rubric for interactive poster

2
Rubric for Interactive Poster Name: ………………………………………………. Date: ……………………................... CRITERIA 4 (16 – 20 pts) 3 (10 – 15 pts) 2 (5 – 9 pts) 1 (1 – 4 pts) SCORE Language Mechanics No spelling, punctuatio n, grammar usage problems. Some spelling, punctuation, and grammar usage problems. Many spelling, punctuation, and grammar usage problems. Work is barely readable due to errors. Style Highly organized and easy to follow. Mostly clear, but needs work with simplifying design and text. Some objects are placed inconsistent ly, not very easy to read, and needs work with simplifying design. Very hard to read because design is inconsistent. Content Stays focused completely on topic and task, ideas organized. Stays mostly focused on topic and task. Stays somewhat focused on topic and task. Is off topic most of the time. Quality of text informati on No errors. Informatio n is accurate, complete, shows excellent writing technique. Adequate writing technique includes complete thoughts. Minimal writing technique, incomplete thoughts. Less than minimal writing technique. Incomplete information. Originali ty The project shows significan t evidence of originalit y and The project shows some evidence of originality and inventivenes s. The work is an extensive collection and rehash of other people's ideas, products, The work is a minimal collection or rehash of other people's ideas, products, and

Upload: ammani-jeya-hari-haran

Post on 08-Nov-2015

21 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Testing and evaluation for every activity is needed. This testing is used for a 21st century classroom in malaysia

TRANSCRIPT

Rubric for Interactive PosterName: .Date: ...................CRITERIA4(16 20 pts)3(10 15 pts)2(5 9 pts)1(1 4 pts)SCORE

Language MechanicsNo spelling, punctuation, grammar usage problems.Some spelling, punctuation, and grammar usage problems.Many spelling, punctuation, and grammar usage problems.Work is barely readable due to errors.

StyleHighly organized and easy to follow.Mostly clear, but needs work with simplifying design and text.Some objects are placed inconsistently, not very easy to read, and needs work with simplifying design.Very hard to read because design is inconsistent.

ContentStays focused completely on topic and task, ideas organized.

Stays mostly focused on topic and task.Stays somewhat focused on topic and task.Is off topic most of the time.

Quality of text informationNo errors. Information is accurate, complete, shows excellent writing technique.

Adequate writing technique includes complete thoughts.Minimal writing technique, incomplete thoughts.Less than minimal writing technique. Incomplete information.

OriginalityThe project shows significant evidence of originality and inventiveness. The majority of the content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, and inventive.The project shows some evidence of originality and inventiveness.The work is an extensive collection and rehash of other people's ideas, products, and images. There is little evidence of new thought or inventiveness.The work is a minimal collection or rehash of other people's ideas, products, and images. There is no evidence of new thought.

Overall PresentationExcellent quality: neat, appropriate color and font use. Project flows smoothly.A few presentation errors. OK color usage and font size. Overall is OK.Some presentation errors. Some use of garish colors and unreadable fonts.Many errors that disrupt the flow and readability of presentation.

TOTAL SCORE