results sectiondraftshm dec30

24
1 Results 1.1 Demographic Characteristics Table 1: Age of Children under 2 (n=358) Age of children (n=300) Freq % 0 to 5 months 107 30 6 to 11 months 95 27 12 to 23 months 156 43 Total 358 100.0 Table 2: Sex of Children under 2 (n=358) Sex of children (n=358) Freq % Female 137 45.7 Male 163 54.3 Total 358 100.0 1.2 Maternal and newborn care: Table 5: Health Center/Home Delivery Freq % Health Center 213 59,7 Home 144 40,3 Total 357 100,0 60% of deliveries take place in th e Health centers. It is t wice the baseline line (29%). While there has been modest increase in the extension of Health facility coverage between 2007 (52 Healt h post) and 2011 (60 Health post) in the Konni District in general. In the surveyed 60 villages, the number of HP and Primary Health Care ( CSI) Centers has even remained unchange d. Improved Healt h care deliver y and Communit y Mobili zation in project area may have contributed . Table 6 : Assistance during the Deliver y (n =358)  

Upload: zine

Post on 06-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/results-sectiondraftshm-dec30 1/24

1 Results

1.1 Demographic Characteristics

Table 1: Age of Children under 2 (n=358)

Age of children (n=300) Freq %0 to 5 months 107 30

6 to 11 months 95 27

12 to 23 months 156 43

Total 358 100.0

Table 2: Sex of Children under 2 (n=358)

Sex of children (n=358) Freq %Female 137 45.7

Male 163 54.3

Total 358 100.0

1.2 Maternal and newborn care:

Table 5: Health Center/Home DeliveryFreq %

Health Center 213 59,7Home 144 40,3

Total 357 100,0

60% of deliveries take place in the Health centers. It is twice the baseline line (29%). Whilethere has been modest increase in the extension of Health facility coverage between 2007 (52Health post) and 2011 (60 Health post) in the Konni District in general. In the surveyed 60villages, the number of HP and Primary Health Care ( CSI) Centers has even remainedunchanged. Improved Health care delivery and Community Mobilization in project area mayhave contributed .

Table 6: Assistance during the Delivery (n=358)

Page 2: Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/results-sectiondraftshm-dec30 2/24

* within this group, 4 responses were categorized as ³ auxiliaire´ and the cross check on where this staff exist shows that they are in Health Centers. This could be relatedto Health post workers ( HPw) who temporarily work in Integrated Health Centers (CSI) during the Frequent absence of the Chief CSI nurse in the majority of Healthcenters staffed by only one or 2 nurses.

The Catch indicator includes Health post worker as qualified Personnel since theywere trained by Project in Clean Delivery. Some of this HPW are nurses but may not

be known as such by respondents.

There almost 40% of delivery still attended by TBA (Matrons) even though they arenot considered as skilled personnel. The project has devoted considerable time in thesensitization to teach to TBA in their new role of ³ companion to delivery´ .

Table 6: Home delivery By TBA

HomedeliveryTBA Frequency Percent Cum Percent Yes 67 47,2% 47,2%

No 75 52,8% 100,0%Total 142 100,0% 100,0%

95% Conf Limits Yes 38,8% 55,7%

No 44,3% 61,2%

Comments:

when we cross where do the Birth assisted by matrons took, we find that only half of them were at Home, 50% of these Births assisted by TBA( 75/142) occurred inHealth Centers. This is well know practices particularly in CSI and District Hospitalwhere matrons are still used for night shift under Midwife supervision. Officiallymatrons are expected even in those centers to only accompany Parturient to Maternityand help the women in post partum wards. But the reality is that matrons continue toassist delivery when the Midwife actually went to rest during night guards.

Person who assisted Freq %

Doctor/ Nurse/Midwife 161 45

HP worker 28 8

Traditional birth attendant 140 40

Other 25 *

Not assisted 2

Total 358 100.0

Page 3: Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/results-sectiondraftshm-dec30 3/24

Table 7: Use of Clean delivery Kits (n=358)

76% of the deliveries benefited clean delivery kit. Project has provided a single usedelivery Kit in health centers. The Kit comprises a 2 Yards Cloth to wrap the baby, arazor blade for Cordon Section, a gloves and soap. While 60% of the deliveryoccurred in health centers, approximately 16% of Kit used were either at home or elsewhere. This is a significant increase compared to 21% of Kit delivery use at

baseline KPC

Table 8: Post Natal check for Mother within first week

Q27 Frequency Percent Cum PercentHeure1 159 79,1% 79,1%

jour1 19 9,5% 88,6%NSP1 20 10,0% 98,5%Semaine1 3 1,5% 100,0%Total 201 100,0% 100,0%

95% Conf Limits

Heure172,8% 84,5%

jour1 5,8% 14,4%

NSP1 6,2% 14,9%Semaine1 0,3% 4,3%

Was a Clean Delivery Kitused during delivery?

Freq %

Yes 272 76

No 84

Do Not Know 2 1

Total 358 100.0

Page 4: Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/results-sectiondraftshm-dec30 4/24

88% (178/201) of mothers who delivered had a post natal check within the first week and80% of them had the check within the day after delivery. The total number of the respondentsmatches with 213 who delivered in Health Center.Only 29 mothers were able to identify the Health personnel who performed the Check. Half of them (51%) were done by Health post Worker. 4 checks done by midwifes and 2 by Doctors.It appears clearly that Doctor and Midwife are most recognizable or may be more

communicative (?) Than Nurses and Health Post worker, since the number of deliveriesassisted by Midwife and Doctors are the same for the post natal checks.

Table 9: Post Natal Check within 3 days for New born

Fre q Percent Yes 34 54,0%No 29 46,0%

Total 63 100,0%

36% (63/216) of mothers said that their baby was checked by the health personnel of thefacility where they delivered but only half of the Newborn (38) were checked within the week after birth.

Breastfeeding

Table10: Time of Breastfeeding after Birth (n=358)

94% of the newborn were breastfed Immediately ( with 1 hour) and same proportionwere given colostrums during the first 3 days after birth and 84% of them new werenot given any other feed during the same period. This is twice (42%) higher than

baseline rates.

Table11: Exclusive Breafeeding/ breastmilk and simple water (n= 107) pending

analysis

Time Freq %Within 1 hour (Initiation ) 339 94%

After 1 hour 13 62.0

Did not Know 6 2.7

Total 358 100.0

Type of feeding Freq %EBF

Total 107 100.0

Page 5: Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/results-sectiondraftshm-dec30 5/24

Vitamin A Supplementation

Table 12: Children who received Vit A (n=251)

74% of children aged 5-23month received at least once a dose of Vitamin A in the last six

month

Vaccination:

Table 13: Health Card/vaccination possessionDo you have a card where your child¶s

vaccinations are written down? Freq %

Yes,seen by theSurveyor

273 76,3

Do not Know1 ,3

Not availalbe 68 19 ,0

Never had a Card 16 4,5

Total 358 100,0

73% of mothers possess Health or vaccination cards. Baseline line value is 61%. The major issue with Health/vaccination card is that they are not filled mostly by Health personnel.

72% (258/358) of mother mentioned to have received vaccination that is not written in the book.

Table 14: Children who received Penta 1 / Penta3 (n=120, children 12-23mth whopossess vaccination card)

Received Vit A (at least once) Freq %Yes 184 74

No 62

Did not know 4 1

Blank 1 0

Total 251 100.0

Freq %

Page 6: Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/results-sectiondraftshm-dec30 6/24

Table 15: Children who received Vit A (Most Recent Dose, children 6-23, cardseen by enumerator)

y This result is obtained from a cross table of Q44 (did the child receive a single dose of Vitamin A with the last 6 month) and Q45 ( do the mother possess a vaccinationcard?) as indicated in the KPC 2000Tabulation guide .The 65 responses categorizedas ³NA´ includes children 8-23 month who either have the card and not available(n=50) or never possess a vaccination card (n= 11) or 1 mother was not clear whether she possessed a card or not. If the we calculate the percentage of children who¶smother said to have received a single dose of Vitamin A whether or not they have avaccination card, then the percentage increase to 74%.

y In contrary when we calculate the proportion of children who possessed a vaccinationcard in which is mentioned that the child has received a Vitamin A dose either the date

is or not found; the percentage will drop to 11% only.

74% of children aged 5-23month

Tab 13: BCGTable 17: Children who received Measles vaccine ( children 9-23, card seen byenumerator)

Penta 1 94 78

Penta3 49 41

Freq %Yes 140 56

No 46

NA 65* 25

Total 251 100.0

Freq %

Yes 94 51%

No 48

Do not Know 40 * 26%

Total 189 100.0

Page 7: Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/results-sectiondraftshm-dec30 7/24

The percentage of children who had measles vaccination is calculated among children 9-23.51% of them had the vaccination. The percentage remains the same when it is calculatedamong children 12-23mth ( 52%= 78/151)

Discussion:

1-Rapid Cath Indicator

Page 8: Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/results-sectiondraftshm-dec30 8/24

Baseline(330)

Endline(358)

DiTarg

Indicator Num/Deno % CI Num/Deno % CIMaternal and Newborn Care Percentage of mothers with children age 0-23 months who received at least two Tetanustoxoid vaccinations before the birth of theyoungest child

95/330 28.8% s 6.1% 261/322 81

Percentage of children age 0-23 monthswhose births were attended by skilled

personnel

87/330 26.4% s 6.7% 189/358 52%

Percentage of children age 0-23 months whoreceived a post-natal visit from anappropriately trained health worker withinthree days after birth

44/330 13.3% s 5.2% 38/358 11% *

IYCF :Breastfeeding

Percentage of children age 0-5 months whowere exclusively breastfed during the last 24hours

31/86 36% +-14%70/105 67%

IYCF: Complementary FeedingPercentage of infants and young childrenage 6-23 months fed according to aminimum of appropriate feeding practices

94/244 38.1

Vitamin A Supplementation Percentage of children age 6-23 months whoreceived a dose of Vitamin A in the last 6months (Mother¶s recall)

26/244 10% 8.6185/251

73

Immunization Percentage of children age 12-23 months

who received DPT3 according to thevaccination card or mother¶s recall bythe time of the survey

39/137 28.5% s 10.7 %

49/120

41

Percentage of children age 12-23 monthswho received a measles vaccination

94/189 51

Malaria Percentage of children age 0-23 months whoslept under an insecticide-treated bed net the

previous night.

132/330 40.0% s 7.5%

Percentage of children age 0-59 months witha febrile episode during the last two weekswho were treated with an effective anti-malarial drug within 24 hours after the fever

began

35/199 17.5% s 7.5%

Diarrhea Percentage of children age 0-59 months withdiarrhea in the last two weeks who receivedoral rehydration solution (ORS)

36/180 18.4% s 5.9%

ARI/Pneumonia Percentage of children age 0-59 months withchest-related cough and fast and/ or difficult

breathing in the last two weeks who weretaken to an appropriate health provider.

39 214 18.2% s 5.9%

Water and Sanitation Percentage of households of children age 0-23 months that treated water effectively

50/330 15.2%

Percentage of mothers of children age 0-23 38/330 11.5%

Page 9: Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/results-sectiondraftshm-dec30 9/24

months who live in a household with soap atthe place for hand washing

Anthropometrics Percentage of children 0-23 months who areunderweight (-2 SD for the median weightfor age, according to WHO/HCHS reference

population)

100 330 30.3%s 7.0%

Page 10: Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/results-sectiondraftshm-dec30 10/24

Detailed annexe: Q15-Q16

Q15:Did you ever breastfeed your child?

Effectifs PourcentagePourcentage

validePourcentage

cumuléValide NON 4 1 ,1 1 ,1 1 ,1

OUI 35 4 9 8, 9 9 8, 9 1 00,0

Total 358 100,0 100,0

Q16:How long after birth did you first put your child to the breast?

Effectifs PourcentagePourcentage

validePourcentage

cumuléValide HEURE 80 22,3 22,3 22,3

IMMEDIATEMENT 25 9 72,3 72,3 94 ,7

JOURS 1 3 3,6 3,6 98,3

NSP 6 1,7 1,7 100,0

Total 358 100,0 100,0

Q17:During the first three or four days after delivery, before your regular milk began flowing, did you give yourchild the liquid (colostrum) that came from your breast?

Effectifs PourcentagePourcentage

validePourcentage

cumuléValide NON 1 8 5,0 5,0 5,0

OUI 3 40 95,0 95,0 100,0

Total 358 100,0 100,0

Q18: In the first three days after delivery, was your child given anything to drink other than breast milk?

Effectifs PourcentagePourcentage

validePourcentage

cumuléValide NON 302 8 4,4 8 4,4 8 4,4

OUI 56 15,6 15,6 100,0

Total 358 100,0 100,0

Q16:How long after birth did you first put your child to the breast?

Page 11: Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/results-sectiondraftshm-dec30 11/24

Effectifs Pourcentage

Pourcentagevalide

Pourcentagecumulé

Valide HEURE 80 22,3 22,3 22,3

IMMEDIATEMENT 25 9 72,3 72,3 94 ,7

JOURS 1 3 3,6 3,6 98,3

NSP 6 1,7 1,7 100,0

Total 358 100,0 100,0

Q44:

tr_age Effectifs

Pourcentage

Pourcentagevalide

Pourcentagecumulé

1 Valide NON 25 23,4 23,4 23,4

OUI 82 76,6 76,6 100,0

Total 107 100,0 100,02 Valide NON 63 25,1 25,1 25,1

NSP 4 1,6 1,6 26,7

OUI 184 73,3 73,3 100,0

Total 251 100,0 100,0

ForwardVITAMINEA Frequency Percent Cum Percent

40241 1 3,6% 3,6%

40387 1 3,6% 7,1%

40494 1 3,6% 10,7%

40538 1 3,6% 14,3%

40559 1 3,6% 17,9%

40570 1 3,6% 21,4%

40596 1 3,6% 25,0%

40608 1 3,6% 28,6%

40617 1 3,6% 32,1%

40624 1 3,6% 35,7%40628 1 3,6% 39,3%

40647 1 3,6% 42,9%

40659 1 3,6% 46,4%

40663 2 7,1% 53,6%

40681 1 3,6% 57,1%

40697 1 3,6% 60,7%

Page 12: Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/results-sectiondraftshm-dec30 12/24

40717 1 3,6% 64,3%

40718 1 3,6% 67,9%

40721 1 3,6% 71,4%

40756 1 3,6% 75,0%

40768 1 3,6% 78,6%

40779 1 3,6% 82,1%

40783 1 3,6% 85,7%

47484 3 10,7% 96,4%

146099 1 3,6% 100,0%

Total 28 100,0% 100,0%

95% Conf Limits 40241 0,1% 18,3%

40387 0,1% 18,3%40494 0,1% 18,3%40538 0,1% 18,3%40559 0,1% 18,3%40570 0,1% 18,3%40596 0,1% 18,3%40608 0,1% 18,3%40617 0,1% 18,3%40624 0,1% 18,3%40628 0,1% 18,3%40647 0,1% 18,3%40659 0,1% 18,3%40663 0,9% 23,5%40681 0,1% 18,3%40697 0,1% 18,3%40717 0,1% 18,3%40718 0,1% 18,3%40721 0,1% 18,3%40756 0,1% 18,3%

40768 0,1% 18,3%40779 0,1% 18,3%40783 0,1% 18,3%47484 2,3% 28,2%146099 0,1% 18,3%

Previous Dataset Results Library

Page 13: Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/results-sectiondraftshm-dec30 13/24

1.1.1.1 FREQ Q44

Next Procedure

Forward

Q44 Frequency Percent Cum Percent NON 62 24,8% 24,8%

NSP 4 1,6% 26,4%

OUI 184 73,6% 100,0%

Total 250 100,0% 100,0%

95% Conf Limits NON 19,6% 30,6% NSP 0,4% 4,0%

OUI 67,7% 79,0%

Previous Dataset Results Library

1.1.1.2 TABLES VITAMINEA Q44

Next Procedure

ForwardQ44

VITAMINEA NON OUI TOTAL

40241 Row %

Col %

00,00,0

1100,0

3,8

1100,0

3,6

40387 Row %

Col %

00,00,0

1100,0

3,8

1100,0

3,6

40494 Row %

Col %

00,00,0

1100,0

3,8

1100,0

3,6

40538

Row %Col %

0

0,00,0

1

100,03,8

1

100,03,6

40559 Row %

Col %

00,00,0

1100,0

3,8

1100,0

3,6

40570 Row %

Col %

00,00,0

1100,0

3,8

1100,0

3,6

Page 14: Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/results-sectiondraftshm-dec30 14/24

40596 Row %

Col %

00,00,0

1100,0

3,8

1100,0

3,6

40608 Row %

Col %

1100,0

50,0

00,00,0

1100,0

3,6

40617 Row %

Col %

00,00,0

1100,0

3,8

1100,0

3,6

40624 Row %

Col %

00,00,0

1100,0

3,8

1100,0

3,6

40628 Row %

Col %

00,00,0

1100,0

3,8

1100,0

3,6

40647

Row %Col %

0

0,00,0

1

100,03,8

1

100,03,6

40659 Row %

Col %

00,00,0

1100,0

3,8

1100,0

3,6

40663 Row %

Col %

00,00,0

2100,0

7,7

2100,0

7,1

40681 Row %

Col %

00,00,0

1100,0

3,8

1100,0

3,6

40697 Row %

Col %

00,00,0

1100,0

3,8

1100,0

3,6

40717 Row %

Col %

00,00,0

1100,0

3,8

1100,0

3,6

40718 Row %

Col %

00,00,0

1100,0

3,8

1100,0

3,6

40721

Row %Col %

1

100,050,0

0

0,00,0

1

100,03,6

40756 Row %

Col %

00,00,0

1100,0

3,8

1100,0

3,6

40768 Row %

Col %

00,00,0

1100,0

3,8

1100,0

3,6

Page 15: Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/results-sectiondraftshm-dec30 15/24

1.1.1.3 Single Table Analysis

Chi-square df Probability

28,0000 24 0,2600

An expected value is < 5.Chi-square not valid.

Tab: Exclusive

Breastfeeding

Exclusive Breasfeeding bf

Total1 2 3 4 5 tr_age 1 Effectif 9 2 0 9 6 0 107

% comprisdanstr_age

86,0 % ,0 % 8, 4% 5,6 % ,0 % 1 00,0 %

% comprisdans bf

2 9,5 % ,0 % 3 4,6 % 4 0,0 % ,0 % 2 9,9%

% du total 25,7 % ,0 % 2,5 % 1 ,7 % ,0 % 2 9,9%

2 Effectif 220 3 17 9 2 25 1

% comprisdanstr_age

87,6 % 1 ,2 % 6,8 % 3,6 % ,8 % 1 00,0 %

% comprisdans bf

70,5 % 1 00,0 % 65, 4% 60,0 % 1 00,0 % 70, 1%

% du total 6 1,5 % ,8 % 4 ,7 % 2,5 % ,6 % 70, 1%

40779 Row %

Col %

00,00,0

1100,0

3,8

1100,0

3,6

40783 Row %

Col %

00,00,0

1100,0

3,8

1100,0

3,6

47484 Row %

Col %

00,00,0

3100,0

11,5

3100,0

10,7

146099 Row %

Col %

00,00,0

1100,0

3,8

1100,0

3,6

TOTAL Row %

Col %

27,1

100,0

2692,9

100,0

28100,0100,0

Page 16: Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/results-sectiondraftshm-dec30 16/24

:\Users\Relief2\Desktop\KPC report ne\Ali Results Dec26\ClasseurfullrecombinedHMdec27.xls:Feuil1$

Select: (Q45 = "Oui, vu par l'enqueteur" ) AND (Age >11 )

R ecord Count: 120 Da te: 31/12/2011 18:02:44

1.1.1.4 FREQ DTC1Penta1 DTC3Penta3

Next ProcedureDTC1Penta1 DTC3Penta3

1.1.1.5 DTC1Penta1

ForwardDTC1Penta1 Frequency Percent Cum Percent

22/05/2001 1 1,1% 1,1%

28/12/2009 1 1,1% 2,1%

24/02/2010 2 2,1% 4,3%

15/03/2010 1 1,1% 5,3%26/03/2010 1 1,1% 6,4%

09/04/2010 1 1,1% 7,4%

21/04/2010 1 1,1% 8,5%

23/04/2010 1 1,1% 9,6%

24/04/2010 1 1,1% 10,6%

27/04/2010 1 1,1% 11,7%

05/06/2010 1 1,1% 12,8%

21/06/2010 1 1,1% 13,8%

27/06/2010 1 1,1% 14,9%

16/07/2010 1 1,1% 16,0%

29/07/2010 3 3,2% 19,1%

26/08/2010 1 1,1% 20,2%

03/09/2010 1 1,1% 21,3%

05/09/2010 1 1,1% 22,3%

Page 17: Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/results-sectiondraftshm-dec30 17/24

08/09/2010 1 1,1% 23,4%

22/09/2010 1 1,1% 24,5%

23/09/2010 1 1,1% 25,5%

24/09/2010 1 1,1% 26,6%

11/10/2010 1 1,1% 27,7%

23/10/2010 1 1,1% 28,7%

23/11/2010 1 1,1% 29,8%

25/11/2010 1 1,1% 30,9%

06/12/2010 1 1,1% 31,9%

08/12/2010 1 1,1% 33,0%

22/12/2010 1 1,1% 34,0%

05/01/2011 1 1,1% 35,1%

07/01/2011 1 1,1% 36,2%

15/01/2011 1 1,1% 37,2%20/01/2011 1 1,1% 38,3%

22/01/2011 1 1,1% 39,4%

24/01/2011 1 1,1% 40,4%

25/01/2011 1 1,1% 41,5%

15/02/2011 1 1,1% 42,6%

21/02/2011 1 1,1% 43,6%

26/02/2011 1 1,1% 44,7%

14/03/2011 1 1,1% 45,7%

29/03/2011 1 1,1% 46,8%13/04/2011 1 1,1% 47,9%

21/04/2011 1 1,1% 48,9%

25/04/2011 1 1,1% 50,0%

30/04/2011 5 5,3% 55,3%

02/05/2011 1 1,1% 56,4%

11/05/2011 1 1,1% 57,4%

12/05/2011 1 1,1% 58,5%

18/05/2011 1 1,1% 59,6%

26/05/2011 1 1,1% 60,6%27/05/2011 1 1,1% 61,7%

28/05/2011 1 1,1% 62,8%

30/05/2011 1 1,1% 63,8%

31/05/2011 1 1,1% 64,9%

03/06/2011 4 4,3% 69,1%

05/06/2011 2 2,1% 71,3%

Page 18: Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/results-sectiondraftshm-dec30 18/24

21/06/2011 1 1,1% 72,3%

22/06/2011 1 1,1% 73,4%

23/06/2011 1 1,1% 74,5%

24/06/2011 3 3,2% 77,7%

25/06/2011 2 2,1% 79,8%

26/06/2011 1 1,1% 80,9%

28/06/2011 2 2,1% 83,0%

30/06/2011 1 1,1% 84,0%

04/07/2011 1 1,1% 85,1%

17/07/2011 2 2,1% 87,2%

22/07/2011 1 1,1% 88,3%

29/07/2011 1 1,1% 89,4%

10/08/2011 1 1,1% 90,4%

17/08/2011 1 1,1% 91,5%28/08/2011 1 1,1% 92,6%

12/09/2011 1 1,1% 93,6%

13/09/2011 1 1,1% 94,7%

20/09/2011 1 1,1% 95,7%

28/10/2011 1 1,1% 96,8%

26/11/2011 1 1,1% 97,9%

03/09/2019 1 1,1% 98,9%

01/01/2030 1 1,1% 100,0%

Total 94 100,0% 100,0%

95% Conf Limits 22/05/2001 0,0% 5,8%28/12/2009 0,0% 5,8%24/02/2010 0,3% 7,5%15/03/2010 0,0% 5,8%26/03/2010 0,0% 5,8%09/04/2010 0,0% 5,8%

21/04/2010 0,0% 5,8%23/04/2010 0,0% 5,8%24/04/2010 0,0% 5,8%27/04/2010 0,0% 5,8%05/06/2010 0,0% 5,8%21/06/2010 0,0% 5,8%27/06/2010 0,0% 5,8%

Page 19: Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/results-sectiondraftshm-dec30 19/24

16/07/2010 0,0% 5,8%29/07/2010 0,7% 9,0%26/08/2010 0,0% 5,8%03/09/2010 0,0% 5,8%05/09/2010 0,0% 5,8%

08/09/2010 0,0% 5,8%22/09/2010 0,0% 5,8%23/09/2010 0,0% 5,8%24/09/2010 0,0% 5,8%11/10/2010 0,0% 5,8%23/10/2010 0,0% 5,8%23/11/2010 0,0% 5,8%25/11/2010 0,0% 5,8%06/12/2010 0,0% 5,8%08/12/2010 0,0% 5,8%22/12/2010 0,0% 5,8%05/01/2011 0,0% 5,8%07/01/2011 0,0% 5,8%15/01/2011 0,0% 5,8%20/01/2011 0,0% 5,8%22/01/2011 0,0% 5,8%24/01/2011 0,0% 5,8%25/01/2011 0,0% 5,8%15/02/2011 0,0% 5,8%

21/02/2011 0,0% 5,8%26/02/2011 0,0% 5,8%14/03/2011 0,0% 5,8%29/03/2011 0,0% 5,8%13/04/2011 0,0% 5,8%21/04/2011 0,0% 5,8%25/04/2011 0,0% 5,8%30/04/2011 1,7% 12,0%02/05/2011 0,0% 5,8%11/05/2011 0,0% 5,8%

12/05/2011 0,0% 5,8%18/05/2011 0,0% 5,8%26/05/2011 0,0% 5,8%27/05/2011 0,0% 5,8%28/05/2011 0,0% 5,8%30/05/2011 0,0% 5,8%31/05/2011 0,0% 5,8%

Page 20: Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/results-sectiondraftshm-dec30 20/24

03/06/2011 1,2% 10,5%05/06/2011 0,3% 7,5%21/06/2011 0,0% 5,8%22/06/2011 0,0% 5,8%23/06/2011 0,0% 5,8%

24/06/2011 0,7% 9,0%25/06/2011 0,3% 7,5%26/06/2011 0,0% 5,8%28/06/2011 0,3% 7,5%30/06/2011 0,0% 5,8%04/07/2011 0,0% 5,8%17/07/2011 0,3% 7,5%22/07/2011 0,0% 5,8%29/07/2011 0,0% 5,8%10/08/2011 0,0% 5,8%17/08/2011 0,0% 5,8%28/08/2011 0,0% 5,8%12/09/2011 0,0% 5,8%13/09/2011 0,0% 5,8%20/09/2011 0,0% 5,8%28/10/2011 0,0% 5,8%26/11/2011 0,0% 5,8%03/09/2019 0,0% 5,8%01/01/2030 0,0% 5,8%

1.1.1.6 DTC3Penta3

Back Forward Current Procedure

DTC3Penta3 Frequency Percent Cum Percent

24/04/2010 1 2,0% 2,0%

10/05/2010 1 2,0% 4,1%

22/06/2010 1 2,0% 6,1%

24/06/2010 1 2,0% 8,2%

21/08/2010 1 2,0% 10,2%

27/08/2010 1 2,0% 12,2%

09/09/2010 1 2,0% 14,3%

19/10/2010 1 2,0% 16,3%

10/11/2010 1 2,0% 18,4%

Page 21: Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/results-sectiondraftshm-dec30 21/24

11/11/2010 1 2,0% 20,4%

07/12/2010 1 2,0% 22,4%

20/12/2010 1 2,0% 24,5%

14/01/2011 2 4,1% 28,6%

15/02/2011 1 2,0% 30,6%

21/02/2011 1 2,0% 32,7%

23/02/2011 1 2,0% 34,7%

09/03/2011 1 2,0% 36,7%

15/03/2011 1 2,0% 38,8%

22/03/2011 1 2,0% 40,8%

25/03/2011 1 2,0% 42,9%

18/04/2011 1 2,0% 44,9%

15/05/2011 1 2,0% 46,9%

18/05/2011 1 2,0% 49,0%03/06/2011 2 4,1% 53,1%

04/06/2011 2 4,1% 57,1%

20/06/2011 1 2,0% 59,2%

29/06/2011 1 2,0% 61,2%

05/07/2011 1 2,0% 63,3%

12/07/2011 1 2,0% 65,3%

15/07/2011 1 2,0% 67,3%

20/07/2011 1 2,0% 69,4%

25/07/2011 1 2,0% 71,4%26/07/2011 1 2,0% 73,5%

29/07/2011 2 4,1% 77,6%

31/07/2011 1 2,0% 79,6%

13/08/2011 1 2,0% 81,6%

27/08/2011 1 2,0% 83,7%

28/08/2011 2 4,1% 87,8%

09/09/2011 1 2,0% 89,8%

18/09/2011 1 2,0% 91,8%

11/10/2011 1 2,0% 93,9%02/11/2011 1 2,0% 95,9%

14/11/2011 1 2,0% 98,0%

22/11/2011 1 2,0% 100,0%

Total 49 100,0% 100,0%

Page 22: Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/results-sectiondraftshm-dec30 22/24

95% Conf Limits 24/04/2010 0,1% 10,9%10/05/2010 0,1% 10,9%22/06/2010 0,1% 10,9%24/06/2010 0,1% 10,9%

21/08/2010 0,1% 10,9%27/08/2010 0,1% 10,9%09/09/2010 0,1% 10,9%19/10/2010 0,1% 10,9%10/11/2010 0,1% 10,9%11/11/2010 0,1% 10,9%07/12/2010 0,1% 10,9%20/12/2010 0,1% 10,9%14/01/2011 0,5% 14,0%15/02/2011 0,1% 10,9%21/02/2011 0,1% 10,9%23/02/2011 0,1% 10,9%09/03/2011 0,1% 10,9%15/03/2011 0,1% 10,9%22/03/2011 0,1% 10,9%25/03/2011 0,1% 10,9%18/04/2011 0,1% 10,9%15/05/2011 0,1% 10,9%18/05/2011 0,1% 10,9%

03/06/2011 0,5% 14,0%04/06/2011 0,5% 14,0%20/06/2011 0,1% 10,9%29/06/2011 0,1% 10,9%05/07/2011 0,1% 10,9%12/07/2011 0,1% 10,9%15/07/2011 0,1% 10,9%20/07/2011 0,1% 10,9%25/07/2011 0,1% 10,9%26/07/2011 0,1% 10,9%

29/07/2011 0,5% 14,0%31/07/2011 0,1% 10,9%13/08/2011 0,1% 10,9%27/08/2011 0,1% 10,9%28/08/2011 0,5% 14,0%09/09/2011 0,1% 10,9%18/09/2011 0,1% 10,9%

Page 23: Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/results-sectiondraftshm-dec30 23/24

11/10/2011 0,1% 10,9%02/11/2011 0,1% 10,9%14/11/2011 0,1% 10,9%22/11/2011 0,1% 10,9%

Select age>11, freq

Recevoir_VAR Frequency Percent Cum Percent

NON 37 32,2% 32,2%

OUI 78 67,8% 100,0%

Total 115 100,0% 100,0%

Next Procedure

Forward

Recevoir_VAR Frequency Percent Cum Percent

NON 43 31,4% 31,4%

OUI 94 68,6% 100,0%

Total 137 100,0% 100,0%

95% Conf Limits NON 23,7% 39,9%OUI 60,1% 76,3%

Next Procedure

Forward

Recevoir_VAR Frequency Percent Cum Percent NON 37 32,2% 32,2%

OUI 78 67,8% 100,0%

Total 115 100,0% 100,0%

95% Conf Limits

Page 24: Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec30

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/results-sectiondraftshm-dec30 24/24

NON 23,8% 41,5%OUI 58,5% 76,2%