rtia anaual report 2013 ne annual report 2013-590.pdf · mr bryan chaplog chairperson of the audit...

Justice in Adjudication

ROAD TRAFFICINFRINGEMENT AGENCY

Annual Report

ChangeAhead

ANNUAL REPORT 2012/13 ROAD TRAFFIC INFRINGEMENT AGENCY

ChangeAhead

1

Contents Page

Organisational overview ............................................................................................................................................ 4

Statement by Chairperson of the Board ..............................................................................................................10

Section 1: Strategic Overview ................................................................................................................................14

Section 2: Corporate Governance and Management ........................................................................................20

Section 3: Human Resource Overview .................................................................................................................30

Section 4: Infringements Performance Report ..................................................................................................40

Section 5: Highlights and Achievements ...........................................................................................................142

Section 6: Performance Information Report ....................................................................................................146

Section 7:

Company Secretary’s Certi cate of Assurance ........................................................................158

Approval and Statement of Responsibility ................................................................................159

Accounting Authority Report ....................................................................................................... 160

Audit Committee Report ...............................................................................................................163

Report of the Auditor-General ......................................................................................................166

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 31 March 2013 ........................................157

Abbreviations and Acronyms ....................................................................................................................................206

ChangeAhead

ANNUAL REPORT 2012/13 ROAD TRAFFIC INFRINGEMENT AGENCY2

The VisionRTIA’s vision is to have an informed, compliant and safe road user community.

MissionThe Agency’s mission is to encourage compliance with road traf c laws in South Africa through:

• targeted road user and community education and communication programmes;

• promotion of procedurally fair, lawful and reasonable administrative adjudication;

• levying of penalties;

• imposing demerit points;

• effective administration and management of the suspension and cancellation of driving licences and operator cards; and

• rewarding compliant road users.

ValuesThe core values of the RTIA are:

• integrity;

• Transparency;

• fairness;

• Accessibility; and

• Accountability.

VisionThe RTIA’s vision is to have an informed, compliant and safe road user community.

MissionThe Agency’s mission is to encourage compliance with

road traffic laws in South Africa through:

• targeted road user and community education andcommunication programmes;

• promotion of procedurally fair, lawful andreasonable administrative adjudication;

• levying of penalties;

• imposing demerit points;

• effective administration and management of the suspensionand cancellation of driving licences and operator cards; and

• rewarding compliant road users.

ValuesThe core values of the RTIA are:

• Integrity• Transparency

• Fairness• Accessibility

• Accountability


ChangeAhead

3

Organisational Overview


Organisational overviewFrom its founding Act, the Road Traf c Infringement Agency was envisaged to play a critical role in forging a closer, more effective and ef cient link between the enforcement role played by the various Issuing Authorities and adjudication processes. RTIA was set up to play the role of an independent adjudicator, overseeing and enforcing the provisions of the Act in compliance with road traf c laws, as well as inculcating a new habit of voluntary compliance through community educational and awareness programmes. In this regard, the Agency is mandated to ensure the implementation of an objective, transparent and fair administrative adjudication process.

Mandate and FunctionsThe RTIA derives its mandate and functions from the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traf c Offences Act, 1998 (Act No. 46 of 1998), herein-after referred to as the AARTO Act, which states that the objects of the Agency are, despite the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 (Act No. 51 of 1977):

(a) to encourage compliance with the national and provincial laws and municipal by-laws relating to road traf c and to promote road traf c safety;

(b) to encourage the payment of penalties imposed for infringements and to allow alleged minor infringers to make representations;

(c) to establish a procedure for the effective and expeditious adjudication of infringements;

(d) to alleviate the burden on the courts of trying offenders for infringements;

(e) to penalise drivers and operators who are guilty of infringements or offences through the imposition of demerit points leading to the suspension and cancellation of driving licences, professional driving permits or operator cards;

(f) to reward law-abiding behaviour by reducing demerit points where they have been incurred if infringements or offences are not committed over speci ed periods;

(g) to establish an agency to support the law enforcement and judicial authorities and to undertake the administrative adjudication process; and

(h) strengthen co-operation between the prosecuting and law enforcement authorities by establishing a Board to govern the agency.

Whereas all matters related to traf c violations were previously dealt with under the CPA, the establishment of the Agency and the full implementation of the AARTO Act, means that most of the traf c violations will be dealt with administratively. This is expected to help free the courts and judicial authorities to deal with more serious criminal matters.

ANNUAL REPORT 2012/13 ROAD TRAFFIC INFRINGEMENT AGENCY 5

ChangeAhead

Ms Nomini Rapoo: Board ChairpersonMs Nomini Rapoo was appointed to the Board in August 2010. She holds an LLB degree from the University of Natal (Pietermaritzburg), a B Com (Law) degree from the University of the North and a Certi cate in Corporate Governance from the University of Johannesburg. She is an admitted attorney of the High Court and her extensive career spans from among others, the South African Maritime Safety Authority, Industrial Development Corporation, Airports Company South Africa before joining AECI Ltd as Group Company Secretary responsible for legal advisory, risk management, compliance and governance portfolios. Ms Rapoo specialises in corporate governance and has written a book on Black Economic Empowerment and contributed numerous articles on governance issues. Ms Rapoo serves as the chairperson of the RTIA Board.

Mr Japh Chuwe (Executive): RegistrarMr Chuwe has extensive experience in the transport industry both in private and government sectors. He holds a BA Law and Honours in Industrial Sociology from the University of the Witwatersrand, a Certi cat D’assiduite from the Institut International Des Droits De L’Homme, France and a Postgraduate Certi cate Programme in Project Management from the University of Pretoria. He has worked as Operations Manager for NaTIS and successfully implemented the NaTIS in the Kingdom of Lesotho pursuant to the standardisation of transport information systems espoused in the SADC Protocol, Project Manager that developed the Road Classi cation System and Best Practice Model in the Licensing Departments in Gauteng.

Adv. Thomas Dicker: Board memberAdv. Thomas Dicker was appointed to the Board in August 2010. He is a Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions for the South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg. He holds an LLB degree from the University of Pretoria and has a long career in the legal fraternity as Senior Public Prosecutor, Senior State Advocate, Deputy Attorney-General to the current post. He has a wide range of experience and expertise in traf c law and related matters and was a previous Chairperson of the Technical Committee for Standards and Procedures for Traf c Control and Traf c Control Equipment.

Mr Christopher Manzini: Board memberMr Christopher Manzini was appointed to the Board in August 2010. He holds a B Iuris degree from the University of Durban Westville, an LLB degree from the University of Witwatersrand and Public Prosecutor Certi cate from the Justice College. Mr Manzini has held numerous positions in the legal eld, including being a Legal Consultant for Ntuli, Noble and Spoor Attorneys deployed to the Department of Land Affairs (Mpumalanga Province). He is a practicing attorney and currently the Director in Manzini - Mdladla Attorneys specializing in criminal and civil matters.

RTIA BOARD OF DIRECTORS


Mr Bryan ChaplogChairperson of the Audit Committee

Ms Shelley ThomasMember of the Audit Committee

Mr Christopher ManziniMember of the Audit Committee

RTIA BOARD COMMITTEES (Audit Committee)


ChangeAhead

RTIA BOARD COMMITTEES (Technical Committee)Adv. Thomas Dicker

Chairperson of the Technical CommitteeMr Benedict Matinise

Member of the Technical Committee

Prof. Job MokgoroMember of the Technical Committee


ChangeAhead

9

Statement by Chairpersonof the board


Statement by Chairperson of the BoardBackgroundThe Road Traf c Infringement Agency was established by section 3 of the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traf c Offences Act, 1998 and in the continuation of its operations, sought to achieve its legislated mandate through the effective implementation of the AARTO Act, which is geared towards the increment of road safety and the goals of the “Decade of Action for Road Safety” targets.

The RTIA is now in its third year of operations and has made commendable progress towards full implementation of the AARTO Act. In addition to on-going work to establish its administrative support structures at head of ce in Midrand and hire suitable skills, the Agency has since taken over most of the interim functions previously carried out by Road Traf c Management Corporation (RTMC) and is in process to conclude service level agreements with the various Issuing Authorities. These agreements provide a critical link between the enforcement functions of the Issuing Authorities and the adjudication role of the Agency. This report elaborates on the activities of the Agency for the year.

Solvency and Going ConcernIt is pleasing to report that the Agency has obtained an unquali ed audit opinion for the second year running. The Board and management have worked hard to ensure that the control environment improves each year as this helps to lay a rm foundation on which to build a sustainable business.

Without qualifying his opinion, the Auditor-General repeated his concerns about the solvency and going concern status of the Agency. This concern is fully shared by the Board and management and stems from the chronic underfunding of the Agency from the beginning. The nancial statements that accompany this report show a signi cant impairment of accounts receivables. The main reason for this state of affairs is that it has taken unduly too long to regularise the transfer of revenue received through the RTMC managed bank accounts as well the problems that arise when reconciling these amounts. The impairment charge amounted to R 31 million and relates to disputed amounts due by the Issuing Authorities. The Agency cannot afford this level of impairment and were it not for the year end “virement” amounting to R 14 million by the Department of Transport, it would have reported a substantial loss. To prevent a recurrence of this situation, it is necessary to resolve the issue of the transfer of AARTO accounts so that these fall under the direct control of the RTIA without further delay. Management has committed to engaging with all parties in order to urgently resolve this matter.

The Board is still concerned about the future nancial sustainability of the Agency as its present funding levels fall far short of the approved business plan. Despite this, the Board believes that the strategies put together by management will provide a sound footing and should help to ensure the Agency operates viably over the short term. It is for this reason that the nancial statements of the Agency were prepared on a going concern basis.

Ms Nomini RapooChairperson: RTIA Board


ChangeAhead

11

The Board and management are committed to implementing plans to increase the collection of outstanding infringement revenue in order to ensure the future sustainability of the Agency. As part of these plans, the Agency has engaged National Treasury and the Department of Transport in discussions to resolve its short, medium and long-term funding requirements. Without suf cient funding, the Agency will take unduly too long to roll out its operations to the rest of the country.

The Board is con dent that Management is working hard to build the required capacity to enable the Agency to begin the much-anticipated roll-out of the AARTO to all provinces in the upcoming nancial year. Pursuant to this, the Agency remains committed to working very closely with all its stakeholders, including government departments, labour, business and the broader community in making its contribution towards ensuring a safe road transport environment in the current Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) period.

GovernanceThe Board, as the custodian of corporate governance is committed to sound governance principles and to ensuring an effective control environment. However for the past two years the Board has been operating under serious capacity challenges, where in terms of the AARTO Act it is supposed to be comprised of seven members but has instead been operating with four members for the majority of the period under review. This challenge meant that Board Members could not be distributed effectively to the sub committees. To address this, the Board has made use of non-member experts to augment its sub-committee membership.

In line with our commitment to continuous performance improvement, the Board commissioned a Board Evaluation process whose outcomes were used to implement various remedial interventions to ensure that we operate in line with best practice. Consequently, the RTIA has formed strategic partnerships with key stakeholders in preparation for a successful launch of road user and community education and awareness programmes in the upcoming nancial year. This programme is geared at ensuring that road users understand the AARTO and its objectives, as well as their obligations and rights as set out in the AARTO Act, towards ensuring a safe environment in the country. This undertaking and commitment is based on the conviction that the more educated and empowered the general community is about the AARTO and its objectives, the greater its contribution and active engagement towards achieving these objectives.

Challenges experiencedThe critical challenges faced during the period under review continued to relate to:

• inadequate funding which is cross-cutting on the Agency’s operations;

• mandate overlap with other entities, which negatively impacts the Agency’s ability to effectively implement its statutory functions; and

• lack of credible systems to ensure data integrity of all the entity’s operations.

The Board and management considered these challenges and implemented an intervention plan to address them effectively. Those challenges that were in the ambit of the Agency’s control were effectively dealt with, whereas those outside its scope were brought to the attention of the relevant role-players to assist in addressing them. The Board is optimistic that the remaining challenges will be effectively dealt with by the Shareholder in order to free the Agency to focus on delivering on its mandate.


On behalf of the Board, I wish to thank the former Minister of Transport Mr Dikobe Ben Martins for his leadership and support. Allow me to also extend a warm welcome to our new Minister, Ms Dipuo Peters and assure her of our commitment to continued good performance. With her leadership and that of our Deputy Minister, Ms Sindisiwe Chikunga, we are assured of an excellent and dynamic team, who will lead the Agency and the whole transport sector to greater heights. My sincerest gratitude to the Registrar and his management team and staff of the Agency, who, in spite of these seemingly insurmountable challenges have kept their focus towards the Agency’s deliverables.

Ms Nomini Rapoo

Chairperson: RTIA Board


ChangeAhead

13

Strategic Overview


Section 1: Strategic Overview

BackgroundThis being the third year of operations for the Agency, tremendous progress has been made in entrenching its operations from establishment, in spite of the continuing challenges experienced from inception and in particular, the insuf cient funding in terms of the government grant allocation of R5 million which falls far short of requirements.

As a direct result of under-funding and in a bid to contain escalating costs, the Board decided to suspend the South African Post Of ce account through which the Agency served courtesy letters and enforcement orders. Instead, management devoted more time to data cleaning so as to improve the integrity of the records on the National Contraventions Register (NCR), in respect of off-line payments that were not uploaded thereto.

This change of focus enabled the Agency to undertake the capturing of the payment records made and not updated. Without the updating on the NCR, courtesy letters and enforcement orders would have had to be processed and served on infringers who had already paid, thereby resulting in fruitless expenditure. At the beginning of the updating project, a total of 107 000 payments were made via the offline platforms (eg. Standard Bank account), with a value of R207 million and of these, a total of 79 440 transactions with a value of R149 million were updated onto the NCR, which represented a considerable improvement to the records system.

In order to fund its operations, the Agency relied on the revenue portion accruing to it from the road traf c infringement activities of the implementing authorities in the Tshwane and Johannesburg municipal jurisdictions. Having consistently engaged the Department for additional funding, the Agency was allocated a further R 14 million as a ‘virement’ at the end of the nancial year. This amount was critical and helped to offset a potential loss arising from an impairment charge that had to be made this year.

Audit PerformanceFor the second consecutive year, the Agency has achieved excellent performance with a resounding con rmation of this in the form of an unquali ed opinion from the Auditor-General. This tremendous achievement was a result of proactive measures in the form of establishing and implementing an internal system of control to ensure good governance and ef cient performance. The Board and management made a rm commitment to entrench the practise of fair, transparent and good governance in all its operations and sought to further entrench its excellent audit performance. This excellent performance was achieved through proactively engaging with the process of developing new measures to augment the internal system of control implemented.

Mr Japh R. ChuweRegistrar


ChangeAhead

15

Casting it’s eyes towards enhanced future performance, the Agency recognises that the NCR was developed as a module of the eNaTIS and is the preferred strategic system providing the backbone of the RTIA’s operations, however, given its system’s architecture, the information technology needs of the RTIA with respect to the NCR cannot be fully addressed through the NCR on eNaTIS and thus the Board is developing a long-term strategy of establishing its own independent NCR in order to fully and efficiently support the AARTO implementation and the connectivity of all stakeholders across the country. This will enable the Agency to be in complete control of its environment, as well as providing reliable, credible data on a real-time, on-line basis to be used as an effective decision support mechanism.

GovernanceThe Board operated for the majority of the period with inadequate membership. Whereas the Act provides for seven Board members, the Agency operated for the majority of the time with only four members. This led to a challenge in terms of the required skills and capacity for effective governance and stretched the remaining members to ensure effectiveness in the exercise of their duciary duties. Having brought this to the attention of the Shareholder, the Agency is hopeful to achieve its full complement of Board members in the upcoming nancial year.

Pursuant to good governance and in spite of the dif culties faced, the Board had implemented innovations to address the capacitation challenges it faced, by augmenting it’s support structures with the appointment of additional, highly skilled members of its sub-committees, thereby ensuring that the resultant gaps in governance structures were adequately addressed.

In addition, for effective performance, the Board and management have been engaging interactively in assessing the Agency’s operational environment and challenges and to that extent, submitted an amended Strategic Plan and Annual Performance Plan for approval by the Minister. These amended plans had taken due cognisance of the continuing challenges experienced and provided a practical estimation of performance and approved by the Minister. The related information is provided under section 6 on performance information.

State of Road User ComplianceThe statistics provided in Section 4: Infringements Performance Report, are in accordance with the data captured in the NCR provided by the eNaTIS contractor and uploaded thereto by the issuing authorities currently implementing AARTO. Some of these are briefly summarised below.

• The total number of AARTO Infringement Notices served in the Tshwane and Johannesburg jurisdictional areas increased by 2 052 508 (114.82%) from 1 787 517 in the previous year to 3 839 925 notices in the 2012-2013 period. These numbers include an increase of 86 595 (10.33%) in hand written AARTO 01 Notices to 924 629; an increase of 1 487 687 (244.14%) in AARTO 03 Notices to 2 097 043 and a decrease of 7 685 (7.68%) in Notices to operators to 92 433. The total value of the notices served amounted to R1 925 084 500.00.

• Of the total notices served, 58.73% were to drivers of light passenger vehicles; 7.46% to drivers of heavy passenger vehicles (including midi-buses and buses); 13.33% to drivers of light load vehicles (LDV’s) and 1.26% to truck drivers.

• Notices served for vehicle registration and licencing infringements increased by 53 175 (47%) from 112 413 during the previous year to 165 588 during the 2012-2013 nancial year. Notices served for vehicle tyre infringements increased by 6 177 (15%) from 40 481 to 46 658 and notices for general vehicle roadworthiness infringements increased by 15 243 (21%) from 71 367 to 86 610.


• Notices for road sign, traf c signal and road marking infringements increased by 21 149 (10%) from 214 478 to 235 627 and for rules of the road and driving signal infringement by 151 828 (105%) from 144 077 to 295 905. Notices for speed infringement increased by 1 521 164 (232%) from 655 121 to 2 176 285.

• The number of Courtesy Letters served decreased from 1 039 426 the previous year to 469 466 during 2012-2013. This is as a direct result of the decision to curb the related expenditure, in part due to the lack of integrity in the address validations, as well as the lack of con rmation of service of infringement notices as provided for in the Act.

• The number of Enforcement Orders served increased from 9 826 to 90 214 during the rst four months of the 2012-2013 period. Due to the high cost to serve Courtesy Letters and Enforcement Orders by registered mail and very tight nancial constraints experienced by the Agency at the time, the RTIA Board at its meeting held on 25 July 2012 resolved that the serving of letters and orders be suspended until such time as the nancial situation of the Agency improved.

• The number of Representations adjudicated increased by 459 (1.33%) from 34 410 in 2011-2012 to 34 869 in 2012-2013 of which 15 261 (43.77%) were successful and 19 608 (56.23%) were un-successful and rejected.

• The total number of Elections submitted to be tried in court increased by 48 208 (209.52%) from a total of 23 009 during 2011-2012 to a total of 71 217 during 2012-2013.

• A total of 481 801 infringements were paid for an amount of R143 185 321.00. This shows a payment rate of 7.44% on the value of infringements captured. This rate of payment does not determine the compliance rate to road traf c laws, since the AARTO process entails 5 distinct options that can be exercised by infringers, including the payment of the infringement where applicable. Other options exercised by the infringer, such as submission of successful representations, means that the infringement is cancelled and the infringer is not held accountable, resulting in the infringement and the penalty value being nulli ed. Furthermore, the report shows a gradual decreased payment rate from 1.78% during Infringement Notice stage, 1.51% at Courtesy Letter stage, to an increased rate of 4.15% at Enforcement Order stage.

At this stage, it is dif cult to determine the actual level of compliance in terms of payments of outstanding infringement notices due to challenges related to systems’ interfaces with the NCR, and some platforms not uploading the payments thereto. Furthermore, the inability to automatically upload and update the NCR often results in Courtesy Letters and Enforcement Orders being issued for infringement notices that have already being paid. This negatively impacts on the Agency’s costs as the expenditure for the serving of Courtesy Letters and Enforcement Orders would have been incurred by the Agency but becomes irrecoverable. There is an additional reputational risk for the Agency and all role-players involved in the AARTO process itself which is being addressed through consultations with the critical stakeholders. In addition, there will be a full audit on the system so as to remedy shortcomings during the 2013/2014 nancial year.

Legislative FrameworkDuring the period under review, tremendous effort was put into nalising the amendments to the AARTO Act and the Regulations. The Amendment Bill was published in Government Gazette Number 36173 dated 20 February 2013, inviting comments from the public and interested stakeholders. After a 30 day period of publication, the comments were to be considered and the nal Amendment Bill submitted to Parliament for promulgation after approval by the Minister, which is now scheduled for the 2013/14 period.


ChangeAhead

17

The essential elements entailed in the Amendment Bill are geared at addressing operational challenges experienced, as well as curbing the exorbitant expenditure costs related to the service of documents and providing textual clarity to the administrative and judicial processes relating to offences and infringements. Some of the aspects envisaged in the Amendment bill include the following:

• deletion of the distinction between “minor” and “major” infringements;

• enabling the Agency to administer rehabilitation programmes for habitual infringers, including but not limited to driver retesting, compulsory community service at road accident trauma wards in public hospitals or state mortuaries for victims of road accidents;

• increase in the number of Board members;

• textual clarity in relation to the service of documents;

• amendment of certain sections to provide clarity between the administrative and judicial processes;

• the introduction of electronic service of documents in addition to the traditional methods of registered mail and personal service; and

• clari cation of the initiation process of serving documents for categorised offences.

The second process of the legislative framework entailed the development of the Regulations Amendments, which are aligned to the envisaged Amendment Bill and provides further details on their operational mechanisms.

ConclusionThe Agency’s excellent performance for the period under review came about in the face of tremendous challenges. The achievements that we report on could not have been attained were it not for the strong belief, conviction, dedication and an unrelenting focus by a multi-disciplinary team of competent people, who comprise of the Board, management and staff of the Agency. I wish to express my sincerest gratitude to all of you for your loyalty and commitment to make a positive contribution towards the attainment of the road safety goals and effective dispense of our mandate. My appreciation, deepest respect and admiration are to the Board of the RTIA, both present and past, for the sterling contribution to the Agency’s governance and continued critical inputs, guidance and leadership. In particular, my sincerest gratitude to the Chairperson of the Board, Ms Nomini Rapoo, for her leadership, sharp guidance and critical input. To the rest of the staff, indeed, we continue with our relentless focus and dedication to achieve the vision of a better future for our country and together, we shall succeed!

I wish to express my deepest respect, admiration and gratitude to our former Minister, Mr Ben Dikobe Martins for his sterling leadership and support. Having come at a time when the Agency’s morale was at its lowest, your interventions and support strengthened our resolve to continue dispensing our mandate effectively. I would be remiss not to express my appreciation to the Portfolio Committee on Transport for their support and empathy to the cause of the Agency in meeting its road safety mandate.


Lastly I wish to express our excitement in welcoming the new Minister of Transport, Ms Dipuo Peters and assure her of our best cooperation and commitment to ef cient performance at all times. With the continued dynamic leadership, dedication and active support from you and Deputy Minister Ms Sindisiwe Chikunga, you can rest assured of the Agency’s tremendous improvement, ef cient performance and the successful achievement of the goals of “The Decade of Action for Road Safety 2011 – 2020” and beyond, to render a safe environment for all our road users.

Mr Japh R. Chuwe

Registrar


ChangeAhead

19

Corporate Governance andManagement


Section 2: Corporate Governance and ManagementThe RTIA is a schedule 3A public entity as de ned in terms of the PFMA and is the Agency envisaged by the AARTO Act. It is a wholly state owned entity with the Minister of Transport acting as the political principal and shareholder and charged with the responsibility of overseeing the Agency.

The RTIA is committed to ensuring full compliance with the AARTO Act, King III Report on Corporate Governance, the provisions of the Public Finance Management Act, 1999, as well as governance and compliance directives from the Department of Transport and National Treasury.

The Board of the RTIA is responsible for directing the entity towards the achievement of the set vision and mission. The Board is therefore accountable for the development and execution of the Agency’s strategy, performance and nancial results as well as being the custodian of corporate governance.

The role of the members of the Board is to bring independent judgment and experience to the deliberations and decisions at the strategic level. In line with international best practice, the Chairperson is a non-executive director and is therefore not involved in the day-to-day management of the entity which is delegated to the executive team, led by the Registrar.

In terms of established governance processes, the Registrar and the Board develop strategic and performance plans for approval by the Minister in accordance with the PFMA and the AARTO Act. The strategic plan has key strategic objectives and deliverables. The Minister assesses the achievement of these objectives on a quarterly basis through the annual performance plan and this helps to keep the Minister fully informed of the progress, performance and the challenges the Agency encounters.

Governance StructuresBoard of Directors The Board of the Agency is the Accounting Authority. The current Board was appointed in August 2010 and is in its third year of existence.

In terms of AARTO Act, the Board is comprised of ve (5) non-executive directors, one (1) ex of cio member (Director of Public Prosecution) and the Registrar. The current Board comprises three (3) non-executive directors and one (1) executive director, namely the Registrar and has had a resignation of one (1) member. This means that there is a vacancy of three (3) members. As the Chairperson is not a member of any of the subcommittees, there is a problem of capacity when lling sub-committee positions from the present compliment of non-executive directors.

This issue is of concern and has been brought to the attention of the Shareholder and the Agency hope to achieve a full complement of directors without further delays which can be attributed to the appointment process.

The Board is responsible for governance and it’s duties include approving the strategic plan and presenting it to the Minster, monitoring and assessing management performance, and acting as a resource for management in matters of planning and policy. The duciary duties and other general duties of the Board are set out in the PFMA. The Board is governed by a formal written Board Charter which sets out its duties and responsibilities.

The Board has reserved, amongst others, the following powers for itself:

• approval and monitoring of the implementation of the strategic plan;

• determination of the overall policies and processes to ensure the integrity of RTIA’s management of risk and internal controls; and


ChangeAhead

21

• approval of all policies in the organisation, save for instances where it has delegated some of those approvals to management.

The Board has devolved the responsibility of running the day-to-day affairs of the Agency to the Registrar. This is done through written delegations of authority.

Board Members• Ms NE Rapoo - Non-Executive Chairperson

• Mr JR Chuwe - Registrar & Executive Director

• Adv. TE Dicker - Non-Executive Director

• Mr IS Jordaan - Non-Executive Director (resigned 26 July 2012)

• Mr CM Manzini - Non-Executive Director

Board Subcommittees Speci c responsibilities have been delegated to the committees of the Board, with full access to independent advice at the RTIA expense. The Board has two (2) subcommittees, namely: the Audit and Risk Committee and the Technical Committee. These subcommittees assist the Board in discharging its duties and responsibilities and they follow the guidelines of King III. There is full transparency of the subcommittees’ deliberations and their decisions are communicated to the Board through subcommittee reports to each Board meeting.

The work of the subcommittees was severely hampered for most of the year by the lack of a quorum and owing to delays in the appointments process which saw additional committee members being con rmed only after the AGM in November 2012.

The Audit and Risk Committee Committee members:

• Mr B Chaplog

• Ms S Thomas

• Mr C Manzini

This Committee is chaired by Mr Bryan Chaplog and it assists the Board in the discharge of its duties and responsibilities relating to the Audit and Risk functions.


The Technical Committee Committee members:

• Adv. TE Dicker

• Prof. J Mokgoro

• Mr Benedict Matinise

• Mr IS Jordaan (resigned 26 July 2012)

This committee is chaired by Adv. Thomas Dicker and it assists the Board in discharging its duties and responsibilities on revenue management, IT issues, the National Contraventions Register (NCR), adjudications, education and legislative issues.

Company Secretary The Agency’s Company Secretary is Adv. MLT Bilikwana, who is empowered by the Board to perform his duties and directly or indirectly:

• assists the Chairperson and Registrar with the induction of new members;

• assists the Board with orientation, development and education;

• ensures that RTIA complies with all applicable legislation;

• monitors the legal and regulatory environment and communicates new legislation and any changes to existing legislation;

• provides the Board with a central source of guidance and assistance; and

• ensures that the proceedings and affairs of the Board and its committees are properly administered in accordance with relevant legislation.

All members of the Board have direct access to the Company Secretary at all times.

Board Remuneration The remuneration of Board members is determined by the Minister in consultation with the Minister of Finance.


ChangeAhead

23

Board MeetingsThe Board recognises and is committed to ensuring that it meets regularly, at least once every quarter in line with best practise as incorporated in the King Report. Details of the Board and Subcommittee meetings for the year under review are tabled below:

Board Meeting Audit & Risk Committee Technical Committee

25 May 2012 19 April 2012 09 May 2012

25 July 2012 18 May 2012 08 February 2013

26 October 2012 06 July 2012 20 March 2013

16 November 2012@ 20 July 2012

16 -17 January 2013 # 15 October 2012

30 January 2013 25 January 2013

Board Meetings AttendanceMember 25 May 2012 25 July 2012 26 October 2012 30 January 2013 Total Attendance

Ms NE Rapoo 4

Mr JR Chuwe 4

Adv. TE Dicker 4

Mr IS Jordaan O O 2

Mr CM Manzini 4

Mr B Chaplog 4

Audit & Risk Committee Meetings

Member 19 April 2012

18 May 2012

06 July 2012

20 July 2012

15 October 2012

25 January 2013

Total Attendance

Ms S Thomas 1

Mr CM Manzini 6

Mr BS Chaplog 6

Technical Committee MeetingsMember 09 May 2012 08 February 2013 20 March 2013 Total Attendance

Mr IS Jordaan O O 1

Adv. TE Dicker 3

Mr B Matinise 2

Prof TJ Mokgoro 2

Legend:Attended X Absent with apology O Resigned Board special advisor Not yet a member

@ Annual General Meeting # Board’s Strategic Session


Board Evaluation ProcessDuring the nancial year under review, the Board introduced a formal evaluation of its effectiveness and to assist with the process, it appointed Cheziya Consulting to conduct an independent evaluation and to make recommendations for improvement. This task was completed on time and the results were presented to the Shareholder and major ndings were also used to assist the Board in addressing areas of weaknesses in its performance and to come up with remedial interventions where required. As such, the Board has implemented various remedial interventions during the period under review. These included ensuring that every Board Member is now fully registered with the Institute of Directors for enhancing its members’ development. The Agency will continue to identify areas requiring ongoing education and development for its existing and new members.

Executive ManagementMr JR Chuwe Registrar & Executive Director

Mr S Amos Deputy Registrar

Mr C Matjie Acting Chief Financial Of cer

Mr GJ Botha Specialist Technical Advisor to the Registrar

Adv. ML Bilikwana Company Secretary

Ms KF Pooe Senior Manager: Audit & Risk

Mr F Malindzisa Acting Head: Communication

Mr J Mmekoa Acting Head: Strategy & Reporting

Mr LV Masango Senior Manager: Information Technology

The RegistrarThe Registrar oversees the functions of the RTIA in accordance with the business plan as approved by the Board from time to time and in particular the:

• compilation and submission of the Strategic Plan, Annual Performance Plan and Annual Reports for consideration and approval by the Board;

• ef ciency of penalty collection and supporting administrative procedures;

• operational and organisational functioning of the RTIA; and

• full implementation of the Act through the introduction and entrenchment of effective management practices.


ChangeAhead

25

RTIA EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT

Mr Japh ChuweRegistrar

Mr Sherman AmosDeputy Registrar

Mr Gerrie BothaSpecialist Technical Advisor to the Registrar

Mr Caiphus MatjieActing Chief Financial Of cer

Adv Mncedisi BilikwanaCompany Secretary (Ex Of cio Member of Exco)

Ms Keobakile PooeSenior Manager: Internal Audit and Risk

Management


RTIA EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT

Mr Jacob MmekoaActing Head: Corporate Strategy and Reporting

Mr Fakazi MalindzisaActing Head: Corporate Communication

Mr Leonard MasangoSenior Manager: Information Technology


ChangeAhead

27

Organisation StructureThe organisational structure of the Agency which is shown below was approved by the Shareholder along with the strategic plan and annual performance plan for the 2012/13 nancial year.

RTIA Board

Registrar

Snr Deputy Registrar Representations &

Demerit Points

Snr Exec ManagerInformation

Management

Infringement adjudication

Representation management

Demerit management

Human Resource Mngmt & Dev

Comp Secretary & Board Support Corporate Strategy

Facilities Mngmt & Office Services

Financial Accounting Management Accounting Procurement Asset Management

Administer courtesy notices Administer enforcement notices Administer warrants of execution

Administer representations Manage representations officers Amend infringements

Administer demerits Maintain demerit database Driving licence/Operator card suspend or cancel

Minister

Snr Deputy Registrar Infringements

PR & Corporate Communications

Snr Exec Manager Corporate Support

Legal Services

Internal Audit

Disbursement of Penalties

Head: Office of Registrar

Chief Financial Officer (CFO)

Electronic document management

Call Centre operations Interfaces to Banks, SAPO & LCMS’s

Dep Reg: WC & EC

Dep Reg: Gauteng

Dep Reg: NC & FS

Dep Reg: KZN & MP

Dep Reg: LP & NW

Snr Deputy Registrar Prov Operations

(COO)

Website & Internet processing

Liaise sheriffs

Data processing

Data mining & Reporting Registration & documentation IT Services

Risk Management

The structure when fully implemented should enable the Agency to roll out its services throughout the country over the MTEF funding cycle of three years. So far, the Agency has not received suf cient funding to enable it to open sub-of ces at provincial or regional level as is envisaged by the approved plan. As the Agency acquires the related budgetary support, it will be able to ll the approved positions in the structure, and anticipates achieving this by the 2014/15 period.


ChangeAhead

29

Human Resource Overview


Section 3: Human Resources OverviewFor the year under review, the Agency started with 22 staff and increased its complement by 16 (72%) to a total of 38. Due to budgetary constraints, a cautious but phased human capital acquisition approach was adopted. Eight staff was appointed on a short-term contract basis in order to deal with the data clean-up of the National Contravention Register (NCR) in relation to off-line payments that were not uploaded, as well as the debt collection of infringement amounts due to the Agency.

Two managers, whose duties are directly related to the Agency’s mandate, were transferred from the Road Traf c Management Corporation to the Agency, thereby increasing the Agency’s capacity to perform its functions. The total staff compliment of 38 at year end resulted in a total of 37 (49%) under-capacitation for the Agency when compared to the target of 75 as set out in the approved plans. The tables that follow present a breakdown of staff by race and gender in relation to a number of measures and perspectives as required by the Employment Equity Act.

Table 3.1: Staff Pro le by Race

Level African Coloured Indian White Total

Registrar 1 0 0 0 1

Deputy Registrar 0 1 0 0 1

Senior Management 6 0 0 1 7

Middle Management 4 0 0 1 5

Specialists 7 2 0 0 9

Junior staff 13 0 0 0 13

General workers 2 0 0 0 2

Total Staff 33 3 0 2 38

% 86.84% 7.89% 0.00% 5.26% 100.00%

Table 3.2: Staff Pro le by Gender

Level Male Female Total

Registrar 1 0 1

Deputy Registrar 1 0 1

Senior Management 6 1 7

Middle Management 3 2 5

Specialists 5 4 9

Junior staff 6 7 13

General worker 1 1 2

Total Staff 23 15 38

% 60.53% 39.47% 100%

ChangeAhead


The

info

rmat

ion

in th

e ta

ble

abov

e sh

ows

a st

aff c

ompl

imen

t of 6

0.53

% m

ales

and

39.

47%

fem

ales

.

Tabl

e 3.

3 : T

otal

num

ber o

f Em

ploy

ees

per O

ccup

atio

nal C

ateg

ory(

SASC

O) (i

nclu

ding

Em

ploy

ees

with

dis

abilit

ies)

Occ

upat

iona

l Ban

dsM

ale

Mal

e M

ale

Mal

eM

ale

Fem

ale

AFe

mal

e C

Fem

ale

I

Fem

ale

Fem

ale

WTo

tal

%A

C I

T B

WT

B

L13-

16 L

egis

lato

r / F

inan

ce, I

T Au

dit s

enio

r of

cia

ls a

nd M

anag

emen

t Per

man

ent

61

07

11

00

10

923

.68%

L11-

12 P

rofe

ssio

nals

20

02

12

00

20

513

.16%

L9-1

0 Pr

ofes

sion

als

41

05

03

10

40

923

.68%

L5-8

Cle

rks

Tech

nici

ans

60

06

07

00

70

1334

.21%

L2-4

Sem

i-Ski

lled

10

01

01

00

10

25.

26%

L1 E

lem

enta

ry o

ccup

atio

ns0

00

00

00

00

00

0.00

%

TOTA

L19

20

212

141

015

038

100.

00%

Mal

eM

ale

Mal

eM

ale

TBM

ale

Fem

ale

AFe

mal

e C

Fem

ale

IFe

mal

e T

BFe

mal

e W

Tota

lA

CI

W

Empl

oyee

s w

ith d

isab

ilitie

s0

00

00

00

00

00

The

info

rmat

ion

in th

e ta

ble

abov

e sh

ows

the

follo

win

g pe

rcen

tage

(%) p

erso

nnel

dis

trib

utio

n ac

ross

the

diffe

rent

sal

ary

leve

ls:

• Le

vel 1

3 - 1

6 :

23.

68%

• Le

vel 1

1 - 1

2 :

13.

16%

• Le

vel

9 -

10

: 23

.68%

• Le

vel

5 –

8

: 34

.21%

• Le

vel

2 –

4

: 5.

26%

• Le

vel 1

:

0.

00%


Tabl

e 3.

4 : T

otal

num

ber o

f Em

ploy

ees

per O

ccup

atio

nal B

ands

(inc

ludi

ng E

mpl

oyee

s w

ith d

isab

ilitie

s)

Occ

upat

iona

l Ban

dsM

ale

Afric

anM

ale

Colo

ured

Mal

eIn

dian

Mal

eto

tal

Blac

ks

Mal

eW

hite

Fem

ale

Afric

ans

Fem

ale

Colo

ured

Fem

ale

Indi

ans

Fem

ale

Tota

l Bl

acks

Fem

ale

Whi

teTo

tal

L15-

16 T

op M

anag

emen

t Per

man

ent

21

03

10

00

00

4

L13-

14 S

enio

r Man

agem

ent P

erm

anen

t4

00

40

10

01

05

L9-1

2 Pr

ofes

sion

ally

qua

li e

d an

d ex

perie

nced

sp

ecia

lists

and

mid

-man

agem

ent P

erm

anen

t6

10

71

51

06

014

L5-8

Ski

lled

tech

nica

l and

aca

dem

ical

ly q

uali

ed

60

06

07

00

70

13

L2-4

Sem

i-Ski

lled

10

01

01

00

10

2

L1 E

lem

enta

ry o

ccup

atio

ns0

00

00

00

00

00

TOTA

L19

20

212

141

015

038

The

info

rmat

ion

in th

e ta

ble

abov

e sh

ows

the

follo

win

g pe

rcen

tage

(%) p

erso

nnel

dis

trib

utio

n ac

ross

the

diffe

rent

occ

upat

iona

l ban

d sa

lary

leve

ls fo

r bla

ck m

ales

and

fe

mal

es :

• Le

vel 1

5 - 1

6 :

Bla

ck m

ales

– 7

.89%

; Bl

ack

fem

ales

– 0

.00%

;

• Le

vel 1

3 - 1

4 :

Bla

ck m

ales

– 1

0.53

%; B

lack

fem

ales

– 2

.63%

;

• Le

vel

9 -

12

: Bl

ack

mal

es –

18.

42%

; Bla

ck fe

mal

es –

15.

79%

;

• Le

vel

5 –

8

: Bl

ack

mal

es –

15.

79%

; Bla

ck fe

mal

es –

18.

42%

;

• Le

vel

2 –

4

: Bl

ack

mal

es -

2.6

3%;

Bla

ck fe

mal

es –

2.6

3%;

• Le

vel 1

:

Bla

ck m

ales

– 0

.00%

; Bl

ack

fem

ales

0.0

0%

ChangeAhead


Table 3.5: Promotions by Occupation Type

Termination Type

Employment at beginning

of period April 2010

Promotions to another salary

level

Salary level promotions

as % of employment

Progressions to another notch

within salary level

Notchprogressions

as a % of employment

Legal 0 0 0 0 0

Finance and economic related 0 0 0 0 0

Human resource 0 0 0 0 0

Administrative related 0 0 0 0 0

General workers 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 0 0 0 0

The information in the table above shows that the Agency did not effect any promotions during the year under review, thus the promotions by occupation type shows zero values.

Table: 3.6: Promotions by Salary Bands

Salary bands

Employment at beginning

of period April 2010

Promotions to another salary

level

Salary level promotions

as % of employment

Progressionsto another

notch within salary level

Notchprogressions

as a % of employment

Senior & executive (level 13-16) 0 0 0 0 0

Highly skilled supervision (level 9-12) 0 0 0 0 0

Highly skilled production (level 6-8) 0 0 0 0 0

Skilled (level 3-5) 0 0 0 0 0

Lower skilled (level 1-2) 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 0 0 0 0

The information in the table above shows no promotions by salary bands during the year under review.


Table 3.7: Performance Rewards by Race, Gender and Disability

Demographics Number of Bene ciaries

Total Employment

Percentage of Total

EmploymentCost (R’000) Average cost

per Bene ciary

African Female 0 0 0 0 0

African Male 0 0 0 0 0

Asian Female 0 0 0 0 0

Asian Male 0 0 0 0 0

Coloured Female 0 0 0 0 0

Coloured Male 0 0 0 0 0

Total Blacks Female 0 0 0 0 0

Total Blacks Male 0 0 0 0 0

White Female 0 0 0 0 0

White Male 0 0 0 0 0

Employment with disability 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0

Given the serious nancial constraints experienced by the Agency during the year under review, there has not been any performance rewards whatsoever given to the staff, thus zero values are indicated on all categories above.

ChangeAhead


Table 3.8: Performance Rewards by Salary Band for Personnel below Senior Management

Salary Band Number of Bene ciaries

Total Employment

Percentage of Total

EmploymentCost (R’000) Average cost

per Bene ciary

Lower Skilled (Levels 1-2) 0 0 0 0 0

Skilled(Levels 3-5) 0 0 0 0 0

Highly Skilled production (Levels 6-8) 0 0 0 0 0

Highly Skilled Supervision (Levels 9-12) 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 0 0 0 0

The information in the table above shows no performance rewards by salary band for personnel below senior management during the year under review.


Tabl

e 3.

9: T

erm

inat

ions

Occ

upat

iona

l Ban

dsM

ale

Afric

anM

ale

Colo

ured

Mal

eIn

dian

Mal

eTB

Mal

eW

hite

Fem

ale

Afric

anFe

mal

eCo

lour

edFe

mal

eIn

dian

Fem

ale

Tota

l BFe

mal

eW

hite

Tota

l

L 15

-16

Top

Man

agem

ent P

erm

anen

t0

00

00

00

00

00

L13-

14 S

enio

r Man

agem

ent P

erm

anen

t0

00

00

00

00

00

L9-1

2 Pr

ofes

sion

ally

qua

li e

d an

d ex

perie

nced

sp

ecia

lists

and

mid

-man

agem

ent P

erm

anen

t0

00

00

10

01

01

L5-8

Ski

lled

tech

nica

l and

aca

dem

ical

ly q

uali

ed

wor

kers

, jun

ior m

anag

emen

t, su

perv

isor

s fo

rem

en p

erm

anen

t1

00

10

00

00

01

L2-4

Sem

i-ski

lled

and

disc

retio

nary

dec

isio

n m

akin

g Pe

rman

ent

00

00

00

00

00

0

L 1

Elem

enta

ry o

ccup

atio

ns0

00

00

00

00

00

Tota

l1

00

10

10

01

02

The

info

rmat

ion

in th

e ta

ble

abov

e sh

ows

a to

tal o

f 2 s

ervi

ce te

rmin

atio

ns, a

s fo

llow

s:

• Af

rican

mal

e:

1 a

t lev

el 5

– 8

; and

• Af

rican

fem

ale:

1 a

t lev

el 9

– 1

2.

ChangeAhead


Tabl

e 3.

10: R

easo

ns w

hy s

taff

is le

avin

g th

e Ag

ency

Term

inat

ion

type

Num

ber

Perc

enta

ge o

f Tot

al

Resi

gnat

ions

Perc

enta

ge o

f Tot

al

Empl

oym

ent

Tota

l sta

ff c

ompl

imen

t

Deat

h Pe

rman

ent

00

038

Resi

gnat

ion

Perm

anen

t2

100%

5.00

%38

Expi

ry o

f con

trac

t Per

man

ent

00

038

Tran

sfer

s Pe

rman

ent

00

038

Retir

emen

t Per

man

ent

00

038

TOTA

L2

100%

5.00

%38

The

info

rmat

ion

in th

e ta

ble

abov

e sh

ows

2 (5

.00%

) per

man

ent s

taff

resi

gnat

ions

dur

ing

the

year

und

er re

view

.


Tabl

e 3.

11: G

rant

ing

of E

mpl

oyee

Initi

ated

Sev

eran

ce P

acka

ges

Term

inat

ion

type

Num

ber

Perc

enta

ge o

f Tot

al

Resi

gnat

ions

Perc

enta

ge o

f Tot

al

Empl

oym

ent

Tota

l

Low

er S

kille

d (S

alar

y Le

vel 1

-2)

00

00

Skill

ed(S

alar

y Le

vel 3

-5)

00

00

Hig

hly

Skill

ed P

rodu

ctio

n (S

alar

y Le

vel 6

-8)

00

00

Hig

hly

Skill

ed P

rodu

ctio

n (S

alar

y Le

vel 9

-12)

00

00

Seni

or M

anag

emen

t (S

alar

y Le

vel 1

3 an

d H

ighe

r0

00

0

TOTA

L0

00

0

The

info

rmat

ion

in th

e ta

ble

abov

e sh

ows

no g

rant

ing

of e

mpl

oyee

initi

ated

sev

eran

ce p

acka

ges

durin

g th

e ye

ar u

nder

revi

ew.

Ther

e w

ere

no la

bour

dis

pute

s ex

perie

nced

by

the

Agen

cy fo

r the

per

iod

unde

r rev

iew

and

the

Agen

cy u

ses

a pr

oact

ive

appr

oach

of e

ngag

ing

with

its

staf

f, th

us th

e le

vel

of s

taff

mor

ale

and

satis

fact

ion

is c

onsi

dere

d to

be

high

des

pite

the

nan

cial

con

stra

ints

.

ChangeAhead


Infringements Performance Report


Section 4: Infringements Performance Report OverviewThe administrative adjudication role of the RTIA is derived from the AARTO Act, in facilitating the exercise of the ve options available to road users once they have been issued with a Notice of an offence and the relevant infringement has been recorded on the NCR.

For the 2012/13 period under review, the following statistics are derived from the National Contraventions Register (NCR), and are based on the records captured and uploaded thereto by the Issuing Authorities of Johannesburg (JMPD); Tshwane (TMPD); the Gauteng Department of Community Safety (GDOCS) and the Road Traf c Management Corporation (RTMC).

These Notices, as shown in the table below, are based on actual entries that were captured on the NCR from 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2013.

Number of All Notices captured per Issuing Authority 2012 -2013

Month Issuing Authority Grand

Captured JMPD TMPD GDOCS RTMC Total

Apr 12 84 660 73 990 9 626 5807 174 083

May 12 134 016 104 453 8 100 6885 253 454

Jun 12 102 340 71 419 5 833 3768 183 360

Jul 12 114 191 54 637 6 241 4335 179 404

Aug 12 115 622 83 158 7 020 4197 209 997

Sep 12 175 183 60 491 5 554 3 719 244 947

Oct 12 254 307 70 369 6 704 5 178 336 558

Nov 12 206 098 70 351 5 837 4 857 287 143

Dec 12 190 788 44 354 4 245 4 787 244 174

Jan 13 490 200 93 094 6 958 5 551 595 803

Feb 13 496 501 71 507 6 793 7 728 582 529

Mar 13 465 720 71 346 6 654 4 753 548 473

Grand Total 2 829 626 869 169 79 565 61 565 3 839 925

The above table shows that of the total infringements captured on the NCR system, JMPD had the largest number (more than half of the total) and a sharply rising trend over the period when compared to the rest where numbers were either static or in decline.

ChangeAhead


A schematic representation of the notices captured per Issuing Authority per month is given in the graph below.

The total number of Notices captured per month on the NCR by all the Issuing Authorities is reflected in the graph below.


The number of all Notices and corresponding percentages captured per Issuing Authority are also reflected in the graph below.

The above pie-chart shows the percentage contribution by each Issuing Authority to the Notices captured on the NCR during the 2012/2013 nancial year and this information illustrates the dominant position of the JMPD in the total volume of transactions captured.

The change in the number of Notices captured per Issuing Authority from the 2011-2012 to the 2012-2013 nancial year is shown in the table and schematically reflected in the graph below.

Change in the Number of All Notices captured per Issuing Authority

Year Issuing Authority Grand


2011-2012 870 886 799 168 72 386 45 077 1 787 517

2012-2013 2 829 626 869 169 79 565 61 565 3 839 925

Change 1 958 740 70 001 7 179 16 488 2 052 408

% Change 224.91% 8.76% 9.92% 36.58% 114.82%

ChangeAhead


The information in the table and pie chart above shows the following changes in the number of Notices captured per Issuing Authority from 2011-2012 to 2012-2013:

• JMPD: an increase of 224.91% from 870 886 to 2 829 626 Notices;

• TMPD: an increase of 8.76% from 799 168 to 869 169 Notices;

• GDoCS: an increase of 9.92% from 72 386 to 79 565 Notices;

• RTMC: an increase of 36.58% from 45 077 to 61 565 Notices; and

• All issuing Authorities: an increase of 2 052 508 (114.82%) from 1 787 517 to 3 839 925 notices.


The number of AARTO 01 Infringement Notices captured per Issuing Authority is shown in the table and schematically reflected in the graphs below.

Number of AARTO 01 Notices captured per Issuing Authority



Apr 12 38 802 22 514 7 965 4777 74 058

May 12 44 229 35 605 6 766 5763 92 363

Jun 12 30 729 27 529 4 749 3223 66 230

Jul 12 46 115 21 876 5 012 3582 76 585

Aug 12 45 010 23 806 5 584 3364 77 764

Sep 12 50 916 18 429 4 436 3 091 76 872

Oct 12 56 601 19 755 5 441 4 420 86 217

Nov 12 50 296 27 969 5 057 4 143 87 465

Dec 12 32 077 14 628 3 765 4 088 54 558

Jan 13 47 179 35 537 5 887 4 652 93 255

Feb 13 35 227 23 575 5 686 6 581 71 069

Mar 13 35 464 23 193 5 628 3 908 68 193

Grand Total 512 645 294 416 65 976 51 592 924 629

ChangeAhead


The change in the number of AARTO 01 Notices captured per Issuing Authority from the 2011-2012 to the 2012-2013 nancial years is shown in the table and schematically reflected in the graph below.

Change in No. of AARTO 01 Notices captured per Issuing Authority



2011-2012 445 923 296 413 58 705 36 993 838 034

2012-2013 512 645 294 416 65 976 51 592 924 629

Change 66 722 -1 997 7 271 14 599 86 595

% Change 14.96% -0.67% 12.39% 39.46% 10.33%

The information above shows the following changes in the number of AARTO 01 Notices captured per Issuing Authority from 2011-2012 to 2012-2013:

• JMPD: an increase of 14.96% from 445 923 to 512 645 Notices;

• TMPD: a decrease of 0.67% from 296 413 to 294 416 Notices;

• GDoCS: an increase of 12.39% from 58 705 to 65 976 Notices; and

• RTMC: an increase of 39.46% from 36 993 to 51 592 Notices.

The number of AARTO 03 Infringement Notices captured per Issuing Authority is shown in the table and schematically reflected in the graphs below.


Number of AARTO 03 Notices captured per Issuing Authority



Apr 12 35 082 30 045 70 0 65 197

May 12 63 517 40 289 74 0 103 880

Jun 12 47 224 26 634 41 0 73 899

Jul 12 45 506 16 116 85 0 61 707

Aug 12 47 213 40 860 99 0 88 172

Sep 12 71 291 22 629 66 0 93 986

Oct 12 120 901 26 249 59 0 147 209

Nov 12 103 807 11 512 55 0 115 374

Dec 12 116 263 12 759 37 0 129 059

Jan 13 396 750 24 867 95 0 421 712

Feb 13 388 362 25 327 100 0 413 789

Mar 13 370 865 12 108 86 0 383 059

Grand Total 1 806 781 289 395 867 0 2 097 043

ChangeAhead


The change in the number of AARTO 03 Notices captured per Issuing Authority from the 2011-2012 to the 2012-2013 nancial years is shown in the table and schematically reflected in the graph below.

Change in No. of AARTO 03 Notices captured per Issuing Authority



2011-2012 356 695 252 163 498 0 609 356

2012-2013 1 806 781 289 395 867 0 2 097 043

Change 1 450 086 37 232 369 0 1 487 687

% Change 406.53% 14.77% 74.10% - 244.14%


The information above shows the following changes in the number of AARTO 03 Notices captured per Issuing Authority from 2011-2012 to 2012-2013:

• JMPD: an increase of 406.53% from 356 695 to 1 806 781 Notices;

• TMPD: an increase of 14.77% from 252 163 to 289 395 Notices; and

• GDOCS: an increase of 74.10% from 498 to 867 Notices

• RTMC: no AARTO 03 Notices captured.

ChangeAhead


Infringements Capturing Trends

Number of Notices captured per Issuing Authority - Excluding AARTO 03 Notices



Apr 12 49 578 43 945 9 556 5 807 108 886

May 12 70 499 64 164 8 026 6 885 149 574

Jun 12 55 116 44 785 5 792 3 768 109 461

Jul 12 68 685 38 521 6 156 4 335 117 697

Aug 12 68 409 42 298 6 921 4 197 121 825

Sep 12 103 892 37 862 5 488 3 719 150 961

Oct 12 133 406 44 120 6 645 5 178 189 349

Nov 12 102 291 58 839 5 782 4 857 171 769

Dec 12 74 525 31 595 4 208 4 787 115 115

Jan 13 93 450 68 227 6 863 5 551 174 091

Feb 13 108 139 46 180 6 693 7 728 168 740

Mar 13 94 855 59 238 6 568 4 753 165 414

Grand Total 1 022 845 579 774 78 698 61 565 1 742 882

The table and graph above shows the trends noticed in the capturing of the issued Infringement Notices, excluding AARTO 03 Notices:


JMPD captured the highest number of Notices in October 2012 (133 406), followed by February 2013 (108 139). The lowest number of notices captured was in April (49 578) and June 2012 (55 116).

TMPD captured their highest number of Notices in January 2013 (68 227) followed by May 2012 (64 164). Their lowest numbers of Infringements captured were in September (37 862) and December 2012 (31 595).

GDOCS captured their highest number of Infringements in April (9 556) and May 2012 (8 026). Their lowest numbers of infringements captured were in September (5 488) and December 2012 (4 208).

RTMC captured their highest number of Infringements in February 2013 (7 728) and May 2012 (6 885). Their lowest numbers of Infringements were captured in June (3 768) and September 2012 (3 719).

The table on AARTO 01 Notices and the graph below shows the trends noticed in the capturing of the issued AARTO 01 Infringement Notices:

JMPD captured the highest number of Notices in September (50 916) and October 2013 (56 601). The lowest number of Notices captured was in June (30 729) and December 2012 (32 077). JMPD’s monthly average was 42 720 AARTO 01 Notices.

• TMPD captured their highest number of Notices in May 2012 (35 605) followed by January 2013 (35 537). Their lowest numbers of infringements captured were in September (18 429) and December 2012 (14 628). TMPD’s monthly average was 24 535 AARTO 01 Notices.

• GDOCS captured their highest number of Infringements in April (7 965) and May 2012 (6 766). Their lowest numbers of Infringements captured were in September (4 436) and December 2013 (3 765). Their monthly average was 5 498 AARTO 01 Notices.

• RTMC captured their highest number of Infringements in May 2012 (5 763) and February 2013 (6 581). Their lowest numbers of Infringements were captured in June (3 223) and September 2012 (3 091). RTMC’s monthly average was 4 299 AARTO 01 Notices.

ChangeAhead


The table on AARTO 03 notices and the graph below shows the trends noticed in the capturing of the issued AARTO 03 Infringement Notices:

• JMPD captured the highest number of Notices in January 2013 (396 750), followed by February 2013 (388 362). The lowest number of Notices captured was in April (35 082) and July 2012 (45 506). From December 2012 to January 2013 there was a signi cant increase of 280 487 (241.25%) Notices. JMPD’s monthly average for the year was 150 565 AARTO 03 notices.

• TMPD captured their highest number of Notices in May 2012 (40 289) and August 2012 (40 860). Their lowest numbers of infringements captured were in November 2012 (11 512) and March 2013 (12 108). TMPD’s monthly average for the year was 24 116 AARTO 03 notices.

• GDOCS captured their highest number of Infringements in August 2012 (99) and February 2013 (100). Their lowest numbers of infringements captured were in June (41) and December 2012 (37). Their monthly average for the year was 72 AARTO 03 Notices.

RTMC did not capture any AARTO 03 Notices during the nancial year under review.


Infringements Captured per type (All Issuing Authorities)In order to have a clearer picture of the performance of the various Issuing Authorities, infringements captured are disaggregated and tabulated below per type as follows: Handwritten, Camera, Operator, as well as other Notices processed. The tabulation and graph below represents the total number of Notices captured by all Issuing Authorities.

Number of Notices Captured by Type: All Issuing Authorities

MonthCaptured AARTO 01 AARTO 03 AARTO 31 Operator

infringementsNominations

Served Offences Total

Apr 12 74 058 65 197 24 291 8 486 2 012 39 174 083

May 12 92 363 103 880 43 724 10 002 3 395 90 253 454

Jun 12 66 230 73 899 33 742 7 212 2 220 57 183 360

Jul 12 76 585 61 707 30 268 8 382 2 398 64 179 404

Aug 12 77 764 88 172 33 337 8 477 2 202 45 209 997

Sep 12 76 872 93 986 62 342 7 991 3 651 105 244 947

Oct 12 86 217 147 209 90 942 7 614 4 517 59 336 558

Nov 12 87 465 115 374 70 513 7 698 6 063 30 287 143

Dec 12 54 558 129 059 50 755 4 982 4 801 19 244 174

Jan 13 93 255 421 712 69 069 7 723 3 980 64 595 803

Feb 13 71 069 413 789 85 969 7 341 4 260 101 582 529

Mar 13 68 193 383 059 86 661 6 525 3 978 57 548 473

Total 924 629 2 097 043 681 613 92 433 43 477 730 3 839 925

The table below shows the change from 2011-2012 to 2012-2013 in the total number of Notices captured by all Issuing Authorities.

Change in Number of all Notices Captured : All Issuing Authorities

Year Captured AARTO 01 AARTO 03 AARTO 31 Operator



2011-2012 838 034 609 356 228 960 100 118 10 962 87 1 787 517

2012-2013 924 629 2 097 043 681 613 92 433 43 477 730 3 839 925

Change 86 595 1 487 687 452 653 -7 685 32 515 643 2 052 408

% Change 10.33% 244.14% 197.70% -7.68% 296.62% 739.08% 114.82%

Infringements Captured per type (All Issuing Authorities)The information in table above indicates as follows:

• AARTO 01 Notices : increased by 86 595 (10.33%) to 924 629;

• AARTO 03 Notices : increased by 1 487 687 (244.14%) to 2 097 043;

ChangeAhead



• Operator infringements : decreased by 7 685 (7.68%) to 92 433;

• Nominations served : increased by 32 515 (296.62%) to 43 477; and

• Offences: increased by 643 (739.08%) to 730.

The graph below represents the total number of Notices captured by all Issuing Authorities during 2012-2013.


Johannesburg Metropolitan Police Department (JMPD)The table and graph below is a representation of the infringements captured by JMPD per infringement type.

Number of Notices Captured by Johannesburg Metropolitan Police Department (JMPD)




Apr 12 38 802 35 082 7 097 3 564 76 39 84 660

May 12 44 229 63 517 20 723 4 589 868 90 134 016

Jun 12 30 729 47 224 20 400 3 067 863 57 102 340

Jul 12 46 115 45 506 17 333 4 465 708 64 114 191

Aug 12 45 010 47 213 18 666 4 111 577 45 115 622

Sep 12 50 916 71 291 45 925 4 389 2557 105 175 183

Oct 12 56 601 120 901 70 471 3 826 2449 59 254 307

Nov 12 50 296 103 807 44 868 3 399 3698 30 206 098

Dec 12 32 077 116 263 36 769 2 236 3424 19 190 788

Jan 13 47 179 396 750 41 232 2 283 2692 64 490 200

Feb 13 35 227 388 362 66 857 2 590 3 364 101 496 501

Mar 13 35 464 370 865 53 351 2 467 3 516 57 465 720

Total 512 645 1 806 781 443 692 40 986 24 792 730 2 829 626

The table below shows the change from 2011-2012 to 2012-2013 in the total number of notices captured by JMPD.

Change in Number of all Notices Captured by JMPD




2011-2012 445 923 356 695 19 775 47 253 1 153 87 870 886

2012-2013 512 645 1 806 781 443 692 40 986 24 792 730 2 829 626

Change 66 722 1 450 086 423 917 -6 267 23 639 643 1 958 740

% Change 14.96% 406.53% 2143.70% -13.26% 2050.22% 739.08% 224.91%

The information in the table above indicates as follows:


• AARTO 03 Notices : increased by 1 450 086 (406.53%) to 1 806 781;

• AARTO 31 Notices : increased by 423 917 (2 143.70%) to 443 692;


ChangeAhead


• Nominations served : increased by 23 639 (2 050.22%) to 24 792; and

• Offences: increased by 643 (739.08%) to 730.

The graph below represents the total number of Notices captured by JMPD during 2012-2013.

Based on the number of Notices captured against speci c of cers on the NCR, the table below shows the average number of Notices per type of notice, captured by JMPD per of cer per month.

Average No. of Notices Captured per O cer per Month : JMPD

Month capturedNumber of Notices

AARTO 01 AARTO 03 AARTO 01 & 03

Apr-12 25.80 128.04 41.55

May-12 28.76 218.27 58.91

Jun-12 19.72 178.88 42.78

Jul-12 28.79 177.76 49.31

Aug-12 27.89 187.35 49.42

Sep-12 30.65 271.07 63.52

Oct-12 34.43 436.47 92.40

Nov-12 31.95 387.34 83.66

Dec-12 21.43 435.44 84.09

Jan-13 31.79 1 401.94 251.23

Feb-13 22.80 1 454.54 233.77

Mar-13 23.00 1 437.46 225.74

Average 27.32 561.11 105.51


The information in the table above indicates the following:

• AARTO 01 Notices: the highest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for October 2012 (average 34.43 Notices per Of cer). The lowest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for June 2012 (average 19.72 Notices per Of cer). The monthly average for the year was 27.32 Notices;

• AARTO 03 Notices: the highest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for February 2013 (average 1 454.54 Notices per Of cer). The lowest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for April 2012 (average 128.04 notices per of cer). The monthly average for the year was 561.11 notices; and

• AARTO 01 and 03 notices combined: the highest number of notices captured per of cer per month was for January 2013 (average 251.23 notices per of cer). The lowest number of notices captured per of cer per month was for April 2012 (average 41.55 notices per of cer).

The information in the table is also reflected in the graph below.

ChangeAhead


Tshwane Metropolitan Police Department (TMPD)The table and graph below is a representation of the infringements captured by TMPD per infringement type.

Number of Notices Captured by Tshwane Metropolitan Police Department (TMPD)




Apr 12 22 514 30 045 17 194 2 301 1936 0 73 990

May 12 35 605 40 289 23 001 3 031 2 527 0 104 453

Jun 12 27 529 26 634 13 342 2 557 1357 0 71 419

Jul 12 21 876 16 116 12 935 2 020 1690 0 54 637

Aug 12 23 806 40 860 14 671 2 196 1 625 0 83 158

Sep 12 18 429 22 629 16 417 1 922 1094 0 60 491

Oct 12 19 755 26 249 20 471 1 826 2068 0 70 369

Nov 12 27 969 11 512 25 645 2 860 2365 0 70 351

Dec 12 14 628 12 759 13 986 1 604 1377 0 44 354

Jan 13 35 537 24 867 27 837 3 565 1288 0 93 094

Feb 13 23 575 25 327 19 112 2 597 896 0 71 507

Mar 13 23 193 12 108 33 310 2 273 462 0 71 346

Total 294 416 289 395 237 921 28 752 18 685 0 869 169

The table below shows the change from 2011-2012 to 2012-2013 in the total number of notices captured by TMPD.

Change in Number of all Notices Captured by TMPD

Year Cap-tured AARTO 01 AARTO 03 AARTO 31 Operator in-

fringementsNominations


2011-2012 296 413 252 163 209 185 31 598 9 809 0 799 168

2012-2013 294 416 289 395 237 921 28 752 18 685 0 869 169

Change -1 997 37 232 28 736 -2 846 8 876 0 70 001

% Change -0.67% 14.77% 13.74% -9.01% 90.49% - 8.76%


• AARTO 01 notices : decreased by 1 997 (0.67%) to 294 416;

• AARTO 03 notices : increased by 37 232 (14.77%) to 289 395;



• Nominations served : increased by 8 876 (90.49%) to 18 685; and


• Offences: no summonses were issued by TMPD for offences.

The graph below represents the total number of notices captured by TMPD during 2012-2013.

Based on the number of notices captured against speci c of cers on the NCR, the table below shows the average number of notices per type of notice, captured by TMPD per of cer per month.

Average No. of Notices Captured per O cer per Month : TMPD

Month capturedNotice Numbers


Apr-12 27.16 1 877.81 62.20

May-12 39.08 2 685.93 81.96

Jun-12 30.62 2 421.27 59.52

Jul-12 26.52 1 239.69 45.34

Aug-12 29.61 3 143.08 79.15

Sep-12 23.24 1 616.36 50.88

Oct-12 24.94 1 874.93 57.08

Nov-12 31.60 1 151.20 44.11

Dec-12 19.90 1 159.91 36.71

Jan-13 41.91 2 486.70 70.40

Feb-13 30.07 2 532.70 61.59

Mar-13 29.73 1 345.33 44.74

Average 29.78 1 982.16 58.20


ChangeAhead


• AARTO 01 Notices: the highest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for January 2013 (average 41.91 Notices per Of cer). The lowest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for December 2012 (on average 19.90 Notices per Of cer). The monthly average for the year was 29.78 Notices;

• AARTO 03 Notices: the highest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for August 2012 (average 3 143.08 Notices per Of cer). The lowest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for November 2012 (average 1 151.20 Notices per Of cer). The monthly average for the year was 1 982.16 Notices per Of cer; and

• AARTO 01 and 03 Notices combined: the highest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for May 2012 (average 81.96 Notices per Of cer). The lowest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for December 2012 (average 36.71 Notices per Of cer).



Gauteng Department of Community Safety (GDoCS)The table and graph below is a representation of the infringements captured by GDoCS per infringement type.

Number of Notices Captured by Gauteng Department of Community Safety (GDoCS)

MonthCaptured AARTO 01 AARTO 03 AARTO 31 Operator in-



Apr 12 7 965 70 0 1 591 0 0 9 626

May 12 6 766 74 0 1 260 0 0 8 100

Jun 12 4 749 41 0 1 043 0 0 5 833

Jul 12 5 012 85 0 1 144 0 0 6 241

Aug 12 5 584 99 0 1 337 0 0 7 020

Sep 12 4 436 66 0 1 052 0 0 5 554

Oct 12 5 441 59 0 1 204 0 0 6 704

Nov 12 5 057 55 0 725 0 0 5 837

Dec 12 3 765 37 0 443 0 0 4 245

Jan 13 5 887 95 0 976 0 0 6 958

Feb 13 5 686 100 0 1 007 0 0 6 793

Mar 13 5 628 86 0 940 0 0 6 654

Total 65 976 867 0 12 722 0 0 79 565

The table below shows the change from 2011-2012 to 2012-2013 in the total number of notices captured by GDoCS.

Change in Number of all Notices Captured by GDoCS




2011-2012 58 705 498 0 13 183 0 0 72 386

2012-2013 65 976 867 0 12 722 0 0 79 565

Change 7 271 369 0 -461 0 0 7 179

% Change 12.39% 74.10% - -3.50% - - 9.92%



• AARTO 03 notices : increased by 369 (74.10%) to 867;

• AARTO 31 notices : no notices were captured;

• Operator infringements : decreased by 461 (3.50%) to 12 722;

ChangeAhead


• Nominations served : no nominations were captured; and

• Offences: no offences were captured.

The graph below represents the total number of notices captured by GDoCS during 2012-2013.

Based on the number of notices captured against speci c of cers on the NCR, the table below shows the average number of notices per type of notice, captured by GDoCS per of cer per month.

Average No. of Notices Captured per O cer per Month : GDoCS



Apr-12 46.58 6.36 44.15

May-12 41.26 10.57 40.00

Jun-12 31.24 5.86 30.13

Jul-12 32.76 8.50 31.27

Aug-12 34.90 9.00 33.23

Sep-12 28.25 7.33 27.12

Oct-12 34.01 6.56 32.54

Nov-12 31.61 7.86 30.61

Dec-12 25.97 4.11 24.69

Jan-13 34.43 10.56 33.23

Feb-13 35.32 12.50 34.24

Mar-13 34.96 8.60 33.42

Average 34.45 8.10 33.06



• AARTO 01 Notices: the highest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for April 2012 (average 46.58 Notices per Of cer). The lowest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for December 2012 (average 25.97 Notices per Of cer). The monthly average for the year was 34.45 Notices;

• AARTO 03 Notices: the highest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for February 2013 (on average 12.50 Notices per Of cer). The lowest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for December 2012 (average 4.11 notices per of cer). The monthly average for the year was 8.10 Notices; and

• AARTO 01 and 03 Notices combined: the highest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for April 2012 (average 44.15 Notices per Of cer). The lowest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for December 2012 (on average 24.69 Notices per Of cer).


ChangeAhead


Road Traf c Management Corporation (RTMC)The table and graph below is a representation of the infringements captured by the RTMC per infringement notice type.

Number of Notices Captured by Road Tra c Management Corporation (RTMC)

MonthCaptured AARTO 01 AARTO 03 AARTO 31 Operator in-



Apr 12 4 777 0 0 1 030 0 0 5 807

May 12 5 763 0 0 1 122 0 0 6 885

Jun 12 3 223 0 0 545 0 0 3 768

Jul 12 3 582 0 0 753 0 0 4 335

Aug 12 3 364 0 0 833 0 0 4 197

Sep 12 3 091 0 0 628 0 0 3 719

Oct 12 4 420 0 0 758 0 0 5 178

Nov 12 4 143 0 0 714 0 0 4 857

Dec 12 4 088 0 0 699 0 0 4 787

Jan 13 4 652 0 0 899 0 0 5 551

Feb 13 6 581 0 0 1 147 0 0 7 728

Mar 13 3 908 0 0 845 0 0 4 753

Total 51 592 0 0 9 973 0 0 61 565

The table below shows the change from 2011-2012 to 2012-2013 in the total number of notices captured by RTMC.

Change in Number of all Notices Captured by RTMC




2011-2012 36 993 0 0 8 084 0 0 45 077

2012-2013 51 592 0 0 9 973 0 0 61 565

Change 14 599 0 0 1 889 0 0 16 488

% Change 39.46% - - 23.37% - - 36.58%

Note : It should be noted that the National Traf c Police unit of the RTMC only commenced with enforcement operations during September 2011.



• AARTO 03 Notices : no notices were captured;


• AARTO 31 Notices : no notices were captured;

• Operator infringements : increased by 1 889 (23.37%) to 9 973;

• Nominations served : no nominations were captured; and

• Offences : no offences were captured.

The graph below represents the total number of notices captured by RTMC during 2012-2013.

Based on the number of notices captured against speci c of cers on the NCR, the table below shows the average number of notices per type of notice, captured by RTMC per of cer per month.

Average No. of Notices Captured per O cer per Month : RTMC



Apr-12 22.64 0.00 0.00

May-12 28.25 0.00 0.00

Jun-12 16.28 0.00 0.00

Jul-12 17.56 0.00 0.00

Aug-12 16.49 0.00 0.00

Sep-12 15.30 0.00 0.00

Oct-12 21.67 0.00 0.00

Nov-12 21.47 0.00 0.00

Dec-12 21.07 0.00 0.00

Jan-13 24.23 0.00 0.00

Feb-13 36.77 0.00 0.00

Mar-13 21.59 0.00 0.00

Average 21.81 0.00 0.00

ChangeAhead



• AARTO 01 Notices: the highest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for February 2013 (average 36.77 Notices per Of cer). The lowest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for September 2012 (average 15.30 Notices per Of cer). The monthly average for the year was 21.81 Notices per Of cer; and

• AARTO 03 Notices: no Notices were captured.



Infringements Captured per Type per Of cer (All Issuing Authorities)Based on the number of notices captured against speci c of cers on the NCR, the table below shows the average number of AARTO 01 Notices captured per Of cer per month for each of the Issuing Authorities.

Average Number of AARTO 01 Notices Captured per O cer per Month per IA

Month capturedIssuing Authority

JMPD TMPD GDoCS RTMC

Apr-12 25.80 27.16 46.58 22.64

May-12 28.76 39.08 41.26 28.25

Jun-12 19.72 30.62 31.24 16.28

Jul-12 28.79 26.52 32.76 17.56

Aug-12 27.89 29.61 34.90 16.49

Sep-12 30.65 23.24 28.25 15.30

Oct-12 34.43 24.94 34.01 21.67

Nov-12 31.95 31.60 31.61 21.47

Dec-12 21.43 19.90 25.97 21.07

Jan-13 31.79 41.91 34.43 24.23

Feb-13 22.80 30.07 35.32 36.77

Mar-13 23.00 29.73 34.96 21.59

Average 27.32 29.78 34.45 21.81


• JMPD: the highest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for October 2012 (average 34.43 Notices per Of cer). The lowest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for June 2012 (average 19.72 Notices per Of cer). The monthly average for the year was 27.32 notices per of cer.

• TMPD: the highest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for January 2013 (on average 41.91 Notices per Of cer). The lowest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for December 2012 (average 19.90 Notices per Of cer). The monthly average for the year was 29.78 notices.

• GDoCS: the highest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for April 2012 (average 46.58 Notices per Of cer). The lowest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for December 2012 (average 25.97 Notices per Of cer). The monthly average for the year was 34.45 notices per of cer.

• RTMC: the highest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for February 2013 (average 36.77 Notices per Of cer). The lowest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for September 2012 (on average 15.30 Notices per Of cer). The monthly average for the year was 21.81 notices.

ChangeAhead


Infringements Captured per Type per Of cer (All Issuing Authorities)The information in the table above is also schematically shown in the graph below.

Based on the number of AARTO 01 Notices captured against speci c Of cers on the NCR, and assuming an average of 20 working days per of cer per month, the table below shows the average number of AARTO 01 Notices captured per of cer per day for the various Issuing Authorities.

Average No. of AARTO 01 Notices Captured per O cer per Day


JMPD TMPD GDoCS RTMC

Apr-12 1.29 1.36 2.33 1.13

May-12 1.44 1.95 2.06 1.41

Jun-12 0.99 1.53 1.56 0.81

Jul-12 1.44 1.33 1.64 0.88

Aug-12 1.39 1.48 1.75 0.82

Sep-12 1.53 1.16 1.41 0.77

Oct-12 1.72 1.25 1.70 1.08

Nov-12 1.60 1.58 1.58 1.07

Dec-12 1.07 1.00 1.30 1.05

Jan-13 1.59 2.10 1.72 1.21

Feb-13 1.14 1.50 1.77 1.84

Mar-13 1.15 1.49 1.75 1.08

Average 1.37 1.49 1.72 1.09



• JMPD: the highest number of Notices captured per Of cer per day was during October 2012 (average 1.72 Notices per Of cer). The lowest number of Notices captured per Of cer per day was during June 2012 (average 0.99 Notices per Of cer). The average for the year was 1.37 Notices per Of cer per day.

• TMPD: the highest number of Notices captured per Of cer per day was during January 2013 (on average 2.10 Notices per Of cer). The lowest number of Notices captured per Of cer per day was during December 2012 (average 1.00 Notices per Of cer). The average for the year was 1.49 notices per of cer per day.

• GDoCS: the highest number of Notices captured per Of cer per day was during May 2012 (average 2.06 Notices per Of cer). The lowest number of Notices captured per Of cer per day was during December 2012 (average 1.30 Notices per Of cer). The daily average for the year was 1.72 Notices per Of cer.

RTMC: the highest number of notices captured per of cer per day was for February 2013 (average 1.84 notices per of cer). The lowest number of notices captured per of cer per month was for September 2012 (on average 0.77 notices per of cer). The average for the year was 1.09 notices per of cer per day.

The information in the table above is also schematically shown in the graph below.

ChangeAhead


Based on the number of notices captured against speci c of cers on the NCR, the table below shows the average number of AARTO 01 and AARTO 03 Notices captured per Of cer per month for each of the Issuing Authorities.

Average Number of AARTO 01 & 03 Notices Captured per O cer per Month


JMPD TMPD GDoCS

Apr-12 41.55 62.20 44.15

May-12 58.91 81.96 40.00

Jun-12 42.78 59.52 30.13

Jul-12 49.31 45.34 31.27

Aug-12 49.42 79.15 33.23

Sep-12 63.52 50.88 27.12

Oct-12 92.40 57.08 32.54

Nov-12 83.66 44.11 30.61

Dec-12 84.09 36.71 24.69

Jan-13 251.23 70.40 33.23

Feb-13 233.77 61.59 34.24

Mar-13 225.74 44.74 33.42

Average 105.51 58.20 33.06


• JMPD: the highest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for January 2013 (average 251.23 Notices per Of cer). The lowest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for April 2012 (average 41.55 Notices per Of cer). The monthly average for the year was 105.51 notices per of cer.

• TMPD: the highest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for May 2012 (on average 81.96 Notices per Of cer). The lowest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for December 2012 (average 36.71 Notices per Of cer). The monthly average for the year was 58.20 notices.

• GDoCS: the highest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for April 2012 (average 44.15 Notices per Of cer). The lowest number of Notices captured per Of cer per month was for December 2012 (average 24.69 Notices per Of cer). The monthly average for the year was 33.06 Notices per Of cer.

Because the RTMC did not issue AARTO 03 Notices, they were not included in the table above.



Based on the number of Notices captured against speci c Of cers on the NCR, the table below shows the average number of AARTO 03 Notices captured per Of cer in the AARTO 03 team per month for each of the Issuing Authorities.

Average Number of AARTO 03 Notices Captured per AARTO 03 Team O cer per Month


JMPD TMPD GDoCS

Apr-12 128.04 1 877.81 6.36

May-12 218.27 2 685.93 10.57

Jun-12 178.88 2 421.27 5.86

Jul-12 177.76 1 239.69 8.50

Aug-12 187.35 3 143.08 9.00

Sep-12 271.07 1 616.36 7.33

Oct-12 436.47 1 874.93 6.56

Nov-12 387.34 1 151.20 7.86

Dec-12 435.44 1 159.91 4.11

Jan-13 1 401.94 2 486.70 10.56

Feb-13 1 454.54 2 532.70 12.50

Mar-13 1 437.46 1 345.33 8.60

Average 561.11 1 982.16 8.10

ChangeAhead



• JMPD: the highest number of notices captured per of cer per month was for February 2013 (average 1 454.54 notices per of cer). The lowest number of notices captured per of cer per month was for April 2012 (average 128.04 notices per of cer). The monthly average for the year was 561.11 notices per of cer.

• TMPD: the highest number of notices captured per of cer per month was for August 2012 (on average 3 143.08 notices per of cer). The lowest number of notices captured per of cer per month was for November 2012 (average 1 151.20 notices per of cer). The monthly average for the year was 1 982.16 notices per of cer.

• GDoCS: the highest number of notices captured per of cer per month was for February 2013 (average 12.50 notices per of cer). The lowest number of notices captured per of cer per month was for December 2012 (average 4.11 notices per of cer). The monthly average for the year was 8.10 notices per of cer.



The information in the table and graph below shows the % of of cers per Issuing Authority that issued the number of AARTO 01 Notices within the “number of notices” group per month for each authority.

Notice % O cers per Issuing Authority

Group JMPD TMPD GDoCS RTMC

1 - 10 39.14% 36.26% 25.12% 26.08%

11 - 20 21.71% 17.74% 18.17% 32.21%

21 - 30 12.81% 13.01% 15.56% 21.26%

31 - 40 8.36% 9.39% 10.34% 11.50%

41 - 50 5.37% 6.69% 8.62% 4.18%

51 - 60 3.50% 5.28% 5.74% 2.07%

61 - 70 2.71% 3.38% 4.18% 1.31%

71 - 80 1.80% 2.34% 2.87% 0.55%

81 - 90 1.40% 1.56% 1.88% 0.25%

91 - 100 0.98% 1.02% 1.93% 0.25%

>100 2.23% 3.34% 5.59% 0.34%

The information above indicates that:

• JMPD :

An average of 39.14% of cers issued between 1 and 10 AARTO 01 Notices per month;


An average of 1.80% of cers issued between 71 and 80 AARTO 01 Notices per month.

ChangeAhead


• TMPD :




• GDoCS :




• RTMC :




Infringements Captured per Vehicle Category (All Issuing Authorities)The table below is a representation of the infringements captured by all issuing authorities per vehicle category.

Number of Infringement Notices issued per Vehicle Category

MonthCaptured Li

ght

pass

enge

rve

hicl

es

Hea

vy

pass

enge

rve

hicl

es

Mot

orcy

cles

Ligh

t loa

d ve

hicl

es

Hea

vy lo

ad

vehi

cles

- dr

aw

Hea

vy lo

ad

vehi

cles

- no

t dra

w

Spec

ial,

unkn

own

& ot

her

vehi

cles

Tota

l N

otic

esCa

ptur

ed

Apr 12 68 882 6 145 450 14 107 580 271 83 648 174 083

May 12 111 055 7 647 662 24 160 994 458 108 478 253 454

Jun 12 81 671 5 835 543 15 950 740 310 78 311 183 360

Jul 12 81 127 10 732 628 18 111 1 818 859 66 129 179 404

Aug 12 127 807 25 191 1 039 34 541 4 798 2 049 14 572 209 997

Sep 12 130 851 24 225 1 308 40 620 5 213 2 115 40 615 244 947

Oct 12 192 540 25 855 1 492 53 307 5 807 2 569 54 988 336 558

Nov 12 162 928 26 033 1 538 48 287 6 183 2 672 39 502 287 143

Dec 12 145 900 21 168 1 110 37 969 4 429 1 768 31 830 244 174

Jan 13 403 905 48 641 3 015 76 356 6 107 2 699 55 080 595 803

Feb 13 379 738 46 038 2 985 77 635 6 323 2 612 67 198 582 529

Mar 13 368 939 38 963 2 841 70 861 5 364 2 419 59 086 548 473

Total 2 255 343 286 473 17 611 511 904 48 356 20 801 699 437 3 839 925

% 58.73% 7.46% 0.46% 13.33% 1.26% 0.54% 18.21% 100.00%



• A total of 2 255 343 (58.73% of all Notices) was issued for light passenger vehicles;

• 286 473 (7.46% of the Notices issued) was for heavy passenger vehicles; and

• 511 904 (13.33% of the Notices issued) was for light load vehicles; and

• 48 356 (1.26% of all Notices issued) was for heavy load vehicles – to draw (trucks).

The above information is also reflected in the graph below.

The table below shows the change from 2011-2012 to 2012-2013 in the total number of notices captured per vehicle category.

Number of Infringement Notices issued per Vehicle Category

MonthCaptured Li

ght

pass

enge

rve

hicl

es

Hea

vy

pass

enge

rve

hicl

es

Mot

orcy

cles

Ligh

t loa

d ve

hicl

es

Hea

vy lo

ad

vehi

cles

- dr

aw

Hea

vy lo

ad

vehi

cles

- no

t dr

aw

Spec

ial,

unkn

own

& ot

her v

ehic

les

Tota

l Not

ices

Ca

ptur

ed

2011-2012 687 407 121 143 3 512 181 432 13 847 7 304 772 872 1 787 517

2012-2013 2 255 343 286 473 17 611 511 904 48 356 20 801 699 437 3 839 925

Change 1 567 936 165 330 14 099 330 472 34 509 13 497 -73 435 2 052 408

% Change 228.09% 136.48% 401.45% 182.15% 249.22% 184.79% -9.50% 114.82%

The information in the table above shows that:

• The number of Notices for light passenger vehicles increased by 1 567 936 (228.09%) from a total of 687 407 during 2011-2012 to a total of 2 255 343 during 2012-2013;

ChangeAhead


• The number of Notices for heavy passenger vehicles increased by 165 330 (136.48%) from a total of 121 143 during 2011-2012 to a total of 286 473 during 2012-2013;

• The total number of Notices for motorcycles increased by 14 099 (401.45%) from a total of 3 512 during 2011-2012 to a total of 17 611 during 2012-2013;

• The number of notices for light load vehicles increased by 330 472 (182.15%) from a total of 181 432 during 2011-2012 to a total of 511 904 during 2012-2013; and

• The total number of Notices special, unknown and other vehicles decreased by 73 435 (9.50%) from a total of 772 872 during 2011-2012 to a total of 699 437 during 2012-2013. It also needs to be emphasised that in the 2011-2012 nancial year, this category of vehicles constituted 43.24% of the overall number of notices captured compared to

only 18.21% for 2012-2013.

The information in the table above is also schematically reflected in the graph below.


Infringements Captured per Infringement Category (All Issuing Authorities)The number of Infringement Notices captured per infringement category by all issuing authorities for the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 years are shown in the table below.

Number of Notices captured per Infringement Category

Infringements Category All Issuing Authorities

2011 / 2012 2012 / 2013 Change % Change

Vehicle registration & licencing 112 413 165 588 53 175 47%

Vehicle number plates 11 304 12 076 772 7%

Learner & driving licences 68 578 71 624 3 046 4%

Professional driving permits 36 391 34 534 -1 857 -5%

Vehicle roadworthiness - general 71 367 86 610 15 243 21%

Vehicle - Brakes 13 680 14 674 994 7%

Vehicle - Lights 45 078 59 017 13 939 31%

Vehicle - Steering mechanism 386 384 -2 -1%

Vehicle - Tyres 40 481 46 658 6 177 15%

Seatbelts 158 696 166 220 7 524 5%

Loads : Passenger transport vehicles 7 352 8 698 1 346 18%

Vehicle overload 2 705 3 424 719 27%

Passengers on goods vehicles 3 043 4 375 1 332 44%

Passenger carrying vehicles 13 754 10 715 -3 039 -22%

Operator tness 102 329 95 162 -7 167 -7%

Dangerous goods 338 368 30 9%

Road signs, signals & markings 214 478 235 627 21 149 10%

Exceeding speed limits 655 121 2 176 285 1 521 164 232%

Rules of the road & driving signals 144 077 295 905 151 828 105%

Driving under the in uence 2 598 3 153 555 21%

Other 81 070 348 090 267 020 329%

Bylaws 2 278 738 -1 540 -68%

Total 1 787 517 3 839 925 2 052 408 115%

The information above shows the following:

• The highest number of Notices captured was for exceeding the speed limit which increased by 1 521 164 (232%) from 655 121 in 2011-2012 to a total of 2 176 285 in 2012-2013;

ChangeAhead


• The number of Notices captured for rules of the road and driving signals increased by 151 828 (105%) from 144 077 in 2011-2012 to a total of 295 905 in 2012-2013; and

• The number of Notices captured for road signs, and signals and markings increased by 21 149 (10%) from 214 478 in 2011-2012 to a total of 235 627 in 2012-2013.

The percentage (%) of notices captured per infringement category for each of the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 nancial years are reflected in the graph below, excluding notices for exceeding the speed limit.

The information in the graph above shows that, in terms of all notices captured:

• The % of Notices captured for road signs, signals and markings decreased from 18.94% in 2011-2012 to 14.16% in 2012-2013;

• The % of Notices captured for rules of the road and driving signals increased from 12.72% in 2011-2012 to 17.79% in 2012-2013; and

• The % of Notices captured for seatbelts decreased from 14.01% in 2011-2012 to 9.99% in 2012-2013.


The number of Infringement Notices captured per Infringement Category per Issuing Authority during 2012-2013 is shown in the table below.


Infringements Category April 2012 to March 2013

JMPD TMPD GDoCS RTMC Total

Vehicle registration & licencing 98 357 55 811 4 331 7 089 165 588

Vehicle number plates 9 470 1 813 302 491 12 076

Learner & driving licences 37 305 25 565 3 473 5 281 71 624

Professional driving permits 16 467 11 214 3 398 3 455 34 534

Vehicle roadworthiness - general 50 969 19 180 8 461 8 000 86 610

Vehicle - Brakes 6 070 5 611 1 336 1 657 14 674

Vehicle - Lights 29 338 19 130 3 606 6 943 59 017

Vehicle - Steering mechanism 243 60 55 26 384

Vehicle - Tyres 25 892 12 234 5 116 3 416 46 658

Seatbelts 87 706 65 846 7 004 5 664 166 220

Loads : Passenger transport vehicles 3 600 3 040 852 1 206 8 698

Vehicle overload 824 1 283 1 195 122 3 424

Passengers on goods vehicles 3 020 1 002 32 321 4 375

Passenger carrying vehicles 3 024 4 521 879 2 291 10 715

Operator tness 40 988 31 326 12 795 10 053 95 162

Dangerous goods 181 87 56 44 368

Road signs, signals & markings 91 089 140 556 3 102 880 235 627

Exceeding speed limits 1 842 076 316 441 17 763 5 2 176 285

Rules of the road & driving signals 192 632 96 661 5 106 1 506 295 905

Driving under the in uence 1 378 1 679 59 37 3 153

Other 288 997 55 371 644 3 078 348 090

Bylaws 0 738 0 0 738

Total 2 829 626 869 169 79 565 61 565 3 839 925

The information above shows the following:

• The number of Notices captured for exceeding the speed limit per IA :

JMPD : 1 842 076;

TMPD : 316 441;

GDoCS : 17 763; and

ChangeAhead


RTMC : 5.

• The number of Notices captured for vehicle tyres per IA :

JMPD : 25 892;

TMPD : 12 234;

GDoCS : 5 116; and

RTMC: 3 416.

The number of Infringement Notices captured per infringement category by JMPD is shown in the table below.


Infringements Category JMPD

2011 / 2012 2012 / 2013 Change % Change


Vehicle number plates 7 807 9 470 1 663 21%


Professional driving permits 18 058 16 467 -1 591 -9%


Vehicle - Brakes 5 525 6 070 545 10%

Vehicle - Lights 19 758 29 338 9 580 48%

Vehicle - Steering mechanism 294 243 -51 -17%

Vehicle - Tyres 20 753 25 892 5 139 25%

Seatbelts 80 303 87 706 7 403 9%

Loads : Passenger transport vehicles 2 844 3 600 756 27%

Vehicle overload 769 824 55 7%

Passengers on goods vehicles 1 999 3 020 1 021 51%

Passenger carrying vehicles 5 420 3 024 -2 396 -44%

Operator tness 47 240 40 988 -6 252 -13%


Road signs, signals & markings 63 707 91 089 27 382 43%

Exceeding speed limits 370 271 1 842 076 1 471 805 397%


Driving under the in uence 943 1 378 435 46%

Other 49 408 288 997 239 589 485%

Bylaws 0 0 0 -

Total 870 886 2 829 626 1 958 740 225%

The information above shows that:


• The number of Notices captured for exceeding speed limits increased by 1 471 805 (397%) from 370 271 in 2011-2012 to 1 842 076 in 2012-2013;

• The number of Notices captured for rules of the road and driving signals increased by 138 550 (256%) from 54 082 in 2011-2012 to 192 632 in 2012-2013; and

• The number of Notices captured for vehicle registration and licencing increased by 50 547 (106%) from 47 810 in 2011-2012 to 98 357 in 2012-2013.


• The % of Notices captured for learner and driving licences decreased from 6.69% in 2011-2012 to 3.78% in 2012-2013;

• The % of Notices captured for professional driving permits decreased from 3.61% in 2011-2012 to 1.67% in 2012-2013; and


ChangeAhead


Infringements Captured per Infringement Category Tshwane Metropolitan Police Department (TMPD)


Infringements Category TMPD

2011 / 2012 2012 / 2013 Change % Change

Vehicle registration & licencing 55 412 55 811 399 1%

Vehicle number plates 2 691 1 813 -878 -33%

Learner & driving licences 27 920 25 565 -2 355 -8%

Professional driving permits 12 140 11 214 -926 -8%

Vehicle roadworthiness - general 18 251 19 180 929 5%

Vehicle - Brakes 5 612 5 611 -1 0%

Vehicle - Lights 18 571 19 130 559 3%

Vehicle - Steering mechanism 35 60 25 71%

Vehicle - Tyres 13 164 12 234 -930 -7%

Seatbelts 66 111 65 846 -265 0%

Loads : Passenger transport vehicles 3 116 3 040 -76 -2%

Vehicle overload 786 1 283 497 63%

Passengers on goods vehicles 830 1 002 172 21%

Passenger carrying vehicles 4 944 4 521 -423 -9%

Operator tness 33 717 31 326 -2 391 -7%

Dangerous goods 90 87 -3 -3%

Road signs, signals & markings 147 309 140 556 -6 753 -5%

Exceeding speed limits 271 298 316 441 45 143 17%


Driving under the in uence 1 601 1 679 78 5%

Other 28 589 55 371 26 782 94%

Bylaws 2 278 738 -1 540 -68%

Total 799 168 869 169 70 001 9%


• The number of Notices captured for exceeding speed limits increased by 45 143 (17%) from 271 298 in 2011-2012 to 316 441 in 2012-2013;



• The number of Notices captured for vehicle registration and licencing increased by 399 (1%) from 55 412 in 2011-2012 to 55 811 in 2012-2013.

Infringements Captured per Infringement Category


• The % of Notices captured for road signs, signals and markings decreased from 27.91% in 2011-2012 to 25.43% in 2012-2013;



ChangeAhead


Gauteng Department of Community Safety (GDoCS)


Infringements Category GDoCS

2011 / 2012 2012 / 2013 Change % Change

Vehicle registration & licencing 3 697 4 331 634 17%

Vehicle number plates 301 302 1 0%

Learner & driving licences 2 961 3 473 512 17%

Professional driving permits 3 054 3 398 344 11%

Vehicle roadworthiness - general 8 407 8 461 54 1%

Vehicle - Brakes 1 237 1 336 99 8%

Vehicle - Lights 2 691 3 606 915 34%


Vehicle - Tyres 5 128 5 116 -12 0%

Seatbelts 7 261 7 004 -257 -4%

Loads : Passenger transport vehicles 759 852 93 12%

Vehicle overload 1 085 1 195 110 10%

Passengers on goods vehicles 42 32 -10 -24%

Passenger carrying vehicles 1 338 879 -459 -34%

Operator tness 13 229 12 795 -434 -3%


Road signs, signals & markings 2 556 3 102 546 21%

Exceeding speed limits 13 551 17 763 4 212 31%


Driving under the in uence 32 59 27 84%

Other 996 644 -352 -35%

Bylaws 0 0 0 -

Total 72 386 79 565 7 179 10%


• The number of Notices captured for exceeding speed limits increased by 4 212 (31%) from 13 551 in 2011-2012 to 17 763 in 2012-2013;



• The number of Notices captured for vehicle registration and licencing increased by 634 (17%) from 3 697 in 2011-2012 to 4 331 in 2012-2013.

ChangeAhead



• The % of Notices captured for operator tness decreased from 22.48% in 2011-2012 to 20.70% in 2012-2013;

• The % of Notices captured for professional driving permits increased from 5.19% in 2011-2012 to 5.50% in 2012-2013; and


Road Traf c Management Corporation (RTMC)


Infringements Category RTMC

2011 / 2012 2012 / 2013 Change % Change


Vehicle number plates 505 491 -14 -3%


Professional driving permits 3 139 3 455 316 10%


Vehicle - Brakes 1 306 1 657 351 27%

Vehicle - Lights 4 058 6 943 2 885 71%


Vehicle - Tyres 1 436 3 416 1 980 138%

Seatbelts 5 021 5 664 643 13%

Loads : Passenger transport vehicles 633 1 206 573 91%

Vehicle overload 65 122 57 88%

Passengers on goods vehicles 172 321 149 87%

Passenger carrying vehicles 2 052 2 291 239 12%

Operator tness 8 143 10 053 1 910 23%


Road signs, signals & markings 906 880 -26 -3%

Exceeding speed limits 1 5 4 400%

Rules of the road & driving signals 1 317 1 506 189 14%

Driving under the influence 22 37 15 68%

Other 2 077 3 078 1 001 48%

Bylaws 0 0 0 -

Total 45 077 61 565 16 488 37%



• The number of Notices captured for vehicle tyres increased by 1 980 (138%) from 1 436 in 2011-2012 to 3 416 in 2012-2013;

• The number of Notices captured for rules of the road and driving signals increased by 189 (14%) from 1 317 in 2011-2012 to 1 506 in 2012-2013; and

• The number of Notices captured for vehicle registration and licencing increased by 1 595 (29%) from 5 494 in 2011-2012 to 7 089 in 2012-2013.

ChangeAhead



• The % of Notices captured for learner and driving licences decreased from 9.28% in 2011-2012 to 8.58% in 2012-2013;



Infringements Captured per Day of the Week (All Issuing Authorities)The number of Infringement Notices captured per Day of the Week by all issuing authorities is shown in the table below.

No. of Infringement Notices captured per Day of Week : 2012-2013 Total

Month Cap-tured Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Total

Apr 12 1 31 855 39 285 47 949 35 558 19 435 0 174 083

May 12 0 47 481 50 142 55 218 58 284 41 468 861 253 454

Jun 12 0 37 260 36 739 32 214 29 621 42 328 5 198 183 360

Jul 12 20 34 532 45 245 32 898 35 198 27 471 4 040 179 404

Aug 12 89 37 943 43 413 39 150 45 263 41 276 2 863 209 997

Sep 12 249 29 385 51 499 58 521 50 408 50 217 4 668 244 947

Oct 12 863 79 390 74 318 77 987 59 015 44 630 355 336 558

Nov 12 526 47 396 61 518 53 051 69 347 51 990 3 315 287 143

Dec 12 1 715 68 479 34 892 42 373 50 333 42 470 3 912 244 174

Jan 13 13 155 127 483 123 175 119 003 106 350 90 570 16 067 595 803

Feb 13 4 988 92 752 110 677 150 949 113 895 109 226 42 582 529

Mar 13 5 96 335 104 058 141 162 92 004 106 817 8 092 548 473

Total 21 611 730 291 774 961 850 475 745 276 667 898 49 413 3 839 925

% 0.56% 19.02% 20.18% 22.15% 19.41% 17.39% 1.29% 100.00%

The information in the table above indicates that:

• Sundays: during May and June 2012 no Notices were captured. The highest number of notices for Sundays was captured during January 2013, a total of 13 155;

• Saturdays: during April 2012 no Notices were captured. The highest number of notices for Saturdays was captured during January 2013, which totalled 16 067; and

• Wednesdays: the highest number of Notices was captured during February 2013, a total of 150 949.


On a percentage basis the Notices captured per day of the week were as follows:

• Sundays : 0.56%;

• Mondays : 19.02%;

• Tuesdays : 20.18%;

• Wednesdays : 22.15%;

• Thursdays : 19.41%;

• Fridays : 17.39%; and

• Saturdays : 1.29%

Worthy of note is the fact that the % for Sundays and Saturdays are the lowest of all days in the week.


The number of Infringement Notices captured per Day of the Week by all issuing authorities for the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 nancial years is shown in the table below.

No. of Infringement Notices issued per Day of Week

Month Cap-tured Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Total

2011 / 2012 23 676 305 165 329 429 344 267 366 967 300 610 117 403 1 787 517

2012 / 2013 21 611 730 291 774 961 850 475 745 276 667 898 49 413 3 839 925

Change -2 065 425 126 445 532 506 208 378 309 367 288 -67 990 2 052 408

% Change -8.72% 139.31% 135.24% 147.04% 103.09% 122.18% -57.91% 114.82%


• Sundays : the number of Notices captured for Sundays decreased by 2 065 (8.72%) from 23 676 during 2011-2012 to 21 611 during 2012-2013;

ChangeAhead


• Saturdays : the number of Notices captured for Saturdays decreased by 67 990 (57.91%) from 117 403 in 2011-2012 to 49 413 during 2012-2013; and

• Wednesdays: the number of Notices captured for Wednesdays increased by 506 208 (147.04%) from 344 267 in 2011-2012 to 850 475 in 2012-2013.


The percentage (%) of Infringement Notices captured per Day of the Week per Issuing Authority during 2012-2013 is shown in the table below.

% of Infringement Notices issued per Day of Week : 2012-2013

Issuing Author-ity Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Total

JMPD 0.73% 19.07% 20.05% 22.50% 19.16% 17.50% 0.99% 100.00%

TMPD 0.03% 18.73% 20.39% 21.10% 20.21% 17.12% 2.41% 100.00%

GDoCS 0.01% 18.77% 21.29% 21.54% 20.93% 17.39% 0.07% 100.00%

RTMC 0.84% 20.79% 21.97% 21.57% 17.83% 16.44% 0.55% 100.00%

All IA’s 0.56% 19.02% 20.18% 22.15% 19.41% 17.39% 1.29% 100.00%


• Sundays : the highest number of Notices for Sundays was captured by the RTMC, 0.84%;

• Saturdays : the highest number of Notices for Saturdays was captured by TMPD, 2.41%; and

• Wednesdays: the highest number of Notices for Wednesdays was captured by JMPD, 22.50%.



Johannesburg Metropolitan Police Department (JMPD)The number of Infringement Notices captured per Day of the Week by JMPD is shown in the table below.

No. of Infringement Notices captured per Day of Week - JMPD

MonthCaptured Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Total

Apr 12 0 18 784 16 840 19 386 16 897 12 753 0 84 660

May 12 0 24 984 26 759 29 923 34 000 18 349 1 134 016

Jun 12 0 20 587 18 488 17 918 17 819 25 798 1 730 102 340

Jul 12 20 18 688 30 468 21 384 22 948 16 643 4 040 114 191

Aug 12 89 18 994 23 276 21 454 24 605 24 341 2 863 115 622

Sep 12 239 21 436 35 542 41 907 34 167 37 235 4 657 175 183

Oct 12 860 59 235 57 786 58 493 43 251 34 405 277 254 307

Nov 12 219 34 757 43 868 36 638 53 569 34 415 2 632 206 098

Dec 12 1 410 55 386 27 029 34 055 38 398 32 633 1 877 190 788

Jan 13 13 155 109 568 104 692 98 247 81 713 72 900 9 925 490 200

Feb 13 4 788 77 013 93 842 132 659 95 724 92 448 27 496 501

Mar 13 1 80 309 88 642 124 588 78 937 93 240 3 465 720

Total 20 781 539 741 567 232 636 652 542 028 495 160 28 032 2 829 626

% 0.73% 19.07% 20.05% 22.50% 19.16% 17.50% 0.99% 100.00%


ChangeAhead


• Sundays: during April, May and June 2012 no Notices were captured. The highest number of notices for Sundays was captured during January 2013, a total of 13 155;

• Saturdays : The highest number of Notices for Saturdays was captured during January 2013, which totalled 9 925; and



• Sundays : 0.73%;

• Mondays : 19.07%;





• Saturdays : 0.99%.

The % for Sundays and Saturdays are the lowest of all days in the week.

Infringements Captured per Day of the Week The information in the table above is also schematically shown in the graphs below.


Tshwane Metropolitan Police Department (TMPD)The number of Infringement Notices captured per Day of the Week by TMPD is shown in the table below.

No. of Infringement Notices captured per Day of Week - TMPD

Month Captured Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Total

Apr 12 1 9 774 19 017 24 769 15 803 4 626 0 73 990

May 12 0 19 580 20 531 21 819 21 161 20 503 859 104 453

Jun 12 0 14 494 16 042 12 632 10 202 14 581 3 468 71 419

Jul 12 0 13 398 12 340 9 539 10 075 9 285 0 54 637

Aug 12 0 17 033 17 585 15 129 18 122 15 289 0 83 158

Sep 12 0 6 247 14 054 14 328 14 329 11 533 0 60 491

Oct 12 0 17 824 13 379 16 956 13 589 8 550 71 70 369

Nov 12 299 10 966 15 577 13 962 13 667 15 199 681 70 351

Dec 12 0 11 586 5 874 6 437 9 964 8 769 1 724 44 354

Jan 13 0 15 618 16 169 18 386 21 431 15 385 6 105 93 094

Feb 13 0 12 809 13 538 15 176 15 729 14 254 1 71 507

Mar 13 0 13 488 13 160 14 267 11 545 10 810 8 076 71 346

Total 300 162 817 177 266 183 400 175 617 148 784 20 985 869 169

% 0.03% 18.73% 20.39% 21.10% 20.21% 17.12% 2.41% 100.00%


ChangeAhead


Sundays: for ten (10) months no Notices were captured. The highest number of notices for Sundays was captured during November 2012, a total of 299;

Saturdays : The highest number of Notices for Saturdays was captured during March 2013, which totalled 8 076; which could be attributed to the Easter Weekend; and

Wednesdays: the highest number of Notices was captured during April 2012, a total of 24 769.


• Sundays : 0.03%;

• Mondays : 18.73%;







The information in the table above is also schematically shown in the graphs below.


Gauteng Department of Community Safety (GDoCS)The number of Infringement Notices captured per Day of the Week by GDoCS is shown in the table below.

No. of Infringement Notices captured per Day of Week - GDoCS


Apr 12 0 1 818 2 009 2 488 1 880 1 431 0 9 626

May 12 0 1 552 1 524 1 842 1 719 1 462 1 8 100

Jun 12 0 1 223 1 297 1 154 954 1 205 0 5 833

Jul 12 0 1 394 1 398 1 257 1 330 862 0 6 241

Aug 12 0 1 229 1 429 1 629 1 771 962 0 7 020

Sep 12 2 1 116 1 263 1 414 882 875 2 5 554

Oct 12 3 1 364 1 751 1 326 1 414 839 7 6 704

Nov 12 0 1 024 1 279 927 1 324 1 281 2 5 837

Dec 12 0 668 857 1 132 1 124 458 6 4 245

Jan 13 0 1 291 1 344 1 182 1 752 1 379 10 6 958

Feb 13 1 1 269 1 368 1 445 1 340 1 356 14 6 793

Mar 13 4 983 1 417 1 346 1 166 1 725 13 6 654

Total 10 14 931 16 936 17 142 16 656 13 835 55 79 565

% 0.01% 18.77% 21.29% 21.54% 20.93% 17.39% 0.07% 100.00%


ChangeAhead


• Sundays: for most Sundays no Notices were captured. The highest number of notices for Sundays was captured during March 2013, a total of 4;

• Saturdays : The highest number of Notices for Saturdays was captured during February 2013, which totalled 14; and

• Wednesdays: the highest number of Notices was captured during April 2012, a total of 2 488.


• Sundays : 0.01%;

• Mondays : 18.77%;









The number of Infringement Notices captured per Day of the Week by RTMC is shown in the table below.

No. of Infringement Notices captured per Day of Week - RTMC


Apr 12 0 1 479 1 419 1 306 978 625 0 5 807

May 12 0 1 365 1 328 1 634 1 404 1 154 0 6 885

Jun 12 0 956 912 510 646 744 0 3 768

Jul 12 0 1 052 1 039 718 845 681 0 4 335

Aug 12 0 687 1 123 938 765 684 0 4 197

Sep 12 8 586 640 872 1 030 574 9 3 719

Oct 12 0 967 1 402 1 212 761 836 0 5 178

Nov 12 8 649 794 1 524 787 1 095 0 4 857

Dec 12 305 839 1 132 749 847 610 305 4 787

Jan 13 0 1 006 970 1 188 1 454 906 27 5 551

Feb 13 199 1 661 1 929 1 669 1 102 1 168 0 7 728

Mar 13 0 1 555 839 961 356 1 042 0 4 753

Total 520 12 802 13 527 13 281 10 975 10 119 341 61 565

% 0.84% 20.79% 21.97% 21.57% 17.83% 16.44% 0.55% 100.00%


ChangeAhead


• Sundays: for 8 months no Notices were captured. The highest number of notices for Sundays was captured during December 2012, a total of 305;

• Saturdays: for 9 months no Notices were captured. The highest number of notices for Saturdays was captured during December 2012, which totalled 305; and



• Sundays : 0.84%;

• Mondays : 20.79%;









Courtesy LettersSection 19 of the principal Act provides for the issuing and service of Courtesy Letters after the infringer had failed to exercise any of the options provided for in the rst phase of 32 days from being served with an Infringement Notice by the Issuing Authorities. The table below represents the total number of Courtesy Letters that were created and served on infringers from 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2013 in comparison with the same period the previous nancial year. When reading this information, it is important to note that there is an over-flow of infringements from the previous year into the current and also into the next and this is due to a time lag of up to two months, between the event occurring and its subsequent capture on the system.

Number of Courtesy Letters Served

Month 2011-2012 2012-2013 Change % Change

Apr 163 557 121 629 -41 928 -25.64%

May 22 318 142 732 120 414 539.54%

Jun 71 721 143 562 71 841 100.17%

Jul 36 620 61 543 24 923 68.06%

Aug 38 613 0 - -

Sep 86 172 0 - -

Oct 97 972 0 - -

Nov 127 069 0 - -

Dec 98 579 0 - -

Jan 100 475 0 - -

Feb 83 867 0 - -

Mar 112 463 0 - -

Total 1 039 426 469 466 - -


ChangeAhead


• The number of Courtesy Letters served during April 2012 decreased by 41 928 (25.64%) from a total of 163 557 served in April 2011 to 121 629; and

• The number of Courtesy Letters served during June 2012 increased by 71 841 (100.17%) from a total of 71 721 served in June 2011 to 143 562.

Due to the high cost to serve Courtesy Letters by registered mail and very tight nancial constraints experienced by the Agency at the time, the RTIA Board at its meeting held on 25 July 2012 resolved that the serving of Courtesy Letters be suspended until such time as the nancial situation of the Agency improved.

The information in the table above is also reflected in the graph below.


Enforcement OrdersThe number of Enforcement Orders served by the Agency during the 2012-2013 nancial years in comparison with the same period the previous year is shown in the table below.

Number of Enforcement Orders Served

Month 2011-2012 2012-2013 Change % Change

Apr 0 0 0 -

May 0 19 233 19 233 -

Jun 0 58 389 58 389 -

Jul 0 12 589 12 589 -

Aug 0 0 - -

Sep 0 0 - -

Oct 0 0 - -

Nov 0 0 - -

Dec 0 0 - -

Jan 3 102 0 - -

Feb 6 724 0 - -

Mar 0 0 - -

Total 9 826 90 211 - -


• During the 2011-2012 nancial year a total of 9 826 Enforcement Orders was served, 3 102 and 6 724 during the months of January 2012 and February 2012 respectively.

• During the 2012-2013 nancial year a total of 90 211 Enforcement Orders was served, the highest number being during the three month period from May to July 2012.

Due to nancial constraints and signi cant systems challenges experienced with the National Contraventions Register, insuf cient data quality and incorrect infringer address details, Courtesy Letters and Enforcement Orders were suspended during the latter part of the nancial period.

Due to the high cost to serve Enforcement Orders by registered mail and very tight nancial constraints experienced by the Agency at the time, the RTIA Board at its meeting held on 25 July 2012 resolved that the serving of Enforcement Orders be suspended until such time as the nancial situation of the Agency improved.

ChangeAhead



The number of applications received for the revocation of Enforcement Orders and the results of the revocation applications for the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 nancial years respectively, are given in the tables below.

Application for revocation of Enforcement Order receipt Result of revocation application of Enforcement Order

Month 2011-2012 2012-2013 Month 2011-2012 2012-2013

Apr 1 Apr 1

May 5 May 4

Jun 60 Jun 60

Jul 103 Jul 80

Aug 5 0 Aug 5 0

Sep 0 Sep 0

Oct 0 Oct 0

Nov 0 Nov 0

Dec 0 Dec 0

Jan 6 0 Jan 3 0

Feb 4 0 Feb 7 0

Mar 6 0 Mar 3 0

Total 21 169 Total 18 145

Average 2 14 Average 2 12

The information in the table above shows:


• The number of applications for the revocation of Enforcement Orders increased by 148 (704.8%) from 21 in 2011-2012 to 169 in 2012-2013;

• The month when the highest number of applications was received was July 2012, with a total of 103 applications;

• The number of results on the application for revocation of Enforcement Orders increased by 127 (705.6%) from 18 in 2011-2012 to 145 in 2012-2013;

• The month when the highest numbers of application results were issued was July 2012, with a total of 80.

Application Results for Instalment PaymentsThe number of application results for the payment of penalties in instalments issued by the Agency during the 2012-2013 nancial years in comparison with the same period the previous year is shown in the table below.

Number of Application Results for Instalment Payments

Month 2011-2012 2012-2013

Apr 0

May 1

Jun 1 2

Jul 1 4

Aug 0

Sep 1 0

Oct 0

Nov 0

Dec 0

Jan 0

Feb 0

Mar 0

Total 3 7


• During the 2011-2012 nancial year a total of only three (3) instalment payment receipts were issued, one per month during the months of June, July and September 2011; and

• During the 2012-2013 nancial year a total of 7 instalment payment receipts were issued.

ChangeAhead


The number of receipts for payment of penalties by infringers issued by the Agency during the 2012/2013 nancial year in comparison with the same period the previous year is shown in the table below.

Number of Receipts for Payments

Month 2011-2012 2012-2013

Apr 8 596 0

May 9 421 0

Jun 14 831 0

Jul 10 595 2

Aug 1 963 0

Sep 0 0

Oct 0 0

Nov 0 0

Dec 0 0

Jan 0 0

Feb 0 0

Mar 1 0

Total 45 407 2

The information in the table above shows:

• During 2011-2012 a total of 45 407 receipts for payments were issued and;

• During 2012-2013 a total of 2 receipts were issued.


Other Notices Issued by the RTIAWhereas the Agency sends out notices as tabulated above, based on the actions it has taken in exercising its mandate, there are other notices that it sends out as a direct consequence of the transactions performed elsewhere. These are for example, acknowledgement of receipts for payments effected at agents other than the IAs, DLTCs or VTSs. Upon the uploading of the payment and capture thereof on the NCR, the con rmation receipts are sent out to infringers by the Agency.

The number of acknowledgement of receipt notices send out during the 2012-2013 nancial year in comparison with the same period the previous year is shown in the table below.

Acknowledgement of Receipt

Month 2011-2012 2012-2013

Apr 23 11

May 23 19

Jun 12 71

Jul 35 76

Aug 17 0

Sep 42 0

Oct 30 0

Nov 20 0

Dec 14 0

Jan 11 0

Feb 24 0

Mar 17 0

Total 268 177


• A total of 268 acknowledgement of receipts were issued in 2011-2012; and

• During 2012-2013 a total of 177 were issued.

ChangeAhead


Percentage of Representations Captured per Infringement NoticeThe percentage (%) of representation applications captured per infringement notice during the 2012/2013 nancial year in comparison with the same period the previous year is shown in the table below.

% Representations/Notice

All Issuing Authorities

Month Captured 2011-2012 2012-2013 2-YearAverage

Apr 1.10% 1.35% 1.25%

May 0.82% 1.71% 1.29%

Jun 1.65% 1.73% 1.70%

Jul 1.52% 2.37% 1.95%

Aug 1.65% 2.27% 2.06%

Sep 2.73% 1.44% 1.85%

Oct 3.10% 1.16% 1.67%

Nov 2.95% 0.96% 1.73%

Dec 1.72% 0.01% 0.58%

Jan 2.02% 0.33% 0.70%

Feb 2.18% 0.46% 0.84%

Mar 1.94% 0.36% 0.75%

Total 1.91% 0.93% 1.24%


• The % of applications for representations per infringement notice decreased from 1.91% in 2011-2012 to 0.93% in 2012-2013;

• The highest % captured per month during 2012-2013 was for July 2012 when 2.37% was captured followed by August with 2.27%; and

• The monthly average over the 2-year period from April 2011 to March 2013 is shown in the Total column, indicating that the average monthly % of representations per notices was 1.24%.


The information in the table above is also reflected in the graphs below.

The % of all representations captured per issuing authority for the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 nancial years respectively are shown in the graph below.

ChangeAhead


The 2-year average monthly % of infringement notices on which representations were submitted per issuing authority for the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 nancial years respectively are shown in the table below.

% of Notices on which Representations were submitted

Month JMPD TMPD GDoCS RTMC All IA’s

Apr 0.65% 1.81% 1.23% 1.38% 1.25%

May 0.58% 2.36% 1.81% 1.82% 1.29%

Jun 1.10% 2.42% 1.63% 2.73% 1.70%

Jul 1.30% 3.02% 1.45% 2.70% 1.95%

Aug 1.82% 2.36% 1.28% 2.03% 2.06%

Sep 1.20% 2.86% 1.72% 1.29% 1.85%

Oct 1.26% 2.78% 1.50% 0.91% 1.67%

Nov 0.85% 3.94% 1.51% 0.98% 1.73%

Dec 0.22% 1.63% 1.13% 0.38% 0.58%

Jan 0.34% 1.90% 1.46% 0.95% 0.70%

Feb 0.37% 2.65% 1.11% 0.93% 0.84%

Mar 0.29% 2.39% 1.47% 1.09% 0.75%

Average 0.67% 2.51% 1.44% 1.19% 1.24%

The information in the table above shows as follows:

• Johannesburg Metropolitan Police Department (JMPD) :

The average % of infringement notices on which representation applications were submitted was 0.67%; and

The month with the highest percentage was August: 1.82%.

• Tshwane Metropolitan Police Department (TMPD) :

The average % of infringement notices on which representation applications were submitted was 2.51%; and

The month with the highest percentage was November: 3.94%.

• Gauteng Department of Community Safety (GDoCS):

The average % of Infringement Notices on which representation applications were submitted was 1.44%; and

The month with the highest percentage was May: 1.81%.

• Road Tra c Management Corporation (RTMC):


The month with the highest percentage was June: 2.73%.

• All Issuing Authorities:


The month with the highest percentage was August: 2.06%.



Representations AdjudicatedBased on the statistical analysis of compliance stemming from the Criminal Procedure Act processes, the Agency had projected an average of 5% of all infringement notices issued would result in representations. During the year, there were 34 869 representations adjudicated, which when compared to 3 839 925 Infringement Notices issued, is less than 1%. The lower than expected result is partly due to systems challenges and the need for more road user education about their rights.

Number of Representations Adjudicated

Month Adjudicated 2011 / 2012 2012 / 2013 Change % Change

Apr 17 2 213 2 196 12917.65%

May 451 2 661 2 210 490.02%

Jun 637 2 661 2 024 317.74%

Jul 987 3 680 2 693 272.85%

Aug 1 203 4 311 3 108 258.35%

Sep 8 070 4 086 -3 984 -49.37%

Oct 4 417 4 346 -71 -1.61%

Nov 3 482 1 748 -1 734 -49.80%

Dec 2 482 2 004 -478 -19.26%

Jan 4 670 1 891 -2 779 -59.51%

Feb 4 992 2 306 -2 686 -53.81%

Mar 3 002 2 962 -40 -1.33%

Total 34 410 34 869 459 1.33%

The information in the table above shows the following:

ChangeAhead


• The number of representations adjudicated increased by 459 (1.33%) from 34 410 in 2011-2012 to 34 869 in 2012-2013;

• The monthly average number of representations adjudicated 2 868 and 2 906 in 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 respectively; and

• Although there were decreases in the monthly number adjudicated from September 2012 to March 2013, August 2012 shows an increase of 3 108 (258.35%) from 1 203 in August 2012 to 4 311.



The information shown in the table below reflects the monthly number of representations that were adjudicated and the numbers and percentages respectively successful and unsuccessful.

Number of Representations Adjudicated

Month Adjudicated NumberAdjudicated

NumberSuccessful

%Successful

NumberUnsuccessful % Unsuccessful

Apr 12 2 213 822 37.14% 1 391 62.86%

May 12 2 661 1 172 44.04% 1 489 55.96%

Jun 12 2 661 1 123 42.20% 1 538 57.80%

Jul 12 3 680 1 512 41.09% 2 168 58.91%

Aug 12 4 311 1 537 35.65% 2 774 64.35%

Sep 12 4 086 1 889 46.23% 2 197 53.77%

Oct 12 4 346 2 043 47.01% 2 303 52.99%

Nov 12 1 748 560 32.04% 1 188 67.96%

Dec 12 2 004 1 121 55.94% 883 44.06%

Jan 13 1 891 916 48.44% 975 51.56%

Feb 13 2 306 1 088 47.18% 1 218 52.82%

Mar 13 2 962 1 478 49.90% 1 484 50.10%

Total 34 869 15 261 43.77% 19 608 56.23%


• From the 34 869 Representations that were adjudicated, 15 261 (43.77%) was successful and19 608 (56.23%) was un-successful and rejected;

• On a percentage basis the highest number of successful Representations was during December 2012 when 1 121(55.94%) out of 2 004 were successful; and

• On a percentage basis the highest number of un-successful Representations was during November 2012 when 1 188 (67.96%) out of 1 748 were unsuccessful.

The information in the table above, comparing the percentage Representations that were successful and unsuccessful (rejected) during the previous nancial year is also reflected in the graphs below. The information in these graphs shows that:

• The average successful Representations were 43.77% during 2012-2013 in comparison with 73.50% during 2011-2012; and

• The average unsuccessful Representations were 56.23% during 2012-2013 in comparison with 26.50% during 2011-2012.

ChangeAhead



Some of the main reasons on which about 87% of successful and unsuccessful representations were based during the nancial year, are given in the tables below.

Main reasons for Successful Representations %

Infringer given bene t of doubt 35.37%

SAPO page not updated - cannot con rm posting & collection of notice 35.36%

Supporting evidence accompanying representation provided 3.75%

Licencing of vehicles - disc not af xed to vehicle 3.67%

Licencing of drivers - licence not carried on person 3.32%

Infringement description is vague and incomplete 3.15%

Particulars of the vehicle incorrectly recorded 2.25%

Police members with acceptable documentary evidence 0.87%

Operator charges - applicable to operator not driver 0.27%

Particulars of the infringer incorrectly recorded 0.23%

PrPD - not carried on person 0.08%

Members of Diplomatic community 0.03%

Main reasons for Unsuccessful Representations %

Infringer does not dispute infringement facts 21.15%

No supporting reasons provided disputing the infringement 18.67%

Infringer’s explanation not probable 10.22%

Representation not made in the prescribed form or manner 6.96%

Infringer’s explanation based on nancial circumstances 6.74%

Details other than the infringement in dispute 6.22%

Infringer’s explanation without acceptable evidence 6.17%

Police of cial without acceptable documentation 4.97%

Insuf cient evidence to corroborate the explanation 4.47%

Application submitted outside the prescribed period 0.37%


• Successful representations : 35.37% cases where the infringer was give bene t of the doubt and 35.36% cases where the posting and/or the collection of notices by infringers could not be veri ed – this was attributed to the strike of postal workers; and

• Unsuccessful representations: 21.15% cases where infringers did not dispute the facts of the infringement and 18.67% cases where no supporting evidence were provided.

ChangeAhead


The year commenced with 7 Representation Of cers and slightly increased to a planned complement of 8 in May 2012 before returning to 7 during the last quarter of the nancial year following a resignation.

The average number of adjudications concluded per Representations Of cer per month during the year is shown in the table and represented in the graph below.

Number of Representations per Representations O cer

Month Adjudicated Number of Representation O cers

Number of Representations

Adjudicated

Average number of adjudications per O cer

per Month

Apr 12 7 2 213 316.14

May 12 8 2 661 332.63

Jun 12 8 2 661 332.63

Jul 12 8 3 680 460.00

Aug 12 8 4 311 538.88

Sep 12 8 4 086 510.75

Oct 12 8 4 346 543.25

Nov 12 8 1 748 218.50

Dec 12 8 2 004 250.50

Jan 13 7 1 891 270.14

Feb 13 7 2 306 329.43

Mar 13 7 2 962 423.14

Average 7.67 2 905.75 378.85

The information above shows that the highest average number of adjudications concluded per Representations Of cer per month was in October at 543.25 and the lowest in November 2012 at 218.50.


The Agency experienced disruptions in the service of Infringement Notices following an outbreak of industrial action at SAPO during the year. The main effect of this action was to slow down the flow of mail and when this happens, there is an increase in the numbers of Representations received as well as wide fluctuations in the flow of work for the Representation Of cers. The Agency is putting together alternative arrangements to deal with this risk.

The NCR has undergone tremendous changes towards a seamless adjudication process. This includes timely status updates that improved the quality of adjudication. The adjudication framework was further developed in line with the AARTO Act and regulations and included aspects relating to various categories of outcomes.

It is expected that, with the national rollout of AARTO and the implementation of the Point Demerit System (PDS) during the next nancial year, the volumes of Representations will increase and appropriate measures will be put in place to cope with the workload.

Elections to be tried in CourtIn terms of sections 17(1)(f)(iv) or 18(7) of the principal Act, an infringer may elect to be tried in court on the charge of having committed the infringement(s) as stated on the Infringement Notice. These elections are submitted to the Issuing Authority who issued the Infringement Notice and are also captured on the NCR. The table below represents the total number of Elections to be Tried in Court that were captured on the NCR for the period 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2013 in comparison with the elections captured for the same months during the previous nancial year.

Due to the timeframes provided in the AARTO process, these elections are not all strictly applicable to the nancial year during which the Infringement Notices were issued. The elections submitted in the rst two months of a nancial year, could typically stem from Infringement Notices issued during the previous nancial year and similarly, elections submitted in the last two months of a nancial year may only be captured during the following nancial year.

Number of Elections to be Tried in Court - All Issuing Authorities

Monthcaptured

2011-2012 2012-2013 Change

No. of Driver

Elections

No. of OperatorElections

Total No. of

Elections

No. of Driver

Elections


Total No. of

Elections

No. of Driver

Elections


Total No. of

Elections

Apr 295 76 371 3 751 786 4 537 3 456 710 4 166

May 465 171 636 4 276 817 5 093 3 811 646 4 457

Jun 962 114 1 076 5 155 1 093 6 248 4 193 979 5 172

Jul 1 233 163 1 396 4 760 801 5 561 3 527 638 4 165

Aug 1 389 276 1 665 6 144 1 023 7 167 4 755 747 5 502

Sep 796 199 995 2 775 875 3 650 1 979 676 2 655

Oct 834 108 942 6 462 596 7 058 5 628 488 6 116

Nov 1 253 158 1 411 5 904 1 006 6 910 4 651 848 5 499

Dec 1 643 161 1 804 4 634 545 5 179 2 991 384 3 375

Jan 3 451 397 3 848 8 000 623 8 623 4 549 226 4 775

Feb 2 535 375 2 910 5 929 789 6 718 3 394 414 3 808

Mar 5 077 878 5 955 4 129 344 4 473 -948 -534 -1 482

Total 19 933 3 076 23 009 61 919 9 298 71 217 41 986 6 222 48 208

% 86.63% 13.37% 100.00% 86.94% 13.06% 100.00% 210.64% 202.28% 209.52%

ChangeAhead


The above information is also schematically reflected in the graph below.

The information above indicates the following:

The number of elections submitted by drivers increased by 41 986 (210.64%) from a total of 19 933 during 2011-2012 to a total of 61 919 during 2012-2013.

• The number of elections submitted by operators increased by 6 222 (202.28%) from a total of 3 076 during 2011-2012 to a total of 9 298 during 2012-2013.

• The total number of elections submitted increased by 48 208 (209.52%) from a total of 23 009 during 2011-2012 to a total of 71 217 during 2012-2013.

• Elections submitted by drivers during 2012-2013 comprised 86.94% of all elections in comparison with 86.63% the previous year.

• Elections submitted by operators during 2012-2013 comprised 13.06% of all elections in comparison with 13.37% the previous year.


The number of driver, operator and total elections to be tried in court during the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 nancial years are also schematically reflected in the graphs below.

ChangeAhead


The table and graph below shows the number of elections to be tried in court per Issuing Authority for the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 nancial years respectively.

Number of Elections to be Tried in Court per Issuing Authority

Month captured2011-2012 2012-2013

JMPD TMPD GDoCS RTMC Total JMPD TMPD GDoCS RTMC Total

Apr 7 347 17 0 371 340 3 992 155 50 4 537

May 12 606 18 0 636 590 4 255 196 52 5 093

Jun 60 1 007 9 0 1 076 1 005 5 003 174 66 6 248

Jul 62 1 304 30 0 1 396 405 4 895 182 79 5 561

Aug 49 1 545 71 0 1 665 800 6 057 243 67 7 167

Sep 4 950 41 0 995 736 2 599 217 98 3 650

Oct 2 931 9 0 942 749 5 963 245 101 7 058

Nov 8 1 373 28 2 1 411 1 029 5 474 314 93 6 910

Dec 2 1 749 50 3 1 804 574 4 294 217 94 5 179

Jan 29 3 686 116 17 3 848 1 607 6 570 331 115 8 623

Feb 13 2 828 64 5 2 910 985 5 357 278 98 6 718

Mar 71 5 673 188 23 5 955 452 3 769 168 84 4 473

Total 319 21 999 641 50 23 009 9 272 58 228 2 720 997 71 217

% of Total 1.39% 95.61% 2.79% 0.22% 100.00% 13.02% 81.76% 3.82% 1.40% 100.00%


The information in the table and graph above indicate as follows:

• JMPD: The number of elections to be tried in court increased by 8 953 (2 086.58%) to 9 272. During the 2012-2013 nancial year 13.02% of all elections were for JMPD in comparison with 1.39% during the previous year;

• TMPD: The number of elections to be tried in court increased by 36 229 (164.68%) to 58 228. During the 2012-2013 nancial year 81.76% of all elections were for TMPD in comparison with 95.61% during the previous year;

• GDoCS: The number of elections to be tried in court increased by 2 079 (324.34%) to 2 720. During the 2012-2013 nancial year 3.82% of all elections were for GDoCS in comparison with 2.79% during the previous year; and

• RTMC: The number of elections to be tried in court increased by 947 (1 894.00%) to 997. During the 2012-2013 nancial year 1.40% of all elections were for RTMC in comparison with 0.22% during the previous year

ChangeAhead


Tables and graphs with regard to driver and operator elections to be tried in court for the individual Issuing Authorities are given below.

Number of Elections to be Tried in Court - JMPD

Monthcaptured

2011-2012 2012-2013 Change

No. of Driver

Elections


Total No. of

Elections

No. of Driver

Elections


Total No. of

Elections

No. of Driver

Elections


Total No. of

Elections

Apr 7 0 7 181 159 340 174 159 333

May 12 0 12 327 263 590 315 263 578

Jun 60 0 60 558 447 1 005 498 447 945

Jul 60 2 62 121 284 405 61 282 343

Aug 49 0 49 551 249 800 502 249 751

Sep 3 1 4 513 223 736 510 222 732

Oct 2 0 2 666 83 749 664 83 747

Nov 7 1 8 649 380 1 029 642 379 1 021

Dec 2 0 2 434 140 574 432 140 572

Jan 28 1 29 1 583 24 1 607 1 555 23 1 578

Feb 13 0 13 954 31 985 941 31 972

Mar 59 12 71 430 22 452 371 10 381

Total 302 17 319 6 967 2 305 9 272 6 665 2 288 8 953


Tshwane Metropolitan Police Department (TMPD)

Number of Elections to be Tried in Court - TMPD

Monthcaptured

2011-2012 2012-2013 Change

No. of Driver

Elections


Total No. of

Elections

No. of Driver

Elections


Total No. of

Elections

No. of Driver

Elections


Total No. of

Elections

Apr 287 60 347 3 507 485 3 992 3 220 425 3 645

May 453 153 606 3 839 416 4 255 3 386 263 3 649

Jun 902 105 1 007 4 521 482 5 003 3 619 377 3 996

Jul 1 173 131 1 304 4 541 354 4 895 3 368 223 3 591

Aug 1 338 207 1 545 5 434 623 6 057 4 096 416 4 512

Sep 792 158 950 2 092 507 2 599 1 300 349 1 649

Oct 832 99 931 5 567 396 5 963 4 735 297 5 032

Nov 1 245 128 1 373 5 042 432 5 474 3 797 304 4 101

Dec 1 613 136 1 749 4 009 285 4 294 2 396 149 2 545

Jan 3 337 349 3 686 6 113 457 6 570 2 776 108 2 884

Feb 2 478 350 2 828 4 735 622 5 357 2 257 272 2 529

Mar 4 918 755 5 673 3 514 255 3 769 -1 404 -500 -1 904

Total 19 368 2 631 21 999 52 914 5 314 58 228 33 546 2 683 36 229

ChangeAhead


Gauteng Department of Community Safety (GDoCS)

Number of Elections to be Tried in Court - GDoCS

Monthcaptured

2011-2012 2012-2013 Change

No. of Driver

Elections


Total No. of

Elections

No. of Driver

Elections


Total No. of

Elections

No. of Driver

Elections


Total No. of

Elections

Apr 1 16 17 55 100 155 54 84 138

May 0 18 18 91 105 196 91 87 178

Jun 0 9 9 65 109 174 65 100 165

Jul 0 30 30 83 99 182 83 69 152

Aug 2 69 71 130 113 243 128 44 172

Sep 1 40 41 120 97 217 119 57 176

Oct 0 9 9 167 78 245 167 69 236

Nov 1 27 28 171 143 314 170 116 286

Dec 26 24 50 143 74 217 117 50 167

Jan 76 40 116 224 107 331 148 67 215

Feb 40 24 64 174 104 278 134 80 214

Mar 89 99 188 121 47 168 32 -52 -20

Total 236 405 641 1 544 1 176 2 720 1 308 771 2 079


Road Traf c Management Corporation (RTMC)

Number of Elections to be Tried in Court - RTMC

Monthcaptured

2011-2012 2012-2013 Change

No. of Driver

Elections


Total No. of

Elections

No. of Driver

Elections


Total No. of

Elections

No. of Driver

Elections


Total No. of

Elections

Apr 0 0 0 8 42 50 8 42 50

May 0 0 0 19 33 52 19 33 52

Jun 0 0 0 11 55 66 11 55 66

Jul 0 0 0 15 64 79 15 64 79

Aug 0 0 0 29 38 67 29 38 67

Sep 0 0 0 50 48 98 50 48 98

Oct 0 0 0 62 39 101 62 39 101

Nov 0 2 2 42 51 93 42 49 91

Dec 2 1 3 48 46 94 46 45 91

Jan 10 7 17 80 35 115 70 28 98

Feb 4 1 5 66 32 98 62 31 93

Mar 11 12 23 64 20 84 53 8 61

Total 27 23 50 494 503 997 467 480 947

ChangeAhead


Elections to be tried in CourtBased on the monthly average over the past two nancial years, the information in the table below shows the percentages (%) of Infringement Notices served by the various Issuing Authorities on which elections to be tried in court were submitted.

Average % of Notices on which Elections to be Tried in Court were submitted

Month JMPD TMPD GDoCS RTMC All IA’s

Apr 0.28% 3.21% 1.24% 0.86% 1.75%

May 0.22% 2.80% 1.75% 0.76% 1.22%

Jun 0.64% 4.51% 1.81% 1.75% 2.33%

Jul 0.23% 4.86% 1.86% 1.82% 2.00%

Aug 0.59% 5.01% 2.45% 1.60% 2.82%

Sep 0.38% 2.69% 1.69% 1.23% 1.32%

Oct 0.25% 5.52% 2.08% 0.77% 1.77%

Nov 0.34% 5.41% 2.64% 0.94% 1.82%

Dec 0.23% 7.23% 2.74% 0.97% 1.95%

Jan 0.29% 6.41% 3.07% 0.93% 1.64%

Feb 0.18% 5.73% 2.18% 0.68% 1.30%

Mar 0.09% 6.35% 3.23% 0.95% 1.44%

Average 0.26% 4.89% 2.21% 0.98% 1.69%

The information in the table above shows as follows:

• Johannesburg Metropolitan Police Department (JMPD) :

On average, elections to be tried in court stemmed from 0.26% of the infringement notices served by JMPD;

JMPD shows the lowest percentage of the four authorities : 0.26%; and

The highest percentage was for June: 0.64%.

• Tshwane Metropolitan Police Department (TMPD) :

On average, elections to be tried in court stemmed from 4.89% of the infringement notices served by TMPD;

TMPD shows the highest percentage of the four authorities : 4.89%; and

The highest percentage was for December: 7.23%.

• Gauteng Department of Community Safety (GDoCS) :

On average, elections to be tried in court stemmed from 2.21% of the infringement notices served by GDoCS;

GDoCS shows the second highest percentage of the four authorities : 2.21%; and


The highest percentage was for March: 3.23%.

• Road Traf c Management Corporation (RTMC) :

On average, elections to be tried in court stemmed from 0.98% of the infringement notices served by RTMC;

RTMC shows the second lowest percentage of the four authorities : 0.98%; and

The highest percentage was for July: 1.82%.

• All four issuing authorities :

• On average, elections to be tried in court over the 2-year period stemmed from 1.69% of the infringement notices served by all four authorities; and

• The highest percentage was for August: 2.82%.


ChangeAhead


The percentage (%) of Infringement Notices served by the individual Issuing Authorities on which elections to be tried in court were submitted for the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 nancial years respectively are reflected in the graphs below.


Collection of Infringement RevenueThe total infringement payments made amounted to R 143 185 321, of which R 49 011 052 (34.23%) accrued to the Agency. This is an increase of R 20 431 189 (71.49%) from the R 28 579 863 million collected during the 2011-2012 nancial year.

The total notional value of infringements captured on the NCR at 31 March 2012 amounted to R980 million and this rose to R1.9 billion at 31 March 2013. This amount includes:

• Potentially invalid infringements. Incorrectly issued infringements are nulli ed via the adjudications process. It is important to note that there is a high possibility of the value of infringements decreasing due to the high percentage of successful representations (43.77% in 2013);

ChangeAhead


• Incomplete information is uploaded onto the NCR in some instances. As a result, the outstanding infringements are potentially overstated;

• Unmatched payments not uploaded onto the eNaTIS result in infringements being reflected as outstanding whereas they have already been settled; and

• Incorrect contact details of infringers on the eNaTIS can lead to the Agency not being able to contact the infringers. As a result the outstanding infringements will remain uncollected for a signi cant period.

Payments MadeThe table below represents the total number of infringements paid and uploaded onto the NCR, the amount paid as well as the month the payment was made in the nancial year 2012-2013, irrespective of when the infringements were captured onto the system.

Notices and Payments Captured

MonthCaptured

Number of Infringements

Captured

Penalty Value of Infringements

Captured (Rand)


Paid

Total Amount Paid (Rand)

Percentage of Infringements

Paid(Number)


Paid (Rand)

Apr 12 174 083 R 110 689 250.00 29 681 R 8 131 960.00 17.05% 7.35%

May 12 253 454 R 162 043 050.00 33 634 R 9 435 594.00 13.27% 5.82%

Jun 12 183 360 R 118 160 450.00 34 777 R 9 982 930.00 18.97% 8.45%

Jul 12 179 404 R 118 278 100.00 49 767 R 14 870 442.05 27.74% 12.57%

Aug 12 209 997 R 134 090 850.00 45 773 R 14 271 835.00 21.80% 10.64%

Sep 12 244 947 R 127 809 050.00 30 309 R 9 645 585.00 12.37% 7.55%

Oct 12 336 558 R 163 243 850.00 38 716 R 12 156 179.96 11.50% 7.45%

Nov 12 287 143 R 143 139 100.00 44 899 R 13 764 030.02 15.64% 9.62%

Dec 12 244 174 R 118 582 950.00 39 217 R 11 591 219.96 16.06% 9.77%

Jan 13 595 803 R 255 125 050.00 38 052 R 11 278 715.00 6.39% 4.42%

Feb 13 582 529 R 244 109 600.00 50 075 R 13 559 990.02 8.60% 5.55%

Mar 13 548 473 R 229 793 200.00 46 901 R 14 496 840.00 8.55% 6.31%

Total 3 839 925 R 1 925 064 500.00 481 801 R 143 185 321.01 12.55% 7.44%


• A total number of 481 801 infringements was paid amounting to R143 185 321.00;

• The months with the highest number of infringements being paid was February 2013, when a total of 50 075infringements were paid, followed by July 2012 when a total of 49 767 infringements were paid; and

• The months with the highest value of infringements penalties being paid was July 2012, when a total amount of R14.870 million was paid, followed by March 2013 when a total of R14.496 million was paid.


The amounts paid per month are also reflected in the graph below.

Payments Made

A comparison between the number of infringements paid and the total amounts paid per year for the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 nancial years is given in the table below.

Notices and Payments Captured

Year Captured


Captured

Penalty Value of Infringements

Captured (Rand)


Paid


Percentage of InfringementsPaid (Number)


Paid (Rand)

2011-2012 1 787 517 R 980 500 950.00 251 125 R 86 553 514.98 14.05% 8.83%

2012-2013 3 839 925 R 1 925 064 500.00 481 801 R 143 185 321.01 12.55% 7.44%

Change 2 052 408 R 944 563 550.00 230 676 R 56 631 806.03 - -

% Change 114.82% 96.33% 91.86% 65.43% - -


• The number of infringements captured increased by 2 052 408 (114.82%) from 1 787 517 in 2011-2012 to 3 839 925in 2012-2013;

• The penalty value of the infringements captured increased by R944 563 550.00 (96.33%) from R980 500 950.00 in 2011-2012 to R 1 925 064 500.00 in 2012-2013;

• The number of infringements paid increased by 230 676 (91.86%) from 251 125 to 481 801 in 2012-2013;

• The total penalty amount paid increased by R56 631 806.03 (65.43%) from R86 553 514.98 to R143 185 321.01 in 2012-2013; and

• The percentage of infringements paid (in Rand value) decreased from 8.83% in 2011-2012 to 7.44% in 2012-2013.

ChangeAhead


The percentage (%) of Notices paid per month during the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 nancial years are also schematically reflected in the graph below.


The information above shows that the average monthly number of notices paid decreased from 14.05% in 2011-2012 to 12.55% in 2012-2013.

Payments in Discount StageThe table below is a representation of the payments made whilst the infringements were still in the discounted stage (within the rst 32 days after the service of the notice). Payment of the infringement during this stage quali es the infringer to a 50% discount on the infringement penalty value and the total amount paid is disbursed to the IA that served the notice.

Notices and Payments made within 32 Days

MonthCaptured


Captured

Number of Infringements paid

within 32 days

Amount paid within 32 days

(Rand)

Percentage of Infringements paid

within 32 days (Number)


within 32 days (Rand)

Apr 12 174 083 8 824 R 2 060 250.00 5.07% 1.86%

May 12 253 454 10 063 R 2 549 515.00 3.97% 1.57%

Jun 12 183 360 9 578 R 2 516 580.00 5.22% 2.13%

Jul 12 179 404 10 522 R 2 866 620.00 5.86% 2.42%

Aug 12 209 997 10 282 R 2 806 225.00 4.90% 2.09%

Sep 12 244 947 8 492 R 2 460 500.00 3.47% 1.93%

Oct 12 336 558 11 360 R 2 875 650.00 3.38% 1.76%

Nov 12 287 143 13 993 R 3 386 425.00 4.87% 2.37%

Dec 12 244 174 11 244 R 2 685 225.00 4.60% 2.26%

Jan 13 595 803 12 494 R 2 759 075.00 2.10% 1.08%

Feb 13 582 529 20 369 R 4 231 500.00 3.50% 1.73%

Mar 13 548 473 14 175 R 3 075 550.00 2.58% 1.34%

Total 3 839 925 141 396 R 34 273 115.00 3.68% 1.78%


• A total of 141 396 notices was paid within 32 days amounting to R34 273 115.00;

• The months with the highest number of infringements being paid was February 2013, when a total of 20 369 infringements were paid, followed by March 2013 when a total of 14 175 infringements were paid; and

• The months with the highest value of infringements penalties being paid was February 2013, when a total amount of R4.231 million was paid, followed by November 2012 when a total of R3.386 million was paid.

ChangeAhead



A comparison between the number of infringements paid within 32 days and the total amounts paid per year for the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 nancial years is given in the table below.

Notices and Payments made within 32 Days

Year CapturedNumber of

InfringementsCaptured

Number of Infringementspaid within 32

days

Amount paid within 32 days

(Rand)


within 32 days (Number)


within 32 days (Rand)

2011-2012 1 787 517 72 148 R 24 371 500.00 4.04% 2.49%

2012-2013 3 839 925 141 396 R 34 273 115.00 3.68% 1.78%

Change 2 052 408 69 248 R 9 901 615.00 - -

% Change 114.82% 95.98% 40.63% - -


• The number of infringements paid within 32 days increased by 69 248 (95.98%) from 72 148 in 2011-2012 to 141 396 in 2012-2013;

• The total penalty amount paid increased by R9 901 615.00 (40.63%) from R24 371 500.00 to R34 273 115.00 in 2012-2013;

• The percentage of infringements paid (in terms of number paid) decreased from 4.04% in 2011-2012 to 3.68% in 2012-2013; and

• The percentage of infringements paid (in terms of Rand value) decreased from 2.49% in 2011-2012 to 1.78% in 2012-2013.


The percentage (%) of Notices paid per month within 32 days during the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 nancial years are also schematically reflected in the graph below.

The information above shows that the average monthly number of notices paid decreased from 4.04% in 2011-2012 to 3.68% in 2012-2013.

ChangeAhead


Payments made in Courtesy Letter StageThe table below represents the payments made whilst the infringements were in the Courtesy Letter phase, which is from 33 days up to 64 days from the date that the Infringement Notice was served. At this stage the infringer no longer quali es for a 50% discount on the penalty value and the full penalty amount is applicable for payment.

Notices and Payments made from 33 to 64 Days

Month CapturedNumber of



paid from 33 to 64 days

Amount Paid from 33 to 64 days (Rand)


paid from 33 to 64 days (Number)


paid from 33 to 64 days (Rand)

Apr 12 174 083 5 024 R 1 279 635.00 2.89% 1.16%

May 12 253 454 6 842 R 1 773 110.00 2.70% 1.09%

Jun 12 183 360 7 232 R 2 124 635.00 3.94% 1.80%

Jul 12 179 404 9 583 R 3 301 315.00 5.34% 2.79%

Aug 12 209 997 6 316 R 2 563 820.00 3.01% 1.91%

Sep 12 244 947 3 738 R 1 551 700.00 1.53% 1.21%

Oct 12 336 558 6 924 R 2 654 600.00 2.06% 1.63%

Nov 12 287 143 8 809 R 2 874 600.00 3.07% 2.01%

Dec 12 244 174 7 499 R 2 338 750.00 3.07% 1.97%

Jan 13 595 803 7 530 R 2 424 775.00 1.26% 0.95%

Feb 13 582 529 10 843 R 2 805 900.00 1.86% 1.15%

Mar 13 548 473 11 893 R 3 294 575.00 2.17% 1.43%

Total 3 839 925 92 233 R 28 987 415.00 2.40% 1.51%


• A total of 92 233 notices were paid from 33 to 64 days amounting to R28 987 415.00;

• The months with the highest number of infringements being paid was March 2013, when a total of 11 893 infringements were paid, followed by February 2013 when a total of 10 843 infringements were paid; and

• The months with the highest value of infringements penalties being paid was July 2012, when a total amount of R 3.301 million was paid, followed by March 2013 when a total of R3.294 million was paid.



A comparison between the numbers of infringements paid from 33 to 64 days after the notices were served and the total amounts paid per year for the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 nancial years respectively is given in the table below.

Notices and Payments made from 33 to 64 Days

Year Captured


Captured


paid from 33 to 64 days

Amount Paid from 33 to 64 days

(Rand)

Percentage of Infringements paid from 33 to 64 days

(Number)


paid from 33 to 64 days (Rand)

2011-2012 1 787 517 17 236 R 9 481 055.00 0.96% 0.97%

2012-2013 3 839 925 92 233 R 28 987 415.00 2.40% 1.51%

Change 2 052 408 74 997 R 19 506 360.00 - -

% Change 114.82% 435.11% 205.74% - -


• The number of infringements paid from 33 to 64 days increased by 74 997 (435.11%) from 17 236 in 2011-2012 to 92 233 in 2012-2013;


• The percentage of infringements paid (in terms of number paid) increased from 0.96% in 2011-2012 to 2.40% in 2012-2013; and

• The percentage of infringements paid (in terms of Rand value) increased from 0.97% in 2011-2012 to 1.51% in 2012-2013.

ChangeAhead


The % of notices paid per month from 33 to 64 days during the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 nancial years are also schematically reflected in the graph below.


• The average monthly number of notices paid increased from 0.96% in 2011-2012 to 2.40% in 2012-2013; and

• Payments in July increased from 0.51% in 2011-2012 to 5.34% in 2012-2013.


Payments made in Enforcement Order StageThe table below represents the payments made whilst the infringements were in the enforcement order stage, which is after 64 days from the date that the infringement notice was served.

Notices and Payments made after 64 Days

MonthCaptured


Captured


paid after 64 days

Amount Paid after 64 days (Rand)


paid after 64 days (Number)


after 64 days (Rand)

Apr 12 174 083 15 833 R 4 792 075.00 9.10% 4.33%

May 12 253 454 16 729 R 5 112 969.00 6.60% 3.16%

Jun 12 183 360 17 967 R 5 341 715.00 9.80% 4.52%

Jul 12 179 404 29 662 R 8 702 507.05 16.53% 7.36%

Aug 12 209 997 29 175 R 8 901 790.00 13.89% 6.64%

Sep 12 244 947 18 079 R 5 633 385.00 7.38% 4.41%

Oct 12 336 558 20 432 R 6 625 929.96 6.07% 4.06%

Nov 12 287 143 22 097 R 7 503 005.02 7.70% 5.24%

Dec 12 244 174 20 474 R 6 567 244.96 8.39% 5.54%

Jan 13 595 803 18 028 R 6 094 865.00 3.03% 2.39%

Feb 13 582 529 18 863 R 6 522 590.02 3.24% 2.67%

Mar 13 548 473 20 833 R 8 126 715.00 3.80% 3.54%

Total 3 839 925 248 172 R 79 924 791.01 6.46% 4.15%


• A total of 248 172 notices were paid after 64 Days amounting to R79 924 791.01;

• The months with the highest number of infringements being paid was July 2012, when a total of 29 662 infringements were paid, followed by August 2013 when a total of 29 175 infringements were paid; and

• The months with the highest value of infringements penalties being paid was August 2012, when a total amount of R8.901 million was paid, followed by July 2012 when a total of R8.702 million was paid.


ChangeAhead


A comparison between the number of infringements paid after 64 days after the notices were served and the total amounts paid per year for the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 nancial years respectively is given in the table below.

Notices and Payments made after 64 Days

Year CapturedNumber of


Number of Infringementspaid after 64

days

Amount Paid after 64 days (Rand)


paid after 64 days (Number)


paid after 64 days (Rand)

2011-2012 1 787 517 97 609 R 52 700 959.98 5.46% 5.37%

2012-2013 3 839 925 248 172 R 79 924 791.01 6.46% 4.15%

Change 2 052 408 150 563 R 27 223 831.03 - -

% Change 114.82% 154.25% 51.66% - -


• The number of infringements paid after 64 days increased by 150 563 (154.25%) from 97 609 in 2011-2012 to 248 172 in 2012-2013;


• The percentage of infringements paid (in terms of number paid) increased from 5.46% in 2011-2012 to 6.46% in 2012-2013; and

• The percentage of infringements paid (in terms of Rand value) decreased from 5.37% in 2011-2012 to 4.15% in 2012-2013.


The percentage (%) of Notices paid per month after 64 days during the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 nancial years are also schematically reflected in the graph below.


• The average monthly number of Notices paid increased from 5.46% in 2011-2012 to 6.46% in 2012-2013; and

• Payments in July increased from 2.03% in 2011-2012 to 16.53% in 2012-2013.

ChangeAhead


Percentage of Payments made within various Time FramesThe graph below reflects the percentage (%) of infringements paid during 2012-2013 within the various time frames provided for in the AARTO process.

The information in the graph indicates that:

• The percentage (%) of infringements paid within a period of 32 days from the date that the infringement notice was served range from 5.07% in April 2012 to 2.58% in March 2013 with an average of 4.13% per month. July 2012 was the highest with 5.86% and January 2013 the lowest with 2.10%.

• The percentage (%) of infringements paid in the courtesy letter stage, which is from 33 days up to 64 days from the date that the infringement notice was served, range from 2.89% in April 2012 to 2.17% in March 2013 with an average of 2.74% per month. July 2012 was the highest with 5.34% and January 2013 the lowest with 1.26%.

• The percentage (%) of infringements paid in the enforcement order stage that is after 64 days from the date that the infringement notice was served, range from 9.10% in April 2012 to 3.80% in March 2013 with an average of 7.96% per month. July 2012 was the highest with 16.53% and January 2013 the lowest with 3.03%.

The possible main reason for the improved payment rate after 64 days is that no vehicle licence disc in respect of any of the vehicles of the infringer and no driving licence or professional driving permit will be issued until the infringement has been paid.


Correction of some data contained in the 2011-2012 Annual ReportThe table showing the total number of Infringement Notices paid during the 2011-2012 nancial year as printed on page 46 of the 2011-2012 Annual Report was not correct, and should be replaced with the following table:

Month Captured


Captured

Penalty Value of Infringements Captured

(Rand)


Paid



Paid (Number)


Paid (Rand)

Apr 11 109 573 R 56 641 200.00 18 964 R 8 420 994.98 17.31% 14.87%

May 11 219 619 R 110 543 100.00 23 722 R 10 474 795.00 10.80% 9.48%

Jun 11 133 722 R 69 770 000.00 31 287 R 14 444 265.00 23.40% 20.70%

Jul 11 171 898 R 87 700 700.00 9 212 R 3 611 500.00 5.36% 4.12%

Aug 11 106 372 R 55 042 050.00 10 986 R 4 778 265.00 10.33% 8.68%

Sep 11 111 885 R 59 555 500.00 13 125 R 5 937 365.00 11.73% 9.97%

Oct 11 121 264 R 69 679 400.00 9 292 R 4 250 320.00 7.66% 6.10%

Nov 11 176 775 R 99 421 550.00 12 979 R 6 071 880.00 7.34% 6.11%

Dec 11 120 343 R 63 414 600.00 13 413 R 6 284 345.00 11.15% 9.91%

Jan 12 170 008 R 97 912 750.00 12 836 R 6 288 355.00 7.55% 6.42%

Feb 12 164 761 R 99 294 450.00 16 239 R 8 177 265.00 9.86% 8.24%

Mar 12 181 297 R 111 525 650.00 14 940 R 7 814 165.00 8.24% 7.01%

Total 1 787 517 R 980 500 950.00 186 993 R 86 553 514.98 10.46% 8.83%

All Notices and Payments Captured

The total number of Notices paid during the 2011-2012 nancial year was 186 993 and not 251 125. This amendment also results in an amendment of the percentage (%) of Notices paid during the various months. The total amount paid remains R 86 553 514.96.

General Note:It should be noted that all the basic data on which the statistics contained under Section 4 above are based, were provided by the NaTIS contractor and is reflecting the data as captured on the National Contraventions Register (NCR) which operates as a module on eNaTIS.

ChangeAhead


Highlights and Achievements


Section 5: Highlights and achievementsAudit Performance The Agency received an unquali ed audit opinion and this follows a similar one received in the last nancial year ended 31 March 2012.

The matters of impairment and under-funding have been noted by the Board and management to be sources of high risk for the Agency and even though both presently lie outside of its immediate control, are nevertheless receiving priority attention.

Legislative Framework The publication of the Amendment Bill in Government Gazette 36173 dated 20 February 2013 was the culmination of an initiative by the Agency to amend its enabling laws and regulations based on experience and intended to enhance operational ef ciency.

The process to amend the legislative framework has been an intensively interactive one, with the active participation of various stakeholders representing the public, labour and business under the umbrella of NEDLAC in particular.

Institutional Capacitation Whereas the Agency started with a total of 22 staff at the beginning of the nancial period, this was increased to a total of 38 at the end of the period. The additional staff of 16 was brought in to build capacity in the key areas of Audit and Risk Management, Information Technology and Debt Collection Units.

The pace of recruitment was constrained by the underfunding situation whereby the MTEF grant was R 5 million for the year and this was only supplemented at year end when the Department of Transport made a virement of R 14 million.

Infringement Penalty CollectionRTIA’s share of revenue from outstanding road traf c infringements penalties amounted to R 49 million against a revised target of R 50 million. The result compares well with the total share of revenue of R 28.5 million achieved last year.

Data Clean-up After experiencing problems of data integrity and the lack of enforcement of the address validation on the NCR, as well as the non-uploading of infringement payments on the NCR, the Agency embarked on a data cleaning project as a matter of priority this year.

The project made commendable progress in that a total of 79 440 transactions with a value of R 143.2 million were updated and this helped close the reconciliation gap of 107 000 transactions with a value of R 207 million that were still to be uploaded at the start of the report period.

Adjudications Performance The total number of Representations received was 35,552 from which 34,869 Representations were adjudicated. This is slightly less than the total number of Representations applications received in the preceding year.

ChangeAhead


Marketing and EducationThe AARTO national marketing and educational programmes were conducted through targeted publications, collaboration with the Department of Transport and other transport sector stakeholders mainly during Easter and Festive Season Road Safety campaigns. Key exhibitions were conducted, which targeted high-traf c areas and peak periods offering the highest impact, such as those executed during the launch of October Transport Month and the Rand Show in NASREC which increased public awareness of the RTIA brand and educated the public about their rights and responsibilities under the AARTO Act.

The Agency devised a programme to ‘take its services to the people’ through setting up kiosks in the various communication events. The kiosk project is geared to educate the public and encourage infringers to pay their outstanding infringements thus foster voluntary compliance with road traf c laws and take responsibility for their actions.


PAY FULL AMOUNT AND ADMIN FEE ELECT TO BE TRIED IN COURT

PAY FULL AMOUNT AND ADMIN FEE ELECT TO BE TRIED IN COURT APPLY FOR REVOCATION OF ENFORCEMENT ORDER

PAY FULL AMOUNT AND ADMIN FEE MAKE A REPRESENTATION ELECT TO BE TRIED IN COURT

PAY THE DISCOUNTED AMOUNT (50%)

NOMINATE A DRIVER OR PERSON IN CONTROL MAKE A REPRESENTATION

ELECT TO BE TRIED IN COURT

ARRANGE TO PAY IN INSTALLMENTS

ARRANGE TO PAY IN INSTALLMENTS

SHERIFF COLLECTS MOVABLE PROPERTY TO SELL

AFTER A WARRANT OF EXECUTION HAS BEEN SERVED

AFTER RECEIVING AN ENFORCEMENT ORDER (3rd 32 DAY CYCLE)

AFTER RECEIVING A COURTESY LETTER (2nd 32 DAY CYCLE)

AFTER RECEIVING AN INFRINGEMENT NOTICE (1ST32 DAY CYCLE )

The AARTO Process ow:

ChangeAhead


Performance Information


Section 6: Performance Information Report Overview of the Performance Management FrameworkFor the period under review, the Agency committed to the following strategic objectives:

2012/13 Strategic Objectives:1. To increase Agency revenue share from the outstanding road traf c infringement penalties.

2. Implementation of effective governance processes to achieve an unquali ed opinion.

3. Implementation of AARTO communication campaigns.

4. Implementation of effective adjudication processes.

5. Comprehensive legislative review.

6. Full transfer of AARTO functions to the RTIA.

Strategic objective 1 To increase the Agency’s revenue share from the outstanding road tra c infringement penalties.

Objective statement To ensure compliance with the AARTO Act by the users.

Baseline The RTIA currently receives minimal funding by the DoT/National Treasury and relies on revenue collected from AARTO pilot project sites.

Justi cation Improved compliance to the Road Traf c Laws by road users.

LinksTo contribute to the achievement of the objective of encouraging the payment of outstanding penalties as provided by the AARTO Act, requirements of the Public Finance Management Act and the DoT Strategic priorities

Included in Annual Performance Plan – annual targets:

Strategic objectiveStrategic Plan

target2012/13

Audited/Actual performance Estimated performance

2012/13

Medium-term targets

2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16

1.

To increase the Agency’s revenue share from the outstandingroad traf c infringementpenalties.

Introduction of debt collectors.

Uploadingof penalties relating to the JMPD on the eNaTIS system to facilitate collection of infringementpenalties

R292m R290m

Was R319.1m(Revised to R50m)

R351m R351m

Programme performance indicators identi ed above.

ChangeAhead


Programmeperformance

indicators

Reporting period

Annual target 2012/13 Year to Date YTD

VarianceReason for Variance Remedial Action

1.1

Increased Agencyrevenue share of outstandinginfringementpenalties

Quarterly R50m (Revised annual target)

R49 million was collected during the 2012/13 nancial year.

R1.2m

The non-transfer of AARTO National Bank Accounts from the RTMC to the RTIA negatively impacted on the Agency’s ability to collect all its outstandingrevenue.

RTIA has sent a letter of request for the DoT to facilitate transfer of AARTO National Bank Accounts to the Agency. Awaiting DoT response in this regard.

1.2

Debt CollectionAgenciesappointed

Quarterly

R100m revenue collected by the Debt Collection Agencies (target revised and accounted for under 1.1 above)

Target revised and accountedfor under 1.1 above.

Refer to 1.1

Appointment of debt collectors not feasible for the nancial year 2012/13 due to nancial constraints

The appointment of debt collectors is envisaged in the next nancial year, subject to suf cient funds being provided

Strategic Objective 2 To implement effective governance processes to achieve an unquali ed audit opinion

Objective statement Ef cient governance framework

Baseline The Board has approved nine policies during the 2010/11 nancial year.

Justi cation Improved service delivery by RTIA towards the realisation of the national goals.

Links Compliance to national priorities and good corporate governance practices


Strategicobjective

StrategicPlan target

2012/13

Audited/Actual performanceEstimated

performance2012/13

Medium-term targets

2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16

2.

To implementeffective governance processes to achieve anunquali ed auditopinion

Appointeda Specialist to assist in the audit preparation

A disclaimer of audit opinion on the basis of revenue, trade and otherreceivables

Unquali ed auditopinion

Unquali ed auditopinion and reduction of ndings relating to performance auditing

Effective processes implementedto ensure full compliancewith the regulatory framework,particularly the PFMA and the Treasury Regulations.A clean audit performance expected.

Unquali ed audit opinion achieved

Full compliancewith the PFMA and the Treasury Regulations

Unquali ed audit opinion achieved

Full complianceto the PFMA and the Treasury Regulations

Programme performance indicators.


Programme performance indicators

Reporting period

Annualtarget

2012/13Year To Date YTD

Variance

Reasonfor

Variance

RemedialAction

2.1

Unquali ed auditopinionachieved

AnnuallyUnquali ed auditopinion

Target achieved.

RTIA Strategic Plan, Annual Performance Plan, and Budget for 2012/13 were approved and tabled in Parliament on the 7th

March 2012

All quarterly reports were submitted to the Department of Transport on time.

Internal systems of control developed and implemented as a mechanism towards the achievement of clean administration.

N/A N/A N/A

Strategic objective 3 Implementation of effective AARTO communication campaigns

Objective statement To create awareness and form strategic partnerships

Baseline Draft RTIA communication strategy developed

Justi cation Improved awareness and brand recognition of RTIA.

Links Contribution to effective stakeholder relations


ChangeAhead


Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive

Stra

tegi

c Pl

an

targ

et20

12/1

3

Audi

ted/

Actu

al p

erfo

rman

ceEs

timat

ed

perf

orm

ance

2012

/13

Med

ium

-ter

m ta

rget

s

2009

/10

2010

/11

2011

/12

2013

/14

2014

/15

2015

/16

3.

Impl

emen

tatio

nof

effe

ctiv

e AA

RTO

co

mm

unic

atio

npr

ogra

mm

es

Effe

ctiv

e Co

mm

unic

atio

nca

mpa

igns

deve

lope

d

Draf

tco

mm

unic

atio

nsst

rate

gydo

cum

ent w

as

deve

lope

d

Appr

oved

co

mm

unic

atio

nst

rate

gy

Impl

emen

tef

fect

ive

AART

O

natio

nal m

arke

ting

and

educ

atio

n pr

ogra

mm

es.

Impl

emen

t AAR

TO

med

ia c

ampa

igns

lin

ked

to n

atio

nal

road

saf

ety

prog

ram

mes

.

Roll

out e

ffect

ive

AART

O n

atio

nal

mar

ketin

g an

d ed

ucat

ion

prog

ram

mes

.

Impl

emen

t AAR

TO

med

ia c

ampa

igns

lin

ked

to n

atio

nal

road

saf

ety

prog

ram

mes

st

rate

gy

Sust

ain,

mon

itor

and

eval

uate

the

effe

ctiv

enes

s of

AA

RTO

mar

ketin

g an

d ed

ucat

iona

l pr

ogra

mm

es.

Sust

ain,

mon

itor

and

eval

uate

AAR

TO

med

ia c

ampa

igns

lin

ked

to n

atio

nal

road

saf

ety

stra

tegy

an

d pr

ogra

mm

es

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rs.


Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tors

Repo

rtin

g pe

riod

Annu

al ta

rget

20

12/1

3Ye

ar T

o Da

teYT

D Va

rianc

eRe

ason

for

Varia

nce

Rem

edia

lAc

tion

3.1

Impl

emen

t ef

fect

ive

AART

O n

atio

nal

mar

ketin

g an

d ed

ucat

iona

lpr

ogra

mm

es.

AART

O m

edia

ca

mpa

igns

linke

d to

na

tiona

lro

ad s

afet

y pr

ogra

mm

es

Qua

rter

lyEf

fect

ive

AART

O n

atio

nal

mar

ketin

g an

d ed

ucat

ion

prog

ram

mes

im

plem

ente

d

Effe

ctiv

e AA

RTO

med

ia

cam

paig

nslin

ked

to

natio

nal

road

saf

ety

prog

ram

mes

de

velo

ped.

The

term

s of

refe

renc

e an

d bi

d do

cum

enta

tion

for

the

appo

intm

ent o

f a m

arke

ting

and

educ

atio

nal

serv

ice

prov

ider

on

AART

O a

nd n

atio

nal r

oad

safe

ty

prog

ram

mes

has

bee

n de

velo

ped.

Fest

ive

seas

on e

duca

tiona

l roa

d sa

fety

cam

paig

ns

wer

e he

ld in

the

2012

/13

fest

ive

seas

on re

achi

ng

mor

e th

an 5

000

mot

oris

ts a

nd p

asse

nger

s at

var

ious

m

ajor

rout

es s

uch

as th

e Ph

umla

ni T

oll P

laza

, N12

, N3

and

Joha

nnes

burg

Educ

atio

nal E

xhib

ition

at H

ando

ver T

orch

of P

eace

by

Min

iste

r of T

rans

port

to E

duca

tion

Min

iste

r rea

chin

g 30

0 gu

ests

Part

ners

hip

disc

ussi

ons

held

with

Equ

estr

a, S

AVRA

LA

and

C-BR

TA to

pre

pare

MO

Us

East

er R

oad

Safe

ty C

ampa

ign

and

educ

atio

nal

exhi

bitio

n in

Pol

okw

ane

reac

hed

mor

e th

an 1

500

peop

le

JHB

Wan

dere

rs T

axi R

ank

East

er R

oad

Safe

ty

Cam

paig

n br

and

activ

atio

n an

d ed

ucat

ion.

Rea

ched

m

ore

than

150

0 pe

ople

, tax

i driv

ers

and

pass

enge

rs

East

er R

and

Show

pub

lic a

war

enes

s an

d ed

ucat

iona

l ex

hibi

tion

from

28

Mar

ch to

01

April

201

3 re

achi

ng

over

250

0 pe

ople

AART

O e

duca

tion

and

awar

enes

s pr

ogra

mm

es w

ere

impa

rted

to

mor

e th

an 2

5000

rea

ders

of

Lead

ersh

ip

and

Safe

Tra

vel M

agaz

ines

whi

ch c

arrie

d fe

atur

es a

nd

pro

le o

f the

RTI

A in

bot

h pu

blic

atio

ns w

ith e

mph

asis

on

the

inf

ringe

men

ts s

tatu

s re

late

d to

AAR

TO,

Pay-

men

ts o

f inf

ringe

men

ts n

otic

es a

nd th

e op

tions

ava

il-ab

le to

infr

inge

rs in

rela

tion

to th

e in

frin

gem

ent n

otic

es.

AART

O p

rogr

amm

es f

or n

atio

nal,

prov

inci

al a

nd lo

cal

med

ia n

etw

ork

enga

gem

ent f

unct

ions

wer

e de

velo

ped.

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Educ

atio

n Bi

ds e

nvis

aged

fo

r the

201

3/14

pe

riod

Urg

ent f

undi

ng

requ

ired

initi

atin

gsi

gni

cant

co

mm

unic

atio

nan

d ed

ucat

ion

prog

ram

mes

.

Depa

rtm

ent

of T

rans

port

ap

proa

ched

to

ass

ist

with

fund

ing

inje

ctio

n.

Part

ners

hips

on

pla

tfor

ms

esta

blis

hed

to

com

mun

icat

etr

ansp

ort

safe

ty re

late

d pr

ogra

mm

es

thro

ugho

ut th

e co

untr

y.

ChangeAhead


Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive

4To

dev

elop

e c

ient

adj

udic

atio

n pr

oces

s in

line

with

the

AART

O A

ct

Obj

ectiv

e st

atem

ent

To e

nsur

e in

crea

sed

rate

of p

aym

ent o

f inf

ringe

men

t pen

altie

s an

d co

mpl

ianc

e to

road

traf

c la

ws.

Base

line

Eigh

t Rep

rese

ntat

ion

of c

ers

appo

inte

d to

exe

cute

the

task

.

Just

i ca

tion

Enha

nced

com

plia

nce

to th

e AA

RTO

Act

and

Roa

d Tr

af c

Leg

isla

tion.

Link

sCo

ntrib

utio

n to

the

natio

nal p

riorit

ies

of g

over

nmen

t of e

nsur

ing

a sa

fe a

nd s

ecur

e tr

ansp

ort.

Incl

uded

in A

nnua

l Per

form

ance

Pla

n –

ann

ual t

arge

ts:

Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive

Stra

tegi

c Pl

an

targ

et20

12/1

3

Audi

ted/

Actu

al p

erfo

rman

ceEs

timat

edpe

rfor

man

ce20

12/1

3

Med

ium

-ter

m ta

rget

s

2009

/10

2010

/11

2011

/12

2013

/14

2014

/15

2015

/16

4.

To d

evel

op e

f ci

ent

adju

dica

tion

proc

esse

s in

line

with

the

AART

O

Act

179

520

AART

O

repr

esen

tatio

ns

adju

dica

ted.

8 40

8 re

pres

enta

tions

ad

judi

cate

d

4000

0 AA

RTO

re

pres

enta

tions

ad

judi

cate

d

179

520

AART

O

repr

esen

tatio

ns

adju

dica

ted

380

000

AART

O

repr

esen

tatio

ns

adju

dica

ted

780

000

AART

O

repr

esen

tatio

ns

adju

dica

ted

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rs.


Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tors

Repo

rtin

g pe

riod

Annu

al ta

rget

20

12/1

3Ye

ar to

Dat

eYT

D Va

rianc

eRe

ason

for

Varia

nce

Rem

edia

lAc

tion

4.1

Num

ber o

f re

pres

enta

tions

ad

judi

cate

dw

ithin

the

lega

l fr

amew

ork

Qua

rter

ly

179

520

AART

O

repr

esen

tatio

ns

adju

dica

ted.

(Rev

ised

targ

et

75%

of A

nnua

l Re

pres

enta

tions

ad

judi

cate

d:35

, 552

x 7

5% =

26

,664

)

Tota

l rep

rese

ntat

ions

rece

ived

: 35,

552

and

34,8

69

repr

esen

tatio

ns a

djud

icat

ed.

A ba

lanc

e of

683

repr

esen

tatio

ns w

ill b

e ca

rrie

d ov

er

to th

e 20

13/1

4 n

anci

al y

ear.

The

Agen

cy h

as re

port

ed th

at d

urin

g th

e rs

t qu

arte

r 125

68 re

pres

enta

tions

wer

e pr

oces

sed.

The

g

ures

wer

e pr

emis

ed o

n th

e as

sum

ptio

n th

at th

ere

wer

e 50

33 p

endi

ng a

pplic

atio

ns fr

om th

e pr

evio

us

nan

cial

yea

r.

Follo

win

g a

thor

ough

inte

rnal

aud

it ex

erci

se it

w

as re

veal

ed th

at th

e Ag

ency

mis

dire

cted

itse

lf by

incl

usio

n of

503

3 g

ure

into

the

1st q

uart

er o

f 20

12/1

3 n

anci

al y

ear t

here

by e

xagg

erat

ing

the

seco

nd a

nd th

ird q

uart

er s

tatis

tics.

The

audi

t rev

eale

d th

at th

ese

appl

icat

ions

wer

e pr

oces

sed

durin

g Au

gust

and

Sep

tem

ber o

f the

pr

evio

us

nanc

ial y

ear.

The

Agen

cy s

ubm

it th

e fo

llow

ing

stat

istic

s fro

m th

e 1st

qua

rter

to th

e 4th

qua

rter

of t

he 2

012/

13

nanc

ial

year

: •

7 53

5 1st

qua

rter

• 12

077

2nd

qua

rter

• 8

098

3rd q

uart

er

• 7

842

4th q

uart

er

Targ

et a

chie

ved

in li

ne w

ith

revi

sed

targ

ets

(75%

of a

nnua

l Re

pres

enta

tions

re

ceiv

ed a

nd

adju

dica

ted

The

perf

orm

ance

of

repr

esen

tatio

ns

is d

epen

dent

on

the

volu

mes

of

app

licat

ions

re

ceiv

ed.

N/A

ChangeAhead


Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive

5To

dev

elop

com

preh

ensi

ve le

gisl

atio

n re

view

Obj

ectiv

e st

atem

ent

To e

nsur

e al

igne

d ro

ad tr

af c

legi

slat

ion

Base

line

Draf

t AAR

TO re

gula

tions

na

lised

and

sub

mitt

ed to

the

Min

iste

r for

app

rova

l. Re

ques

t for

revi

ew o

f the

AAR

TO A

ct h

as b

een

enlis

ted

on th

e Pa

rliam

enta

ry s

ched

ule.

Just

i ca

tion

Har

mon

isat

ion

syst

ems

and

proc

edur

es to

ena

ble

smoo

th ro

ll-ou

t of A

ARTO

Act

to th

e re

mai

ning

eig

ht p

rovi

nces

.

Link

sCo

ntrib

utio

n to

impr

oved

com

plia

nce

to th

e Ro

ad T

raf

c La

ws

Incl

uded

in A

nnua

l Per

form

ance

Pla

n –

ann

ual t

arge

ts:

Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive

Stra

tegi

c Pl

an

targ

et20

12/1

3

Audi

ted/

Actu

al p

erfo

rman

ceEs

timat

ed

perf

orm

ance

2012

/13

Med

ium

-ter

m ta

rget

s

2009

/10

2010

/11

2011

/12

2013

/14

2014

/15

2015

/16

5.To

dev

elop

co

mpr

ehen

sive

le

gisl

ativ

e re

view

Revi

ewed

AA

RTO

Re

gula

tions

and

AA

RTO

Act

Appr

oved

AA

RTO

Re

gula

tions

Impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

AART

O R

egul

atio

ns

Draf

t AAR

TO

Amen

dmen

tBi

ll ap

prov

ed b

y Pa

rliam

ent

Impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

AART

O R

egul

atio

ns

Impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

AART

O A

men

dmen

t Ac

t

Impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

AART

O R

egul

atio

ns

Impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

AART

O A

men

dmen

t Ac

t

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rs

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tors

Repo

rtin

g pe

riod

Annu

al ta

rget

20

12/1

3Ye

ar to

Dat

eYT

D Va

rianc

eRe

ason

for

Varia

nce

Rem

edia

l act

ion

5.1

Revi

ew o

f AA

RTO

Act

and

al

ignm

ent w

ith

the

Regu

latio

ns

Qua

rter

lyRe

view

ed

AART

O A

ctDr

aft A

ARTO

Am

endm

ent B

ill w

as p

ublis

hed

for

com

men

t in

Gov

ernm

ent G

azet

te 3

6173

dat

ed 2

0 Fe

brua

ry 2

013.

The

proc

ess

of c

onso

lidat

ing

the

publ

ic c

omm

ent

will

be

unde

rtak

en in

the

rst q

uart

er o

f the

201

3/14

pe

riod.

N/A

.N

/A.

N/A

.


Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive

6Fu

ll tr

ansf

er o

f AAR

TO fu

nctio

ns to

RTI

A

Obj

ectiv

e st

atem

ent

To e

nsur

e ca

paci

tatio

n of

the

RTIA

to e

xecu

te it

s le

gisl

ativ

e m

anda

te o

f im

plem

entin

g th

e AA

RTO

Act

Base

line

Draf

t AAR

TO re

gula

tions

na

lised

and

sub

mitt

ed to

the

Min

iste

r for

app

rova

l. Re

ques

t for

revi

ew o

f the

AAR

TO A

ct h

as b

een

enlis

ted

on th

e Pa

rliam

enta

ry s

ched

ule.

Just

i ca

tion

Har

mon

ise

syst

ems

and

proc

edur

es to

ena

ble

smoo

th ro

ll-ou

t of A

ARTO

Act

to th

e re

mai

ning

eig

ht p

rovi

nces

.

Link

sCo

ntrib

utio

n to

impr

oved

com

plia

nce

to th

e Ro

ad T

raf

c La

ws

Incl

uded

in A

nnua

l Per

form

ance

Pla

n –

ann

ual t

arge

ts:

Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive

Stra

tegi

c Pl

an

targ

et20

12/1

3

Audi

ted/

Actu

al p

erfo

rman

ceEs

timat

ed

perf

orm

ance

2012

/13

Med

ium

-ter

m ta

rget

s

2009

/10

2010

/11

2011

/12

2013

/14

2014

/15

2015

/16

6.

To n

egot

iate

fu

ll tr

ansf

er

of A

ARTO

fu

nctio

ns to

RT

IA

AART

O

func

tions

tran

sfer

red

to

the

RTIA

Fina

l pre

para

tion

for t

he n

atio

nal r

oll-

out o

f AAR

TO A

ct in

th

e re

mai

ning

eig

ht

prov

ince

s

Nat

iona

l rol

l-out

of

AART

O A

ct

Nat

iona

lim

plem

enta

tion

of th

e AA

RTO

Act

con

tinue

s

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rs.

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rsRe

port

ing

perio

d

Annu

alta

rget

2012

/13

Year

to D

ate

YTD

Varia

nce

Reas

on fo

r Var

ianc

eRe

med

ial a

ctio

n

6.1

MoU

sig

ned

with

RTM

C as

a

decl

arat

ion

for t

he

tran

sfer

of A

ARTO

fu

nctio

ns to

the

RTIA

Qua

rter

ly

AART

O

func

tions

tran

sfer

red

to th

e RT

IA

Enga

gem

ents

with

the

mai

n st

akeh

olde

rs

are

on-g

oing

.

The

Nat

iona

l Tre

asur

y ha

s re

ques

ted

the

Depa

rtm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rt to

faci

litat

e th

e tr

ansf

er o

f AAR

TO N

atio

nal b

ank

acco

unts

and

oth

er re

late

d fu

nctio

ns to

th

e RT

IA

MoU

not

si

gned

.

RTIA

is a

wai

ting

the

deci

sion

of t

he D

epar

tmen

t of

Tra

nspo

rt to

tran

sfer

the

AART

O b

ank

acco

unts

and

ot

her r

elat

ed fu

nctio

ns,

give

n th

e ob

ject

ions

lo

dged

by

the

RTM

C.

Min

iste

rial i

nter

vent

ion

requ

ired

to e

ffect

the

tran

sfer

to th

e RT

IA.

ChangeAhead


Annual Financial Statements

ANNUAL REPORT 2012/13 ROAD TRAFFIC INFRINGEMENT AGENCY156 ANNUAL REPORT 2012/13 ROAD TRAFFIC INFRINGEMENT AGENCY156

Section 7: Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 31 March 2013Corporate Information

Directors Ms NE Rapoo (Non-Executive Chairperson)

Mr JR Chuwe (Registrar & Executive Director)

Adv. TE Dicker (Non-Executive Director)

Mr IS Jordaan (Non-Executive Director – resigned 26 July 2012)

Mr CM Manzini (Non-Executive Director)

Company Secretary Adv. MLT Bilikwana

Business address Waterfall Edge BHowick CloseWaterfall ParkBekker RoadMidrand

Postal addressP O Box 6341Halfway House1685

Auditors Auditor-General of South Africa

ANNUAL REPORT 2012/13 ROAD TRAFFIC INFRINGEMENT AGENCY157ANNUAL REPORT 2012/13 ROAD TRAFFIC INFRINGEMENT AGENCY

ChangeAhead

157

Contents ................................................................................................................Page

The reports and statements set out below comprise the Annual Financial Statements presented to the Minister of Transport:

Company Secretary’s Certi cate of Assurance .................................................................................................................158

Approval and Statement of Responsibility ..........................................................................................................................159

Accounting Authority Report .................................................................................................................................................160

Audit Committee Report .........................................................................................................................................................163

Report of the AuditorGeneral ................................................................................................................................................166

Statement of Financial Position ............................................................................................................................................169

Statement of Financial Performance ...................................................................................................................................170

Statement of Changes in Net Assets ...................................................................................................................................171

Cash Flow Statement ..............................................................................................................................................................172

Notes to the Financial Statements .......................................................................................................................................173

Reconciliation between Statement of Financial Performance and the Budget ..........................................................205


Company Secretary’s Certi cate of Assurance

In terms of Section 14(1) and (3) of the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traf c Offences Act, 1998 (Act No. 46 of 1998) and Section 40(1)(c) and (d) of the Public Finance Management Act, 1999 (Act No. 1 of 1999), I certify that for the nancial year ended 31 March 2013, the Road Traf c Infringement Agency has lodged with the Minister of Transport and

the National Treasury, the required annual nancial statements, performance information, annual report and the audit report as prescribed.

Adv. MLT Bilikwana

Company Secretary


ChangeAhead

159

Approval and Statement of ResponsibilityThe Board of Directors, which is the accounting authority of the Road Traf c Infringement Agency, is responsible for the maintenance of adequate accounting records and the preparation, integrity and fair presentation of the nancial statements of the Agency and related information. As at the reporting date, the RTIA had a functioning Board of Directors and hereby presents the Annual Financial Statements after due consideration and approval thereof.

The Auditor-General of South Africa is responsible for independently auditing and reporting on the fair presentation of the nancial statements in conformity with International Standards of Auditing. The accounting authority is also responsible

for the systems of internal nancial controls. These are designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute assurance as to the reliability of the nancial statements, and to adequately safeguard, verify and maintain accountability of assets, and to prevent and detect misstatements and losses. In spite of on-going challenges that the Agency continued to face and having partially managed to overcome some of them, there has not been anything that has come to the attention of the accounting authority to indicate that any material breakdown in the functioning of these controls, procedures and systems has occurred during the year under review.

The nancial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis, since the accounting authority has every reason to believe that the A gency, whilst not at its optimum capacity of resources, has nonetheless, the essential and critical elements and strategies required to continue with the operations of the Agency for the foreseeable future. The accounting authority is satis ed that the information contained in the nancial statements fairly presents the results of the operations for the year and the nancial position of the Agency at year end.

The annual nancial statements set out on pages 169 to 205 have been approved by the accounting authority and were signed on its behalf by the Chairperson.

Ms Nomini Rapoo

Chairperson: RTIA Board


Accounting Authority’s ReportThe accounting authority presents the audited annual nancial statements of the Road Traf c Infringement Agency for the year ended 31 March 2013, being the third set of nancial statements for the Agency since its scheduling in terms of the Public Finance Management Act, 1999.

IntroductionThe RTIA was established by section 3 of the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traf c Offences Act, 1998 (Act No. 46 of 1998) and is listed under Schedule 3 Part A of the Public Finance Management Act, 1999 (Act No. 1 of 1999).

The function of the Agency is to administer a procedure to discourage the contravention of road traf c laws and to support the adjudication of infringements; to enforce penalties imposed against persons contravening road traf c laws; provide specialised prosecution support services and undertake community education and awareness programmes in order to ensure that individuals understand their rights and options.

The Board of Directors are the accounting authority in terms of section 49 of the PFMA.

Review of ActivitiesDuring the period under review, the Agency continued to face critical challenges that impacted on its operations, which challenges were adequately brought to the attention of the Department and Shareholder for effective interventions. These challenges related to the following:

• Continued inadequate budget provision;

• Lack of enforcement of the Agency’s full mandate on AARTO and the control of the AARTO national bank accounts;

• Legislative de ciencies impeding the ef ciency and nancial viability of the Agency; and

• De ciencies of the National Contraventions Register.

FundingFor the nancial period 2012/13, the Agency received a government grant allocation of R 5 million and a further R14 million was granted at the end of the nancial year. In addition to its grant allocation, the Agency received funds stemming from its share of fees as provided for in section 13(1) of the AARTO Act which amongst others, allows the Agency to be funded through payments made on infringements after 32 days in order to pay for its operational costs and meet its obligations.

The average expenditure for the serving of courtesy letters was R 3 million per month and was projected to escalate to R 5.5 million per month with the enforcement orders served by registered mail. Due to the under-funding of the Agency, the Board resolved to drastically curb its expenditure by suspending the South African Post Of ce account for the serving of Courtesy Letters and Enforcement Orders. This decision was motivated by the huge costs related to the service of those documents, coupled with the related de ciencies and lack of data integrity on the address validation on the NCR, which ultimately could lead to fruitless expenditure. This decision will be reviewed regularly with a view to resuscitating the arrangement or to implement other low cost alternatives.

Contingent liabilitiesThe Agency was cited as a co-defendant in a legal action involving the alleged refusal of the Issuing Authority to issue an operator’s card to the plaintiff, Ngijulukile Logistics and Trading CC due to an enforcement order issued against its


ChangeAhead

161

name. Management believes that based on legal advice obtained from the Agency’s Legal Advisors, the action can be successfully defended and therefore no losses (including for costs) will be incurred by the Agency. The matter was not set down in court during the course of the 2012/13 nancial year, and is regarded as pending.

Enforcement of mandateThe Agency has raised the matter of the lack of enforcement of the AARTO mandate in respect of institutional arrangements with the RTMC. This related to the continued involvement of the RTMC in the AARTO process, which started with the provision of support services to the Agency as embodied in Chapter 2 of the AARTO Regulations 2008. In preparation for the national rollout, it is imperative for the Agency to be given its full mandate with the take-over of these functions, so that the Agency, as the custodian of the AARTO Act, becomes the authoritative entity in order to ensure that clear, uniform and standardised communication is disseminated to the public.

Legislative de ciencies With the continuation of the AARTO implementation, a number of legislative de ciencies were identi ed and the required interventions put in place. A two-phased approach was adopted by the Agency, entailing the Regulations Amendments, as well as the amendment to the AARTO Act. The Amendment Bill was published in Government Gazette 36173 dated 20 February 2013 for public comments. It is envisaged that the Amendment Bill will be nalised in the 2013/14 period and tabled at the National parliament for approval and promulgation.

The supporting regulations to the Act were also updated, taking into consideration the amended aspects in the Amendment Bill. A thorough consultative process was engaged upon by the Agency in order to ensure broad stakeholder participation and support for the amendments, ultimately leading to ef cient implementation of the AARTO process.

Institutional capacitationThe Agency continued to operate under severe shortage of critical staff, which impeded its ef cient performance, due to the lack of adequate funding. Notwithstanding these challenges, the Agency undertook a strategic and phased implementation process for capacitating itself. To that extent, a cautious recruitment approach resulted in the increase in staff capacity from 22 at the beginning of the nancial period to a total of 38 by 31 March 2013.

The arrangement made with the Department for the secondment of 4 staff at management level continued to the end of the nancial year, with the staff making a positive contribution to the development and operations of the Agency. A recruitment process was also started in February 2013 with advertisements for 18 posts to be lled and it is expected that these posts will be lled in the 2013/14 period, to reach a total of at least 75 staff.

Lack of Cooperation from Pilot SitesFor some considerable time through to December 2012 when the situation changed for the better, Johannesburg Metropolitan Police Department was not uploading their infringement records onto the NCR, and furthermore continued to serve Notices by ordinary mail, instead of registered mail, contrary to the provisions of the Act. This resulted in unprecedented negative publicity and criticism on the AARTO processes. Furthermore, the Agency was placed in a position of not serving Courtesy Letters and Enforcement Orders to the affected infringers since this would result in fruitless expenditure, given that the original Notices would not have been served as prescribed by the Act.

The Issuing Authorities continued to withhold payments of the infringement portion due to the RTIA, citing lack of service level agreements with the Agency and the inability to disburse the related infringement penalty fees paid by infringers into the AARTO national bank accounts that are held by the RTMC. Having elevated the matter regarding the enforcement of the mandate and the transfer of the AARTO national bank accounts from the RTMC to the RTIA, the Agency has been awaiting nalisation thereof from the Department. Once this has been fully resolved, the Agency will


be able to meet its obligations in relation to the nancial management and disbursement of infringement revenue due to various Issuing Authorities and receiving Agencies.

National Contraventions Register De cienciesWhereas signi cant progress had been made in addressing the de ciencies in the functionality of the National Contraventions Register, some aspects remain critical and may negatively impact on the Agency’s ef ciencies and performance. These have been brought to the attention of the Department of Transport to ensure the adequate prioritisation of all the required functionality supporting the Agency’s and AARTO implementation needs.

Given that the Issuing Authorities are the originators of the Infringement Notices captured, the lack of enforcement for address validations, leads to a tremendously negative impact on the Agency’s operations, particularly relating to the data integrity and correctness of addresses for the service of Courtesy Letters and Enforcement Orders. The Agency has engaged with the Department of Transport and is hopeful that the plan of action put in place will adequately address these problems.

Organisation StructureThe Board is the Accounting Authority which oversees the operations of the Agency.

The Board of Directors was appointed for a three year term with effect from 1 August 2010 to 31 July 2013. Whereas the Act provides for 7 Board Members including the Registrar, for the majority of the nancial year, the Board operated with four members due to the resignation of two members over the preceding two years and one member short that was not appointed at the beginning of the term and not replaced. The Registrar is the Accounting Of cer and supported by the Executive Committee, comprising of seven members. The Agency had four established operational divisions to cover adjudications, nance, communications and information technology and reached a total staff compliment of 38 at the end of the period under review.

DirectorsThe Board of Directors for the period ending 31 March 2013 was constituted as follows:

Ms NE Rapoo (Non-Executive Chairperson)

Mr JR Chuwe (Registrar and Executive Director)

Adv. TE Dicker (Non-Executive Director)

Mr IS Jordaan (Non-Executive Director – resigned 26 July 2012)

Mr CM Manzini (Non-Executive Director)

The shareholder was duly noti ed of the resignation of Mr Jordaan and the process for replacement and augmentation of the Board Members was started but not yet completed at the end of the nancial year.

Company SecretaryThe Company Secretary is Adv. MLT Bilikwana.

BankersThe Agency operates its bank account with the Centurion branch of the Standard Bank of South Africa.

AuditorsThe Auditor-General of South Africa is the designated auditor of the Agency.


ChangeAhead

163

The Audit and Risk Committee ReportThe Audit and Risk Committee in place for the year ended 31 March 2013 consisted of one non-executive member of the Board and two independent external members. The Audit and Risk Committee is pleased to present its report for the nancial year ended 31 March 2013.

Audit Committee Charter & AttendanceThe Committee has adopted formal terms of reference as its Audit and Risk Committee Charter which were approved by the Board of the RTIA. The Committee has conducted its affairs in compliance with this Charter and has discharged its responsibilities contained therein.

The Audit Committee, consisting of the members listed below, convened six times during the year under review.

Audit & Risk Committee Meetings

Member 19 April 2012

18 May 2012

06 July 2012

20 July 2012

15 October 2012

25 January 2013

Total Attendance

Ms S Thomas 1

Mr CM Manzini 6

Mr BS Chaplog 6

Legend: Attended Not yet a member

The acting Chief Financial Of cer, the Senior Manager for Internal Audit and Risk Management, and representatives of the Auditor-General are standing invitees at each meeting of the Audit and Risk Committee which has direct access to these attendees in the ful llment of its duties. Executives and managers are invited to attend for agenda items covering audit ndings or business matters which relate to their job descriptions.

Audit & Risk Committee ResponsibilityDuring the nancial year under review the Audit Committee has complied with its responsibilities arising from section 38(1) (a) of the PFMA and Treasury Regulations 3.1.13. The Audit and Risk Committee also has appropriate terms of reference in the form of its Audit and Risk Committee Charter and has regulated its affairs in compliance with this charter and has discharged all its responsibilities as contained therein including the review of the following:

• The effectiveness of the RTIA’s internal control systems;

• The risk areas of the RTIA’s operations to be covered in the scope of the internal and external audits;

• The accounting and auditing concerns identi ed as a result of the internal or external audits;

• The RTIA’s compliance with legal and regulatory provisions, in particular the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traf c Offences Act, 1998 (Act No. 46 of 1998); the Public Finance Management Act, 1999 (Act No. 1 of 1999) (as amended by Act 29 of 1999), (“PFMA”), as well as the National Treasury Regulations.


Risk ManagementThe risk management function was established during the period under review. In line with the ARC charter, the committee has recommended for approval to the Board, the Risk Management Strategy, Policy and Risk Appetite. The strategic risk register was developed and monitored by quarterly reporting to ARC on implementation of action plans. Though risk management function is still in its infancy, the ARC is con dent that to date signi cant improvements have been made by the Agency.

Effectiveness of Internal Control SystemsThe systems of internal control are designed to provide cost effective assurance that assets are safeguarded and that liabilities and working capital are ef ciently managed. From the various reports of the in- house Internal Auditors and the Auditor-General, the Audit Committee noted some improvements as well as the continued existence of weaknesses in the internal control environment, and instances of non-compliance with laid down procedures.

During the period under review, an Internal Audit and Risk Management Unit was established. In line with the PFMA, Internal Audit plans which are developed from the strategic risk register are provided to the Audit Committee and to management with assurance that internal controls are appropriate and effective. This is achieved by means of an appropriate quarterly reporting process, as well as the identi cation of corrective actions and suggested enhancements to the controls and processes. Based on the audits conducted and presented to the Audit Committee for the 2012/13 nancial year, the Committee concludes overall that the internal controls evaluated during those audits were partially

adequate and effective.

Quality of Management ReportsThe Audit Committee is satis ed with the content and quality of the quarterly reports as prepared and issued by management during the year under review in terms of the PFMA regulations.

Going ConcernThe Audit Committee reviewed a documented assessment by management of the going concern premise before agreeing that the adoption of the going concern premise is appropriate in preparing the nancial statements.

Evaluation of the Financial Statements The Audit Committee has:

• reviewed and discussed with management and the Auditor-General the audited annual nancial statements and the Auditor-General’s report and audit opinion, to be included in the annual report;

• reviewed the Auditor-General’s management letter and management’s responses thereto;

• reviewed the appropriateness of accounting policies and practices; and

• reviewed signi cant adjustments, resulting from the annual audit.


ChangeAhead

165

The Audit Committee has evaluated the nancial statements of the RTIA for the year ended 31 March 2013 and concluded that they comply, in all material respects, with the requirements of the PFMA, and were prepared in accordance with the effective Standards of Generally Recognised Accounting Practices (“GRAP”) issued by the Accounting Standards Board (“ASB”). The Committee has discussed, concurs with and accepts the conclusions of the Auditor-General on the annual nancial statements contained in the Report of the Auditor-General to Parliament, and recommended these to the Accounting Authority for acceptance and inclusion in the Annual Report.

Mr Bryan S. ChaplogAudit & Risk Committee Chairperson


FINAL REPORT OF THE AUDITOR-GENERAL TO PARLIAMENT ON THE ROAD TRAFFIC INFRINGEMENT AGENCY REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Introduction 1. I have audited the nancial statements of the Road Traf c Infringement Agency set out on pages 169 to 205,

which comprise the statement of nancial position as at 31 March 2013, the statement of nancial performance, statement of changes in net assets and the cash flow statement for the year then ended, and the notes, comprising a summary of signi cant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Accounting authority’s responsibility for the nancial statements2. The accounting authority is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these nancial statements in

accordance with South African Standards of Generally Recognised Accounting Practice (SA Standards of GRAP) and the requirements of the Public Finance Management Act of South Africa, 1999 (Act No.1 of 1999) (PFMA), and for such internal control as the accounting authority determines is necessary to enable the preparation of nancial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor-General’s responsibility 3. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these nancial statements based on my audit. I conducted my audit

in accordance with the Public Audit Act of South Africa, 2004 (Act No. 25 of 2004) (PAA), the General Notice issued in terms thereof and International Standards on Auditing. Those standards require that I comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the nancial statements are free from material misstatement.

4. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the nancial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of

the risks of material misstatement of the nancial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the nancial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the nancial statements.

5. I believe that the audit evidence I have obtained is suf cient and appropriate to provide a basis for my unquali ed audit opinion.

Opinion6. In my opinion, the nancial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the nancial position of the Road

Traf c Infringement Agency as at 31 March 2013, and its nancial performance and cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with South African Standards of Generally Recognised Accounting Practice (SA Standards of GRAP) and the requirements of the Public Finance Management Act of South Africa, 1999 (Act No.1 of 1999) (PFMA).


ChangeAhead

167

Emphasis of matter7. I draw attention to the matter below. My opinion is not modi ed in respect of this matter:

Material Impairment 8. As disclosed in note 5 to the nancial statements, a material impairment to the amount of R31 164 022 was incurred

as a result of the assessment made on the cash recoverability of the accounts receivable relating to the AARTO management process.

REPORT ON OTHER LEGAL AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS 9. In accordance with the PAA and the General Notice issued in terms thereof, I report the following ndings relevant to

performance against predetermined objectives, compliance with laws and regulations and internal control, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion.

Predetermined objectives 10. I performed procedures to obtain evidence about the usefulness and reliability of the information in the annual

performance report as set out on pages 146 to 154 of the annual report.

11. The reported performance against predetermined objectives was evaluated against the overall criteria of usefulness and reliability. The usefulness of information in the annual performance report relates to whether it is presented in accordance with the National Treasury’s annual reporting principles and whether the reported performance is consistent with the planned objectives. The usefulness of information further relates to whether indicators and targets are measurable (i.e. well de ned, veri able, speci c, measurable and time bound) and relevant as required by the National Treasury Framework for managing programme performance information.

12. The reliability of the information in respect of the selected objectives is assessed to determine whether it adequately reflects the facts (i.e. whether it is valid, accurate and complete).

13. There were no material ndings on the annual performance report concerning the usefulness and reliability of the information.

Additional matter14. I draw attention to the matter below. My conclusion is not modi ed in respect of this matter:

Achievement of planned targets15. Of the total number of 6 targets planned for the year, 2 of the targets were not achieved during the year under review.

This represents 33% of total planned targets that were not achieved during the year under review. This was mainly due to the fact that indicators and targets were not suitably developed during the strategic planning process.

Compliance with laws and regulations 16. I performed procedures to obtain evidence that the entity has complied with applicable laws and regulations regarding

nancial matters, nancial management and other related matters. My ndings on material non-compliance with speci c matters in key applicable laws and regulations as set out in the General Notice issued in terms of the PAA are as follows:


Material misstatements in annual nancial statements subsequently corrected17. The accounting authority submitted nancial statements for auditing that were not prepared in all material aspects

in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice and supported by full and proper records as required by section 55 (1) (a) and (b) of the PFMA. Material misstatements identi ed by the AGSA were subsequently corrected.

Courtesy and Enforcement letters not issued18. During the review of the agency key performance drivers and overview of the national contravention register, we

noted that the agency did not issue and serve any courtesy and enforcement letters to traf c infringers for the period September 2012 to 31 March 2013 in contravention of section 19 and 20 of the AARTO Act 46 of 1998.

Internal control 19. I considered internal control relevant to my audit of the nancial statements, performance report and compliance

with laws and regulations. The matters reported below under the fundamentals of internal control are limited to the signi cant de ciencies that resulted in the basis for quali ed opinion and the ndings on compliance with laws and regulations included in this report.

Leadership20. Lack of oversight responsibility and proper review regarding the nancial statements preparation and related internal

controls.

21. Issuing authorities have not managed the infringement process in alignment with the AARTO Act and this has limited the RTIA to effectively execute its traf c infringement enforcement mandate.

Pretoria

31 July 2013


ChangeAhead

169

STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION as at 31 March 2013

Notes 2013 2012

R R

ASSETS

Non - Current Assets 643 257 750 779

Property, plant and equipment 3 608 934 693 637

Intangible asset 4 34 323 57 142

Current assets 14 631 609 6 850 327

Trade and other receivables 5 1 428 817 6 850 281

Cash and cash equivalents 6 13 202 792 46

Total Assets 15 274 866 7 601 106

Net Assets 12 890 676 6 280 803

Accumulated surplus 12 890 676 6 280 803

Current liabilities 2 384 190 1 320 303

Trade and other payables 7 2 384 190 1 320 303

Total net assets and liabilities 15 274 866 7 601 106


STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

for the year ended 31 March 2013

Notes 2013 2012

R R

Revenue 68 011 052 45 579 863

Infringement fees 8 49 011 052 28 579 863

Grants received 8 19 000 000 17 000 000

Expenses (61 408 114) (34 467 651)

Impairment loss on receivables (31 164 022) -

Employment costs (10 538 186) (2 259 931)

Other operating expenses (19 451 089) (32 058 909)

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment (225 104) (105 718)

Amortisation of intangible assets (22 819) (16 298)

Assets written-off (6 894) (26 795)

Surplus from operations 9 6 602 938 11 112 212

Finance income 10.1 6 947 13 953

Finance costs 10.2 (12) (513)

Surplus for the period 6 609 873 11 125 652


ChangeAhead

171

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS


Notes Accumulatedsurplus Total

R R

Restated opening balance as at 1 April 2011 (4 844 849) (4 844 849)

Surplus for the year 11 125 652 11 125 652

Opening balance as at 1 April 2012 6 280 803 6 280 803

Surplus for the year 6 609 873 6 609 873

Closing balance at 31 March 2013 12 890 676 12 890 676

ANNUAL REPORT 2012/13 ROAD TRAFFIC INFRINGEMENT AGENCYANNUAL REPORT 2012/13 ROAD TRAFFIC INFRINGEMENT AGENCY172

CASH FLOW STATEMENT


Notes 2013 2012

R R

Cash ow from operating activities

Receipts

Opening balance of trade and other receivables 6 850 281 10 540 620

Infringement Receipts 17 847 030 28 579 863

Grant received 19 000 000 17 000 000

Closing balance of trade and other receivables (1 428 817) (6 850 281)

Receipts from customers and grants 42 268 494 49 270 202

Interest received 6 947 13 953

Total Receipts 42 275 441 49 284 155

Payments

Opening balance of trade and other payables (1 320 303) (15 393 103)

Employee costs (10 538 186) (2 259 931)

Suppliers (19 451 089) (32 058 909)

Closing balance of trade and other payables 2 384 190 1 320 303

Payments to suppliers and employees (28 925 388) (48 391 640)

Interest paid (12) (513)

Total Payments (28 925 400) (48 392 153)

Net cash in ow from operating activities 11 13 350 041 892 002

Cash ow from investing activities

Acquisition of property, plant and equipment (147 295) (818 516)

Acquisition of intangible assets - (73 440)

Net cash out ow from investing activities (147 295) (891 956)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 13 202 746 46

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year 46 -

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year 6 13 202 792 46


ChangeAhead


NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSfor the year Ended 31 March 2013

1. Basis of Presentation

1.1 Statement of Compliance

The annual nancial statements have been prepared in accordance with the effective Standards of Generally Recognised Accounting Practices (“GRAP”) issued by the Accounting Standards Board (“ASB”) in accordance with the Public Finance Management Act, 1999 (Act No.1 of 1999) (“PFMA”).

During the year, a number of standards of GRAP became effective for the current nancial period. A brief description of these standards as well as an estimate of the impact is contained in Note 19.

A summary of the signi cant accounting policies, which have been applied, are disclosed below. These accounting policies are consistent with the previous period.

1.2 Reporting Entity

The Road Traf c Infringement Agency (“RTIA or the Agency”) derives its mandate and functions from the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traf c Offences Act, 1998 (Act No.46 of 1998). The full responsibilities of the Agency are contained in this Act.

1.3 Basis of Measurement

The nancial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis.

1.4 Functional and Presentation Currency

These nancial statements are presented in South African Rand, which is the Agency’s functional currency. All nancial information presented in Rand has been rounded to the nearest Rand.

1.5 Use of estimates and judgements

The preparation of nancial statements in conformity with GRAP requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates. These judgments and estimates are reviewed annually by management. Revisions and accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised and in any future periods affected.

The following signi cant areas of judgments and sources of estimation uncertainty were used during the nancial year:

• Asset lives and residual values

Property, plant and equipment are depreciated over their useful lives taking into account residual values, where appropriate. The actual lives of the assets and residual values are assessed annually and may vary depending on a number of factors. In re-assessing asset lives, factors such as technological innovation, product life cycles and maintenance programmes are taken into account. Residual value assessments consider issues such as future market conditions, the remaining life of the asset and projected disposal values.

For uncertainties that result from the assessment of useful lives and residual values on property, plant and equipment and intangible assets (see note 2.1 and 2.2).

173

ANNUAL REPORT 2012/13 ROAD TRAFFIC INFRINGEMENT AGENCYANNUAL REPORT 2012/13 ROAD TRAFFIC INFRINGEMENT AGENCY

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSfor the year ended 31 March 2013

• Provisions

The nature of the judgments and estimation uncertainties related to provisions. Provisions were raised and management determined an estimate based on the information available.

• Impairment testing

Key assumptions, judgments and/or estimates used with regards to impairment of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets.

Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets are considered for impairment if there is reason to believe that impairment may be necessary. Factors taken into consideration in reaching such a decision include the economic viability of the asset and where it is a component of a larger economic unit, the viability of that unit itself.

Future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset are projected, taking into account market conditions and the expected useful lives of the assets. The present value of these cash flows, determined using appropriate discount rates, is compared to the current net asset value and if lower, the assets are impaired to the present value.

• Impairment for doubtful debts

The Agency assesses its receivables for impairment at each balance sheet date. In determining whether impairment for doubtful debts should be recognised, management will make judgements as to whether there is objective evidence indicating that the nancial asset may be impaired.

2. Signi cant Accounting Policies

2.1 Property, plant and equipment

2.1.1 Recognition and measurement

An item of property, plant and equipment is recognized as an asset:

• When the Agency has full control over it and;

• It is probable that future economic bene ts will flow to the Agency and;

• The asset has a cost, or other determined value which can be measured reliably.

Property, plant and equipment is initially measured at cost, including all directly attributable costs necessary to bring the asset to its required working condition for its intended use. Subsequently property, plant and equipment is measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses.

Property, plant and equipment cease to be recognised when it is disposed of or permanently withdrawn from use or when no future economic bene ts are expected from its use or disposal. Gains and losses arising from the retirement or disposal of property, plant and equipment are determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and carrying amount of the assets, these are recognised as income or expenses in surplus or de cit for the period.

174


ChangeAhead



The depreciation method used reflects the pattern in which the asset’s future economic bene ts are expected to be consumed by the Agency.

When property, plant and equipment comprises of major components with different useful lives, these components are accounted for as separate items and they are depreciated separately.

2.1.2 Subsequent costs

The Agency recognises in the carrying amount of an item of property, plant and equipment the cost of replacing part of such an item when that cost is incurred if it is probable that the future economic bene ts embodied within the item will flow to the Agency and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. The carrying amount of the replaced part is derecognised.

All other costs are recognised in surplus or de cit as an expense when they are incurred. Repairs and maintenance costs are generally charged to expenses when they are incurred. However, major renovations are capitalised and included in the carrying amount of the asset when it is probable that future economic bene ts in excess of the originally assessed standard of performance of the existing asset will flow to the Agency. Major renovations are depreciated over the remaining useful life of the related asset.

2.1.3 Depreciation

The useful life of an asset and residual values are reviewed annually, and if expectations differ from previous estimates, the changes are accounted for as a change in accounting estimate.

Depreciation on all property, plant and equipment commences when the items are available for use. Depreciation is recognised on a straight-line basis to write off the cost of assets to their residual values over the estimated useful lives.

The useful lives for items of property, plant and equipment have been assessed as follows:

Furniture & ttings 5 yearsOf ce equipment and appliances 5 yearsComputer equipment 3 years

Depreciation does not cease when the asset becomes idle or is retired from active use unless the asset is fully depreciated.

2.2 Intangible assets

2.2.1 Recognition and measurement

Intangible assets are initially measured at cost. Cost includes any directly attributable cost of preparing the asset for its intended use.

After initial recognition, intangible assets are carried at their cost less any accumulated amortisation and any accumulated impairment losses.

Intangible assets are derecognised on disposal or when no future economic bene ts are expected from its use or disposal.

175



2.2.2 Subsequent costs

Subsequent expenditure is capitalised only when it increases the future economic bene ts embodied in the speci c asset to which it relates. All other expenditure is recognised in surplus or de cit as incurred.

An internally-generated intangible asset arising from development (or from the development phase of an internal project) is recognised when:

• it is technically feasible to complete the asset so that it will be available for use or sale;

• there is an intention to complete and use or sell it;

• there is an ability to use or sell it;

• it will generate probable future economic bene ts;

• there are available technical, nancial and other resources to complete the development and to use or sell the asset; and

• the expenditure attributable to the asset during its development can be measured reliably.

Intangible assets with a nite useful life are amortised over that useful life of the product. Amortisation commences when the asset is available for use, i.e. when it is in the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management.

The useful life of an intangible asset is reviewed annually, and if expectations differ from previous estimates, the changes shall be accounted for as a change in accounting estimates.

The useful lives for items of intangible assets have been assessed as follows:

Computer software and licenses 3 yearsWebsite development costs 3 years

Amortisation does not cease when the asset becomes idle or is retired from active use unless the asset is fully depreciated.

2.3 Impairment

Financial assets

The entity assesses at each statement of nancial position date whether there is objective evidence that a nancial assets or the Agency assets are impaired.

Assets carried at amortised cost

If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss has been incurred, the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the assets carrying amount and the present value of the estimated future cash flows (excluding future expected credit losses) discounted at the asset’s original effective interest rate.

Objective evidence that nancial assets are impaired can include default or delinquency by a debtor or indications that a debtor will enter into bankruptcy.

176


ChangeAhead



Signi cant nancial assets should be tested for impairment on an individual basis and the remaining nancial assets should be assessed collectively into groups of similar credit risk characteristics.

If, in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment decreases and the decrease relates objectively to an event occurring after the impairment, it is reversed to the extent that the carrying value does not exceed the amortised cost. Any subsequent reversal of an impairment loss is recognised in surplus or de cit. A nancial asset is considered to be impaired if objective evidence indicates that one or more events have had a negative effect on the estimated future cash flows of that asset.

Non- nancial assets

The carrying amount of non- nancial assets is reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, then the asset’s recoverable amount is estimated. The recoverable amount of an asset is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to sell. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks speci c to the asset.

An impairment loss is recognised when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated recoverable amount. Impairment losses are recognised in surplus or de cit.

2.4 Financial Instruments

2.4.1 Initial recognition

Financial assets and nancial liabilities are recognised on the statement of nancial performance when the company has become a party to contractual provisions of the instrument. Financial assets are derecognised only when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire; or when nancial assets and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the assets are transferred to another entity. Financial liabilities are derecognised when, and only when, the company’s obligations are discharged, cancelled or they expire.

2.4.2 Trade and other receivables

Trade and other receivables that have xed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market are classi ed as loans and receivables. Loans and receivables are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment. Interest income is recognised by applying the effective interest rate, except for short-term receivables when the recognition of interest would be immaterial.

Trade receivables are carried at cost less provision made for impairment of these receivables.

2.4.3 Trade and other payables

Trade and other payables are initially measured at fair value and are subsequently measured at amortised cost, using the effective interest rate method.

2.4.4 Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand. This is measured at fair value.

177



2.5 Employee bene ts

Short-term employee bene ts

The cost of short-term employee bene ts, (those payable within 12 months after the service is rendered, such as paid vacation leave and sick leave, bonuses and non-monetary bene ts such as medical care), are recognised in the period in which the service is rendered and are not discounted.

The expected cost of compensated absences is recognised as an expense as the employees render services that increase their entitlement or, in the case of non-accumulating absences, when the absence occurs.

The expected cost of bonus payments is recognised as an expense when there is a legal or constructive obligation to make such payments as a result of past performance.

De ned Contribution

Payments to de ned contribution retirement bene t plans are recognised as an expense when employees have rendered service entitling them to the contributions.

Under a de ned contribution plan xed contributions are payable by the Agency and members. The Agency has no legal or constructive obligation to pay any further contributions other than these xed contributions.

2.6 Provisions

Provisions are made for unavoidable liabilities of which the amount can be estimated, but the settlement is uncertain. These provisions are recognised when the Agency has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events, for which it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic bene ts will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate of the amount of the obligation can be made.

The carrying amount of each provision is reviewed at reporting date and adjusted, if necessary, to reflect the best estimate of the consideration required to settling the present obligation as at that date. Where the effect of the time value of money is material, the amount of a provision is the present value of the expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation.

A provision is reversed to the extent that it is no longer probable that a future outflow of economic bene ts will be required to settle the obligation.

2.7 Revenue recognition

Grants and virements received

Government grants are recognised when there is reasonable assurance that:

• the Agency will comply with the conditions attaching to them; and

• the grants will be received.

Government grants are recognised as income in the year in which they are received or deferred when conditions for the grant are not met.

178


ChangeAhead



A government grant that becomes receivable as compensation for expenses or losses already incurred or for the purpose of giving immediate nancial support to the Agency with no future related costs is recognised as income in the period in which it becomes receivable.

Infringement fees

Infringement fees comprise of traf c penalties collected, courtesy letter fees, enforcement order fees, penalty fees and unsuccessful representation fees.

Infringement fees are recognised when the outcome of the transaction involving the collection of infringement fees can be estimated reliably, revenue associated with these transactions is recognised by reference to the stage of completion of the transaction. The outcome of these transactions can be reliably measured when all of the following conditions are satis ed:

• The amount of revenue can be measured reliably,

• It is probable that the economic bene ts or service potential associated with the transactions will flow to the Agency,

• The stage of completion of the transaction at the end of the nancial year can be measured reliably, and

• The costs incurred for the transaction and the costs to complete the transaction can be measured reliably.

These conditions are met at the point where fees are collected from the infringers.

2.8 Financing income

Interest income is recognised in surplus or de cit as it accrues, using the effective interest rate method.

2.9 Expenses

2.9.1 Financing costs

The interest expense is recognised in surplus or de cit using the effective interest method.

2.9.2 Lease payments

Payments made under operating leases are recognised in surplus or de cit on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.

2.10 Operating leases

Leases where the lessor retains the risk and rewards of ownership of the underlying asset are classi ed as operating leases. Payments made under operating leases are recognised as expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.

179



2.11 Taxation

The RTIA is exempt from taxation in terms of the provision of section 10 (1) (cA) (i) of the Income Tax Act, 1962 (Act No. 58 of 1962).

2.12 Related Parties

The RTIA operates in an economic environment currently dominated by entities directly or indirectly owned by the Department of Transport of the South African Government. Only parties within the Department of Transport will be considered to be related parties.

Key management is de ned as being individuals with the authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the Agency. We regard all individuals from the level of Executive Management up to the Board of Directors as key management per the de nition.

Close family members of key management personnel are considered to be those family members who may be expected to influence, or be influenced by key management individuals in their dealings with the Agency.

The objective of the nancial statements is to provide relevant and reliable information and therefore materiality is considered in the disclosure of these transactions.

2.13 Irregular, Fruitless and Wasteful Expenditure

Irregular expenditure means expenditure incurred in contravention of, or not in accordance with, a requirement of any applicable legislation, including:

• The PFMA, or

• Any national legislation providing for procurement in that National Government.

Fruitless and wasteful expenditure is expenditure that was made in vain and could have been avoided had reasonable care been exercised.

Any irregular, fruitless and wasteful expenditure is charged against surplus or de cit in the period in which it is incurred.

180


ChangeAhead



O ce equipment&

appliancesFurniture& ttings

Computerequipment Total

R R R R

3. Property, plant and equipment

31 March 2013Cost 20 166 592 830 323 606 936 602

Accumulated depreciation (6 432) (173 133) (148 103) (327 668)

Net carrying value 13 734 419 697 175 503 608 934

Movement summary

Opening net carrying value 5 398 439 067 249 172 693 637

Additions 18 169 98 740 30 386 147 295

Assets written off - cost (6 999) - - (6 999)

Assets written off - accumulated depreciation 105 - - 105

Depreciation (2 939) (118 110) (104 055) (225 104)

Closing net carrying value 13 734 419 697 175 503 608 934

The residual values of property, plant and equipment have been assessed to be immaterial, as a result they have not been considered in the calculation of the depreciable amount.

181



3. Property, plant and equipment

31 March 2012

O ce equipment&

appliancesFurniture& ttings

Computerequipment Total

R R R R

Cost 8 997 494 090 293 220 796 307

Accumulated depreciation (3 599) (55 023) (44 048) (102 670)

Net carrying value 5 398 439 067 249 172 693 637

Movement summary

Opening net carrying value - - 7 634 7 634

Additions 8 997 494 090 315 429 818 516

Assets written off - cost - - (30 000) (30 000)

Assets written off - accumulated depreciation - - 3 205 3 205

Depreciation (3 599) (55 023) (47 096) (105 718)

Closing net carrying value 5 398 439 067 249 172 693 637

The residual values of property, plant and equipment have been assessed to be immaterial, as a result they have not been considered in the calculation of the depreciable amount.

182


ChangeAhead



Computersoftware and

licenses

Website development

costsTotal

R R R

4. Intangible assets

31 March 2013Cost 53 440 20 000 73 440

Accumulated amortization (31 003) (8 114) (39 117)

Net carrying value 22 437 11 886 34 323

Movement summary

Opening net carrying value 38 585 18 557 57 142

Additions - - -

Amortization (16 148) (6 671) (22 819)

Closing net carrying value 22 437 11 886 34 323

183



4. Intangible assets

31 March 2012

Computersoftware and

licenses

Website development

costsTotal

R R R

Cost 53 440 20 000 73 440

Accumulated amortisation (14 855) (1 443) (16 298)

Net carrying value 38 585 18 557 57 142

Movement summary

Opening net carrying value - - -

Additions 53 440 20 000 73 440

Amortisation (14 855) (1 443) (16 298)

Closing net carrying value 38 585 18 557 57 142

184


ChangeAhead



2013 2012

R R

5. Trade and other receivables

Deposit 1 426 128 -

Prepayments 2 689 1 542 301

Other receivables - 5 307 980

1 428 817 6 850 281

A deposit was made to the South African Post Of ce for opening an account.

Other receivables relates to the amount of the infringement fees collected by the Road Traf c Management Corporation (RTMC) on behalf of the Agency. RTMC is the custodian of the AARTO bank accounts in which infringement fees are paid into by the infringers and issuing authorities.

Other receivable are shown net of an impairment loss amounting to R31 164 022 (2012: R nil).

Other receivables impaired

As of 31 March 2013, other receivables of R31 164 022 (2012: R nil) were impaired and provided for.

The ageing of amounts past due and provided for is as follows:

0 – 60 days 8 359 969 -

60 – 90 days 3 727 409 -

90 + days 19 076 644 -

31 164 022 -

Other receivables which are less than 60 days past due were not considered to be impaired at 31 March 2013.

However management performed a further assessment in the post balance sheet period which resulted in indicators of impairment. As a result these amounts have been subsequently impaired.

Reconciliation of allowance on impairment

Balance at the beginning of the year - -

Allowance on impairment 31 164 022 -

Balance at the end of the year - -

31 164 022 -

185



2013 2012

R R

6. Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents comprise of:

Bank balance 13 202 792 46

7. Trade and other payables

Trade payables 806 776 5 613

Other payables 795 832 -

Board fees accrual - 134 259

General accruals 71 086 922 284

Leave pay accrual 552 077 79 271

Payroll accruals 83 629 125 318

Lease payments accrual 74 790 53 558

2 384 190 1 320 303

Other payables relates to expenses incurred by the RTMC on behalf of the Agency.

186


ChangeAhead



2013 2012

R R

8. Revenue

Infringement fees 49 011 052 28 579 863

- Collected Infringements 42 507 811 24 210 547

- Courtesy Fees 4 853 160 4 153 884

- Enforcement Fees 1 550 631 150 563

- Partial Payment Penalty Fees 85 650 64 364

- Unsuccessful Representation Fees 13 800 505

Grant received 19 000 000 17 000 000

- MTEF Allocation 5 000 000 5 000 000

- Virement received 14 000 000 12 000 000

68 011 052 45 579 863

The virement represents an additional government grant received over and above the Medium Term Expenditure Framework (“MTEF”) allocation. This is a once off grant that was made to meet the operational requirements of the Agency not met by the MTEF allocation and cash received from revenue receipts.

187



2013 2012

R R

9. Surplus from operationsSurplus from operations is arrived at after taking into account some of the following signi cant amounts:

Auditors’ remuneration 1 092 882 907 707

- audit fees 1 062 696 883 312

- other services (SCOPA debrie ng) 30 186 24 395

Courier and postage costs 9 083 061 21 439 846

- South African Post Of ce 9 083 061 21 439 846

Debt Collection 1 742 163 2 056 090

- commission 1 742 163 2 056 090

Administration fees 44 949 -

- payroll administration 44 949 -

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment 225 104 105 718

- Of ce equipment and appliances 2 939 3 599

- Furniture and ttings 118 110 55 023

- Computer equipment 104 055 47 096

Amortisation of intangible assets 22 819 16 298

- Computer software and licenses 16 148 14 855

- Website development costs 6 671 1 443

Staff costs 11 699 005 5 650 620

- Employee costs 10 538 186 2 259 931

- Seconded staff costs 1 160 819 3 390 689

Consulting fees 2 518 619 1 652 296

- Legal fees - 243 000

- Accounting services 2 518 619 1 407 255

- Other - 2 041

Rental expense 818 364 656 915

- premises 818 364 656 915

Board fee (refer to note 13.3) 623 005 346 981

- For services as board members 421 637 300 253

- For services as audit committee members 152 300 46 728

- For services as technical committee members 49 068 -

188


ChangeAhead



2013 2012

R R

10. Finance income and costsFinance income has been earned from the bank balances.Finance costs were incurred from the late payment of anaccount overdue and also from the bank balances.

10.1 Finance income 6 947 13 953

- bank 6 947 13 953

10.2 Finance cost 12 513

- bank 12 2

- Other - 511

11. Reconciliation of net cash flows from operating activities to surplus

Surplus for the period 6 609 873 11 125 652

Adjustment for non-cash items:

Impairment loss on receivables 31 164 022 -

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment 225 104 105 718

Amortisation of intangible assets 22 819 16 298

Assets written off 6 894 26 795

Operating surplus before working capital changes 38 028 712 11 274 463

Working capital changes:

Decrease in trade and other receivables 5 421 464 3 690 339

Increase in allowance for impairment (31 164 022) -

Increase / (decrease) in trade and other payables 1 063 887 (14 072 800)

Net cash in ow from operating activities 13 350 041 892 002

189



12. Operating lease commitments

Non-cancellable operating leases for future minimum lease payments are as follows:

31 March 2013

Building Parking Total

Due within 1 year 734 256 114 045 848 301

Between 1 and 5 years 187 833 29 174 217 007

922 089 143 219 1 065 308

31 March 2012

Building Parking Total

Due within 1 year 667 505 103 677 771 182

Between 1 and 5 years 922 089 143 219 1 065 308

1 589 594 246 896 1 836 490

RTIA entered into an operating lease agreement with the Public Investment Corporation on 1 July 2011.

The RTIA occupies of ce premises in the Waterfall Of ce Park which are under an operating lease. The parking lease relates to the rental of the parking bays in the leased property. The lease agreement period is three years, and is subject to an escalation clause at 10% per annum.

190


ChangeAhead



13.

Regi

stra

r and

Key

Man

agem

ent R

emun

erat

ion

31

Mar

ch 2

013

13.1

Re

gist

rar

Basi

cSa

lary

Serv

ice

Bonu

sAc

ting

Allo

wan

ce

Non

Pens

iona

ble

Cash

Mot

orVe

hicl

eAl

low

ance

Hou

sing

Allo

wan

ce

Cont

ribut

ions

to P

ensi

onSc

hem

e

Cont

ribut

ions

to M

edic

alSc

hem

e

Oth

erCo

sts

Tota

l

JR C

huw

e93

487

6-

-14

665

116

828

810

000

010

874

516

560

8173

21

556

852

934

876

--

146

651

168

288

100

000

108

745

16 5

6081

732

1 55

6 85

2

13.2

Ke

y m

anag

emen

t

*C M

atjie

--

364

020

--

--

-22

045

386

065

G B

otha

181

437

--

--

--

-2

112

183

549

SM A

mos

555

227

--

92 0

7418

654

0-

72 1

80-

15 0

4692

106

7

MLT

Bili

kwan

a 43

6 63

2-

-46

010

75 0

0010

8 85

855

682

-12

449

734

631

KF P

ooe

415

788

--

13 6

7810

9 32

497

815

54 0

52-

7 47

469

8 13

1

LV M

asan

go

422

644

--

63 4

5492

556

68 2

0154

945

-7

607

709

407

*J M

mek

oa-

-15

8 68

1-

--

--

14 8

4317

3 52

4

*F M

alin

dzis

a-

-34

2 00

2-

--

--

10 9

9835

3 00

0

2 01

1 72

8-

864

703

215

216

463

420

274

874

236

859

-92

574

4 15

9 37

4

* M

embe

r of s

enio

r man

agem

ent s

econ

ded

from

the

Depa

rtm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rt, t

here

fore

not

em

ploy

ees

of th

e Ag

ency

.

191



13.

Regi

stra

r and

Key

Man

agem

ent R

emun

erat

ion

31

Mar

ch 2

012

13.1

Re

gist

rar

Basi

cSa

lary

Serv

ice

Bonu

sAc

ting

Allo

wan

ce

Non

Pens

iona

ble

Cash

Mot

orVe

hicl

eAl

low

ance

Hou

sing

Allo

wan

ce

Cont

ribut

ions

to P

ensi

onSc

hem

e

Cont

ribut

ions

to M

edic

alSc

hem

e

Oth

erCo

sts

Tota

l

JR C

huw

e45

4 89

0-

585

597

59 2

7716

8 28

8-

57 9

7616

560

15 3

201

357

908

454

890

-58

5 59

759

277

168

288

-57

976

16 5

6015

320

1 35

7 90

8

13.2

Ke

y m

anag

emen

t

*C M

atjie

-

-11

331

1-

--

--

150

711

481

8

P Bu

thel

ezi

288

704

--

76 9

8011

5 48

9-

--

5 20

548

6 37

8

SM A

mos

504

233

--

84 0

6518

654

0-

6555

0-

849

484

8 88

2

TP N

thot

so

396

191

31 0

9613

9 77

717

577

-55

152

5080

47

500

978

670

7 88

3

MLT

Bili

kwan

a 34

260

--

1838

6-

-4

454

-62

657

726

1

223

388

31 0

9625

3 08

819

7 00

830

2 02

955

152

120

808

7 50

025

618

2 21

5 68

7

*Mem

ber o

f sen

ior m

anag

emen

t sec

onde

d fro

m th

e De

part

men

t of T

rans

port

, the

refo

re n

ot e

mpl

oyee

s of

the

Agen

cy.

192


ChangeAhead



2013 2012

R R

13.3 Non-executive directors

Board members fee

For services as board members of the Agency:

Board members

NE Rapoo (Chairman) 153 166 118 114

HG Motau - 38 419

IS Jordaan 46 728 68 610

CM Manzini 221 743 75 110

TE Dicker* - -

421 637 300 253

For services as audit committee members of the Agency:

Audit Committee members

B Chaplog (Chairman) 133 218 46 728

S Thomas 19 082 -

152 300 46 728

For services as technical committee members of the Agency:

Technical Committee members

TE Dicker*(Chairman) - -

J Mokgoro 16 356 -

B Matinise 32 712 -

49 068 -

623 005 346 981

*TE Dicker is a representative from the National Prosecuting Authority, therefore he is not remunerated for participation in the board meetings.

193



13.4 Details of service contracts in respect of directors

Appointment Resignation Term

Board members

NE Rapoo (Chairman) 1 August 2010 - 3 years

IS Jordaan 1 August 2010 26 July 2012 3 years

CM Manzini 1 August 2010 - 3 years

TE Dicker 1 August 2010 - 3 years

JR Chuwe (Registrar) 11 March 2010 - 5 years

Audit Committee members

B Chaplog (Chairman) 8 December 2011 - 3 years

S Thomas 1 November 2012 - 3 years

Technical Committee members

J Mokgoro 1 November 2012 - 3 years

B Matinise 1 November 2012 - 3 years

194


ChangeAhead



2013 2012

R R

14. Related parties

14.1 Related party transactions

Revenue

- Department of Transport 19 000 000 17 000 000

14.2 Related party balances

Amounts owed by related party

Road Traf c Management Corporation

- Prepayments - 98 538

- Other receivables 31 164 024 5 307 980

31 164 024 5 460 518

Amounts owed to related party

Road Traf c Management Corporation

- Other payable 795 832 -

- Payroll accrual - 21 527

795 832 21 527

195



2013 2012

R R

15. Fruitless and Wasteful Expenditure

15.1 PABX Machine 37 059 18 530

A PABX machine was acquired with an intention to connecttelephone lines when the Agency moved out of the TASIMA premises into its own leased premises. Due to nancial constraints the Agency requested the Department of Transport to provide the telephone service to the Agencyfrom the eNaTIS site at no costs. As a result of this agreement, the PABX machine that had been acquired prior to the arrangement with the Department of Transport was redundant. However the Agency will be utilizing the machine in the future when proper infrastructure has been acquired.

15.3 Rental of telephone lines 10 414 23 758

Telephone lines were rented with the same intention as per the acquisition of the PABX machine (refer to note 15.1). The rental agreement of these lines has been terminated.

15.4 Software license - 3 785

In the prior year the Agency’s payroll function was performed by the RTMC. A software license for a payroll system was acquired with the intention of taking over the payroll function from the RTMC. Due to nancial constraints the Agency has not been able to

setup its own human resource function. Subsequently this license has not been renewed with the service provider.

47 473 46 073

196


ChangeAhead



2013 2012

R R

16. Irregular expenditure

Goods and services with a transaction value between 83 954 - R2 000 and R10 000 were procured without inviting at least three written price quotations from prospective suppliers and the deviation was not approved as per the National Treasury Practice Note 8 of 2007/2008.

Procurement of goods and services without 31 830 -a decision memorandum as required in terms of theTreasury Regulations Section 8.2.1 and 8.2.2.

Goods and services procured without the declaration of 40 950 - Interest in the SBD4 form.

In terms of the Preferential Procurement Regulations, 2011 398 195 -

an organ of state must:

(a) prior to making an invitation for tenders determine and stipulate the appropriate preference point system to be utilized in the evaluation and adjudication of the tenders (section 3(b))

(b) indicate if the tender will be evaluated on functionality(Section 4 (1))

(c) when evaluating for functionality the following must beclearly speci ed in the invitation (section 4 (3))

- evaluation criteria for measuring functionality;

- weight of each criterion;

- applicable values; and

- minimum qualifying score for functionality

the above requirements were not complied with in making

the request for quotations.

Closing balance 554 929 -

The irregular expenditure for the 2012 and 2011 nancial year ends has been condoned by the

Department of Transport.

197



17. Financial Risk ManagementThe Agency’s principal nancial instruments comprise of trade payables, trade receivables and cash balances which arise directly from its operations. The main purpose of these nancial instruments is to fund the Agency’s day to day operations. The Agency is mainly exposed to the liquidity risk of the nancial instruments.

17.1 Fair value of nancial instruments

At 31 March 2013 the carrying amounts of the nancial assets and liabilities, approximates their fair value.

Carryingvalue2013

R

Fairvalue2013

R

Carryingvalue2012

R

Fairvalue2012

R

Assets

Trade and other receivables 1 428 817 1 428 817 6 850 281 6 850 281

Cash and cash equivalents 13 202 792 13 202 792 46 46

Liabilities

Trade and other payables 2 384 190 2 384 190 1 320 303 1 320 303

17.2 Liquidity risk management

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Agency will not be able to meet its nancial obligations as they fall due. The Agency’s approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have suf cient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Agency’s reputation. This implies maintaining suf cient cash resources and the availability of funding through Medium Term Expenditure Framework. The Agency receives a guaranteed subsidy from National Treasury through the Medium Term Expenditure Framework allocation process to meet all its current and future obligations.

The Agency monitors its risk to a shortage of funds by using cash flow forecasting. The cash flow forecasting evaluates cash requirements over the foreseeable future, as well as expected cash flows from operations. Cash flow forecasts are prepared and adequate utilised borrowing facilities are monitored.

198


ChangeAhead



The following table details the Agency’s remaining contractual maturity for its nancial liabilities. The table has been drawn up based on the undiscounted cash flows of nancial liabilities based on the earliest date on which the Agency can be required to pay.

< 1 year 1-2 years 2-5 years > 5 years

31 March 2013 R R R R

Trade and other payables 2 384 190 - - -

31 March 2012

Trade and other payables 1 320 303 - - -

17.3 Market risk

The Agency was not exposed to any market risk factors during the current nancial year.

17.4 Credit risk management

Credit risk refers to the risk that counterparty will default on its contractual obligations, which will result in nancial loss to the Agency. The Agency has adopted a policy of dealing with creditworthy customers.

17.5 Maximum exposure to credit risk

The carrying amount of nancial assets recorded net of impairment allowance, represents the Agency’s maximum exposure to credit risk.

199



18. Financial instruments

2013Loans

andreceivables

Financialinstruments

carried atamortised

cost

Total nancial

instrumentscarrying

amounts

Non- nancial

instruments

Totalcarryingamount

R R R R R

Assets

Non-current assets - - - 643 257 643 257

Property, plant and equipment - - - 608 934 608 934

Intangible asset - - - 34 323 34 323

Current Assets 14 631 609 - 14 631 609 - 14 631 609

Trade and other receivables 1 428 817 - 1 428 817 - 1 428 817

Cash and cash equivalents 13 202 792 - 13 202 792 - 13 202 792

Total assets 14 631 609 - 14 631 609 643 257 15 274 866

Net assets and Liabilities

Net assets - - - 12 890 676 12 890 676

Accumulated surplus - - - 12 890 676 12 890 676

Current liabilities - 2 384 190 2 384 190 - 2 384 190

Trade and other payables - 2 384 190 2 384 190 - 2 384 190

Total net assets and liabilities - 2 384 190 2 384 190 12 890 676 15 274 866

Management believes that the fair value of the nancial instruments approximates their carrying amount.

200


ChangeAhead



18. Financial instruments

2012Loans

andreceivables

Financialinstruments

carried atamortised

cost

Total nancial

instrumentscarrying

amounts

Non- nancial

instruments

Totalcarryingamount

R R R R R

Assets

Non-current assets - - - 750 779 750 779

Property, plant and equipment - - - 693 637 693 637

Intangible asset - - - 57 142 57 142

Current Assets 6 850 327 - 6 850 327 - 6 850 327

Trade and other receivables 6 850 281 - 6 850 281 - 6 850 281

Cash and cash equivalents 46 - 46 - 46

Total assets 6 850 327 - 6 850 327 750 779 7 601 106

Net assets and Liabilities

N et assets - - - 6 280 803 6 280 803

Accumulated surplus - - - 6 280 803 6 280 803

Current liabilities - 1 320 303 1 320 303 - 1 320 303

Trade and other payables - 1 320 303 1 320 303 - 1 320 303

Total net assets and liabilities - 1 320 303 1 320 303 6 280 803 7 601 106

Management believes that the fair value of the nancial instruments approximates their carrying values.

201



19. New standards and interpretations

19.1 Standards effective and adopted in the current year

In the current year, the Agency has adopted the following standards that were issued by the Accounting Standards Board. The standards are effective for the current nancial year and they are relevant to the Agency’s operations:

Standard Title Effective year beginning

GRAP 1 Presentation of Financial Statements (as revised in 2010) 1 April 2011

GRAP 2 Cash Flow Statements 1 April 2011

GRAP 3Accounting Policies, Changes in Accunting Estimates and Errors (as revised 2010)

1 April 2011

GRAP 5 Borrowing Costs 1 April 2009

GRAP 9 Revenue from exchange transactions (as revised 2010) 1 April 2011

GRAP 13 Leases (as revised 2010) 1 April 2011

GRAP 14 Events after the reporting date (as revised 2010) 1 April 2011

GRAP 17 Property, plant and equipment (as revised 2010) 1 April 2011

GRAP 19 Provisions, contingent liabilities and assets (as revised 2010) 1 April 2011

GRAP 100 Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations (as revised 2010) 1 April 2011

GRAP 31 Intangible assets 1 March 2012

GRAP 21 Impairment of non-cash generating assets 1 April 2012

GRAP 23 Revenue from non-exchange transactions (taxes and transfers) 1 April 2012

GRAP 24 Presentation of budget information in the nacial statement 1 April 2012

GRAP 26 Impairment of cash generating assets 1 April 2012

GRAP 104 Financial instrument 1 April 2012

GRAP 12 Inventory 1 March 2012

GRAP 16 Investment Property 1 March 2012

GRAP 25 Employee bene ts 1 April 2013

GRAP 7 Investment in associates 1 March 2012

The Agency has elected to not adopt any standards in advance of their effective dates. Management anticipates that the adoption of these Standards in future periods will have no material impact on the nancial statements of the Agency.

202


ChangeAhead



19.2 Interpretations effective in the current year and not yet adopted

The following interpretations were issued by the Accounting Standards Board and they are relevant to the Agency’s operations:


IGRAP 1 Applying the probability test on initial recognition of exchange revenue 1 April 2013

IGRAP 1 Applying the Probability Test on Initial Recognition of exchange revenue 1 April 2009

IGRAP 3 Determining whether an arrangement contains a lease 1 April 2011

IGRAP 6 Loyalty programmes 1 April 2011

IGRAP 10 Assets received from customers 1 April 2011

IGRAP 13 Operating leases - Incentives 1 April 2011

IGRAP 14 Evaluating the substance of transaction involving the Legal form of a lease 1 April 2011

IGRAP8 Agreements for the Construction of Assets from Exchange Transactions 1 April 2009

IGRAP9 Distributions of Non-cash Assets to Owners 1 April 2011

IGRAP10 Assets Received from Customers 1 April 2011

IGRAP11 Consolidation - Special Purpose Entities -

IGRAP12 Jointly Controlled Entities - Non-Monerary Contributions by Venturers -

IGRAP13 Operating Leases – Incentives 1 April 2011

IGRAP15 Revenue - Barter Transactions Involving Advertising Services 1 April 2011

IGRAP16 Intangible Assets - Website Costs 1 April 2013

19.3 Standards in issue not yet adopted

At the date of authorisation of these nancial statements, the following standards were in issue but not yet effective. The effective date has not been determined by the Minister of Finance:


GRAP 20 Related Party Disclosures -

GRAP 18 Segment Reporting -

GRAP 105 Transfer of Functions Between Entities Under Common Control -

GRAP 106 Transfer of Functions Between Entities Not Under Common Control -

GRAP 107 Mergers -

203



19.4 Pronouncements of other standard-setters

Standard Title Issued year

IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures (with all subsequent amendments) August 2005

IAS 19 Employee Bene ts (with all subsequent amendments) February 1998

IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation (with all subsequent amendments) December 2003

IAS 39Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement (with all subsequent amendments)

December 2003

20. Going concernThe annual nancial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis. This basis presumes that funds will be available to nance future operations of the Agency and that the realisation of assets and settlement of liabilities will occur in the ordinary course of business.

However we would like to draw your attention to note 8, which discloses a once off virement from the Department of Transport amounting to R14 million. Without this virement a de cit of R7 390 127 would have been incurred.

This is an indication that the Department of Transport will continue to support the Agency nancially as evidenced by the virement provided in the past two years.

21. Contingent LiabilitiesThe Agency is a defendant in a legal action involving the alleged failure to renew the specialised PrDP licence against the plaintiff Ngijulukile Logistics and Trading CC.

Management believes that based on legal advice obtained from the Agency legal advisors, the action can be successfully defended and therefore no losses (including for costs) will be incurred by the Agency. The matter has not set down in court during the course of the 2012/13 nancial year; therefore the matter is regarded to be pending a court date.

22. Retention of surplus for the periodThe National Treasury has approved the retention of the surplus for the period.

23. Events after balance sheet There were no matters which are material to the nancial affairs of the Agency that have occurred between the statement of nancial position date and the date of approval of the nancial statements.

24. Approval of nancial statementsThe nancial statements were approved by the board of directors and authorised for issue on 27 July 2013.

204


ChangeAhead



25. Reconciliation between the Statement of Financial Performance and the Budget for the year ended 31 March 2013

Actual Budget Variance

Revenue 68 011 052 50 000 000 18 011 052

Expenses 61 408 114 50 000 000 11 408 114Impairment loss on receivables 31 164 022 - 31 164 022Advertising and marketing 376 529 4 000 000 (3 623 471)Payroll administration 44 949 152 000 (107 051)Debt collection 1 742 163 800 000 942 163Audit fees 1 062 696 1 500 000 (437 304)Bank charges 56 541 22 000 34 541Catering 102 388 100 000 2 389Cleaning 2 420 - 2 420Computer expenses 11 359 500 000 (488 641)Consulting fees 2 530 280 2 700 000 (169 720)Consumables 24 204 100 000 (75 796)Courier and postage 9 083 061 20 696 000 (11 612 939)Depreciation 225 104 80 000 145 104Amortization 22 819 20 000 2 819Director fees 623 005 406 000 217 005Electricity 45 835 - 45 835Water and sewerage 48 058 50 000 (1 942)Insurance 8 028 - 8 028IT support costs 213 704 - 213 704Repairs and maintenance 44 595 250 000 (205 405)Printing and stationary 242 624 100 000 142 624Rent Paid 818 364 720 000 98 364Salaries 10 065 380 14 400 000 (4 334 620)Leave pay expense 472 806 - 472 806Staff training 15 375 154 000 (138 625)Staff seconded costs 1 160 820 - 1 160 820Employee bursaries - 500 000 (500 000)Subscriptions 15 478 - 15 478Cell phone costs 193 132 - 193 132Contractors - 1 500 000 (1 500 000)PABX Rental 37 059 - 37 059Legal fees - 1 000 000 (1 000 000)Telephone expenses 10 414 - 10 414Travel and accommodation 716 102 150 000 566 102Venues and facilities 65 421 50 000 15 421Research and development - 50 000 (50 000)Loss of revenue – Gauteng Law Administration 156 485 - 156 485Assets written off 6 894 - 6 894

Surplus from operations 6 602 938 - 6 602 938Finance income 6 947 - 6 947Finance costs (12) - (12)

6 609 873 - 6 609 873

The budgeted amounts were arrived at based on the National roll-out of AARTO. This implementation has been deferred to a future date. As a result there are signi cant variances between the budgeted amounts and the actual amounts.

205


Abbreviations and AcronymsAARTO/(Act) Administrative Adjudication of Road Traf c Offences (Act)

AARTO 01 Infringement notice completed by hand at the roadside and served in person

AARTO 02 Infringement notice completed electronically at the roadside and served in person or by registered mail

AARTO 03 Infringement notice for camera and other infringements served by registered mail

AARTO 31 Notice in respect of unattended vehicle

AG Auditor-General

Agency Refers to the RTIA

CFO Chief Financial Of cer

CL/s Courtesy Letter/s

CPA Criminal Procedure Act

DLTC Driving Licence Testing Centre

DoJ & CD Department of Justice & Constitutional Development

EFT Electronic Funds Transfer

eNaTIS/NaTIS National Traf c Information System

EO/s Enforcement Order/s

EXCO Executive Committee of the Agency

FAR Fixed Asset Register

GRAP Generally Recognised Accounting Practise

GDoCS Gauteng Department of Community Safety

IA/s Issuing Authority/ies

IT Information Technology

JMPD Johannesburg Metropolitan Police Department

MOU Memorandum of Understanding

MTEF Medium Term Expenditure Framework

NCR National Contraventions Register

NDOT/DoT National Department of Transport

NRTA National Road Traf c Act

NT National Treasury


ChangeAhead

207

PDS Points Demerit System

PFMA Public Finance Management Act

PPP Public Private Partnerships

PrDP Professional Driving Permit

RO/s Representation Of cer/s

RTIA Road Traf c Infringement Agency

RTMC Road Traf c Management Corporation

RSA Republic of South Africa

SLA Service Level Agreement

SAPO South African Post Of ce

SAPS South African Police Service

SWOT Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats

TMPD Tshwane Metropolitan Police Department

TOR Terms of Reference

UNDoARS United Nations Decade of Action for Road Safety

VTS Vehicle Testing Station


NOTES

Justice in Adjudication

ROAD TRAFFICINFRINGEMENT AGENCY

Waterfall Edge BHowick Close,Waterfall ParkBekker Road, Midrand

Tel: 011 256 1000Fax: 011 256 1011Fax: 086 620 7836

Website: www.rtia.co.zaemail: [email protected]

RP271/2013ISBN: 978-0-621-42185-9

rtia anaual report 2013 ne annual report 2013-590.pdf · mr bryan chaplog chairperson of the audit...

Documents