ryan luke johns portfolio 2005-2009 · 1 projector 2 central material bin (4) 3 retractable touch...
TRANSCRIPT
RYAN LUKE JOHNSPORTFOLIO 2005-2009
Roving Library Unit 5
Chinatown Branch Library 13
Bike Share Station 25
Mid-Block Refuge 39
Fondue Abstraction 47
Vision Construction 55
Lerner Hall Study 67
Wallas 73
Putt-Putt Partition 79
Fabricated Chair 83
Electronics 87
Brother 93
Drawings + Collage 99
Model Construction/Craft 109
The Grand [Run] 119
NAME: RYAN LUKE JOHNSBORN: 8/16/1987, Hong KongSEX: MHEIGHT: 5’9”WEIGHT: 137 lbsEYES: BRN
EDUCATION: Columbia CollegeBachelor of Arts 2009Honors in ArchitectureMajor: ArchitectureConcentration: MathematicsMajor GPA 3.9 GPA 3.6
WORK EXPERIENCE: INTERN
Diller Scofi dio + RenfroMay-August 2008Tasks include model construction, material research, on-site assembly, 3D modelling, rendering
Kohn Pederson Fox Associates, May-August 2007Tasks include model construction, Photoshop renderings, Rhino modelling, CAD drafting
RANCH HANDOver 10 summers of work experience on family owned ranch. 11 hour workdays, 6 days per week. Tasks include home and barn construction (all stages), log, stone, and wire fencing, haying (alfalfa), processing of cattle, and installation of irrigation systems
SKILLS: Adobe Creative Suite, AutoCAD, Rhino, Processing, Arduino, Maya, Solidworks, MS Offi ce, Model Construction, Hand Drafting, Circuitry, Drawing, Printmaking, Collage, Italian (intermediate), French, German (basic)2 3RYAN LUKE JOHNS
Portfolio | 2005-2008 Contents
The Roving Library Unit explores the dual functionality of a library: that of providing information and that of collecting information (GIVE vs. GATHER). It takes the retrieval of information into its own hands, while simultaneously providing a greater amount of easily accessible information to its users. It is both bookmobile and briefcase laboratory.
It combines the tactile solidity of books with the fl uid intangibility of digital media. It is both boulder and balloon (information=helium).
It understands the role of the library in collecting/cataloguing/containing local life: by recording the everyman and by recognizing his everyword, it shall become a mechanized outlet of emotion in a city of emotionless mechanisms. It will encourage a new voyeurism–capturing in turn a greater girth of information on the psychology of Manhattanites.
It will gather as much media as possible: just as man’s capabilities in storing information have increased,
stone→paper→books→ … →kilobyte→megabyte→gigabyte→terabyte
so must he expand the genres/amounts of data which he is willing to collect:
basic rules→great events→political policy→census data→daily news/temperature→ … →EVERYTHING
Information is everywhere. It must be gathered on site.Information is needed everywhere. It must be given where it is wanted.
5ROVING LIBRARY UNITStudio: Design II | Critic: Janette Kim | Spring 2008
6 7ROVING LIBRARY UNITStudio: Design II | Critic: Janette Kim | Spring 2008
ROVING LIBRARY UNITStudio: Design II | Critic: Janette Kim | Spring 2008
8 9ROVING LIBRARY UNITStudio: Design II | Critic: Janette Kim | Spring 2008
ROVING LIBRARY UNITStudio: Design II | Critic: Janette Kim | Spring 2008
1 Projector2 Central material bin (4)3 Retractable touch keyboard4 Camera armature5 Collection armature6 Small sample collection armature7 Tread with embedded sensors8 Structural frame9 Variable-opacity glass membrane
10 Door11 Interior camera12 Photovoltaic collectors13 Seat14 Headrest15 Back View (“Gather”)16 Sliding armature portal17 Antenna18 Hinged material bin cover19 Digital data storage and processing unit20 Fluid storage containers
21 Battery unit22 Sample view from camera23 View from interior (variable opacity glass)24 Means of movement diagram25 Inner wheel26 Electric motor27 Sliding weights28 Tilt (turning) diagram29 Front View (“Give”)30 Satellite View
11ROVING LIBRARY UNITStudio: Design II | Critic: Janette Kim | Spring 2008
As with the Roving Library Unit, the Chinatown Branch Library recognizes that as texts become increasingly digitized, the library must revive its necessity by supplementing this textual information with that that cannot be accessed digitally—the information of objects. In curating and combining written information with that of informative objects, the library enables a kind of research unobtainable via private PC.
In the search for information, scales shift from large to small as the desired material is pinpointed. Each stage presents its own information as we index and re-index from city block to paragraph. An enormous amount of information is parsed in order to obtain a specifi c piece of knowledge: information is not merely found in the result, but exists everywhere in the search. The Chinatown Branch Library suggests this universality of knowledge by paralleling its containers of information with its containers of program and in turn, the city.
13CHINATOWN BRANCH LIBRARYStudio: Design II | Critic: Karen Fairbanks | Spring 2008
14 15CHINATOWN BRANCH LIBRARYStudio: Design II | Critic: Karen Fairbanks | Spring 2008
CHINATOWN BRANCH LIBRARYStudio: Design II | Critic: Karen Fairbanks | Spring 2008
CITY
LIBRARY INDEX
INDEX AREA
STACK SHELF
SITE
BOOK INDEX PAGE LINE
(map)
(catalogue)
(contents)
The site is examined in the context of its surroundings in a fl ash video (made in collaboration with Alyssa Yee, Gabriel Schama and Aanya Chugh). The video examines the rapid evolution and reprogramming of interstitial spaces in Chinatown through the lens of a game of Tetris.
Changes in Scale and the Search for Information: Indexing and Re-indexing
INITIAL PROGRAM CONSIDERATIONS:
NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY Program Net SFAdult Collection/Seating 1,000Young Adult Collection/Seating 2,000Children’s Collection/Seating 1,000Computer Access Area(s) 1,000Media 500Meeting Room 500Non-Public Work Area(s) 750Staff Offi ces 500LIBRARY PROGRAM AREA 8,000
CENTER FOR URBAN PEDAGOGYProgram Net SF Gallery/Presentation 750Archive 500Meeting/Work Rooms 1,000Training Workstations 600Editing Rooms 300Equipment Loan/Storage 500Staff Offi ces 500CUP PROGRAM AREA 4,150
Additional Considerations: Delivery, Restrooms,Information, Outdoor Programs
1716 CHINATOWN BRANCH LIBRARYStudio: Design II | Critic: Karen Fairbanks | Spring 2008
CHINATOWN BRANCH LIBRARYStudio: Design II | Critic: Karen Fairbanks | Spring 2008
In this branch of the New York Public Library, information is categorized and organized into eleven-inch cubes by commissioned experts, authors and artists. These cubes contain not only textual information, but a diverse range of hand-selected media which most precisely conveys their subject. The design and concept of the Chinatown Branch Library is presented as one of these cubes.
18 19CHINATOWN BRANCH LIBRARYStudio: Design II | Critic: Karen Fairbanks | Spring 2008
CHINATOWN BRANCH LIBRARYStudio: Design II | Critic: Karen Fairbanks | Spring 2008
1/8” Scale Model
Opposite: View from Eldridge St; Program Blocks Become Signage
20 21CHINATOWN BRANCH LIBRARYStudio: Design II | Critic: Karen Fairbanks | Spring 2008
CHINATOWN BRANCH LIBRARYStudio: Design II | Critic: Karen Fairbanks | Spring 2008
Roof Plan Level 5 Level 4
Level 1
Basement
Level 2Level 3
OUTDOORSTAFF OFFICES TRAINING
MEETING2
EDIT 1
EDIT 2
LOAN / STORAGE
OUTDOOR LIBRARY STAFFCHILDREN
ARCHIVE MEETING 1
OUTDOOR
YOUNG ADULT
OUTDOORPUBLICMEET
TEENSTUDY
COMP. ADULT BOOTH
OUTDOOR GALLERY LOAD
PROCESSING AND STORAGEWC
WC
COPY
2322 CHINATOWN BRANCH LIBRARYStudio: Design II | Critic: Karen Fairbanks | Spring 2008
CHINATOWN BRANCH LIBRARYStudio: Design II | Critic: Karen Fairbanks | Spring 2008
This project calls for a central hub of a NYC bike-share program, situated on a new pier off of Riverside Park between 72nd and 79th street on the west side of Manhattan.
The site is surrounded by lingering elements of its industrial past—ruined and rusting loading docks are scattered upon the water, while traces of the old railway are strewn upon the land. In a way, it is the environmental impact of these past industries which has mandated the necessity of a bike-share program.
The users of the station are inspired to understand the signifi cance of the site—its layered history, its placement upon the waterfront, and its position on the periphery of Manhattan.
Just as the use of the park has developed with roots within the rich soil of its historic surroundings, so are the functions of the station anchored and burrowed within these layers. The layered landscape of the proposed bike station rolls like waves away from the city—expanding outwards as New Yorkers pour their spatial needs upon the periphery.
25BIKE SHARE STATIONStudio: Design I | Critic: Bill Arbizu | Fall 2007
1800
2007
1885
SITE MAPHighlights land expansion, accessible bike routes (blue), and historical use.
26 BIKE SHARE STATION: SITE ANALYSISStudio: Design I | Critic: Bill Arbizu | Fall 2007
A fl ash video (made in collaboration with Alex Cook and Daniella Zalcman) explores the rich historical development of the site. Examining both the site’s industrial past and the changing cycling community which it fosters, it emphasizes the interesting and often awkward overlap of new developments with the lingering layers of the past.
2928 BIKE SHARE STATIONStudio: Design I | Critic: Bill Arbizu | Fall 2007
BIKE SHARE STATIONStudio: Design I | Critic: Bill Arbizu | Fall 2007
Model Sections
30 31BIKE SHARE STATIONStudio: Design I | Critic: Bill Arbizu | Fall 2007
BIKE SHARE STATIONStudio: Design I | Critic: Bill Arbizu | Fall 2007
Section I
Section II
North Elevation
West ElevationEast Elevation
Plans
32 33BIKE SHARE STATIONStudio: Design I | Critic: Bill Arbizu | Fall 2007
BIKE SHARE STATIONStudio: Design I | Critic: Bill Arbizu | Fall 2007
In order to remain useful during inclement weather, the bicycle racks serve the secondary function of an enclosed space for stationary-bike riding. A retractable enclosure is lifted using the pedal-power of the rider, allowing the space to be converted instantaneously. When the user stops pedaling, the cover retracts and the bicycle becomes available once more.
Rainy Day Rendering
Opposite: Retractable enclosure diagram and model
35BIKE SHARE STATIONStudio: Design I | Critic: Bill Arbizu | Fall 200734 BIKE SHARE STATION
Studio: Design I | Critic: Bill Arbizu | Fall 2007
Whereas public piers often engage the waterfront by directing the user’s gaze outwards, the bike station encourages the user to look upon the city—causing him to recognize his position of periphery.
Below: View from Southwest
Opposite: View from East End of Pier
36 37BIKE SHARE STATIONStudio: Design I | Critic: Bill Arbizu | Fall 2007
BIKE SHARE STATIONStudio: Design I | Critic: Bill Arbizu | Fall 2007
The desire for “escape” is often felt within the mechanized repetition of a monotonous metropolis—in seeking refuge/relaxation/recovery, city citizens attempt to temporarily remove themselves from the urban environment: they hide themselves in artifi cial shrubberies or travel across the bridges at the city’s periphery to seek an area which has not yet been tarnished by the urban sprawl.
Escape from the metropolitan machine, however, is not only attained beyond the urban fringe: the most effi cient getaway is one which can be attained instantaneously, within the walls of the city. This relaxation is gained by perceiving one’s own stationary position relative to the ceaseless fl ow of the city: It is resting within an eddy as a raging river goes by. It is stopping for conversation or walking against the grain within a massive crowd. It is watching people run about their daily lives while sitting within the confi nes of a comfortable café. It is schadenfreude.
The Mid-Block Refuge creates an instant retreat within the city—it is a shell of safety within a torrential metropolis. While its walls provide a sense of solitude, this protection is drawn from the chaos of the surrounding city.
39MID-BLOCK REFUGEStudio: Design I | Critic: David Smiley | Fall 2007
Sec
tion
Dev
elop
men
t
p. 31
A Break in the City Individuals Among the Masses An Eddy in the Metropolitan Flow
CONCEPT SKETCHES
41MID-BLOCK REFUGEStudio: Design I | Critic: David Smiley | Fall 2007
Concept Comparisons
Plan Section
Roof Plan
40 MID-BLOCK REFUGEStudio: Design I | Critic: David Smiley | Fall 2007
Rendered Section
Below: Exterior View from North (Right)
View from Interior (Left)
Panel Development (3 views x 3 stages)
42 MID-BLOCK REFUGEStudio: Design I | Critic: David Smiley | Fall 2007
Piezoelectric Tile
One-way Glass
Photovoltaic Panel
Piezoelectric tiles harness the energy of the bustling metropolis during the day, providing power for an illuminated haven at night.
44 45MID-BLOCK REFUGEStudio: Design I | Critic: David Smiley | Fall 2007
MID-BLOCK REFUGEStudio: Design I | Critic: David Smiley | Fall 2007
In architectural practice, it is often impossible to transfer idea into building instantaneously; rather, that idea must be converted through several mediums before it is able to exist in its fi nal physical condition. In order to ensure a lossless conversion process, it is essential that this procedure is practiced and refi ned.
The fondue abstraction is a practice in this procedure, evolving as follows:
preparation/cooking process (fondue)→photography→photo-manipulation/collage→line→vector fi eld→model
Each stage of this evolution deals with the act of mixing and combining, recognizing that any process of food preparation is not a fi nite event: things have been mixed before you purchased them, and they will be remixed internally once you have consumed them.
In converting this concept through several means of representation, this “continual mixing” principle was not lost before reaching its fi nal state as model, but rather, was enriched by the multiple mediums through which it passed.
47FONDUE ABSTRACTIONStudio: Abstraction | Critic: Monica Tiulescu | Spring 2007
Drawings and Photocollage: Mixing/Remixing/Cooking/Combining (Fondue)
Vector Diagram
48 FONDUE ABSTRACTIONStudio: Abstraction | Critic: Monica Tiulescu | Spring 2007
Collage Line Drawing
51FONDUE ABSTRACTIONStudio: Abstraction | Critic: Monica Tiulescu | Spring 2007
MIXING + REMIXING{INFINITE CONTINUITY}
Model Perspective and Section Drawings
Opposite: Fondue Abstraction Model
52 53FONDUE ABSTRACTIONStudio: Abstraction | Critic: Monica Tiulescu | Spring 2007
FONDUE ABSTRACTIONStudio: Abstraction | Critic: Monica Tiulescu | Spring 2007
The Vision Construction is an exploration of vision through the appendages, and the effect of this alteration upon our perception. It proposes an evolution of the human body—an inner gutter system which transports the eyes to new sockets in the extremities.
The model seeks to understand the effects of having the eyes in two completely different areas at the same time—testing whether this vision would heighten our perception, or if instead, the effects of our inner parallax would render these images incomprehensible. The model creates, through a series of angled mirrors, the impression of sight through the hand in the left eye while maintaining regular vision in the right. An electronic motor system allows the user to see in multiple directions through the hand (posterior, lateral, and inferior) by redirecting the path of light with a change of mirror angles.
55VISION CONSTRUCTIONStudio: Perception | Critic: Madeline Schwartzman | Fall 2006
57VISION CONSTRUCTIONStudio: Perception | Critic: Madeline Schwartzman | Fall 200656 VISION CONSTRUCTION
Studio: Perception | Critic: Madeline Schwartzman | Fall 2006
59VISION CONSTRUCTIONStudio: Perception | Critic: Madeline Schwartzman | Fall 200658 VISION CONSTRUCTION
Studio: Perception | Critic: Madeline Schwartzman | Fall 2006
6160 VISION CONSTRUCTIONStudio: Perception | Critic: Madeline Schwartzman | Fall 2006
VISION CONSTRUCTIONStudio: Perception | Critic: Madeline Schwartzman | Fall 2006
62 63VISION CONSTRUCTIONStudio: Perception | Critic: Madeline Schwartzman | Fall 2006
VISION CONSTRUCTIONStudio: Perception | Critic: Madeline Schwartzman | Fall 2006
65VISION CONSTRUCTIONStudio: Perception | Critic: Madeline Schwartzman | Fall 200664 VISION CONSTRUCTION
Studio: Perception | Critic: Madeline Schwartzman | Fall 2006
In studying Bernard Tschumi’s Lerner Hall, an interpretation of “vectors” is unavoidable. Our perception of this vector-space is rendered two-dimensional by the large, fl at façade of the building. As the ramps run parallel to the curtain wall, and the student mail services run along these ramps, the façade assumes the role of screen, presenting student activity as an ant-farm of sorts.
In this space, the head-on crisscrossing of paths becomes much more likely, and likewise, more apparent. The interaction of individuals in this two dimensional realm therefore becomes dependant upon the time period in which these paths are traced.
This project traces the paths of eleven individuals through the space, in terms of the two spatial dimensions (X, Y) apparent in the façade, over a four hour period.
In this study, we begin to see that the interaction of individuals within the hall is much less dependant upon intersections in standard 3-space (X, Y, Z), but derives, rather, its value from its placement in a system dependant upon time (X, Y, TIME).
67LERNER HALL STUDYStudio: Perception | Critic: Madeline Schwartzman | Fall 2006
Path Models (extracted from collage)Collage illustrates the paths of 11 individuals through Lerner Hall over a 4 hour time period.
69LERNER HALL STUDYStudio: Perception | Critic: Madeline Schwartzman | Fall 200668 LERNER HALL STUDY
Studio: Perception | Critic: Madeline Schwartzman | Fall 2006
→→→
TIMEY
X
The model compresses the paths of the eleven individuals presented in the collage into one space-time display. Colored squares and thread key these paths with the collage, indicating which individual is represented, and when their path began in the four-hour time-spectrum.
→→ TIME
Y
→→ X
Y
70 71LERNER HALL STUDYStudio: Perception | Critic: Madeline Schwartzman | Fall 2006
LERNER HALL STUDYStudio: Perception | Critic: Madeline Schwartzman | Fall 2006
“He walks on and gradually unrolls the uninterrupted ribbon of his own passage, not a series of irrational, unrelated images, but a smooth band where each element immediately takes its place in the web, even the most fortuitous, even those that might at fi rst seem absurd or threatening or anachronistic or deceptive; they all fall into place in good order, one beside the other and the ribbon extends without fl aw or excess”
-Excerpt from Alain Robbe-Grillet’s The Erasers
Everything is connected. Our own existence is entirely dependent upon the infi nite web in which we are emeshed; we are nothing without our surroundings. This is the world of Wallas, the protagonist of Alain Robbe-Grillet’s The Erasers–his existence is composed of fragmented memories and strands of interconnected information. The text itself is bound together with words that thread and tie themselves throughout its pages. Textually, Wallas holds a central role in the massive conglomerate of ideas which is the story. He is defi ned by the linked ideas which surround him, and when these pieces are pulled away or rearranged “his existence loses shape.”
73WALLASStudio: Perception | Critic: Madeline Schwartzman | Fall 2006
TEXT SAMPLES
“His existence loses its shape.”
74 WALLASStudio: Perception | Critic: Madeline Schwartzman | Fall 2006
WALLASStudio: Perception | Critic: Madeline Schwartzman | Fall 2006
}MOST→LEASTFROM CENTER
WORD FREQUENCYLINKS TO OTHER WORDS
77
The traditional folding partition has two functions:
1. Divide/Conceal (Unfolded)2. Open/Reveal (Folded)
The latter function however, is simply a position of neutrality—were the wall not to exist, the room would remain “open.” The Putt-Putt Partition seeks to break the neutrality of the “open” function: rather than simply opening the space, it encourages social exchange. By becoming a surface for putt-putt golf, it functions in opposition to the idea of “division,” actively bringing the room together. By using found objects as obstacles for the game and roommates as players, the wall becomes a gravitational center for the room, depolarizing both object and individual.
79PUTT-PUTT PARTITIONPartner: Christopher Macies | Summer 2006
Stand for Privacy Down for PlayFold for Storage
80 81PUTT-PUTT PARTITIONPartner: Christopher Macies | Summer 2006
PUTT-PUTT PARTITIONPartner: Christopher Macies | Summer 2006
As an introduction to CNC milling, a two-week / three-session workshop was offered by the Columbia Architecture department in collaboration with Tietz-Baccon Fabrication. The result was the following transformable laminate chair. Designed and produced with Alex Cook and Doreen Lam.
83FABRICATED CHAIRCritic: Hye-Young Chung | Fall 2008
84 FABRICATED CHAIRCritic: Hye-Young Chung | Fall 2008
Above: Potential Uses / Chair designers
(Doreen Lam, Ryan Johns, Alex Cook)
Right: 3/4” Scale CNC Milling Plan (x4)
Opposite: Chair Arrangements
85FABRICATED CHAIRCritic: Hye-Young Chung | Fall 2008
Electronic Development : Architectural Design
Both forms of development involve an untangling of plans and a manipulation of path. In both realms, one must consider the desired function of a project and effi ciently direct an internal energy (electrical/human) to achieve this purpose.
The following projects are examples of electronic design, and in turn, displays of architectural understanding.
87ELECTRONICS2005-2006
“Ryan’s mod is just beautiful.”
“The most badass ipod case ever.”
.com-
.com-
HOLD INDICATOR LED
VOLUME UP
SEEK FORWARD
SEEK BACK
HOLD SWITCH
VOLUME KNOB
PREVIOUS TRACK
NEXT TRACK
VOLUME DOWN
PLAY/PAUSE
SPEAKER
The iBoy is an iPod case with an internal dock connector—allowing the user to control the iPod with the buttons of an outdated Game Boy. Complete with a functioning speaker, hold switch, and headphone port, the iBoy is a user-friendly theft-deterrent.
88 89iBOYFunctional iPod Disguise | Spring 2006
iBOYFunctional iPod Disguise | Spring 2006
Designed for the 2005 Olympia HS Parade of Nerds, this “Calculus Hat” displays the graph of the sphere X²+Y²+(Z-5.25)²=12.25 and the parabola Z=(-1/4)Y²+12.5.The elliptic parabaloid Z=(-1/4)Y²+(-1/4)²+12.5 is drawn via light path by the motorized rotation of the LED illuminated parabola about the Z-axis.
CALCULUS HATCritic: Jan Stuckey | Spring 200590 91CALCULUS HAT
Critic: Jan Stuckey | Spring 2005
As many humans look towards the fantasies of science fi ction they often forget the magic of the everyday object. They constantly disregard and discard the obsolete as they struggle to own the most recent technology.
Brother encourages a revision of this philosophy. Part obsolete-electronics and part science fi ction, he is a re-engineered electronic typewriter that can understand and respond to human speech. Internally overhauled and programmed with Processing, brother utilizes speech recognition and an AI response database to hold complex conversation. You speak, he types.
93brotherStudio: Independent Study | Critic: Karen Fairbanks | Spring 2009
brotherStudio: Independent Study | Critic: Karen Fairbanks | Spring 200994 95brother
Studio: Independent Study | Critic: Karen Fairbanks | Spring 2009
brotherStudio: Independent Study | Critic: Karen Fairbanks | Spring 200996 97brother
Studio: Independent Study | Critic: Karen Fairbanks | Spring 2009
Arduino
Switchboard Circuit
TypewriterCircuit
TypedResponse
Microphone Speech Recognition
ResponseDatabase
Application
Processing Code
With the increasing ease and availability of digital design mediums, the importance of hand as tool is often neglected. The hand, however, has an inseverable alliance with human perception and imagina-tion—it is the most honest and expedient means of channeling spatial fi gures and imagined ideas onto a two-dimensional surface. Unbiased by binary decryption, it is an essential element in the true translation of imagination.
99DRAWING + COLLAGE2006 - 2008
Above: Drypoint Stg. 1
Below: Zinc Plate
101Abstract CollagesStudio: Basic Drawing | Critic: Thomas White | Spring 2006100 Drypoint, Etching, Aquatint
Studio: Intro to Printmaking | Critic: Jomar Statkun | Spring 2008
103AUTOPSY IN THREAD (Thread, Ink, Pencil, Tea on Canvas)Studio: Basic Drawing | Critic: Thomas White | Spring 2006
105VICE WALLPAPER (Tricolor Woodblock Print)Studio: Intro to Printmaking | Critic: Jomar Statkun | Spring 2008
106 107Watercolor, Pencil / Collage / Charcoal2007
Charcoal, PencilStudio: Basic Drawing | Critic: Thomas White | Spring 2006
Buildings must fi rst exist in the form of dollhouse. It is only in this manner that we can play out our architectural fancies in their entirety before they are converted from imagination to reality. Without the aided decryption provided by good modelling, this conversion process results in a massive loss of information.
Craft and intricacy in building fi nds its roots in the intricate craft of transferring ideas into models.
The following models were built during summer internships at Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates and Diller Scofi dio + Renfro.
109MODEL CONSTRUCTION/CRAFTInternships | 2007-2008
111X3-2 BASE MODELKPF Internship | Summer 2007110 X3-2 BASE MODEL
KPF Internship | Summer 2007
113112 X3-2 UPPER MODELKPF Internship | Summer 2007
X3-2 UPPER MODEL: SOLAR STUDIESKPF Internship | Summer 2007
Foam topography carved by lofting between laser-cut sections at 1” intervals
Model surfaced in fi berglass with voids for laminated terraces
Painted model with inset terraces and program elements
From Top Right: Material/form studies, Fitting of laminated terrace elements, Model split for shipping, Cutting templates before surfacing with fi berglass, Hand-carved/painted plexiglass component, Material Samples, Filling Seams, Studies in surfacing options, Examining the fl exibility of the laser-cut mesh
114 115TAEKWONDO PARK MODELDS+R Internship | Summer 2008
TAEKWONDO PARK MODELDS+R Internship | Summer 2008
116 117TAEKWONDO PARK MODELDS+R Internship | Summer 2008
TAEKWONDO PARK MODELDS+R Internship | Summer 2008
Upon my graduation in May 2009, I began a 2,542-mile adapted version of the classical Grand Tour.
Combining my passion for architecture with my love of distance running, I ran from Amsterdam to Athens over the course of 130 days. Extensive planning went into the trip, and the end route brought me through 7 countries: the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Germany, Switzerland, Italy and Greece. I averaged 20 miles per day.
The objectives of the trip were multifold: to see and experience art and architecture fi rsthand; to perceive distances on a human scale; to expose myself to new cultures; to improve my abilities in French, German and Italian; and to test my own limitations.
Over the course of the trip I obeyed two simple rules: maintain an unbroken line on foot, and never pay for a place to sleep. In this way I was able to see each destination for what it really was and learn about local life by entering the homes of the complete strangers who offered me hospitality.
During the trip, I updated a daily online journal of my experiences which was followed consistently by a thousand readers. The story was featured in several newspapers and radio interviews, including the Italian “l’Unità” and “Ecoradio.”
More information on my journey can be found online at:www.ryanlukejohns.com/runseurope
119THE GRAND [RUN]May-September 2009
Opposite: Screenshots from the website made for the run – 1. An embedded interactive map allows people to explore the route and points of interest. 2. Daily blog featured geotagged photos, mileage totals and a description of each day’s events, including the search for a place to sleep. The blog held a thousand followers. 3. Route diagram identifi es the 7 countries and the largest city passed through in each.
Above: Day Fifty-Five, Running between Zug and Altdorf, Switzerland. A 54.8 Kilometer day.
1
2
3
120 121THE GRAND [RUN]May-September 2009
THE GRAND [RUN]May-September 2009
Above: Shirt with silkscreened route enabled me to quickly explain myself to potential hosts during the run
Left: Silkscreened “Thank You” Postcards
Opposite: Selected photos from the runShipping & Transport College, Rotterdam, NetherlandsAmiens Cathedral, Amiens, FranceVilla Savoye, Poissy, FranceView from the Tour Eiffel, Paris, FranceChâteau de Blandy-les-Tours, Blandy-les-Tours, FranceNotre Dame du Haut, Ronchamp, FranceETH-Dfab Studio, Zurich, SwitzerlandS. Maria degli Angeli, Monte Tamaro, SwitzerlandLeaning Tower, Pisa, ItalyDome of St. Peter’s Basilica, Vatican CityTempio di Nettuno, Paestum, ItalySassi, Matera, ItalyMeteora, Kalambaka, GreeceParthenon, Athens, GreecePanathinaiko Stadium, Athens, Greece
122 123THE GRAND [RUN]May-September 2009
THE GRAND [RUN]May-September 2009
RYAN LUKE [email protected] 6 0 . 4 0 2 . 7 5 3 3www.ryanlukejohns.com