safety analysis of aircraft systems

12
Safety analysis of aircraft systems In aviation, safety is defined as the absence of accidents and incidents. JAR 25 treats systems as a whole. Acceptable accident rates must be established, 100% safety can never be guaranteed. A relationship must be established between severity of effect and probability of occurrence.

Upload: damita

Post on 25-Feb-2016

46 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Safety analysis of aircraft systems. In aviation, safety is defined as the absence of accidents and incidents. JAR 25 treats systems as a whole. Acceptable accident rates must be established, 100% safety can never be guaranteed. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Safety analysis of aircraft systems

Safety analysis of aircraft systems

• In aviation, safety is defined as the absence of accidents and incidents.

• JAR 25 treats systems as a whole.• Acceptable accident rates must be established,

100% safety can never be guaranteed.• A relationship must be established between

severity of effect and probability of occurrence.

Page 2: Safety analysis of aircraft systems

Probability versus severity of effect

Page 3: Safety analysis of aircraft systems

The principle of graceful degradation

• In any system the failure of a single element, component or connection should not prevent continued safe flight and landing.

• This single failure should also not lead to an unacceptable workload for the operating crew.

Page 4: Safety analysis of aircraft systems

Types of failure to be considered

• Single active failure• Passive and undetected (dormant) failures• Combinations of independent failures• Common-mode failures• Cascade failures• Failures produced by the environment

Page 5: Safety analysis of aircraft systems

Errors

• Design errors• Manufacturing errors• Maintenance errors• Pilot mismanagement• Errors in manuals or checklists

Page 6: Safety analysis of aircraft systems

Dormant failure

• Reverser is deployed!• Lauda Air B767 , 26-

5-1991• Design errors in the

thrust reverser electric systems led to unobserved deterioration of the HIV valve

Page 7: Safety analysis of aircraft systems

Common-mode failure• Whatever you do, keep

us away from the city!”• UA 232, 19-6-1989, Sioux

City, Iowa.• No. 2 engine fan disc

disintegration severed all 3 hydraulic lines in the tail area.

• Exceptional flying by the crew led to a landing at Sioux airport

Page 8: Safety analysis of aircraft systems

Cascade failure• THY 981, 3-7-1974,

Paris• Inadequately closed

lower deck door opened, causing floor collapse

• This blocked the flying control runs under the floor, causing catastrophic failure

Page 9: Safety analysis of aircraft systems

Failure rates in light single engined aircraft

• Engine failure. A minimum demonstrated flying speed must be 61 kts or below, to enable a succesful off-airport landing.

• Instrument systems for IFR operations must be dual and independent. Vacuum pump MTBF 700 hrs.

• Prevention of flap asymmetry must be adequate

Page 10: Safety analysis of aircraft systems

A few examples

• Cessna 172. Seat rails, flap system, elevator control

• Piper PA 28 wing attachment• Robinson R22 helicopter, mast bumping

Page 11: Safety analysis of aircraft systems

Current concerns for GA

• Inadequate training• Inadequate currency• Insufficient pilot ability• Lack of familiarity with the full flight

envelope• Inadequate understanding of increasingly

complex systems

Page 12: Safety analysis of aircraft systems