resources & strategy

36
ACTIONABLE ARCHITECTURE The complementary disciplines of EA and BPM

Upload: others

Post on 03-Feb-2022

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

ACTIONABLE

ARCHITECTURE

The complementary disciplines of EA and BPM

Presenters

• Di Ireland, Director, Enterprise Architecture and Liaison.

• Colm Cox, Enterprise Architect, Business Process Management.

And introducing..

• The CSU Team @EASymposium 2009

• Enterprise Architecture @ CSU

• BPM @ CSU

• Contribution to EA actionability• The role of Business Process Management

• The role of Business Architecture

• Case Studies• BPM project: Research Process review

• Developing an Online Architecture

So what is EA for CSU?

EA for CSU is about developing capabilityand a culture within the organisation

Benefits of Enterprise Architecture

• Improved Planning and Alignment with Strategy – “Doing the Right Things”– Building necessary capability (the desired state) aligned to the

changing educational / business strategy and mission of the University

• Fully optimized change and enhancements– “Doing Things The Right Way”– to business functions, process, financial resources and

investment, people, organizational structure, information and technology. Maximize reuse and empower decision makers with the right information.

• Adoption of Disciplined Strategies – “Getting them done well”– Effective and disciplined management , delivery and change

management processes. Provides “best practice” disciplines such as Data Governance, Portfolio, Program and Project Management

• Sustainability– Managed complexity, understand impact of proposed changes

and assimilate high rates of change.

Some things we need to accept!

Very few if any of us know

much about the business of

others in our organisation

Technology will always be at

fault and the shining light

We rarely know who else is

worrying about the same things

we are worrying about

We rarely know enough to know

how little we know

We mostly under-estimate the

complexity of our organisations

Many of our institutions are

managed to an alarming extent

by “gut feel”

The more complex the

organisation the less accurate

is the gut

People will attempt to make

their lack of planning your

emergency

Business Benefits

BPM@CSU

BPM Objectives

• Embed process thinking

• Managing business processes is part of „normal‟ mgmt.

• „line-of-sight‟ thinking

• Continuous improvement

• Performance and agility.

Governance MethodsStrategic

Alignment

Information

Technology

People Culture

Process -Related

Standards

Process Metrics

& Performance

Linkage

Process Roles

and

Responsibilities

Process

Management

Decision Making

Process

Measures

Enterprise

Process

Architecture

Strategy &

Process

Capability

Linkage

Process

Improvement

Plan

Process

Customers &

Stakeholders

Process Control

& Measurement

(M)

Process

Implementation &

Execution (M)

Process Design &

Modeling (M)

Process Control

& Measurement

(I)

Process

Implementation &

Execution (I)

Process Design &

Modeling (I)

Process

Education &

Learning

Process

Management

Knowledge

Process Skills &

Expertise

Process Attitudes

& Behaviors

Process Values &

Beliefs

Responsiveness

to Process

Change

Process Project &

Program Mgmt

(M)

Process

Improvement &

Innovation (M)

Process Project &

Program Mgmt (I)

Process

Improvement &

Innovation (I)

Process

Management

Leaders

Process

Collaboration &

Communication

Leadership

Attention to

Process

Process

Management

Social Networks

Process

Management

Controls

Governance MethodsStrategic

Alignment

Information

Technology

People Culture

Process -Related

Standards

Process Metrics

& Performance

Linkage

Process Roles

and

Responsibilities

Process

Management

Decision Making

Process

Measures

Enterprise

Process

Architecture

Strategy &

Process

Capability

Linkage

Process

Improvement

Plan

Process

Customers &

Stakeholders

Process Control

& Measurement

(M)

Process

Implementation &

Execution (M)

Process Design &

Modeling (M)

Process Control

& Measurement

(I)

Process

Implementation &

Execution (I)

Process Design &

Modeling (I)

Process

Education &

Learning

Process

Management

Knowledge

Process Skills &

Expertise

Process Attitudes

& Behaviors

Process Values &

Beliefs

Responsiveness

to Process

Change

Process Project &

Program Mgmt

(M)

Process

Improvement &

Innovation (M)

Process Project &

Program Mgmt (I)

Process

Improvement &

Innovation (I)

Process

Management

Leaders

Process

Collaboration &

Communication

Leadership

Attention to

Process

Process

Management

Social Networks

Process

Management

Controls

Governance MethodsStrategic

Alignment

Information

Technology

People Culture

Process -Related

Standards

Process Metrics

& Performance

Linkage

Process Roles

and

Responsibilities

Process

Management

Decision Making

Process

Measures

Enterprise

Process

Architecture

Strategy &

Process

Capability

Linkage

Process

Improvement

Plan

Process

Customers &

Stakeholders

Process Control

& Measurement

(M)

Process

Implementation &

Execution (M)

Process Design &

Modeling (M)

Process Control

& Measurement

(I)

Process

Implementation &

Execution (I)

Process Design &

Modeling (I)

Process

Education &

Learning

Process

Management

Knowledge

Process Skills &

Expertise

Process Attitudes

& Behaviors

Process Values &

Beliefs

Responsiveness

to Process

Change

Process Project &

Program Mgmt

(M)

Process

Improvement &

Innovation (M)

Process Project &

Program Mgmt (I)

Process

Improvement &

Innovation (I)

Process

Management

Leaders

Process

Collaboration &

Communication

Leadership

Attention to

Process

Process

Management

Social Networks

Process

Management

Controls

The BPM Maturity Model

10

Strategicalignment

Governance Methods IT People Culture

- Adapted, The BPM Maturity Model, BPM Group, QUT.

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

BPM @ CSU

Strategic Alignment

Governance

Methods

IT

People

Culture

ID and document processes

Develop Process Review

Methdology

SEC endorsement

WPI

Est. forums

WPP Grant

Common bus.language

General Briefings

EA/BPM roleInitiativesHandling

Survey of mapping approaches

Develop Process

Architecture

Strategic BPM project liaisonGet Executive buy-in for plan

Support Divisional Process mapping effort

Professional Development Programs

Modelling stds.

Tool Selection

Define Process

Ownership

Establish COPs

– Supporting executive decision making on investment in initiatives

– Building a „process culture‟

• Develop awareness and capabilities

• Cultivate consistent practices in process documentation, design, modelling and analysis

• Apply BPM ideas and practices to strategic initiatives

• Understand process activity across the university and engage with it where possible.

–Engage, Engage , Engage !!!

Actionability

• Relating to or being information that allows a decision to be made or action to be taken

-The Free dictionary

“To be successful, people within

the organization need the right information, at the right time, in the right format, at the right place. The information must be delivered securely, reliably and in a timely manner”

- Burget, Jerald, “EA as an Actionable Architecture”

Why Actionability?

• The Enterprise Architecture with all its viewpoints provides no value to the enterprise unless it is used.

Enterprise Architecture

• Current state and the vision for the future state

• Suggests where the focus should be

• Optimise architecture for BPM, e.g., SOA to support process control and measurement

• Process management decision making…IHP impact assessments

Business Process Management

• BPM initiatives can provide detail re: current/future state business models

• Improve business performance through align process with Strategy incl. measures

• E2E Process Ownership ethos

• Follows EA guidelines for execution

• Process view identifies underpinning needs: applications, information,skills and knowledge needs, platform, eg., SOA

• Process architecture inputs to data, applications , technology integration and EBA viewpoints

Synergy

The EBA Continuum

• “…. the EBA future state should represent where your business (processes, people, organization, financials) must be in the future to support the overall EA future state.”

• Need to integrate with development of other viewpoints

Source: Gartner, “Understand Enterprise Business

Architecture to Realise your Future State “, Research

Publication, G00158306, June 2008

Business functions and sub-functions

PEOPLE

FINANCIALS

ORGANISATIONS

PROCESS

Contribution of BPM to EBA

• BPM- Process Architecture

Business functions and sub-functions

PEOPLE

FINANCIALS

ORGANISATIONS

PROCESSBus.Process Inputs, outputs,

events, priorities etc.

$$Finance and

Budget Plan

Workforce Plan

Case Study 1

Drivers:

• Research –wide process review identifies key issues and process improvement opportunities.

– Poor Mgmt. of RHD students.

– External reporting problems

– The need to be flexible and agile to be able to meet changing Dept. of Education reporting.

– Internal management reporting needs.

– Demands for a new Research Mgmt. System

RESEARCH PROCESSES REVIEW PROJECT

BPM Engagement approach

Realise Benefits

Implement

Innovate

Understand

Launch Pad

Process Architecture

Organisation Strategy

20

alignment of project goals with strategy

Focus on Research

Selection of „Gap‟ Projects

Detailed modeling understand measures

Process (re)design

Delivery Projects

Process measures linked to outcomes

Benefits of the engagement

• Building organisational capability esp. with Project Team and steering committee

• Deliver business value

• Use the outcome to develop an engagement framework for future projects and further develop engagement with the business

• Ongoing refinement of the process architecture for the greater good !

• Provide useful input into the Enterprise Architecture information set. i.e., Feed into EA planning and architecture development methodology…triggers etc, into ADM

Benefits of the engagement(2)

Bridging the gap

• Developing the business context and articulating a business architecture as well as a technical architecture. (Case Study 2).

• Applying process management practices in active projects – delivering value on the ground

• Developing People and Culture aspects

• Positioning Enterprise Architecture as a proactive business enabler..not just “secret IT business”.

• Undertaking manageable BPM initiatives

Case Study 2

• Online Architecture Project

• Drivers

• Approach-defining a „business architecture‟

Online Environment Architecture

Vision

• Attract new participants to CSU community – students, researchers, collaborators, associates, vendors, customers, etc

• Support more effective and efficient teaching and learning

• Support current and alumni students more effectively.

• Encourage more collaborative research

• Encourage members of CSU community to broaden context of their relationships to

– Add value for themselves and

– Add value to the university

Strategy

Optimise the CSU Online Environment toward

• Developing an online sales environment for prospective students

• Enhancing the interactivity and online communities

• Developing a strong and engaging brand

Online Environment Issues(1)

• Focused on passive provision of information and lack of opportunity to engage with audiences

• Lack of provision of information relevant to the audience

Drivers for the BA

• Disagreement between key stakeholders with regard to the impact of the proposed change

• The need to understand the interdependencies of projects currently listed on the CSU enabling plan.

Online Environment Issues (2)

• Focused on passive provision of information and lack of opportunity to engage with audiences

• Lack of provision of information relevant to the audience

• No common understanding of what the „Online Environment‟ is.

• Responsibilities for governance, management of change and continuous improvement across the online environment are not clear.

Goal

• Articulate an agreed business view of the Online Environment that:

1. Provided a basis for the governance discussion

2. Described the desired state for the purposes

– Understanding impact

– Planning

Business Architecture Development Process

• Stakeholder model and RACI model

• Architectural description within a broader business context

–History

–Purpose

–Trends that influence the architecture

–Structure current state and future state

–Principles

• Model

Outcomes (1)

• Quick Win

Outcomes (2)

–Effective engagement with business stakeholders

– Linkage to process and University functions

–Segmented migration efforts can be identified

– Iteration 2 EBA development

– Interdependence and ripple effects

–Use the online architecture approach as a template for other strategic initiatives such as IDM

Contribution to actionable architecture

Realise Benefits

Implement

Innovate

Understand

Launch Pad

Process Architecture

Organisation Strategy Define a slice of the Future State

Trigger for updating the

Identify Gap Projects

Detailed Process info input to architecture viewpoints

Gaining Executive Support

• Looked for the right hooks

• Drive continuous process improvement - Process Review/Mapping/improvement projects

• The Eureka moment will come ..we hope!