richardson grant final

Upload: shellyshome71

Post on 07-Jan-2016

20 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

551 final

TRANSCRIPT

  • Academic Library Collaborative Learning Support through Interactive Technology Grant Funding Proposal Submitted by Shelly Richardson May, 2015

  • Needs Assessment

    Weigel Library is a venue for group study and collaborative learning for students,

    faculty and staff. Those who use this small branch of K-State Libraries are primarily

    members of the College of Architecture, Planning and Design. In order to facilitate this

    learning environment in an academic library setting, library patrons need collaborative

    tools.

    When students and faculty gather to study and share project plans in the current

    branch library setting, the creating and sharing of visual materials is accomplished by

    displaying drawings on the flat surface of a study table, through verbally describing

    design concepts or by gathering around individual computers to electronically display

    their creative ideas.

    Over the next two years, the building will undergo extensive renovations, making

    the availability of group study and collaborative spaces scarce. Incorporating innovative,

    collaborative tools in the branch will provide a valuable asset to our service population

    during this time of transition. These collaborative tools will also serve as a technological

    experiment, providing administration with user feedback about implementing similar

    tools in the new branch library.

    The funding sought through this grant will provide an Interactive White Board

    (IWB) for Weigel Library. An example that demonstrates the instructional use of such a

    tool can be seen in this video by Samsung: http://youtu.be/rBohGcWBgiM Also referred

    to as interactive touch-screen display, the Samsung website describes the IWB as

    having three main components: a large format display (similar to a flat screen tv), a

    touchscreen overlay for said display, and the Magic IWB software package. Unlike

  • SMARTtvs or similar products, there is no need for a projector to operate this

    interactive device.

    Incorporating IWB technology in the study areas of this branch library will fulfill

    the following instructional needs:

    1. Save money: Students will have the ability to remotely connect to the IWB, sharing

    what otherwise might need to be printed with their classmates and professor. Changes

    to the design can be made and iterations saved digitally. Administration will see a

    decrease in operational costs. According to the Samsung website, when compared to a

    projector-based interactive system maintenance needs, the IWB saves an average of

    30% during the first four years of ownership.

    2. Development of professional-level skills: IWB screens and acquiring the skills to

    present successfully with them, will give students experience in an environment they

    may encounter with future employers. These skills will increase the students

    marketability, making them valuable prospective employees in their field of study.

    3. Interactivity: Library patrons will participate in real time learning. This technology

    will transform group/class study through virtual screen sharing software and the hands-

    on development of ideas shared on the large display. They will have enhanced

    designing abilities through interactive drawing tools and the integration of digital media.

    4. Collaboration: Library patrons will be able to produce new material and illustrate

    iterations of their designs with their class or study group. Groups will be able to engage

    one another in their learning processes, creating collaborative learning communities.

    5. Improved pedagogy: Instructors, presenters and group leaders using the IWB will

    experience improved methods of instruction/information sharing. Through improved

  • content availability, options like video and image capture, the sharing or storing of

    presentations and ability to mark up files and save them as a copies, will allow the

    creative process to flow and function more quickly and smoothly. This will also improve

    course access for students with learning, physical or cognitive issues.

    Goals and Objectives

    Grant funding for this project will address the goal of providing academic library

    patrons an effective group-learning environment through improved collaborative study

    methods facilitated by the incorporation of an Interactive White Board (IWB).

    The objectives for this project are based on two of the instructional needs

    identified in the Needs Assessment: Interactivity and Collaboration. These needs are

    being viewed through the lens of the College of Architecture, Planning and Design

    (College of APDesign) Mission statement, one aspect of which asserts the importance

    of A creative, stimulating environment that inspires shared learning and creative

    growth. In providing collaborative study tools, we will be facilitating both shared

    learning and creative growth.

    Objective 1- Shared Learning

    Over the next year, 50% of library patrons using the IWB for group study collaboration

    will participate in shared learning through use of screen sharing, interactive drawing

    tools, and/or digital media integration. These actions will increase the effectiveness of

    the collaborative learning environment.

  • Objective 2- Creative Growth

    Over the next year, 50% of library patrons using the IWB for group study collaboration

    will participate in creative growth by producing new creative works, saving mark up

    files of creative work iterations, and/or using video or image capture to record creative

    sessions for later use. These actions will increase the effectiveness of the collaborative

    learning environment.

    Projected purchase and integration of IWB into library setting will be prior to the

    start of the spring semester of 2016. At the time of purchase and installation, initial

    training and demonstration on the usage of the IWB will be provided by the vendor in a

    one-off session, available to all staff, student employees and library patrons. Continued

    demonstration and training will be based on this vendor instructional session, to be

    conducted by library staff and student assistants and will be offered on an as-needed

    basis to any interested parties. Library staff and student assistants will be responsible

    for assisting patrons in using the IWB and for maintaining statistics on its use.

    Adoption of the IWB for study group use may be slow and instruction by library

    staff and student assistants may be necessary. The physical space of the library is

    open, allowing staff to observe study group habits and intercede or offer suggestions to

    patrons when collaborative tools may be useful.

    This open adoption process allows for two methods of measuring success of

    project objectives. Qualitative methods may be employed through observation of IWB

    use and a standardized form of recording these observations could be developed. For

    example, an instance of recorded observation would record the date, number in the

    study group, IWB tools they used for their collaboration and whether there were any

  • difficulties in using the tools successfully.

    The second assessment method employed for measuring project objective

    success would be a pre/post survey of library patrons, producing quantitative results.

    This would be an informal paper and online survey, distributed in a manner that would

    be non-invasive to the library patron experience. The patron would voluntarily provide

    feedback on their collaborative study experience, using wording specific to the Shared

    Learning and Creative Growth objectives. These objective based questions could be

    measured for effectiveness by using a Likert scale. The feedback gained from these

    patron assessments could inform the future technology purchases planned for the new

    building opening in 2017.

    Budget

    Grant funds are requested for the interactive white board (IWB), operating software, and

    related equipment. The remaining budget consists of In-kind Costs of staff time for

    installation, maintenance, promotion, training and evaluation.

    Grant Costs Total

    65 Interactive White Board (IWB) $2,600

    IWB software $600

    Internet modem/router $120

    Stand/Cart mount for IWB $420

    $3740

    In-kind Costs

  • Library Staff Time Staff and student assistant training

    Approx. 80 hrs.

    IRB training and application

    Advertising and Marketing (in-house)

    Program evaluation (library staff collaboration) $0

    Information Technology Staff Time

    IWB Installation and support $0

    Total Costs $3,740 Program Evaluation The objectives for this program are specific and measurable. The purpose of the

    evaluation is to measure the program impact and effectiveness, based on the program

    objectives.

    The funding sought through this grant will provide an Interactive White Board

    (IWB) for Weigel Library. Also referred to as interactive touch-screen display, the

    manufacturers website describes the IWB as having three main components: a large

    format display (similar to a flat screen tv), a touchscreen overlay for said display, and

    the Magic IWB software package. The IWB will facilitate collaborative study and

    learning for library patrons.

    Objective 1- Shared Learning

    Over the next year, 50% of library patrons using the IWB for group study collaboration

    will participate in shared learning through use of screen sharing, interactive drawing

    tools, and/or digital media integration. These actions will increase the effectiveness of

    the collaborative learning environment.

  • Objective 2- Creative Growth

    Over the next year, 50% of library patrons using the IWB for group study collaboration

    will participate in creative growth by producing new creative works, saving mark up

    files of creative work iterations, and/or using video or image capture to record creative

    sessions for later use. These actions will increase the effectiveness of the collaborative

    learning environment.

    Evaluation Methods

    Formative Evaluation

    The library space for this proposal is an open room, allowing staff to observe IWB

    activity and use. Using a spreadsheet, the library staff will record statistics on the use of

    the IWB through observation. Staff will also train interested patrons on the use of the

    IWB and through these staff/patron interactions, encourage user feedback via survey

    (online or hard copy).

    The observational statistics and feedback survey results will be analyzed at the

    end of each semester for a full calendar year. The results of the formative evaluation will

    reveal the degree of the success and/or effectiveness of the program objectives. Based

    on the end of semester evaluation compilations, in-program changes may be

    implemented to improve overall program success. For example, formative data may

    reveal that more formal IWB training for library patrons may be necessary for objective

    effectiveness and program success. A library administrator who specializes in

    assessment will assist with evaluation processes and conclusions.

  • Summative Evaluation

    At the conclusion of a full calendar year of IWB implementation, a summative

    evaluation of program objectives will be conducted. This will also use the datasets of

    staff observations of IWB use and patron feedback surveys measuring the effectiveness

    of the program objectives. In particular, these datasets will show the growth and impact

    over the full term of the program, revealing both areas of program strength and

    development need. The summative evaluation will demonstrate a broad scope of the

    program, statistically supporting or discounting the usefulness of IWB use in contributing

    to the success of library patrons collaborative learning environment.

  • References College of Architecture, Planning and Design: Mission and Vision. (2013, October 9).

    Retrieved April 12, 2015, from http://apdesign.k-state.edu/about/mission.html

    Doorley, S., & Witthoft, S. (2012). Make space: How to set the stage for creative

    collaboration. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons.

    Karsh, E., & Fox, A. (2014). The only grant-writing book you'll ever need (Fourth ed.).

    New York: Basic Books.

    McElrath, T., & Carlson, M. (2013). Winning grants step by step: The complete

    workbook for planning, developing, and writing successful proposals (Fourth ed.).

    San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

    Samsung. (n.d.). MagicIWB - SMART Signage Solutions - SAMSUNG DISPLAY.

    Retrieved March 17, 2015, from

    http://displaysolutions.samsung.com/solutions/lfdSolutions/magicIwb?method=list

    Samsung Magic IWB 3.0 Demo. (n.d.). Retrieved March 17, 2015, from

    http://youtu.be/rBohGcWBgiM

    h.qqfxq6fcgv6lh.dyvrq55j6217h.p3banxdcyqmch.72hpdelxzca7h.j215w0ej6t5dh.dw7bm3wgud54h.1hasmwz444dxh.2jubmvnlzqreh.u8b9ogph1kfh.gjdgxs