s truc t aero section idealization
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
1/46
Aerospace & Mechanical engineering
University of Lige
Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering
Aircraft structures
Section idealization
Ludovic Noels
LTAS-Milieux Continus et Thermomcanique
Chemin des Chevreuils 1, B4000 Lige
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
2/46
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
3/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 3
General expression for unsymmetrical beams
Stress
With
Curvature
In the principal axesIyz = 0
Euler-Bernoulli equation in the principal axis
forx in [0L]
BCs
Similar equations foruy
Pure bending: linear elasticity summary
x
z f(x) TzMxxuz =0
duz/dx =0 M>0
L
y
z
Mxx
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
4/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 4
General relationships
Two problems considered
Thick symmetrical section
Shear stresses are small compared to bending stresses ifh/L 0
L
h
L
L
h t
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
5/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 5
Shearing of symmetrical thick-section beams
Stress
With
Accurate only ifh > b
Energetically consistent averaged shear strain
with
Shear center on symmetry axes
Timoshenko equations
&
On [0L]:
Beam shearing: linear elasticity summary
h
z
y
z
b(z)
A*
h
x
z
Tz
x
Tz+ xTz x
max
x
z
x
y
y
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
6/462011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 6
Shearing of open thin-walled section beams
Shear flow
In the principal axes
Shear centerS
On symmetry axes
At walls intersection
Determined by momentum balance
Shear loads correspond to
Shear loads passing through the shear center &
Torque
Beam shearing: linear elasticity summary
x
z
y
Tz
Tz
Ty
Ty
y
z
S
Tz
TyCq
s
y
t
t
h
b
z
C
t
S
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
7/462011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 7
Shearing of closed thin-walled section beams
Shear flow
Open part (for anticlockwise ofq, s)
Constant twist part
The completely around integrals are related to the
closed part of the section, but if there are open parts,
their contributions have been taken in qo(s)
Beam shearing: linear elasticity summary
y
z
T
Tz
Ty
C
q
s
pds
dAh
y
z
T
Tz
Ty
C
qs
p
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
8/462011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 8
Shearing of closed thin-walled section beams
Warping around twist centerR
With
ux(0)=0 for symmetrical section if origin on
the symmetry axis
Shear centerS
Compute q for shear passing thought S
Use
With point S=T
Beam shearing: linear elasticity summary
y
z
T
Tz
Ty
C
qs
pds
dAh
y
z
S
Tz
C
q s
p ds
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
9/462011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 9
Torsion of symmetrical thick-section beams
Circular section
Rectangular section
Ifh >> b
&
Beam torsion: linear elasticity summary
z
y
C
Mx
r
0.229
0.246
2
0.281
0.282
4
1/30.2310.208
1/30.1960.141
1.51h/b
z
y
C
max Mx
b
h
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
10/462011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 10
Torsion of open thin-walled section beams
Approximated solution for twist rate Thin curved section
Rectangles
Warping ofs-axis
Beam torsion: linear elasticity summary
y
z
l2
t2
l1t1
l3
t3
t
z
y
C
Mx
t
ns
R
pR
us
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
11/46
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
12/462011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 12
Virtual displacement (see annex of beams for demonstrations)
In linear elasticity the general formula of virtual displacement reads
(1) is the stress distribution corresponding to a (unit) load P(1)
P
is the energetically conjugated displacement to P in the direction ofP(1) that
corresponds to the strain distribution
Example: bending of a semi cantilever beam
In the principal axes
Example: shearing of a semi-cantilever beam
Deflection of open and closed section beams
x
z Tz
uz =0
duz/dx =0 M>0
L
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
13/462011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 13
Example 2-spar wing (one cell)
Stringers to stiffen thin skins
Angle section form spar flanges
Design stages Conceptual
Define the plane configuration
Span, airfoil profile, weights,
Analyses should be fast and simple
Formula, statistics,
Preliminary design
Starting point: conceptual design Define more variables
Number of stringers, stringer area,
Analyses should remain fast and simple
Use beam idealization
See today
FE model of thin structures
See next lectures
Detailed design
All details should be considered (rivets, ) Most accurate analyses (3D, non-linear, FE)
Structural idealization
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
14/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 14
Principle of idealization
Booms
Stringers, spar flanges,
Have small sections compared to airfoil
Direct stress due to wing bending is
almost constant in each of these
They are replaced by concentrated areacalled booms
Booms
Have their centroid on the skin
Are carrying most direct stress due
to beam bending
Skin
Skin is essentially carrying shear stress
It can be assumed
That skin is carrying only shear stress
If direct stress carrying capacity of skin is
reported to booms by appropriate
modification of their area
Wing section idealization
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
15/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 15
Panel idealization
Skin panel
Thickness tD, width b
Carrying direct stress linearly distributed
Replaced by
Skin without thickness
2 booms of areaA1 andA2
Booms area depending on loading
Moment around boom 2
Total axial loading
Wing section idealization
tD
b
y
z
xxx1 xx
2
b
xx1
xx2
A1 A2
y
z
x
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
16/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 16
Example
2-cell box wing section
Simply symmetrical
Angle section of 300 mm2
Idealization of this section
to resist to bending moment?
Bending moment alongy-axis
6 direct-stress carrying
booms
Shear-stress-only carrying
skin panels
Wing section idealization
hl=0.4m
h
r=0.2m
la = 0.6 mlb = 0.6 m
tr= 2 mmtl = 3 mm tm = 2.5 mm
ta
= 2 mm
tb = 1.5 mm
hl=0.4m
hr
=0.2m
la = 0.6 mlb = 0.6 m
tr= 2 mmtl = 3 mm tm = 2.5 mm
ta = 2 mm tb = 1.5 mm
A1 A2 A3
A6
A5
A4
y
z
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
17/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 17
Booms area Bending moment
Alongy-axis
Stress proportional toz
stress distribution is
linear on each section edge
Contributions Flange(s) area
Reported skin parts
Use formula for linear distribution
Wing section idealization
hl=0.4m
hr
=0.2m
la = 0.6 mlb = 0.6 m
tr= 2 mmtl = 3 mm tm = 2.5 mm
ta = 2 mm tb = 1.5 mm
A1 A2 A3
A6A5
A4
y
z
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
18/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 18
Consequence on bending
Idealization depends on the loading case
Booms area are dependent on the loading case
Direct stress due to bending is carried by booms only
For bending the axial load is equal to zero
But direct stress depends on the distancez from neutral axis
It can be concluded that for open or closed sections, the position of the
neutral axis, and thus the second moments of area
Refer to the direct stress carrying area only
Depend on the loading case only
Section idealization consequences
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
19/46
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
20/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 20
Centroid
Of idealized section
Section idealization consequences
z8= 0.038 m
A1
= 640 mm2
y
z
C
y
z
O
A2 = 600 mm2
A3 = 600 mm2
A4 = 600 mm2
A5 = 620 mm2
A6 = 640 mm2
A7 = 640 mm2
A8 = 850 mm2
A9 = 640 mm2
z7
= 0.144 m
z6
= 0.336 m
z5 = 0.565 m
z4
= 0.768 m
z3
= 0.960 m
z2
= 1.14 m
z1
= 1.2 m
My
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
21/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 21
Second moment of area
Of idealized section
Section idealization consequences
z8= 0.038 m
A1
= 640 mm2
y
z
C
y
z
O
A2 = 600 mm2
A3 = 600 mm2
A4 = 600 mm2
A5 = 620 mm2
A6 = 640 mm2
A7 = 640 mm2
A8 = 850 mm2
A9 = 640 mm2
z7
= 0.144 m
z6
= 0.336 m
z5 = 0.565 m
z4
= 0.768 m
z3
= 0.960 m
z2
= 1.14 m
z1
= 1.2 m
My
S i id li i
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
22/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 22
Stress distribution
Stress assumed constant in each boom
As we are in the principal axes
Section idealization consequences
z8= 0.038 m
A1
= 640 mm2
y
z
C
y
z
O
A2 = 600 mm2
A3 = 600 mm2
A4 = 600 mm2
A5 = 620 mm2
A6 = 640 mm2
A7 = 640 mm2
A8 = 850 mm2
A9 = 640 mm2
z7
= 0.144 m
z6
= 0.336 m
z5 = 0.565 m
z4
= 0.768 m
z3
= 0.960 m
z2
= 1.14 m
z1
= 1.2 m
My
S ti id li ti
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
23/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 23
Consequence on open-thin-walled section shearing
Classical formula
Results from integration of balance
equation
With
So consequences are
Terms & should account for the direct
stress-carrying parts only (which is not the case of shear-carrying-only skin
panels)
Expression of the shear flux should be modified to account for discontinuities
encountered between booms and shear-carrying-only skin panels
Section idealization consequences
q + sq s
s
x
x
s
qq
q + xq x
s
s + ss s
xx + xxx x
xx
S ti id li ti
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
24/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 24
Consequence on open-thin-walled section shearing (2)
Equilibrium of a boom of an idealized section
Lecture on beam shearing
Direct stress reads
With &
Eventually
(no sum on i)
Section idealization consequences
Tzy
z
x
x
Ty
x
qi
qi+1qi
qi+1
xx+xxx
xx
y
z
x
qi
qi+1
S ti id li ti
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
25/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 25
Consequence on open-thin-walled section shearing (3)
Shear flow
Section idealization consequences
Tzy
z
x
x
Ty
S ti id li ti
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
26/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 26
Example
Idealized U shape
Booms of 300 mm2- area each
Booms are carrying all the direct stress
Skin panels are carrying all the shear flow
Shear load passes through the shear center
Shear flow?
Section idealization consequences
S
Tz = 4.8 kN
y
h
=0.4m
b =0.2 m
z
y
z
C
A1A2
A3 A4
S ti id li ti
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
27/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 27
Shear flow Simple symmetry principal axes
Only booms are carrying direct stress
Second moment of area
Shear flow
Section idealization consequences
S
Tz = 4.8 kN
y
h=0.4m
b = 0.2 m
z
y
z
C
A1A2
A3 A4
q
Section idealization consequences
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
28/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 28
Comparison with uniform U section We are actually capturing the average value in each branch
Section idealization consequences
S
Tz
y
h
b
z
y
z
C
A1A2
A3 A4
q
q
s
S
Tz
y
t
t
t
h
b
z
y
z
C
q
q
O
Section idealization consequences
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
29/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 29
Consequence on closed-thin-walled section shearing
Classical formula
With
And
for anticlockwise q and s
So consequences are the same as for open section
Section idealization consequences
Section idealization consequences
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
30/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 30
Example
Idealized wing section
Simply symmetrical
Booms are carrying all the direct stress
Skin panels are carrying all the shear flow
Shear load passes through booms 3 & 6
Shear flow?
Section idealization consequences
A1 = 200mm2
y
z
C y
z
O
A2 = 250 mm2
A5 =A4
bm = 0.24 m
Tz = 10 kN
A3 = 400 mm2
A4 = 100 mm2
A6 =A3A7 =A2
A8 =A1
br= 0.24 mbl = 0.12 m
hl = 0.1 m
hm
=
0.
2m
hr= 0.06 m
Section idealization consequences
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
31/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 31
Open part of shear flow
Symmetrical section
Shear center & centroid on Cy axis
Ixy = 0 (we are in the principal axes)
Only booms are carrying direct stress
Second moment of area
Section idealization consequences
A1 = 200mm2
y
z
C y
z
O
A2 = 250 mm2
A5 =A4
bm = 0.24 m
Tz = 10 kN
A3 = 400 mm2
A4 = 100 mm2
A6 =A3A7 =A2
A8 =A1
br= 0.24 mbl = 0.12 m
hl = 0.1 m
hm
=
0.
2m
hr= 0.06 m
Section idealization consequences
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
32/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 32
Open part of shear flow (2)
Choose (arbitrarily) the origin
between boom 2 and 3
Section idealization consequences
A1 = 200 mm2
y
z
C y
z
O
A2 = 250 mm2
A5 =A4
bm = 0.24 m
Tz = 10 kN
A3 = 400 mm2
A4 = 100 mm2
A6 =A3A7 =A2
A8 =A1
br= 0.24 mbl = 0.12 m
hl = 0.1 m
hm
=
0.
2m
hr= 0.06 m
s0
Section idealization consequences
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
33/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 33
Open part of shear flow (3)
Choose (arbitrarily) the origin between boom 2 and 3 (2)
Section idealization consequences
y
z
C y
z
O
2
bm = 0.24 m
-qo=28.9 kN.m-1
3
br= 0.24 mbl = 0.12 m
hl = 0.1 m
hm
=
0.
2m
hr= 0.06 m
4
5
6 7
8
1
-qo=32.5 kN.m-1
qo=18 kN.m-1
qo=22.4 kN.m-1
qo=18 kN.m-1
-qo=28.9 kN.m-1
Section idealization consequences
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
34/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 34
Constant part of shear flow
(anticlockwise s, q)
If origin is chosen at point O
With
&
Section idealization consequences
y
z
C y
z
O
2
bm = 0.24 m
-qo=28.9 kN.m-1
3
br= 0.24 mbl = 0.12 m
hl = 0.1 m
hm
=
0.
2m
hr= 0.06 m
4
5
6 7
8
1
-qo=32.5 kN.m-1
qo=18 kN.m-1
qo=22.4 kN.m-1
qo=18 kN.m-1
-qo=28.9 kN.m-1
Section idealization consequences
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
35/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 35
Constant part of shear flow (2)
Section idealization consequences
y
z
C y
z
O
2
bm = 0.24 m
-qo=28.9 kN.m-1
3
br= 0.24 mbl = 0.12 m
hl = 0.1 m
hm
=
0.2m
hr= 0.06 m
4
5
6 7
8
1
-qo=32.5 kN.m-1
qo=18 kN.m-1
qo=22.4 kN.m-1
qo=18 kN.m-1
-qo=28.9 kN.m-1
Section idealization consequences
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
36/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 36
Total shear flow
Section idealization consequences
y
z
C y
z
O
2
bm = 0.24 m
-qo=28.9 kN.m-1
3
br= 0.24 mbl = 0.12 m
hl = 0.1 m
hm
=
0.
2m
hr= 0.06 m
4
5
6 7
8
1
-qo=32.5 kN.m-1
qo=18 kN.m-1
qo=22.4 kN.m-1
qo=18 kN.m-1
-qo=28.9 kN.m-1
y
z
C y
z
O
2-q=34.2 kN.m-1
3
4
5
6 7
8
1
-q=37.8 kN.m-1
q=12.7 kN.m-1
q=17.1 kN.m-1
q=12.7 kN.m-1
-q=34.2 kN.m-1
-q=5.3 kN.m-1
-q=5.3 kN.
m-1
Section idealization consequences
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
37/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 37
Consequence on torsion
If no axial constraint
Torsion analysis does not involve axial stress
So torsion is unaffected by the structural idealization
Section idealization consequences
Exercise: Structural idealization
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
38/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 38
Exercise: Structural idealization
Box section
Arrangement of
Direct stress carrying booms positioned at the four corners and
Panels which are assumed to carry only shear stresses
Constant shear modulus
Shear centre?10 mm
10 mm
8 mm
10 mm
300 mm
500 mm
Angles50 x 40 x 8 mm
Angles
60 x 50 x 10 mm
References
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
39/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 39
References
Lecture notes
Aircraft Structures for engineering students, T. H. G. Megson, Butterworth-
Heinemann, An imprint of Elsevier Science, 2003, ISBN 0 340 70588 4
Other references
Books
Mcanique des matriaux, C. Massonet & S. Cescotto, De boek Universit, 1994,ISBN 2-8041-2021-X
Exercise: Structural idealization
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
40/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 40
Exercise: Structural idealization
As shear center lies on Oy by symmetry we considerTZ Section is required to resist bending moments in a vertical plane
Direct stress at any point is directly proportional to the distance from the
horizontal axis of symmetry, i.e. axis y
The distribution of direct stress in all the panels will be linear so that we can
use the relation below
In addition to contributions from adjacent panels, booms areas include the
existing spar flanges
b
xx1
xx2
A1 A2
y
z
x
21
34
300 mm
500 mm
yS
Tz
yT
z
O
Exercise: Structural idealization
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
41/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 41
Exercise: Structural idealization
Booms area
By symmetry
A3 =A2 = 3540 mm2
A4 =A1 = 4000 mm2
10 mm
10 mm
8 mm
10 mm
300 mm
500 mm
Angles50 x 40 x 8 mm
Angles
60 x 50 x 10 mm
21
34
300 mm
500 mm
yS
Tz
yT
z
O
Exercise: Structural idealization
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
42/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 42
Exercise: Structural idealization
Shear flow
Booms area
A3 =A2 = 3540 mm2
A4 =A1 = 4000 mm2
By symmetryIyz = 0
As only booms resist direct stress
21
34
300 mm
500 mm
yS
Tz
yT
z
O
Exercise: Structural idealization
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
43/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 43
e c se S uc u a dea a o
Open shear flow
21
34
300 mm
500 mm
yS
Tz
yT
z
O>0
s
Exercise: Structural idealization
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
44/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 44
Constant shear flow
Load through the shear center
no torsion
With
and
21
34
300 mm
500 mm
yS
Tz
yT
z
O
>0
s
-1.77 x 10-3 Tz 1.57 x 10-3 Tz
Exercise: Structural idealization
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
45/46
2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 45
Total shear flow
21
34
300 mm
500 mm
yS
Tz
yT
z
O>0
s
-1.77 x 10-3 Tz 1.57 x 10-3 Tz
21
34
300 mm
500 mm
yS
Tz
yT
z
O>0
-0.034 x 10-3 Tz
-0.034 x 10-3 Tz
1.536 x 10-3 Tz-1.804 x 10-3 Tz
Exercise: Structural idealization
-
7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization
46/46
Shear center
Moment around O
Due to shear flow
Should be balanced by the external loads
21
34
300 mm
500 mm
yS
Tz
yT
z
O>0
-0.034 x 10-3 Tz
-0.034 x 10-3 Tz
1.536 x 10-3 Tz-1.804 x 10-3 Tz