rewarding the service providerscrops. this gap, known as the opportunity cost, is made wider by...
TRANSCRIPT
REWARDING THE SERVICE PROVIDERS A P O L I C Y B R I E F
Compensating tropical forest dwellers, owners and managers for the environmental services their forests provide will enhance
livelihoods and improve forest management
R. Carrillo/ITTO
Baharaddin/ITTO
Page 2 R E W A R D I N G T H E S E R V I C E P R O V I D E R S
WHAT POLICYMAKERS NEED TO KNOW AND DOWhat they need to know• Tropicalforestsprovide
criticalenvironmentalservices.Theyprotectvitalwatercatchmentsandbiodiversity,helpregulateregionalclimates,andaregiantcarbondioxide“vacuumcleaners”andmanufacturersofrenewablebiomass.
• Currently,however,mostpeopleandcompaniesbenefitingfromtropicalforestenvironmentalservicespaylittleornothingforthem.
• Byprovidingtropicalforestownersandmanagerswithincomeandincreasingtheeconomiccompetitivenessofsustainableforestmanagement(SFM),paymentsforenvironmentalservices(PES)schemescanhelp:
– Alleviateruralpoverty.
– Reducetropicaldeforestation.
– Stimulatetherehabilitationofdegradedforestlands.
– IncreasetheuptakeofSFM.
• TherearemanysuccessfulexamplesofPESschemesinthetropics.Overall,however,PESschemesarenothavingthedesiredimpactonreducingdeforestationandforestdegradationandarebenefitingrelativelyfewforestownersandmanagers.Actionisneeded,therefore,toexpandPESschemestomoretropicalforests.
What they need to do• StrengthenPESschemes
intropicalforestsby:
– Raisingawarenessoftheimportanceandvalueoftropicalforestenvironmentalservices.
– Developingpoliciestoincreasemarketdemandfortheenvironmentalservicesprovidedbytropicalforests.
– EnsuringthatPESschemesprotecttherightsofindigenouspeoples,localcommunitiesandvulnerablegroups.
– StrengtheninggovernanceandinstitutionstoenabletheeffectiveimplementationofPESschemes.
Aim of this briefTheaimofthispolicybriefistoincreaseawarenessamongpolicymakersandthegeneralpublicaboutthevitalroleoftropicalforestsinprovidingenvironmentalservicesandtheincreasingneedforbeneficiariestocompensateforestownersormanagersforthoseservices.ThebriefbuildsontheinsightsgainedattheInternationalForumonPaymentsforEnvironmentalServicesofTropicalForests,whichwasheldinSanJosé,CostaRica,inApril2014.Itsetsouttherationalefor,andtheconstraintsfacedby,PESschemes,andkeyrecommendationsforscalingthemup.
PES schemes should protect the rights of indigenous peoples, local communities and vulnerable groups
N. Kingman
Page 3 A P O L I C Y B R I E F
THE NEED TO COMPENSATE FOR TROPICAL FOREST ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Tropicalforestsprovidemanycriticalenvironmentalservices,especiallybyprotectingwatercatchments,sequesteringcarbonandharbouringbiodiversity.Butmanypeoplewhobenefitconsiderablyfromtropicalforestenvironmentalservices—suchasurbandwellers,bigindustryanddevelopedcountries—paylittleornothingforthem,withtheresultthattropicalforestsareoftenundervaluedcomparedwithalternativelanduses,leadingtoforestdegradationanddeforestation.
PESschemesattempttocorrectthismarketfailurebycreatingeconomicincentivesthatenablethetransferoffinancialresourcesfromthebeneficiariesofenvironmentalservices(the“users”)tothosewhoprovidetheservicesby,forexample,engaginginSFM.Theunderlyingprincipleistointernalizeenvironmentalbenefitsandcoststhatotherwisearenotincludedineconomicaccounts,withtheaimsofreducingandreversingforestdegradationanddeforestationandrewardingforestownersandmanagersforgoodforeststewardship.
Notallcompensationforenvironmentalservicesisfinancial.Someenvironmentalserviceprovidersmayobtaingreaterbenefitsfromincreasedtenuresecurity,forexample,orfromin-kindcompensationsuchassupporttoincreasefoodsecurity.PESalsooffersopportunitiesforpositive“branding”thatmighthavesufficientvalueforacompanyoracountrytojustifylong-terminvestmentinPESschemes.
TherearealreadymanyfunctioningPESschemesintropicalforests,includingsomenationalschemes.CostaRica’sschemearoseaftercatastrophicdeforestationhadreducedforestcoverto21%ofthenationallandarea.TheintroductionofaPESschemein1997,inwhichlandholdersreceivecompensationforretainingforestsfortheirenvironmentalservices,contributedtoanincreaseinforesttothecurrent52.4%ofthelandarea.InChina,thestatehaspaidmorethan32millionfarmerhouseholdsover7000yuan(US$1150)eachtoestablishorrestoreforests(includingasmallareainthetropics),withtheaimofreducingdesertification,soilerosion,sedimentationandflooding.PESschemesalsoexistatvariouslevelsofimplementationinseveralothertropicalcountries.
Overall,however,PESschemesarestillmostlyatarelativelysmallscale.Globally,thevalueofPESisdwarfedbytheincomegeneratedbytimberandagriculturalproducts.
What are forest environmental services?Theenvironmentalservices(alsocalledecosystemservices)offorestsarethebenefitspeopleobtainfromforestecosystems.Theyincludeprovisioningservices,suchasfoodandwater;regulatingservices,suchastheregulationoffloods,droughts,landdegradationanddisease;supportingservices,suchassoilformationandnutrientcycling;andculturalservices,suchasrecreational,spiritual,religiousandothernonmaterialbenefits.Forestenvironmentalservicesperformarangeoffunctions,suchas:moderatingweatherextremesandtheirimpacts;dispersingseeds;mitigatingdroughtandfloods;cyclingandmovingnutrients;protectingstreamandriverchannelsandcoastalshoresfromerosion;detoxifyinganddecomposingwastes;controllingagriculturalpests;maintainingbiodiversity;generatingandpreservingsoilsandrenewingtheirfertility;contributingtoclimatestability;purifyingairandwater;andpollinatingcropsandnaturalvegetation.Tropicalforestsprovidealltheseservicesandareoftenparticularlyimportantforcarbonsequestration,biodiversityconservation,theprotectionofwatershedsandtheregulationofregionalclimates.Sources: Ecological Society of America undated. Ecosystem services. Fact sheet. Washington, DC, USA; Hassan, R., Scholes, R. & Ash, N. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Millennium Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
Tropical forest environmental services help control agricultural pests and ensure crop pollination
DGFRN
Page 4 R E W A R D I N G T H E S E R V I C E P R O V I D E R S
PES for SFMThereisoftenalargegapbetweentheincomethatcanbeearnedfromSFM—through,forexample,thesustainableharvestingofwoodandnon-woodproducts—andwhatcanbeearnedfromagriculturallanduses,suchasoil-palmplantationsandsoybeancrops.Thisgap,knownastheopportunitycost,ismadewiderbysubsidiesforagriculturalproduction.Forests,especiallynaturaltropicalforests,ontheotherhand,provideabroaderrangeofenvironmentalservicesandingreaterquantitiesthanagricultureorpossiblyanyotherlanduse.
Forestsneednotbe“lockedaway”toprovideenvironmentalservices.Thereisconvincingevidence,forexample,thatselectivewoodharvestingintropicalforestsappliedusingSFMprinciplescausesarelativelysmalllossofcarboncomparedwithdeforestationand“conventional”logging,especiallywhenthewoodisusedforlong-termpurposes,andthatthelostcarbonisquicklyreabsorbedbytheregrowingforest,indicatingasustainablesystemofcarbonstorage.Thereisalsostrongevidencethattheharvestingofwoodandnon-woodproductsappliedunderSFMconservesmostforestbiodiversityandprotectswatersheds.ProperlydevelopedforestmanagementplanscanbeeffectivemechanismsforSFM,andtheirimplementationintropicalforestscanhelpensurethemaintenanceofenvironmentalservices.
PESschemescanhelpreducetheopportunitycostofSFMcomparedwithotherlandusesbycompensatingforestownersandmanagersfortheprovisionofenvironmentalservices.PEScanthushelpincreasetheeconomiccompetitivenessofSFMbyassigningafinancialvaluetothepreviouslyunmarketedenvironmentalbenefitsprovidedbyforestsandtrees.
ForestmanagementcertificationaimstopromoteSFM,reducetropicaldeforestationandreassureconsumersthatforestproductsarenotenvironmentallydestructive.Itimpliesthattheforestsfromwhichcertifiedproductsareobtainedarebeingmanagedinsuchawaythat
theenvironmentalservicestheyprovidearebeingwellmaintained.Butthereissubstantialevidencethatmostconsumersareunwillingtopayasignificantpremiumforcertifiedtimber,placingsuchtimberatadisadvantagecomparedwithcheapertimberobtainedfromforeststhatarenotbeingsustainablymanaged(andwhereenvironmentalservicesarelikelytobedecliningduetopoormanagement).
PESschemesareapotentialwayofprovidingadditionalrevenuestreamsforcertified(orotherwisesustainablymanaged)foreststohelpcoverthecostsofmaintainingenvironmentalservices.ForestmanagementcertificationcancomplementPESschemesbyprovidingathird-partyassessmentofforestmanagementandtherebyreassuringPEScustomersthattheenvironmentalservicestheyarepayingforarebeingdelivered.
IncountrieswherePESschemesarealreadyimportantpolicytoolsforimplementingSFM,thereisevidencethatsuchschemesareproducingsignificantsocioeconomicoutcomes.Forexample,theyprovide“bridgefinancing”toenablecommunitiestopursueotherincome-generatingactivities.
Tropical forests maintain rich biodiversity, an important environmental service
R. Carrillo/ITTO
Page 5 A P O L I C Y B R I E F
CONSTRAINTSEventhoughtherearemanysuccessfulPESschemes,theyarenothavingthedesiredimpactsinthevastmajorityoftropicalforeststhatarevulnerabletodeforestationanddegradation.Mostexistingschemesoperateonlyatarelativelylocallevel,and,overall,theyarebenefitingonlyafewofthemanymillionsoftropicalforestdwellers,ownersandmanagers.ThefollowingkeyconstraintsareholdingbackthepotentialofPESschemes.
Lack of markets Theunderlyingcauseofalackofadequatemarketsfortropicalforestenvironmentalservicesisalackofawarenessamongbeneficiariesoftheneedtopay,or,ifsuchawarenessexists,alackofawillingnesstopay.Dealingwith“freeriders”—beneficiariesofenvironmentalserviceswhodonotpayfortheirusebutcannotbeexcludedfromsuchuse—isasubstantial
challenge.Poorcoordinationamongthevariousland-useandotherrelevantsectorsalsoconstrainsthedevelopmentofeffectivePESmarkets.Manycountriesdonothaveasupportivepolicyenvironmentforthesuccessfuldevelopmentofmarketsforenvironmentalservices.
Insufficient data and knowledgeTherearefewrobuststudiesontheeffectivenessofPESschemesinachievingconservationoutcomes,orontheeffectivenessandcostsofdifferentinstitutionalarrangementsforPES.Therearealsoknowledgegapsontheinterplayofbiophysicalandsocioeconomicparameters,whichcanmakeitdifficulttoestablishaclearcause-and-effectrelationshipbetweenforestmanagementinterventionsandthedeliveryofenvironmentalservices.Difficultiesinquantifyingtheenvironmentalservicesbeingrenderedbyagivenmanagementregimeor
areaoftropicalforestcanconstrainthedevelopmentandimplementationofPESschemes.
The risk of marginalizing forest peoplesThereisariskthatpoorlyconceivedorimplementedPESschemes,especiallytop-downschemes,willviolatetherightsofindigenouspeoplesandlocalcommunities.AlackofclarityontenureisamajorconstraintforPESschemesbecause,inmanycases,itisunclearwho
Top-down PES schemes could violate the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities
Knowledge gaps on the interplay of biophysical and socioeconomic parameters hinder PES scheme implementation
J. Malleux/ITTO
A. Freitas
Page 6 R E W A R D I N G T H E S E R V I C E P R O V I D E R S
islegallyprovidingagivenenvironmentalserviceandwhoshouldbecompensatedforit.Overlapsbetweenstatutoryandtraditionallandtenure,whicharecommonintropicalforests,createconfusionandincreasetheriskofinequitiesinthedistributionofbenefitsfromPESschemes.Evenwheretenureisclear,ariskremainsthatmarginalizedpeopleinlocalcommunities,includingwomenandyouth,willreceivefewofthebenefitsofPESschemes.
Formanytropicalforestcommunities,theriskofmarginalizationandrightsviolationsisincreasedbyalackofunderstandingoftheconceptofPES,alackoftechnicalcapacity,andalackoforganization.
Weak governance and institutional arrangementsEstablishingandmanagingviable,long-termPESschemesrequiresarobustgovernancestructureandstronginstitutionalsupport,butthesearelackinginmanytropicalcountries.Keyenablinginstitutionalelementsinclude:well-definedpropertyrights;codes,standardsandotherlegalstructuresthatreduceriskanduncertainty;inclusivepolicies;andappropriatemultistakeholderplatformsandinstitutionalstructuresthatallowPEStobemainstreamedinnationalplanningandfinancialdecision-making.Inmanytropicalcountries,forestlawsareinadequateorunenforced,foresttenureiscontested,forestagencieslackcapacity,intersectoralcoordinationispoor,andlegalframeworksimpedeorfailtoenablethedevelopment
ofPESschemes.Inthecaseofpaymentsfortheclimate-relatedservicesoftropicalforests,internationalarrangementsarestilluncertainandthemechanismsfortransferringpaymentsareyettobefullydeveloped.
Ingeneral,knowledgeisincompleteontheeffectivenessofdifferentinstitutionalarrangementsatvariousscales,andtheircosts.Manygovernmentsarecentralizingtenureandcontroloverenvironmentalservices,especiallygreenhousegasemissionreductions,butthishaspotentiallyseriousimplicationsforsocialcohesion,equityandtheeffectivenessofinterventions.
Tropical forests help purify the air and store vast quantities of carbon
Sarawak Forestry Department
Page 7 A P O L I C Y B R I E F
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BOOSTING PES SCHEMESGivencontinueddeforestationandforestdegradationinthetropics,inlargemeasurebecauseoftheunremuneratedopportunitycostsofmaintainingforestcover,thereisanurgentneedtoestablishnew—andscaleupexisting—PESschemes.Doingsorequiresseveralenablingfactors,especiallythefollowing:
• Increasedawarenessoftheimportanceoftropicalforestenvironmentalservices.
• Strongdemandforenvironmentalservicesandawillingnessofbeneficiariestopayforthem.
• MechanismstoensuretheequitabledistributionofPESamongforestownersandmanagers.
• Anenablinginstitutionalandgovernanceframework.
Policyoptionsforachievingtheseenablingfactorsarepresentedbelow.
1 Raise awareness of the importance of environmental services Policyoptions
• Increaseawarenessoftheimportanceofenvironmentalservices,theroleoftropicalforestsintheprovisionofsuchservices,andtheneedforcompensation.Importantmessagestoconveyinclude:
– Tropicalforestssafeguardvitalwaterresourcesandbiodiversityandregulateregionalclimates.
– Tropicalforestscanmanufacturevast
amountsofrenewablebiomass,absorbinghugequantitiesofgreenhousegasesastheydoso.
– Tropicalforestsarelife-supportsystemsforpresentandfuturegenerations.
– SFMisameansofensuringthelong-termmaintenanceandenhancementofenvironmentalservicesintropicalforests.
• Supportscientificallysoundstudiestoassessthe:
– Quantityandvalueoftheenvironmentalservicesprovidedbytropicalforests.
– Conservationandsustainable-developmentoutcomesofPESschemes.
– EffectivenessandcostofdifferentinstitutionalarrangementsforPES.
• PromotecollaborationandexchangesonPESexperiencesandoptions,especiallysouth–southcooperation.
2 Develop policies to increase market demand for the environmental services provided by tropical forestsPolicyoptions
• Developaregulatoryenvironmentthatencouragesorcompels“freeriders”tobecomebuyersofenvironmentalservices.
• Promotethedevelopmentofequitablemarketsfortropicalforestenvironmentalservices,includingmarketsforforestcarbon.
• WorkwiththeprivatesectortoencouragePESasameansofachievingcorporatesocialresponsibilityobjectives.
• PromotepoliciesinothereconomicsectorstointernalizethecostsofenvironmentalserviceswiththeaimofincreasingthesizeofPESmarkets.
• Encourageinnovativeapproachestothemarketingofenvironmentalservices,forexamplein“bundles”ofservices,withtheaimsofincreasingrevenuesandreducingoroptimizingtransactioncosts.
• IncorporatePESschemeswithinasustainable-developmentmodelthatintegratesecological,poverty-reductionandeconomicobjectivesacrosssectorsandvaluechains.
3 Ensure that PES schemes protect the rights of indigenous peoples, local communities and vulnerable groupsPolicyoptions
• Transparentlyandfairlyresolveoverlapsbetweenstatutoryandtraditionaltenureoflandandforests.
• Buildsafeguardssuchastherighttofree,priorandinformedconsentintoPESschemesandhonourthem,includingbyapplyingtheVoluntaryGuidelinesfortheResponsibleGovernanceofTenureofLand,FisheriesandForestsintheContextofNationalFoodSecurity.1
• Involveindigenouspeoples,localcommunitiesandotherforestownersin
1www.fao.org/nr/tenure/voluntary-guidelines
Page 8 R E W A R D I N G T H E S E R V I C E P R O V I D E R S
PESschemesasresourceowners,rightsholdersandentrepreneursandpromotegenderequality,includinginpropertyrights.
• BuildcapacityintropicalforestcommunitiestoimplementPESschemes.
• Facilitatetheeffortsofindigenouspeoplesandlocalcommunitiestoformproducerorganizationsandothermechanismstomarkettheirenvironmentalservicesmoreeffectively.
• Assistindigenouspeoples,localcommunitiesandothertropicalforestownersandmanagerstodevelopandimplementforestmanagementplanstomaintainforestenvironmentalservices.
4 Strengthen governance and institutions to enable the effective implementation of PES schemesPolicyoptions
• Devolvethetenureoftropicalforestenvironmentalserviceswiththeaimofachievingwin–winoutcomesforgovernments,communitiesandtheprivatesector.
• EnsurethedevelopmentofappropriatemultistakeholderplatformsandinstitutionalstructuresthatallowPESschemes
tobemainstreamedinnationalplanningandfinancialdecision-making.
• CreateasupportivelegalframeworkfortheestablishmentofPESschemesbyremovinglegislativeandregulatorybarriers,providingclearlegalrecognitionoftheeconomicroleoftropicalforestenvironmentalservices,andminimizingtheopportunitiesforenvironmental-servicefreeriders.
• PromotethesynergiesbetweenPESschemesandforestcertificationincontributingtoSFMandassuringbuyersandregulatorsthatforestownersandmanagersaremaintainingorincreasingtheprovisionofenvironmentalservices.
• InsistonmeasurestoassesstheeffectivenessofPESinthedesignofPESprojects.
• AssistthedevelopmentofdiversefinancingmechanismsforPESschemeswithclearrules,transparentoversightandpoliticallegitimacy.
• Encourageintersectoralinteractionandcooperationinthedevelopmentofbroad,flexiblePESschemesthatencompass
theenvironmentalservicesprovidedbytropicalforests.
• ImprovethebusinessclimateforPESschemesby:
– Reducingtransactioncosts.
– Ensuringthatpaymentsaremadeinatimelymanner.
– Promotingentrepreneurshipalongthevaluechain.
– Providingappropriateincentivesforprivate-sectorinvestmentandparticipationinPESschemes.
– Continuallyprovidinginformationtosocietywiththeaimofincreasingpaymentsforforestenvironmentalservices.
TheInternationalForumonPaymentsforEnvironmentalServicesofTropicalForestswasco-organizedbytheInternationalTropicalTimberOrganization(ITTO),theFoodandAgricultureOrganizationoftheUnitedNations(FAO),andCostaRica’sNationalFundforForestFinance(FONAFIFO)andhostedbytheGovernmentofCostaRicainSanJosé,CostaRica,on7–10April2014.TheforumexploredhowpaymentsfortheenvironmentalservicesprovidedbytropicalforestscansupportforestownersandmanagerstoimproveincomesandsupportSFM.Morethan150peoplefrom60countriesattendedfromgovernments,regionalandinternationaldevelopmentpartners,civil-societyorganizationsandtheprivatesector.
Presentations, background information and the Forum summary can be found at: www.fao.org/forestry/84884.
Tropical forest communities require capacity-building to implement PES schemes
Sarawak Forestry Department