risky income, life cycle consumption, and precautionary savings
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Risky income, life cycle consumption, and precautionary savings](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022073108/575071071a28ab0f07d7aa46/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
met
Received
equation. Given plausible precautimary savings are of empirkal. savings rates
udget studies s found substantial differences in savin among occupations: isher (1956), for example, found the self-employe 12 percentage points more than managers.’
ue to differences in into precautionary savings against aN income ri
of aggregate capital accumullat f precautionary savin
may appear, ex JIOS~, ff and Summers (1981
hedge against future income uncertainty. rograms such as une
mcome risk, could have lower ecline in aggregate sa
ndrew Abel, Ch
sevier
![Page 2: Risky income, life cycle consumption, and precautionary savings](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022073108/575071071a28ab0f07d7aa46/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
238 J. Skinner, Risky income
rd, the dynastic model of intergenerational transfers [
on-specific income risk can be cushioned by the ap- of bequests, rendering life cycle precaution
ly, models that assume quadratic utilityr functions r by assumption precautionary savings against earnings risk. Finding si precautionary savings would cast doubt on the relevance of both t beauest model and quadratic utility functions. .a
recautionary savin s arise when individuals consume less (and hence save more) while young to ard against possible income downturns later in life.
hus the analysis of precautionary saving must begin with the analysis of how uncertain income affects consumption. There have been many studies of this topic, but most have been restricted to two-period models, or were so intracta- ble that precautionary savings could not be calculated. This paper closed-form multi-period life cycle model of consumption with
s and earnings. The true (but intractable) optimal consumption er Taylor-series expa
he somewhat surprising result of the theoretical model is that, given moderate levels of income uncertainty, precautionary savings are very small. The intuition is that precautionary savings depend on the proportion of lifetime resources at risk, but a given year’s earnings fluctuation is a small fraction of the present value of future income. It is only to the extent that annual variations in earnings signal a permanent change in future earnings
become imporrant. SW (1982) suggest that consumers do fetime resources; estimates from panel
e variation in annual earnings are a signal of a Precautionary savings are therefore r up to 56 percent of aggregate life
ive result - that precautionary savings are large - is con- sistent with the models of consumption under uncertainty developed by Zeldes
eldes (1986), the results presented below
![Page 3: Risky income, life cycle consumption, and precautionary savings](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022073108/575071071a28ab0f07d7aa46/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
result may re verse
numerical methods. e analytical closed-form
There is a substantial literature on t earnings uncertainty, on consumption and savings [
(1982)]. The analytic results derived below are, in o the exact solutions for con (1971), and, most recently, w (1987) because they allow for uncertainty both in interest rates and earnings. The major limitation of the derivations below is that they are approximations rather than exact solutions. An alternative approach to measuring the effect of uncertainty on consump- tion is to use numerical methods to solve rogramming problem for optimal consumption [Zeldes (1986), and Zeldes (1986)].
owever, it is often difficult to gain intuition from numerical solutions about why precautionary savings is important or unimportant.
The strategy in this section will be to derive an explicit uncertainty premium reflecting combi interest rate and earnings risk which can be implemented in a life cycle model. The consumer is assumed to maximize expected lifetime utility
EU= E, (1 -k- S)‘-‘U(Ci) ir4 1
0)
J( ,Si)=maX{U(Ci)+(l+S)-' cl
span add 4 fQllOW.
![Page 4: Risky income, life cycle consumption, and precautionary savings](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022073108/575071071a28ab0f07d7aa46/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
J. Skinner, Risky income
ue function which depends cm financial wealth age i and a vector of age and occupation-specific state variables Si.
ect differences among individuals in ea e functional relationship between Ci and
wi= (Wi-1 - ci_l)(l + ri) + F, (3)
d ri the net interest r
an
(&- C,)R;rO, (4) i=l
L i + rs)-l with j=1,
s=j+l
The first-order condition for (2) subject to (3) is written
e/‘(Ci) = (5)
equations in Grossman and Shiller (1982),
studies have used w, a second-order
![Page 5: Risky income, life cycle consumption, and precautionary savings](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022073108/575071071a28ab0f07d7aa46/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
es equ
expectation of weal
gs, but a zero (and certain) interest second-order Tayl
where Si is suppress and 3/=y+y* when the tion (or, equivalently, the value function) exhibits
second-period utility func- constant relative ri
sion.’ Just as uncertain wealth is discounted by y/20:, so also d parameter \k, a monotoni of future consu
ode1 to include interest rate uncertainty and multi-period consumption requires more structure and leads to greater analyti
ssumptions (i)-(iv) which follow facilitate the derivation of form solutions.
(i) Tke utility function d Letting y denote the Arrow-
constant relative risk aversion ( measure of G the utility function is
U(Ci) = -y(1 -Y), Y + 19
‘The value function a-is dS.
![Page 6: Risky income, life cycle consumption, and precautionary savings](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022073108/575071071a28ab0f07d7aa46/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
2 =
![Page 7: Risky income, life cycle consumption, and precautionary savings](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022073108/575071071a28ab0f07d7aa46/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
- .=
1 i9
co
b 2 2i= 2
i iS is et
![Page 8: Risky income, life cycle consumption, and precautionary savings](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022073108/575071071a28ab0f07d7aa46/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
244 J. Skinner, Risky income
uncertainty about lifetime resources Li in the next period. Like eq. (7) above, the ‘income’ uncertainty premium is simply one-half # times the proportional V ante of next period full wealth Li. The second term in (11) i ‘substitution’ effect, which reflects the covariance between the error te the asset yield, (ri - i;)/(l + i’), and the unexpected change (or ‘error term’) in the proportional realization of lifetime resources, (Li - Li)/Zi. Note that vi >< 0, depending on the relative magnitude of the income and substitution effectsF
Eq. (10) is simplified by taking the logarithm of both sides, noting that (1 + M) = x for x = r,&v, and expressing ln[ Ci/Ci_ 11 as 6,
c =~~~-~+.il+ln[Li,~i]. Y
(12)
certainty model, the consumption growth rate is simply n income is uncertain, there are two additional terms. The
first is the risk premium vi. The second term, ln[L,/Zi], represents the revaluation of lifetime resources following the new realization of interest rates
e consumption is a linear fu in consumption is equal ime resources. g the solutio; for optimal consumption, it is important to
note sources of error in the Taylor-series approximation. First, the approxima- tion assumes that the unconditional expectation of the uncertainty premium
J vi}, j < i, is equal to the correct conditional expectation E,_,( Pi}. This may not hold for two reasons. As earnings and interest rates are
e expectation of the asset share (~7) and the present value of rags share (pi) at age i may shift, the anging the expectation of vi.
source of error is that a depend (marginally) on the since increasin e, will reduce assets at age i.’
se sources of err d in section 5, where the cal solutions.
type of error by iterating over the vectors C = fixed-point solution for optimal consumption. This
wed, rather than
![Page 9: Risky income, life cycle consumption, and precautionary savings](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022073108/575071071a28ab0f07d7aa46/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The general expressio ctiv
Cj = Lj
where
(13)
Eq. (13) is a forward-looking representation of consumption, in which Li encompasses all information about future earnings and current assets. It is also useful for econometric purposes to express Ci as the geometric sum of consumption originally planned for age i plus the cumulative revaluations in Ei { Li } since age 1. That is, using logarithmic approximations,
i-l
ln(Cj)= [(i-l)(?-S)]/y+ vj/U+In(Cl)
j-l
This expression for consumption is similar to the estimating equation in ‘X-constant’ models of labor supply [e.g., acurdy (1980)], and is straightforward to implement for applied work. The final term of (14) will qualify as an ‘error’ term, since its mean is zero and, assuming rational expectations, is independent of other terms on the S [Flavin (19Sl)].
Finally, will the optimizing consumer ever b The theoretical model predicts that the individual will only borrow on the certain component of future earnings. Since marginal utility is infinite when consumption is zero, any positive probability that Ci+j = 0, j > 0, would violate the first-order conditions. As long as current wealth is positive, the consumer will never borrow against the random element of earnings and thereby risk consu nothing at age i + j. The Taylor-series approximati condition [since it does not account for the asy Ci = 0] uce error if it pre section
![Page 10: Risky income, life cycle consumption, and precautionary savings](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022073108/575071071a28ab0f07d7aa46/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
246 J. Skinner, Risky income
earnings process to compare capital accumulation in a certain and uncertai regime. Turning first to the parameters of the utility fu
tion in measures of risk aversion [for e lume (1975), Landskroner (1977), ansen and Sin
and Shiller (1982), and Skinner (1985)], a central measure of y = 3.0 app reasonable, while the time preference rate 6 is assumed to be 1.5 percent. degree of interest rate uncertaintv is measured by the v nce of the return on Aaa bonds, adjusted by the G&P deflator, over the pe Report of the President, 198T). The average PX FCW real in percent, with a standard error of 2.9 percentage points. Finally, a,,. was assumed to be zero.
The structure of earnings uncertainty is a key factor in affecting precau- tionary savings. A general expression for earnings is an ARMA(l, 2) process,
yj = Xjfi + 0 + Ui, (15) and
ui = pUj_1 + Ej + mlej_1 + m2Ej-2,
where yi is log earnings at age i, Xi is a vector of exogenous factors such as experience and education, o the individual-specific effect, Ui the error term, Ei an iid variable, and year dummy variables have been suppressed.
Consider first the specii case of an AR(l) process (m, = m2 = 0) estimated ilk (1978). Using data from the Panel Study of Income und that p = 0.406 and CJ: = 0.069. The persistence of
over time implies that simply measuring var( Ui) will understate otal risk to lifetime resources. For the purposes of estimating precau-
tionary savings one requires the variance of an iid process which causes the same uncertainty to lifetime resources as the empirically observed structure of earnings. To calculate such a measure, note that for a given realization of
“i = ui - pt~~_~, the impact on the present value of expected and future resources is
![Page 11: Risky income, life cycle consumption, and precautionary savings](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022073108/575071071a28ab0f07d7aa46/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
20
26
24
22
20
10
16
14
12
19
50 55 60 t35 70 75 20 25 30 35 40 45
his
Fig. 1
estimates imply that this equivalent white percent of average earnings.*
Adopting the earnings regression from
noise variance is approximately 43
Lillard and Willis for whites with high school education (column 1, table A2) and assuming an annual real growth rate in wages of 0.5 percent and continuous employment, yields an average age-earnings profile (A) as shown in fig. 1. In this model, period 1 corresponds to age 2 individuals retire at age 65 and die
ows at a constant rate 0
![Page 12: Risky income, life cycle consumption, and precautionary savings](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022073108/575071071a28ab0f07d7aa46/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
248 J. Skinner, Risky income
ulation growth rate, is estimated to be only 12 percent of aggregate gs.9
s estimated usin larger degree of persistence equation of log earnings from m, = - 0.390, and m2 = - 0.094. year, new information out future lifetime e gs is substantial, leading to measures of Vi in excess of 4 percent.
Path (D) in fig. 1 presents the calculated Taylor-series measure of consump- life cycle, using the aCurdy earnings structure and given that
tions of earnings and erest rates occur. The substantially higher measures of vi lead to a steeply sloped consumption path, with both lower
mption in early periods and higher co ption at later periods (this r level of consumptio reflects the ‘spe down’ of the precautionary
g retirement). recautionary savings are calculated to be 56 per- cent of aggregate savings.
The degree of risk aversion s an important role in determining precau- tionary savings. lIncreasing the ow-Pratt measure of risk aversion y to 6.0 (\t = 32) increases precautionary savings to 76 percent of aggregate savings,
1, then variations in t
![Page 13: Risky income, life cycle consumption, and precautionary savings](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022073108/575071071a28ab0f07d7aa46/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
dure continues i
ue of Uf(CD_J is n
approximation tracks b&e
ion subject to certain income (CF) explained by th proxkation (C:). The R* is written:
ains more than 99 percent of its earnings process, path (D) seems
to diverge from the exact solution (E) most strongly at early ages, owing to the strict borrowing const less, the accuracy of t accuracy of restrictive.
ve would predict that average savings rates should be
![Page 14: Risky income, life cycle consumption, and precautionary savings](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022073108/575071071a28ab0f07d7aa46/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
3co J. Skinner, Risky income
pension contributions an
resented in table 1. It is not surpri
income is also lower. and farmers, opposite of
es, while the second equation e occupational dummy variable
coefficients are generally small; except for the self-employed, managers, and sale workers, the ence in savings rates are less than 2.5 percentage points, or a difference 0 percent of average savings. The savings rates of the self-employed and sales workers, those generally thought to receive riskier
than the benchmark group of craftsmen. ta refute the oft-cited stylized fact that the self-employed and
ers save more than others, a number of other factors could explain the titular, there may be problems in measuring differences of attitudes towards risk among e most accepting of ris so chose sales or
there would be no retical presump- re.
![Page 15: Risky income, life cycle consumption, and precautionary savings](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022073108/575071071a28ab0f07d7aa46/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
rofession
Manageri
Sales
0.144 795
0.143
0.130
.2P7 345
0.221 286
Craftsmen
Operatives
0.341
0.138
0.093
0.100
1322
1072
.222
0.219
- -
0.019 (2.27)
0.003 (0.22)
- 0.017 (1.36)
0.204 (25.94)
- 0.016 (7.36)
0.005 (1.51)
- 1.772 (20.60)
0.122
0.021 (2.95)
0. (0.
- 0.024 (2.43)
0.232 (35.86)
- 0.021 (12.31)
(1.64)
OX3E.-3 (0-W
- 1.708 (24.15)
0.211
Laborers 0.228 284
Service workers 0.220 368
Log(net income)
Family size
49
Age-squared
Constallt
RZ
e of t-statistics in parentheses; IV = 5685; craftsmen are the excluded occu me: Consumer Expenditure Survey 1972-73. .
![Page 16: Risky income, life cycle consumption, and precautionary savings](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022073108/575071071a28ab0f07d7aa46/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
2 =
9
![Page 17: Risky income, life cycle consumption, and precautionary savings](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022073108/575071071a28ab0f07d7aa46/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
-Y
-1 -1
=
![Page 18: Risky income, life cycle consumption, and precautionary savings](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022073108/575071071a28ab0f07d7aa46/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
J. grimmer, isky imcome
![Page 19: Risky income, life cycle consumption, and precautionary savings](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022073108/575071071a28ab0f07d7aa46/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)