restrained shrinkage cracking: self-curing concrete made...
TRANSCRIPT
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 1 of 26
School of Civil Engineering
Purdue University
Restrained Shrinkage Cracking:
Self-Curing Concrete Made using
Saturated Lightweight Aggregate
Ryan Henkensiefken, Purdue University
Tommy Nantung, INDOT
Jason Weiss, Purdue University
Prepared and Presented for the 2008 National Concrete Bridge Conference
St. Louis, Missouri, by Ryan Henkensiefken
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 2 of 26
Outline
• Cracking in Bridge Decks
• Causes of Autogenous Shrinkage
• How LWA helps Mitigate the Problem
• Objectives
• Difference between Sealed and Unsealed Curing Conditions as it relates to autogenous shrinkage
• Experimental Measurements
• Experimental Results
• Conclusion
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 3 of 26
Cracking in Bridge Decks
• Increase in the use of high-performance concrete in bridge decks because of improved durability
• HPC tends to have increased autogenous shrinkage in sealed conditions
Initial Specimen
Autogenous
Shrinkage Effect
Initial Bridge Deck
Length
Restraint Effect Reconnect Deck
Disconnect Deck
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 4 of 26
Outline
• Cracking in Bridge Decks
• Causes of Autogenous Shrinkage
• How LWA helps Mitigate the Problem
• Objectives
• Difference between Sealed and Unsealed Curing Conditions as it relates to autogenous shrinkage
• Experimental Measurements
• Experimental Results
• Conclusion
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 5 of 26
Causes of Autogenous Shrinkage
• Hydration
product volume
is smaller than
cement and water
volume
• Not problematic with higher w/c mixtures
Cement
Water
Hydration
products
Chemical
shrinkage
1 Vol
1 Vol
1.8
Vol
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 6 of 26
• Chemical Shrinkage
creates vapor filled
space
• Pressure Difference
between fluid and
vapor
• Pressure Difference
is the cause of
shrinkage
Causes of Autogenous Shrinkage
Jensen, 2005
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 7 of 26
Causes of Autogenous Shrinkage
• Autogenous shrinkage
is the shrinkage of the
bulk system
• Before set - No stress
development due to
autogenous shrinkage
• After set - Can have
significant stress
development due to
autogenous shrinkage
Jensen, 2005
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 8 of 26
Causes of Autogenous Shrinkage
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Time (Days)
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
Po
re V
olu
me (
ml/
gcem)
Chemical Shrinkage
Autogenous Shrinkage
Open Void Space
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 9 of 26
Outline
• Cracking in Bridge Decks
• Causes of Autogenous Shrinkage
• How LWA helps Mitigate the Problem
• Objectives
• Difference between Sealed and Unsealed Curing Conditions as it relates to autogenous shrinkage
• Experimental Measurements
• Experimental Results
• Conclusion
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 10 of 26
80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100
Relative Humidity (%)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Pe
rcen
t o
f A
bso
rbe
d
Wate
r R
em
ain
ing
(%
)
LWA
How LWA helps Mitigate the Problem
• Water is given up at
high relative
humidities
• Water leaves the
largest pore first
• Pores of the LWA are
larger than the pores
of the paste
Radlinska et al, 2007
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 11 of 26
How LWA helps Mitigate the Problem
• Initial consumption
of water
• Replenish system
with water from
LWA
Jensen, 2005
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 12 of 26
How LWA helps Mitigate the Problem
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Time (Days)
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
Po
re V
olu
me (
ml/
gcem)
Chemical Shrinkage
Autogenous Shrinkage
Open Void Space
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 13 of 26
Outline
• Cracking in Bridge Decks
• Causes of Autogenous Shrinkage
• How LWA helps Mitigate the Problem
• Objectives
• Difference between Sealed and Unsealed Curing Conditions as it relates to autogenous shrinkage
• Experimental Measurements
• Experimental Results
• Conclusion
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 14 of 26
Objectives
• Discuss the difference
between sealed and
unsealed curing
conditions
• Provide experimental
measurement of
shrinkage performance
of mortars with varying
LWA volume
replacements.
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 15 of 26
Outline
• Cracking in Bridge Decks
• Causes of Autogenous Shrinkage
• How LWA helps Mitigate the Problem
• Objectives
• Difference between Sealed and Unsealed Curing Conditions as it relates to autogenous shrinkage
• Experimental Measurements
• Experimental Results
• Conclusion
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 16 of 26
Sealed and Unsealed Curing
Conditions
• Interior Voids
are created
due to self-
desiccation
• Surface Voids
are created due to drying
• Sealed curing experiences internal voids only
• Unsealed curing experiences both internal and external voids
liquid solid vapor
(a) Sealed (b) External Drying Only (c) Unsealed
Drying Drying Sealed
Radlinska et al, 2007
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 17 of 26
Outline
• Cracking in Bridge Decks
• Causes of Autogenous Shrinkage
• How LWA helps Mitigate the Problem
• Objectives
• Difference between Sealed and Unsealed Curing Conditions as it relates to autogenous shrinkage
• Experimental Measurements
• Experimental Results
• Conclusion
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 18 of 26
Experimental Measurements
• As more LWA is added more water is available
• Aggregate volume remained constant at 55%
0% 728 218 1418 0 0
3.8% 728 218 1319 60 6
7.3% 728 218 1230 114 12
11.0% 728 218 1135 172 18
14.3% 728 218 1050 223 23
18.3% 728 218 950 283 30
25.3% 728 218 808 369 39
29.3% 728 218 667 455 48
33.0% 728 218 567 525 54
Additional Water
Provided by LWA (kg/m3)
Cement
(kg/m3)
Water
(kg/m3)
Fine Aggregate
(kg/m3)
LWA
(kg/m3)
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 19 of 26
Experimental measurements
• Internal Relative
Humidity
• Free Shrinkage
C157 with first 24 hours
• Restrained Shrinkage
C1581
Moon et al., 2004
Sant, 2007
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 20 of 26
Outline
• Cracking in Bridge Decks
• Causes of Autogenous Shrinkage
• How LWA helps Mitigate the Problem
• Objectives
• Difference between Sealed and Unsealed Curing Conditions as it relates to autogenous shrinkage
• Experimental Measurements
• Experimental Results
• Conclusion
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 21 of 26
Internal Relative Humidity
• Equation relating RH to pore size
• Equation relating pore size to shrinkage
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Time (Days)
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
Rela
tive H
um
idit
y (
%)
33.0% LWA
29.3% LWA
25.3% LWA
18.3% LWA
14.3% LWA
7.3% LWA
0.0% LWA
sp
pKKr
S 112
3
RT
V
RHr m
)ln(
)cos(2
Henkensiefken et al., 2008
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 22 of 26
Sealed Free Shrinkage
0 7 14 21 28
Time (Days)
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
Str
ain
()
33.0% LWA
29.3% LWA
25.3% LWA
18.3% LWA
14.3% LWA
11.0% LWA
7.3% LWA
0.0% LWA
Henkensiefken et al., 2008
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 23 of 26
Sealed Restrained Shrinkage
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Time (Days)
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
Str
ain
()
25.3% LWA
14.3% LWA
11.0% LWA
7.3% LWA
3.8% LWA
0.0% LWA
Henkensiefken et al., 2008
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 24 of 26
Unsealed Free Shrinkage
0 7 14 21 28
Time (Days)
-800
-700
-600
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
Str
ain
()
33.0% LWA
29.3% LWA
25.3% LWA
18.3% LWA
14.3% LWA
11.0% LWA
7.3% LWA
0.0% LWA
Henkensiefken et al., 2008
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 25 of 26
Unsealed Restrained Shrinkage
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Time (Days)
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
Str
ain
()
33.0% LWA
29.3% LWA
25.3% LWA
14.3% LWA
11.0% LWA
7.3% LWA
0.0% LWA
Henkensiefken et al., 2008
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 26 of 26
Conclusions
• Specimens with a larger replacement
volume of LWA maintained a higher internal
humidity
• Specimens with a larger volume of LWA
showed a reduction in rate of shrinkage and
absolute shrinkage
• The time to cracking is prolonged for
mixtures with an increasing replacement
volume of LWA
CBC 2008 May 4-7, 2008 Slide 27 of 26
Acknowledgements
• This work was supported in part by the Joint Transportation Research Program administered by the Indiana Department of Transportation and Purdue University
• Dale Bentz
– National Institute of Standards and Technology
• John Roberts
– Northeast Solite Corporation
• Jack Spaulding
– Hydraulic Press Brick Company