s truc t aero section idealization

Upload: dhayalanr

Post on 05-Apr-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    1/46

    Aerospace & Mechanical engineering

    University of Lige

    Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering

    Aircraft structures

    Section idealization

    Ludovic Noels

    LTAS-Milieux Continus et Thermomcanique

    Chemin des Chevreuils 1, B4000 Lige

    [email protected]

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    2/46

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    3/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 3

    General expression for unsymmetrical beams

    Stress

    With

    Curvature

    In the principal axesIyz = 0

    Euler-Bernoulli equation in the principal axis

    forx in [0L]

    BCs

    Similar equations foruy

    Pure bending: linear elasticity summary

    x

    z f(x) TzMxxuz =0

    duz/dx =0 M>0

    L

    y

    z

    Mxx

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    4/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 4

    General relationships

    Two problems considered

    Thick symmetrical section

    Shear stresses are small compared to bending stresses ifh/L 0

    L

    h

    L

    L

    h t

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    5/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 5

    Shearing of symmetrical thick-section beams

    Stress

    With

    Accurate only ifh > b

    Energetically consistent averaged shear strain

    with

    Shear center on symmetry axes

    Timoshenko equations

    &

    On [0L]:

    Beam shearing: linear elasticity summary

    h

    z

    y

    z

    b(z)

    A*

    h

    x

    z

    Tz

    x

    Tz+ xTz x

    max

    x

    z

    x

    y

    y

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    6/462011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 6

    Shearing of open thin-walled section beams

    Shear flow

    In the principal axes

    Shear centerS

    On symmetry axes

    At walls intersection

    Determined by momentum balance

    Shear loads correspond to

    Shear loads passing through the shear center &

    Torque

    Beam shearing: linear elasticity summary

    x

    z

    y

    Tz

    Tz

    Ty

    Ty

    y

    z

    S

    Tz

    TyCq

    s

    y

    t

    t

    h

    b

    z

    C

    t

    S

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    7/462011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 7

    Shearing of closed thin-walled section beams

    Shear flow

    Open part (for anticlockwise ofq, s)

    Constant twist part

    The completely around integrals are related to the

    closed part of the section, but if there are open parts,

    their contributions have been taken in qo(s)

    Beam shearing: linear elasticity summary

    y

    z

    T

    Tz

    Ty

    C

    q

    s

    pds

    dAh

    y

    z

    T

    Tz

    Ty

    C

    qs

    p

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    8/462011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 8

    Shearing of closed thin-walled section beams

    Warping around twist centerR

    With

    ux(0)=0 for symmetrical section if origin on

    the symmetry axis

    Shear centerS

    Compute q for shear passing thought S

    Use

    With point S=T

    Beam shearing: linear elasticity summary

    y

    z

    T

    Tz

    Ty

    C

    qs

    pds

    dAh

    y

    z

    S

    Tz

    C

    q s

    p ds

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    9/462011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 9

    Torsion of symmetrical thick-section beams

    Circular section

    Rectangular section

    Ifh >> b

    &

    Beam torsion: linear elasticity summary

    z

    y

    C

    Mx

    r

    0.229

    0.246

    2

    0.281

    0.282

    4

    1/30.2310.208

    1/30.1960.141

    1.51h/b

    z

    y

    C

    max Mx

    b

    h

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    10/462011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 10

    Torsion of open thin-walled section beams

    Approximated solution for twist rate Thin curved section

    Rectangles

    Warping ofs-axis

    Beam torsion: linear elasticity summary

    y

    z

    l2

    t2

    l1t1

    l3

    t3

    t

    z

    y

    C

    Mx

    t

    ns

    R

    pR

    us

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    11/46

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    12/462011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 12

    Virtual displacement (see annex of beams for demonstrations)

    In linear elasticity the general formula of virtual displacement reads

    (1) is the stress distribution corresponding to a (unit) load P(1)

    P

    is the energetically conjugated displacement to P in the direction ofP(1) that

    corresponds to the strain distribution

    Example: bending of a semi cantilever beam

    In the principal axes

    Example: shearing of a semi-cantilever beam

    Deflection of open and closed section beams

    x

    z Tz

    uz =0

    duz/dx =0 M>0

    L

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    13/462011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 13

    Example 2-spar wing (one cell)

    Stringers to stiffen thin skins

    Angle section form spar flanges

    Design stages Conceptual

    Define the plane configuration

    Span, airfoil profile, weights,

    Analyses should be fast and simple

    Formula, statistics,

    Preliminary design

    Starting point: conceptual design Define more variables

    Number of stringers, stringer area,

    Analyses should remain fast and simple

    Use beam idealization

    See today

    FE model of thin structures

    See next lectures

    Detailed design

    All details should be considered (rivets, ) Most accurate analyses (3D, non-linear, FE)

    Structural idealization

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    14/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 14

    Principle of idealization

    Booms

    Stringers, spar flanges,

    Have small sections compared to airfoil

    Direct stress due to wing bending is

    almost constant in each of these

    They are replaced by concentrated areacalled booms

    Booms

    Have their centroid on the skin

    Are carrying most direct stress due

    to beam bending

    Skin

    Skin is essentially carrying shear stress

    It can be assumed

    That skin is carrying only shear stress

    If direct stress carrying capacity of skin is

    reported to booms by appropriate

    modification of their area

    Wing section idealization

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    15/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 15

    Panel idealization

    Skin panel

    Thickness tD, width b

    Carrying direct stress linearly distributed

    Replaced by

    Skin without thickness

    2 booms of areaA1 andA2

    Booms area depending on loading

    Moment around boom 2

    Total axial loading

    Wing section idealization

    tD

    b

    y

    z

    xxx1 xx

    2

    b

    xx1

    xx2

    A1 A2

    y

    z

    x

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    16/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 16

    Example

    2-cell box wing section

    Simply symmetrical

    Angle section of 300 mm2

    Idealization of this section

    to resist to bending moment?

    Bending moment alongy-axis

    6 direct-stress carrying

    booms

    Shear-stress-only carrying

    skin panels

    Wing section idealization

    hl=0.4m

    h

    r=0.2m

    la = 0.6 mlb = 0.6 m

    tr= 2 mmtl = 3 mm tm = 2.5 mm

    ta

    = 2 mm

    tb = 1.5 mm

    hl=0.4m

    hr

    =0.2m

    la = 0.6 mlb = 0.6 m

    tr= 2 mmtl = 3 mm tm = 2.5 mm

    ta = 2 mm tb = 1.5 mm

    A1 A2 A3

    A6

    A5

    A4

    y

    z

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    17/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 17

    Booms area Bending moment

    Alongy-axis

    Stress proportional toz

    stress distribution is

    linear on each section edge

    Contributions Flange(s) area

    Reported skin parts

    Use formula for linear distribution

    Wing section idealization

    hl=0.4m

    hr

    =0.2m

    la = 0.6 mlb = 0.6 m

    tr= 2 mmtl = 3 mm tm = 2.5 mm

    ta = 2 mm tb = 1.5 mm

    A1 A2 A3

    A6A5

    A4

    y

    z

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    18/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 18

    Consequence on bending

    Idealization depends on the loading case

    Booms area are dependent on the loading case

    Direct stress due to bending is carried by booms only

    For bending the axial load is equal to zero

    But direct stress depends on the distancez from neutral axis

    It can be concluded that for open or closed sections, the position of the

    neutral axis, and thus the second moments of area

    Refer to the direct stress carrying area only

    Depend on the loading case only

    Section idealization consequences

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    19/46

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    20/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 20

    Centroid

    Of idealized section

    Section idealization consequences

    z8= 0.038 m

    A1

    = 640 mm2

    y

    z

    C

    y

    z

    O

    A2 = 600 mm2

    A3 = 600 mm2

    A4 = 600 mm2

    A5 = 620 mm2

    A6 = 640 mm2

    A7 = 640 mm2

    A8 = 850 mm2

    A9 = 640 mm2

    z7

    = 0.144 m

    z6

    = 0.336 m

    z5 = 0.565 m

    z4

    = 0.768 m

    z3

    = 0.960 m

    z2

    = 1.14 m

    z1

    = 1.2 m

    My

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    21/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 21

    Second moment of area

    Of idealized section

    Section idealization consequences

    z8= 0.038 m

    A1

    = 640 mm2

    y

    z

    C

    y

    z

    O

    A2 = 600 mm2

    A3 = 600 mm2

    A4 = 600 mm2

    A5 = 620 mm2

    A6 = 640 mm2

    A7 = 640 mm2

    A8 = 850 mm2

    A9 = 640 mm2

    z7

    = 0.144 m

    z6

    = 0.336 m

    z5 = 0.565 m

    z4

    = 0.768 m

    z3

    = 0.960 m

    z2

    = 1.14 m

    z1

    = 1.2 m

    My

    S i id li i

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    22/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 22

    Stress distribution

    Stress assumed constant in each boom

    As we are in the principal axes

    Section idealization consequences

    z8= 0.038 m

    A1

    = 640 mm2

    y

    z

    C

    y

    z

    O

    A2 = 600 mm2

    A3 = 600 mm2

    A4 = 600 mm2

    A5 = 620 mm2

    A6 = 640 mm2

    A7 = 640 mm2

    A8 = 850 mm2

    A9 = 640 mm2

    z7

    = 0.144 m

    z6

    = 0.336 m

    z5 = 0.565 m

    z4

    = 0.768 m

    z3

    = 0.960 m

    z2

    = 1.14 m

    z1

    = 1.2 m

    My

    S ti id li ti

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    23/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 23

    Consequence on open-thin-walled section shearing

    Classical formula

    Results from integration of balance

    equation

    With

    So consequences are

    Terms & should account for the direct

    stress-carrying parts only (which is not the case of shear-carrying-only skin

    panels)

    Expression of the shear flux should be modified to account for discontinuities

    encountered between booms and shear-carrying-only skin panels

    Section idealization consequences

    q + sq s

    s

    x

    x

    s

    qq

    q + xq x

    s

    s + ss s

    xx + xxx x

    xx

    S ti id li ti

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    24/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 24

    Consequence on open-thin-walled section shearing (2)

    Equilibrium of a boom of an idealized section

    Lecture on beam shearing

    Direct stress reads

    With &

    Eventually

    (no sum on i)

    Section idealization consequences

    Tzy

    z

    x

    x

    Ty

    x

    qi

    qi+1qi

    qi+1

    xx+xxx

    xx

    y

    z

    x

    qi

    qi+1

    S ti id li ti

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    25/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 25

    Consequence on open-thin-walled section shearing (3)

    Shear flow

    Section idealization consequences

    Tzy

    z

    x

    x

    Ty

    S ti id li ti

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    26/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 26

    Example

    Idealized U shape

    Booms of 300 mm2- area each

    Booms are carrying all the direct stress

    Skin panels are carrying all the shear flow

    Shear load passes through the shear center

    Shear flow?

    Section idealization consequences

    S

    Tz = 4.8 kN

    y

    h

    =0.4m

    b =0.2 m

    z

    y

    z

    C

    A1A2

    A3 A4

    S ti id li ti

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    27/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 27

    Shear flow Simple symmetry principal axes

    Only booms are carrying direct stress

    Second moment of area

    Shear flow

    Section idealization consequences

    S

    Tz = 4.8 kN

    y

    h=0.4m

    b = 0.2 m

    z

    y

    z

    C

    A1A2

    A3 A4

    q

    Section idealization consequences

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    28/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 28

    Comparison with uniform U section We are actually capturing the average value in each branch

    Section idealization consequences

    S

    Tz

    y

    h

    b

    z

    y

    z

    C

    A1A2

    A3 A4

    q

    q

    s

    S

    Tz

    y

    t

    t

    t

    h

    b

    z

    y

    z

    C

    q

    q

    O

    Section idealization consequences

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    29/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 29

    Consequence on closed-thin-walled section shearing

    Classical formula

    With

    And

    for anticlockwise q and s

    So consequences are the same as for open section

    Section idealization consequences

    Section idealization consequences

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    30/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 30

    Example

    Idealized wing section

    Simply symmetrical

    Booms are carrying all the direct stress

    Skin panels are carrying all the shear flow

    Shear load passes through booms 3 & 6

    Shear flow?

    Section idealization consequences

    A1 = 200mm2

    y

    z

    C y

    z

    O

    A2 = 250 mm2

    A5 =A4

    bm = 0.24 m

    Tz = 10 kN

    A3 = 400 mm2

    A4 = 100 mm2

    A6 =A3A7 =A2

    A8 =A1

    br= 0.24 mbl = 0.12 m

    hl = 0.1 m

    hm

    =

    0.

    2m

    hr= 0.06 m

    Section idealization consequences

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    31/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 31

    Open part of shear flow

    Symmetrical section

    Shear center & centroid on Cy axis

    Ixy = 0 (we are in the principal axes)

    Only booms are carrying direct stress

    Second moment of area

    Section idealization consequences

    A1 = 200mm2

    y

    z

    C y

    z

    O

    A2 = 250 mm2

    A5 =A4

    bm = 0.24 m

    Tz = 10 kN

    A3 = 400 mm2

    A4 = 100 mm2

    A6 =A3A7 =A2

    A8 =A1

    br= 0.24 mbl = 0.12 m

    hl = 0.1 m

    hm

    =

    0.

    2m

    hr= 0.06 m

    Section idealization consequences

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    32/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 32

    Open part of shear flow (2)

    Choose (arbitrarily) the origin

    between boom 2 and 3

    Section idealization consequences

    A1 = 200 mm2

    y

    z

    C y

    z

    O

    A2 = 250 mm2

    A5 =A4

    bm = 0.24 m

    Tz = 10 kN

    A3 = 400 mm2

    A4 = 100 mm2

    A6 =A3A7 =A2

    A8 =A1

    br= 0.24 mbl = 0.12 m

    hl = 0.1 m

    hm

    =

    0.

    2m

    hr= 0.06 m

    s0

    Section idealization consequences

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    33/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 33

    Open part of shear flow (3)

    Choose (arbitrarily) the origin between boom 2 and 3 (2)

    Section idealization consequences

    y

    z

    C y

    z

    O

    2

    bm = 0.24 m

    -qo=28.9 kN.m-1

    3

    br= 0.24 mbl = 0.12 m

    hl = 0.1 m

    hm

    =

    0.

    2m

    hr= 0.06 m

    4

    5

    6 7

    8

    1

    -qo=32.5 kN.m-1

    qo=18 kN.m-1

    qo=22.4 kN.m-1

    qo=18 kN.m-1

    -qo=28.9 kN.m-1

    Section idealization consequences

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    34/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 34

    Constant part of shear flow

    (anticlockwise s, q)

    If origin is chosen at point O

    With

    &

    Section idealization consequences

    y

    z

    C y

    z

    O

    2

    bm = 0.24 m

    -qo=28.9 kN.m-1

    3

    br= 0.24 mbl = 0.12 m

    hl = 0.1 m

    hm

    =

    0.

    2m

    hr= 0.06 m

    4

    5

    6 7

    8

    1

    -qo=32.5 kN.m-1

    qo=18 kN.m-1

    qo=22.4 kN.m-1

    qo=18 kN.m-1

    -qo=28.9 kN.m-1

    Section idealization consequences

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    35/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 35

    Constant part of shear flow (2)

    Section idealization consequences

    y

    z

    C y

    z

    O

    2

    bm = 0.24 m

    -qo=28.9 kN.m-1

    3

    br= 0.24 mbl = 0.12 m

    hl = 0.1 m

    hm

    =

    0.2m

    hr= 0.06 m

    4

    5

    6 7

    8

    1

    -qo=32.5 kN.m-1

    qo=18 kN.m-1

    qo=22.4 kN.m-1

    qo=18 kN.m-1

    -qo=28.9 kN.m-1

    Section idealization consequences

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    36/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 36

    Total shear flow

    Section idealization consequences

    y

    z

    C y

    z

    O

    2

    bm = 0.24 m

    -qo=28.9 kN.m-1

    3

    br= 0.24 mbl = 0.12 m

    hl = 0.1 m

    hm

    =

    0.

    2m

    hr= 0.06 m

    4

    5

    6 7

    8

    1

    -qo=32.5 kN.m-1

    qo=18 kN.m-1

    qo=22.4 kN.m-1

    qo=18 kN.m-1

    -qo=28.9 kN.m-1

    y

    z

    C y

    z

    O

    2-q=34.2 kN.m-1

    3

    4

    5

    6 7

    8

    1

    -q=37.8 kN.m-1

    q=12.7 kN.m-1

    q=17.1 kN.m-1

    q=12.7 kN.m-1

    -q=34.2 kN.m-1

    -q=5.3 kN.m-1

    -q=5.3 kN.

    m-1

    Section idealization consequences

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    37/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 37

    Consequence on torsion

    If no axial constraint

    Torsion analysis does not involve axial stress

    So torsion is unaffected by the structural idealization

    Section idealization consequences

    Exercise: Structural idealization

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    38/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 38

    Exercise: Structural idealization

    Box section

    Arrangement of

    Direct stress carrying booms positioned at the four corners and

    Panels which are assumed to carry only shear stresses

    Constant shear modulus

    Shear centre?10 mm

    10 mm

    8 mm

    10 mm

    300 mm

    500 mm

    Angles50 x 40 x 8 mm

    Angles

    60 x 50 x 10 mm

    References

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    39/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 39

    References

    Lecture notes

    Aircraft Structures for engineering students, T. H. G. Megson, Butterworth-

    Heinemann, An imprint of Elsevier Science, 2003, ISBN 0 340 70588 4

    Other references

    Books

    Mcanique des matriaux, C. Massonet & S. Cescotto, De boek Universit, 1994,ISBN 2-8041-2021-X

    Exercise: Structural idealization

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    40/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 40

    Exercise: Structural idealization

    As shear center lies on Oy by symmetry we considerTZ Section is required to resist bending moments in a vertical plane

    Direct stress at any point is directly proportional to the distance from the

    horizontal axis of symmetry, i.e. axis y

    The distribution of direct stress in all the panels will be linear so that we can

    use the relation below

    In addition to contributions from adjacent panels, booms areas include the

    existing spar flanges

    b

    xx1

    xx2

    A1 A2

    y

    z

    x

    21

    34

    300 mm

    500 mm

    yS

    Tz

    yT

    z

    O

    Exercise: Structural idealization

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    41/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 41

    Exercise: Structural idealization

    Booms area

    By symmetry

    A3 =A2 = 3540 mm2

    A4 =A1 = 4000 mm2

    10 mm

    10 mm

    8 mm

    10 mm

    300 mm

    500 mm

    Angles50 x 40 x 8 mm

    Angles

    60 x 50 x 10 mm

    21

    34

    300 mm

    500 mm

    yS

    Tz

    yT

    z

    O

    Exercise: Structural idealization

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    42/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 42

    Exercise: Structural idealization

    Shear flow

    Booms area

    A3 =A2 = 3540 mm2

    A4 =A1 = 4000 mm2

    By symmetryIyz = 0

    As only booms resist direct stress

    21

    34

    300 mm

    500 mm

    yS

    Tz

    yT

    z

    O

    Exercise: Structural idealization

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    43/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 43

    e c se S uc u a dea a o

    Open shear flow

    21

    34

    300 mm

    500 mm

    yS

    Tz

    yT

    z

    O>0

    s

    Exercise: Structural idealization

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    44/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 44

    Constant shear flow

    Load through the shear center

    no torsion

    With

    and

    21

    34

    300 mm

    500 mm

    yS

    Tz

    yT

    z

    O

    >0

    s

    -1.77 x 10-3 Tz 1.57 x 10-3 Tz

    Exercise: Structural idealization

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    45/46

    2011-2012 Aircraft structures: Section Idealization 45

    Total shear flow

    21

    34

    300 mm

    500 mm

    yS

    Tz

    yT

    z

    O>0

    s

    -1.77 x 10-3 Tz 1.57 x 10-3 Tz

    21

    34

    300 mm

    500 mm

    yS

    Tz

    yT

    z

    O>0

    -0.034 x 10-3 Tz

    -0.034 x 10-3 Tz

    1.536 x 10-3 Tz-1.804 x 10-3 Tz

    Exercise: Structural idealization

  • 7/31/2019 s Truc t Aero Section Idealization

    46/46

    Shear center

    Moment around O

    Due to shear flow

    Should be balanced by the external loads

    21

    34

    300 mm

    500 mm

    yS

    Tz

    yT

    z

    O>0

    -0.034 x 10-3 Tz

    -0.034 x 10-3 Tz

    1.536 x 10-3 Tz-1.804 x 10-3 Tz