results objective 1. figure 1. flow chart of disease ... · this case report shows an example of...

1
The Effects Of a Long-Term Multidisciplinary Disease Management Program: A Case Report Evan T Cohen, PT, MA, PhD, NCS 1 , John T Marmarou, PT, DPT 2 and John R Armando, LCSW 2 , (1)School of Health Related Professions, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, (2)Total Rehab and Fitness, LLC Background There is a paucity of evidence for the use of long-term multidisciplinary care lasting longer than six months for persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). This case report describes the results of a person’s year-long episode of care in the Disease Management Program (DMP), a multidisciplinary, medically-based rehabilitation service and health management program for persons with MS. The DMP provides services based on each person’s needs. Each DMP participant undergoes a quarterly reassessment. Additional reassessments may be conducted if new patient- or clinician-identified problems arise. Objectives 1. Describe the DMP as applied to a person with MS, and describe the person’s status from the baseline examination through 15-months of participation in the DMP. 2.Describe the feasibility of the DMP in improving function and quality of life for persons with MS. Methods The baseline assessment was conducted by the DMP team members at intake. This included both the standard set of measures collected from all DMP participants and a discipline-specific examination by respective DMP team members. The designation of services was based on goals identified by the person with MS and the DMP team. Once the person’s progress stabilized, a transition to the maintenance phase was initiated. If issues arose during the maintenance phase or at a quarterly assessment that indicated need, the person reentered the skilled phase. This cycle was repeated over the 15-month-long period resulting in the collection of data for the baseline and five regular quarterly assessment. A flow chart of DMP processes can be found in figure 1. Results Objective 1. The person completed 15-months of the DMP despite three unexpected events: two separate orthopedic foot injuries, and a crisis of hope and optimism. These problems were identified early through the DMP’s routine and special assessments. This facilitated redesignation of skilled services which enabled the person to continue participation in the DMP. From baseline to the 15-month measurement, the person improved all components of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (figure 2) and in 7/9 items of the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Inventory (MSQLI) (figure 3). Improvements were also noted in 6-Minute Walk and Four- Square Step tests, walking speed, and in the number of reported falls (Figure 4). Objective 2. The program described here was a person- centered multidisciplinary rehabilitation and health maintenance program with a relatively low cost. The interventions provided by the DMP were well tolerated and resulted in substantial improvements across a number of important outcomes. This case report shows an example of the steady improvements that can be achieved through the use of a persistent, long-term health maintenance program, even when unexpected events may temporarily derail progress. The DMP appears to be a feasible intervention and health management program for persons with MS. DMP Intake, Orientation and Baseline Examination Designation of Services Skilled Phase Maintenance/ Prevention Phase Special Reassessment Routine Quarterly Reassessment Services May Include: Hand Therapy (with OTR/L) Functional mobility retraining (PT) Cognitive Therapy (SLP) Acceptance and Commitment and/or Behavioral Therapies (Behavioral Therapist) Functional improvements stabilize/plateau Figure 1. Flow Chart of Disease Management Program Processes Expected Transition Unexpected Transition Figure 2. MS Functional Composite Components 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Seconds 25' Timed Walk Test Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Correct Answers 3-Second Paced Serial Addition Test Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Seconds 9-HPT - Non-dominant Hand Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Seconds Nine-Hole Peg Test Dominant Hand Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Figure 3. Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Inventory Components 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 6 Score SF-36 Physical Component Summary Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Score SF-36 Mental Component Summary Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Score Modified Fatigue Impact Scale Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Score Bladder Control Scale Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Score MOS Pain Effects Scale Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Score Bowel Control Scale Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 -1 0 1 2 3 Score Impact of Visual Impairment Scale Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Score Mental Health Inventory Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Score Perceived Deficits Questionnaire Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Score Modified Social Support Survey Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Seconds Four Square Step Test Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Feet 6-Minute Walk Test Distance Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Incidents Number of Falls in Prior Two Weeks Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Meters/Second 6-Minute Walk Test Average Walking Speed Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Figure 4. Other Outcome Measures Conclusion In this case study, the year-long DMP resulted in substantial improvements from baseline for this person with moderate MS-related disability. Despite a number of potentially problematic events, the person was able to adhere to this long-term program. The DMP team felt that the use of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy was critical to this person’s success. Although the overall trend was toward improvement, quality of life (QOL) (i.e. the MSQLI components) showed the greatest variation. The DMP shows promise as an efficient, effective and feasible multidisciplinary intervention program. Further study is required to fully determine the feasibility and effectiveness of this long-term multidisciplinary program for persons with MS of different severities, and to determine how the DMP may be altered to have a more consistent positive impact on QOL. The Disease Management Program at Total Rehab and Fitness is supported, in part, by a Community Impact Grant from the Greater Delaware Valley Chapter of the National Multiple Sclerosis Society

Upload: lyliem

Post on 02-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Results Objective 1. Figure 1. Flow Chart of Disease ... · This case report shows an example of ... Flow Chart of Disease Management Program Processes ... Average Walking Speed

The Effects Of a Long-Term Multidisciplinary Disease Management

Program: A Case Report Evan T Cohen, PT, MA, PhD, NCS1, John T Marmarou, PT, DPT2 and John R Armando, LCSW2, (1)School of Health Related

Professions, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, (2)Total Rehab and Fitness, LLC

Background There is a paucity of evidence for the use of long-term

multidisciplinary care lasting longer than six months for

persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). This case report

describes the results of a person’s year-long episode of

care in the Disease Management Program (DMP), a

multidisciplinary, medically-based rehabilitation service

and health management program for persons with MS.

The DMP provides services based on each person’s

needs. Each DMP participant undergoes a quarterly

reassessment. Additional reassessments may be

conducted if new patient- or clinician-identified

problems arise.

Objectives 1. Describe the DMP as applied to a person with MS,

and describe the person’s status from the baseline

examination through 15-months of participation in the DMP.

2.Describe the feasibility of the DMP in improving

function and quality of life for persons with MS.

Methods The baseline assessment was conducted by the DMP team members at intake. This included both the standard set of measures collected from all DMP

participants and a discipline-specific examination by respective DMP team members. The designation of services was based on goals identified by the person

with MS and the DMP team. Once the person’s progress stabilized, a transition to the maintenance phase was initiated. If issues arose during the

maintenance phase or at a quarterly assessment that indicated need, the person reentered the skilled phase. This cycle was repeated over the 15-month-long period

resulting in the collection of data for the baseline and five regular quarterly assessment. A flow chart of DMP processes can be found in figure 1.

Results Objective 1. The person completed 15-months of the DMP despite three unexpected events: two separate orthopedic foot injuries, and a crisis of hope and optimism. These

problems were identified early through the DMP’s routine and special assessments. This facilitated redesignation of skilled services which enabled the person to continue participation in

the DMP. From baseline to the 15-month measurement, the person improved all components of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (figure 2) and in 7/9 items of the

Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Inventory (MSQLI) (figure 3). Improvements were also noted in 6-Minute Walk and Four-Square Step tests, walking speed, and in the number of

reported falls (Figure 4). Objective 2. The program described here was a person-

centered multidisciplinary rehabilitation and health maintenance program with a relatively low cost. The interventions provided by the DMP were well tolerated and

resulted in substantial improvements across a number of important outcomes. This case report shows an example of the steady improvements that can be achieved through the

use of a persistent, long-term health maintenance program, even when unexpected events may temporarily derail progress. The DMP appears to be a feasible intervention and

health management program for persons with MS.

DMP Intake,

Orientation and

Baseline Examination

Designation of

Services Skilled Phase

Maintenance/

Prevention Phase

Special

Reassessment

Routine Quarterly

Reassessment

Services May Include:

Hand Therapy (with OTR/L)

Functional mobility retraining (PT)

Cognitive Therapy (SLP)

Acceptance and Commitment and/or

Behavioral Therapies (Behavioral Therapist)

Functional improvements

stabilize/plateau

Figure 1. Flow Chart of Disease Management Program Processes

Expected Transition

Unexpected Transition

Figure 2. MS Functional Composite Components

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1 2 3 4 5 6

Seco

nd

s

25' Timed Walk Test

Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

1 2 3 4 5 6

Co

rrect

An

sw

ers

3-Second Paced Serial Addition Test

Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1 2 3 4 5 6

Seco

nd

s

9-HPT - Non-dominant Hand

Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1 2 3 4 5 6

Se

co

nd

s

Nine-Hole Peg Test – Dominant Hand

Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5

Figure 3. Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Inventory Components

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

1 2 3 4 5 6

Sco

re

SF-36 Physical Component Summary

Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1 2 3 4 5 6

Sco

re

SF-36 Mental Component Summary

Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1 2 3 4 5 6

Sco

re

Modified Fatigue Impact Scale

Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

1 2 3 4 5 6

Sco

re

Bladder Control Scale

Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

1 2 3 4 5 6

Sco

re

MOS Pain Effects Scale

Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5

-1

0

1

2

3

4

1 2 3 4 5 6

Sco

re

Bowel Control Scale

Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 -1

0

1

2

3

1 2 3 4 5 6

Sco

re

Impact of Visual Impairment Scale

Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1 2 3 4 5 6

Sco

re

Mental Health Inventory

Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1 2 3 4 5 6

Sco

re

Perceived Deficits Questionnaire

Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1 2 3 4 5 6

Sco

re

Modified Social Support Survey

Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

1 2 3 4 5 6

Seco

nd

s

Four Square Step Test

Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1 2 3 4 5 6

Feet

6-Minute Walk Test Distance

Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

1 2 3 4 5 6

Incid

en

ts

Number of Falls in Prior Two Weeks

Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1 2 3 4 5 6

Mete

rs/S

eco

nd

6-Minute Walk Test Average Walking Speed

Baseline Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5

Figure 4. Other Outcome Measures

Conclusion In this case study, the year-long DMP resulted in substantial improvements from baseline for this person with moderate

MS-related disability. Despite a number of potentially

problematic events, the person was able to adhere to this long-term program. The DMP team felt that the use of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy was critical to this

person’s success. Although the overall trend was toward improvement, quality of life (QOL) (i.e. the MSQLI components) showed the greatest variation.

The DMP shows promise as an efficient, effective and feasible multidisciplinary intervention program. Further study is required to fully determine the feasibility and effectiveness of

this long-term multidisciplinary program for persons with MS of different severities, and to determine how the DMP may be altered to have a more consistent positive impact on QOL.

The Disease Management Program at Total Rehab and Fitness is supported, in part, by a Community

Impact Grant from the Greater Delaware Valley Chapter of the National Multiple Sclerosis Society