russian steel remain cautious as costs take centre stage

Upload: dinnur-galikhanov

Post on 06-Apr-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    1/38

    DINNURGALIKHANOV+7(495)2130338

    [email protected]

    ILYAMAKAROV+7(495)7779090ext.2644

    [email protected]

    Note:Pricesasofclose15Feb2011throughoutthereport.Localsharedataisforinformationonlyandwas

    calculatedusingeachcompanyscommonshare/GDRratioandprevailing USD/RUBexchangerate

    Forprofessionalinvestorsonly.Thisdocumenthasnotbeenpreparedinaccordancewithlegal

    requirementsdesignedtopromotetheindependenceofinvestmentresearch. Pleaserefertoimportant

    disclosuresandanalystcertificationattheendofthis document

    WeraiseourtargetpricesforRussiansteelmakersEvraz,MMK,SeverstalandNLMKto

    reflectstrengthening

    steel

    prices.

    However,

    we

    advocate

    aselective

    approach

    to

    stock

    pickingin2011astheindustrycontinuestofaceanumberofchallengeswhichwe

    believearenotyetreflectedinmarketforecasts.

    Figure1:Russiansteelheadingforanotherrollercoasterridein2011?

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    200

    Oct09

    Nov09

    Dec09

    Feb10

    Mar10

    May10

    Jun10

    Aug10

    Sep10

    Nov10

    Dec10

    Feb11

    Rus s i ansteelmakersharepriceindexRus s i ansteel priceindex

    Willwesee the boombustpatternof2010repeatingitselfin 2011?

    The2010correctionma yhavebeenlinkedtoEUdebtworries

    Source:Bloomberg,MetalExpert

    Coststakecentrestagein2011.Webelievecostpressureswillriseaslabour,energy

    andotherexpensesaddtorawmaterialpricehikes.Wedoubtthecurrenteconomic

    environmentwouldallowforcoststobefullypassedontocustomers,sosteelmakers

    mayhavetoabsorbsomeoftheburden,tothedetrimentoftheirmargins.

    Assteelpricessoftenmarginsmaybedepressedfurther.Januarysawasharpincrease

    insteelprices,bothdomesticallyandinexportmarkets.Webelievethatpartofthe

    increasewasduetorestockingandmaynotbesustainable.Therearealsosignsthatend

    customersmaynotbereadytoacceptsubstantiallyhighersteelpriceswhenfacedwith

    uncertaintyintheirownmarkets.Lackofrealdemandmayleadtoasteelprice

    correctionin2011,depressingsteelmakersmarginsfurther.

    Wemayseefurthervolatilityinsteelnamesasmarketexpectationsadjust.Current

    marketforecastsforRussiansteelmakers2011financialsassumemarginimprovement

    vs2010.Thismaybethecaseassteelpricesstrengthenovertheyear.However,ascost

    pressuresbecomemoreapparent,wemayseeexpectationsreducedleadingto

    downgradesinfairvaluecalculationsforsteelstocks.

    WACCadjustedtoreflectlowercostofequity,forecastingperiodextendedto2016.As

    aresultofa50bptsreductioninourcountryspecificequityriskpremiumourbasecost

    ofequityhasbeencutto11.7%.CompanyspecificWACCshavebeenadjustedfurtherto

    reflecttheirliquidity,debtloadandcurrentcostofdebt.

    RemainbullishonRussiansteel,butfocusonnameswithshorttermvaluetriggers.

    WeexpectRussiansteelperformancetobecloselycorrelatedwithsteelpricesand

    companiesabilitytoprotecttheirmargins.Werecommendfocusingonnameswith

    shorttermvaluetriggersasweexpectthemtooutperformtheirpeers.Severstal

    (reiterateBUY)mayseeanimprovedperformanceintheUS,whileNLMK(upgradeto

    BUY)couldbenefitfromacquiringtheremainingDufercoJVstake.MMKs(reiterate

    BUY)performancecouldbedrivenbyagrowingshareofHVAproductsinitssalesmix.

    Evraz(downgradetoHOLD)maynotseethefullbenefitofincreasedconstruction

    activityinRussiauntil2012.

    EQUITYRESEARCH

    METALS&MINING

    17February2011

    RUSSIAN STEELMAKERSRemain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    3Mstock,indexandsteelperformance

    0 % 10% 2 0% 30% 40 %

    MMKGDR

    BBGIron/SteelCo

    Index

    Baosteel

    NLMKGDR

    RTSIndex

    ArcelorMittal

    SBBHRCTracker

    SBBRebarTracker

    EvrazGDR

    SeverstalGDR

    Mechel ADR

    Source:Bloomberga

    Company

    Target

    price

    ($/share)

    Potential

    upside

    (%)

    Rating

    (old)

    Rating

    (new)

    EvrazGroup 42.30 10.7% BUY HOLD

    MMK 16.20 17.2% BUY BUY

    NLMK 49.40 13.6% HOLD BUY

    Severstal 22.10 24.9% BUY BUY

    YtDstock,indexandsteelperformance

    10% 0% 10% 20%

    NLMKGDR

    MMKGDR

    BBGIron/SteelCo

    Index

    ArcelorMittal

    SeverstalGDR

    RTSIndex

    EvrazGDR

    MechelADR

    BaosteelSBB

    Rebar

    Tracker

    SBBHRCTracker

    Source:Bloomberga

    Sector target value $84.3bn

    Potential upside 16%

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    2/38

    2

    Contents

    InvestmentCase...........................................................................................3CostsStarttoTakeCentreStage.................................................................................3WedonotyetSeeCostPressuresReflectedin2011MarketForecasts.................... 5

    RussianSteel

    Valuations

    Premiums

    to

    Global

    Peers

    Still

    Justified................10

    SummaryDataforSteelStocksunderCoverage ...........................................12PriceForecastsUpgradedduetoStrongGainsinRecentMonths................15

    CompanyPages..........................................................................................19EVRAZGROUP ............................................................................................21

    ForecastChangesandValuation............................................................................... 21

    FinancialAccounts..................................................................................................... 22

    MAGNITOGORSKIRONANDSTEEL...............................................................24ForecastChangesandValuation............................................................................... 25

    FinancialAccounts..................................................................................................... 26

    NOVOLIPETSKSTEEL ...................................................................................28ForecastChangesandValuation............................................................................... 29

    FinancialAccounts..................................................................................................... 30

    SEVERSTAL .................................................................................................32USBusinessmayHoldtheKeyto2010MarginExpansion....................................... 33

    ForecastChangesandValuation............................................................................... 34

    FinancialAccounts..................................................................................................... 35

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    3/38

    3

    Investment Case

    Russiansteelstockshaveenjoyedastrongrunfollowingthecorrectionofmid2010.The

    gainshavebeensupportedbyagradualrecoveryindemandandpricesandencouraging

    Russianeconomicdata.However,weareincreasinglywaryofgrowingcostpressures

    andthefragilestateofrealdemandwhichcouldmakeitdifficultforsteelmakersto

    protecttheirmarginsin2011,letalonerecordgrowthatthelevelsachievedin2010.

    AshighlightedinourJan2011issueofStratonomics,weremainfundamentallybullish

    ontheRussiansteelsectorduetotheeconomicrecovery,appreciatingsteelpricesand

    steelmakershighdegreeofverticalintegration.However,weareconcernedthatrecent

    steelpriceincreases,drivenbycostinflationandseasonalrestocking,areunsustainable

    inthemediumtermduetothelackofsupportfromrealdemand.Atthesametime,raw

    materialcostpressures,exacerbatedbyrisingenergyandlabourcosts,continueto

    depressmargins.

    Russiassteelmakerscurrentsharepricesmaynotfullyreflectthechallengesthe

    industryisstillfacing.Russiansteelstockshaveperformedstronglysincethe

    publicationofourreportRoundupYourFlats,ShortWaitforLongs(25Oct2010),gaininganaverageof35%beforeacorrectionattheendofJanuary.Whiletheoverall

    gainsinsharepriceswerebroadlyinlinewithourexpectations(apartfromNLMKwhich,

    despiteourHOLDrating,gainedaround45%,reachingapeakof$51.30/GDRon4Jan),

    thepaceofsharepriceappreciationhassurpassedourexpectations.

    Althoughsomeofthesharepricemovementcouldbeexplainedbytherapidgainsin

    steelpricesattheendof2010andthebeginningof2011,aswellasencouragingdata

    onRussiaseconomicdevelopment,wethinkthisexuberancemaybeunfoundedgiven

    thattheindustrystillfacesanumberoftoughchallenges.

    CostsStarttoTakeCentreStage

    Rapidrawmaterialcostrisescamebackintofocusin2H10

    Thefirst

    half

    of

    2010

    was

    a

    period

    of

    continued

    improvement

    in

    margins

    for

    Russian

    steelmakersasgrowingproductionvolumesandstrengtheningsteelpricesoffsetrising

    rawmaterialcosts.Steelmakerswerealsoquitesuccessfulinkeepingnonrawmaterial

    costsundertightcontrol,ascanbeseenfromFigures2and3,whichdepictcompanies

    withahighdegreeofverticalintegrationEvrazandSeverstal.

    Figure2:EvrazCashcostsandEBITDAmarginprogression Figure3:Severstal*CashcostsandEBITDAmarginprogression

    37.1% 34.7% 38.2%

    16.7%15.6%

    16.6%

    36.2%34.6% 27.1%

    10.1% 15.0% 18.1%

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    1H09 2H09 1H10

    Material Cos ts Energy+Labour

    Cash SG&Aa nd othe r EBITDA

    36.0% 36.5% 35.2% 42.4%

    18.6% 19.2%

    16.9%

    14.0%

    24.1% 18.5%19.1%

    19.0%

    21.3% 25.8% 28.9% 24.6%

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    2009 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10

    Material Cos ts Energy+Labour

    CashSG&Aan dother EBITDA

    *Note:abovefiguresareforRussianSteelandSeverstalResources

    Source:Companydata,Atonestimates

    Meanwhile,Figures4and5showthemarginprogressionfortwocompanieswitha

    lowerdegreeofverticalintegrationMMKandNLMK.

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    4/38

    4

    Figure4:MMKCashcostsandEBITDAmarginprogression Figure5:NLMKCashcostsandEBITDAmarginprogression

    43.9% 43.7% 47.6% 51.4%

    15.6% 17.3% 13.7%14.3%

    15.3% 17.0% 17.6%15.4%

    25.3% 22.0% 21.1% 18.9%

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    2009 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10

    Material Cos ts Energy+Labour

    Cash SG&Aa nd othe r EBITDA

    27.4% 34.5% 33.7%35.1%

    16.7%20.3% 16.1% 15.9%

    26.8%22.4%

    14.2% 17.9%

    29.1% 22.7% 35.9% 31.1%

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    4Q09 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10

    Material Cos ts Energy+Labour

    CashSG&Aan dother EBITDA

    Source:Companydata,Atonestimates

    Inthesecondhalfof2010severalfactorstookaturnfortheworseforsteelcompanies,

    notjustinRussia,butglobally:

    Demandforsteelfaltered,leadingtosharppricecorrections Steel

    companies

    were

    forced

    to

    cut

    output

    to

    bring

    it

    in

    line

    with

    demand

    Pressurefromrawmaterialcostscontinuedtoincrease

    ThecombinationofthesefactorsledtomargindeteriorationforallRussiansteelmakers

    in3Q10,ascanbeseeninFigures25.

    WhileRussiansteelmakershavenotyetpublishedtheir4Q10financials,guidance

    providedbycompaniesduringrecentannouncementsofoperatingresultshintsata

    furthermargindeclineinthelastquarterof2010.

    Forinstance,Evrazs4Q10operatingresultshighlightedacontinuousincreaseinraw

    materialprices,exacerbatedbyrisinglabourandenergycosts.Consequently,despite

    strongerthan

    expected

    output

    and

    price

    realisations

    during

    the

    quarter,

    its

    4Q10

    EBITDAguidanceremainedunchangedfromtheprevioustradingupdate.NLMKhasalso

    indicatedthatits4Q10EBITDAmarginshouldbearound25%,significantlydownfrom

    the30%achievedin3Q10,partlyduetosteelpriceweaknessattheendoftheyear,but

    mainlyasaresultofgrowingcosts,inourview.

    Costinflationspreadstononrawmaterialcostsin2011

    While2H10costincreasesweredrivenprimarilybyrawmaterials,in2011,weestimate

    thatpricesforlabour,transportation,utilitiesandenergywillaccountforagrowing

    portionofcashcosts.

    AccordingtodatafromRussiasMinistryofEconomicDevelopment(MED),thecountrys

    electricitytariffs

    for

    industrial

    users

    are

    estimated

    to

    have

    risen

    by

    18%

    YoY

    in

    2010,

    with1316%increasesexpectedin2011.Theincreaseinwholesalenaturalgaspricesin

    2010wasevengreater,currentlyestimatedat26.7%YoY,while2011willlikelysee

    pricesrisinganother15%andthisisjustfortheregulatedmarket.Finally,rail

    transportationtariffsgained9.4%in2010andareexpectedtorise8%in2011(see

    Figure6).

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    5/38

    5

    Figure6:Tariffsonnaturalmonopolies(%increaseYoY)

    2008 2009 2010E 2011E 2012E

    Electricity:regulatedandunregulatedtariffsforallusers(excluding generalpublic) 22.4%* 20.0% 18.0% 1316% 1113%

    Naturalgas:regulatedpricesforallusers(excludinggeneralpublic) 25.0% 15.9% 26.7% 15.0% 15.0%

    Railfreighttransportation(annualaverages) 16.3% 12.4% 12.4% 8.0% 7.4%

    *includesgeneralpublic

    Source:RussianMinistryofEconomicDevelopment

    Inaddition,weanticipatesteelmakerslabourcostsrisingatleastinlinewithdomestic

    inflation.AccordingtopreliminaryMEDestimates,inflationtotalled8.8%in2010andis

    expectedtoreach78%in2011.However,giventhatRussiansteelcompanieskept

    labourcostsundertightcontrolduringthecrisis,theactualincreasescouldbeeven

    higher,inourview.

    Forexample,accordingtotheRussianindustryjournalMetalSupplyandSales(Metallosnabzhenie iSbyt),ZapSiboneofEvrazssteelproductionunitsinRussiarecentlyheldanemployeeconferencewhereacollectiveagreementfor201112was

    finalised.Itwasagreedthataveragesalarieswouldincreaseby7%from1Mar2011and

    byanother7%from1Oct2011anincreaseofover14%fortheyear.Weexpectother

    Russiansteelmakerstoagreetosimilarlabourcostincreasesfor2011.

    Roublestrengthmayaddtocostpressures

    AshighlightedinourrecentreportTimetoStartAppreciatingtheRouble(21Dec2010),theRussiancurrencyisstronglycorrelatedtotheoilprice.Basedonourmodels,an

    averageoilpriceof$79/bblfor2011(AtonOilandGasteamestimate)wouldimplythe

    rouble/$exchangeratestrengtheningtoRUB29/$byYE11,averagingaroundRUB30/$

    fortheyear.Withoilnowtradingataround$100/bbl,ourforecastisbeginningtolook

    conservative.

    SincemostRussiansteelcompanycostsareroubledenominated,localcurrency

    appreciationinflatescosts,althoughthisissomewhatoffsetbyastrengthenedrevenue

    line.

    ThedomesticcurrencystrengthenedtoRUB29.42/$in1Q10andthenweakenedto

    RUB31.24/$in2Q,whichwebelievewaslikelyoneofthefactorsthatallowedRussian

    steelmakerstodemonstratestrongerfinancialperformancevs1Q10.Thecurrencythen

    appreciatedtoaroundRUB30.60/$in3Q4Q10,exacerbatingcostpressures.

    WeDoNotYetSeeCostPressuresReflectedin2011MarketForecasts

    Ascoststakecentrestagein2011,weseelittlereflectionofthemincurrentBloomberg

    consensusforecastsfortheyear.Wehaveanalysedchangesto201011consensus

    forecastsbetweenJuly2010,whentheoutlookforthesteelmarketandpriceswasstill

    positive,andFeb2011,whenthefirstsignsof2H10margindeteriorationbecamevisible

    andthe

    risk

    of

    further

    deterioration

    in

    2011

    became

    clear.

    AscanbeseeninFigure7,BloombergconsensusEBITDAmarginforecastsfor2010saw

    someminoradjustmentsastheyearprogressed.However,expectationsfor2011

    marginssawlittledownwardrevisionbetweenJuly2010andFeb2011.Infact,in

    Severstalscasetheforecastfor2011actuallyimproved(althoughthiscouldbe

    explainedbyexpectationsofmarginimprovementsinthecompanysUSbusiness,which

    maybejustifiedgiventhecurrentstrongrecoveryintheUSsteelmarket).

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    6/38

    6

    Figure7:EBITDAmarginforecastprogression(July10Feb11) Figure8:EPSforecastprogression(July10Feb11)

    23.3

    %

    16.2%

    20.2

    %

    19

    .1%

    18

    .5%

    17.

    1%

    32.0

    %

    32.1

    %

    29.1

    %

    29.2

    %

    22.1

    %

    22.5

    %

    20.0

    %

    2

    0.9

    %

    20.3

    %

    22.5

    %

    15%

    20%25%

    30%

    35%

    40%

    Jul'10

    Feb'11

    Jul'10

    Feb'11

    Jul'10

    Feb'11

    Jul'10

    Feb'11

    Jul'10

    Feb'11

    Jul'10

    Feb'11

    Jul'10

    Feb'11

    Jul'10

    Feb'11

    2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011

    Evrazf'ca st MMKf'ca st NL MKf'ca st SVSTf'cast

    Mostconsensus2011EBITDAmarginforecastshavehardly

    changeddespitesharpdeteriorationofmarginsin 2H10

    1.4

    8

    0

    .03

    3.2

    5

    2.6

    8

    1.7

    9

    1.6

    5

    0.6

    7

    0.9

    8

    3.5

    3

    3.3

    5

    2.1

    6

    2.3

    52.9

    1

    3.0

    3

    1.0

    11.8

    6

    0.5

    0.5

    1.5

    2.5

    3.5

    Jul'10

    Feb'11

    Jul'10

    Feb'11

    Jul'10

    Feb'11

    Jul'10

    Feb'11

    Jul'10

    Feb'11

    Jul'10

    Feb'11

    Jul'10

    Feb'11

    Jul'10

    Feb'11

    2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011

    EvrazEPSf'cast MMKEPSf'cast NLMKEPSf'cast SVSTEPSf'cast

    Consensus 2011EPSforecastssaw little revisioninthe lastsix months

    Source:Bloomberg consensus

    WeseeasimilarpictureinconsensusEPSforecastsfor201011:while2010EPS

    estimateshavebeenreviseddownwardconsiderably(exceptforNLMK),themarkets

    2011EPSexpectationshaveremainedbroadlyunchangedandinsomecases(NLMK,

    Severstal)have

    actually

    improved

    (see

    Figure

    8).

    Webelievethelackofdownwardrevisionto2011forecastsfromJuly2010toFeb2011

    canbeexplainedbythefollowingfactors:

    Anexpectationofhighersteeloutputvolumesin2011whichwouldtranslateintoimprovedtoplineperformance

    Anassumptionthatsteelmakerswouldbeabletoprotectorevenimprovetheirmarginsbypassingmost,ifnotall,cashcostincreasesontotheircustomers

    throughhighersteelprices

    Thecombinationofthesetwofactorswouldintheoryhaveallowedsteelmakersto

    protecttheir

    margins

    while

    improving

    bottom

    line.

    Lackofrealdemandmayhampersteelmakersfrompassingcostsontocustomers

    Whilethetwofactorsnotedabovetoplineimprovementsandsuccessinpassingcosts

    ontocustomerscouldinfactmaterialisein2011,webelieveswiftresultsareunlikely

    andnoteseveralriskfactorsthatmaydelaythefullpositiveeffectfrombeingfeltin

    2012.

    Firstly,steelpriceappreciationattheendof2010andthebeginning2011shouldnotbe

    confusedwithasustainedpricerecovery,whichisverymuchdependantonarecovery

    inrealdemandforsteel.Rather,webelievethisisagaintheresultofrestocking,which

    mayhavebeencausedbyexpectationsofhighersteelpricesin1Q2Q10drivenbyrising

    rawmaterial

    costs.

    This

    is

    perhaps

    similar

    to

    the

    steel

    price

    rally

    seen

    at

    the

    beginning

    of

    2010.

    Secondly,forpriceincreasestobesustainable,realdemandneedstorecovertolevels

    sufficienttoabsorbtheincreasedvolumeofsteelsuppliedtothemarket.AstheRussian

    economycontinuestorecover,soshouldrealdemand.Atthemomentthesignsare

    encouraging:ascanbeseenfromFigure9,bothindustrialproductionandfixed

    investmentarefirmlyinpositivegrowthterritory.However,growthrateshavestabilised

    atlevelsthatarestillbelowthepeaksreachedatthebeginningof2008.

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    7/38

    7

    Figure9:FixedinvestmentandIPgrowthinpositiveterritory Figure10:RussianGDPtogrowbyaround6%in201112

    30%

    20%

    10%

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    Ja n08 Jul08 Jan09 Jul09 Jan10 Jul10

    Industrialproduction Fixedinvestment

    Industrialproductionand fixed

    investmentgrowthrateshave

    stabilisedat stronglevels

    7.1%6.4%

    7.4%8.1%

    5.6%

    7.9%

    4.0%

    5.9% 5.50%

    10%

    8%

    6%

    4%

    2%

    0%

    2%

    4%

    6%

    8%

    10%

    2 00 4 2 00 5 2 00 6 2 00 7 2 00 8 2 00 9 2 01 0E 2 01 1E 2 01 2E

    Source:Rosstat Source:Rosstat,Atonestimates

    Moreover,theAtonStrategyandEconomicsteamforecastthattherateofeconomic

    growthin2011willnotexceed6%.Althoughthiswouldbeanimprovementon2010,it

    isstillfarbelowtheratesachievedbyRussiaintherunupto2008(Figure10).Inthis

    macroeconomicsetting

    we

    doubt

    that

    real

    demand

    for

    steel

    could

    return

    to

    2007

    08

    levelsthisyear.

    Infact,thecurrentdisputebetweenRussiansteelcompaniesandautomakers

    demonstratesthatnotallsteelconsumersarereadytoabsorbpriceincreaseswhen

    uncertaintyontheirownmarketsisstillhigh.Thissuggests,inourview,thatitcouldbe

    difficultforsteelmakerstopassonthefullextentofcostinflationtotheircustomers.

    Automakersarenottheonlycustomerswhoarefeelingtheeffectofrisingsteelprices.

    Russiantubemakers,workinginmuchbettermarketconditions a$100/bbloilworld

    arealsofeelingtheheat.TMKandChTPZrecentlyapproachedRussiasFederal

    AntimonopolyService(FAS)askingthemtoinvestigatesharppriceincreasesbytheir

    mainsuppliers,

    MMK

    and

    Severstal.

    Weshouldalsonotdiscountthegovernmentsdesiretokeepdomesticmarketpricesin

    checkascontaininginflationcomesintofocusduringtherunuptoparliamentary

    electionsin2011andpresidentialpollsin2012.Inthissituation,webelievethe

    governmentcouldintroducemeasuresaimedatcontrollingdomesticpriceincreases.

    Thegovernment hasalreadybroachedtheideaofexporttariffsonrolledsteelandiron

    oreasonepotentialmeasure.Wethinkthisapproachcouldleadtoashortterm

    oversupplyofsteelonthedomesticmarketandaneventualcurtailmentofproduction

    byRussiansteelmakers.

    Finally,highersteelpricescouldenticesteelmakerstoincreaseoutput,whichinthe

    absenceof

    strong

    real

    demand

    could

    lead

    to

    oversupply.

    This

    would

    put

    additional

    downwardpressureonsteelprices,likelyleadingtoasharpcorrectionsimilartowhat

    wasseenin2010.However,thistimearound,wethinkstrongerexportmarketscould

    helpoffsetsomeofthepotentialweaknessathome.Nevertheless,thiscouldalsobe

    shortlivedasindustrynewswires(MetalBulletin,SteelBusinessBriefing)arealreadyreportingsofteningsteelpricesinseveralkeyexportmarkets.Inanycase,theexport

    offeringsofRussiansteelmakersarelimitedprimarilytolowvalueaddedproducts.

    Mostofthesefactors,inoneformoranother,wereinplayin2010,whenprices

    increasedinthefirstthreetofourmonthsoftheyearoverexpectationsofhigherraw

    materialcosts,leadingtopanicrestocking.Thiswasfollowedbyasharpprice

    correctionduringthesummermonthsandonlyaslightrecoveryinsteelpricescloserto

    the

    end

    of

    the

    year.

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    8/38

    8

    Steelsharescouldseearepeatof2010pricevolatility

    GivenhowcloselycorrelatedRussiansteelstocksaretosteelprices,wecouldseea

    repeatofthe2010correctionin2011,inourview.Figures11and12showthatRussian

    steelcompanysharepricesmovedinanticipationofchangesinsteelprices,gaining

    throughthelatterpartof2009andthebeginningof2010andthenreversingdirection

    evenbeforethefullextentofthesteelpricecorrectionwasapparent.

    Figure11:

    MMK

    and

    NLMK

    share

    performance

    vs

    flat

    steel

    prices

    Figure

    12:

    Evraz

    share

    performance

    vs

    long

    steel

    prices

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    Oct09

    Nov09

    Dec09

    Feb10

    Mar10

    Apr10

    Jun10

    Jul10

    Sep10

    Oct10

    Nov10

    Jan11

    MMKstockprice i ndex

    NLMKstockpriceindex

    F l atsteel

    price

    index

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    Oct09

    Nov09

    Dec09

    Feb10

    Mar10

    Apr10

    Jun10

    Jul10

    Sep10

    Oct10

    Nov10

    Jan11

    Evrazstockpriceindex

    Longsteel

    price

    index

    Source:Bloomberg

    Althoughreportsfromsteelcompaniessuggestthatstrongrisesinsteelpricesshouldbe

    expectedin1Q11,sharepricesstartedtocorrectwhensteelpricessoftenedafter

    supportfromtherestockingdrivebegantodiminish.Giventhatasteelpricecorrection

    couldbecomearealityasearlyas1Q11,wewouldnotruleoutthepossibilityoffurther

    volatilityinRussiansteelstocksinthecomingquarters.

    Notallisdoomandgloom

    Whilesteelandcommoditypricesshouldcontinuetobethemaindriverofshareprice

    performance

    for

    Russian

    steelmakers,

    we

    believe

    that

    shares

    with

    additional

    value

    catalystsshouldoutperformtheirpeersin2011.Belowaresomeofthedriversthatmay

    supportRussiansteelsharesin2011:

    Severstal:

    ArecoveryintheUSsteelmarketleadingtoupsidesurprises.WethinkSeverstalUScouldrepeatitspositive2Q10performanceonthebackofstrongerUSprices

    andgrowingcapacityutilisation.AswingtopositiveEBITDAin2Q10cameona15%

    QoQincreaseinsalesvolumesandan8%QoQincreaseinaveragerealisedprices.

    NordgoldIPOmaysoonbebackonthecards.AlthoughthemarketsreceptionoftheIPOwaslukewarm,webelievethatavaluationintherangeof$3.54bnisstill

    realisticandcouldoffer1015%upsidepotentialtothecurrentshareprice.

    MMK:

    RisingshareofHVAgoodscouldhelpoffsetcostpressures.ThecompanysMill5000isnowoperatingatfullcapacity(1.5mntpa)withitsorderbookfullatleastto

    theendof1H11.

    NLMK:

    AcquisitionoftheremainingstakeinJVwithDuferco.NLMKisshortofinhouserollingcapacityandusestheJVasanoutletforitsexcessslabproduction.The

    acquisitionwouldallowittorecordhighersalesmarginswithinthegroup.

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    9/38

    9

    Evraz:

    RecoveryinconstructionactivityinRussiaandUkraine.Evrazcouldbeastocktowatchin2011giventheexpectedrecoveryinRussiasconstructionindustry.

    However,weviewexpectationsofanystrongsharepricehikesaspremature,given

    thatthefullextentofincreasedconstructionactivitywouldprobablynotbefelt

    untilwellinto2012.Werecommendwaitinguntilearly2Q11toreassessthe

    progressof

    Russias

    construction

    industry

    before

    increasing

    positions

    in

    the

    stock.

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    10/38

    1

    0

    Russian Steel Valuations Premiums to Global Peers Still Justified

    Despiterisingcostpressuresandtheresultingdeteriorationofmargins,webelieve

    thatRussiansteelmakersvaluationpremiumstointernationalpeersarejustified.

    Whileincreasingcostpressuresareaworldwidephenomenon,Russiancompanies

    verticalintegrationgivesthemanimportantedgeoverglobalpeers,actingasa

    cushionandlimitingthenegativeimpactofhighercostsonmargins.

    Ourvaluationmethodusesacombinedmultiplesbasedapproach(P/EandEV/EBITDA)

    andDCF.Thetwomultipleseachaccountfor25%oftheweightedaveragevaluation,

    withtheDCFvaluationprovidingtheremaining50%.Themultiplesvaluationallowsus

    toaccountforacompanysshorttomediumtermfinancialperformanceanddebtload,

    whiletheDCFcalculationaimstoreflectthegrowthpotentialofeachstockandhence

    hasahigherweightinginourvaluations.

    Oneminoradjustmentfromourpreviouscalculationsisachangetothebasecostof

    equityduetotherecentrevisionofourcountryspecificriskpremium,whichwas

    reducedfrom3.7%to3.2%.Asaresult,thebasecostofequitydeclinedfrom12.2%to

    11.7%.TheWACCforeachindividualcompanyalsotakesintoaccountitsliquidityand

    debtposition.

    Russiansteelspremiumtoglobalpeersisstilljustified,inourview

    Figures13and14arebasedonBloombergconsensusforecastsofthe2011EBITDA

    marginsofRussiancompaniesandaselectionofinternationalpeersinbothdeveloped

    andemergingmarketsatthetimeofourpreviousupdateon25Oct2010(Figure13)

    andnow(Figure14).ThechartsshowthatthemarketstillexpectsRussiansteelmakers

    tooutperformtheirpeersin2011.TheaverageEBITDAmarginforecastforfiveRussian

    steelmajorsin2011isapproximately25%vstheemergingmarketaverageof16%and

    thedevelopedmarketaverageof11%(seeFigure14).

    Figure13:Consensus2011EEBITDAmargins(25Octupdate) Figure14:Consensus2011EEBITDAmargins(currentupdate)

    26.9%

    21.1% 20.9%19.4%

    16.3%

    12.7%

    32.2%

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    20%

    25%

    30%

    35%

    NLMK

    Mechel

    MMK

    Evraz

    Severstal

    Avg.

    Int.

    Emerging

    Markets

    Avg.

    Int.

    Developed

    Markets

    25.9%2 2. 3% 2 2.4 %

    20.7%

    16.4%

    10.0%

    31.9%

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    20%

    25%

    30%

    35%

    NLMK

    Mechel

    MMK

    Evraz

    Severstal

    Avg.

    Int.

    Emerging

    Markets

    Avg.

    Int.

    Developed

    Markets

    Source:Bloomberg

    Evenifweassumethe2011estimatesforRussiansteelmakersareoverlyoptimisticand

    theywilleventuallybereviseddownward,wethinktherewillstillbeenoughofalead

    overinternationalpeerstojustifythepremiumsatwhichRussiansteelmakerscurrently

    trade.

    OurapproachtovaluingRussiansteelsreflectsourexpectationsofsustained

    profitabilityleadershipoverinternationalpeers

    Globalsteelmakersarecurrentlytradingat2011P/Esrangingfrom9xto16xfor

    emergingmarketpeersand1218xforsteelmakersindevelopedmarkets.Therangefor

    EV/EBITDAis511xforemergingmarketsand58xfordevelopedmarkets(foramore

    detailedbreakdown,seeFigure15).

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    11/38

    1

    1

    Figure15:Comparativemultiplesofpeersbasedonestimatesfor201112E

    CountryMktCap

    ($mn)EV/EBITDA P/E

    EBITDA

    margin(%)

    Netmargin

    (%)

    2011E 2012E 2011E 2012E 2011E 2011E

    Developedmarkets

    ArcelorMittal Luxembourg 57,986 7.1 5.8 13.1 9.2 12% 5%

    ThyssenKrupp Germany 21,132 4.5 3.6 15.7 9.9 8% 2%

    Voestalpine

    Austria

    7,555

    6.9

    6.1

    12.0

    9.6

    14%

    4%

    NucorCorp USA 15,262 8.0 6.1 18.9 13.0 11% 4%

    USSteel USA 8,949 6.5 5.2 15.9 11.0 8% 3%

    AKSteel USA 1,815 5.3 4.1 17.5 11.1 6% 2%

    NipponSteel Japan 24,877 6.8 6.3 17.3 12.9 12% 3%

    JFEHoldings Japan 20,070 6.6 6.0 17.6 11.9 14% 3%

    BluescopeSteel Australia 4,145 8.5 5.6 53.7 14.6 6% 1%

    Median,DMpeers 6.8 5.8 17.3 11.1 11% 3%

    Emergingmarkets

    POSCO SouthKorea 37,468 5.3 4.9 9.4 8.7 21% 12%

    HyundaiSteel SouthKorea 10,410 7.3 6.9 9.6 8.8 16% 9%

    ChinaSteelCorp Taiwan 15,460 11.1 9.9 13.3 10.9 17% 13%

    BaoshanIron&Steel China 19,082 4.8 4.3 8.7 7.5 16% 6%

    WuhanIron&Steel

    China

    5,389

    5.8

    5.2

    12.9

    9.6

    14%

    3%

    MaanshanIron&Steel China 4,330 5.1 4.7 13.1 11.9 12% 3%

    AngangSteel China 9,108 6.4 5.7 13.5 10.4 14% 4%

    TataSteel India 12,993 6.7 6.1 9.2 8.1 14% 6%

    Gerdau Brazil 19,242 6.6 5.3 11.5 9.3 18% 8%

    Usiminas Brazil 14,300 8.8 6.3 17.4 11.9 20% 9%

    Median,EMpeers 6.5 5.5 12.2 9.4 16% 7%

    Russia

    EvrazGroup Russia 16,731 7.2 5.9 16.7 10.6 22% 7%

    MagnitogorskSteel Russia 11,879 7.4 5.4 14.6 8.9 21% 8%

    Mechel Russia 13,154 6.2 5.5 8.6 8.4 26% 13%

    NovolipetskSteel Russia 26,071 8.5 6.2 13.4 9.5 30% 18%

    Severstal Russia 17,836 6.4 5.4 11.1 8.8 19% 9%

    Median,Russian

    peers

    7.2

    5.5

    13.4

    8.9

    22%

    9%

    Russiansteelproducerspremium/discounttointernationalpeers:

    EvrazGroup 8% 5% 13% 4%

    MagnitogorskSteel 11% 5% 1% 14%

    Mechel 7% 2% 42% 18%

    NovolipetskSteel 27% 10% 9% 8%

    Severstal 4% 4% 25% 14%

    Source:Bloomberg,Atonestimates

    WestillbelievethatRussiansteelmakersshouldbevaluedatapremiumtointernational

    peers,giventheirsuperiorfinancialperformancetodateandmarketandour

    expectationsthattheywillsustainthisleadershipintheshorttomediumterm.

    Nevertheless,weremainconservativeandusemultiplesof14xP/Eand7xEV/EBITDAin

    ourcalculations

    (except

    for

    NLMK,

    which

    we

    value

    using

    a

    P/E

    of

    16x

    and

    an

    EV/EBITDA

    of8xtoreflectitsprofitabilityleadership,mediumtermgrowthprospectsandthe

    uniquemixofhighvalueproductsinitssalesportfolio).

    However,wearemoreconservativethantheconsensusinour2011forecasts

    AsFigure22demonstrates,wearemoreconservativethantheBloombergconsensusin

    our2011forecastsforRussiansteelmakers.Thisisintendedtoreflectthepressures

    steelcompaniescouldfacethisyear.However,wealsobelievethatasmarketsrecover

    in2012,steelcompaniesshouldbewellplacedtotakeadvantageofrisingdemandand

    prices.

    Therefore,wehaveusedtheaverageofour201112EEBITDAandnetincomeforecasts

    asthe

    basis

    for

    our

    multiples

    valuations.

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    12/38

    1

    2

    Summary Data for Steel Stocks under Coverage

    ThissectionprovidessummaryinformationforstocksunderAtoncoverage.

    InFigure16wesummarisethechangestoourtargetpricesandratings.

    Figure16:

    Rating

    summary

    Company Ticker

    Target

    price

    (old)

    Target

    price

    (new)

    Target

    price

    change

    Current

    price

    Upside

    potential

    Rating

    (old)

    Rating

    (new)

    ($/share) ($/share) (%) ($/share) (%)

    EvrazGroup(GDR) EVRLI 35.33 42.30 19.7% 38.21 10.7% BUY HOLD

    MMK(GDR) MMKLI 15.33 16.20 5.7% 13.82 17.2% BUY BUY

    MMK(Local) MAGNRM 1.18 1.25 6.0% 1.07 16.6% BUY BUY

    NLMK(GDR) NLMKLI 35.55 49.40 39.0% 43.50 13.6% HOLD BUY

    NLMK(Local) NLKMRM 3.56 4.94 39.0% 4.35 13.5% HOLD BUY

    Severstal(GDR)

    SVST

    LI

    18.57

    22.10

    19.0%

    17.70

    24.9%

    BUY

    BUY

    Severstal(Local) CHMFRM 18.57 22.10 19.0% 17.62 25.4% BUY BUY

    Source:Bloomberg,Atonestimates

    Figure17reflectsthechangesinourtargetpricesifwealteranyofthekeyvaluation

    criteriaforthestocksundercoverage.

    Figure17:Valuationrangesforthestocks

    Company

    Current

    share

    price

    Target

    priceDCFWACCRate

    201112E

    averageP/E

    201112E

    averageEV/EBITDA

    ($/share) ($/share)Base

    +1%

    Base

    WACC

    Base

    1%

    12x 14x 16x 6x 7x 8x

    EvrazGroup(GDR) 38.21 42.30 35.15 42.83 53.36 35.30 41.18 47.07 33.77 42.27 50.77

    MMK(GDR) 13.82 16.20 13.00 15.44 18.69 15.11 17.63 20.15 13.26 16.12 18.99

    NLMK(GDR) 43.50 49.40 50.73 59.24 70.92 32.84 38.32 43.79 26.01 30.70 35.38

    Severstal(GDR) 17.70 22.10 17.86 20.69 24.32 21.62 25.22 28.83 18.13 21.91 25.70

    Source:Bloomberg,Atonestimates

    Thefollowingtablesprovidesomeusefulperformanceandfinancialdataforthestocks.

    Figure18:Stockperformancedata

    EvrazGroup MMK NLMK Severstal

    1M 3.2% 11.0% 7.6% 7.0%

    3M 27.4% 8.0% 15.8% 27.0%

    YtD

    6.5%5.0%

    8.8%

    5.0%

    1Y 15.1% 8.1% 42.2% 42.9%

    52weekhigh($) 42.72 16.23 51.00 19.78

    52weeklow($) 21.80 8.90 25.04 9.35

    Combineddailyt/o($mn) 47.1 8.2 19.9 46.9

    Freefloat(%) 17.4% 13.4% 12.9% 17.6%

    Freefloat($mn) 2,911 1,592 3,363 3,139

    Source:Companydata,Bloomberg,Atonestimates

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    13/38

    1

    3

    Figure19:Keyvaluationdata

    EvrazGroup MMK NLMK Severstal

    Valuationsummary:

    Targetprice($/GDR) 42.30 16.20 49.40 22.10

    Currentprice($/GDR) 38.21 13.82 43.50 17.70

    Potentialupside/downside(%) 10.7% 17.2% 13.6% 24.9%

    Rating(GDR) HOLD BUY BUY BUY

    Target

    price

    local

    ($/share)

    n/a

    1.25

    4.94

    22.10

    Currentprice local($/share) n/a 1.07 4.35 17.62

    Potentialupside/downside(%) n/a 16.6% 13.5% 25.4%

    Rating(local) n/a BUY BUY BUY

    Keyvaluationmetrics:

    Commonsharesinissue(mn) 146 11,174 5,993 1,008

    CommonshareGDRequivalent(mn) 438 860 599 1,008

    Marketcap($mn) 16,731 11,879 26,071 17,836

    Netdebt($mn) 7,219 2,928 1,148 4,331

    EV($mn) 24,269 15,228 27,333 22,448

    BV($mn) 10,312 10,128 9,556 7,718

    Keyvaluationratios:

    P/Eratios(x)

    2009 n/a 51.1 97.7 n/a

    2010E n/a 49.5 17.4 n/a

    2011E 16.7 14.6 10.4 11.1

    2012E 10.6 8.9 9.2 8.8

    EV/EBITDAratios(x)

    2009 19.6 14.9 15.8 26.5

    2010E 10.2 10.6 9.2 8.0

    2011E 7.2 7.4 6.9 6.4

    2012E 5.9 5.4 6.0 5.4

    P/BVratio(x) 1.6 1.2 2.7 2.0

    Source:Companydata,Bloomberg,Atonestimates

    Figure20:Keyfinancials

    EvrazGroup

    MMK

    NLMK

    Severstal

    Revenue($mn)

    2009 9,772 5,081 6,140 13,054

    2010E 12,382 7,597 8,382 15,021

    2011E 15,365 10,038 10,905 18,767

    2012E 16,835 12,091 13,524 20,823

    AdjustedEBITDA($mn)

    2009 1,237 1,023 1,370 846

    2010E 2,368 1,437 2,384 2,804

    2011E 3,361 2,059 3,233 3,508

    2012E 4,081 2,837 4,397 4,121

    EBITDAmargin(%)

    2009 12.7% 20.1% 22.3% 6.5%

    2010E

    19.1%

    18.9%

    28.4%

    18.7%

    2011E 21.9% 20.5% 29.6% 18.7%

    2012E 24.2% 23.5% 32.5% 19.8%

    Netincome($mn)

    2009 1,251 232 215 1,037

    2010E 54 240 1,332 87

    2011E 1,002 812 1,949 1,603

    2012E 1,574 1,342 2,753 2,029

    Netmargin(%)

    2009 12.8% 4.6% 3.5% 7.9%

    2010E 0.4% 3.2% 15.9% 0.6%

    2011E 6.5% 8.1% 17.9% 8.5%

    2012E 9.4% 11.1% 20.4% 9.7%

    Source:

    Company

    data,

    Aton

    estimates

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    14/38

    1

    4

    Figure21summariseschangesmadetoourkeyestimates(EBITDAandnetincome)

    sinceourpreviousupdate.

    Figure21:AtonestimatesoldvsnewEBITDA Netincome

    Company 2010E 2011E 2012E3Y

    average2010E 2011E 2012E

    3Y

    average

    EvrazGroup:

    Newestimate($mn) 2,368 3,361 4,081 54 1,002 1,574

    Oldestimate($mn) 2,373 3,431 4,040 112 826 1,297

    Changevsold(%) 0.2% 2.0% 1.0% 0.4% n/a 21.3% 21.4% 21.3%

    MMK:

    Newestimate($mn) 1,437 2,059 2,837 240 812 1,342

    Oldestimate($mn) 1,535 2,423 2,737 270 872 1,058

    Changevsold(%) 6.3% 15.0% 3.7% 5.9% 11.2% 6.8% 26.8% 2.9%

    NLMK:

    Newestimate($mn) 2,384 3,233 4,397 1,332 1,949 2,753

    Oldestimate($mn) 2,424 3,263 3,700 1,208 2,011 2,293

    Changevsold(%) 1.6% 0.9% 18.8% 5.4% 10.3% 3.1% 20.1% 9.1%

    SVST*:

    Newestimate

    ($mn)

    2,804

    3,508

    3,508

    87

    1,603

    2,029

    Oldestimates($mn) 3,315 3,961 4,155 9 1,598 1,802

    Changevsold(%) 15.4% 11.4% 15.6% 14.2% n/a 0.3% 12.6% 6.4%

    *PreviousSeverstalforecastsincludedLucchini

    Source:Atonestimates

    Finally,Figure22comparesourestimatesforsteelstockswiththecurrentBloomberg

    consensusview.Wearemoreconservativethanconsensusinour2011forecasts.

    Meanwhile,ourexpectationsfor2012areeitherinlinewithoraheadofconsensus,as

    webelievethebenefitofincreaseddemandandhighersteelpriceswillnotbefullyfelt

    in2011,butshouldbepushedbackto2012.

    Figure

    22:

    Aton

    estimates

    vs

    Bloomberg

    consensus

    EBITDA Netincome

    Company 2010E 2011E 2012E3Y

    average2010E 2011E 2012E

    3Y

    Average

    EvrazGroup:

    Atonestimates($mn) 2,368 3,361 4,081 54 1,002 1,574

    Bloombergconsensus($mn) 2,384 3,553 4,068 103 1,208 1,442

    Atonvsconsensus(%) 0.7% 5.4% 0.3% 1.9% n/a 17.1% 9.2% 3.9%

    MMK:

    Atonestimates($mn) 1,437 2,059 2,837 240 812 1,342

    Bloombergconsensus($mn) 1,557 2,414 2,799 380 1,047 1,360

    Atonvsconsensus(%) 7.7% 14.7% 1.4% 7.0% 36.8% 22.4% 1.3% 20.2%

    NLMK:

    Aton

    estimates

    ($mn)

    2,384

    3,233

    4,397

    1,332

    1,949

    2,753

    Bloombergconsensus($mn) 2,400 3,370 3,959 1,311 2,047 2,373

    Atonvsconsensus(%) 0.7% 4.1% 11.1% 2.1% 1.6% 4.8% 16.1% 4.3%

    SVST:

    Atonestimates($mn) 2,804 3,508 3,508 87 1,603 2,029

    Bloombergconsensus($mn) 2,930 3,831 4,016 1,002 1,818 1,970

    Atonvsconsensus(%) 4.3% 8.4% 12.6% 8.5% n/a 11.8% 3.0% 4.4%

    Source:Bloomberg,Atonestimates

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    15/38

    1

    5

    Price Forecasts Upgraded Due to Strong Recent Gains

    Wehaveupgradedourpriceforecastsforsteelandrawmaterialpricestoreflectthe

    stronggainsrecordedinrecentmonths.Exportpricesforflatsteelhaveseenasolid

    recoveryandnowtradeataslightpremiumtodomesticsteel.Longsteelpriceshave

    alsotrendedhigheronagradualrecoveryinconstructionactivity.Inrawmaterials,

    cokingcoalpricessawamajorappreciationduetothedeficitthatfollowedthe

    Raspadskaya

    mine

    accident

    in

    2010.

    Highrawmaterialprices,inparticularforcokingcoalandsteelscrap,willlikelycontinue

    toputpressureonRussiansteelproducersmargins,asitwillbedifficultforthemto

    passonthefullextentofcostincreasestocustomerswhilethedemandpictureremains

    uncertain.

    HRCprices:weexpectasofteningin2H11

    HRCpricesexperiencedexceptionalgainsatthebeginningof2011,whichweexpectto

    continueintheseasonallystronger2Q11:weestimateaveragepriceswillrangefrom

    $700/tto$800/tinthefirsthalfoftheyear.However,weexpectpricestosoftenin

    2H11,withafullyearaverageof$740/tforthedomesticmarketand$760/tforexports

    (seeFigure

    23).

    Figure23:HRCpricesstrongin1H11,softeningin2H11($/t) Figure24:CISHRCuparound13%vsourpreviousforecast($/t)

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    1Q09

    2Q09

    3Q09

    4Q09

    1Q10

    2Q10

    3Q10

    4Q10

    1Q11E

    2Q11E

    3Q11E

    4Q11E

    HRC CIS producerpri ce HRC CIS exportprice

    Weassumeprice

    softeningin 2H11,similar

    to2H10correction

    Exportpricesstarttrading

    at apremiumtodomestic

    516

    642588 604

    695

    781742 731

    601631

    663 666 650

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    900

    1Q10

    2Q10

    3Q10

    4Q10

    1Q11E

    2Q11E

    3Q11E

    4Q11E

    HR C CIS producerprice NEW

    HR C CIS producerprice OLD

    Source(Figures32and33):MetalExpert,Bloomberg,Atonestimates

    OurnewdomesticHRCpriceestimatesfor2011areanaverageof13%higherthanour

    previousforecast(seeFigure24).

    Rebar:strongrecoveryatend2010andstartof2011

    Rebarpricesenjoyedastrongerrecoverythanweexpectedin4Q10,averagingaround

    $590/tvs$550/tinourOctoberforecast.Wehaverevisedourestimatestotakeinto

    accountthepricestrengthseeninJanuaryandFebruary.Onceagain,weexpect3Q

    4Q11tobeseasonallyweak,bringingtheaveragepricefor2011toaround$700730/t,

    withdomesticpricesexpectedtoreachapremiumtoexport(seeFigure25).

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    16/38

    1

    6

    Figure25:Rebarstrongerrecoveryin4Q10vsforecast($/t) Figure26:Rebarpriceestimateup20%vsearlierforecast($/t)

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    1Q09

    2Q09

    3Q09

    4Q09

    1Q10

    2Q10

    3Q10

    4Q10

    1Q11E

    2Q11E

    3Q11E

    4Q11E

    Rebar CIS producerpri ce Re ba r CIS exportprice

    Domesticprices improveas

    constructionactivitypicks up

    Weassumeprice

    softeningin2H11,similar

    to2H10correction

    474

    618

    579589

    663

    762 751 732

    550577

    621 605 599

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    900

    1Q10

    2Q10

    3Q10

    4Q10

    1Q11E

    2Q11E

    3Q11E

    4Q11E

    Rebar CIS producerprice NEW

    Rebar CIS producerprice OLD

    Sources:MetalExpert,Bloomberg,Atonestimates

    Ournewpriceassumptionsforrebarare2021%higherthanourOctoberestimates(see

    Figure26).

    Flatsteelmaintainsanarrowingpremiumoverlongproducts

    Longsteelpriceshaveundergoneastrongrecovery,narrowingthediscounttoflatsteel

    toaround3%in4Q10.AlthoughweexpectHRCtocontinuetradingatapremiumto

    rebargoingforward,wethinkthepremiumwillbelower:around5%in2011vs10%in

    ourpreviousforecast(Figure27).

    Figure27:Longssteeldiscounttoflatexpectedtonarrow($/t)

    500

    600

    700

    800

    900

    1Q

    09

    2Q

    09

    3Q

    09

    4Q

    09

    1Q

    10

    2Q

    10

    3Q

    10

    4Q

    10E

    1Q

    11E

    2Q

    11E

    3Q

    11E

    4Q

    11E

    CIS DomesticFlatSteel Basket

    CIS DomesticLongSteelBasket

    Flatsteel is still

    expectedtotradeat

    apremiumtolong...

    butthe discountis expectedtonarrow

    as constructionactivitypicksup

    Source:MetalExpert,Bloomberg,Atonestimates

    Pressurefromhighrawmaterialpricessettorolloverinto2011

    Weexpecthighrawmaterialpricestocontinuepressuringsteelmakersmargins.This

    shouldbe

    especially

    pronounced

    in

    coking

    coal

    in

    2011

    (due

    to

    the

    Raspadskaya

    accidentlastyearandastructuralshortageofhighquality,locallyproducedcoking

    coal).Amajorincreaseinscrappricescanbeexpectedfrom2012onthebackof

    insufficientscrapgenerationandaddeddemandfromnewelectricarcfurnace(EAF)

    capacity.

    Wethinktheincreaseinironorepriceswillbelesspronouncedvscokingcoalsince

    Russiaisnotcurrentlyexperiencinganyshortageofthismaterial(seeFigure28).

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    17/38

    1

    7

    Figure28:StrongincreaseincokingcoalpriceduetoRussiandeficit($/t)

    51 49 58

    92103 125 124

    134158 166 168 164

    33 32 3648

    6288 81 82 92 94

    95 94

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    1Q09

    2Q09

    3Q09

    4Q09

    1Q10

    2Q10

    3Q10

    4Q10

    1Q11E

    2Q11E

    3Q11E

    4Q11E

    Cokingcoal (Russia domesticGZh type)Iron ore concentrate(Russiadomestic)

    Shortageofdomesticoutput

    supportscokingcoalprices

    Source:MetalExpert,Bloomberg,Atonestimates

    Raspadskayarecentlyannouncedan11%increasein1Q11pricesforcokingcoal.

    However,weexpectthisupwardmomentumtoslowfrom2Q11,asRaspadskayastarts

    torecovertheoutputlostfollowinglastyearsaccident.Weexpect1Q113Q11pricesto

    averagearound

    $160

    165,

    softening

    in

    4Q11

    (see

    Figure

    29).

    We

    estimate

    an

    average

    2011cokingcoalpriceofaround$165/t,35%higherthanin2010.

    Figure29:Cokingcoalpricessupportedbycontinueddeficit($/t) Figure30:Ironorepricestrengtheningonhigherdemand($/t)

    103

    125 124134

    158166 168 164

    151153157

    146135

    75

    100

    125

    150

    175

    200

    1Q10

    2Q10

    3Q10

    4Q10

    1Q11E

    2Q11E

    3Q11E

    4Q11E

    Cokingcoal (Russia domesticGZh type) NEW

    Cokingcoal (Russia domesticGZh type) OLD

    62

    8881 82

    92 94 95 94

    82 80 8486 85

    50

    75

    100

    125

    1Q10

    2Q10

    3Q10

    4Q10

    1Q11E

    2Q11E

    3Q11E

    4Q11E

    Iron ore concentrate (Russiadomestic)NEWIron ore concentrate (Russiadomestic)OLD

    Sources(Figures29and30):MetalExpert,Bloomberg,Atonestimates

    Weexpectironoreconcentratepricestoincreasemodestlyovertheyear,averaging

    $95/t,up20%YoY(seeFigure30).

    Forsteelscrap,weforecastapriceincreaseofapproximately15%YoYin2011toaround

    $270/t.Thisis16%higherthanourearlierforecast,mainlyduetoincreasedlongsteel

    pricesandthereforeelevateddemandforscrap.

    Ourpriceassumptionsforthemainsteelproductsandrawmaterialsaresummarisedin

    Figures3132.

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    18/38

    1

    8

    Figure31:AtonrawmaterialandsteelpriceassumptionsFeb2011($/metrictonne)Annualprices Quarterlyprices

    2010 2011E 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11E 2Q11E 3Q11E 4Q11E

    Rawmaterialprices,FCA,exVAT:

    Ironoreconcentrate old 79 83 88 85 80 76 84 83 80 84 85 84

    new 79 95 101 101 97 92 84 84 93 96 96 96

    %

    chg

    0.5%

    14.6%

    15.7%

    18.8%

    21.0%

    21.5%

    2.0%

    16.2%

    14.9%

    13.7%

    13.7%

    Cokingcoalconcentrate(GZhtype) old 122 152 157 156 152 150 124 135 146 157 153 151

    new 122 164 181 179 174 168 124 134 158 166 168 164

    %chg 0.2% 8.1% 15.1% 15.2% 14.5% 12.2% 0.8% 8.1% 5.6% 9.9% 8.8%

    Steelscrap old 230 231 257 272 272 272 211 207 218 234 237 234

    new 233 268 314 345 349 347 211 221 249 267 281 274

    %chg 1.5% 16.0% 22.1% 26.9% 28.5% 27.5% 6.5% 14.1% 14.1% 18.7% 16.9%

    Domesticprices,exworks,exVAT:

    HRC old 589 653 667 655 639 630 598 601 631 663 666 650

    new 587 737 825 803 778 757 588 604 695 781 742 731

    %chg 0.3% 13.0% 23.6% 22.6% 21.7% 20.3% 0.4% 10.0% 17.9% 11.4% 12.6%

    Rebar old 555 601 632 633 618 607 579 550 577 621 605 599

    new 565 727 844 838 812 790 579 589 663 762 751 732

    %chg 1.8% 21.0% 33.6% 32.4% 31.2% 30.2% 7.1% 14.8% 22.8% 24.0% 22.2%

    Exportprices,FOB,exVAT:

    Slab old 532 561 574 563 549 541 514 517 543 570 573 558

    new 533 669 755 731 708 689 514 521 599 674 708 697

    %chg 0.2% 19.4% 31.6% 29.8% 28.8% 27.3% 0.8% 10.4% 18.3% 23.6% 24.8%

    Billet old 517 548 576 578 564 554 528 502 527 567 552 547

    new 532 687 817 823 797 776 528 564 635 698 716 698

    %chg 3.0% 25.2% 41.7% 42.4% 41.2% 40.1% 12.4% 20.4% 23.2% 29.6% 27.6%

    HRC old 595 626 640 628 613 604 574 577 605 636 639 623

    new 605 764 866 843 816 795 574 618 710 799 779 767

    %chg 1.7% 22.1% 35.2% 34.2% 33.2% 31.6% 7.1% 17.3% 25.7% 21.9% 23.2%

    Rebar old 548 583 613 614 600 589 562 534 560 602 587 581

    new 563 702 811 805 780 759 562 592 651 732 721 703

    %chg 2.6% 20.4% 32.3% 31.1% 29.9% 28.9% 10.9% 16.2% 21.6% 22.8% 21.0%

    Source:MetalExpert,Atonestimates

    Figure32:Rawmaterialandsteelpriceassumptions(Feb2010)periodonperiodprogression(%)

    YoYchangeinprices QoQchangeinprices

    2010

    2011E

    2012E

    2013E

    2014E

    2015E

    3Q10

    4Q10

    1Q11E

    2Q11E

    3Q11E

    4Q11E

    Rawmaterialprices,FCA,exVAT:

    Ironoreconcentrate 83% 20% 6% 1% 4% 5% 4% 0% 10% 4% 1% 1%

    Cokingcoalconcentrate(GZhtype) 95% 35% 10% 1% 3% 3% 1% 8% 18% 5% 1% 3%

    Steelscrap 39% 15% 17% 10% 1% 1% 15% 5% 13% 8% 5% 3%

    Domesticprices,exworks,exVAT:

    HRC 35% 26% 12% 3% 3% 3% 8% 3% 15% 13% 5% 2%

    Rebar 34% 29% 16% 1% 3% 3% 6% 2% 13% 15% 2% 3%

    Exportprices,FOB,exVAT:

    Slab 43% 26% 13% 3% 3% 3% 14% 1% 15% 13% 5% 2%

    Billet 35% 29% 19% 1% 3% 3% 1% 7% 13% 10% 2% 3%

    HRC 33% 26% 13% 3% 3% 3% 12% 8% 15% 13% 3% 2%

    Rebar 28% 25% 16% 1% 3% 3% 3% 5% 10% 13% 2% 2%

    Source:

    Metal

    Expert,

    Aton

    estimates

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    19/38

    1

    9

    Companies

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    20/38

    2

    0

    WeincreaseourtargetpriceforEvrazto$42.30/GDR(up20%from$35.33/GDR

    previously)onstrongersteelpricesandencouragingsignsfromtheRussian

    constructionsector.However,wedowngradeourratingtoHOLDaswethinkthe

    shareshave

    run

    slightly

    ahead

    of

    fundamentals:

    while

    arecovery

    in

    construction

    seemstobeunderway,weneedmoreevidencetobesureitissustainable.

    Figure33:Evrazssteelsalescontinuetoberelativelyflat(000tonnes)

    0

    1,000

    2,000

    3,000

    4,000

    5,000

    1Q0

    9

    2Q0

    9

    3Q0

    9

    4Q0

    9

    1Q1

    0

    2Q1

    0

    3Q1

    0

    4Q1

    0

    Semi finished p ro du cts Con s truc ti o nproductsRailwayproducts Fl atrolledproductsTubularproducts Othe rsteel products

    Steelsales volumesremained

    relativelyflatoverlastsixquarters

    Source:CompanyData

    Operatingresultsfor2010broadlyinlinewithexpectations.Outputin4Q10recovered

    acrossmostproductgroupsafterplannedmaintenancein3Q10.Asaresult,2010crude

    steelproductionincreased6.6%YoYto16.3mnt.Rolledproductsalesgained3%YoYto

    14.7mnt.Encouragingly,salesofconstructionsteelcontinuedtoshowpositiveQoQ

    dynamics,whichwehopereflectsagradualrecoveryintheRussianconstruction

    industry.Inmining,Evrazproduced19.4mntofironoreproducts(up9%YoY)andmined

    7.5mntof

    coking

    coal

    (down

    27%

    YoY

    due

    to

    operational

    issues).

    ButconservativeEBITDAguidanceconfirmsourcostconcerns.Despiteencouraging

    operatingdata,Evrazmaintainedits4Q10EBITDAguidanceataround$595mn(inline

    with3Q10)highlightinggrowingcostpressuresfromrawmaterials,energyandwages

    thateffectivelycancelledoutgainsinoutputandprices.

    Verticalintegrationshouldprovidesomemarginprotection.Evrazenjoysahighdegree

    ofintegrationinironore(closeto90%in2010)andcokingcoal,whereselfsufficiencyis

    expectedtoincreasefrom85%currentlytoover100%onceoutputfromRaspadskaya

    recovers.EvrazsinternationalfootprintallowsittotakeselfsufficiencybeyondRussia

    byexportingsemifinishedsteeltounitsintheUSandtheEU.

    Russianstatisticsareencouragingbutsustainabilityisuncertain.Russiapostedfixed

    investmentgrowthof6%YoYin2010,whileproductionofcement,bricksandplywood

    roseanaverageof15%YoY.However,weneedtoseesustainedgrowthinthese

    productsoveralongerperiod(probablyto2Q11)tobeconfidentthattheyreflectareal

    recoveryinconstructionandnotjustseasonalrestockingpatterns.

    DowngradetoHOLDdespiteincreasedtargetpriceof$42.30/GDR.Aftergainingover

    34%sinceourinitiationtoahighof$42.00/GDRinJan2011,Evrazhelditsground

    duringtherecentcorrectionandisnowtradingat$38.21/GDR.Althoughweraisedour

    TPto$42.30/GDRonstrongersteelpricesandsignsofarecoveryinRussian

    construction,thisoffersonly11%upsidepotential,sowedowngradethestocktoHOLD.

    We

    need

    to

    see

    a

    sustained

    recovery

    in

    domestic

    construction

    before

    we

    can

    believe

    the

    stockcouldofferanygreaterupside.

    EVRAZ GROUPHold on a Little Bit Longer

    HOLD

    Target price $42.30

    Potential upside 11%

    Bloombergcode EVRLI

    Reuterscode

    HK1q.L

    Price(ordinaryGDR,$) 38.21

    Price(pref,$) n/a

    Upsidepotential 10.7%

    Ordinary:GDRratio 1:3

    Sharedata

    No.ofordinaryshares(mn) 146

    No.ofordinaryGDRs(mn) 438

    No.ofprefshares(mn) n/a

    3Maveragedailyt/o($mn) 47

    Freefloat(%) 17.4%

    Marketcapitalisation($mn) 16,731

    Enterprisevalue

    ($mn)

    24,269

    Majorshareholders

    LanebrookLimited 72.39%

    FINANCIALS($mn) 2009 10E 11E

    Revenue 9,772 12,382 15,365

    EBITDA 1,237 2,368 3,361

    EBIT (1,047) 514 1,795

    Netincome (1,251) (54) 1,002

    EPS (9.30) (0.37) 6.87

    VALUATION

    P/E(x) (13.4) (307.0) 16.7

    P/CF(x) 15.8 25.5 13.3

    EV/EBITDA(x) 19.6 10.2 7.2

    EV/Sales(x) 2.5 2.0 1.6

    P/BV(x) 1.6 1.6 1.4

    RoCE(%) 6.9% 0.3% 5.6%

    RoE(%) 12.2% 0.5% 8.4%

    PERFORMANCE

    1month(%) 3.2%

    3month(%) 27.4%

    12month(%) 15.1%

    52weekhigh($) 42.72

    52weeklow($) 21.80

    Source:Bloomberg,Atonestimates

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    21/38

    2

    1

    Forecast Changes and Valuation

    Figure34:EvrazAtonestimates,newvsoldEBITDA Netincome

    YearendDecember: 2010E 2011E 2012E3Yaverage

    2010E 2011E 2012E3Yaverage

    Newestimates($mn) 2,368 3,361 4,081 54 1,002 1,574

    Oldestimates($mn) 2,373 3,431 4,040 112 826 1,297

    Changevsold(%) 0.2% 2.0% 1.0% 0.4% n/a 21.3% 21.4% 21.3%

    Source:Atonestimates

    Figure35:EvrazAtonestimatesvsconsensusEBITDA Netincome

    YearendDecember: 2010E 2011E 2012E3Yaverage

    2010E 2011E 2012E3Yaverage

    Atonestimates($mn) 2,368 3,361 4,081 54 1,002 1,574

    Bloombergconsensus($mn) 2,384 3,553 4,068 103 1,208 1,442

    Atonvsconsensus(%) 0.7% 5.4% 0.3% 1.9% n/a 17.1% 9.2% 3.9%

    Source:Bloomberg,Atonestimates

    Figure36:EvrazValuationbreakdown

    DCFcalculation

    ($mn):

    2011E

    2012E

    2013E

    2014E

    2015E

    2016E

    EBIT 1,795 2,472 2,409 1,838 1,409 1,198

    Lesstaxation (449) (618) (602) (460) (352) (299)

    Taxadj.EBIT 1,346 1,854 1,807 1,379 1,057 898

    Depreciation 1,566 1,609 1,635 1,635 1,635 1,635

    Lesscapex (1,100) (1,250) (1,000) (750) (750) (750)

    Changeinworkingcapital (556) (435) (222) (10) 20 37

    Freecashflow 1,256 1,778 2,220 2,254 1,963 1,820

    Terminal value 28,679

    NPVoffreecashflow 1,056 1,573 1,796 1,668 1,328 1,126

    NPVofterminalvalue 17,746

    Discountedcashflowvaluation: ($mn) (%) WACCcalculation: %

    NPVof

    free

    cash

    flow

    8,547

    32.5%

    Risk

    free

    rate

    4.50%

    NPVofterminalvalue 17,746 67.5% Standardequityriskpremium 4.00%

    Enterprisevalue 26,293 100.0% Countryspecificequitypremium 3.20%

    Plus:otherassets Liquidityriskpremium 0.00%

    Less:minorities 319 Othercompanyspecificriskpremiums 1.00%

    Less:netdebt 7,219 Totalcostofequity 12.70%

    Equityvalue 18,755 Currentcostofdebt 7.00%

    Less:preferredstockvalue Effectivecorporatetaxrate 25.00%

    Commonequityvalue 18,755 Costofdebtaftertax 5.25%

    No.ordinaryshares(mn) 146 Targetgearing(debt/equity) 45.00%

    Valuepercommonshare 128.50 WACC 9.35%

    CommonsharestoGDRratio 0.3

    ValueperGDR 42.83 Terminalgrowthrate 3.00%

    Multiplesbasedvaluation:

    Ratios: Multiple Value($mn) $/GDR

    14 xEarnings 18,034 41.18

    7 xEBITDA 18,509 42.27

    Weightedaveragevaluation:

    Valuation Weightings Netvaluation

    $/GDR % $/GDR

    DCF 42.83 50% 21.42

    P/E 41.18 25% 10.30

    EV/EBITDA 42.27 25% 10.57

    Valuepershare($/GDR) 100% 42.28

    Potentialupside(%) 10.7%

    Source:Aton

    estimates

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    22/38

    2

    2

    Financial Accounts

    Figure37:EvrazIFRSnetincomestatement($mn)2008 2009 2010E 2011E 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E

    Revenue 20,380 9,772 12,382 15,365 16,835 17,156 16,685 16,303

    Costofrevenueandotheroperatingcosts(exDD&A) (13,944) (8,399) (9,964) (11,954) (12,704) (13,061) (13,162) (13,208)

    Unallocatedexpenses (221) (136) (50) (50) (50) (50) (50) (50)

    EBITDA 6,215 1,237 2,368 3,361 4,081 4,045 3,473 3,044

    EBITDAmargin 30.5% 12.7% 19.1% 21.9% 24.2% 23.6% 20.8% 18.7%

    DD&A (1,195) (1,632) (1,735) (1,566) (1,609) (1,635) (1,635) (1,635)

    Otherincome/(expenses) (1,388) (652) (119)

    EBIT 3,632 (1,047) 514 1,795 2,472 2,409 1,838 1,409

    Netfinancialexpenses (598) (637) (602) (463) (365) (276) (180) (83)

    Otherpretaxincome/(expenses) 17 84 45 45 45 45 45 45

    Profitbeforetax 3,051 (1,600) (43) 1,377 2,153 2,178 1,703 1,371

    Incometaxexpenses (1,192) 339 (13) (344) (538) (545) (426) (343)

    Profitaftertax 1,859 (1,261) (56) 1,033 1,615 1,634 1,277 1,028

    Minorityinterests 62 (10) (2) 31 40 41 32 26

    Profitattributabletoequityholdersofthecompany 1,797 (1,251) (54) 1,002 1,574 1,593 1,246 1,002

    Netmargin 8.8% 12.8% 0.4% 6.5% 9.4% 9.3% 7.5% 6.1%

    Earningspershare:

    BasicEPSperordinaryshare 14.6 (9.3) (0.4) 6.9 10.8 10.9 8.5 6.9

    No.ofordinaryshares 123 134 146 146 146 146 146 146

    No.ofGDRs(1GDR=1/3ordinaryshare) 370 403 438 438 438 438 438 438

    Source:Companydata,Atonestimates

    Figure38:EvrazIFRSbalancesheet($mn)2008 2009 2010E 2011E 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E

    Cashandcashequivalents 930 675 406 503 1,110 1,995 2,884 3,544

    Inventories 2,416 1,886 2,186 2,457 2,776 2,784 2,863 2,885

    Receivables 2,349 1,559 2,013 2,415 2,632 2,724 2,689 2,649

    Other

    current

    assets

    589

    120

    76

    76

    76

    76

    76

    76

    Totalcurrentassets 6,284 4,240 4,681 5,451 6,594 7,579 8,511 9,154

    Property,plantandequipment 9,012 14,941 14,156 13,689 13,331 12,695 11,810 10,924

    Intangibleassets 1,108 1,098 1,016 1,016 1,016 1,016 1,016 1,016

    Goodwill 2,167 2,211 2,165 2,165 2,165 2,165 2,165 2,165

    Othernoncurrentassets 873 921 1,025 1,025 1,025 1,025 1,025 1,025

    Totalnoncurrentassets 13,160 19,171 18,362 17,895 17,537 16,901 16,016 15,130

    Assetsclassifiedforsale 7 13 113

    Totalassets 19,451 23,424 23,156 23,346 24,131 24,481 24,527 24,284

    Payables 2,538 1,694 1,884 2,000 2,101 1,980 2,012 2,015

    Shorttermloansandleaseliabilities 3,937 2,009 1,758 1,658 1,508 1,358 1,208 1,058

    Provisions 63 35 38 38 38 38 38 38

    Totalcurrentliabilities 6,538 3,738 3,680 3,696 3,647 3,376 3,258 3,111

    Longtermloans 6,064 5,931 5,431 4,281 3,431 2,581 1,731 881

    Otherlongtermliabilities 1,932 3,146 3,129 3,129 3,129 3,129 3,129 3,129

    Liabilitiesassociatedwithassetsclassifiedforsales 1 48

    Totalnoncurrentliabilities 7,996 9,078 8,608 7,410 6,560 5,710 4,860 4,010

    Shareholders'equity 4,672 10,284 10,548 11,920 13,604 15,075 16,089 16,844

    Minorityinterests 245 324 320 320 320 320 320 320

    Totalequity 4,917 10,608 10,868 12,240 13,924 15,395 16,409 17,164

    Totalequityandliabilities 19,451 23,424 23,156 23,346 24,131 24,481 24,527 24,284

    Source:Companydata,Atonestimates

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    23/38

    2

    3

    Figure39:EvrazIFRScashflowstatement($mn)

    2008 2009 2010E 2011E 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E

    Netincome 1,859 (1,261) (56) 1,033 1,615 1,634 1,277 1,028

    Adjustments:

    Depreciation,depletionandamortisation 1,195 1,632 1,735 1,566 1,609 1,635 1,635 1,635

    Othernoncashadjustments 1,672 675 200 418 320 231 135 38

    Operatingprofitbeforechangesinworkingcapital 4,726 1,046 1,879 3,017 3,543 3,500 3,048 2,702

    Changesinworkingcapital (163) 654 (516) (556) (435) (222) (10) 20

    Netcashprovidedbyoperatingactivities 4,563 1,700 1,364 2,461 3,108 3,278 3,037 2,722

    Cashflowfrominvestingactivities:

    Purchasesofproperty,plantandequipment (1,103) (441) (950) (1,100) (1,250) (1,000) (750) (750)

    Otherinvestingactivities (2,633) 624 12

    Netcashusedforinvestingactivities (3,736) 183 (938) (1,100) (1,250) (1,000) (750) (750)

    Cashflowfromfinancingactivities:

    Proceeds fromissuanceofsharecapital,netoftransactioncosts (1) 310

    Proceeds frombankloansandpromissorynotes 5,657 3,427 1,750 750 250 250 250 250

    Repaymentofbankloansandpromissorynotes,includinginterest (3,949) (4,987) (2,500) (2,000) (1,250) (1,250) (1,250) (1,250)

    Dividendspaidbytheparententitytoitsshareholders (1,276) (90) (14) (250) (394) (398) (311)

    Otherfinancingactivities (558) (809) 110

    Netcashprovidedbyfinancingactivities (127) (2,149) (640) (1,264) (1,250) (1,394) (1,398) (1,311)

    Effectsofexchangeratechangesoncashandcashequivalents (97) 11 (55)

    Cashandcashequivalentsatbeginningoftheperiod 327 930 675 406 503 1,110 1,995 2,884

    Netincreaseincashandcashequivalents 603 (255) (269) 97 607 885 889 661

    Cashofdisposalgroupsclassifiedasheldforsale (21)

    Cashandcashequivalentsattheendoftheperiod 930 675 406 503 1,110 1,995 2,884 3,544

    Source:Companydata,Atonestimates

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    24/38

    2

    4

    WeincreaseourtargetpriceforMMKto$16.20/GDR(up6%from$15.33/GDR)to

    accountforstrongersteelpricesanditsgrowingexposuretoHighValueAdded(HVA)

    products,whichshouldmitigatesomeoftherisingpressurefromcosts.Ournew

    targetprice

    offers

    17%

    upside

    potential

    from

    the

    current

    level,

    allowing

    us

    to

    reiterate

    ourBUYratingonMMK.

    Figure40:Domesticmarketremainsthefocusforhighvalueaddedproductsales

    77%

    10%

    8%5%

    Regional s a l e s structure (3Q10)

    Domesticmarket

    Middle

    East

    Asia&

    Fa rEast Other

    12%

    37%

    21%13%

    12%

    5%

    Domestics a l e s bysector(3Q10)

    Pipe

    production

    Spotsales

    Russia &CISMachine

    building

    Construction

    Auto

    industryOther

    Source:Companydata

    Financialsfor3Q10highlightgrowingcostpressures.MMKs3Q10IFRSresultsclearly

    reflectthecostpressuresitfacesasoneofRussiasleastintegratedsteelmakers:EBITDA

    wasdown11%QoQto$388mnduetohighercosts,withEBITDAmarginslippingto

    18.9%from21.1%in2Q10(seeFigure41).

    Figure41:MMK3Q10IFRSresultssummary($mn)

    3Q10

    actual

    2Q10

    actual

    QoQ

    change

    3Q10

    Atonest.

    3Q09

    actualvs

    Atonest.

    3Q10

    Interfax

    consensus

    3Q09

    actualvs

    consensus

    EBITDA 388 437 11.2% 404 4.0% 381 1.8%

    EBITDAmargin 18.9% 21.1% 19.7% 18.8%

    Netincome 43 53 18.9% 78 44.9% 85 49.4%

    Source:Companydata,Interfax,Atonestimates

    Operatingresultsbelowexpectationsin4Q10,promptingrevisiontoFY10forecast.

    MMKs4Q10productionnumberscameinbelowourexpectationswithQoQreductions

    acrossmoststeelproductgroups;rolledproductoutputwasdown6%QoQto2.7mn

    tonnes.ThenotableexceptionwasHVAproduction,whichaccountedfor42%of4Q10

    shipments(upfrom38%in3Q10).AsaresultwerevisedourFY10netincomeforecast

    down11%from$270mnto$240mn.

    HVAproductsandverticalintegrationshouldhelpinprotectingmargins.The

    companysMill5000,whichaccountsforalargeshareofHVAproductiongrowth,isnow

    operatingatitsfullcapacityof1.5mntpaofthickplate.Togetherwithgrowingself

    sufficiencyincokingcoal,thisshouldmitigatesomeofthecostpressuresexpectedin

    2011.Onthedownside,theprofitabilityofitsAtakasJVremainsuncertain.Weestimate

    MMKcouldeasilyadd3mnt(27%)ofsteelproductionfromexistingfacilitiesifmarket

    conditionsimprove,quicklytranslatingintobetterfinancialperformance.

    Targetpriceuppedto$16.20/GDR;BUYratingreiterated.Ournewtargetpriceimplies

    17%upsidepotentialfromcurrentlevels,supportingourBUYratingonthestock.Future

    reviewswill

    depend

    on

    MMKs

    ability

    to

    manage

    its

    cost

    exposure

    and

    protect

    margins

    fromfurtherdeterioration.

    MAGNITOGORSK IRON AND STEELGrowing HVA Output Offsets Cost Pressures

    BUY

    Target price $16.20

    Potential upside 17%

    Bloombergcode MMKLI

    Reuterscode

    MAGNq.L

    Price(ordinaryGDR,$) 13.82

    Price(pref,$) n/a

    Upsidepotential 17.2%

    Ordinary:GDRratio 13:1

    Sharedata

    No.ofordinaryshares(mn) 11,174

    No.ofordinaryGDRs(mn) 860

    No.ofprefshares(mn) n/a

    3Maveragedailyt/o($mn) 8

    Freefloat(%) 13.4%

    Marketcapitalisation($mn) 11,879

    Enterprisevalue

    ($mn)

    15,228

    Majorshareholders

    MinthaHoldingLimited 45.62%

    FulnekEnterprisesLimited 41.01%

    FINANCIALS($mn) 2009 10E 11E

    Revenue 5,081 7,597 10,038

    EBITDA 1,023 1,437 2,059

    EBIT 288 643 1,219

    Netincome 232 240 812

    EPS 0.02 0.02 0.07

    VALUATION

    P/E(x)

    51.1

    49.5

    14.6

    P/CF(x) 15.2 11.1 153.8

    EV/EBITDA(x) 14.9 10.6 7.4

    EV/Sales(x) 3.0 2.0 1.5

    P/BV(x) 1.2 1.2 1.1

    RoCE(%) 1.9% 1.8% 5.7%

    RoE(%) 2.3% 2.4% 7.7%

    PERFORMANCE

    1month(%) 11.0%

    3month(%) 8.0%

    12month(%) 8.1%

    52weekhigh($) 16.23

    52week

    low

    ($)

    8.90

    Source:Bloomberg,Atonestimates

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    25/38

    2

    5

    Forecast Changes and Valuation

    Figure42:MMKAtonestimates,newvsoldEBITDA Netincome

    YearendDecember 2010E 2011E 2012E3Yaverage

    2010E 2011E 2012E3Yaverage

    Newestimates($mn) 1,437 2,059 2,837 240 812 1,342

    Oldestimates($mn) 1,535 2,423 2,737 270 872 1,058

    Changevsold(%) 6.3% 15.0% 3.7% 5.9% 11.2% 6.8% 26.8% 2.9%

    Source:Atonestimates

    Figure43:MMKAtonestimatesvsconsensusEBITDA Netincome

    YearendDecember 2010E 2011E 2012E3Yaverage

    2010E 2011E 2012E3Yaverage

    Atonestimates($mn) 1,437 2,059 2,837 240 812 1,342

    Bloombergconsensus($mn) 1,557 2,414 2,799 380 1,047 1,360

    Atonvsconsensus(%) 7.7% 14.7% 1.4% 7.0% 36.8% 22.4% 1.3% 20.2%

    Source:Bloomberg,Atonestimates

    Figure44:MMKValuationbreakdown

    DCFcalculation

    ($mn):

    2011E

    2012E

    2013E

    2014E

    2015E

    2016E

    EBIT 1,219 1,907 1,644 1,328 1,121 1,009

    Lesstaxation (274) (429) (370) (299) (252) (227)

    Taxadj.EBIT 945 1,478 1,274 1,029 869 782

    Depreciation 840 930 969 1,019 1,037 1,063

    Lesscapex (1,000) (950) (850) (650) (500) (500)

    Changeinworkingcapital (707) (386) (96) (27) 31 49

    Freecashflow 77 1,072 1,297 1,372 1,437 1,393

    Terminal value 19,758

    NPVoffreecashflow 65 940 1,034 993 945 833

    NPVofterminalvalue 11,811

    Discountedcashflowvaluation: ($mn) (%) WACCcalculation: %

    NPVof

    free

    cash

    flow

    4,810

    28.9%

    Risk

    free

    rate

    4.50%

    NPVofterminalvalue 11,811 71.1% Standardequityriskpremium 4.00%

    Enterprisevalue 16,621 100.0% Countryspecificequitypremium 3.20%

    Plus:otherassets Liquidityriskpremium 1.00%

    Less:minorities 421 Othercompanyspecificriskpremiums 0.00%

    Less:netdebt 2,928 Totalcostofequity 12.70%

    Equityvalue 13,272 Currentcostofdebt 5.00%

    Less:preferredstockvalue Effectivecorporatetaxrate 22.50%

    Commonequityvalue 13,272 Costofdebtaftertax 3.88%

    No.ordinaryshares(mn) 11,174 Targetgearing(debt/equity) 30.00%

    Valuepercommonshare 1.19 WACC 10.05%

    Commonshares:GDRratio 13

    ValueperGDR 15.44 Terminalgrowthrate 3.0%

    Multiplesbasedvaluation:

    Ratios: Multiple Value($mn) $/GDR

    14 xEarnings 15,076 17.63

    7 xEBITDA 13,786 16.12

    Weightedaveragevaluation:

    Valuation Weightings Netvaluation

    $/GDR % $/GDR

    DCF 15.44 50% 7.72

    P/E 17.63 25% 4.41

    EV/EBITDA 16.12 25% 4.03

    Valuepershare($/GDR) 100% 16.16

    Potentialupside(%) 17.2%

    Source:Aton

    estimates

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    26/38

    2

    6

    Financial Accounts

    Figure45:MMKIFRSnetincomestatement($mn)2008 2009 2010E 2011E 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E

    Grossrevenue 10,550 5,081 7,597 10,038 12,091 12,330 12,327 12,107

    Costofgoodssold (6,890) (3,205) (4,944) (6,322) (7,259) (7,682) (7,945) (7,951)

    Selling,distributionandadministrativeexpenses (1,163) (802) (1,064) (1,556) (1,874) (1,911) (1,911) (1,877)

    Otheroperatingexpenses/(income) (378) (51) (152) (100) (121) (123) (123) (121)

    EBITDA(reported) 2,204 1,285 1,566 2,059 2,837 2,613 2,348 2,158

    EBITDA(adjusted) 2,119 1,023 1,437 2,059 2,837 2,613 2,348 2,158

    EBITDA(adjusted)margin 20.1% 20.1% 18.9% 20.5% 23.5% 21.2% 19.0% 17.8%

    EBIT 1,174 288 643 1,219 1,907 1,644 1,328 1,121

    Netforeignexchangegain/(loss) 16 9 (40)

    Othernonoperatingincome/(loss) 1 180 10

    Netinterestexpense (18) (76) (136) (160) (158) (128) (87) (40)

    Otherincome/(expenses),net (67) (144) (168)

    Incomebeforetaxandminorityinterest 1,106 257 310 1,059 1,749 1,516 1,241 1,081

    Incometax (25) (38) (68) (238) (394) (341) (279) (243)

    Incomebeforeminorityinterest 1,081 219 242 821 1,356 1,175 962 838

    Minorityinterest (6) 13 (2) (8) (14) (12) (10) (8)

    Netincome 1,075 232 240 812 1,342 1,163 952 830

    Netmargin 10.2% 4.6% 3.2% 8.1% 11.1% 9.4% 7.7% 6.9%

    Earningspershare:

    BasicEPSperordinaryshare 0.10 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.07

    No.ofordinarysharesoutstanding 11,160 11,099 11,116 11,116 11,116 11,116 11,116 11,116

    No.ofGDRs(1GDR=13ordinaryshares) 858 854 855 855 855 855 855 855

    Source:Companydata,Atonestimates

    Figure46:MMKIFRSbalancesheet($mn)2008 2009 2010E 2011E 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E

    Cashandcashequivalents 1,106 165 248 246 490 958 1,557 2,270

    Otherinvestments 138 221 202 202 202 202 202 202

    Accounts

    receivables

    980

    941

    1,249

    1,650

    1,817

    1,773

    1,773

    1,741

    Inventories 996 856 1,084 1,299 1,388 1,421 1,469 1,470

    Othercurrentassets 408 247 203 182 165 168 174 174

    Totalcurrentassets 3,628 2,430 2,986 3,579 4,062 4,523 5,176 5,858

    Plant,propertyandequipment 9,751 11,276 12,218 12,378 12,398 12,279 11,910 11,373

    Intangibleassets 36 37 34 34 34 34 34 34

    Goodwill 45 309 299 299 299 299 299 299

    Investmentsinaffiliates 228 22 25 25 25 25 25 25

    Otherinvestments 358 627 562 562 562 562 562 562

    Othernoncurrentassets 151 132 154 154 154 154 154 154

    Totalnoncurrentassets 10,569 12,403 13,292 13,452 13,472 13,352 12,983 12,446

    Totalassets 14,197 14,833 16,277 17,031 17,534 17,875 18,159 18,305

    Shorttermloansandleaseliabilities 1,295 828 972 1,022 922 822 722 622

    Accountsandnotespayable 1,321 928 1,151 1,039 892 789 816 817

    Othercurrentliabilities 24 21 23 23 23 23 23 23

    Totalcurrentliabilities 2,640 1,777 2,146 2,084 1,837 1,634 1,561 1,462

    Longtermdebtandcapitalleases 431 1,290 2,378 2,578 2,328 2,078 1,828 1,578

    Othernoncurrentliabilities 1,274 1,441 1,403 1,403 1,403 1,403 1,403 1,403

    Totalnoncurrentliabilities 1,705 2,731 3,781 3,981 3,731 3,481 3,231 2,981

    Totalliabilities 4,345 4,508 5,927 6,065 5,568 5,115 4,792 4,443

    Minorityinterests 189 368 405 405 405 405 405 405

    Totalshareholders'equity 9,664 9,957 9,945 10,560 11,560 12,355 12,962 13,457

    Totalliabilitiesandshareholders'equity 14,198 14,833 16,277 17,031 17,534 17,875 18,159 18,305

    Source:Companydata,Atonestimates

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    27/38

    2

    7

    Figure47:MMKIFRScashflowstatement($mn)2008 2009 2010E 2011E 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E

    Operatingactivities:

    Netincome 1,075 232 240 812 1,342 1,163 952 830

    Adjustmentsfornoncashitems:

    Depreciationandamortisation 945 735 794 840 930 969 1,019 1,037

    Income

    tax

    25

    38

    68

    238

    394

    341

    279

    243

    Netfinancecost 18 76 136 160 158 128 87 40

    Otheradjustmentsfornoncashitems 715 (115) 224 30 31 8 4 8

    Operatingprofitbeforechangesinworkingcapital 2,778 966 1,461 2,080 2,854 2,609 2,342 2,158

    Changesinworkingcapital (269) (127) (245) (707) (386) (96) (27) 31

    Cashgeneratedfromoperations 2,509 839 1,216 1,373 2,468 2,513 2,315 2,189

    Interestpaid (104) (109) (110) (165) (172) (170) (152) (135)

    Incometaxrefund/(paid) (480) 135 (70) (217) (376) (345) (285) (243)

    Netcashgeneratedbyoperatingactivities 1,925 865 1,036 991 1,920 1,999 1,877 1,810

    Investingactivities:

    Acquisitionofproperty,plantandequipment (2,112) (1,613) (2,118) (1,000) (950) (850) (650) (500)

    Otherinvestingactivities 1,133 (76) 10

    Netcashusedforinvestingactivities (979) (1,689) (2,108) (1,000) (950) (850) (650) (500)

    Financing

    activities:

    Proceeds fromborrowings 3,974 2,935 2,500 500

    Repaymentofborrowings (3,562) (2,974) (1,250) (250) (350) (350) (350) (350)

    Dividendspaid (314) (16) (48) (203) (336) (291) (238) (207)

    Otherfinancingactivities (36) 15 3 (40) (40) (40) (40) (40)

    Netcashprovidedbyfinancingactivities 62 (40) 1,205 7 (726) (681) (628) (597)

    Effectsofexchangeratechangesincashandcashequivalents (158) (77) (50)

    Cashandcashequivalentsatbeginningoftheperiod 256 1,106 165 248 246 490 958 1,557

    Netincreaseincashandcashequivalents 850 (941) 83 (2) 244 468 599 713

    Cashandcashequivalentsattheendoftheperiod 1,106 165 248 246 490 958 1,557 2,270

    Source:Companydata,Atonestimates

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    28/38

    2

    8

    WeupgradeourratingonNLMKfromHOLDtoBUYwitha12MTPof$49.40/GDR,

    implying14%upsidepotential.Whileupsidemaybelimitedcomparedtoothersteel

    stocks,NLMKsassetquality,healthybalancesheetandstrongprofitabilitymakeita

    soundpotential

    addition

    to

    any

    steel

    company

    portfolio,

    in

    our

    view.

    Figure48:Salesandrevenuearefinelybalancedovermajormarkets

    Other

    11%Middle

    East

    15%

    USA

    17%

    Russia

    35%

    Europe22%

    Regional s a l e s structure (3Q10)

    Other

    12%Middle

    East

    14%

    USA

    13%

    Russia

    40%

    Europe

    21%

    Regional revenue structure(3Q10)

    Source:CompanyData

    HVAproductsunderpinprofitabilityleadership.AlthoughHVAproducts(e.g.pre

    painted,transformeranddynamosteels)accountforonly30%ofNLMKssalesvolumes,

    thepremiummarginstheseproductscommandunderpinitsprofitabilityleadershipover

    peers,evenintimesofrisingcosts.Increasedlongsteeloutputshouldprovide

    additionalupsideonceRussianconstructionactivityrecovers,inourview.

    Outlookfor4Q10highlightschallengingcostenvironment.NLMKreportedastrongset

    of3Q10results,outperformingbothourandconsensusestimatesbyasubstantial

    margin,recordingEBITDAof$695mnandnetincomeof$516mn(seeFigure49).

    Figure49:NLMK3Q10USGAAPresultssummary($mn)

    3Q10

    actual

    2Q10

    actual

    QoQ

    change

    3Q10

    Atonest.

    3Q09

    actualvs

    Atonest.

    3Q10

    Interfax

    consensus

    3Q09

    actualvs

    consensus

    EBITDA 695 750 7% 612 14% 646 8%

    EBITDAmargin 30.5% 34.8% 29.1% 30.2%

    Netincome 516 466 11% 309 67% 409 26%

    Source:Companydata,Interfax,Atonestimates

    However,thecompanysoutlookfor4Q10highlightsthecostpressuresthebusinessis

    facing:EBITDA

    margin

    is

    expected

    at

    around

    25%

    vs

    31%

    in

    3Q10.

    BuyingremainingstakeinDufercoJVcouldbeakeyvaluecatalyst.NLMK's

    internationalexpansionhasfocusedonacquiringsteelrerollingassetstocompensate

    forashortageofrollingcapacity.TheJVwithDuferco(SteelInvest&FinanceS.A.)aimed

    togiveNLMKanoutletforitsexpandingslabproduction.Buyingtheremaining50%in

    theJVcouldbecomeapowerfulvaluedriversupportinghighermarginsviasalesto

    internationalmarkets(providedthepriceisrightandNLMKcanreturnthefacilitiesto

    profitability).

    TPraisedto$49.40/share,upgradetoBUY.Thestockhascorrectedaround15%from

    itsJanuarypeakof$51.30/GDR.WhileournewTPimpliesjust14%upsidefromcurrent

    levels,wehaveupgradedourratingtoBUYonNLMKsassetquality,strongbalance

    sheetand

    profitability

    leadership

    vs

    global

    peers,

    which

    should

    keep

    the

    stock

    among

    thetoppicksforanysteelfocusedportfolio,inourview.

    NOVOLIPETSK STEELProfitability Leader Despite Margin Pressures

    BUY

    Target price $49.40

    Potential upside 14%

    Bloombergcode NLMKLI

    Reuterscode

    NLMKq.L

    Price(ordinary,$) 43.50

    Price(pref,$) n/a

    Upsidepotential 13.6%

    Ordinary:GDRratio 10:1

    Sharedata

    No.ofordinaryshares(mn) 5,993

    No.ofordinaryGDRs(mn) 599

    No.ofprefshares(mn) n/a3Maveragedailyt/o($mn) 19

    Freefloat(%) 12.9%

    Marketcapitalisation($mn) 26,071

    Enterprisevalue

    ($mn)

    27,333

    Majorshareholders

    FletcherGroupHoldings 85.5%

    FINANCIALS($mn) 2009 10E 11E

    Revenue 6,140 8,382 10,905

    EBITDA 1,370 2,384 3,233

    EBIT 892 1,882 2,673

    Netincome 215 1,332 1,949

    EPS 0.04 0.22 0.33

    VALUATION

    P/E(x) 121.2 19.6 13.4

    P/CF(x) 101.5 100.1 76.5

    EV/EBITDA(x) 20.0 11.5 8.5

    EV/Sales(x) 4.5 3.3 2.5

    P/BV(x) 3.0 2.7 2.3

    RoCE(%) 1.9% 10.7% 14.3%

    RoE(%) 2.5% 13.7% 17.5%

    PERFORMANCE

    1month(%) 7.6%

    3month(%) 15.8%

    12month(%) 42.2%

    52weekhigh($) 51.00

    52weeklow($) 25.04

    Source:Bloomberg,Atonestimates

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    29/38

    2

    9

    Forecast Changes and Valuation

    Figure50:NLMKAtonestimates,newvsoldEBITDA Netincome

    YearendDecember 2010E 2011E 2012E3Yaverage

    2010E 2011E 2012E3Yaverage

    Newestimates($mn) 2,384 3,233 4,397 1,332 1,949 2,753

    Oldestimates($mn) 2,424 3,263 3,700 1,208 2,011 2,293

    Changevsold(%) 1.6% 0.9% 18.8% 5.4% 10.3% 3.1% 20.1% 9.1%

    Source:Atonestimates

    Figure51:NLMKAtonestimatesvsconsensusEBITDA Netincome

    YearendDecember 2010E 2011E 2012E3Yaverage

    2010E 2011E 2012E3Yaverage

    Atonestimates($mn) 2,384 3,233 4,397 1,332 1,949 2,753

    Bloombergconsensus($mn) 2,400 3,370 3,959 1,311 2,047 2,373

    Atonvsconsensus(%) 0.7% 4.1% 11.1% 2.1% 1.6% 4.8% 16.1% 4.3%

    Source:Bloomberg,Atonestimates

    Figure52:NLMKValuationbreakdown

    DCFcalculation

    ($mn):

    2011E

    2012E

    2013E

    2014E

    2015E

    2016E

    EBIT 2,673 3,756 3,923 3,953 3,748 3,635

    Lesstaxation (601) (845) (883) (889) (843) (818)

    Taxadj.EBIT 2,071 2,911 3,040 3,063 2,905 2,818

    Depreciation 560 640 696 710 709 709

    Lesscapex (1,800) (1,500) (900) (700) (700) (700)

    Changeinworkingcapital (491) (478) (266) (71) (39) (39)

    Freecashflow 341 1,574 2,570 3,002 2,875 2,788

    Terminal value 43,887

    NPVoffreecashflow 290 1,391 2,077 2,219 1,943 1,723

    NPVofterminalvalue 27,123

    Discountedcashflowvaluation: ($mn) (%) WACCcalculation: %

    NPVof

    free

    cash

    flow

    9,643

    26.2%

    Risk

    free

    rate

    4.5%

    NPVofterminalvalue 27,123 73.8% Standardequityriskpremium 4.0%

    Enterprisevalue 36,766 100.0% Countryspecificequitypremium 3.2%

    Plus:otherassets Liquidityriskpremium 0.0%

    Less:minorities 115 Othercompanyspecificriskpremiums 0.0%

    Less:netdebt 1,148 Totalcostofequity 11.7%

    Equityvalue 35,504 Currentcostofdebt 5.0%

    Less:preferredstockvalue Effectivecorporatetaxrate 22.5%

    Commonequityvalue 35,504 Costofdebtaftertax 3.9%

    No.ordinaryshares(mn) 5,993 Targetgearing(debt/equity) 30.0%

    Valuepercommonshare 5.92 WACC 9.4%

    Commonshares:GDRratio 10

    ValueperGDR 59.24 Terminalgrowthrate 3.0%

    Multiplesbasedvaluation:

    Ratios: Multiple Value($mn) $/GDR

    16 xEarnings 26,246 43.79

    8 xEBITDA 21,206 35.38

    Weightedaveragevaluation:

    Valuation Weightings Netvaluation

    $/GDR % $/GDR

    DCF 59.2 50% 29.62

    P/E 43.8 25% 10.95

    EV/EBITDA 35.4 25% 8.85

    Valuepershare($/GDR) 100% 49.41

    Potentialupside(%) 13.6%

    Source:Aton

    estimates

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    30/38

    3

    0

    Financial Accounts

    Figure53:NLMKUSGAAPP&Lstatement($mn)2009 2010E 2011E 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E

    Totalrevenue 6,140 8,382 10,905 13,524 14,839 15,184 15,298

    COGS (4,150) (5,399) (7,033) (8,280) (9,284) (9,561) (9,867)

    Grossprofit 1,990 2,982 3,872 5,244 5,555 5,623 5,431

    SG&A (1,054) (1,097) (1,200) (1,488) (1,632) (1,670) (1,683)

    Otheroperatingincome/(expense) (44) (3)

    Operatingincome(EBIT) 892 1,882 2,673 3,756 3,923 3,953 3,748

    EBITDA 1,370 2,384 3,233 4,397 4,619 4,662 4,457

    DD&A (478) (503) (560) (640) (696) (710) (709)

    Netinterestincome/(expense) (111) (54) (78) (90) (65) (6) 70

    Associates

    FX(loss)/gain (78) (54)

    Others(recurring) (108) (13)

    Pretaxprofit 595 1,761 2,595 3,666 3,858 3,947 3,818

    Tax (182) (423) (584) (825) (868) (888) (859)

    Equityinnetlosses/(earnings)ofassociates (315) (29) (43) (60) (63) (65) (63)

    Netincome(preexceptionals) 98 1,310 1,969 2,781 2,927 2,994 2,896

    Minorityinterest 117 22 (20) (28) (29) (30) (29)

    Netincome(postexceptionals) 215 1,332 1,949 2,753 2,898 2,964 2,868

    EPS($/GDR) 0.36 2.22 3.25 4.59 4.83 4.95 4.78

    DividendperGDR($) 0.07 0.31 0.98 1.38 1.45 1.48 1.44

    NumberofGDRs(mn) 599 599 599 599 599 599 599

    Source:Companydata,Atonestimates

    Figure54:NLMKUSGAAPbalancesheet($mn)2009 2010E 2011E 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E

    Cash&shortterminvestments 1,699 1,268 722 540 2,027 3,971 5,978

    Accountsreceivable 913 1,247 1,622 2,011 2,207 2,258 2,275

    Inventory 1,134 1,475 1,922 2,263 2,537 2,613 2,696

    Other

    current

    assets

    131

    131

    131

    131

    131

    131

    131

    Totalcurrentassets 3,877 4,121 4,396 4,944 6,902 8,972 11,080

    PP&E 7,316 8,613 9,853 10,713 10,917 10,907 10,898

    Intangibleassets 760 760 760 760 760 760 760

    Investments 468 468 468 468 468 468 468

    Otherlongtermassets 81 122 122 122 122 122 122

    Totalnoncurrentassets 8,625 9,963 11,204 12,063 12,267 12,257 12,248

    Totalassets 12,502 14,084 15,599 17,007 19,168 21,230 23,328

    Accountspayable 841 1,094 1,425 1,678 1,882 1,938 2,000

    Shorttermdebt 557 600 600 600 600 600 600

    Othercurrentliabilities 19 19 19 19 19 19 19

    Totalcurrentliabilities 1,417 1,714 2,045 2,298 2,501 2,557 2,619

    Longtermdebt 1,939 2,100 1,900 1,100 1,000 900 900

    Deferredtaxliabilities 396 396 396 396 396 396 396

    Othernoncurrentliabilities 140 140 140 140 140 140 140

    Totallongtermliabilities 2,475 2,636 2,436 1,636 1,536 1,436 1,436

    Totalliabilities 3,892 4,350 4,481 3,934 4,037 3,994 4,056

    Minorityinterests (108) (108) (108) (108) (108) (108) (108)

    Totalshareholdersequity 8,610 9,734 11,118 13,073 15,131 17,236 19,272

    Totalliabilitiesandequity 12,502 14,084 15,599 17,007 19,168 21,229 23,328

    Source:Companydata,Atonestimates

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    31/38

    3

    1

    Figure55:NLMKUSGAAPcashflow($mn)

    2009 2010E 2011E 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E

    Netincome 98 1,310 1,969 2,781 2,927 2,994 2,896

    DD&Aaddback 478 503 560 640 696 710 709

    (Increase)/Decreaseinworkingcapital 859 (422) (491) (478) (266) (71) (39)

    Otheroperatingcashflowitems (41)

    Cashflowfromoperations 1,394 1,391 2,038 2,944 3,357 3,633 3,567

    Capital

    expenditure

    (1,121)

    (1,800)

    (1,800)

    (1,500)

    (900)

    (700)

    (700)

    Acquisitions

    Otherinvestingcashflow (651)

    Cashflowfrominvesting (1,771) (1,800) (1,800) (1,500) (900) (700) (700)

    Dividendspaid (2) (185) (585) (826) (869) (889) (860)

    Share(repurchase)/issue

    Increase/(decrease)interestbearingliabilities (533) 164 (200) (800) (100) (100)

    Cashflowfromfinancing (535) (21) (785) (1,626) (969) (989) (860)

    Cashandcashequivalentsatbeginningofyear 2,159 1,247 817 270 88 1,575 3,519

    Netincrease/(decrease)incashandcashequivalents (912) (431) (547) (182) 1,487 1,944 2,007

    Cashandcashequivalentsatendofyear 1,247 817 270 88 1,575 3,519 5,526

    Source:Companydata,Atonestimates

  • 8/3/2019 RUSSIAN STEEL Remain Cautious as Costs Take Centre Stage

    32/38

    3

    2

    WeupgradeourtargetpriceforSeverstalto$22.10/GDRandreiterateourBUYrating

    ontheshares.PostponementofthecompanysgoldbusinessIP