/25

/201

59/

25/2

017

Neg

otia

ble

CD

sB

AN

K O

F N

OV

A S

CO

TIA

YC

D06

417H

UR

550

,000

,000

0.

530.

52-

- 62

,661

In

tere

st3/

26/2

015

9/26

/201

6F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FH

LMC

EX

-CA

LL M

TN

3134

G4X

W3

25,0

00,0

00

0.60

0.60

- -

75,0

00

Inte

rest

3/27

/201

59/

27/2

017

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

NM

A S

TE

P N

T31

36G

0D81

100,

000,

000

0.

720.

72-

- 36

0,00

0

Inte

rest

3/27

/201

52/

27/2

017

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

FC

B F

LT N

T 1

ML+

5.5

3133

ED

FW

750

,000

,000

0.

230.

23-

- 8,

828

In

tere

st3/

28/2

015

3/28

/201

6F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FF

CB

NT

3133

EA

JU3

25,0

00,0

00

1.05

0.82

- -

131,

250

In

tere

st3/

28/2

015

3/28

/201

7F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FH

LMC

CA

LL M

TN

3134

G4X

M5

25,0

00,0

00

0.78

0.78

- -

97,5

00

Inte

rest

3/28

/201

53/

28/2

017

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

NM

A C

ALL

NT

3136

G1Z

B8

25,0

00,0

00

0.88

0.88

- -

109,

375

In

tere

st3/

28/2

015

9/28

/201

6F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FH

LB N

T C

ALL

3130

A1C

D8

25,0

00,0

00

1.13

0.80

- -

140,

625

In

tere

st3/

29/2

015

9/29

/201

7F

eder

al A

genc

ies

FH

LMC

GLO

BA

L N

T31

37E

AD

L025

,000

,000

1.

001.

22-

- 12

5,00

0

Inte

rest

3/29

/201

53/

29/2

017

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

FC

B F

LT N

T 1

ML+

231

33E

DZ

W5

25,0

00,0

00

0.19

0.19

- -

3,86

5

Inte

rest

3/30

/201

53/

30/2

016

Fed

eral

Age

ncie

sF

NM

A G

LOB

AL

NT

3135

G0V

A8

25,0

00,0

00

0.50

0.46

- -

62,5

00

Mar

ch 3

1, 2

015

City

and

Cou

nty

of S

an F

ranc

isco

18

47

Inve

stm

ent

Tra

nsa

ctio

ns

Po

ole

d F

un

d

Tra

nsa

ctio

n

Set

tle

Dat

eM

atu

rity

T

ype

of

Inve

stm

ent

Issu

er N

ame

CU

SIP

Par

Val

ue

Co

up

on

YT

MP

rice

Inte

rest

Tra

nsa

ctio

n

Inte

rest

3/31

/201

59/

30/2

016

U.S

. Tre

asur

ies

US

TS

Y N

T91

2828

RJ1

75,0

00,0

00

1.00

1.05

-

-

375,

000

In

tere

st3/

31/2

015

3/31

/201

7U

.S. T

reas

urie

sU

S T

SY

NT

9128

28S

M3

50,0

00,0

00

1.00

1.07

-

-

250,

000

In

tere

st3/

31/2

015

4/1/

2015

Mon

ey M

arke

t Fun

dsM

S IN

ST

L G

OV

T F

UN

D61

747C

707

5,09

0,18

6

0.

040.

04-

-

25

0

Inte

rest

3/31

/201

54/

1/20

15M

oney

Mar

ket F

unds

FID

ELI

TY

INS

TL

GO

VT

PO

RT

3161

7510

85,

003,

920

0.01

0.01

-

-

43

S

ub

tota

ls2,

475,

115,

106

$

0.61

0.58

-$

-

$

5,73

4,41

3$

Gra

nd

To

tals

21P

urc

has

es(2

)S

ales

(9)

Mat

uri

ties

/ C

alls

10C

han

ge

in n

um

ber

of

po

siti

on

s

Mar

ch 3

1, 2

015

City

and

Cou

nty

of S

an F

ranc

isco

19

48

No

n-P

oo

led

Inve

stm

ents

As

of

Mar

ch 3

1, 2

015

Typ

e o

f In

vest

men

tC

US

IPIs

sue

Nam

eS

ettl

e D

ate

Mat

uri

ty

Dat

eD

ura

tio

nC

ou

po

nP

ar V

alu

eB

oo

k V

alu

eA

mo

rtiz

edB

oo

k V

alu

eM

arke

t V

alu

eS

tate

/Loc

al A

genc

ies

7977

12A

D8

SF

RD

A S

OU

TH

BE

AC

H H

AR

BO

R1/

20/1

212

/1/1

61.

623.

502,

640,

000

$

2,64

0,00

0$

2,

640,

000

$

2,64

0,00

0$

S

ub

tota

ls1.

623.

502,

640,

000

$

2,64

0,00

0$

2,

640,

000

$

2,64

0,00

0$

Gra

nd

To

tals

1.62

3.50

2,64

0,00

0$

2,

640,

000

$

2,64

0,00

0$

2,

640,

000

$

NO

N-P

OO

LE

D F

UN

DS

PO

RT

FO

LIO

ST

AT

IST

ICS

Cur

rent

Mon

thP

rior

Mon

thF

isca

l YT

DM

arch

201

5F

isca

l YT

DF

ebru

ary

2015

Ave

rage

Dai

ly B

alan

ce2,

991,

788

$

2,64

0,00

0$

3,

036,

667

$

2,64

0,00

0$

N

et E

arni

ngs

78,4

88$

7,70

0$

70

,788

$

7,

700

$

Ear

ned

Inco

me

Yie

ld3.

50%

3.43

%3.

50%

3.80

%

Not

e:A

ll no

n-po

oled

sec

uriti

es w

ere

inhe

rited

by

the

City

and

Cou

nty

of S

an F

ranc

isco

as

succ

esso

r ag

ency

to th

e S

an F

ranc

isco

Red

evel

opm

ent

Age

ncy.

Boo

k va

lue

and

amor

tized

boo

k va

lue

are

deriv

ed fr

om li

mite

d in

form

atio

n re

ceiv

ed fr

om th

e S

FR

DA

and

are

sub

ject

to v

erifi

catio

n.

Mar

ch 3

1, 2

015

City

and

Cou

nty

of S

an F

ranc

isco

20

49


50

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

Bil

ls o

f In

tere

st

To

vie

w d

ocu

men

ts a

sso

ciate

d w

ith

th

e b

ill,

cli

ck t

he b

ill

nu

mb

er

lin

k.

To

vie

w t

he b

ill

tex

t, c

lick

th

e P

DF

or

HT

ML

lin

k.

Sta

ff is

reco

mm

end

ing

new

sup

po

rt p

osi

tio

ns

on

Ass

emb

ly B

ill (

AB

) 35 (

Ch

iu),

AB

1335 (

Atk

ins)

, an

d S

enat

e B

ill (

SB

) 413 (

Wie

cko

wsk

i), an

d o

pp

ose

po

siti

on

s o

n A

B 1

56 (

Per

ea),

AB

1176 (

Per

ea),

AB

1336 (

Sal

as)

and

SB

760 (

Men

do

za)

this

mo

nth

.

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

2

Am

ended

: 3/

26/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Ale

jo D

(Dis

t 30)

Co

mm

un

ity r

evi

tali

zati

on

au

tho

rity

. W

ould

auth

ori

ze c

erta

in lo

cal ag

enci

es t

o f

orm

a c

om

mun

ity

revit

aliz

atio

n a

uth

ori

ty (

auth

ori

ty)

wit

hin

a c

om

mun

ity

revit

aliz

atio

n a

nd

in

ves

tmen

t ar

ea, as

def

ined

, to

car

ry o

ut

pro

vis

ion

s o

f th

e C

om

mun

ity

Red

evel

op

men

t L

aw in

th

at a

rea

for

purp

ose

s re

late

d t

o, am

on

g o

ther

th

ings

, in

fras

truct

ure

, af

ford

able

h

ousi

ng,

an

d e

con

om

ic r

evit

aliz

atio

n. T

he

bill

wo

uld

pro

vid

e fo

r th

e fi

nan

cin

g o

f th

ese

acti

vit

ies

by,

am

on

g oth

er t

hin

gs, t

he

issu

ance

of

bo

nds

serv

iced

by

tax

incr

emen

t re

ven

ues

, an

d w

ould

re

quir

e th

e au

tho

rity

to

ado

pt

a co

mm

un

ity

revit

aliz

atio

n p

lan

fo

r th

e co

mm

un

ity

revit

aliz

atio

n a

nd

in

ves

tmen

t ar

ea t

hat

in

cludes

el

emen

ts d

escr

ibin

g an

d g

ove

rnin

g re

vit

aliz

atio

n a

ctiv

itie

s.

Ass

emb

ly

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Wat

ch

Fo

rmer

ly a

Sp

ot

bill

. T

he

inte

nt

is t

o

pro

vid

e fo

r th

e es

tab

lish

men

t o

f lo

cal

com

mun

ity

revit

aliz

atio

n a

uth

ori

ties

th

at

wo

uld

fin

ance

pro

ject

s usi

ng

tax

incr

emen

t re

ven

ues

.

AB

4

Intr

oduce

d:

12/

1/

2014

pd

f h

tml

Lin

der

R

(Dis

t 60)

Veh

icle

weig

ht

fees:

tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

bo

nd

deb

t se

rvic

e.

Wo

uld

, n

otw

ith

stan

din

g sp

ecif

ied p

rovis

ions

or

any

oth

er law

, un

til Ja

nuar

y 1, 2020, p

roh

ibit

wei

ght

fee

reven

ues

fro

m b

ein

g tr

ansf

erre

d f

rom

th

e Sta

te H

igh

way

Acc

oun

t to

th

e T

ransp

ort

atio

n

Deb

t Ser

vic

e F

un

d, th

e T

ransp

ort

atio

n B

on

d D

irec

t P

aym

ent

Acc

oun

t, o

r an

y o

ther

fun

d o

r ac

coun

t fo

r th

e p

urp

ose

of

pay

men

t o

f th

e d

ebt

serv

ice

on

tra

nsp

ort

atio

n g

ener

al o

blig

atio

n b

on

ds,

an

d

wo

uld

als

o p

roh

ibit

lo

ans

of

wei

ght

fee

reven

ues

to

th

e G

ener

al

Fun

d.

Ass

emb

ly

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

–2 y

ear

bill

Wat

ch

Sim

ilar

to s

ever

al b

ills

fro

m 2

014, th

is b

ill

seek

s to

res

tore

sta

te t

ruck

fee

s to

fun

d

hig

hw

ay r

epai

r in

stea

d o

f su

pp

ort

ing

Pro

p.

1B

bo

nd

deb

t se

rvic

e.

51

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=YIH0KQOYjnBkIH5q88%2fZrkWxNGQh7HHVv459bFAtZ6gZRn%2bcL03UlD7kLv7e4d%2fp

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/ab_2_bill_20150326_amended_asm_v98.pdf

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/ab_2_bill_20150326_amended_asm_v98.html

http://asmdc.org/members/a30/

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=0UfG%2fzXvPagz9sj3fs%2fqNCCLKGt%2bxkbNpOBcvZkNEt83yf70y4LPAe0W13Natukt

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/ab_4_bill_20141201_introduced.pdf

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/ab_4_bill_20141201_introduced.html

https://ad60.assemblygop.com/

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

6

Intr

oduce

d:

12/

1/

2014

pd

f h

tml

Wil

k R

(Dis

t 38)

Bo

nd

s: t

ran

spo

rtati

on

: sc

ho

ol

facil

itie

s.

Wo

uld

pro

vid

e th

at n

o f

urt

her

bo

nds

shal

l b

e so

ld f

or

hig

h-s

pee

d

rail

purp

ose

s p

urs

uan

t to

th

e Saf

e, R

elia

ble

Hig

h-S

pee

d P

asse

nge

r T

rain

Bo

nd

Act

fo

r th

e 21s

t C

entu

ry, ex

pec

t as

sp

ecif

ical

ly

pro

vid

ed w

ith

res

pec

t to

an

exi

stin

g ap

pro

pri

atio

n f

or

hig

h-s

pee

d

rail

purp

ose

s fo

r ea

rly

impro

vem

ent

pro

ject

s in

th

e P

has

e 1

ble

nd

ed s

yste

m. T

he

bill

, su

bje

ct t

o t

he

abo

ve

exce

pti

on, w

ould

re

quir

e re

dir

ecti

on

of

the

unsp

ent

pro

ceed

s re

ceiv

ed f

rom

o

uts

tand

ing

bo

nd

s is

sued

and

so

ld f

or

oth

er h

igh

-sp

eed

rai

l p

urp

ose

s p

rior

to t

he

effe

ctiv

e dat

e o

f th

ese

pro

vis

ions,

up

on

ap

pro

pri

atio

n, fo

r use

in

ret

irin

g th

e deb

t in

curr

ed f

rom

th

e is

suan

ce a

nd

sal

e o

f th

ose

outs

tan

din

g b

on

ds.

Th

ese

pro

vis

ion

s w

ould

bec

om

e ef

fect

ive

on

ly u

po

n a

pp

roval

by

the

vote

rs a

t th

e n

ext

stat

ewid

e el

ecti

on

.

Ass

emb

ly

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

–2 y

ear

bill

Op

pose

P

roh

ibit

s sa

le o

f b

on

ds

to s

up

po

rt H

igh

-Sp

eed

Rai

l p

rogr

am. D

irec

ts u

nsp

ent

bo

nd

fun

ds

to r

etir

e d

ebt

fro

m P

rop

1A

an

d

wo

uld

auth

ori

ze u

se o

f b

on

d p

roce

eds

for

K-1

2 b

uild

ing

purp

ose

s.

AB

8

Intr

oduce

d:

12/

1/

2014

pd

f h

tml

Gatt

o D

(Dis

t 43)

Em

erg

en

cy s

erv

ices:

hit

-an

d-r

un

in

cid

en

ts.

Wo

uld

auth

ori

ze a

law

en

forc

emen

t ag

ency

to

iss

ue

a Y

ello

w A

lert

if

a p

erso

n h

as b

een

kill

ed o

r h

as s

uff

ered

ser

ious

bo

dily

in

jury

due

to a

hit

-an

d-r

un

in

cid

ent

and t

he

law

en

forc

emen

t ag

ency

has

sp

ecif

ied info

rmat

ion

co

nce

rnin

g th

e su

spec

t o

r th

e suspect’s

veh

icle

. T

he

bill

wo

uld

req

uir

e th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f th

e C

alif

orn

ia

Hig

hw

ay P

atro

l to

act

ivat

e a

Yel

low

Ale

rt w

ith

in t

he

reques

ted

geo

grap

hic

are

a up

on

req

ues

t if

it

con

curs

wit

h t

he

law

en

forc

emen

t ag

ency

th

at s

pec

ifie

d r

equir

emen

ts a

re m

et.

Ass

emb

ly

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Sup

po

rt

Th

is b

ill e

xpan

ds

the

Am

ber

Ale

rt s

yste

m

to c

reat

e a

new

yel

low

ale

rt t

o c

all at

ten

tio

n

to h

it a

nd

run

in

cid

ents

wh

en a

per

son

die

s o

r su

ffer

s bo

dily

har

m.

52

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=u6R7ZfGhIMBgFArARualGOAqsLPD7mFRNFv9RUXhBBGgaD5wC84YIVRVlEf7Mda%2b



http://ad38.asmrc.org/

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=L3hmoUA%2bCUth1hboxAss%2bQqSQYdELxcpuMyUHD5nX92HZdCGoREQBVqmXHjxAv7I




San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

23

Intr

oduce

d:

12/

1/

2014

pd

f h

tml

Patt

erso

n R

(Dis

t 23)

Cali

forn

ia G

lob

al

Warm

ing

So

luti

on

s A

ct

of

2006

: m

ark

et-

base

d c

om

pli

an

ce m

ech

an

ism

s: e

xem

pti

on

. T

he

Cal

ifo

rnia

Glo

bal

War

min

g So

luti

ons

Act

of

2006 a

uth

ori

zes

the

Sta

te A

ir R

eso

urc

es B

oar

d t

o in

clude

the

use

of

mar

ket-

bas

ed

com

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

s. C

urr

ent

stat

e b

oar

d r

egula

tio

ns

requir

e sp

ecif

ied e

nti

ties

to

co

mp

ly w

ith

a m

arket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

m

ech

anis

m b

egin

nin

g Ja

nuar

y 1, 2013, an

d r

equir

e ad

dit

ion

al

spec

ifie

d e

nti

ties

to

co

mp

ly w

ith

th

at m

arket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

m

ech

anis

m b

egin

nin

g Ja

nuar

y 1, 2015. T

his

bill

would

inst

ead

ex

emp

t th

ose

cat

ego

ries

of

per

son

s o

r en

titi

es t

hat

did

no

t h

ave

a co

mp

lian

ce o

blig

atio

n, as

def

ined

, un

der

a m

arket

-bas

ed

com

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

beg

inn

ing

Jan

uar

y 1, 2013, f

rom

bei

ng

sub

ject

to

th

at m

arket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

th

rough

D

ecem

ber

31, 2020.

Ass

emb

ly

Nat

ura

l R

eso

urc

es –

2

year

bill

Op

pose

T

his

bill

wo

uld

po

stp

on

e th

e ef

fect

ive

dat

e o

f th

e im

po

siti

on

of

Cap

and

Tra

de

emis

sion

reg

ula

tio

ns

on

fuel

fro

m 2

015 t

o

2020 s

ched

ule

d f

or

the

tran

spo

rtat

ion

fuel

s sy

stem

.

Th

e au

tho

r is

co

nce

rned

th

at t

he

pub

lic w

ill

be

sub

ject

to

a s

pik

e in

fuel

pri

ces.

Ho

wev

er, th

e ef

fect

of

the

def

erra

l w

ill b

e to

red

uce

Cap

an

d T

rad

e au

ctio

n r

even

ues

.

AB

24

Am

ended

: 4/

22/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Nazari

an

D

(Dis

t 46)

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

netw

ork

co

mp

an

ies:

pu

bli

c s

afe

ty

req

uir

emen

ts.

Wo

uld

pro

hib

it t

he

Pub

lic U

tilit

ies

Co

mm

issi

on

fro

m iss

uin

g o

r re

new

ing

a p

erm

it o

r ce

rtif

icat

e to

a c

har

ter-

par

ty c

arri

er o

f p

asse

nge

rs u

nle

ss t

he

app

lican

t, in

addit

ion

to

exi

stin

g re

quir

emen

ts, p

arti

cip

ates

in

th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f M

oto

r V

ehic

les

pull-

no

tice

sys

tem

. Th

is b

ill w

ould

sp

ecif

ical

ly r

equir

e a

tran

spo

rtat

ion

net

work

co

mp

any

to c

om

ply

wit

h t

his

pro

vis

ion

an

d t

o p

rovid

e fo

r a

man

dat

ory

co

ntr

olle

d s

ub

stan

ce a

nd

alc

oh

ol

test

ing

cert

ific

atio

n p

rogr

am.

Ass

emb

ly

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Wat

ch

Inte

nd

ed t

o f

urt

her

dev

elo

p t

he

exis

tin

g tr

ansp

ort

atio

n n

etw

ork

co

mp

any

regu

lato

ry

stat

ute

s b

y re

quir

ing

TN

Cs

to p

arti

cip

ate

in

DM

V "

pull-n

oti

ce"

pro

gram

an

d t

hat

d

river

s ar

e su

bje

ct t

o d

rug/

alco

ho

l te

sts.

AB

28

Am

ended

: 4/

22/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Ch

u D

(Dis

t 25)

Bic

ycle

safe

ty:

rear

lig

hts

. C

urr

ent

law

req

uir

es t

hat

a b

icyc

le o

per

ated

duri

ng

dar

knes

s upo

n

a h

igh

way

, a

sid

ewal

k w

her

e b

icyc

le o

per

atio

n is

no

t p

roh

ibit

ed b

y th

e lo

cal ju

risd

icti

on

, o

r a

bik

eway

, as

def

ined

, b

e eq

uip

ped

wit

h a

re

d r

efle

cto

r o

n t

he

rear

th

at is

vis

ible

fro

m a

dis

tan

ce o

f 500 f

eet

to t

he

rear

wh

en d

irec

tly

in f

ron

t o

f la

wfu

l up

per

bea

ms

of

hea

dla

mp

s o

n a

mo

tor

veh

icle

. T

his

bill

wo

uld

req

uir

e th

at a

b

icyc

le o

per

ated

un

der

th

ose

cir

cum

stan

ces

be

equip

ped

wit

h a

red

re

flec

tor,

a s

olid

red

lig

ht,

or

a fl

ash

ing

red

lig

ht

on

th

e re

ar t

hat

is

vis

ible

fro

m a

dis

tan

ce o

f 50

0 f

eet

to t

he

rear

wh

en d

irec

tly

in f

ron

t o

f la

wfu

l upp

er b

eam

s o

f h

eadla

mp

s o

n a

mo

tor

veh

icle

.

Ass

emb

ly

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Wat

ch

Th

is is

a n

ew a

pp

roac

h t

o b

ike

safe

ty t

hat

, as

am

end

ed, w

ould

auth

ori

ze b

icyc

lists

to

h

ave

a so

lid o

r fl

ash

ing

red

lig

ht

in p

lace

of

a re

flec

tor.

53

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=tZHy42gRzhNST3E7s7SWdU58KmojbONQ7ao6Y8KZ%2bJ80ZFcwrD7qR2cRvgl%2f9Cym




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=kxUBR9yvS8OxEPQMsE0%2fHZP%2f4aR6oB%2bM95eGudNathHu%2bCdHaPZk16SeRJV0nv%2b5




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=Jg5O%2frt93iBVFmCIbaUrwZ%2bZTcRhKnPbekKjkIDOl5w53JIJ2Z8YZAkDZ5Jf8X1S




San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

35

Am

ended

: 4/

16/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Ch

iu D

(Dis

t 17)

Inco

me t

ax

es:

cre

dit

s: lo

w-i

nco

me h

ou

sin

g:

all

ocati

on

in

cre

ase

. T

his

bill

, fo

r ca

len

dar

yea

rs b

egin

nin

g 2015, w

ould

in

crea

se t

he

aggr

egat

e h

ousi

ng

cred

it d

olla

r am

oun

t th

at m

ay b

e al

loca

ted

amo

ng

low

-in

com

e h

ousi

ng

pro

ject

s b

y $3

00,0

00,0

00, as

sp

ecif

ied.

Th

e b

ill, und

er t

he

insu

ran

ce t

axat

ion

law

, th

e P

erso

nal

In

com

e T

ax L

aw, an

d t

he

Co

rpo

rati

on

Tax

Law

, w

ould

mo

dif

y th

e d

efin

itio

n o

f ap

plic

able

per

cen

tage

rel

atin

g to

qual

ifie

d lo

w-i

nco

me

build

ings

th

at m

eet

spec

ifie

d c

rite

ria.

Ass

emb

ly

Rev

enue

and

T

axat

ion

New

–

Rec

om

men

d

Sup

po

rt

AB

35 w

ould

in

crea

se t

he

stat

e ta

x cr

edit

fo

r lo

w in

com

e h

ousi

ng

allo

cati

on

by

an

add

itio

nal

$300 m

illio

n w

hic

h w

ould

allo

w

the

stat

e to

lev

erag

e an

ad

dit

ion

al $

200

mill

ion

in

fed

eral

tax

cre

dit

s an

d a

t le

ast

$400 m

illio

n in

fed

eral

tax

-exe

mp

t b

on

d

auth

ori

ty a

nn

ual

ly f

or

the

crea

tio

n a

nd

p

rese

rvat

ion

of

affo

rdab

le r

enta

l h

om

es f

or

a b

road

ran

ge o

f lo

wer

in

com

e h

ouse

ho

lds

thro

ugh

th

e st

ate.

AB

40

Am

ended

: 4/

15/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Tin

g D

(Dis

t 19)

To

ll b

rid

ges:

ped

est

rian

s an

d b

icycle

s.

Curr

ent

law

pro

vid

es f

or

the

con

stru

ctio

n a

nd o

per

atio

n o

f var

ious

toll b

rid

ges

by

the

stat

e, t

he

Go

lden

Gat

e B

ridge

, H

igh

way

an

d

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n D

istr

ict,

an

d b

y p

rivat

e en

titi

es t

hat

hav

e en

tere

d

into

a f

ran

chis

e ag

reem

ent

wit

h t

he

stat

e. T

his

bill

wo

uld

pro

hib

it a

to

ll f

rom

bei

ng

imp

ose

d o

n t

he

pas

sage

of

a p

edes

tria

n o

r b

icyc

le

over

th

ese

var

ious

toll b

ridge

s.

Ass

emb

ly

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Susp

ense

File

Sup

po

rt

Th

is m

easu

re w

ould

pro

hib

it t

he

Go

lden

G

ate

Bri

dge

Dis

tric

t fr

om

im

po

sin

g to

lls o

r fe

es o

n p

edes

tria

n o

r b

icyc

lists

for

use

of

the

bri

dge

sid

ewal

ks.

AB

61

Am

ended

: 4/

20/

2015

pd

f h

tml

All

en

, T

ravi

s R

(Dis

t 72)

Sh

utt

le s

erv

ices:

lo

ad

ing

an

d u

nlo

ad

ing

of

pass

en

gers

. W

ould

allo

w lo

cal au

tho

riti

es t

o p

erm

it s

hutt

le s

ervic

e veh

icle

s, a

s d

efin

ed, to

sto

p f

or

the

load

ing

or

un

load

ing

of

pas

sen

gers

al

on

gsid

e sp

ecif

ied c

urb

sp

aces

up

on

agr

eem

ent

bet

wee

n a

tra

nsi

t sy

stem

op

erat

ing

buse

s en

gage

d a

s co

mm

on

car

rier

s in

lo

cal

tran

spo

rtat

ion

an

d a

sh

utt

le s

ervic

e p

rovid

er, as

def

ined

. Th

e b

ill

wo

uld

sta

te t

hat

it

is t

he

inte

nt

of

the

Leg

isla

ture

to

no

t re

pla

ce

pub

lic t

ran

sit

serv

ices

.

Ass

emb

ly

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n W

atch

T

he

bill

exp

ands

auth

ori

ty n

ow

exi

stin

g fo

r lo

cal au

tho

riti

es t

o g

ran

t tr

ansi

t ag

enci

es t

he

righ

t to

sto

p a

nd

pic

k u

p p

asse

nge

rs t

o a

lso

ap

ply

to

shutt

le s

ervic

e veh

icle

s.

54



http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/ab_35_bill_20150416_amended_asm_v96.htm


http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=tWH7KuD0msNqt2Edmb%2fOt1fJ%2b9zUvsHWuyn3eWy2OL%2fM4Zh8ChzoFEh4%2bHB7z83Z




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=gj%2bd0mfxp1TBy4LxI1iZr2v2%2bKp21ycquPHXsGvZV1NDlUNLbq0DYWMjkf167p01




San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

156

Am

ended

: 4/

27/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Pere

a D

(Dis

t 31)

Gre

en

ho

use

Gas

Red

ucti

on

Fu

nd

: te

ch

nic

al

ass

ista

nce

pro

gra

m.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

req

uir

e th

e st

ate

bo

ard

to

est

ablis

h a

co

mp

reh

ensi

ve

tech

nic

al a

ssis

tan

ce p

rogr

am, up

on

th

e ap

pro

pri

atio

n o

f m

on

eys

from

th

e G

reen

ho

use

Gas

Red

uct

ion

F

un

d, fo

r el

igib

le a

pp

lican

ts, as

sp

ecif

ied, as

sist

ing

dis

adva

nta

ged

co

mm

un

itie

s an

d o

ther

sp

ecif

ied

co

mm

un

itie

s. T

his

bill

wo

uld

als

o

requir

e th

e d

epar

tmen

t to

incl

ude

in t

he

3-y

ear

inves

tmen

t p

lan

an

al

loca

tio

n t

o t

he

stat

e b

oar

d f

or

that

tec

hn

ical

ass

ista

nce

pro

gram

.

Ass

emb

ly

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Susp

ense

File

New

–

Rec

om

men

d

Op

pose

Th

is b

ill r

equir

es t

he

Air

Res

ourc

es B

oar

d

(AR

B)

to in

clud

e te

chn

ical

ass

ista

nce

fund

s to

ass

ist

dis

advan

tage

d a

nd

lo

w-i

nco

me

com

mun

itie

s in

its

AB

32 G

reen

ho

use

Gas

R

educt

ion

Fun

d (

GG

RF

) In

ves

tmen

t P

lan

.

Th

e M

etro

po

litan

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

Co

mm

issi

on

has

op

po

sed

th

is b

ill a

s th

e B

ay A

rea

has

ver

y fe

w a

reas

cla

ssif

ied a

s “disadvantaged

communities”

an

d t

his

p

rogr

am w

ould

red

irec

t fu

nd

s th

at w

ould

o

ther

wis

e b

e d

irec

ted t

o o

ther

tr

ansp

ort

atio

n p

rogr

ams.

AB

162

Am

ended

: 3/

24/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Ro

dri

gu

ez D

(Dis

t 52)

Sta

te h

igh

ways:

wro

ng

-way d

rivi

ng

. W

ould

req

uir

e th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f T

ransp

ort

atio

n, in

con

sult

atio

n

wit

h t

he

Dep

artm

ent

of

the

Cal

ifo

rnia

Hig

hw

ay P

atro

l, to

up

dat

e a

1989 r

epo

rt o

n w

ron

g-w

ay d

rivin

g o

n s

tate

hig

hw

ays

to a

cco

un

t fo

r te

chn

olo

gica

l ad

van

cem

ents

an

d in

no

vat

ion

, to

in

clude

a re

vie

w o

f m

eth

od

s st

ud

ied

or

imp

lem

ente

d b

y o

ther

juri

sdic

tio

ns

and

en

titi

es t

o p

reven

t w

rong-

way

dri

ver

s fr

om

en

teri

ng

stat

e h

igh

way

s, a

nd

to

pro

vid

e th

e re

po

rt t

o s

pec

ifie

d leg

isla

tive

com

mit

tees

on

or

bef

ore

Jan

uar

y 1, 2017. T

his

bill

co

nta

ins

oth

er

rela

ted p

rovis

ion

s.

Sen

ate

Rule

s W

atch

T

his

bill

wo

uld

in

itia

te a

form

aliz

ed a

nal

ysis

b

y C

altr

ans

on w

ron

g-w

ay d

rivin

g.

55





http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=GaEwaH26GtZxuQdh1%2b6%2byNE4weou%2bwWjIjmpy%2fQ87F6V8uFin%2fvLNbvDuLKzECKv



http://www.asmdc.org/members/a52/

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

194

Am

ended

: 4/

7/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Fra

zie

r D

(Dis

t 11)

Hig

h-o

ccu

pan

cy t

oll

lan

es.

C

urr

ent

law

pro

vid

es t

hat

th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f T

ransp

ort

atio

n h

as

full

po

sses

sion

an

d c

on

tro

l o

f th

e st

ate

hig

hw

ay s

yste

m. C

urr

ent

law

auth

ori

zes

the

dep

artm

ent

to c

on

stru

ct e

xclu

sive

or

pre

fere

nti

al lan

es f

or

buse

s o

nly

or

for

buse

s an

d o

ther

hig

h-

occ

up

ancy

veh

icle

s. T

his

bill

wo

uld

auth

ori

ze a

reg

ion

al

tran

spo

rtat

ion

age

ncy

, in

coo

per

atio

n w

ith

th

e dep

artm

ent,

to

ap

ply

to

th

e C

alif

orn

ia T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Co

mm

issi

on

to

dev

elo

p

oth

er t

oll

faci

litie

s, a

s sp

ecif

ied

Ass

emb

ly

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Susp

ense

File

Sup

po

rt

Th

e au

tho

r in

tro

duce

d t

his

bill

fo

r th

e Sel

f-H

elp

Co

un

ty C

aucu

s to

pro

vid

e au

tho

rity

fo

r th

e Sta

te a

nd

reg

ion

al t

ran

spo

rtat

ion

ag

enci

es t

o d

evel

op

an

d o

per

ate

toll

faci

litie

s.

As

dra

fted

, th

e b

ill r

equir

es a

reg

ion

al

agen

cy t

o c

on

sult

wit

h a

ny

loca

l tr

ansp

ort

atio

n a

uth

ori

ty w

ith

juri

sdic

tio

n

over

th

e p

lan

ned

fac

ility

.

Pro

po

sed

am

endm

ents

wo

uld

per

mit

lo

cal

auth

ori

ty, und

er a

gree

men

t to

be

resp

on

sib

le f

or

envir

on

men

tal,

des

ign

an

d

fin

anci

al s

tud

ies.

MP

O w

ould

op

erat

e th

e fa

cilit

y.

AB

208

Am

ended

: 4/

21/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Big

elo

w R

(Dis

t 5)

Veh

icle

s: h

igh

way:

lan

e u

se.

Curr

ent

law

req

uir

es, o

n a

2-l

ane

hig

hw

ay w

her

e p

assi

ng

is u

nsa

fe

due

to s

pec

ifie

d r

easo

ns,

a s

low

-mo

vin

g veh

icle

beh

ind

wh

ich

5 o

r m

ore

veh

icle

s ar

e fo

rmed

in

a lin

e to

turn

off

th

e ro

adw

ay a

t th

e n

eare

st p

lace

des

ign

ed a

s a

turn

out

or

wh

erev

er s

uff

icie

nt

area

of

a sa

fe t

urn

out

exis

ts in

ord

er t

o p

erm

it t

he

veh

icle

s fo

llow

ing

it t

o

pro

ceed

. T

his

bill

wo

uld

mak

e a

tech

nic

al, n

on

subst

anti

ve c

han

ge

to t

hat

pro

vis

ion

.

Ass

emb

ly

Co

nse

nt

Cal

endar

Wat

ch

Ad

ds

to t

he

new

3 f

oo

t b

ike

clea

ran

ce law

a

new

req

uir

emen

t th

at t

he

bic

yclis

t p

ull

over

at

a t

urn

out

if 5

or

mo

re v

ehic

les

are

follo

win

g.

AB

212

Intr

oduce

d:

2/

2/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Ach

ad

jian

R

(Dis

t 35)

Sta

te h

igh

ways.

C

urr

ent

law

est

ablis

hes

th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f T

ransp

ort

atio

n a

nd

th

e C

alif

orn

ia T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Co

mm

issi

on

an

d p

rovid

es t

hat

th

e d

epar

tmen

t h

as f

ull

po

sses

sio

n a

nd

co

ntr

ol o

f al

l st

ate

hig

hw

ays

and

all

pro

per

ty a

nd

rig

hts

in

pro

per

ty a

cquir

ed f

or

stat

e h

igh

way

p

urp

ose

s an

d a

uth

ori

zes

and d

irec

ts t

he

dep

artm

ent

to lay

out

and

co

nst

ruct

all

stat

e h

igh

way

s b

etw

een

th

e te

rmin

i des

ign

ated

by

law

an

d o

n t

he

loca

tio

ns

as d

eter

min

ed b

y th

e co

mm

issi

on

. Th

is b

ill

wo

uld

mak

e te

chn

ical

, n

on

sub

stan

tive

chan

ges

to t

hes

e p

rovis

ion

s. A

ssem

bly

Pri

nt

–2 y

ear

bill

Wat

ch

Th

is is

a sp

ot

bill

for

wh

ich

th

e au

tho

r h

as

no

t d

iscl

ose

d h

is inte

nti

ons.

56

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=Y0I%2fsR%2bV%2f8FpHHM0e%2bUDl3S535Je9fa8QvM%2fyBo6WuFwpCuLUW3rWGrnTarX5QbI




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=pOklYZYznkyppzPkxjarZ6ZJujhf6XR5HZWmlhiK%2bStVU5PcX%2bS5ghr0VnMzVqvv




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=zrze%2bwwlMEd%2b%2btpyn867Af8pEI3L0XcIVZIAzRYc%2b%2ftiPK%2bD6eUvsyoyiu9ezOOQ




San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

227

Am

ended

: 4/

15/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Ale

jo D

(Dis

t 30)

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

fu

nd

ing

. C

urr

ent

law

pro

vid

es f

or

loan

s o

f re

ven

ues

fro

m v

ario

us

tran

spo

rtat

ion

fun

ds

and

acc

oun

ts t

o t

he

Gen

eral

Fun

d, w

ith

var

ious

rep

aym

ent

dat

es s

pec

ifie

d. T

his

bill

, w

ith

res

pec

t to

an

y lo

ans

mad

e to

th

e G

ener

al F

un

d f

rom

sp

ecif

ied t

ran

spo

rtat

ion

fu

nd

s an

d a

cco

un

ts w

ith

a r

epay

men

t dat

e o

f Ja

nuar

y 1, 20

19, o

r la

ter,

wo

uld

req

uir

e th

e lo

ans

to b

e re

pai

d b

y D

ecem

ber

31, 2018.

Th

is b

ill c

on

tain

s o

ther

rel

ated

pro

vis

ions

and

oth

er c

urr

ent

law

s.

Ass

emb

ly

Budge

t Sup

po

rt

Th

is b

ill m

and

ates

th

at S

tate

Gen

eral

Fun

d

loan

s fr

om

tra

nsp

ort

atio

n r

even

ues

be

rep

aid

. A

lso

, ex

ten

ds

P3 law

.

AB

239

Intr

oduce

d:

2/

5/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Gall

ag

her

R

(Dis

t 3)

Gre

en

ho

use

gase

s: r

eg

ula

tio

ns.

W

ould

pro

hib

it t

he

Sta

te A

ir R

eso

urc

es B

oar

d, o

n a

nd

aft

er

Jan

uar

y 1, 2016, fr

om

ad

op

tin

g o

r am

endin

g re

gula

tio

ns

purs

uan

t to

th

e C

alif

orn

ia G

lob

al W

arm

ing

So

luti

on

s A

ct o

f 2006. T

he

bill

w

ould

auth

ori

ze t

he

bo

ard

to

subm

it t

o t

he

Leg

isla

ture

re

com

men

dat

ion

s o

n h

ow

to

ach

ieve

the

goal

s o

f th

e ac

t.

Ass

emb

ly

Nat

ura

l R

eso

urc

es –

2

year

bill

Wat

ch

Res

tric

ts A

RB

fro

m a

men

din

g re

gula

tio

ns

un

der

AB

32 s

tart

ing

in 2

016

.

AB

313

Intr

oduce

d:

2/

12/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Atk

ins

D

(Dis

t 78)

En

han

ced

in

frast

ructu

re f

inan

cin

g d

istr

icts

. W

ould

req

uir

e, a

fter

th

e ad

op

tio

n o

f a

reso

luti

on

of

inte

nti

on

to

es

tab

lish

a p

rop

ose

d d

istr

ict,

th

e le

gisl

ativ

e b

od

y to

sen

d a

co

py

of

the

reso

luti

on

to

th

e p

ub

lic f

inan

cin

g au

tho

rity

. T

his

bill

wo

uld

re

vis

e th

e d

uti

es o

f th

e pub

lic f

inan

cin

g au

tho

rity

aft

er t

he

reso

luti

on

of

inte

nti

on

to

est

ablis

h t

he

pro

po

sed

dis

tric

t h

as b

een

ad

op

ted

, so

th

at t

he

pub

lic f

inan

cin

g au

tho

rity

, in

stea

d o

f th

e le

gisl

ativ

e b

od

y, w

ill p

erfo

rm t

he

spec

ifie

d d

uti

es r

elat

ed t

o t

he

pre

par

atio

n, p

rop

osa

l, an

d a

do

pti

on

of

the

infr

astr

uct

ure

fin

anci

ng

pla

n a

nd

th

e ad

op

tio

n o

f th

e fo

rmat

ion

of

the

dis

tric

t.

Ass

emb

ly

Lo

cal

Go

ver

nm

ent

Wat

ch

Th

e au

tho

r is

ad

dre

ssin

g th

e el

imin

atio

n o

f d

wel

ling

un

its

un

der

th

e st

ate'

s n

ew

En

han

ced

IF

D law

; es

sen

tial

ly t

he

bill

w

ould

est

ablis

h r

equir

emen

ts f

or

rep

lace

men

t o

f un

its

and

a r

elo

cati

on

as

sist

ance

pro

cess

.

AB

378

Intr

oduce

d:

2/

18/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Mu

llin

D

(Dis

t 22)

Sta

te H

igh

way 1

01

co

rrid

or.

C

urr

ent

law

pro

vid

es t

hat

th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f T

ransp

ort

atio

n h

as

full

po

sses

sion

an

d c

on

tro

l o

f th

e st

ate

hig

hw

ay s

yste

m. C

urr

ent

law

im

po

ses

var

ious

requir

emen

ts f

or

the

dev

elo

pm

ent

and

im

ple

men

tati

on

of

tran

spo

rtat

ion

pro

ject

s. T

his

bill

wo

uld

dec

lare

th

e in

ten

t o

f th

e L

egis

latu

re t

o e

nac

t le

gisl

atio

n t

hat

will

en

able

re

spo

nsi

ble

lo

cal,

regi

on

al, an

d s

tate

age

nci

es t

o s

ub

stan

tial

ly

imp

rove

mo

bili

ty in

th

e Sta

te H

igh

way

101 c

orr

idor.

The

bill

w

ould

mak

e fi

nd

ings

an

d d

ecla

rati

on

s in

th

at r

egar

d.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

–2 y

ear

bill

Sup

po

rt

Th

e au

tho

r se

eks

inn

ovat

ive

mea

ns

to

add

ress

mo

bili

ty in

th

e B

ay r

egio

n's

SR

101

corr

idor.

We

hav

e m

et w

ith

th

e author’s

staf

f to

dis

cuss

an

d a

re e

nga

ged in

on

goin

g d

iscu

ssio

ns

wit

h s

tate

/re

gion

al/

loca

l st

akeh

old

ers

in t

he

corr

ido

r.

57

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=AZR65qmrPHmwvgKulegbaVevEkvHvHX62ztiDwjGAQg7%2fKnqacURCYpZo1RgRDY%2b




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=6FGgm2pYjtAoawQiV1OWetcJFyeB712VmGQCNaCMWBHbJbOmYivpzyxLYXaEYFi2




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=YrnbRP9kZ3FHfFx34Y2eEqpIEQP%2fiOESn162JRGZwCfYGEYrFlZZUDSIHjW%2bhjta



http://asmdc.org/speaker/

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=%2bkYQzx8jSZGwDbZofq6WpapKQxBikN%2f%2bY3b79OlIIpxIkWgkI5XA6nkBCKORdjZK




San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

457

Am

ended

: 3/

26/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Mele

nd

ez R

(Dis

t 67)

Hig

h-o

ccu

pan

cy t

oll

lan

es.

C

urr

ent

law

auth

ori

zes

a re

gio

nal

tra

nsp

ort

atio

n a

gen

cy, as

def

ined

, in

co

op

erat

ion

wit

h t

he

Dep

artm

ent

of

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n, to

ap

ply

to

th

e C

alif

orn

ia T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Co

mm

issi

on

to

dev

elo

p a

nd

op

erat

e h

igh

-occ

up

ancy

to

ll lan

es. C

urr

ent

law

req

uir

es t

he

com

mis

sio

n, in

co

op

erat

ion

wit

h t

he

Leg

isla

tive

An

alys

t, t

o a

nn

ual

ly p

rep

are

a re

po

rt o

n t

he

pro

gres

s o

f th

e dev

elo

pm

ent

and

op

erat

ion

of

thes

e fa

cilit

ies.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

inst

ead

req

uir

e th

e co

mm

issi

on

, in

co

op

erat

ion

wit

h t

he

Leg

isla

tive

An

alys

t, t

o p

rep

are

this

rep

ort

ev

ery

two

yea

rs.

Ass

emb

ly

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

–2 y

ear

bill

Wat

ch

A s

po

t b

ill. D

iscu

ssio

ns

wit

h t

he

auth

or'

s o

ffic

e in

dic

ate

that

sh

e se

eks

mo

re

tran

spar

ent

no

tifi

cati

on

to

mo

tori

sts

on

to

ll si

gns

in O

ran

ge c

oun

ty.

AB

464

Am

ended

: 4/

6/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Mu

llin

D

(Dis

t 22)

Tra

nsa

cti

on

s an

d u

se t

axes

: m

axim

um

co

mb

ined

rate

. C

urr

ent

law

auth

ori

zes

citi

es a

nd

co

un

ties

, an

d, if

sp

ecif

ical

ly

auth

ori

zed

, o

ther

lo

cal go

ver

nm

enta

l en

titi

es, su

bje

ct t

o c

erta

in

limit

atio

ns

and

ap

pro

val

req

uir

emen

ts, to

lev

y a

tran

sact

ion

s an

d

use

tax

fo

r ge

ner

al p

urp

ose

s, in

acc

ord

ance

wit

h t

he

pro

cedure

s an

d r

equir

emen

ts s

et f

ort

h in

th

e T

ran

sact

ion

s an

d U

se T

ax L

aw,

incl

ud

ing

a re

quir

emen

t th

at t

he

com

bin

ed r

ate

of

all ta

xes

imp

ose

d in

acc

ord

ance

wit

h t

hat

law

in

th

e co

unty

no

t ex

ceed

2%

. T

his

bill

wo

uld

in

crea

se t

hat

max

imum

co

mb

ined

rat

e to

3%

.

Ass

emb

ly

Sec

on

d

Rea

din

g -

Flo

or

Sup

po

rt

Pro

vid

es s

ign

ific

ant

new

lo

cal go

ver

nm

ent

sale

s ta

x ca

pac

ity

by

sett

ing

loca

l ca

p a

t 3%

.

AB

481

Intr

oduce

d:

2/

23/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Harp

er

R

(Dis

t 74)

Au

tom

ate

d t

raff

ic e

nfo

rcem

en

t sy

stem

s.

Curr

ent

law

auth

ori

zes

the

limit

lin

e, in

ters

ecti

on

, o

r oth

er p

lace

s w

her

e a

dri

ver

is

requir

ed t

o s

top

to

be

equip

ped

wit

h a

n

auto

mat

ed t

raff

ic e

nfo

rcem

ent

syst

em if

the

syst

em m

eets

cer

tain

re

quir

emen

ts. C

urr

ent

law

auth

ori

zes

a go

ver

nm

enta

l ag

ency

to

co

ntr

act

out

the

op

erat

ion

of

the

syst

em u

nder

cer

tain

ci

rcum

stan

ces,

exc

ept

for

spec

ifie

d a

ctiv

itie

s. T

his

bill

wo

uld

mak

e te

chn

ical

, n

on

sub

stan

tive

chan

ges

to t

hes

e p

rovis

ion

s.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

–2 y

ear

bill

Wat

ch

Th

is is

a sp

ot

bill

. T

he

auth

or

has

no

t in

dic

ated

his

ult

imat

e in

tent

for

the

bill

, b

ut

it is

app

aren

t fr

om

pub

lic s

tate

men

ts h

e d

oes

no

t en

do

rse

use

of

auto

mat

ed t

raff

ic

enfo

rcem

ent.

58

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=CU52KWZOwYKE9dE8Ipi9Hr3TjAJ5gAEZYU0%2b1G49Ywzt6jHaPQ42N6DKhiqaZFvw




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=iZo%2ffZOfeuWOMischDqosW64FXyLYbo1NNz%2bqvP5T2JQg37KQ0Y%2baBq3pkJqgws3




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=juwLw1Pe0ebflX4OmRAu36pDGjdYJgUwQr2NvFis9rpQC5QtTwW%2bj5FxnB2Pe1H0




San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

B

ill

#

Au

tho

r D

esc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

516

A

men

ded

: 4/

20/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Mu

llin

D

(Dis

t 22)

Veh

icle

s: t

em

po

rary

lic

en

se p

late

s.

Wo

uld

req

uir

e th

e D

MV

to

dev

elo

p a

tem

po

rary

lic

ense

pla

te

syst

em t

o e

nab

le t

he

DM

V, veh

icle

dea

lers

th

at a

re p

rivat

e in

dust

ry

par

tner

s, a

nd

fir

st-l

ine

serv

ice

pro

vid

ers,

as

def

ined

, to

pro

vid

e te

mp

ora

ry lic

ense

pla

tes,

and

wo

uld

req

uir

e th

e sy

stem

to

beg

in

op

erat

ion

on

Jan

uar

y 1, 201

7. T

he

bill

wo

uld

req

uir

e, c

om

men

cin

g Ja

nuar

y 1, 2017, a

mo

tor

veh

icle

dea

ler

that

is

a pri

vat

e-in

dust

ry

par

tner

to

aff

ix a

tem

pora

ry lic

ense

pla

te, at

th

e ti

me

of

sale

, to

a

veh

icle

so

ld w

ith

out

a p

erm

anen

t lic

ense

pla

te.

Ass

emb

ly

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Sup

po

rt

Th

is b

ill r

equir

es d

evel

opm

ent

of

a st

atew

ide

tem

po

rary

lic

ense

pla

te (

TL

P)

syst

em t

o e

nsu

re n

ew a

nd

use

d p

urc

has

ed

veh

icle

s ar

e id

enti

fiab

le t

o law

en

forc

emen

t an

d t

oll o

per

ato

rs d

uri

ng

the

per

iod

b

etw

een

th

e p

oin

t o

f sa

le a

nd

wh

en

per

man

ent

licen

se p

late

s ar

e re

ceiv

ed b

y th

e p

urc

has

er. T

his

bill

is

spo

nso

red

by

the

Met

rop

olit

an T

ransp

ort

atio

n C

om

mis

sio

n

(MT

C)

to a

ddre

ss b

rid

ge t

oll

reven

ue

evas

ion

.

AB

518

In

tro

duce

d:

2/

23/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Fra

zie

r D

(D

ist

11)

Dep

art

men

t o

f T

ran

spo

rtati

on

. C

urr

ent

law

auth

ori

zes

a lo

cal ag

ency

to

en

ter

into

an

agr

eem

ent

wit

h t

he

app

rop

riat

e tr

ansp

ort

atio

n p

lan

nin

g ag

ency

, th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

, an

d t

he

Cal

ifo

rnia

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

Co

mm

issi

on

, to

use

its

ow

n f

un

ds

to d

evel

op

, purc

has

e ri

ght-

of-

way

, an

d c

on

stru

ct a

pro

ject

wit

hin

its

juri

sdic

tio

n if

the

pro

ject

is

incl

ud

ed in

th

e ad

op

ted s

tate

tra

nsp

ort

atio

n im

pro

vem

ent

pro

gram

an

d f

un

ded

fro

m s

pec

ifie

d s

ourc

es. T

his

bill

wo

uld

del

ete

that

p

rovis

ion

req

uir

ing

the

dep

artm

ent

to c

om

pile

in

form

atio

n a

nd

re

po

rt t

o t

he

Leg

isla

ture

. T

his

bill

co

nta

ins

oth

er c

urr

ent

law

s.

Ass

emb

ly

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

– 2

yea

r b

ill

Wat

ch

Sp

ot

bill

.

AB

528

Intr

oduce

d:

2/

23/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Bak

er

R

(Dis

t 16)

San

Fra

nci

sco

Bay A

rea R

ap

id T

ran

sit

Dis

tric

t (B

AR

T):

st

rik

es:

pro

hib

itio

n.

Wo

uld

pro

hib

it e

mp

loye

es o

f th

e San

Fra

nci

sco

Bay

Are

a R

apid

T

ran

sit

Dis

tric

t fr

om

en

gagi

ng

in a

str

ike

or

work

sto

pp

age

if t

he

tran

sit

dis

tric

t b

oar

d m

ainta

ins

the

com

pen

sati

on

an

d b

enef

it

pro

vis

ion

s o

f an

exp

ired

co

ntr

act

and

an

em

plo

yee

or

emp

loye

e o

rgan

izat

ion

has

agr

eed t

o a

pro

vis

ion

pro

hib

itin

g st

rikes

in

th

e ex

pir

ed o

r p

revio

us

wri

tten

lab

or

con

trac

t. T

he

bill

wo

uld

pro

vid

e th

at a

n e

mp

loye

e w

ho

m t

he

tran

sit

dis

tric

t em

plo

yer

fin

ds

will

fully

en

gage

d in

a s

trik

e o

r w

ork

sto

pp

age

in v

iola

tio

n o

f th

ese

pro

vis

ion

s is

sub

ject

to

dis

mis

sal if

th

at f

indin

g is

sust

ained

up

on

co

ncl

usi

on

of

the

app

rop

riat

e p

roce

edin

gs n

eces

sary

fo

r th

e im

po

siti

on

of

a d

isci

plin

ary

acti

on

.

Ass

emb

ly

Pub

lic

Em

plo

yees

, R

etir

emen

t an

d

So

cial

Sec

uri

ty

Wat

ch

Th

e b

ill w

ould

pro

hib

it B

AR

T e

mp

loye

es

fro

m s

trik

ing

or

un

der

takin

g a

wo

rk

sto

pp

age.

59

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=5iM6F4NlQ47T24lHb32unrBtug5SgO%2fG0mylp26FeOIgzuA3z3atkw08tLCnJga2




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=y7CWgWDQimt98Yp3IFTJp1ByiuRIdBFrfVEOFwilEn54cUkGcGUH%2ft%2foFsEqa9Dt




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=jBU9ma81bqAorNiV31ZyUAq2s9eaoxnHNM6dRFfnYDFThn6d7cAZkHJ7xItcLtb9




San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

620

Intr

oduce

d:

2/

24/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Hern

án

dez,

Ro

ger

D

(Dis

t 48)

Hig

h-o

ccu

pan

cy t

oll

lan

es:

exem

pti

on

s fr

om

to

lls.

W

ould

req

uir

e th

e L

os

An

gele

s C

oun

ty M

etro

po

litan

T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Auth

ori

ty, in

im

ple

men

tin

g th

e val

ue-

pri

cin

g an

d

tran

sit

dev

elo

pm

ent

pro

gram

, to

ado

pt

elig

ibili

ty r

equir

emen

ts f

or

mit

igat

ion

mea

sure

s fo

r co

mm

ute

rs a

nd

tra

nsi

t use

rs o

f lo

w a

nd

m

od

erat

e in

com

e, a

s d

efin

ed, an

d w

ould

als

o r

equir

e L

AC

MT

A t

o

pro

vid

e h

ard

ship

exe

mp

tions

fro

m t

he

pay

men

t o

f to

ll c

har

ges

for

com

mute

rs w

ho

mee

t th

e el

igib

ility

req

uir

emen

ts f

or

spec

ifie

d

assi

stan

ce p

rogr

ams.

Th

is b

ill c

on

tain

s oth

er e

xist

ing

law

s.

Ass

emb

ly

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n W

atch

E

xpan

ds

LA

Met

ro a

uth

ori

ty r

elat

ive

to

HO

T L

anes

in

th

eir

juri

sdic

tio

n, re

quir

ing

the

agen

cy t

o p

rovid

e as

sist

ance

to

tra

nsi

t use

rs a

nd

co

mm

ute

rs o

f la

w a

nd

mo

der

ate

inco

me.

AB

779

Am

ended

: 4/

14/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Garc

ia,

Cri

stin

a D

(Dis

t 58)

En

viro

nm

enta

l q

uali

ty:

tran

sit

pri

ori

ty a

reas.

C

EQ

A r

equir

es t

he

Off

ice

of

Pla

nn

ing

and

Res

earc

h t

o p

rep

are

and

dev

elo

p, an

d t

he

Sec

reta

ry o

f th

e N

atura

l R

esourc

es A

gen

cy t

o

cert

ify

and

ad

op

t, p

rop

ose

d r

evis

ion

s to

th

e gu

idel

ines

for

the

imp

lem

enta

tio

n o

f C

EQ

A t

o e

stab

lish

cri

teri

a fo

r det

erm

inin

g th

e si

gnif

ican

ce o

f tr

ansp

ort

atio

n im

pac

ts o

f pro

ject

s w

ith

in t

ran

sit

pri

ori

ty a

reas

th

at, am

on

g oth

er t

hin

gs, p

rom

ote

th

e re

duct

ion

of

gree

nh

ouse

gas

em

issi

ons.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

pro

vid

e th

at t

he

revis

ed

guid

elin

es s

hal

l n

ot

be

effe

ctiv

e b

efo

re J

uly

1, 201

7. T

his

bill

co

nta

ins

oth

er e

xist

ing

law

s.

Ass

emb

ly

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Op

pose

O

rigi

nal

ly a

spo

t b

ill. N

ow

it

requir

es O

PR

to

del

ay g

uid

elin

es t

hat

ad

dre

ss o

ther

im

pac

ts o

f tr

affi

c in

PD

A's

th

at s

eek t

o

red

uce

GH

G e

mis

sio

ns

to 2

017.

AB

828

Am

ended

: 4/

20/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Lo

w D

(Dis

t 28)

Veh

icle

s: t

ran

spo

rtati

on

netw

ork

co

mp

an

ies

(TN

Cs)

. C

urr

ent

law

def

ines

a “transportation

net

work

company”

to

mea

n

an o

rgan

izat

ion

, in

clud

ing,

but

no

t lim

ited

to

, a

corp

ora

tio

n,

limit

ed lia

bili

ty c

om

pan

y, p

artn

ersh

ip, so

le p

rop

riet

or,

or

any

oth

er

enti

ty, o

per

atin

g in

Cal

ifo

rnia

th

at p

rovid

es p

rear

ran

ged

tr

ansp

ort

atio

n s

ervic

es f

or

com

pen

sati

on

usi

ng

an o

nlin

e-en

able

d

app

licat

ion

or

pla

tfo

rm t

o c

on

nec

t p

asse

nge

rs w

ith

dri

vers

usi

ng

a p

erso

nal

veh

icle

. Th

is b

ill w

ould

exc

lude

from

th

e def

init

ion

of

“commercial

vehicle,”

fo

r purp

ose

s o

f th

e V

ehic

le C

ode,

an

y m

oto

r veh

icle

op

erat

ed in

con

nec

tio

n w

ith

a t

ran

spo

rtat

ion

n

etw

ork

co

mp

any,

if

spec

ifie

d c

on

dit

ion

s ar

e sa

tisf

ied.

Ass

emb

ly

Th

ird R

eadin

g W

atch

A

men

ded

to

exc

lud

e T

NC

veh

icle

s fr

om

"c

om

mer

cial

veh

icle

" d

efin

itio

n u

nd

er

cert

ain

co

nd

itio

ns.

60

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=xXOY5z21N1ZkssFji4NLSsbummtDRimiNW1lvD8I2HgA72nG377derjv8rBEqjvm





http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=oOlPrNlXtJ5t4Ta7oCfmM8HG0Ma8xWpUYxBfhvPMxQ8CbcQRLAvA4I%2fMx3vnWHuZ





http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=Ksxda57akDjJJSCQ0tpjxTUkpxVKrpbcHVIZS5i7QIfy5woizg7t5L7Xj7%2bjHJpS




San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

869

Am

ended

: 4/

13/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Co

op

er

D

(Dis

t 9)

Pu

bli

c t

ran

spo

rtati

on

ag

encie

s: f

are

eva

sio

n a

nd

pro

hib

ited

co

nd

uct.

C

urr

ent

law

auth

ori

zes

a p

ub

lic t

ran

spo

rtat

ion

age

ncy

to

ado

pt

and

en

forc

e an

ord

inan

ce t

o im

po

se a

nd

en

forc

e ci

vil

adm

inis

trat

ive

pen

alti

es f

or

fare

evas

ion

or

oth

er p

asse

nge

r m

isco

nduct

, o

ther

th

an b

y m

ino

rs, o

n o

r in

a t

ran

sit

faci

lity

or

veh

icle

in

lie

u o

f th

e cr

imin

al p

enal

ties

oth

erw

ise

app

licab

le, w

ith

sp

ecif

ied

adm

inis

trat

ive

pro

ced

ure

s fo

r th

e im

po

siti

on

an

d e

nfo

rcem

ent

of

the

adm

inis

trat

ive

pen

alti

es, in

cludin

g an

in

itia

l re

vie

w a

nd

o

pp

ort

un

ity

for

a su

bse

quen

t ad

min

istr

ativ

e h

eari

ng.

Th

is b

ill

wo

uld

pro

vid

e th

at a

per

son

wh

o f

ails

to

pay

th

e ad

min

istr

ativ

e p

enal

ty w

hen

due

or

succ

essf

ully

co

mp

lete

th

e ad

min

istr

ativ

e p

roce

ss t

o d

ism

iss

the

no

tice

of

fare

evas

ion

or

pas

sen

ger

mis

con

duct

may

be

sub

ject

to

th

ose

cri

min

al p

enal

ties

.

Ass

emb

ly

Co

nse

nt

Cal

endar

Wat

ch

Pro

vid

es a

dd

itio

nal

fle

xib

ility

to

tra

nsi

t ag

enci

es t

hat

see

k t

o u

se t

he

adm

inis

trat

ive

adju

dic

atio

n p

roce

ss (

tran

sit

court

).

AB

877

Am

ended

: 3/

26/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Ch

u D

(Dis

t 25)

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

. W

ould

exp

and

th

e C

alif

orn

ia T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Co

mm

issi

on

to

15

mem

ber

s, w

ith

on

e ad

dit

ion

al M

emb

er o

f th

e A

ssem

bly

an

d o

ne

add

itio

nal

Mem

ber

of

the

Sen

ate

as e

x o

ffic

io n

on

vo

tin

g m

emb

ers.

T

his

bill

co

nta

ins

oth

er r

elat

ed p

rovis

ions

and

oth

er e

xist

ing

law

s.

Ass

emb

ly

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

–2 y

ear

bill

Wat

ch

Th

is r

emai

ns

a sp

ot

bill

reg

ard

ing

stat

e tr

ansp

ort

atio

n f

un

din

g.

AB

886

Am

ended

: 3/

26/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Ch

au

D

(Dis

t 49)

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

serv

ice n

etw

ork

pro

vid

er:

pass

en

ger

pri

vacy.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

req

uir

e tr

ansp

ort

atio

n s

ervic

e n

etw

ork

pro

vid

ers

(TSN

P)

to a

do

pt

cert

ain

pri

vac

y st

andar

ds

per

tain

ing

to a

p

asse

nge

r's

per

son

ally

iden

tifi

able

dat

a.

Ass

emb

ly –

2

Yea

r B

ill

New

–

Rec

om

men

d

Wat

ch

Th

e b

ill s

eeks

to e

nco

mp

ass

no

t ju

st T

NC

s,

but

all fu

ture

tra

nsp

ort

atio

n s

ervic

es,

incl

ud

ing

taxi

s, w

hic

h m

ay s

om

eday

ad

op

t o

nlin

e-en

able

d a

pp

licat

ion

s o

r p

latf

orm

s.

Th

is b

ill t

hen

see

ks

to p

rote

ct T

SN

P

cust

om

er d

ata

con

sist

ent

wit

h P

UC

in

form

atio

n p

ract

ices

pri

nci

ple

s b

y lim

itin

g it

s co

llect

ion

, use

, an

d s

har

ing

to o

nly

p

urp

ose

s n

eces

sary

to

co

mp

lete

a

tran

sact

ion

, in

ves

tiga

te c

rim

inal

act

ivit

ies,

an

d m

ain

tain

ing

a use

r's

acco

un

t.

61

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=7B6mpJPs35ZtrOGGY2zwSb9XJhUyDwPx6NfwOPFbnc1XwkpQAi2W4WUd7cHRIkLp




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=zNxqIyBFGYz%2b2g8%2fvW5U%2fXCfxVkg%2fNU6FJFjwNVUQMxRP7A5tSdnL2lBG%2bru6MPD








San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

902

Am

ended

: 3/

26/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Blo

om

D

(Dis

t 50)

Tra

ffic

vio

lati

on

s: d

ivers

ion

pro

gra

ms.

C

urr

ent

law

pro

vid

es t

hat

a lo

cal au

tho

rity

may

no

t al

low

a p

erso

n

wh

o h

as c

om

mit

ted a

Tra

ffic

Vio

lati

on

Un

der

th

e veh

icle

co

de

to

par

tici

pat

e in

a d

river

aw

aren

ess

or

educa

tio

n p

rogr

am a

s an

al

tern

ativ

e to

th

ose

pen

alti

es

and

pro

ced

ure

s, u

nle

ss t

he

pro

gram

is

a div

ersi

on

pro

gram

fo

r a

min

or

wh

o c

om

mit

s an

in

frac

tio

n n

ot

invo

lvin

g a

mo

tor

veh

icle

an

d f

or

wh

ich

no

fee

is

char

ged

. T

his

bill

wo

uld

in

stea

d a

llow

an

y p

erso

n o

f an

y ag

e w

ho

co

mm

its

an in

frac

tio

n n

ot

invo

lvin

g a

mo

tor

veh

icle

to

par

tici

pat

e in

a d

iver

sion

pro

gram

of

the

typ

e des

crib

ed a

bo

ve.

Sen

ate

Rule

s W

atch

In

itia

lly a

spo

t b

ill r

elat

ed t

o b

icyc

list

law

s.

No

w r

elat

es t

o m

oto

r veh

icle

co

de

vio

lati

on

re

late

d t

o b

icyc

les

and

div

ersi

on

pro

gram

s fo

r m

ino

rs.

AB

945

Am

ended

: 4/

27/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Tin

g D

(Dis

t 19)

Sale

s an

d u

se t

ax

es:

exem

pti

on

: lo

w-e

mis

sio

n v

eh

icle

s.

Th

e b

ill, o

n a

nd

aft

er J

anuar

y 1,2

016,u

nti

l Ja

nuar

y 1, 2020

,wo

uld

p

rovid

e a

par

tial

exe

mp

tio

n f

rom

sta

te s

ales

tax

es w

ith

res

pec

t to

th

e sa

le o

f sp

ecif

ied lo

w-e

mis

sion

veh

icle

s, a

s p

rovid

ed.

Ass

emb

ly

Rev

enue

and

T

axat

ion

New

–

Rec

om

men

d

Wat

ch

Th

e b

ill is

inte

nd

ed t

o e

nco

ura

ge o

ut-

of-

stat

e el

ectr

ic v

ehic

le b

uye

rs t

o c

om

e to

th

e fa

cto

ry a

nd

vis

it t

he

stat

e as

par

t o

f th

eir

exp

erie

nce

.

Rec

ent

amen

dm

ents

app

ly t

he

exem

pti

on

o

nly

on

sta

te, n

ot

loca

l, sa

les

taxe

s. T

he

Bay

A

rea

Air

Qual

ity

Man

agem

ent

Dis

tric

t h

as

ado

pte

d a

supp

ort

po

siti

on

.

AB

1015

Am

ended

: 4/

23/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Blo

om

D

(Dis

t 50)

Park

ing

: car

share

veh

icle

s.

Wo

uld

auth

ori

ze a

lo

cal au

tho

rity

to

, by

ord

inan

ce o

r re

solu

tio

n,

des

ign

ate

cert

ain

str

eets

or

po

rtio

ns

of

stre

ets

for

the

non

excl

usi

ve

par

kin

g p

rivile

ge o

f m

oto

r ve

hic

les

par

tici

pat

ing

in a

car

sh

are

veh

icle

pro

gram

or

rid

esh

arin

g p

rogr

am.

Ass

emb

ly

Co

nse

nt

Cal

endar

Wat

ch

Per

mit

s d

esig

nat

ion

of

cars

har

e o

r ri

des

har

e p

arkin

g ar

eas,

an

d p

erm

its

fees

to

be

pai

d

to t

he

loca

l au

tho

rity

.

AB

1030

Intr

oduce

d:

2/

26/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Rid

ley-

Th

om

as

D

(Dis

t 54)

Cali

forn

ia G

lob

al

Warm

ing

So

luti

on

s A

ct

of

2006

: G

reen

ho

use

Gas

Red

ucti

on

Fu

nd

. W

ould

req

uir

e a

stat

e ag

ency

th

at a

lloca

tes

mo

ney

s fr

om

th

e G

reen

ho

use

Gas

Red

uct

ion

Fun

d t

o p

riori

tize

pro

ject

s th

at in

clude

pro

ject

lab

or

agre

emen

ts w

ith

tar

gete

d h

ire

goal

s, c

om

mun

ity

wo

rkfo

rce

agre

emen

ts t

hat

co

nn

ect

loca

l re

siden

ts t

o jobs

or

trai

nin

g o

pp

ort

un

itie

s, o

r p

artn

ersh

ips

wit

h t

rain

ing

enti

ties

th

at

hav

e a

pro

ven

tra

ck r

eco

rd o

f p

laci

ng

dis

advan

tage

d w

ork

ers

in

care

er-t

rack

jo

bs.

Ass

emb

ly

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Wat

ch

Req

uir

es p

rio

rity

fo

r ca

p a

nd t

rad

e -

fun

ded

p

roje

cts

by

stat

e gr

ant

agen

cies

for

pro

ject

s w

ith

PL

A o

r lo

cal w

ork

forc

e ag

reem

ents

.

62









http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=EluqbJx%2bkUyiSL2z9QY3cdjgoBBlhAHNpsDxNSppGL2Fw8wbnEhkUazAwfPvXQ24




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=EQNBF3nd3Bg98BKbKVbGES2wjHuSinTYrwJJIlfqeznQudgpsSP7RrTPDEVraz3q





San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

B

ill

#

Au

tho

r D

esc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

1033

Intr

oduce

d:

2/

26/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Garc

ia,

Ed

uard

o D

(D

ist

56)

Infr

ast

ructu

re f

inan

cin

g.

Th

e B

erge

son

-Pea

ce I

nfr

astr

uct

ure

an

d E

con

om

ic D

evel

op

men

t B

ank A

ct e

stab

lish

es t

he

Cal

ifo

rnia

In

fras

truct

ure

and

Eco

no

mic

D

evel

op

men

t B

ank, w

ith

in t

he

Go

ver

no

r's

Off

ice

of

Busi

nes

s an

d

Eco

no

mic

Dev

elo

pm

ent,

to

be

gover

ned

by

a sp

ecif

ied b

oar

d o

f d

irec

tors

. T

he

act

mak

es f

indin

gs a

nd

dec

lara

tio

ns,

pro

vid

es

def

init

ion

s, a

nd

auth

ori

zes

the

bo

ard

to

tak

e var

ious

acti

on

s in

co

nn

ecti

on

wit

h t

he

ban

k, in

cludin

g th

e is

suan

ce o

f b

on

ds,

as

spec

ifie

d. T

his

bill

, am

on

g oth

er t

hin

gs, w

ould

rev

ise

the

def

init

ion

o

f ec

on

om

ic d

evel

op

men

t fa

cilit

ies

to in

clude

faci

litie

s th

at a

re

use

d t

o p

rovid

e go

od

s m

ovem

ent

and

wo

uld

def

ine

goods

mo

vem

ent-

rela

ted in

fras

truct

ure

.

Ass

emb

ly J

ob

s,

Eco

no

mic

D

evel

op

men

t an

d t

he

Eco

no

my – 2

ye

ar b

ill

Wat

ch

Cre

ates

th

e C

alif

orn

ia I

nfr

astr

uct

ure

F

inan

ce C

ente

r in

th

e st

ate

iBan

k t

o

faci

litat

e th

e use

of

P3s.

AB

1087

Intr

oduce

d:

2/

27/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Gro

ve R

(D

ist

34)

Gre

en

ho

use

Gas

Red

ucti

on

Fu

nd

: h

igh

-sp

eed

rail

. W

ould

pro

vid

e th

at t

he

con

tin

uo

us

app

rop

riat

ion

s fr

om

th

e G

reen

ho

use

Gas

Red

uct

ion

Fun

d t

o t

he

Hig

h-S

pee

d R

ail

Auth

ori

ty a

re f

or

spec

ifie

d c

om

po

nen

ts o

f th

e in

itia

l o

per

atin

g se

gmen

t an

d P

has

e I

ble

nded

sys

tem

, as

des

crib

ed in

th

e au

tho

rity

's 2

012 b

usi

nes

s p

lan

, o

f th

e h

igh

-sp

eed

tra

in s

yste

m t

hat

sh

all b

e co

nst

ruct

ed a

s sp

ecif

ied.

Ass

emb

ly

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

– 2

yea

r b

ill

Wat

ch

Th

is b

ill w

ould

ded

icat

e th

e 25%

sh

are

of

cap

an

d t

rad

e to

(1)

the

ICS, a

nd

(2)

ble

nd

ed s

yste

m p

roje

cts

(in

clud

ing

Cal

trai

n

Ele

ctri

fica

tio

n).

Th

is w

ould

pre

ven

t th

e ult

imat

e H

SR

pro

ject

fro

m b

ein

g fu

lly

real

ized

wit

ho

ut

an a

lter

nat

e fu

nd

ing

sourc

e.

AB

1096

Am

ended

: 4/

29/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Ch

iu D

(D

ist

17)

Veh

icle

s: e

lectr

ic b

icycle

s.

Wo

uld

def

ine

an "

elec

tric

bic

ycle

" as

a b

icyc

le w

ith

fully

op

erab

le

ped

als

and

an

ele

ctri

c m

oto

r o

f le

ss t

han

750

wat

ts, an

d w

ould

cr

eate

3 c

lass

es o

f el

ectr

ic b

icyc

les,

as

spec

ifie

d. T

he

bill

wo

uld

re

quir

e m

anufa

cture

rs o

r dis

trib

uto

rs o

f el

ectr

ic b

icyc

les

to a

ffix

a

lab

el t

o e

ach

ele

ctri

c b

icyc

le t

hat

des

crib

es its

cla

ssif

icat

ion

n

um

ber

, to

p a

ssis

ted s

pee

d, an

d m

oto

r w

atta

ge. T

his

bill

co

nta

ins

oth

er r

elat

ed p

rovis

ion

s an

d o

ther

exi

stin

g la

ws.

Ass

emb

ly

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Wat

ch

Th

is b

ill p

erta

ins

to t

he

def

init

ion

of

mo

tori

zed

bik

es.

63

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=J9K6krFQrOPY638Ipcnch2o6vmzceo%2bnlg%2b6Q2olK%2fXVfZAtfXJ5uT7VfgwwHRlE





http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=I2vL4Yz%2bRbs9uPXu%2bDI0O7r68dOPcJwbvobFS7hHhZ476hsvw15pkEzNgPexA%2f7Y




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=7Rl3mhB4q4qf1PYKWyYdPaYaNV%2bYDjczYy7NPAblZw9%2fgngs5Mf%2bqxrfy7%2fZax8V




San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

1098

Am

ended

: 3/

26/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Blo

om

D

(Dis

t 50)

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

: co

ng

est

ion

man

ag

emen

t.

Curr

ent

law

req

uir

es a

co

nge

stio

n m

anag

emen

t pro

gram

to

be

dev

elo

ped

, ad

op

ted

, an

d u

pdat

ed b

ien

nia

lly b

y a

des

ign

ated

age

ncy

fo

r ev

ery

coun

ty t

hat

in

cludes

an

urb

aniz

ed a

rea.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

d

elet

e th

e tr

affi

c le

vel

of

serv

ice

stan

dar

ds

as a

n e

lem

ent

of

a co

nge

stio

n m

anag

emen

t pro

gram

an

d w

ould

del

ete

rela

ted

requir

emen

ts, in

clud

ing

the

requir

emen

t th

at a

cit

y o

r co

un

ty

pre

par

e a

def

icie

ncy

pla

n w

hen

hig

hw

ay o

r ro

adw

ay lev

el o

f se

rvic

e st

and

ards

are

no

t m

ain

tain

ed. T

his

bill

co

nta

ins

oth

er r

elat

ed

pro

vis

ion

s an

d o

ther

exi

stin

g la

ws.

Ass

emb

ly

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

–2 y

ear

bill

Wat

ch

Th

is b

ill w

ould

rev

ise

the

met

rics

rel

ated

to

co

nge

stio

n m

anag

emen

t pro

gram

s, b

rin

gin

g th

em in

lin

e w

ith

SB

375, re

quir

e th

e re

gio

nal

age

ncy

to

eval

uat

e h

ow

th

e C

MP

is

ach

ievin

g G

HG

red

uct

ion

s, a

nd

sup

po

rt

the region’s

Sust

ain

able

Com

mun

itie

s Str

ateg

y.

We

are

sup

po

rtiv

e o

f re

cen

t am

end

men

ts,

and

we

are

acti

vel

y w

ork

ing

wit

h o

ther

Bay

A

rea

Co

nge

stio

n M

anag

emen

t A

gen

cies

to

re

vie

w a

nd

co

mm

ent

up

on

th

e p

rop

ose

d

legi

slat

ion

, an

d w

ill r

each

out

to a

uth

or

and

th

e O

ffic

e o

f P

lann

ing

& R

esea

rch

.

AB

113

8

Intr

oduce

d:

2/

27/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Patt

erso

n R

(Dis

t 23)

Hig

h-s

peed

rail

: em

inen

t d

om

ain

. W

ould

pro

hib

it t

he

Hig

h-S

pee

d R

ail A

uth

ori

ty, o

r th

e Sta

te P

ub

lic

Wo

rks

Bo

ard

act

ing

on

beh

alf

of

the

auth

ori

ty, fr

om

adop

tin

g a

reso

luti

on

of

nec

essi

ty t

o c

om

men

ce a

n e

min

ent

do

mai

n

pro

ceed

ing

to a

cquir

e a

par

cel o

f re

al p

rop

erty

alo

ng

a co

rrid

or,

or

usa

ble

seg

men

t th

ereo

f, f

or

the

hig

h-s

pee

d t

rain

sys

tem

un

less

th

e re

solu

tio

n id

enti

fies

th

e so

urc

es o

f al

l fu

nds

to b

e in

ves

ted in

th

e co

rrid

or

or

usa

ble

seg

men

t an

d t

he

anti

cip

ated

tim

e o

f re

ceip

t o

f th

ose

fun

ds,

an

d c

erti

fies

th

at t

he

auth

ori

ty h

as c

om

ple

ted

all

nec

essa

ry p

roje

ct lev

el e

nvir

on

men

tal cl

eara

nce

s n

eces

sary

to

p

roce

ed t

o c

on

stru

ctio

n.

Ass

emb

ly

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

–2 y

ear

bill

Op

pose

E

ffec

t o

f th

e b

ill is

to s

top

pro

gres

s o

n I

CS

ph

ases

of

Hig

h S

pee

d R

ail pro

ject

.

AB

116

0

Am

ended

: 4/

14/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Harp

er

R

(Dis

t 74)

Veh

icle

s: a

uto

mate

d t

raff

ic e

nfo

rcem

ent

syst

em

s.

Wo

uld

, b

egin

nin

g Ja

nuar

y 1, 2

016, p

roh

ibit

a g

over

nm

enta

l ag

ency

fr

om

in

stal

ling

an a

uto

mat

ed t

raff

ic e

nfo

rcem

ent

syst

em. T

he

bill

w

ould

auth

ori

ze a

go

ver

nm

enta

l ag

ency

th

at is

op

erat

ing

an

auto

mat

ic t

raff

ic e

nfo

rcem

ent

syst

em o

n t

hat

dat

e to

con

tin

ue

to

do

so

aft

er t

hat

dat

e o

nly

if

the

agen

cy b

egin

s co

nduct

ing

a tr

affi

c sa

fety

stu

dy

on

or

bef

ore

Feb

ruar

y 28, 2016, at

eac

h in

ters

ecti

on

w

her

e a

syst

em is

in u

se t

o d

eter

min

e w

het

her

th

e use

of

the

syst

em r

esult

ed in

a r

educt

ion

in

th

e n

um

ber

of

traf

fic

acci

den

ts a

t th

at in

ters

ecti

on

.

Ass

emb

ly

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

–2 y

ear

bill

Op

pose

P

roh

ibit

s n

ew a

uto

mat

ic t

raff

ic s

yste

ms

and

requir

es e

xist

ing

syst

ems

to h

ave

traf

fic

stud

y fo

r ea

ch in

ters

ecti

on

.

64

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=cd1GQGFyz1OqxVOQHNfgtGfaY%2fTSV6W3bpEcKVPp08%2bdCuX5FpNR%2bSCB04G8oUDW




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=D%2fOVIEa1pPmVYwUiZ2V%2fSZ8x3DdxUCkbt6rt%2boeluWQ8OWOX14m8mbJ08Nxku4PX




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=idxgrIZSviUKqnVB%2bsG0IRoWobFMby2lxrixKDtTkhnl4EkvT2YDmN0SON8kCGgt




San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

116

4

Am

ended

: 4/

21/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Gatt

o D

(Dis

t 43)

Sta

te h

igh

ways:

eva

luati

on

an

d r

ati

ng

. W

ould

req

uir

e th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f T

ransp

ort

atio

n, in

con

sult

atio

n

wit

h s

pec

ifie

d e

nti

ties

, to

con

duct

an

an

nual

eval

uat

ion

an

d r

atin

g o

f th

e o

ver

all qual

ity

of

the

stat

e h

igh

way

sys

tem

an

d t

he

reso

urc

es

nee

ded

to

pro

vid

e a

syst

em in

go

od r

epai

r, a

nd

wo

uld

req

uir

e a

rep

ort

to

sp

ecif

ied c

om

mit

tees

of

the

Leg

isla

ture

in

th

at r

egar

d

ann

ual

ly u

nti

l 2020. T

he

bill

wo

uld

als

o r

equir

e th

e dep

artm

ent

to

po

st t

he

rep

ort

on

its

Inte

rnet

Web

sit

e.

Ass

emb

ly

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Sup

po

rt

Req

uir

es C

altr

ans

to d

evel

op

per

form

ance

m

easu

res

in c

on

sult

atio

n w

ith

a h

ost

of

enti

ties

th

at in

clud

e co

unty

tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

agen

cies

.

AB

117

1

Am

ended

: 4/

21/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Lin

der

R

(Dis

t 60)

Co

nst

ructi

on

Man

ag

er/

Gen

era

l C

on

tracto

r m

eth

od

: re

gio

nal

tran

spo

rtati

on

ag

encie

s: p

roje

cts

on

exp

ress

ways.

W

ould

auth

ori

ze r

egio

nal

tra

nsp

ort

atio

n a

gen

cies

, as

def

ined

, to

use

th

e C

on

stru

ctio

n M

anag

er/G

ener

al C

on

trac

tor

pro

ject

del

iver

y m

eth

od

, as

sp

ecif

ied

, to

des

ign

an

d c

on

stru

ct c

erta

in e

xpre

ssw

ays

that

are

no

t o

n t

he

stat

e h

igh

way

sys

tem

if

the

expre

ssw

ays

are

dev

elo

ped

in

acc

ord

ance

wit

h a

n e

xpen

dit

ure

pla

n a

pp

roved

by

vo

ters

as

of

Jan

uar

y 1, 2014. T

he

bill

wo

uld

req

uir

e sp

ecif

ied

in

form

atio

n p

rovid

ed t

o a

reg

ion

al t

ran

spo

rtat

ion

age

ncy

to

be

ver

ifie

d u

nd

er o

ath

.

Ass

emb

ly

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Wat

ch

Ext

end

s to

reg

ion

al e

nti

ties

th

e use

of

CM

/G

C, b

ut

on

ly in

cas

es t

hat

th

e p

roje

ct

is o

n a

n e

xpre

ssw

ay in

a lo

cal sa

les

tax

exp

end

iture

pla

n.

65

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=GWpENHan6Jl1uGuDV%2b131lt0B2OdXE%2fLxPrBQdz7PddmrK07jsJ4aiSLWrqLG3Im




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=IDF%2bgMhjBzi810Lp5K2I%2bQU%2bMAWrgAarQo0z9riedxsr9onmlDjqcnmKco6KF9Id




San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

B

ill

#

Au

tho

r D

esc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

117

6

Am

ended

: 4/

23/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Pere

a D

(D

ist

31)

Veh

icu

lar

air

po

llu

tio

n.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

est

ablis

h t

he

Advan

ced L

ow

-Car

bo

n D

iese

l F

uel

s A

cces

s P

rogr

am, to

be

adm

inis

tere

d b

y th

e co

mm

issi

on

, in

co

nsu

ltat

ion

wit

h t

he

stat

e bo

ard, fo

r th

e p

urp

ose

of

reduci

ng

the

gree

nh

ouse

gas

em

issi

ons

of

die

sel m

oto

r veh

icle

s b

y p

rovid

ing

cap

ital

ass

ista

nce

fo

r p

roje

cts

that

exp

and

advan

ced lo

w-c

arb

on

d

iese

l fu

elin

g in

fras

truct

ure

in

co

mm

un

itie

s th

at a

re

dis

pro

po

rtio

nat

ely

imp

acte

d b

y en

vir

on

men

tal h

azar

ds

and

ad

dit

ion

ally

wh

ere

the

grea

test

air

qual

ity

imp

acts

can

be

iden

tifi

ed.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

req

uir

e th

e co

mm

issi

on

an

d t

he

stat

e b

oar

d t

o

allo

cate

no

les

s th

an 5

0%

of

the

avai

lab

le m

on

eys

un

der

th

e A

lter

nat

ive

and

Ren

ewab

le F

uel

an

d V

ehic

le T

ech

no

logy

Pro

gram

an

d t

he

Air

Qual

ity

Imp

rovem

ent

Pro

gram

to

pro

ject

s th

at p

rovid

e d

irec

t b

enef

its

to o

r se

rve

or

are

loca

ted in

dis

advan

tage

d

com

mun

itie

s.

In a

dd

itio

n, T

his

bill

wo

uld

ap

pro

pri

ate

$35,0

00,0

00 f

rom

th

e fu

nd

to

th

e co

mm

issi

on

to

im

ple

men

t th

e A

dvan

ced L

ow

-Car

bo

n

Die

sel F

uel

s A

cces

s P

rogr

am.

Ass

emb

ly

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

New

–

Rec

om

men

d

Op

pose

Cre

ates

th

e A

dvan

ced L

ow

-Car

bo

n D

iese

l F

uel

s A

cces

s P

rogr

am, ad

min

iste

red b

y th

e E

ner

gy C

om

mis

sio

n t

o f

un

d a

dvan

ced lo

w-

carb

on

die

sel fu

elin

g in

fras

truct

ure

pro

ject

s in

dis

advan

tage

d c

om

mun

itie

s.

MT

C o

pp

ose

s th

is a

nd

oth

er b

ills

to

ded

icat

e ca

p a

nd

tra

de

fun

ds

to

dis

advan

tage

d c

om

mun

itie

s o

n t

he

bas

is

that

th

e m

eth

od

olo

gy t

o d

eter

min

e “disadvantaged

communities”

is

flaw

ed.

AB

1250

Am

ended

: 3/

19/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Blo

om

D

(Dis

t 50)

Veh

icle

s: b

use

s: g

ross

axle

weig

ht.

T

his

bill

wo

uld

exe

mp

t fr

om

th

e w

eigh

t lim

itat

ion

tra

nsi

t b

use

s p

rocu

red

th

rough

a s

olic

itat

ion

pro

cess

purs

uan

t to

wh

ich

a

solic

itat

ion

was

iss

ued

bef

ore

Jan

uar

y 1, 2016.

Sen

ate

Rule

s W

atch

T

his

is

a C

alif

orn

ia T

ran

sit

Ass

oci

atio

n

spo

nso

red b

ill t

o p

rovid

e an

ext

ensi

on

of

tim

e to

rec

on

cile

th

e p

olic

y d

iffe

ren

ce

bet

wee

n lo

cal ju

risd

icti

on

s an

d t

ransi

t ag

enci

es o

ver

th

e o

per

atio

n o

f b

use

s th

at

exce

ed s

tate

veh

icle

co

de

limit

s o

n b

us

wei

ghts

. C

itie

s/co

un

ties

cla

im e

xces

s w

eigh

t d

amag

es r

oad

way

s, w

hile

so

me

tran

sit

buse

s ex

ceed

leg

al lim

its

due

to

AD

A e

quip

men

t, C

NG

tan

ks a

nd

oth

er

cause

s th

at a

re im

ple

men

ted in

th

e fu

rth

eran

ce o

f m

and

ates

.

66










San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

1236

Am

ended

: 4/

20/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Ch

iu D

(Dis

t 17)

Lo

cal

ord

inan

ces:

ele

ctr

ic v

eh

icle

ch

arg

ing

sta

tio

ns.

W

ould

req

uir

e a

city

, co

unty

, o

r ci

ty a

nd

co

unty

to

ap

pro

ve

the

inst

alla

tio

n o

f el

ectr

ic v

ehic

le c

har

gin

g st

atio

ns,

as

def

ined

, th

rough

th

e is

suan

ce o

f sp

ecif

ied

per

mit

s un

less

th

e ci

ty o

r co

un

ty m

akes

sp

ecif

ied w

ritt

en f

ind

ings

bas

ed u

po

n s

ubst

anti

al e

vid

ence

in

th

e re

cord

th

at t

he

pro

po

sed

inst

alla

tio

n w

ould

hav

e a

spec

ific

, ad

ver

se

imp

act

up

on

th

e p

ub

lic h

ealt

h o

r sa

fety

, an

d t

her

e is

no

fea

sib

le

met

ho

d t

o s

atis

fact

ori

ly m

itig

ate

or

avo

id t

he

spec

ific

, ad

ver

se

imp

act.

Th

e b

ill w

ould

pro

vid

e fo

r ap

pea

l o

f th

at d

ecis

ion

to

th

e p

lan

nin

g co

mm

issi

on

, as

sp

ecif

ied.

Ass

emb

ly

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Wat

ch

Sub

ject

s E

V c

har

gin

g st

atio

n t

o

requir

emen

t th

at lo

cal go

ver

nm

ents

ap

pro

ve

inst

alla

tio

ns.

AB

1265

Am

ended

: 4/

29/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Pere

a D

(Dis

t 31)

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

pro

jects

: co

mp

reh

ensi

ve d

eve

lop

men

t le

ase

ag

reem

en

ts.

Curr

ent

law

auth

ori

zes

the

Dep

artm

ent

of

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n a

nd

re

gio

nal

tra

nsp

ort

atio

n a

genci

es, as

def

ined

, to

en

ter

into

co

mp

reh

ensi

ve

dev

elo

pm

ent

leas

e ag

reem

ents

wit

h p

ub

lic a

nd

p

rivat

e en

titi

es, o

r co

nso

rtia

of

tho

se e

nti

ties

, fo

r ce

rtai

n

tran

spo

rtat

ion

pro

ject

s th

at m

ay c

har

ge c

erta

in u

sers

of

tho

se

pro

ject

s to

lls a

nd

use

r fe

es, su

bje

ct t

o v

ario

us

term

s an

d

requir

emen

ts. T

hes

e ar

ran

gem

ents

are

com

mo

nly

kn

ow

n a

s p

ub

lic-

pri

vat

e p

artn

ersh

ips.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

pro

vid

e th

at a

lea

se a

gree

men

t sh

all n

ot

be

ente

red into

un

der

th

ese

pro

vis

ions

on

or

afte

r Ja

nuar

y 1, 2030, an

d w

ould

del

ete

ob

sole

te c

ross

-ref

eren

ces

and

mak

e te

chn

ical

ch

ange

s to

th

ese

pro

vis

ions.

Ass

emb

ly

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Sup

po

rt

Ext

end

s P

3 law

th

rough

2030

.

AB

1284

Am

ended

: 4/

8/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Bak

er

R

(Dis

t 16)

Bay A

rea s

tate

-ow

ned

to

ll b

rid

ges:

To

ll B

rid

ge P

rog

ram

O

vers

igh

t C

om

mit

tee.

Curr

ent

law

req

uir

es t

he

Dep

artm

ent

of

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n a

nd

th

e B

ay A

rea

To

ll A

uth

ori

ty (

BA

TA

) to

fo

rm t

he

To

ll B

ridge

Pro

gram

O

ver

sigh

t C

om

mit

tee.

Curr

ent

law

pro

vid

es t

hat

th

e co

mm

itte

e is

n

ot

a st

ate

bo

dy

or

a lo

cal ag

ency

fo

r th

e p

urp

ose

s o

f th

e o

pen

m

eeti

ng

law

s ap

plic

able

to

eit

her

sta

te b

odie

s o

r lo

cal ag

enci

es

kn

ow

n a

s th

e B

agle

y-K

een

e O

pen

Mee

tin

g A

ct a

nd

th

e R

alp

h M

. B

row

n A

ct, re

spec

tivel

y. T

his

bill

wo

uld

del

ete

that

pro

vis

ion

an

d

wo

uld

pro

vid

e th

at t

he

To

ll B

ridge

Pro

gram

Over

sigh

t C

om

mit

tee

is s

ub

ject

to

th

e B

agle

y-K

een

e O

pen

Mee

tin

g A

ct.

Ass

emb

ly

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Wat

ch

Sub

ject

s B

AT

A t

o o

pen

mee

tin

g A

ct

requir

emen

ts.

67

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=UqBA%2fWm%2fvnrCqpSS03oBZmaeaYSt8ORlNESCsHcomuEckIFrKbF3ISrJLhzeH8mc




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=lMKtvVeM%2bKlXG4wfaSgMDA4144fSsPPT8XAKUHBaYMX9v1hzF87lq4DKECtGdvNC




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=paaZNIxNTT64iFhvPCRONCvpfVQa8qigQB3xx7SNAl0tKAOF%2bMw7CsGokNf1TikT




San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

B

ill

#

Au

tho

r D

esc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

1287

Am

ended

: 4/

29/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Ch

iu D

(D

ist

17)

Veh

icle

s: p

ark

ing

an

d m

ovi

ng

vio

lati

on

s: c

am

era

s.

Wo

uld

auth

ori

ze S

an F

ran

cisc

o t

o inst

all fo

rwar

d-f

acin

g ca

mer

as

to r

eco

rd p

arkin

g vio

lati

on

s an

d e

xclu

sive

or

pre

fere

nti

al t

ran

sit-

on

ly lan

e an

d in

ters

ecti

on

ob

stru

ctio

n v

iola

tio

ns.

Th

e b

ill w

ould

re

quir

e an

exc

lusi

ve

or

pre

fere

nti

al t

ransi

t-o

nly

lan

e o

r in

ters

ecti

on

o

bst

ruct

ion

vio

lati

on

rec

ord

ed p

urs

uan

t to

th

ese

pro

vis

ion

s to

be

sub

ject

to

a c

ivil

pen

alty

no

t to

exc

eed $

100. T

he

bill

wo

uld

del

ete

the

rep

eal d

ate,

th

ereb

y ex

ten

din

g th

e o

per

atio

n o

f th

ese

pro

vis

ion

s in

def

init

ely.

Th

is b

ill c

on

tain

s o

ther

rel

ated

pro

vis

ions

and

oth

er e

xist

ing

law

s.

Ass

emb

ly

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Sup

po

rt

Gra

nts

cit

y o

f San

Fra

nci

sco

ext

end

ed

auth

ori

ty t

o inst

all ca

mer

as f

or

enfo

rcem

ent

of

par

kin

g an

d H

OV

vio

lati

on

s.

AB

1335

Am

ended

: 4/

20/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Atk

ins

D

(Dis

t 78)

Bu

ild

ing

Ho

mes

an

d J

ob

s A

ct.

T

his

bill

wo

uld

en

act

the

Build

ing

Ho

mes

an

d J

ob

s A

ct. T

he

bill

w

ould

mak

e le

gisl

ativ

e fi

ndin

gs a

nd

dec

lara

tio

ns

rela

tin

g to

th

e n

eed f

or

esta

blis

hin

g p

erm

anen

t, o

ngo

ing

sourc

es o

f fu

ndin

g d

edic

ated

to

aff

ord

able

ho

usi

ng

dev

elo

pm

ent.

Th

e b

ill w

ould

im

po

se a

fee

, ex

cep

t as

pro

vided

, o

f $7

5 t

o b

e p

aid

at

the

tim

e o

f th

e re

cord

ing

of

ever

y re

al e

stat

e in

stru

men

t, p

aper

, or

no

tice

re

quir

ed o

r p

erm

itte

d b

y la

w t

o b

e re

cord

ed, p

er e

ach

sin

gle

tran

sact

ion

per

sin

gle

par

cel o

f re

al p

rop

erty

, no

t to

exc

eed $

225.

Ass

emb

ly

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

New

–

Rec

om

men

d

Sup

po

rt

Th

is b

ill, w

hic

h is

sim

ilar

to S

B 3

91

(DeS

auln

ier)

wh

ich

we

sup

po

rted

las

t ye

ar

wo

uld

im

po

se a

fee

of

$75 o

n r

eal p

rop

erty

tr

ansa

ctio

ns.

Th

e b

ill is

sup

po

rted

by

the

Cit

y an

d C

oun

ty o

f San

Fra

nci

sco

, as

a

mea

ns

to f

ulf

ill a

fford

able

ho

usi

ng

nee

ds

in

exis

tin

g, d

evel

op

ed c

om

mun

itie

s.

AB

1336

Am

ended

: 3/

26/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Sala

s D

(D

ist

32)

Cali

forn

ia G

lob

al

Warm

ing

So

luti

on

s A

ct

of

2006

: d

isad

van

tag

ed

co

mm

un

itie

s.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

req

uir

e a

min

imum

of

40%

of

the

avai

lab

le m

on

eys

in t

he

Gre

en H

ouse

Red

uct

ion

fun

d t

o b

e al

loca

ted t

o p

roje

cts

that

p

rovid

e b

enef

its

to d

isad

van

tage

d c

om

mun

itie

s.

Ass

emb

ly

Nat

ura

l R

eso

urc

es –

2

year

bill

New

–

Rec

om

men

d

Op

pose

Th

e au

tho

r se

eks

to in

crea

se t

he

amo

un

t o

f ca

p a

nd

tra

de

fund

s av

aila

ble

fo

r th

e var

ious

on

goin

g ca

p a

nd

tra

de

pro

gram

s to

d

isad

van

tage

d c

om

mun

itie

s fo

rm 2

5%

in

cu

rren

t la

w, to

40%

. M

TC

op

po

ses

this

an

d o

ther

bill

s to

d

edic

ate

cap

an

d t

rad

e fu

nds

to

dis

advan

tage

d c

om

mun

itie

s o

n t

he

bas

is

that

th

e m

eth

od

olo

gy t

o d

eter

min

e “disadvantaged

communities”

is

flaw

ed.

68

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=4nelNM3ArUcApc0S3YgSTszZkPmdn%2bcfWPIPN9Qs1%2fWgmTgxIYx4Y5SZOvzmNEfI







http://asmdc.org/speaker/





San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AB

1364

Intr

oduce

d:

2/

27/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Lin

der

R

(Dis

t 60)

Cali

forn

ia T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Co

mm

issi

on

. C

urr

ent

law

ves

ts t

he

Cal

ifo

rnia

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n C

om

mis

sio

n

(CT

C)

wit

h s

pec

ifie

d p

ow

ers,

duti

es, an

d f

un

ctio

ns

rela

tive

to

tran

spo

rtat

ion

mat

ters

. C

urr

ent

law

req

uir

es t

he

com

mis

sio

n t

o

reta

in in

dep

end

ent

auth

ori

ty t

o p

erfo

rm t

he

duti

es a

nd

fun

ctio

ns

pre

scri

bed

to

it

un

der

an

y pro

vis

ion

of

law

. T

his

bill

wo

uld

exc

lude

the

Cal

ifo

rnia

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n C

om

mis

sion

fro

m t

he

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n A

gen

cy a

nd

est

ablis

h it

as a

n e

nti

ty in

th

e st

ate

gover

nm

ent.

Th

e b

ill w

ould

als

o m

ake

con

form

ing

chan

ges.

Ass

emb

ly

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

–2 y

ear

bill

Wat

ch

Rem

oves

CT

C f

rom

juri

sdic

tio

n u

nd

er

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n A

gen

cy a

nd

re-

esta

blis

hes

it

s au

ton

om

y.

AB

1384

Intr

oduce

d:

2/

27/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Bak

er

R

(Dis

t 16)

To

ll f

acil

itie

s: M

etro

po

lita

n T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Co

mm

issi

on

(M

TC

) C

urr

ent

law

auth

ori

zes

the

Bay

Are

a T

oll

Auth

ori

ty (

BA

TA

) to

m

ake

dir

ect

con

trib

uti

on

s to

th

e M

etro

po

litan

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

Co

mm

issi

on

in

furt

her

ance

of

the

exer

cise

of

the

auth

ori

ty's

p

ow

ers,

in

cludin

g co

ntr

ibuti

on

s in

th

e fo

rm o

f p

erso

nn

el s

ervic

es,

off

ice

spac

e, o

ver

hea

d, an

d o

ther

fun

din

g n

eces

sary

to

car

ry o

ut

the

fun

ctio

n o

f th

e au

tho

rity

, w

ith

th

ose

co

ntr

ibuti

on

s no

t to

ex

ceed

1%

of

the

gro

ss a

nn

ual

bri

dge

rev

enues

. T

his

bill

wo

uld

m

ake

a te

chn

ical

, n

on

subst

anti

ve

chan

ge t

o t

his

lim

itat

ion

on

co

ntr

ibuti

on

s.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

–2 y

ear

bill

Wat

ch

Sp

ot

bill

rel

atin

g to

fis

cal re

lati

on

ship

b

etw

een

BA

TA

an

d M

TC

.

AB

1486

Intr

oduce

d:

2/

27/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Ob

ern

olt

e R

(Dis

t 33)

Veh

icle

s: t

oll

hig

hw

ays.

C

urr

ent

law

req

uir

es t

he

Dep

artm

ent

of

the

Cal

ifo

rnia

Hig

hw

ay

Pat

rol to

pro

vid

e fo

r th

e p

rop

er a

nd

adeq

uat

e p

olic

ing

of

all to

ll

hig

hw

ays

and

all

veh

icula

r cr

oss

ings

to

en

sure

en

forc

emen

t o

f th

e V

ehic

le C

od

e an

d o

f an

y o

ther

law

rel

atin

g to

th

e use

an

d

op

erat

ion

of

veh

icle

s up

on

to

ll h

igh

way

s, h

igh

way

s o

r veh

icula

r cr

oss

ings

, an

d o

f th

e ru

les

and

reg

ula

tio

ns

of

the

Dep

artm

ent

of

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n a

s th

ey r

elat

e to

th

ose

law

s, a

nd

to

co

op

erat

e w

ith

th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

to

th

e en

d t

hat

veh

icula

r cr

oss

ings

are

op

erat

ed a

t al

l ti

mes

in

a m

ann

er a

s to

car

ry t

raff

ic

effi

cien

tly.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

mak

e te

chn

ical

, n

on

subst

anti

ve c

han

ges

to t

hes

e p

rovis

ion

s.

Ass

emb

ly P

rint

–2 y

ear

bill

Wat

ch

Sp

ot

bill

per

tain

ing

to t

oll h

igh

way

s.

69

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=rk%2bPksN83yqgbOl0U%2fZs6utx4mSSFL%2fkVCYncAiGU2gdTkBXMKR9H%2fzIkt0%2fBhDI




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=kxTxBtZMmSM%2bDO3Ku9ZAA4zfDzAzH8kKaPXbfpkZoTQe4yb6D05tiKaHpVCID2Gh




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=0oo9Z76c4wxKL7yWPvo8y5WT70MOK2FVlShldg1p911v8tYKQ7VP1Kd1y6O%2bPY5R




San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

B

ill

#

Au

tho

r D

esc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

AC

A 4

In

tro

duce

d:

2/

27/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Fra

zie

r D

(D

ist

11)

Lo

cal

go

vern

men

t tr

an

spo

rtati

on

pro

ject

s: s

pecia

l ta

xes:

vo

ter

ap

pro

val.

W

ould

pro

vid

e th

at t

he

impo

siti

on

, ex

ten

sion

, o

r in

crea

se o

f a

spec

ial ta

x b

y a

loca

l go

ver

nm

ent

for

the

purp

ose

of

pro

vid

ing

fun

din

g fo

r lo

cal tr

ansp

ort

atio

n p

roje

cts,

as

def

ined

, re

quir

es t

he

app

roval

of

55%

of

its

vo

ters

vo

tin

g o

n t

he

pro

po

siti

on

. T

he

mea

sure

wo

uld

als

o m

ake

con

form

ing

and

tec

hn

ical

, n

on

sub

stan

tive

chan

ges.

Th

is m

easu

re w

ould

als

o p

rovid

e th

at it

shal

l b

eco

me

effe

ctiv

e im

med

iate

ly u

po

n a

pp

roval

by

the

vo

ters

an

d s

hal

l ap

ply

to

an

y lo

cal m

easu

re im

po

sin

g, e

xten

din

g, o

r in

crea

sin

g a

spec

ial ta

x fo

r lo

cal tr

ansp

ort

atio

n p

roje

cts

sub

mit

ted

at

th

e sa

me

elec

tio

n.

Ass

emb

ly

Rev

enue

and

T

axat

ion

Sup

po

rt

Th

is b

ill w

ould

pro

vid

e vo

ters

th

e o

pp

ort

un

ity

to r

educe

th

e re

quir

emen

t fo

r ap

pro

val

of

futu

re s

pec

ial ta

xes

for

tran

spo

rtat

ion

purp

ose

s w

ith

a 5

5%

m

ajo

rity

.

SB

1

Intr

oduce

d:

12/

1/

2014

pd

f h

tml

Gain

es

R

(Dis

t 1)

Cali

forn

ia G

lob

al

Warm

ing

So

luti

on

s A

ct

of

2006

: m

ark

et-

base

d c

om

pli

an

ce m

ech

an

ism

s: e

xem

pti

on

. T

he

Cal

ifo

rnia

Glo

bal

War

min

g So

luti

ons

Act

of

2006 a

uth

ori

zes

the

Sta

te A

ir R

eso

urc

es B

oar

d t

o in

clude

the

use

of

mar

ket-

bas

ed

com

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

s. C

urr

ent

stat

e b

oar

d r

egula

tio

ns

requir

e sp

ecif

ied e

nti

ties

to

co

mp

ly w

ith

a m

arket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

m

ech

anis

m b

egin

nin

g Ja

nuar

y 1, 2013, an

d r

equir

e ad

dit

ion

al

spec

ifie

d e

nti

ties

to

co

mp

ly w

ith

th

at m

arket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

m

ech

anis

m b

egin

nin

g Ja

nuar

y 1, 2015. T

his

bill

in

stea

d w

ould

ex

emp

t ca

tego

ries

of

per

son

s o

r en

titi

es t

hat

did

no

t h

ave

a co

mp

lian

ce o

blig

atio

n, as

def

ined

, un

der

a m

arket

-bas

ed

com

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

beg

inn

ing

Jan

uar

y 1, 2013, f

rom

bei

ng

sub

ject

to

th

at m

arket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

.

Sen

ate

En

vir

on

men

tal

Qual

ity – 2

ye

ar b

ill

Op

pose

T

his

bill

wo

uld

elim

inat

e th

e ex

ten

sio

n o

f C

ap a

nd

Tra

de

emis

sion

reg

ula

tio

ns

sch

edule

d f

or

the

tran

spo

rtat

ion

fuel

s sy

stem

. D

iffe

rs f

rom

AB

23 a

s th

is b

ill p

erm

anen

tly

pro

hib

its

the

Cap

an

d T

rad

e re

gula

tio

ns

fro

m a

ffec

tin

g th

e fu

els

sect

or.

70

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=PEonnMFZ3XDma3NqRn7vvte%2f%2bzA55SjfrzgCTbzQrF%2bchkcqlke1LU41yFZf2plX

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/aca_4_bill_20150227_introduced.pdf

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/aca_4_bill_20150227_introduced.html


http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=4gAg07S%2brTK9jRZK9VwKK5erbKpfWzkAGhj0qhCjdPz0yLR9roP3I%2b3xyXCt3Bn0

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sb_1_bill_20141201_introduced.pdf

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sb_1_bill_20141201_introduced.html

http://gaines.cssrc.us/

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

SB

5

Intr

oduce

d:

12/

1/

2014

pd

f h

tml

Vid

ak

R

(Dis

t 14)

Cali

forn

ia G

lob

al

Warm

ing

So

luti

on

s A

ct

of

2006

: m

ark

et-

base

d c

om

pli

an

ce m

ech

an

ism

s: e

xem

pti

on

. U

nd

er t

he

Cal

ifo

rnia

Glo

bal

War

min

g So

luti

on

s A

ct o

f 20

06,

curr

ent

Sta

te A

ir R

eso

urc

es B

oar

d r

egula

tio

ns

requir

e sp

ecif

ied

enti

ties

to

co

mp

ly w

ith

a m

arket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

b

egin

nin

g Ja

nuar

y 1, 2013, an

d r

equir

e ad

dit

ion

al s

pec

ifie

d e

nti

ties

to

co

mp

ly w

ith

th

at m

arket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

b

egin

nin

g Ja

nuar

y 1, 2015. T

his

bill

inst

ead

wo

uld

exe

mp

t ca

tego

ries

of

per

son

s o

r en

titi

es t

hat

did

no

t h

ave

a co

mp

lian

ce

ob

ligat

ion

, as

def

ined

, un

der

a m

arket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

m

ech

anis

m b

egin

nin

g Ja

nuar

y 1, 2013, fr

om

bei

ng

sub

ject

to

th

at

mar

ket

-bas

ed c

om

plia

nce

mec

han

ism

th

rough

Dec

emb

er 3

1, 2020. S

enat

e E

nvir

on

men

tal

Qual

ity – 2

ye

ar b

ill

Op

pose

T

his

bill

wo

uld

po

stp

on

e th

e ef

fect

ive

dat

e o

f th

e ex

tensi

on

of

Cap

an

d T

rad

e em

issi

on

re

gula

tio

ns

from

2015 t

o 2

020 s

ched

ule

d

for

the

tran

spo

rtat

ion

fuel

s sy

stem

.

Th

e au

tho

r is

co

nce

rned

th

at t

he

pub

lic w

ill

be

sub

ject

to

a s

pik

e in

fuel

pri

ces.

Ho

wev

er, th

e ef

fect

of

the

def

erre

d w

ill b

e to

red

uce

Cap

an

d T

rad

e au

ctio

n r

even

ues

.

SB

8

Am

ended

: 2/

10/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Hert

zb

erg

D

(Dis

t 18)

Tax

ati

on

. W

ould

sta

te leg

isla

tive

fin

din

gs r

egar

din

g th

e U

pw

ard

Mob

ility

A

ct, key

pro

vis

ion

s o

f w

hic

h w

ould

exp

and

th

e ap

plic

atio

n o

f th

e Sal

es a

nd

Use

Tax

law

by

imp

osi

ng

a ta

x o

n s

pec

ifie

d s

ervic

es,

wo

uld

en

han

ce t

he

stat

e's

busi

nes

s cl

imat

e, w

ould

in

cen

tiviz

e en

trep

ren

eurs

hip

an

d b

usi

nes

s cr

eati

on

by

eval

uat

ing

the

corp

ora

te

tax,

an

d w

ould

exa

min

e th

e im

pac

ts o

f a

low

er a

nd

sim

ple

r p

erso

nal

in

com

e ta

x. T

his

bill

co

nta

ins

oth

er r

elat

ed p

rovis

ion

s.

Sen

ate

Go

ver

nan

ce

and

Fin

ance

Wat

ch

Fo

rmer

ly a

sp

ot

bill

, th

is is

the

auth

or'

s at

tem

pt

to c

han

ge t

he

emp

has

is o

f C

alif

orn

ia's

tax

atio

n s

yste

m t

o in

corp

ora

te

taxe

s o

n s

ervic

es.

71

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=KtkXUdOu%2b3CYupXzUb335vKaGYG7FDO%2f%2fY3IVlrZRwIv3SnKTvDaDyV0eif7lJA9



http://district14.cssrc.us/

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=9qMaxHfZQ3l%2fX6rV1F5j90hDPwzos%2bb4q63tOY54EGcrPDG5iwFdPy7CI1zHCT2B

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sb_8_bill_20150210_amended_sen_v98.pdf

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sb_8_bill_20150210_amended_sen_v98.html

http://sd18.senate.ca.gov/

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

B

ill

#

Au

tho

r D

esc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

SB

9

Am

ended

: 4/

15/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Beall

D

(Dis

t 15)

Gre

en

ho

use

Gas

Red

ucti

on

Fu

nd

: T

ran

sit

an

d I

nte

rcit

y R

ail

C

ap

ital

Pro

gra

m.

Curr

ent

law

pro

vid

es v

ario

us

sourc

es o

f fu

ndin

g fo

r tr

ansp

ort

atio

n

pro

gram

s, in

clud

ing

cap

ital

an

d o

per

atin

g fu

nds

for

rail

serv

ices

, in

clud

ing

inte

rcit

y, c

om

mute

r, a

nd

urb

an r

ail sy

stem

s, in

cludin

g th

e T

ran

sit

and

In

terc

ity

Rai

l C

apit

al P

rogr

am w

hic

h r

ecei

ves

10%

of

the

ann

ual

pro

ceed

s o

f th

e G

reen

ho

use

Gas

Red

uct

ion

Fun

d a

s a

con

tin

uo

us

app

rop

riat

ion

. T

his

bill

wo

uld

req

uir

e th

at t

he

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n A

gen

cy a

do

pt

a m

ult

iyea

r p

rogr

am o

f pro

ject

s fo

r fu

nd

ing,

an

d r

equir

e th

e C

alif

orn

ia T

ransp

ort

atio

n C

om

mis

sio

n t

o

allo

cate

fun

din

g to

ap

plic

ants

purs

uan

t to

th

e p

rogr

am o

f p

roje

cts.

Sen

ate

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Wat

ch

Th

is b

ill w

ould

alt

er t

he

focu

s fo

r R

ail an

d

Tra

nsi

t C

ap a

nd

Tra

de

fun

ds

to o

nly

ad

dre

ss lar

ge-s

cale

tra

nsi

t p

roje

cts

that

p

rom

ote

a d

irec

t co

nn

ecti

on

to

th

e st

ate'

s H

igh

Sp

eed

Rai

l Sys

tem

. A

men

ded

to

ap

ply

90%

of

thes

e fu

nds

for

larg

e p

roje

cts

that

cost

in

exc

ess

of

$100

mill

ion

; th

e re

mai

nin

g 10%

wo

uld

be

rese

rved

fo

r o

ther

s.

Guid

elin

es f

or

exp

and

ing

the

firs

t $2

5

mill

ion

in

th

is c

ateg

ory

wer

e fi

nal

ized

; a

com

pet

itiv

e ca

ll fo

r p

roje

cts

was

rel

ease

d b

y th

e Sta

te T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Age

ncy

. T

he

San

F

ran

cisc

o M

un

icip

al T

ransp

ort

atio

n

Age

ncy

is

targ

etin

g th

is p

rogr

am t

o p

ay

bac

k f

un

ds

com

mit

ted b

y th

e M

etro

po

litan

T

ransp

ort

atio

n C

om

mis

sion

to

its

lig

ht

rail

veh

icle

pro

cure

men

t co

ntr

act

op

tion

for

40

exp

ansi

on

veh

icle

s.

72

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=jMyqSiVbvnYzf5HZvVccbdURMmp4BZZx1DOcmE4sFFT0OqNTEV3G9al%2fSNBU8gat




San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

SB

16

Am

ended

: 4/

15/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Beall

D

(Dis

t 15)

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

fu

nd

ing

. W

ould

cre

ate

the

Ro

ad M

ainte

nan

ce a

nd

Reh

abili

tati

on

Pro

gram

to

ad

dre

ss d

efer

red

mai

nte

nan

ce o

n t

he

stat

e h

igh

way

sys

tem

an

d

the

loca

l st

reet

an

d r

oad

sys

tem

. T

he

bill

wo

uld

pro

vid

e fo

r th

e p

rogr

am t

o b

e au

tho

rize

d e

very

5 y

ears

by

the

Leg

isla

ture

, an

d

wo

uld

pro

vid

e th

at a

uth

ori

zati

on

for

the

2015-

16 t

hro

ugh

2019-2

0

fisc

al y

ears

. Th

e b

ill w

ould

req

uir

e th

e C

alif

orn

ia T

ransp

ort

atio

n

Co

mm

issi

on

to

id

enti

fy t

he

esti

mat

ed f

un

ds

to b

e av

aila

ble

fo

r th

e p

rogr

am a

nd

ad

op

t p

erfo

rman

ce c

rite

ria

to e

nsu

re e

ffic

ien

t use

of

the

fun

ds.

Sen

ate

Go

ver

nan

ce

and

Fin

ance

Wat

ch

Lat

est

amen

dm

ents

to

pro

vid

e $3

-4 b

illio

n

+, an

nual

ly, fo

r 5 y

ears

, to

fun

d s

tate

an

d

loca

l ro

ad r

epai

r. S

ee a

ttac

hed

sum

mar

y o

f th

e p

rop

osa

l.

We

gen

eral

ly s

up

po

rt t

he author’s

pro

po

sal

exce

pt

we

are

con

cern

ed t

hat

th

e V

ehic

le

Lic

ense

Fee

(V

LF

) in

crea

se w

ould

dec

reas

e fu

nd

ing

avai

lab

le if

San

Fra

nci

sco

pas

ses

its

ow

n V

LF

in

crea

se, w

hic

h is

curr

entl

y p

lan

ned

to

be

pla

ced

on

th

e b

allo

t in

N

ovem

ber

2016. S

an F

ran

cisc

o c

urr

entl

y h

as a

uth

ori

zati

on

und

er S

B14

92 (

Len

o)

to

incr

ease

th

e V

LF

up

to

a t

ota

l o

f 2%

, w

ith

th

e in

crem

ent

bet

wee

n t

he state’s

rate

(c

urr

entl

y 0.6

5%)

and

2%

goin

g to

th

e ge

ner

al f

un

d. W

e ar

e w

ork

ing

wit

h t

he

Mayor’s

off

ice

and

par

tner

age

nci

es t

o

dev

elo

p p

ote

nti

al r

emed

ies

rela

ted t

o t

he

VL

F a

nd

to

see

k f

lexi

bili

ty t

o u

se f

un

ds

for

tran

sit,

as

wel

l.

SB

34

Am

ended

: 4/

22/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Hil

l D

(Dis

t 13)

Au

tom

ate

d lic

en

se p

late

reco

gn

itio

n s

yst

em

s: u

se o

f d

ata

. W

ould

im

po

se s

pec

ifie

d r

equir

emen

ts o

n a

n "

AL

PR

op

erat

or"

as

def

ined

, in

clud

ing,

am

on

g o

ther

s, e

nsu

rin

g th

at t

he

info

rmat

ion

th

e A

LP

R o

per

ato

r co

llect

s is

pro

tect

ed w

ith

cer

tain

saf

eguar

ds,

an

d im

ple

men

tin

g an

d m

ain

tain

ing

spec

ifie

d s

ecuri

ty p

roce

dure

s an

d a

usa

ge a

nd

pri

vac

y p

olic

y w

ith

res

pec

t to

th

at in

form

atio

n.

Th

is b

ill c

on

tain

s o

ther

rel

ated

pro

vis

ions

and

oth

er e

xist

ing

law

s.

Sen

ate

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Wat

ch

Th

e b

ill is

inte

nd

ed t

o e

nh

ance

th

e au

tom

ated

lic

ense

pla

te r

ecogn

itio

n e

nd-

use

r d

ata

colle

ctio

n.

73

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=Iv9m42FJktqgIBVw76AeF3840JX6b146jK97xVLlu0p2qL2VAilMfzbSH7iwnIB6




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=nu2ihAvbfMMIcZH3vGtdLZ9oZtq11yAqXOahMoaXNxvv7VOXqdaq10AoP5sgCs92




San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

B

ill

#

Au

tho

r D

esc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

SB

39

Am

ended

: 4/

8/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Pavl

ey D

(D

ist

27)

Veh

icle

s: h

igh

-occu

pan

cy v

eh

icle

lan

es.

C

urr

ent

fed

eral

law

, un

til Sep

tem

ber

30, 2017, au

tho

rize

s a

stat

e to

al

low

sp

ecif

ied lab

eled

veh

icle

s to

use

lan

es d

esig

nat

ed f

or

hig

h-

occ

up

ancy

veh

icle

s (H

OV

s). C

urr

ent

law

auth

ori

zes

the

DM

V t

o

issu

e n

o m

ore

th

an 7

0,0

00 o

f th

ose

iden

tifi

ers.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

in

crea

se t

he

num

ber

of

tho

se iden

tifi

ers

that

th

e D

MV

is

auth

ori

zed

to

iss

ue

to 8

5,0

00. T

his

bill

co

nta

ins

oth

er r

elat

ed

pro

vis

ion

s an

d o

ther

curr

ent

law

s.

Sen

ate

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Op

pose

T

he

bill

wo

uld

exp

and

th

e am

oun

t o

f H

OV

la

ne

acce

ss d

ecal

s fo

r cl

ean

veh

icle

s. 2

014

saw

th

e n

um

ber

of

dec

als

per

mit

ted

, in

crea

se f

rom

40,0

00 t

o 7

0,0

00.

SB

59

Intr

oduce

d:

12/

19/

2014

pd

f h

tml

Kn

igh

t R

(D

ist

0)

Veh

icle

s: h

igh

-occu

pan

cy v

eh

icle

lan

es.

C

urr

ent

law

auth

ori

zes

loca

l au

tho

riti

es a

nd

th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

to

est

ablis

h e

xclu

sive

or

pre

fere

nti

al u

se o

f h

igh

way

la

nes

fo

r h

igh

-occ

up

ancy

veh

icle

s. T

his

bill

would

mak

e te

chn

ical

, n

on

sub

stan

tive

chan

ges

to t

hat

pro

vis

ion

.

Sen

ate

Rule

s W

atch

T

his

spo

t b

ill a

men

ds

the

core

sta

tute

th

at

pro

vid

es a

uth

ori

ty f

or

excl

usi

ve

HO

V

lan

es. T

he

auth

or

has

sin

ce a

ssum

ed h

is

con

gres

sio

nal

sea

t an

d t

her

e is

no

cle

ar

un

der

stan

din

g o

f w

hat

pla

ns

may

be

in

sto

re f

or

this

bill

.

SB

64

Intr

oduce

d:

1/

15/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Liu

D

(Dis

t 25)

Cali

forn

ia T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Pla

n.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

req

uir

e th

e C

alif

orn

ia T

ransp

ort

atio

n C

om

mis

sio

n

to r

evie

w r

eco

mm

end

atio

ns

in t

he

up

dat

e to

th

e C

alif

orn

ia

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n P

lan

pre

par

ed b

y th

e dep

artm

ent

in 2

015,

an

d

ever

y 5 y

ears

th

erea

fter

, to

pre

par

e sp

ecif

ic r

eco

mm

endat

ion

s fo

r st

atew

ide

inte

grat

ed m

ult

imo

dal

tra

nsp

ort

atio

n s

yste

m

imp

rovem

ents

, an

d t

o s

ub

mit

a r

epo

rt in

th

at r

egar

d t

o t

he

Leg

isla

ture

an

d t

he

Go

ver

no

r b

y D

ecem

ber

31, 2016

and e

ver

y 5

year

s th

erea

fter

.

Sen

ate

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

New

–

Rec

om

men

d

Wat

ch

Th

e b

ill s

eeks

an in

dep

end

ent

revie

w o

f Caltrans’s

2015 C

alif

orn

ia T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Pla

n a

nd

d

esig

nat

es t

he

CT

C t

o p

rep

are

reco

mm

end

atio

ns

for

stat

ewid

e in

tegr

ated

m

ult

imo

dal

tra

nsp

ort

atio

n s

yste

m

imp

rovem

ents

.

SB

154

Intr

oduce

d:

2/

2/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Hu

ff R

(D

ist

29)

Cali

forn

ia E

nvi

ron

men

tal Q

uali

ty A

ct.

T

he

Cal

ifo

rnia

En

vir

on

men

tal Q

ual

ity

Act

(C

EQ

A)

requir

es a

lea

d

agen

cy, as

def

ined

, to

pre

par

e, o

r ca

use

to

be

pre

par

ed b

y co

ntr

act,

an

d c

erti

fy t

he

com

ple

tio

n o

f, a

n e

nvir

onm

enta

l im

pac

t re

po

rt, as

d

efin

ed, o

n a

pro

ject

th

at m

ay h

ave

a si

gnif

ican

t ef

fect

on

th

e en

vir

on

men

t, o

r to

ad

op

t a

neg

ativ

e dec

lara

tio

n if

it f

inds

that

th

e p

roje

ct w

ill n

ot

hav

e th

at e

ffec

t. T

his

bill

wo

uld

mak

e te

chn

ical

, n

on

sub

stan

tive

chan

ges

to t

he

def

init

ion

of

"en

vir

on

men

tal im

pac

t re

po

rt."

Sen

ate

Rule

s –

2 y

ear

bill

W

atch

T

his

is

a C

EQ

A s

po

t b

ill.

74

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=hzsKzEpR73Meja7PtjGiGVUo7VCr7A4aLEkauMFyWm93clBNQGHX5sesRYbogdBe




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=b%2fNEtYRYC6Z2sj2y9lkGkAtL5rhpeEuxHSyOxnK5CVoEF351iebGvpuyIUsiY3EU






http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/sen/sb_0051-0100/sb_64_bill_20150105_introduced.htm


http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=06fj%2f8k1NZDZQZpLt747z1QxL8U87fjvN%2fSIbcFWdOUnkuLt9kN%2b3sLLSJYC1WNU



http://huff.cssrc.us/

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

SB

158

Am

ended

: 3/

26/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Hu

ff R

(Dis

t 29)

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

pro

jects

: co

mp

reh

ensi

ve d

eve

lop

men

t le

ase

ag

reem

en

ts.

Wo

uld

auth

ori

ze t

he

Dep

artm

ent

of

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n o

r a

regi

on

al

tran

spo

rtat

ion

age

ncy

to

en

ter

into

a c

om

pre

hen

sive

dev

elo

pm

ent

leas

e o

n o

r af

ter

Jan

uar

y 1, 20

17, fo

r a

pro

po

sed

tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

pro

ject

on

th

e st

ate

hig

hw

ay s

yste

m if

a dra

ft e

nvir

on

men

tal

imp

act

stat

emen

t o

r d

raft

envir

on

men

tal im

pac

t re

po

rt f

or

the

pro

ject

was

rel

ease

d b

y th

e dep

artm

ent

in M

arch

201

5 f

or

pub

lic

com

men

t. T

his

bill

co

nta

ins

oth

er r

elat

ed p

rovis

ions.

Sen

ate

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

and

Ho

usi

ng –

2 y

ear

bill

Wat

ch

Th

is w

as in

itia

lly a

sp

ot

bill

to

ad

dre

ss t

he

P3 law

. It

has

bee

n a

men

ded

to

ap

ply

so

lely

to

th

e 710 N

pro

ject

in

LA

co

un

ty.

SB

166

Intr

oduce

d:

2/

5/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Gain

es

R

(Dis

t 1)

Cali

forn

ia E

nvi

ron

men

tal Q

uali

ty A

ct.

T

he

Cal

ifo

rnia

En

vir

on

men

tal Q

ual

ity

Act

(C

EQ

A)

requir

es a

lea

d

agen

cy t

o p

rep

are

a m

itig

ated

neg

ativ

e dec

lara

tio

n f

or

a p

roje

ct

that

may

hav

e a

sign

ific

ant

effe

ct o

n t

he

envir

on

men

t if

rev

isio

ns

in t

he

pro

ject

wo

uld

avo

id o

r m

itig

ate

that

eff

ect

and

th

ere

is n

o

sub

stan

tial

evid

ence

th

at t

he

pro

ject

, as

rev

ised

, w

ould

hav

e a

sign

ific

ant

effe

ct o

n t

he

envir

on

men

t. T

his

bill

wo

uld

mak

e te

chn

ical

, n

on

sub

stan

tive

chan

ges

to t

ho

se p

rovis

ions.

Th

is b

ill

con

tain

s o

ther

exi

stin

g la

ws.

Sen

ate

Rule

s –

2 y

ear

bill

W

atch

C

EQ

A s

po

t b

ill.

SB

167

Intr

oduce

d:

2/

5/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Gain

es

R

(Dis

t 1)

Cali

forn

ia G

lob

al

Warm

ing

So

luti

on

s A

ct

of

2006

. T

he

Sta

te A

ir R

eso

urc

es B

oar

d is

requir

ed t

o a

do

pt

a st

atew

ide

gree

nh

ouse

gas

em

issi

ons

limit

equiv

alen

t to

th

e st

atew

ide

gree

nh

ouse

gas

em

issi

ons

level

in

1990 t

o b

e ac

hie

ved

by

2020,

and

to

ad

op

t ru

les

and

reg

ula

tio

ns

in a

n o

pen

pub

lic p

roce

ss t

o

ach

ieve

the

max

imum

tec

hn

olo

gica

lly f

easi

ble

an

d c

ost

-eff

ecti

ve

gree

nh

ouse

gas

em

issi

on

red

uct

ion

s. T

his

bill

wo

uld

mak

e n

on

sub

stan

tive

chan

ges

to t

hes

e p

rovis

ions.

Th

is b

ill c

on

tain

s o

ther

exi

stin

g la

ws.

Sen

ate

Rule

s –

2 y

ear

bill

W

atch

Sp

ot

bill

th

at a

dd

ress

es A

B 3

2 r

egula

tory

p

roce

ss.

SB

192

Am

ended

: 4/

30/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Liu

D

(Dis

t 25)

Bic

ycle

s: h

elm

ets

. W

ould

req

uir

e th

e O

ffic

e o

f T

raff

ic S

afet

y, in

co

ord

inat

ion

wit

h

the

Dep

artm

ent

of

the

Cal

ifo

rnia

Hig

hw

ay P

atro

l (C

HP

), t

o

con

duct

a c

om

pre

hen

sive

study

of

bic

ycle

hel

met

use

, in

cludin

g sp

ecif

ied info

rmat

ion

, an

d t

o r

epo

rt t

he

study'

s fi

ndin

gs b

y Ja

nuar

y 1, 2017, as

sp

ecif

ied

.

Sen

ate

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Wat

ch

Th

e b

ill o

rigi

nal

ly m

and

ated

th

at a

ll b

icyc

le

rid

ers

and

pas

sen

gers

wea

r hel

met

s an

d, at

n

igh

t to

als

o w

ear

refl

ecti

ve

safe

ty a

pp

arel

.

Am

end

ed t

o r

equir

e a

stud

y b

y C

HP

of

hel

met

use

.

75

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=hA3EnsvKDXdavsngT1CxxiF86YOk6Fzq0f2JFBmzyslKLUfBi7BFU5LZTEzESLjR



http://huff.cssrc.us/

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=daXBiSc%2bgjgkX50jvzRmUCzN8ESZqLTXBAZ2nFw8cUI1a2qGHY69RR%2b4Vq2dbjRr




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=hhWUhUmvGgeflGy%2ftQlUXSeNbzobsQkApX5MHk8Wzo%2fgZNQ5jNxZXwCbGWRiIvda




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=nj53w%2b6Lpz1Vxt4IjoltWYCDvo%2fPnjqbgdqn%2badHFBzD8mcrMQ8l0Whx8Pb%2bQQBS




San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

B

ill

#

Au

tho

r D

esc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

SB

321

Am

ended

: 4/

23/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Beall

D

(Dis

t 15)

Mo

tor

veh

icle

fu

el ta

xes:

rate

s: a

dju

stm

ents

. C

urr

ent

law

, as

of

July

1, 201

0, ex

emp

ts t

he

sale

of,

and

th

e st

ora

ge, use

, o

r o

ther

con

sum

pti

on

of,

mo

tor

veh

icle

fuel

fro

m

spec

ifie

d s

ales

an

d u

se t

axes

an

d in

crea

ses

the

exci

se t

ax o

n m

oto

r veh

icle

fuel

, as

pro

vid

ed. T

his

bill

wo

uld

, fo

r th

e 2015-1

6 f

isca

l ye

ar a

nd

eac

h f

isca

l ye

ar t

her

eaft

er, in

stea

d r

equir

e th

e b

oar

d, o

n o

r b

efo

re J

uly

1, 2015, o

r M

arch

1 o

f th

e fi

scal

yea

r im

med

iate

ly

pre

ced

ing

the

app

licab

le f

isca

l ye

ar, as

sp

ecif

ied, to

adju

st t

he

rate

in

a m

ann

er a

s to

gen

erat

e an

am

oun

t o

f re

ven

ue

equal

to

th

e am

oun

t o

f re

ven

ue

loss

att

rib

uta

ble

to

th

e ex

emp

tio

n, b

ased

on

es

tim

ates

mad

e b

y th

e bo

ard t

hat

ref

lect

th

e co

mb

ined

aver

age

of

the

actu

al f

uel

pri

ce o

ver

th

e p

revio

us

4 f

isca

l ye

ars

and

th

e es

tim

ated

fuel

pri

ce f

or

the

curr

ent

fisc

al y

ear,

an

d c

on

tin

uin

g to

ta

ke

into

acc

oun

t ad

just

men

ts r

equir

ed b

y cu

rren

t la

w t

o m

ain

tain

re

ven

ue

neu

tral

ity.

Sen

ate

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Sup

po

rt

Th

is b

ill w

ould

pro

vid

e m

ore

fle

xib

ility

to

th

e B

oar

d o

f E

qual

izat

ion

in

est

ablis

hin

g an

nual

gas

exc

ise

tax

rate

s b

y ex

ten

din

g th

e p

erio

d f

rom

3 t

o 5

yea

rs t

o e

nsu

re "

reven

ue

neu

tral

ity"

. T

his

wo

uld

add

ress

th

e vo

lati

lity

no

w o

bse

rved

in

th

e an

nual

tax

-rat

e-se

ttin

g p

roce

ss.

SB

413

Am

ended

: 4/

16/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Wie

ck

ow

ski

D

(Dis

t 10)

Pu

bli

c t

ran

sit:

pro

hib

ited

co

nd

uct.

E

xist

ing

law

als

o a

uth

ori

zes

a p

ub

lic t

ransp

ort

atio

n a

gency

to

ad

op

t an

ord

inan

ce t

o im

po

se a

nd

en

forc

e ci

vil

adm

inis

trat

ive

pen

alti

es f

or

cert

ain

pas

sen

ger

mis

con

duct

, o

ther

th

an b

y m

ino

rs,

on

or

in a

tra

nsi

t fa

cilit

y o

r ve

hic

le in

lie

u o

f th

e cr

imin

al p

enal

ties

o

ther

wis

e ap

plic

able

, w

ith

spec

ifie

d a

dm

inis

trat

ive

pro

cedure

s fo

r th

e im

po

siti

on

an

d e

nfo

rcem

ent

of

the

adm

inis

trat

ive

pen

alti

es,

incl

ud

ing

an in

itia

l re

vie

w a

nd

op

po

rtun

ity

for

a su

bse

quen

t ad

min

istr

ativ

e h

eari

ng.

Exi

stin

g la

w r

equir

es t

he

ord

inan

ce t

o

incl

ud

e th

e st

atuto

ry p

rovis

ion

s go

ver

nin

g th

e ad

min

istr

ativ

e p

enal

ties

.

Sen

ate

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

New

–

Rec

om

men

d

Sup

po

rt

Exp

and

s av

aila

ble

ad

min

istr

ativ

e ad

jud

icat

ive

rem

edie

s un

der

law

fo

r n

ew

crim

es in

clud

ing

loud n

ois

e an

d n

ot

yiel

din

g re

serv

ed s

eats

fo

r el

der

ly o

r d

isab

led

per

son

s. S

FM

TA

has

req

ues

ted

our

sup

po

rt f

or

this

bill

to

dec

rim

inal

ize

youth

far

e ev

asio

n.

Per

Fin

ance

Co

mm

itte

e d

irec

tio

n, w

e w

ill

seek

ad

dit

ion

al info

rmat

ion

an

d, if

nee

ded

, am

end

men

ts t

o t

he

bill

in

ord

er t

o e

nsu

re

that

yo

uth

are

no

t n

egat

ivel

y im

pac

ted

by

this

bill

(e.

g. e

nsu

re n

o im

pac

ts o

n juven

ile

reco

rd).

76

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=mexMvv92awiyEjiVyyGZAHdp0e2R70L%2bu4VqelWXk%2fVwgPjVYiiTq8BNVTlAccqj






http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/sen/sb_0401-0450/sb_413_bill_20150416_amended_sen_v98.htm


San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

SB

433

Am

ended

: 4/

6/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Berr

yh

ill

R

(Dis

t 8)

Mo

tor

veh

icle

fu

el ta

xes:

die

sel

fuel ta

xes:

rate

s: a

dju

stm

en

ts.

Wo

uld

, fo

r th

e 2016-1

7 fi

scal

yea

r an

d e

ach

fis

cal ye

ar t

her

eaft

er,

inst

ead

req

uir

e th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f F

inan

ce t

o a

dju

st t

he

mo

tor

veh

icle

fuel

tax

rat

e as

des

crib

ed a

bo

ve,

an

d w

ould

req

uir

e th

e d

epar

tmen

t to

no

tify

th

e b

oar

d o

f th

e ra

te a

dju

stm

ent

effe

ctiv

e fo

r th

e st

ate'

s n

ext

fisc

al y

ear,

as

pro

vid

ed. T

his

bill

co

nta

ins

oth

er

rela

ted p

rovis

ion

s an

d o

ther

exi

stin

g la

ws.

Sen

ate

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

New

- W

atch

Sh

ifts

res

po

nsi

bili

ty f

rom

Boar

d o

f E

qual

izat

ion

to

Dep

artm

ent

of

Fin

ance

fo

r an

nual

gas

tax

rat

e.

SB

491

Am

ended

: 4/

22/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Co

mm

itte

e o

n

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

an

d

Ho

usi

ng

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

: o

mn

ibu

s b

ill.

C

urr

ent

law

, in

th

e ar

ea u

nder

th

e ju

risd

icti

on

of

the

Bay

Are

a A

ir

Qual

ity

Man

agem

ent

Dis

tric

t, r

equir

es a

t le

ast

40%

of

fee

reven

ues

to

be

pro

po

rtio

nat

ely

allo

cate

d t

o e

ach

co

un

ty w

ith

in t

he

dis

tric

t,

and

req

uir

es a

n e

nti

ty r

ecei

vin

g th

ese

reven

ues

, at

lea

st o

nce

a y

ear,

to

ho

ld o

ne

or

mo

re p

ub

lic m

eeti

ngs

fo

r th

e p

urp

ose

of

ado

pti

ng

crit

eria

fo

r ex

pen

dit

ure

of

the

fun

ds

and

to

rev

iew

th

ose

ex

pen

dit

ure

s. T

his

bill

wo

uld

in

stea

d, at

lea

st o

nce

a y

ear,

req

uir

e o

ne

or

mo

re p

ub

lic m

eeti

ngs

to

ado

pt

crit

eria

fo

r ex

pen

dit

ure

of

fun

ds,

if

the

crit

eria

hav

e b

een

mo

dif

ied

fro

m t

he

pre

vio

us

year

, an

d o

ne

or

mo

re p

ub

lic m

eeti

ngs

to

rev

iew

th

ose

exp

endit

ure

s.

Sen

ate

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Wat

ch

Th

is is

the

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n O

mn

ibus

bill

. It

m

ay o

nly

co

nta

in t

ech

nic

al law

ch

ange

s.

SB

508

Am

ended

: 4/

27/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Beall

D

(Dis

t 15)

Tra

nsi

t o

per

ati

on

s: f

inan

cial

req

uir

em

en

ts.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

del

ete

the

requir

emen

t fo

r tr

ansi

t o

per

ato

rs t

o

mai

nta

in h

igh

er f

areb

ox r

equir

emen

ts b

ased

on

th

e 1978-

79 f

isca

l ye

ar. T

he

bill

wo

uld

exe

mp

t ad

dit

ion

al c

ateg

ori

es o

f ex

pen

dit

ure

s fr

om

th

e d

efin

itio

n o

f “operating cost”

use

d t

o d

eter

min

e co

mp

lian

ce w

ith

req

uir

ed f

areb

ox r

atio

s, in

cludin

g, a

mo

ng

oth

ers,

ce

rtai

n h

ealt

h c

over

age,

pen

sio

n, fu

el, in

sura

nce

, an

d c

laim

s se

ttle

men

t co

sts.

Th

e b

ill w

ould

als

o e

xem

pt

star

tup

cost

s fo

r n

ew

tran

sit

serv

ices

fo

r up

to

2 y

ears

.

Sen

ate

Sec

on

d

Rea

din

g W

atch

U

pd

ates

dec

ade-

old

mas

s tr

ansi

t pro

gram

ef

fici

ency

sta

nd

ard

s. S

po

nso

red

by

Cal

ifo

rnia

Tra

nsi

t A

sso

ciat

ion

.

77

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=lgt2PtfLICDO%2f97zGrzBrIgx48K%2bzEBWkxyCDcD4CG9Du6H0bXwiKdFF%2fikh9hYR




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=9TVq7EP1bAjIzrN8KLkV0gpZzzcYc9KLZhEsR1T6SPBygcaWZTBJC4ZStUsGnWB6







San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

B

ill

#

Au

tho

r D

esc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

SB

516

A

men

ded

: 4/

21/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Fu

ller

R

(Dis

t 16)

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

: m

oto

rist

aid

serv

ices.

C

urr

ent

law

req

uir

es m

on

eys

rece

ived

by

a se

rvic

e au

tho

rity

to

be

use

d f

or

the

imp

lem

enta

tio

n, m

ain

ten

ance

, an

d o

per

atio

n o

f a

mo

tori

st a

id s

yste

m o

f ca

ll b

oxe

s an

d a

uth

ori

zes

mo

ney

s re

ceiv

ed

by

a se

rvic

e au

tho

rity

in

exc

ess

of

wh

at is

nee

ded

fo

r th

at s

yste

m

to b

e use

d f

or

add

itio

nal

mo

tori

st a

id s

ervic

es, in

cludin

g, a

mo

ng

oth

er t

hin

gs, ch

ange

able

mes

sage

sig

ns

and

lig

hti

ng

for

call

bo

xes.

T

his

bill

wo

uld

req

uir

e th

at t

ho

se m

on

eys

be

use

d b

y th

e se

rvic

e au

tho

rity

fo

r se

rvic

e ex

pen

ses

asso

ciat

ed w

ith

th

e im

ple

men

tati

on

, m

ain

ten

ance

, an

d o

per

atio

ns

of

a m

oto

rist

aid

sys

tem

, in

cludin

g th

e in

stal

lati

on

of

call

bo

xes.

Sen

ate

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

Wat

ch

Th

e b

ill s

eeks

to t

ransf

orm

th

e p

urp

ose

of

the

call

bo

x s

yste

ms

to a

bro

ader

arr

ay o

f m

oto

rist

ass

ista

nce

act

ivit

ies.

SB

564

Intr

oduce

d:

2/

26/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Can

nell

a R

(D

ist

12)

Veh

icle

s: s

ch

oo

l zo

ne f

ines.

C

urr

ent

law

, in

th

e ca

se o

f sp

ecif

ied v

iola

tio

ns

rela

tin

g to

rule

s o

f th

e ro

ad a

nd

dri

vin

g und

er t

he

infl

uen

ce, do

ub

les

the

fine

in t

he

case

of

mis

dem

ean

ors

, an

d in

crea

ses

the

fin

e, a

s sp

ecif

ied, in

th

e ca

se o

f in

frac

tio

ns,

if

the

vio

lati

on

is

com

mit

ted b

y th

e dri

ver

of

a veh

icle

wit

hin

a h

igh

way

co

nst

ruct

ion

or

mai

nte

nan

ce a

rea

duri

ng

any

tim

e w

hen

tra

ffic

is

regu

late

d o

r re

stri

cted

by

the

Dep

artm

ent

of

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n o

r lo

cal au

tho

riti

es p

urs

uan

t to

exi

stin

g la

w o

r is

co

mm

itte

d w

ith

in a

des

ign

ated

Saf

ety

En

han

cem

ent-

Do

ub

le F

ine

Zo

ne.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

als

o r

equir

e th

at a

n a

ddit

ion

al f

ine

of

$35 b

e im

po

sed

if

the

vio

lati

on

occ

urr

ed w

hen

pas

sin

g a

sch

oo

l b

uild

ing

or

sch

oo

l gr

oun

ds,

as

spec

ifie

d.

Sen

ate

Th

ird

R

eadin

g Sup

po

rt

Incr

ease

s fi

nes

for

traf

fic

vio

lati

on

s n

ear

sch

oo

ls. Sim

ilar

bill

pas

sed

las

t ye

ar, b

ut

was

vet

oed

by

Go

ver

no

r.

SB

595

Intr

oduce

d:

2/

27/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Can

nell

a R

(D

ist

12)

Veh

icle

s: p

rim

a f

acie

sp

eed

lim

its:

sch

oo

ls.

Un

der

curr

ent

law

, th

e pri

ma

faci

e sp

eed

lim

it w

hen

appro

ach

ing

or

pas

sin

g a

sch

oo

l is

25 m

iles

per

ho

ur.

Curr

ent

law

auth

ori

zes

a lo

cal au

tho

rity

to

est

ablis

h a

lo

wer

pri

ma

faci

e sp

eed

lim

it w

ith

in

spec

ifie

d d

ista

nce

s o

f a

schoo

l. T

his

bill

wo

uld

mak

e te

chn

ical

, n

on

sub

stan

tive

chan

ges

to t

hat

pro

vis

ion

.

Sen

ate

Rule

s –

2 y

ear

bill

Wat

ch

Sp

ot

bill

rel

ated

to

sch

oo

l zo

ne

spee

ds;

par

t o

f a

larg

er s

cho

ol tr

affi

c sa

fety

pac

kag

e.

78

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=imLoQzhXtzFySUUdg1gLI4q06qwNxmmA0SVcWhmNAiRgsidYdwlYp%2fArhvaNGkqO




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=%2fOh2oqZq1u3pL5TlNx9QYzthd0XemOhFbEIslC1rDJcQj0GA4Pt%2b755yhfgsxA4c




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=Ej3s0L8QYj2mWsCWBvslPsAr3Sa0jIAqckGQXr4r05i9ZH%2bimcJQPvKqZzLAoo8o




San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

B

ill

#

Au

tho

r D

esc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

SB

632

Intr

oduce

d:

2/

27/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Can

nell

a R

(D

ist

12)

Veh

icle

s: p

rim

a f

acie

sp

eed

lim

its:

sch

oo

ls.

Wo

uld

allo

w a

cit

y o

r co

unty

to

est

ablis

h in

a r

esid

ence

dis

tric

t, o

n

a h

igh

way

wit

h a

po

sted

sp

eed

lim

it o

f 30 m

iles

per

ho

ur

or

slo

wer

, a

15 m

iles

per

ho

ur

pri

ma

faci

e sp

eed

lim

it w

hen

app

roac

hin

g, a

t a

dis

tan

ce o

f le

ss t

han

1,3

20 f

eet

from

, o

r p

assi

ng,

a s

cho

ol b

uild

ing

or

gro

un

ds

ther

eof,

co

nti

guo

us

of

to a

hig

hw

ay a

nd

po

sted

wit

h a

sc

ho

ol w

arn

ing

sign

th

at indic

ates

a s

pee

d lim

it o

f 15 m

iles

per

h

our

24 h

ours

a d

ay. T

his

bill

wo

uld

pro

vid

e th

at a

25 m

iles

per

h

our

pri

ma

faci

e lim

it in

a r

esid

ence

dis

tric

t, o

n a

hig

hw

ay, w

ith

a

po

sted

sp

eed

lim

it o

f 30 m

iles

per

ho

ur

or

slo

wer

, ap

plie

s, a

s to

th

ose

lo

cal au

tho

riti

es, w

hen

ap

pro

ach

ing,

at

a dis

tan

ce o

f 500 t

o

1,3

20 f

eet

fro

m a

sch

oo

l b

uild

ing

or

gro

un

ds

ther

eof.

Sen

ate

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

and

Ho

usi

ng –

2 y

ear

bill

Wat

ch

Th

e b

ill e

xpan

ds

scho

ol zo

ne

limit

s. T

her

e m

ay b

e un

inte

nd

ed im

plic

atio

ns

to s

ort

out

rela

ted t

o c

ity/

county

go

ver

nan

ce p

ow

ers.

SB

698

Intr

oduce

d:

2/

27/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Can

nell

a R

(D

ist

12)

Acti

ve T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Pro

gra

m:

sch

oo

l zo

ne s

afe

ty p

roje

cts.

W

ould

co

nti

nuo

usl

y ap

pro

pri

ate

an u

nsp

ecif

ied a

mo

un

t fr

om

th

e G

reen

ho

use

Gas

Red

uct

ion

Fun

d t

o t

he

Sta

te H

igh

way

Acc

oun

t in

th

e Sta

te T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Fun

d f

or

purp

ose

s o

f fu

ndin

g sc

ho

ol

zon

e sa

fety

pro

ject

s w

ith

in t

he

Act

ive

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n P

rogr

am.

Th

is b

ill c

on

tain

s o

ther

exi

stin

g la

ws.

Sen

ate

En

vir

on

men

tal

Qual

ity – 2

ye

ar b

ill

Wat

ch

An

oth

er o

f a

larg

er p

ackag

e o

f sc

ho

ol

safe

ty b

ills.

Th

is b

ill w

ould

sup

po

rt t

he

AT

P w

ith

fun

ds

fro

m c

ap a

nd

tra

de.

SB

760

Am

ended

: 5/

5/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Men

do

za D

(D

ist

32)

Th

is b

ill w

ould

req

uir

e th

e Str

ateg

ic G

row

th C

oun

cil to

dev

elo

p

and

im

ple

men

t th

e D

isad

van

tage

d C

om

mun

ity

En

han

cem

ent

Pro

gram

to

aw

ard

gra

nts

to

dis

advan

tage

d c

om

mun

itie

s, a

s d

efin

ed, to

fac

ilita

te p

roje

cts

for

com

mun

ity

enh

ance

men

t im

pro

vem

ents

.

Sen

ate

Ap

pro

pri

atio

ns

New

–

Rec

om

men

d

Op

pose

Th

e b

ill c

reat

es a

new

Dis

advan

tage

d

Co

mm

un

ity

En

han

cem

ent

Pro

gram

wit

hin

th

e Str

ateg

ic G

row

th C

oun

cil th

at w

ould

be

pro

vid

e gr

ants

fo

r en

han

cem

ent

pro

gram

s to

red

uce

GH

G e

mis

sion

s an

d p

rovid

e en

vir

on

men

tal b

enef

its

to d

isad

van

tage

d

com

mun

itie

s. P

roje

cts

would

in

clud

e urb

an

gree

nin

g, p

ark d

evel

opm

ent,

an

d a

ctiv

e tr

ansp

ort

atio

n f

acili

ties

. M

TC

op

po

ses

this

an

d o

ther

bill

s to

d

edic

ate

cap

an

d t

rad

e fu

nds

to

dis

advan

tage

d c

om

mun

itie

s o

n t

he

bas

is

that

th

e m

eth

od

olo

gy t

o d

eter

min

e “disadvantaged

communities”

is

flaw

ed.

79

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=GO%2fQ24FWjpVwR70EPB2iaZThyyI4yLTOYGBlZRb5IvMaDAwMlK0g8QfHzdCku3Qi




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=MB%2b6h62V6BPvgyKpTYpG18DPvh8zJNJn%2fN01y2%2b8cM4kStN8KvC2tEGaM7XUBqu7








San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

May 2

015

Bil

l #

A

uth

or

Desc

rip

tio

n

Sta

tus

Po

siti

on

C

om

men

ts

SB

782

Intr

oduce

d:

2/

27/

2015

pd

f h

tml

All

en

D

(Dis

t 26)

Sta

te h

igh

ways:

reli

nq

uis

hm

en

t.

Curr

ent

law

giv

es t

he

Dep

artm

ent

of

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n f

ull

po

sses

sio

n a

nd

co

ntr

ol o

f al

l st

ate

hig

hw

ays.

Curr

ent

law

des

crib

es

the

auth

ori

zed

ro

ute

s in

th

e st

ate

hig

hw

ay s

yste

m a

nd

est

ablis

hes

a

pro

cess

fo

r ad

op

tio

n o

f a

hig

hw

ay o

n a

n a

uth

ori

zed

ro

ute

by

the

Cal

ifo

rnia

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n C

om

mis

sio

n. C

urr

ent

law

als

o p

rovid

es

for

the

com

mis

sio

n t

o r

elin

quis

h t

o lo

cal ag

enci

es s

tate

hig

hw

ay

segm

ents

th

at h

ave

bee

n d

elet

ed f

rom

th

e st

ate

hig

hw

ay s

yste

m b

y le

gisl

ativ

e en

actm

ent,

an

d in

cer

tain

oth

er c

ases

. Th

is b

ill w

ould

m

ake

no

nsu

bst

anti

ve

chan

ges

to t

hes

e pro

vis

ion

s.

Sen

ate

Rule

s –

2 y

ear

bill

W

atch

T

his

is

a sp

ot

bill

th

at is

inte

nd

ed t

o

stre

amlin

e st

ate

hig

hw

ay r

elin

quis

hm

ents

.

SC

A 5

Intr

oduce

d:

3/

26/

2015

pd

f h

tml

Han

co

ck D

(Dis

t 9)

Lo

cal

go

vern

men

t: s

pecia

l ta

xes:

vo

ter

ap

pro

val.

W

ould

co

nd

itio

n t

he

imp

osi

tio

n, ex

ten

sio

n, o

r in

crea

se o

f a

spec

ial

tax

by

a lo

cal go

ver

nm

ent

up

on

th

e ap

pro

val

of

55%

of

the

vo

ters

vo

tin

g o

n t

he

pro

po

siti

on

, if

th

e p

rop

osi

tio

n p

rop

osi

ng

the

tax

con

tain

s sp

ecif

ied r

equir

emen

ts. T

he

mea

sure

wo

uld

als

o m

ake

con

form

ing

and

tec

hn

ical

, no

nsu

bst

anti

ve

chan

ges.

Sen

ate

Go

ver

nan

ce

and

Fin

ance

Sup

po

rt

Wo

uld

sp

ecif

y th

at t

he

vote

r ap

pro

val

re

quir

emen

t is

55%

for

loca

l go

ver

nm

ent

spec

ial ta

xes.

To

tal

Measu

res:

73

To

tal

Tra

ckin

g F

orm

s: 7

3

Att

ach

men

t:

1.SB

16 –

Sum

mar

y of

Pro

po

sal

80

http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=lVAE03Jw5GnDsxXtS2%2fatr0Nky3HkE%2bUq8GRhByPhJD4EjFmEt5oDWyS2i09LOdu




http://ctweb.capitoltrack.com/public/publishbillinfo.aspx?bi=JB7dXu25cly6XmkgeOXShhQFpKh1l6jF2PVT5YoVHffLDXp7LLk3e50YlQhD15kG

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sca_5_bill_20150326_introduced.pdf

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sca_5_bill_20150326_introduced.html


Attachment 1

81


82

M:\CAC\Meetings\Memos\2015\05 May\CAC By-Laws - 2015 Revision.docxM:\CAC\Administration\Structure\CAC By-Laws - 2015 Revision.docx


By-Laws

ARTICLE I – MEMBERSHIPAUTHORITY

Section 1. Per Section 5.3 of the Transportation Authority’s Administrative Code, tThe eleven (11) members of the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) are appointed by the San Francisco County Transportation Authority (SFCTATransportation Authority) to advise the SFCTA Transportation Authority on the development and implementation of the Transportation Expenditure Plan and the Traffic Congestion Management Plan.

ARTICLE II – MEMBERSHIP

Section 21. Per the Transportation Authority’s Administrative Code, CAC members shall include representatives from various segments of the community, including public policy organizations, labor, business, senior citizens, the disabled, environmentalists and the neighborhoods. The Committee members shall be residents of San Francisco and shall serve for two-year periods.

Section 2. Per the Transportation Authority’s Administrative Code, any member who is absent for four of any twelve regularly scheduled consecutive meetings shall automatically be terminated. Any resulting vacancy shall be filled for a new two-year period. Any terminated member who wishes to be reappointed shall contact his or her district Supervisor and shall reappear before the Plans and Programs Committee to speak on his or her behalf.

ARTICLE III – OFFICERS

Section 1. The Officers of the CAC shall be a Chairperson and a Vice-Chairperson. Their duties shall be as follows:

Chairperson: Presides over CAC meetings; develops the monthly meeting agenda; appoints subcommittees and subcommittee chairpersons; represents the CAC’s actions and decisions to the SFCTATransportation Authority, appropriate agencies, and to the community at large, or designates other CAC members to perform these duties.

Vice-Chairperson: Presides over the CAC meetings in the absence of the Chairperson; conducts the other duties of the Chairperson in his/her absence.

Section 2. Nominations for the Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson shall be made at the last CAC meeting of the calendar year (e.g. December) in order to be eligible for election at the first CAC meeting of the following year (e.g. January). A nomination must be accepted by the candidate. Self-nominations are allowed. Candidates are required to submit statements of qualifications and objectives to the Clerk of the Transportation Authority one week prior to the January CAC meeting to be included in the meeting packet.

Section 23. Selection of Officers shall be made as follows:

Chairperson: The Chairperson shall be elected by a majority of the appointed members at the January meeting. The term of office shall be for one year. If the term of appointment of the member elected

Page 1 of 3

83


Chairperson expires before the year is out and that member does not either seek reappointment or the Board does not grant such reappointment, the Vice-Chairperson will serve as Chairperson until the following Januaryfor the remainder of the term.

Vice-Chairperson: This OfficerThe Vice-Chairperson shall be elected by a majority of the appointed members at the January meeting. The term of office shall be for one year. If the term of appointment of the member elected Vice-Chairperson expires before the year is out and that member does not either seek reappointment or the Board does not grant such reappointment, the Committee CAC will shall hold an election at the next regular meeting of the CAC for a Vice-Chairperson to serve out the remainder of the term.

ARTICLE III IV – MEETINGS

Section 1. The regular meetings of the CAC shall be held on the fourth Wednesday of each month at 6:00 p.m. in at the Transportation Authority offices.s at 100 Van Ness Avenue, 26th Floor, San Francisco, California.

Section 2. The CAC meetings are subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act and the City’s Sunshine Ordinance.

Section 3. The rules contained within the current edition of Robert’s Rules of Order (Newly Revised) shall govern the CAC in all cases to which they are applicable and in which they are not inconsistent with these by-laws, the Transportation Authority’s Administrative Code and any special rules of order the CAC may adopt. A quorum is defined as a majority of currently appointed members. Section 3. Any member who is absent for four (4) of any twelve (12) regularly scheduled consecutive meetings shall automatically be terminated. Any resulting vacancy shall be filled for a new two-year period.

ARTICLE IV – SUBCOMMITTEES

Section 1. Subcommittees and Ad Hoc Committees may be established by the Chairperson as necessary.

Section 2. Each Subcommittee shall consist of at least three but not more than five (3) CAC members appointed by the CAC Chairperson.

ARTICLE V - PARLIAMENTARY AUTHORITY

The rules contained within the current edition of Robert’s Rules of Order (Newly Revised) shall govern the CAC in all cases to which they are applicable and in which they are not inconsistent with these by-laws, the SFCTA Administrative Code and any special rules of order the CAC may adopt. A quorum is defined as a majority of currently appointed members.

ARTICLE VI – AMENDMENT OF BY-LAWS

These by-laws may be amended at any regular meeting of the CAC by a two-thirds (2/3) vote of the CAC members present and voting, and constituting not less than a majority of the CAC members appointed, provided that the amendment has been submitted in writing at the previous regular meeting.

ARTICLE VII – CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Per the Transportation Authority’s Administrative Code, tThe CAC members serve without any compensation. There shall be no personal or monetary gain by members of the CAC as a result of their membership and actions on the CAC.

Page 2 of 3

84


ARTICLE VIII – CONDUCT OF MEMBERS

No CAC member shall directly or indirectly by any form of words impute to another CAC member or to other CAC members any conduct or motive unworthy or unbecoming of a CAC member.

ARTICLE VIII IX – MAJORITY/MINORITY REPORTS

CAC members may elect to present separate reports on decisions and actions by the CAC under the following circumstances: A majority report will reflect at least two-thirds (2/3) of the CAC members present and voting, and constituting not less than a majority of CAC members. A minority report will reflect at least twenty-five percentone-fourth (25%) of the CAC members present and voting.

Rev. Month Day, 2015

Page 3 of 3

85


86

M:\CAC\Meetings\Minutes\2015\5 May 14 CAC Subcommittee Mins.docx Page 1 of 2

DRAFT MINUTES


May 14, 2015 SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING

1. Subcommittee Meeting Call to Order

The meeting was called to order by Chair Christopher Waddling at 5:35 p.m. Subcommitteemembers present were Santiago Lerma, Raymon Smith and Chris Waddling. TransportationAuthority staff members present were Cynthia Fong, Maria Lombardo and Steve Stamos.

2. Election of Subcommittee Chair – ACTION

Chair Waddling opened the floor for nominations for the Subcommittee Chair seat.

Raymon Smith nominated himself, seconded by Santiago Lerma. There were no furthernominations.


The motion to appoint Raymon Smith as Subcommittee Chair was approved by thefollowing vote:

Ayes: CAC Members Lerma, Smith and Waddling

3. Update of Citizens Advisory Committee By-Laws – ACTION

The subcommittee reviewed the by-laws section by section and approved all staffrecommendations with the following revisions. All changes were made unanimously.

The subcommittee renamed Article I from Membership to Authority and added a reference tothe Transportation Authority’s Administrative Code.

The subcommittee created a new article titled Membership and moved Section 3 from ArticleIV (Meetings) to the new article (Membership) as Section 2. The subcommittee addedclarification language to the new Section 2 regarding terminated members seekingreappointment.

The subcommittee created a new Section 2 regarding nominations under Article II (Officers).

The subcommittee moved Article V (Parliamentary Authority) to Article III (Meetings) asSection 3.

The subcommittee removed language from Article VIII (Majority/Minority Reports) forclarification.

During discussions, members of the subcommittee noted that the Citizens AdvisoryCommittee (CAC) was approaching a gender imbalance and stated that the CAC should be asdiverse and representative as possible.

Members of the subcommittee requested that staff provide greater detail on the benefits ofproposed projects in the meeting materials.

87

Members of the subcommittee requested a look ahead of what items would appear before the CAC in the months ahead. Maria Lombardo, Chief Deputy, stated that programming of Prop K projects for the next five years could be found on the Transportation Authority’s MyStreetSF page at www.sfcta.org/mystreetsf-projects-map.


The item was approved by the following vote:

Ayes: CAC Members Lerma, Smith and Waddling

4. Public Comment


5. Adjournment

The meeting was adjourned at 6:45 p.m.

88

M:\CAC\Meetings\Memos\2015\05 May\Potrero\Potrero NTP Final Report.docx Page 1 of 3

Memorandum


May 27, 2015


David Uniman – Deputy Director for Planning

– Adopt a Motion of Support for the Adoption of the Potrero Hill Neighborhood Transportation Plan Final Report

The Potrero Hill Neighborhood Transportation Plan (NTP) is the result of a community-based planning effort in the southern Potrero Hill neighborhood of San Francisco, and was funded by a California Department of Transportation Environmental Justice Planning grant and a Metropolitan Transportation Commission Community Based Transportation Planning grant. The technical team, led by the Transportation Authority, collaborated with community stakeholders to identify multimodal transportation priorities at the neighborhood scale, prioritizing near-term improvements to improve connectivity across the site and to the broader neighborhood, city, and region. The final recommendations focus on low-cost improvements that could be implemented before the site is redeveloped wholesale through the Rebuild Potrero project. Prioritized projects include pedestrian safety and transit stop enhancements, including transit bulbouts that would be built using non-infrastructure materials (i.e., construction that does not require regrading the street or moving sewer catchbasins). If successful, this innovative feature could be replicated throughout the city, bringing benefits to transit riders more quickly and cost effectively, particularly on streets that are not scheduled for near term repaving. The NTP includes complete funding plans for these enhancements, with allocations from all sources (including Lifeline Transportation Program funds from the Transportation Authority) anticipated by July 2015 and implementation anticipated by early 2016. The NTP also studied a potential shuttle route to improve access across the site and to connect residents with nearby amenities.

The Potrero Hill Neighborhood Transportation Plan (NTP) is the result of a community-based planning effort in the southern Potrero Hill neighborhood of San Francisco, and was funded by a California Department of Transportation Environmental Justice Planning grant and a Metropolitan Transportation Commission Community Based Transportation Planning grant. The technical team, led by the Transportation Authority, collaborated with community stakeholders to identify multimodal transportation priorities at the neighborhood scale, prioritizing near-term improvements to improve connectivity across the site and to the broader neighborhood, city, and region. The final recommendations focus on low-cost improvements that could be implemented before the site is redeveloped wholesale through the Rebuild Potrero project.

89


The plan study area is bordered by US 101 to the west, I-280 to the east, Cesar Chavez Street to the south, and 22nd Street/20th Street to the north (see Figure 1-1), wholly encompassing the Potrero Annex and Potrero Terrace public housing sites, with approximately 1,200 people living in 606 homes on the steep, south-facing slope of the hill. The sites were developed in the middle of the 20th Century, during a period in which accommodating cars was the highest transportation priority. A product of its time, the Potrero Annex and Terrace are characterized by wide roads and narrow sidewalks interrupted by curb cuts that provide access to ample off-street parking. While traffic volumes through the site are relatively low, street widths encourage cars to travel at high speeds, and intersection design prioritizes efficient vehicle movement rather than safe and comfortable pedestrian crossings. The circuitous internal street grid and the area’s steep topography further reduce pedestrian accessibility.

The public housing sites are also isolated from the rest of San Francisco with relatively few and challenging connections to the surrounding neighborhoods. A number of these connections require crossing the I-280 and US 101 freeways, which form major barriers just east and west of the site. While there are multiple transit lines that stop along or within the housing site, the lines do not connect residents from one end of the site to the other, forcing residents to undertake a steep walk or an untimed transfer to access many locations outside of the site.

Finally, there are few transit amenities on the site. Narrow sidewalks do not have the space to allow for Muni shelters. Stops are demarcated by painted lines on either the street or a light pole. This lack of amenities makes using transit a less desirable option.

BRIDGE Housing is the lead developer for Rebuild Potrero and also leads community building efforts such as the Healthy Generations Project, the sites’ walking club, community gardening program, and the walking school bus. Using their intimate knowledge and relationships with residents, BRIDGE served as the outreach consultant for the project. Appendix A of the final report includes a summary of outreach conducted as part of the NTP.

The Rebuild Potrero project will demolish and re-build the public housing sites in their entirety as a mixed-use, mixed-income neighborhood, replacing all of the public housing units and adding up to 1,000 moderate-income and market-rate units and building a new gridded street network. The effort is currently undergoing environmental review and seeking funding for implementation. The groundbreaking is expected by 2016, but the project is broken into multiple phases that will not be fully completed for at least 10 to 15 years.

: Previous planning efforts led by community partners have identified important and urgent transportation needs before Rebuild Potrero can be completed; Potrero Hill NTP aimed to identify and prioritize projects to address those needs while advancing design, cost estimation, and funding and implementation strategies. The NTP built on the following studies: Baseline Conditions Assessment of HOPE SF Redevelopment: Potrero Terrace and Annex (San Francisco Department of Public Health), Potrero Hope SF Master Plan EIR, and Potrero Hill Traffic Calming Project (San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency).

Due to the extensive planning processes preceding the current effort as well as the anticipated redevelopment of the Potrero Terrace and Annex housing sites through the Rebuild Potrero project, this NTP was focused on developing low-infrastructure transportation solutions (i.e., construction that does not require regrading the street or moving sewer catchbasins) that could bring benefit to residents in the very near term. Three priority projects emerged:

90


1. Building on the success of the neighborhood’s walking school bus program, the team partneredwith residents to design pedestrian safety improvements at five intersections throughout theproject site where the program currently operates. These improvements call for the use ofmaterials that do not require infrastructure changes. Therefore, they are lower in cost and can bereused in other parts of the city once development begins for Rebuild Potrero. They also willallow space for transit amenities such as shelters, allowing the city to test the use of non-infrastructure materials for a concept such as a bus bulb.

2. Complementing the intersection design improvements, the team also proposed a lighting projectbehind the Potrero Hill Recreation Center to improve security for the walking school busparticipants as well as other residents using this key link in the dark.

3. Finally, the project team developed a potential shuttle route to enhance access for residentsacross the site and to other goods and services.

The Potrero Hill NTP includes cost estimates and a funding and implementation strategy for each of the projects described above. The first two pedestrian safety projects should be fully funded by the time the study is adopted, and implementation could be as soon as the end of 2015. In February, the Transportation Authority recommended the pedestrian improvement and traffic calming project for $375,854 of Lifeline Transportation Program funds for final design and construction, and MTC approved this programming last month. SFMTA anticipated filling the gap with an in-kind match of staff time and $60,000 in other funds, which could include Prop K. At its September 2014 meeting, the Eastern Neighborhoods CAC voted to recommend the allocation of $150,000 in developer impact fees to the lighting project, thereby fully funding it. The shuttle project will require further refinement and identification of funding sources, and implementation is likely at least one to two years away.

1. Adopt a motion of support for the adoption of the Potrero Hill Neighborhood TransportationPlan Final Report, as requested.

2. Adopt a motion of support for the adoption of the Potrero Hill Neighborhood TransportationPlan Final Report, with modifications.


None.

Adopt a motion of support for the adoption of the Potrero Hill Neighborhood Transportation Plan Final Report.

Enclosure: 1. Draft Potrero Hill Neighborhood Transportation Plan Final Report

91


92

M:\CAC\Meetings\Memos\2015\05 May\Prop K_AA grouped allocations\Prop K Grouped Memo CAC.docx Page 1 of 3

Memorandum


May 27, 2015


Anna LaForte – Deputy Director for Policy and Programming

– Adopt a Motion of Support for the Allocation of $40,678,143 in Prop K Funds,with Conditions, and Appropriation of $162,400 in Prop K funds, Subject to the Attached Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution Schedules

As summarized in Attachments 1 and 2, we have sixteen requests totaling $40,840,543 in Prop K sales tax funds to present to the Citizens Advisory Committee. We are requesting $12.3 million for allocation to Caltrans as the Prop K portion of a $276.4 million milestone payment due to the Public Private Partnership concessionaire upon substantial completion of the Presidio Parkway project, which is anticipated this September. There are two NTIP requests. One is for $150,000 for San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) and Transportation Authority staff to provide NTIP program support and the other is for $100,000 for concept development and evaluation of a new north-south multimodal pathway connecting San Bruno Avenue to the Alemany Farmer’s Market, and new bicycle lanes along Alemany Boulevard between Putnam Street and Bayshore Boulevard. This is the District 9 NTIP planning project. The remaining projects include ten from the SFMTA: additional funds for pre-environmental work for the proposed Southwest Subway (19th Avenue/M Ocean View); procurement of 26 60-ft articulated hybrid-diesel buses; 5 traffic signal related projects, replacement or upgrade of safe-hit posts, green bike lanes and bike boxes; planning funds for the Fiscal Year 2015/16 local-track Traffic Calming program; and an environmental impact report for the 6th Street Pedestrian Safety Improvement Project. San Francisco Public Works is requesting Prop K funds for repair of sidewalks damaged by city street trees ($514,349) and replacement, establishment, and maintenance of about 1,700 street trees. BART is requesting $160,000 for design of replacement cross-passage doors in the Transbay Tube.

We have sixteen requests totaling $40,840,543 in Prop K sales tax funds to present to the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) at the May 27, 2015 meeting, for potential Board approval on June 23, 2015. As shown in Attachment 1, the requests come from the following Prop K categories:

Other Transit Enhancements

Vehicles - SFMTA

Guideways - BART

Presidio Parkway

New Signals & Signs

Signals & Signs

Pedestrian and Bicycle Facility Maintenance

93


Traffic Calming

Pedestrian Circulation/ Safety

Tree Planting and Maintenance

Transportation/ Land Use Coordination

Transportation Authority Board adoption of a 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) for Prop K programmatic categories is a prerequisite for allocation of funds from each of these categories except Presidio Parkway, a single-project category programmed directly in the Prop K Strategic Plan.

The purpose of this memorandum is to present sixteen Prop K requests totaling $40,840,543 to the CAC and to seek a motion of support to allocate or appropriate the funds as requested. Attachment 1 summarizes the requests, including information on proposed leveraging (i.e. stretching Prop K dollars further by matching them with other fund sources) compared with the leveraging assumptions in the Prop K Expenditure Plan. Attachment 2 provides a brief description of each project. A detailed scope, schedule, budget and funding plan for each project is included in the attached Allocation Request Forms.

Attachment 3 summarizes the staff recommendations for the requests, highlighting special conditions, 5YPP amendment and other items of interest.

Representatives from sponsor agencies will attend the CAC meeting to answer questions.

1. Adopt a motion of support for the allocation of $40,678,143 in Prop K funds, with conditions, andappropriation of $162,400 in Prop K funds, with conditions, subject to the attached Fiscal YearCash Flow Distribution Schedules, as requested.

2. Adopt a motion of support for the allocation of $40,678,143 in Prop K funds, with conditions, andappropriation of $162,400 in Prop K funds, with conditions, subject to the attached Fiscal YearCash Flow Distribution Schedules, with modifications.


This action would allocate $40,678,143 and appropriate $162,400 in Fiscal Year 2015/16 Prop K funds, with conditions, for a total of sixteen requests. The allocations and appropriations would be subject to the Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution Schedules contained in the attached Allocation Request Forms.

The Fiscal Year 2015/16 Prop K Allocation Summary (Attachment 4) shows that the allocations and cash flows recommended in this memorandum are the first of Fiscal Year 2015/16.

Sufficient funds are included in the amended Fiscal Year 2015/16 budget to accommodate the recommended actions. Furthermore, sufficient funds will be included in future budgets to cover the recommended cash flow distribution for those respective fiscal years.

Adopt a motion of support for the allocation of $40,678,143 in Prop K funds, with conditions, and appropriation of $162,400 in Prop K funds, with conditions, subject to the attached Fiscal Year Cash

94


Flow Distribution Schedules.

Attachments (4): 1. Summary of Applications Received2. Project Descriptions3. Staff Recommendations4. Prop K 2014/15 Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution – Summary

Enclosure: Prop K Allocation Request Forms (16)

95

Att

ach

men

t 1:

Su

mm

ary

of

Ap

pli

cati

on

s R

eceiv

ed

So

urc

e

EP

Lin

e

No

./

Cate

go

ry 1

Pro

ject

Sp

on

sor

2P

roje

ct

Nam

eC

urr

en

t

Pro

p K

Req

uest

Cu

rren

t

Pro

p A

A

Req

uest

To

tal

Co

st f

or

Req

uest

ed

Ph

ase

(s)

Ex

pecte

d

Leve

rag

ing

by E

P L

ine 3

Actu

al

Leve

rag

ing

by

Pro

ject

Ph

ase

(s)4

Ph

ase

(s)

Req

uest

ed

Dis

tric

t

Pro

p K

16

SF

MT

A

So

uth

wes

t Sub

way

(19th

Aven

ue/

M O

cean

Vie

w)

- P

re-

En

vir

on

men

tal Sup

ple

men

t

$

255,7

00

$

1,2

75,7

00

74%

80%

Pla

nn

ing

7, 11

Pro

p K

17M

SF

MT

A

61 6

0-f

t L

ow

Flo

or

Die

sel

Hyb

rid

Co

ach

es (

26 r

epla

ce+

35

exp

and

)

$

12,3

52,0

94

$

78,6

88,1

13

84%

84%

Pro

cure

men

tC

ityw

ide

Pro

p K

22B

BA

RT

Tra

nsb

ay T

ub

e C

ross

-Pas

sage

Do

ors

Rep

lace

men

t $

1

60,0

00

$

500,0

00

78%

68%

Des

ign

6

Pro

p K

24

Cal

tran

sP

resi

dio

Par

kw

ay $

2

0,4

00,0

00

$

276,4

00,0

00

79%

93%

Co

nst

ruct

ion

2

Pro

p K

31

SF

MT

AN

ew S

ign

al C

on

trac

t 62

$

1,5

00,0

00

$

1,9

60,0

00

16%

23%

Co

nst

ruct

ion

1, 3, 4, 5, 6

Pro

p K

33, 31

SF

MT

AT

raff

ic S

ign

al C

on

duit

$

550,0

00

$

550,0

00

41%

0%

Co

nst

ruct

ion

1, 7, 8, 11

Pro

p K

33

SF

MT

AT

raff

ic S

ign

al U

pgr

ade

Co

ntr

act

34

$

518,0

00

$

518,0

00

41%

0%

Des

ign

1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,

8, 9, 11

Pro

p K

33

SF

MT

A3rd

Str

eet

Tra

ffic

Sig

nal

Det

ecti

on

Up

grad

e P

has

e I

$

300,0

00

$

300,0

00

41%

0%

Co

nst

ruct

ion

10

Pro

p K

33

SF

MT

A19th

Aven

ue

Sig

nal

s P

has

e II

I $

6

30,0

00

$

630,0

00

41%

0%

Des

ign

4, 7

Pro

p K

37

SF

MT

AB

icyc

le F

acili

ty M

ain

ten

ance

$

150,0

00

$

150,0

00

48%

0%

Co

nst

ruct

ion

Cit

ywid

e

Pro

p K

37

SF

PW

Pub

lic S

idew

alk R

epai

r $

5

14,3

49

$

745,4

70

48%

31%

Co

nst

ruct

ion

Cit

ywid

e

Pro

p K

38

SF

MT

AL

oca

l-T

rack

Ap

plic

atio

n-B

ased

Tra

ffic

Cal

min

g P

rogr

am $

2

03,4

00

$

203,4

00

51%

0%

Pla

nn

ing

Cit

ywid

e

Pro

p K

40

SF

MT

A6th

Str

eet

Ped

estr

ian

Saf

ety

Imp

rovem

ent

$

2,0

12,0

00

$

2,0

50,6

01

25%

2%

En

vir

on

men

tal

6

Pro

p K

42

SF

PW

Tre

e P

lan

tin

g &

Mai

nte

nan

ce

$

1,0

45,0

00

$

4,6

81,5

17

57%

78%

Co

nst

ruct

ion

Cit

ywid

e

Pro

p K

44

SF

CT

A/

SF

MT

AN

TIP

Pro

gram

Sup

po

rt $

1

50,0

00

$

150,0

00

40%

0%

Pla

nn

ing

Cit

ywid

e

Pro

p K

44

SF

CT

A/

SF

MT

A

Ale

man

y In

terc

han

ge

Imp

rovem

ent

Stu

dy

[NT

IP

Pla

nn

ing]

$

100,0

00

$

200,0

00

40%

50%

Pla

nn

ing

9, 10

$

40,8

40,5

43

$

-

$ 3

69,0

02,8

01

78%

89%

Pro

p K

Leve

rag

ing

TO

TA

L

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs\

Me

mo

s\2

01

5\0

5 M

ay\

Pro

p K

_A

A g

rou

pe

d a

llo

cati

on

s\P

rop

K G

rou

pe

d C

AC

5.2

7.1

5 A

TT 1

-3;

1-S

um

ma

ryP

ag

e 1

of

2

96

Att

ach

men

t 1:

Su

mm

ary

of

Ap

pli

cati

on

s R

eceiv

ed

Fo

otn

ote

s

4 "A

ctual

Lev

erag

ing

by

Pro

ject

Ph

ase"

is

calc

ula

ted

by

div

idin

g th

e to

tal n

on

-Pro

p K

fun

ds

in t

he

fun

din

g p

lan

by

the

tota

l co

st f

or

the

reques

ted

ph

ase

or

ph

ases

. If

th

e

per

cen

tage

in

th

e "A

ctual

Lev

erag

ing"

co

lum

n is

low

er t

han

in

th

e "E

xpec

ted

Lev

erag

ing"

co

lum

n, th

e re

ques

t (i

nd

icat

ed b

y ye

llow

hig

hlig

hti

ng)

is

lever

agin

g fe

wer

no

n-P

rop

K

do

llars

th

an a

ssum

ed in

th

e E

xpen

dit

ure

Pla

n. A

pro

ject

th

at is

wel

l le

ver

aged

over

all m

ay h

ave

low

er-t

han

-exp

ecte

d lev

erag

ing

for

an in

div

idual

or

par

tial

ph

ase.

1 "E

P L

ine

No

./C

ateg

ory

" is

eit

her

th

e P

rop

K E

xp

end

iture

Pla

n lin

e n

um

ber

ref

eren

ced

in

th

e 2014 P

rop

K S

trat

egic

Pla

n o

r th

e P

rop

AA

Exp

end

iture

Pla

n c

ateg

ory

refe

ren

ced

in

th

e 2012 P

rop

AA

Str

ateg

ic P

lan

, in

clud

ing:

Str

eet

Rep

air

and

Rec

on

stru

ctio

n (

Str

eet)

, P

edes

tria

n S

afet

y (P

ed),

an

d T

ran

sit

Rel

iab

ility

an

d M

ob

ility

Im

pro

vem

ents

(Tra

nsi

t).

2 A

cro

nym

s: B

AR

T (

Bay

Are

a R

apid

Tra

nsi

t D

istr

ict)

; C

altr

ans

(Cal

ifo

rnia

Dep

artm

ent

of

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n);

SF

CT

A (

San

Fra

nci

sco

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Auth

ori

ty);

SF

MT

A

(San

Fra

nci

sco

Mun

icip

al T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Age

ncy

); S

FP

W (

San

Fra

nci

sco

Pub

lic W

ork

s).

3 "

Exp

ecte

d L

ever

agin

g B

y E

P L

ine"

is

calc

ula

ted

by

div

idin

g th

e to

tal n

on

-Pro

p K

fun

ds

exp

ecte

d t

o b

e av

aila

ble

fo

r a

given

Pro

p K

Exp

end

iture

Pla

n lin

e it

em (

e.g.

Ped

estr

ian

Cir

cula

tio

n a

nd

Saf

ety)

by

the

tota

l ex

pec

ted

fun

din

g fo

r th

at P

rop

K E

xp

end

iture

Pla

n lin

e it

em o

ver

th

e 30-y

ear

Exp

end

iture

Pla

n p

erio

d. F

or

exam

ple

, ex

pec

ted

lever

agin

g o

f 90%

in

dic

ates

th

at o

n a

ver

age

no

n-P

rop

K f

un

ds

sho

uld

co

ver

90%

of

the

tota

l co

sts

for

all p

roje

cts

in t

hat

cat

ego

ry, an

d P

rop

K s

ho

uld

co

ver

on

ly 1

0%

.

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs\

Me

mo

s\2

01

5\0

5 M

ay\

Pro

p K

_A

A g

rou

pe

d a

llo

cati

on

s\P

rop

K G

rou

pe

d C

AC

5.2

7.1

5 A

TT 1

-3;

1-S

um

ma

ryP

ag

e 2

of

2

97

Att

ach

men

t 2:

Bri

ef

Pro

ject

Desc

rip

tio

ns

1

EP

Lin

e

No

./

Cate

go

ry

Pro

ject

Sp

on

sor

Pro

ject

Nam

eP

rop

K F

un

ds

Req

uest

ed

Pro

ject

Desc

rip

tio

n

16

SF

MT

A

So

uth

wes

t Sub

way

(19th

Aven

ue/

M O

cean

Vie

w)

-

Pre

-En

vir

on

men

tal

Sup

ple

men

t

$ 255,7

00

Fun

ds

will

be

use

d f

or

pla

nn

ing,

co

nce

ptu

al e

ngi

nee

rin

g, c

om

mun

ity

outr

each

an

d p

rep

arat

ion

of

do

cum

ents

th

at w

ill b

e n

eeded

fo

r th

e en

vir

on

men

tal p

has

e o

f th

e p

roje

ct. A

dd

itio

nal

fun

din

g is

bei

ng

sough

t p

rim

arily

to

: 1)

cover

add

itio

nal

co

sts

incu

rred

as

a re

sult

of

an in

corr

ect

assu

mp

tio

n t

hat

th

e

level

of

engi

nee

rin

g w

ork

co

mp

lete

d in

th

e F

easi

bili

ty S

tudy

was

adeq

uat

e to

car

ry d

irec

tly

into

th

e

requir

ed C

altr

ans

do

cum

ents

(P

SR

-PD

S);

an

d 2

) co

nduct

add

itio

nal

co

nce

ptu

al e

ngi

nee

rin

g w

ork

to

con

sider

ref

inem

ents

to

th

e so

uth

ern

gra

de-

sep

arat

ed c

ross

ing.

Th

e o

ver

all p

roje

ct w

ill im

pro

ve

tran

sit

per

form

ance

an

d p

edes

tria

n s

afet

y an

d r

educe

co

nge

stio

n in

th

e 19th

Aven

ue

corr

ido

r, a

s w

ell as

sup

po

rtin

g an

tici

pat

ed g

row

th a

lon

g th

e w

est

side

of

the

corr

ido

r. T

he

full

cost

of

the

pro

ject

is

esti

mat

ed a

t $5

20 m

illio

n.

17M

SF

MT

A

61 6

0-f

t L

ow

Flo

or

Die

sel

Hyb

rid C

oac

hes

(26

rep

lace

+35 e

xpan

d)

$ 1

2,3

52,0

94

Pro

p K

fun

ds

will

be

use

d t

o p

urc

has

e 26 6

0-f

t lo

w f

loo

r h

ybri

d b

use

s to

rep

lace

buse

s th

at h

ave

reac

hed

th

eir

use

ful lif

e o

f 12 y

ears

. T

his

purc

has

e is

par

t o

f a

larg

er$8

0 m

illio

n p

rocu

rem

ent

that

incl

udes

35 a

dd

itio

nal

buse

s fo

r ex

pan

sio

n. T

he

new

hyb

rid b

use

s w

ill a

llow

th

e SF

MT

A t

o p

rovid

e

mo

re r

elia

ble

an

d f

uel

-eff

icie

nt

serv

ice.

SF

MT

A a

lrea

dy

awar

ded

th

e co

ntr

act

to N

ew F

lyer

of

Am

eric

a,

Inc.

an

d h

as r

ecei

ved

th

e fi

rst

veh

icle

. A

ll th

e b

use

s ar

e ex

pec

ted t

o b

e del

iver

ed b

y F

ebru

ary

2016.

22B

BA

RT

Tra

nsb

ay T

ub

e C

ross

-

Pas

sage

Do

ors

Rep

lace

men

t

$ 160,0

00

Th

is r

eques

t fu

lly f

un

ds

the

des

ign

ph

ase

for

the

rep

lace

men

t o

f up

to

10 c

ross

-pas

sage

do

ors

on

th

e

San

Fra

nci

sco

sid

e o

f th

e T

ran

sbay

Tub

e. T

hes

e do

ors

are

th

e m

ean

s o

f em

erge

ncy

egr

ess

to a

n in

teri

or

pas

sage

way

bet

wee

n t

he

tun

nel

s. C

urr

ent

do

ors

are

40 y

ears

old

an

d h

ave

reac

hed

th

e en

d o

f th

eir

use

ful liv

es. D

esig

n is

anti

cip

ated

to

be

com

ple

ted b

y M

arch

2016.

24

Cal

tran

sP

resi

dio

Par

kw

ay $

2

0,4

00,0

00

Ph

ase

II o

f th

e P

resi

dio

Par

kw

ay p

roje

ct is

bei

ng

del

iver

ed a

s a

pub

lic-p

rivat

e p

artn

ersh

ip (

PP

P).

As

par

t o

f th

e P

PP

agr

eem

ent

bet

wee

n C

altr

ans

and t

he

con

cess

ion

aire

(G

LC

), C

alta

ns

is t

o p

ay a

$276.4

mill

ion

mile

sto

ne

pay

men

t to

GL

C u

po

n s

ub

stan

tial

co

mp

leti

on

of

Ph

ase

II w

hic

h is

anti

cip

ated

to

occ

ur

on

Sep

tem

ber

24, 2015. T

he

reques

ted P

rop

K f

un

ds

will

pro

vid

e th

e $2

0.4

mill

ion

Pro

p K

sh

are

of

the

mile

sto

ne

pay

men

t co

nsi

sten

t w

ith

th

e p

roje

ct f

un

din

g ag

reem

ent

app

roved

by

the

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n A

uth

ori

ty in

2011.

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs\

Me

mo

s\2

01

5\0

5 M

ay\

Pro

p K

_A

A g

rou

pe

d a

llo

cati

on

s\P

rop

K G

rou

pe

d C

AC

5.2

7.1

5 A

TT 1

-3;

2-D

esc

rip

tio

nP

ag

e 1

of

4

98

Att

ach

men

t 2:

Bri

ef

Pro

ject

Desc

rip

tio

ns

1

EP

Lin

e

No

./

Cate

go

ry

Pro

ject

Sp

on

sor

Pro

ject

Nam

eP

rop

K F

un

ds

Req

uest

ed

Pro

ject

Desc

rip

tio

n

31

SF

MT

AN

ew S

ign

al C

on

trac

t 62

$ 1

,500,0

00

Pro

p K

fun

ds

will

be

use

d f

or

the

con

stru

ctio

n o

f n

ew t

raff

ic s

ign

als

on

Sun

set

at W

awo

na

and M

ora

ga

Str

eets

, G

eary

at

22n

d a

nd 2

6th

Aven

ues

, 34th

/L

inco

ln W

ay, an

d O

'Far

rell

and W

ebst

er S

tree

ts, an

d a

new

fla

shin

g b

eaco

n s

yste

m a

t 350 F

ran

cisc

o S

tree

t n

ear

the

Fra

nci

sco

Mid

dle

Sch

oo

l. C

on

trac

t 62 a

lso

incl

udes

a n

ew s

ign

al a

t 8th

an

d N

ato

ma

Str

eets

, fu

nded

th

rough

pre

vio

usl

y al

loca

ted P

rop

AA

fun

ds,

as r

eco

mm

ended

in

th

e W

este

rn S

oM

a N

eigh

bo

rho

od T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Pla

n. N

ew s

ign

als

will

hav

e

ped

estr

ian

co

un

tdo

wn

sig

nal

s, c

urb

ram

ps,

mas

t-ar

ms,

co

nduit

, an

d o

ther

nec

essa

ry s

ign

al

infr

astr

uct

ure

. D

esig

n w

as f

un

ded

by

Pro

p K

an

d P

rop

AA

fun

ds.

SF

MT

A e

xpec

ts a

ll o

f th

e si

gnal

s to

be

op

en f

or

use

by

Augu

st 2

016.

33, 31

SF

MT

AT

raff

ic S

ign

al C

on

duit

$ 550,0

00

Req

ues

ted f

un

ds

will

be

use

d t

o in

stal

l un

der

gro

un

d c

on

duit

at

7 t

o 1

0 in

ters

ecti

on

s w

her

e th

e SF

MT

A

is p

lan

nin

g n

ew o

r up

grad

ed t

raff

ic s

ign

als.

Th

is p

roje

ct w

ill o

ccur

in a

dvan

ce o

f SF

PW

pav

ing

pro

ject

s

on

San

Jo

se A

ven

ue,

Guer

rero

Str

eet,

Sag

amo

re S

tree

t an

d N

aple

s A

ven

ue,

wh

ich

are

sch

edule

d t

o

beg

in c

on

stru

ctio

n b

efo

re t

he

end o

f 2015. In

stal

ling

the

con

duit

no

w e

nsu

res

that

all

wo

rk is

do

ne

bef

ore

th

e 5-y

ear

mo

rato

rium

fo

r w

ork

on

new

ly p

aved

str

eets

. It

als

o a

llow

s fo

r co

nst

ruct

ion

coo

rdin

atio

n t

o m

inim

ize

dis

rup

tio

n t

o t

he

pub

lic. In

stal

lati

on

of

7 o

f th

e si

gnal

s is

sch

edule

d t

o b

e

com

ple

te b

y 2018. L

oca

tio

ns

are

on

pag

e 3 o

f th

e al

loca

tio

n r

eques

t.

33

SF

MT

AT

raff

ic S

ign

al U

pgr

ade

Co

ntr

act

34

$ 518,0

00

Th

is r

eques

t w

ill f

un

d t

he

des

ign

of

traf

fic

sign

al-r

elat

ed u

pgr

ades

at

14 lo

cati

on

s ac

ross

th

e ci

ty.

Up

grad

es w

ill in

clude

new

co

ntr

olle

rs, p

ole

s, m

ast

arm

s, lar

ger

sign

al h

eads

and p

edes

tria

n c

oun

tdo

wn

ind

icat

ors

, as

wel

l as

curb

ram

ps

and s

epar

ated

lef

t tu

rn p

has

ing

in c

erta

in lo

cati

on

s. E

igh

t o

f th

e

inte

rsec

tio

ns

are

loca

ted o

n t

he

Vis

ion

Zer

o H

igh

In

jury

Net

wo

rk, w

hic

h e

nco

mp

asse

s th

e p

edes

tria

n,

bic

ycle

, an

d v

ehic

le h

igh

in

jury

co

rrid

ors

. T

he

SF

MT

A e

xpec

ts t

o c

om

ple

te d

esig

n b

y A

ugu

st 2

016 a

nd

com

ple

te c

on

stru

ctio

n b

y Ju

ne

2018. See

th

e al

loca

tio

n r

eques

t fo

r th

e lis

t o

f lo

cati

on

s.

33

SF

MT

A

3rd

Str

eet

Tra

ffic

Sig

nal

Det

ecti

on

Up

grad

e P

has

e

I

$ 300,0

00

Th

is p

roje

ct w

ill r

epla

ce t

he

vid

eo c

amer

a-b

ased

veh

icle

det

ecti

on

sys

tem

s at

12 o

f th

e 67 in

ters

ecti

on

s

alo

ng

the

T-T

hir

d lig

ht

rail

line,

fro

m 1

8th

Str

eet

to B

urk

e A

ven

ue,

in

cludin

g C

esar

Ch

avez

Str

eet.

Th

e

new

wir

eles

s tr

affi

c det

ecti

on

sys

tem

will

ale

rt t

he

sign

al c

on

tro

ller

that

veh

icle

s an

d b

icyc

les

are

wai

tin

g

in t

he

traf

fic

lan

es. T

he

SF

MT

A h

as f

oun

d w

irel

ess

det

ecti

on

is

mo

re r

elia

ble

, ac

cura

te, an

d e

asie

r to

mai

nta

in t

han

th

e vid

eo d

etec

tio

n s

yste

m. T

he

wir

eles

s det

ecti

on

sys

tem

will

op

erat

e in

dep

enden

tly

fro

m t

he

Vet

ag t

ran

sit

pri

ori

ty s

yste

m o

n 3

rd S

tree

t, w

hic

h d

etec

ts lig

ht

rail

veh

icle

s, t

ho

ugh

bo

th

syst

ems

will

use

th

e sa

me

traf

fic

con

tro

ller.

Wo

rk w

ill b

e do

ne

by

Dec

emb

er 2

016.

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs\

Me

mo

s\2

01

5\0

5 M

ay\

Pro

p K

_A

A g

rou

pe

d a

llo

cati

on

s\P

rop

K G

rou

pe

d C

AC

5.2

7.1

5 A

TT 1

-3;

2-D

esc

rip

tio

nP

ag

e 2

of

4

99

Att

ach

men

t 2:

Bri

ef

Pro

ject

Desc

rip

tio

ns

1

EP

Lin

e

No

./

Cate

go

ry

Pro

ject

Sp

on

sor

Pro

ject

Nam

eP

rop

K F

un

ds

Req

uest

ed

Pro

ject

Desc

rip

tio

n

33

SF

MT

A19th

Aven

ue

Sig

nal

s

Ph

ase

III

$ 630,0

00

Req

ues

ted f

un

ds

will

be

use

d f

or

des

ign

of

5 o

f th

e re

mai

nin

g 9 s

ign

als

nee

din

g up

grad

es a

lon

g th

e

19th

Aven

ue

corr

ido

r. P

has

es I

an

d I

I w

ere

com

ple

ted in

2010 t

hro

ugh

a p

artn

ersh

ip b

etw

een

th

e

SF

MT

A a

nd C

altr

ans

and im

pro

ved

sig

nal

s at

25 in

ters

ecti

on

s al

on

g th

e co

rrid

or

wit

h lar

ger

sign

al

hea

ds

mo

un

ted o

n m

ast

arm

s, p

edes

tria

n c

oun

tdo

wn

in

dic

ato

rs, n

ew c

urb

ram

ps,

an

d r

elat

ed s

ign

al

infr

astr

uct

ure

. F

or

Ph

ase

III,

SF

MT

A a

nd C

altr

ans

are

resp

on

sib

le f

or

5 a

nd 4

lo

cati

on

s re

spec

tivel

y.

SF

MT

A e

xpec

ts t

o c

om

ple

te d

esig

n b

y la

te 2

016 a

t it

s 5 lo

cati

on

s (M

ora

ga, W

awo

na,

Slo

at, R

oss

mo

or,

and W

inst

ron

). C

on

stru

ctio

n w

ill b

e co

mb

ined

wit

h t

he

larg

er 1

9th

Aven

ue

imp

rovem

ent

pro

ject

,

wh

ich

in

cludes

bulb

outs

, st

reet

res

urf

acin

g, w

ater

an

d s

ewer

wo

rk. Sig

nal

up

grad

es a

t 19th

an

d

Ro

ssm

oo

r w

ill b

e co

nst

ruct

ed a

s p

art

of

the

19th

Aven

ue

M-L

ine

con

trac

t.

37

SF

MT

AB

icyc

le F

acili

ty

Mai

nte

nan

ce $

150,0

00

SF

MT

A w

ill r

epla

ce a

pp

roxi

mat

ely

400 s

afe-

hit

po

sts

and t

o u

pgr

ade

and/

or

mai

nta

in g

reen

bik

e la

nes

and b

ike

bo

xes

in p

oo

r co

ndit

ion

at

iden

tifi

ed h

igh

-nee

d lo

cati

on

s. I

n a

dd

itio

n, th

ese

fun

ds

will

allo

w

SF

MT

A s

taff

to

tes

t n

ew, m

ore

sub

stan

tial

typ

es o

f sa

fe-h

it p

ost

s, a

nd t

o c

oo

rdin

ate

wit

h S

FP

W o

n

test

ing

po

wer

was

hin

g te

chn

iques

fo

r gr

een

bik

e b

oxe

s th

at c

an b

e ad

op

ted in

to e

xist

ing

stre

et f

acili

ty

mai

nte

nan

ce. SF

MT

A s

taff

will

co

mp

lete

th

is p

roje

ct b

y su

mm

er 2

016. See

pag

es 2

-3 o

f th

e en

clo

sed

allo

cati

on

req

ues

t fo

r th

e lis

t o

f lo

cati

on

s.

37

SF

PW

Pub

lic S

idew

alk R

epai

r $

514,3

49

Pro

p K

fun

ds

will

lev

erag

e $2

31,0

00 in

sta

te f

un

ds

to r

epai

r a

tota

l o

f 320 s

idew

alk lo

cati

on

s ar

oun

d

Cit

y st

reet

tre

es. P

rio

riti

zati

on

cri

teri

a in

clude

info

rmat

ion

bas

ed o

n in

spec

tio

n, p

ub

lic r

eques

ts a

nd

oth

er f

acto

rs d

etai

led in

th

e 5Y

PP

.

38

SF

MT

A

Lo

cal-

Tra

ck A

pp

licat

ion

-

Bas

ed T

raff

ic C

alm

ing

Pro

gram

$ 203,4

00

Pro

p K

fun

ds

will

be

use

d f

or

the

pla

nn

ing

and c

on

cep

tual

en

gin

eeri

ng

ph

ase

of

the

Fis

cal Y

ear

2015/16 p

rogr

am, in

cludin

g ci

tyw

ide

outr

each

, ev

aluat

ion

an

d p

rio

riti

zati

on

of

up

to

100 a

pp

licat

ion

s,

and p

roje

ct d

evel

op

men

t fo

r up

to

25 lo

cati

on

s in

cludin

g b

allo

tin

g, leg

isla

tio

n, an

d p

ub

lic h

eari

ng

to

app

rove

the

dev

ices

. T

he

SF

MT

A a

nti

cip

ates

eval

uat

ing

app

licat

ion

s fo

llow

ing

the

Augu

st 1

, 2015

dea

dlin

e an

d n

oti

fyin

g re

siden

ts if

thei

r ap

plic

atio

ns

hav

e b

een

acc

epte

d o

r n

ot

by

Jan

uar

y 2016. D

esig

n

of

the

reco

mm

ended

tra

ffic

cal

min

g dev

ices

, m

ost

of

wh

ich

are

an

tici

pat

ed t

o b

e sp

eed h

um

ps,

is

exp

ecte

d t

o b

e co

mp

lete

d b

y A

ugu

st 2

016. T

he

con

stru

ctio

n p

has

e w

ould

be

fun

ded

th

rough

a f

utu

re

Pro

p K

req

ues

t an

d o

ccur

Augu

st-D

ecem

ber

2016.

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs\

Me

mo

s\2

01

5\0

5 M

ay\

Pro

p K

_A

A g

rou

pe

d a

llo

cati

on

s\P

rop

K G

rou

pe

d C

AC

5.2

7.1

5 A

TT 1

-3;

2-D

esc

rip

tio

nP

ag

e 3

of

4

100

Att

ach

men

t 2:

Bri

ef

Pro

ject

Desc

rip

tio

ns

1

EP

Lin

e

No

./

Cate

go

ry

Pro

ject

Sp

on

sor

Pro

ject

Nam

eP

rop

K F

un

ds

Req

uest

ed

Pro

ject

Desc

rip

tio

n

40

SF

MT

A6th

Str

eet

Ped

estr

ian

Saf

ety

Imp

rovem

ent

$ 2

,012,0

00

Pro

p K

fun

ds

will

be

use

d t

o f

ully

fun

d a

n E

nvir

on

men

tal Im

pac

t R

epo

rt (

EIR

) fo

r th

e su

bje

ct p

roje

ct,

wh

ich

will

im

pro

ve

the

safe

ty a

nd liv

abili

ty o

f th

e co

rrid

or

for

all ro

adw

ay u

sers

bet

wee

n M

arket

an

d

Bry

ant

Str

eets

an

d o

n G

old

en G

ate

Aven

ue

fro

m J

on

es t

o M

arket

Str

eets

. T

he

cen

tral

co

mp

on

ent

of

this

pro

ject

is

a ro

ad d

iet

on

6th

Str

eet

fro

m t

he

exis

tin

g tw

o lan

es o

f tr

avel

in

eac

h d

irec

tio

n t

o o

ne

lan

e o

f tr

avel

in

eac

h d

irec

tio

n. In

add

itio

n t

o c

alm

ing

veh

icula

r tr

affi

c o

n t

his

cro

wded

ped

estr

ian

corr

ido

r, t

he

pro

po

sed r

oad

die

t w

ill p

rovid

e sp

ace

in t

he

righ

t-o

f-w

ay f

or

ped

estr

ian

saf

ety

bulb

-outs

,

rais

ed c

ross

wal

ks,

lan

dsc

apin

g, a

nd s

tree

tsca

pe

imp

rovem

ents

.Bas

ed o

n p

ast

pra

ctic

e, E

IRs

can

tak

e 18-

36 m

on

ths.

C

on

trac

t aw

ard is

anti

cip

ated

in

fal

l 2015.

42

SF

PW

Tre

e P

lan

tin

g &

Mai

nte

nan

ce

$ 1

,045,0

00

Pro

p K

fun

ds

will

be

use

d t

o r

epla

ce 3

25 s

tree

t tr

ees

in t

he

pub

lic r

igh

t-o

f-w

ay, es

tab

lish

622 y

oun

g

tree

s b

y w

ater

ing

them

on

a w

eekly

bas

is, an

d m

ain

tain

779 m

ature

str

eet

tree

s. P

rio

riti

zed lo

cati

on

s ar

e

liste

d o

n p

age

2 o

f th

e al

loca

tio

n r

eques

t. SF

PW

is

no

tify

ing

pro

per

ty o

wn

ers

of

thei

r ev

entu

al

mai

nte

nan

ce r

esp

on

sib

ility

th

rough

co

mm

un

ity

mee

tin

gs, w

eb o

utr

each

an

d n

oti

ces

at t

he

tim

e o

f

tran

sfer

. P

rop

K w

ill lev

erag

e o

ver

$3.6

mill

ion

in

sta

te g

as t

ax a

nd lo

cal fu

nds.

44

SF

CT

A/

SF

MT

AN

TIP

Pro

gram

Sup

po

rt $

150,0

00

Req

ues

ted f

un

ds

enab

le t

he

SF

MT

A a

nd T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Auth

ori

ty s

taff

to

wo

rk t

oge

ther

to

sup

po

rt

com

mis

sio

ner

s' e

ffo

rts

to iden

tify

po

ten

tial

Nei

ghb

orh

oo

d T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Im

pro

vem

ent

Pro

gram

(NT

IP)

pla

nn

ing

and c

apit

al p

roje

cts;

to

dev

elo

p p

rop

ose

d s

cop

e, s

ched

ule

, an

d b

udge

t in

form

atio

n t

o

sup

po

rt a

lloca

tio

n o

f N

TIP

gra

nts

; an

d t

o p

rovid

e o

ngo

ing

NT

IP s

up

po

rt a

s gr

ants

are

im

ple

men

ted.

44

SF

CT

A/

SF

MT

A

Ale

man

y In

terc

han

ge

Imp

rovem

ent

Stu

dy

[NT

IP P

lan

nin

g]

$ 100,0

00

Req

ues

ted f

un

ds

will

be

use

d to

dev

elo

p a

nd e

val

uat

e a

new

no

rth

-so

uth

mult

imo

dal

pat

hw

ay

con

nec

tin

g San

Bru

no

Aven

ue

to t

he

Ale

man

y F

arm

er’s

Mar

ket

, an

d n

ew b

icyc

le lan

es a

lon

g A

lem

any

Bo

ule

var

d b

etw

een

Putn

am S

tree

t an

d B

aysh

ore

Bo

ule

var

d. T

he

SF

CT

A w

ill lea

d t

he

Stu

dy

in

coo

rdin

atio

n w

ith

par

tner

age

nci

es a

nd t

he

surr

oun

din

g co

mm

un

itie

s. T

he

pro

po

sed b

udge

t as

sum

es

avai

lab

ility

of

$100,0

00 f

rom

th

e G

ener

al F

un

d. If

Gen

eral

Fun

d m

on

ey is

no

t av

aila

ble

th

e sc

op

e w

ill

incl

ude

stud

y o

f th

e m

ult

imo

dal

pat

hw

ay o

nly

. T

he

reques

t in

cludes

a $

12,6

00 a

lloca

tio

n t

o t

he

SF

MT

A

to s

up

po

rt its

sta

ff w

ork

on

th

e N

TIP

stu

dy.

Th

e st

ud

y w

ill b

e co

mp

lete

d b

y Ju

ne

2016.

$ 4

0,8

40,5

43

1 S

ee A

ttac

hm

ent

1 f

or

foo

tno

tes.

TO

TA

L

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs\

Me

mo

s\2

01

5\0

5 M

ay\

Pro

p K

_A

A g

rou

pe

d a

llo

cati

on

s\P

rop

K G

rou

pe

d C

AC

5.2

7.1

5 A

TT 1

-3;

2-D

esc

rip

tio

nP

ag

e 4

of

4

101

Att

ach

men

t 3:

Sta

ff R

eco

mm

en

dati

on

s 1

EP

Lin

e

No

./

Cate

go

ryP

roje

ct

Sp

on

sor

Pro

ject

Nam

e

Pro

p K

Fu

nd

s

Req

uest

ed

Reco

mm

en

dati

on

16

SF

MT

A

So

uth

wes

t Sub

way

(19th

Aven

ue/

M

Oce

an V

iew

) -

Pre

-En

vir

on

men

tal

Sup

ple

men

t

$255,7

00

5Y

PP

Am

en

dm

en

t: R

equir

es a

rev

enue

neu

tral

sw

ap o

f cu

rren

t fu

nd

ing

no

t

nee

ded

fo

r th

e Q

uin

t Je

rro

d C

on

nec

tor

Ro

ad w

ith

FY

16/

17 f

un

din

g fo

r th

e

envir

on

men

tal p

has

e o

f th

e su

bje

ct p

roje

ct. T

he

Co

nn

ecto

r R

oad

is

mo

vin

g m

ore

slo

wly

th

an a

nti

cip

ated

so

th

is f

un

d s

wap

ho

lds

the

pro

ject

har

mle

ss.

17M

SF

MT

A61 6

0-f

t L

ow

Flo

or

Die

sel H

ybri

d

Co

ach

es (

26 r

epla

ce+

35 e

xp

and)

$

12,3

52,0

94

Str

ate

gic

Pla

n P

oli

cy W

aiv

er

is r

equir

ed a

s SF

MT

A a

war

ded

th

e co

ntr

act

and

incu

rred

exp

ense

s p

rio

r to

allo

cati

on

of

Pro

p K

fun

ds.

P

rop

K p

olic

y re

quir

es

allo

cati

on

of

fun

ds

pri

or

to a

dver

tise

men

t. S

FM

TA

in

dic

ates

th

is w

as d

ue

to a

n

adm

inis

trat

ativ

e o

ver

sigh

t.

22B

BA

RT

Tra

nsb

ay T

ub

e C

ross

-Pas

sage

Do

ors

Rep

lace

men

t $

160,0

00

Co

mm

itm

en

t to

All

ocate

: A

pp

rovin

g th

is r

eques

t w

ould

fulf

ill t

he

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n A

uth

ori

ty’s

co

mm

itm

ent

to a

lloca

te F

Y 1

5/

16 P

rop

K f

un

ds

to

fully

fun

d t

he

pro

ject

(R

eso

luti

on

15-2

8).

24

Cal

tran

sP

resi

dio

Par

kw

ay $

20,4

00,0

00

Th

e te

rms

and

co

nd

itio

ns

of

this

allo

cati

on

sh

all b

e go

ver

ned

by

the

exis

tin

g

Co

op

erat

ive

Agr

eem

ent

bet

wee

n C

altr

ans

and

th

e T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Auth

ori

ty f

or

the

sub

ject

pro

ject

, ra

ther

th

an b

y a

Pro

p K

Sta

nd

ard

Gra

nt

Agr

eem

ent.

31

SF

MT

AN

ew S

ign

al C

on

trac

t 62

$

1,5

00,0

00

Str

ate

gic

Pla

n P

oli

cy W

aiv

er

was

gra

nte

d o

n J

anuar

y 9, 2015, at

th

e SF

MT

A's

reques

t to

ad

ver

tise

th

e p

roje

ct in

ad

van

ce o

f th

e T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Auth

ori

ty B

oar

d

allo

cati

ng

the

reques

ted

Pro

p K

fun

ds

to t

he

pro

ject

.

Co

mm

itm

en

t to

All

ocate

: A

pp

rovin

g th

is r

eques

t w

ould

fulf

ill t

he

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n A

uth

ori

ty’s

co

mm

itm

ent

to a

lloca

te F

Y 1

5/

16 P

rop

K f

un

ds

to

fully

fun

d t

he

pro

ject

(R

eso

luti

on

15-3

4).

33, 31

SF

MT

AT

raff

ic S

ign

al C

on

duit

$550,0

00

33

SF

MT

AT

raff

ic S

ign

al U

pgr

ade

Co

ntr

act

34

$518,0

00

33

SF

MT

A3rd

Str

eet

Tra

ffic

Sig

nal

Det

ecti

on

Up

grad

e P

has

e I

$300,0

00

33

SF

MT

A19th

Aven

ue

Sig

nal

s P

has

e II

I $

630,0

00

37

SF

MT

AB

icyc

le F

acili

ty M

ain

ten

ance

$150,0

00

37

SF

PW

Pub

lic S

idew

alk R

epai

r $

514,3

49

37

SF

MT

AL

oca

l-T

rack

Ap

plic

atio

n-B

ased

Tra

ffic

Cal

min

g P

rogr

am $

203,4

00

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs\

Me

mo

s\2

01

5\0

5 M

ay\

Pro

p K

_A

A g

rou

pe

d a

llo

cati

on

s\P

rop

K G

rou

pe

d C

AC

5.2

7.1

5 A

TT 1

-3;

3-R

eco

mm

en

da

tio

ns

Pa

ge

1 o

f 2

102

Att

ach

men

t 3:

Sta

ff R

eco

mm

en

dati

on

s 1

EP

Lin

e

No

./

Cate

go

ryP

roje

ct

Sp

on

sor

Pro

ject

Nam

e

Pro

p K

Fu

nd

s

Req

uest

ed

Reco

mm

en

dati

on

40

SF

MT

A6th

Str

eet

Ped

estr

ian

Saf

ety

Imp

rovem

ent

$

2,0

12,0

00

Str

ate

gic

Pla

n P

oli

cy W

aiv

er

was

gra

nte

d a

dm

inis

trat

ivel

y b

y SF

CT

A s

taff

on

May

4, 2015, at

th

e SF

MT

A's

req

ues

t to

ad

ver

tise

th

e co

nsu

ltan

t co

ntr

act

in

advan

ce o

f th

e T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Auth

ori

ty B

oar

d a

lloca

tin

g th

e re

ques

ted

Pro

p K

fun

ds.

5Y

PP

Am

en

dm

en

t: O

ur

reco

mm

end

atio

n is

con

tin

gen

t o

n a

n a

men

dm

ent

to t

he

Ped

estr

ian

Cir

cula

tio

n/

Saf

ety

5Y

PP

to

red

irec

t $2

,012,0

00 f

rom

th

e d

esig

n a

nd

con

stru

ctio

n p

has

e o

f th

e su

bje

ct p

roje

ct t

o t

he

envir

on

men

tal p

has

e. Sin

ce

ado

pti

on

of

the

5Y

PP

in

July

2014, th

e P

lan

nin

g D

epar

tmen

t d

eter

min

ed t

hat

th

e

pro

ject

nee

ds

a fo

cuse

d E

IR b

ecau

se o

f th

e p

rop

ose

d lan

e ch

ange

s an

d t

raff

ic

mo

dif

icat

ion

s d

evel

op

ed t

hro

ugh

th

e p

lan

nin

g p

has

e.

42

SF

PW

Tre

e P

lan

tin

g &

Mai

nte

nan

ce

$

1,0

45,0

00

44

SF

CT

A/

SF

MT

AN

TIP

Pro

gram

Sup

po

rt $

150,0

00

44

SF

CT

A/

SF

MT

A

Ale

man

y In

terc

han

ge I

mp

rovem

ent

Stu

dy

[NT

IP P

lan

nin

g] $

100,0

00

$

40,8

40,5

43

1 S

ee A

ttac

hm

ent

1 f

or

foo

tno

tes.

TO

TA

L

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs\

Me

mo

s\2

01

5\0

5 M

ay\

Pro

p K

_A

A g

rou

pe

d a

llo

cati

on

s\P

rop

K G

rou

pe

d C

AC

5.2

7.1

5 A

TT 1

-3;

3-R

eco

mm

en

da

tio

ns

Pa

ge

2 o

f 2

103

Attachment 4.Prop K Allocation Summary - FY 2015/16

PROP K SALES TAX

CASH FLOW

Total FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 2019/20Prior Allocations -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Current Request(s) 40,840,543$ 38,430,543$ 2,410,000$ -$ -$ -New Total Allocations 40,840,543$ 38,430,543$ 2,410,000$ -$ -$ -$

The above table shows maximum annual cash flow for all FY 2015/16 allocations approved to date, along with the current recommended

Strategic Initiatives1.3% Paratransit

8.6%

Streets & Traffic Safety

24.6%Transit65.5%

Investment Commitments, per Prop K Expenditure Plan

Strategic Initiatives0.9% Paratransit

8.0%

Streets & Traffic Safety18.7%

Transit72.3%

Prop K Investments To Date

P:\Prop K\Capital Budget\Prop K Actions Master List.xlsm

104

M:\CAC\Meetings\Memos\2015\05 May\TFCA\TFCA 1516 Project Priorities Memo CAC.docx Page 1 of 4

Memorandum


May 27, 2015


Anna LaForte – Deputy Director for Policy and Programming

– Adopt a Motion of Support for the Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Transportation Fundfor Clean Air Program of Projects

The Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA) Program was established to fund the most effective transportation projects that achieve emission reductions from motor vehicles in accordance with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s (Air District’s) Clean Air Plan. Funds are generated from a $4 surcharge on the vehicle registration fee collected by the Department of Motor Vehicles. As the San Francisco TFCA County Program Manager, the Transportation Authority annually develops the Program of Projects for the TFCA Program Manager funds. In February we issued the call for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 TFCA applications. We received six project applications by the April 30, 2015 deadline, requesting $1,490,986 in TFCA funds compared to $857,723 in available funds. We reviewed the projects for eligibility, then evaluated eligible projects following the Board-adopted local expenditure criteria which include project type (e.g., first priority to zero emission projects), cost effectiveness of emissions reduced, program diversity, project readiness, and other considerations (e.g., a sponsor’s track record for delivering prior TFCA projects). Based on this review, we are recommending awarding TFCA funds to the five projects shown in Attachment 3. We’ve recommended partial funding for one scale-able project to allow us to fund five of the six projects. Two projects are recommended for slightly less funding than requested to comply with Air District cost effectiveness requirements.

The Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA) Program was established to fund the most effective transportation projects that achieve emission reductions from motor vehicles in accordance with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s (Air District) Clean Air Plan. Funds are generated from a $4 surcharge on the vehicle registration fee collected by the Department of Motor Vehicles in San Francisco. 40% of the funds are distributed on a return-to-source basis to Program Managers for each of the nine counties in the Air District. The Transportation Authority is the designated County Program Manager for the City and County of San Francisco. The remaining 60% of the revenues, referred to as the TFCA Regional Fund, are distributed on a competitive basis to applicants from the nine Bay Area counties. The TFCA Regional Fund is administered by the Air District through a separate application process.

On February 25, 2015 we issued the call for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 TFCA applications to San Francisco project sponsors. We received six project applications by the April 30, 2015 deadline, requesting $1,490,986 in TFCA funds compared to $857,723 in available funds.

105


The purpose of this memorandum is to present the staff recommendation for San Francisco’s Fiscal Year 2014/15 TFCA Program of Projects to the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), and to seek a motion of support for its approval.

We have a total of $857,723 in available TFCA funds to program in Fiscal Year 2015/16. As shown in the table below, this amount is comprised of estimated Fiscal Year 2015/16 TFCA revenues, interest income, and de-obligated funds from completed and canceled prior-year TFCA projects.

Eight projects were completed under budget over the past year. Unused funds were deobligated and made available for the 2015/16 call for projects. After netting out 5% for Transportation Authority staff administrative expenses as allowed by the Air District, the estimated amount available to program to projects is $857,723.

We evaluated the TFCA project applications following the prioritization process for developing the TFCA Program of Projects shown in Attachment 1. The first step involved screening projects to ensure eligibility according to the Air District’s TFCA guidelines. One of the most important aspects of this screening was ensuring a project’s cost effectiveness (CE) ratio was calculated correctly and was low enough to be eligible for consideration. The Air District’s CE ratio, described in detail in Attachment 1, is designed to measure the cost effectiveness of a project in reducing air pollutant emissions and to encourage submittal of projects that leverage funds from non-TFCA sources. Consistent with TFCA guidelines, most projects must have a CE ratio that is less than or equal to $90,000 per ton of motor vehicle emissions reduced in order to be eligible for TFCA funds. Pilot shuttle projects in Community Air Risk Evaluation (CARE) Program areas must have a CE ratio that is $500,000 or less during the first year, $250,000 or less by the end of the second year and $125,000 or less by the end of the third year to be eligible.

We performed our review of the CE ratio calculations in consultation with project sponsors and the Air District. The focus was to ensure that the forms were completed correctly, that values other than default values had adequate justification, and that assumptions were consistently applied across all project applications for a fair evaluation. Inevitably, as a result of our review, we had to adjust some of the submitted CE worksheets. In these cases, we worked with the project sponsor to determine the correct CE ratio and whether or not it exceeded the Air District’s CE threshold.

We then prioritized projects that passed the eligibility screening using factors such as project type (e.g., first priority to zero emission projects), cost effectiveness, program diversity, project delivery (i.e.,

Estimated TFCA Funds Available for Projects Fiscal Year 2015/16

Estimated TFCA Revenues (Fiscal Year 2015/16) $770,282

Interest Income $2,116 De-obligated Funds and Previously Unallocated Funds $123,839

Total Funds $896,237

5% Administrative Expense ($38,514)

Total Available for Projects $857,723

106


readiness), and other considerations (e.g., a sponsor’s track record for delivering prior TFCA projects). Our prioritization process also considered carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions reduced by each project. CO2 emissions are measured in the Air District’s CE worksheets, but are not included in the CE calculations.

Tables A and B in Attachment 2 show the six candidate projects and other information including a brief project description, total project cost, and amount of TFCA funds requested. Table A shows the projects we are recommending to receive TFCA funds. Table B details the one project not recommended for funding.

We are recommending TFCA funding for five of the six candidate projects, which includes two transportation demand management projects, one bicycle parking project, one bicycle facility/transit island project, and one shuttle project. Four of the five projects recommended for funding are zero emissions non-vehicles projects, which is the top priority project type in the Transportation Authority’s prioritization criteria.

We recommend fully funding two projects and partially funding three projects, as described in Table A of Attachment 2.

As described in Table B of Attachment 2, the San Francisco Department of Public Health (DPH) requested funds for a 3-year shuttle bus pilot project to connect San Francisco General Hospital (SFGH) directly to the 4th and King Caltrain Station and the Transbay Terminal. A high proportion of employees use single occupant vehicles to get to work at SFGH, including 82% of employees who commute from the Peninsula, according to a staff survey, so we believe this project has potential to reduce vehicle emissions, however, shuttles projects are the second priority project type in the Transportation Authority’s Local Priorities and this year’s available TFCA funds cannot accommodate this request which is for more than 50% of the available funds. Transportation Authority staff will work with DPH to seek out alternate funding sources including the upcoming cycle of Regional TFCA funds.

We expect to enter into a master funding agreement with the Air District by July 1, 2015 after which we will issue grant agreements for the recommended Fiscal Year 2015/16 TFCA funds. Pending timely review and execution of the grant agreements by the Air District and project sponsors, we expect funds to be available for expenditure beginning in July 2015.

1. Adopt a motion of support for the Fiscal Year 2015/16 TFCA Program of Projects, as requested.

2. Adopt a motion of support for the Fiscal Year 2015/16 TFCA Program of Projects, withmodifications.


The estimated total budget for the recommended Fiscal Year 2015/16 TFCA program is $896,237. This

includes $857,723 for the five proposed projects and $38,514 for administrative expenses. The latter is consistent with Air District rules, which allow the Transportation Authority to set aside up to 5% of each year’s annual income to use for administrative expenses. Revenues and expenditures for the TFCA program are included in the proposed Transportation Authority’s Fiscal Year 2015/16 budget, which will be considered for adoption by the Transportation Authority Board in June 2015.

107


Adopt a motion of support for the Fiscal Year 2015/16 TFCA Program of Projects.

Attachments (3): 1. Fiscal Year 2015/16 TFCA Local Expenditure Criteria2. Fiscal Year 2015/16 TFCA Program of Projects – Detailed Staff Recommendation3. Fiscal Year 2015/16 TFCA Program of Projects – Summary Staff Recommendation

108

Attachment 1

Fiscal Year 2015/16 Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA)

LOCAL EXPENDITURE CRITERIA

The following are the Fiscal Year 2015/16 Local Expenditure Criteria for San Francisco’s TFCA County Program Manager Funds.

ELIGIBILITY SCREENING

In order for projects to be considered for funding, they must meet the eligibility requirements established by the Air District’s TFCA County Program Manager Fund Policies for Fiscal Year 2015/16. Consistent with the policies, a key factor in determining eligibility is a project’s cost effectiveness (CE) ratio. The TFCA CE ratio is designed to measure the cost effectiveness of a project in reducing motor vehicle air pollutant emissions and to encourage projects that contribute funding from non-TFCA sources. TFCA funds budgeted for the project (both Regional Funds and County Program Manager Funds combined) are divided by the project’s estimated emissions reduction. The estimated reduction is the weighted sum of reactive organic gases (ROG), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), and particulate matter (PM) emissions that will be reduced over the effective life of the project, as defined by the Air District’s guidelines.

TFCA CE is calculated by inputting information provided by the applicant into the Air District’s CE worksheets. Transportation Authority staff will be available to assist project sponsors with these calculations, and will work with Air District staff and the project sponsors as needed to verify reasonableness of input variables. The worksheets also calculate reductions in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, which are not included in the Air District’s official CE calculations, but which the Transportation Authority considers in its project prioritization process.

Consistent with the Air District’s Guidelines, in order to be eligible for Fiscal Year 2015/16 TFCA funds, a project must meet the CE ratio for emissions (i.e., ROG, NOx, and PM) reductions as specified in the guidelines for each project type. Projects that do not meet this threshold cannot be considered for funding.

PROJECT PRIORITIZATION

Candidate projects that meet the cost effectiveness thresholds will be prioritized for funding based on the two-step process described below:

Step 1 – TFCA funds are programmed to eligible projects, prioritized using the Transportation Authority Board-adopted Local Priorities (see next page).

Step 2 – If there are TFCA funds left unprogrammed after Step 1, the Transportation Authority will work with project sponsors to develop additional TFCA candidate projects. This may include refinement of projects that were submitted for Step 1, but were not deemed eligible, as well as new projects. This approach is in response to an Air District policy that does not allow County Program Managers to rollover any unprogrammed funds to the next year’s funding cycle. If Fiscal Year 2015/16funds are not programmed by November 2015, funds can be redirected (potentially to non-San

P:\TFCA\15_16\Call\TFCA FY 1516 Local Expenditure Criteria ATT 1.docx

Page 1 of 2

109

Francisco projects) at the Air District’s discretion. New candidate projects must meet all of the TFCA eligibility requirements, and will be prioritized based on the Transportation Authority Board’s adopted Local Priorities.

Local Priorities

The Transportation Authority’s Local Priorities for prioritizing TFCA funds include the following factors:

Project Type – In order of priority:

1) Zero emissions non-vehicle projects including, but not limited to, bicycle and pedestrian facility improvements, transit priority projects, traffic calming projects, and transportation demand management projects;

2) Shuttle services that reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT);

3) Alternative fuel vehicles and alternative fuel infrastructure; and

4) Any other eligible project.

Emissions Reduced and CE – Priority will be given to projects that achieve high CE (i.e. a low cost per ton of emissions reduced) compared to other applicant projects. The Air District’s CE worksheet predicts the amount of reductions each project will achieve in ROG, NOx, PM, and CO2 emissions. However, the Air District’s calculation only includes the reductions in ROG, NOx, and PM per TFCA dollar spent on the project. The Transportation Authority will also give priority to projects that achieve high CE for CO2 emission reductions based on data available from the Air District’s CE worksheets. The reduction of transportation-related CO2 emissions is consistent with the City and County of San Francisco’s 2004 Climate Action Plan for San Francisco.

Project Delivery – Priority will be given to projects that are ready to proceed and have a realistic implementation schedule, budget, and funding package. Projects that cannot realistically commence in calendar year 2016 or earlier (e.g. to order or accept delivery of vehicles or equipment, begin delivery of service, award a construction contract, start the first TFCA-funded phase of the project) and be completed within a two-year period will have lower priority. Project sponsors may be advised to resubmit these projects for a future TFCA programming cycle.

Program Diversity – Promotion of innovative TFCA projects in San Francisco has resulted in increased visibility for the program and offered a good testing ground for new approaches to reducing motor vehicle emissions. Using the project type criteria established above, the Transportation Authority will continue to develop an annual program that contains a diversity of project types and approaches and serves multiple constituencies. The Transportation Authority believes that this diversity contributes significantly to public acceptance of and support for the TFCA program.

Other Considerations – Projects that are ranked high in accordance with the above local expenditure criteria may be lowered in priority or restricted from receiving TFCA funds if either of the following conditions applies or has applied during Fiscal Years 2013/14 or 2014/15:

• Monitoring and Reporting – Project sponsor has failed to fulfill monitoring and reporting requirements for any previously funded TFCA project.

• Implementation of Prior Project(s) – Project sponsor has a signed Funding Agreement for a TFCA project that has not shown sufficient progress; the project sponsor has not implemented the project by the project completion date without formally receiving a time extension from the Authority; or the project sponsor has violated the terms of the funding agreement.

P:\TFCA\15_16\Call\TFCA FY 1516 Local Expenditure Criteria ATT 1.docx

Page 2 of 2

110

TA

BL

E A

. P

RO

JEC

TS

RE

CO

MM

EN

DE

D F

OR

TF

CA

FU

ND

S [

sort

ed

by p

roje

ct

typ

e a

nd

co

st-e

ffecti

ven

ess

(C

E)

rati

o]

To

tal

TF

CA

TF

CA

Pro

ject

CE

CO

2P

roje

ct

Am

ou

nt

Am

ou

nt

No

.S

po

nso

r 1

Pro

ject

Desc

rip

tio

nD

istr

ict

Pri

ori

ty2

Rati

o 3

Red

ucti

on

4C

ost

Req

uest

ed

Pro

po

sed

1SF

MT

A

Sh

ort

-Term

Bic

ycle

Park

ing

- S

FM

TA

will

pla

n, d

esig

n, e

nvir

on

men

tally

cle

ar, an

d

inst

all 500 b

icyc

le p

arkin

g ra

cks

in S

an F

ran

cisc

o, p

rovid

ing

an a

dd

itio

nal

1,0

00 b

icyc

le

par

kin

g sp

aces

. B

icyc

le p

arkin

g sp

aces

will

pro

vid

e en

d-o

f-tr

ip f

acili

ties

fo

r n

ew b

icyc

le

trip

s, t

her

eby

rep

laci

ng

veh

icle

tri

ps

and

red

uci

ng

mo

tor

veh

icle

em

issi

on

s. P

roje

ct s

ites

will

be

sele

cted

in

res

po

nse

to

req

ues

ts f

rom

busi

nes

s o

wn

ers

and

cit

izen

s su

bm

itte

d

thro

ugh

th

e SF

MT

A w

ebsi

te.

No

tes:

Bec

ause

of

TF

CA

pro

gram

over

sub

scri

pti

on

, st

aff

is r

eco

mm

end

ing

that

th

is

pro

ject

be

fun

ded

at

74%

of

the

reques

ted

am

oun

t. S

FM

TA

sta

ff h

ave

con

firm

ed t

hat

this

fun

din

g le

vel

wo

uld

allo

w t

he

pro

ject

to

ad

van

ce (

revis

ed n

um

ber

of

rack

s p

end

ing)

wh

ile a

dd

itio

nal

fun

din

g so

urc

es a

re id

enti

fied

(e.

g. P

rop

K, A

TP

, R

egio

nal

TF

CA

).C

ityw

ide

1$8

7,4

26

1729.2

$542,9

28

$495,5

28

366,9

25

$

2SF

E

Em

erg

en

cy R

ide H

om

e -

Pro

vid

es r

eim

burs

emen

t fo

r ta

xi, ca

rsh

are

or

ren

tal ca

r ri

de

ho

me

in c

ases

of

emer

gen

cy o

r su

per

vis

or-

app

roved

un

sch

edule

d o

ver

tim

e fo

r

emp

loye

es w

ho

use

alt

ern

ativ

e m

od

es t

o g

et t

o w

ork

. T

his

pro

gram

pro

vid

es o

ne

year

of

fun

din

g.

No

tes:

Sta

ff c

ost

s ar

e h

igh

er t

han

pri

or

year

s b

ecau

se S

FE

pla

ns

to im

ple

men

t a

syst

em

to a

llow

par

tici

pan

ts t

o r

egis

ter

dir

ectl

y ra

ther

th

an t

hro

ugh

em

plo

yers

. T

he

Em

erge

ncy

Rid

e H

om

e P

rogr

am h

as b

een

sup

po

rted

by

TF

CA

sin

ce F

isca

l Y

ear

2005/

06.

Cit

ywid

e1

$89,3

96

229.9

$42,9

91

$42,9

91

42,9

91

$

3SF

MT

A

New

Resi

den

t O

utr

each

- S

FM

TA

will

pro

vid

e in

form

atio

n t

o n

ew S

an F

ran

cisc

o

resi

den

ts a

bo

ut

avai

lab

le t

ran

spo

rtat

ion

op

tio

ns

(e.g

., ri

des

har

e, b

ikin

g, t

ran

sit)

wit

h t

he

inte

nti

on

of

red

uci

ng

sin

gle

occ

up

ancy

veh

icle

(SO

V)

use

bef

ore

tra

vel

hab

its

are

esta

blis

hed

. SF

MT

A w

ould

sen

d m

aile

rs t

o a

ll n

ew r

esid

ents

, th

en s

elf-

sele

ctin

g

resp

on

den

ts w

ould

rec

eive

furt

her

in

form

atio

n a

nd

en

gage

men

t. G

oal

is

to r

educe

ten

per

cen

t o

f to

tal SO

V v

ehic

les

mile

s tr

avel

ed b

y n

ew r

esid

ents

.

No

tes:

Rev

ised

co

st-e

ffec

tiven

ess

inp

uts

per

Air

Dis

tric

t gu

idan

ce f

or

this

pro

ject

typ

e

resu

lted

in

a s

taff

rec

om

men

ded

am

oun

t $7

,000 lo

wer

th

an r

eques

ted

by

the

SF

MT

A.

Cit

ywid

e1

$89,9

91

723.5

$250,5

00

$250,5

00

Att

ach

men

t 2

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Dra

ft F

iscal

Year

2014

/2015

TF

CA

Pro

gra

m o

f P

roje

cts

– D

eta

iled

Sta

ff R

eco

mm

en

dati

on

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs\

Me

mo

s\2

01

5\0

5 M

ay\

TFC

A\A

TT 2

- 3

TFC

A 1

51

6

Page

1 o

f 3

$

243,500111

To

tal

TF

CA

TF

CA

Pro

ject

CE

CO

2P

roje

ct

Am

ou

nt

Am

ou

nt

No

.S

po

nso

r 1

Pro

ject

Desc

rip

tio

nD

istr

ict

Pri

ori

ty2

Rati

o 3

Red

ucti

on

4C

ost

Req

uest

ed

Pro

po

sed

4SF

MT

A

8th

an

d M

ark

et

Bik

ew

ay I

mp

rove

men

t -

Pro

ject

will

im

pro

ve

bic

yclis

t sa

fety

an

d

com

fort

at

the

inte

rsec

tio

n o

f M

arket

, G

rove,

Hyd

e, a

nd

8th

Str

eets

. Im

pro

vem

ents

incl

ud

e tw

o-s

tage

lef

t tu

rn b

oxe

s fo

r tu

rns

on

to e

astb

oun

d M

arket

Str

eet

and

on

to

south

bo

un

d 8

th S

tree

t, a

nd

a n

ew s

epar

ated

bik

e fa

cilit

y o

n 8

th S

tree

t ju

st s

outh

of

Mar

ket

Str

eet,

in

clud

ing

a tr

ansi

t is

lan

d f

or

the

19 a

nd

83X

bus

route

s. P

roje

ct

trea

tmen

ts w

ould

red

uce

co

nfl

icts

bet

wee

n t

urn

ing

bic

yclis

ts a

nd

mo

tori

sts,

as

wel

l as

con

flic

ts b

etw

een

bic

yclis

ts a

nd

tra

nsi

t. S

FM

TA

will

pla

n, en

vir

on

men

tally

cle

ar, d

esig

n,

and

co

nst

ruct

th

e im

pro

vem

ents

. C

on

stru

ctio

n is

anti

cip

ated

to

beg

in a

s ea

rly

as

sum

mer

2016.

No

tes:

Rev

ised

co

st-e

ffec

tiven

ess

inp

uts

per

Air

Dis

tric

t gu

idan

ce f

or

this

pro

ject

typ

e

resu

lted

in

a s

taff

rec

om

men

ded

am

oun

t $1

3,0

13 lo

wer

th

an r

eques

ted

by

the

SF

MT

A.

61

$89,9

99

944.2

$175,4

01

$175,4

01

162,3

88

$

5SF

DP

H

San

Fra

ncis

co

Gen

era

l H

osp

ital

Sh

utt

le:

BA

RT

Lo

op

Ex

pan

sio

n P

ilo

t -

Pro

vid

es

thre

e ye

ars

of

fun

din

g fo

r th

e ad

dit

ion

of

a si

ngl

e ea

rly

mo

rnin

g ru

n t

o e

xist

ing

shutt

le

serv

ice

that

co

nn

ects

SF

GH

to

24th

Str

eet

BA

RT

sta

tio

n. A

cco

rdin

g to

th

e 2013

SF

GH

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n C

om

mute

Surv

ey, 20%

of

emp

loye

es a

rriv

e at

th

e h

osp

ital

at

6:0

0 A

M, b

efo

re c

om

par

able

MU

NI

bus

serv

ice

beg

ins.

Th

e sh

utt

le w

ould

be

op

en t

o

the

pub

lic. F

un

ds

will

be

use

d f

or

shutt

le o

per

atio

ns

con

trac

t an

d D

PH

lab

or

for

mar

ket

ing

and

eval

uat

ion

.

No

tes:

To

mee

t A

ir D

istr

ict

cost

eff

ecti

ven

ess

requir

emen

ts, th

is p

ilot

pro

ject

must

resu

lt in

a m

inim

um

of

10 d

aily

tri

ps

the

firs

t ye

ar, 20 d

aily

tri

ps

the

seco

nd

yea

r, a

nd

40

dai

ly t

rip

s th

e th

ird

yea

r.10 (

6,9

)2

$249,5

05

61.3

$41,9

19

$41,9

19

41,9

19

$

TO

TA

L$1,

053,7

39

$1,

006,3

39

$857,7

23

To

tal T

FC

A F

un

din

g A

vai

lab

le f

or

Pro

ject

s:$8

57,7

23

To

tal T

FC

A R

eco

mm

end

ed:

$857,7

23

Surp

lus/

(Sh

ort

fall)

$0

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs\

Me

mo

s\2

01

5\0

5 M

ay\

TFC

A\A

TT 2

- 3

TFC

A 1

51

6

Pa

ge

2 o

f 3112

To

tal

TF

CA

TF

CA

Pro

ject

CE

CO

2P

roje

ct

Am

ou

nt

Am

ou

nt

No

.S

po

nso

r 1

Pro

ject

Desc

rip

tio

nD

istr

ict

Pri

ori

ty2

Rati

o 3

Red

ucti

on

4C

ost

Req

uest

ed

Pro

po

sed

TA

BL

E B

--P

RO

JEC

T N

OT

RE

CO

MM

EN

DE

D F

OR

TF

CA

FU

ND

S

6SF

DP

H

San

Fra

ncis

co

Gen

era

l H

osp

ital

Sh

utt

le:

Pil

ot

Lo

op

to

Calt

rain

an

d T

ran

sbay

Term

inal

- W

ould

pro

vid

e th

ree

year

s o

f fu

nd

ing

for

a sh

utt

le b

us

pilo

t p

roje

ct t

o

con

nec

t SF

GH

dir

ectl

y to

th

e 4th

an

d K

ing

Cal

trai

n S

tati

on

an

d t

he

Tra

nsb

ay T

erm

inal

to e

nco

ura

ge m

ore

reg

ion

al c

om

mute

rs t

o t

ake

advan

tage

of

pub

lic t

ran

sit.

Acc

ord

ing

to t

he

2013 S

FG

H T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Co

mm

ute

Surv

ey, 56%

of

SF

GH

co

mm

ute

rs d

rive

alo

ne

to w

ork

. T

he

shutt

le w

ould

op

erat

e 4 h

ours

duri

ng

bo

th t

he

mo

rnin

g an

d

afte

rno

on

co

mm

ute

ho

urs

, an

d w

ould

co

nsi

st o

f tw

o b

use

s, e

ach

wit

h a

35-p

asse

nge

r

cap

acit

y ab

le t

o m

ake

12 t

rip

s p

er v

ehic

le p

er d

ay.

No

tes:

Pro

ject

no

t re

com

men

ded

fo

r fu

nd

ing

bec

ause

of

pro

ject

typ

e p

rio

rity

ord

er

and

siz

e o

f re

ques

t. S

taff

bel

ieves

th

e p

roje

ct w

ould

be

effe

ctiv

e in

red

uci

ng

emis

sio

ns

and

will

wo

rk w

ith

DP

H a

nd

Air

Dis

tric

t st

aff

to e

xplo

re f

un

din

g o

pti

on

s w

ith

Reg

ion

al

TF

CA

fun

din

g in

ear

ly F

isca

l Y

ear

2015/

16.

10 (

6,9

)2

$116,5

68

2166.7

$729,8

40

$484,6

47

-$

To

tal:

$729,8

40

$484,6

47

-$

2P

rio

rity

bas

ed o

n p

roje

ct t

ype

is e

stab

lish

ed in

th

e L

oca

l E

xpen

dit

ure

Cri

teri

a.

4 C

O2 R

educt

ion

is

bas

ed o

n t

on

s o

f ca

rbo

n d

ioxi

de

red

uce

d o

ver

th

e lif

etim

e o

f th

e p

roje

ct. T

his

fig

ure

is

calc

ula

ted

in

th

e co

st e

ffec

tiven

ess

wo

rksh

eet.

3T

he

TF

CA

co

st e

ffec

tiven

ess

rati

o (

CE

) is

des

ign

ed t

o m

easu

re t

he

cost

eff

ecti

ven

ess

of

a p

roje

ct in

red

uci

ng

mo

tor

veh

icle

air

po

lluta

nt

emis

sio

ns

and

to

en

coura

ge p

roje

cts

that

co

ntr

ibute

fun

din

g fr

om

no

n-T

FC

A s

ourc

es. M

ost

pro

ject

s m

ust

hav

e a

CE

rat

io t

hat

is

$90,0

00 o

r le

ss t

o b

e el

igib

le f

or

Fis

cal Y

ear

2015/

16 f

un

ds.

Pilo

t sh

utt

le p

roje

cts

in C

om

mun

ity

Air

Ris

k

Eval

uat

ion

(C

AR

E)

Pro

gram

are

as m

ust

hav

e a

CE

rat

io t

hat

is

$500,0

00 o

r le

ss d

uri

ng

the

firs

t ye

ar, $2

50,0

00 o

r le

ss b

y th

e en

d o

f th

e se

con

d y

ear

and

$125,0

00 o

r le

ss b

y th

e en

d o

f th

e th

ird

year

to

be

elig

ible

.

1 S

po

nso

r ac

ron

yms

incl

ud

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f th

e E

nvir

on

men

t (S

FE

), S

an F

ran

cisc

o M

un

icip

al T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

Age

ncy

(SF

MT

A),

San

Fra

nci

sco

Dep

artm

ent

of

Pub

lic H

ealt

h (

SF

DP

H).

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs\

Me

mo

s\2

01

5\0

5 M

ay\

TFC

A\A

TT 2

- 3

TFC

A 1

51

6

Pa

ge

3 o

f 3113

Att

ach

men

t 3

To

tal

TF

CA

TF

CA

Pro

ject

Co

stR

eq

uest

ed

Reco

mm

en

ded

SF

MT

ASh

ort

-Ter

m B

icyc

le P

arkin

g3$5

42,9

28

$495,5

28

$366,9

25

SF

EE

mer

gen

cy R

ide

Ho

me

$42,9

91

$42,9

91

$42,9

91

SF

MT

AN

ew R

esid

ent

Outr

each

4$2

50,5

00

$250,5

00

$243,5

00

SF

MT

AB

ikew

ay I

nte

rsec

tio

n I

mp

rovem

ent

Pro

ject

4$1

75,4

01

$175,4

01

$162,3

88

SF

DP

HSF

Gen

eral

Ho

spit

al S

hutt

le B

us:

BA

RT

Lo

op

Exp

ansi

on

Pilo

t$4

1,9

19

$41,9

19

$41,9

19

To

tals

:$1,

053,7

39

$1,

006,3

39

$857,7

23

To

tal

TF

CA

Fu

nd

ing

Avail

ab

le f

or

Pro

jects

:$857,7

23

3P

roje

ct s

cale

d d

ow

n w

ith

co

ncu

rren

ce o

f sp

on

sor

to a

llow

us

to f

un

d t

wo

addit

ion

al p

roje

cts.

4T

FC

A r

eco

mm

ended

am

oun

t is

th

e m

axim

um

elig

ible

fo

r T

FC

A f

un

ds,

as

det

erm

ined

by

revis

ed c

ost

eff

ecti

ven

ess

wo

rksh

eets

, co

nsi

sten

t w

ith

Air

Dis

tric

t G

uid

ance

.

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Fis

cal

Year

2014

/2015

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

Fu

nd

fo

r C

lean

Air

Co

un

ty P

rog

ram

Man

ag

er

Fu

nd

RE

CO

MM

EN

DE

D P

RO

JEC

TS (

sort

ed b

y co

st-e

ffec

tiven

ess

(CE

) ra

tio

)

1P

roje

cts

are

liste

d in

ran

ked

ord

er b

y p

roje

ct p

rio

rity

typ

e an

d c

ost

-eff

ecti

ven

ess

rati

o.

Su

mm

ary

of

Dra

ft R

eco

mm

en

dati

on

s1

Sp

on

sor2

Pro

ject

2See

Att

ach

men

t 2 f

or

acro

nym

s an

d o

ther

no

tes.

M:\

CA

C\M

ee

tin

gs\

Me

mo

s\2

01

5\0

5 M

ay\

TFC

A\A

TT 2

- 3

TFC

A 1

51

6P

ag

e 1

of

1

114

M:\CAC\Meetings\Memos\2015\05 May\Budget and Work Program\Proposed Budget and Work Program FY15-16.docx Page 1 of 5

Memorandum


May 27, 2015



– Adopt a Motion of Support for the Adoption of the Proposed Fiscal Year2015/16 Annual Budget and Work Program

Pursuant to State statutes (PUC Code Sections 131000 et seq.) and the Transportation Authority’s Fiscal Policy, the Transportation Authority Board must adopt an annual budget for the following fiscal year by June 30. The proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2015/16 Annual Budget includes projections of sales tax revenues; federal, state and regional grants; investment income for the fiscal period; and projections of operating and administrative costs, capital expenditures, and associated financing costs. The proposed FY 2015/16 Annual Budget also includes a description of the Transportation Authority’s proposed Work Program for the coming fiscal year. Total revenues are project to be $214.8 million, including $101.3 million in sales tax revenues. Total expenditures are project to be $273.1 million. Capital project expenditures are projected to be $241.4 million or about 88.4% of total expenditures. The final proposed FY 2015/16 Annual Budget and Work Program will be presented to the Finance Committee and Transportation Authority Board in June for approval. A public hearing will precede consideration of the FY 2015/16 Annual Budget and Work Program at the Transportation Authority Board’s June meeting.

Pursuant to State statutes (PUC Code Sections 131000 et seq.), the Transportation Authority must adopt an annual budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2015/16 by June 30, 2015. As called for in the Transportation Authority’s Fiscal Policy (Resolution 14-43) and Administrative Code (Ordinance 14-01), it is the responsibility of the Finance Committee to set both the overall budget parameters for administrative and capital expenditures, the spending limits on certain line items, as well as to recommend adoption of the budget to the Board of Commissioners prior to June 30 of each year.

Since the presentation of the preliminary FY 2015/16 annual budget last month, the Transportation Authority has secured commitments for up to $200,000 of revenues for “SF-CHAMP,” the San Francisco Travel Demand Forecasting Model. The Transportation Authority maintains “SF-CHAMP” which is the official transportation modeling tool for San Francisco and is certified as compliant with the Regional Transportation Plan by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission. The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) and Planning Department frequently requests travel demand services from SF-CHAMP to evaluate the impacts for various City projects. The SFMTA and the Planning Department each agreed to continue to contribute up to $100,000 to the Transportation Authority for the care, maintenance and updates of SF-CHAMP, in order to implement new relevant features, reporting tools and up-to-date assumptions about travel behavior. All project

115


expenditures were included in the preliminary FY 2015/16 annual budget. The net effect of the additional funding increases Regional Revenues by $21,554 since these new revenues allow us to preserve Federal Surface Transportation Program 3% grant funds for future project needs, providing a critical reserve given the lack of State Planning, Programming and Monitoring SB45 funds in FY 2015/16.

The purpose of this memorandum is to present the Transportation Authority’s proposed FY 2015/16 Annual Budget and Work Program and to seek a motion for its adoption.

The Transportation Authority’s proposed FY 2015/16 Work Program includes activities in five major functional areas that are overseen by the Executive Director: 1) Policy and Programming, 2) Capital Projects delivery support and oversight, 3) Planning, 4) Technology, Data & Analysis and 5) Finance and Administration. These categories of activities are organized to efficiently address the Transportation Authority’s designated mandates, including overseeing the Prop K Sales Tax Expenditure Plan, functioning as the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) for San Francisco, acting as the Local Program Manager for the Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA) program, administering the $10 Prop AA vehicle registration fee and operating as the Treasure Island Mobility Management Agency (TIMMA) for San Francisco. Our organizational approach also reflects the principle that all activities at the Transportation Authority contribute to the efficient delivery of transportation plans and projects, even though many activities are funded with a combination of revenue sources and in coordination with a number of San Francisco agencies as well as and federal, state and regional agencies. Attachment A contains a description of the Transportation Authority’s proposed Work Program for FY 2015/16.

Attachment B displays the proposed budget in a format described in the Transportation Authority’s Fiscal Policy. Total revenues are projected to be $214.8 million. Sales tax revenues, net of interest earnings, are projected to be $101.3 million, or 47.2% of FY 2015/16 revenues. Total expenditures are projected to be about $273.1 million. Of this amount, capital project costs are $241.4 million. Capital projects costs are 88.4% of total projected expenditures, with 3.6% of expenditures budgeted for administrative operating costs, and 8% for debt service and interest costs. The division of revenues and expenditures into the sales tax program, CMA program, TFCA program, Prop AA program and TIMMA program on Attachment B reflects the five distinct Transportation Authority responsibilities and mandates. The TIMMA program was separated as a new fund and program in the FY 2014/15 budget. On April 1, 2014, through Resolution No. 110-14, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors designated the Transportation Authority as the TIMMA for San Francisco to oversee the implementation of the Treasure Island Transportation Implementation Plan in accordance with the Treasure Island Transportation Management Act (AB 981), which includes congestion pricing and travel demand management on Treasure Island.

Attachment C shows a more detailed version of the proposed budget.

The sales tax revenue projection of $101.3 million is an increase from the prior year sales tax revenue collected.. Sales tax revenues have recovered from the FY 2009/10 low and FY 2015/16 revenues are projected to be the highest collected in a single fiscal year since the inception of the Prop K program.

CMA revenues of $29 million include federal, state, regional and other sources, and are used for professional services contracts and staffing expenditures to implement the Transportation Authority’s

116


planning, oversight and programming responsibilities. CMA revenues include project specific grants, and also include annual funding sources such as federal Surface Transportation Program funds that we receive from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission to undertake our CMA-related planning, policy, programming, project delivery support and other activities.

CMA revenues also include federal and state reimbursements of $26.8 million for construction activities on the I-80/Yerba Buena Island Interchange Improvement Project and Yerba Buena Island Bridge Structures (collectively known as YBI Project), an effort undertaken under agreement by the Transportation Authority in its role as CMA for San Francisco. Other CMA revenues include the San Francisco Freeway Performance Initiative Study and Strategic Highway Research Program.

Prop AA revenues in FY 2015/16 are projected to be $4.8 million or 2.2% of all budgeted revenues, consistent with the Prop AA Strategic Plan. These funds are available for projects and programs identified in the Strategic Plan or through periodic competitive calls for projects.

The estimate for sales tax capital expenditures reflects a combination of estimated cash flow needs for existing allocations based on review of reimbursements, progress reports and conversations with project sponsors, as well as anticipated new allocations estimated for FY 2015/16. The anticipated largest capital project expenditures for existing allocations include the SFMTA’s Radio Communications System & Computer-Aided Dispatch Replacement and Central Subway projects; and the Transbay Joint Powers Authority’s (TJPA’s) Transbay Transit Center/Downtown Extension Project; as well as various transit and street maintenance improvements, and pedestrian and bicycle projects. One of the largest anticipated new allocations and corresponding expenditures will be over $20 million in sales tax funds for the milestone payment due to the concessionaire at substantial completion of Presidio Parkway project, anticipated this fall. We anticipate needing to revise the capital budget mid-year, given the large portfolio of sales tax projects that we are overseeing and the complexity of forecasting reimbursement needs with such a large and diverse portfolio. We continue to work closely with our sponsors, particularly SFMTA and the TJPA to monitor project progress and anticipate project cost reimbursement needs especially for the grants with the largest remaining balances.

CMA capital expenditures of $28.9 million include technical consulting services which are needed in order to fulfill the Transportation Authority’s CMA Program responsibilities under state law. Projects in this category include the Geary Corridor and Van Ness Avenue Bus Rapid Transit projects, Freeway Corridor Management Study, San Francisco Transportation Plan, Modeling Service Bureau, and various local area plans studies, such as the 19th Avenue M-Ocean View and eFleet Carsharing Electrified and Strategic Highway Research Programs. The FY 2015/16 budget also includes $26.8 million from federal, state, and regional funding for work on the YBI Project.

Prop AA capital expenditures of $9.1 million include projects that will be delivered under the voter-approved Prop AA Expenditure Plan. Consistent with the Expenditure Plan, the vehicle registration fee revenues will be used for design and construction of ready-to-go local road repairs, pedestrian safety improvements, transit reliability improvements, and travel demand management projects. The Prop AA capital expenditures include new FY 2015/16 projects based on the approved Prop AA Strategic Plan, and carryover prior year projects with multi-year schedules as well as projects not anticipated to be completed in FY 2014/15. The largest capital project expenditures for existing allocations include the Dolores Street Pavement Renovation project, the Hunters View Phase II: Transit Connection, and the Mansell Corridor Improvement Project, which is also a OneBayArea Grant project.

Administrative operating expenditures of $10 million includes personnel and non-personnel costs. Personnel costs are budgeted at $7 million. In May 2014, through Resolution 14-80, the Transportation

117


Authority approved a staff reorganization plan to address staff capacity and sustainability issues given the ongoing ambitious work programs and Board interest in expanding and enhancing certain aspects of the work program. Adoption of the staff reorganization plan increased Administrative costs by 7.1%. Employees are not entitled to any cost of living adjustment, and all salary adjustments are determined by the Executive Director based on performance only. Non-personnel costs are budgeted at $2.9 million, which includes a decrease of 7.7% related to the implementation of the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software system. We fully transitioned to the new ERP system in September 2014.

Debt service costs of $21.8 million are included in the FY 2015/16 budget, which assumes a continuation of the current Commercial Paper Program agreements and an increase in commercial paper interest rates and a $20 million paydown on the outstanding $135 million commercial paper program. By 2021, it is expected that the outstanding commercial paper will be fully repaid. Any savings from the proposed changes to the commercial paper program (e.g. replacing the program with a revolving credit agreement) would be reflected in the mid-year budget revision.

The Other Financing Sources (Uses) section of the Line Item Detail for the FY 2015/16 budget includes inter-fund transfers (for example between the sales tax and CMA funds). These transfers represent the required local match or appropriation of Prop K to federal and state grants such as the Surface Transportation Program and TIMMA Program.

The budgetary fund balance is generally defined at the difference between assets and liabilities, and the ending balance is based on previous year’s audited fund balance plus the current year’s budget amendment and the budgeted year’s activity. There is a negative of $140.7 million in total fund balances, which is largely the result of how multi-year programming commitments are accounted for. A large portion of the negative fund balance reflects grant-funded capital projects that are scheduled to be implemented over the course of several fiscal years with non-current (i.e. future) revenues. Commitments of future revenues are tracked through the grant administration process, and there is no issue with the availability of future revenues to honor them. A negative fund balance is a result of how these commitments are accounted for, and it does not affect the viability of the projects or grants. This is a conservative accounting presentation of multi-year programming because these commitments are funded with non-current (i.e. future) revenues. In addition, the Transportation Authority does not hold or retain title for the projects it has constructed or for the vehicles and system improvements purchased with sales tax funds, which can result in a negative position. This reporting of all legal funding commitments without the corresponding revenue or assets creates or largely contributes to the $140.7 million negative fund balance.

The Transportation Authority’s Fiscal Policy directs that the Transportation Authority shall allocate between 5% and 15% of the estimated annual sales tax revenues as a hedge against emergencies in the fiscal year. The FY 2015/16 budget sets aside $10.1 million, or 10% of annual projected sales tax revenues, as a set-aside for a program and operating contingency reserve. The Transportation Authority has also set aside $477,654 and $77,240 or 10% as a program and operating contingency reserve for the Prop AA and TFCA Programs, respectively.

Attachment D provides additional descriptions of line items in the budget.

The final proposed FY 2015/16 Annual Budget and Work Program will be presented to the Finance Committee and Transportation Authority Board in June. A public hearing will precede consideration of the FY 2015/16 Annual Budget and Work Program at the Transportation Authority Board’s June meeting.

118


1. Adopt a motion of support for the adoption of the proposed FY 2015/16 Annual Budget andWork Program, as presented.

2. Adopt a motion of support for the adoption of the proposed FY 2015/16 Annual Budget andWork Program, with modifications.


As described above.

Adopt a motion of support for the adoption of the proposed 2015/16 Annual Budget and Work Program.

Attachments (4): A. Proposed FY 2015/16 Annual Work Program B. Proposed FY 2015/16 Annual Budget C. Proposed FY 2015/16 Annual Budget – Line Item Detail D. Line Item Descriptions

119

Attachment A Proposed Fiscal Year 2015/16 Annual Work Program

Page 1 of 7

The Transportation Authority’s proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2015/16 Work Program includes activities in five major divisions overseen by the Executive Director: 1) Policy and Programming, 2) Capital Projects, 3) Planning, 4) Technology, Data & Analysis, and 5) Finance & Administration. The Executive Director’s office is responsible for directing the agency in keeping with the annual Board-adopted goals, for the development of the annual budget and work program, and for the efficient and effective management of staff and other resources. Further, the Executive Director’s office is responsible for regular and effective communications

with the Board, the Mayor’s Office, San Francisco’s elected representatives at the state and federal levels and the public, as well as for coordination and partnering with other city, regional, state and federal agencies, and other county Congestion Management Agencies.

The agency’s work program activities address the Transportation Authority’s designated mandates and functional roles. These include: serving as the transportation sales tax administrator and Congestion

Management Agency (CMA) for San Francisco, acting as the Local Program Manager for the

Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA) program, administering the $10 Prop AA vehicle registration

fee and operating as the new Treasure Island Mobility Management Agency (TIMMA). Our work program

also reflects the multi-disciplinary and collaborative nature of our roles in planning, funding and delivering transportation projects and programs across the city, while ensuring transparency and accountability in the use of taxpayer funds.

In FY 2015/16 we will continue to move forward key planning efforts previously identified through the 2013 San Francisco Transportation Plan (SFTP), as well as undertake new planning efforts meant to inform and respond to emerging trends and policy areas (e.g. shared mobility). We will also continue the planning phase to deliver the Treasure Island Transportation Implementation Plan as the recently designated TIMMA. Most of the FY 2015/16 activities listed below are strong multi-divisional efforts, often lead by the Planning Division in close coordination with Transportation, Data & Analysis; Capital Projects; and the Policy and Programming Divisions. Proposed activities include:

Continue advancing the Treasure Island Transportation Implementation Plan, which includes transit planning, congestion pricing and travel demand management on Treasure Island. Efforts this year will focus on implementing governance arrangements and advancing both program-wide planning and systems engineering in response to the development program schedule for Treasure Island. This effort will require integration of policies with the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) and the Bay Area Tolling Authority (BATA) and coordination of project scope, schedule and implementation with a number of local partners.

Complete environmental review of the Geary BRT study, transition project lead to the SFMTA, support the SFMTA’s efforts to enter the project into the Federal Transit Administration’s Small Starts program to secure federal funds, and provide engineering support and oversight as SFMTA advances design of the near-term and core BRT projects. Complete the Geneva Harney BRT Feasibility Study looking at multi-modal east-west BRT and light rail options through Daly City, San Francisco and Brisbane with community and agency partners on both sides of the San Francisco/San Mateo county line. Transition project lead to the SFMTA and support SFMTA as it advances the project to the environmental review phase.

Start Phase 2 corridor planning study efforts in close coordination with city, regional and State agencies to determine a feasible set of near-term freeway management projects for US 101 and I-280 corridors, as well as a strategic network of managed lanes for the future. Participate in Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s (MTC’s) Managed Lanes

120


Page 2 of 7

Implementation Study. This work will also include a Freeway Ramp Vision Zero Safety Assessment of pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle conflicts and road safety on local San Francisco streets associated with US 101, I-280, and possibly I-80 on- and off- ramps, as part of the FCMS.

As part of the multi-agency project team, support the launch and execution of this two-year MTC-led effort, looking at major transit capacity improvements for the core of San Francisco and the Transbay corridor. Includes participation in BART’s Embarcadero and Montgomery Station Study and Muni Rail Capacity Study.

In collaboration with San Francisco agencies and regional partners, update the SFTP in parallel with the Plan Bay Area update that is underway. As part of this effort, a white paper on the Shared Mobility/Commercial Transportation Services sector will be produced to reflect evolving conditions within the city and to support development of a policy framework for this sector.

Update the CMP, incorporating new traffic volumes in addition to speed monitoring efforts, and an updated set of performance metrics for multi-modal travel. Incorporate the latest thinking on transportation demand management (TDM) based on the Transportation Sustainability Project (TSP) and TDM Partnership Project. Work closely with state and regional stakeholders to revamp CMP statutes to modernize them and bring them in line with SB 375 and other relevant planning and policy changes that have come to pass since the CMP statutes were first developed.

Continue implementation of the sales tax-funded Neighborhood Transportation Improvement Program (NTIP), identified as a new equity initiative in the previous SFTP. In some cases the Transportation Authority will carry out neighborhood transportation plans directly but for the most part, we will provide support to other agencies delivering planning studies and capital projects. NTIP planning studies have been approved in the Western Addition and Richmond. We anticipate Board approval of a NTIP planning study and NTIP capital project this month in Districts 2 (Lombard “Crooked”) and 10 (I-280 “Hairball” Interchange), with other proposals currently in active pre-development.

: Complete the Parking Utilization Study and assist city agencies with the Transportation Sustainability Project. Complete the West Side Strategic Analysis Report (SAR) and work with Commissioner Cohen’s office to scope a potential District 10 SAR. Coordinate with SFMTA to provide policy framework and advice on jitney transit services per the request of Commissioner Farrell. Complete San Francisco Public-Private Travel Demand Management Partnership Project and initiate Late Night Transportation Study Part II.

Continue to support city agencies on the Better Market Street Project through environmental review phase. Support finalization of designs and the Caltrans approval process for the 19th Avenue Pedestrian and Transit Bulb-outs Project.

In partnership with BART, the Transportation Authority will conduct employer outreach in anticipation of a travel incentives pilot to explore the potential for cost-effective peak period shifts in travel behavior to mitigate the capacity-constrained BART and MUNI Embarcadero and Montgomery systems in the San Francisco core. The pilot will use gamification and technology to generate changes in travel patterns, testing this new approach and its potential impacts.

Provide modeling, data analysis, technical advice and graphics services to support efforts such as Geneva BRT Feasibility Study, Parking Pricing and Utilization Study, SFTP, FCMS, Balboa I-280 Interchange improvements, CMP, Core Capacity Transit Study, and the Geary Corridor BRT environmental analysis.

121


Page 3 of 7

Provide modeling, data analysis, and technical advice to city agencies and consultants in support of many projects and studies. Expected service bureau support this year will be provided for the 16th Street Busway, Better Market Street Study, provide in-kind technical support to Transit Sustainability Program and Caltrain Railyard/Boulevard Study.

Continue to serve as a data resource for city agencies, consultants, and the public and enhance data management and dissemination capabilities by developing web-based tools such as the “Count Dracula” portal for organizing, mapping, and analyzing traffic, bike, and pedestrian counts. Analyze and publish important results from the 2012 California Household Travel Survey. Support researchers working on topics that complement and enhance our understanding of travel behavior. Potential topics include: explore the potential use of new data sources from Transportation Network Companies (TNC’s) and private big data sources; explore the fusion of multiple geographic data sources such as cell phone data with transit fare card, vehicle location, and passenger data; investigate bicycle route choice data before and after the implementation of bicycle infrastructure projects.

Complete the requirements for model consistency in coordination with MTC as a part of the CMP update. Participate in Bay Area Model Users Group. Continue supporting the refinement of the Bay Area land use growth allocation model with the Planning Department, the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) and MTC. Coordinate land use analysis activities in cooperation with these same agencies.

Implement numerous SF-CHAMP and Dynamic Traffic Assignment model improvements, with special emphasis on transit reliability and model performance. In conjunction with MTC and the Puget Sound Regional Council, continue development of a dynamic transit assignment model that will enhance our ability to analyze the impacts of service reliability and crowding on transit trip-making.

One of the agency’s core functions is to serve as the administrator of the Prop K half-cent sales tax (which superseded Prop B). This funding role complements the agency’s other core roles (e.g. Prop AA administrator and CMA). We serve as funding and financing strategist for San Francisco projects; we advocate for discretionary funds and legislative changes to advance San Francisco project priorities; provide support to enable sponsors to comply with timely-use-of-funds and other grant requirements; and seek to secure new sources of revenues. The work program activities highlighted below are typically led by the Policy and Programming Division with support from all agency divisions.

Administer the Prop K sales tax, Prop AA vehicle registration fee, TFCA, Lifeline, OneBayArea Grant, and Regional Improvement Program funds which the agency directly allocates or prioritizes projects for grant funding. Provide technical, strategic and advocacy support for a host of other fund programs such as the State’s Cap-and-Trade and Active Transportation Programs and federal competitive grant programs. Notable special initiatives for FY 2015/16 include:

This multi-division initiative will continue to improve the Transportation Authority’s grants administration process and the Portal – a web-based grants management database – in terms of efficiency and user-friendliness.

The Transportation Authority will continue to provide expertise in grants administration for federally funded projects and is playing a leadership role supporting regional efforts to streamline the current federal-aid grant process.

122


Page 4 of 7

Provide monitoring of financial performance, maintain the cash flow model, analyzing finance options, developing recommendations, issuing and managing debt to enable accelerated delivery of sales-tax funded projects.

As CMA, coordinate San Francisco’s input to the 2017 Plan Bay Area update, drawing upon the 2013 SFTP recommendations and the update that is now underway. This includes: conducting the call for projects, providing San Francisco’s input on changes to regional fund program guidelines and policy frameworks, new revenue advocacy and other policy initiatives. This involves close coordination with San Francisco agencies, the Mayor’s office, and our ABAG and MTC Commissioners, as well as coordination with Bay Area CMAs, the “big 3 cities” (San Francisco, Oakland, and San Jose), transit agencies and other community stakeholders.

Advocate for San Francisco priorities and new regional, state and federal funds by providing Board member staffing, issue advocacy at various venues (such as at MTC committees, Bay Area CMA meetings, and SPUR) and ongoing coordination with, and appearances before, the MTC, California Transportation Commission, and federal agencies. Locally, we continue to support efforts related to the Mayor’s Transportation 2030 Task Force, which include targeting the 2016 ballot for consideration of a vehicle license fee and shaping San Francisco’s input to BART’s anticipated 2016 revenue measure. We will develop revenue advocacy white papers as part of the SFTP update.

We will continue to monitor and take positions on state legislation affecting San Francisco’s transportation programs, and develop strategies for advancing legislative initiatives beneficial to San Francisco’s transportation programs. This advocacy builds off of SFTP recommendations, the agency’s adopted legislative program (e.g. includes Vision Zero, new revenue, and project delivery advocacy), and is done in coordination with the Mayor’s office, the Self Help Counties Coalition, and other city and regional agencies.

Provide funding and financing strategy support for Prop K signature projects which are also included in MTC’s Regional Transit Expansion Agreement: i.e. Caltrain Electrification, Central Subway, Transbay Transit Center/Downtown Extension and Van Ness BRT. Continue to serve as a funding resource for all San Francisco project sponsors, including brokering fund swaps, as needed.

Continue to serve as fiscal agent for City CarShare’s eFleet: Carsharing Electrified Project, which will deploy a fleet of electric vehicles with supportive infrastructure and operations. Provide ongoing funding and technical support to Bayview Mobility Study community group exploring van-sharing operations in the Bayview.

The timely and cost-effective delivery of Transportation Authority-funded transportation projects and programs requires a multi-divisional effort, led primarily by the Capital Projects Division with support from other divisions. As in past years, the agency focuses on providing engineering support and overseeing the delivery of the Prop K sales tax major capital projects, such as the Presidio Parkway, the SFMTA’s Central Subway, Radio Replacement and facility upgrade projects; the Transbay Transit Center/Caltrain Downtown Extension; and Caltrain Electrification. The agency is also serving as lead agency for the delivery of certain projects, such as the Yerba Buena Island Interchange Improvement Project and I-280/Balboa Park Area Freeway Ramps projects, which typically are multijurisdictional in nature and often involve significant coordination with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Key delivery activities for FY 2015/16 include the following:

123


Page 5 of 7

and Yerba Buena Island Bridge Structures: Continue to lead construction of the East Side Ramps. Continue final engineering and design of the West Side Bridges and prepare for construction. Includes consideration of alternative delivery methods for the West Side Bridges project. Continue coordination activities with Caltrans, Bay Area Toll Authority, the Office of Economic and Workforce Development and the Treasure Island Development Authority.

: Complete construction of the Folsom Off-Ramp Realignment Project for the Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure, providing pedestrian safety improvements and supporting the goals of the Transbay Redevelopment Project Area.

: Continue supporting Caltrans with construction management and design support during construction; serve as lead for various components of the public private partnership (P3) contract; work with Caltrans to ensure compliance with conditions associated with prior allocations of federal economic stimulus funds; actively assist Caltrans with oversight of the P3 contract including implementation of various programs outlined in the contract such as the Workforce Development Program and the Underutilized Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program. In FY 15/16, we anticipate completing the P3 study that is comparing the effectiveness of delivering Phase 1 of the project using the more tradition design-bid-build model with Phase 2 which is being delivered as a P3.

Lead next steps for implementing recommendations from the recently completed Balboa Park Circulation Study. This includes working towards achieving Caltrans approval and environmental clearance of the realignment of the southbound I-280 off-ramp to Ocean Avenue (to improve safety at the ramp/local street interface) by July 2016, and preparing a Ramp Closure Analysis for the northbound I-280 on-ramp from Geneva Avenue, anticipated to be completed by early 2016.

Advance design and support the Quint Street Bridge Replacement.

: Coordinate with the California High-Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) and San Francisco agencies on high-speed rail issues affecting the city; work with Caltrain, MTC, the Mayor’s Office and other Peninsula and regional stakeholders to monitor and support delivery of the Caltrain Early Investment Program including the Communications Based Overlay Signal System and Electrification projects. Continue to work closely with aforementioned stakeholders to fully fund electrification and support delivery of the blended system to the Peninsula corridor that extends to the new Transbay Transit Center.

: Project management oversight; scope/cost/schedule and funding assessment and strategy.

Project management oversight and provide support for Board member participation on other oversight bodies (TJPA, Board of Supervisors), assist with funding assessment and strategy and participate on Planning Department-led Railyard/Boulevard Study.

: Project engineering support, environmental compliance, and

124


Page 6 of 7

general project oversight. Work closely with SFMTA and an interagency project team to maintain project integrity and quality while controlling budget and schedule. Assist SFMTA in implementing a Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) approach to construction.

: Support for SFMTA-led 19th Avenue/M-Ocean View Project Pre-Environmental Study, including support for Caltrans coordination during the production of a Project Study Report-Project Development Support document. Provide engineering support, as needed, for other Transportation Authority-led planning and programming efforts.

This section of the work program highlights ongoing agency operational activities, and administrative processes to ensure transparency and accountability in the use of taxpayer funds. It includes ongoing efforts lead by the Finance & Administration Division (e.g. accounting, human resources, procurement support), by the Transportation, Data & Analysis Division (e.g. IT and systems integration support), and by the Executive Office (e.g. Board operations and support, budgeting and communications) as listed below:

Staff Transportation Authority Board meetings including standing and ad hoc committees, Vision Zero Committee and Treasure Island Mobility Management Agency meetings.

Prepare, procure, and manage fiscal compliance and management audits.

: Develop and administer Transportation Authority budget, including performance monitoring, internal program and project tracking. Monitor internal controls and prepare reports and financial statements.

Maintain payroll functions, general ledger and accounting system, including paying, receiving and recording functions. Manage grants and prepare invoices for reimbursement.

Ongoing enhancement and maintenance of the new enterprise resource planning system (business management and accounting software) to improve accounting functions, general ledger reconciliations and financial reporting, as well as enabling improved data sharing with Portal (web-based grants management database used by agency staff and project sponsors).

Oversee procurement process for professional consultant contracts, prepare contracts, and manage compliance for contracts and associated Memoranda of Agreement and Understanding.

Administer program, review and update policy for any new state and federal requirements, conduct outreach and review applications and award certifications.

Execute the agency’s communications strategy with the general public, the agency’s board, various interest groups and other government agencies. This is accomplished through various means, including fostering media and community relations, developing strategic communications plans for projects and policy initiatives, disseminating agency news and updates through ‘The Messenger’ newsletter, supporting public outreach and helping coordinate events to promote the agency’s work. In this second half the 25th Anniversary year of the agency, the Executive Director’s office will continue to lead special commemorative activities to highlight major Prop K accomplishments and program management activities.

125


Page 7 of 7

Update content and maintain and enhance interactive project delivery reporting features such as the mystreetsf.com project map.

Maintain and update Administrative Code, fiscal, debt, procurement, investment, and travel policies.

Administer recruitment, personnel and benefits management and office procedures. Conduct or provide training for staff.

Maintain facilities and provide procurement of goods and services and administration of services contracts. Staff front desk reception duties. Provide assistance to the Clerk of the Authority as required with preparation of agenda packets and minutes, updates to website and clerking meetings.

Manage routine legal issues, claims and public records requests.

Provide internal development and support; maintain existing technology systems including phone and data networks; develop new collaboration tools to further enhance efficiency and technological capabilities; and expand contact management capabilities.

126

Vehicle

Registration Treasure Island

Congestion Transportation Fee For Mobility Proposed Amended

Sales Management Fund Transportation Management Budget Budget

Tax Agency For Clean Air Improvements Agency Fiscal Year Fiscal Year

Program Programs Program Program Program 2015/16 2014/15

Revenues:

Sales Tax Revenues 101,293,575$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 101,293,575$ 2,470,575$ 98,823,000$

Vehicle Registration Fee - - - 4,776,540 - 4,776,540 48,822 4,727,718

Interest Income 328,196 - 2,140 4,370 - 334,706 (11,484) 346,190

Federal/State/Regional Revenues 75,000,000 29,041,216 772,398 - 650,000 105,463,614 56,114,694 49,348,920

Other Revenues 2,909,880 6,210 - - - 2,916,090 (2,754,527) 5,670,617

Total Revenues 179,531,651 29,047,426 774,538 4,780,910 650,000 214,784,525 55,868,080 158,916,445

Expenditures:

Capital Project Costs 201,816,864 28,943,668 1,225,593 9,108,958 274,400 241,369,483 56,001,882 185,367,601

Administrative Operating Costs 7,143,980 2,065,647 37,486 228,830 475,600 9,951,543 220,839 9,730,704

Debt Service 21,760,000 - - - - 21,760,000 19,973,400 1,786,600

Total Expenditures 230,720,844 31,009,315 1,263,079 9,337,788 750,000 273,081,026 76,196,121 196,884,905

Other Financing Sources (Uses): (2,061,889) 1,961,889 - - 100,000 - - -

Net Change in Fund Balance (53,251,082)$ -$ (488,541)$ (4,556,878)$ -$ (58,296,501)$ (20,328,041)$ (37,968,460)$

Budgetary Fund Balance, as of July 1 (87,859,874)$ -$ 488,541$ 5,011,347$ -$ (82,359,986)$ N/A (44,391,526)$

Budgetary Fund Balance, as of June 30 (141,110,956)$ -$ -$ 454,469$ -$ (140,656,487)$ N/A (82,359,986)$

San Francisco County Transportation Authority

Attachment B

Proposed Fiscal Year 2015/16 Annual Budget

Proposed Budget by Fund

Increase

(Decrease) from

Prior Year

127

V

ehic

le

R

egi

stra

tion

Tre

asure

Isl

and

Conge

stio

nT

ransp

ort

atio

nFee F

or

Mobili

ty

Pro

po

sed

Am

ended

Sa

les

Man

agem

ent

Fund

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

nM

anag

em

ent

Bu

dget

Budge

t

T

axA

gency

For

Cle

an A

irIm

pro

vem

ents

Age

ncy

Fis

cal Y

ear

Fis

cal Y

ear

Pro

gram

Pro

gram

sPro

gram

Pro

gram

Pro

gram

2015/1

62014/1

5

Reven

ues:

Sale

s T

ax R

eve

nues

101,2

93,5

75

$

-$

-$

-$

-$

101,2

93,5

75

$

2,4

70,5

75

$

98,8

23,0

00

$

Vehic

le R

egi

stra

tion F

ee

-

-

-

4,7

76,5

40

-

4,7

76,5

40

48,8

22

4,7

27,7

18

Inte

rest

Inco

me

328,1

96

-

2,1

40

4,3

70

-

334,7

06

(11,4

84)

346,1

90

Federa

l/St

ate/R

egi

onal

Reve

nues

Federa

l C

onge

stio

n M

itig

atio

n a

nd A

ir Q

ual

ity

(CM

AQ

) Pro

gram

: eFle

et

-

367,6

23

-

-

-

367,6

23

(528,9

75)

896,5

98

Federa

l C

MA

Q P

rogr

am: T

ransp

ort

atio

n D

em

and M

anan

agem

ent

Par

tners

hip

Pro

ject

-

-

-

-

-

-

(191,8

31)

191,8

31

Federa

l G

eneva

-Har

ney

Bus

Rap

id T

ransi

t Feas

ibili

ty S

tudy

-

-

-

-

-

-

(205,5

00)

205,5

00

Federa

l H

ighw

ay B

ridge

Pro

gram

- I-8

0/Y

erb

a B

uena

Isla

nd Inte

rchan

ge Im

pro

vem

ent

Pro

ject

-

23,2

30,1

06

-

-

-

23,2

30,1

06

(7,7

45,0

74)

30,9

75,1

80

Federa

l H

ighw

ay B

ridge

Pro

gram

- Y

erb

a B

uena

Isla

nd B

ridge

Str

uct

ure

s-

582,5

27

-

-

-

582,5

27

(1,7

40,0

58)

2,3

22,5

85

Federa

l Sa

n F

ranci

sco F

reew

ay P

erf

orm

ance

Initia

tive

Stu

dy

-

219,0

00

-

-

-

219,0

00

219,0

00

-

Federa

l Sa

n F

ranci

sco P

arkin

g Pri

cing

and R

egu

lation S

tudy

-

-

-

-

-

-

(332,2

09)

332,2

09

Federa

l Sm

all Sm

art

Funds

(fro

m S

FM

TA

): V

an N

ess

Ave

nue B

us

Rap

id T

ransi

t-

-

-

-

-

-

(2

08,1

59)

208,1

59

Federa

l St

rate

gic

Hig

hw

ay R

ese

arch

Pro

gram

-

123,9

47

-

-

-

123,9

47

61,9

72

61,9

75

Federa

l Su

rfac

e T

ransp

ort

atio

n P

rogr

am 3

% R

eve

nue

-

1,2

55,1

07

-

-

-

1,2

55,1

07

288,5

61

966,5

46

Federa

l T

reas

ure

Isl

and M

obili

ty M

anag

em

ent

Pri

ori

ty D

eve

lopm

ent

-

-

-

-

-

-

(476,0

00)

476,0

00

Federa

l V

alue P

rici

ng

Pilo

t Pro

gram

: T

reas

ure

Isl

and M

obili

ty

-

-

-

-

-

-

(329,4

23)

329,4

23

Stat

e P

lannin

g, P

rogr

amm

ing

& M

onitori

ng

SB45 F

unds

-

-

-

-

-

-

(161,0

00)

161,0

00

Stat

e P

otr

ero

Hill

Com

munity-

Bas

ed T

ransp

ort

atio

n P

lan

-

-

-

-

-

-

(56,8

56)

56,8

56

Stat

e S

eis

mic

Retr

ofit

Pro

posi

tion 1

B -

I/8

0 Y

BI In

terc

han

ge Im

pro

vem

ent

Pro

ject

-

3,0

09,7

07

-

-

-

3,0

09,7

07

(9

79,7

14)

3,9

89,4

21

Stat

e T

CR

P P

resi

dio

Par

kw

ay-

-

-

-

-

-

(4

8,3

10)

48,3

10

Regi

onal

MT

C -

Chin

atow

n C

om

munity-

Bas

ed T

ransp

ort

atio

n P

lan

-

-

-

-

-

-

(21,0

00)

21,0

00

Regi

onal

MT

C -

Potr

ero

Hill

Com

munity-

Bas

ed T

ransp

ort

atio

n P

lan

-

-

-

-

-

-

(60,0

00)

60,0

00

Regi

onal

MT

C -

Pre

sidio

Par

kw

ay (

AB

1171)

-

-

-

-

-

-

(1,4

08,1

29)

1,4

08,1

29

Regi

onal

MT

C -

San

Fra

nci

sco P

arkin

g Pri

cing

and R

egu

lation S

tudy

(MT

C)

-

-

-

-

-

-

(60,0

00)

60,0

00

Regi

onal

San

Fra

nci

sco (

OC

II)

- Fols

om

Str

eet

Ram

ps

-

-

-

-

-

-

(4,4

92,1

14)

4,4

92,1

14

Regi

onal

San

Fra

nci

sco (

OEW

D)

- Lat

e N

ight

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n-

-

-

-

-

-

(4

0,0

00)

40,0

00

Regi

onal

San

Fra

nci

sco (

Pla

nnin

g) -

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n S

ust

ainab

ility

Pro

gram

-

-

-

-

-

-

(17,4

51)

17,4

51

Regi

onal

San

Fra

nci

sco (

Pla

nnin

g, S

FM

TA

) -

Tra

vel D

em

and M

odelin

g A

ssis

tance

-

200,0

00

-

-

-

200,0

00

-

200,0

00

Regi

onal

San

Fra

nci

sco (

SFM

TA

) -

19th

Ave

nue M

-Oce

an V

iew

-

53,1

99

-

-

-

53,1

99

(3

83,6

02)

436,8

01

Regi

onal

San

Fra

nci

sco (

SFM

TA

) -

Wat

erf

ront

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n A

ssess

ment

-

-

-

-

-

-

(140,3

68)

140,3

68

Regi

onal

San

Fra

nci

sco (

SFPU

C)

- 19th

Ave

nue C

ity-

Com

bin

ed P

roje

ct-

-

-

-

-

-

(1

60,0

00)

160,0

00

Regi

onal

TFC

A M

atch

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n D

em

and M

anan

agem

ent

Par

tners

hip

Pro

ject

-

-

-

-

-

-

(34,4

19)

34,4

19

Regi

onal

(Pla

nnin

g, S

FE, SF

MT

A)

- T

rave

l D

em

and M

anag

em

ent

Par

tners

hip

Pro

ject

-

-

-

-

-

-

(7,2

52)

7,2

52

Regi

onal

TID

A -

Tre

asure

Isl

and M

obili

ty M

anag

em

ent

Age

ncy

-

-

-

-

650,0

00

650,0

00

350,0

00

300,0

00

Regi

onal

San

Fra

nci

sco (

GG

BH

TD

) Fundin

g -

Pre

sidio

Par

kw

ay75,0

00,0

00

-

-

-

-

75,0

00,0

00

75,0

00,0

00

-

Regi

onal

Vehic

le R

egi

stra

tion F

ee R

eve

nues

(TFC

A)

-

-

772,3

98

-

-

772,3

98

22,6

05

749,7

93

Oth

er

Reve

nues

Loca

l M

atch

: C

ity

Car

Shar

e e

Fle

et

Car

shar

ing

Ele

ctri

fied

-

6,2

10

-

-

-

6,2

10

(19,9

59)

26,1

69

Pri

vate

Contr

ibutions:

19th

Ave

nue M

-Oce

an V

iew

-

-

-

-

-

-

(8,3

67)

8,3

67

San F

ranci

sco D

ept

of Envi

ronm

ent

- B

icyc

le R

acks/

Show

er

Fac

ilities

2,0

00

-

-

-

-

2,0

00

(21,8

51)

23,8

51

Suble

ase o

f O

ffic

e S

pac

e45,3

84

-

-

-

-

45,3

84

7,2

00

38,1

84

TID

A L

oan

Reim

burs

em

ent

- Y

BI In

terc

han

ge Im

pro

vem

ent

Pro

ject

2,8

62,4

96

-

-

-

-

2,8

62,4

96

(2

,711,5

50)

5,5

74,0

46

Tota

l R

eve

nues

179,5

31,6

51

29,0

47,4

26

774,5

38

4,7

80,9

10

650,0

00

214,7

84,5

25

55,8

68,0

80

158,9

16,4

45

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Att

ach

men

t C

Pro

po

sed

Fis

cal Y

ear

2015/1

6 A

nn

ual B

ud

get

Lin

e I

tem

Deta

il

Incr

eas

e

(Decr

eas

e)

from

Pri

or

Year

Pro

po

sed

Bu

dget

Am

en

dm

en

t b

y F

un

d

128

Vehic

le

Regi

stra

tion

Tre

asure

Isl

and

Conge

stio

nT

ransp

ort

atio

nFee F

or

Mobili

ty

Pro

po

sed

Am

ended

Sale

sM

anag

em

ent

Fund

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

nM

anag

em

ent

Bu

dget

Budge

t

Tax

Age

ncy

For

Cle

an A

irIm

pro

vem

ents

Age

ncy

Fis

cal Y

ear

Fis

cal Y

ear

Pro

gram

Pro

gram

sPro

gram

Pro

gram

Pro

gram

2015/1

62014/1

5

San

Fra

ncis

co

Co

un

ty T

ran

spo

rtati

on

Au

tho

rity

Att

ach

men

t C

Pro

po

sed

Fis

cal Y

ear

2015/1

6 A

nn

ual B

ud

get

Lin

e I

tem

Deta

il

Incr

eas

e

(Decr

eas

e)

from

Pri

or

Year

Pro

po

sed

Bu

dget

Am

en

dm

en

t b

y F

un

d

Exp

en

dit

ure

s:

Cap

ital

Pro

ject

Cost

s

Indiv

idual

Pro

ject

Gra

nts

, Pro

gram

s &

Initia

tive

s125,0

00,0

00

-

1,2

25,5

93

9,0

83,9

58

-

135,3

09,5

51

(1

,132,3

18)

136,4

41,8

69

Tech

nic

al P

rofe

ssio

nal

Serv

ices

76,8

16,8

64

28,9

43,6

68

-

25,0

00

274,4

00

106,0

59,9

32

57,1

34,2

00

48,9

25,7

32

Adm

inis

trat

ive O

pera

ting

Cost

s

Pers

onnel Expenditure

s

Sala

ries

3,0

18,3

17

1,2

35,6

26

25,4

90

69,8

58

290,9

64

4,6

40,2

55

329,6

85

4,3

10,5

70

Fri

nge

Benefits

1,4

20,3

84

582,1

24

11,9

96

32,8

74

134,2

09

2,1

81,5

87

120,9

28

2,0

60,6

59

Pay

for

Perf

orm

ance

194,9

65

-

- -

- 194,9

65

15,7

20

179,2

45

Non-p

ers

onnel Expenditure

s

Adm

inis

trat

ive O

pera

tions

2,2

95,2

14

247,8

97

-

126,0

98

46,2

27

2,7

15,4

36

(1

36,3

94)

2,8

51,8

30

Equip

ment, F

urn

iture

& F

ixtu

res

144,7

00

-

- -

- 144,7

00

(1

13,3

00)

258,0

00

Com

mis

sioner-

Rela

ted E

xpense

s70,4

00

-

- -

4,2

00

74,6

00

4,2

00

70,4

00

Debt

Serv

ice

Pri

nci

pal

Retire

ment

20,0

00,0

00

-

- -

- 20,0

00,0

00

20,0

00,0

00

-

Inte

rest

and F

isca

l C

har

ges

1,7

60,0

00

-

- -

- 1,7

60,0

00

(2

6,6

00)

1,7

86,6

00

Tota

l Expenditure

s 230,7

20,8

44

31,0

09,3

15

1,2

63,0

79

9,3

37,7

88

750,0

00

273,0

81,0

26

76,1

96,1

21

196,8

84,9

05

Oth

er

Fin

an

cin

g S

ou

rces

(Use

s):

Tra

nsf

ers

in -

Pro

p K

Mat

ch t

o G

rant

Fundin

g(2

,061,8

89)

-

- -

- (2

,061,8

89)

(3

,070,1

41)

1,0

08,2

52

Tra

nsf

ers

out

- Pro

p K

Mat

ch t

o G

rant

Fundin

g-

1,9

61,8

89

-

- 100,0

00

2,0

61,8

89

3,0

70,1

41

(1

,008,2

52)

Tota

l O

ther

Fin

anci

ng

Sourc

es

(Use

s)(2

,061,8

89)

1,9

61,8

89

-

- 100,0

00

-

- -

Net

Ch

an

ge in

Fu

nd

Bala

nce

(53,2

51,0

82)

$

-

$

(4

88,5

41)

$

(4

,556,8

78)

$

-

$

(5

8,2

96,5

01)

$

(2

0,3

28,0

41)

$

(3

7,9

68,4

60)

$

Budge

tary

Fund B

alan

ce, as

of Ju

ly 1

(87,8

59,8

74)

$

-

$

488,5

41

$

5,0

11,3

47

$

-

$

(8

2,3

59,9

86)

$

N

/A(4

4,3

91,5

26)

$

Budge

tary

Fund B

alan

ce, as

of Ju

ne 3

0(1

41,1

10,9

56)

$

-

$

-

$

454,4

69

$

-

$

(1

40,6

56,4

87)

$

N

/A(8

2,3

59,9

86)

$

Incl

udes

Sale

s T

ax a

nd V

ehic

le R

egi

stra

tion F

ee F

or

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n Im

pro

vem

ents

Rese

rved for

Pro

gram

and O

pera

ting

Continge

ncy

Fund R

ese

rved for

Pro

gram

and O

pera

ting

Continge

ncy

10,1

29,3

58

$

-

$

77,2

40

$

477,6

54

$

-

$

10,6

84,2

51

$

129

Attachment D Line Item Descriptions

TOTAL PROJECTED REVENUES ...................................................................... $214,784,525

The following chart shows the composition of revenues for the proposed FY 2015/16 budget.

Prop K Sales Tax Revenues: ....................................................................................................... $101,293,575

The budgeted revenues for Sales Tax programs are from a voter-approved levy of 0.5% sales tax in the County of San Francisco for transportation projects and programs included in the voter-approved Expenditure Plan. The 2003 Prop K Sales Tax Revenue’s Expenditure Plan includes investments in four major categories: 1) Transit; 2) Streets and Traffic Safety; 3) Paratransit services for seniors and disabled people and 4) Transportation System Management/Strategic Initiatives. Based on Fiscal Year (FY) 2014/15 revenues to date, the Transportation Authority projects FY 2015/16 sales tax revenues to increase compared to the budgeted revenues for FY 2014/15 by $2.5 million. The sales tax revenue projection is net of the Board of Equalization’s charges for the collection of the tax.

Vehicle Registration Fee for Transportation Improvements Program (Prop AA) Revenues: ............................................................................................................................................................. $4,776,540

These revenues (excluding interest earnings budgeted in Interest Income) fund projects that will be delivered under Prop AA’s Expenditure Plan. This measure, approved by San Francisco voters in November 2010, collects an additional $10 vehicle registration fee on motor vehicles registered in San Francisco. Revenues must be used to fund projects included in the voter-approved Expenditure Plan, such as local road repairs, pedestrian safety improvements, and transit reliability improvements. The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) began assessing the fee on vehicle registrations starting May 2011. This amount is net of the DMV’s charges for the collection of these fees.

47.2%

12.1% 1.3%

1.4%

2.2%

35.6%

0.2%

Proposed FY2015/16 Budget Total Revenue $214,784,525

Sales Tax Revenues $101,293,575

Federal Grant Funding $25,778,310

Other Revenues $2,916,090

State Grant Funding $3,009,707

Vehicle Registration Fee (Prop AA) $4,776,540

Regional Grant Funding $76,675,597

Interest Income $334,706

130


Interest Income: ................................................................................................................................... $334,706

Most of the Transportation Authority’s investable assets are deposited in the City’s Treasury Pool. Per direction from the Treasurer’s Office, the deposits in the Pooled Investment Fund are assumed to earn approximately 0.5% during the year. The level of Transportation Authority deposits held in the pool during the year depends on the Prop K capital project reimbursement requests. An average sales tax fund budget cash balance during the year of approximately $40 million was assumed. The budget cash balance consists largely of allocated Prop K funds, which are invested until invoices are received and sponsors are reimbursed.

Sales Tax Program Regional Revenue:………………………………………............…….$75,000,000

The Presidio Parkway Project Phase II is being delivered as a public private partnership. The contract with Golden Link Concessionaire, LLC is structured such that Caltrans must make a one-time milestone payment to the concessionaire upon substantial completion, which is anticipated by September 2015. Caltrans will subsequently provide quarterly availability payments to the concessionaire. In support of the Presidio Parkway Project, one of the Transportation Authority’s responsibilities is arranging for and serving as aggregator of local funds for the milestone payment, including $75 million from the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District (Bridge District) and $20.3 million of Prop K funds. Based on the funding agreement between the Bridge District and the Transportation Authority, the Bridge District shall pay the Transportation Authority no later than 75 days prior to the substantial completion date and then the Transportation Authority will pass those funds onto Caltrans to pay the concessionaire. Prop K funds will be requested through a separate appropriation request.

Congestion Management Agency (CMA) Programs Federal, State and Regional Grant Revenues: ........................................................................................................................................................... $29,041,216

The CMA program revenues (excluding Other Revenues) for FY 2015/16 will be used to cover ongoing staffing and professional/technical service contracts required to implement the CMA programs and projects, as well as for large projects undertaken in the Transportation Authority’s role as CMA. The FY 2015/16 budget includes $26.8 million from federal and state funding for work on the I-80/Yerba Buena Island (YBI) Interchange Improvement Project and YBI Bridge structures (collectively known as YBI Project). CMA revenues are also comprised of federal, state and regional grant funds, including funds received from the Federal Highway Administration, Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Several of these grants are project-specific, such as those for the Freeway Corridor Management Study, Strategic Highway Research Program and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) funds for eFleet: Car Sharing Electrified projects, a high-impact, innovative project with the greatest potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that can be replicated on a larger-scale around the region. Other funding sources, such as federal Surface Transportation Program funds can be used to fund a number of eligible planning, programming, model development, and project delivery support activities, including the Congestion Management and San Francisco Transportation Plan. Regional CMA program revenues include project management and travel demand model services provided to City agencies in support of various projects and studies, such as the 19th Avenue M-Ocean View Study.

Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA) Program Regional Revenues: ................................ $772,398

The TFCA Vehicle Registration Fee Revenues (excluding interest earnings included in Interest

131


Income above) are derived from a $4 surcharge on vehicles registered in the nine Bay Area counties and must be used for cost-effective transportation projects which reduce motor vehicle air pollutant emissions. Budgeted revenues are based on a funding estimate provided by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, which administers these revenues. The FY 2015/16 budgeted amount includes new estimated revenues only.

Treasure Island Mobility Management Agency (TIMMA) Program Federal and Regional Revenues: ................................................................................................................................................................ $650,000

The TIMMA program revenues for FY 2015/16 are planned to cover the full costs of all Transportation Authority activities in support of TIMMA. This includes ongoing staffing and professional/technical service contracts required to conduct pre-implementation planning and administration. The FY 2015/16 budget consists of local funds from the Treasure Island Development Authority (TIDA). The TIDA funds provide support for administrative, operating, planning and engineering functions including: developing agency policies and partnership agreements; analyzing policy alternatives, developing the budget, cost estimates, financial profile and schedule management of the program; legal counsel; and other direct costs.

Other Revenues: ............................................................................................................................... $2,916,090

Other revenues budgeted in FY 2015/16 include contributions from City CarShare for the eFleet: CarSharing Electrified Project and revenues from the sublease of office space. In addition, the Transportation Authority will receive the second of three loan repayments from TIDA on the environmental phase of the YBI Project.

TOTAL PROJECTED EXPENDITURES ............................................................ $273,081,026

The Transportation Authority’s Total Expenditures projected for the budget year are comprised of Capital Expenditures of $241.4 million, Administrative Operating Expenditures of $10 million, and Debt Service Expenditures of $21.8 million.

The following chart shows the composition of expenditures for the proposed FY 2015/16 budget.

132


CAPITAL EXPENDITURES ................................................................................. $241,369,483

Capital expenditures in FY 2015/16 are budgeted to increase from the FY 2014/15 Amended Budget by an estimated 30.2% due to higher activity existing projects, project delays and billing other grants first in the prior year, for both Prop K and Prop AA capital programs. Project expenditures by Program Fund are detailed below.

Sales Tax Program Expenditures: ............................................................................................... $201,816,864The estimate for sales tax capital expenditures reflects a combination of estimated cash flow needs for existing allocations based on review of reimbursements, progress reports and conversations with project sponsors, as well as anticipated new allocations estimated for FY 2015/16. The anticipated largest capital project expenditures for existing allocations include the SFMTA’s Radio Communications System & Computer-Aided Dispatch Replacement and Central Subway projects; and the Transbay Joint Powers Authority’s (TJPA's) Transbay Transit Center/Downtown Extension Project; as well as various transit and street maintenance improvements, and pedestrian and bicycle projects. One of the largest anticipated new allocations and corresponding expenditures will be over $20 million in sales tax funds for the milestone payment due to the concessionaire at substantial completion of Presidio Parkway project, anticipated this fall. We anticipate needing to revise the capital budget mid-year, given the large portfolio of sales tax projects that we are overseeing and the complexity of forecasting reimbursement needs with such a large and diverse portfolio. We continue to work closely with our sponsors, particularly SFMTA and the TJPA to monitor project progress and anticipate project cost reimbursement needs especially for the grants with the largest remaining balances.

CMA Programs Expenditures: ..................................................................................................... $28,943,668

This line item includes staff time and technical consulting services such as planning, programming, engineering, design, environmental, or programming services, which are needed in order to fulfill the Transportation Authority’s Congestion Management Agency responsibilities under state law. Included are technical services contracts for the Geary Corridor and Van Ness Avenue Bus Rapid

88%

3% 1%

8%

Proposed FY2015/16 Budget Total Expenditure $273,081,026

Capital Project Expenditures $241,369,483

Personnel Expenditures $7,016,807

Non-Personnel Expenditures $2,934,736

Debt Service Expenditures $21,760,000

133


Transit projects, the Freeway Corridor Management Study, the San Francisco Transportation Plan, and various other planning efforts and projects such as the 19th Avenue M-Ocean View, and eFleet Carsharing Electrified and Strategic Highway Research Program. Also included is ongoing construction activity for the YBI Project, being funding by federal and state funding matched with funds from the Treasure Island Development Authority.

TFCA Program Expenditures: ........................................................................................................ $1,225,593

This line item covers projects to be delivered with TFCA funds, a regional program administered by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. These monies must be used for cost-effective transportation projects which reduce motor vehicle air pollutant emissions. The TFCA capital expenditures program includes new FY 2015/16 projects, and carryover prior year projects with multi-year schedules as well as projects not anticipated to be completed in FY 2014/15. We have included an estimate for expenditures for the FY 2015/16 program of projects, which is scheduled to be approved by the Transportation Authority Board in June 2015.

Vehicle Registration Fee for Transportation Improvements Program (Prop AA) Expenditures: ............................................................................................................................................................. $9,108,958

This line item includes projects that will be delivered under the voter-approved Prop AA Expenditure Plan. Consistent with the Expenditure Plan, the revenues will be used for design and construction of ready-to-go local road repairs, pedestrian safety improvements, transit reliability improvements, and travel demand management projects. The Prop AA capital expenditures include new FY 2015/16 projects based on the approved Prop AA Strategic Plan, and carryover prior year projects with multi-year schedules as well as projects not anticipated to be completed in FY 2014/15. The largest capital project expenditures for existing allocations include the Dolores Street Pavement Renovation project, the Hunters View Phase II: Transit Connection, and the Mansell Corridor Improvement Project.

Treasure Island Mobility Management Agency (TIMMA) Program Expenditures: .................. $274,400

This line item includes technical consulting services which are needed in order to fulfill the Transportation Authority’s responsibilities as TIMMA per state and local law. Technical consulting services include planning, engineering, design, communications, and environmental services. Included are technical services contracts already awarded: for the Treasure Island Mobility Management Study; Treasure Island demand model development and application; and project management support. Additional technical services contracts anticipated in this line item include strategic communications, legal services, and outreach services.

ADMINISTRATIVE OPERATING EXPENDITURES ......................................... $9,951,543

Operating expenditures include personnel expenditures, administrative expenditures, commissioner-related expenditures, and equipment, furniture and fixtures.

Personnel: ........................................................................................................................................... $7,016,807

Personnel costs are budgeted at a higher level as in the amended budget for FY 2014/15. In May 2014, through Resolution 14-80, the Transportation Authority approved a staff reorganization plan to address staff capacity and sustainability issues given the ongoing ambitious work programs and Board interest in expanding and enhancing certain aspects of the work program. Adoption of the staff reorganization plan increased administrative costs by 7.1%. Capacity for merit increases is also included in the pay-for-performance and salary categories; however, there is no assurance of any

134


annual pay increase. Transportation Authority employees are not entitled to cost of living increases. All salary adjustments are determined by the Executive Director based on merit only.

Non-Personnel: ................................................................................................................................. $2,934,736

This line item includes typical operating expenditures for office rent, telecommunications, postage, materials and office supplies, printing and reproduction equipment and services, and other administrative support requirements for all Transportation Authority activities, along with all administrative support contracts, whether for City-supplied services, such as the City Attorney legal services and the Department of Technology cablecast services, or for competitively procured services (such as auditing, legislative advocacy, outside computer system support, etc.). Also included are funds for ongoing maintenance and operation of office equipment; computer hardware; licensing requirements for computer software; and an allowance for replacement furniture and fixtures. This line item also includes Commissioner meeting fees, and compensation for Commissioners’ direct furniture and equipment expenditures. Non-personnel expenditures are budgeted lower in FY 2015/16 due to a decrease of 7.7% related to the implementation of the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software system. We transitioned to the new ERP system in September 2014.

DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURES ....................................................................... $21,760,000

This line item assumes a continuation of the current Commercial Paper Program agreements with an increase in commercial paper interest rates and a $20 million paydown on the outstanding $135 million commercial paper program. By 2021, it is expected the outstanding commercial paper will be fully repaid.

OTHER FINANCING SOURCES/USES……………………………………..……………..$0

The Other Financing Sources Uses section of the Line Item Detail for the FY 2015/16 budget includes inter-fund transfers (for example between the sales tax and CMA funds). These transfers represent the required local match or appropriation of Prop K to federal and state grants such as the Surface Transportation Program and TIMMA Program.

BUDGETARY FUND BALANCE FOR CONTINGENCIES…………………….$10,684,251

The Transportation Authority’s Fiscal Policy directs that the Transportation Authority shall allocate not less than five percent (5%) and up to fifteen percent (15%) of estimated annual sales tax revenues as a hedge against an emergency occurring during the budgeted fiscal year. In the current economic climate, a budgeted fund balance of $10.1 million, or 10% of annual projected sales tax revenues, is set aside as a program and operating contingency reserve. The Transportation Authority has also set aside $477,654 and $77,240 or about 10% as a program and operating contingency reserve for the Prop AA Program and TFCA Program.

135


136

Ca

ltra

in M

od

ern

iza

tio

n

EM

U P

roc

ure

me

nt

Bo

ard

ing

He

igh

t

SF

CT

A C

AC

Ma

y 2

7,

20

15

137

Co

nte

xt

2 138

Avera

ge W

eekd

ay R

iders

hip

24

,59

7

26

,79

4

26

,02

8

29

,72

8

33

,69

1

29

,17

8

25

,57

7

23

,94

7

26

,53

3

29

,76

0

31

,50

7

34

,611

3

6,2

32

34

,12

0 3

7,7

79

42

,35

4

47

,06

0

52

,611

58

,24

5

20,0

00

25,0

00

30,0

00

35,0

00

40,0

00

45,0

00

50,0

00

55,0

00

60,0

00

Riders (Boardings)

Ye

ar

Sin

ce 2

00

4 1

43

% i

ncre

as

e

3

139

Exc

eed

ing

Cap

acit

y T

od

ay

4

No

rth

bo

un

d

Depart

SJ

Perc

ent

of

Seate

d C

apacity

(low

season)

Perc

ent

of

Seate

d C

apacity

(hig

h s

eason)

7:0

3 A

M

13

5%

1

58

%

7:4

5 A

M

12

8%

1

50

%

8:0

3 A

M

12

7%

1

49

%

5:2

3 P

M

12

2%

1

43

%

6:5

7 A

M

122%

142%

7:5

0 A

M

117%

1

37

%

6:4

5 A

M

108%

126%

6:5

0 A

M

10

6%

1

24

%

4:3

9 P

M

10

6%

1

24

%

7:5

5 A

M

10

3%

1

21

%

8:4

0 A

M

10

2%

119%

4:2

3 P

M

96

%

113%

140

Reg

ion

al T

ran

sp

ort

ati

on

Need

s

•U

S 1

01

an

d I

nte

rsta

te 2

80

Co

ng

este

d

•C

orr

idor

su

pp

ort

s g

row

ing e

con

om

y

-1

4%

CA

GD

P; 5

2%

CA

pa

ten

ts; 2

5%

CA

ta

x r

eve

nu

e

•C

altra

in C

om

mu

ter

Co

alit

ion

(fo

rme

d 2

01

4)

-7

5%

ca

ltra

in r

ide

r’s c

om

mu

te to

wo

rk; 6

0%

ch

oic

e r

ide

rs

5

141

http://samceda.org/

http://www.lifescienceleader.com/doc/leading-by-following-baybio-s-gail-maderis-0001

Ne

ed

to

Max

imiz

e C

ap

ac

ity

•A

dd M

etr

olin

k C

ars

to

Die

sel T

rain

s (

Now

)

•C

altra

in E

lectr

ific

ation

(2

02

0)

-M

ore

tra

ins / s

erv

e m

ore

rid

ers

-In

cre

ase

sta

tio

n s

top

s a

nd

/or

red

uce

d tra

ve

l tim

es

•Le

ve

l B

oa

rdin

g a

nd L

on

ge

r T

rain

s (

Futu

re)

6 142

7

Ca

ltra

in M

od

ern

iza

tio

n

143

Key R

eg

ion

al

Ben

efi

ts

No

te: 2

01

3 B

AC

Re

po

rt, g

en

era

tes $

2.5

B e

co

no

mic

activity a

nd

9,6

00

jo

bs

8 144

PC

EP

Serv

ice B

en

efi

ts

Metr

ic

To

day

PC

EP

Tra

ins / p

eak h

our

/

direction

5

6

Passengers

/ p

eak

hour

/ direction

5,1

00

6,3

00

Ex

am

ple

Ba

by

Bu

lle

t T

rain

Re

tain

5-6

sto

ps

60

min

ute

s

45

min

ute

s

Re

tain

SF

to

SJ

60

min

ute

s

6 s

top

s

13

sto

ps

Ex

am

ple

RW

C S

tati

on

Tra

in s

top

s / p

ea

k h

our

3

5

9

145

202

0 R

even

ue S

erv

ice

2020

Serv

ice

Desig

n /

Build

/ T

est

Aw

ard

EM

U

Co

ntr

ac

t

(WIN

TE

R)

Iss

ue

RF

P E

MU

(JU

LY

)

En

vir

on

me

nta

l C

lea

ran

ce

20

13

- 2

01

4

2014

2013

2015

Aw

ard

DB

Co

ntr

ac

t

(FA

LL

)

Iss

ue

RF

P

DB

(F

EB

)

Se

rvic

e a

nd

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

20

16

– 2

02

0 (

5 y

ea

rs)

Import

ant

mile

sto

nes t

o m

eet

2020 s

erv

ice d

ate

1

0 146

Req

uest

for

Info

rmati

on

S

um

me

r 2

014

11

Att

rib

ute

s

Ind

ustr

y C

on

firm

ati

on

Maxim

ize C

apacity

•B

i-le

vel (v

ers

us s

ingle

level)

Pre

vio

usly

Made

•S

erv

ice p

roven

options

•S

ave

s c

osts

/ t

ime

US

Regula

tion

Com

plia

nce

•A

DA

•B

uy A

merica

•F

RA

Wa

ive

r / A

lte

rna

tive

Co

mp

lian

t V

eh

icle

s C

rite

ria

•M

eet

Caltra

in T

echnic

al /

Qualit

y S

tan

dard

s

Flo

or

Thre

shold

•

2 d

ouble

doors

per

car

(low

level board

ing)

•~

22

” to

~25

” m

ost

com

mon

Note

: A

nticip

ate

adequate

com

petition f

or

the R

FP

147

12

Re

co

mm

en

ded

EM

U

•B

i-le

vel car

•2

do

ub

le d

oo

rs (

loca

ted

: ~

25

” flo

or)

•P

asse

ng

ers

ste

p (

1-2

) fr

om

pla

tfo

rm

•A

DA

pa

sse

ng

ers

an

d b

ike

s lo

ca

ted

~2

5”

leve

l

•A

DA

use

min

i h

igh

s a

nd

wa

ysid

e lifts

Pla

tfo

rm 8

”

~5

0”

~2

5”

1-2

ste

ps o

nb

oa

rd

148

Sim

ila

r to

To

day’s

Bo

mb

ard

ier

13

149

14

Fu

ture

Level B

oard

ing

(B

eyo

nd

Ele

ctr

ific

ati

on

)

Pla

tfo

rm

25

”

No s

teps,

use a

t 27 s

tations HS

R / C

altra

in D

ed

icate

d P

latform

s

150

15

Re

qu

es

t fo

r E

MU

Mo

dif

ica

tio

n

151

Req

uest

for

EM

U M

od

ific

ati

on

s

•S

takeh

old

er

req

uest

for

ca

r m

od

ific

ation

•C

altra

in b

i-le

vel E

MU

~25”

board

ing h

eig

ht

•H

SR

sin

gle

level cars

~50”

board

ing h

eig

ht

(diffe

ren

t ne

ed

s t

ha

n C

altra

in)

•C

an C

altra

in m

odify E

MU

s t

o n

ot pre

clu

de ~

50”

board

ing in t

he futu

re?

16

152

Mo

dif

icati

on

A (

2020)

C

ars

wit

h M

ore

Do

ors

17

~5

0”

~2

5”

Pla

tfo

rm 8

”

1-2

ste

ps

Wa

ysid

e I

nfr

astr

uctu

re f

or

AD

A

153

18

Op

en T

rap

Clo

se T

rap

Sin

gle

Door

w/

Tra

p

Mo

dif

icati

on

B (

2020)

Ca

rs w

ith

Tra

ps

~5

0”

Pla

tfo

rm 8

”

Tra

p:

3-5

ste

ps

154

19

Fu

ture

Ble

nd

ed

Syste

m E

valu

ati

on

Fu

ll F

leet

EM

U S

erv

ice

(

HS

R a

nd M

odifie

d L

eve

l B

oa

rdin

g S

tation

s)

155

Sc

en

ari

o 1

: S

ha

red

Pla

tfo

rm a

t H

SR

Sta

tio

ns O

nly

20

2-3

Sta

tions:

Caltra

in /

HS

R

Sta

tions C

om

mon P

latf

orm

s ~

50”

25 S

tations:

Caltra

in L

evel

Board

ing ~

25”

156

Sce

nari

o 2

: S

hare

Pla

tfo

rms a

t A

ll

Sta

tio

ns

21

27 S

tations: C

altra

in /

HS

R S

tations

Com

mon P

latf

orm

s ~

50”

157

Mo

dif

icati

on

A (

Fu

ture

)

22

Pla

tfo

rm 5

0”

Pla

tfo

rm 2

5”

No

ste

ps

(u

se

at

2-3

sta

tio

ns)

No

ste

ps

(u

se

at

25

sta

tio

ns)

Pla

tfo

rm 5

0”

No

ste

ps

(u

se

at

27

sta

tio

ns)

Inte

rio

r s

tep

s n

avig

ate

d b

y b

ike

s;

po

ten

tia

l A

DA

in

teri

or

lift

ne

ed

ed

Scen

ari

o 1

Sh

are

d a

t 2 –

3 (

seat

loss w

/ b

oth

do

ors

op

en

)

Scen

ari

o 2

Sh

are

d a

t A

ll

Inte

rio

r s

tep

s n

avig

ate

d b

y b

ike

s;

AD

A i

nte

rio

r li

ft n

ee

de

d

158

Mo

dif

icati

on

B (

Fu

ture

)

23

Pla

tfo

rm 5

0”

Pla

tfo

rm 2

5”

Le

ss

ste

ps

(u

se

at

25

sta

tio

ns)

No

ste

ps

(u

se

at

2-3

sta

tio

ns)

No

ste

ps

; u

se

at

27

sta

tio

ns

Se

al T

rap

s N

o s

tep

s (

us

e a

t 2

7

sta

tio

ns)

Inte

rio

r s

tep

s n

avig

ate

d b

y b

ike

s

Pla

tfo

rm

50

”

Scen

ari

o1 S

hare

d a

t 2 -

3

Scen

ari

o 2

Sh

are

d a

t A

ll

Inte

rio

r s

tep

s n

avig

ate

d b

y b

ike

s;

159

Po

ten

tial P

ath

Fo

rwa

rd

24

160

Fra

mew

ork

•H

SR

/ C

altra

in b

len

de

d s

yste

m p

art

ne

rsh

ip

•B

lended s

yste

m n

ot yet defined

-C

om

mu

nity p

lan

nin

g

-E

nviro

nm

en

tal e

va

lua

tio

n

•E

arly investm

ent

pro

gra

m (

defined /

environm

enta

lly

cle

are

d)

-C

BO

SS

PT

C (

20

15

)

-E

lectr

ific

atio

n P

roje

ct (2

02

0)

•N

eed t

o m

ake

EM

U d

esig

n d

ecis

ion n

ow

to n

ot

pre

clu

de c

om

mon p

latf

orm

s w

/ H

SR

in f

utu

re

2

5

161

Cars

wit

h M

ore

Do

ors

Op

tio

n

•C

ha

llen

ge

s A

sso

cia

ted

with

Mo

re D

oo

rs

-S

eat lo

ss

-P

assenger

circula

tion insid

e c

ar

•S

hort

-Term

Solu

tion (

2020)

-D

esig

n c

ar

with 2

sets

of

doors

-K

eep h

igh d

oo

rs s

eale

d /

use low

doors

-C

ar

configure

d s

imila

r to

origin

al E

MU

s (

mitig

ate

challe

nges)

-R

equest

HS

R t

o f

und m

odific

ation c

osts

•F

utu

re B

lended S

yste

m (

TB

D)

-C

om

munity p

lannin

g /

environm

enta

l re

vie

w

-D

efine b

lended s

erv

ice p

lan a

nd c

apital im

pro

vem

ents

-E

valu

ate

use o

f h

igh d

oors

/ inte

rior

reconfigura

tion

26

162

27

Ne

xt

Ste

ps

163

May –

Ju

ly A

cti

vit

ies

•P

ub

lic M

ee

tin

gs

•R

ele

ase D

raft

RF

P t

o C

ar

Build

ers

•Ju

ne

JP

B

-U

pdate

on

pro

posed p

ath

forw

ard

-S

eats

/Sta

ndees/B

ikes/B

ath

room

bala

nce

•Ju

ly J

PB

-R

ele

ase E

MU

RF

P

-R

egio

nal fu

ndin

g p

lan u

pdate

28

164

Qu

esti

on

s

w

eb

site

: w

ww

.caltra

in.c

om

/ca

lmo

d

em

ail:

calm

od@

caltra

in.c

om

29

165

http://www.caltrain.com/calmod

mailto:[email protected]


166

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

Su

sta

inab

ilit

y P

rog

ram

Tra

nsp

ortatio

n

Sust

ain

abili

ty P

rogra

m

Pho

to: S

ergi

o R

uiz

167

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

Su

sta

inab

ilit

y P

rog

ram

2

Sa

n F

ran

cisc

o is

a p

op

ula

r

pla

ce t

o w

ork

, liv

e a

nd

vis

it,

stra

inin

g th

e ex

isti

ng

tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

ne

two

rk

•R

oads a

nd t

ransit v

ehic

les

nearin

g c

apacity in s

om

e

are

as

•Life

sty

le p

refe

rences a

nd

new

infr

astr

uctu

re h

ave

contr

ibute

d t

o incre

ases in

cyclin

g a

nd w

alk

ing,

even in

less-t

han-ideal conditio

ns

2

168

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

Su

sta

inab

ilit

y P

rog

ram

3

HO

W D

O W

E G

RO

W S

US

TAIN

AB

LY?

Ho

use

ho

lds

Job

s

100

,00

0+

new

ho

use

ho

lds

190

,00

0+ ne

w jo

bs

By

20

40

: o

f ho

usi

ng

pro

ject

ion

s

alr

ead

y in

pip

elin

e 4

0%

3

169

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

Su

sta

inab

ilit

y P

rog

ram

4

WE

NEE

D A

CO

MP

REH

ENS

IVE

AP

PR

OA

CH

TO A

DD

RES

S T

HES

E C

HA

LLEN

GES

…

Pub

lic in

vest

men

t for

exi

stin

g an

d fu

ture

pop

ulat

ion

und

erw

ay

•Tr

ansi

t cap

ital a

nd o

pera

tiona

l inv

estm

ents

(Cen

tral

Subw

ay, M

uni F

orw

ard,

BRT

, DTX

, etc

.)

•Bi

cycl

e in

fras

truc

ture

(pro

tect

ed la

nes,

par

king

, etc

.)

•Pe

dest

rian

saf

ety

(Vis

ion

Zero

, Wal

k Fi

rst,

etc.

)

•De

man

d M

anag

emen

t (bi

ke s

hari

ng, s

hutt

les,

city

wid

e

TDM

, etc

.)

New

dev

elop

men

t

cont

rib

utio

n

•Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Sust

aina

bilit

y

Prog

ram

170

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

Su

sta

inab

ilit

y P

rog

ram

S

F P

lannin

g

SF

Exam

iner

Marr

k D

raeger

171

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

Su

sta

inab

ilit

y P

rog

ram

6

172

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

Su

sta

inab

ilit

y P

rog

ram

MO

DER

NIZ

E EN

VIR

ON

MEN

TAL

REV

IEW

173

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

Su

sta

inab

ilit

y P

rog

ram

THE

WAY

IT IS

TH

E W

AY

IT W

OU

LD B

E

Aut

o-ce

ntri

c

revi

ew s

tand

ard

Mul

ti-m

odal

revi

ew s

tand

ard

wit

h

a fo

cus

on v

ehic

le le

vel o

f ser

vice

(LO

S)

Mul

ti-m

odal

revi

ew s

tand

ard

Mul

ti-m

odal

revi

ew

stan

dar

d th

at p

rom

otes

mob

ility

and

acc

ess

STA

TE

sets

sta

nda

rd

CIT

Y de

velo

ps

thre

shol

d (m

etri

c)

174

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

Su

sta

inab

ilit

y P

rog

ram

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F P

RO

PO

SED

OP

R G

UID

ELIN

ES

•L

an

d U

se

Pro

jects

•V

MT

ratio <

regio

na

l avera

ge =

LT

S im

pact

•C

onsis

tency w

ith C

ity P

olic

ies =

LT

S im

pact

•L

an

d U

se

Pla

ns

•C

onsis

tency w

ith P

lan B

ay A

rea o

r achie

ve s

imila

r V

MT

reduction =

LT

S im

pact

•T

ran

sp

ort

atio

n P

roje

cts

•Im

pro

ve s

afe

ty/o

pera

tions,

inclu

din

g tra

nsit o

pera

tions =

LT

S im

pact

•P

ede

str

ian, b

icycle

and t

ransit p

roje

cts

that

lead to a

net

decre

ase in V

MT

= L

TS

im

pact (e

ven

if th

ey r

equire r

eallo

cation o

r re

moval of

vehic

le lanes)

•P

hysic

al auto

mo

bile

roadw

ay c

apacity incre

ase (

induced d

em

and)

= I

mp

act

•S

afe

ty

•M

itig

atio

n M

ea

su

re a

nd

Alte

rna

tive

s

•T

DM

measure

s

175

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

Su

sta

inab

ilit

y P

rog

ram

OU

TCO

MES

OF

CEQ

A R

EFO

RM

LAN

D U

SE

PR

OJE

CTS

•M

ore

ce

rtain

ty d

uring

environ

menta

l re

vie

w

•R

educed t

ime &

cost of te

chnic

al

stu

die

s

•B

ett

er

environm

enta

l outc

om

es

Go

od

by

e L

OS

…H

ello

VM

T!

TRA

NS

PO

RTA

TIO

N P

RO

JEC

TS

•F

aste

r deliv

ery

of

many

transport

ation

pro

jects

•B

ett

er

environm

enta

l outc

om

es

176

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

Su

sta

inab

ilit

y P

rog

ram

ENC

OU

RA

GE

SU

STA

INA

BLE

TR

AVE

L

177

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

Su

sta

inab

ilit

y P

rog

ram

Dev

elop

ing

a co

nsol

idat

ed

TDM

Too

lkit

W

ha

t ca

n

dev

elop

ers

do

Cre

atin

g

a S

F TD

M E

ffic

acy

Tool

H

ow

wel

l d

o t

he

mea

sure

s w

ork

Esta

blis

hing

Imp

lem

enta

tion

Str

ateg

y

M

easu

rin

g a

nd

enfo

rcin

g p

rog

ress

to

ensu

re g

oa

ls a

re

ach

ieve

d

SA

N F

RA

NC

ISC

O T

RA

NS

PO

RTA

TIO

N D

EMA

ND

MA

NA

GEM

ENT

(TD

M) P

RO

GR

AM

20 178

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

Su

sta

inab

ilit

y P

rog

ram

TRA

NS

PO

RTA

TIO

N D

EMA

ND

MA

NA

GEM

ENT

PO

TEN

TIA

L LE

GIS

LATI

ON

•V

MT

ra

tio

re

du

ctio

n g

oa

l

•D

evelo

pers

se

lect fr

om

a m

enu

of T

DM

s

•F

lexib

ility

•C

onsis

tency

•P

red

icta

bili

ty d

uri

ng

th

e e

ntitle

me

nt p

roce

ss

•T

he

City p

rovid

es t

echnic

al advis

orie

s t

o g

uid

e

the

TD

M s

ele

ctio

n p

roce

ss

•T

he

City m

onitors

and

en

forc

es im

ple

menta

tio

n

13

179

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

Su

sta

inab

ilit

y P

rog

ram

EXA

MP

LE O

F TR

AN

SP

OR

TATI

ON

DEM

AN

D

MA

NA

GM

ENT

(TD

M) M

ENU

•S

ub

sid

ize

Tra

nsit P

asse

s

•S

ub

sid

ize

Bik

e S

ha

re o

r C

ar

Sh

are

Me

mb

ers

hip

•H

ire

TD

M C

oo

rdin

ato

r

•S

hu

ttle

or

Va

np

oo

l S

erv

ice

•R

educe O

n-s

ite P

ark

ing S

upply

•P

rovid

e D

eliv

ery

Se

rvic

e

•S

po

nso

r B

ike

-sh

are

Sta

tio

ns

•C

om

mute

Reduction P

rogra

ms

•C

ha

rge

fo

r P

ark

ing

/Pa

rkin

g P

ricin

g

22 180

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

Su

sta

inab

ilit

y P

rog

ram

ENH

AN

CE

TRA

NS

PO

RTA

TIO

N

TO S

UP

PO

RT

GR

OW

TH

181

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

Su

sta

inab

ilit

y P

rog

ram

UR

GEN

T FU

ND

ING

NEE

D

16

TRAN

SPO

RTA

TIO

N TA

SK

FO

RC

E 2

03

0

182

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

Su

sta

inab

ilit

y P

rog

ram

INVE

STM

ENT

PR

IOR

ITIE

S

Fo

cu

s o

f n

ew

reven

ue

so

urc

es

req

uir

ing

vo

ter

ap

pro

val – e

xis

tin

g

resid

en

ts i

nvest

in

main

tain

ing

th

e c

ore

syste

m

Fo

cu

s o

f th

e

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

Su

sta

inab

ilit

y F

ee –

De

ve

lop

ers

pay t

he

ir f

air

sh

are

fo

r tr

an

sp

ort

ati

on

imp

acts

fro

m n

ew

tri

ps

MA

INT

AIN

TH

E

CO

RE

EN

HA

NC

E

SY

ST

EM

E

FF

ICIE

NC

Y

EX

PA

ND

C

AP

AC

ITY

17

TRAN

SPO

RTA

TIO

N TA

SK

FO

RC

E 2

03

0

183

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

Su

sta

inab

ilit

y P

rog

ram

TRA

NS

PO

RTA

TIO

N S

US

TAIN

AB

ILIT

Y FE

E

•C

ityw

ide

tra

nsp

ort

atio

n f

ee

to e

nsure

tha

t ne

w

develo

pm

en

t pays its

fair

share

for

impacts

on

the

tra

nsit s

yste

m

•R

epla

ces e

xis

tin

g T

IDF

and

expan

ds a

pp

lica

bili

ty to

inclu

de

mark

et-

rate

resid

entia

l develo

pm

ent

and

majo

r

institu

tio

ns

•N

exus a

nd

Fe

asib

ility

Stu

die

s u

nde

rway

18

184

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

Su

sta

inab

ilit

y P

rog

ram

EXP

END

ITU

RE

PLA

N: O

UTC

OM

ES

•M

ore

Mun

i bus

es a

nd tr

ains

•Fa

ster

and

mor

e re

liabl

e lo

cal t

rans

it

•Ro

omie

r an

d fa

ster

reg

iona

l tra

nsit

(e.g

. BAR

T, C

altr

ain)

•Sa

fer

wal

king

and

bic

yclin

g

19

185

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

Su

sta

inab

ilit

y P

rog

ram

NEX

T S

TEP

S

•F

ina

lize

th

e T

ech

nic

al A

na

lysis

•C

onfirm

Polic

y A

ppro

ach

•S

take

ho

lde

r O

utr

ea

ch

20

186

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

Su

sta

inab

ilit

y P

rog

ram

TSP

TIM

ELIN

E

SP

RIN

G

SU

MM

ER

FA

LL

WIN

TER

2015

Pub

lic O

utre

ach

Sta

te U

pgr

ades

Envi

ronm

enta

l

Rev

iew

Sta

ndar

d

Com

ple

te T

echn

ical

Wor

k

PU

BLI

C H

EA

RIN

G

Fee

Ord

inan

ce

Rei

ntro

duc

ed /

Ad

opte

d

PU

BLI

C H

EA

RIN

G

Sus

tain

able

Tra

vel L

egis

lati

on

Intr

oduc

ed /

Ad

opte

d

21

187

Tra

nsp

ort

ati

on

Su

sta

inab

ilit

y P

rog

ram

THAN

K Y

OU

ht

tp:/

/tsp

.sfp

lann

ing.

org

188