Results of Print Survey12 February 2016

• 770 Total Respondents– 148 Faculty– 386 Staff– 236 Students

Respondent Numbers

Participation

Staff Demographics

Access and Use

WhatdoyouuseMFD’sfor?

Whatprintersdoyouhaveaccessto?

Access to both Shared and Personal Printer

Staff: Comments on MFDs

• Printer/network issues, performance (17)• Confidentiality concerns (5)• Like the MFDs (4)• Local printer saves time (4)• MFDs cost too high vs desktop printing (3)• We need to remove individual printers (2)• I need multiple letterheads• I have proprietary print needs• Copy card is cumbersome• Unhappy about costs associated with minimums/level of

MFD (When I outgrew my machine the jump in minimums was painful)

• Need more size options for scanning

Staff: Why don’t you use MFDs?

Staff: If you had access to electronic processing/workflow tools and/or electronic signatures, how many pages could you reduce per semester?

Whosaid100+pages/semester? Whosaid50- 100pages/semester?

Faculty Demographics

• 77% faculty interested in reducing print on campus

• 77% allow laptops in classrooms for all classes

• 55% require zero printing of course materials

• 29% require zero printing of assignments

Faculty Highlights

Faculty: Are you interested in reducing print volume on campus?

Whosaidno?

Faculty: Do you allow students to use laptops/tablets in your classes?

Whosaidno?

Faculty: What is your interest in the following technologies?

Faculty: What is your interest in the following technologies?

Whoisnotinterested:

Faculty: During average semester, average course, how many pages do you require each student to print that are available electronically?

Whosaidnone?

Whosaid100+pages?Answer Responses %

Liberal Arts&Sciences

5 63%

CollegeofEducation

3 38%

Faculty: During average semester, average course, how many pages do you require each student to print for turning in papers/assignments?

Whosaid 51- 100pages?

WhosaidNone?

Answer Responses %

Liberal Arts&Sciences

5 100%

Student Demographics

• After print quota implemented, printing in fall of 2012 was 3.2M fewer pages than in the fall of 2011 without a quota

• Spring 2014– 39% of students used 0% of allotment– 8% of students used all of their allotment– 32% of entire allotment spent (68% unused)

• Spring 2015– 38% of entire allotment spent (62% unused)

Student Print Quota Statistics

Spring 2014: Remaining Student Print Quota

Students: AnywherePrints Satisfaction

Students VERY dissatisfied with:QualityofAnywherePrints printers:

NumberofavailableAnywherePrints printers:

LocationofAnywherePrints printers:

Students: What do you print the most?

227Responses

Students: What would have the greatest influence in reducing your printing?

226Responses17%ranked“Ihavenointention…”as#1answer10%ofthosedonotuseAnyWhere Prints

Students: I have no intention of reducing my printing

• Want free unlimited printing back/increase quota (14)• Faculty drives my printing (13)• AnywherePrints not reliable (11)• Love/like AnywherePrints (10)• We pay thousands of $$, this is silly (8)• Better learning on paper vs. electronic (6)• Can’t take notes/highlight on computer (3)• Need more printers (3 )• Costs too much per page (3)• Graduate students need to print more due to research (2)• Don’t cut the quota (2)• Eyesight (2)• Give quotas on a per class basis (2)• Instructors don’t allow electronic devices in class (1)• Unused quotas should roll over (1)• Students can’t afford technology that would allow them to go paperless (1)

AnywherePrints: Student Comments

• While it’s a good idea, the ending goal of ‘going paperless’ or reducing printing is not feasible due to (80):

– Certain departments requiring paper printouts and/or the fact that paper documents are more effective

– To keep documents private / I need to print for my job– Reducing printing may reduce efficiency and work flow– Scholar needs– Paper print-outs are less distracting than laptops

• Paper documents need to be formatted to be filled out and processed electronically (both for faculty and students) – including digital signatures! (40)

• Going paperless? Great! I’m on board! (27)• Our department is already helping in the effort to reduce printing (12)• In order to go paperless, students/faculty need to be educated on what options

they have electronically (11)• Having more scanners, recycling bins, and/or printers at more locations would be

appreciated in moving this process forward (10)• Can cheaper paper be used? Lowest ink settings? Double-sided printing? (7)

All: General Comments

• Instead of having this be geared towards printing, let’s find a new way to finance it / option of opt-in, opt-out printing (5)

• Electronic grading applications are terrible; I’d rather do it by hand (4)• Mandatory that no personal printers be allowed unless paid for by the individual

(2)• We need a license for Adobe Acrobat Pro if this is going to work (1)• Not everything is electronically available to those who are visually impaired (1)

All: General Comments (cont.)