roll no. 60

Upload: neha-kuthari

Post on 09-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/7/2019 roll no. 60

    1/20

    K.J.SOMAIYA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES & RESEARCH

    IMCAFFECT INTENSITY OF EMOTIONAL ADVERTISING ON THE MINDS OF

    CONSUMER

    SUBMITTED TO: -

    PROF. ISAAC JACOB

    SUBMITTED BY: -

    VIJAY VYAS

    ROLL NO: - 60

    COURSE: - PGDM RM

    Affect Intensity of Emotional Advertising on the Minds of Consumer

    1

  • 8/7/2019 roll no. 60

    2/20

    Vijay vyas, K.J. Somaiya Institute of

    Management Studies & Research(SIMSR)

    ABSTRACT

    The measurement of emotional responses to advertising stimuli is a central field of advertising

    research. Although the role of feelings at a verbal and therefore conscious level has beeninvestigated extensively in the marketing literature, little is known about how the human brain is

    involved in advertising perception processes. The methodological problems associated with

    previous pioneering approaches in this context seem to be mostly compensated for new methodsof modern neuroscience. These methods and possible applications for advertising research are

    discussed in the present paper with a particular focus on the method of functional magnetic

    resonance imaging. I found that a positive emotion-inducing program facilitates ad evaluationwhile a negative emotion-inducing program debilitates ad evaluation.Emotional advertising is a

    subject of growing interest to advertising managers and researchers given its potential forincreasing the effectiveness of marketing communications. Emotions portrayed by actors in ads

    may communicate hedonic product benefits and enhance attention to the ad Emotional responsesaroused within viewers have been found to affect consumers' reactions to ads , enhance attention

    to the ad (Olney, Holbrook, and Batra, 1991), affect brand attitudes, influence brand memories,

    and determine the nature and extent of brand differentiation (Holman, 1984). Despite rapidlyemerging insight into the role of emotion in advertising effectiveness, much remains to be

    understood about how advertising executions influence the extent of emotional processing in

    viewers and how they affect more "downstream" measures of advertising effectiveness like brandattitudes, brand image, and choice behavior.

    Indeed, a special conference on emotional advertising sponsored by the Marketing Science

    Institute (Yoon, 1991) highlights the need for research on emotions in advertising.Emotional Integration: - Emotional integration is defined as the extent to which the ad portraysa link between the brand, on the one hand, and the emotional responses of the ad's characters on

    the other. In ads for which emotional integration is high, the brand is perceived as a causal agent

    to the characters' emotions in the ad. For example, an advertisement that depicts not only thebrand but also clearly portrays the ad's characters as experiencing an emotional benefit or

    outcome from brand use is high in emotional integration. Emotional integration is a relatively

    new construct in advertising and was recently introduced to the advertising literature by Maclnnisand Stayman (1993). The potential for this construct is strong, however, as Maclnnis and

    Stayman (1993) found that commercials varied widely in the level of emotional integration they

    exhibited.

    Emotional Flow: -Emotional flow is defined as the extent to which emotions portrayed in a

    commercial are perceived to change in their nature and/or intensity during the course of the

    commercial. We conceptualize change in emotions as following Russell's (1980) circumplexmodel of emotions. This emotion theorist represents emotions in two-dimensional space, with

    emotions described in terms of their valence (positive versus negative) and their degree of arousal

    (high versus low arousal). Thus, an emotion like "pleasure" is positive and high in intensity,while "boredom" is an emotion that is moderately negative and low in intensity.

    2

  • 8/7/2019 roll no. 60

    3/20

    With respect to emotional flow, ads that show the characters' emotions as changing, either going

    from positive to negative or negative to positive, from high arousal to low arousal or low arousal

    to high arousal, would represent commercials in which emotional flow is dynamic.

    One way in which emotional flow and emotional integration "work" in advertising is toprovide a connection between the brand and the viewer

    Linkages Created in Advertising

    Creating Viewer/Brand Linkages

    In addition to their effects on enhancing connections between the characters in the ad and the

    viewer which is shown in the figure below Emotional flow and integration are also expected to

    influence outcomes that indicate a connection between the viewer and the brand.

    Emotional Advertisements can appeal to:

    1. The need for sex

    3

    Characters

    Viewer

    Ad and brand

  • 8/7/2019 roll no. 60

    4/20

    2. The need for affiliation

    3. The need for nurture

    4. The need for guidance5. The need to aggress

    6. The need to achieve

    7. The need to dominate9. The need for attention10. The need for autonomy

    11. The need to escape

    12. The need to feel safe13. The need for aesthetic sensations

    14. The need to satisfy curiosity

    15. Physiological needs: food, drink. sleep, etc....

    LITERATURE REVIEW

    Affect Intensity

    The affect intensity measurement (AIM) scale measures the strength with which individuals

    experience their emotions in response to emotion-eliciting stimuli (Larsen 1984). Larsen and

    Diener (1987) confirmed that when people are exposed to equal levels of affect-producing

    stimuli, some individuals consistently respond with high levels of emotional intensity while

    others respond with only moderate levels. Moreover, the emotional reactivity seems to generalize

    across both positive and negative emotional domains. For example, Larsen, Diener, and Emmons

    (1986) found that subjects classified as high on the AIM scale, when faced with a positive

    emotion-eliciting event, reported stronger positive affect than subjects classified as low on the

    AIM scale. Correspondingly, when faced with a negative emotion-eliciting event, the same high

    AI individuals reported stronger negative emotional responses than their low AI counterparts.

    When subjects were exposed to a neutral or nonemotional stimulus or event, the individual

    differences tended to disappear. Similarly, Diener et al. (1985), using longitudinal studies,

    tracked the daily moods of individuals over a period of eight weeks. They found that the intensity

    of the respondents' positive emotions correlated approximately .70 with the intensity of their

    negative emotions. Hence, some people may be inclined to manifest more intensity in their

    emotions regardless of the valence of the emotions Validity and Reliability of the AIM Scale.

    Assessments of the validity of the AIM scale have been conducted in a variety of studies. In one

    study, Larsen and Diener (1985) found that the correlation between respondents' self-reported

    4

  • 8/7/2019 roll no. 60

    5/20

    AIM scores and the parents' reports of those subjects' emotional response intensity correlated .50.

    Peer reports of affect intensity have been shown to be correlated at .41 with self-reported AIM

    scores (Larsen and Diener 1987). Three separate studies have compared AIM with an average

    daily assessment of emotional response intensity (Larsen and Diener 1987). AIM correlated .61

    with emotional intensity in the first study, .52 in the second study, and .49 in the third study.

    Assessments of the reliability of the AIM scale have been quite impressive. Larsen (1984) found

    that the test-retest reliability for AIM with one-month, two-month and three-month time intervals

    was .80, .81 and .81, respectively. In another study the test-retest reliability of AIM was reported

    to be .75 over a two-year time interval (Larsen and Diener 1987). Activity Correlates of Affect

    Intensity. Larsen, Diener, and Emmons (1986) found affect intensity to be related to four

    dimensions of temperament: sociability, activity level, arousability, and emotionality. They found

    that high AI individuals were more active, sociable, physically arousable and emotionally

    reactive than their low AI counterparts. Evidence from daily activity reports (Larsen 1984)

    suggests that individuals scoring high on the affect intensity measure tend to seek emotional

    stimulation from day-to-day activities that are highly emotionally provocative (e.g., sexual

    activity, attending a sports event, going to a party, and singing/dancing). In contrast, low affect

    intensity individuals tend to engage in daily activities that are less emotionally provocative, such

    as leisure reading, shopping, letter writing, and bicycle riding. In spite of those findings, Larsen,

    Diener, and Emmons (1986) reported that affect intensity showed a zero correlation with

    Zuckerman's (1979) sensation seeking scale. The reason is that, unlike the AIM scale that

    measures affective reaction to normally occurring day-to-day activities, the sensation-seeking

    construct incorporates behaviors associated with risky and thrilling activities that are unusual and

    infrequent and serve to provide a change from the daily routine of life (Larsen and Diener 1987).

    High AI individuals tend to maintain strong and consistent emotional responses by engaging in

    day-to-day activities that are most likely to stimulate emotions. In other words, "individuals high

    on the affect intensity dimension do not seek out-of-the-ordinary experiences as much as they

    seek out an ordinary daily life that is more emotionally stimulating" (Larsen and Diener 1987, p.

    24).

    The Regulation of Sensory Stimulation. Research has confirmed that people tend to differ in their

    baseline level of arousal (Eysenck 1967). That is, some individuals may be quite underaroused at

    baseline and others may be very overaroused at baseline. Given the assumption that people are

    5

  • 8/7/2019 roll no. 60

    6/20

    normally driven toward some optimal level of arousal (Geen 1984), the individual who is

    underaroused at baseline is expected to be motivated to seek stronger forms of stimulation to

    compensate for the presumed low level of arousal, whereas the already overaroused individual is

    expected to seek to minimize strong forms of stimulation (Larsen and Diener 1987, p. 28). Affect

    intensity theorists suggest that high AI individuals who may be under-aroused at baseline may

    modulate the intensity of the impact of emotional stimuli and therefore tend to manifest stronger

    or more intense emotional reactions. In contrast, low AI individuals who may be already over-

    aroused at baseline may be much less emotionally reactive to equivalent levels of emotion-

    provoking stimulation (Larsen and Diener 1987). That rationale suggests that for high AI

    individuals, positive emotional stimulation is likely be a very strong form of enjoyment, but

    negative emotional stimulation may be unbearably unpleasant.

    Research also suggests that dimensions of temperament serve as mechanisms for the regulation of

    emotional arousal (Strelau 1982). Larsen and Diener (1987) found that high levels of affect

    intensity were associated with individuals who were elevated on the four fundamental dimensions

    of temperament (sociability, activity, arousability, and emotionality). In other words, highly

    emotionally reactive individuals are likely to show preferences for frequent social interaction, an

    activity-driven lifestyle, and physically arousing sensory experiences (Larsen and Diener 1987).

    Affect Intensity, Emotional Response, and Attitude Formation. Although previous research has

    established that individuals' affect intensity levels have a direct impact on their emotionalresponses (Larsen, Diener, and Emmons 1986), very little research is available on the relationship

    between affect intensity and attitude. Advertising studies featuring self-monitoring (Snyder and

    DeBono 1985) and need for cognition (Cacioppo and Petty 1982) have provided encouraging

    support for a linkage between individual differences in personality traits and attitude formation.

    For example, Haugtvedt, Petty, and Cacioppo (1992) have shown that need for cognition can

    influence attitude formation through the process of differentiating strong from weak arguments

    underlying the message. In a corresponding manner, Moore, Harris, and Chen (1995) found that

    affect intensity influenced attitude formation through the mediation of emotional responses. Their

    study featured a public service advertisement about child abuse that elicited very strong negative

    as well as empathic emotions. High AI individuals reported more favorable attitudes toward the

    organization sponsoring the ad and showed more positive attitudes toward helping to support the

    organization. However, because high AI individuals supposedly experience their emotions with

    6

  • 8/7/2019 roll no. 60

    7/20

    great intensity, such individuals may tend to avoid any stimuli (or advertising appeals) that evoke

    uncomfortable negative emotions. If so, high AI individuals may be more likely than their low

    intensity counterparts, to report unfavorable attitudes toward a negative emotional advertising

    appeal. To provide a theoretical foundation for that proposition, we examined some of the

    literature on approach/avoidance responses to emotional stimuli.

    Approach/Avoidance Responses to Emotional Stimuli

    Research assessing approach/avoidance behavior toward emotional stimuli that differ in hedonic

    quality indicates that high AI individuals do have a distaste for negative stimuli and seek positive

    sensory stimulation (Gallagher, Diener, and Larsen 1989). Research associated with optimal

    stimulation theory suggests that individuals, in general, are likely to select positive situations and

    avoid negative ones (Gallagher, Diener, and Larsen 1989; Petrie 1967). Moreover, some

    individuals supposedly experience their emotions with greater intensity than others, and it may be

    more difficult for such high AI individuals to tolerate the experience of intense negative

    emotional stimulation. Hence, they tend to dislike exposure to such stimulation.

    RESEARCH OBJECTIVE

    To study the impact of emotional advertising on the minds of consumers and acceptance of the

    product attached to it. The current study is designed to determine whether affective

    Measures that assess emotional responses to advertisement are needed to measure the impact of

    emotional advertising.

    7

  • 8/7/2019 roll no. 60

    8/20

    HYPOTHESIS

    H1 A positive emotion-inducing program facilitates ad memory and evaluation while a negative

    emotion-inducing program debilitates ad memory and evaluation

    RESEARCH PROCESS

    Research will be conducted in the city of Mumbai and it will be a primary research.

    Research papers from ebsco and proquest will also help in making this research a profound one.

    POSSIBLE OUTCOME

    Emotional ads have a greater impact than any other ads.

    SAMPLING DESIGN

    Since everyone watches ads it was difficult and infeasible to interview all of them. Hence the

    method of Sampling was used.

    To give reliable results by Sampling Procedures, Two Important Factors was taken care of:

    Accuracy: The degree to which Bias is absent from the Sample

    Precision: It should fully represent its Population in all respects.

    Relevant Population

    8

  • 8/7/2019 roll no. 60

    9/20

    The Relevant Population in my case is of all consumers who are watching ads.

    Elements All consumers watching television ads

    Sample Unit Socio Economic Class A & B

    Extent watching television at least one hour a day

    Type of Sampling

    For the purpose of this Research Simple Random Sampling was adopted.

    Sample Size

    Sample Size was 100 consumers.

    Data Source

    Interviewing viewers the relevant population with the help of Questionnaires collected the

    Background information.

    Research Design

    Exploratory/Statistical

    Statistical technique was used, varying from simple means and percentage to computerized

    analysis to derive relevant information out of the raw data collected from the consumers.

    Data was collected from the Primary Source. The project on Consumer Perception has been

    conducted through a household viewer survey. The study was performed area wise with a

    sample size of 100 Respondents in Mumbai

    Sample Range

    South Mumbai (opera house to worli )

    9

  • 8/7/2019 roll no. 60

    10/20

    In Simple Random Sampling every possible sample has a known and equal chance of selection.

    The nature of the samples studied includes the Middle Class consumers of Socio Economic

    Class A. & B.

    ME stands for measurement

    The ME in emotional flow is more prominent with sad feeling in emotional ads.

    10

  • 8/7/2019 roll no. 60

    11/20

    And in emotional intergation positive feeling is the most dominant function

    And in interaction negative feeling is more

    MALE FEMALE RESPONSE TO THE EMOTIONAL ADS.

    11

  • 8/7/2019 roll no. 60

    12/20

    Who responds to emotional advertising the maximum?

    It has been found in the survey that females are most easily persuaded by emotional advertising.

    This group is more likely to feel empathy toward the situations presented in emotional adsand as a result, view the brand more favorably than those competitors advertising based

    upon rational appeals.

    OF THE 100 SAMPLE SIZE THIS WAS THE OUTCOME AND FINDINGS ABOUT

    THE PRODUCT ATTACHED TO THE EMOTIONAL ADS

    12

  • 8/7/2019 roll no. 60

    13/20

    Product brought after seeing the emotional ad works was found to be 43% yes and 57% no which

    means that the consumer were not affected towards buying intention.

    Sample Size: 100 (All

    Figures in Nos.)

    1 Middle Class 55

    2 Upper Middle Class 22

    3 Lower Middle Class 21

    4 For All 2

    55%22%

    21%2%

    Middle Class

    Upper Middle Class

    Lower Middle Class

    For All

    DISCUSSION

    13

  • 8/7/2019 roll no. 60

    14/20

    Combined, the results suggest a clear superiority to ads regarded as dynamic versus static in

    nature and those for which emotional integration is high versus low. Such ads seem to create

    greater linkages between the viewer and the consumer creating more empathy andmore

    intense feelings from the ad. They are also associated with less negative feelings about the ad

    feelings that are unintended by the advertiser. Such ads also appear to enhance linkages between

    the viewer and the product. They create more favorable evaluations of the ad as relevant/

    involving, create greater liking for the ad, and create a better sense of congruence between the

    brand and the self.

    The effects of emotional flow and integration on feelings, relevance/ involvement, ad liking, and

    self-brand image congruity may drive purchase intentions, but the effect of emotional flow and

    emotional integration on purchase intentions seems to vary by consumer segment.

    These advertising variables seem to have little impact on intentions for consumers in the least

    promising segment (low loyalty/ low usage) or those consumers in the segment that is currently

    most profitable (high loyalty/ high usage). Instead, they seem to create differential effects on the

    two segments with the greatest leverage capabilitiesthe low loyalty/high usage and high

    loyalty/ low usage segments. These results are promising since they indicate potential behavioral

    effects of advertising on segments for which leverage is most substantial. While emotional flow

    appears particularly important in creating empathy, feelings, and ad likability, the interactions

    reported in suggest that when emotional integration is low and ads are dynamic, the increase in

    involvement and likability due to dynamic emotional flow may detract from purchase intentions.

    In terms of attributions, dynamic ads may make the viewer-in interested in the cause of the

    character's actions and emotions, but in the absence of salient cues about the product's causal role

    (low emotional integration), this enhanced curiosity is effectively wasted on attributions related

    to other cues.

    Research shows that individuals do differ widely in the intensity of their emotional response to

    affect-laden stimuli. Hence, because of differences in the magnitude of their affective response to

    emotionally provocative appeals, some individuals may experience intense emotional discomfort

    when exposed to negative emotional appeals and others may be only mildly affected. We

    conducted a study to examine the extent to which individual differences in emotional reactivity

    influence consumers' response to emotionally provocative advertising appeals and to observe how

    those emotional reactions influence attitude toward the ad.

    14

  • 8/7/2019 roll no. 60

    15/20

    55 %, Respondents to Target Middle Class Consumers as according to them are for that Class of

    People.

    22 %, i.e. 32, Respondents are of Upper Middle Class of People because they feel certain

    products especially for Upper Middle Class category.

    These shows how do the class responds towards the emotional ads

    This study tests only one personality trait and examines only emotional ads. Since a person's self-

    concept is multidimensional, examining other personality traits is necessary for replications. As

    discussed briefly earlier, bottled water is a low involving product. Extroverts and introverts are

    likely to respond differently to high-involving products due to their orientations toward risk.

    Hence the hypothesis taken

    H1 A positive emotion-inducing program facilitates ad memory and evaluation while a negative

    emotion-inducing program debilitates ad memory and evaluation

    And the possible outcome was also correct that emotional ads do influence the minds of

    consumers though majorly by female consumers/viewers.

    References

    1. THE IMPACT OF EMOTIONAL VALENCE AND INTENSITY ON AD EVALUATION

    AND MEMORY

    15

  • 8/7/2019 roll no. 60

    16/20

    Karen Russo France, West Virginia University

    Reshma H. Shah, University of Pittsburgh

    C. Whan Park, University of Kttsburgh

    2. EMOTIONAL FEELINGS AND ATTITUDE TOWARD THE ADVERTISEMENT: THE

    ROLES OF BRAND FAMILIARITY AND REPETITIONKaren A. MachleitR. Dale Wilson

    3. MEASURING EMOTIONAL RESPONSES TO ADVERTISINGRonald P. Hill, The American University

    Michael B. Mazis, The American University

    4. THE IMPACTS OF PERSONALITY DIFFERENCES ON PRODUCT EVALUATIONS

    Chingching Chang, National Chengchi University

    5. SOME THINK DTC ADS BAD FOR HEALTH; OTHERS CONTEND EFFECTS HARD TOPROVE

    Chairman of the AMA Board 2002-2003

    Barton A. Weitz University of Florida, GainesvilleAMA Publishing Group Vice President 2000-2003

    MichaelJ. Houston University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

    6. IMPACT OF DIRECT ADVERTISING

    Carlo Lewis

    7. DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADS: IMPACT ON PRESCRIBING

    Rodent feces." (MMWR, May 6 2005; 54:429-

    432)

    8. EMOTIONAL IMPACT

    Regina molaro

    9. ETHICAL JUDGMENTS OF POLITICAL TELEVISION

    COMMERCIALS AS PREDICTORS OF ATTITUDE TOWARD THE AD

    Spencer F. Tinkham and Ruth Ann Weaver-Larisey

    10. CHARACTERISTICS OF PORTRAYED EMOTIONS IN COMMERCIALS: WHEN DOES

    WHAT IS SHOWN IN ADS AFFECT VIEWERS?

    Edward Kamp and Deborah j. McInnis

    16

  • 8/7/2019 roll no. 60

    17/20

    ANNEXURE

    QUESTIONNAIRE

    (1) Do you watch television ads?

    17

  • 8/7/2019 roll no. 60

    18/20

    Yes No

    (2) Can you recall the last few ads that you have seen?

    ________________________________________________________________________

    (3) Can you recall the last few emotional ads that you have seen?

    ________________________________________________________________________

    (4) Of the ads viewed which one do you think was more impactful? (if emotional continue)

    Emotional ________________

    Humorous ________________

    Fearful _________________

    Educative _________________

    Any other (please mention) ______________________________________

    (5) How did you feel about the ad?

    Empathy ______________

    Positive feelings ______________

    Sad feelings ______________

    Negative feelings ______________

    Relevance/involvement ______________

    Ad attitudes _______________

    Self-brand Image congruity _______________

    Purchase intentions _______________

    (6) What was the product attached to the emotional ads viewed?

    18

  • 8/7/2019 roll no. 60

    19/20

    Insurance ________________

    Car ________________

    Baby care ________________

    Telecom ________________

    Apparels ________________

    Any other(please specify) _____________________

    (7) Did the ad emotionally focused on fear, humor and self-idealization?

    Fear _____________

    Humor _____________

    Self-idealization _____________

    (8) Did you buy the product attached to it after seeing the ads?

    Yes No

    Name: _________________________________________________

    Age: _________________________________________________

    Gender: _________________________________________________

    Occupation: _________________________________________________

    No. of family Members: _________________________________________________

    Monthly Income:

    19

  • 8/7/2019 roll no. 60

    20/20

    o Upto 10,000

    o 10,000 20,000

    o 20,000 40,000

    o 40,000 and above.

    20