russ hauge's memo on officer-involved shooting
TRANSCRIPT
Kitsap County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office
Adult Criminal & Administrative Divisions • 614 Division Street, MS-35 • Port Orchard, Washington 98366-4681 • (360) 337-7174 • FAX (360) 337-4949
Juvenile Criminal Division • 614 Division Street, MS-35 • Port Orchard, Washington 98366-4681 • (360) 337-5500 • FAX (360) 337-4949
Special Assault Unit • 614 Division Street, MS-35 • Port Orchard, Washington 98366-4681 • (360) 337-7148 • FAX (360) 337-4949
Bainbridge Island Municipal Court Division • 614 Division Street, MS-35 • Port Orchard, Washington 98366 • (360) 337-7174 • FAX (360) 337-4949
Port Orchard Municipal Court Division • 614 Division Street, MS-35 • Port Orchard, Washington 98366-4681 • (360) 337-7174 • FAX (360) 337-4949
Poulsbo Municipal Court Division • 614 Division Street, MS-35 • Port Orchard, Washington 98366-4681 • (360) 337-7174 • FAX (360) 337-4949
Civil Division • 614 Division Street, MS-35A • Port Orchard, Washington 98366-4681 • (360) 337-4992 • FAX (360) 337-7083
Child Support Division • 614 Division Street, MS-35B • Port Orchard, Washington 98366-4681 • (360) 337-7020 • FAX (360) 337-5733
Russell D. Hauge
Prosecuting Attorney
Carol I. Maves Office Administrator
Ione S. George
Case Management
Division Chief
Timothy A. Drury
Felony and Juvenile
Division Chief
Claire A. Bradley District/Municipal
Division Chief
Jacquelyn M.
Aufderheide
Civil/Child Support
Division Chief
www.kitsapgov.com/pros
Memorandum
TO: Port Gamble Public Safety Department, Suquamish Police Department,
Kitsap County Sheriff’s Office, Kitsap Sun, Kitsap Newspaper Group
FROM: Russell D. Hauge, Prosecuting Attorney
REPLY TO: Adult Criminal & Administrative Divisions
CC: Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribal Council
DATE: February 3, 2012
RE: Decline Discussion, Dec. 8, 2011 Officer-Involved Shooting
At approximately ten minutes to three on the afternoon of December 8, 2011, Officers
of the Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribal Police Department, the Suquamish Tribal Police
Department, and the Kitsap County Sheriff’s Office gathered outside the residence at
18636 Second Ave. NE in Suquamish, Washington. They were there to arrest Stacy
Callihoo, a forty-two-year-old male with a long history of serious and violent
criminal offenses. The officers had a warrant for his arrest and solid information that
he was inside the residence. Four officers entered the residence and noted a male
subject sitting on a couch or bed across the room. This subject had his hands partially
obscured by blankets and pillows. The officers ordered him to show his hands—
repeatedly. The officers were clearly identified as law enforcement personnel and
made reasonable and clear demands consistent with protecting themselves and any
other occupants of the residence. The subject made eye contact with the officers but
did not comply. Instead, keeping his hands down in front of him and out of sight, he
made a sudden, furtive gesture, consistent with reaching for a weapon. Reasonably
fearing for his safety, the officer in the lead position, Det. Greg Graves of the Port
Gamble S’Klallam Police Department, fired his service weapon at the subject. The
subject was struck twice and died as a result of his wounds. Under Washington law,
this shooting by Det. Graves was a justified use of deadly force.
This conclusion rests on the investigation conducted by the Kitsap County Sheriff’s
Office. One of the pieces of evidence collected and analyzed in that investigation
was a video tape of the officers’ contact with the deceased. A Suquamish officer was
February 3, 2012
Page 2
________________________________
wearing “vest cam,” a small portable video and sound recorder attached to the front
of her uniform. The tape covers the transaction from initial confrontation to shooting.
The warrant for Callihoo's arrest was issued on November 30, 2011, by the Port
Gamble S’Klallam Tribal Court. Callihoo had violated probation conditions imposed
after his conviction for Indecent Liberties and Assault. Callihoo is a Native American
and subject to the jurisdiction of that court. He is also well known to the Suquamish
tribal justice system and the courts of the State of Washington. His criminal record
includes arrests and convictions for violent, drug and property crimes going back to
1987. He is considered dangerous, presenting a high likelihood of resisting arrest.
The information that Callihoo was at the Suquamish address was developed by the
Suquamish Police Department. Reliable informants had identified the house as a
center for illegal drug trafficking. Callihoo was known to have a relationship with
one of the residents of the house, Shari Black. The Suquamish Police received
information from a trusted source that Callihoo and others were at the residence on
the afternoon of December 8, 2011.
Knowing that he was subject to a Port Gamble S’Klallam arrest warrant, the
Suquamish P.D. notified the Port Gamble Police Department of Callihoo’s presence
on the Suquamish reservation. Officer Michael Hultberg and Det. Graves of Port
Gamble were detailed to respond. They reported to the Suquamish Police
Department offices early in the afternoon on Dec. 8, 2011. There they met with
Suquamish Police Department Officers and two Kitsap County Sheriff’s deputies to
develop a plan to arrest Callihoo. The Kitsap County Sheriff’s Deputies were on duty
and assigned to patrol the northern part of the County. It is the standard practice of
all three law enforcement agencies to provide direct, mutual support when dealing
with a potentially violent offender like Callihoo.
Callihoo’s violent criminal history heavily influenced the plan that was made for his
arrest. He had convictions for, among other offenses, Robbery in the First Degree,
Assault, Attempting to Elude Pursuing Police, Obstructing Law Enforcement, and
Resisting Arrest. All of the police officers involved in this incident were graduates of
the Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission Academy. This training
dictates that extreme caution should be used when apprehending a fugitive with a
history of violent crimes and resisting arrest. It was determined that three officers
would approach the residence: Det. Graves of Port Gamble, Sgt. Swift Sanchez of the
Suquamish Police Department, and Det. Gary Drake of the Suquamish P.D. Kitsap
County Sheriff’s Deputies Michael Grant and David Fortenbacher would stand by
February 3, 2012
Page 3
________________________________
near the entrance. Other units of the Suquamish Police Department and the Port
Gamble Police would secure the perimeter of the house and grounds.
At approximately ten minutes to three on the afternoon of Dec. 8, Det. Graves, Sgt.
Sanchez, and Det. Drake approached the entrance. The critical events of this
transaction—the initial contact with the occupants of the dwelling through the
officers’ retreat from the house after shots were fired—were captured on the personal
video camera worn by Sgt. Sanchez. The visual recording is spotty. Sgt. Sanchez
had the camera attached to her uniform and was not in a position to choose the images
and frame the action. Moreover, the light in the interior of the dwelling was very
dim. The audio portion of the recording is clearer. Most importantly, the recording
captures the action in real time. We have prepared a table showing the order of the
critical events and the intervals between them. That table is attached as an appendix
at the end of this document.
The three members of the entry team stepped up onto the porch, knocked on the front
door, identified themselves, and asked the occupants to come out. The front entrance
consisted of a glass sliding door screened on the inside by a blanket hung like a
curtain. All three officers were wearing clothing that clearly identified them as law
enforcement. Shari Black, the regular resident of the dwelling, answered the door.
At the officers’ request, she exited the house, closing the sliding door behind her.
She was escorted away from the porch/entryway of the dwelling.
Her small dog followed her outside. She asked if her dog could be let back in the
house. Det. Graves opened the door and pulled back the window covering so the dog
could reenter. When the sliding door opened, Det. Graves noted another person, a
large male, seated on a bed or couch on the other side of the room just beyond the
door. And the officers had good reason to believe that the fugitive Callihoo was still
inside.
The officers made repeated demands for the remaining occupants of the house to
come out but received no response. They prepared to enter the residence. Because of
Callihoo’s violent history, all drew weapons. Detective Graves, in the lead, drew his
pistol. The next two officers in line, Sgt. Sanchez and Detective Drake of Suquamish,
had their tasers out. They opened the door, pointed their weapons at the subject on
the couch across the room, identified themselves, and demanded—forcefully—that he
raise his hands.
The subject, later identified as Thomas Black, a forty-four-year-old white male, was
approximately five yards from the officers as they entered the dwelling. It was light
February 3, 2012
Page 4
________________________________
outside, and at least one lamp was on in the room. All the entering officers were
clearly identified as police by their clothing and badges, and they had announced their
identity from the very first contact. He did not comply with their demands. Black
remained seated, his left hand hidden by blankets and pillows, his right hand down at
his side.
Over the next ten seconds, the officers demanded that he raise or show his hands at
least eight times. Sensing danger from the rising volume and frequency of the
demands that the subject show his hands, KCSO Deputy Grant also entered the
dwelling with his taser in his hand. At this point, the video tape shows three red laser
dots on the body of the subject. These were the sighting lasers from the tasers
deployed by Sgt. Sanchez, Det. Drake, and Deputy Grant.
If Black had at that time raised both of his hands, he would have allayed the growing
and reasonable fears of the officers. They were in a dark room in a house associated
with drug dealing. They knew that a dangerous fugitive was somewhere inside.
Their training and experience demanded that they assure themselves that the person
before them presented no threat. But this person, aware of—but ignoring—their
status as police officers, was giving clear signals that he was not going to respond
rationally to the situation. It was quite possible that he had a firearm concealed under
the blankets and pillows. If he was given the opportunity to use a concealed pistol,
any of the officers could be injured or killed.
The subject made the worst choice possible under the circumstances. He turned
quickly away from the officers, reaching with his right hand for something under the
blankets and pillows to his left, and immediately turned back to face them. Det.
Graves fired his pistol.
The officers quickly exited the house. They established containment of the dwelling
and made no other attempts to enter until the arrival of the County SWAT team.
While waiting for the SWAT team to assemble, the officers on scene noted movement
inside the house and continued to call on the people inside to come out peaceably.
They received no response. The SWAT team entered the house approximately two
hours later and took Callihoo into custody. Black’s body was found on the floor just
in front of where he had been sitting. He was dead.
Det. Graves fired five times. Two of his bullets struck the subject: one entered the
left front of his upper chest; the other grazed his right thigh before striking him in the
front of his lower abdomen. The pathologist determined the cause of death to be
February 3, 2012
Page 5
________________________________
gunshot wounds with acute methamphetamine intoxication as a contributing factor:
Black’s blood level at the time of his death was 0.44 milligrams of meth per liter.
The dwelling was searched after Callihoo’s arrest. The police found marijuana,
methamphetamine, heroin, and evidence of drug dealing but no guns. Immediately
after the shooting, Sgt. Sanchez reported that she saw Black point a silver-colored
semi-automatic pistol at them and fire at least three shots. Det. Graves reported
seeing a revolver in the subject’s hand when he turned back after reaching under the
blankets. The search of the area around where Black had been sitting turned up
several silver-colored TV remote controls. The searching officers also found a black
revolver. It was a plastic toy. Full-sized, it was originally orange in color but had
been painted black in an apparent attempt to make it look like a real gun. Whatever
he might have been thinking, there is no evidence that Black had access to any kind
of firearm.
Sgt. Sanchez was obviously mistaken. And if the subject had a revolver in his hand
before Det. Graves shot, it was a black-painted toy. However, these facts are not
relevant to the decision we face here. Det. Graves and the other officers who
confronted Black had every reason to suspect that he posed a threat of serious
physical harm. In a situation where the only reasonable course of action would have
been to follow the directions of the officers, Black acted in a furtive, threatening
manner. The officers had no way to know what action he might take to protect the
drug business they knew was being conducted in the house or how far he would go to
defend Callihoo. The only test of his intent would have been to wait for him to finish
retrieving whatever it was he had concealed under the blankets and pillows on his lap.
However, if that object had been a firearm, one or more of the officers would
probably have been wounded or killed. Police officers do not carry that heavy a
burden.
Washington law provides that to justify the use of deadly force a “peace officer must
have probable cause to believe that the suspect…poses a threat of serious physical
harm to the officer or a threat of serious physical harm to others….” RCW 9A.16.040
(2). The law also states that “A public officer or peace officer shall not be held
criminally liable for using deadly force without malice and with a good faith belief
that such act is justifiable pursuant to this section [of the law].” RCW 9A.16.040 (3).
Acting without malice and in good faith, Det. Graves took the only reasonable course
that Mr. Black left him. He used the force necessary to avoid the harm he had
probable cause to believe was imminent. His actions give us no reason to consider
criminal charges.
February 3, 2012
Page 6
________________________________
Timeline: Officer Involved Shooting at 18636 Second Ave. NE, Suquamish, WA;
December 8, 2011. Contact begins at approximately 2:50 P.M.
Elapsed Time Action
0:00:00 Officers Arrive. Det. Graves, Sgt. Sanchez, and Det. Drake
approach front door and announce their presence.
0:00:02 S. Black, primary resident, appears in response to Officers
knock on the door.
0:00:26 S. Black exits at request of Officers.
0:00:41
At request of S. Black, Det. Graves opens front door to allow
small dog to enter. He sees a male subject sitting on a bed or
couch across the room.
0:00:45 Officers hear others in the residence; they decide to enter to
make the arrest of Callihoo.
0:00:51
The Officers cross the threshold of the dwelling. Subject on
couch across the room makes eye contact. He is less than five
yards away.
0:00:56 Officers make verbal contact with subject on bed/couch. He is
looking at them and has his hands in his lap.
0:00:57-0:01:07
Over the next ten seconds, all three officers repeatedly call out
to the subject to show them both of his hands. He is looking
directly at them while they make their commands. Hearing no
response to the commands and sensing that the danger is
escalating, KCSO Deputy Grant, standing by outside, decides to
enter and assist.
0:01:08
The subject, after ignoring repeated and clear commands to stay
still and show his hands, makes a quick, furtive movement away
from the officers, apparently digging his right hand under a
blanket on his lap, and starts to turn back toward the officers.
Fearing that the subject has reached for a weapon, Det. Graves
fires his pistol.