risk experts - riskmatrix, beispieldaten · riskmatrix assessment (rating) a very low fire,...

2015

Advice: grey fields to be completed manually (others are computed automatically)! V150218

3

* comparison to other occupancies or benchmarking is reasonable only in case of similar risk class!

*multi‐lingual selection and weighted rating only availlable in the full version!

Risk

assessment

category

Rating

Rating criteria

Operational risks:

occupancy hazards, high

pressure, high temperature,

chemical reactionsA

Detection:

sensors (fire, gas, ignition

sources), alarm management

(manual, automatic)A

Location:

surrounding, neighborhood

A

Fire water supply:

water source, fire water

pumps, fire water mains,

outdoor hydrant systemD

Inspections:

organization, programs,

procedures,

mechanical / electricalD

Risk management:

philosophy, safety

organization, safety culture,

risk awareness, management

KPI's

C

Rating criteria

Warehouse risks:

block storage, high rack

storage, tank farms B

Monitoring:

process control, control

rooms, server rooms, data

processingB

External layout:

spacing between buildings

and units, fire complex

separationB

Fixed and automatic fire

suppression systems:

sprinkler, deluge, foam, CO2 D

Maintenance / repairs:

organisation, programs,

procedures, impairment

handling, preventive /

protective

E

Hazard analysis:

programs (HAZOP),

emergency plan, change

management0

Rating criteria

Material risks:

fire load, flammable liquids,

combustible gases, fine dust,

explosivesD

Security:

burglary protection, intruder

alarm B

Internal layout:

physical separation within

buildings and units, fire area

compartmentationE

Manual fire fighting systems:

hose reel boxes, indoor

hydrants, fire monitors,

extinguishersB

Safety installations control:

Inspection and maintenance

of fire fighting equipment and

safety featuresC

Documentation:

fire safety plan, emergency

operating procedures, P&Ids C

Rating criteria

Utilities service risk:

electricity, steam,

compressed air, heating,

cooling, technical gases, IT &

EDP

B

0

Construction:

materials, insulation,

fireproofing D

Emergency response:

Public / plant fire brigade, full‐

time (24/7) / voluntary,

emergency team, response

time, equipment

C

Workforce:

staffing, education,

experience, training,

contractorsD

Safety audits:

inspection rounds, response

to recommendations,

incident investigationB

Rating criteria

Process risk:

size of the plant, complexity

of processes, capacity,

utilizationA

0

Leakage control:

Drainage, curbing,

embankments, spill

protectionB

Isolation and interlocks:

Automatic shut‐down (ESD),

unit isolation means,

automatic interlock devicesB

Safe work practice:

Shift hand‐over , work

permits, smoking ban,

housekeeping, storage

practice

B

Claims handling:

claims handling procedures,

crisis management team,

crisis control roomC

Rating criteria

0

0

Building and equipment

integrity:

technical age, operating

hours, design codes, state of

repair

A

Special protection:

smoke vents, explosion

protection, lightning

protection, oxygen reductionA

Safety at work:

safety management,

commitment to safety,

personnel protection

equipment

C

0

Risk

assessment

category

Rating

Rating criteria

Plant configuration,

complexity,

operation mode C

Plant configuration,

complexity,

operation mode E

General:

Annual turnover,

replacement time, peak

periods, market conditionsC

General:

Annual turnover,

replacement time, peak

periods, market conditionsA

Earthquake

D

Earthquake

D

Rating criteria

Proven technology

(no prototype),

proven parts,

reliable design B

Proven technology

(no prototype),

proven parts,

reliable design D

Process flow configuration,

critical bottlenecks

(equipment, spareparts),

utilities service interruptionB

Process flow configuration,

critical bottlenecks

(equipment, spareparts),

utilities service interruptionB

Flood exposure:

river flood, flash flood, storm

surge, tsunami D

Flood exposure:

river flood, flash flood, storm

surge, tsunami E

Rating criteria

Physical condition of

machines and equipment,

technical age,

corrosionA

Physical condition of

machines and equipment,

technical age,

corrosionD

Interdependency within the

company (IBI): units,

machines, plants,

subsidiaries, associated

companies

E

Interdependency within the

company (IBI): units,

machines, plants,

subsidiaries, associated

companies

B

Wind exposure:

extratropical storm, tropical

cyclone, tornado, hurricane E

Wind exposure:

extratropical storm, tropical

cyclone, tornado, hurricane E

Rating criteria

Maintenance programs,

inspection and regular

diagnostics D

Maintenance programs,

inspection and regular

diagnostics D

Contingent business

interruption (CBI): customers,

suppliers, service providers 0

Contingent business

interruption (CBI): customers,

suppliers, service providers 0

Extreme weather conditions:

hail, lightning, freezing, snow

C

Extreme weather conditions:

hail, lightning, freeze, snow

D

Rating criteria

Technical safety features,

emergency shut‐down

A

Technical safety features,

emergency shut‐down

C

Business continuity

management

D

Business continuity

management

A

Other perils:

volcanism, avalanche,

landslide D

Other perils:

volcanism, avalanche,

landslide D

Rating criteria

Experienced and well

qualified staff

C

Experienced and well

qualified staff

C

0

0

0

0

Protection level

A = Excellent (80‐99)

B = Good (60‐79)

C = Standard (40‐59)

A = Very low (0‐19)

B = Low (20‐29)

C = Typical (40‐59)

E = Very high (80‐99)

Hazard potential

Protection level

Hazard potential

0 = Not applicable

D = Moderate (20‐39)

E = Critical (0‐19)

0 = Not applicable

33% 29%

Chemicals, petrochemicals, plastics, pharma

Hazard potential

Protection level

Protection level:

Operational risk management

and

corporate risk control programs

25%Hazard potential

Protection level

Hazard potential

Protection level

D = High (60‐79)

Company, site name

Main occupancy

88%

57%

33%

29%

63%

Fire, explosion

and operational risk

Machinery breakdown

and technical risk

Business interruption

and contingency risk

Corporate group

Address

ABC

XYZ

123

Industry category

Protection level:

Constructional precautions and

prevention measures

Protection level:

Technical protection systems

and

fire‐fighting means

Comment

Fire, explosion and operational risk

Risk class (1‐4)*

Date of assessment

01.01.2015

Protection level:

Organizational measures and

loss prevention procedures

Natural hazard

and external perils

75%

15%

Protection level:

Hazards identification and

exposure monitoring

Weighted rating*

Nein

High operational risk

56%63% 58% 38%

15%88%

Protection level:

Safety precautions and

prevention measures

63% 75%

Hazard potential:

Exposure, hazards and risks

Machinery breakdown and technical risk

Hazard potential:


Natural hazard and external perils

RiskMatrix

Plastics prosessing: injection moulding, extrusion, etc.

Hazard potential:


Protection level:


prevention measures

Business interruption and contingency risk

Protection level:


prevention measures

Language / Sprache*

Risk engineer

English

ABC

83%

Hazard potential:


25%

RISK EXPERTS - RiskMatrix, Beispieldaten.xlsm 20.02.2015

RiskMatrix

Assessment

(rating)

AVERY

LOW

Fire, Business Interruption, Machinery Breakdown, etc.:

considerably lower than a typical risk

in the industry peer group

NatCat: according to exposure analysis

EXCELLENT

‐ expectations exceeded

‐ no deficiencies

‐ best of class

‐ no risk improvement recommendations

‐ management strives for perfection

B LOW


lower than a typical risk in the industry peer group


GOOD

‐ expectations met

‐ minor deficiencies

‐ exemplifies best practices standards

‐ minor risk improvement recommendations

‐ management strives for proactive compliance

C TYPICAL


comparable to a typical risk in the industry peer group


STANDARD

‐ expectations mostly met

‐ no noteworthy deficiencies

‐ best practice standards

‐ room for improvement

‐ compliant, requirements are met

D HIGH


higher than a typical risk in the industry peer group


MODERATE

‐ expectations partially met

‐ significant deficiencies

‐ some areas are below best practice standards

‐ considerable potential for improvement

‐ reactive, intent is to do the minimum

EVERY

HIGH


considerably higher than a typical risk

in the industry peer group


CRITICAL

‐ expectations not met

‐ critical deficiencies

‐ few or none of best practice standards are met

‐ major improvements required

‐ defensive, culture of “cutting corners”

The evaluation form is divided into four sections, each representing a specific risk:

Fire, explosion and operational risks

Machinery breakdown and technical risks

Business interruption and bottlenecks

Natural hazard and external perils

Hazard

potential:

Protection

level:

Each box is subject to an individual rating with five rating categories (plus 0 = not applicable):

Hazards potential Protection

A = Very low A = Excellent

B = Low B = Good

C = Typical C = Standard

D = High D = Moderate

E = Very high E = Critical

0 = Not applicable 0 = Not applicable

Disclaimer:

The RiskMatrix provides a rough overview of the classification of hazards and risks. The prevailling evaluation is carried out based on the information and assessment rating made by the

user. The evaluation results are to be understood as a rough estimate and as a principle cannot provide a comprehensive or complete picture of the actual risk situation. It is expressly

stipulated that no claims can arise therefrom. All liability is excluded.

Input data cells are color‐coded "grey".

All other cells are for information or for condition based response to the user.

The rating can be addressed by using the computer mouse (drop‐down menu),

or by manually typing the respective letter to the corresponding cell.

Hazard potential:

Threat of hazards and perils at the site.

Protection level:

Loss prevention measures for mitigating the impact of hazards and perils.

Each category (risk) is composed of two dimensions (spreadsheet columns) of.

The higher the likelihood and impact of a particular risk (hazard potential)

the higher are the requirements for safety equipment and protective measures (protection level).

Threat of hazards and perils at the site.

The evaluation indicates the exposure level compared to typical (similar) examples within an industry segment (occupancy category).

Loss prevention measures for mitigating the impact of hazards and perils.

The evaluation indicates the protection level compared to typical (similar) examples within an industry segment (occupancy category).

3Dr. Michael Buser

RiskMatrix

4Dr. Michael Buser

RiskMatrix

risk experts - riskmatrix, beispieldaten · riskmatrix assessment (rating) a very low fire,...

Documents