rpt ip sur capella l - geologyontario.mndmf.gov.on.ca file- li - figure or ei c drawing no. title 6...

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

S3BMNEe015 Z . 1 8696 KEEYASK LAKE

REPORT ON

INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY

CAPELLA LAKE, PATRICIA MINING DIVISION

ONTARIO

for

AGNICO-EAGLES MINES LTD.

RtCMVED

IAMUS SfCllOH

Frank L. Jagodits, P. Eng.,

Consulting Geophysicist

October 1987

010

BXGALIBUR INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANTS LTD.

1111111111111111111

* iiiuinniiiiiiiiniii^F 53BMNEeei5 2.18696 KEEYASK LAKE

- i -

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Introduction

2. Survey Specifications and Instrumentation3. Presentation of the Data

4. Discussion of the Results

4.1 General Comments

5. Conclusions and Recommendations

6,. References

7. Appendix

- List of Personnel

- Writers Declaration

LIST OF ACCOMPANYING FIGURES AND MAPS

FIGURE OR

EI C DRAWING NO. TITLE

1 General Location Map

2 Claim Group Location

3 Induced Polarization Survey

Pseudo-Section, Line 7+OOE

4 Induced Polarization SurveyPseudo-Section, Line 18+OOE

5 Induced Polarization Survey

Pseudo-Section, Line 20+OOE

1191010C

Page 1

23

4

4

10

11

12

15

16

SCALE

1 : 2500

1:2500

1:2500

BXGAblBUR INTERNATIONALCONSULTANTS fcTD.

- li -

FIGURE OR

EI C DRAWING NO. TITLE

6 Induced Polarization

Pseudo-Section, Line









11 Induced PolarizationPseudo-Section, Line



EIC-1856 Induced PolarizationApparent Chargeabili

-1857 Induced Polarization

Apparent Resistivity


Survey,

22+OOESurvey,23-fOOE

Survey,

24+OOE ;

Survey,

26+OOE

Survey,

28+OOE

Survey,30+OOE

Survey,

32+OOE

Survey,

ty Contours n^l

Survey,

Contours n-1Survey,

SCALE

1:2500

1:2500

1:2500

1:2500

1:2500

1:2500

1:2500

1:5000

1:5000

1:5000Differential SP Contours


Interpretation Map

Survey, 1:5000

BXGAblBUR INTERNATIONAb CONSULTANTS I*TD.


1. INTRODUCTION

In the spring of 1987, Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. conducted

ground magnetic and VLF-EM surveys over a group of claims east of

Capella Lake, Ontario (Fig. 1). Based on the results of the

above survey, recommendations were made to carry out an induced

polarization/resistivity survey over selected parts of the

claims. The purpose of the surveys was to detect sulphide

mineralization and alteration which may be associated with

precious metal deposits (Ref. 1). '

TechTerrex Inc. of Mississauga carried out the time

domain induced polarization/resistivity survey over parts of the

claims which are located approximately 185 km north of Pickle

Lake, Ont. (N.T.S. Map 53 B/14). The survey took place from July

22nd and to August 10th, 1987 and altogether 6.1 km of lines were

covered. The claim group is shown on Fig. 2.

The lines surveyed are listed below (the corresponding

claim numbers are given in brackets):

Line 7+OOE (1-869359 and 1-869360), Lines 18+OOK and 20+OOE

(1-869264 and 1-869265), Lines 22+OQE, 23+OOE and 24+OOE

(1-869261 and 1-869262), Line 26+OOE (1-869254 and 1-869255),

Lines 28+OOE and 20+OOE (1-869252 and 1-869253) and Line 32+OOE

(1-869244 and 1-869245).

The following report gives the survey specifications,

instrumentation and discusses the survey results.

BXGAMBURINTERNATIONALCONSULTANTS

l lll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

CAPELLA LAKE PROJECT AREA

n ,,-.p

' l 'i.'x .-''r'J- '

•- f ., ; j i? s y ' x i ;

-o /'a

GENERAL LOCATION MAP

LCCCNO

CZ1' CD CD

\f—bud'

B3

c^ *cv5 ^V"^^^ -

FIGURE 2

CLAIM GROUP LOCATION

KEEYASK LAKE CLAIM SHEET AHEA

t.** t tO.OOO

- 2 -

2. SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS AND INSTRUMENTATION

The survey was conducted employing the M4 time domain receiver manufactured by Huntec (1974) Ltd. of Toronto coupled with the 2.5 kW transmitter, IPT-1 and the generator MG-3 which were made by Phoenix Geophysics Ltd. of Markham, Ontario.

The dipole-dipole electrode array was utilized with an electrode separation (a) of 50m. The apparent chargeability and apparent resistivity were determined at dipole separations (n) of 1 to 4. The survey was conducted in such a way that the current electrode dipole was always to the north of the potential dipoles (traversing due south).

The current cycling rate was 2 sec. "on" and 2 sec. "off" and the measurement of the decay of secondary voltage during the "off" period commenced after an initial delay of 150 msec. The M4 receiver is capable of measuring the decay over selectable periods which are divided into ten windows. For this survey a window width of 60 msec was employed and the total apparent

chargeability and the apparent chargeability in the second, fourth, sixth, eighth and tenth windows were recorded in the field note books. In addition, the self-potential (SP) between the potential electrodes were also measured providing profiles of

differential SP.

BXGAbinilR INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANTS IsTD.


— 3 —

3. PRESENTATION OF THE RESULTS

The results are presented on pseudo-sections at a horizontal scale of 1:2500. The pseudo-sections show the apparent chargeability observed in the eighth window, the computed apparent resistivity and the metal factor. The sections also show a topographic profile along the line (vertical scale 1cm ^ 25m) and the profile of the differential SP. The differential SP observations are shown in the centre of the potential dipoles. The pseudo-sections (Eigures 3 to 12) are located in the back of this report.

The apparent chargeabilities, apparent resistivities observed at n ^ 1 and the diferential SP are given on stable based copies of the base map provided by Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. at a scale of 1:5000. (The same base map was used to present the results of the earlier surveys).

In order to portray possible trends, contours are shown

where possible. The contour interval is 1.0 msec on the apparent chargeability map and on the apparent resistivity : contour map the following contours are shown: 25, 50, 100, 250, 500, 1000, 2500, 5000 and 10,000 ohm-m. The zero, -50mV, -lOOmV and -500mV contours are given on the differential SP map.

The interpretation is presented on stable based copy of the Interpretation Map of Ref. 1 and on the pseudo-sections.

BXGAMBURINTERNATIONALCONSULTANTS


- 4 -

4. DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS

4.1 General Comments

The general geology and the history of previous work is given in some detail in Reference 1. The geology of the claims can be stated briefly as having three major rock types commencing from the north: granite gneiss, mafic volcanics and conglomerate-wacke. In addition, a diabase dyke and mafic intrusives were also mapped.

The previous ground magnetic surveys have clearly outlined three magnetic domains corresponding to the rock types given above. The ground VLF-EM survey have indicated numerous VLF-EM conductors of which the major west-northwest striking conductor describes a regional fault separating the volcanics and sediments.

The induced polarization survey was concentrated in the southeast corner of the property where possible Iron formations were indicated by the magnetics in areas of structural deformation. This area could be near the intersection of two structural breaks, the above mentioned regional fault and a north-northwest striking fault which is now filled by a diabase dyke. Additional lines were also surveyed to test the major fault and its vicinity, and to test the non-magnetic and magnetic volcanics in the west central map area (Line 7+OOE).

BXGAMBUR INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANTS bTD.


- 5 -

Unfortunately, the very unusual ground and geological conditions prevented the introduction of sufficient current into ground to produce reliable observations of the apparent chargeability at many localities. These locations are marked with an "NA" on the pseudo-sections and the chargeability map. It is noteworthy that these conditions occurred when the current electrode dipole was located south of the base line. Under normal circumstances quite reliable observations were made at dipole separation n ~ 1 , but the reliability deteriorated at increasing dipole separations. An exception is the area just south of the base l ine on Lines 23+OOE and 24+OOE where reliable observations could not be made even at the first dipole separation. The peculiar conditions may be caused by very high contact resistances at the current electrodes. The survey crew attempted to remedy the situation by moving the current electrodes or watering them, which was successful on occasion. It is also suspected that rapidly varying electrical properties of the overburden and bedrock may have created unusual near surface current paths resulting in the unreliable measurements. It is also noted that the apparent resistivities associated with the "NA" apparent chargeabilities may be less reliable because of the small current applied and because of the small primary

voltages obtained.

The study of the apparent chargeabilities reveals that they seldom deviate markedly from the background. Where the

chargeabilities are about one and one-half times the background they are marked as having "elevated chargeability" which is the lowest,'possible anomalous' rating. The majority of the indicated localities fall in this category. In addition one

BXGAfclBUR INTERNATIONAb CONSULTANTS IsTD.


- 6 -

location was identified as probably anomalous and one locality as anomalous.

The contour map of the apparent resistivity at n ^ 1 was used to indicate the areas where the apparent resistivity is less than 100 ohm-m. Not surprisingly, these areas appear to correlate with zones of structural deformation indicated by VLF-EM conductors (conductive faults and/or shears) and by structures interpreted from the magnetic contour map.

The differential SP anomaly axes which are graded weak,

moderate and strong were taken from the contour map and will be discussed below as appropriate.

The surveyed part of Line 7+OOE crosses the extreme

northwest, narrow end of a magnetic volcanic unit which is in contact with interpreted altered non-rnagnetic volcanics. This

part of the line is north of the base line and measurement problems were not encountered. Elevated chargeability coupled with medium to high resistivities were observed over the narrow, magnetic volcanics. It would appear that higher resistivity

rocks could underlay the area of interpreted altered volcanics. Further work will be needed to confirm this observation. The IP anomaly may have been caused by rock type change. The northerly SP anomaly correlates with a zone of lower resistivity; however

there are insufficient data to predict a source reliably.

The observations along Line 18+OOE contain many "NA" situations at n ^ 2, 3 and 4. One zone of elevated chargeability just south of 4-fOOS is outlined near the interpreted boundary

BXGALIBUR INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANTS LTD.


- 7 -

between two volcanic units. It is associated with a relative resistivity low. The main low resistivity feature of the line is found at the southern end where the major west-northwest striking fault zone intersects an interpreted northwest shear; the n^l apparent chargeabilities are at background. Unfortunately, reliable chargeabilities could not be obtained at the larger dipole separations, hence any mineralization which may be associated with the major structure was not detected. Only minor, weak differential SP anomalies were observed at this location, but the pronounced resistivity low describes the structurally disturbed zone.

The induced polarization data include many "NA" stations along Line 20+OOE, The questionable elevated chargeability feature near 2+OOS is over a magnetic anomaly and a VLF-EM conductor (VC 3). The chargeability anomaly is associated with a moderate differential SP anomaly and a relative resistivity low. Once again rock type change and/or very minor mineralization along a fault and/or contact may be implied. \

The induced polarization results are indeed poor along Lines 22+OOE, 23+OOE and 24+OOE. Only one questionable, elevated chargeability was outlined on Line 24+OOE north of the base line,

correlating with a magnetic anomaly at the contact between members of the volcanic domain. There is no further interest attached to this anomaly. The interesting feature of this area is a zone of very low apparent resistivity covering three VLF-EM

conductors and a part of a magnetic anomaly. This zone also covers two significant differential SP anomalies. It is noted that northern SP anomaly appears to be on an upward sloping

BXGAbiniJR INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANTS bTD.


- 8 -

ground. The source of the SP responses is enigmatic, but both anomalies are near VLF-EM conductors. The zone of low apparent resistivity could indicate an intensely fractured area which may be covered by conductive overburden. However it should be kept in mind that the apparent resistivities coupled with the "NA" chargeabilities are suspect.

Although the number of "NA" observations have decreased along L-26+OOE the results are essentially featureless. The very high resistivities observed at 2+25S and at the corresponding larger dipole separations are due to conditions at the site of the current electrode pair (located at H-50S and 2+OOS). An elevated chargeability anomaly centred about 5+OOS is the noted event of L-28+OOE. It is associated with a -623mV differential SP anomaly and a relative apparent resistivity low. The possible anomaly is located at the interpreted boundary between sediments and volcanics and it correlates with VLF-EM conductor VC6. It is suggested that above signatures could indicate sulphides and/or

graphite.

The prime event of the survey occurs on L-30+OOE centred

about 1+75S. The 18.7 msec observation at 2+OOS, n ^ 2 is

questionable, however there is an anomalous build-up at dipole separations of n ~ l and n ^ 2. The IP anomaly which could indicate sulphides is associated with moderate to low apparent

resistivities in an area interpreted to be underlain by moderately magnetized volcanics. The anomalous situation is near a nearly circular magnetic anomaly, believed to indicate mafic rocks which may be part of the diabase dyke observed further to the north-northwest; as noted earlier this diabase dyke may

BXGAMBUR INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANTS bTD.


- 9 -

signify the location of another significant zone of weakness.

This IP anomaly is just north of a magnetic event which may indicate iron formation.

The northerly elevated chargeability anomaly of L-32+OOE is manifested at n ~ 1 and it could be considered as the signature of the eastesrly continuation of the anomalous horizon on L-30+OOE. However the magnetic association which exists on Line 32+OOE is lacking on L-30+OOE, consequently the possibility of having two separate sources should be kept in mind.

The probable IP anomaly at the southern end of L-30+OOE and the southern elevated chargeability of L-32+OOE form a weak east-northeast trend which is associated with a mangetic unit

indicating possible iron formations. The IP trend and the IP anomalies are also associated with an east-northeast striking shear zone. The probable IP anomaly of L-30+OOE, which is open to the south is situated over the intersection of the above mentioned shear and an interpreted shear striking northwest. The southern elevated chargeability of L-32+OOE appears to have deeper source which may be nearer to surface at 3+OOS. Although the IP responses of this trend are not well defined, the trend occupies a significant location near possible iron formation in an area of complex structural deformation. It is believed that the cause of the IP responses include sulphide and magnetic sulphides which may be located along a shear zone.

HXGAMIUW INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANTS LTD.


- TO -

5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The effectiveness of the limited induced polarization coverage was considerably reduced by the unususal electrical property variations in the overburden and bedrock south of the base line. These variations could have caused the conditions in which the observations became unreliable. These are marked as "NA" on the pseudo-sections and on the apparent chargeability contour map.

The observations at n ^ 1 indicate that the chargeability remains moderately uniform near surface. Several elevated (about 1.5 times background) IP responses were observed together with an anomalous xone on L-30+OOE which possibly extends to L~32-fOOE. The anomaly which could indicate sulphides could constitute a drill target if the locality is believed to be geologically favourable. The other locations of further interest are found along the east-northeast trending weak IP trend commencing at about 4+65S on Line 30+OOE. This trend appears to correlate with a magnetic unit which may represent iron formation and/or basic volcanics and it is also associated with an east-northeast interpreted shear zone. Sulphides, magnetic sulphides associated with the iron formation could be the source of the IP responses.

Although the elevated IP feature at 5+OOS, on Line 28+OOE is outside, but very close to the above mentioned magnetic unit it gains importance because of its location along the interpreted boundary between volcanics and metasediments and because of the

EXGAblBURINTERNATIONALCONSULTANTS


- 11 -

correlation between the IP feature and a strong differential SP anomaly, indicating a weakly mineralized contact and/or shear zone.

An area of very low apparent resistivity coupled with differential SP anomalies located just south of the base line between Lines 22-fOOE and 24+OOE could also hold further interest.

The present induced polarization survey provided only partial results which should be combined with the more recent geologic information to select drill hole locations.' The promising, partial IP results show weak trends, indicating possible line-to-line correlation which suggest that the re-surveying the original recommended areas employing special surveying techniques would be beneficial to outline zones of weak mineralization. It is recommended that the new surveying should employ a 7.5 kW or 10 kW transmitter. It is believed that use of the gradient array will help to overcome the problems encountered during the present survey. However, it is suggested that as an alternative, the PPL (lateral pole-pole) array should also be tested. The specifications for the survey and the test could be prepared after reviewing the present results in the light of new geologic information. The specifications should be flexible to allow the operator to change current electrode locations to avoid high contact resistances, realizing that some experimentation will be needed to locate the proper current electrode sites. It is also recommended that the VLF-EM surveying of the claims should be completed if a crew is mobililzed to conduct the new IP surveys.

BXGftblBUR INTERNATIONAb CONSULTANTS IsTD.


- 12 -

In view of the difficulties of the present IP survey, it is recommended that a geophysicist should be present during the initial part of the new survey.

FraVik u.

Consulting Gooo ph y gio i s t-/.'''

BXGAMBUR INTBRNATIONftl* GONSUbTANTS bTD.


- 13 -

6. REFERENCES

1. Jagodits, F.L., 1987 Report on Ground Magnetic and VLF-EM Surveys, Capella Lake, Patricia Mining Division, Ontario, prepared for Agnico- Eagle Mines Ltd.

EXGAMBUR INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANTS LTD.

1111111111111111111

0- 14 -

7. APPENDIX

LIST OF PERSONNEL

Name

———

J. Ashenhurst, Operator

M. Nemes, Helper

P. Perigny, Helper

0. Adeniji, Helper

R. T. Marcroft, Drafting

Address

13771 - 114A Ave.

Surrey, B.C.

V3R 2N3

102 - 770E 7th Ave.

Vancouver, B.C.

V5T 1P2

321 Oakwood Ave.

North Bay, Ont.

P1B 9C6

1201-200 Woolner Ave.

Toronto, Ont.

M6N 1Y4

10 Hurontario Street,

Mississauga, Ont.

L5G 3G7.

BXGAblBUR INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANTS fcTD.


- 15 -

S. Blunt, Typing

F.L. Jagodits, P. Eng.

Consulting Geophysicist

10 Hurontario Street,

Mississauga, Ont.

L5G 3G7.

353 Berkeley Street,

Toronto, Ont.

M5A 2X6.

BXGAMBUR INTERNATIONAL. CONSULTANTS I*TD.


- 16 -

CERTIFICATE

I, Francis Loui Jagodits, of the City of Toronto, County of York,

Province of Ontario, do hereby certify that:

1. I am a geophysical engineer residing at 353 Berkely Street, Toronto, Ontario.

2. I am a graduate of the Technical University of Sopron, Hungary with a Dipl. Eng. degree in geophysical engineering (1956).

3. I am a member of the Society of ExplorationGeophysicists, the European Association of Exploration Geophysicists, the Canadian Geophysical Union and a Fellow of the Geological Association of Canada.

4. I am a professional engineer, registered in the Province of Ontario.

5. I have no direct or indirect interest, nor do I expect to receive any interest directly or indirectly in the property or securities of Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd.

6. The statements made in this report are based on the study of published and unpublished private reports.

7. Permission is granted to use in whole or in part forassessment and qualifications requirements but not for advertising purposes.

Dated at Toronto,This 8th day of October, 1987

Francis L. Jagodi\*Si XDipl-^Eng. P. Eng.X 1 B^prfBlBUR

*1 ffi.-INTERNATIONAL-INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANTS LTD.

l l l l l l l l l l l l

o o

CHARGEABILITY :i ^ ''''vo" - seconds ,

volt

5 "Vs/V ' m Vs/V

- 3

RESISTIVITY.

Lcgc"*'1rT"c cci*ou r | ri

"V. 'C a- -n e'c

~- _ '-5,3,5,7 -5 n-m e'C-

o •e

o o

/•f 1.1,

/•e

Z.ff 2-0?

/f//J

o o

2.2

CD

(S)o

Direc*'6n of Trove^se (South)

o r 50m \ i- 1,2,3 S4

' 'P'ottjng Point

INSTRUMENTATION

Tx : phoenix Geophysics Ltd IPT-1 and MG-3 generator (2-SkW)

Rx: Huntec (!974) L*d V4 Time Domain

Td ^ !50ms, Tc = 60ms

IP RESPONSE

Anomalous,,.

Probably anomalous.... L-.-.-.J

Eleva

\

co o0 J--o

COo oJ.^-

1

COoO-i- in

——J

CO0 O-1-U3

CO Oo^N-

Zof

2/5"

M* 3 l ? 3.*?

of Troverse (South)

o ——

O - 50m n- !,2,3

'.'Plotting Point

INSTRUMENTATIONTx : phoenix Geop.hysics Ltd (PT- i

and MG-3 generator (2-5KW)

Rx: Huntec (1974) Ltd M4 ^me Domain Td = iSCms, Tc = 50ms

IP RESPONSE

Anomalous...

Probably anomalous...... L

Elevated.................... L


CHARGEABILITY : IV!sf rri'M'vo" - seconds ^

volt

Con'Diir intorvo's:

S^. Sr-Vs/V

x., l m VS/V

co C O4-

CO (^OO-ex1

CO r^

C -1-•o

CO 0oJ-^

1

COoO-um

1

CO O 0-J-

u?

APPARENT RESISTIVITY:- m e'res )

i*^'ri | c coi*ou r ii'e 0 n- -ri e*c. -5,3,5,7-5 H-m e*c.

z i

/. 7 Z y

3. f 3.1?


C U ARGEAB!UTY-n.i', vo "- - seconds ,

CO n *OUr in'eryg' 5 ;

S^. 5 ^vs 7 V x^. ' "-Ws /v

APPARENT RESISTIVITY:

Lcoc r !*h-Yi'c cc^'ou'' | ri **"S. 'O H. - m e*c.

•*— 1-5,3,5,7-5 firn e'c.

oo Oo

o o

toCo O

CO

O O -i-(O

l i

J. o 7

12.-J

2.S-

J. f

' 3 l 3.0?

to O O

CO Oo

COo o

tOo o

Direc*'on of Traverse ( Sou^h)

/•t

f f,

3 l

Z V 2 t,

——— 3"

'S./

3-3

3.0 7

a - 5 0m i- 1,2,3

Point

INSTRUMENTATIONTx : Phoenix Geophysics Ltd IPT-1

ond MG-3 generotor (2-5kW)

Rn: Huntec U974) L*d M4 "Hme Domain Td - 150ms, Tc = 50ms

IP RESPONSE

Anomalous..

Probably anomalous.... LI

Elevated. ........,....... L-

o(f) o o o

oDirection of Troverse (Sou^b)

2-7a - 50m n^ 1,2,3

'•'p'otting Poirits 3

INSTRUMENTATIONTx : Phoe n ix Geophysics Ltd IPT-1

and MG -3 generator (2'5kW)

Rx: Huntec (1974) L*d M4Time Domain Td ^ 150 ms, Tc - 60ms

IP RESPONSE

Anomalous..

Probably anomalous.... L

Elevated................... L


CHARGEABILITY : V!smi ! l 'vo" - seconds ,

voi* "~~ '

5 nWs /V l m Vs/V

APPARENT RESISTIVITY:

ooo r i*hTt'c contour tn*

. 10 fi- m e*c

— '-5, 3, 5 , 7- 5 rim etc-

n ^ 2

O O

en O O

en O O

z-7

2.4

COO O


CHARGEABILITY : Ms( -rv " i v o'* - seconds ,~ "

5 riVs /V

l mVS/V

APPARENT RESISTIVITY( O^TI - metres )

Q H- rri e*C.

'-5.3,5,7-5n-m etc.

n : 2

/-J

/•S 7

COo o

CD

OO

f.7

Z 07

Zz-JS

viO O

tn O O

CDo o

w o o

Direction of Traverse (South)

2-4?

0 ~H —

-^h, — __ o ___ *-L-- ~ - - n a

\N

50m N',2,3 8-1 \

——— (V^-i) ——

s/

/s

s

".'P'otting Point

8-7

INSTRUMENTATIONTX : Phoenix Geophysics Ltd IPT- l

and MG-3 generator (2-5kW)

Rx: Huntec (1974) Ltd M4 Time Domain Td - 1 50ms, Tc z 60ms

P RESPONSE

Anomalous ..

Probably anomalous..... L

Elevated................... l

COcO

O O

c o

girec*'OP of Troverse (South)

If 7

O ; 50mn^ 1,2,3

Point

INSTRUMENTATIONTx : Dhoenix GeoDhysics Ltd !PT-

and MG-3 generoTor (2-5KW)

U974) Lrd M4 Tlme Domain ""d ^ 150ms, Tc - 60ms

IP RESPONSE

Anomalous................. I\\XX\\1

Probably anomalous .... L J---- — J

Elevated................... l —J

SOC

H

SOO

4

SO

CH

NG

CH

o-.COs-Ij fS

8

Cj

t/*U

J '

liJ E

C

C C

C

IftOk.

1 v -^ ^

•* i/)

vi

1 E

Ec

•n -

O

1 J

oQ.

JZ CO00LJcr~-^

LiJor.Q

. Q,

k.Eer: O

C

C f

C

y."bE o

^ O

)

g E

r C

i o

-

' M

0

"' N

c E

in

f

C!

"l

E

0

9CJ'

-oil

oO O

Oo

V)oo

V)o o?irec t 'Qp of Troverse (South)

/••s x 3

2. r

INSTRUMENTATIONTX : Dhoenix Geophysics Ltd !PT- 1

ond MG- 3 generator ( 2'5kW)

RK: Huntec (1974) L^d M4 Time Domain Td ^ 150ms, Tc = 60ms

IP RESPONSE

Anomalous...

Probably anomalous...!

Elevated .............. ....l

SOC

M9

SO

CH

S

SO

CH

SO

CM

9

SGCH

Z

V;

SO

CH

l

•T8

(T C

C

C

O

Q.

1 —CO

—p

x w

h '-

00LO

J

V

S *C

[ IT)

UJ

'

lij- f.

UJ

10 CT

S ^

h-1

c ^ x

UJ

^ ^ cr

1 f-

E g

c w - Q:

Oil

^r

u

—

o y

y -^

*

((

W;

4(bEe~0, _ ,

•J'

4-Cri orC'

Uo

*

OCJOr i^Ti'C

i. 1C Q--

-.j i

c c.

c c

o4-E^ro 10i(

oo o

to oo

wo o

/•S? z./

Z.6

•4726

71*

o o

o* Trcverse (Sou*h)

O -— — t——— no -

o rn- ,2,3 Si

".'P'otting Po'nt

INSTRUMENTATIONTx : Dhoemx Geophysics Ltd !PT- l

and MG-3 generotor (2-5KW)

Rx.: H untec (1974) Ltd W4 Time Domain Td - 150ms, Tcz 50ms

IP RESPONSE

Anomalous...

Protxibly anomalous..... l

Elevated............... l i


CHARGEABILITY : M s^ -TV^'^'VO"- seconds , ' v o' *

^'our m'e'vo' s :

5 r^Vs /V

i ^ V s /V

APPARENT RESISTIVITY :

ic coi'our in*e'vo's

;o Q i-53

n -- 2

n; 3

co

O

COo o

COo0

CO00

ID

1 1

COOoCO

Z-*

Z-S

A'X -30- 2.1 i-k

CO CO CO CO CO C 0 O o O 0 0 O o O ^ i i * J Direction o' Traverse (Sou*b)

CsNN^ L ; -~-j— —— o ——— i— —— no ———

— (Q —— ——— 0 ————— 1

a : 50m \ n^ 1,2,3 S & \

'.'P'otting Point

INSTRUMENTATIONr* : Phoenix Geophysics Ltd l PT- 1

and MG-3 generator (2-5kW)

Rx: Hu-itec (!974) Ltd M4 Time Domain Td - !50ms, Tc = 60ms

IP RESPONSES

Anomalous.....

Probably anomalous.... l

Elevated

o oCOo o o

COo o

COo o

COo o

CHARGEABILITY :( ^l''''vo" ' seconds ,

volt

Co n 'our i^te-'vo' s :

S.. 5 ^Vs/Vv^ ' m Vs X V

l\\\\\\\\\\Vi

xV/f

APPARENT RESISTIVITY:OHm -

0 n - "i e'c -5,3,5,7-5n-m etc.

n - c. 744.

0o•o

1

CO0 O

1

CO0 0

LO

,

CO0o

,

COo oN'

,

2.3

l2o

3.2.

Pirec* ; on o ' Traverse ( Sou*h)

0 - 50m i^ 1,2,3

Point

INSTRUMENTATIONT* ; Phoenix Geophysics Ltd !PT- l

G"d MG-3 generoTor (2-5KW)

Rx: Huitec (1974) L!d V4 "^me Domain ^d - 150ms, Tc : 60ms

P RESPONSESAnomalous ........

Probably anomalous.

Elevated..............

LIL__J


"n' : ''VC'* - S'? C Q ^ c! S

Co n *ou r ' n *e r

••^ 5 ^ Vs 7 V

v^ l nn VS/ V

APPARENT RESISTIVITY :

e*c.

n ^ 2

-4-

inO OCM

1 1

tooo

1

too04-

1

en00

IO

enO O

3 t, z. t 3.Z.

3.3

Z.3

l2-0

/i.

/

Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines 53BHNEeei5 S . 1 8696 KEEYASK LAKE

Ministere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines

February 8, 1988 Your File: 87-236 Our file: 2.10696

900

Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development and MinesCourt HouseP.O. Box 3000Sioux Lookout, OntarioPOV 2TO

Dear Sir:

f u ' .'a' • .'•^iv'ii.:! •it r i..11-' /l , V-'i

f. R l G 1C!W

PI f:- c i -, i v r DRE: Notice of Intent dated January 22, 1988

Geophysical {Induced Polarization) Survey submitted on Mining Claims PA 869244 et al in the Area of Keeyask Lake

The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.

Please inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so indicate on your records.

Yours sincerely,

W. R. Cowan, ManagerMining Lands SectionMines and Minerals Division

Whitney Block, Room 6610 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3

Telephone: (416) 965-4888

RM:plEnclosure: Technical Assessment Work Credits

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining A Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

Mr. J.B. Boniwell, Mr. S. Medd 10 Hurontario Street Mississauga, Ontario L5G 3G7

Resident Geologist Sioux Lookout, Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern Development

Technical Assessment Work Credits

Ontario Date

Janaury 22, 1988

File2.10696

Mining Recorder's Report of Work W 8? ^ 236

Recorded Holder

J. B. Boni well , S. MeddKXOUWXifr Area

Keeyask LakeType of survey and number of

Assessment days credit per claimGeophysical

Magnetometer Hays

46

Other days

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column

Geological days

Geochftmical . days

Man days Q Airborne Q]

Special provision | | Ground (x)

1 l Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

fi Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

PA 869261 869359 to 360. inclusive

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

40 Days Induced PolarizationPA 869244 to 245 inclusive

869252 to 255 inclusive 869262 869264 to 265 inclusive

Mo credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

Q not tuff iciently covered by the survey Q insufficient technical data filed

* Maximum geophysical credits attained on claims PA 869244 to 245 inclusive, 869252 to 255 inclusive, 869262 and 869264 to 265 inclusive under subsection 77(9) of the Mining Act, RSO 1980.

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment day* recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical -80; Geologocal-40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) -60.

626 (65/12)

Ministry of., N6rthern Development

and MinesOuaoo

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Gcochemical and Expenditures) 8 f-Z St,

Mining Act J

Instructions: — Please type or print.If number of mining claims traversed exceeds soace on this form, attach a list.

Note: — Only days credits ca'culated in the "Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

— Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Survcy(s)

TT-WTOED POLARIZATIONClaim Holdcrls)

J. B. BONIV ? EJ.3 , S. MEDD

Township or Area

KEEYASK I-AKS/6-2085Prospector's Licence No.

A49270/.M9150Address

10KURONTARIO ST., MISSISSAHOA, ONTARIO J5" 307Survey Company Date of E

TEdHTERREX INC. ?02a y \ rurvey (from e/ to))7 87 i10 OS 87vlo. I Yr. Day l Mo. l Yr.

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

FRANK L. JAGODITS, 10 HURONTARIO ST., MISSISSATCA, ONTARIO I

Total Miles of line Cut

5.2 km

50 307Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Special Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 10 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

RECEM., D.,, JAN J

Complete reverse side and enter 'CHWslilf^ l AU

rf

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

1- Other

VfO

Geochemical

Geophysical

)S ®TtWnet c- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other -j. ^ p

Geological

Geochemica

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days perClaim

Days per Claim

46

Days per Claim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type o* Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calc ulation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total Expenditures

S -5- 15

cTotal

Jays Credits

Instructions Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

D.itc . Recorded HnfUcr c^ec. 16/87 ' farf (' i

rAy tjjgnature)

Mining ClaimPrefix

Pa. v .•.-V'.'.'' -'

* - :' j *

l-

..~

Number

86924/1

86923586925286925386925486925586Q26186Q262869264869265869359869360

x^nTK7'fc nr\\if(ffillV' Oc.C w ^ '*

.-.. Ml

J^DWISIQ.

Expend. Days Cr.

^s."x/

•07 B^lOf

tps

-K

A. eton.!For Office Use Only

T"olal Days Cf Recorded

4?6)

Certification Verifying Report of Workhereby certify that l have a personal

or witnessed same during and/or after

Namo and Postal Address of Person Certi

- i Ciiriol n . V/il son

Date Hccoracd

J)fC. 22, it S fDato Aoproved as Recorded

Mining ClaimPrefix | Number

——

. ————————————

TrffalruTrnb/r of mining clayms covefect-tw this report of work. ^S.

Min/ftg Recori\er f

Branf*i"Director j C. rJ). / ,-Ji 1 J

QfrtSc^ls*^-*-^

Expend. Days Cr.

——————

12

1— VJU~X

nnd intimate knowledge of the fncls set forth in (he Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work its completion nnd the annexed report is true.

tying

-..3. Jlo.s.ew.o.o d .^\V.B. , .. F:i ss jpRnnpm Ont.ArJn T^O ~T:n

S&T/^; Ce^fffied bw)Sigoaturef) i /?

Assessment Work Breakdown

Man Days are based on eight (8) hour Technical or Line-cutting days. Technical days include work performed by consultants, draftsmen, etc..

Type of Survey

INDUCED POLARIZATJOr SHRVEY

Technical Days

70 X y

Technical Days Credits

n: 553

Line-cutting Days Total Credits

4- 553

No. of Claims

,| 12 .

Days perClaim

A6

Type of Survey

Technical Days Credits

Lino-cutting Days Total Credits

Days per Claim

X 7

X 7

X 7

Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Geophysical-Geological-Geochemical Technical Data Statement

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

S

Type of Survcy(s) Induced Polarization

Township or Area Keeyask Lake /6-2085——

Claim Holdcr(s) J.B. Boniwell. S. Medd

Survey Company

Author of Report

Address of Author lQ^HurQD±ariO-

. L. JagotSi f.s

Covering Dates of Survey. 22/07/87 - R/1Q/R7(linecutting to office)

Total Miles of Line Cut __f

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical

--Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer——Radiometric.

-Other————-.

DAYS per claim

Geological.

GeochemicaL

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne survey*)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. .Radiometric(enter days pet claim)

DATF.! December 38/87 SIGNATURE:.Author of Report or Agent

Res. Geol._____

Previous Surveys File No. l"ype

.Qualifications.

Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

(prefix)

.P.Q......................

(number)

........8692M......

869245

.869252.

869253

.869.25.5..

.86.9.2.61.

...................................86.9.2.6.4.............

...................................B6.9.26.51.............

...................................86.9.25.9..............

TOTAL CLAIMS__12.

837 (85/12)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUNDLSUKVKYS^ - If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations _________________________Number of Readings — Station interval ______________________________Line spacing —————.

Profile scale___________________________________________Contour interval.

C

O

Instrument .Accuracy — Scale constant - Diurnal correction method -Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ___

InstrumentCoil configuration Coil separation ^^^ Accuracy

S bw. ". ' (specify V.L.F. station) M

Method: C! Fixed transmitter D Shoot back Q In line CD Parallel line

Frequency ______________________

Parameters measured.

Instrument.Scale constantCorrections made.

Base station value and location

y,OH

Q

Elevation accuracy.

Instrument ._______________———————————————————————————————— Method QTime Domain D Frequency Domain Parameters - On time ,- 2 sec -___________________ Frequency —————

^;. - Off time 2 sec.___________________ Range ———^ - Delay time 150 msec.--^—-—-———......——

- Integration time 600 msec._______________O P.,lf} Power 2.5 kw Tx

Electrode array— Dipole-Dipole

Electrode spacing —^Q "L*——————

Type of electrode metal

Instrument________________________________________ Range.Survey Method M————.^--———-.—--—--^——-——.——--—-—-—--———-—-.-————.

Corrections made.

RAlMpM^TRJCInstrument^———Values measured .Energy windows (levels) ________,———-——-——-———..^——.——.-.—.—.——. Height of instrument____________________________Background Count. Size of detector.^—————^——-—-^———--^———-——————-——————.-—.——.—..——...——Overburden -—-—-——--^—-..^.^-——--^^-.-.--——.——--—.-—-——.^-..—-^-——..^——.

(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTIIKRS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey———————.————^^-—-—————.——..——

Instrument ~———————^———^—————————.

Accuracy__________________________Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

A1R15ORNE SURVEYS Type of survcy(s).————

Instrumcnt(s) ——————(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy__________________.(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used_______________ ————^——————^^——

Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude________________________________Line Spacing. Miles flown over total area________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples- Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled.. Horizon Development- Sample Depth—————Terrain.————————

Drainage Development——————————Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICALMEILJODSValues expressed in: per cent

p.p. m. p. p. b.

D Da

Cu, Pb,

Others^-

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle)

Field Analysis (-Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used__

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. -—————————

SAMl^K REPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis ———...

Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used.——

Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory^— Extraction Method__ Analytical Method__ Reagents Used -^———

.tests)

-tests)

.tests)

GcneraL General.

9I 0 I5 9i?OO'

53 0 00'

Cope 'la l O

,oij i "-"^J *'l

8t134? | gt93Vg l (?6 *.?tV l BLVZLl l 8 0*14-1 \ gbllsJl/i n/ i q ,HI** i vnfTi/ l I '^gocr-

o fei" \icoiS2c j ^;7*7?.(, i /.I.M"---

RESERVE N2.87INDIAN i-es /co, tcoi-rei, rootvvo,— — . ,- — -t- — — -4— — -4- — î

LOG. REB 44

97rJ /ec^T^/cc^ris/so? wV' \^ -^/l*

Eyapomikama

^"1007948.) 1007941*1007^3B ^ 1008116

J

T007947 |i007942Tio07937|lOOein--l-. TT^- V__ ^—

1007694.1007^9' p*

f__lri^.H---'1!———^--ii^rt-fl **ft ft"' Pn 4 FÂ iDn "1007698 ,oo7C

|I007944 } l0079jSfe' 1008119

*"73**0t. fcv?Wo7 , jf^3WoP ^ 10060^0 l * eo"8pW/ l iepBfiJ \ l pTs •I'jrT X P o "fltZV~tO oTieS \ f O Q719 ot'*e 7 911 l V. *^W MfcMW

x^V

V-

"Nj

30

13 12' 7'9! 0 OO'

53B14NEB815 2.19696 KEEYASK LAKE

Bob K

S00

LEGEND

HIGHWAY AND ROUTE No.

OTHER ROADS

TRAILS

SURVEYED LINESTOWNSHIPS. BASE LINES, ETC LOTS, MINING CLAIMS, PARCELS. ETC

UNSURVEYED LIMSLOT LINESPARCEL BOUNDARYMINING CLA'VS ETC,

RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY UTILITY LINES NON PERENNIAL STREAM FLOODING OR F i CODING RIGHTS SUBDIVlStON OR COMPOSITE PLAN RESERVATIONS ORIGINALMARSH OR

MINES

TRAVERSE MONUMENT

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS

TYPE OF DOCUMENT

PATENT, SURFACE A, MINING RIGHTS

.SURF-ACE RIGHTS ONLY ...

. MINING RIGHTS ONLY .

LEASE,SURFACE 4 MINING RIGHTS,.

" .SURFACE RfGHTSONLY.....

" , MINING RIGHTSONLY.. . . .

LICENCE OF OCCUPATION ............

SYMBOL

RESERVATION .

CANCELLED

SAND 5. GRAVE L

mBBT

OC0

MAYNOTf M INING *if,HT* IN CARCfcLS1*13 VESTED IN ORIGINAL PATENTCC **LANDS AC' RSQ 19 JO C H A*1 MO, SEC 43 EuftStC

R E F E R E^ N C E SÂREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION

M.R.O M'NING ftlGHTSONLY -;

SRO - SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

M.* S. - MINING AND SURFACE RIGHTS

mor Ord*f N o D*t* DttpocJtfon f .1*

it

. 30/8 ftf/tf

APR z /fS/tf-S

)

z 1/5 7

SCALE: 1 INCH - 40 CHAINS

PATRICICIA MIMING rw." lIE

. Vft

A.M.

Lb

P f.1

O l OOO 2CKW 40OO 6OOO aooo

o ?ooM6TWES

1OOO1 KM 1

2000 (2 KM)

AREA

KEEYASK LAKEMN R ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT

SIOUX LOOKOUTMINING DIVISION

PATRICIALAND TITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION

KENORA ( PATRICIA PORTION

Ministryof L andNatural ManagementResources Branch

Ontario

t FEBRUttn; AM. • ••fell

G-2085

Capel la Lake

LEGEND1-869(297 Q * - 8 6 [9290Extent of IP coverage......!

Contours at logarithmic intervals of 25, 50, 100 in ohm-m

AZ.90 0

AQNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

CAPELLA LAKE AREA Patricia M.D.. Ontartii

Induced Polaniatkm APPARENT RlSlSfWTfY CQ

86-CU-DIDwg. No. E.I.C. 1857

24 X 34 PAINTED ON NO 1000H CLtARPRINT

Capet la Lake

360 D 4 - 8 69354 ' " 9

LEGENDExtent of IP coverage

-O mV contour

-50 mV contour

-100 mV contour

-500 mV contour,

53BI4NEeeiS S.19696 KEEYASK LAKE

869352-D r -r.

l -B69|55I p 4 -999

26

99

9

— . -f'

267

'

s

,-- — ""'

l -

- - - FV1 -869268^

869267 Q 4-

869350 -j- Q 4 8692+66

69349 Q 4-H69265

•4B34C Q

2-869348 -D

4- 869264

3/86926*,

l- 069263 H 4-86929*

iiJ(O

UJ GO

Ulo CJ

OJ

UJ^J- ea

LJ(O CVJ

UJoo ea

UJO ro

UJ CJrO

UJ

ro

UJ (Oro

A2.90 0

i

^\\ o\

l/1

AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

CAPELLA LAKE AREA Patrlda M.D., Ontario

SCALE: 1 5000

DATE: SEPT. 1987

Indu* DIFFEI

APPROVED BY : DRAWN BY

REVISED

;ed Polarizatton Survey*ENTfALipT0lIfB9fe*

Dwg. No. E.I.C. 1858DRAWING NUMBER

86-CL-DI

I* X 3* PHINTEO ON NO 1 000H CLEARPRJNT *

Capel la Lake

LEGEND

Extent of IP coverage.......!

Contour interval..........,. l mvs/V

l mVs/V contour

5 mVs/V contour

Depression

AZ.90 0

1-869265 D 4-66*29

D--V-86933B

2-869234 3-869253.- -

2-869348 t-i 3 -869264.

53B14NE8ai5 2.1*696 KEEYASK LAKE

l————————————————————————————

230

24 X M POINTED ON HO. 1 OOOH CUAflPftlNT *

AQNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

CAPELLA LAKE AREA Patricia M.D., Qniart©

SCALE: l : 5000

DATE: SEPT. I987

APPROVED BY:DRAWN BY

REVISED

Induced Polartzatlon Survfttf APPARENT CHARGEABJUtt

M8, n-1Dwg. Ne. Ejl.C. 1856 86-CL-D!

Iron formation . ...,............ l r

Felsic intrusive.............,. T l

Mafic intrusive ............ ITH

Meta sediments ................ IDS

Diabase dyke ...,,....... . .—— dd

Axis of magnetic anomaly with amplitude larger than 61,000 nT or anomaly with significant strike length ....

Capella Lake

DOMAINGRANITE

Limit of magnetic domain .

Limit of magnetic unit

Limit of magnetic body...... — — ~ — — — va afid vbMagnetization,

l east, moderate, i ntense ..VO,VD,VC

vb and ve

vb/va and veDOMAINVOLCANIC

49692*66 V

vb ahd vavb/vo and ve va and vb

vb dnd va

ve and vb

M-

va and vbva and vb

SEDIMENTARYor r.

DOMAINvb and ve

2 869S4B n 3 869264

4 Interpreted fault and/or shear zone

M - magnetic support V- VLF-EM support

Axis of VLF-EM conductor with identification

poor, fair, good.

Approximate location ofV

mapped gossan............... ^

Extent of IP coverage........

Differential SP anomaly axis weak, moderate, strong.....

IP responsesanomalous ....................probably anomalous.........elevated.............,.......

Area of apparent resistivity -~— -T" tess than lOOohm-m, n-1..... -1- ——

To accompany report by :

F. L. Jagodits , P.Eng., Consulting Geophysicist

UJCO

UJ UJ UJ CO

UJo

53B14MEUMS1S 2,16696 KEEYASK LAKE

U UJ UJ 0) GO Oc\J , c^ ro '

Survey Contractor TECHTERREX INC.

Mississauga, Ontario X?^^^Nwf^ — N^\

r 4 t\\ ,, ]f t^---Vr*. 1 f 1K v ( K^4^-

LJ i Ul U OJ | ^ *0ro ; K) i 10

AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

CAPELLA LAKE AREA Patricia M.DM Ontarfe

SCALE 15000 *PPROVED BY: DRAWN BY R.f.N

DATE April 1987 REVISED

INTERPRETATIONDRAWING NUMKft

Dwg. No. E.t.C. 1859 86-CU- D|-

rpt ip sur capella l - geologyontario.mndmf.gov.on.ca file- li - figure or ei c drawing no. title 6...

Documents