rigor vs. time: a study of instructional benefits with intelligent tutoring systems for students...

33
By Kareem Savoy RIGOR VS. TIME: A STUDY OF INSTRUCTIONAL BENEFITS WITH INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS FOR STUDENTS WITH PERSISTENT DEFICITS IN MATHEMATICS

Upload: crealcsuf

Post on 15-Aug-2015

160 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

By Kareem Savoy

RIGOR VS. TIME: A STUDY OF

INSTRUCTIONAL BENEFITS WITH

INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS

FOR STUDENTS WITH PERSISTENT

DEFICITS IN MATHEMATICS

• 1979 | IDENTIFIED LEARNING DISABILITIES

• 1990 | CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY OF

RIVERSIDE

• 1999 | BEGAN MY TEACHING CAREER

• 2003 | NATIONAL UNIVERSITY

• 2014 | CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY,

FULLERTON

RESEARCHER'S BACKGROUND

THE TIME NEEDED TO LEARN (Carroll, 1963, 1989; Crawford, Carpenter, Wilson, Schmeister, & McDonald,

2012; Miller & Mercer, 1997).

The COST TO HUMAN CAPITAL (Acosta & Martin, 2013; Mastropieri, Scruggs, & Chung, 1998; Miller & Mercer,

1997; Rumberger & Palardy, 2005).

PERSISTENT DEFICITS IN MATHEMATICS ETIOLOGY

(Kovas, Haworth, Petrill, & Plomin, 2007; Mazzocco & Thompson, 2005; Miller & Mercer, 1997;

Murphy et al., 2007; Watson & Gable, 2013)

COMPUTATION, PROCEDURES, AND CONTEXT (Fuchs, Fuchs, & Compton, 2012; Garnett, 1998; Geary, 1993; Geary, 2007, 2011a; Gersten,

Chard, et al., 2009; Gersten, Chard, et al., 2009; Gersten, Jordan, & Flojo, 2005; Mazzocco, 2005;

Meyer et al., 2010; Montague & van Garderen, 2008; Swanson & Jerman, 2006; Watson & Gable,

2013; Wilson & Swanson, 2001)

TOPIC BACKGROUND

INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS (ITS)

POTENTIAL VS. PRODUCTION

TOOLS OF GOOD TEACHING

(Gersten et al., 2007; Koedinger & Corbett, 2006; Kulik, 2003)

ALEKS

INSTRUCTIONAL APPLICATION

(Canfield, 2001)

INSTRUCTIONAL APPLICATION

(National Mathematics Advisory Panel, 2008; Slavin et al., 2009)

DESIGN VS. INSTRUCTIONAL NEED

(Clark, 1963; 1989)

TOPIC BACKGROUND (CONTINUED)

ASSESSMENT AND LEARNING IN KNOWLEDGE SPACES (ALEKS)

ASSESSMENT AND LEARNING IN KNOWLEDGE SPACES (ALEKS)

ASSESSMENT AND LEARNING IN KNOWLEDGE SPACES (ALEKS)

ASSESSMENT AND LEARNING IN KNOWLEDGE SPACES (ALEKS)

THE PROBLEM ANALYZED HERE WAS THE LACK OF APPLICABLE LITERATURE ON THE USE OF INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS (ITS) WITH STUDENTS EXHIBITING DEFICITS PERFORMANCE IN MATHEMATICS (PDM).

Lack of understanding variables influencing instruction Engagement Time (Carroll, 1963) The ability to learn (Carroll, 1963)

MEASURING OUTCOME ESTABLING PARAMETERS OF IMPLEMNTATION MEASURING FIDELITY OF USE

(Allsopp et al., 2010; Balfanz et al., 2007; Carroll, 1963; Cheung and Slavin, 2013; Chong and Siegel, 2008; Fuchs et al., 2008a; Fuchs and Fuchs, 2007; Fuchs, 2009; Miller and Mercer, 1997; Murphy et al., 2007; Watson and Gable, 2013)

PROBLEM STATEMENT

THE PURPOSE OF THIS CROSS SECTIONAL ANALYSIS WAS TO TEST THE CAPACITY OF CARROLL’S (1963) “MODEL OF SCHOOL LEARNING.” Regarding:

the time needed to learn The use of Assessment and Learning in Knowledge Spaces

(ALEKS) To improve achievement of students with PDM.

PURPOSE OF RESEARCH

What eff ect does Engagement Time, with Assessment

and Learning in Knowledge Spaces, have on the

achievement of students with persistent deficits in

mathematics (PDM)?

RESEARCH QUESTION

REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Major Sections Highlighted Works from Each Section

Characterizing Performance

• Mimicking Abilities Andersson, (2007), Anderssen(2008); Aunola, Leskinen, Lerkkanen, & Nurmi, (2004); Brown, (2013); Bryant et al., 2008; Fuchs et al., (2005); Fuchs, Fuchs, & Compton, (2010)

• Perceptions in Performance

Cheung & Slavin,(2013); Craig et al. (2011); Li & Ma,(2010); Min & VanLehn, (2010); Steenbergen-Hu & Cooper, (2013)

• Outcome Measures Ding and Davison (2005) ; Gersten, Chard, et al., (2009); Li & Ma,(2010); Steenbergen-Hu and Cooper (2013)

• Curriculum in Context Fuchs, (2009); Miller & Mercer, (1997); Tamim, Bernard, Borokhovski, Abrami, & Schmid, (2011); What Works Clearning House (2013)

Engagement Time Crawford et al., (2012); Gersten, Chard, et al. (2009); Steenbergen-Hu and Cooper (2013); Slavin et al. (2009)

Quantitative • (Creswell, 2013; Duffy & Chenail,

2009; Paul & Marfo, 2001)

Descriptive Study• Bickman and Rog, (2009); Creswell, (2009)

Pretest Posttest Design• Duffy and Chenail, (2009); Paul and

Marfo, (2001)

Archival Data

Reasonable Assumptions of Causation• (Creswell, 2013)

METHODOLOGY

Controlling for: • Gender • Socioeconomics• Prior

performance • Attendance

Quantitative Cross-Sectional

Analysis

Archival

Data

Variable influencin

g Performa

nce

ALEKS

RESEARCH DESIGN

MEASURE OF CENTRAL TENDENCIES CORRELATION REGRESSION

Y= b0 + b1X (gender) + b2X

(free/reduced lunch)+ b3X

(reading achievement) + b4X

(math achievement) + b5X

(attendance) + b6X (intervention)

+ εi

Y= Achievement outcome

b0 = Interception of time and

achievement

B1-6= Gender, Socioeconomics, Prior

Performance, Attendance

X7 = Time engagement (in minute

increments)

εi = Error (everything else not

explained by the model

SETTING Fisher Creek Unified

School District (FCUSD)

SAMPLE 138 9th Grade Students

Site A = 39 Site B = 59 Site C = 40

CRITERIA Performing below the 25th

Percentile on CST for 2 consecutive years

INSTRUMENT CST

Algebra I Assessment VARIABLES

Independent Variables Engagement Time

Dependent Variables Algebra I Assessment Current GPA Ending Mastery on

ALEKS

RESEARCH METHODS

RESEARCH METHODS (CONTINUED)

DATA COLLECTION Initial Assessment Treatment Condition

20 Weeks 300 Minutes a Week 10 Skills Mastered

Per Week Post Assessment

DATA ANALYSIS Measures of Central Tendencies

Correlation

RegressionVALIDITY

Sample SizeStatistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS)

ROLE OF THE RESEARCHER Association Communication

FINDINGS

MEASURES OF CENTRAL TENDENCIES

CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS

GPA REGRESSION

ALGEBRA I POST ASSESSMENT REGRESSION

ENDING MASTERY ON ALEKS REGRESSION

ENDING MASTERY

8th Gr. Math SS

INITIAL ASSESSMENT

Posttest Assessment

GPA

INTERPRETATION AND IMPLICATION

CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS

GPA REGRESSION

ALGEBRA I POST ASSESSMENT REGRESSION

ENDING MASTERY ON ALEKS REGRESSION

SKILLS MASTER

ED PER/HOU

R

Expectations

Correlation w/ Outco

me

Predict Perfor

mance

ENDING

MASTERY

8th Gr. Math SS

INITIAL ASSESSMENT

Posttest

Assessment GPA

INTERPRETATION AND IMPLICATION

INTERPRETATION AND IMPLICATION

• Outcome

Measures

• Fidelity to

Expectation

• Engagement Time

Skills Mastered Per/Hour

• Policy

• Practice

• Theory

Fidelity of implementation

Protects the opportunities to learn with ALEKS

Modification of interpretation with outcome

parameters

A longitudinal analysis of growth rate,

standardized achievement, and curriculum

based measure of achievement

RECOMMENDATIONS

Acos ta , R. A. , & Mar t in , E . J . (2013) . Ca l i f o rn ia U rban C r i s i s and Fi sca l Dec l ine : Trends in H igh Schoo l Dropou t Ra tes and Economic Imp l i ca t ions .

A l l sopp , D . H. , A lva rez McHat ton , P. , & Crans ton - G ing ras , A. (2009) . Examin ing Percep t ions o f Sys temat i c In teg ra t ion o f In s t ruc t i ona l Techno logy i n a Teacher Educa t ion Prog ram. Teacher Educa t i on and Spec ia l Educa t ion : The Jou rna l o f the Teacher Educa t ion D iv i s i on o f t he Counc i l f o r Excep t iona l Ch i l d ren , 32 (4 ) , 337 -350 . do i : 10 .1177 /0888406409346144

A l l sopp , D . H. , A lva rez McHat ton , P. , & Fa rmer , J . L . (2010) . Techno logy , mathemat i c s ps / r t i , and s tuden ts w i th ld : What do we know, what have we t r i ed , and what can we do to improve ou tcomes now and in the fu tu re? . Learn ing D i sab i l i t y Quar te r l y, 33 (4 ) , 273 -288 . do i : 10 .1177 /073194871003300405

B ickman , L . , & Rog , D . J . E . (2009) . The Sage handbook o f app l i ed soc ia l resea rch methods : Sage .

Bryan t , D . P. , B ryan t , B . R. , Gers ten , R. , Scammacca , N . , & Chavez , M . M . (2008) . Mathemat i c s In te rven t ion fo r Fi r s t - and Second - Grade S tudent s Wi th Mathemat i c s D iffi cu l t i es : The Eff ec ts o f Ti e r 2 In te rven t ion De l i ve red as Boos te r Lessons . Remed ia l and Spec ia l Educa t i on , 29 (1 ) , 20 -32 . do i : 10 .1177 /0741932507309712

Ca l i f o rn ia Depar tment o f Educa t ion Assessment Deve lopment and Admin i s t ra t i on D iv i s i on . (2013) . Ca l i fo rn ia S tandards Tes t s Techn ica l Repor t Sp r ing 2012 Admin i s t ra t i on .

Canfi e ld , W. (2001) . ALEKS -A web -based in te l l i gen t tu to r ing sys tem. Mathemat i cs and Computer Educa t i on , 35 (2 ) , 152 -158 .

Carro l l , J . B . (1963) . A mode l o f schoo l l ea rn ing . The Teachers Co l l ege Reco rd , 64 (8 ) , 723 -723 . Carro l l , J . B . (1989) . The Carro l l mode l a 25 -year re t rospec t i ve and p rospec t i ve v iew.

Educa t i ona l Researcher, 18 (1 ) , 26 -31 . do i : 10 .3102 /0013189X018001026 Cheung , A. (2013) . Eff ec t s o f Educa t iona l Techno logy App l i ca t ions on S tuden t Ach ievement fo r

D i sadvantaged S tuden ts : What Fo r ty Yea rs o f Research Te l l s Us . Cypr io t J ou rna l o f Educa t iona l Sc iences , 8 (1 ) , 19 -33 .

Cheung , A. C . K . , & S lav in , R. E . (2013) . The eff ec t i veness o f educa t i ona l t echno logy app l i ca t ions fo r enhanc ing mathemat i cs ach ievement in K-12 c lass rooms : A meta -ana lys i s . Educa t i ona l Research Rev iew, 9 , 88 -113 . do i : 10 .1016 / j .edu rev.2013 .01 .001

REFERENCES

Chong , S . L . , & S iege l , L . S . (2008) . S tab i l i t y o f computa t iona l defi c i t s i n math l ea rn ing d i sab i l i t y f rom second th rough fi f th g rades . Dev Neuropsycho l , 33 (3 ) , 300 -317 . do i : 10 .1080 /87565640801982387

C la rk , R. E . (1983) . Recons ider ing Research on Lea rn ing f rom Med ia . Rev iew o f Educa t iona l Research , 53 (4 ) , 445 -459 . do i : 10 .3102 /00346543053004445

C la rk , R. E . (1994) . Med ia w i l l never i nfl uence lea rn ing . Educa t i ona l Techno logy Research and Deve lopment , 42 (2 ) , 21 -29 . do i : 10 .1007%2FBF0229908

Ding , C . S . , & Dav i son , M . L . (2005) . A l ong i tud ina l s tudy o f math ach ievement ga ins fo r i n i t i a l l y l ow ach iev ing s tuden t s . Contemporary Educa t iona l Psycho logy, 30 (1 ) , 81 -95 . do i : 10 .1016 / j . cedpsych .2004 .06 .002

Educa t i on , C . D . o . (2013 , 08 /08 / ) . 2012 STAR Tes t Resu l t s : Te rm and Sco re Exp lana t ions . f rom h t tp : / / s ta r. cde .ca .gov / s ta r2012 /he lp_sco reexp lana t ions .aspx

Fuchs , D . , Mock , D . , Morgan , P. L . , & Young , C . L . (2003) . Respons iveness - to - In te rven t i on : Defi n i t i ons , Ev idence , and Imp l i ca t i ons fo r the Lea rn ing D i sab i l i t i es Cons t ruc t . Learn ing D i sab i l i t i es Research and P rac t i ce , 18 (3 ) , 157 -171 . do i : 10 .1111 /1540 -5826 .00072

Fuchs , L . , & Fuchs , D . (1995) . Acqu i s i t i on and t rans fe r eff ec t s o f c l assw ide peer-ass i s ted l ea rn ing s t ra teg ies i n mathemat i cs fo r s tudent s w i th va ry ing l ea rn ing h i s to r ies . Schoo l Psycho logy Rev iew, 24 (4 ) , 604 -620 .

Fuchs , L . S . , & Fuchs , D . (2007) . A mode l fo r imp lement ing respons iveness t o i n te rven t ion . Teach ing Except iona l Ch i ld ren , 39 (5 ) , 14 -20 .

Fuchs , L . S . , & Fuchs , D . (2009) . C rea t ing oppor tun i t i es fo r i n tens ive in te rven t i on fo r s tuden ts w i th l ea rn ing d i sab i l i t i es . Teach ing Except iona l Ch i ld ren , 42 (2 ) , 60 -62 .

Geary , D . C . (1993) . Mathemat i ca l d i sab i l i t i es : cogn i t i ve , neu ropsycho log i ca l , and genet i c components . Psycho log i ca l bu l l e t i n , 114 (2 ) , 345 .

Geary , D . C . (2005) . Ro le o f Cogn i t i ve Theory in the S tudy o f Lea rn ing D i sab i l i t y i n Mathemat i c s . J ou rna l o f Lea rn ing D i sab i l i t i es , 38 (4 ) , 305 -307 . do i : 10 .1177 /00222194050380040401

Geary , D . C . (2007) . An evo lu t ionary perspec t i ve on l ea rn ing d i sab i l i t y i n mathemat i c s . Dev Neuropsycho l , 32 (1 ) , 471 -519 . do i : 10 .1080 /87565640701360924

Geary , D . C . (2011a) . Cogn i t i ve p red ic to rs o f ach ievement g rowth i n mathemat i cs : a 5 -yea r l ong i tud ina l s tudy. Dev Psycho l , 47 (6 ) , 1539 -1552 . do i : 10 .1037 /a0025510

Geary , D . C . (2011b) . Consequences , charac te r i s t i c s , and causes o f mathemat i ca l l ea rn ing d i sab i l i t i es and pers i s ten t l ow ach ievement in mathemat i c s . J Dev Behav Ped ia t r, 32 (3 ) , 250 -263 . do i : 10 .1097 /DBP.0b013e318209ede f

Ku l i k , J . A . (2003) . Eff ec t s o f u s ing ins t ruc t iona l t echno logy in e lementa ry and secondary schoo l s : What con t ro l l ed eva lua t ion s tud ies say. A r l i ng ton : C i t eseer.

L i , Q . , & Ma , X . (2010) . A Meta -ana lys i s o f the Eff ec t s o f Computer Techno logy on Schoo l S tudent s ’ Mathemat i c s Lea rn ing . Educa t i ona l Psycho logy Rev iew, 22 (3 ) , 215 -243 . do i : 10 .1007 / s10648 -010 -9125-8

Mazzocco , M . M . , & Thompson , R. E . (2005) . K indergar ten Pred i c to rs o f Math Lea rn ing D i sab i l i t y. Learn D i sab i l Res P rac t , 20 (3 ) , 142 -155 . do i : 10 .1111 / j .1540 -5826 .2005 .00129 .x

Murphy , M . M . , Mazzocco , M . M . M . , Han ich , L . B . , & Ea r l y , M . C . (2007) . Cogn i t i ve Charac te r i s t i c s o f Ch i ld ren Wi th Mathemat i c s Lea rn ing D i sab i l i t y (MLD) Va ry as a Func t i on o f the Cu toff Cr i t e r i on Used to Defi ne MLD. J ou rna l o f Lea rn ing D i sab i l i t i es , 40 (5 ) , 458 -478 . do i : 10 .1177 /00222194070400050901

Nat iona l Cen ter fo r Educa t i on S ta t i s t i c s . (2013) . The na t ion ' s repo r t ca rd : Trends in academic p rog ress (Vo l . 79 , pp . 59 -63 ) : The Educa t ion D iges t .

Nat iona l Counc i l o f Teachers o f Mathemat i c s . (2013) . A V i s i on fo r Schoo l Mathemat i c s . f rom h t tp : / /www.nc tm.o rg / s tandards / con ten t .aspx? id=3434

Nat iona l Mathemat i c s Adv i so ry Pane l . (2008) . Foundat ions fo r Success : The Fina l Repor t o f t he Na t iona l Mathemat i c s Adv i so ry Pane l .

S lav in , R. E . , Lake , C . , & Groff , C . (2009) . Eff ec t i ve Prog rams in M idd le and H igh Schoo l Mathemat i c s : A Bes t -Ev idence Syn thes i s . Rev iew o f Educa t iona l Research , 79 (2 ) , 839 -911 . do i : 10 .3102 /0034654308330968

Tienken , C . H . , Sou th Orange , N . , Maher , J . A . , & Consu l t i ng , M . (2008) . The i nfl uence o f computer-ass i s ted in s t ruc t i on on e igh th g rade mathemat i cs ach ievement . RMLE On l i ne , 32 (3 ) .

Watson , S . R. , & Gab le , R. A. (2013) . Un rave l ing the Comp lex Na tu re o f Mathemat i c s Lea rn ing D i sab i l i t y: Imp l i ca t ions fo r Research and Prac t i ce . Learn ing D i sab i l i t y Quar te r l y, 36 (3 ) , 178 -187 . do i : 10 .1177 /0731948712461489

Wi l son , K . M . , & Swanson , H. L . (2001) . A re mathemat i c s d i sab i l i t i es due to a doma in -genera l o r a doma in - spec ifi c work ing memory defi c i t ? J ou rna l o f Lea rn ing D i sab i l i t i es , 34 (3 ) , 237 -248 .