retail automation: stranded workers? - irrci · retail automation: stranded workers? ... •...
TRANSCRIPT
Retail Automation: Stranded Workers?Opportunities and risks for labor and automation
Prepared by Cornerstone Capital Group For the Investor Responsibility Research Center Institute
June 8, 2017
Agenda
• Introductions• Research Review• IRRCi Perspective • Q&A
Webinar Logistics
• Attendees are in listen only mode. • But, questions are encouraged. Type using
the “Question” function, and we will answer following report overview.
• Session recording, replay will be posted at www.irrcinstitute.org.
• Share webinar info on social media: • @IRRCResearch• @Cornerstone_Cap
• Audio issues during webinar, contact GoToWebinar @ 1-‐800-‐263-‐6317.
3
Speakers
4
Jon LukomnikExecutive DirectorInvestor Responsibility Research Center Institute
Sebastian VanderzeilDirector, Global Thematic Analyst
About the Investor Responsibility Research Center Institute
5
§ Not-‐for-‐profit established in 2005.§ Funds, disseminates objective, unbiased research on range of issues at intersection of corporate
responsibility, investors informational needs.§ Academic & practitioner research examining capital market context that impacts how investors,
companies make decisions.§ Annual research award with two $10K awards. Deadline October 6, 2017.§ More than 60 research reports available at no charge.
About Cornerstone Capital Group
6
• Founded in 2013, Cornerstone Capital is a financial services firm offering research-‐driven investment advisory and strategic consulting services.
• Our research connects global themes to industry and equity market analysis to identify investment opportunities and risks across sectors.
• We work with investors, corporations and financial institutions to drive the systematic analysis of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) factors throughout the global capital markets.
7
Overview
7
Setting the Stage
8
Summary of Key Findings• 16 million Americans employed in retail, representing 10% of the working population and 6% of US GDP.
• Retail landscape experiencing unprecedented change from online shopping (esp. Amazon) and increasing wage pressure.
• US economic growth inseparable from growth in automation, but high-‐change periods have triggered job losses, particularly hollowing-‐out of middle-‐skilled workers.
• Based on analysis from World Economic Forum and Oxford computerization study, 6-‐7.5 million retail jobs are at high risk of automation, representing a greater percentage reduction than the US manufacturing industry experienced.
9
Summary of Key Findings (cont.)• Of 30 retailers examined in this report:
• Most companies discuss in-‐store technologies such as mobile devices, self-‐checkout, digital kiosks and proximity beacons; sensor-‐based checkouts and smart shelves are a small but growing application (Amazon Go stores).
• None reported key labor indicators (employee turnover, labor expenses or employee satisfaction).• Most do not exhibit signs of a explicit consumer strategy (experience or convenience) for their stores as defined
by our framework.• Only four companies paid cashiers and sales associates at or above the living wage as calculated by the
Department of Health and Human Services.• Five companies have explicit programs to enable workers to skill-‐up or transition away from jobs that are likely to
be automated while two additional companies have technical skills programs.
• Women are particularly exposed to retail automation as they constitute 73% of retail cashiers, which face a very high risk of automation from existing technologies.
• Big box retailers such as WalMart have greater market share in communities with less than 500,000 people compared to metropolitan areas, which means that retail automation by retailers could disproportionately impact these communities.
10
Retail employment
Source: US FRED, Cornerstone Capital Group
JobsProbability of
computerization (0-‐1)
Number of workers in retail trade sector
( 2014)
Order Clerks 0.99 52,600
Parts Salesperson 0.98 167,300
Counter and Rental Clerks 0.97 87,900
Cashier 0.97 2,778,500
Retail Salesperson 0.92 4,189,800
Laborers and freight, stock, and material movers, hand 0.85 312,700
Total number of workers 7,588,800
Retail employment eclipsed manufacturing in 2001… … but more than 7.5 million workers face high risk of computerization
Source: Frey and Osborne, “The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation?” Oxford University, September 2013; BLS, 2014
11
Rise of Amazon
Source: US Census Bureau, Cornerstone Capital Group
E-‐commerce rising as percent of total US retail sales… … and Amazon dominates US e-‐commerce sales
Source: Internet Retailer, ChannelAdvisor, Slice Intelligence, US Commerce Department, Cornerstone Capital Group
12
Amazon pressures retailers through prices and costs
13
Societal pressure to raise wages is increasing36% of retail workers receive a government payment… … linking into concerns about growing income inequality
Source: US Census Bureau, Cornerstone Capital Group
Source: EPI analysis of Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement microdata, pooled years 2012-‐2014
“Brick and mortar” retailers: transforming under pressureTwo broad consumer strategies:
• Convenience – focus on removing the ‘friction’ of the purchase process within the retail store to increase sales volume and decrease labor costs through technology.
• Experience – focus on increasing the consumer interaction with the store and its employees to increase pricing power.
Source: McKinsey, ‘Making stores matter in a multichannel world’, Cornerstone Capital Group
15
Retail sector labor productivity
Retail labor productivity has grown faster than economy average… … but primarily driven by electronic shopping
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Cornerstone Capital Group Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Cornerstone Capital Group
16
Bricks and mortar store labor productivity
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Cornerstone Capital Group
17
Retailers are discussing technologiesTechnology Description Focus Frequency of Use
Mobile devicesMobile apps enable consumers to scan a barcode or take a picture of a product to access product info or find other colors and sizes on the retailer’s e-‐commerce site
Consumer High
Self-‐checkout Customers scan and finalize purchase at terminal Consumer/Operational High
Digital kiosks Touch screens that enable consumers to view product info, access customer reviews, and place orders for delivery Consumer High
Proximity beaconsDevices that alert shoppers to promotions or provide sales associates with information on frequent store visitors to deliver high-‐touch service
Consumer High
Workforce and task management solutions
Software that analyzes, forecasts, and manages labor scheduling and task management Operational High
RFID technology Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tags enable enhanced inventory tracking throughout the supply chain Operational Medium
Autonomous robots Smart robots that aid in areas ranging from leading customers to desired products to inventory replenishment Consumer/Operational Medium/Low
Smart price tags Smart price tags can be changed in real time based on demand or other trends Consumer Medium/Low
Sensor-‐based checkout Contactless checkout by automatic scanning of product as customer walks out of store Consumer/Operational Low
Smart shelves Sensor-‐based shelves that detect when inventory is low Operational Low
18
Connecting into consumer needs
0.48
0.24
0.23
0.21
0.17
0.17
Knowledgeable store associates
Self-‐service/mobile checkouts
Bar-‐code scanners to confirm product priceand features
Personalized coupons/offers through asmartphone
Personalized coupons/offers through social-‐networking sites
Wi-‐fi access for comparison shopping
Source: Deloitte Annual Holiday Survey, 2014 (Question not asked in 2015 or 2016)
Source: Deloitte Annual Holiday Survey, 2016; Cornerstone Capital Group
Consumer wants knowledgeable sales associates … as well as avoiding crowds and delays
19
Broader stakeholders
Women are over-‐represented as cashiers, a highly automatable function
Source: Osborne and Frey, US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Cornerstone Capital Group
“A UCLA study on Wal-‐Mart shows that since 2006,
its average grocery market share in the 25 most
populated metropolitan areas grew from 5.5% to
almost 12%. However, Wal-‐Mart possesses an
average market share of 25% in metropolitan areas
with populations fewer than 500,000 residents.”
Regional centers could be affected more than metropolitan areas
Source: http://www.irle.ucla.edu/publications/documents/AnthonyRobert_Wal-‐MartReport_July2015.pdf
20
Companies examined in this report
21
Company assessmentCriteria Description
Public discussion of automation initiatives
Public disclosure and discussion of technology initiatives including discussion on impacts to labor suggests that a company is appropriately attentive to the issue.
Changing labor profile A changing labor profile can be indicative of a company’s future management of its labor force, as well as its relationship with its consumer base. The framework provides an indication of companies’ positioning towards an experience or convenience consumer strategy. The ability of a company to execute its strategy will be impacted by its exposure to minimum wage risk, current investment in labor, and public perception.
Minimum wage risk exposure and government subsidization
The research suggests that minimum wage increases prompt automation. Companies exposed to states with upcoming minimum wage increases may pursue automation more rapidly to offset labor cost headwinds. In addition, retailers that pay wages below the poverty line may be perceived by stakeholders as taking advantage of government support schemes. Growing stakeholder concern could lead to public campaigns and calls for minimum wage increases.
Investing in labor to support the strategy
Based on the analysis, retailers that invest in training and development programs are likely to be developing a motivated and skilled employee base that will support technology initiatives. Public announcements of tuition support and training that go beyond existing day-‐to-‐day job development signal such an intention.
Public perception of employee practices, social policies, and prior reputation
As indicated by Mission Measurement data, companies with strong consumer perception of employee treatment and fair wages may face less scrutiny should they have to reduce their labor force. Additionally, a high social score from Sustainalytics shows an ability to manage social issues, which could protect companies from being perceived negatively by stakeholders.
22
Unclear strategy with fewer employees Experience strategy
Convenience strategy Unclear strategy with more employees
23
Retail wages
$0.00
$4.00
$8.00
$12.00
$16.00
Dollar G
eneral
Foot Locker
Kroger
Ross Stores
Kohl's
TJX Co
mpanies
Walgreens Boo
tsUlta Salon
J.C. Pen
ney
Staples
Target
CVS He
alth
Dick's Sportin
g …L Brands
Advance Au
to …
Macy's
Wal-‐M
art
Gap
Bed Ba
th & …
Sprouts
O'Reilly Auto
Williams-‐…
Best Buy
Home De
pot
Lowe's
Who
le Foo
dsNordstrom
Costco
Tiffa
ny & Co
Federal minimum wage
Poverty level wage
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Sprouts
Costco
Nordstrom
Ross Stores
Tiffa
ny & Co.
Macy's
Who
le Foo
dsStaples
Williams-‐Sono
ma
Bed Ba
th & Beyon
dTarget
Gap
Kroger
Home De
pot
L Brands
TJX Co
mpanies
Best Buy
Ulta Salon
Kohl's
Walgreens Boo
tsCV
S He
alth
O'Reilly Auto
Lowe's
J. C. Pen
ney
Dick's Sportin
g Go
ods
Wal-‐M
art
Advance Au
to Parts
Dollar G
eneral
% of stores in states
Few companies pay at or above the poverty level wage… … and exposure to minimum wage increases is concentrated in a few companies
Source: Glassdoor, US Department of Health and Human Services, US Department of Labor, Cornerstone Capital Group
Source: Company reports, Cornerstone Capital Group
24
Public perception of labor practices matters
-‐8%-‐12% -‐13% -‐13% -‐14% -‐14% -‐14% -‐15% -‐15% -‐16% -‐17%
-‐21% -‐21% -‐22% -‐24%-‐28%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Source: Mission Measurement, Cornerstone Capital Group
Consumer perceptions of labor practices relative to leading company, Costco
Shareholder engagement questions• What is the long-‐term strategy of the retail company and how does labor policy inform or drive this strategy?
• How does technology catalyze business and labor strategy?
• Given its current wage structure, how does the company consider potential minimum wage increases?
• How will the workforce evolve to achieve the long-‐term strategy? What metrics are used to monitor the labor strategy?
• How are labor stakeholders engaged in development of the long-‐term strategy?
• What management challenges are created by the “hollowing-‐out” of labor?
• What are expectations for employee turnover?
• Where does responsibility lie in the organization for labor strategy? To what extent does this occur at the store level or with Board involvement?
From IRRCi’s Perspective
• Important market segment undergoing rapid change
• Report designed to suggest how investors can differentiate companies by strategy / execution
• Report does that, but, in process, larger story emerged• Hard to ignore likely multi-‐million job hollowing out• With these jobs belonging to working poor, economic disruption likely to stress social safety net• Potentially disparate effects on specific small metropolitan and rural geographies
26
From IRRCi’s Perspective
• Key questions for investors:
• What is company’s automation / labor strategy designed to accomplish?• Convenience / experience continuum is relevant intellectual paradigm to consider• What are labor / automation implications? Risks? Opportunities?• What is the path of transformation?• What disclosures / metrics should a company make to help investors understand if it is executing on its strategy?
27
2828
29
Contacts
29
Sebastian VanderzeilGlobal Thematic AnalystCornerstone Capital [email protected]@Cornerstone_Capwww.cornerstonecapinc.com
Jon LukomnikExecutive [email protected]@irrcresearchwww.irrcinstitute.org
Important disclosures
The information in this material is for illustration and discussion purposes only. It is not intended to be, nor should it be construed or used as, investment, tax or legal advice, any recommendation or opinion regarding the appropriateness or suitability of any investment. No representation is made that the investment advice, investment process, or risk management techniques of Cornerstone Capital Inc. (together with its affiliates, “Cornerstone”) or that a client’s objectives or goals will or are likely to be achieved or successful or that any underlying investment will make any profit or will not sustain losses. All investments involve risk. Cornerstone may engage in investment practices or trading strategies, or give investment advice, that may increase the risk of investment loss and a loss of principal may occur. The risk management techniques that may be utilized by Cornerstone cannot provide any assurance that a client will not be exposed to risks of significant trading losses. An investor is subject to potential loss of his/her investment.
Any descriptions involving investment process, investment advice, investment examples, statistical analysis, investment strategies or risk management techniques are provided for illustration purposes only, will not apply in all situations, may not be fully indicative of any present or future investments, may be changed in the discretion of Cornerstone and are not intended to reflect performance. Portfolio characteristics and limits reflect guidelines only and are implemented, and may change, in the discretion of Cornerstone. To the extent that Cornerstone is given discretionary authority, investments will be selected by, and will vary in the discretion of, Cornerstone and are subject to availability and market conditions, among other factors. A client’s actual returns and volatility will depend on a variety of factors including overall market conditions and the ability of Cornerstone and/or the client to implement the client’s investment objectives and policies. Investments are subject to the risks of market volatility, which may be severe. Such market volatility may be caused by, among other events, unpredictable economic and political events that may cause sudden and severe reductions in the value of investments.
Any opinions, assumptions, assessments, statements or the like (collectively, “Statements”) regarding future events or which are forward-‐looking, including regarding portfolio characteristics and limits, constitute only subjective views, beliefs, outlooks, estimations or intentions of Cornerstone, should not be relied on, are subject to change due to a variety of factors, including fluctuating market conditions and economic factors, and involve inherent risks and uncertainties, both general and specific, many of which cannot be predicted or quantified and are beyond Cornerstone’s control. Future evidence and actual results (including actual composition and investment characteristics of an investment portfolio) could differ materially from those set forth in, contemplated by, or underlying these Statements, which are subject to change without notice. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance and no representation is given that these Statements are now, or will prove to be accurate, or complete in any way. Cornerstone undertakes no responsibility or obligation to revise or update such Statements. Statements expressed herein may not necessarily be shared by all personnel of Cornerstone. This material is as of the date indicated, is not complete, is subject to change and does not contain material information regarding Cornerstone or any specific investment or investment advice. No representation is made with respect to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of information and Cornerstone assumes no obligation to update or otherwise revise such information. Unless the context otherwise requires, the term “investor” and “client” may be used interchangeably.
This information is confidential, is the property of Cornerstone, is intended only for intended recipients and their authorized agents and representatives andmay not be reproduced or distributed to any other person without prior written consent.
© Cornerstone Capital Inc. 2017