richard birdsey, usda forest service kurt pregitzer, michigan technological university
DESCRIPTION
Forest Carbon Management in the United States: 1600-2100. Richard Birdsey, USDA Forest Service Kurt Pregitzer, Michigan Technological University Alan Lucier, National Council for Air and Stream Improvement. Forest Carbon Management: 1600-2100. Extraction and Deforestation: 1600-1900 - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Richard Birdsey, USDA Forest Service
Kurt Pregitzer, Michigan Technological University
Alan Lucier, National Council for Air and Stream Improvement
Forest Carbon Management in the United States: 1600-2100
Forest Carbon Management: 1600-2100
• Extraction and Deforestation: 1600-1900• Harvest, Regrowth, Management: 1900-2000• Global Stewardship: The 21st Century
– Managing the atmosphere– Forest sector– Forestry activities– Forest practices– Technology
Themes:
Inventory systems
Technologies and practices
Decision support
Extraction and Deforestation: 1600-1900
1630
From Eric Sloan
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900
Total Commodity Cut
Total Other Losses
Drain on the Sawtimber Stand, 1650-1925
Billion Board Feet per Decade
From an unpublished Forest Service Report by R.V. Reynolds and A.H. Pierson
Washington, DC, 1941
Fuelwood
Lumber
Other
Insects and Disease
Farm clearing
Fire
“A long struggle against growth was the experience of hundreds of thousands of settlers in timberland.”
-100
0
100
200
300
400
1600 1700 1800 1900
MtC/yr
Carbon Emissions from Drain on the Sawtimber Stand, 1630-1930
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1600 1700 1800 1900
Million acres of
forest land
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1600 1700 1800 1900
Total cut, billion board
feet per decade
Emissions
Sequestration
Carbon Emissions from Drain on the Sawtimber Stand, 1630-1930
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
1600 1700 1800 1900
MtC/yr
Forest Ecosystem
Wood Products
Net ChangeEmissions
Sequestration
Harvest, Regrowth, Management: 1900-2000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
1916-1938
1939-1953
1954-1963
1964-1977
1978-1987
1988-1997
Northeast North Central Southeast South Central Great Plains Intermountain Pacific Coast
Th
ousa
nd H
a/yr
Average Area of Land Affected by Wildfire, 1916-1997
Uncontrolled fire in the 1930’s and early 1940’s in the South kept pine land poorly stocked
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000
1000
acr
es
Loblolly-shortleafpine (planted)Loblolly-shortleafpine (natural)Oak-pine
Oak-hickory
Oak-gum-cypress
Non-stocked
Example of Forest Type Changes: Southern U.S.
Example of Forest Structure Changes: Northern Rockies
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
1850 1900 1950 2000
hect
ares
Seedling/saplingPoleMatureOld growthRetention cut
Forest Ecosystem Carbon Pools for Forest Land of the Conterminous U.S. (soil C excluded)
Heath and Smith 2003: National Report on Sustainable Forests
0
100
200
300
1953-1962
1963-1976
1977-1986
1987-1996
1997-2001
MtC/yr
Forest
Products
Excludes soil C, reserved forest land, other forest land
From Heath and Smith 2003; Skog 2003
38% decline in ecosystem carbon sequestration
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Bil
lion
cu
ft
GrowthRemovalsMortality
Annual Change in Timber Volume
Carbon Sequestration on United States Timberland and in Wood Products, 1953-2001
-300-200-100
0100200300400
1600 1700 1800 1900 2000
MtC/yr
Carbon Emissions from Drain on the Sawtimber Stand, and Sequestration from Regrowth, 1630-2000
Emissions
Sequestration
• Managing the atmosphere• Forest sector• Forestry activities• Forest practices• Technology
Global Stewardship: 2000-2100
From Host
The U.S. Leads:
•Worldwide emissions of carbon dioxide
•Investment in climate change research ($2 billion in 2004) 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000
CO
2 C
on
ce
ntr
ati
on
(p
pm
v)
0
280
300
320
340
360
380Atmospheric CO2 Concentration
Since 1880: 30% Increase to
370 ppmv
From Pacala and Socolow in Nature 2004
Business-as-usual emissions scenario
Emissions scenario to achieve stabilization at 500 ppm CO2
Options to achieve stabilization
• Biomass energy
• Forestry
• Agriculture
• Other options
21st Century Challenge: Stabilize Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations
Carbon Budget of the U.S. Forest Sector, 1700-2100
-300-200-100
0100200300400
1700 1800 1900 2000 2100
MtC/yr
Forestry stabilization wedge
How Big is the Forest Sector Stabilization Wedge?
BaselineEmissions
Sequestration
Activities:• Afforestation• Mine land reclamation• Forest restoration • Agroforestry • Forest management • Biomass energy • Forest preservation • Wood products • Urban forestry
Example Practices:
• Thinning
• Rotation length
• Residue management
• Species/genotypes
Technology
The Forest Sector Stabilization Wedge
The National Plan for Reducing Greenhouse Gases
• In 2002, the President directed Secretaries of Energy and Agriculture to revise guidelines for reporting– Originally authorized in the 1992 Energy Policy Act section
1605(b)
• Program is voluntary• Registered reductions may lead to transferable credits• Take into account emerging domestic and international
approaches• Develop new targeted incentives for carbon
sequestration and greenhouse gas reductions• Research and development
Continuing National and International Debate on Climate Policy Options
• Market mechanisms– Chicago climate exchange– European Union exchange
• U.S., regional, and State– Action plans– Greenhouse gas registries
• DOE “Regional Partnerships” and “Climate Vision” • EPA “Climate Leaders” program• ISO greenhouse gas standards• Kyoto treaty mechanisms
– National GHG reduction targets– Clean Development Mechanism– Joint Implementation projects– Emissions trading
From BBC News 2/16/05
Will a market approach work for managing CO2?
•European cap and trade system modeled after successful U.S. emissions trading scheme
•U.S. approach involves voluntary participation with incentives
Potential Role of Forests in Mitigating Greenhouse Gas Emissions
• U.S. forests remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere – 200 million tons C per year (10% of U.S. fossil fuel emissions)
• It is feasible to increase the rate of carbon sequestration in forests…– Plant more trees– Maintain healthy forests– Manage productivity – Residue management
• …and forest products– Biomass energy– Use more wood
From Heath and Smith
Forest Ecosystems, Practices and Technology
From Host
0 10 20 30 40 50
Afforestation
Deforestation
Grazing
Plantation establishment
Timber stand improvement
Clearcut harvest
Partial cut harvest
Wildfire
Insects and disease
Million ha/decadeBirdsey and Lewis 2003
Disturbances Affecting U.S. Forests, 1990’s
0
C S
tora
ge
Recently disturbed
Young Mature OldRecently disturbed
Young Mature Old
Living Biomass Total Ecosystem C
Organic Soil Mineral Soil Coarse Woody Debris
BorealTemperate & Tropical
Recently disturbed
Young Mature Old
Recently disturbed
Young Mature Old
Boreal Temperate
Tropical
TemperateBoreal Boreal
0
C S
tora
ge
Recently disturbed
Young Mature Old
Temperate & Tropical
Boreal
Temperate
Tropical
Biome synthesis
Tropical
How Carbon Stocks Change After Disturbance is Critical
Pregitzer and Euskirchen 2004
Rh
NPP NEP
0
C Source
C Sink0R
es
pir
ato
ry C
Lo
sse
s
Temperate
Boreal
General steady state, but with some
interannual variability due
to climate
Recently disturbed
Young Mature OldRecently disturbed
Young Mature Old
Recently disturbed
Young Mature Old
Biome synthesis
The Role of Ecosystem Respiration
Pregitzer and Euskirchen 2004
Generalizations Regarding Carbon Cycling and Storage in Forests
• Net C accumulation depends on time since disturbance
• NPP and NEP are strongly correlated except in younger forests
• Microbial respiration (Rh) declines with age• Reducing the pulse of microbial respiration after
disturbance will increase NEP• Factors that regulate decomposition of CWD are
the same as those that regulate Rh
Some Promising Forestry Technology for Increasing Carbon Sequestration
• Nutrient management• Residue management and utilization• Thinning and utilization of thinnings• Low-impact harvesting• Optimum rotation length• Species/genotype selection• Forest biotechnology
Critical Research Needs for Forest Carbon Management (1)
• Socioeconomic issues– Quantifying the forestry opportunity– Relative benefits of sequestration vs. emissions
reduction– Integrating carbon management with other objectives– Land-use policies and drivers of land-use change
• Forest carbon accounting and measurement issues– Life cycle analysis including fossil fuel emissions
associated with management and use– Additionality, leakage, and avoided emissions– Reducing cost of measurement and monitoring
Critical Research Needs for Forest Carbon Management (2)
• Carbon management technology– Reduce respiration emissions from forests
• Utilization of logging residues• Low-impact harvesting
– Reduce fossil fuel emissions from operations and manufacturing• Efficiency in harvesting technology and biomass transportation• Efficiency in manufacturing operations
– Mechanistic studies of C fluxes along chronosequences – Well-designed field experiments to develop practices for
maximizing NEP following harvest– Improve efficiencies of carbon management technologies
• Technology transfer– Decision support tools– Demonstration projects
0
5
10
15
20
25
1926 1932 1938 1944 1950 1956 1962 1968 1974 1980 1986 1992 1998
Million ha
3 million hectares burned in 2000 ~ 65 MTC
Carbon Management Questions and Concerns
Are forest carbon sinks permanent?
How much CO2 is emitted from wildfire?
How to account for natural disturbance?
Changes in forest soil carbon?
Accounting for wood products
Who will participate?
Will the market accept forest carbon credits?
Estimate “additionality”?
Wildfire in the U.S.
Tree/stand models
• FVS
• AMORPHYS
• UFORE
• CORRIM
Decision support:
• COLE
• NIACS
• CQUEST
• Growout
• GHG inventory
Extensive data:
• FIA/FHM
• Remote Sensing
Landscape data:
• Biometrics
• Remote sensing
Intensive data:
• CO2 flux
• Meteorology
• Field experiments
Ecoregion models:
• FORCARB
• CASA
• LANDIS
• PnET
• TEM
Carbon manager
Scale up
Simplified Decision Support “Roadmap” for Carbon Management
Experimentation/Monitoring
Modeling Decision support
-300-200-100
0100200300400
1700 1800 1900 2000 2100
MtC/yr
Forestry stabilization wedge
Outlook for Forest Carbon Management
Themes:
Inventory of baseline and wedge
What technologies and practices?
Decision support
BaselineEmissions
Sequestration
Goal: additional 100-200
MtC/yr
Final Thoughts
• Sustainability – are recommendations for forest carbon management complementary with resource sustainability?
• Ecosystem Services – how does forest carbon management enhance or detract from other ecosystem services such as water and biodiversity?