rpt on geochem analyses of till samples feder n …...gold was discovered on the shores of lake wawa...

42C02SE2002 2.18035 CHABANEL 010

REPORT ON GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSESOF TILL SAMPLES,

FEDER NORTH CLAIM GROUPChabanel and McMurray Townships

WAWA, ONTARIONTS 42C/2

Claims 1163960, 1174530, 1174531, and 1174532

Prepared for: Elliot Feder Robert Arend Ltd. 14993 Yonge St., Suite 4 Aurora, Ontario L4G 1M5

Attn: Elliot Feder

RECEIVEDJAN - R 1998

GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT ^ _OFFICE____.

Prepared by: Roger D. Thomas, MSc., P.Eng. R. D. Thomas and Associates 1373 Corkery Road, RR*2 Carp, Ontario KOA1LO

December 16, 1997

SUMMARY

From September 5 to 16, 1997, a heavy mineral sampling program was completed on the Feder Claim Group, Wawa, Ontario. A total of 92 sites were sampled. At each site, a 15 - 20 kg bulk sample was obtained for heavy mineral analysis, and a 250 gm representative sample was taken for future reference and geochemical analysis.

The results of this program have been reported previously (Thomas, 1997). Apart from the kimberlite indicator minerals that were found, two samples were found to contain gold grains and six samples were found to contain pyrite or goethite- limonite after pyrite. In order to evaluate the significance of the pyrite bearing samples on the Feder Northern Claim Group, the 250 gm representative samples were submitted for geochemical analysis. Three samples were found to contain detectable quantities of gold with a maximum of 6 ppb; one of these was found to contain elevated quantities of copper. Three samples contained anomalous quantities of silver. None of the Co, Cr, Ni contents of any samples would indicate the presence of ultramafic intrusives.

2- l

42C02SE2002 2.18035 CHABANEL Q -| QQ

TABLE OF

SUMMARY

1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

2 LOCATION AND ACCESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

3 GEOGRAPHIC SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

4 REGIONAL GEOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34.1 Precambrian Geology ................. ................. 34.2 Quaternary Geology . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3

5 CLAIMS . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 5

6 PREVIOUS WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66.1 Exploration by Others . . .. ... ....... ... . . . .. .. . . . .. .. ... 6

6.1.1 General . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 66.1.2 Diamond exploration . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . . . .. .. ... 6

6.2 Present Project . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

7 GEOLOGY OF THE CLAIMS 1163960, 1174530, 1174531 AND 1174532 . . . 7

8 METHODOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78.1 Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 78.2 Laboratory Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

9 RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89.1 Gold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . 109.2 Elements associated with kimberlitic intrusions ... .. . .. .. ... 10

10 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

11 RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

12 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

13 CERTIFICATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

f:2 .

LIST OF FIGURES

1. Location of property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

2. Geology of the claims . .. .. .. .. . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . 4

3. Distribution of gold, pyrite and pseudomorphs after pyrite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

4. Distribution of base metals, Ag, Mo, As and Sb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

5. Distribution of Co, Gr, Ni, Ti and ilmenite . . .. .. . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 13

LIST OF TABLES

1. Elements analysed and detection limits . . . . . . .. . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 9

LIST OF APPENDICES

I. Geochemical Laboratory Reports

II. Statement of Expenses and Costs

1 INTRODUCTION

The 1996 field program conducted on the Robert Arend property comprised a heavy mineral sampling program aimed at evaluating specific targets and at generally appraising the diamond and gold potential of the claims. Similar techniques have been shown by Morris et al ( 1994) to identify areas of kimberlite emplacement in the Wawa area. R. D. Thomas and Associates was contacted to carry out this program. The field work was carried out between September 5 and 16, 1997 with a total of 92 samples being taken. The sample acquisition procedure, laboratory techniques and results are discussed in Thomas (1997).

Two samples collected during this program contained gold grains. Six other samples were reported to contain pyrite or hematite (or goethite/limonite) after pyrite in the heavy mineral concentrates. As a test to determine if there is gold associated with this pyrite, the samples from the northern group of claims was analysed geochemically for Au + 47 elements. This report outlines and discusses the results that were obtained. The geochemical results are presented in the appendices; the field notes and heavy mineral analytical results were previously reported in Thomas (1997).

2 LOCATION AND ACCESS

The property is located (Figure 1) seven kilometres east of Wawa on NTS map sheet 42C/2 and on Ontario Base Maps 2016 6700 53200 and 2016 6700 53100. The centre of the claim group is located at latitude 84" 41.5' N longitude 840 03' W (UTM zone 16 5320300mN 674700mE). Two claims lie within Chabanel Geographic Township and two claims lie within McMurray Geographic Township. Chabanel and McMurray Geographic Townships are incorporated within the Municipality of Michipicoten Township.

Access to the claims is from Highway 101 from Wawa which crosses through the northwest part of the claims.

3 GEOGRAPHIC SETTING

The property lies to the southeast of Wawa Lake (Figure 1) in an area of high, steep sided hills which reach a maximum altitude of 432 m. The altitude of Wawa Lake is 287 m.

The claims are drained by small streams that flow into Wawa Lake. Wawa Lake drains southwesterly via Wawa Creek into the Michipicoten River and thence into Lake Superior. Wawa Lake underlies the north westernmost corners of the claims 1174531 and 1174532. Several small lakes, generally 200 m to 400 m in length, lie within the southernmost claims. Some appear to be related to the activity of beavers, however the others may be structurally controlled.

R. D. Thomas and Associates December 16, 1997 Page l of 17

ESQUEGA TWP.

I LASTHEELS TWP.

CHABANEL TWPl LEGEND

1174510 Claim Number

Claim Boundary and Post

Road or trail

Township Line

SCALE

ROBERT AREND LIMITEDFEDER CLAIM GROUP

Wawa, Ontario

Figure 1. Location of property

Sampling Date: Sept 5-16,1897

Compiled by: R. D. Thomas

Date dratted: October 22,1897

Revision date:

4 REGIONAL GEOLOGY

4.1 Precambrian Geology

The regional geology has been mapped by Rupert (1975, 1979) and Sage et al. (1982), and Sage (1988 and 1993) among others. A compendium of the regional geology has been written by Sage (1994). The geology of the Wawa Subprovince is presented in Williams, et a/(1991).

The property lies within the Michipicoten Greenstone Belt of the Wawa Subprovince of the Superior Province. The Michipicoten Greenstone Belt has been subjected to considerable study, dating back to 1847 (Logan, 1847), because of its economic significance with respect to the many gold and siderite iron mines that have been developed. Three cycles of volcanism have been outlined by Sage (1986), which, from oldest to youngest are: the Hawk Assemblage, the Wawa Assemblage and the Catfish Assemblage. The claim group is underlain by the Wawa Assemblage

The lower part of the Wawa Assemblage is composed of massive and pillowed magnesium- and iron-rich tholeiitic volcanic rocks. These are overlain by polymictic breccia and epiclastic tuff of intermediate composition with thin beds of chert, pyrite, and graphite that form the middle part of the unit. The upper part of the Wawa Assemblage comprises calc-alkalic intermediate to felsic volcanic rocks consisting of tuff, quartz-feldspar crystal tuff, lapilli tuff, oligomictic and polymictic breccia and rare spherulitic flows. The Wawa Assemblage is capped by 100 -150 m section of iron formation which is the ore rock for the Wawa Iron Mines. The Jubilee Stock, which lies to the west of the claims, is believed to be comagmatic with the intermediate to felsic volcanic rocks of the Wawa Assemblage. The Wawa Assemblage has been deformed into major folds; it is also sheared along its contacts. Details of the geology of the claims, as mapped by Archibald (1996), are presented in Figure 2.

4.2 Quaternary Geology

The Quaternary geology of the area has been mapped in detail by Morris (1990, 1992) and is described on a province-wide scale by Barnett (1992). The details of the post-glacial history of the Lake Superior Basin is presented in Farrand and Drexler(1985).

In general, the glacial deposits present in the Wawa area were deposited during the last glacial event which ended at approximately 9 500 yrs BP (Phillips and Fralick, 1994). This event, the Marquette Readvance, started at approximately 10 000 BP, and filled the Lake Superior basin reaching into northern Michigan. The glacial till that lies throughout the Wawa area was laid down during both this advance and the subsequent deglaciation. This till is a silt till, in places becoming a sand till, generally with less than 1007o gravel-sized material. It is generally less than 2 m thick and lies on bedrock. In thicker sections it is observed to be hard and very compact. Ice flow directions, recorded from striae in the region indicate that the initial flow was toward the southwest (225T) varying between 165T and 2630T. During the retreat phase,

R. D. Thomas and Associates December 16, 1997 Page 3 of 17

LEGEND1174532

x 97RND-92

1a

1b

7a

7e

7e

7h

Claim Number

Sample location and number

Mafic volcanic flows

Coarse-grained mafic flows

Gabbro

Amphibolite

Peridotite

Olivine gabbro

l l l l l

SCALE


_____Wawa, Ontario

Figure 2. Geology of claims (after Archibald, 1996).

Sampling Date: Sept 5 -16,1997


Date drafted: December 10,1997

Revision date:

the ice flow direction became progressively more westerly 2660 21 0T as the ice thinned and the local topography had more influence on the ice dynamics (Morris et a/., 1994). In valleys, the glacial deposits are commonly overlain by glaciofluvial sands and gravels deposited in front of the melting icesheet. Such deposits are present along the Firesand River Valley.

The ice front was in contact with glacial lake Minong during its retreat from the Lake Superior Basin. This lake reached a maximum altitude of approximately 311 m, although there is some evidence that flood discharges from Lake Agassiz may have resulted in short lived lake level increases of up to 20 m (Phillips and Fralick, 1994). As such, the floor of the Firesand River valley and the terrain adjacent to Wawa Lake may have been covered by Lake Minong, at which time, some lacustrine materials, probably coarse-grained, may have been deposited. Subsequent to the draining of Lake Minong, geological activity would include general subaerial erosion of the lands surface, incision of some of the streams and rivers, and the deposition of organic (peat) deposits in depressions.

5 CLAIMS

The claims are located approximately 8 km east of Wawa in Chabanel, and McMurray townships (Figure 1). The claims discussed in this report include numbers 1174530, 1174531, 1174532, and 1163960. They are located adjacent to Highway 101.

The following table gives the status of each claim and the relevant dates. The information was obtained from claim abstracts, dated October 1997, issued by the Mining Recorders Office, Sudbury.

Claim No Township

11745311174532

Chabanel Chabanel

Recording Date Number Work Due Dateof Units Required

Mar21,1994 2 3 1600 Mar21, 1998 Mar 3, 1994 2 S 800 Mar 3, 1998

1163960 McMurray 1174530 McMurray

Oct23, 1996 Mar 3, 1994

2 3800 Oct23, 1998 2 31600 Mar 3, 1998

An assessment report has been filed recently for assessment credits to be applied to these claims, however, the status has not yet been officially recorded. The claims are recorded in the names of Elliot Feder, 2 Snowberry Lane, King City, Ontario, L7B 1J9, Klaus Becker, C7o Karl Bernhardt, 3102 105 William, Coberg, Ontario, K9A 5J4, and Mitchell Winestock, 166 Carrington Dr., Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4C 7Z8.

R. D. Thomas and Associates December 16, 1997 PaseSof 17

6 PREVIOUS WORK

6.1 Exploration by Others

6.1.1 General

Wawa has been a centre of mineral exploration and mining for a century. Gold was discovered on the shores of Lake Wawa in 1897 and the ensuing gold rush created the Michipicoten Mining Division with the first government Mining Office in Ontario being established in Wawa shortly thereafter. With the rapid increase in population as a result of the gold discovery, the town site was surveyed and registered as Wawa City in 1899. In 1898, Ben Boyer discovered iron ore near Wawa. This was eventually developed into the first, and last, iron mine in Ontario and the only underground iron mine in Canada. The first iron mines, Helen, Magpie and Moose Mountain Mines along with a few smaller ones, produced iron from the Wawa area from 1904 to 1926. After a period of about 13 years when there was very little iron produced because of cheap ore from the USA, iron production recommenced from the Helen and George W. Macleod mines by Algoma Ore Division on the outskirts of Wawa. The George W. Macleod mine is presently active and has reserves for at least the next 20 years.

In the 1920's, gold exploration resumed and culminated with the opening of fifteen mines including the Grace, Jubilee, Minto, Darwin and Parkhill. The latest gold exploration activity occurred as a result of the major discovery and development of the Hemlo deposit, some 100 km to the northwest of Wawa. As a result several mines were opened in the late 1980's including the Magino, Kremzar and Magnacon mines but most have since closed. The main gold mine presently operating in the Wawa area is the Eagle River mine owned by River Gold Mines Ltd. It has an annual production of S40,000 ounces. Production of ore from the Magnacon Mine has recently recommenced and is being processed by River Gold Mines.

6.1.2 Diamond exploration

Diamond exploration in the Wawa area started with the discovery of diamonds in the gravels of a point bar of the Dead River south of Wawa by C. Clement in the summer of 1991. Two of the three diamonds that were discovered were verified by the Royal Ontario Museum, Department of Mineralogy, and were described as industrial grade stones of 1.05 and 1.13 carats.

Follow-up work by the Ontario Geological Survey consisted of a regional stream sediment sampling program and two detailed sampling programs in which a total of 257 samples were taken (Morris, et a /, 1994). This program discovered an abundance of kimberlite indicator minerals in the streams south of Wawa and along the Michipicoten River to the south of Wawa. Several samples of modern alluvium were collected along the Firesand River (Wad56 - Wad62) and in the general vicinity of the claims (Wad79). Sample Wad58 taken on the Firesand River in the southern part of claiml 10143 was found to contain one grain each of ilmenite and chromite. Sample Wad56, taken on the Firesand River where it crosses Highway 101 also contained one grain of ilmenite. Sample Wad79, taken along Leroy Lake south of the claims,


contained 18 gold grains. These gold grains presumably were derived from further up the drainage system, or possibly the Golden Reed Mine.

Several companies have been involved in diamond exploration in the past few years. The most recent announcements from some of these companies confirm the presence of kimberlites and diamonds in the Wawa area. Currie Rose Resources Inc. have found up to nine kimberlitic bodies near Wawa. Canabrava Diamond Corporation have recently announce finding two 'kimberlite1 pipes near Wawa. Spider Resources Inc. have recently announced finding diamonds in several mafic (lamprophyric) dikes along the Trans-Canada Highway 20 km north of Wawa.

6.2 Present Project

Two campaigns of exploration have been conducted by Robert Arend Ltd. The first, in August and October, 1995 (Archibald, 1995), involved detailed geological mapping, magnetometer and VLF-EM surveys, and backhoe pitting and sampling for heavy minerals on the central block of claims. Of the thirteen pits that were sampled, one contained 24 specks of gold per cubic yard, one contained 60 grains per 2.5 yd3 and three others contained a few grains each. The auriferous sites are located mainly on claims 1201473, 1174010 and 1201471 (Figure 1). The geophysical surveys outlined several targets that were considered worthy of further investigation.

The second exploration campaign (Archibald, 1996) was conducted October-November, 1996 and involved diamond drilling four holes on claims 1110143, 1201473, 1174480, andl 171421, as well as geological mapping, and magnetometer and VLF-EM surveys on claims 1174416, 1174530, and 1174531. Several lamprophyre dikes were intersected by the drill holes, particularly on claim 1171421 which was designed to intersect the Ward Lake - Coleman Creek Fault and the northwest contact of the Firesand Carbonatite.

7 GEOLOGY OF THE CLAIMS 1163960, 1174530, 1174531 AND 1174532

The claims are underlain by rocks of the Wawa Assemblage. Detailed mapping by Archibald (1996) (Figure 2) and by Rupert (1975) show that the rocks are predominantly mafic to intermediate volcanic rock comprising predominantly fine grained flows (basalts). Two flows, 25 m and 50 m in width, of coarse-grained mafic (gabbroic) flows were observed by Archibald (1996). This steeply dipping, east northeast trending, north facing sequence of flows is cut by several north northwest trending dikes of diabase, gabbro, olivine gabbro, peridotite and amphibolite. All units have been cut by northeast trending carbonate-rich shear zones, some of which contain quartz veins and quartz-calcite veins.

8 METHODOLOGY

8.1 Sampling

The sampling medium of choice was till. If till was not available, then glaciofluvial materials was the second choice. The optimum sample locations were


chosen before the field crew left for Wawa based on the previous work that was available. Samples locations were selected to test previously delimited magnetic and/or VLF-EM targets.

Upon mobilization to Wawa, the field crew, comprising Igor Bilot and Marc Filion of Consorminex Inc., visited the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources to obtain the latest information on the forestry roads in the area. This information was useful to locate the roads on maps such that the sampling could be completed efficiently. The sampling was completed between September 5 and 16, 1997 by the two man field crew. Sample locations were located on the cut grid or by means of pace and compass traverses from known reference points along the roads, rivers or lakes. Topographic maps were used as an aid in locating the points.

At each site, a 15 - 20 kg bulk sample for heavy mineral concentration and a 250 gm "soil" sample were collected. The samples were taken by hand digging a 0.5 -1.0m deep pit, preferable into unoxidized till. In many places, where bedrock was less than 1 m from surface, the material was oxidized throughout the section. The walls of the pit were examined to determine the stratigraphy of the materials present. If till was present, then this material was sampled. The treatment and results of the bulk samples have been previously described (Thomas, 1997). The notes describing the location of the sample, the nature of the materials and the terrain at each site are also in Thomas (1997). The sample location was marked on a topographic map and a flag bearing the sample number was tied to a nearby tree.

The 250 gram samples were delivered to R. D. Thomas and Associates in Carp, Ontario for storage. The eight samples which were taken from the northern claim group were selected and shipped to Activation Laboratories for geochemical analysis.

8.2 Laboratory Analysis

The ^O-mesh fraction of the geochemical samples was analysed by the "Au + 47" combination INAA/Total digestion - ICP package. This package utilizes both the INAA and 4-acid digestion-ICP techniques. The elements determined are listed in Table 1 along with their detection limits. Note that Ag, Ca, Mo, Ni, Sr, and Zn are analysed by both techniques. Except for Mo and Sr, the ICP technique obtains a lower detection limit and is generally considered to have a more accurate result.

9 RESULTS

The geochemical laboratory reports are presented in Appendix l. Other data related to the samples are presented in Thomas (1997) and are summarized where pertinent, below.

A total of eight samples were collected from the four northern claims. Seven were classified as tills, one 97RND04 was classified as silt. This latter sample is probably of material derived from the washing of the till by a postglacial lake.


IN AA PORTION

Au

Ag

As

Ba

Br

Ga

Ce

Co

Gr

2ppb

5 ppm

0.5 ppm

50 ppm

0.5 ppm

1 o/o

3 ppm

1 ppm

5 ppm

Cs

Eu

Fe

Hf

HgIr

La

Lu

Mo

1 ppm

0.2 ppm

0.01 o/o

1 ppm

1 ppm

5 ppb

0.5 ppm

0.05 ppm

1 ppm

Na

Nd

Ni

Rb

Sb

Se

Se

Sm

Sn

0.01 "/o

5 ppm

20 ppm

5 ppm

0.1 ppm

0.1 ppm

3 ppm

0.1 ppm

0.01 "ft

Sr

Ta

Th

Tb

U

W

Yb

Zn

0.05 ppm

0.5 ppm

0.2 ppm

0.5 ppm

0.5 ppm

1 ppm

0.2 ppm

50 ppm

TOTAL DIGESTION - 1 C P PORTION

Ag

Al

Be

Bi

Ga

0.5 ppm

0.01 "/o

2 ppm

5 ppm

0.01 "/o

Cd

Cu

K

Mg

Mn

0.5 ppm

1 ppm

0.01 o/o

0.01 07o

1 ppm

Mo

Ni

P

Pb

Sr

2 ppm

1 ppm

0.001 "/o

5 ppm

1 ppm

Ti

V

Y

Zn

0.01 "/o

2 ppm

2 ppm

1 ppm

Note that Al may not be total in oxidized material.

Table 1. Elements analysed and detection limits (modified after Activation Laboratories Ltd brochure).


9.1 Gold and base metals

Pyrite was found in the heavy mineral concentrate of sample 97-RND-92 and pseudomorphs after pyrite (PAP), basically oxidized pyrite, were observed in the heavy mineral concentrate from sample 97-RND-06 (Figure 3). Geochemically, gold was detected in sample 97RND-06 (6 ppb) but was not detected in 97RND-92 ^2 ppb) (Figure 3). Two other samples, 97RND-03 and 97RND-04, contained detectable gold, 3 and 4 ppb respectively. Although none of these results can be considered "anomalous", they are significant because the "normal" gold content of till is generally ^1 ppb.

Sample 97RND-06 also contains anomalous quantities of As (7.7 ppm), and Mo (6 ppm INAA) (Figure 4). Sample 97RND-03 also contains anomalous quantities of Ag (0.7 ppm ICP) and As (6.9 ppm). 97RND-04 contains anomalous quantities of Ag (0.7 ppm ICP), Sb (0.8 ppm), and elevated quantities of As (2.6 ppm), Cu (152 ppm) and Zn (118 ppm ICP and 144 ppm INAA). Other samples of interest include 97RND-02 which contains anomalous As (10 ppm) and 97RND-92 which contains anomalous quantities of As (5.1 ppm) and elevated amounts of Ag (0.5 ppm ICP).

9.2 Elements associated with kimberlitic intrusions

The heavy mineral concentrates from samples 97RND-01 and 97RND-92 contained 4 and 3 grains of ilmenite respectively (Figure 5). The geochemical analyses of the eight samples contained and average of 0.42 07o Ti varying from a minimum of Q.30% to a maximum of Q.70% (Figure 5). Samples 97RND-01 and 97RND-92 contained Q.40% and Q.36% Ti respectively, which is not significantly different from the average of all samples. Also all results except 97RND-04 (Q.70% Ti) are below the estimated crustal abundance of Q.632% for Ti (Mason and Moore, 1982). Similarly all samples contained normal abundances for Co, Ni, and Gr, elements that might indicate the presence of ultramafic bodies or kimberlites.

10 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION

There appears to be a close association of Au with pyrite, Ag and As. Mo, Cu and Zn are also present in some samples. This association is strongest in samples 97RND-03, 97RND-04 and 97RND-06 which are grouped in the central part of claim 1174530. The pyrite pseudomorphs observed in the heavy mineral concentrate of sample 97RND-92 does not appear to be of similar genesis. The bedrock source of the former sulphide mineralization may be associated with VLF anomaly "A" or "B" (Archibald 1996). The style of mineralization may be similar to that found along the Jubilee Shear where the main deposits are in predeformation quartz-carbonate-chlorite- tourmaline veins in locations outside the main zone of deformation (Samson et a /., 1997).

None of the samples contained significant quantities of Ni, Cr, Co or other metals that would indicate the presence of nearby mafic or ultramafic intrusive bodies. The results do not negate the presence of these bodies either as the distribution of the samples does not evenly sample the claims.


x/ /'S'f

1174531 /

X/

1174530

s

1163960

97R

x 97RND^02

x 97RND-03

97RNW)4 x 97RND-0

97RND-06

97RND-07

1174532

X297RND-01

D-92

CHABANEL TOWNSHIP

MCMURRAY TOWNSHIP

ll f

S ff /

S f

LEGEND1174532

x 97RND-92

El

<2 X

Claim Number


HM sample containing pyrite

HM sample containing PAP

Au content (ppb) of sample

TM

SCALE


Wawa, Ontario

Figure 3. Distribution of gold, pyrite and PAP (pseudomorphs after pyrite).

Sampling Date: Sept 5 - 1 6, 1 997


Date drafted: December 1 0, 1 997

Revision date:

x/

1174531 ,x

1 //

68/12/39 0.5/-C1X97R

5.1/0.4

//50/11/100

<0.4/2 X97RND-02 10/0.3

X/

16/14/41 0.7AC1X97RND-03

6.9/0.1

0.7/0 x 2.6/0.8

1174530

70/12/67 eO.4/6 X 97RND-06

77^0.1

1163960

(VV9/14/44 ^OW-c1X 97RND-07

x J

1174532

11/15/31 40.4/2 X 97RND-01

3.8/0.3D-92

CHABANEL TOWNSHIP

MCMURRAY TOWNSHIP

t*'

LEGEND1174532

X 97RNO-92

11/15/31 x

x3.8/0.3

Claim Number


Cu/Pb/Zn content (ppm) of sample

Ag/Mo content (ppm) of sample

As/Sb content (ppm) of sample

TN

SCALE


Wawa, Ontario

Figure 4. Distribution of base metals, Ag, Mo, As and Sb

Sampling Date: Sept 5 - 1 6, 1 997


Date drafted: December 1 0, 1 997

Revision date:

1-92' //

70A36 97R

15/0.36

65/27 x 97RND-03 10/0.30

41/30 X 97RND-O4 47/0.70

64/30 x 97RND-C

10/0.31

1174530

72/33 x 97RND-06 13/0.34____^_

78/29X 97RND-07 13/0.33

1174532

49/14O97RND-01 6/0.40

CHABANEL TOWNSHIP

MCMURRAY TOWNSHIP

ll f

LEGEND1174532

x 97RND-92

4

49/14 x

x

6/0.40

Claim Number


HM sample containing ilmenite and number of grains

Cr/Ni content (ppm) of sample

Co/Ti content (ppm.%) of sample

TM

SCALE


Wawa, Ontario

Figure 5. Distribution of Co, Gr, Ni, Ti and ilmenite.

Sampling Date: Sept 5 -16,1997


Date drafted: December 10,1997

Revision date:

1 1 RECOMMENDATIONS

The present study has shown an association between pyrite, Au, Ag As and in places Mo, Cu and Zn. In order to better define the source of the gold mineralization, further till or humus sampling should be completed to determine the extent and location of the anomaly. Some geophysical surveying, induced potential or MaxMin, may be required to define the mineralization at depth. By these techniques a drillable target will be defined.

The presence of kimberlite bodies associated with the ilmenite bearing samples on these claims appears unlikely. The olivine gabbro dike which occurs up-ice from these samples should be examined to determine if it contains ilmenite that could be the source of the mineral in the heavy mineral concentrates.

Other recommendations for further work based on the heavy mineral till sampling program (Thomas, 1997) are still valid and should be implemented.

This report is respectfully submitted by,

l 'V

Roger D. Thomas, MSc., P.Eng.


12 REFERENCES

Archibald, F. T.1995: Summary report: Firesand Carbonatite diamond study, geological, magnetics,

electromagnetics, backhoe bulk testing, Lastheels and McMurray Townships, northern Ontario; Unpublished report for Robert Arend Ltd., 46 pages.

Archibald, F. T.1996: Summary report, Elliot Feder Property, northeast part of McMurray Township

and northwest part of Lastheels Township, District of Algoma, Ontario;Unpublished report for Robert Arend Ltd., 32 pages.

Barnett, P. J.1992: Quaternary Geology of Ontario, in: Geology of Ontario; Ontario Geological

Survey, Special Volume 4, Part 2, p. 1009-1088.

Farrand, W. R. and Drexler, C. W.1984: Late Wisconsin and Holocene history of the Lake Superior basin, in: Quaternary

evolution of the Great Lakes, edited by P. F. Karrow and P. E. Calkin, GeologicalAssociation of Canada, Special Paper 30, p. 17-32.

Logan, W. E.1847: On the geology and economic minerals of the north shore of Lake Superior with

remarks on copper ores and their treatment; Geological Survey of Canada,Report of Progress 1846-47.

Mason, B. and Moore, C. B.1982: Principles of geochemistry; John Wiley and Sons.

Morris, T. F.1990: Quaternary geology of the Wawa area, Northern Ontario; in: Summary of Field

Work and Other Activities 1990, Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper151, p. 149-151.

Morris, T. F.1992: Quaternary geology of the Wawa area; Ontario Geological Survey, Open File

Map 192, scale 1:50000.

Morris, T. F., Murray, C. and Crabtree, D.1994: Results of overburden sampling for kimberlite heavy mineral indicators and gold

grains, Michipicoten River - Wawa area, northeastern Ontario; OntarioGeological Survey, Open File Report 5908, 69p.


Phillips, B. A. M. and Fralick, P. W.1994: A post-Lake Minong transgressive event on the north shore of Lake Superior,

Ontario: possible evidence of Lake Agassiz inflow; Canadian Journal of EarthSciences, Vol. 31, no, 11, p. 1638-1641.

Rupert, R. J.1975: McMurray Township and parts of surrounding townships, District of Algoma;

Ontario Division of Mines, Preliminary Map P.828, Geological Series, scale 1inch to VA m ile.

Rupert, R. J.1979: Geology of McMurray and parts of the surrounding Townships; Ontario

Geological Survey, Open File Report 5283.

Sage, R. P.1986: Stratigraphic correlation in the Wawa area, in: Volcanology and Mineral

Deposits, Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper 129, p. 62-68.

Sage, R. P.1988: Geology of carbonatite-alkalic complexes in Ontario: Firesand River Carbonatite

Complex, District of Algoma; Ontario Geological Survey Study 47, 82p.

Sage, R. P.1993: Geology of Chabanel, Esquega, Lastheels and McMurray Township, District of

Algoma, Ontario; Ontario Geological Survey Open File Report 5586, 462p.

Sage, R. P.1994: Geology of the Michipicoten Greenstone Belt; Ontario Geological Survey, Open

File Report 5888, 592p.

Sage, R. P., Rebic, Z., Abercrombie, S., Neale, K., MacMillan, D., England, D. and Calvert, T.1982: Precambrian geology of Chabanel Township, Algoma District; Ontario Geological

Survey Map P. 2439, Geological Series - preliminary map, scale 1:15840.

Samson, l. M., Bulent, B. and Holm, P. E.1997: Hydrothermal evolution of auriferous shear zones, Wawa, Ontario; Economic

Geology, volume 92, p. 325-342.

Thomas, R. D.1997: Report on heavy mineral sampling, Feder Claim Group, Chabanel, McMurray

and Lastheels Townships, Wawa, Ontario; unpublished manuscript, OntarioGeological Survey, assessment files.

Williams, H. R., Stott, G. M., Heather, K. B., Muir, T. L. and Sage, R. P. 1991: Wawa Subprovince, in: Geology of Ontario; Ontario Geological Survey, Special

Volume 4, Part 1, p.485-539.


13 CERTIFICATE

l, Roger D. Thomas, of the Township of West Carleton, Province of Ontario certify that:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

l reside at 1373 Corkery Rd, RR * 2, Carp, Ontario,

l have worked as a geologist for the last 30 years.

l have worked for the Geological Survey of Canada for five years, for Terrain Analysis and Mapping Services Ltd. for 12 years and have been president of R. D. Thomas and Associates for 3 years, l have been a consulting geologist for 15 years.

l am a graduate of McGill University with a B.Se. and M.Se., both in geology.

l am a Professional Engineer of Ontario.

l am a Fellow of the Geological Association of Canada.

l selected the preliminary sample locations and instructed the field personnel on the methodology to be used in the field for obtaining the samples; selected the samples for geochemical analysis; completed the interpretation of the data and wrote the report on the results entitled "REPORT ON GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSES OF TILL SAMPLES, FEDER NORTH CLAIM GROUP, Chabanel and McMurray Townships, WAWA, ONTARIO, NTS 42C/2" dated December 16, 1997.

l do not have any financial interest in the Feder Claim Group (Wawa) property nor in Robert Arend Limited.

Dated at Carp, OntarioThis 16th day of December, 1997 Roger D. Thomas, MSC., P.Eng.


APPENDIX l

Geochemical Laboratory Reports

R. D. Thomas and Associates December 16, 1997 Appendices

ACTLABS ACTIVATION LABORATORIES LTD

Invoice No.: Work Order: Invoice Date: Date Submitted: Your Reference: Account Number:

14226 14349

19-NOV-97 31-OCT-97

AREND-97 1801

R.D. THOMAS AND ASSOCIATES1373 CORKERY RD., RR#2CARP, ONTARIOKOA 1LOATTN: ROGER D. THOMAS

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

8 SOILS(PREP.REV1) were submitted for analyis.

The following analytical packages were requested. Please see our current fee schedule for elements and detection limits.

REPORT 14226 CODE 1H INAA(INAA.REVl) REPORT 14226 B TOTAL DIGESTION ICP

This report may only be reproduced in its entirety without the express consent of ACTIVATION LABS. If no instructions were received or will be received within 90 days from the date of this report, excess material will be discarded. Our liability is limited solely to the analytical cost of these analyses. Test results are representative only of material submitted for analysis

CERTIFIED BY :

DR E.HOFFMAN/GENERAL MANAGER

1336 SANDHILL DRIVE, ANCASTER, ONTARIO, CANADA L9G 4V5 - TEL: 905-648-9611 . FAX: 905-648-9613 E-MAIL: [email protected] or 102040.700 @ COMPUSERVE.COM

Activation Laboratories Ltd. Work Order: 14349 Report: 14226 Page: l of

Sample description

97 RND-00197 RND-00297 RND-00397 RND-00497 RND-005

97 RND-00697 RND-00797 RND-092

AU PPB

•C2•c234

•C2

6•C2

rt

AG PPM

•C5<5<5<5•eS

<5•e5

<5

AS PPM

3.8106.92.62.2

7.73.15.1

BA PPM

440330370470390

380520530

BR PPM

2.77.9103.18.8

147.0

15

CAl

12

•el3

•el

1•ci•el

CO PPM

623104710

131315

CR PPM

4965654164

727870

CS PPM

11122

21

•ci

FE l

2.785.903.13

11.43.27

4.773.325.07

BF PPM

85637

687

HG PPM

•el•el•el•el•el

•elel•el

IR PPB

•e5•C5•C5•e5•eS

•e5•c5•eS

MO PPM

22

elel•el

6el•el

HA t

1.811.871.810.471.95

1.742.011.83

HI PPM

•C20•e22^0•C23•C20

^0<20<21

RB PPM

56•e!5462957

31•e!552

SB PPM

0.30.30.10.80.2

•eO.leO.l0.4

sePPM

7.5218.8

319.0

131316

SE SN SR PPM l t

•C3 -CO. 01 •cO.OS•C3 eO.Ol e0.05^ eO.Ol ^ .05<3 •eO.Ol eO.OS<3 eO.Ol eO.OS

•e3 ^.01 ^.05<3 ^ .01 4:0.05<3 <0.01 eO.OS

TA PPM

•eO.5^.5e0.5<0.5•eO.5

e0.5KO.S

e0.5

TH PPM

3.63.13.72.53.6

8.15.47.3

Activation Laboratories Ltd. Work Order: 14349 Report: 14226B Page: l of

Sample description

97 RND-00197 RND-00297 RND-00397 RND-00497 RND-005

97 RND-00697 RND-00797 RND-092

MO COPPM DPI!trtrn FtrH

<2. 11.^. 50.<2. 16.•c2. 152.<2. 17.

<2. 70.^. 4 9.<2. 68.

PBPPMfrn

15.11.14.5.

14.

12.14.12.

ZN PPM

31.100.

41.118.40.

67.44.39.

AGPPM

•CO. 4•CO. 4

0.70.7

•cO.4

•CO. 4-cd. 40.5

NIPPM

14.30.27.30.30.

31.29.36.

MNPPM

291.1193.301.

1417.325.

410.430.469.

SRPPMFifn

210.149.220.102.255.

193.256.205.

CDPPM -

•eO.S•cO.5•cO.S•eO.5•cO. 5

•eO.S•CO. 5•eO.5

BI VPPM PPMFirn Wn

^. 84.•cS. 188.<5. 78.•eS. 315.<5. 75.

<5. 104.•c5. 89.<5. 116.

CAt

1.302.031.453.281.74

1.721.731.34

Pt

0.0170.0890.0360.0520.038

0.0660.0350.044

MGt

0.471.600.612.590.73

0.960.800.71

TIt

0.400.580.300.700.31

0.340.330.36

ALt

5.145.956.266.756.38

6.576.246.48

K1

1.380.781.140.451.35

1.101.431.35

YPPM

12.29.11.43.12.

17.24.82.

BEPPM

•C2.^.^.•e2.•C2.

^.•e2.

2.

Activation Laboratories Ltd. Work Order: 14349 Report: 14226 Page: 2 of

Sample description

97 RND-001 97 RND-00297 RHD-00397 RND-00497 RND-005

97 RND-00697 RMD-00797 RND-092

U PPM

1.0 1.3

cO.5•cO. 51.1

1.11.31.2

W PPM

ci <l<lci•ci

cicici

ZN PPM

c50 12164

14454

707186

LA PPM

15 16122214

152629

CE PPM

2825233928

304858

ND PPM

16 159

1616

122430

SM PPM

2.1 3.11.84.52.0

3.04.36.9

EU PPM

0.7 1.20.81.80.8

1.21.73.3

IB PPM .

cO. 5 0.7

CO. 5CO. 5CO. 5

0.7cO.52.0

YB PPM

1.8 3.11.23.81.5

1.92.86.8

LU PPM

0.30 0.440.210.610.22

0.260.420.93

Mass

g

26.58 27.5526.8328.9030.39

24.0226.7726.22

APPENDIX II

Statement of Expenses and Costs

R. D. Thomas and Associates December 16, 1997 Appendices

R. D. THOMAS AND ASSOCIATES1373 Corkery Rd., RR #2

Carp, OntarioKOA1LO

INVOICE No: 97-18 DATE: December 16, 1997 PROJECT No: RND97

Robert Arend Limited 14993 Yonge St., Suite 4 Aurora, Ontario L4G1M5

attn: Elliot Feder

Invoice Re: Geochemical analysis of six samples, interpretation and preparation of report, Feder North Claim Group, Wawa, Ontario, November 1 to December 16, 1997.

R. Thomas 1 day at S4507day Printing Expenses (courier)

Activation Laboratories (Geochemical analyses)

S 450.00 S 17.50 S 18.50

S 192.00

Sub-total

GST

TOTAL

TOTAL INVOICE DUE:

3 678.00

S 47.46

S 725.46

3 725.46

GST registration no. 139483507RT

R. D. THOMAS AND ASSOCIATES1373 Corkery Rd., RR #2

Carp, OntarioKOA1LO

DATE: October 21, 1997 PROJECT No: RND97

Robert Arend Limited 14993 Yonge St., Suite 4 Aurora, Ontario L4G 1M5

attn: Elliot Feder

Septembers, 1997 October 21, 1997 December 16, 1997

STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT

Advance for field work Invoice 97-15 Invoice 97-18

TOTAL OUTSTANDING

Total GST included

3 10,000.00322,800.003 725.46

S 13,525.46

S 2,217.05

\,

GST registration no. 139483507RT

ACTLABS ACTIVATION LABORATORIES LTD

R.D. THOMAS AND ASSOCIATES1373 CORKERY RD., RR#2CARP, ONTARIOKOA 1LOATTN: ROGER D. THOMAS

Invoice No.: 14226 Work Order: 14349 Invoice Date: 19-NOV-97 Date Submitted: 31-OCT-97 Your Reference: AREND-97 Account Number: 1801 GST # R121979355

No. samples Description j Unit Price | Total

8 8 1

DRY AND SIEVE 1H RETURN OF SAMPLES

1 VX/XO-11

1.75 21.00 10.00

1 VX/XO-1

14.00 168.00 10.00

Subtotal : $ 192.00

GST ( 7.0%) : S 13.44

AMOUNT DUE : $ 205.44

Net 30 days l 1/2 % per month charged on overdue accounts.

1336 SANDHILL DRIVE, ANCASTER, ONTARIO, CANADA L9G 4V5 ^ TEL: 905-648-9611 . FAX: 905-648-9613 E-MAIL: [email protected] or 102040.700 @ COMPUSERVE.COM

@ Ontario and Mine*

Declaration of Assessment Work Performed on Mining LandMining Act. SubMCtton esfj) and 15(3). R.S.O. 1MO

NumDac (office gee)

i Imaging

Person*! Information collected o Mining Act. the Information it a p Oueattona about thla collection 933 fUmaey lake Road. Sudbui

the Mining Act. Undw MCtlon l ol thettrreipond wtth th* mining land holder.

Development and Mine*, 8th Roof.

42C02SE2002 2.18035 CHABANEL 900

Instructions: - For work performed on Crown Lands before recording a claim, use form 0240. - Please type or print In ink. a-

1. Recorded holder(s) (Attach a list if necessary)Name

^ee cinTa.A-k/-Addfeaa

Name

Addreaa

t

A UV

RECEIVE^JAN - 6 W58

6EOS&ENCEASSESSMENT

-.60.

CUmlNumbw

Tvtopnon* Numbar

Fax Number

Client Number

Telephone Number

Fax Number

2. Type of work performed: Check ( ^ ) and report on only ONE of the following groups for this declaration.

fvi Geotechnical: prospecting, surveys, r i Physical: drilling, stripping, "1 assays and work under section 18 (regs) L- ' trenching and associated assaysWork Type

tKoevvefwveoX a rv oA i-**-*-** t^ *

Si -kll

Performed From tt -j \ O f i *f^ 0*r \ Ma* 1 Y,*

Global Poaittoning System Data (H available) Town*m cMor (

Cq-

-

8v^vV toctmpLco

Te / t .0'} . q? J0*r 1 Mo* J YM(

hip/Area

li U-flAa^, C ̂ w*\3*XrtcAa-Plan Number4*- a?1-T; 6- JUUM

n Rehabilrtation

Office Use

Commodity -

Total S Value of JL ^ . ^x- Work Claimed ^ /.A^

NTS Reference ' ,- - ' - "

Mining Division ^5^57-^

Resident Geologist District Ssrt *

Please remember to: - obtain a work permit from the Ministry of Natural Resources as required;- provide proper notice to surface rights holders before starting work;- complete and attach a Statement of Costs, form 0212;- provide a map showing contiguous mining lands that are linked for assigning work;'- Include two copies of your technical report.

3. Person or companies who prepared the technical report (Attach a list if necessary)Name

Roc,Efc X* T1-\on BSAddreae

li^S c'oeviCR.M RX RR.*3 C ftfc? oiJT AKP/MName J J

Addreea

Name

Addreaa

Talephona Number

(t,l3} 2.4T4, -h2.o1Fax Number

(til) z-rt, - ^zo7Telephone Number

Fax Number

Telephone Number

Fax Number

4. Certification by Recorded Holder or Agent i

l, , do hereby certify that l have personal knowledge of the facts set(PrMNuna)

forth in this Declaration of Assessment Work having caused the work to be performed or witnessed the same during or after Its completion and, to the best of rnyJtnpwledjQe, the annexed report Is true.

esrSignature o* Recorded Holder or AgenT

Fa* NumberAgent'a Addreea

2 7/3*737

RECEIVEDJAN - R 1998

GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT OFFICF , M

LIST OF RECORDED HOLDERS

Elliot Feder

Klaus Becker

Mitchell Winestock

2 Snowberry Lane King City, Ontario L7B 1J9

CX0 Karl Bernhardt 31 02 105 William St. Coberg, K9A 5J4

166 Carrington Dr. Richmond Hill Ontario L4C 7Z8

Client No.: 300540 Telephone: s 4966J 833-4257 Fax: Cp (905)713-0727

Client No.:Telephone:Fax:

Client No.:Telephone:Fax:

300135(905)372-8789 (905) 373-0376

301919(905) 508-5355N/A

5. Work to be recorded and distributed. Work can only be assigned to claims that are contiguous (adjoining) to the mining land where work was performed,' at the time work was performed. A map snowing the contiguous link, must accompany this form. j

Mining Claim Number. Or if work *as don* on other eligible mining tend, show in this column the location number Indicated on the claim map.

9

g

g

i

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

TB 7827

1234567

1234568

M^tf.U

l 7 US 3 i

ill U 5" 1 0

1 l i 3 *Uo

*

lumber ol Claim Jnlta. For other mining land, dal hectare*.

16 ha

12

2

4

JL

1

Ji* ' '

~

--

-

J.I.-

Column Totals

Value of wot* performed on thlt claim or other mining land.

126,825

- 0

S 8, 892

o('*4 (

363jt {

?l N/" " " --

- - - --

- -

;

US'

Value of work applied lo this claim.

N/A

524,000

S 4.000

//.3

30^

0

O*~

-

-

- -

.

mi

Value of work atalgned to other mining claima.

S24.000

0

Q

6

6

m?o

--

- -

mf

Bank. Value of work to be distributed at a future data.

52,625

0

54.892

l*-- i-

H*

f/ - - - -

4-

-- -- --

. .^.....

- - .-. . - - .

: .-

30 K

l, , do hereby certify that the above work credits are eligible under(Print Ful Name)

subsection 7 (1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96 for assignment to contiguous claims or for application to

the claim where the work was done.Signature of Recorded Holder or Agent Authorized in Writing BatT

6. Instructions for cutting back credits that are not approved.

Some of the credits claimed in this declaration may be cut back. Please check ( r- ) in the boxes below to show how

you wish lo prioritize the deletion of credits:

S 1. Credits are to be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option 2 or 3 or 4 as indicated.

0 2. Credits are to be cut back starting with the claims listed last, working backwards; or

Q 3. Credits are to be cut back equally over afl claims listed in this declaration; or

D 4. Credits are to be cut back as prioritized on the attached appendix or as follows (describe):

Note: If you have not indicated how your credits are to be deleted, credits will be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option number 2 if necessary.

For Office Use OnlyReceived Stamp n

rflENTl ^. -~*

Deimed Approved Date

Date Approved

Dale Nottflcetion Sem

Total Value ol Credit Approved

Approved lor Recording by Mining Recorder (Signature)

Ontario Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Statement of Costs for Assessment Credit

Transaction Number (office use)

Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of subsection 6(1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96. Under section 8 of the Mining Act, the information is a public record. This information will be used to review the assessment work and correspond with the mining land holder. Questions about this collection should be directed to the Chief Mining Recorder. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 6th Floor, 933 Ramsay Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 685.

Work Type

\?if A {"V*^ tf on L f"^" ^^f li i-f h v ji^

^ fl hll A*a.or*p\At,

Units of WorkDepending on the type of work, list the number of hours/days worked, metres of drilling, kilo metres of grid line, number of samples, etc.

Q \O lv^-% mrv /^ 1 ^k.

1

Associated Costs (e.g. supplies, mobilization and demobilization).

Transportation Costs

Food and Lodging Costs

Cost Per Unit of work

*1o. L*

Total Value of Assessment Work

Total Cost

7J15- Z,6

li* i4(~

Calculations of Filing Discounts:

1. Work filed within two years of performance is claimed at 10007o of the above Total Value of Assessment Work.2. If work is filed after two years and up to five years after performance, it can only be claimed at 5007o of the Total

Value of Assessment Work. If this situation applies to your claims, use the calculation below:

TOTAL VALUE OF ASSESSMENT WORK x 0.50 . Total S value of worked claimed.

Note:- Work older than 5 years is not eligible for credit.- A recorded holder may be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 45 days of a request for verification and/or correction/clarification. If verification and/or correction/clarification is not made, the Minister may reject all or part of the assessment work submitted.

Certification verifying co

Z2 * l SO 3

the accompanying D

to make this certified

, do hereby certify, that the amounts shown are as accurate as may

l whili

fa

(please print lull name)

reasonably be determined and the costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands indicated on

on.JAN -R 1998

O (corded holder, agent, or state company position with signing authority)

GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT OFFICE.

l am authorized

0212 (02/96)

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

March 24, 1998

ELLIOT FEDER 27 SNOWBERRY LANE KING CITY, ONTARIO LOG-1 KO

Minlstere du Developpement du Nordet des Mines

OntarioGeoscience Assessment Office 933 Ramsey Lake Road 6th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5

Telephone: (888)415-9846 Fax: (705) 670-5881

Dear Sir or Madam:

Subject: Transaction Number(s):

Submission Number: 2 .18035

StatusW9850.00001 Deemed Approval

We have reviewed your Assessment Work submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached summary page(s) indicate the results of the review. WE RECOMMEND YOU READ THIS SUMMARY FOR THE DETAILS PERTAINING TO YOUR ASSESSMENT WORK.

If the status for a transaction is a 45 Day Notice, the summary will outline the reasons for the notice, and any steps you can take to remedy deficiencies. The 90-day deemed approval provision, subsection 6(7) of the Assessment Work Regulation, will no longer be in effect for assessment work which has received a 45 Day Notice.

Please note any revisions must be submitted in DUPLICATE to the Geoscience Assessment Office, by the response date on the summary.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Steve Beneteau by e-mail at [email protected] or by telephone at (705) 670-5855.

Yours sincerely,

ORIGINAL SIGNED BYBlair KiteSupervisor, Geoscience Assessment OfficeMining Lands Section

Correspondence ID: 12051

Copy for: Assessment Library

Work Report Assessment Results

Submission Number: 2.18035

Date Correspondence Sent: March 24, 1998

Transaction Number

W9850.00001

First Claim Number

1174532

Township(s) 1 Area(s)

MCMURRAY, CHABANEL

Assessor: Steve Beneteau

Status Approval Date

Deemed Approval March 23, 1998

Section:17 Assays ASSAY

Note, in subsequent submissions please ensure maps are at a scale between 1:10 and 1:5,000.

Correspondence to: Recorded Holder(s) and/or Agent(s):Resident Geologist ELLIOT FEDERSault Ste. Marie, ON KING CITY, ONTARIO

Assessment Files Library KLAUS THEODOR BECKER Sudbury, ON Coberg, Ontario

MITCHELL WAYNE WINESTOCK RICHMOND HILL, ONTARIO

Page: 1Correspondence ID: 12051

rpt on geochem analyses of till samples feder n …...gold was discovered on the shores of lake wawa...

Documents