rethinking the somali state - university of minnesota
TRANSCRIPT
Rethinking the Somali State
MPP Professional Paper
In Partial Fulfillment of the Master of Public Policy Degree Requirements The Hubert H. Humphrey School of Public Affairs
The University of Minnesota
Aman H.D. Obsiye
May 2017 Signature below of Paper Supervisor certifies successful completion of oral presentation and completion of final written version: _________________________________ ____________________ ___________________ Dr. Mary Curtin, Diplomat in Residence Date, oral presentation Date, paper completion Paper Supervisor ________________________________________ ___________________ Steven Andreasen, Lecturer Date Second Committee Member Signature of Second Committee Member, certifying successful completion of professional paper
2
TableofContents
Introduction...........................................................................................................................3
Methodology..........................................................................................................................5
TheSomaliClanSystem..........................................................................................................6
TheColonialEra.....................................................................................................................9
BritishSomalilandProtectorate.................................................................................................9
SomaliaItalianaandtheUnitedNationsTrusteeship..............................................................14
ColonialEraSummation...........................................................................................................21
SomaliRepublic(1960-1969).................................................................................................21
SomaliDemocraticRepublic(1969-1991)...............................................................................30
SomaliaasaFailedState.......................................................................................................34
Somaliland................................................................................................................................35
PuntlandStateofSomalia........................................................................................................38
SouthcentralSomalia...............................................................................................................39
ReestablishingtheSomaliState(1991-2012).........................................................................41
InsightsandLessons..............................................................................................................43
RethinkingtheSomaliState:Vision2021...............................................................................47
3
Introduction
Somaliahasbeenafailedstateforovertwodecadesandisbeginningtofullyrecoveras
anation.Beyondbroaderdevelopmentalissues,Somaliahaslaggedbecauseitlackedaproper
structureofgovernment.Somaliahasitsfairshareofhumanitarianissuesbutthisacademic
researchpaperispurelyfocusedondevelopingtheSomalistate.IacknowledgeSomaliahas
majorsecurityissues,butbeforeSomaliacaneffectualaddresshersecurityconcernsshemust
ironoutherpoliticalwrinkles.InRethinkingtheSomaliState,Ifocusontheprocessand
procedurestoachievepoliticalstabilitybyproposinganinnovativemodelforachievingfull
statehoodforSomalia:Vision2021.Inaddition,Iproposepolicysolutionstohelptacklethe
majorissuesservingasobstaclestothethreegoalsthatwereoutlaidinthenowdefunctVision
2016.
TheSomalination-state,Somalia,hashadtworepublics:(1)theSomaliRepublic,1960-
1969,and(2)theSomaliDemocraticRepublic,1969-1991.Bytheendof2016,theSomali
peopleandtheinternationalcommunitywerehopingtocreatetheSomalination-state’sthird
fullyfunctioningrepublicthroughanambitiousplancalledVision20161.Thisplan
encompassedthreemajorgoals:(a)federalizationofSomalia;(b)constitutionalrevisionanda
nationalreferendum;and(c)one-personone-votenationalelection.Thoughnoble,Vision
2016’sstrategywasnotpalatabletotherealitiesofSomalia’scurrentpoliticalclimateandthus
1 Vision 2016’s strategy is being executed by the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) with guidance from United
Nations Assistant Mission to Somalia (UNSOM).
4
wasafailure.Notonegoalwasfullycompleted.Thescheduledpresidentialelectionwasnot
evenheldbytheendof2016.
TheSomalistatewasinitiallyestablishedbyanamalgamationoftwoformercolonial
territories,BritishSomalilandProtectorateandSomaliaItaliana,whichunitedin1960tocreate
theSomaliRepublic.ThebirthoftheSomaliRepubliccanbetracedbackto1950whenthe
UnitedNationsadministeredSomaliaItalianafortenyears.Upongainingindependence
Somaliagoverneditselfunderamulti-partysystembutthisdemocraticexperimentabruptly
endedafternineshortyears.In1969,GeneralMohamedSiadBareexecutedacouptocreate
theSomaliDemocraticRepublicandgoverneditunderacommunistsystem.Aftertwenty-one
yearsofdictatorship,aconglomerateofclanmilitiasoverthrewSiadBarein1991leadingto
thecollapseofthestate.
ThereweremanyattemptstoresuscitatetheSomalistatebutallattemptswerefeeble.
SuccessfinalcameonSeptember16,2012,whenformerPresidentHassanSheikhMohamud
wasdemocraticallyelectedtoheadSomalia’sfirstpost-transitionalgovernment,theFederal
GovernmentofSomalia(FGS),albeit,theFGSisgovernedbyaprovisionalconstitution.On
February8,2017,PresidentMohamedAbdullahi"Farmaajo"waselectedasSomalia’snewhead
ofstateforafour-yearmandate.TheFGSisworkingonregainingfullstatehoodforSomalia
withtheUnitedNationsAssistantMissiontoSomalia(UNSOM)servingasitsinternational
guide.
InordertounderstandandappreciateSomalia’scurrentpoliticalclimate,andtodevise
achievablesolutions,wemustanalyzehermodernsociopoliticalhistory,beginningwithan
understandingoftheimportanceoftheSomaliclansystem,followedbyanhistoricalanalysisof
5
hercolonialhistory.Additionally,wewillthoroughlydiscusstheSomaliRepublic’sdemocratic
experimentandbrieflydiscussthecommunisteraoftheSomaliDemocraticRepublic.
Thishistoricalanalysiswillprovidevaluableinsightsandlessonstowardsrebuildinga
democraticSomalistateandwillprovideaframeworkforachievingVision2021.Vision2021is
arevisedandenhancedversionofVision2016,andisaccompaniedbytimetablestocomplete
eachgoal.Itprovidesabottom-upapproachtoachievingfullstatehoodforSomaliabytheend
ofPresidentMohamedAbdullahiFarmaajo’stermin2021.TherearefivegoalsinVision2021
andeachgoalisabuildingblocktoachievingfullstatehoodinmoderation.
Vision2021willaccomplishthefollowinggoals:(a)regionalone-personone-vote
electionsforallrespectiveFederalMemberStates;(b)FederalConstitutionalConventionfor
purposesofconstitutionalrevision;(c)nationalreferendumforSomalia’snewconstitution;(d)
establishmentofafullyfunctioningSomaliNationalArmyandthewithdrawaloftheAfrican
UnionMissioninSomalia(AMISOM);and(e)one-personone-votenationalelection.
Methodology
Myresearchisbasedonreviewingandanalyzingmultitudesofacademicarticles,books,
documentsandreportsconcerningSomaliaffairs,combinedwithmyownacademicand
personalexperienceinSomalia.Myanalysisseekstoclarifyproceduresandtechniquesthat
weresuccessfullyimplementedtocreatetheSomalistate,whileidentifyingproblemsthat
accompanieditsinitialfounding.
6
RethinkingtheSomaliStatecriticallyanalyzesthereasonsbehindVision2016’sfailure
andcritiquesitsapplication.Additionally,itprovideshistoricalanalysisonsuccessfulstrategies
duringSomalia’screation,whichcanbeappliedpresentlyduringitsrecreation.Myresearch
concludeswithpolicyrecommendationstoreestablishtheSomalistate.
I.M.Lewis’sresearchismostreferencedbecauseheisthepreeminentacademicscholar
onSomalistudies,“hehadbeenoneofthepioneeringsocialscientiststochronicletheprocess
ofstate-buildingamongSomalisfromthemid-1950sonwards.”2HefirstvisitedtheSomali
territoriesin1955foranthropologicalresearch,3andthroughouthislifecontinuedtoprovide
valuableandreliableinformationonSomalistudies.Ifrequentlysoughthisuniqueinsightby
evaluatinghistreasuretroveofresearchonSomaliaffairs.
TheSomaliClanSystem
AsanethnicSomali,whowasbornandraisedintheUnitedStates,Icanintimately
attesttotheimportanceoftheclan.ItistheSomalis’socialsecuritysystem,itisthe
preeminentunderlyingidentifyingfactorofourexistence,itisourwayoflife,anditmustbe
consideredinanypoliticalplan.IhavehadtheopportunitytotraveltoSomaliathreetimesin
2 Barnes, Cedrick. [review of the book Milk and peace, drought and war: Somali culture, society and politics:
essays in honour of I. M. Lewis, by Markus V. Hoehne and Virginia Luling]. International Affairs (Royal Institute
of International Affairs 1944-), Vol. 86, No.6, Post-American Iraq (November 2010), pp. 1453.
3 I.M. LEWIS 1930-2014: A GREAT TREE HAS FALLEN. Samater, S. Said. http://www.wardheernews.com/m-
lewis-1930-2014-great-tree-fallen/
7
mylife,thefirsttripbeingdaqaancelis,or“returntoculture.”MyparentssentmetoSomalia
forasummertolearnmynativecultureintimately.TheothertwotimesIvisitedSomaliawas
foracademicpurposes;theUniversityofMinnesotaSchoolofLaw’sHumanRightsCenter
awardedmetheUpperMidwestHumanRightsFellowshipandtheRobinaHumanRights
Fellowship,whichallowedmetoconsiderissuesonamoreacademiclevel.
Throughtheseexperiences,andmyownupbringingasanethnicSomali,Ihavecometo
concludethat:tobeSomaliistobelongtoaclan.Inessence,tobeSomaliistobelongtoaclan
thatotherSomaliclansregardasbelongingtotheirsystem,regardlessofhowbigorsmallthat
clanis.IfonedoesnotbelongtoarecognizedSomaliclan,thenthatpersonisnottechnically
Somali.AsI.M.Lewisobserved,“[t]heentireSomalipopulationcanbecomprisedwithinone
vastgenealogyrecordingalltherelationshipsofthenumerouspatrilinealdescentgroupsinto
whichSomalisocietyisdivided...Somalisocietyisthusanagnaticlineagesociety....”4
TherearefourmajorSomaliclanconfederations,theBigFour,(1)Darood,(2)Dir,(3)
Hawiye,and(4)Rahaweyn,andamultitudeofsmaller/minorityclans.AllethnicSomalis,
regardlessofnationality,belongtooneoftheBigFourorsmallerclans.Generally,everyclan
confederationanditssubunitsliveindefinedterritories,therefore,clanloyaltyisintrinsically
tiedtoland.TheSomaliclansystemisgovernedbytheXeer,Somalicustomarylaw.5Xeeris
themaindisputeresolutionmechanismusedbetweenclansandencompasseslegaldoctrines
4 Lewis, I.M. (1958). Modern Political Movements in Somaliland I. Africa: Journal of the International African
Institute, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 245-46.
5 Van Notten, Michael. The Law of the Somalis. Trenton: The Red Sea Press, 2005. Print. pp. 33.
8
thatgovernlife,liberty,andproperty.6Clanshavefigureheadswhoserveastheirceremonial
leaderswithlifetimeappointments;theseappointmentsareusuallyhereditary.7
TheSomaliclansystemplacesgreatimportanceonelders,“[a]teverylevelof
segmentationitistheeldersofthenomadichamletswhocontrolpoliticalrelations.”8This
explainswhytheinternationalcommunityhaveutilizedclaneldersintheprocessofelecting
membersofSomalia’sparliament(HouseofthePeople),both,in2012and2016.Without
authenticdemocraticelections,claneldersarethemostlegitimateandrepresentativeof
Somalia’ssociety.Duetoitspaternalandagnaticnature,theSomaliclansystemdoesnot
traditionallyempoweritswomenfolk.
UnlikemostAfricannation-states,Somaliaisethnicallyhomogenousbutitsclansystem
servesasitsgreatdivider.“Africannationalistsinmostcolonialstates,becauseoftheirmulti-
ethniccharacter,didnothavetheluxuryofaready-made,country-widelocalfoundationfor
nationalism.”9Somalis,duetotheirethnic,linguistic,culturalandreligioushomogeneity,were
endowedwithamoreorganicformofnationalismwhencomparedtotheirAfrican
counterparts.10SomalinationalismdoeshaveanAchillesheel,theclansystem,thereforeits
6 Ibid.
7 Ibid.
8 Ibid. at 248
9 Lewis, I.M. (2004) Visible and Invisible Differences: The Somali Paradox. Africa (Edinburgh University Press),
Vol. 74 Issue 4, pp.490.
10 Ibid.
9
ethnicandculturalhomogeneityis“accompaniedbyapervasivesystemofinternaldivisions
basedontheideologyofkindship,andhenceinvisible....”11
TheSomaliclansystemhasitsprosandcons,butmostexpertsacknowledgethatithas
historicallyhamperedtheSomalipeople’ssocial,economic,andpoliticaldevelopment.
However,ifutilizedcorrectlyitcanbeatoolthathelpsrevamptheSomalistate.Theclan
systemisomnipresentwithinthefabricofSomalisocietyandthusmustbeavariablewhen
devisingapoliticalsolution.
TheColonialEra
TheBritishandItaliansencounteredthevariousSomaliclansduringtheircolonial
conquestofAfrica.Ironically,theSomaliclansystemassistedtheEuropeancolonialsintheir
conquestforSomaliterritories.“[D]espitetheirsenseofculturalidentity,theydidnot
constituteasinglepoliticalunit.Foreignaggressionthusencounterednotanation-state,buta
congeriesofdisunitedandoftenhostileclans....”12Inadditiontotheclanstructure,theway
inwhichtheBritishandItalians(andlatertheUNTrusteeship)governedthenorthernand
southernpartsofSomalia,respectively,hashadalastingimpactonthedevelopmentofthe
Somalistate.
BritishSomalilandProtectorate
11 Ibid.
12 Lewis, I.M. A Modern History of the Somali. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2002. Print. pp. 43.
10
TheBritishEmpirelaidclaimtonorthernSomalia,whatwouldbecometheBritish
SomalilandProtectorate,in1884.13TheBritishwereabletonegotiatewiththevariousclans
thatresidedintheareaduetotheirfearofAbyssinian(i.e.Ethiopian)expansion;theBritshad
signedtreatyagreementswiththeGadabuursi,Isaaq,IssaandWarsangeliclans.14Thequiddity
ofthetreatiesstipulatedthat“themembersofthetribalsectionsrepresentedbecame‘British
Protectedpersons’,andintheirlands(stilltobedefined)Britainwasrecognized,inreturn,as
theparamountpowerevenwhileultimatesovereigntyandownershipremainedvestedinthe
tribes...Legally,Somalilandwasneveracolony.”15
In1899,aSomalianti-colonialmovementknownastheDervisharosefromthe
ProtectorateledbySayyidMuhammadAbdilleHassan.16TheconflictbetweentheDervishes
andtheBritishwouldlastfortwodecades,endingwiththedefeatofAbdilleHassanin1920.17
AfterthedefeatoftheDervishes,theBritishbegantoenhancetheiradministrativecapacity
andinfrastructuraldevelopmentintheProtectorate.18“Itisonlysincethedestructionofthe
MadMullah[AbdilleHassan]in1920thatthecountry[Protectorate]hashadanyrealchanceof
13 Millman, Brock. British Somaliland: An Administrative History, 1920-1960. New York: Routledge, 2014. Print.
pp. 15
14 Ibid.
15 Ibid. at 16.
16 Lewis, I.M. A Modern History of the Somali. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2002. Print. pp. 68-69.
17 Ibid. at 80.
18Kittermaster, H.B. (Jul., 1928). British Somaliland. Journal of the Royal African Society, Vol. 27, No. 108, pp.
335-337
11
progressing.”19SomeoftheprojectstheBritishinitiatedwereroadconstructionfromthe
coastalareatothehinterland,medicalservices,schooling,drillingwaterwellsandproviding
veterinarianservicestofacilitatethepastoraleconomyofthenomadicpopulation.20
WorldWarIIbroughtconflicttotheHornofAfrica,wheretheBritishandItalianempires
foughtforsupremacyoftheregion.MussolinicapturedtheBritishSomalilandProtectoratein
August1940andincorporateditintotheItalianEastAfricanEmpire,whichalsoincluded
Ethiopia,Eritrea,andSomaliaItaliana.21Aftersevenmonths,theBritishrecapturedthe
Protectorate,liberatedEthiopiafromMussolini’sgrips,andcapturedSomaliaItaliana.22The
BritishnowhadcontrolofbothBritishSomalilandProtectorateandSomaliaItaliana,and
governedtherespectiveterritoriesunderaBritishMilitaryAdministration.23TheBritish
governedSomaliaItalianauntil1949,whenithandeditovertotheUNTrusteeship,keeping
SomalilandasaProtectorate.24
ThesociopoliticaldevelopmentundertheBritishSomalilandProtectoratewasnotas
intensiveandsophisticatedasinSomaliaItalianaunderthenewUNTrusteeship.25TheBritish
19 Ibid. at 335.
20 Lewis, I.M. A Modern History of the Somali. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2002. Print. pp. 104.
21 Ibid. at 116.
22 Ibid.
23 Ibid. at 116-17.
24 Ibid. at 128.
25 Lewis, I.M. (1958). Modern Political Movements in Somaliland II. Africa: Journal of the International African
Institute, Vol. 28, No. 4 (Oct. 1958), pp. 352.
12
didnothaveapolicyofgrantingtheProtectorateindependenceuntilDecember1958.26Thisis
thereasonwhytheProtectorate’sSomalizationprogramswereinitiatedmuchlaterthan
SomaliaItaliana’s,whoseindependencewasdecidedin1949.“AccordingtoJ.H.A.Watson
(ForeignOffice),itwasimpossibletomaintainBritishruleoverSomalilandonceSomalia
becameindependent.Therewasanurgentneed,heargued,forarapiddevolutionofpowerto
theProtectorate...Somalilandwastobegranteditsindependencein1960,whichwould
coincidewiththedateofindependenceoftheTrusteeshipTerritory[SomaliaItaliana].”27
ThefirstdemocraticelectiontookplaceinFebruary1960,fourmonthspriorto
independence,fortheProtectorate’sLegislativeCouncil.28Thetwomainpoliticalpartiesofthe
ProtectorateweretheSomalilandNationalLeague(SNL)andtheUnitedSomaliParty(USP).29
TheinitialpoliticalplatformoftheSNLdidnotpromoteunitywithSomaliaItaliana,butrather
advocatedfortheProtectoratetobeitsowncountry,a“policyofindependencewithinthe
Commonwealth.”30Inaddition,itwasrepresentativeoftheIsaaqclancenteredaround
Hargeisa,Berbera,andBurco.31ThepoliticalplatformfortheUSPwasfortheProtectorateto
26 Mohamed, Jama (2002). Imperial Policies and Nationalism in The Decolonization of Somaliland. The English
Historical Review, Vol. 117, No. 474, pp. 1198.
27 Ibid. at 1998-99
28 Samatar, Ahmed I., Samatar, Ahmed I. (2002). Somalis As Africa’s First Democrats. Bildhaan, Vol. 2, pp. 30.
29 Lewis, I.M. (1958). Modern Political Movements in Somaliland II. Africa: Journal of the International African
Institute, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 347.
30 Ibid.
31 Lewis, I.M. Visible and Invisible Differences: The Somali Paradox. Africa (Edinburgh University Press). 2004,
Vol. 74 Issue 4, pp.499
13
mergewithSomaliaItalianatoformtheSomaliRepublic.Itwasrepresentativeofthe
Gadabuursi,Dhulbahante,andWarsangeliclans,respectivelycenteredaroundBorama,Las
Anod,andLasQoray.32
Womenwerenotofferedsuffrageinthiselection,whichcausedconcernfortheBritish
intheProtectorate.33SirDouglasHall,lateGovernoroftheProtectorate,explained,“Oneof
ourmainworrieswashowthewomenwouldbehave.Theyhadnovote,buttheywere
surprisinglypolitically-conscious,andthereisnothingthatanadministratordislikesmorethana
riotofwomen.However,theSomalisthemselvesdecidedthattheelectionshouldbeorderly,
anditwas.TherewerenoincidentsworthyofthenameandforthewholeofFebruary17thnot
awomanwastobeseen.”34
Therewereone-hundredandfiftypollingstations,andanestimated82,000males
castedtheirvotes(80%-90%voterparticipationrate).35TheSNLwontwentyoftheLegislative
Council’sthirty-threeavailableseats,withtheUSPcominginsecondplacegainingtwelve
seats.36MuhammadHajiIbrahimIgal,wholedtheSNL,becamethe“LeaderofGovernment
Business”oftheLegislativeCouncil,inessenceitspresident.37Somalizationalsofollowedwith
allsixdistrictsoftheProtectorate“inthedirectchargeofSomaliofficials.”38
32 Ibid.
33 Hall, Douglas (1961). Somaliland’s Last Year as a Protectorate. African Affairs, Vol. 60, No. 238, pp. 7.
34 Ibid.
35 Ibid.
36 Lewis, I.M. A Modern History of the Somali. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2002. Print. pp. 153-54.
37 Ibid.
38 Ibid.
14
TofacilitateitsnewfoundpolicyofgrantingtheProtectorateindependence,theBritish
hostedaconstitutionalconferenceinLondononMay2,1960,inwhichtheProtectorate’s
delegationwasledbyIgal.39TheconferenceconcludedonMay12,and“endedwiththe
signingofareportbytheSecretaryofStatefortheColonies,whichformallyspecifiedthedate
ofindependenceofSomaliland(26June1960),anditsunionwithSomalia(1July1960).”40
SomaliaItalianaandtheUnitedNationsTrusteeship
TheBritishcolonizednorthernSomaliawhilethe
Italianscolonizedthesouthernpart.SomaliaItaliana,
Italy’scolony,wasfirstestablishedin1882“whenthe
SultanofZanzibarcededtheportsofBrava,Merca,[and]
Mogadishu....”41In1899,theItaliansextendedtheir
sphereofinfluencebysigningtreatieswiththeleaders
oftheMajarteenclan:SultanofHobyoandSultanofMajarteenia.42SomaliaItaliana’s
territorialconfineswouldfurtherbeexpandedwhentheBritishgavetheItaliansthefar-south
SomalicityofKismayo.43
39 Ibid. at 1200
40 Ibid.
41 Lewis, I.M. A Modern History of the Somali. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2002. Print. pp. 51.
42 Ibid.
43 Reece, Gerald (1954). The Horn of Africa. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-),
Vol. 30, No.4, pp. 443
15
SomaliaItalianawaspeacefulandforthemostpartthelocalSomalisdidnotrebellike
theDervishinthenorth.“AlargesubsidycamefromRomeand...Somalisgotagooddealof
workwhichmadethemfairlywelldisposedtowardstheItalianadministration.Thedesertfolk
werenotinterferedwithverymuchand,asistheircustom,theykeptasfarawayfromofficials,
troops,andpoliceastheycould.TheItalianswereveryactivelyengagedonthemakingofroads
andtheerectionofbuildings.”44ItalywouldcontinuetogovernSomaliaItalianauntilItaly’s
defeatinWorldWarII.
AftertheAlliesemergedvictoriousinWorldWarII,oneofthemanyissuestheyhadto
solvewaswhattodowithItaly’scolonialpossessions.TheAlliesdecidedthatSomaliaItaliana’s
fatewouldbedecidedbythenewlyestablishedUnitedNations.45TheUNGeneralAssemblyin
1949agreedthatSomaliaItalianawouldbeplacedunderaUnitedNationsTrusteeship,which
cameunderaBritishprotectorateatthetimeofItaly’sdefeat,administeredbyItalyinwhich
“ItalianSomaliahastoberecognizedasanindependentstateintenyears....”46
TheTrusteeshipagreementofficiallycommencedonApril1,1950andsoughtto
graduallyprepareSomalisforself-governanceandeventualindependencein1960.47Inorder
toaccomplishthisgoalwithinadecade’stime“theagreementputspecialemphasisonthe
educationsystem,whichwasconsidered‘thebestinstrumentforpromotingthesocial,
44 Ibid. at 444
45 Samatar, Ahmed I., Samatar, Ahmed I. (2002). Somalis As Africa’s First Democrats. Bildhaan, Vol. 2, pp. 19.
46 UN Resolution 289, 21 November 1949.
47 Tripodi, P. (1999). Back to the Horn: Italian Administration and Somalia’s Troubled Independence. The
International Journal of African Historical Studies, Vol. 32, No. 2/3, pp. 360.
16
economic,politicalandmoralprogressofthepopulationoftheterritory.’”48Inadditionto
givingtheItaliansadministrativeduties,theUNhaditsownAdvisoryCouncilbasedin
MogadishutoobservethedevelopmentstowardsSomaliindependence.
AmongsttheaccomplishmentsoftheTrusteeship,themostnotablehighlightswerethe
fourdemocraticelectionsthattookplace.In1954,thefirstmunicipalelectionswere
conducted,followedbythefirstnationallegislativeelectionsin1956.49In1958and1959,the
secondmunicipalandnationallegislativeelectionsoccurred,respectively.50Priortocolonialism
andnationalindependence,Somalisociopoliticalstructuresweresolelybasedonpaternal
kinshipties(i.e.clans)managedandorganizedaroundtheXeer(customarylaw),therefore
makingSomalisociety“quintessentiallystateless.”51WiththeadventoftheTrusteeship,
Somalisbegantoorganizethemselvespoliticallythroughparties,althoughthesepolitical
partiesstillmaintainedstrongpaternalkingshipties.52Inactuality,clanrelationshipsplayedan
importantpartintheSomalipeople’sdemocraticexperimentthroughouttheTrusteeshipera.
“ClandivisionappearstobethemostevidentandmajorpartitionofSomalisociety...TheSYL
48Ibid.
49 Lewis, I.M. (1960). The New East African Republic of Somalia. The World Today, Vol. 16, No. 7, pp. 290-91.
50 Ibid.
51 Tripodi, P. (1999). Back to the Horn: Italian Administration and Somalia’s Troubled Independence. The
International Journal of African Historical Studies, Vol. 32, No. 2/3, pp. 365.
52 Ware, Gilbert (1965). From Trust Territory to Nation, 1950-1960. Phylon, Vol. 26, No. 2 (2nd Qtr., 1965), pp.
175-76.
17
[SomaliYouthLeague],thestrongestdeclaredpan-Somalimovementinthisperiod,had
politicalsupremacybutdidnotmanagetoeliminateclannismfrompoliticalcompetition.”53
SomalisfirsttastedelectoraldemocracywithmunicipalelectionsinMarch1954,
althoughonlymaleswereallowedtovote.SinceSomalisocietywasquintessentiallystateless,
the“inexperienceofthepoliticalpartieswithmodernelectoralsystemsandthepolitical
immaturityofthemassespersuadedtheUnitedNationsandtheAdministeringAuthorityto
extendgraduallythesuffrageinSomalia.”54Sixteenpoliticalpartiespartookinthe1954
elections,butonlytwopartiesemergedasauthenticpoliticalvanguards.Thetwopartieswere
theSomaliYouthLeague(SYL)andtheHizbiaDigil-Mirifleh(HDM);ofthetwo-hundredand
eighty-oneseatsavailable,theSYLwonone-hundredandforty-twoandtheHDMwonfifty-
seven.55TheresultseffectivelymadetheSYLthe“rulingparty”whiletheHDMservedasthe
“oppositionparty.”ItshouldbenotedthattheHDM’spoliticalandeconomicplatform
propagatedthatSomaliashouldbeafederalstate,ineffectmakingthemthefirstSomali
proponentsoffederalism.56Theseelectionsweredeemedsuccessfulandhighlyparticipatory
53 Tripodi, P. (1999). Back to the Horn: Italian Administration and Somalia’s Troubled Independence. The
International Journal of African Historical Studies, Vol. 32, No. 2/3, pp. 361-65.
54 Ibid. at 177.
55 Lewis, I.M. (1958). Modern Political Movements in Somaliland II. Africa: Journal of the International African
Institute, Vol. 28, No. 4 (Oct. 1958), pp. 352.
56 Tripodi, P. (1999). Back to the Horn: Italian Administration and Somalia’s Troubled Independence. The
International Journal of African Historical Studies, Vol. 32, No. 2/3, pp. 365.
18
withmorethan75%ofregisteredvoterspartaking.57Partofitssuccessisowedtothecensus
thatwasconductedpriortothe1954elections,inwhichthirty-fivetownsandvillages
participated.58
Followingtheelections,theAdministeringAuthoritypresenteda“seriesofSeven-Year
DevelopmentPlansfortheperiod1954-1960...”59anditspurposewas“evaluatingthe
country’seconomicimprovement.”60Anotherpost-electiondevelopmentwastheintroduction
oftheSomalinationalflag,whichwas“presentedtotheUNmissioninSomaliainSeptember
1954.”61ThelastmajortaskfortheAdministeringAuthoritywastolaythegroundworkforthe
1956generalelectionsfortheLegislativeAssembly.
Likethe1954elections,thefirstgenerallegislativeelectionswererestrictedtomale
voterswhoweretwenty-oneandolder.62SixtyseatswereavailabletoSomalis,whiletenseats
weredesignatedforminoritycommunities:Italians,Arabs,Indians,andPakistanis.63Ofthe
57 Lewis, I.M. (1958). Modern Political Movements in Somaliland II. Africa: Journal of the International African
Institute, Vol. 28, No. 4 (Oct. 1958), pp. 374.
58 Tripodi, P. (1999). Back to the Horn: Italian Administration and Somalia’s Troubled Independence. The
International Journal of African Historical Studies, Vol. 32, No. 2/3, pp. 372.
59 Lewis, I.M. (1960). The New East African Republic of Somalia. The World Today, Vol. 16, No. 7, pp. 292.
60 Tripodi, P. (1999). Back to the Horn: Italian Administration and Somalia’s Troubled Independence. The
International Journal of African Historical Studies, Vol. 32, No. 2/3, pp. 376.
61 Ibid. at 378.
62 Lewis, I.M. (1960). The New East African Republic of Somalia. The World Today, Vol. 16, No. 7, pp. 290.
63 Ibid.
19
sixtyavailableseats,theSYLwonforty-threewhiletheHDMwonthirteen.64TheSYL’sleader,
AdenA.Osman,becamethePresidentoftheLegislativeAssembly;65hewouldlaterbecome
thefirstpresidentofanindependentSomalia.ThatyearalsomarkedtheSomalizationofthe
Trusteeshipterritory,withtheLegislativeAssemblyinmajoritarianhandsofSomalisaswellas
allProvincialandDistrictCommissioners.66Amilestonehadbeenachievedwiththeadventof
electionsforthemunicipalitiesandLegislativeAssembly.“Throughoutthetrusteeshipyears,
theUnitedNationscallednotonlyforthetrainingofSomalisforgovernmentalpostsbutalso
forSomalization,thatis,widerparticipationbySomalisinthegovernmentalprocess.”67
The1958municipalelectionswerethefirsttrulydemocraticelectionsbecauseSomali
womenwerefinallyallowedtovote,whichresultedin85.5%ofregisteredvotersvoting.68
Somaliwomendidnotshyawayfromtheballotbox,“despiteallpredictionstothecontrary
anddespitethemalebiasoftraditionalMuslimsociety,[Somaliwomen]showedgreat
interest.”69Inadditiontowomansuffrage,thevotingagewasloweredtoeighteenyears,
whichresultedinanincreaseofthevoterregistrar,with156,636votersinthe1958elections
64 Lewis, I.M. (1958). Modern Political Movements in Somaliland II. Africa: Journal of the International African
Institute, Vol. 28, No. 4 (Oct. 1958), pp. 352.
65 Samatar, Ahmed I., Samatar, Ahmed I. (2002). Somalis As Africa’s First Democrats. Bildhaan, Vol. 2, pp. 29.
66Lewis, I.M. (1958). Modern Political Movements in Somaliland II. Africa: Journal of the International African
Institute, Vol. 28, No. 4 (Oct. 1958), pp. 356.
67 Ware, Gilbert (1965). From Trust Territory to Nation, 1950-1960. Phylon, Vol. 26, No. 2 (2nd Qtr., 1965), pp.
180. (emphasis added).
68 Ibid. at 178.
69 Lewis, I.M. (1960). The New East African Republic of Somalia. The World Today, Vol. 16, No. 7, pp. 290.
20
comparedtothe50,740inthe1954elections.70ThelastelectionsoftheTrusteeshiptook
placein1959fortheLegislativeAssembly.71ThesefourelectionspreparedtheTrusteeship
territoryforindependence,andwouldsetthefoundationforSomalia’spoliticalstructure.
ElectoraldemocracywasnowfirmlyembeddedintheSomalisociopoliticalculture.
SincetheItaliansweretheAdministrativeAuthorityoftheTrusteeship,theyintroducedaform
ofgovernancewhichwas“copiedfromtheItalianpoliticalmodel,”butinreality,it“couldnot
managethedynamicsoftheclansystemeffectively.”72ThefoundationofSomalisocietyis
basedonclanrelations,andtheItaliandemocraticsystem,whichwasimportedtotheSomalis,
was“notrespectfuloftheSomalitraditionalstructure,Italypromotedtheadoptionofaformof
stateinappropriatetotheSomalipeople.”73ThisinappropriatepoliticalstructureofSomali
societywouldplayadetrimentalroleintheSomaliRepublic,andeventodayhindersthe
emergenceofapoliticallystableFederalGovernmentofSomalia(theFGScurrentlyusesthis
sameItalian-importedstructure).EventhefalloftheSomalistatecanbepartiallyblamedon
theun-Somalipoliticalfoundationofthecountry.AsBasilobserved:“Somalisocietyhastorn
itselfinpieces,notonlybecausetheinstitutionssetinplacein1960gaveplaytotherivalriesof
70 Ware, Gilbert (1965). From Trust Territory to Nation, 1950-1960. Phylon, Vol. 26, No. 2 (2nd Qtr., 1965), pp.
180.
71 Lewis, I.M. (1960). The New East African Republic of Somalia. The World Today, Vol. 16, No. 7, pp. 291.
72 Tripodi, P. (1999). Back to the Horn: Italian Administration and Somalia’s Troubled Independence. The
International Journal of African Historical Studies, Vol. 32, No. 2/3, pp. 379.
73 Ibid.
21
clan-structuredsociety,but,worse,impelledtheserivalrieswithnewmethodsand
resources.”74
ColonialEraSummation
TheBritishandItaliansdifferedintheirprocessofcolonizingtheirrespectiveterritories
inSomalia.TheItaliansundertheUNTrusteeshippreparedtheirterritoryforindependence
startingin1950,whiletheBritishdidnotevenconsidernotionsofindependenceuntilthevery
endof1958.TheBritishrushedthroughtheirprocessofself-governanceandSomalization
withinfourmonths,whiletheItaliansgraduallyimplementedtheirprocessfrom1954until
eventualindependencein1960.
WhenSomaliaItaliana(southernSomalia)andtheBritishSomalilandProtectorate
(northernSomalia)mergedtoformtheSomaliRepublic,southernSomaliawasbetterprepared
andthusmoreinfluential.ThenationalcapitalbecameMogadishu,thecapitalofSomalia
Italiana,andtheSomaliRepublic’sformofgovernancewasmodeledafterItaly.Additionally,
thePresident,PrimeMinister,andSpeakeroftheHouseofthenewlyindependentSomali
Republicallhailedfromthesouth.
SomaliRepublic(1960-1969)
TheSomaliRepublicisuniqueamongstitsAfricannation-statepeersbecauseits
territorialconfineswerenotdrawnbyEuropeans,butratherbySomaliswhounitedtwo
74 Davidson, Basil, The Search for Africa (London, 1994), 284-85.
22
colonialterritoriestocreateanAfricannation-statewhosejurisdictionwasnotidenticaltothe
originalcoloniallines.InApril1960,thepoliticalleadersoftheProtectorateandTrusteeship
“agreedtothespeedyunificationofthetwoSomaliterritories.”75TheProtectoratereceived
independenceonJune26,1960whiletheTrusteeshipreceiveditonJuly1,1960.Somali
IndependenceDayisthereforeofficiallycelebratedonJune26th,whileitsRepublic’sDayis
celebratedonJuly1st.
PriortoindependenceofthetwoSomaliterritories,leadersfromtheTrusteeshipsent
thedraftconstitutionfortheSomaliRepublictotheleadersoftheProtectorate;exceptforthe
additionofonearticle,leadersoftheProtectorateacceptedthedraftconstitutionintotality.76
Uponindependence,“[t]hefirstactoftheunifiedNorthern[BritishSomalilandProtectorate]
andSouthern[SomaliaItaliana]parliamentswastheapprovaloftheUnionActby
acclamation.”77
Somalistudiesscholar,I.M.Lewis,observedthat“[t]oappreciatethefullimportofthis
immediateconsequenceofunionitisnecessarytorealizethat,despitethepatrioticfervor
whichacclaimedtheformationoftheRepublic,themostall-pervasiveelementinpolitics
remainedtheloyaltyoftheindividualtohiskinandclan.”78Hewouldfurtheraddthatclan
“remainedthemostpervasive,themostcommanding,andaboveallthemostinsidious.No
othersinglelineofcommunicationandcommoninterestconnectedsodirectlyand
75 Samatar, Ahmed I., Samatar, Ahmed I. (2002). Somalis As Africa’s First Democrats. Bildhaan, Vol. 2, pp. 30.
76 Ibid. at 31.
77 Ibid.
78 Lewis, I.M. A Modern History of the Somali. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2002. Print. pp. 166.
23
incontrovertiblythepastoralnomadintheinteriorwithhiskinsmeninthecivilservice,inthe
NationalAssembly,orinthecabinetitself.Nootherbondofmutualinteresthadsomanyfar-
reachingramificationinallaspectsofprivateandpubliclife.”79
Inadditiontoclanties,dual-colonialidentityhamperedtheintegrationofthetwo
halves,north-southaxis,oftheSomaliRepublic.Thenorthernhalf’slegal,administrative,and
politicalsystemwasbasedonBritishtraditions,whilethesouthernhalf’sonItaliantraditions.
Also,politicalandeconomicpowerbecameconcentratedinthesouth,sinceMogadishuserved
asthecapitaloftheRepublicandseatoftheNationalAssembly.Duetosoutherndomination
oftheRepublic,northerners,especiallythosewithtiestotheSNL,feltunfairlycheatedinthe
dispensationofnationalpowerbecause“[t]henorthscarifiedmorethanthesouth”forthe
sakeofunity.80Aswewillobserveshortly,thisalmostledtothedemiseofthenascentSomali
Republic.
AftervotingontheUnionAct,all123membersoftheunitedSomalinationalassembly
(90seatsforthesouthand33forthenorth)votedforAdenAbdillahOsmantobethe
transitionalpresidentofthenewRepublicuntilthe1961constitutionalreferendum.81TheSYL
leader,AbdirashidAliSharmarke,wastappedbySomalia’sPresidenttobecometheRepublic’s
primeminister.82Thetransitionalgovernmenthadaoneyearmandate,inwhichitstwomajor
79 Ibid.
80 Ibid. at 172
81 Lewis, I.M. The Politics of the 1969 Somali Coup. The Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. 10, pp. 392-93
82 Samatar, Ahmed I., Samatar, Ahmed I. (2002). Somalis As Africa’s First Democrats. Bildhaan, Vol. 2, pp. 32
24
goalswereintegratingthenorthernandsouthernhalvesofthecountryandhostinganational
referendumonitsprovisionalconstitution.83
Theconstitutionalreferendum,whichwasheldonJune20th,1961,wasconsidereda
testofconfidenceforthenewRepublicanditstransitionalleaders.84Inthenorth,theSNL
boycottedthereferendumandofthe100,000recordedvoteshalfvotedagainstit.85As
observed“themajoroppositionturnedouttobefromthecentralpartoftheNorthernregion
[Hargeisa-Berbera-Burcotriangle].”86Nonetheless,theconstitutiongarneredenoughnational
votesandthereferendumwasconsideredtobe“overwhelminglyfreeandfair.”87OnJuly6th,
1961,afterthreeballots,Somalia’snationalassemblyvotedforAdenAbdillahOsmanto
becomethecountry’spresident.Inreturn,PresidentOsmanreappointedSharmarketobethe
country’sprimeminister.88ThePrimeMinister’sgoverningcoalitioncontainedcabinet
membersfromtheSYL,SNL,andUSP89,butwithinmonths,thenewadministrationwouldface
anationalproblem.
Asaforementioned,northernSomaliswithtiestotheSNLwerenothappywiththe
politicalandeconomicdistributionofpowerinthenewSomaliRepublicandinDecember1961,
83 Ibid. at 33
84 Lewis, I.M. A Modern History of the Somali. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2002. Print. pp. 172
85 Ibid.
86 Samatar, Ahmed I., Samatar, Ahmed I. (2002). Somalis As Africa’s First Democrats. Bildhaan, Vol. 2, pp. 34
87 Ibid. at 35
88 Lewis, I.M. A Modern History of the Somali. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2002. Print. pp. 172-73
89 Lewis, I.M. The Politics of the 1969 Somali Coup. The Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. 10, pp. 393
25
rogueofficersfromthenorthtriedtostageacoup.90DuringtheProtectorateera,theSNL’s
originalpoliticalplatformwasforthenorthtobeitsownnation-stateundertheBritish
Commonwealth;itwouldlaterchangeitsplatformtoresembletheUSP’sandSYL’sunionist
stance.91ThegoalofthefailedcoupwastomakethenorthsecedefromSomaliaproper.I.M.
Lewisstatesthat“therealobjectoftherevolt,nodoubtstronglysympathizedwith,ifnot
directlyaidedandabetted,byelementswithintheSNL,wastobreakwiththesouthand
destroytheRepublic.”92Loyalsoldiersandpolicequicklyarrestedthering-leadersofthefailed
coup,quelledtheunrest,andayearlater,theSandhurst-trainedofficersweretriedinacourt
oflaw.93
ThenextfewyearsoftheRepublicwerefocusedonharmonizingthenorth-south
tensionofSomalia.TheSomaligovernmentunderstoodthatmoreattentionneededtobe
giventothenorthandtheAdministrationimplementednewdevelopmentandindustrial
projectsforit.94Inaddition,theAdministrationfocuseditsnationaleffortstowards
“reintegrationandreformofthecivilservice;findingamajorpowertotrainandarmtheSomali
military;anddevelopmentplanning.”95Itwasn’tuntiltheendof1963thatbothhalvesofthe
SomaliRepublicwouldbelegallyandadministrativelyintegrated.”96
90 Ibid.
91 Lewis, I.M. (1958). Modern Political Movements in Somaliland II. Africa: Journal of the International African
Institute, Vol. 28, No. 4 (Oct. 1958), pp. 347.
92 Lewis, I.M. A Modern History of the Somali. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2002. Print. pp. 174
93 Ibid.
94 Ibid. at 175
95 Samatar, Ahmed I., Samatar, Ahmed I. (2002). Somalis As Africa’s First Democrats. Bildhaan, Vol. 2, pp. 37
26
Thenextmajorgoalfortheadministrationwastohostthegeneralelectionsof1964,
buttheRepublicwouldfaceanationalcrisispriortoit.TensionsbetweenEthiopiaandSomalia
hadbeenbrewingsincepriortoindependencebecauseofaborderdispute,andinearly1964
all-outwareruptedbetweenthetwonationswhenEthiopiaunilaterallyattackedSomali
territory.97SomaliahelditsgeneralelectionsforitsnationalassemblyonMarch30th,1964.98
PrimeMinisterAbdirashidfamouslyaddressedthenationbystatingthat,“Wewillvotewith
onehandandfightwiththeother.”99ThefirstSomali-Ethiopianwarendedwithmediation
fromSudan.100
The1964electionswitnessedthedemiseoftheSNLandUSP,andtheentranceoftwo
newpoliticalalliances,theSomaliNationalCongress(SNC)andtheSomaliDemocraticUnion
(SDU).101Bynow,northerndisgruntlementhadbeenassuaged,andthesenewpolitical
alliances“signifiedthecollapseofthenorthern-southernregionalaxis,andindicatedthe
commoncommitmentofallthepoliticalleaderstotheRepublicasaunitarystate.”102TheSYL
triumphantlywonthatelectionbygainingsixty-nineofthe123seats,theSNCandSDUwould
garnertwenty-twoandfifteenseats,respectively,whiletheHDMSgarnerednineseats(the
96 Lewis, I.M. A Modern History of the Somali. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2002. Print. pp. 178
97 Ibid. 201
98 Ibid.
99 Samatar, Ahmed I., Samatar, Ahmed I. (2002). Somalis As Africa’s First Democrats. Bildhaan, Vol. 2, pp. 46
100 Ibid.
101 Lewis, I.M. The Politics of the 1969 Somali Coup. The Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. 10, pp. 394
102 Ibid. at 395
27
remainingeightseatswenttoothers).103Asnoted,“themannerinwhichtheelectionswere
conducted,andtheextenttowhichoppositionpartiesparticipatedinthem,reaffirmedthe
Republic’scontinuingcommitmenttotheprinciplesofparliamentarydemocracy.”104
PresidentOsmanwasreelectedandheappointedAbdirazakH.Husseinashisprime
minister.105PremierHusseinwasknownasareformistanda“politicianofconsiderable
personalcharismaandcourage.”106Hismainobjectiveswere“publicservicereform;
corruption;andpreparationforthenextpresidentialelection.”107Histenureaspremieris
knownforcurbingcorruption,whichhadbecomeamajorprobleminthenascentSomali
Republic.
OneelementofthePremier’sreformagendawastheestablishmentofthePublic
ServiceCommission,whichwas“giventhetaskofreviewingallpromotionsanddemotionsof
civilservants.”108Thiswouldeventuallyleadtothreeministersaswellasothercivilservants
beingdismissed;thereformagendatargetedthreetypesofemployees,“thecorrupt,the
incompetent,andindividualsengagedinleakingnationalsecurityinformation.”109Another
boldreformagendaofPremierHusseinwashavingallhiscabinetmembersdeclareandregister
103 Ibid.
104 Lewis, I.M. A Modern History of the Somali. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2002. Print. pp. 201
105 Samatar, Ahmed I., Samatar, Ahmed I. (2002). Somalis As Africa’s First Democrats. Bildhaan, Vol. 2, pp. 48
106 Lewis, I.M. A Modern History of the Somali. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2002. Print. pp. 202
107 Samatar, Ahmed I., Samatar, Ahmed I. (2002). Somalis As Africa’s First Democrats. Bildhaan, Vol. 2, pp. 48-49
108 Ibid. at 53
109 Ibid. at 52-54
28
theirassets.110Thesereformswouldlaterhaunt,both,thePresidentandhisPrimeMinister,
whenthe1967generalelectionscamearound.MembersofParliamentwerenotfondof
PremierHussein’snewstyleofgoodgovernance.111
EventhoughincumbentPresidentOsmanhadtheofficialendorsementofhisSYL
party112,formerPremierSharmarke,whoalsoamemberoftheSYL,wasabletomobilizethe
nationalassemblytovotehiminasthenewpresidentoftheSomaliRepublic.113Thepresident-
electwouldinturnnominateHajiIbrahimEgalashisprimeminister;thiswasthefirsttimein
theRepublic’shistorythatanorthernerwasgiventhepremiership.114
Somali-AmericanscholarsAhmedandAbdiSamatarhavestatedthattheOsman-
Husseingovernmentshouldbeheldinhighregard,intermsofgovernance,duetotheir
“combinedcontributionsasexemplaryofwhatcourageousandnoblespiritmean.Their
clairvoyancetodiscernwhatwasimperativeforadifferentandmoreenablingfuture,coupled
witharesolutebeliefinthenecessityofconstitutionalpracticetothemakingofamature
politicalcommunity,areinspiringforSomaliandAfricantime,desperateforboth.”115More
importantly,PresidentOsmanandPremierHussein’sacceptanceofdefeat,andhandingover
110 Ibid. at 53
111 Ibid. at 54-55
112 Ibid. at 56
113 Lewis, I.M. The Politics of the 1969 Somali Coup. The Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. 10, pp. 396
114 Ibid.
115 Samatar, Ahmed I., Samatar, Ahmed I. (2002). Somalis As Africa’s First Democrats. Bildhaan, Vol. 2, pp. 60
29
thekeysofthestatetotheirelectoralopponents,madethem“Africa’sfirstgenuinemodern
democrats....”116
The1967electionswouldserveasamajorturningpointfortheSomaliRepublic,andits
demisewouldsoonfollowaftertwoyears.WiththereformistsgoneandSharmarkeandEgal
backinpower,clantiesbecamemoreapparent.Theseproblemspeakedduringthe
subsequent1969elections,atotalof1002candidates,representingsixty-twopoliticalparties,
themajoritybeingclan-basedparties,contestedtheseelections.117Asusual,theSYLwonthe
overwhelmingmajorityoftheseats(seventy-three),andonceagainPresidentSharmarkeand
PremierEgalbecameheadofthestateandgovernment,respectively.TheSomalipopulace
believedthegovernmentriggedtheelectionsorthatmanyirregularitiestookplace.118As
observed,“officialcorruptionandnepotism[i.e.clannism]seemedtobeflourishingonascale
hithertounknownintheRepublic...TheNationalAssemblywasnolongerthesymboloffree
speechandfairplayforallcitizens.Onthecontrary,ithadbeenturnedintoasordidmarket-
placewheredeputiestradedtheirvotesforpersonalrewardswithscantregardfortheinterest
oftheirconstituents.”119BetweenJanuary1969andOctober1969,£500,000(758,000USD)
weregiventovariousmembersoftheNationalAssembly.120
116 Ibid. at 6-7
117 Lewis, I.M. The Politics of the 1969 Somali Coup. The Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. 10, pp. 397
118 Ibid. at 399
119 Ibid.
120 Payton, Gary. The Somali Coup of 1969: The Case for Soviet Complicity. The Journal of Modern African
Studies, Vol. 18, No. 3 (Sep., 1980), pp. 501
30
Underthesescathingconditions,anationaltragedytranspiredthatderailedSomalia’s
democraticexperiment.OnOctober15,1969,PresidentSharmarkewasassassinatedbyoneof
hisguards,andonthemorningofOctober21,theSomalimilitaryexecutedacoupd’état.121
“TheNationalAssemblywasclosed,politicalpartiesweredeclaredillegal,anditwas
announcedthatthestatewouldbegovernedbyaSupremeRevolutionaryCouncil.”122
SomaliDemocraticRepublic(1969-1991)
TheCommanderoftheArmy,GeneralMohamedSiadBare,becamethePresidentofthe
country,andfollowingcommunistlexicon,renamedittheSomaliDemocraticRepublic.123
ScientificSocialismbecamethenewideologyoftheSomalistate,andthroughitthevestigesof
clannismandcorruptionwere,purportedly,buried.124Likeothercommunistcountries,
PresidentBaredevelopedapervasivesecurityapparatusknownastheNationalSecurity
Service,anditsfunctionwastobethe“longandstrongarmofthestate,withunlimitedpower
tosearch,detain,andeventortureandkillsuspecteddissidents.”125
121 Lewis, I.M. The Politics of the 1969 Somali Coup. The Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. 10, pp. 400
122 Ibid. at 399
123 Ibid. at 401
124 Lewis, I.M. The Ogaden and the Fragility of Somali Segmentary Nationalism. African Affairs, Vol. 88 No. 353
(Oct. 1989), pp. 573
125 Samatar, Ahmed I. Underdevelopment in Somalia: Dictatorship without Hegemony. Africa Today, Vol. 32, No.
3 Somalia: Crises of State and Society (3rd Qtr., 1985), pp. 28
31
Somalisinitiallywelcomedthemilitarytakeoverofthestateduetothecorruptand
nepotisticnatureofitsdemocraticexperiment.“Intheviewofthemostdisillusionedcritics,
democracyhadlapsedintocommercializedanarchy,andstrongruleofanewtypewas
desperatelyneededifthestatewastoberescuedfromitspresentmorassofpoverty,
insecurity,andinefficiency,andsetontheroadtoprogress.”126
PresidentBarefocusedondevelopingSomalia’sinfrastructure,economy,anditshuman
capacity.HisgreatestfeatofdevelopingSomalia’shumancapacityisarguablydeveloping
orthographyfortheSomalilanguage;priorto1972,thelanguagewaspurelyoral.Hechosethe
RomanscriptfortheSomalilanguage,andwouldlaunch“intensivenation-wideurbanandrural
literacycampaignsin1973and1974.”127
Sincetwo-thirdsofSomalia’seconomywasbasedon“theruralsector(pastoral,
agriculture,andfisheries),”anotherdevelopmentobjectiveofhiswas“thecontrolofanimal
disease;theextensionofagriculturalcrashprograms;andanimprovementoffoodgrain
productionandmarketing....”128Hisdevelopmentoftheindustrialsub-sectorwassomewhat
fruitful,“publicestablishmentsgrewfromfourteenin1970toforty-sixin1974.”129
126 Lewis, I.M. The Politics of the 1969 Somali Coup. The Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. 10, pp. 400
127 Lewis, I.M. The Ogaden and the Fragility of Somali Segmentary Nationalism. African Affairs, Vol. 88 No. 353
(Oct. 1989), pp. 574
128 Samatar, Ahmed I. Underdevelopment in Somalia: Dictatorship without Hegemony. Africa Today, Vol. 32, No.
3 Somalia: Crises of State and Society (3rd Qtr., 1985), pp. 32.
129 Ibid. at 33.
32
EventhoughPresidentBareespousedtheideologyofsocialism,hestillreliedon
Somalia’straditionalsociopoliticalstructure,clanties,torule.Hisinnerpowercirclewas
dubbedthe“MODclique,”inwhichtheMrepresentedhisclan,theOrepresentedhismother’s
clan(i.e.hismaternalclanties),andtheDrepresentedtheclanofhisson-in-law,who
controlledsecurityaffairs.130UntilSomalia’sdefeatinthe1978OgadenWar,PresidentBare
wasabletogovernandruleSomaliathroughthedelicatebalanceofa“two-dimensional
politicalstructure,withclandestineclanpoliticsatthecoreandsurfacesocialistnationalismfor
everyoneelse....”131
SomaliaandEthiopiafoughtanintensivewarfrom1977-78overtheSomaliinhabited
regionineasternEthiopia:TheOgaden(alsoreferredtoasWesternSomalia).Ethiopiahad
gainedpossessionofthisSomaliterritoryviaatreatywithBritainin1954.132Overtime,a
SomaliliberationmovementwithintentionsoffreeingitsterritoryfromEthiopianrule
emerged,theWesternSomaliLiberationFront(WSLF).“Followingsuccessfulrisingsagainst
EthiopianruleinneighbouringprovincesbyalliesoftheSomalis,theforcesoftheWestern
SomaliLiberationFront(WSLF),aidedbytroopsfromSomalia,beganinthesummerof1977to
pushtheEthiopiansoutoftheOgaden.TheSomalivictorywas,however,short-lived.The
conflicttriggeredaseismicshiftinsuperpoweralignmentsintheHornofAfricawiththe
130 Lewis, I.M. Visible and Invisible Differences: The Somali Paradox. Africa (Edinburgh University Press). 2004,
Vol. 74 Issue 4, pp.501
131 Ibid. at 502
132 Brown, Latham D.J. The Ethiopia-Somaliland Frontier Dispute. The International and Comparative Law
Quarterly, Vol. 5, No. 2 (Apr., 1956), pp. 259
33
RussiansturningtosupporttheEthiopiansandenablingthemtoregaincontrolofthe
Ogaden.”133
Bare’smilitaryjuntasufferedmajorlossesafterthiswarwhichresultedin“widespread
publicdemoralizationandtoanupsurgeof‘tribalism,’”andleadtodisgruntledmilitaryofficers
attemptingafailedcoupinApril1978.134Thosewhowereabletoescapewouldlaterformthe
SomaliSalvationDemocraticFront(SSDF),Somalia’sfirstarmed-oppositiongroupwith
intentionsofoverthrowingPresidentBare.135Yearslater,additionalarmed-oppositiongroups
wouldbeformedtohelpoustPresidentBare,mostnotablytheSomaliNationalMovement
(SNM)andUnitedSomaliCongress(USC).136Thesefactionsdidnotdifferinpoliticsperse,but
werejustarmedguerillarebelsoftheirrespectiveclans.
Thesearmedfactions,amongstothers,justifiedtheirrebellionagainstBare’sregime
duetohis“mismanagingtheOgadenwar;sendingmembersoftribesotherthanhisowntodie
intheOgadenwar;nepotism;tribalism;‘fascistrule’;running‘anabsoluteanddespotic
dictatorship’;[and]the‘underminingofthefaithandIslamicwayoflifeoftheSomalipeople..
133 Lewis, I.M. The Ogaden and the Fragility of Somali Segmentary Nationalism. African Affairs, Vol. 88 No. 353
(Oct. 1989), pp. 574-75.
134 Lewis, I.M. The Ogaden and the Fragility of Somali Segmentary Nationalism. African Affairs, Vol. 88 No. 353
(Oct. 1989), pp. 575
135 Lewis, I.M. Visible and Invisible Differences: The Somali Paradox. Africa (Edinburgh University Press). 2004,
Vol. 74 Issue 4, pp.503
136 Ibid.
34
..”137Thesearmedfactionswouldeventuallysucceed,andPresidentBarevacatedVilla
Somalia(thePresidentialPalace)inJanuary1991.Hisfinaloverthrow“wasachievedthrough
theclan-basedmilitiasandguerillaorganizations.”138Subsequently,theSomalistatecollapsed
anditsfailedstatestatuswouldremainintakeforthenexttwodecades.
SiadBare’sdictatorshipwasseenbymanyinSomaliaastreatingtheDaroodclanas
first-classcitizens,whiletreatingtherestassecond.Thishelpedsowtheseedof
discontentmentamongstSomalis.“Theonlysubstantialdifference,now,wasthatthevolatile
relationsbetweentheseclanunitsacrossthewholecountryhadbeenraisedtoafeverpitchby
theexperienceofDarod(particularlyMarehan)hegemonyandoppression,andthebitter
fightingwhich,withmodernweapons,wroughtdeathanddestructiononanunprecedented
scale.”139
SomaliaasaFailedState
AfterthefalloftheSomaliDemocraticRepublicin1991,theSomalistatebrokedown
intoatriadicstructure(seemap140).TheSNMtookcontrolofnorthernSomalia,theSSDFtook
137 Ododa, Harry. Somalia’s Domestic Politics and Foreign Relations since the Ogaden War of 1977-78. Middle
Eastern Studies, Vol. 21. No. 3 (Jul.,1985), 295
138 Lewis, I.M. Visible and Invisible Differences: The Somali Paradox. Africa (Edinburgh University Press). 2004,
Vol. 74 Issue 4, pp.504
139 Ibid.
140 The Economist.
35
controlofeasternSomalia,andtheUSCtookcontrolofsouthcentralSomalia.141TheSNM
unilaterallydeclaredindependencefromSomaliainMay181991,claimingjurisdictionofthe
formerBritishSomalilandProtectorate.142TheSNMnamedtheirsecessionistentitythe
RepublicofSomaliland,butitisunrecognizedbytheworldcommunity.143TheSSDFpursueda
pathofautonomy,callingtheirterritoryPuntlandonMay51998,andsayingitdesires“tobe
thecornerstoneofafuturefederalSomalia.”144SouthcentralSomalia,andmostimportantly
Mogadishu,becameaviolentandlawlessareaduetowarlordism.145Mogadishu,onceknown
asthe“PearloftheIndianOcean,”duringthe1990sbecamea“chaoticgraveyard.”146
Somaliland
NorthernSomaliaiscurrentlyadministeredbyanarmed
secessionistmovement,“Somaliland”,wantingtosecedefrom
Somalia,butitshouldbehighlightedthatsizablepopulationsinthe
northadheretothebeliefinaunitedSomalia.Itisnotfarfetched
tosaythatSomaliland,anditssecessionistideology,isanexistential
141 Duffiled, Andrew Scott. When Do Rebels Become State-Builders?: A Comparative Case Study of Somaliland,
Puntland, and South-Central Somalia. Bildhaan, Vol. 13, pp. 1
142 Ibid. at 6.
143 Ibid. at 4.
144 Ibid. at 9.
145 Ibid. at 15
146 Ibid. at 16
36
threattoSomalia.WhattheRepublicofBiafrawastoNigeriaiswhattheRepublicof
SomalilandistoSomalia.
ThesecessionistRepublicofSomalilandisthebrainchildoftherebelgroupSomali
NationalMovement(SNM),whichpoliticallyrepresentedtheIsaaqclan.147AfterSiadBare’sfall
inJanuary1991,theSNM’sfirstprovocativemovewastoattackanddisarmtheGadabuursi
clanthatresideintheAwdalprovince.TheSNMconducteda“full-scaleassaultonBorama
[largestcityinAwdal]onFebruary5,andarmedoperationsinZeila[coastalcityinAwdal]later
inthemonth.”148ThepeopleofAwdalhavebeenundersecessionistoccupationsincethat
attackin1991.Laterin2007,Somaliland’smilitaryattackedtheeasternterritories
incorporatingLasAnodintoitssecessionistentity.
ManyexpertsviewSomalilandthroughanarrowlens,oftencitingthatitisdemocratic,
“TheRepublicofSomaliland,thesecessionistnorthwesternsliceofSomaliathatdeclared
independencein1991,hasafarbetterdemocratictrackrecordthananyofitsneighbors..
..”149ThoughSomaliland’sprogressiscommendable,itspoliticalmotivesaremoresinister.
Historically,theIsaaqhaveasociopoliticalideologyofclansupremacy.Though
belongingtotheSomaliclanconfederationofDir,theIsaaqhavedismissedthis.“TheIshaaq
[Isaaq]areclassifiedbyotherSomaliasDir,butthemselvesdenythisgrouping,claimingthat
theyareaclan-familyofArabiandescentintheirownrightandwithouttheintermediacyof
147 Lewis, I.M. A Modern History of the Somali. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2002. Print. pp. 266.
148 Lidwien Kapteljns. Clan Cleansing in Somalia: The Reinous Legacy of 1991. pp.158.
149 Kaplan, Seth (2008). The Remarkable Story of Somaliland. Journal of Democracy, Volume 19, Number 3, pp.
143.
37
otherSomaliancestors.”150DuringBritishcolonialism,“theIsaq[Isaaq]refusedtobecalled
Africans,orevenSomali...,”151andwhenBritishauthoritiestriedtoadministerapoll-taxon
themasSomalis“theIsaq[Isaaq]rejectedtheirpassesbecausetheyweredescribedasSomalis,
whereastheynowcalledthemselvesSharifIsaqArabs.”152WhentheSomalilandNational
League(SNL)wasfirstcreated,itspoliticalplatformdidnotinitiallyadvocateforunitywith
otherSomalis,butratherfortheProtectoratetobeitsownnation.153WhentheSomali
Republichelditsconstitutionalreferendumin1961,itwastheSNLthatboycottedit,anditwas
theirrespectivecities(Hargeisa,Berbera,andBurco)thatvotedagainstit.154Toaddinsultto
injury,itwasSNLsupporterswhoplannedthefailedcoupof1961.Again,“therealobjectof
therevolt,nodoubtstronglysympathizedwith,ifnotdirectlyaidedandabetted,byelements
withintheSNL,wastobreakwiththesouthanddestroytheRepublic.”Lastly,inMay1991,the
SomaliNationalMovementunilaterallydeclaredsecessionfromSomalia,completingthetask
theirSNLforefatherscouldnotin1961.Theirhistoricaloverlyingsociopoliticalthemecannot
bedenied,Somaliland’sraisond’etreforsecessionisbasedonclansupremacy.
150 Lewis, I.M. (1958). Modern Political Movements in Somaliland I. Africa: Journal of the International African
Institute, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 245. 151 Turton, E.R. (1974). The Isaq Somali Diaspora and Poll-Tax Agitation in Kenya, 1936-41. African Affairs, Vol.
73, No. 292, pp. 327.
152 Ibid. at 340
153 Lewis, I.M. (1958). Modern Political Movements in Somaliland II. Africa: Journal of the International African
Institute, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 347.
154 Samatar, Ahmed I., Samatar, Ahmed I. (2002). Somalis As Africa’s First Democrats. Bildhaan, Vol. 2, pp. 34
38
NoteveryoneinnorthernSomalia
sharesthisview,however.Theclansthatwere
representedbythecolonialeraUnitedSomali
Party(USP)stilldesiretobepartofSomalia
proper,andhavestartedminorrebellionsinthe
north(seemap:lighterarearepresents
unionists).155
PuntlandStateofSomalia
ThePuntlandStateofSomalia,locatedinthenorth-easternpartofformerSomalia
Italiana,isthebrainchildoftheSomaliSalvationDemocraticFront(SSDF).156Puntlandisa
unionofclansundertheDarood,157mostnotablytheMajeerteensub-clan.158TheSSDFwere
Somaliunionistsand“therewasneverapparentlyanysuggestionofdecisivelybreakingfrom
Somalia,asSomalilandhaddone.”159
TheSSDFencounteredsomehurdlesbetween1991-98beforeofficiallycreating
Puntland.Bare’sfallresultedinapoliticalvacuumandgavewaytonumeroussecurity
155 United Nations Monitoring Group on Somalia and Eritrea, Report on Somalia, S/2014/726 (13 October 2014),
available from http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/2014/726
156 Ibid. at 10.
157 Ibid.
158 Lewis, I.M. A Modern History of the Somali. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2002. Print. pp. 286-87.
159 Ibid. at 287.
39
threats.160ThemostnotablethreatcamefromtheUnitedSomaliCongress(USC)basedin
southcentralSomalia,“theS.S.D.F.founditselfdefendingitstraditionalgrazingrightsinMudug
regionagainstthedeterminedeffortsof‘Aideed’sHabarGidirSa’admilitia,whowerebidding
fairtobecomeageneralscourgeofthewholecountry.”161Thisparticularconflictendedin
1993whenColonelAbdulahiYusuf,commanderoftheSSDF,andGeneralAideedoftheUSC,
signedtheMudugPeaceAgreement.162
By1998,theSSDF,alongwiththeirrespectiveclanelders,“establishedthenew
‘PuntlandstateofSomalia’asanautonomouslocalentity,with[AbdulahiYusuf]asitsfirst
electedPresident....”163Since1998,Puntlandhassuccessfullyconductedfivepresidential
elections,inwhichtheirparliamentariansareelectedviaaclanformulasimilartohow
Somalia’sHouseofthePeoplewaselectedin2012and2016.Puntland’sparliamentarianselect
theirpresident.
SouthcentralSomalia
SouthcentralSomalia’sclanmakeupishighlydiversesoithadmorerebelgroupsthan
SomalilandandPuntland,“[a]sopposedtoSomalilandandPuntland,whereviolencewas
160 Duffiled, Andrew Scott. When Do Rebels Become State-Builders?: A Comparative Case Study of Somaliland,
Puntland, and South-Central Somalia. Bildhaan, Vol. 13, pp. 11.
161 Lewis, I.M. A Modern History of the Somali. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2002. Print. pp. 287.
162 Duffiled, Andrew Scott. When Do Rebels Become State-Builders?: A Comparative Case Study of Somaliland,
Puntland, and South-Central Somalia. Bildhaan, Vol. 13, pp. 12.
163 Lewis, I.M. A Modern History of the Somali. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2002. Print. pp. 288-89.
40
concentratedmoreorlessintheSNMandSSDFrespectively,in[southcentral]Somaliaitwas
diffuse.Ineffect,themarket-placeforviolencewasmuchmorecompetitive,withnogroup
achievinganythingclosetoamonopolyposition.”164
Thoughnogroupachievedamonopolyposition,theUnitedSomaliCongress(USC)was
themostdominantplayer;theUSC“concentratedonprovidingsecurityandpursuingthe
interestsoftheHawiyekingroup.”165TheUnitedSomaliCongress(USC)didnotfocuson
buildingaregionaladministrationliketheSNMandSSDFdid,butrather,unsuccessfully,sought
tobetheSomalinationalgovernment,“theUSCfailedtoproduceablueprintforhowSomalia
wouldbegoverned...Thelackofpoliticalprogramforthesharingofpowerbetweengroups
producedanevengreatersecuritychallengethanBarre’stotalitariangovernmentbypavingthe
wayforwarlordism.”166
Conflictwasfurtherexacerbatedwhenahigh-rankingmemberoftheUSC,businessman
AliMahdi,declaredhimselfthePresidentofSomaliapriortoGeneralAideed’sarrivalto
Mogadishu.167Aideeddidnotacceptthisandwarbrokeoutbetweentheirtwofactions.168
TheUSC’slackofvisionarypoliticalleadershipforanationalgovernment,combined
withitsinternalfactionalwar,resultedinsouthcentralSomalia’scompletedisintegration.169In
164 Ibid.
165 Ibid.
166 Duffiled, Andrew Scott. When Do Rebels Become State-Builders?: A Comparative Case Study of Somaliland,
Puntland, and South-Central Somalia. Bildhaan, Vol. 13, pp. 15.
167 Ibid. at 16.
168 Ibid.
169 Ibid. at 17.
41
the1990s,warlordismterrorizedtheinhabitantsofsouthcentralSomalia,‘Mogadishuwasthus
thecentreofwavesofdestructionandterrorwhichradiatedoutsidethecityunpredictably.”170
ReestablishingtheSomaliState(1991-2012)
Sinceitsfallin1991,therehasbeen“fifteenattempt[s]bytheinternationalcommunity
atre-establishingtheSomalistate.”171Ofthesefifteenattempts,twostandout:(1)TheArta
peaceprocessand(2)theNairobipeaceprocess.172TheArtapeaceprocess,knownasthe
SomaliNationalPeaceConference,concludedinAugust2000withtheestablishmentofa
TransitionalNationalGovernment(TNG);bothSomalilandandPuntlandboycottedthe
process.173Throughoutitsexistence,theTNGwasunabletogaincontroloverSomalia,itdid
notevencontrolMogadishu.TheTNGeventuallyfailed,andinitsplaceemergedaTransitional
FederalGovernment(TFG).
170 Lewis, I.M. A Modern History of the Somali. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2002. Print. pp. 264.
171 Kasaija, Appuli Phillip (2010). The UN-led Djibouti peace process for Somalia 2008-2009: Results and
problems. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 28:3, pp. 262
172 Ibid. at 266-69
173 Le Sage, Andre. Sovereign Disguise for a Mogadishu Mafia. Review of African Political Economy, Vol. 29, No.
91, Sovereignty, Democracy & Zimbabwe’s Tragedy (Mar., 2002), pp. 132
42
TheTFGwasestablishedinAugust/October2004aftertheoutcomeoftheNairobi
peaceprocess.174Thetwomostsignificantpoliticaloutcomesofthisconferencewerethe
acknowledgmentthatSomaliawouldbeafederalstate,andtheestablishmentofthe‘4.5
formula,’inwhich“powerwastobesharedbetweenthefourmainclan-familiesofSomalia...
togetherwiththeminorityclan-families,whichconstitutethe0.5.”175Puntlandparticipatedin
thisconference,butSomalilanddidnot.
TheSomalistateexperiencedtwelveyearsofvarioustransitionalgovernments,2000-
2012;thetransitionalphaseended“withtheannouncementofapost-transitionalfederal
governmentin2012[FederalGovernmentofSomalia]....”176
InAugust2012,basedonthe4.5formula,claneldersappointedmembersforSomalia’s
post-transitionalparliament,andsubsequentlythatparliamentelectedHassanSheikh
MohamedasSomalia’sfirstpost-transitionalpresident.177PresidentMohamed’svictorywas
widelyacceptedbySomalisduetothefactthathewas“viewedaspartofa‘constructiveelite’
thathadstayedinMogadishuthroughoutthe20-yearcrisisandbuiltschools,universities,
hospitals,andbusiness.”178TheFederalGovernmentofSomalia(FGS)isthefirstgovernment
togainofficialdiplomaticrecognitionfromthecommunityofnationssincethefallofthe
174 Kasaija, Appuli Phillip (2010). The UN-led Djibouti peace process for Somalia 2008-2009: Results and
problems. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 28:3, pp. 265
175 Ibid.
176 Menkhaus, Ken. State Failure, State-Building, and Prospects for a “Functional Failed State” in Somalia. Annals
of the American Academy of Political & Social Science. Nov. 2014, Vol. 656 Issue 1, pp. 154
177 Ibid. at 168
178 Ibid.
43
Somalistatein1991.Currently,theFGS’s“capacityisweak,budgetsmodest,corruptionhigh,
andinstitutionalizationlow.”179
Asofthewritingofthispaper,themandatefortheFGS’sfirstadministrationisover;
SomaliasuccessfullyelectednewmembersofparliamentinDecember2016.Theseelections
differedslightlyfromthe2012elections.In2012,135claneldersselectedallmembersof
parliament(HouseofthePeople);in2016,thesame135claneldersselectedanapproximate
14,000electoralcollegemembers,whointurnelectedSomalia’snewmembersofparliament
(HouseofthePeople).Somalia’sparliamentarianselectedthenewPresidentofSomaliaon
February8,2017.TheFederalGovernmentofSomalia’ssecondadministrationhasafour-year
mandateendingin2021.
InsightsandLessons
IhavespentagoodportionofmyanalysisofSomalia’ssociopoliticalhistoryontwo
eras:theUNTrusteeship,1950-60,andtheSomaliRepublic,1960-69.Ifindthatthesetwoeras
arethemostanalogoustoSomalia’scurrentpoliticalsituation,andthereforeofferusthebest
insightsandlessons.Today,Somaliafindsitselftryingtoregainstatehoodwithinternational
guidancefromtheUnitedNationsAssistanceMissiontoSomalia(UNSOM).Thisresemblesthe
1950-60era,whenSomaliawaspreparingherselftogainstatehoodforthefirsttimewith
internationalguidanceviatheUnitedNationsTrusteeship.ThepoliticalplatformforSomalia’s
179 Ibid. at 164
44
thirdrepublicisamultipartyparliamentarydemocracy,justasitwasduringtheSomaliRepublic
era,1960-69,albeititwillbeafederalstateandnotaunitarystate.
TheTrusteeshiperagivesusinvaluableguidanceonhowtheinternationalcommunity
preparedSomalisforstatehood.WelearnthatthemajorfocalpointforpreparingSomalisfor
self-governancewasplacedoneducation.Institutionsofhigherlearningwereestablished,and
enrollmentsofprimaryandsecondaryeducationwereexpanded.180TheUnitedNations
enhancedSomalia’seducationalsystemtodevelopitshumancapacityforgoodgovernance.
Today,Somalia’seducationalsystemisinshamblesduetotwo-decadesplusofcivilstrife,and
Somalia’syouthhavesufferedthemost.TheUnitedNationsDevelopmentProgramme
estimatesthatseventypercentofSomalia’spopulationisundertheageofthirty,whichmeans
theoverwhelmingmajorityofSomalia’spopulationsufferedfromthelackoftraditional
educationsystems.181Strangely,theFGSandUNSOMsoughttointroducenationwideelections
bytheendof2016withoutproperlypreparingtheSomalipopulaceviaaneducationalsystem.
Thelessonhereisthatmuchemphasisshouldbeplacedonestablishinganeducationalsystem
whichpromotesprimaryandsecondaryschoolsacrossSomalia,withspecialemphasisonadult-
basedschoolingforthosewhocameofageduringthestatelessera.
AnothervaluablelessonfromtheTrusteeshiperaisthegradualdemocratizationof
Somalia.TheTrusteeshipintroduceddemocracytoSomaliainmoderation,withmunicipal
180 Tripodi, P. (1999). Back to the Horn: Italian Administration and Somalia’s Troubled Independence. The
International Journal of African Historical Studies, Vol. 32, No. 2/3, pp. 360.
181 Somalia Human Development Report 2012: Empowering youth for peace and development. United Nations
Development Programme. 28 Sep 2012.
45
electionstakingplacetwoyearspriortonationalelections.TheFGSandUNSOMplannedto
haveanationalelectionbytheendof2016,yetnoFederalMemberState(orInterim
Administration)haseverhadone-personone-voteelectionswithintheirrespectiveterritories.
Thewiserapproachwouldbetohaveone-personone-voteregionalelectionsinallthe
respectiveFederalMemberStatesfirsttograduallyestablishdemocracyinSomaliapriorto
havinganationalelection.
WelearnedduringtheSomaliRepublic’serathattransposinganItalian-statemodel
ignorestheuniquenatureofSomalia’straditionalsociopoliticalfoundation,theclanstructure.
ToborrowfromtheChinese,whatisneededinSomaliais“democracywithSomali
characteristics.”Washington,D.C.’sdemocracyandLondon’sdemocracydifferincomposition,
yetbothareauthenticallydemocratic.ThereforeitisonlynaturalthatMogadishu’sdemocracy
willdifferaswell.Somaliscannolongerignoretheclanstructureintheirpoliticalcalculus,
somethingtheyacknowledgedintheNairobipeaceprocess.Whatisnowneededisthe
permanentinstitutionalizationoftheclanstructureinthenationalpoliticalfabricofthenew
Somalia.IfSomaliaistofullyregainstatehood,hermoderndemocraticfoundationmust
complementhertraditionalclanstructure.
AnadditionallessonwelearnedfromtheeraoftheSomaliRepublicisthatthelackof
goodgovernancehampersthepoliticaldevelopmentoftheSomalistate,andeventuallyleads
tounwantedoutcomes.CorruptionandnepotismweakenedthefabricoftheSomaliRepublic,
andifnotchecked,willalsoweakenthenewemergingSomalistate.Somalia’sformer
president,HassanSheikhMohamud,acknowledgedtheneedforgoodgovernanceinhis
forewordinForeignPolicyofSomalia.Hestates:“Itisnowacceptedthatpoorgovernancehas
46
beenoneofthemajorcausesofthecollapseofSomalia’ssocioeconomicdevelopment.”182
Whatisneededisatechnocraticcivilserviceandnational/regionaladministrationsfreeof
corruptvices.EnhancingSomalia’seducationalsystemwillhelpinthisendeavor.
WhenoneproperlyanalyzesSomalia’smodernsociopoliticalhistoryandthegoals
enshrinedinVision2016,onereachesapracticalconclusionthatthethreemajorgoals
(federationofSomalia,constitutionalrevisionandnationalreferendum,andone-personone-
votenationalelection)werenotgenuinelyattainableinsuchashorttime.TheSomalistate
collapsedin1991,becomingtheworld’squintessentialfailedstate,andhassufferedfromover
twodecadesofcivilstrife,whichincludecivilwar,warlordism/lawlessness,piracy,andviolent
extremism.Thoughnoble,thetimetableofVision2016wasnotfairtotheSomalinationand
people.Underthetheme“TransitioningTowardsDemocracy,”Vision2016wasformulatedin
MogadishuinSeptember2013withtheendorsementoftheUnitedNations.183Inretrospect,
wecanadmitthatitwasnaïvetobelievethattherecoveringSomalistatewascapableof
completingthosegoalsinthreeyears.Whatisnowneededisareassessmentofhowto
completethethreemajorgoalsoutlinedinVision2016bytheyear2021.
182 “FOREIGN POLICY OF SOMALIA.” http://www.mfa.gov.so/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Somali-Federal-
Policy.pdf
183 “VISION 2016: TRANSITIONING TOWARDS DEMOCRACY.”
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&ved=0CC8QFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2
Fwww.villasomalia.gov.so%2Fwp-
content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F12%2FVision_2016_report_FINAL_DRAFT.pdf&ei=qnlKVZf2K8jisAXz04CID
A&usg=AFQjCNFN4XTHacKA6iRPCPN_G8Up6Vui8Q&bvm=bv.92291466,d.b2w
47
TheFederalGovernmentofSomaliaandtheinternationalcommunityneedtorethink
theSomalistate,ormoreprecisely,rethinkhowSomaliawillachievefullstatehood.Inthe
sectionbelow,Iprovidetimetablestoachievethethreemajorgoalsandprovidepolicy
solutionsonhowtoreachthemby2021.Specifically,Iamadvocatingforamoredetailed
approachtoachievingthethreeoutlinedgoalsbyprovidingadifferentformula,abottom-up
approach.Thismoredetailedversion,Vision2021,laysoutmorerealisticandlogical
parametersforSomaliatore-attainstatehood.
RethinkingtheSomaliState:Vision2021
Inordertoachievethegoalsofconstitutionalrevision,followedbyanational
referendum,andone-personone-votenationalelections,Somalia’sfederalizationprocessmust
firstbecompletelyfinalizedandinstitutionalized.ThefullfederalizationofSomalia’sregions
hasnotauthenticallytranspiredyet,andofficialdemarcationofSomalia’sregionalstateshas
notbeencompleted.
Thesouth,whatusetobeSomaliaItaliana,isinthe
finalprocessonfederalizingintosixpotentialstates(see
map184).Somalia’sProvisionalConstitutionstipulatesthat
“Basedonavoluntarydecision,twoormoreregionsmay
184 “SOMALIA’S FEDERAL FUTURE: LAYERED AGENDAS, RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES”
https://www.chathamhouse.org/publication/somalias-federal-future-layered-agendas-risks-and-
opportunities#sthash.UKnpfEhx.dpuf
48
mergetoformaFederalMemberState.”185TheregionsarebasedontheSomaliDemocratic
Republic’sprovincialadministrativeboundariesatitsfallin1991.Therewere/areeighteen
regionsinSomaliaproper,withfiveprovincessituatedinthenorthandthirteeninthesouth.
Asoftoday,PuntlandStateistheonlyofficialFederalMemberState,buttheFGSand
UNSOMhavehelpedcreatefourInterimAdministrationsthatwillpresumablybecomeofficial
FederalMemberStates.Thesefourare:InterimJubalandAdministration(JubalandState),
InterimSouthwestAdministration(SouthwestState),InterimGalmudugAdministration
(GalmudugState),InterimHirshabelleAdministration(HirshabelleState).Thelastremaining
region/provinceinthesouthisBanaadir.WhatshallhappentoBanaadirisstillupintheair.
JubalandandSouthweststatesencompassthreeregions,andHirshabelleState
encompassestwo.SomeareproposingthatBanaadirbecomeaFederalMemberState,which
runscountertothe“tworegionsormore”requirementstipulatedintheProvisional
Constitution.ItshouldbenotedthatMogadishuis,literally,theonlycityintheBanaadir
region.Puntlandencompassestwowholeregions,andspecificdistrictsofthreeotherregions.
GalmudugState,intheory,isanamalgamationoftworegions,GalguduudandMudug,
butPuntlandclaimsjurisdictionovernorthernMudugprovince,specificallyitsdistrictsof
Galdogob,Galkayo,andJariban(see:ConstitutionoftheRegionalPuntlandStateofSomalia,
Article6.Section1.).ThisleavestheremainingtwodistrictsofMudugprovince,Harardhere
andHobyo,withinthejurisdictionalconfinesofMudugState.Therefore,GalmudugStatewill
notbeanamalgamationoftwoprovinces,butratheroneandone-halfofaprovince,whichalso
185 Provisional Fed. Const. June 12, 2012, art. 49, §6 (Som.).
49
runscountertothe“tworegionsormore”requirementstipulatedintheProvisional
Constitution.Inaddition,PuntlandclaimsjurisdictionovercertaindistrictsofeasternSooland
Sanaagregions,whicharealsoclaimedbySomaliland.
Sotherearethreemajorobstaclesconfrontingtheterritorialaspectsofthe
federalizationprocessofsouthernSomalia.Theseare:(1)Puntland’sandGalmudug’s
overlappingclaimtoMudugprovince,(2)Puntland’sandSomaliland’soverlappingclaimtoSool
andSanaag,and(3)BanaadirandGalmudugStates’disqualificationtobeFederalMember
StatesundertheConstitution,sincetheyonlyencompassoneregion,andoneandone-half
regions,respectively.TheFGSandUNSOMmustquicklysolvethesethreeobstacles.
Inordertocompletethefederalizationprocessthe“BoundariesandFederal
Commission”shouldbefullyinstitutionalizedimmediately,asstipulatedinchapter10ofthe
ProvisionalConstitution.Itcurrentlyexists,butisnottrulyfunctional,butoncethoroughly
establishedcanbethevenuefordisputeresolutionforFederalMemberStates’(FMS)to
resolvethevariousterritorialconflicts.Also,amendingtheProvisionalConstitution’scriteriaof
“twoormoreregions”asarequirementtobeaFMSto“oneormoreregions”willameliorate
thecurrentdilemmafacingtheemergingstateofGalmudug,andpotentiallyBanaadir.
Eventhoughitisevidentthatone-personone-votenationalelectionwasnotattainable
in2016,electoraldemocracyshouldstillbereintroducedtoSomaliainthenexttwoyears.
Insteadoffocusingonfirsthavinganationalelection,theFGSandUNSOMshouldwork
towardshavingaone-personone-voteregionalelectioninPuntlandState;thiselectionshould
happenassoonaspossible.PuntlandStateisthefirstofficialFederalMemberState(FMS)of
thenewSomalia,thereforehavingasuccessfulone-personone-voteelectionforitsregional
50
governmentwouldsignaltotheotherregionalstatesthatelectoraldemocracyisattainable.
ThiswouldmakePuntlandStatethefirstFMStohaveone-personone-voteelection,andwould
beasymbolicvictoryfordemocracy’sreintroductiontoSomalia.Thereisnobetterplaceto
reintroduceitthanPuntland.
OneofFGS’smajorgoalswasreachedbyDecember2016,i.e.,fullyinstitutionalizing
Somalia’sparliamentbyhavinganupperhouse.Somalia’sparliamentissupposedtobe
bicameral,butduring2012-16functionedasaunicameralparliament(theHouseofthePeople
onlyexisted).LikeAmerica’sSenate,Somalia’sUpperHouse,“HouseoftheFederation,"is
designedtobethechamberwhereFederalMemberStatesaregivenequalnumberofseats
regardlessofpopulationandterritorialsize.
Iwouldrecommendentirelyscrappingtheideaofa“HouseoftheFederation.”We
haveobservedthatignoringSomalia’straditionalsociopoliticalstructure,whilestrictly
importingwesternmodels,doesnotservetheSomalistateadequately.Whatisneededisfor
Somalia’sUpperHousetobethechamberwereclanrepresentativesareinstitutionalized(i.e.
“HouseofChiefs”).Thesame135clanchiefswhoappointedmemberstoSomalia’s
parliamentarianHouseofthePeoplein2012,andappointedthe14,000electoralcollegefor
the2016election,shouldserveinofficialcapacityinthe“HouseofChiefs.”TheHouseofChiefs
shouldhavetheresponsibilitiesofstabilizingclandisputes,normalizingclanrelations,and
reservingtraditions.
TheobservationsofI.M.Lewisshedsfurtherlight:“iffurtherprogressistobeachieved
instate-formation,Somalipoliticianswillsurelyhavetocomeoutof‘denial’andstartseriously
exploringhowclanandlineagetiescanbeutilizedpositively...HerealessEurocentricandless
51
evolutionaryviewoflineageinstitutionsbyWesterncommentators,socialscientists,and
bureaucratsmighthelptocreateamoreproductiveenvironmentforrethinkingclanship(i.e.
agnation)positively.”186Hefurtherstatesthat“[i]fthecontinuingforceofclanshiphadbeen
franklyrecognizedandacknowledgedandmeanssoughttoaccommodateitpolitically,rather
thanpretendingitdidnotexist,thingsmighthaveturnedoutdifferentlyforSomalia.”187Ifa
fullyfunctioningandviableSomalistateistopermanentlyreemerge,itisimperativetotake
Somalia’straditionalclanstructureintoaccount.TheHouseofChiefswillpurposefullyserve
thisendeavor.
Finally,Somaliamustchangeits4.5clanformulasinceitisnotbasedonascientific
censusbutratherclandiscrimination.FourclansaregivenequalrepresentationintheHouse
ofthePeople,sixty-oneseatseach,whileaconglomerationof“minorityclans”aregivenhalf
representation,thirty-oneseats.188Iwouldadvocatefora5.0formulatogivethe“minority
clans”equalseatsintheHouseofthePeoplebecausethe4.5formulaispolitically
discriminatory.
Onceapost-2016FederalGovernmentofSomaliaisinplace,itshouldfocuson
accomplishingthegoalssetoutinVision2021.Tocompletethesegoalsnecessarystepsmust
beinitiallytaken.
186 Lewis, I.M. Visible and Invisible Differences: The Somali Paradox. Africa (Edinburgh University Press). 2004,
Vol. 74 Issue 4, pp.508-09. (emphasis added)
187 Ibid. at 506
188 Hanson, Stephanie, and Kaplan, Eben. Somalia's Transitional Government. Foreign Affairs.
http://www.cfr.org/somalia/somalias-transitional-government/p12475
52
TheFGS’snewadministration,inaccordancewiththevariousFMS,mustprepareall
FMSforregionalone-personone-voteelectionsby2019.FMSwillhavetheirregionalelections
atdifferenttimes,butmustallbeaccomplishedbythesecondquarterof2019.Thiswillallow
forelectoraldemocracytobegraduallyreintroducedtotheentireSomalinationviaabottom-
upapproach.Itwillalsoputinplacethenecessarymechanisms(census,voterregister,polling
stations,etc.)foraneventualconstitutionalreferendumandnationalone-personone-vote
election.Itshouldbenotedthatthesenecessarymechanismsarecurrentlynon-existent
throughoutSomalia,afurtherindicationoftheunrealistictimetableimposedbytheoriginal
Vision2016.
OnceallFederalMemberStateshavedirectly-electedrepresentativesfortheir
respectiveregionalgovernments,a“FederalConstitutionalConvention”shouldbehostedby
thefirstquarterof2020.IfSomaliaistocompleteherfederalsocialcontract,shemustironout
thewrinklesofherstyleoffederalism.Whatdifferentiatesfederalismfromotherformsof
governmentisthedual-sovereignnotionof“verticalseparationofpowers.”Thisnotion
disseminatesgoverningpowersbetweentwomainentities,thefederalgovernmentandthe
stategovernments(i.e.FederalMemberStates),andeachentitymaynotencroachuponthe
otherentity’sgoverningpowers.
IntheUnitedStates,thefederalgovernmentcontrolsforeignaffairs,nationaldefense,and
monetarypolicy,interalia,whilethestategovernmentscontrolpublichealth,safety(e.g.
policing),andeducationalaffairs,interalia.Thedual-sovereignconceptencompassestwo
parallelentities,federalandstate,governinginunison.TheFederalGovernmentofSomalia
(FGS)andthevariousFMSgovernmentshaveyettoproperlynegotiatewhatgoverningpowers
53
aredelegatedtothefederalgovernmentandwhatpowersarereservedforstate
governments.Somalia’ssocialfabricisslowlybeingsownbacktogetherthroughafederal
systemandthetenetsofherverticalseparationofpowersmustbecodified.Thiscanonlybe
viablydonethroughanationaldialoguebetweenSomalia’svariousFMSstakeholders.
In1787,America’sthirteenstatesmetinPhiladelphiafortheConstitutionalConvention
(alsoknownastheFederalConvention)todiscusshowtoformamoreperfectunion.The
UnitedStatesConstitutionwasthebrain-childoftheconvention.Theconventionaddressed
theissuesoffederaldelegatedpowersandreservedstatepowers,inadditiontothetripartite
systemofgovernment(Legislative,Executive,andJudicialbranches).Eachstatesentdelegates
totheconventiontoensureitsinterestwereproperlyrepresented,andthesedelegates
returnedtotheirrespectivestatestolobbytheircitizenstovoteinfavorofthenewUS
constitutioninanationalreferendum.
AsimilarconventionmustbeheldinSomaliatoensureSomalis,ofallclanandregional
affiliations,havetheirinterestsproperlyrepresented.Thiswillensureforanall-inclusive
constitutionalrevisionprocess.Subsequently,thenationalreferendumforSomalia’snew
permanentconstitutionshouldtakeplacebythethirdquarterof2020.
AnadditionalgoalofVision2021isforSomaliatoregaincontrolofhernationalsecurity
andpolicingpowers.Currently,theAfricanUnionMissiontoSomalia(AMISOM)isproviding
thebruntofSomalia’ssecurity,anditisobviousthatitcannotimmediatelyleave,butalso
cannotremaininthecountryindefinitely.Agradualapproachisneeded.Irecommendthat
from2017through2021allFederalMemberStatescontributeanequalnumberofrecruits(e.g.
54
5,000perregionalstate)fortheSomaliNationalArmy.Thiswillallowfortheestablishmentof
anall-inclusiveSomaliNationalArmyandwillallowAMISOMtodepartfromSomaliaby2021.
Oncethesegoalsareaccomplished,Somaliawillfinallybereadytohostitsone-personone-
votenationalelectionbyfirstquarterof2021.Toconclude,Vision2021willaccomplishthe
followinggoals:(a)regionalone-personone-voteelectionsforallrespectiveFederalMember
States;(b)FederalConstitutionalConventionforpurposesofconstitutionalrevision;(c)
nationalreferendumforSomalia’snewconstitution;(d)establishmentofafullyfunctioning
SomaliNationalArmyandthewithdrawalofAMISOM;and(e)one-personone-votenational
election.
“[I]ncontrasttotherestofAfricawherestatesarestrugglingtobecomenations,theSomali
peoplerepresentanationstrugglingtobecomeastate....”-FrankJ.Mahony