runway incursion causal categories operational error (oe) - a human error caused by a tower...

23
Runway Incursion Causal Categories OPERATIONAL ERROR (OE) - A human error caused by a tower controller. There are over 8000 tower controllers in the U.S. PILOT DEVIATION (PD) - A human error caused by a pilot. There are over 675,000 licensed pilots in the U.S. VEHICLE/PEDESTRIAN DEVIATION (V/PD) - A human error caused by a vehicle operator or pedestrian which results in an entry onto the movement area that has not been authorized by ATC.

Upload: frederick-shields

Post on 17-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Runway Incursion Causal CategoriesOPERATIONAL ERROR (OE) - A human error caused by a tower controller. There are over 8000 tower controllers in the U.S.

    PILOT DEVIATION (PD) - A human error caused by a pilot. There are over 675,000 licensed pilots in the U.S.

    VEHICLE/PEDESTRIAN DEVIATION (V/PD) - A human error caused by a vehicle operator or pedestrian which results in an entry onto the movement area that has not been authorized by ATC.

  • Distribution by Type of Reported Runway IncursionsFY 2002 YTD (03/04/02)FY 1998-2001DATA ARE PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE

  • Distribution of Pilot Deviations- Office of Runway Safety

    Chart3

    197

    54

    4

    Sheet1

    General AviationCommercialOther

    CY2000197544255

    Sheet1

    Chart2

    1212

    2929

    99

    Sheet1

    Sheet1

    1212

    2929

    99

    CY

    JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal19981999Change

    19972022222125293728233114202921Q67670%

    19982420232622322328383036233252Q8079-1%

    19992921172229283923332425313213Q89957%

    20002424363339444248334133324294Q8980-10%

    20012525000000000050325321-1%

    199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001Target

    28124221918620024027529232532143137932124823%

    CALANDER YEAR

    2001OEPDVPDOther

    Jan515525

    Feb714425

    Mar0

    Apr01990651729100.431Rate Increase

    May01999680844090.4719.35%

    Jun029114994.47%

    Jul0

    Aug0

    Sep0

    Oct0

    Nov0

    Dec0

    12299050FISCAL YEAR

    2000OEPDVPDOther

    Jan2156124

    Feb512724

    Mar1122336

    Apr720633

    May825639

    Jun1125844

    Jul629742

    Aug10281048

    Sep5181033

    Oct927541

    Nov8151033

    Dec620632

    88256841429

    1999OEPDVPDOther

    1Q18341567

    2Q19451579ReportsOEsPDsVPDsRIs

    3Q2253209519966914660275

    4Q1950118019978713273292

    7818261032119989118351325

    19997818261321

    1998OEPDVPDOther20008825684428

    1Q2041667

    2Q27391480

    3Q21521689

    4Q23511589

    91183510325

    1997OEPDVPDOther

    1Q21301364

    2Q17312775

    3Q28392188

    4Q21321265

    87132730292

    RIOpsRateOEPDVPD

    198818762,501,0590.30.140.110.05

    198922362,625,5480.360.130.130.10

    199028165,506,2910.430.150.180.09

    199124262,421,6350.390.120.160.11

    199221963,018,6800.350.140.150.06

    199318661,946,4820.30.120.140.05

    199420062,452,5720.320.130.110.08

    199524062,074,3060.390.100.200.08

    199627561,817,4250.440.110.240.10

    199729264,440,9470.450.140.200.11

    199832566,218,9750.490.140.280.08

    199932168,684,0370.470.110.260.09

    200042971,000,0000.600.120.360.12

    YearOEPDVPDTotals

    1988896830187

    1989808360223

    199010011962281

    19917410266242

    1992909237219

    1993748428186

    1994836651200

    19956512550240

    19966914660275

    19978713273292

    19989118351325

    19997818261321

    20008825684428

    1988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000

    187223281242219186200240275292325321429

    CY

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    FY

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    OE

    PD

    VPD

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    000

    Operational Errors

    Pilot Deviations

    Vehicle/Pedestrian Deviations

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    OE

    PD

    VPD

    00

    00

    00

    000

    000

    000

    000

    OE

    PD

    VPD

    CYJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal

    199619132123231628362828202027515% Reduction2001OEPDVPDTotal

    19972022222125293728233114202922481Q236221106

    19982420232622322328383036233252Q1229950

    19992921172229283923332425313213Q0

    20002424363339444248334133324294Q0

    20012525000000000050359130156

    2000

    FYOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepTotal15% Reduction1Q19501180

    19972820202022222125293728232952512Q19491684

    19983114202420232622322328383013Q267020116

    19993036232921172229283923333304Q217527123

    20002425312424363339444248334030.36610169498524474403

    2001413332252500000001561999

    2449801041281641972362801Q23511589

    3023212421212325303326312Q18341567

    -23.6%6.7%32.3%-1.4%12.5%42.6%30.3%35.0%32.6%21.4%3Q19451579

    4Q22532095

    Avg:30.6%FY1997199819992000Change over 978218365330

    1Q6865898018%

    2Q6467678431%

    3Q75807911655%

    4Q88899512340%

    295301330403

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    FY1997

    FY1998

    FY1999

    FY2000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    000

    000

    000

    Monthly Average 97-99

    FY 97

    FY 98

    FY 99

    FY 00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    FY 2001

    FY 2000

    000

    000

    00

    00

    1999

    2000

    2001

    0

    0

    0

    FY 2001

    0

    0

    0

    FY 2000

    0

    0

    0

    FY 1999

    Chart3

    197

    54

    4

    Sheet1

    General AviationCommercialOther

    CY2000197544255

    Sheet1

    197

    54

    4

  • 33% Private30.1%ATP24.3%Commercial15.2%CFIs7.9%StudentsPilot certificate levelWho?

  • Pilots total flight timeWho?< 300 hrs>10,000 hrs97.3% GA68.9% Non-GA22%18%

  • Causal Factors Pilot Deviations (PD) Pilot Interviews(data from category A & B incursions between 1997-2000)- FAA Report on Runway Incursion Information Evaluation ProgramMarch 17, 2000 through March 16, 2001

    Chart1

    46

    44

    17

    7

    21

    48

    27

    Percentage

    Conditions at Time of Runway Incursions

    Sheet1

    Not Familiar with Airport Signage46

    Not Familiar with Airport44

    Unfavorable Environmental Conditions17

    Clearance was Not Readback7

    Inexperienced at Towered Airports21

    Airport Diagram Not Used48

    Failed to Follow Instructions27

    Sheet1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    Conditions at Time of Runway Incursions

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

  • 61.8% Taxied onto runway12.7% Took off without clearance10.8% Landed without clearance 9.6% Landed wrong runway/ taxiway/airport.Type of DeviationWhat?

  • Aircrew workload has increasedChallenges facing Air Crews and Air Traffic ControllersTaxi operations are difficult and potentially hazardousAir traffic volume increases yearlyAir Traffic System is more complexAirport layout design is more complicatedTechnology improvements at airports have not kept pace with demand

  • Major Runway Incursion Causes

    Spatial DisorientationLoss of Situational AwarenessUnclear/Ineffective CRMMisunderstanding ATCDisorientationLapse in short-term memory

  • SPATIAL DISORIENTATIONEye, head, and aircraft movements can create situations the brain cannot reconcileG-forces on the inner ear can add to situations in which pilots become unwilling or even incapacitated to execute required maneuversLeast frequent cause of an incursionVisual Dominance may be the single Safety Net. Know airport signage, marking and lighting

  • LOSS OF SITUATIONAL AWARENESSMonitor ATC instructions to other aircraftDont copy ATC clearances while taxiingPlan your head down time (such as a checklist review, GPS fixation) wiselyTIPH=time for extra vigilance [Angle to centerline]Use all external lights while on the runway

  • Fort Lauderdale International Airport, March 2001Night, VFR, Rain ShowersClose Call involving two commercial aircraft1. Departing aircraft was directed to taxi into position and hold Runway 27R with aircraft on a 5 mile approach same runway.

  • Fort Lauderdale International Airport, March 2001(cont)2. Aircraft on approach was then cleared to land with other aircraft still holding in position for takeoff.

  • Fort Lauderdale International Airport, March 2001(cont)3. Landing aircraft over flew aircraft holding in position by less than 100 feet.

  • UNCLEAR/INEFFECTIVE CRMHas your front seat passenger been coached to assist you with ears and eyes?Before entering a runway proclaim CLEAR RIGHT/LEFT both the approach path and the runway

  • The most recent fatal U.S. runway collision accident occurred in March 2000, when two general aviation aircraft collided on the runway at the Bradenton International Airport in Sarasota, Florida, killing all four onboard.X

  • MISUNDERSTANDING ATCUse a good headset rather than the speaker and microphoneTaxi into position and HOLDDont let ATC A-B-C you: Abandon, Bully or Confuse

  • DISORIENTATIONUse an airport diagram, even at your home fieldBoth pilots should have the airport diagram in viewIf you are not sure where you are NOW or what you are to do NEXTASK !!!

  • An ambiguous clearanceAn unintelligible transmissionA clearance that doesnt fitSomeone else acknowledging your clearanceAlways Question

  • LAPSE IN SHORT-TERM/WORKING MEMORY6-8 items, 20-second retentionTask saturation is a cockpit realityKeep cockpit sterile while on the surface and until reaching a predetermined altitude.Copy taxi instructions.Dont copy other ATC clearances while taxiing

  • Cockpit workload and distractions tend to increase.As cockpit activity increases, attention to communications decrease.Fatigue level increases.Increased vigilance is needed when snow and other weather conditions obscure airport markings and signs.During Night Operations and Periods of Low Visibility:

  • Severity CategoriesABCDAnimated Illustration9Little or no risk of collisionAmple time and distance to avoid collisionSignificant potential for collisionBarelyavoidcollision

    Above scenarios are all classified as runway incursions, but with different severity codes. In each case the taxiing aircraft penetrated the runway safety area (hold position) ANDA collision hazard or loss of separation occurred with the landing aircraft.

  • FY 2002 YTD (03/04/02)Severity Distribution of Reported Runway IncursionsCategory A includes 2 accidents / 4 fatalities.Category A includes 1 accident / 0 fatalities.FY 1998-2001DATA ARE PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE

    Introduce myselfbackgroundand tell about the makeup of the RSTeam

    2. RECENT STATS. Major collision every 2.3 years. March 2000 was last. By July 2002 due. 407 incursions in 2000. A few less in 2001. Modify my approach from statistics to REASONS & PREVENTIONS. Human Factors analysts need Self-revelation from pilots and controllers. I will do it for you today

    3. Survey the ratings of the pilots in the audience.

    4. Start this slide.22% of incursions are caused by pilots with less than 300 hours.

    18% of incursions were caused by pilots with more than 10,000 hours.

    60% of the incursions were caused by pilots between these two figures.T/O w/o clearance at CRG and SRQ. Others at CVG and elsewhere.

    Wrong airport. Delta at MCF. G/A at PDK rather than GwinnetPut on your introspective, self-analytical leather helmet and goggles. As we list and discuss these causes of incursions, if you see yourself, purpose to create for yourself a personal technique to trap or corral that human error and devise a practice for yourself that will break the chain Defn:SPATIAL DISORIENTATION-an erroneous sense of ones position and motion relative to the plane of the earths surface

    LINEAR VECTION ILLUSION-nearly everyone who drives an auto has experienced this. We are stopped at a red light and a large, presumable stationary vehicle in the adjacent lane creeps forward when we experience the compelling illusion that our own car is creeping backward. This prompts a swift but suprisingly ineffectual stomp on the brakes.

    SOMATOGYRAL ILLUSION-a visual/extra-visual disorientation that can only be interrupted by the existence of a non-confusing sign and our overriding voluntary analytical judgment of the brain.-acft in a turn-head turning-eye movement-numerous lights causing flickers in the eye (like the passing of a train at a RR crossing)

    G FORCES-rapidly changing gravitational forces on a pilot during takeoff, the jarring forces of a landing, rapid deceleraton immediately after landing, high speed turns off the R/W3 TYPES OF S.D.Unrecognized-no suspicion that anything is wrong2)Recognized-3)Incapacitating-freeze at the controls due to fear or confusion

    VISUAL DOMINANCE-the Figure Skaters secret. The dizziness and disorientation that normally results from a skaters rapid decelerations and rapid spins on the ice is overcome by suppressing (ignoring) all other sensations, picking out the correct visual reference and then executing subsequent manuevers based upon that visual point, ignoring all other sensations. (It is in situations like this that airport lighting, markings and signage becomes the central feature of the pilots focus.)

    STORY: LAHSO operation at TPA

    HEAD-DOWN ACTIVITIES-changing frequency to Ground Control after landing, switching the transponder to standby, or waiting till clearing the runway to locate the airport diagram. Some of these activities can also be called vertigo traps leading to Spatial Disorientation.The March 2000 fatal accident was an ATC error that could have been prevented at the last link in the chain IF the two people in the acft moving onto the runway had executed this single practice: CLEAR LEFT/CLEARNOT CLEAR RIGHT.(you might interject the throat mike story about Mr. Toothacher)

    Very frequently, pilots have begun their takeoff roll without and ATC clearance after given TIPH. It is not just pilots who use uncontrolled airports. Commercial operators are just as frequently guilty of this violation.

    A-B-C are not acceptable ATC activities or intentions; but these may occur intentionally or simply be a pilot perception.

    Fast Talkers The nature of the work Decoding all of the information surrounding a pilot is a complex skill that requires training and then maintaining through practice. Although pilots may travel to many different locations, if airport signage and marking are all in compliance, a pilot on an unfamiliar field should have adequate cues to assist him in conducting a safe surface operation. But even on a simple airfield, an airport diagram can be a life saver.Short-term memory keeps information IF you think about it; otherwise, it is lost after about 20 seconds.

    The short-term memory retains 6-8 items under optimum conditions. Both indifference and distractions adversely affect this capacity. not up for it or overload will cause itemsperhaps critical to safetyto be dropped.

    Excessive demands on the pilots attention can lead to task saturation

    Either get your ATC clearance before you taxi OR wait until you reach the run-up area. Dont accept your ATC clearance while moving.