resource november 2012

52
Cover Story UD Trucks: Leading the way by meeting customer expectations 6 Regulars President’s comment 3 Editor’s comment 5 IWMSA News 50 Solid waste Tyre recycling plan: the next step in waste minimisation and recycling 9 Solid waste management practices in Western Africa 12 Recycling Anton Hanekom chats with RéSource about the recycling industry in SA 14 Landfills Leachate is one of the highest risks in landfills 19 Waste to energy Sewage as a reliable supply of energy 22 Air pollution/CDM Global business remains far too carbon intensive 26 Hazardous waste E-waste awareness is low and it is a growing challenge in SA 28 Healthcare waste The safe disposal of healthcare waste lies in training and research 35 Profile CAIA: Managing the safe management of chemicals 40 Wastewater Water remains our most limited resource and, as such, it must be managed 43 Industry Opinion: Protecting the environment in hazardous waste disposal 46 Promoting integrated resources management U U U U U U U U U U U U U UD D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T TR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R RU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UC C C C C C C C C C C C C C K K K K K K K K K K K K K K KS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S Tackling environmental issues Pollution Leachate containment critical on landfills Carbon tax Global climate mitigation – pie in the sky Rolling out Tyre recycling plan cleans up Urban mining Lucrative, but buy-in is essential is printed on 100% recycled paper “Our energy recovery rates are lower than that of the European Union. On the mechanical side, though, we are better off than them.” Anton Hanekom, executive director at Plastics|SA contents www.3smedia.co.za ISSN 1680-4902, Volume 14, Number 4, November 2012 The RéSource team stands firmly behind environmental preservation. As such, RéSource magazine is printed on 100% recycled paper and uses no dyes or varnishes. The magazine is saddle- stitched to ensure that no glues are required in the binding process. RéSource November 2012 – 1 in association with } infrastructure news infrastructure4 www.infrastructurene.ws 09 Tyre recycling 22 Waste to energy 28 Electronic Waste 19 Leachate control RéSource offers advertisers an ideal platform to ensure maximum exposure of their brand. Companies are afforded the opportunity of publishing a cover story and a cover picture to promote their products and services to an appropriate audience. Please call Christine Pretorius on +27 (0)11 465 6273 to secure your booking. The article does not represent the views of the Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa, or those of the publisher.

Upload: 3s-media

Post on 26-Mar-2016

231 views

Category:

Documents


7 download

DESCRIPTION

Resource November 2012 edition

TRANSCRIPT

  • Cover StoryUD Trucks: Leading the way by meeting

    customer expectations 6

    RegularsPresidents comment 3

    Editors comment 5

    IWMSA News 50

    Solid wasteTyre recycling plan: the next step in

    waste minimisation and recycling 9

    Solid waste management

    practices in Western Africa 12

    RecyclingAnton Hanekom chats with RSource

    about the recycling industry in SA 14

    LandfillsLeachate is one of the highest

    risks in landfills 19

    Waste to energySewage as a reliable supply

    of energy 22

    Air pollution/CDMGlobal business remains

    far too carbon intensive 26

    Hazardous wasteE-waste awareness is low and

    it is a growing challenge in SA 28

    Healthcare waste The safe disposal of healthcare

    waste lies in training and research 35

    ProfileCAIA:Managing the safe management

    of chemicals 40

    WastewaterWater remains our most limited resource

    and, as such, it must be managed 43

    Industry Opinion: Protecting the environment in

    hazardous waste disposal 46

    +5504

    KPEN8#68QN0Q0QXGODGT

    Promoting integrated resources management

    UUUUUUUUUUUUUUDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSTackling environmental issues

    Pollution Leachate containment critical on landfills

    Carbon taxGlobal climate

    mitigation pie in the sky

    Rolling outTyre recycling plan cleans up

    Urban miningLucrative, but buy-in

    is essential

    6JGQHEKCNLQWTPCNQHVJG+PUVKVWVGQH 9CUVG/CPCIGOGPVQH5QWVJGTP#HTKEC

    +550

    'ZRGTV1RKPKQP

    is printed on 100% recycled paper

    Our energy recovery rates are lower than that of the European Union. On the mechanical side, though, we are better off than them. Anton Hanekom, executive director at Plastics|SA

    contentswww.3smedia.co.za ISSN 1680-4902, Volume 14, Number 4, November 2012

    The RSource team stands firmly behind environmental preservation. As such, RSource magazine is printed on 100% recycled paper and uses no dyes or varnishes. The magazine is saddle-stitched to ensure that no glues are required in the binding process.

    RSource November 2012 1

    in association with }

    infrastructure news infrastructure4 www.infrastructurene.ws

    09 Tyre recycling

    22 Waste to energy

    28 Electronic Waste

    19 Leachate control

    RSource offers advertisers an ideal platform to ensure maximum exposure of their brand. Companies are afforded the opportunity of publishing a cover story and a cover picture to promote their products and services to an appropriate audience. Please call Christine Pretorius on +27 (0)11 465 6273 to secure your booking. The article does not represent the views of the Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa, or those of the publisher.

  • :HRHUessential productsIRUwaste storage and transportation.

    Wheeled Bins: 140 litre 240 litre 770 litre 1000 litre 1100 litre

    3m collection bank

    240 litre

    770 litre

    Mpact Plastic ContainersNeil Hare Road, Atlantis, South Africa 9 Piet Pretorius Street, Brits, South AfricaPO Box 1551, Dassenberg, 7350 Tel: +27 (0) 21 573 9400/ 0861 672 444 www.mpcsa.co.za

    IRUPRUHLQIRUPDWLRQFRQWDFWXV

    3mFROOHFWLRQEDQN

  • RSource November 2012 3

    Cover strapPresident's comment

    Patron members of the IWMSA

    WasteCon 2012, Southern Africas most comprehensive waste man-agement conference, drew to a close in East London on 12 October 2012

    and we are delighted to report a resound-

    ingly successful event. This years WasteCon

    boasted over 500 delegates and 100 exhibi-

    tors, and was the biggest waste conference

    to have been hosted in South Africa to date.

    Now in its 25th year, this four-day, flagship

    biennial event brought together municipals as

    well as private entities to deliberate and set

    up processes that will move our nation ahead

    in addressing crucial issues pertinent to the

    waste management industry.

    At the IWMSA, we believe that we are on

    the brink of change, facing exciting new

    opportunities and challenges. Establishing

    a quality assurance framework for our mem-

    bership base is foremost on the agenda,

    which will not only result in that base having

    acquired sound knowledge but also serve

    to enhance the reputation and credibility of

    the IWMSA.

    We simply have to move away from landfill

    as the primary option for waste disposal and

    in order to achieve the desired result, our

    focus will continue to be on reuse, recycling

    and recovery. The IWMSA seeks for its mem-

    bers self-regulation within an appropriate

    legal framework. We understand that it is

    critical that the IWMSA serves its members

    by engaging with the various stakeholders in

    determining legislation and also to provide

    education in the form of workshops and

    training that is relevant and informed.

    A successful bout at WasteCon 2012

    We are pleased to have established a

    much greater rapport with government,

    and the resultant attendance of more

    municipal delegates than ever before at

    WasteCon 2012 is evidence of the strides

    taken in this regard. We are excited, too, to

    have received inputs from young delegates

    attending WasteCon 2012, who were there

    as a result of concern for the environment

    and for their future. We need to nurture

    and encourage such interest wherever

    possible in order to more effectively com-

    municate with communities so that trans-

    formation takes place from the ground up.

    In the past five years, the IWMSA has

    made signifi-

    cant progress in

    appointing spon-

    sored and accred-

    ited assessors

    and moderators to

    facilitate accred-

    ited training pro-

    grammes. These

    individuals are

    professionals in their respective fields who

    give voluntarily of their time and expertise

    and are, as such, truly invested in combat-

    ting our waste management crises. We

    thank and salute them all.

    The role of the IWMSA as an organisation

    is to educate its members, as well as pri-

    vate and government sectors, and to set a

    new standard for IWMSA members in terms

    of certification and accreditation. In order

    to implement effective and sustainable

    waste management processes, we need

    to be proactive, especially at grass roots

    level. The challenges that are faced by

    those on the ground on a day-to-day basis

    must be addressed in order to effect real

    change in the industry.

    We, at the IWMSA, focus on providing

    education and training for our members, as

    well as other interested parties, whether

    private individuals or government entities.

    The IWMSA is a non-profit organisation

    comprising a body of dedicated profes-

    sionals in their respective fields, who give

    freely and voluntarily of their time and

    expertise in order to effectively educate,

    promote and fur ther

    the science and prac-

    tice of waste man-

    agement. Anyone

    wishing to find out

    more about the

    IWMSA or how to

    become a mem-

    ber can visit

    www.iwmsa.

    co.za.

    We believe that we are on the brink of change, facing exciting new opportunities and challenges. Deidr Nxumalo-Freeman, president, IWMSA

    WRESTLING WITH WASTE

    by Deidr Nxumalo-Freeman, president, IWMSA

  • RSource November 2012 5

    Waste is part of the human con-dition. It is a by-product of our very existence and for this rea-son, solutions to minimising and managing

    it are critical. The amount of waste gener-

    ated per person is highly dependent on

    living standard measures and the higher

    that measure, the higher the consumption

    and, consequently, the higher the levels of

    waste. Thus, you would not be wrong for

    thinking that as a country, South Africa

    should be in a better position since the

    bulk of our population falls into the lower

    levels of income but this, in turn, provides

    a new challenge as a lot of recyclable waste

    is sent to landfill. Re-

    cycling and concern

    for the environment

    is not exactly top of

    the list for people

    who are struggling to

    meet the most basic

    needs. Maslows hi-

    erarchy of needs is

    applicable here. We cannot expect of peo-

    ple whose basic needs are not met to care

    about recycling, litter and things like the

    environment. We cannot expect people who

    need plastic canisters to keep water to be

    concerned about what the canisters held in

    the first place. Neither can we expect those

    self-same people to not litter or separate

    their waste for the benefit of reducing land-

    fills. In fact, many of those people are on

    landfills trying to reclaim what they can to

    make a living or collecting recyclables from

    more affluent suburbs.

    By the same token, recycling initiatives

    cannot solely rely on private individuals

    and companies, with very little assis-

    tance from government. More support

    is required to back up the legislation

    and, as discussed by Anton Hanekom,

    the chief at Plastics|SA in this edition,

    more incentives and subsidies could form

    part of that solution. Training and polic-

    ing of waste management and disposal,

    including hazardous waste, along with

    forums where all the role players can

    come together and keep communication

    channels open to engage everyone, are

    very important to achieve country suc-

    cess. The process is moving forward but

    it is fragmented because the business,

    economic and infrastructure environment

    to see it achieve the success it has to

    achieve, is not in place.

    Waste is not an isolated concept. Every

    citizen is involved because we are all gen-

    erating it. We cannot expect innovation,

    recycling and minimisation to take place

    if we are not all involved and we do not

    all understand the paramount importance

    of it. A lot of information was put for-

    ward at the recently

    held WasteCon in

    East London, hosted

    by the Institute of

    Waste Management

    of Southern Africa,

    but in-depth research

    is required. Solutions

    include training, edu-

    cation, employment opportunities to uplift

    communities living on the fringe of soci-

    ety, and a conducive environment in which

    to operate. There are many initiatives and

    while this puts us on our way to waste

    management success, we are nowhere

    near close enough yet.

    Yanna Erasmus

    RSource is endorsed by:

    It has to be a collective and inclusive effort

    Publisher: Elizabeth ShortenAssociate Publisher: Ferdie PieterseEditor: Yanna Erasmus Tel: +27 (0)11 233 2600, [email protected] of design: Frdrick DantonSenior designer: Hayley MendelowChief sub-editor: Claire NozacSub-editor: Patience GumboProduction manager: Antois-Leigh BotmaProduction coordinator: Jacqueline ModiseFinancial manager: Andrew Lobban Marketing & online manager: Martin HillerDistribution manager: Nomsa MasinaDistribution coordinator: Asha PursothamAdministrator: Tonya HebentonPrinters: United Litho JohannesburgTel: +27 (0)11 402 0571 Advertising sales: Christine PretoriusTel: +27 (0)11 465 8255 [email protected]

    Publisher: MEDIANo.4, 5th Avenue Rivonia, 2191PO Box 92026, Norwood 2117Tel: +27 (0)11 233 2600Share Call: 086 003 3300 Fax: +27 (0)11 234 7274/5www.3smedia.co.za

    Annual subscription: [email protected] (incl VAT) South Africa ISSN 1680-4902

    The Institute of Waste Management of Southern AfricaTel: +27 (0)11 675 3462E-mail: [email protected]

    All material herein RSource is copyright-protected and may not be reproduced either in whole or in part without the prior written permission of the publisher. The views and opinions ex-pressed in the magazine do not necessarily reflect those of the publisher or editor, but those of the author or other contributors under whose name contributions may appear, unless a con-tributor expresses a viewpoint or opinion in his or her capacity as an elected office bearer of a company, group or association.

    Copyright 2012. All rights reserved.

    We cannot expect innovation, recycling and minimisation to take place if we are not all involved

    Editor's comment

    APOLOGY RSource left out the references from the following case study in the August 2012 edition: Water balance covers and their applicability to South African land-fills. For more information on the case study, please contact Riva Nortje on +27 (0)11 519 0200 or e-mail: [email protected]. We apologise for any inconvenience caused.

  • UD Trucks forms part of one of the worlds largest trucking groups, with operations in South Africa being the brands largest market outside of Japan, sig-

    nifying its strategic importance in the country

    as well as in Southern Africa.

    For more than 50 years, UD Trucks

    has produced legendary vehicles that have

    built an outstanding reputation in the local

    transport industry, says Jacques Carelse,

    UD Trucks Southern Africa MD. This is

    mainly due to the vehicles unrelenting reli-

    ability, versatile performance and suitability

    to South African road and operating condi-

    tions. The company has invested greatly in

    developing innovative and modern vehicles

    that offer better efficiency, fuel economy and

    environmental responsibility.

    Through its environmental

    policy, UD Trucks aims to cre-

    ate a better environment by

    taking every possible meas-

    ure to tackle global environ-

    mental issues. The company

    also aims to develop envi-

    ronmentally friendly products

    through measures such as

    reducing exhaust emissions, improving fuel

    efficiency, developing cleaner fuels and

    reducing external automobile noise.

    Matching customer expectations with global business insightsExtensive research by UD Trucks has

    revealed that customers are increasingly

    looking for a truck provider that can be a

    true professional partner. The company is

    therefore committed to continue building

    closer professional relationships with its

    customers and offers dependable transport

    solutions a recipe for future success.

    UD Trucks extensive dealer network

    remains committed to providing customers

    with innovative transport solutions and ser-

    vice offerings, built on trust, in-depth industry

    knowledge and a strong technical skills set.

    The company has more than 60 dealers in

    Southern Africa, including Botswana, Kenya,

    Lesotho, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius,

    Mozambique, Namibia, Uganda, Swaziland,

    Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

    UD Trucks has a proud after-sales care

    record as a result of a concerted commit-

    ment to consistently improve product and

    customer support to ensure the best pos-

    sible vehicle availability and utilisation.

    This commitment

    starts with excellent

    product support from

    UD Trucks in Japan.

    The company also

    continuously employs

    and trains specialist

    technicians in order

    to ensure the highest

    quality of workmanship, explains Carelse.

    The efficient and timely supply of quality

    UD Trucks parts remains one of the com-

    panys main priorities.

    UD Trucks dedicated distribution centre

    aims to provide the best service in the

    industry and contribute to the low life

    cycle costs of all UD Trucks products. With

    more than 400 000 parts internationally

    and 28 000 locally all of which are man-

    aged through a computer-controlled storage

    system an industry-leading parts supply

    has consistently been achieved.

    Legendary trucks, future-forward technologyThrough a pioneering spirit, groundbreak-

    ing engineering and a customer-centric

    approach, UD Trucks applies the expertise

    amassed in the diesel-engine field to pro-

    duce trucks that are comfortable, safe and

    environmentally friendly.

    UD Trucks Southern Africa offers a well-

    balanced range ensuring appropriate tech-

    nology for the needs of customers in the

    waste management and related industries.

    Medium duty trucks UD85 Recycling (skip loader)

    UD90 Recycling (compactor)

    Specifically configured for the waste manage-

    ment industry, UD Trucks range of medium

    duty trucks (MDT) offers a comfortable ride

    and low noise levels, with advanced safety

    features and a powerful engine that provides

    high levels of fuel economy and durability.

    UD Trucks MDT range is geared to achieve

    excellent fuel consumption and gradeabil-

    ity, ensuring that a high average speed is

    attained to boost productivity.

    The class-leading performance of these

    units is achieved by the unique combination

    of engine power, transmission ratios and

    final drive ratio.

    The high specification, inherent strength

    and minimalist approach of UD Trucks MDT

    engine range, proven through extensive

    testing, make the trucks ideal for work.

    The vehicles are easy to drive, operate and

    UD TRUCKS

    As one of the regions leading truck manufacturers, UD Trucks Southern Africa is driven by its vision of being professional, passionate and dependable in everything it does.

    6 RSource November 2012

    Into the future after UUD TR

    QUALITY AND AFTERSALES SUPPORT FORM THE BACKBONE OF UD TRUCKS

    UD Trucks MDT range is geared to achieve excellent fuel consumption and gradeability

    Cover Story

  • RSource November 2012 7

    Cover story

    RSSRSRSRSRSRSRSRSRSRSR ourouourourourourourrceccecececeeec NovNovNovNovovNovNovvNovNovNovN vvvembembembemembembembemembemem er eererrerer errererr 20120120120201201202012012200010012012012012010001000102002010 222 22 2 22 2 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 22222 77777777777777777777777777777

    maintain, and are exactly what UD Trucks

    Southern Africa wants to offer its South

    African customers.

    Heavy duty trucks UD330WF Recycling (compactor)

    CW26 490 Recycling (skip loader)

    UD Trucks Quon range of heavy duty trucks

    has been specifically designed and devel-

    oped as a smart worker a truck that

    works intelligently as part of a profitable

    transport solution for its owner.

    The design fuses UD Trucks tradition of

    environmentally friendly technology, with the

    smartness and stalwart power of a new-

    generation working truck that is endowed

    with high levels of intelligence. After thou-

    sands of kilometres of testing, UD Trucks

    believes the new Quon range also adheres

    to stringent local requirements.

    A selection of manual and automatic

    manual transmissions has been employed

    across the range to suit a variety of appli-

    cations. The automatic gearboxes were

    specifically developed to improve safety,

    overall economy and offer the operators

    easy driving capabilities. The AO612 group

    new automated manual transmission, offers

    two-pedal or clutchless operation through

    the innovative 12-speed Escot V gearshift

    mechanism, and is suitable for the skip

    loader application. For compactor applica-

    tions, the Allison fully automatic transmis-

    sions are employed specifically like in the

    case of the UD330 WM.

    ESCOT has been specifically designed

    for enhanced driver comfort and safety,

    lower maintenance as well as greater fuel

    efficiency. It offers both power and econ-

    omy in a wide variety of driving scenarios

    by increasing driving performance at low

    speeds at time of start, and reducing engine

    speeds in high gear at cruising speeds.

    The UD Trucks Quon range successfully

    combines leading environmentally friendly

    technology with the smartness and stalwart

    power of a new-generation working truck that

    is endowed with high levels of intelligence.

    However, the Quon range remains easy to

    operate and maintain, providing customers

    with the best of both worlds.

    A special off-road chassis packaging has

    also been introduced specifically to suit the

    regions unique operating conditions. This

    includes uprated front axle ratings, heavy

    duty front suspension and stabiliser, radia-

    tor protection, as well as a higher reposi-

    tioned exhaust silencer and fuel tanks.

    RSource November 2012 7

    50 successful years

  • RSource November 2012 9

    Solid Waste

    Somewhere between 10 and 15 million tyres are produced annually in South Africa, which equates to approximately 300 000 t. The number of scrap tyres, or tyres

    that can no longer be retreaded or reused,

    amounts to 10 million per year. Currently, there

    are only three active tyre recycling companies

    in the country, recycling around 1 000 t each,

    which means an estimated

    13% of total waste tyres re-

    cycled, and this is currently

    meeting market demand for

    crumb. Tyres are a particu-

    lar problem for landfill due

    to their large volumes and

    75% void space, which

    provides a breeding ground for mosquitoes

    and rodents. They also trap methane, not

    only risky in itself for fires at landfills, but the

    gas also causes the tyres to become buoy-

    ant or bubble to the surface, damaging the

    liners in landfills and enhancing groundwater

    pollution with toxic leachate.

    The controversyOriginally, three plans to deal with the sur-

    plus existed; the Retail Motor Industry

    Organisation (RMI), the South African Tyre

    Recycling Process (SATRP) and the Recycling

    and Economic Development Initiative of South

    Africa (Redisa) all prepared plans. The RMI

    accused Redisa of hijacking the plan pre-

    pared by the RMI and

    the Tyre Dealers

    and Fitment

    Association plan,

    as the Redisa chief,

    Herman Erdmann,

    was formerly the

    chairman of the lat-

    ter. Erdmann denied these allegations, but

    allegedly agreed to repay the association for a

    disputed amount that was spent on the plan.

    The SATRP also submitted a plan that cost in

    the region of R8 million, which it had worked

    on for around 12 years. At the end of it all,

    after several attempts and interdicts and

    other actions, the court ruled in favour of the

    Redisa plan, which was approved by the min-

    istry, and all tyre manufacturers were ordered

    to join Redisa by 21 September this year. The

    judge ruled that no one would be prejudiced

    if the other plans were also approved by the

    environment ministry as they could then leave

    Redisa and join another plan. The other organ-

    isations are continuing their submissions.

    The recycling planRedisas recycling plan, which is now gazet-

    ted, involves a levy of R2.30/kg on all locally

    manufactured and imported tyres. Instead

    of the producer responsibility system for

    recycling, the association opted for a levy

    system. The argument for this is based on

    its argument that producer responsibility is

    a voluntary system, which does not offer a

    fair playing field. In a levy system, it says

    REMOVAL OF SCRAP TYRES BY YANNA ERASMUS

    As South Africa continues in its drive to manage and limit waste, in particular waste to landfi ll, recycling initiatives are growing. The driving force for recycling is attaching a value to the waste product and in the next step to waste minimisation, one plan for dealing with scrap tyres has recently been gazetted, albeit surrounded by controversy.

    ABOVE A pile of scrap tyres near a landfill in the East Rand

    The number of scrap tyres, or tyres that can no longer be retreaded or reused, amounts to 10 million per year

    Rolling out tyre recycling

  • 10 RSource November 2012

    Solid waste

    all producers and importers operate equally.

    Redisa has focused on small and very small

    black businesses to remove waste tyres that

    are already in the environment. These will be

    delivered to one of a 150 collection points

    which will be established across the country.

    The document states that a network of

    collection depots and recyclers will be estab-

    lished, and part of the operating cost of the

    plan will be devoted to training and support-

    ing of the SMMEs. Another component will

    be allocated to research and development to

    create recycling processes.

    Formalising collectionThe roll-out of the plan is that collections

    of passenger and truck tyres must start

    within 10 months. They are aiming to better

    that target. New recycling plants will typi-

    cally take 18 to 24 months to establish from

    scratch, but some are being commissioned

    now and others estimated to account for

    about 10% of the total volume of waste tyres

    are currently operating.

    Redisa stated: At the moment, collec-

    tors pick up the tyres from dealers but

    there is no agreed tariff and no agreed

    or regulated depot for transporting the

    tyres, which often results in the tyres being

    indiscriminately dumped either at landfills

    or in the veld. There is, as yet, little for-

    malised recycling of tyres, and the majority

    is disposed in environmentally unfriendly

    ways (burning, illegal dumping, landfill).

    Recycled rubber for other avenues, such as

    rubber shoes and so on, have not yet been

    formally set-up and there is therefore no

    overall regulation of this informal industry.

    By creating a sustainable recycling indus-

    try (that includes product development

    and transporters), formal income earning

    opportunities will be significantly increased

    (and tracked and reported on).

    This will not be without its challenges.

    Currently, there are three recycling plants

    in operation with one in Gauteng, one in

    KwaZulu-Natal and another in the Western

    Cape. They are meeting market demand.

    More crumb markets neededAccording to Ika van Niekerk of SA Tyre

    Recyclers in the Western Cape, the company

    handles around 1 000 t scrap tyres monthly

    and produces crumb from them. He is also of

    the opinion that the three recyclers are meet-

    ing market demand. It is becoming a very

    limited and competitive market for direct or

    wholesale sales to crumb users. More crum-

    bers would result in profitability challenges

    and inevitably the survival of the fittest.

    Thus, a market must be created for crumb.

    The future lies in utilising rubber crumb

    in value-adding industries, such as motor

    industry components, foot wear and many

    other possibilities. This process will inevi-

    tably compete with Chinese imports and

    other countries in the East, where labour

    costs are very competitive. To establish

    markets for downstream products is easier

    said than done. It might well require seri-

    ous intervention from government and an

    approved waste tyre plant to assist in creat-

    ing markets. One of the challenges is a sur-

    plus of crumb in Europe and if the market

    here is not protected, the prices that the

    crumb can be imported at will be equivalent

    to what it costs us to produce it.

    The challenge of recyclingTyres offer a particular challenge for recy-

    cling, because unlike waste products like

    glass, plastics and paper, they cannot be

    remade. Natural rubber consists of polymers

    that exist in chains, and virgin or new rubber

    cannot bind to the polymers in crumb, the

    final product of the tyre recycling process.

    Scrap tyres can be used in the construction

    of houses, roads, boarding, apparel and

    the like.

    Incineration in cement factory kilns is also

    an option, but only 15% of the coal load can

    be replaced by crumb and the technol-

    ogy is very expensive. Thus, Van Niekerk

    says that his plant does not sell crumb for

    incineration. He says that he is aware of

    one factory near Port Elizabeth that uses

    shredded tyres in the brick-making process.

    Road construction companies, however,

    order crumb and the Heidelberg highway

    for example, was constructed this way. The

    use of crumb in this way is very efficient

    as the road lasts five times longer because

    the crumb protects the road foundation.

    The problem of red tapeAnother criticism of the Redisa plan is the

    levy system. Riaan van Niekerk from Pirelli

    and the SATRP plan is of the opinion that the

    levy system will cause a lot of red tape. A lot

    of tyre brands are imported to South Africa

    and from here, service the SADC region. The

    levy must be paid on the import but once

    exported the levy must be claimed back. This

    is considered to be a strength in the SATRP

    plan and the levy is lower at R1.98/kg. The

    levy on the tyre is charged at the point of

    sale in South Africa, which eliminates the

    system of credits and debits that the Redisa

    plan will cause.

    The majority of countries in the European Union are using producer responsibility above the levy system

    ABOVE Scrap tyres are baled to reduce their volume for transport to a recycling plant

  • RSource November 2012 11

    t Integrated Waste Management Planst Waste Disposal Strategiest Identification and permitting of landfill sitest Design of General and Hazardous Waste sitest Design of Solid Waste Transfer Stationst Design of Material Recovery Facilitiest Optimisation of Waste Collection Systemst Auditing of Waste Management Facilitiest Development of Operational Planst Closure and Rehabilitation of Landfillst Quality Assurance on Synthetic Linerst Waste Recycling Plans

    Specialist Waste Management ConsultantsSustainable and appropriate engineering solutions with integrity and professionalism.

    Jan Palm Consulting EngineersTel +27 21 982 6570 / Fax +27 21 981 0868 / E-mail [email protected] / www.jpce.co.za

    Gansbaai Recycling Centre

    Velddrif Transfer Station

    Botrivier Drop-off

    Hermanus Materials Recovery Facility

    Vissershok Waste Management Facility

    Stanford Drop-off

    And the European Tyre and Rubber

    Manufacturers Association (ETRMA) agrees.

    Research published in 2011 on end-of-

    life tyres (ELT) shows that the majority of

    countries in the European Union (EU) are

    using producer responsibility above the levy

    system. Some 57% in 2011 used producer

    responsibility. This system, the association

    says, is robust and suitable and currently,

    there is a 100% recovery rate with producer

    responsibility. Denmark and Slovakia still

    use the levy system and six countries are

    using the free-market system. In the EU,

    countries can choose the system they want

    to use, but landfilling has been abolished

    since 2006. Only two countries are still

    landfilling: Bulgaria and Cyprus. Europe has

    around 5.7 Mt of tyre stockpiles, which is

    almost double the number of used tyres pro-

    duced in 2010, and the number continues to

    increase. Material recovery stands at 40%

    and energy recovery at 38%.

    The total recycling rate in the EU stands at

    96% compared to 50% in 2005. The asso-

    ciation says that the improvement is due

    to the sustained deployment of the producer

    responsibility model. Genan in Denmark,

    one of the largest recycling operations in the

    world, does not agree due to unfair competi-

    tion and Redisa has followed this model.

    If it is indeed true, as Redisa says,

    that South Africa has 60 million scrap

    tyres lying around,

    then the countrys

    challenge is mas-

    sive. Once value

    has been added

    to these tyres,

    the influx will

    grow quickly and

    the market has to

    catch up. Plants

    have to be built, research into new products

    must be completed and a market created

    for these products as a matter of urgency.

    However, in spite of these tangible obsta-

    cles, South Africa has to deal with its waste

    tyre problem and the gazetting of this plan is

    the first step in the right direction.

    Options for recycled and scrap tyresBesides reuse and retreatment, there are

    other products that can be created. Options

    for tyre derived products include the use of

    crumb as an energy source, binding whole

    tyres together used as barriers including col-

    lision reduction, erosion control, rainwater

    runoff, wave action that protects piers and

    marshes, landfill walls and sound barriers

    between roadways and residences. Entire

    homes can be built with whole tyres by ram-

    ming them full of earth and covering them

    with concrete. Shredded tyres can also be

    used in civil engineering applica-

    tions such as sub-grade fill and

    embankments, backfill for walls

    and bridge abutments, sub-grade

    insulation for roads and septic

    system drain fields. Ground and crumb rubber

    can also be used in both paving type projects

    and mouldable products. These types of pav-

    ing are rubber-modified asphalt or concrete,

    livestock mats and more.

    This means an estimated 13% of total waste tyres are recycled

    Solid waste

  • 12 RSource November 2012

    and formal private role players are mostly in-

    volved in insufficient collection and final

    disposal (landfills), whereas informal actors

    are involved in pre-collection and recycling.

    Pre-collection is generally per formed by

    the informal sector in low-income neigh-

    bourhoods that are not covered by the

    formal collection systems. So, informal

    actors or NGOs organise pre-collection and

    transportation up to the level of transfer

    stations. From here the waste is collected

    by trucks belonging to either public or pri-

    vate entities and brought to the municipal

    dumping site. Sometimes informal col-

    lectors also deposit the waste in illegal

    dumping sites, especially when there is no

    reloading site nearby or when waste is not

    collected regularly.

    When zoning of waste collection was initi-

    ated, conflicts between formal and informal

    sectors was observed especially in the

    metropolitan areas of Accra, Kumasi, Tema,

    Takoradi and Tamale. There is an ongoing

    dispute about whether or not the informal

    sector should be allowed to continue oper-

    ating, to be integrated or organised into the

    formal sector or to be stopped all together.

    Final disposal infrastructureThe Accra Metropolitan Assembly is struggling

    to secure land for the construction of a sani-

    tary landfill. Residents are against the idea

    of constructing landfills close to their homes

    because of the fear of the unbearable stench

    that is likely to emanate from the landfill and

    also of the possibility of flies and rodents

    invading the area.

    In Ivory Coast, after having provided an

    emergency support during the political

    crisis (four SMEs have signed service

    agreements with Abidjan), the World Bank

    in its partnership strategy for 2010-2013

    has committed to funding the construc-

    tion of two sanitary landfills in Abidjan

    TABLE 7 ORGANISATION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT IN WESTERN AFRICAStep Actors Infrastructure and equipment availablePre-collection (in low income areas)

    Informal sector, CBOs, NGOs, coop-eratives, SMEs

    Very low. Wheelbarrows, handcarts, tricycles (in Ghana).Communal collection points or transfer stations.

    Collection (in high income areas)

    Municipality, formal private sector

    Plastic bags, bins, barrels, skip containers.

    Transportation Municipality, formal private sector

    Compactor trucks, skip trucks, tipper trucks and roll-on roll-off trucks, or in more rural areas tractors and carts. An important share of the vehicles is second hand vehicles (international donations), which is not in working order.

    Zoomlion Ghana Limited, the largest Ghanaian company has 50 000 collection trucks and tricycles.

    Separation Households, infor-mal sector

    By households (if they sell to the informal waste buyers), by informal workers in the street and on dumping sites.

    Recycling Informal and for-mal sector

    Informal sector: manual metal smelting equipmentFormal sector: plastic shredders etc.

    Final disposal Municipality, formal private sector

    70% to 90% of the municipal solid waste is disposed of in official dumpsites. The rest is irregularly or illegally dumped.

    On the official dumpsites, the waste is compacted with trucks. There are usually no installations for gas collection and treatment or leakage water drainage. The leakage water runs uncontrolled to the next river. Only in Lagos the leakage water reaches a leachate pond.

    Information on total and remaining capacities of official dumpsites could not be acquired.

    Open air incineration is very common for households and at irregular and official dumpsites, to reduce the volumes.

    Source: (IWWA 2011)

    Solid waste management practices in Western Africa

    PART II OF V

    In Western Africa, the rapid rate of uncontrolled and unplanned urbanisation, coupled with a high density of urban settlements and changing consumption patterns, have accelerated the need for water supply, sanitation and waste management infrastructure.

    Solid waste

    In Western African countries, as in many other low-income countries, waste man-agement is generally organised as sum-marised in Table 7, with low income area

    collection informally organised and separa-

    tion for recycling done by households and

    the informal sector. Recycling takes place in

    both the informal and formal sectors. Public

  • RSource November 2012 13

    Mills & Otten ccEnvironmental Consultants

    1998/46338/23 Johannesburg Cape TownTel: (011) 486 0062 Tel: (021) 671 7107 Fax: (086) 554 6573 Fax: (021) 671 7107 Contact: Charles Mills / Kirstin Otten Contact: Stephanie de Beer

    Independent Environmental Consultants specialising in:

    Environmental Impact Assessments Environmental Management Systems Environmental Audits

    Contaminated Land Assessment Environmental Management Plans Waste License Applications

    [email protected]

    TABLE 10 JOBS IN MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE COLLECTION, TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL

    Ghana Ivory Coast Nigeria SenegalAccra KEEA Abidjan Lagos Ido Dakar Matam

    Number of formal companies 17 in Ghana 7 10 n.a. n.a. n.a.

    Number of formal workers 3 200 141 1 765 3 000 120 1 701 9

    Number of formal workers per 1 000 inhabitants

    0.80 0.71 0.0003 0.38 n.a. 0.57 0.51

    Number of informal workers engaged in separation, re-selling of recyclable materials and recycling

    On Abgog-bloshie scrap yard: 3 000 members of the scrap dealers association.

    n.a. Over 25 000 in the Kano metropolis

    Sources: IWWA 2011; San 2002; Saleh 2008

    Solid waste

    and further, to support the government

    in conceiving a national strategy for solid

    waste management. The objective is to

    secure 9 000 permanent jobs (waste col-

    lectors) by 2013 and to collect and deposit

    in the landfills 80% of the waste generated

    in Abidjan.

    In Dakar, a sanitary landfill is built in

    the region of This next to Dakar, where

    Dakars waste will be disposed in the

    future. The landfill will be operated by a

    private company. In addition, a transfer

    and separation station is being built in

    Mbao. There is currently a conflict regard-

    ing the geographical location of the landfill

    between the Ministry of the Environment,

    the National Agency for Cleanliness

    (APROSEN), the network of the main cities

    of the region of Dakar (Entente CADAK-

    CAR) and inhabitants of neighbouring areas

    in the rural communities of Sindia and

    Diass. In the City of Matam, the NGO Lux-

    Development is implementing a project

    including three transfer stations and a

    sanitary landfill for the municipal waste.

    Prior to the project, the city administration

    together with the inhabitants has carried

    out an environmental impact analysis.

    Collection and recycling ratesConcerning recycling rates, there is no public

    monitoring of such figures as recycling is left

    to the formal and informal private sector.

    There is hardly any support from both local

    authorities and governmental agencies for

    companies and business people who intend

    to establish businesses that make use of

    waste materials. However, paper, cardboard,

    organic waste, plastics, e-waste and scrap

    metal are sorted by the informal sector on

    dumpsites or scrap yards and either recy-

    cled locally by formal or informal actors, or

    exported. Some fractions such as metal

    scrap have a very high recycling rate while

    less valuable fractions end up in the dump-

    sites to a large extent.

    Employment opportunitiesThe number of formal workers responsible for

    the collection and transportation of municipal

    solid waste varies from 0.003 (Abidjan) to

    0.8 per 1 000 inhabitants (see Table 10).

    The number of informal workers is high in all

    four countries. The informal sector is particu-

    larly developed in Nigeria and is structured

    in the following way (Adebola, 2006):

    Cart pushers: house to house waste col-

    lection at a small fee.

    Scavengers: involved in both on-site and

    off-site waste and resource recovery. They

    recover re-usable and recyclable materials

    like plastics, aluminium, glass, paper,

    scrap metal and animal waste such as

    horn, bones and the like.

    Resource merchants: traders involved

    in the purchase of all recovered

    recyclable and reusable materials from

    the scavengers.

    Recyclers: includes both the micro- and

    the small-scale recycling companies. They

    convert recovered waste materials like

    paper, aluminium, animal by-products,

    plastics and scrap metals, to valuable

    materials and raw materials for the con-

    sumption of the industrial sector.

    Costs and financing mechanismIt is generally assumed that the cost of the

    management of solid municipal waste in

    Africa is very low with an average of 2 (R26) per year per inhabitant, as compared to the

    high income countries where it can go well

    beyond 100 (R1 300). The City of Accra is practicing full cost recovery and thus charging

    close to commercial rates, while waste man-

    agement in the most Western African cities

    is subsidised. Moreover, households pay the

    service providers directly, particularly in the

    informal sector for pre-collection services.

    This is an abridged version of the second

    part of a paper on the project of Integrated

    Waste Management in Western Africa. The

    duration of the project, funded by the EU

    within the Seventh Framework Programme,

    was two years and the results of the research

    were submitted during May 2012. For a full

    version, including references, please contact

    Yanna Erasmus at [email protected]

  • 14 RSource November 2012

    Recycling

    PLASTICS RECYCLING

    SA has unique circumstances in the recycling sector

    Plastics|SAs executive director, Anton Hanekom, speaks to Yanna Erasmus about the business of recycling plastics. The industry in South Africa is growing in leaps and bounds and the country leads in many aspects, but there are diffi culties and obstacles that must be overcome.

    The advent of plastics changed the packaging landscape and human society forever. Not only was it rela-tively inexpensive and easy to make, it was

    light and easier to handle than the packag-

    ing solutions of old. In South Africa, it is a

    relatively young material, having only been

    around for about 50 or 60 years. Today, and

    in the public eye, plastics have a bad repu-

    tation, thanks to litter in par ticular plastic

    bags. Hanekom says: Our modern lifestyle

    will not be possible without plastics. The in-

    dustry provides essential products to a vari-

    ety of sectors, including medical and health,

    automotive, mining, agriculture, packag-

    ing, building and construction, electrical,

    and electronics.

    South Africa conver ts around 1.3 million

    tonnes of virgin plastic material a year,

    and 52 to 55% of this goes into packaging.

    The rate of plastics packaging recycling is

    around 30%, and this figure grows annu-

    ally. That, however, does not mean that

    there is more room for growth. Plastics

    are getting lighter and lighter, resulting in

    more products being created out of the

    same total weight and hence, more are

    recycled. Many recycled plastics also go

    into long-term products, like motor vehicle

    bumpers and water pipes, and do not

    return into the recycling stream. In fact,

    DID YOU KNOW? Just over 245 000 t of plastics were

    recycled in 2011 and of this, 76% was packaging material.

    South African consumers spend around R45 billion on plastics every year.

    Some 63 000 people are employed in the plastics industry.

    Plastic packaging has a low carbon footprint because only between 1 and 3% of the total product weight is the packaging. This decreases the rate of transport.

    Around 27% fewer apples are discarded if they are purchased shrink-wrapped in a tray.

    The shelf life of an average cucumber is increased by 333% (from three to 14 days) if it is packaged in a mere 1.5 g of plastic wrap.

  • 16 RSource November 2012

    our recycling rate is higher than that of the

    UK and the US. But it is not that simple,

    says Hanekom.

    As a country, we are both ahead and

    behind in terms of plastics recycling. Our

    energy recovery rates are lower than that of

    the European Union (EU), which has histor-

    ically incinerated its waste due to the lack

    of landfill space. On the mechanical side,

    though, the collection, sor ting, separation

    and reprocessing process, we are better

    off than the above-mentioned countries.

    It can therefore be said that because

    South Africa historically did not focus on

    recycling and mostly landfilled its waste,

    the recycling of plastics and innovation in

    this waste stream has grown, due to the

    pressure of the decreasing landfill space.

    The EU, on the other hand, has focused

    on developing waste to energy strategies

    instead of innovations in recycling, due to

    its incineration of waste.

    Innovations are driven by Plastics|SAs

    Sustainability Council. Here, issues of dif-

    fering polymers, which affect the success

    of recycling, are discussed to maintain and

    increase the recycling rate. The aim is to

    achieve a 35% plastics packaging recycling

    rate by 2015. However, Hanekom says

    that innovation star ts at the planning,

    design and manufacturing of the original

    product. Its complexity influences its even-

    tual rate of recovery.

    For example, a plastic water bottle is

    made from PET, the closure from poly-

    propylene (PP) and the label from a dif-

    ferent plastic material. Thus, the choice

    of material used by the manufacturer can

    influence the recycling process of the

    plastics. Ink on the bottle, which indicates

    the manufacturing and expiry dates, can

    also act as a contaminant in the pro-

    cess. These are the things that need to

    be considered. Plastics are multidimen-

    sional, and this is the central challenge in

    recycling success.

    Public awareness is also important. A lot

    of plastics are going to landfill, in par ticu-

    lar plastic bags, as they are used in the

    home to dispose of nappies, organic and

    general waste, for example. A low level

    of separation at source and the efficient

    sor ting of domestic waste with collection

    also hampers success.

    Separation at sourceMunicipalities must increase capacity to

    ensure that sor ted domestic waste is kept

    sor ted and that consumers develop the dis-

    cipline to do the separation. This may take

    some form of incentive for the consumers,

    but municipalities can save a lot of money

    as landfills are expensive. WastePlan was

    very successful in Cape Town with its house-

    hold recycling collection service. This two-

    bag curb side collection project was rolled

    out to cer tain areas in Pretoria. PikiTup has

    recently launched its second pilot project for

    this in Johannesburg.

    Skills shortageTo maintain our current success, it is vital

    that skills are retained and, as in other

    sectors, there is a skills shortage in the

    country. There are too few university gradu-

    ates that specialise in polymers, and too

    few plasticians, setters and operators. The

    designers who create the product are also

    few and far in between. Says Hanekom:

    The process is not cheap, and because

    there is a skills shortage the price of recy-

    cling increases. This, in turn, affects the

    success of the entire process.

    Challenges for the plastics industryThere are other problems as well. Company

    compliance costs in South Africa are high

    and this could increase final product price

    by between 5 and 15%. Energy, labour

    and logistics costs continue to increase.

    In some instances, it is cheaper to ship

    products to South Africa than to transport

    them within the country. Cheap imports also

    undermine plastics recycling. In China, for

    example, there are subsidies and cheaper

    operating costs. This results in a cheaper

    final product. The bulk of local consumers

    are poor and purchase according to price,

    which affects not only the industry that

    manufactures local products but also the

    recovery of these products.

    We are exporting jobs, money and raw

    material, states Hanekom.

    Companies that recycle must also import

    all the equipment from overseas, and

    the moulds used to manufacture the

    actual products are also imported from

    the Far East or the EU. This pushes up the

    cost substantially.

    Another challenge is the public view that

    recycled plastics are second-hand and

    substandard, or that purchasing glass and

    paper packaging is the greener option.

    It is critical that this mind-set is changed.

    Recycled plastic products are new prod-

    ucts and the bad reputation of plastic is

    undeserved. The total carbon footprint

    resulting from the creation of a plastic

    product and its recycling is in many cases

    lower than the manufacturing and recycling

    of other products such as glass. Only 4%

    of the total global oil production is cur-

    rently going into plastic manufacturing.

    So how do we keep the industry in posi-

    tive growth? Hanekom is of the view that

    it needs to be protected. South Africas

    borders are open to imports, and there

    are no protective measures such as lev-

    ies or standards. For example, the current

    levy on plastic bags should be going to the

    industry. There should be incentives and

    subsidies for plastics recycling companies,

    ABOUT PLASTIC WATER BOTTLES: Close to four million PET bottles are

    recycled every day in South Africa. Recycling plastic bottles decreases the

    need for raw materials and saves energy. Recycling a tonne of PET bottles saves

    1.5 t of carbon dioxide emissions. Some 100 kg of plastic, in a car weighing

    1 000 kg, ensures a fuel saving of up to 7.5%.

    A total of 41 recycled polystyrene hamburger clamshells make one plastic picture frame.

    Five recycled PET bottles are equal to one T-shir t.

    A total of 11 coke bottles is equals to a pair of trousers.

    It takes 35 recycled water bottles to produce a polar fleece jacket.

    The carbon footprint of plastic water bottles can be reduced by 25% if consumers simply recycle the bottles.

    Producers must create local, recyclable products and take responsibility for them. This should not be voluntary

    Recycling

  • RSource November 2012 17

    Recycling

    Johannes Schuback & Sons(S.A.) PTY Limited, Johannesburg / RSAPhone: +27 11 7062270, Fax: +27 11 7069236

    [email protected]

    AMANDUS KAHL GmbH & Co. KGDieselstrasse 5, D-21465 Reinbek / Hamburg, GermanyPhone: +49 (0)40 727 71-0, Fax: +49 (0)40 727 71-100

    [email protected] www.akahl.de

    Recycling of Municipal and Industrial WasteRecycling of Municipal and Industrial Waste

    Pellets or fluff as alternative fuels

    as adding a levy onto a recycled product is

    too much of a burden for already burdened

    consumers in the current economic cli-

    mate. Consumers should be educated to

    support locally manufactured products, as

    this will combat pover ty overall.

    SolutionsStandards are crucial. These have to be

    put in place and maintained in our industry.

    If this occurs and they are enforced, certain

    imports will be limited and those that enter

    the country will comply. Our Enviromark on

    products also guarantees that the producers

    of those products are committed to extend-

    ed producer responsibility. This is important

    as producers must create local, recyclable

    products and take responsibility for them.

    This should not be voluntary. Communication

    between the trade and industry and environ-

    mental departments is also essential to

    this process.

    The Preferential Procurement Policy

    Framework Act that came into force during

    December, last year, is a good example

    of what can be done. Previously, the only

    requirement for a tender was an empower-

    ment policy, but with this Act there must

    be a cer tain amount of locally manufac-

    tured product or content to secure the

    work. However, government procurement

    of plastics is low and hence, local content

    should be specified.

    Hanekom adds that the industry as a

    whole must become more original and inno-

    vative. There are a host of small companies

    This logo indicates that the manufacturer has expressed its commitment to environmental responsibility. It is registered in the name of the Plastics Federation of South Africa.

    making the same product. Industry should

    be thinking about how it can diversify and

    enter a more niche market with an original

    product. This will decrease competition and

    increase innovation.

    The recycling of plastics is a group effor t

    and all role players, from the manufacturer,

    the user and the municipal utility through

    to the government, must be involved if

    the industry is to grow and develop. Many

    successes have been achieved as was

    seen with the awards for the best recycled

    products held in September. A wide variety

    of innovative products were entered but

    support is needed for the manufacture of

    these products to grow from small com-

    munity products to large and inexpensive

    mainstream products. It has to be a col-

    lective effor t.

    Our modern lifestyle will not be possible without plastics. The industry provides essential products to a variety of sectors. Anton Hanekom, Executive Director of Plastics|SA

  • RSource November 2012 19

    Landfills

    South African experts in the field be-lieve that between 20 and 30% of landfills in South Africa comply with the minimum requirements. This is primar-

    ily due to smaller towns and villages across

    the country with landfills that can only be

    described as dumpsites.

    If this is indeed true, or if overestimated

    and around 50% of landfills do not com-

    ply, our groundwater resources are under

    threat. Smaller towns and villages also

    do not separate organic waste and when

    coupled with high rainfall, the potential for

    contamination is high. Consider a dump-

    site on top of a hill in a high rainfall area

    such as Mpumalanga. There is a settle-

    ment at the base of the hill, drawing water

    from stream or borehole. Chronic infec-

    tions in these communities are considered

    to be a by-product of their lifestyle when it

    could be due to polluted groundwater. But

    Pulling the plug on leachateCOMPLIANCE

    If it is true that leachate is somewhere between 10 and 1 000 times more contaminated and damaging to the local surface and groundwater than sewage, then the case is made for well-engineered and more importantly, well-managed landfi ll sites. Yanna Erasmus reports.

  • 20 RSource November 2012

    Landfills

    the problem is not only centred around

    landfill sites that do not comply. According

    to Leon Grobbelaar of Interwaste: Around

    50% of the active landfills in the country

    are poorly managed. The cause of this

    is not necessarily that the landfill was

    badly designed but that the knowledge

    of managing it well is lacking. In some

    cases, municipalities, being unaware, also

    damage liner systems. Municipalities also

    often move away from non-compliant land-

    fill sites and simply construct new ones.

    And this is not all we do not know.

    According to Dr Luis Diaz, a member of

    the solid waste management task group

    for the International Waste Working Group,

    and expert in the field for the past 40

    years: We still have insufficient knowl-

    edge of the science associated with waste

    management. Luis raised several con-

    cerns including increased consumption,

    which is coupled with increased affluence

    and the excessive increase in packaging in

    urban societies. Globally, the focus is on

    the diversion of waste from landfill.

    While this is the emphasis in South

    Africa as well, with the well-known dead-

    line of zero waste to landfill by 2022, we

    still have the problem of existing land-

    fills, many of them holes in the ground

    filled with a variety of waste from vastly

    differing sources.

    While some landfills may be classified

    as dry and the potential for leachate low,

    there is still some runoff, albeit consid-

    ered negligible. Leachate becomes a tan-

    gible challenge in wet or B+ rated landfills

    as well as hazardous landfill sites. For the

    purposes of this discussion, the focus will

    be on general waste landfills.

    The goal of landfill technical design

    is complex and the main objective is to

    preserve groundwater and to protect the

    environment. Stormwater systems for both

    contaminated and clean water must be

    in place and collection and storage for

    leachate, including lined leachate dams,

    must form part of the site. Rod Claus from

    Fiber tex says that clay liners in landfills

    are risky. Early in the landfill operations,

    clay may be exposed to the open environ-

    ment and dry out. This can cause cracks

    and consequently, a drainage path for

    leachate. Darryn Meissel, regional direc-

    tor of Geotextiles Africa, agrees. Clay

    is moisture dependent. In a wet and dry

    season, it has the potential to desiccate.

    Clay needs to function at its optimum

    moisture content and wet clay does not

    crack and create a leak path. Liners,

    although not infallible, seem to be the

    penultimate solution to capturing leachate

    and ensuring that it is drained to leachate

    collection dam.

    Except for waste type, landfill liners and

    design depend on the topography and

    rainfall of the area, among other things.

    For a large, general waste and wet landfill

    though, minimum requirements in the draft

    standard include drainage and monitoring

    system on top of in situ soil is topped by

    a geosynthetic clay liner. This, in turn, is

    topped by four 150 mm of compacted clay

    topped by a 1.5 mm HDPE geomembrane.

    On top this either a 100 mm protection

    layer of silty sand or a geotextile of equiva-

    lent per formance is required. This is fol-

    lowed by a stone leachate collection sys-

    tem which is topped by another geotextile

    layer on which the waste body is collected.

    At the Rietfontein landfill (GLB+) site near

    Springs, which is managed by Interwaste,

    the municipality has taken the linings a

    step fur ther. Below the leakage detection

    and collection layer, a 150 mm compacted

    clay liner and below that 150 mm base

    preparation layer tops the in situ soil.

    Sanitar y landfills have been par t of

    human settlements since 1937 with the

    first one built in Fresno, California, in that

    year. By the 1960s, laws and regulations

    were implemented and in the 1970s the

    US star ted separation at source.

    A paper published in 1982 examined

    the potential of German sanitary landfills

    to pollute through leachate and methane

    entering the groundwater system. The

    results indicated that landfills compacted

    with a compactor instead of a crawler trac-

    tor had a lower incidence of leachate gen-

    eration, around 15 to 25% of the annual

    precipitation as compared to between 25

    and 50% in the case of the crawler tractor.

    This was measured at a 500 to 800 mm

    annual precipitation rate. The author, R

    Stegman suggested, already at that time,

    that biological processes be used to fil-

    ter leachate. The product, although still

    relatively contaminated, can be recircu-

    lated to increase moisture content in the

    landfill and after it is closed, leachate

    recirculation should be practiced in order

    to maximise evaporation on top of the

    landfill. Leachate production of closed-up

    landfill sections can also be reduced by

    supporting vegetation growth on top of the

    landfill and erosion prevention methods

    should be used such as growing grass on

    the slopes.

    We still have insufficient knowledge of the science associated with waste management Dr Luis Diaz

  • RSource November 2012 21

    VERMEER PORTRAIT

    Cut-off trenches that effectively isolate landfills hydraulically

    from the surrounding environment and monitoring boreholes

    also assist to manage leachate.

    Treating leachateThere are a variety of factors that can influence the production

    and composition of leachate. One major factor is the climate of

    the landfill. For example, where the climate is prone to higher lev-

    els of precipitation, there will be more water entering the landfill

    and therefore more leachate generated. Another factor is the site

    topography of the landfill, which influences the runoff patterns

    and again the water balance within the site.

    There are two natural treatments that can be used to filter and

    treat leachate although the product is still not entirely free of

    toxins. Bioremediation is the treatment of choice for mineralis-

    ing most organic compounds in landfill leachate. Under aerobic

    conditions, microorganisms can degrade organic compounds to

    carbon dioxide, and under anaerobic conditions to carbon dioxide

    and methane. Xenobiotics can also be degraded with the correct

    species of microorganisms that are introduced.

    This is what was done at Mariannhill Landfill in Durban.

    According to Lindsay Strachan of SLR Consulting: The applica-

    tion of naturalistic engineering to landfill development is crucial

    to environmental acceptance of the landfill site. Naturalistic

    engineering encompasses many landfill facets, for example:

    the provision of landfill capping layers that would stimulate

    vegetation growth, the use of simple and low-cost yet robust

    natural systems to treat landfill leachate, and the installation

    of wetlands to reduce stormwater energy and to simultaneously

    reintroduce bird life to the site.

    Phytoremediation was also used as a second-phase polish-

    ing treatment with the use of a reed bed at the Mariannhill

    landfill site.

    At WasteCon 2012, held in October, Jeffares and Green

    announced the commissioning and initial results of a leachate

    treatment plant at Vissershok in the Western Cape. It is the

    largest treatment plant of its kind in the country and it was

    commissioned after upgrades towards the end of April. After

    10 days, denitrification of the leachate was achieved. The plant

    also boasts an innovative design that is internationally state of

    the ar t for broader wastewater treatment. It is the first in South

    Africa to denitrify landfill leachate. Although expensive, costing

    just under R34 million, Jeffares and Green is of the opinion

    that plants like these are very important due to the pollution

    potential of leachate.

    Leon Grobbelaar of Interwaste agrees: Pollution by anti-

    quated landfills and those that are badly managed will only be

    seen years from now.

    Liners will only go as far as preventing leachate from penetrat-

    ing and polluting groundwater resources, and while leachate

    collection dams are useful for the evaporation of leachate, the

    product still remains, drained off the landfill site. Durban Solid

    Wastes Mariannhill site is a world-class solid waste site and

    leads the way for the country. Hence, bioremediation, phytore-

    mediation and leachate treatment plants are the way of the

    future, even after waste is completely diver ted from landfills.

    Leachate is produced years after landfills have been closed,

    albeit in a lower potency. It must be dealt with as a matter of

    priority focus in landfill and solid waste management.

  • 22 RSource November 2012

    Waste to energy

    Waste not, want notIt has become abundantly clear that South Africa does not have enough energy to supply its power and supplement Eskoms output. The government has announced the Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Programme, which is looking to supply 3 725 MW to Eskoms grid from renewable sources and wastewater is one of those sources, as Yanna Erasmus discovers.

    Biogas is similar to landfill gas in that both are pro-duced by anaerobic bacterial processes from suit-able organic substrate. As such, wastewater treat-ment works are abundant sources of power waiting to be

    exploited, since wastewater plants should be able to gener-

    ate between 60 and 70% of their own power needs. The

    resource, in this case organic substrate, is constantly fed

    into wastewater treatment plants and, as such, is readily

    and reliably available for conversion to electricity.

    The biggest wastewater treatment plant in South Africa

    processes around 450 M/d in wastewater from suburbs of the city of Johannesburg and this is a reliable and

    continuous supply of raw material for the generation of

    electricity. Depending on the design and the operational

  • RSource November 2012 23

    Waste to energy

    oxygen, which produces a methane-rich gas.

    Typically, biogas comprises 60% methane

    and 40% carbon dioxide and other impuri-

    ties, which typically must be removed before

    beneficial use of the biogas. While this may

    appear complicated, it is possible with the

    right equipment and plant plan.

    The method of a treatment works that

    harnesses biogas uses a biological nutrient

    removal (BNR) process whereby the waste-

    water that arrives enters a balancing tank,

    which ensures consistent flow and feed

    into the BNR system. This is very important

    to the stability of the BNR process as the

    influx of sludge must be steady and consist-

    ent for the nutrient removal processes to

    work efficiently. The raw sewage enters the

    primary settling tank and then three phases

    of the BNR process: an anaerobic phase

    followed by an anoxic phase and then the

    aerobic phase. It is then transferred to the

    secondary clarifier as the final step. This

    philosophy of the wastewater treatment

    plant, a biogas-to-power plant has the ability

    to run and supply power in conjunction with

    Eskom. This is referred to as grid parallel

    operation and supplies power to works in the

    absence of Eskom or to feed power into the

    Eskom grid as well, as is practiced in some

    parts of the world. However, this is very

    rare. Where this is the case, the wastewater

    treatment plant supplements this with other

    organic material.

    Biogas is a product of anaerobic diges-

    tion, the decomposition of suitable organ-

    ic matter by bacteria in the absence of

    SAFETY FIRSTSafety features, such as those included in the Johannesburg Water biogas plant, are essential to ensure safe generation of methane-rich biogas for electricity. Biogas, which is made up of 50 to 70% of methane, can form an explosive mixture in air, the lower explosive limit being 5% methane and the upper limit 15% methane. Biogas mixtures containing more than 50% methane are combustible and lower percentages may support combustion. With this in mind, no naked flames should be used in the vicinity of a digester and electrical equipment must be of suitable quality, normally what is referred to as explosion proof. As biogas displaces air it reduces the oxygen level, which restricts respiration, so any digester area needs to be well ventilated to minimise the risks of fire, explosion and asphyxiation.

    entire process settles out solids (primary

    sludge and waste-activated sludge), which

    comprise anaerobically digestible carbon-

    based organic material.

    The settled, thickened combined sludge is

    pumped to the anaerobic digesters where

    the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and

    volatile suspended solids (VSS) are partially

    destroyed in the absence of oxygen. The

    anaerobic process destroys about 30 to

    50% of the VSS, resulting in a stable sludge

    that is suitable for dewatering, composting

    and final disposal of the stabilised solids

    OPPOSITE TOP Applied filter technology and the digester gas conditioning system for siloxane and hydrogen sulphide removal as well as dewatering the gas. This picture from Portland, Colombia

    OPPOSITE BOTTOM Aerial view of a modern biogas plant in Ramstein, Germany

    ABOVE Digesters at Edar de Rubis biogas plant in Madrid, Spain

  • 24 RSource November 2012

    to land. Interestingly, the volume of sewage

    is only an indicator of how much biogas

    can be generated. As digester capacity

    increases, more biogas and thus more elec-

    tricity can be generated on-site for beneficial

    use by a water works. The retention time

    remains the same regardless of the volume

    of the sewage and this is why more digest-

    ers mean more biogas.

    In essence, anaerobic digestion is simply

    about reducing the organic load and stabi-

    lising the sludge by decreasing the volume

    of VSS in the solution. The by-product?

    Valuable methane-rich biogas. Historically,

    a small proportion of gas would be used to

    fire the boilers, which heat the anaerobic

    digesters and the balance of the biogas

    is flared off. However, the flaring of gas,

    essential as a safety mechanism, is not

    applied in a biogas plant that generates

    electricity. In most of these types of plants,

    mesophilic bacteria are used, a species

    that operates best at temperatures between

    36 and 38C.The process works as follows: Once the

    sludge enters the digesters, the biogas pro-

    duced is stored in a gas holder from which

    the boiler, flare and biogas-to-power plant

    can draw biogas.

    As mentioned earlier, wastewater treat-

    ment works that elect to make beneficial

    use of the biogas produced by the anaerobic

    digester for electricity and heating on-site

    at the waste treatment works first must

    clean the biogas before being used to

    fuel the generators. This clean-up process

    includes removing hydrogen sulphide, water

    and siloxanes. The hydrogen sulphide is

    removed by a biological process, resulting in

    hydrogen sulphide levels far below the gener-

    ators maximum tolerance. Once the biogas

    has passed through the biological hydrogen

    sulphide scrubber, it is compressed before

    dewatering and reheating. This process

    ensures that the relative humidity is reduced

    from 100% to a maximum of 30%. The

    biogas then passes through a segmented

    activity gradient unit, which ensures the total

    removal of all species of siloxanes present

    in the biogas produced at the works. Lastly,

    before being made available to the engines,

    the dry siloxane-free biogas passes through

    a three-micron filter to ensure no particles

    (solids) are in the gas.

    Plants of this nature are designed for

    maximum energy efficiency and utilise as

    much of the available energy as possible.

    The generators run an electrical efficiency of

    38 to 40% and a thermal efficiency of 55%,

    giving the installation an overall efficiency of

    93 to 95%.

    The thermal energy is used to heat water,

    which in turn is used to maintain the temper-

    ature within the anaerobic digesters between

    36 and 38C. The heat is recovered from the engine cooling circuit and engine exhaust,

    and is transferred to the digester heating

    circuit via a plate heat exchanger. The heat

    recovery process ensures that the water

    to heat the anaerobic digesters leaves the

    power plant between 85 and 90C. There are

    Waste to energy

    As digester capacity increases, more biogas and thus more electricity can be generated on-site for beneficial use by a water works

    A BRIEF HISTORY OF BIOGAS

    The use of biogas has been with us a long time. Anecdotal evidence indicates that biogas was used for heating bath water in Assyria as early as 900 BC and also in Persia, albeit much later, around AD 1500. Marco Polo also made mention of covered sewage tanks and Chinese literature mentions it around 2 000 to 3 000 years ago. The technology consequently goes back a long time, with experiments in 1630 to around 1808 where biogas was collected successfully. Scientifically, it was determined in 1600 that flammable gas could be extracted from decaying organic matter and methane was discovered in the 1800s from cattle manure. The first digester was built in 1840 in New Zealand and in 1859, an actual plant was built in Bombay, in a leper colony. By 1895, believe it or not, street lamps in Exeter, England, were fuelled by biogas.

    Anaerobic digesters (left) and the double membrane gas holder (right) at the Edar de Rubis wastewater treatment plant in Spain

  • RSource November 2012 25

    Waste to energy

    safety features required throughout the pro-

    cess, including methane gas and fire detec-

    tion, flame arresters and breather valves.

    Plants that do not have power purchase

    agreements in place with municipalities

    of electricity providers require protection

    mechanisms in place to prevent reverse

    feeding into Eskoms or the municipal grid.

    Such a wastewater treatment works would

    use the power available from the biogas-to-

    power plant and draws the additional power it

    requires to supplement its energy demands

    from Eskom. With more than 400 M of sew-age and enough digesters, biogas-to-power

    plants can produce in excess of 4 MW and

    a biogas plant of this scale will pay back the

    investment in between four and seven years.

    Although the generation of electricity from

    biogas is not a new concept, it is relatively

    new for South Africa.

    SILOXANE REMOVALThe prevalence of siloxanes in wastewater and solid waste has increased over the past decades due to their use in almost all cosmetics and industrial applications. Research has indicated that they are persistent and can bioaccumulate in aquatic systems. At wastewater treatment plants and landfills, low molecular weight siloxanes volatilise into digester gas and landfill gas. When this gas is combusted siloxanes are conver ted to silicon dioxide, which can deposit in the form of white powder in the combustion and/or exhaust stages of the equipment. These deposits can compromise the functioning of the equipment and have to be removed, at a cost. Manufacturers of combustion turbines and reciprocating engines are expressing an increasing desire for siloxane control. There is no doubt that some maintenance cost benefit can be realised by siloxane removal, which is why it is such an important step in any biogas plants operation.

    A Guascor SFGLD 560 (1 025 kW) generator, complete with heat recovery

    Ofces across South Africa, Botswana, Ghana, Guinea and Mozambique.

    Tel: +27 11 254 4800 | [email protected] | www.golder.com

    Golder analyses the risk prole of your waste stream and proposes remediation actions. We develop waste processing and treatment infrastructure, in order to minimise waste production and improve waste reuse, thereby providing an alternative to disposing waste at landlls. Our specialists compile Waste Management Plans in accordance with the new Waste Act. Every solution starts with actively listening to our clients needs and working closely with regulators.

    The results are sustainable and compliant.

    Engineering Earths Development, Preserving Earths Integrity

    How does your company turn waste into a resource?

    JUST ASK GOLDER.

  • Air Pollution

    Global 500 companies not doing enough

    CARBON EMISSIONS REDUCTION

    PwCs report on the carbon disclosure of the Global 500 companies shows that the carbon-intensive nature of business has not changed much, or as much as it should have. Yanna Erasmus reports.

    PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) re-cently released its research into the carbon disclosure of the Global 500. The research, conducted on behalf of 655

    investors representing around US$78 tril-

    lion (R672.2 trillion) in assets, showed that

    less than half of the respondents reported

    a decline in carbon emissions solely due to

    emission reduction activities. Some 31% of

    the respondents did not report any reduction

    in carbon emissions, and the average of the

    long-term reduction targets of these compa-

    nies is around 1% per annum. This, of course,

    is too low to achieve the limit in warming of

    2C. For this reduction to be achieved, the re-port states that absolute emission reduction

    must be 4% per year, between the years 2020

    to 2050. Companies appear to be making

    short-term decisions for operations, but there

    is no long-term capital investment.

    The research showed that 82% of the

    Global 500 companies had set emission

    targets and while this appears to be posi-

    tive, long-term targets are lacking. Only

    20% set their targets to 2020 or beyond.

    As with most of the COP (Conference of

    the Parties) meetings, Durban too has not

    translated into government policy. On a

    more positive note, 2012 has seen a 10%

    increase year on year for companies that

    have included climate change into their over-

    all business strategies.

    There has been a 13.8% reduction in

    reported greenhouse gases from 3.6 bil-

    lion tonnes in 2009 to 3.1 billion tonnes

    in 2012. This is equivalent to the closure

    of 227 gas-fired power stations or remov-

    ing 138 million cars off the road. The

    failure of absolute reduction appears to

    be linked to legislation. Almost half, 49%,

    of the respondents said that regulation is

    an important driver of corporate action.

    Emission reduction in the past year has

    occurred due to the credit crunch and

    economic climate, which has affected pro-

    duction levels. While this is positive, it is

    for the wrong reason. It appears to be a

    catch-22 situation. Reductions in emissions

    on this level are set to continue as increas-

    ing erratic weather conditions will seriously

    affect markets, causing financial damage.

    Long-term investments are therefore critical

    to company resilience and shareholders are

    putting increasing pressure on these compa-

    nies to demonstrate this.

    The report states that the new normal is

    a period of high uncertainty, subdued growth

    and volatile commodity prices. Regulatory

    certainty must come soon or business

    ability to act and plan around energy and

    elements such as supply chain risk could be

    anything but normal.

    The primary conclusion drawn from the

    research is that some companies are dem-

    onstrating awareness of strategic opportuni-

    ties in acting on climate change, but few

    are setting the needed targets or invest-

    ing in the long-term. Climate change risks

    are physical in nature and are tangible,

    The average of the long-term reduction targets of these companies is around 1%. This, of course, is too low to achieve the limit in warming of 2C

    26 RSource November 2012

  • RSource November 2012 27

    but capital is hard to come by for these

    changes. PwC is of the opinion that capital

    investments will be made if plans and strat-

    egies are structured over three years and

    more. Only a fifth of companies reported

    that they have a dedicated budget for low

    carbon production research and develop-

    ment, and these companies, with a good

    position on climate change, will generate

    better stock performance.

    The carbon marketThe Clean Development Mechanism (CDP)

    driven by the United Nations also seems to

    be slowing down and research into better

    managing it has recently been completed.

    The bottom line, however, is that due to cli-

    mate change initiatives, the growing of the

    global consciousness of the importance of

    environmental responsibility and the global

    economic downturn, a reduction in emis-

    sions has taken place, whether by capping

    or simply economics. Thus, although this

    initiative has seen more than R215 billion

    in investments in 75 projects worldwide,

    with a total reduction in emission of a

    billion tonnes of carbon, carbon credits

    are simply not being bought the way they

    used to. Valli Moosa, the chair of the CDP

    board, urges countries to restore their faith

    in global carbon markets, saying that the

    system has improved markedly in the past

    years and has mobilised the private sector

    to combat climate change. But, the current

    level of mitigation ambition is simply not

    sufficient, writes Crispian Olver in the Mail

    & Guardian.

    Global mitigation to achieve the 2C target will require an enormous effort to

    restructure our economies on a low-carbon

    footing. This will impose a heavy burden in

    terms of costs and job losses. It is vital for

    the world that we are able to find the least

    costly way of cutting emissions. Inevitably,

    the negotiated system of national emission

    reductions, which will impose some form

    of caps on emissions of the major emitting

    countries, will be an imperfect solution

    some countries will face a much higher cost

    of reducing emissions than others. South

    Africa is one of those countries.

    Regulation and corporate actionIf regulation drives corporate action then

    South Africa is on the right track with

    the planned carbon tax to take off in

    the 2013/14 financial year. The tax was

    announced by minister of Finance, Pravin

    Gordhan, during this years budget speech.

    The proposal currently stands at R75 per

    tonne of carbon dioxide emissions, which

    could amount to almost R7.79 billion for

    the top 40 companies in the country. South

    Africa relies heavily on fossil fuels to drive

    the economy, and measures to change this

    are critical. Part of this is the carbon tax.

    But South African companies are not

    happy. They question the implementation

    of such a tax in the context of a develop-

    ing country, and while the government has

    reiterated that it is open to negotiation, it

    correctly states that the potentially cata-

    strophic effects of climate change must

    be addressed. The status quo cannot be

    maintained as productivity will be impacted

    in the near future. As was demonstrated by

    the PwC research, companies that do com-

    ply and manage carbon could draw benefit

    from this tax

    and its conse-

    quences, and

    subsequently

    also compete

    better and

    grow their mar-

    ket share.

    At the end

    of the day,

    there is only

    one thing that

    is important.

    We must cut

    emissions and

    slow the rate

    of climate change and global warming. This

    in spite of whatever companies may say and

    how difficult it is to change production sys-

    tems and power generation, whatever legis-

    lation governm