response to the covid-19 pandemic: practical guide to

4
AJR:215, December 2020 1 cause it may be helpful to other departments that need to act swiftly. What We Did Before the COVID-19 pandemic, we had been considering options for home worksta- tions in keeping with the American College of Radiology recommendations for teleradi- ology [5], primarily to provide service in po- tential disaster scenarios but also to ease call burden and improve work-life balance. With the rapid spread of COVID-19, the promo- tion of social distancing and quarantining of radiologists due to travel or health restric- tions, rapid transition to off-site working was required. Given the urgency, we rush-ordered off- the-shelf home PACS workstations and en- gaged executive leadership in our hospital and at the vendor company to facilitate the process. Through this effort, the time from ordering to receiving the workstations from the manufacturer (Dell) was reduced from 6 weeks to 12 days. The first batch of new home PACS workstations went to radiolo- gists 14 days after order placement (Fig. 1). For the purchase of home PACS worksta- tions, the system had to meet all users’ re- quirements. Consequently, the home PACS workstation memory, CPU, and video card specifications have processing power simi- lar to that of hospital workstations, and soft- ware identical to that in the in-house PACS workstations was installed in the home PACS workstations. Monitors were chosen that to- gether with calibration software are approved Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Practical Guide to Rapidly Deploying Home Workstations to Guarantee Radiology Services During Quarantine, Social Distancing, and Stay Home Orders Marla B. K. Sammer 1,2 Andrew C. Sher 1,2 Thierry A. G. M. Huisman 1,2 Victor J. Seghers 1,2 Sammer MBK, Sher AC, Huisman TAGM, Seghers VJ 1 Singleton Department of Pediatric Radiology, Texas Children’s Hospital, 6701 Fannin St, Ste 470, Houston, TX 77030. Address correspondence to V. J. Seghers ([email protected]). 2 Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. Medical Physics and Informatics • Clinical Perspective AJR 2020; 215:1–4 ISSN-L 0361–803X/20/2156–1 © American Roentgen Ray Society T he coronavirus disease (COVID- 19) pandemic [1] caused by se- vere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) re- quires a rapid response in radiology depart- ments to care for the potential surge of pa- tients and to decrease negative effects on the radiology workforce [2]. To maintain radiol- ogy department operations, lessons from pri- or outbreaks have been updated, including the ability of radiologists to work from home for isolation [3]. Home PACS workstations are integral to facilitating the social distanc- ing advocated by major health organizations [1, 4] and to meeting work-at-home needs, in- cluding childcare and eldercare. In response to the pandemic, our hospi- tal-based radiology department of 41 ra- diologists successfully installed 22 home PACS workstations within a 10-day period by means of the expedited purchase of 12 new off-the-shelf systems and reallocation of 10 existing hospital workstations to homes. Three radiologists already had home PACS workstations for emergency situations, re- sulting in 25 functional home PACS worksta- tions. We were thus able to convert diagnos- tic staffing from 100% in-house as of March 13, 2020, to approximately 80% off-site as of March 20, 2020. This rapid rollout of home PACS workstations was possible only be- cause key players within the hospital and in- dustry worked together and recognized that in times of crisis, creative solutions are man- datory and administrative barriers should be broken. We are sharing our experience be- Keywords: coronavirus disease, COVID-19, home PACS, stay home orders, teleradiology, work safe orders doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.23297 M. B. K. Sammer and A. C. Sher contributed equally to this work. Received April 5, 2020; accepted without revision May 9, 2020. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to share an experience in the rapid deploy- ment of home workstations that illustrates a creative solution that transcended typical admin- istrative barriers. CONCLUSION. In response to the global coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, radiology departments need to rapidly deploy home PACS workstations to facilitate physical distancing and to guarantee radiologic expertise despite possible home quarantining or stay home, work safe orders. Sammer et al. Home Workstations Medical Physics and Informatics Clinical Perspective Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 71.62.174.241 on 06/30/20 from IP address 71.62.174.241. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

Upload: others

Post on 23-Nov-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

AJR:215, December 2020 1

cause it may be helpful to other departments that need to act swiftly.

What We DidBefore the COVID-19 pandemic, we had

been considering options for home worksta-tions in keeping with the American College of Radiology recommendations for teleradi-ology [5], primarily to provide service in po-tential disaster scenarios but also to ease call burden and improve work-life balance. With the rapid spread of COVID-19, the promo-tion of social distancing and quarantining of radiologists due to travel or health restric-tions, rapid transition to off-site working was required.

Given the urgency, we rush-ordered off-the-shelf home PACS workstations and en-gaged executive leadership in our hospital and at the vendor company to facilitate the process. Through this effort, the time from ordering to receiving the workstations from the manufacturer (Dell) was reduced from 6 weeks to 12 days. The first batch of new home PACS workstations went to radiolo-gists 14 days after order placement (Fig. 1).

For the purchase of home PACS worksta-tions, the system had to meet all users’ re-quirements. Consequently, the home PACS workstation memory, CPU, and video card specifications have processing power simi-lar to that of hospital workstations, and soft-ware identical to that in the in-house PACS workstations was installed in the home PACS workstations. Monitors were chosen that to-gether with calibration software are approved

Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Practical Guide to Rapidly Deploying Home Workstations to Guarantee Radiology Services During Quarantine, Social Distancing, and Stay Home Orders

Marla B. K. Sammer1,2 Andrew C. Sher1,2 Thierry A. G. M. Huisman1,2 Victor J. Seghers1,2

Sammer MBK, Sher AC, Huisman TAGM, Seghers VJ

1Singleton Department of Pediatric Radiology, Texas Children’s Hospital, 6701 Fannin St, Ste 470, Houston, TX 77030. Address correspondence to V. J. Seghers ([email protected]).

2Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.

Medica l Phys ics and Informat ics • Cl in ica l Perspect ive

AJR 2020; 215:1–4

ISSN-L 0361–803X/20/2156–1

© American Roentgen Ray Society

The coronavirus disease (COVID- 19) pandemic [1] caused by se-vere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) re-

quires a rapid response in radiology depart-ments to care for the potential surge of pa-tients and to decrease negative effects on the radiology workforce [2]. To maintain radiol-ogy department operations, lessons from pri-or outbreaks have been updated, including the ability of radiologists to work from home for isolation [3]. Home PACS workstations are integral to facilitating the social distanc-ing advocated by major health organizations [1, 4] and to meeting work-at-home needs, in-cluding childcare and eldercare.

In response to the pandemic, our hospi-tal-based radiology department of 41 ra-diologists successfully installed 22 home PACS workstations within a 10-day period by means of the expedited purchase of 12 new off-the-shelf systems and reallocation of 10 existing hospital workstations to homes. Three radiologists already had home PACS workstations for emergency situations, re-sulting in 25 functional home PACS worksta-tions. We were thus able to convert diagnos-tic staffing from 100% in-house as of March 13, 2020, to approximately 80% off-site as of March 20, 2020. This rapid rollout of home PACS workstations was possible only be-cause key players within the hospital and in-dustry worked together and recognized that in times of crisis, creative solutions are man-datory and administrative barriers should be broken. We are sharing our experience be-

Keywords: coronavirus disease, COVID-19, home PACS, stay home orders, teleradiology, work safe orders

doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.23297

M. B. K. Sammer and A. C. Sher contributed equally to this work.

Received April 5, 2020; accepted without revision May 9, 2020.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to share an experience in the rapid deploy-ment of home workstations that illustrates a creative solution that transcended typical admin-istrative barriers.

CONCLUSION. In response to the global coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, radiology departments need to rapidly deploy home PACS workstations to facilitate physical distancing and to guarantee radiologic expertise despite possible home quarantining or stay home, work safe orders.

Sammer et al.Home Workstations

Medical Physics and InformaticsClinical Perspective

Dow

nloa

ded

from

ww

w.a

jron

line.

org

by 7

1.62

.174

.241

on

06/3

0/20

fro

m I

P ad

dres

s 71

.62.

174.

241.

Cop

yrig

ht A

RR

S. F

or p

erso

nal u

se o

nly;

all

righ

ts r

eser

ved

2 AJR:215, December 2020

Sammer et al.

by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for nonmammographic diagnostic imaging (Table 1). Accessing the hospital resources from off-site locations depends on two-factor authentication and a robust VPN connection provided by the hospital to ensure security, encryption, and HIPAA compliance.

Allocation of At-Home PACS WorkstationsHome PACS workstations were provided

according to the following algorithm. The

first workstations went to those at high risk for COVID-19: older adults, those who were immunocompromised or had other comorbid conditions, and those who were pregnant [6]. The next set was allocated to providers un-dergoing hospital-mandated quarantine. We then distributed workstations to other physi-cians to maintain full subspecialty coverage from home; over one-half of radiologists re-ceived home PACS workstations. Nonover-lapping teams of at-home and in-hospital ra-

diologists were established to further limit exposure to COVID-19. In-hospital staff now consists of the minimum number of physi-cians required on-site to perform procedures and contrast reaction supervision; all other physicians work from home.

Given the rapid spread of COVID-19 and the need to wait for receipt of the new home PACS workstations, we exploited existing hospital-based PACS workstations by relo-cating them to homes of those most at risk or

TABLE 1: Specifications for Off-the-Shelf Home PACS Workstations

Component Example

Workstation specificationsa

Monitorsb

2 Sidecars Dell Ultrasharp 24-in LED LCD monitor U2419H (1920 × 1080 pixels, 60 Hz)

1 Doublewide reading monitor Dell Ultrasharp 32-in LED LCD Ultra HD 4K monitor (3840 × 2160 pixels, 60 Hz)

Video card Nvidia GeForce GT 730, 2 GB, LP (DP/DP)

CPU OptiPlex 7070 SFF XCTO, Intel Core I7–9700, 8 cores/12 MB/8 T/3.0–4.7 GHz

RAM 32 GB 2 × 16 GB 2666 MHz DDR4

Storage M.2 512 GB PCIe NVMe class 40 solid-state drive

Microphone Nuance PowerMic III

Network card Integrated NIC per manufacturer (1000/1000 Mbps)

Operating System Microsoft Windows 10 Enterprise

Items needed at home

Broadband home Internet ≥ 80 Mbps

Router and modem Wired router with Ethernet cable or wireless router with USB 3.0 Wi-Fi adapter for workstation (such as Netgear Nighthawk AC1900 Wi-Fi USB adapter)

Power strip ≥ 4 Outlets

Desk space Approximately 60 in (152 cm) wide, 24 in (61 cm) high, 20 in (51 cm) deep

Items needed from hospital

HIPAA-compliant method to connect to hospital network VPN with two-factor authentication

Note—LP = low profile, DP = display port, DDR = double data rate, NIC = network interface card.aIn addition, mouse, keyboard, and power supply must be added in accordance with local institutional preference.bWe do not perform or interpret mammography at our facility. If the home workstation is to be used to interpret mammography, a different monitor configuration is

necessary.

Fig. 1—Chart shows timeline of rollout of workstations. IS = information services, HWS = home workstations, ETA = estimated time of arrival, CDC = U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, WS = in-house workstation or workstations, 150 miles = 241 km.

Dow

nloa

ded

from

ww

w.a

jron

line.

org

by 7

1.62

.174

.241

on

06/3

0/20

fro

m I

P ad

dres

s 71

.62.

174.

241.

Cop

yrig

ht A

RR

S. F

or p

erso

nal u

se o

nly;

all

righ

ts r

eser

ved

AJR:215, December 2020 3

Home Workstations

quarantined. Although limited in our ability to convert all our reading room workstations to home stations because most are hardware mounted to modular desks, older but func-tional workstations used for training and the few remaining self-standing stations in read-ing rooms could be relocated. In addition to the relocation of the machines, information services (IS) had to create new software and profiles on the machines to allow them to be compatible with at-home use, a process that previously had not been attempted.

Training and DeploymentSome radiologists were able to receive

training from IS, confirm login and VPN access, and determine the functionality of their home PACS workstations at the hospi-tal and subsequently install the home work-station on their own, a process that typical-ly took 2 hours. Instructions to supplement training were developed to ensure straight-forward setup (Fig. 2), including provision of relevant telephone numbers for IS help desks. For some radiologists, in-hospital training or

self-installation was not possible. We there-fore recruited both clinical and nonclinical radiology department personnel, including research scientists, to transport and install the workstations because IS personnel were unable to go to private homes. The in-home setup of a relocated hospital workstation is shown in Figure 3 and of an off-the-shelf home PACS workstation in Figure 4.

Lessons LearnedTechnology

Items such as mousepads, cleaning wipes for monitors and equipment, and webcams to allow virtual conferences (such as tumor board meetings) are helpful but were not in-cluded in the standard setup and have been difficult to come by during this pandemic. A wired Ethernet cable connection is pre-ferred and remains the officially supported network configuration, though a separately purchased USB 3.0 Wi-Fi adapter does allow use of home PACS workstations at sufficient network speeds when a wired connection is not possible. Additionally, a limitation of the

new off-the-shelf workstations is uncertainty about their continued long-range functional-ity, specifically of the monitors, for diagnos-tic work [7]. Performing the recommend-ed routine periodic monitor calibration [8] will also be challenging. Nevertheless, these workstations were an expedient solution to the crisis at hand and may be considered for eventual wider use in our system after long-term follow-up reevaluation.

NetworkingA fast, secure Internet connection is imper-

ative for reading images from home. For our system, an 80-Mbps connection over the VPN gives close to in-house results. Speeds as low as 30–40 Mbps are acceptable, though lag oc-curs. Speeds of 200 Mbps and greater afford a seamless experience. When establishing a work-from-home solution, partnering with IS to optimize the network is essential. We share the VPN tunnel with the rest of the hospital, and speeds decrease during peak hours, par-ticularly as more users are required to work from home to promote social distancing. Ad-

Fig. 2—Photograph shows home PACS workstation cabling setup provided by information services for radiologists and nonclinical personnel recruited to assist with in-home PACS installation. 1 = left monitor, 2 = right monitor, 3 = microphone, 4 = keyboard, 5 = mouse, 6 = middle monitor, 7 = power supply, 8 = port for radiologist-provided network cable.

Fig. 3—Photograph shows formerly in-hospital PACS relocated to home. Monitor resolutions are 1200 × 1600 for each side monitor and 2048 × 2560 for each reading monitor.

Fig. 4—Photograph shows in-home PACS workstation built on rush basis by local vendor. Monitor resolutions are 1080 × 1920 for each side monitor and 2160 × 3240 for reading monitor.

Dow

nloa

ded

from

ww

w.a

jron

line.

org

by 7

1.62

.174

.241

on

06/3

0/20

fro

m I

P ad

dres

s 71

.62.

174.

241.

Cop

yrig

ht A

RR

S. F

or p

erso

nal u

se o

nly;

all

righ

ts r

eser

ved

4 AJR:215, December 2020

Sammer et al.

ditionally, if other family members are using devices at home, the bandwidth is split, which further decreases speeds.

Communication and Tech SupportGiven the need for rapid deployment of

home PACS workstations, a process for dis-tributing the workstations and providing tech support was developed on the fly, because no standard operating procedure had been devel-oped. Through teamwork and open commu-nication, IS and radiology worked to ensure real-time troubleshooting. This took the form of text messages, video conferencing, and e-mail communication between IS and radi-ology leadership to ensure timely issue res-olution. For example, granting VPN access to providers typically takes 3–5 days, but re-quests were being approved within hours ow-ing to the involvement of information secu-rity leadership. This became essential when quarantine rules limited the availability of radiologists to work in-house, changes some-times being made hours before the rotation start time. It was also integral that the IS help desk be able to gain remote access to a home workstation to troubleshoot problems. Initial-ly this required establishing a VPN connec-tion, potentially requiring a quarantined user to find a means of transporting their worksta-tion to the hospital if they could not establish a VPN connection. Subsequently, software was procured that allowed the help desk to

gain remote access into any system that could get online, whether or not a VPN connection could be established.

Given the strained resources of IS, radiolo-gists took it upon themselves to assist one an-other. Text messaging chains were established and how-to guides were distributed by early adopters to enable dissemination of informa-tion. This allowed users to help one another and quickly organize and solve problems in-ternally rather than requiring IS intervention.

ConclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic has required

rapid responses in radiology departments. Using creative solutions, our department was able to make a rapid transition to largely working from home. This was accomplished by both acquisition of new off-the-shelf workstations and reallocation of noncritical hospital PACS workstations to homes. Suc-cess was possible because key players from radiology, IS, hospital executive leadership, and industry worked together toward a com-mon goal. Our experience can be used to guide departments still in need of expedient deployment of at-home PACS workstations.

References 1. World Health Organization website. Coronavirus

disease 2019 (COVID-19) situation report 57. www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200317-sitrep-57-covid-19.pdf?

sfvrsn=a26922f2_2. Updated March 17, 2020. Accessed March 21, 2020

2. Kooraki S, Hosseiny M, Myers L, Gholamrezanezhad A. Coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak: what the department of radiology should know. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 17:447–451

3. Mossa-Basha M, Meltzer CC, Kim DC, Tuite MJ, Kolli KP, Tan BS. Radiology department pre-paredness for COVID-19. Radiology Scientific Expert Panel. Radiology 2020 Mar 16 [Epub ahead of print]

4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention web-site. Communities, schools, workplaces, and events information for where you live, work, learn, and play. www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/index.html. 2020. Accessed May 29, 2020

5. Silva E 3rd, Breslau J, Barr RM, et al. ACR white paper on teleradiology practice: a report from the Task Force on Teleradiology Practice. J Am Coll Radiol 2013; 10:575–585

6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. People who are at higher risk for severe illness. cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/specific-groups/high-risk-complications.html. 2020. Accessed March 21, 2020

7. Krupinski EA. Medical grade vs off-the-shelf color displays: influence on observer performance and visual search. J Digit Imaging 2009; 22:363–368

8. McNeill KM, Major J, Roehrig H, Krupinski E. Practical methods of color quality assurance for telemedicine systems. Med Imaging Technol 2002; 20:111

Dow

nloa

ded

from

ww

w.a

jron

line.

org

by 7

1.62

.174

.241

on

06/3

0/20

fro

m I

P ad

dres

s 71

.62.

174.

241.

Cop

yrig

ht A

RR

S. F

or p

erso

nal u

se o

nly;

all

righ

ts r

eser

ved