rochester institute of technology saunders college of business november 11, 2011

38
Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011 Troy Lubberts Eric Furnal Prerna Malhotra Russell Sisipenzi noco Logistics Partners, LP

Upload: zudora

Post on 25-Feb-2016

40 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011. Troy Lubberts Eric Furnal Prerna Malhotra Russell Sisipenzi. Sunoco Logistics Partners, LP (SXL). R  I  T FMA. Disclaimer. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Rochester Institute of TechnologySaunders College of Business

November 11, 2011

Troy LubbertsEric FurnalPrerna MalhotraRussell Sisipenzi

Sunoco Logistics Partners, LP (SXL)

Page 2: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Disclaimer

Many of the phrases, tables and graphs used in this presentation have been derived from some or all of the following sources: 10-K, 10-Q, Thomson, Hoovers, Mergent Online, Yahoo Finance, and S&P online research documents.

This presentation is intended to synthesize these sources so that they can be used to analyze Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P. Common Units.

RIT FMA

2

Page 3: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Sunoco Logistics Partners, LP (SXL) Equity Valuation

Summary & Investment Conclusions– Capsule description of the company with recent developments– Major conclusions, valuation summary and investment action

Business Summary– Industry and competitive analysis

Risks– Possible negative industry, regulatory and company developments– Risks in forecasts

Historical Performance

Valuation– Description of models used, inputs and statement of conclusions

RIT FMA

3

Page 4: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Summary &

Investment Conclusions

RIT FMA

4

Page 5: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Company Overview

• Headquartered in Philadelphia, PA• 1,400 employees• Operates in 22 states within the Northeast, Midwest and Gulf Coast• Traded on the NYSE as SXL• Market capitalization = $3.22B (at the close of trading on 10/27/11)• Master Limited Partnership – MLP

– Combines tax benefits of Limited Partnership with liquidity of a publicly traded security– Corporate profits not taxed and investors allowed a prorated depreciation write-off

• Created by Sunoco, Inc (SUN) when it transferred most of its pipeline, terminal and storage assets to the partnership

RIT FMA

5

Page 6: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs)

• Publicly-traded partnerships (shares units / dividends distributions)• Mandate: to pay out all earnings not needed for current operations and

maintenance of capital assets (exception = acquisition opportunities)• MLPs are pass-though entities do not pay tax at partnership level• Distributions are not considered dividends, rather a return of capital• Investors pay taxes on their proportionate share of MLP’s income, offset by:

– Depreciation and depletion

• MLPs tend to trade at higher multiples than similar assets in a corporate structure:– Pass-through tax advantages– Premium investors tend to place on yield– Lower cost of capital which facilitates a potentially faster growth rate

RIT FMA

6

Page 7: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Recent Developments

• Recent Developments– Sunoco, Inc. struggles

• Moody’s downgrades long-term credit rating to junk status• Announced plans to exit the refining business

– Acquisition, Acquisition, Acquisition• 2011 acquisitions total $500M

– Texon Crude with exposure to shales– Eagle Point Tank Farm– East Boston Products Terminal

– Strong outlook for future developments• 26th consecutive distribution increase with 7% growth forecast• Currently running an 75/25 mix of ratable to market related revenue• Very bullish on terminals and blending services, crude A&M and crude pipelines

RIT FMA

7

Page 8: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Distribution History

20022003

20032004

20052006

20062007

20082009

20092010

2011 $-

$0.20

$0.40

$0.60

$0.80

$1.00

$1.20

$1.40

14.6% Compound Annual Growth Rate

RIT FMA

8

Page 9: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

6-Month PerformanceRIT FMA

9

Page 10: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Earnings Estimates

• Earnings projections– 2012 EPS estimates:

• Range = 6.05 – 9.30• Average = 7.38• Previous year’s 2012 estimate = 7.60

– Factors influencing EPS estimates:• Ability to integrate new acquisitions into existing asset base (synergies?)• Development of new customer base • Market conditions (oil futures remaining in contango, WTI vs. Brent Spreads)

– Oil futures remaining in contango– WTI vs. Brent Spreads– End user demand of energy (blended products)

RIT FMA

10

Page 11: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Summary & Investment Conclusions

• SXL appears to be an attractive investment for income conscious investors– Opportunity for capital appreciation at or below industry growth rates– More attractive for taxable investment accounts

• Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) models indicate SXL is severely undervalued– Market appears to be discounting SXL’s growth because of recent developments at

Sunoco, Inc.– Sunoco Logistics will rely more heavily on acquisitions for growth in coming years

• Investment Recommendation = Short Term – HOLD / Long Term – BUY – Industry landscape appears extremely attractive– Risks associated with Sunoco, Inc. and SXL’s ability to integrate recent acquisitions to

provide stable growth remains in question

RIT FMA

11

Page 12: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Business Summary

RIT FMA

12

Page 13: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Company OverviewRIT FMA

13

Page 14: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Chairperson, President & CEO• Lynn Elsenhans • Received the 2011 Paradigm Award• Director, Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce• (2007-Present) Director, Member of Audit & Finance Committee and Member of Public Policy & Environment Committee International Paper Co.

RIT FMA

14

Page 15: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Business Summary

• Business Units– Refined Products Pipeline System

• Transports products from refineries• Consists of 6 major pipelines

– Terminal Facilities• Provides terminalling, blending and other ancillary services

– Crude Oil Pipeline System• Gathers and transports crude oil (mainly in Oklahoma and Texas)

– Crude Oil Acquisition & Marketing (new reporting segment)• Purchases and sells crude oil• Has become a larger share of the revenue mix as crude oil futures markets have remained in

contango

RIT FMA

15

Page 16: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Business Summary Q3 2011

Revenue

Terminal Facilities Acquisition & Marketing Crude Oil PipelinesRefined Products

Operating Profit

RIT FMA

16

Page 17: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Industry Analysis

• Industry Analysis– Porter’s 5 Forces

• Threat of Entry (Low)• Power of Suppliers (Moderate) • Power of Buyers (High)• Threat of Substitutes (Low)• Rivalry among Existing Competitors (Relatively High)

– Implications• The Oil & Gas Pipeline Industry remains attractive for incumbents

– Organic growth opportunities (crude oil acquisition and marketing) – Acquisition opportunities (terminal facilities, refined products & crude oil pipelines)

• Operating margins remain tight because of strong industry competition

RIT FMA

17

Page 18: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Industry ComparisonRIT FMA

18

Page 19: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Analyst EstimatesRIT FMA

19

Growth Estimates SXL Industry Sector S&P 500

Current Qtr 25.30% 46.00% -48.40% 27.50%

Next Qtr 72.20% 22.00% 1.30% 19.60%

This Year 38.40% 52.70% 27.20% 12.20%

Next Year -2.90% 14.40% -16.40% 13.20%

Past 5 Years 19.18% N/A N/A N/A

Next 5 Years 7.03% 16.35% 15.86% 10.91%

P/E 13.08 10.51 8.25 15.99

PEG Ratio 1.86 2.12 0.55 1.29

Page 20: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Risks

• Operational– Ability to integrate new acquisitions– Loss of Sunoco Inc. as a customer (or

significant reduction in current level of throughput)

• Regulatory– Increasing environmental regulation

surrounding extracting, fracking, and emissions

– Rates subject to regulatory approval– Increasing safety regulations

• Market Related- Changes in demand for, or supply of,

crude oil and petroleum products- Improvements in energy efficiency

resulting in reduced demand for petroleum products

- Geopolitical events that disrupt the market equilibrium for energy

- Rising interest rates- Makes low-risk assets more

attractive- Increases cost of capital in a capital

intensive industry

RIT FMA

20

Page 21: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Historical Performance

RIT FMA

21

Page 22: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Historical Performance

2006 2007 2008 2009 20100123456789

10

Earnings Per Share (EPS)

RIT FMA

22

Page 23: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Historical Performance

2006 2007 2008 2009 201010

15

20

25

30

35

40Return on Equity (ROE)

BPLEPDSXL

RIT FMA

23

Page 24: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Historical Performance

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200 Net Income

SXLBPLEPDPAA

Mill

ions

RIT FMA

24

Page 25: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Historical Performance

2006 2007 2008 2009 20100

5

10

15

20

25

30Net Profit Margin

BPLEPDSXL

RIT FMA

25

Page 26: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Historical Performance

2006 2007 2008 2009 201050000000

100000000

150000000

200000000

250000000

300000000

350000000

400000000Net Income vs. Operating Cash Flow

Net Income

Operating CF

RIT FMA

26

Page 27: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Historical Performance

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 TTM0

1020304050607080

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12Efficiency Ratios

Days Sales Outstanding

Cash Conversion Cycle

Days

RIT FMA

27

Page 28: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Historical Performance

Main source of cash: Operating ActivitiesMain use of cash: Investing Activities

Operating Activities – Capital Expenditures = positive for most years

RIT FMA

28

Figures (in millions of $) 12-2006 12-2007 12-2008 12-2009 12-2010Cash at Beginning of the Year 21.65 9.41 2.00 2.00 2.00

Operating Activities 141.48 207.50 228.59 176.18 341.00

Investing Activities -241.22 -119.35 -331.24 -225.83 -426.00

Financing Activities 87.51 -95.56 102.66 49.65 85.00

Cash at End of the Year 9.41 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00

Capital Expenditures -119.80 -105.90 -145.80 -175.60 -174.00

Page 29: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Liquidity & Solvency Ratios

• Liquidity – ability to meet short-term obligations– Current Ratio: 1.051– Quick Ratio: 0.899– Cash Ratio: 0.001

• Solvency – ability to meet long-term obligations

– Debt-to-Assets: 0.678– Debt-to-Equity: 2.730

RIT FMA

29

Page 30: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Valuation

• Description of models used– Dividend (Distribution) Discount Model (DDM)

• One-period DDM– Severely undervalues company due to gloomy 1-year forecasted growth rate

• Two-stage DDM– Produces inflated intrinsic value by assuming minimal impact from Sunoco Inc.

– Discounted Free Cash Flow Model• Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) and free cash flow to equity (FCFE)

– Produces most realistic valuation based on all available information– Does not factor “normalized” cash flows for years 2 – 6

RIT FMA

30

Page 31: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Valuation

• Recapitulation of inputs– Cost of Equity– Cost of Debt– WACC– Distribution growth rates– FCFF– Firm Growth Rates

• Year 1• Years 2-5• Perpetual (6+)

RIT FMA

31

Page 32: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

ValuationRIT FMA

• Intrinsic Value– Dividend (Distribution) Discount Model

• One-period DDM– $53.49 per common unit

• Two-stage DDM– $158.05 per common unit

– Discounted Free Cash Flow Model• FCFF/FCFE

– $108.28 per common unit

32

Page 33: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Technical Analysis

ValuationRIT FMA

33

Page 34: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Technical AnalysisRIT FMA

34

Page 35: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Technical AnalysisRIT FMA

35

Page 36: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Technical AnalysisRIT FMA

36

Page 37: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Technical AnalysisRIT FMA

37

Page 38: Rochester Institute of Technology Saunders College of Business November 11, 2011

Investment Conclusions

• Conclusions– Positive Attributes

• Industry landscape appears extremely attractive• Strong growth via acquisition• Steady growth rate of distributions• Strong technicals

– Negative Attributes• Risks associated with deterioration of Sunoco’s refining business• Concerns regarding company’s ability to integrate acquisitions into existing business• Concerns regarding forward/backward integration of marketplace

• Investment Recommendation = Short Term – HOLD / Long Term – BUY

RIT FMA

38