richardson memorial hall charrette presentation
DESCRIPTION
TULANE SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURERICHARDSON MEMORIAL HALLSUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE22-23 MARCH 2011TRANSCRIPT
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
TULANERICHARDSON MEMORIAL HALL
SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE
22-23 MARCH 2011
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
INTRODUCTION
A Vision for the Future of Richardson Memorial Hall
SUSTAINABILITY CHARRETTE TULANE UNIVERSITY
RICHARDSON MEMORIAL HALL
March 22nd-23rd 2011Richardson Memorial Hall – Room 201
12:00-12:10
12:10-12:20
12:50-1:05
1:05-1:30
1:30-1:50
1:50-2:00
Day 1: March 22nd, 2011
Dean Schwartz/ FXFOWLE
Liz Davey/ Collette Creppell
FXFOWLE/ Andropogon Transsolar/SGH Altieri/FXFOWLE
FXFOWLE/ Tulane Facilities
Introduction
Tulane’s Environmental Initiatives
Site and Campus Relationships
Climate Analysis & Passive Design
Systems Operations and Metrics
12:35-12:50
12:20-12:35
el dorado/SGH
FXFOWLE / el dorado
Architecture
Occupancy/Survey
Q&A/Break 2:00-2:30 pm
Team Presentation 12:00-2:00 pm
2
1
Breakout Groups Part 1 2:30-3:45 pm3
4
6
5
7
Break 3:45-4:00 pm
Final Report Day 1 5:15-6:00 pm
Breakout Groups Part 2 4:00-5:15 pm
Dinner 7:00-9:30 pm
Day 2: March 23rd, 2011
8
10
9
11
12
Breakout groups Part 3 9:00-10:15 am
Breakout Groups Part 4 10:30-11:45 am
Break 10:15-10:30 am
Workgroup Final Summary 11:45am–12:00 pm
Optional Afternoon Sessions 2:30–5:00 pm
Final Reports, Conclusions and Next Steps 12:00-1:15 pm (Town Hall)
TGIW 5:00 pm
Lecture “Designing a Sustainable Future” Guy Geier, FXFOWLE
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
INTRODUCTION
Agenda: Day 1
SUSTAINABILITY CHARRETTE TULANE UNIVERSITY
RICHARDSON MEMORIAL HALL
March 22nd-23rd 2011Richardson Memorial Hall – Room 201
12:00-12:10
12:10-12:20
12:50-1:05
1:05-1:30
1:30-1:50
1:50-2:00
Day 1: March 22nd, 2011
Dean Schwartz/ FXFOWLE
Liz Davey/ Collette Creppell
FXFOWLE/ Andropogon Transsolar/SGH Altieri/FXFOWLE
FXFOWLE/ Tulane Facilities
Introduction
Tulane’s Environmental Initiatives
Site and Campus Relationships
Climate Analysis & Passive Design
Systems Operations and Metrics
12:35-12:50
12:20-12:35
el dorado/SGH
FXFOWLE / el dorado
Architecture
Occupancy/Survey
Q&A/Break 2:00-2:30 pm
Team Presentation 12:00-2:00 pm
2
1
Breakout Groups Part 1 2:30-3:45 pm3
4
6
5
7
Break 3:45-4:00 pm
Final Report Day 1 5:15-6:00 pm
Breakout Groups Part 2 4:00-5:15 pm
Dinner 7:00-9:30 pm
Day 2: March 23rd, 2011
8
10
9
11
12
Breakout groups Part 3 9:00-10:15 am
Breakout Groups Part 4 10:30-11:45 am
Break 10:15-10:30 am
Workgroup Final Summary 11:45am–12:00 pm
Optional Afternoon Sessions 2:30–5:00 pm
Final Reports, Conclusions and Next Steps 12:00-1:15 pm (Town Hall)
TGIW 5:00 pm
Lecture “Designing a Sustainable Future” Guy Geier, FXFOWLE
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
INTRODUCTION
Agenda: Day 2
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
INTRODUCTION
Agenda: Workgroups & Topics
TUES2:30-3:45
TUES4:00-5:15
WED9:00-10:15
WED10:30-11:45
Site and CampusRelationships
InteriorOrganizationand Function
Systems
Climate andEnvelope
Site and CampusRelationships
InteriorOrganizationand Function
Systems
Climate andEnvelope
Site and CampusRelationships
InteriorOrganizationand Function
Systems
Climate andEnvelope
Site and CampusRelationships
InteriorOrganizationand Function
Systems
Climate andEnvelope
1 2 3 4 5Dan Maginn Pete Pesce Steve Salzer Ilana Judah Guy Geier
Site and CampusRelationships
InteriorOrganizationand Function
Systems
Climate andEnvelope
group group group group group
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
Kenneth Schwartz, Dean
INTRODUCTION
PresentersTULANE
Collette Creppell, University ArchitectLiz Davey, Office of Environmental Affairs
F X F O W L EGuy Geier, FAIA, FIIDA, LEEDPeter Pesce, AIAIlana Judah, Int’l Assoc. AIA, LEED
Dan Maginn, AIASteve Salzer, AIA
Philip C. Steiner, P.E.AltieriSeborWieber LLC
TRANSSOLARErik Olsen, P.E.
Yaki Miodovnik, RLA, ASLA, CSLA
Sean O’Brien, P.E., LEED AP
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
campus environmental initiatives
Buildings64.3%
Travel25.5%
Commute7.4%
Waste0.6%
Study Abroad1.3%
Fleet0.9%
2009 Emissions by Sector
Analyzing Tulane’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
CAMPUS ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES
Climate Action Plan & Campus Goals
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
CAMPUS ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES
Climate Action Plan & Campus Goals
21,082 20,243 17,537 23,956
77,620 63,765 64,232
68,568
52,796
59,951 62,579
59,510
‐
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
2006 2007 2008 2009
Emissions by Scope
Total Scope 3
Total Scope 2
Total Scope 1
Tulane GHG Emissions (MTC02e)
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
CAMPUS ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES
Climate Action Plan & Campus Goals
Normalized Emissions
2006 2007 2008 2009ACUPCC Average
Full Time Enrollment (FTE) 9,704 9,642 10,091 10,695 Per Capita Emissions (MTCO2e/FTE) 15.61 14.93 14.31 14.21 7.96
Total Building Area (sq. feet) 6,713,508 6,746,734 7,038,007 7,156,328 Emissions Per 1000 sq. Feet(MTCO2e/1000 sq. Feet) 22.57 21.34 20.51 21.23 19.94
Emissions per student and sq. foot
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
CAMPUS ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES
Climate Action Plan & Campus Goals
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
External Actions
Measures during 2015‐2020
Measures during 2010‐2015
Measures Underway
Total emissions
Emission Reduction “Wedges”
A Recycling Snapshot:Uptown Campus RecycleMania Results• In February 2011. . .
Garbage: 52‐57 tons/ weekRecycling: 6‐10 tons/weekRecycling Diversion Rate: 10‐18%
• Tulanians can recycle all paper, cardboard, plastic bottles, aluminum & metal cans on the uptown campus.
• Recycling services also provided for office electronics, laser and ink jet cartridges, and residence hall move‐out (clothes, household items, food, books, Mardi Gras beads).
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
CAMPUS ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES
Recycling
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
CAMPUS ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES
Green Building Initiatives & Projects1990’s Pre-Katrina Post-Katrina 2011 -
C t I iti ti
Timeline
Early Initiatives a a Current Initiatives
o Israel Building
o Alcee Fortier
o Willow Residences
o Wall Residential College
o Lavin Bernick Center for
University Life
Recycling Program
oMcAlister Place
LEED Standards
o Hertz Family Practice Facility
o J. Bennett Johnson Labs
o Broad Street Health Clinicy
- Building Commissioning
- Energy Modeling
- Revit
Energy Retrofits/ Conservation
o Richardson Memorial
Sustainable Strategies
gy
o Dinwiddie Hall
o Residential College II
*
BLDG PHOTO1
BLDG PHOTO2
BLDG PHOTO3
BLDG PHOTO4
BLDG PHOTO5
BLDG PHOTO6
BLDG PHOTO7
BLDG PHOTO8
BLDG PHOTO9
BLDG PHOTO10
BLDG PHOTO11
• Member of U.S. Green Building Council – since 2007
• Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHE) – since 2008
• American College & University President’s Climate Commitment (ACUPCC) – since 2008
* TSA Prototype House #4 – LEED Silver with two more houses completed or in progress
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
CAMPUS ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES
Green Building Initiatives & Projects
Dinwiddie HallCollege II
ResidentialCollege II
Hertz Family Practice Facility
Features: Features: Features:Features:
o re-using existing building
o recycling building materials
o maximizing daylight and
Features:
o lighting and HVAC controls
by motion sensor
o maximized daylighting and
i
Features:
o low flow showers and low flush
plumbing fixtures
o Solar ready
daylight harvesting
o 76% solid waste recycled
Energy Usage:
o estimated to use 17.9% less
views
o louvered sun shades
Energy Usage:
o energy usage of the
Energy Usage:
o energy usage in the design is
energy for 14.3% savings which
translates to $14,468/year
mechanical systems is
estimated to use 21% less
energy than baseline design
T ki LEED Sil /G ld
estimated to use 36% less
energy than baseline design
T ki LEED Hi h G ld/Pl tiTracking LEED High Silver/Gold Tracking LEED Silver/Gold Tracking LEED High Gold/Platinum
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
CAMPUS ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES
Green Building Initiatives & ProjectsSUSTAINABLE TULANE,
SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY
SUSTAINABILITY BENEFITSTHE COST OF LEED
URBANbuild
GREENbuild
City Center
SAVING MONEY (Financial)
FIRST COST VS. LIFECYCLE SAVINGSCost Recovery Time: For university it might be 5-15 years
2% - 3% Silver/Gold 4% - 6% Platinum
Center for Public Service: Samuel Green edible school yardGreen Light NOLA
Priestly Charter School for Construction
For university it might be 5 15 years For businesses it might be 3-5 years
COMMISSIONING & ENERGY MODELING (most payback) Cost Recovered by :
Center for Bio-Environmental Research
Campus Sustainability Report Card A- (2010)
Lower risk Higher energy efficiency Knowing the building and operationsbefore it is opens
SAVING THE PLANET (E i t l) SAVING THE PLANET (Environmental)
Lower energy use Lower water use Less site disturbance
HEALTHY BUILDING/ HEALTHY PEOPLE
Improved health Higher productivity Reduced absenteeism Lower healthcare costs Lower healthcare costs General wellbeing
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
occupancy & program
RESPONDENTS
135 students
28 faculty
4 admin/ other
= distribution of years at RMH
SPACE USAGE
83% studio as primary work space
45% classroom as secondary work space
20% other secondary space (dorm, computer lab, etc)
16.5% library as secondary work space
WEEKLY HOURS
52.5% 11-30 hours in primary work space
41% > 30 hours in primary work space
60% 10 hours or less in secondary space
46% > 40 hours in RMH
63% most time spent during day
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Occupant IEQ and Program Survey
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Occupant IEQ and Program Survey GENERAL BUILDING / PRIMARY WORKSPACE SATISFACTION
41-42% satisfied 26% neutral 32-33% dissatisfied
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
72% conditions interfere with their work
BEST FEATURES
Daylight
ADEQUATE FEATURES
Acoustics Audio Visual
INADEQUATE FEATURES
Information Technology Indoor Air Quality Artificial Lighting Information Technology Storage VERY INADEQUATE FEATURES
Thermal Comfort
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Occupant IEQ and Program Survey BEST COMMON SPACES
Studios Library
ADEQUATE COMMON SPACES
Outdoor spaces Shop Digital output shop Classrooms
INADEQUATE COMMON SPACES
Computer Labs Pin up / Jury Drawing Board Cafe
TOP FAVORITE SPACES
Lobby Library
Studios Entry porch/ outdoors
TOP LEAST FAVORITE SPACES
Computer Lab Offices/ Ground Floor Drawing Board Cafe Classrooms 204 & 404
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Occupant IEQ and Program Survey STUDIOS - SPACE 68% More space for group work
64% More space for storage 73% More comfortable furniture
STUDIOS - THERMAL COMFORT 66% Dissatisfied
Comments- Too cold in cold weather Mixed issues in hot weather Problematic at all times of day Humidity problem in hot weather Need for personal control Many windows are not operable
STUDIOS - LIGHT 78% Satisfied with natural light
35% Dissatisfied with artificial light 62.5% No task lights
Comments- Need for lighting controls Blinds/ shades for glare Poor quality artificial light
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Occupant IEQ and Program Survey STUDIOS - ACOUSTICS Mixed Satisfaction
Comments- Loud window AC units Hard reflective surfaces Loyola Physical plant noise Group / professor meetings Lack of separations Student culture
STUDIOS - USE 50% 11-20 hours on weekdays outside class 45% 11-20 hours on weekends outside class
Would use more if.... Improved thermal comfort More comfortable furniture Computers integrated in studios Lounge/ rest/ sleeping areas Food preparation/ kitchen space Acoustic control
Proximity/ transportation to residence ALTERNATIVES TO STUDIO USE 35% Library
44% Computer lab
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Occupant IEQ and Program Survey OFFICES - USE 80% use as primary work space 11-30 hours OFFICES - SATISFACTION 65% Satisfied with amount of daylight 60% Dissatisfied with amount of space
60% Dissatisfied with comfort of furniture
62% Dissatisfied with air quality
69-72% Dissatisfied with temperature
Comments- Humidity - problem for books
Mold Variations in temperature
Air infiltration through windows Lack of controls/ blinds No natural ventilation/ operable windows Shop needs to be acoustically insulated Noise from corridor due to air return Visual privacy from exterior
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Occupant IEQ and Program Survey CLASSROOMS - FAVORITES
201, 202, 204 301, 305 405
CLASSROOMS - LEAST FAVORITE 201, 204 (temperature issues) 404, 405, 407/409 404 worst overall Furniture rated poorly in many rooms
Comments- Shades/ shutters insufficient for glare Furniture comfort/ lack writing space Poor Acoustics/ AV (internal/external) Poor thermal comfort/ controls Poor artificial lights/ controls Noise from Loyola Need business school style classrooms
PIN-UP/ JURY SPACES
36-57% Dissatisfied with quality, quantity, visibility and access
Comments- Poor lighting Too public/ lacks intimacy/ acoustic issues
Need to incorporate use of technology
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Occupant IEQ and Program Survey LIBRARY
66% use 1-5 hours per week 66-75% temperature comfortable
Would use more if.... Open longer/ at night More computers/ software/ outlets More up to date resources Better seating/ furniture
COMPUTER LAB
Mixed Importance 75% dissatisfied with air quality 68% dissatisfied with space available 68% dissatisfied with lack of daylight 50% dissatisfied with number of computers Issues of heat, odor, cleanliness More distribution throughout RMH
DIGITAL OUTPUT LAB
79% rate as useful 51% use 1-2 per week
Needs better management
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Occupant IEQ and Program Survey SHOP
90% use between once per month and never
Issues of lack of space and air quality Needs longer/ weekend hours Acoustic control to adjacent spaces
DRAWING BOARD CAFE
44% use 1-2 per week Would use more if.... Open longer/ at night More ambiance/ daylight Better quality food Better air quality/ odors Access to exterior space
OUTDOOR SPACES Mixed Importance Not enough opportunity to go outdoors
Ideas... Outdoor sheltered classroom Outdoor pinup/ sketching areas Covered space for full scale experiments Bike Lockers Tables & chairs to replace platforms
SECURITY
Most Feel their person and property is secure
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Occupant IEQ and Program Survey IMPORTANT ITEMS AND DREAMS FOR THE FUTURE...
“The building could be a place for the city. It can signify the new outlook of the city. A role model for the city. It can create interaction between the different studios.”
Better recycling!
“Combining a high tech approach to environmental systems with enhancing the historic elements of the building structure.”
Technologically advanced lighting and controls system
High quality Computer Lab
Lounge/ Nap Areas
“Passive ventilation in the spring and fall. Zones for controlling a Living Building.”
Strong connection between inside and outside
Outdoor Classrooms/ Seating
Building as teaching tool
Modern and innovative within Historic Facade
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Program
MAJOR PROGRAMMATIC ISSUES
STUDIOS IMPROVE STUDIO EXPERIENCE / STUDIO CULTURE CREATE RANGE OF PIN-UP SPACES, BOTH FLEXIBLE AND FIXED EXPLORE COMPUTER LABS WITHIN STUDIOS EXPLORE DIGITAL IMAGING ON MULTIPLE FLOORS
CLASSROOMS ESTABLISH INTERMEDIATE-SIZED CLASSROOM(S)
OFFICES IMPROVE ADMIN OFFICE LAYOUT IMPROVE BUILDING RECEPTION SEQUENCE IMPROVE FACULTY OFFICING AREAS EXPAND / IMPROVE TRUDC / CITY CENTER / URBANBUILD OFFICES
45%
18%
15%
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Program
RESEARCH / LIBRARY FUNCTIONS EMBRACE CURRENT / PREDICTED TRENDS IN LIBRARY ENVIRONMENTS CONSIDER RELATIONSHIP TO CAFE ESTABLISH A CURATED ARCHITECTURE GALLERY EXTEND HOURS OF OPERATION
SHOP EXPAND AND IMPROVE SHOP TO INCLUDE CAPABILITIES BEYOND WOOD
PINUP EXPLORE DEDICATED AREAS FOR SMALL / MEDIUM / LARGE CRITS
10%
3%
3%
MAJOR PROGRAMMATIC ISSUES
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Program
MAJOR PROGRAMMATIC ISSUES
DRAWING BOARD CAFE IMPROVE CAFE EXPERIENCE EXPLORE POTENTIAL OF CAFE AS PART OF LEARNING COMMONS
COMPUTER LAB EXPLORE DE-CENTRALIZED COMPUTER LAB LOCATIONS
DIGITAL OUTPUT LAB EXPLORE SEPARATING DIGITAL IMAGING FROM 3D FAB EXPLORE DIGITAL IMAGING ON MULTIPLE LEVELS
RESTROOMS INCREASE NUMBER OF FIXTURES IN BUILDING PER CODE
EXTERIOR AREAS EXPLORE SUSTAINABLE LANDSCAPE FEATURES IMPROVE EXTERIOR AMENITIES (SEATING, BIKE PARKING, ETC)
2%
2%
1%
1%
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Building Schedule
EXT. STAIR EXT. STAIR
EXT. STAIR
MEN WOMEN
STORAGE
CLASSROOM
OFFICE
CLASSROOM301
303B 303 303A305
304A
304
308 310306
302
R3001M
3STW
3
3STW2
R3002W
3STW
4
3PS2 LOBBY
LOBBY3PS1
OFFICE OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICEOFFICEOFFICECLASSROOM
DN DNUP
UP
(316)
ELEV
3STW1
N
SPRING SEMESTERTYPICAL MONDAY7 AM TO 1 PM
5 - 25 OCCUPANT HOURS
25 - 50 OCCUPANT HOURS
50 - 75 OCCUPANT HOURS
75 - 100 OCCUPANT HOURS
100 + OCCUPANT HOURS
LEVEL THREE FLOOR PLAN
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Building Schedule
LEVEL THREE FLOOR PLAN
EXT. STAIR EXT. STAIR
EXT. STAIR
MEN WOMEN
STORAGE
CLASSROOM
OFFICE
CLASSROOM301
303B 303 303A305
304A
304
308 310306
302
R3001M
3STW
3
3STW2
R3002W
3STW
4
3PS2 LOBBY
LOBBY3PS1
OFFICE OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICEOFFICEOFFICECLASSROOM
DN DNUP
UP
(316)
ELEV
3STW1
SPRING SEMESTERTYPICAL MONDAY1 PM TO 7 PM
5 - 25 OCCUPANT HOURS
25 - 50 OCCUPANT HOURS
50 - 75 OCCUPANT HOURS
75 - 100 OCCUPANT HOURS
100 + OCCUPANT HOURS
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Building Schedule
SPRING SEMESTERTYPICAL MONDAY7 PM TO 1 AM
5 - 25 OCCUPANT HOURS
25 - 50 OCCUPANT HOURS
50 - 75 OCCUPANT HOURS
75 - 100 OCCUPANT HOURS
100 + OCCUPANT HOURS
LEVEL THREE FLOOR PLAN
EXT. STAIR EXT. STAIR
EXT. STAIR
MEN WOMEN
STORAGE
CLASSROOM
OFFICE
CLASSROOM301
303B 303 303A305
304A
304
308 310306
302
R3001M
3STW
3
3STW2
R3002W
3STW
4
3PS2 LOBBY
LOBBY3PS1
OFFICE OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICEOFFICEOFFICECLASSROOM
DN DNUP
UP
(316)
ELEV
3STW1
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Building Schedule
SPRING SEMESTERTYPICAL MONDAY1 AM TO 7 AM
5 - 25 OCCUPANT HOURS
25 - 50 OCCUPANT HOURS
50 - 75 OCCUPANT HOURS
75 - 100 OCCUPANT HOURS
100 + OCCUPANT HOURS
LEVEL THREE FLOOR PLAN
EXT. STAIR EXT. STAIR
EXT. STAIR
MEN WOMEN
STORAGE
CLASSROOM
OFFICE
CLASSROOM301
303B 303 303A305
304A
304
308 310306
302
R3001M
3STW
3
3STW2
R3002W
3STW
4
3PS2 LOBBY
LOBBY3PS1
OFFICE OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICEOFFICEOFFICECLASSROOM
DN DNUP
UP
(316)
ELEV
3STW1
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
architecture
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
ARCHITECTURE
A History of Richardson Memorial Hall
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
ARCHITECTURE
A History of Richardson Memorial Hall
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
ARCHITECTURE
A History of Richardson Memorial Hall
ARCHITECTURE
A History of Richardson Memorial Hall
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
ARCHITECTURE
A History of Richardson Memorial Hall
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
ARCHITECTURE
A History of Richardson Memorial Hall
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
ARCHITECTURE
A History of Richardson Memorial Hall
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
ARCHITECTURE
A History of Richardson Memorial Hall
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
ARCHITECTURE
A History of Richardson Memorial Hall
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
ARCHITECTURE
A History of Richardson Memorial Hall
Existing ConditionsExisting Conditions
• Solid masonry / load bearing walls• Single glazed / wood windows withminimal shading• Wood/steel framed roof; slate &terracotta
Construction style is more typical ofnorthern climates than warm/humidlocations with high solar gains
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
ARCHITECTURE
Structure, Materials, and Building Re-Use
Existing Conditions
Windows• Some deterioration – restorationlikely possible• Poor thermal performance• High solar heat gain
Walls• Extremely durable construction• Poor thermal performance• Some exterior restoration needed
Roofs• Durable wearing materials• Staining potential due to shading patterns• Localized repairs/restoration may be required
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
ARCHITECTURE
Structure, Materials, and Building Re-Use
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
ARCHITECTURE
Building Codes
PRELIMINARY CODE ANALYSIS
CODE: IBC 2006 (2009 PENDING); NFPA 101 WILL APPLY (MORE STRINGENT)
EGRESS: TWO MEANS OF EGRESS REQUIRED. EGRESS STAIRS TO BE ENCLOSED (OR CODE COMPLIANT EXTERIOR)
ATRIUMS: ATRIUM SPACES LIMITED TO TWO CONNECTED STORIES, THEREFOREA FIRE BARRIER MUST BE ESTABLISHED AT THE THIRD LEVEL FLOOR AND AT THE FIFTH LEVEL FLOOR.
EXISTING STAIRS: CAN REMAIN AS NON-REQUIRED "CONVENIENCE STAIRS"
EXIT CORRIDORS: BECAUSE BUILDING IS SPRINKLERED, THEY CAN BE NON RATED
ADA: BUILDING MUST BE MADE FULLY COMPLIANT
RESTROOMS: THERE WILL BE A SUBSTANTIAL INCREASE IN TOILET FIXTURES, INCLUDING ADA.
E X T . S T A IR E X T . S T A IR
E X T . S T A IR
M E N W O M E N
S T O R A G E
C L A S S R O O M
O F F IC E
C L A S S R O O M301
303B 303 303A305
304A
304
308 310306
302
R 3001M
3ST
W3
3S T W 2
R 3002W
3ST
W4
3P S 2 L O B B Y
L O B B Y3P S 1
O F F IC E O F F IC E
O F F IC E
O F F IC EO F F IC EO F F IC EC L A S S R O O M
D ND N
U P
U P
(316 )
E L E V
3S T W 1
L E V E L T H R E E F L O O R P L A N N
N O N -R E Q U IR E D C O N V E N IE N C E S T A IR
XMIN . = X / 3
E G R E S S Z O N E E G R E S S Z O N E
XMIN . = X / 3
O P E N A T R IU M IS S U E
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
ARCHITECTURE
Egress
U P
E X T . S T A IR E X T . S T A IR
E X T . S T A IR
M E C H .
C O R R ID O RC L A S S R O O M
O F F IC E
M 4001
404
403 405 411
402
4S T W 1
4E L E V 1
4S T W 2
4P S 1 L O B B Y
4C R D 1
C L A S S R O O M
C L A S S R O O M O F F IC E
D N D N
E L E V
C L A S S R O O M401
407?C L A S S R O O M ?
S T A IR
S T A IR
L E V E L F O U R F L O O R P L A N N
XMIN . = X / 3
E G R E S S Z O N E
XMIN . = X / 3
E G R E S S Z O N E
N O N -R E Q U IR E D C O N V E N IE N C E S T A IR T O 3
E N C L O S E D S T A IR T O 5C O D E C O M P L IA N T R IS E /R U NS E P A R A T IO N F R O M E L E V A T O R
E L IM IN A T E S T A IR T O 5
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
ARCHITECTURE
Egress
S T U D IO
CO
RR
IDO
R
D E S IG N L A B D E S IG N L A B(o p e n to flo o r b e lo w) ( o p e n to flo o r b e lo w)502
501
503
5P S 1 L O B B Y
5CR
D1
E L E V
C H A S E ?
C H A S E ?
C H A S E ?
C H A S E ?
L E V E L F IV E F L O O R P L A N N
E X T . S T A IR
D N
E G R E S S Z O N E B E L O W
T O E G R E S SB E L O W
E N C L O S E D S T A IR T O 4C O D E C O M P L IA N T R IS E /R U NS E P A R A T IO N F R O M E L E V A T O R
E L IM IN A T E S T A IR
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
ARCHITECTURE
Egress
E X T . S T A IR E X T . S T A IR
E X T . S T A IR
CLO
SE
T
V E S T IB U L E
M E C H .
C L A S S R O O M
S L ID E
L IB R A R Y
S L ID EL IB R A R Y
201B
201A 2CLS
1 2CLS
2
M 2001
204
206
206A
202
S T A IR
K IT C H E N
C L O S E T
2P S 1L O B B Y
L O B B Y2P S 2
U P
L IB R A R Y
E L E V
L E C T U R E201
U P
D N D N
D N
L E V E L T W O F L O O R P L A N N
XMIN . = X / 3 MIN .= X / 3
E G R E S S Z O N E E G R E S S Z O N E
D ND N X
N O N -R E Q U IR E D C O N V E N IE N C E S T A IR
N O N -C O M P L IA N T G U A R D R A IL IS S U E
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
ARCHITECTURE
Egress
S H O P
O F F IC E
O F F IC E
C O R R ID O R
L O B B Y
S T O R A G E
C O R R ID O R
D IG IT A LO U T P U T L A B
M E C H .
D R A W IN G B O A R D C A F E
M E C H .
O F F IC EP R IN T S H O P
C L A S S R O O M
O F F IC E
110A
110
121119 117 115 113 111 109 107 105
M 1001
1CLS
1
1C L S 2
104
101
101A
J100
2
103
M 1002
123 125
116A
129127 131
116B 118 120
131A
122P 1002
1C R D 1
102
S T A IR
1P S 1
1C R D 2
1P S 2E L . L O B B Y
O F F IC EO F F IC EO F F IC E
O F F IC E O F F IC E O F F IC E O F F IC E O F F IC E
F A C U L T Y O P E R A T IO N S
O F F IC E O F F IC E O F F IC E
O F F IC E O F F IC E
S T O R A G E
O F F IC E
M E C H .
J1001JA N IT O R
R 1001WW O M E N
R 1002MM E NM 1003
M E C H A N IC A L
E 1001E L E C T .
M 1004M E C H .
1H W 1H A L L
E L E V .
K IT C H E N
C H A S EO F F IC E
114A 114BO F F IC E
U P U P
U P
E L E V .M E C H .
L E V E L O N E F L O O R P L A N N
E X T .S T A IR
E X T .S T A IR
E X T . S T A IR
P O T E N T IA L E G R E S S L O C A T IO N
E G R E S S Z O N E A B O V E E G R E S S Z O N E A B O V E
P O T E N T IA L E G R E S S L O C A T IO N
P O T E N T IA L E G R E S S L O C A T IO N
N O N -R E Q U IR E D C O N V E N IE N C E S T A IR
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
ARCHITECTURE
Egress
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
site & campus relationships
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SITE & CAMPUS RELATIONSHIPS
Access and Transportation
ServiceParking
Service Route
Streets Shuttle/ Streetcar
Streets
105 spaces
101 spaces58 spaces
Shuttle Drop Off Location
Shuttle Route Bus Stop
Streetcar Stop
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SITE & CAMPUS RELATIONSHIPS
Access and Transportation
Students Faculty Staff
Personal VehicleCarpoolStreetcarBusWalking and BikingRespondents
2010 Commuting Survey Uptown Results
34.10%2.60%
0%1.90%
61.50%61
50.80%4.80%2.10%0.50%
32.80%39
74.80%6%
1.10%0.80%
13.70%111
Bike Path
Bike Path
Pedestrian Circulation
Campus Commuting
Major Path
Minor path
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
0 15 30 60 120 ft.30
property line
Richardson Memorial Hall DinwiddieHall
RichardsonBuilding
Gibson Quad
E N G I N E E R I N G R O A D
L O Y O L A U N I V E R S I T YWest Road
Parking Garage
Stallings Hall
GibsonHall
n
SITE & CAMPUS RELATIONSHIPS
Site Plan
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SITE & CAMPUS RELATIONSHIPS
Exterior Opportunities
b c
a
e
d
f
n
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SITE & CAMPUS RELATIONSHIPS
Storms and Climate ChangeFEMA Advisory Base Flood Elevation (2006) 3 feet above Highest Existing Adjacent Grade
Existing ground floor is below HEAG+3’
Land sinking + sea level rise in Gulf of Mexico resulted in “relative sea-level rise” of three feet over past 100 years
POTENTIAL STRATEGIES Protection Site grading Improved ventilation Dehumidification (high energy demand) Infrastructure improvements
Resistance Mold resistant Materials Natural - Select woods, ceramic tile, porcelain, rubber Engineered - Fiberglass covered drywall, insulation, paints, coatings
Passive collection/ containment
ABFE3 ft above HEAG
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SITE & CAMPUS RELATIONSHIPS
Natural Systems: Eco-RegionSouthern Holocene Meander Belts
Drains all or parts of 31 States, 2 Canadian Provences (over 1,000,000 square •
miles) into the Gulf of Mexico.Critical wildlife habitat includies the largest continuous system of wetlands in •
North America.Levees have separated much of the Mississippi from its natural hydrologic •
system contributing to a decrease of sediment mobilization and altering the natural delta formation leading to habitat loss.Point bars, depositional features along the inside of stream beds, were •
originally occupied by diverse forests of cottonwood, sugarberry, sycamore, green ash, and pecan. Drier sides of the flood plain are marked by willow oak, water oak, swamp chestnut oak, and cherrybark oak. Also common in the southern region are live oak, Spanish moss, and laurel oak.
Eco-Region Map
Bottomland Deciduous Forest Vegetation
Tulane University
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SITE & CAMPUS RELATIONSHIPS
Natural Sytems: Geology and Physiography
0 2,000Feet
elevation
-28 - -25
-24 - -20
-19 - -15
-14 - -10
-9 - -5
-4 - 0
0 - 5
5 - 10
10 - 15
15 - 20
20 - 25
25 - 30
30 - 35
35 - 40
40 - 45
Mississippi River
Point Bar Alluvial Deposits
Levee Flank Depression
Metairie-Gentilly Ridge
Richardson Hall
Physiography Map Geology Sections
Holocene Geology and Physiography of New Orleans
Mississippi River levees form the high ground derived from alluvial •
deposits underlain by sands. Typically gray and brown silts, silty clay, and some very fine sands.The Mid-town area between the Mississippi and Metairie Ridge was an •
enclosed depression known as a “levee flank depression” The campus is situated on the border between the alluvial deposits and the depression.The site is underlain by the Pleistocene age Prairie formation. This unit •
dips down beneath the city and is generally encountered at depths greater than 40 feet.
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SITE & CAMPUS RELATIONSHIPS
Natural Systems: HydrologyTo Lake Pontchartrain
17th
Str
eet C
anal
elevation (msl)-28 - -20
-19 - -10
-9 - 0
0 - 10
10 - 20
20 - 30
30 - 40
40 - 50
0 2,500Feet
0 2,800Feet
flood zone
500-yearflood zone
100-yearflood zone
100-year
500-year
HydrologyCampus drains away from the •
Mississippi River, eventually towards the 17th Canal and into Lake PonchartrainCombined Sewer System •
modifies the natural hydrologic pattern, draining eastward towards Mississippi River Gulf OutletTulane University was on the •
border of the Katrina flood extents due to its elevated location on the natural levee. Flooding was minimal north of Freret Street including the historic quad.
Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans http://swbnola.org
The Sewage Collection
System
The Sewage Collection
SystemMissis-sippi River Gulf Outlet
Natural Hydrology Pattern Modified Hydrologic Pattern- Wastewater Katrina Flood Map
Flood Zone Map
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SITE & CAMPUS RELATIONSHIPS
Natural Systems: Water Resource
0
2
4
6
8
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Average Monthly Precipitation (in)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Potential Rooftop Rainwater Collection Volume (cu. ft.) 0 50’
Roof Collection11,600 sq. ft.
RoofGarden
RoofGarden
Roof Garden
RoofGarden
StorageCisterns
Water ReuseRichardson Hall could collect an average of 4000-6000 cu. •
ft. of rainwater per month.Irrigates approximately 0.5 acres, assuming 1” per week.•
Would require a theoretical cistern 14’ diamter and 40’ tall. •
for storage. (7000 cu. ft)Irrigation for the entire Quad would require 10x this amount•
Rainfall Pattern (average inches per month)
Rooftop Collection with surrounding Roof Gardens
Rooftop Collection Volume (average cu. ft. per month)
Quad Area for Irrigation
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SITE & CAMPUS RELATIONSHIPS
Natural Systems: Soils Sk
Cm
Ub
Sk
Ha
CmCS
Co
LV
CS
0 2,000Feet
NRCS Soil Types
Cm, Cancienne silt loam
Co, Cancienne silty clay loam
Ha, Harahan clay
Sk, Schriever clay
Ub, Urban land
W, Water
CS, Cancienne and Schriever soils,frequently flooded
LV, Levees-Borrow pits complex,0 to 25 percent slopes
Soil ConditionsCm, Cancienne silt loam (south campus) and,
Highly productive, found on natural levees. Consists of silty alluvium, depth to root •
restrictive layer > 60 in.Somewhat poorly drained, moderately high movement in restrictive layer. Low •
shrink-swell potential. (subsidence)High water table at 1.4 to 4 feet below the surface. Construction limitations are •
moderateSouthern hardwoods such as green ash, cottonwood, oaks, and sweetgum.•
Sk, Schriever clay (north campus)Found in backswamps. Consists of clayey alluvium, depth to root restrictive layer > •
60 in.Poorly drained hydric soil. Low water movement in the most restrictive layer. Very •
high shrink-swell potential. Severe construction limitations. (subsidence)High water table at 12 inches. Surface layer is very dark gray clay to 10 inches. •
Subsoils are dark gray clay. Fairly productive soil suitable for bermudagrass, dallisgrass, tall fescue and white •
clover. Good for tree species adapted to wet clay soils.
Soils Map
Subsidence Map Compaction
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SITE & CAMPUS RELATIONSHIPS
Site Conditions: Existing
Richardson Memorial Building
View West (w) View East (e)
View South (s)
Key Plan
View North (n)
e
n
s
w
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SITE & CAMPUS RELATIONSHIPS
Site Conditions: Spatial Quality and Characteristics
Pedestrian Connection
University Boundary
Gathering Spaces Material Use Gateway Active Open Space
Building Entrances/ Forecourt
Quad/ Green
Social Gathering Spaces
GoalsOrganization/ Hierarchy of Spaces•
Organization/ Hierarchy of path systems•
Gateways for Wayfinding•
Forecourts to celebrate entrances•
Outdoor gathering spaces•
Identify property and preserve campus •
identity
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SITE & CAMPUS RELATIONSHIPS
Site Conditions: Tree Cover
Shade Tree
Understory Tree
Gibson Quad Tree Cover Plan Richardson Building Tree Cover
Cherry
Magnolia
CypressLive oak
Bamboo
Cypress
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SITE & CAMPUS RELATIONSHIPS
Site Conditions: Hardscape Materials
Limestone
Concrete Stepping StonesConcrete Walk
Material RecycleRichardson Building Hardscape
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SITE & CAMPUS RELATIONSHIPS
Site Conditions: Infrastructure
Water
Sewer
Telecommunications
Down Spout
Sump Pump
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SITE & CAMPUS RELATIONSHIPS
Site Conditions: Site Furnishings
Light Fixture Bike Racks
Benches
Bike Rack/ Tables Table/ Trash Receptacle
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
climate analysis & passive design
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNThermal Comfort Factors
Comfort: Naturally ventilated spaces
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNThermal Comfort: Indoor Operative and Outdoor Air Temperatures
Ne
w O
rle
an
s
Mean Monthly Outdoor Air Temperature °C
Mean Monthly Outdoor Air Temperature °F
Indo
or O
pera
tive
Tem
pera
ture
°F
Indo
or O
pera
tive
Tem
pera
ture
°C
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
01 Jan 0:00 31 Jan 10:00 02 Mar 20:00 02 Apr 6:00 02 May 16:00 02 Jun 2:00 02 Jul 12:00 01 Aug 22:00 01 Sep 8:00 01 Oct 18:00 01 Nov 4:00 01 Dec 14:00 01 Jan 0:00
Am
bsol
ute
Hum
idity
[g/k
g]
Out
side
Air
Tem
pera
ture
[°F]
Outside Air Temperature [°F]
Absolute Humidity [g/kg]
Natural Ventilation
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNOutside Air Temperature and Absolute Humidity
Natural Ventilation
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNOutside Air Temperature and Absolute Humidity: Typical Winter Week
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
17 D
ec 0
:00
17 D
ec 1
2:00
18 D
ec 0
:00
18 D
ec 1
2:00
19 D
ec 0
:00
19 D
ec 1
2:00
20 D
ec 0
:00
20 D
ec 1
2:00
21 D
ec 0
:00
21 D
ec 1
2:00
22 D
ec 0
:00
22 D
ec 1
2:00
23 D
ec 0
:00
Outs
ide
Air T
empe
ratu
re [°
F]
Outside Air Temperature [°F]Absolute Humidity [‰]
Cold day
Mildday
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
14 O
ct 0
:00
14 O
ct 1
2:00
15 O
ct 0
:00
15 O
ct 1
2:00
16 O
ct 0
:00
16 O
ct 1
2:00
17 O
ct 0
:00
17 O
ct 1
2:00
18 O
ct 0
:00
18 O
ct 1
2:00
19 O
ct 0
:00
19 O
ct 1
2:00
20 O
ct 0
:00
Outs
ide
Air T
empe
ratu
re [°
F]
Outside Air Temperature [°F]
Absolute Humidity [‰]
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNOutside Air Temperature and Absolute Humidity: Typical Autumn Week
Mild day
Mildday
Comfort: Mechanically ventilated spaces
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNThermal Comfort Ranges
24H/D
Operation Time 8h - 20h80%
100%
0
5
10
15
20
25
25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90
Hum
idity
Rat
io [
‰]
Outdoor Air Temperature [°F]
ASHRAE winterindoor comfort range
ASHRAE summerindoor comfort range
Extended indoorcomfort range
20%
40%
60%
95 100
0
100
200
300
400
500
24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88
Natural Ventilation: 44% of occupied hours
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNOutside Air Temperature Statistics for Humidity Ratios <10 g/kg
Occupied hours: 8am – midnight
0
100
200
300
400
500
24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNOutside Air Temperature Statistics for Humidity Ratios <14 g/kg
Natural Ventilation: 63% of occupied hours
Occupied hours: 8am – midnight
316 27
208
341
381
523
51
499
461440
366
286
203
157
7
99
5636
20 20 180
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Cum
ulat
ive
Freq
uenc
y [%
]
Freq
uenc
y [h
]
Wind Speed [mph]
X-Value Is Upper Limit
Interval: 8h - 20 h
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNWind Speed Statistics
0 h
100 h
200 h
300 h
400 h
500 h
600 h
700 h
800 h
900 h
1000 h0
23
45
68
90
113
135
158
180
203
225
248
270
293
315
338
0 h
100 h
200 h
300 h
400 h
500 h
600 h
700 h
800 h
900 h
1000 h0
23
45
68
90
113
135
158
180
203
225
248
270
293
315
338
>1.1 mph
>7.8 mph
>14.5 mph
>21.3 mph
>28.0 mph
All 24 hours a day+ Outside Air Temp < 77°F
8am – 8pm+ Outside Air Temp < 77°F
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNWind Speed, Direction and Frequency Statistics
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNNatural Ventilation Responses
Prevailing wind South
Natural ventilation with stack-driven exhaust through louvers
Natural ventilation with stack-driven exhaust through monitors
Natural ventilation with central mechanical exhaust
0 0 0 0 0
3846
5866
78 7986 81
5950
41 34
45
51
71
97
100 101 9089
88
85
4949
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
jan feb mar apr may jun jul aug sep oct nov dec
Inso
latio
n [k
Wh/
m²]
total 1629 kWh/m²/a
Beam Radiation 913 kWh/m²/a
Diffuse Radiation 716 kWh/m²/a
Ground Reflection 0 kWh/m²/a
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNHorizontal Radiation
8 10 1316 18 18 18 17 15 13
9 8
2024
30
3338 37 40 38
3027
2218
25
28
30
41
38
3030 33
3640
28
25
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
jan feb mar apr may jun jul aug sep oct nov dec
Inso
latio
n [k
Wh/
m²]
total 900 kWh/m²/a
Beam Radiation 381 kWh/m²/a
Diffuse Radiation 356 kWh/m²/a
Ground Reflection 163 kWh/m²/a
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNRadiation on Western Facade
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNSolar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21)
6:45
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNSolar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21)
7:30
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNSolar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21)
8:15
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNSolar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21)
9:00
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNSolar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21)
9:45
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNSolar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21)
10:30
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNSolar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21)
11:15
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNSolar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21)
12:00
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNSolar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21)
12:45
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNSolar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21)
13:30
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNSolar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21)
14:15
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNSolar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21)
15:00
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNSolar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21)
15:45
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNSolar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21)
16:30
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNSolar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21)
17:15
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNSolar Control Responses
Exterior Shades Buffer zone
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNSolar Control Responses
Storm window with exterior shades Bottom-up interior shade
New window withsolar control coating
Exterior shades
Existing window usedas storm window
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNSolar Control Response
No solar control With solar control coating
Humidity Ratio <15 g/kg
Humidity Ratio 15 g/kg≥
2140 2140 20371690
1115680
29432
18391214
843
521
221
9921
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
T > 68 T > 72 T > 76 T > 80 T > 84 T > 88 T > 92 T > 96
2140 2140 20291661
1080629
253 22
1796
1154793
485
189
8412
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
T > 68 T > 72 T > 76 T > 80 T > 84 T > 88 T > 92 T > 96
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNSolar Control Response
No solar control With interior shades
Humidity Ratio <15 g/kg
Humidity Ratio 15 g/kg≥
2140 2140 20371690
1115680
29432
18391214
843
521
221
9921
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
T > 68 T > 72 T > 76 T > 80 T > 84 T > 88 T > 92 T > 96
2140 2135 19941560
914428
86 4
1475964
609
261
123
28
0 00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
T > 68 T > 72 T > 76 T > 80 T > 84 T > 88 T > 92 T > 96
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNSolar Control Response
No solar control With exterior shades
Humidity Ratio <15 g/kg
Humidity Ratio 15 g/kg≥
2140 2140 20371690
1115680
29432
18391214
843
521
221
9921
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
T > 68 T > 72 T > 76 T > 80 T > 84 T > 88 T > 92 T > 96
2140 2124 19741459
749274 41 2
1316838
474
189
81
12
0 00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
T > 68 T > 72 T > 76 T > 80 T > 84 T > 88 T > 92 T > 96
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNSolar Control Response
No solar control With exterior shades and solar control coating
Humidity Ratio <15 g/kg
Humidity Ratio 15 g/kg≥
2140 2140 20371690
1115680
29432
18391214
843
521
221
9921
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
T > 68 T > 72 T > 76 T > 80 T > 84 T > 88 T > 92 T > 96
2140 2121 19671439
725262 33 1
1295816
455
180
7612
0 00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
T > 68 T > 72 T > 76 T > 80 T > 84 T > 88 T > 92 T > 96
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNDaylighting
Rule of Thumb
11
2.5 2.5
Head ofwindow
Cross-section of window
daylightcontrol
solar andglare control
10’10’
16’ 16’
Head ofwindow
8’
Cross-section of typical studio space
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGNControls and Automation
Systems to be controlledShadingWindowsMechanicalLighting
Questions to askManual vs. automatedInterdependency (‘lockout’)OwnershipWhole-building vs. zoned
Building Enclosure Upgrades – Impetus
• Relevant IEQ Survey Results• Majority of occupant workspaces are within 15ft. of exterior walls or windows• Common complaints of poor temperature control
• Too hot/humid/cold during warm weather• Too cold during cool weather
• Majority of occupants dissatisfied with thermalcomfort
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Building Enclosure
Building Enclosure Upgrades – Exterior Walls
• Insulation / vapor retarder benefits• Reduced energy use• Possible increase in occupant comfort• Potential improvement in air tightness
• Potential drawbacks• Reduced wall temperatures during cold weather• Moisture accumulation
• Condensation within walls• Wet masonry => Exterior staining
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Building Enclosure
Building Enclosure Upgrades – Exterior Walls
Insulation andvapor retarder
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Building Enclosure
Building Enclosure Upgrades – Exterior Walls
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Building Enclosure
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
Building Enclosure Upgrades – Exterior Walls
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Building Enclosure
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
Building Enclosure Upgrades – Exterior Walls
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Building Enclosure
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
Building Enclosure Upgrades – Exterior Walls
Moisture accumulation
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Building Enclosure
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
Building Enclosure Upgrades – Exterior Walls
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Building Enclosure
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
Building Enclosure Upgrades – Windows
• Concerns• Primary concern is contribution to buildingcooling loads• Secondary concern is occupant comfort• Tertiary concern is winter heating load• Restoration of wood frames and othercomponents can address operability and watertightness but not thermal issues
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Building Enclosure
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
Building Enclosure Upgrades – Roof
• Evaluation• Need for replacement is uncertain• Slate roofing is extremely durable and provideslongevity when properly designed/constructed
• Staining issues can likely be remedied and areaesthetic only
• Presence or absence of insulation to bedetermined
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Building Enclosure
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Acoustics
Sources of Noise
shop
mechanical rooms
public gathering spaces
studios (individual vs group work conflicts)
street noise
exterior mechanical equipment
Acoustically Sensitive Programs
classrooms
library
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Acoustics
E XT . S TAIR E XT . S T AIR
E XT . S T AIR
CLO
SE
T
C LOS E T
V E S T IB ULE
ME C H.
C LAS S R OOM
S LIDE
LIB R AR Y
S LIDELIB R AR Y
201B
201A 2CLS
1
201C
2CLS
2
M2001
204
206
206A
202
S T AIR
K IT C HE N
C LOS E T
2P S 1LOB B Y
LOB B Y2P S 2
UP
LIB R AR Y
E LE V
LE C T UR E201
UP
DN DN
DN
S HOP
OF F IC E
OF F IC E
C OR R IDOR
LOB B Y
S TOR AG E
C OR R IDOR
DIG IT ALOUT P UT LAB
ME C H.
DR AWING B OAR D C AF E
ME C H.
OF F IC EP R INT S HOP
C LAS S R OOM
OF F IC E
110A
110
121119 117 115 113 111 109 107 105
M1001
1CLS
1
1C LS 2
104
101
101A
J100
2
103
M1002
123 125
116A
129127 131
116B 118 120
131A
122P 1002
1C R D1
102
S T AIR
1P S 1
1C R D2
1P S 2E L. LOB B Y
OF F IC EOF F IC EOF F IC E
OF F IC E OF F IC E OF F IC E OF F IC E OF F IC E
F AC ULT Y OP E R AT IONS
OF F IC E OF F IC E OF F IC E
OF F IC E OF F IC E
S T OR AG E
OF F IC E
ME C H.
J 1001J ANIT OR
R 1001WWOME N
R 1002MME NM1003
ME C HANIC AL
E 1001E LE C T .
M1004ME C H.
1HW1HALL
E LE V .
K IT C HE N
C HAS EOF F IC E
114A 114BOF F IC E
UP UP
UP
E LE V .ME C H.
E XT . S T AIR E XT . S T AIR
E XT . S T AIR
E XT . S TAIR E XT . S T AIR
E XT . S T AIR
ME N WOME N
S T OR AG E
C LAS S R OOM
OF F IC E
C LAS S R OOM301
303B 303 303A305
304A
304
308 310306
302
R 3001M
3ST
W3
3S T W2
R 3002W
3ST
W4
3P S 2 LOB B Y
LOB B Y3P S 1
OF F IC E OF F IC E
OF F IC E
OF F IC EOF F IC EOF F IC EC LAS S R OOM
DNDN
UPUP
(316)
E LE V
3S TW1
E XT . S TAIR E XT . S TAIR
E XT . S T AIR
ME C H.
C OR R IDORC LAS S R OOM
OF F IC E
M4001
404
403 405 411
4024S TW1
4E LE V 1
4S TW2
4P S 1 LOB B Y
4C R D1
C LAS S R OOM
C LAS S R OOM OF F IC E
DN DN
E LE V
UP UP
C LAS S R OOM401
407?C LAS S R OOM?
S TAIRS TAIR
S T UDIO
CO
RR
IDO
R
DE S IG N LAB DE S IG N LAB(open to floor below) (open to floor below)502
501
503
S TAIR
5P S 1 LOB B Y
5CR
D1
E LE V
C HAS E ?
C HAS E ?
C HAS E ?
C HAS E ?
S T AIRDN DN
E XT . S T AIR
1
2
3
4
5
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Acoustics: Interior Materials
acoustic plaster
glass/mineral fiber battmineral fiber ceiling tile
wood fiber acoustic panelscarpet
wood & fiberglass panels
fabric wrapped fiber board
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
systems
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SYSTEMS
MEP Sytems at RMH and on Campus
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SYSTEMS
MEP Sytems at RMH and on Campus
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SYSTEMS
MEP Sytems at RMH and on Campus
1.1. Through Wall PTAC2.2. Ducted Central Station HVAC Unit3.3. Fan Coil Unit4.4. Heat and Exhaust Only5.5. Unconditioned (Heat Only)
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SYSTEMS
MEP Sytems at RMH and on Campus
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SYSTEMS
MEP Sytems at RMH and on Campus
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SYSTEMS
MEP Sytems at RMH and on Campus
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Elec
tric
Dem
and
(kV
A)
Richardson Memorial Electric Demand (kVA), 7/1/2004-7/1/2005
7/1/
2005
7/1/
2004
6/1/
2005
5/1/
2005
4/1/
2005
3/1/
2005
2/1/
2005
1/1/
2005
12/1
/200
4
11/1
/200
4
10/1
/200
4
9/1/
2004
8/1/
2004
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SYSTEMS
Energy Data & Peak Use at RMH
Thermal Complaints
Asymmetric Thermal Radiation
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SYSTEMS
Thermal Complaints
``
Existing and Projected MeteringService Presently Metered? Proposed Metering?
Electric Yes YesSteam No YesChilled Water No YesDomestic Water No Yes
IBM Smart Building Program• Dashboard• Realtime energy analysis• Historical data Smart Building Program Implementation
Energy Metering• By Source?• By system?• By zones?
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SYSTEMS
Existing & Projected Metering
Baseline Energy Model• Compare Baseline Energy Use to Proposed Energy Use• Baseline – ASHRAE 90.1-2007 Appendix G• Proposed – System types may incorporate heat
recovery, displacement ventilation, natural ventilation,central systems, distributed systems, etc.
• Target Energy Reduction:– TU Target: 24% energy cost savings on major
renovation projects– LEED Target: EAc1 - 9 points (24% savings)
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SYSTEMS
Baseline Energy Model
Baseline Energy Model• Process:
– Export Revit file (gbXML) to Autodesk Green BuildingStudio, then import into eQUEST. Run simulations ineQUEST.
– Alternate: Build model directly in eQUEST.• Simulate Multiple Systems.• Organize output to identify major areas of energy usage :
– Dynamic: HVAC, Lighting, Plug Loads– Static: Chilled Water, Steam
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SYSTEMS
Baseline Energy Model
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SYSTEMS
Water: Seasonal potable and Non-Potable Water Use
Total Consumption(Gallons)
Potable (Gal.) Non-Potable (Gal.)
Actual Actual Actual
Spring 402,488 34,013 368,475Summer 38,183 3,938 34,245
Fall 358,620 30,180 328,440Total 799,290 68,130 731,160
Based on 3.5 GPF for WC's and 1.5 GPF for Urinals
Season
Actual Water Use
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SYSTEMS
Water: Seasonal potable and Non-Potable Water Use
Total Consumption(Gallons)
Potable (Gal.) Non-Potable (Gal.)
LA Plbg Code Table406
LA Plbg Code Table406
LA Plbg Code Table406
Spring 216,083 34,013 182,070Summer 20,894 3,938 16,956
Fall 192,468 30,180 162,288Total 429,444 68,130 361,314
Based on 1.6 GPF for WC's and 1.0 GPF for Urinals
Season
Code Water Use
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SYSTEMS
Water: Seasonal potable and Non-Potable Water Use
Total Consumption(Gallons)
Potable (Gal.) Non-Potable (Gal.)
LEED WEReductions
LEED WEReductions
LEED WEReductions
Spring 103,373 34,013 69,360Summer 10,346 3,938 6,408
Fall 92,004 30,180 61,824Total 205,722 68,130 137,592
Based on 0.8 GPF for WC's and 0.5 GPF for Urinals
LEED WE Water UseSeason
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
Actual LA PlbgCode Table
406
LEED WEReductions
Actual LA PlbgCode Table
406
LEED WEReductions
Actual LA PlbgCode Table
406
LEED WEReductions
Total Consumption (Gallons) Potable (Gal.) Non-Potable (Gal.)
Spring 402,488 216,083 103,373 34,013 34,013 34,013 368,475 182,070 69,360
Summer 38,183 20,894 10,346 3,938 3,938 3,938 34,245 16,956 6,408
Fall 358,620 192,468 92,004 30,180 30,180 30,180 328,440 162,288 61,824
Total 799,290 429,444 205,722 68,130 68,130 68,130 731,160 361,314 137,592
Pro
jecte
dA
nnualC
onsu
mption
(Gallo
ns)
Actual vs. Code vs. LEED Reductions
Rainwater Harvest Potential - Grey Water Usage
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SYSTEMS
Water
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SYSTEMS
Lighting
artificial lighting (task)daylighting artificial lighting (general)
dimming/timeclock/scene controls occupancy sensors LED technology
More:personal computerspower & data infrastructurelocations & distribution
Technology:Digital MediaDigital FabricationWireless Connectivity
Energy:Increased Power Usage
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SYSTEMS
Information Technology
operations & metrics
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OPERATIONS & METRICS
Waste Management BIGGEST WASTE ISSUES Huge amount at end of semester, much is recyclable. > 1 cu.yd/ student/ yr compacted Dining area does not have ability to wash dishes
THUS, disposable dishes big component of waste No composting - SUBSTANTIAL food waste. Shop waste = approx. 1 large dumpster/yr (40. cu. yds)
RECYCLING AT RMH No building recycling policies Recycling containers for bottles, cans and paper Bins located in studios, computer lab, offices
REMOVAL Trash removed via passenger elevator - PROBLEM Chute or freight elevator required Facilities and Unico manage recycling EQUIPMENT Free pick up of electronic equipment bi-weekly Electronics reused or donated to Baton-Rouge non-profit
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OPERATIONS & METRICS
Facilities Protocols CONSUMABLES
RMH purchased consumables: Coffee and PAPER Students purchase: chipboard, wood, sodas No official “environmental policies” about purchasing TSA meetings with decanted water and china/glassware
CLEANING/ PEST CONTROL Facilities green cleaning policy per LEED EBOM
Pesticides sprayed outside each building monthly Pesticides inside buildings done as last resort Insecticide - Pyrethrums - natural product Round-up is herbicide used - toxicity studies are debated
MAINTENANCE AND ALTERATIONS Low VOC paint policy Fluorescent light bulbs are green-tipped. HEPA filters are replaced monthly
SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT Siemens building management systems
Facilities monitors systems / manages problems Utilities Infrastructure manages RMH equipment
Equipment replaced with wear/ failure Energy efficient equipment for replacements
COMMISSIONING Done on Dinwiddie, not Lavin-Bernick
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OPERATIONS & METRICS
Commissioning
What is Commissioning?“a quality-oriented process for achieving, verifying, and documenting that the performance of facilities, systems, and assemblies meets defined objectives and criteria” - ASHRAE
What are the benefits of commissioning? • provides safe and healthful environments • optimizes energy use • reduces operating costs • ensures adequate O&M staff training • improves workplace performance due to higher quality environments
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OPERATIONS & METRICS
LEEDLEED 2009 for New Construction and Major RenovationProject Checklist
15 3 7 Possible Points: 26Y N ?
Y Prereq 1
1 Credit 1 1
5 Credit 2 5
1 Credit 3 Brownfield Redevelopment 1
6 Credit 4.1 6
1 Credit 4.2 1
3 Credit 4.3 Alternative Transportation—Low-Emitting and Fuel-Efficient Vehicles 3
1 Credit 4.4 2
1 Credit 5.1 Site Development—Protect or Restore Habitat 1
1 Credit 5.2 Site Development—Maximize Open Space 1
1 Credit 6.1 Stormwater Design—Quantity Control 1
1 Credit 6.2 Stormwater Design—Quality Control 1
1 Credit 7.1 Heat Island Effect—Non-roof 1
1 Credit 7.2 1
1 Credit 8 Light Pollution Reduction 1
5 0 5 Possible Points: 10
Y Prereq 1
2 2 Credit 1 Water Efficient Landscaping 2 to 4
2 Reduce by 50% 2
No Potable Water Use or Irrigation 4
2 Credit 2 Innovative Wastewater Technologies 2
3 1 Credit 3 2 to 4
Reduce by 30% 2
3 Reduce by 35% 3
Reduce by 40% 4
Construction Activity Pollution Prevention
Site Selection
Development Density and Community Connectivity
Alternative Transportation—Public Transportation Access
Alternative Transportation—Bicycle Storage and Changing Rooms
Water Use Reduction
RICHARDSON MEMORIAL HALL SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE - SUSTAINABILITY STUDY
TULANE UNIVERISTY
Sustainable Sites
Water Efficiency
Alternative Transportation—Parking Capacity
Heat Island Effect—Roof
Water Use Reduction—20% Reduction
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OPERATIONS & METRICS
LEED
LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major RenovationProject Checklist
15 3 7 Possible Points: 26Y N ?
Y Prereq 1
1 Credit 1 1
5 Credit 2 5
1 Credit 3 Brownfield Redevelopment 1
6 Credit 4.1 6
1 Credit 4.2 1
3 Credit 4.3 Alternative Transportation—Low-Emitting and Fuel-Efficient Vehicles 3
1 Credit 4.4 2
1 Credit 5.1 Site Development—Protect or Restore Habitat 1
1 Credit 5.2 Site Development—Maximize Open Space 1
1 Credit 6.1 Stormwater Design—Quantity Control 1
1 Credit 6.2 Stormwater Design—Quality Control 1
1 Credit 7.1 Heat Island Effect—Non-roof 1
1 Credit 7.2 1
1 Credit 8 Light Pollution Reduction 1
5 0 5 Possible Points: 10
Y Prereq 1
2 2 Credit 1 Water Efficient Landscaping 2 to 4
2 Reduce by 50% 2
No Potable Water Use or Irrigation 4
2 Credit 2 Innovative Wastewater Technologies 2
3 1 Credit 3 2 to 4
Reduce by 30% 2
3 Reduce by 35% 3
Reduce by 40% 4
Construction Activity Pollution Prevention
Site Selection
Development Density and Community Connectivity
Alternative Transportation—Public Transportation Access
Alternative Transportation—Bicycle Storage and Changing Rooms
Water Use Reduction
RICHARDSON MEMORIAL HALL SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE - SUSTAINABILITY STUDY
TULANE UNIVERISTY
Sustainable Sites
Water Efficiency
Alternative Transportation—Parking Capacity
Heat Island Effect—Roof
Water Use Reduction—20% Reduction
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OPERATIONS & METRICS
LEED
15 14 6 Possible Points: 35
Y Prereq 1
Y Prereq 2
Y Prereq 3
6 7 6 Credit 1 1 to 19
Improve by 12% for New Buildings or 8% for Existing Building Renovations 1
Improve by 14% for New Buildings or 10% for Existing Building Renovations 2
Improve by 16% for New Buildings or 12% for Existing Building Renovations 3
Improve by 18% for New Buildings or 14% for Existing Building Renovations 4
Improve by 20% for New Buildings or 16% for Existing Building Renovations 5
6 Improve by 22% for New Buildings or 18% for Existing Building Renovations 6
Improve by 24% for New Buildings or 20% for Existing Building Renovations 7
Improve by 26% for New Buildings or 22% for Existing Building Renovations 8
Improve by 28% for New Buildings or 24% for Existing Building Renovations 9
Improve by 30% for New Buildings or 26% for Existing Building Renovations 10
Improve by 32% for New Buildings or 28% for Existing Building Renovations 11
Improve by 34% for New Buildings or 30% for Existing Building Renovations 12
Improve by 36% for New Buildings or 32% for Existing Building Renovations 13
Improve by 38% for New Buildings or 34% for Existing Building Renovations 14
Improve by 40% for New Buildings or 36% for Existing Building Renovations 15
Improve by 42% for New Buildings or 38% for Existing Building Renovations 16
Improve by 44% for New Buildings or 40% for Existing Building Renovations 17
Improve by 46% for New Buildings or 42% for Existing Building Renovations 18
Improve by 48%+ for New Buildings or 44%+ for Existing Building Renovations 19
7 Credit 2 1 to 7
1% Renewable Energy 1
3% Renewable Energy 2
5% Renewable Energy 3
7% Renewable Energy 4
9% Renewable Energy 5
11% Renewable Energy 6
13% Renewable Energy 7
2 Credit 3 2
2 Credit 4 2
3 Credit 5 3
2 Credit 6 2Green Power
Optimize Energy Performance
On-Site Renewable Energy
Energy and Atmosphere
Enhanced Commissioning
Enhanced Refrigerant Management
Measurement and Verification
Fundamental Commissioning of Building Energy Systems
Minimum Energy Performance
Fundamental Refrigerant Management
15 14 6 Possible Points: 35
Y Prereq 1
Y Prereq 2
Y Prereq 3
6 7 6 Credit 1 1 to 19
Improve by 12% for New Buildings or 8% for Existing Building Renovations 1
Improve by 14% for New Buildings or 10% for Existing Building Renovations 2
Improve by 16% for New Buildings or 12% for Existing Building Renovations 3
Improve by 18% for New Buildings or 14% for Existing Building Renovations 4
Improve by 20% for New Buildings or 16% for Existing Building Renovations 5
6 Improve by 22% for New Buildings or 18% for Existing Building Renovations 6
Improve by 24% for New Buildings or 20% for Existing Building Renovations 7
Improve by 26% for New Buildings or 22% for Existing Building Renovations 8
Improve by 28% for New Buildings or 24% for Existing Building Renovations 9
Improve by 30% for New Buildings or 26% for Existing Building Renovations 10
Improve by 32% for New Buildings or 28% for Existing Building Renovations 11
Improve by 34% for New Buildings or 30% for Existing Building Renovations 12
Improve by 36% for New Buildings or 32% for Existing Building Renovations 13
Improve by 38% for New Buildings or 34% for Existing Building Renovations 14
Improve by 40% for New Buildings or 36% for Existing Building Renovations 15
Improve by 42% for New Buildings or 38% for Existing Building Renovations 16
Improve by 44% for New Buildings or 40% for Existing Building Renovations 17
Improve by 46% for New Buildings or 42% for Existing Building Renovations 18
Improve by 48%+ for New Buildings or 44%+ for Existing Building Renovations 19
7 Credit 2 1 to 7
1% Renewable Energy 1
3% Renewable Energy 2
5% Renewable Energy 3
7% Renewable Energy 4
9% Renewable Energy 5
11% Renewable Energy 6
13% Renewable Energy 7
2 Credit 3 2
2 Credit 4 2
3 Credit 5 3
2 Credit 6 2Green Power
Optimize Energy Performance
On-Site Renewable Energy
Energy and Atmosphere
Enhanced Commissioning
Enhanced Refrigerant Management
Measurement and Verification
Fundamental Commissioning of Building Energy Systems
Minimum Energy Performance
Fundamental Refrigerant Management
15 14 6 Possible Points: 35
Y Prereq 1
Y Prereq 2
Y Prereq 3
6 7 6 Credit 1 1 to 19
Improve by 12% for New Buildings or 8% for Existing Building Renovations 1
Improve by 14% for New Buildings or 10% for Existing Building Renovations 2
Improve by 16% for New Buildings or 12% for Existing Building Renovations 3
Improve by 18% for New Buildings or 14% for Existing Building Renovations 4
Improve by 20% for New Buildings or 16% for Existing Building Renovations 5
6 Improve by 22% for New Buildings or 18% for Existing Building Renovations 6
Improve by 24% for New Buildings or 20% for Existing Building Renovations 7
Improve by 26% for New Buildings or 22% for Existing Building Renovations 8
Improve by 28% for New Buildings or 24% for Existing Building Renovations 9
Improve by 30% for New Buildings or 26% for Existing Building Renovations 10
Improve by 32% for New Buildings or 28% for Existing Building Renovations 11
Improve by 34% for New Buildings or 30% for Existing Building Renovations 12
Improve by 36% for New Buildings or 32% for Existing Building Renovations 13
Improve by 38% for New Buildings or 34% for Existing Building Renovations 14
Improve by 40% for New Buildings or 36% for Existing Building Renovations 15
Improve by 42% for New Buildings or 38% for Existing Building Renovations 16
Improve by 44% for New Buildings or 40% for Existing Building Renovations 17
Improve by 46% for New Buildings or 42% for Existing Building Renovations 18
Improve by 48%+ for New Buildings or 44%+ for Existing Building Renovations 19
7 Credit 2 1 to 7
1% Renewable Energy 1
3% Renewable Energy 2
5% Renewable Energy 3
7% Renewable Energy 4
9% Renewable Energy 5
11% Renewable Energy 6
13% Renewable Energy 7
2 Credit 3 2
2 Credit 4 2
3 Credit 5 3
2 Credit 6 2Green Power
Optimize Energy Performance
On-Site Renewable Energy
Energy and Atmosphere
Enhanced Commissioning
Enhanced Refrigerant Management
Measurement and Verification
Fundamental Commissioning of Building Energy Systems
Minimum Energy Performance
Fundamental Refrigerant Management
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OPERATIONS & METRICS
LEED9 3 2 Possible Points: 14
Y Prereq 1
2 1 Credit 1.1 1 to 3
Reuse 55% 1
2 Reuse 75% 2
Reuse 95% 3
1 Credit 1.2 Building Reuse—Maintain 50% of Interior Non-Structural Elements 1
2 Credit 2 1 to 2
50% Recycled or Salvaged 1
2 75% Recycled or Salvaged 2
2 Credit 3 1 to 2
Reuse 5% 1
Reuse 10% 2
2 Credit 4 1 to 2
10% of Content 1
2 20% of Content 2
2 Credit 5 1 to 2
10% of Materials 1
2 20% of Materials 2
1 Credit 6 Rapidly Renewable Materials 1
1 Credit 7 1
11 0 4 Possible Points: 15
Y Prereq 1
Y Prereq 2
1 Credit 1 1
1 Credit 2 1
1 Credit 3.1 1
1 Credit 3.2 1
1 Credit 4.1 1
1 Credit 4.2 1
1 Credit 4.3 1
1 Credit 4.4 1
1 Credit 5 1
1 Credit 6.1 Controllability of Systems—Lighting 1
1 Credit 6.2 1
1 Credit 7.1 1
1 Credit 7.2 Thermal Comfort—Verification 1
1 Credit 8.1 1
1 Credit 8.2 1
Indoor Chemical and Pollutant Source Control
Controllability of Systems—Thermal Comfort
Thermal Comfort—Design
Daylight and Views—Daylight
Daylight and Views—Views
Low-Emitting Materials—Composite Wood and Agrifiber Products
Increased Ventilation
Construction IAQ Management Plan—During Construction
Construction IAQ Management Plan—Before Occupancy
Low-Emitting Materials—Adhesives and Sealants
Low-Emitting Materials—Paints and Coatings
Low-Emitting Materials—Flooring Systems
Recycled Content
Regional Materials
Certified Wood
Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance
Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control
Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring
Storage and Collection of Recyclables
Building Reuse—Maintain Existing Walls, Floors, and Roof
Construction Waste Management
Materials Reuse
Materials and Resources
Indoor Environmental Quality
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OPERATIONS & METRICS
LEED
9 3 2 Possible Points: 14
Y Prereq 1
2 1 Credit 1.1 1 to 3
Reuse 55% 1
2 Reuse 75% 2
Reuse 95% 3
1 Credit 1.2 Building Reuse—Maintain 50% of Interior Non-Structural Elements 1
2 Credit 2 1 to 2
50% Recycled or Salvaged 1
2 75% Recycled or Salvaged 2
2 Credit 3 1 to 2
Reuse 5% 1
Reuse 10% 2
2 Credit 4 1 to 2
10% of Content 1
2 20% of Content 2
2 Credit 5 1 to 2
10% of Materials 1
2 20% of Materials 2
1 Credit 6 Rapidly Renewable Materials 1
1 Credit 7 1
11 0 4 Possible Points: 15
Y Prereq 1
Y Prereq 2
1 Credit 1 1
1 Credit 2 1
1 Credit 3.1 1
1 Credit 3.2 1
1 Credit 4.1 1
1 Credit 4.2 1
1 Credit 4.3 1
1 Credit 4.4 1
1 Credit 5 1
1 Credit 6.1 Controllability of Systems—Lighting 1
1 Credit 6.2 1
1 Credit 7.1 1
1 Credit 7.2 Thermal Comfort—Verification 1
1 Credit 8.1 1
1 Credit 8.2 1
Indoor Chemical and Pollutant Source Control
Controllability of Systems—Thermal Comfort
Thermal Comfort—Design
Daylight and Views—Daylight
Daylight and Views—Views
Low-Emitting Materials—Composite Wood and Agrifiber Products
Increased Ventilation
Construction IAQ Management Plan—During Construction
Construction IAQ Management Plan—Before Occupancy
Low-Emitting Materials—Adhesives and Sealants
Low-Emitting Materials—Paints and Coatings
Low-Emitting Materials—Flooring Systems
Recycled Content
Regional Materials
Certified Wood
Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance
Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control
Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring
Storage and Collection of Recyclables
Building Reuse—Maintain Existing Walls, Floors, and Roof
Construction Waste Management
Materials Reuse
Materials and Resources
Indoor Environmental Quality
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OPERATIONS & METRICS
LEED
6 0 0 Possible Points: 6
1 Credit 1.1 1
1 Credit 1.2 1
1 Credit 1.3 1
1 Credit 1.4 1
1 Credit 1.5 1
1 Credit 2 1
1 1 2 Possible Points: 4
1 Credit 1.1 1
1 Credit 1.2 1
1 Credit 1.3 1
1 Credit 1.4 1
62 21 26 Possible Points: 110TotalCertified 40 to 49 points Silver 50 to 59 points Gold 60 to 79 points Platinum 80 to 110
LEED Accredited Professional
MR Cr.2 - Construction Waste Management (75%)
SS Cr.6.1 - Stormwater Design Quantity Control
SS Cr.6.2 - Stormwater Design Quality Control
Regional Priority: Specific Credit
Innovation and Design Process
Regional Priority Credits
Sustainability Education Program
Green Housekeeping Program
Exemplary Performance in Construction Waste Management
Ergonomic Assesment and Furniture
Mold control/ prevention or Other
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OPERATIONS & METRICS
2030 CHALLENGE
2030 CHALLENGE Targets: U.S. National Averages
50% Target 60% Target 70% Target 80% Target 90% Target
Administrative / Professional &Government Office
Education 170 63% 76 38.0 30.4 22.8 15.2 7.6
College / University (campus-level) 280 63% 120 60.0 48.0 36.0 24.0 12.0
K-12 School
Food Sales 681 86% 225 112.5 90.0 67.5 45.0 22.5
Convenience Store(with or without gas station)
753 90% 241 120.5 96.4 72.3 48.2 24.1
Grocery Store / Food Market
Food Service 786 59% 351 175.5 140.4 105.3 70.2 35.1
Fast Food 1306 64% 534 267.0 213.6 160.2 106.8 53.4
Restaurant / Cafeteria 612 53% 302 151.0 120.8 90.6 60.4 30.2
Health Care: Inpatient (Specialty Hospitals, Excluding Children's)
468 47% 227 113.5 90.8 68.1 45.4 22.7
Hospital (Acute Care, Children's)
Health Care: Long Term Care(Nursing Home / Assisted Living)
225 54% 124 62.0 49.6 37.2 24.8 12.4
Health Care: Outpatient 183 72% 73 36.5 29.2 21.9 14.6 7.3
Clinic / Other Outpatient Health 219 76% 84 42.0 33.6 25.2 16.8 8.4
Medical Office
Lodging 194 61% 87 43.5 34.8 26.1 17.4 8.7
Dormitory / Fraternity / Sorority
Hotel, Motel or Inn
Mall (Strip Mall and Enclosed) 271 71% 107 53.5 42.8 32.1 21.4 10.7
Office
Bank / Financial Institution
Public Assembly 143 57% 66 33.0 26.4 19.8 13.2 6.6
Entertainment / Culture 265 63% 95 47.5 38.0 28.5 19.0 9.5
Library 246 59% 104 52.0 41.6 31.2 20.8 10.4
Recreation 136 55% 65 32.5 26.0 19.5 13.0 6.5
Social / Meeting 102 57% 52 26.0 20.8 15.6 10.4 5.2
Public Order and Safety 189 57% 90 45.0 36.0 27.0 18.0 9.0
Fire Station / Police Station 157 56% 78 39.0 31.2 23.4 15.6 7.8
Courthouse
U.S. Averages for Site Energy Use and 2030 Challenge Energy Reduction Targets by Space/Building Type1
Primary Space / Building Type2
Average Site EUI4
(kBtu/Sq.Ft./Yr)
Available inTarget Finder3
Average Source EUI4
(kBtu/Sq.Ft./Yr)
Average PercentElectric
2030 Challenge Site EUI Targets (kBtu/Sq.Ft./Yr)
From the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Use this chart to find the site fossil-fuel energy targets
Source: ©2006-2010 2030 Inc. / Architecture 2030 Data Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; U.S. Energy Information Administration
60% GHG emissions reduction by 2010 - Avg EUI of 48.0 kBtu/sf/yr70% GHG emissions reduction by 2015 - Avg EUI of 36.0 kBtu/sf/yr80% GHG emissions reduction by 2020 - Avg EUI of 24.0 kBtu/sf/yr
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OPERATIONS & METRICS
2030 CHALLENGE
Meeting the 2030 Challenge Through Building Codes 4
Table A: 2030 Challenge Interim Code Equivalents
NOTE: Table A above represents a set of guidelines. Each entity should assess its particular code and building energy consumption patterns and adjust the code equivalents provided in the table as appropriate. For example, those entities with aggressive GHG and energy reduction initiatives may want to increase the recommended percentage reductions. Entities with detailed information on code performance compared to their building stock are encouraged to adjust the percentage reductions to meet the 2030 Challenge targets.
CODE / STANDARD RESIDENTIALCOMMERCIAL
NBI Option19 (prescriptive path)
EC - 154EECC Option18 (prescriptive path)
GBI Standard (in progress)17
LEED 2009 (in progress)
65 or less RESNET HERS Index
HERS Index: 65LEED NC 2.2 / Homes
California Title 24 2008
25% - 30% below16Washington Energy Code
ASHRAE 90.1-2004
ASHRAE 189 (in progress)
ASHRAE 90.1-2007
IECC 2006 30% below
30% below
0
25% below
30% below
New - Core Performancew/ enhanced measures
PATH A, 8.1.1.1: 150pts
New - EA Credit #1: 7 ptsRenovation - EA Credit #1: 9pts
New - EA Credit #1: 6 ptsRenovation - EA Credit #1: 8pts
10% below14
25% below
25% below 30% below Oregon Energy Code15
15% - 20% below13California Title 24 2005
13 The City of Santa Barbara established meeting the 2030 Challenge target for single-family residential units at 20% below Title 24 and, for high-rise residential, at 15% below Title 24.14 Based on preliminary code analysis for the California Energy Commission by Charles Eley of Architectural Energy Corporation.15 Oregon Department of Energy, “Comparison of Oregon Energy Code 2005 & ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2004”.16 For residential buildings east of the Cascade Mountains, use 25% below. For residential buildings west of the Cascades, use 30% below.17 Green Building Initiative, Proposed American National Standard 01-2008P.18 Alliance to Save Energy, Energy Efficient Codes Coalition (EECC), “The 30% Solution”/EC-154. This option provides a method for modifying the prescriptive path of the code to meet or exceed the 2030 Challenge 50% reduction target. 19 New Buildings Institute, Advanced Buildings Core Performance Guide with enhanced measures. This option provides a method for modifying the prescriptive path of the code to meet or exceed the 2030 Challenge 50% reduction target.
Meeting the 2030 Challenge Through Building Codes 4
Table A: 2030 Challenge Interim Code Equivalents
NOTE: Table A above represents a set of guidelines. Each entity should assess its particular code and building energy consumption patterns and adjust the code equivalents provided in the table as appropriate. For example, those entities with aggressive GHG and energy reduction initiatives may want to increase the recommended percentage reductions. Entities with detailed information on code performance compared to their building stock are encouraged to adjust the percentage reductions to meet the 2030 Challenge targets.
CODE / STANDARD RESIDENTIALCOMMERCIAL
NBI Option19 (prescriptive path)
EC - 154EECC Option18 (prescriptive path)
GBI Standard (in progress)17
LEED 2009 (in progress)
65 or less RESNET HERS Index
HERS Index: 65LEED NC 2.2 / Homes
California Title 24 2008
25% - 30% below16Washington Energy Code
ASHRAE 90.1-2004
ASHRAE 189 (in progress)
ASHRAE 90.1-2007
IECC 2006 30% below
30% below
0
25% below
30% below
New - Core Performancew/ enhanced measures
PATH A, 8.1.1.1: 150pts
New - EA Credit #1: 7 ptsRenovation - EA Credit #1: 9pts
New - EA Credit #1: 6 ptsRenovation - EA Credit #1: 8pts
10% below14
25% below
25% below 30% below Oregon Energy Code15
15% - 20% below13California Title 24 2005
13 The City of Santa Barbara established meeting the 2030 Challenge target for single-family residential units at 20% below Title 24 and, for high-rise residential, at 15% below Title 24.14 Based on preliminary code analysis for the California Energy Commission by Charles Eley of Architectural Energy Corporation.15 Oregon Department of Energy, “Comparison of Oregon Energy Code 2005 & ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2004”.16 For residential buildings east of the Cascade Mountains, use 25% below. For residential buildings west of the Cascades, use 30% below.17 Green Building Initiative, Proposed American National Standard 01-2008P.18 Alliance to Save Energy, Energy Efficient Codes Coalition (EECC), “The 30% Solution”/EC-154. This option provides a method for modifying the prescriptive path of the code to meet or exceed the 2030 Challenge 50% reduction target. 19 New Buildings Institute, Advanced Buildings Core Performance Guide with enhanced measures. This option provides a method for modifying the prescriptive path of the code to meet or exceed the 2030 Challenge 50% reduction target.
A 50% GHG emissions reduction (pre-2010 goal) = 25% below ASHRAE 90.1-2007 = 9 LEED 2009 EA Points
Buildings Energy Data Book: 3.9 Educational Facilities October 2009
3.9.1 2003 Delivered Energy End-Use Intensities and Consumption of Educational Facilities, by Building Activity (1
(10^12 Btu) (thousand Btu/SF)Space Heating 389 47% 39.4 Cooling 79 10% 8.0 Ventilation 83 10% 8.4 Water Heating 57 7% 5.8 Lighting 113 14% 11.5 Cooking 8 1% 0.8 Refrigeration 16 2% 1.6 Office Equipment 4 0% 0.4 Computers 32 4% 4.0 Other 39 5% 3.4 Total 820 100% 83.1
Note(s): 1) Educational facilities include K-12 as well as higher education facilities. 2) Due to rounding, sum does not add up to total.Source(s): EIA, 2003 Commercial Building Energy Consumption and Expenditures End-Uses, Sept. 2008, Table E1A and E2A.
3.9.2 2003-2004 Number of Public K-12 Schools in the United States and Students per School
Number of Schools (2004-2005) Average Number of Students per School (2003-2004) (3)Regular (1) 86,487 Elementary 438Special 1,635 Middle 616Vocational 326 High 758Alternative 4,847 Other 266Total (2) 93,295
Note(s): 1) Regular schools are those responsible for providing free public education for school-age children residing within their jurisdiction.2) Data is based on total number of schools reporting current student enrollment, which varies from the actual number of schools,96,296. Special focuses primarily on special education with materials and instructional approaches to meet the needs of thestudents. A vocational school focuses on technical or career skills and training. An alternative school addresses the needs of students that typically cannot be met in a traditional school setting. 3) Averages are for regular schools.
Source(s): U.S. Department of Education/National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES), Public Elementary and Secondary Students, Staff, Schools, and School Districts: School Year 2003-04, Feb. 2006, Table 1, p. 3 and Table 8, p. 19.
3.9.3 National Enrollment and Expenditures for Public K-12 Facilities ($2006)
Enrollment Expenditures(millions) ($billion) Expenditures per Pupil
1986 39.42 254.0 6,444 1990 40.54 301.9 7,446 1995 44.11 330.2 7,484 2000 46.86 389.5 8,313 2003 48.18 433.7 9,000 2005 48.56 454.0 9,405 2010 49.27 507.8 10,419 2015 50.74 597.6 11,779
Source(s): NCES, Projections of Educational Statistics to 2016, Sept. 2006, Table 33, p. 82 for 1990-2014; NCES, Projections of Educational Statistics to 2011, Oct. 2001, Table 33, p. 88 for 1986; and EIA, Annual Energy Review 2007, June 2008, Appendix D, p. 377 for price inflators.
3-36
EUI breakdown for Typical Educational Facility(national avg. source: DOE - Buildings Energy Data Book 2009)
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OPERATIONS & METRICS
BENCHMARKING
51
63
70
76
83
65
74
52
64
NREL Model Medium Office (New)DOE Commercial Benchmarks
NREL Model Medium Office (Post 1980)DOE Commercial Benchmarks
NREL Model Medium Office (Pre 1980)DOE Commercial Benchmarks
Buildings with Principal Bldg Activity ‐ Education*CBECS 2003
Buildings with Principal Bldg Activity ‐ Office*CBECS 2003
Buildings with Floor space 25,000‐50,000*CBECS 2003
All Bldgs Constructed 2000‐2003*CBECS 2003
Dinwidde, Tulane University
RMH, Tulane University
30
34
59
59
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Rinker Hall (School of Construction) at the University of Florida…
Heifer International Headquarters**Commercial Office
The Balzer Theater at Herren's**Rehabilitated historic building with offices and restaurant
Mgmt Bldg at Georgia Tech**Aud, classrooms, offices, bookstore, retail
Total Energy Use Intensity (kBtu/sf)
*CBECS data do not distinguish between dry and humid. New Orleans is considered to be Climate Zone 5, with CDD 2000 and HDD<4000.**These buildings are in climate zone 3A, classified by ASHRAE as warm and humid.
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OPERATIONS & METRICS
BENCHMARKINGWARREN HALL - CORNELL UNIVERSITY
SUSTAINABILITY GOALS
LEED Silver Upgrade all systems (including adding A/C) with no net energy use increase
OR: Energy 50% below ASHRAE 90.1 – 2007
SUSTAINABILITY ACHIEVEMENTS
Anticipated LEED Gold at minimum, Platinum likely
Energy Usage - Baseline: 95.9 kBtu/GSF/yr Anticipated Performance: 52.2 kBtu/GSF/yr (50.3% Energy Cost below baseline)
Anticipated 19 of 19 points in LEED EAcr1
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
OPERATIONS & METRICS
RMH Goals
DESIGN AS A TOOL FOR PEOPLE AND PLANET
OUT OF THE BOX
RESPONSIVE TO OCCUPANTS
PEDAGOGICAL
REASONABLE AND UNREASONABLE
FORWARD THINKING
INTEGRATES OPERATIONS
AMBITIOUS
CONSIDER COST AND PHASING
PRECEDENT SETTING FOR CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY
GROWTH AND CHANGE
HOLISTIC
SYNERGISTIC
SUSTAINABILITY CHARRETTE TULANE UNIVERSITY
RICHARDSON MEMORIAL HALL
March 22nd-23rd 2011Richardson Memorial Hall – Room 201
12:00-12:10
12:10-12:20
12:50-1:05
1:05-1:30
1:30-1:50
1:50-2:00
Day 1: March 22nd, 2011
Dean Schwartz/ FXFOWLE
Liz Davey/ Collette Creppell
FXFOWLE/ Andropogon Transsolar/SGH Altieri/FXFOWLE
FXFOWLE/ Tulane Facilities
Introduction
Tulane’s Environmental Initiatives
Site and Campus Relationships
Climate Analysis & Passive Design
Systems Operations and Metrics
12:35-12:50
12:20-12:35
el dorado/SGH
FXFOWLE / el dorado
Architecture
Occupancy/Survey
Q&A/Break 2:00-2:30 pm
Team Presentation 12:00-2:00 pm
2
1
Breakout Groups Part 1 2:30-3:45 pm3
4
6
5
7
Break 3:45-4:00 pm
Final Report Day 1 5:15-6:00 pm
Breakout Groups Part 2 4:00-5:15 pm
Dinner 7:00-9:30 pm
Day 2: March 23rd, 2011
8
10
9
11
12
Breakout groups Part 3 9:00-10:15 am
Breakout Groups Part 4 10:30-11:45 am
Break 10:15-10:30 am
Workgroup Final Summary 11:45am–12:00 pm
Optional Afternoon Sessions 2:30–5:00 pm
Final Reports, Conclusions and Next Steps 12:00-1:15 pm (Town Hall)
TGIW 5:00 pm
Lecture “Designing a Sustainable Future” Guy Geier, FXFOWLE
SUSTAINABILITY CHARRETTE TULANE UNIVERSITY
RICHARDSON MEMORIAL HALL
March 22nd-23rd 2011Richardson Memorial Hall – Room 201
12:00-12:10
12:10-12:20
12:50-1:05
1:05-1:30
1:30-1:50
1:50-2:00
Day 1: March 22nd, 2011
Dean Schwartz/ FXFOWLE
Liz Davey/ Collette Creppell
FXFOWLE/ Andropogon Transsolar/SGH Altieri/FXFOWLE
FXFOWLE/ Tulane Facilities
Introduction
Tulane’s Environmental Initiatives
Site and Campus Relationships
Climate Analysis & Passive Design
Systems Operations and Metrics
12:35-12:50
12:20-12:35
el dorado/SGH
FXFOWLE / el dorado
Architecture
Occupancy/Survey
Q&A/Break 2:00-2:30 pm
Team Presentation 12:00-2:00 pm
2
1
Breakout Groups Part 1 2:30-3:45 pm3
4
6
5
7
Break 3:45-4:00 pm
Final Report Day 1 5:15-6:00 pm
Breakout Groups Part 2 4:00-5:15 pm
Dinner 7:00-9:30 pm
Day 2: March 23rd, 2011
8
10
9
11
12
Breakout groups Part 3 9:00-10:15 am
Breakout Groups Part 4 10:30-11:45 am
Break 10:15-10:30 am
Workgroup Final Summary 11:45am–12:00 pm
Optional Afternoon Sessions 2:30–5:00 pm
Final Reports, Conclusions and Next Steps 12:00-1:15 pm (Town Hall)
TGIW 5:00 pm
Lecture “Designing a Sustainable Future” Guy Geier, FXFOWLE
SUSTAINABILITY CHARRETTE TULANE UNIVERSITY
RICHARDSON MEMORIAL HALL
March 22nd-23rd 2011Richardson Memorial Hall – Room 201
12:00-12:10
12:10-12:20
12:50-1:05
1:05-1:30
1:30-1:50
1:50-2:00
Day 1: March 22nd, 2011
Dean Schwartz/ FXFOWLE
Liz Davey/ Collette Creppell
FXFOWLE/ Andropogon Transsolar/SGH Altieri/FXFOWLE
FXFOWLE/ Tulane Facilities
Introduction
Tulane’s Environmental Initiatives
Site and Campus Relationships
Climate Analysis & Passive Design
Systems Operations and Metrics
12:35-12:50
12:20-12:35
el dorado/SGH
FXFOWLE / el dorado
Architecture
Occupancy/Survey
Q&A/Break 2:00-2:30 pm
Team Presentation 12:00-2:00 pm
2
1
Breakout Groups Part 1 2:30-3:45 pm3
4
6
5
7
Break 3:45-4:00 pm
Final Report Day 1 5:15-6:00 pm
Breakout Groups Part 2 4:00-5:15 pm
Dinner 7:00-9:30 pm
Day 2: March 23rd, 2011
8
10
9
11
12
Breakout groups Part 3 9:00-10:15 am
Breakout Groups Part 4 10:30-11:45 am
Break 10:15-10:30 am
Workgroup Final Summary 11:45am–12:00 pm
Optional Afternoon Sessions 2:30–5:00 pm
Final Reports, Conclusions and Next Steps 12:00-1:15 pm (Town Hall)
TGIW 5:00 pm
Lecture “Designing a Sustainable Future” Guy Geier, FXFOWLE
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
CONCLUSION
What’s next?
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
CONCLUSION
What’s next?
TUES2:30-3:45
TUES4:00-5:15
WED9:00-10:15
WED10:30-11:45
Site and CampusRelationships
InteriorOrganizationand Function
Systems
Climate andEnvelope
Site and CampusRelationships
InteriorOrganizationand Function
Systems
Climate andEnvelope
Site and CampusRelationships
InteriorOrganizationand Function
Systems
Climate andEnvelope
Site and CampusRelationships
InteriorOrganizationand Function
Systems
Climate andEnvelope
1 2 3 4 5Dan Maginn Pete Pesce Steve Salzer Ilana Judah Guy Geier
Site and CampusRelationships
InteriorOrganizationand Function
Systems
Climate andEnvelope
group group group group group
Q & A
F X F O W L ERMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
CONCLUSION
Q & A