resource november 2012
DESCRIPTION
Resource November 2012 editionTRANSCRIPT
-
Cover StoryUD Trucks: Leading the way by meeting
customer expectations 6
RegularsPresidents comment 3
Editors comment 5
IWMSA News 50
Solid wasteTyre recycling plan: the next step in
waste minimisation and recycling 9
Solid waste management
practices in Western Africa 12
RecyclingAnton Hanekom chats with RSource
about the recycling industry in SA 14
LandfillsLeachate is one of the highest
risks in landfills 19
Waste to energySewage as a reliable supply
of energy 22
Air pollution/CDMGlobal business remains
far too carbon intensive 26
Hazardous wasteE-waste awareness is low and
it is a growing challenge in SA 28
Healthcare waste The safe disposal of healthcare
waste lies in training and research 35
ProfileCAIA:Managing the safe management
of chemicals 40
WastewaterWater remains our most limited resource
and, as such, it must be managed 43
Industry Opinion: Protecting the environment in
hazardous waste disposal 46
+5504
KPEN8#68QN0Q0QXGODGT
Promoting integrated resources management
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSTackling environmental issues
Pollution Leachate containment critical on landfills
Carbon taxGlobal climate
mitigation pie in the sky
Rolling outTyre recycling plan cleans up
Urban miningLucrative, but buy-in
is essential
6JGQHEKCNLQWTPCNQHVJG+PUVKVWVGQH 9CUVG/CPCIGOGPVQH5QWVJGTP#HTKEC
+550
'ZRGTV1RKPKQP
is printed on 100% recycled paper
Our energy recovery rates are lower than that of the European Union. On the mechanical side, though, we are better off than them. Anton Hanekom, executive director at Plastics|SA
contentswww.3smedia.co.za ISSN 1680-4902, Volume 14, Number 4, November 2012
The RSource team stands firmly behind environmental preservation. As such, RSource magazine is printed on 100% recycled paper and uses no dyes or varnishes. The magazine is saddle-stitched to ensure that no glues are required in the binding process.
RSource November 2012 1
in association with }
infrastructure news infrastructure4 www.infrastructurene.ws
09 Tyre recycling
22 Waste to energy
28 Electronic Waste
19 Leachate control
RSource offers advertisers an ideal platform to ensure maximum exposure of their brand. Companies are afforded the opportunity of publishing a cover story and a cover picture to promote their products and services to an appropriate audience. Please call Christine Pretorius on +27 (0)11 465 6273 to secure your booking. The article does not represent the views of the Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa, or those of the publisher.
-
:HRHUessential productsIRUwaste storage and transportation.
Wheeled Bins: 140 litre 240 litre 770 litre 1000 litre 1100 litre
3m collection bank
240 litre
770 litre
Mpact Plastic ContainersNeil Hare Road, Atlantis, South Africa 9 Piet Pretorius Street, Brits, South AfricaPO Box 1551, Dassenberg, 7350 Tel: +27 (0) 21 573 9400/ 0861 672 444 www.mpcsa.co.za
IRUPRUHLQIRUPDWLRQFRQWDFWXV
3mFROOHFWLRQEDQN
-
RSource November 2012 3
Cover strapPresident's comment
Patron members of the IWMSA
WasteCon 2012, Southern Africas most comprehensive waste man-agement conference, drew to a close in East London on 12 October 2012
and we are delighted to report a resound-
ingly successful event. This years WasteCon
boasted over 500 delegates and 100 exhibi-
tors, and was the biggest waste conference
to have been hosted in South Africa to date.
Now in its 25th year, this four-day, flagship
biennial event brought together municipals as
well as private entities to deliberate and set
up processes that will move our nation ahead
in addressing crucial issues pertinent to the
waste management industry.
At the IWMSA, we believe that we are on
the brink of change, facing exciting new
opportunities and challenges. Establishing
a quality assurance framework for our mem-
bership base is foremost on the agenda,
which will not only result in that base having
acquired sound knowledge but also serve
to enhance the reputation and credibility of
the IWMSA.
We simply have to move away from landfill
as the primary option for waste disposal and
in order to achieve the desired result, our
focus will continue to be on reuse, recycling
and recovery. The IWMSA seeks for its mem-
bers self-regulation within an appropriate
legal framework. We understand that it is
critical that the IWMSA serves its members
by engaging with the various stakeholders in
determining legislation and also to provide
education in the form of workshops and
training that is relevant and informed.
A successful bout at WasteCon 2012
We are pleased to have established a
much greater rapport with government,
and the resultant attendance of more
municipal delegates than ever before at
WasteCon 2012 is evidence of the strides
taken in this regard. We are excited, too, to
have received inputs from young delegates
attending WasteCon 2012, who were there
as a result of concern for the environment
and for their future. We need to nurture
and encourage such interest wherever
possible in order to more effectively com-
municate with communities so that trans-
formation takes place from the ground up.
In the past five years, the IWMSA has
made signifi-
cant progress in
appointing spon-
sored and accred-
ited assessors
and moderators to
facilitate accred-
ited training pro-
grammes. These
individuals are
professionals in their respective fields who
give voluntarily of their time and expertise
and are, as such, truly invested in combat-
ting our waste management crises. We
thank and salute them all.
The role of the IWMSA as an organisation
is to educate its members, as well as pri-
vate and government sectors, and to set a
new standard for IWMSA members in terms
of certification and accreditation. In order
to implement effective and sustainable
waste management processes, we need
to be proactive, especially at grass roots
level. The challenges that are faced by
those on the ground on a day-to-day basis
must be addressed in order to effect real
change in the industry.
We, at the IWMSA, focus on providing
education and training for our members, as
well as other interested parties, whether
private individuals or government entities.
The IWMSA is a non-profit organisation
comprising a body of dedicated profes-
sionals in their respective fields, who give
freely and voluntarily of their time and
expertise in order to effectively educate,
promote and fur ther
the science and prac-
tice of waste man-
agement. Anyone
wishing to find out
more about the
IWMSA or how to
become a mem-
ber can visit
www.iwmsa.
co.za.
We believe that we are on the brink of change, facing exciting new opportunities and challenges. Deidr Nxumalo-Freeman, president, IWMSA
WRESTLING WITH WASTE
by Deidr Nxumalo-Freeman, president, IWMSA
-
RSource November 2012 5
Waste is part of the human con-dition. It is a by-product of our very existence and for this rea-son, solutions to minimising and managing
it are critical. The amount of waste gener-
ated per person is highly dependent on
living standard measures and the higher
that measure, the higher the consumption
and, consequently, the higher the levels of
waste. Thus, you would not be wrong for
thinking that as a country, South Africa
should be in a better position since the
bulk of our population falls into the lower
levels of income but this, in turn, provides
a new challenge as a lot of recyclable waste
is sent to landfill. Re-
cycling and concern
for the environment
is not exactly top of
the list for people
who are struggling to
meet the most basic
needs. Maslows hi-
erarchy of needs is
applicable here. We cannot expect of peo-
ple whose basic needs are not met to care
about recycling, litter and things like the
environment. We cannot expect people who
need plastic canisters to keep water to be
concerned about what the canisters held in
the first place. Neither can we expect those
self-same people to not litter or separate
their waste for the benefit of reducing land-
fills. In fact, many of those people are on
landfills trying to reclaim what they can to
make a living or collecting recyclables from
more affluent suburbs.
By the same token, recycling initiatives
cannot solely rely on private individuals
and companies, with very little assis-
tance from government. More support
is required to back up the legislation
and, as discussed by Anton Hanekom,
the chief at Plastics|SA in this edition,
more incentives and subsidies could form
part of that solution. Training and polic-
ing of waste management and disposal,
including hazardous waste, along with
forums where all the role players can
come together and keep communication
channels open to engage everyone, are
very important to achieve country suc-
cess. The process is moving forward but
it is fragmented because the business,
economic and infrastructure environment
to see it achieve the success it has to
achieve, is not in place.
Waste is not an isolated concept. Every
citizen is involved because we are all gen-
erating it. We cannot expect innovation,
recycling and minimisation to take place
if we are not all involved and we do not
all understand the paramount importance
of it. A lot of information was put for-
ward at the recently
held WasteCon in
East London, hosted
by the Institute of
Waste Management
of Southern Africa,
but in-depth research
is required. Solutions
include training, edu-
cation, employment opportunities to uplift
communities living on the fringe of soci-
ety, and a conducive environment in which
to operate. There are many initiatives and
while this puts us on our way to waste
management success, we are nowhere
near close enough yet.
Yanna Erasmus
RSource is endorsed by:
It has to be a collective and inclusive effort
Publisher: Elizabeth ShortenAssociate Publisher: Ferdie PieterseEditor: Yanna Erasmus Tel: +27 (0)11 233 2600, [email protected] of design: Frdrick DantonSenior designer: Hayley MendelowChief sub-editor: Claire NozacSub-editor: Patience GumboProduction manager: Antois-Leigh BotmaProduction coordinator: Jacqueline ModiseFinancial manager: Andrew Lobban Marketing & online manager: Martin HillerDistribution manager: Nomsa MasinaDistribution coordinator: Asha PursothamAdministrator: Tonya HebentonPrinters: United Litho JohannesburgTel: +27 (0)11 402 0571 Advertising sales: Christine PretoriusTel: +27 (0)11 465 8255 [email protected]
Publisher: MEDIANo.4, 5th Avenue Rivonia, 2191PO Box 92026, Norwood 2117Tel: +27 (0)11 233 2600Share Call: 086 003 3300 Fax: +27 (0)11 234 7274/5www.3smedia.co.za
Annual subscription: [email protected] (incl VAT) South Africa ISSN 1680-4902
The Institute of Waste Management of Southern AfricaTel: +27 (0)11 675 3462E-mail: [email protected]
All material herein RSource is copyright-protected and may not be reproduced either in whole or in part without the prior written permission of the publisher. The views and opinions ex-pressed in the magazine do not necessarily reflect those of the publisher or editor, but those of the author or other contributors under whose name contributions may appear, unless a con-tributor expresses a viewpoint or opinion in his or her capacity as an elected office bearer of a company, group or association.
Copyright 2012. All rights reserved.
We cannot expect innovation, recycling and minimisation to take place if we are not all involved
Editor's comment
APOLOGY RSource left out the references from the following case study in the August 2012 edition: Water balance covers and their applicability to South African land-fills. For more information on the case study, please contact Riva Nortje on +27 (0)11 519 0200 or e-mail: [email protected]. We apologise for any inconvenience caused.
-
UD Trucks forms part of one of the worlds largest trucking groups, with operations in South Africa being the brands largest market outside of Japan, sig-
nifying its strategic importance in the country
as well as in Southern Africa.
For more than 50 years, UD Trucks
has produced legendary vehicles that have
built an outstanding reputation in the local
transport industry, says Jacques Carelse,
UD Trucks Southern Africa MD. This is
mainly due to the vehicles unrelenting reli-
ability, versatile performance and suitability
to South African road and operating condi-
tions. The company has invested greatly in
developing innovative and modern vehicles
that offer better efficiency, fuel economy and
environmental responsibility.
Through its environmental
policy, UD Trucks aims to cre-
ate a better environment by
taking every possible meas-
ure to tackle global environ-
mental issues. The company
also aims to develop envi-
ronmentally friendly products
through measures such as
reducing exhaust emissions, improving fuel
efficiency, developing cleaner fuels and
reducing external automobile noise.
Matching customer expectations with global business insightsExtensive research by UD Trucks has
revealed that customers are increasingly
looking for a truck provider that can be a
true professional partner. The company is
therefore committed to continue building
closer professional relationships with its
customers and offers dependable transport
solutions a recipe for future success.
UD Trucks extensive dealer network
remains committed to providing customers
with innovative transport solutions and ser-
vice offerings, built on trust, in-depth industry
knowledge and a strong technical skills set.
The company has more than 60 dealers in
Southern Africa, including Botswana, Kenya,
Lesotho, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius,
Mozambique, Namibia, Uganda, Swaziland,
Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe.
UD Trucks has a proud after-sales care
record as a result of a concerted commit-
ment to consistently improve product and
customer support to ensure the best pos-
sible vehicle availability and utilisation.
This commitment
starts with excellent
product support from
UD Trucks in Japan.
The company also
continuously employs
and trains specialist
technicians in order
to ensure the highest
quality of workmanship, explains Carelse.
The efficient and timely supply of quality
UD Trucks parts remains one of the com-
panys main priorities.
UD Trucks dedicated distribution centre
aims to provide the best service in the
industry and contribute to the low life
cycle costs of all UD Trucks products. With
more than 400 000 parts internationally
and 28 000 locally all of which are man-
aged through a computer-controlled storage
system an industry-leading parts supply
has consistently been achieved.
Legendary trucks, future-forward technologyThrough a pioneering spirit, groundbreak-
ing engineering and a customer-centric
approach, UD Trucks applies the expertise
amassed in the diesel-engine field to pro-
duce trucks that are comfortable, safe and
environmentally friendly.
UD Trucks Southern Africa offers a well-
balanced range ensuring appropriate tech-
nology for the needs of customers in the
waste management and related industries.
Medium duty trucks UD85 Recycling (skip loader)
UD90 Recycling (compactor)
Specifically configured for the waste manage-
ment industry, UD Trucks range of medium
duty trucks (MDT) offers a comfortable ride
and low noise levels, with advanced safety
features and a powerful engine that provides
high levels of fuel economy and durability.
UD Trucks MDT range is geared to achieve
excellent fuel consumption and gradeabil-
ity, ensuring that a high average speed is
attained to boost productivity.
The class-leading performance of these
units is achieved by the unique combination
of engine power, transmission ratios and
final drive ratio.
The high specification, inherent strength
and minimalist approach of UD Trucks MDT
engine range, proven through extensive
testing, make the trucks ideal for work.
The vehicles are easy to drive, operate and
UD TRUCKS
As one of the regions leading truck manufacturers, UD Trucks Southern Africa is driven by its vision of being professional, passionate and dependable in everything it does.
6 RSource November 2012
Into the future after UUD TR
QUALITY AND AFTERSALES SUPPORT FORM THE BACKBONE OF UD TRUCKS
UD Trucks MDT range is geared to achieve excellent fuel consumption and gradeability
Cover Story
-
RSource November 2012 7
Cover story
RSSRSRSRSRSRSRSRSRSRSR ourouourourourourourrceccecececeeec NovNovNovNovovNovNovvNovNovNovN vvvembembembemembembembemembemem er eererrerer errererr 20120120120201201202012012200010012012012012010001000102002010 222 22 2 22 2 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 22222 77777777777777777777777777777
maintain, and are exactly what UD Trucks
Southern Africa wants to offer its South
African customers.
Heavy duty trucks UD330WF Recycling (compactor)
CW26 490 Recycling (skip loader)
UD Trucks Quon range of heavy duty trucks
has been specifically designed and devel-
oped as a smart worker a truck that
works intelligently as part of a profitable
transport solution for its owner.
The design fuses UD Trucks tradition of
environmentally friendly technology, with the
smartness and stalwart power of a new-
generation working truck that is endowed
with high levels of intelligence. After thou-
sands of kilometres of testing, UD Trucks
believes the new Quon range also adheres
to stringent local requirements.
A selection of manual and automatic
manual transmissions has been employed
across the range to suit a variety of appli-
cations. The automatic gearboxes were
specifically developed to improve safety,
overall economy and offer the operators
easy driving capabilities. The AO612 group
new automated manual transmission, offers
two-pedal or clutchless operation through
the innovative 12-speed Escot V gearshift
mechanism, and is suitable for the skip
loader application. For compactor applica-
tions, the Allison fully automatic transmis-
sions are employed specifically like in the
case of the UD330 WM.
ESCOT has been specifically designed
for enhanced driver comfort and safety,
lower maintenance as well as greater fuel
efficiency. It offers both power and econ-
omy in a wide variety of driving scenarios
by increasing driving performance at low
speeds at time of start, and reducing engine
speeds in high gear at cruising speeds.
The UD Trucks Quon range successfully
combines leading environmentally friendly
technology with the smartness and stalwart
power of a new-generation working truck that
is endowed with high levels of intelligence.
However, the Quon range remains easy to
operate and maintain, providing customers
with the best of both worlds.
A special off-road chassis packaging has
also been introduced specifically to suit the
regions unique operating conditions. This
includes uprated front axle ratings, heavy
duty front suspension and stabiliser, radia-
tor protection, as well as a higher reposi-
tioned exhaust silencer and fuel tanks.
RSource November 2012 7
50 successful years
-
RSource November 2012 9
Solid Waste
Somewhere between 10 and 15 million tyres are produced annually in South Africa, which equates to approximately 300 000 t. The number of scrap tyres, or tyres
that can no longer be retreaded or reused,
amounts to 10 million per year. Currently, there
are only three active tyre recycling companies
in the country, recycling around 1 000 t each,
which means an estimated
13% of total waste tyres re-
cycled, and this is currently
meeting market demand for
crumb. Tyres are a particu-
lar problem for landfill due
to their large volumes and
75% void space, which
provides a breeding ground for mosquitoes
and rodents. They also trap methane, not
only risky in itself for fires at landfills, but the
gas also causes the tyres to become buoy-
ant or bubble to the surface, damaging the
liners in landfills and enhancing groundwater
pollution with toxic leachate.
The controversyOriginally, three plans to deal with the sur-
plus existed; the Retail Motor Industry
Organisation (RMI), the South African Tyre
Recycling Process (SATRP) and the Recycling
and Economic Development Initiative of South
Africa (Redisa) all prepared plans. The RMI
accused Redisa of hijacking the plan pre-
pared by the RMI and
the Tyre Dealers
and Fitment
Association plan,
as the Redisa chief,
Herman Erdmann,
was formerly the
chairman of the lat-
ter. Erdmann denied these allegations, but
allegedly agreed to repay the association for a
disputed amount that was spent on the plan.
The SATRP also submitted a plan that cost in
the region of R8 million, which it had worked
on for around 12 years. At the end of it all,
after several attempts and interdicts and
other actions, the court ruled in favour of the
Redisa plan, which was approved by the min-
istry, and all tyre manufacturers were ordered
to join Redisa by 21 September this year. The
judge ruled that no one would be prejudiced
if the other plans were also approved by the
environment ministry as they could then leave
Redisa and join another plan. The other organ-
isations are continuing their submissions.
The recycling planRedisas recycling plan, which is now gazet-
ted, involves a levy of R2.30/kg on all locally
manufactured and imported tyres. Instead
of the producer responsibility system for
recycling, the association opted for a levy
system. The argument for this is based on
its argument that producer responsibility is
a voluntary system, which does not offer a
fair playing field. In a levy system, it says
REMOVAL OF SCRAP TYRES BY YANNA ERASMUS
As South Africa continues in its drive to manage and limit waste, in particular waste to landfi ll, recycling initiatives are growing. The driving force for recycling is attaching a value to the waste product and in the next step to waste minimisation, one plan for dealing with scrap tyres has recently been gazetted, albeit surrounded by controversy.
ABOVE A pile of scrap tyres near a landfill in the East Rand
The number of scrap tyres, or tyres that can no longer be retreaded or reused, amounts to 10 million per year
Rolling out tyre recycling
-
10 RSource November 2012
Solid waste
all producers and importers operate equally.
Redisa has focused on small and very small
black businesses to remove waste tyres that
are already in the environment. These will be
delivered to one of a 150 collection points
which will be established across the country.
The document states that a network of
collection depots and recyclers will be estab-
lished, and part of the operating cost of the
plan will be devoted to training and support-
ing of the SMMEs. Another component will
be allocated to research and development to
create recycling processes.
Formalising collectionThe roll-out of the plan is that collections
of passenger and truck tyres must start
within 10 months. They are aiming to better
that target. New recycling plants will typi-
cally take 18 to 24 months to establish from
scratch, but some are being commissioned
now and others estimated to account for
about 10% of the total volume of waste tyres
are currently operating.
Redisa stated: At the moment, collec-
tors pick up the tyres from dealers but
there is no agreed tariff and no agreed
or regulated depot for transporting the
tyres, which often results in the tyres being
indiscriminately dumped either at landfills
or in the veld. There is, as yet, little for-
malised recycling of tyres, and the majority
is disposed in environmentally unfriendly
ways (burning, illegal dumping, landfill).
Recycled rubber for other avenues, such as
rubber shoes and so on, have not yet been
formally set-up and there is therefore no
overall regulation of this informal industry.
By creating a sustainable recycling indus-
try (that includes product development
and transporters), formal income earning
opportunities will be significantly increased
(and tracked and reported on).
This will not be without its challenges.
Currently, there are three recycling plants
in operation with one in Gauteng, one in
KwaZulu-Natal and another in the Western
Cape. They are meeting market demand.
More crumb markets neededAccording to Ika van Niekerk of SA Tyre
Recyclers in the Western Cape, the company
handles around 1 000 t scrap tyres monthly
and produces crumb from them. He is also of
the opinion that the three recyclers are meet-
ing market demand. It is becoming a very
limited and competitive market for direct or
wholesale sales to crumb users. More crum-
bers would result in profitability challenges
and inevitably the survival of the fittest.
Thus, a market must be created for crumb.
The future lies in utilising rubber crumb
in value-adding industries, such as motor
industry components, foot wear and many
other possibilities. This process will inevi-
tably compete with Chinese imports and
other countries in the East, where labour
costs are very competitive. To establish
markets for downstream products is easier
said than done. It might well require seri-
ous intervention from government and an
approved waste tyre plant to assist in creat-
ing markets. One of the challenges is a sur-
plus of crumb in Europe and if the market
here is not protected, the prices that the
crumb can be imported at will be equivalent
to what it costs us to produce it.
The challenge of recyclingTyres offer a particular challenge for recy-
cling, because unlike waste products like
glass, plastics and paper, they cannot be
remade. Natural rubber consists of polymers
that exist in chains, and virgin or new rubber
cannot bind to the polymers in crumb, the
final product of the tyre recycling process.
Scrap tyres can be used in the construction
of houses, roads, boarding, apparel and
the like.
Incineration in cement factory kilns is also
an option, but only 15% of the coal load can
be replaced by crumb and the technol-
ogy is very expensive. Thus, Van Niekerk
says that his plant does not sell crumb for
incineration. He says that he is aware of
one factory near Port Elizabeth that uses
shredded tyres in the brick-making process.
Road construction companies, however,
order crumb and the Heidelberg highway
for example, was constructed this way. The
use of crumb in this way is very efficient
as the road lasts five times longer because
the crumb protects the road foundation.
The problem of red tapeAnother criticism of the Redisa plan is the
levy system. Riaan van Niekerk from Pirelli
and the SATRP plan is of the opinion that the
levy system will cause a lot of red tape. A lot
of tyre brands are imported to South Africa
and from here, service the SADC region. The
levy must be paid on the import but once
exported the levy must be claimed back. This
is considered to be a strength in the SATRP
plan and the levy is lower at R1.98/kg. The
levy on the tyre is charged at the point of
sale in South Africa, which eliminates the
system of credits and debits that the Redisa
plan will cause.
The majority of countries in the European Union are using producer responsibility above the levy system
ABOVE Scrap tyres are baled to reduce their volume for transport to a recycling plant
-
RSource November 2012 11
t Integrated Waste Management Planst Waste Disposal Strategiest Identification and permitting of landfill sitest Design of General and Hazardous Waste sitest Design of Solid Waste Transfer Stationst Design of Material Recovery Facilitiest Optimisation of Waste Collection Systemst Auditing of Waste Management Facilitiest Development of Operational Planst Closure and Rehabilitation of Landfillst Quality Assurance on Synthetic Linerst Waste Recycling Plans
Specialist Waste Management ConsultantsSustainable and appropriate engineering solutions with integrity and professionalism.
Jan Palm Consulting EngineersTel +27 21 982 6570 / Fax +27 21 981 0868 / E-mail [email protected] / www.jpce.co.za
Gansbaai Recycling Centre
Velddrif Transfer Station
Botrivier Drop-off
Hermanus Materials Recovery Facility
Vissershok Waste Management Facility
Stanford Drop-off
And the European Tyre and Rubber
Manufacturers Association (ETRMA) agrees.
Research published in 2011 on end-of-
life tyres (ELT) shows that the majority of
countries in the European Union (EU) are
using producer responsibility above the levy
system. Some 57% in 2011 used producer
responsibility. This system, the association
says, is robust and suitable and currently,
there is a 100% recovery rate with producer
responsibility. Denmark and Slovakia still
use the levy system and six countries are
using the free-market system. In the EU,
countries can choose the system they want
to use, but landfilling has been abolished
since 2006. Only two countries are still
landfilling: Bulgaria and Cyprus. Europe has
around 5.7 Mt of tyre stockpiles, which is
almost double the number of used tyres pro-
duced in 2010, and the number continues to
increase. Material recovery stands at 40%
and energy recovery at 38%.
The total recycling rate in the EU stands at
96% compared to 50% in 2005. The asso-
ciation says that the improvement is due
to the sustained deployment of the producer
responsibility model. Genan in Denmark,
one of the largest recycling operations in the
world, does not agree due to unfair competi-
tion and Redisa has followed this model.
If it is indeed true, as Redisa says,
that South Africa has 60 million scrap
tyres lying around,
then the countrys
challenge is mas-
sive. Once value
has been added
to these tyres,
the influx will
grow quickly and
the market has to
catch up. Plants
have to be built, research into new products
must be completed and a market created
for these products as a matter of urgency.
However, in spite of these tangible obsta-
cles, South Africa has to deal with its waste
tyre problem and the gazetting of this plan is
the first step in the right direction.
Options for recycled and scrap tyresBesides reuse and retreatment, there are
other products that can be created. Options
for tyre derived products include the use of
crumb as an energy source, binding whole
tyres together used as barriers including col-
lision reduction, erosion control, rainwater
runoff, wave action that protects piers and
marshes, landfill walls and sound barriers
between roadways and residences. Entire
homes can be built with whole tyres by ram-
ming them full of earth and covering them
with concrete. Shredded tyres can also be
used in civil engineering applica-
tions such as sub-grade fill and
embankments, backfill for walls
and bridge abutments, sub-grade
insulation for roads and septic
system drain fields. Ground and crumb rubber
can also be used in both paving type projects
and mouldable products. These types of pav-
ing are rubber-modified asphalt or concrete,
livestock mats and more.
This means an estimated 13% of total waste tyres are recycled
Solid waste
-
12 RSource November 2012
and formal private role players are mostly in-
volved in insufficient collection and final
disposal (landfills), whereas informal actors
are involved in pre-collection and recycling.
Pre-collection is generally per formed by
the informal sector in low-income neigh-
bourhoods that are not covered by the
formal collection systems. So, informal
actors or NGOs organise pre-collection and
transportation up to the level of transfer
stations. From here the waste is collected
by trucks belonging to either public or pri-
vate entities and brought to the municipal
dumping site. Sometimes informal col-
lectors also deposit the waste in illegal
dumping sites, especially when there is no
reloading site nearby or when waste is not
collected regularly.
When zoning of waste collection was initi-
ated, conflicts between formal and informal
sectors was observed especially in the
metropolitan areas of Accra, Kumasi, Tema,
Takoradi and Tamale. There is an ongoing
dispute about whether or not the informal
sector should be allowed to continue oper-
ating, to be integrated or organised into the
formal sector or to be stopped all together.
Final disposal infrastructureThe Accra Metropolitan Assembly is struggling
to secure land for the construction of a sani-
tary landfill. Residents are against the idea
of constructing landfills close to their homes
because of the fear of the unbearable stench
that is likely to emanate from the landfill and
also of the possibility of flies and rodents
invading the area.
In Ivory Coast, after having provided an
emergency support during the political
crisis (four SMEs have signed service
agreements with Abidjan), the World Bank
in its partnership strategy for 2010-2013
has committed to funding the construc-
tion of two sanitary landfills in Abidjan
TABLE 7 ORGANISATION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT IN WESTERN AFRICAStep Actors Infrastructure and equipment availablePre-collection (in low income areas)
Informal sector, CBOs, NGOs, coop-eratives, SMEs
Very low. Wheelbarrows, handcarts, tricycles (in Ghana).Communal collection points or transfer stations.
Collection (in high income areas)
Municipality, formal private sector
Plastic bags, bins, barrels, skip containers.
Transportation Municipality, formal private sector
Compactor trucks, skip trucks, tipper trucks and roll-on roll-off trucks, or in more rural areas tractors and carts. An important share of the vehicles is second hand vehicles (international donations), which is not in working order.
Zoomlion Ghana Limited, the largest Ghanaian company has 50 000 collection trucks and tricycles.
Separation Households, infor-mal sector
By households (if they sell to the informal waste buyers), by informal workers in the street and on dumping sites.
Recycling Informal and for-mal sector
Informal sector: manual metal smelting equipmentFormal sector: plastic shredders etc.
Final disposal Municipality, formal private sector
70% to 90% of the municipal solid waste is disposed of in official dumpsites. The rest is irregularly or illegally dumped.
On the official dumpsites, the waste is compacted with trucks. There are usually no installations for gas collection and treatment or leakage water drainage. The leakage water runs uncontrolled to the next river. Only in Lagos the leakage water reaches a leachate pond.
Information on total and remaining capacities of official dumpsites could not be acquired.
Open air incineration is very common for households and at irregular and official dumpsites, to reduce the volumes.
Source: (IWWA 2011)
Solid waste management practices in Western Africa
PART II OF V
In Western Africa, the rapid rate of uncontrolled and unplanned urbanisation, coupled with a high density of urban settlements and changing consumption patterns, have accelerated the need for water supply, sanitation and waste management infrastructure.
Solid waste
In Western African countries, as in many other low-income countries, waste man-agement is generally organised as sum-marised in Table 7, with low income area
collection informally organised and separa-
tion for recycling done by households and
the informal sector. Recycling takes place in
both the informal and formal sectors. Public
-
RSource November 2012 13
Mills & Otten ccEnvironmental Consultants
1998/46338/23 Johannesburg Cape TownTel: (011) 486 0062 Tel: (021) 671 7107 Fax: (086) 554 6573 Fax: (021) 671 7107 Contact: Charles Mills / Kirstin Otten Contact: Stephanie de Beer
Independent Environmental Consultants specialising in:
Environmental Impact Assessments Environmental Management Systems Environmental Audits
Contaminated Land Assessment Environmental Management Plans Waste License Applications
TABLE 10 JOBS IN MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE COLLECTION, TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL
Ghana Ivory Coast Nigeria SenegalAccra KEEA Abidjan Lagos Ido Dakar Matam
Number of formal companies 17 in Ghana 7 10 n.a. n.a. n.a.
Number of formal workers 3 200 141 1 765 3 000 120 1 701 9
Number of formal workers per 1 000 inhabitants
0.80 0.71 0.0003 0.38 n.a. 0.57 0.51
Number of informal workers engaged in separation, re-selling of recyclable materials and recycling
On Abgog-bloshie scrap yard: 3 000 members of the scrap dealers association.
n.a. Over 25 000 in the Kano metropolis
Sources: IWWA 2011; San 2002; Saleh 2008
Solid waste
and further, to support the government
in conceiving a national strategy for solid
waste management. The objective is to
secure 9 000 permanent jobs (waste col-
lectors) by 2013 and to collect and deposit
in the landfills 80% of the waste generated
in Abidjan.
In Dakar, a sanitary landfill is built in
the region of This next to Dakar, where
Dakars waste will be disposed in the
future. The landfill will be operated by a
private company. In addition, a transfer
and separation station is being built in
Mbao. There is currently a conflict regard-
ing the geographical location of the landfill
between the Ministry of the Environment,
the National Agency for Cleanliness
(APROSEN), the network of the main cities
of the region of Dakar (Entente CADAK-
CAR) and inhabitants of neighbouring areas
in the rural communities of Sindia and
Diass. In the City of Matam, the NGO Lux-
Development is implementing a project
including three transfer stations and a
sanitary landfill for the municipal waste.
Prior to the project, the city administration
together with the inhabitants has carried
out an environmental impact analysis.
Collection and recycling ratesConcerning recycling rates, there is no public
monitoring of such figures as recycling is left
to the formal and informal private sector.
There is hardly any support from both local
authorities and governmental agencies for
companies and business people who intend
to establish businesses that make use of
waste materials. However, paper, cardboard,
organic waste, plastics, e-waste and scrap
metal are sorted by the informal sector on
dumpsites or scrap yards and either recy-
cled locally by formal or informal actors, or
exported. Some fractions such as metal
scrap have a very high recycling rate while
less valuable fractions end up in the dump-
sites to a large extent.
Employment opportunitiesThe number of formal workers responsible for
the collection and transportation of municipal
solid waste varies from 0.003 (Abidjan) to
0.8 per 1 000 inhabitants (see Table 10).
The number of informal workers is high in all
four countries. The informal sector is particu-
larly developed in Nigeria and is structured
in the following way (Adebola, 2006):
Cart pushers: house to house waste col-
lection at a small fee.
Scavengers: involved in both on-site and
off-site waste and resource recovery. They
recover re-usable and recyclable materials
like plastics, aluminium, glass, paper,
scrap metal and animal waste such as
horn, bones and the like.
Resource merchants: traders involved
in the purchase of all recovered
recyclable and reusable materials from
the scavengers.
Recyclers: includes both the micro- and
the small-scale recycling companies. They
convert recovered waste materials like
paper, aluminium, animal by-products,
plastics and scrap metals, to valuable
materials and raw materials for the con-
sumption of the industrial sector.
Costs and financing mechanismIt is generally assumed that the cost of the
management of solid municipal waste in
Africa is very low with an average of 2 (R26) per year per inhabitant, as compared to the
high income countries where it can go well
beyond 100 (R1 300). The City of Accra is practicing full cost recovery and thus charging
close to commercial rates, while waste man-
agement in the most Western African cities
is subsidised. Moreover, households pay the
service providers directly, particularly in the
informal sector for pre-collection services.
This is an abridged version of the second
part of a paper on the project of Integrated
Waste Management in Western Africa. The
duration of the project, funded by the EU
within the Seventh Framework Programme,
was two years and the results of the research
were submitted during May 2012. For a full
version, including references, please contact
Yanna Erasmus at [email protected]
-
14 RSource November 2012
Recycling
PLASTICS RECYCLING
SA has unique circumstances in the recycling sector
Plastics|SAs executive director, Anton Hanekom, speaks to Yanna Erasmus about the business of recycling plastics. The industry in South Africa is growing in leaps and bounds and the country leads in many aspects, but there are diffi culties and obstacles that must be overcome.
The advent of plastics changed the packaging landscape and human society forever. Not only was it rela-tively inexpensive and easy to make, it was
light and easier to handle than the packag-
ing solutions of old. In South Africa, it is a
relatively young material, having only been
around for about 50 or 60 years. Today, and
in the public eye, plastics have a bad repu-
tation, thanks to litter in par ticular plastic
bags. Hanekom says: Our modern lifestyle
will not be possible without plastics. The in-
dustry provides essential products to a vari-
ety of sectors, including medical and health,
automotive, mining, agriculture, packag-
ing, building and construction, electrical,
and electronics.
South Africa conver ts around 1.3 million
tonnes of virgin plastic material a year,
and 52 to 55% of this goes into packaging.
The rate of plastics packaging recycling is
around 30%, and this figure grows annu-
ally. That, however, does not mean that
there is more room for growth. Plastics
are getting lighter and lighter, resulting in
more products being created out of the
same total weight and hence, more are
recycled. Many recycled plastics also go
into long-term products, like motor vehicle
bumpers and water pipes, and do not
return into the recycling stream. In fact,
DID YOU KNOW? Just over 245 000 t of plastics were
recycled in 2011 and of this, 76% was packaging material.
South African consumers spend around R45 billion on plastics every year.
Some 63 000 people are employed in the plastics industry.
Plastic packaging has a low carbon footprint because only between 1 and 3% of the total product weight is the packaging. This decreases the rate of transport.
Around 27% fewer apples are discarded if they are purchased shrink-wrapped in a tray.
The shelf life of an average cucumber is increased by 333% (from three to 14 days) if it is packaged in a mere 1.5 g of plastic wrap.
-
16 RSource November 2012
our recycling rate is higher than that of the
UK and the US. But it is not that simple,
says Hanekom.
As a country, we are both ahead and
behind in terms of plastics recycling. Our
energy recovery rates are lower than that of
the European Union (EU), which has histor-
ically incinerated its waste due to the lack
of landfill space. On the mechanical side,
though, the collection, sor ting, separation
and reprocessing process, we are better
off than the above-mentioned countries.
It can therefore be said that because
South Africa historically did not focus on
recycling and mostly landfilled its waste,
the recycling of plastics and innovation in
this waste stream has grown, due to the
pressure of the decreasing landfill space.
The EU, on the other hand, has focused
on developing waste to energy strategies
instead of innovations in recycling, due to
its incineration of waste.
Innovations are driven by Plastics|SAs
Sustainability Council. Here, issues of dif-
fering polymers, which affect the success
of recycling, are discussed to maintain and
increase the recycling rate. The aim is to
achieve a 35% plastics packaging recycling
rate by 2015. However, Hanekom says
that innovation star ts at the planning,
design and manufacturing of the original
product. Its complexity influences its even-
tual rate of recovery.
For example, a plastic water bottle is
made from PET, the closure from poly-
propylene (PP) and the label from a dif-
ferent plastic material. Thus, the choice
of material used by the manufacturer can
influence the recycling process of the
plastics. Ink on the bottle, which indicates
the manufacturing and expiry dates, can
also act as a contaminant in the pro-
cess. These are the things that need to
be considered. Plastics are multidimen-
sional, and this is the central challenge in
recycling success.
Public awareness is also important. A lot
of plastics are going to landfill, in par ticu-
lar plastic bags, as they are used in the
home to dispose of nappies, organic and
general waste, for example. A low level
of separation at source and the efficient
sor ting of domestic waste with collection
also hampers success.
Separation at sourceMunicipalities must increase capacity to
ensure that sor ted domestic waste is kept
sor ted and that consumers develop the dis-
cipline to do the separation. This may take
some form of incentive for the consumers,
but municipalities can save a lot of money
as landfills are expensive. WastePlan was
very successful in Cape Town with its house-
hold recycling collection service. This two-
bag curb side collection project was rolled
out to cer tain areas in Pretoria. PikiTup has
recently launched its second pilot project for
this in Johannesburg.
Skills shortageTo maintain our current success, it is vital
that skills are retained and, as in other
sectors, there is a skills shortage in the
country. There are too few university gradu-
ates that specialise in polymers, and too
few plasticians, setters and operators. The
designers who create the product are also
few and far in between. Says Hanekom:
The process is not cheap, and because
there is a skills shortage the price of recy-
cling increases. This, in turn, affects the
success of the entire process.
Challenges for the plastics industryThere are other problems as well. Company
compliance costs in South Africa are high
and this could increase final product price
by between 5 and 15%. Energy, labour
and logistics costs continue to increase.
In some instances, it is cheaper to ship
products to South Africa than to transport
them within the country. Cheap imports also
undermine plastics recycling. In China, for
example, there are subsidies and cheaper
operating costs. This results in a cheaper
final product. The bulk of local consumers
are poor and purchase according to price,
which affects not only the industry that
manufactures local products but also the
recovery of these products.
We are exporting jobs, money and raw
material, states Hanekom.
Companies that recycle must also import
all the equipment from overseas, and
the moulds used to manufacture the
actual products are also imported from
the Far East or the EU. This pushes up the
cost substantially.
Another challenge is the public view that
recycled plastics are second-hand and
substandard, or that purchasing glass and
paper packaging is the greener option.
It is critical that this mind-set is changed.
Recycled plastic products are new prod-
ucts and the bad reputation of plastic is
undeserved. The total carbon footprint
resulting from the creation of a plastic
product and its recycling is in many cases
lower than the manufacturing and recycling
of other products such as glass. Only 4%
of the total global oil production is cur-
rently going into plastic manufacturing.
So how do we keep the industry in posi-
tive growth? Hanekom is of the view that
it needs to be protected. South Africas
borders are open to imports, and there
are no protective measures such as lev-
ies or standards. For example, the current
levy on plastic bags should be going to the
industry. There should be incentives and
subsidies for plastics recycling companies,
ABOUT PLASTIC WATER BOTTLES: Close to four million PET bottles are
recycled every day in South Africa. Recycling plastic bottles decreases the
need for raw materials and saves energy. Recycling a tonne of PET bottles saves
1.5 t of carbon dioxide emissions. Some 100 kg of plastic, in a car weighing
1 000 kg, ensures a fuel saving of up to 7.5%.
A total of 41 recycled polystyrene hamburger clamshells make one plastic picture frame.
Five recycled PET bottles are equal to one T-shir t.
A total of 11 coke bottles is equals to a pair of trousers.
It takes 35 recycled water bottles to produce a polar fleece jacket.
The carbon footprint of plastic water bottles can be reduced by 25% if consumers simply recycle the bottles.
Producers must create local, recyclable products and take responsibility for them. This should not be voluntary
Recycling
-
RSource November 2012 17
Recycling
Johannes Schuback & Sons(S.A.) PTY Limited, Johannesburg / RSAPhone: +27 11 7062270, Fax: +27 11 7069236
AMANDUS KAHL GmbH & Co. KGDieselstrasse 5, D-21465 Reinbek / Hamburg, GermanyPhone: +49 (0)40 727 71-0, Fax: +49 (0)40 727 71-100
[email protected] www.akahl.de
Recycling of Municipal and Industrial WasteRecycling of Municipal and Industrial Waste
Pellets or fluff as alternative fuels
as adding a levy onto a recycled product is
too much of a burden for already burdened
consumers in the current economic cli-
mate. Consumers should be educated to
support locally manufactured products, as
this will combat pover ty overall.
SolutionsStandards are crucial. These have to be
put in place and maintained in our industry.
If this occurs and they are enforced, certain
imports will be limited and those that enter
the country will comply. Our Enviromark on
products also guarantees that the producers
of those products are committed to extend-
ed producer responsibility. This is important
as producers must create local, recyclable
products and take responsibility for them.
This should not be voluntary. Communication
between the trade and industry and environ-
mental departments is also essential to
this process.
The Preferential Procurement Policy
Framework Act that came into force during
December, last year, is a good example
of what can be done. Previously, the only
requirement for a tender was an empower-
ment policy, but with this Act there must
be a cer tain amount of locally manufac-
tured product or content to secure the
work. However, government procurement
of plastics is low and hence, local content
should be specified.
Hanekom adds that the industry as a
whole must become more original and inno-
vative. There are a host of small companies
This logo indicates that the manufacturer has expressed its commitment to environmental responsibility. It is registered in the name of the Plastics Federation of South Africa.
making the same product. Industry should
be thinking about how it can diversify and
enter a more niche market with an original
product. This will decrease competition and
increase innovation.
The recycling of plastics is a group effor t
and all role players, from the manufacturer,
the user and the municipal utility through
to the government, must be involved if
the industry is to grow and develop. Many
successes have been achieved as was
seen with the awards for the best recycled
products held in September. A wide variety
of innovative products were entered but
support is needed for the manufacture of
these products to grow from small com-
munity products to large and inexpensive
mainstream products. It has to be a col-
lective effor t.
Our modern lifestyle will not be possible without plastics. The industry provides essential products to a variety of sectors. Anton Hanekom, Executive Director of Plastics|SA
-
RSource November 2012 19
Landfills
South African experts in the field be-lieve that between 20 and 30% of landfills in South Africa comply with the minimum requirements. This is primar-
ily due to smaller towns and villages across
the country with landfills that can only be
described as dumpsites.
If this is indeed true, or if overestimated
and around 50% of landfills do not com-
ply, our groundwater resources are under
threat. Smaller towns and villages also
do not separate organic waste and when
coupled with high rainfall, the potential for
contamination is high. Consider a dump-
site on top of a hill in a high rainfall area
such as Mpumalanga. There is a settle-
ment at the base of the hill, drawing water
from stream or borehole. Chronic infec-
tions in these communities are considered
to be a by-product of their lifestyle when it
could be due to polluted groundwater. But
Pulling the plug on leachateCOMPLIANCE
If it is true that leachate is somewhere between 10 and 1 000 times more contaminated and damaging to the local surface and groundwater than sewage, then the case is made for well-engineered and more importantly, well-managed landfi ll sites. Yanna Erasmus reports.
-
20 RSource November 2012
Landfills
the problem is not only centred around
landfill sites that do not comply. According
to Leon Grobbelaar of Interwaste: Around
50% of the active landfills in the country
are poorly managed. The cause of this
is not necessarily that the landfill was
badly designed but that the knowledge
of managing it well is lacking. In some
cases, municipalities, being unaware, also
damage liner systems. Municipalities also
often move away from non-compliant land-
fill sites and simply construct new ones.
And this is not all we do not know.
According to Dr Luis Diaz, a member of
the solid waste management task group
for the International Waste Working Group,
and expert in the field for the past 40
years: We still have insufficient knowl-
edge of the science associated with waste
management. Luis raised several con-
cerns including increased consumption,
which is coupled with increased affluence
and the excessive increase in packaging in
urban societies. Globally, the focus is on
the diversion of waste from landfill.
While this is the emphasis in South
Africa as well, with the well-known dead-
line of zero waste to landfill by 2022, we
still have the problem of existing land-
fills, many of them holes in the ground
filled with a variety of waste from vastly
differing sources.
While some landfills may be classified
as dry and the potential for leachate low,
there is still some runoff, albeit consid-
ered negligible. Leachate becomes a tan-
gible challenge in wet or B+ rated landfills
as well as hazardous landfill sites. For the
purposes of this discussion, the focus will
be on general waste landfills.
The goal of landfill technical design
is complex and the main objective is to
preserve groundwater and to protect the
environment. Stormwater systems for both
contaminated and clean water must be
in place and collection and storage for
leachate, including lined leachate dams,
must form part of the site. Rod Claus from
Fiber tex says that clay liners in landfills
are risky. Early in the landfill operations,
clay may be exposed to the open environ-
ment and dry out. This can cause cracks
and consequently, a drainage path for
leachate. Darryn Meissel, regional direc-
tor of Geotextiles Africa, agrees. Clay
is moisture dependent. In a wet and dry
season, it has the potential to desiccate.
Clay needs to function at its optimum
moisture content and wet clay does not
crack and create a leak path. Liners,
although not infallible, seem to be the
penultimate solution to capturing leachate
and ensuring that it is drained to leachate
collection dam.
Except for waste type, landfill liners and
design depend on the topography and
rainfall of the area, among other things.
For a large, general waste and wet landfill
though, minimum requirements in the draft
standard include drainage and monitoring
system on top of in situ soil is topped by
a geosynthetic clay liner. This, in turn, is
topped by four 150 mm of compacted clay
topped by a 1.5 mm HDPE geomembrane.
On top this either a 100 mm protection
layer of silty sand or a geotextile of equiva-
lent per formance is required. This is fol-
lowed by a stone leachate collection sys-
tem which is topped by another geotextile
layer on which the waste body is collected.
At the Rietfontein landfill (GLB+) site near
Springs, which is managed by Interwaste,
the municipality has taken the linings a
step fur ther. Below the leakage detection
and collection layer, a 150 mm compacted
clay liner and below that 150 mm base
preparation layer tops the in situ soil.
Sanitar y landfills have been par t of
human settlements since 1937 with the
first one built in Fresno, California, in that
year. By the 1960s, laws and regulations
were implemented and in the 1970s the
US star ted separation at source.
A paper published in 1982 examined
the potential of German sanitary landfills
to pollute through leachate and methane
entering the groundwater system. The
results indicated that landfills compacted
with a compactor instead of a crawler trac-
tor had a lower incidence of leachate gen-
eration, around 15 to 25% of the annual
precipitation as compared to between 25
and 50% in the case of the crawler tractor.
This was measured at a 500 to 800 mm
annual precipitation rate. The author, R
Stegman suggested, already at that time,
that biological processes be used to fil-
ter leachate. The product, although still
relatively contaminated, can be recircu-
lated to increase moisture content in the
landfill and after it is closed, leachate
recirculation should be practiced in order
to maximise evaporation on top of the
landfill. Leachate production of closed-up
landfill sections can also be reduced by
supporting vegetation growth on top of the
landfill and erosion prevention methods
should be used such as growing grass on
the slopes.
We still have insufficient knowledge of the science associated with waste management Dr Luis Diaz
-
RSource November 2012 21
VERMEER PORTRAIT
Cut-off trenches that effectively isolate landfills hydraulically
from the surrounding environment and monitoring boreholes
also assist to manage leachate.
Treating leachateThere are a variety of factors that can influence the production
and composition of leachate. One major factor is the climate of
the landfill. For example, where the climate is prone to higher lev-
els of precipitation, there will be more water entering the landfill
and therefore more leachate generated. Another factor is the site
topography of the landfill, which influences the runoff patterns
and again the water balance within the site.
There are two natural treatments that can be used to filter and
treat leachate although the product is still not entirely free of
toxins. Bioremediation is the treatment of choice for mineralis-
ing most organic compounds in landfill leachate. Under aerobic
conditions, microorganisms can degrade organic compounds to
carbon dioxide, and under anaerobic conditions to carbon dioxide
and methane. Xenobiotics can also be degraded with the correct
species of microorganisms that are introduced.
This is what was done at Mariannhill Landfill in Durban.
According to Lindsay Strachan of SLR Consulting: The applica-
tion of naturalistic engineering to landfill development is crucial
to environmental acceptance of the landfill site. Naturalistic
engineering encompasses many landfill facets, for example:
the provision of landfill capping layers that would stimulate
vegetation growth, the use of simple and low-cost yet robust
natural systems to treat landfill leachate, and the installation
of wetlands to reduce stormwater energy and to simultaneously
reintroduce bird life to the site.
Phytoremediation was also used as a second-phase polish-
ing treatment with the use of a reed bed at the Mariannhill
landfill site.
At WasteCon 2012, held in October, Jeffares and Green
announced the commissioning and initial results of a leachate
treatment plant at Vissershok in the Western Cape. It is the
largest treatment plant of its kind in the country and it was
commissioned after upgrades towards the end of April. After
10 days, denitrification of the leachate was achieved. The plant
also boasts an innovative design that is internationally state of
the ar t for broader wastewater treatment. It is the first in South
Africa to denitrify landfill leachate. Although expensive, costing
just under R34 million, Jeffares and Green is of the opinion
that plants like these are very important due to the pollution
potential of leachate.
Leon Grobbelaar of Interwaste agrees: Pollution by anti-
quated landfills and those that are badly managed will only be
seen years from now.
Liners will only go as far as preventing leachate from penetrat-
ing and polluting groundwater resources, and while leachate
collection dams are useful for the evaporation of leachate, the
product still remains, drained off the landfill site. Durban Solid
Wastes Mariannhill site is a world-class solid waste site and
leads the way for the country. Hence, bioremediation, phytore-
mediation and leachate treatment plants are the way of the
future, even after waste is completely diver ted from landfills.
Leachate is produced years after landfills have been closed,
albeit in a lower potency. It must be dealt with as a matter of
priority focus in landfill and solid waste management.
-
22 RSource November 2012
Waste to energy
Waste not, want notIt has become abundantly clear that South Africa does not have enough energy to supply its power and supplement Eskoms output. The government has announced the Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Programme, which is looking to supply 3 725 MW to Eskoms grid from renewable sources and wastewater is one of those sources, as Yanna Erasmus discovers.
Biogas is similar to landfill gas in that both are pro-duced by anaerobic bacterial processes from suit-able organic substrate. As such, wastewater treat-ment works are abundant sources of power waiting to be
exploited, since wastewater plants should be able to gener-
ate between 60 and 70% of their own power needs. The
resource, in this case organic substrate, is constantly fed
into wastewater treatment plants and, as such, is readily
and reliably available for conversion to electricity.
The biggest wastewater treatment plant in South Africa
processes around 450 M/d in wastewater from suburbs of the city of Johannesburg and this is a reliable and
continuous supply of raw material for the generation of
electricity. Depending on the design and the operational
-
RSource November 2012 23
Waste to energy
oxygen, which produces a methane-rich gas.
Typically, biogas comprises 60% methane
and 40% carbon dioxide and other impuri-
ties, which typically must be removed before
beneficial use of the biogas. While this may
appear complicated, it is possible with the
right equipment and plant plan.
The method of a treatment works that
harnesses biogas uses a biological nutrient
removal (BNR) process whereby the waste-
water that arrives enters a balancing tank,
which ensures consistent flow and feed
into the BNR system. This is very important
to the stability of the BNR process as the
influx of sludge must be steady and consist-
ent for the nutrient removal processes to
work efficiently. The raw sewage enters the
primary settling tank and then three phases
of the BNR process: an anaerobic phase
followed by an anoxic phase and then the
aerobic phase. It is then transferred to the
secondary clarifier as the final step. This
philosophy of the wastewater treatment
plant, a biogas-to-power plant has the ability
to run and supply power in conjunction with
Eskom. This is referred to as grid parallel
operation and supplies power to works in the
absence of Eskom or to feed power into the
Eskom grid as well, as is practiced in some
parts of the world. However, this is very
rare. Where this is the case, the wastewater
treatment plant supplements this with other
organic material.
Biogas is a product of anaerobic diges-
tion, the decomposition of suitable organ-
ic matter by bacteria in the absence of
SAFETY FIRSTSafety features, such as those included in the Johannesburg Water biogas plant, are essential to ensure safe generation of methane-rich biogas for electricity. Biogas, which is made up of 50 to 70% of methane, can form an explosive mixture in air, the lower explosive limit being 5% methane and the upper limit 15% methane. Biogas mixtures containing more than 50% methane are combustible and lower percentages may support combustion. With this in mind, no naked flames should be used in the vicinity of a digester and electrical equipment must be of suitable quality, normally what is referred to as explosion proof. As biogas displaces air it reduces the oxygen level, which restricts respiration, so any digester area needs to be well ventilated to minimise the risks of fire, explosion and asphyxiation.
entire process settles out solids (primary
sludge and waste-activated sludge), which
comprise anaerobically digestible carbon-
based organic material.
The settled, thickened combined sludge is
pumped to the anaerobic digesters where
the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and
volatile suspended solids (VSS) are partially
destroyed in the absence of oxygen. The
anaerobic process destroys about 30 to
50% of the VSS, resulting in a stable sludge
that is suitable for dewatering, composting
and final disposal of the stabilised solids
OPPOSITE TOP Applied filter technology and the digester gas conditioning system for siloxane and hydrogen sulphide removal as well as dewatering the gas. This picture from Portland, Colombia
OPPOSITE BOTTOM Aerial view of a modern biogas plant in Ramstein, Germany
ABOVE Digesters at Edar de Rubis biogas plant in Madrid, Spain
-
24 RSource November 2012
to land. Interestingly, the volume of sewage
is only an indicator of how much biogas
can be generated. As digester capacity
increases, more biogas and thus more elec-
tricity can be generated on-site for beneficial
use by a water works. The retention time
remains the same regardless of the volume
of the sewage and this is why more digest-
ers mean more biogas.
In essence, anaerobic digestion is simply
about reducing the organic load and stabi-
lising the sludge by decreasing the volume
of VSS in the solution. The by-product?
Valuable methane-rich biogas. Historically,
a small proportion of gas would be used to
fire the boilers, which heat the anaerobic
digesters and the balance of the biogas
is flared off. However, the flaring of gas,
essential as a safety mechanism, is not
applied in a biogas plant that generates
electricity. In most of these types of plants,
mesophilic bacteria are used, a species
that operates best at temperatures between
36 and 38C.The process works as follows: Once the
sludge enters the digesters, the biogas pro-
duced is stored in a gas holder from which
the boiler, flare and biogas-to-power plant
can draw biogas.
As mentioned earlier, wastewater treat-
ment works that elect to make beneficial
use of the biogas produced by the anaerobic
digester for electricity and heating on-site
at the waste treatment works first must
clean the biogas before being used to
fuel the generators. This clean-up process
includes removing hydrogen sulphide, water
and siloxanes. The hydrogen sulphide is
removed by a biological process, resulting in
hydrogen sulphide levels far below the gener-
ators maximum tolerance. Once the biogas
has passed through the biological hydrogen
sulphide scrubber, it is compressed before
dewatering and reheating. This process
ensures that the relative humidity is reduced
from 100% to a maximum of 30%. The
biogas then passes through a segmented
activity gradient unit, which ensures the total
removal of all species of siloxanes present
in the biogas produced at the works. Lastly,
before being made available to the engines,
the dry siloxane-free biogas passes through
a three-micron filter to ensure no particles
(solids) are in the gas.
Plants of this nature are designed for
maximum energy efficiency and utilise as
much of the available energy as possible.
The generators run an electrical efficiency of
38 to 40% and a thermal efficiency of 55%,
giving the installation an overall efficiency of
93 to 95%.
The thermal energy is used to heat water,
which in turn is used to maintain the temper-
ature within the anaerobic digesters between
36 and 38C. The heat is recovered from the engine cooling circuit and engine exhaust,
and is transferred to the digester heating
circuit via a plate heat exchanger. The heat
recovery process ensures that the water
to heat the anaerobic digesters leaves the
power plant between 85 and 90C. There are
Waste to energy
As digester capacity increases, more biogas and thus more electricity can be generated on-site for beneficial use by a water works
A BRIEF HISTORY OF BIOGAS
The use of biogas has been with us a long time. Anecdotal evidence indicates that biogas was used for heating bath water in Assyria as early as 900 BC and also in Persia, albeit much later, around AD 1500. Marco Polo also made mention of covered sewage tanks and Chinese literature mentions it around 2 000 to 3 000 years ago. The technology consequently goes back a long time, with experiments in 1630 to around 1808 where biogas was collected successfully. Scientifically, it was determined in 1600 that flammable gas could be extracted from decaying organic matter and methane was discovered in the 1800s from cattle manure. The first digester was built in 1840 in New Zealand and in 1859, an actual plant was built in Bombay, in a leper colony. By 1895, believe it or not, street lamps in Exeter, England, were fuelled by biogas.
Anaerobic digesters (left) and the double membrane gas holder (right) at the Edar de Rubis wastewater treatment plant in Spain
-
RSource November 2012 25
Waste to energy
safety features required throughout the pro-
cess, including methane gas and fire detec-
tion, flame arresters and breather valves.
Plants that do not have power purchase
agreements in place with municipalities
of electricity providers require protection
mechanisms in place to prevent reverse
feeding into Eskoms or the municipal grid.
Such a wastewater treatment works would
use the power available from the biogas-to-
power plant and draws the additional power it
requires to supplement its energy demands
from Eskom. With more than 400 M of sew-age and enough digesters, biogas-to-power
plants can produce in excess of 4 MW and
a biogas plant of this scale will pay back the
investment in between four and seven years.
Although the generation of electricity from
biogas is not a new concept, it is relatively
new for South Africa.
SILOXANE REMOVALThe prevalence of siloxanes in wastewater and solid waste has increased over the past decades due to their use in almost all cosmetics and industrial applications. Research has indicated that they are persistent and can bioaccumulate in aquatic systems. At wastewater treatment plants and landfills, low molecular weight siloxanes volatilise into digester gas and landfill gas. When this gas is combusted siloxanes are conver ted to silicon dioxide, which can deposit in the form of white powder in the combustion and/or exhaust stages of the equipment. These deposits can compromise the functioning of the equipment and have to be removed, at a cost. Manufacturers of combustion turbines and reciprocating engines are expressing an increasing desire for siloxane control. There is no doubt that some maintenance cost benefit can be realised by siloxane removal, which is why it is such an important step in any biogas plants operation.
A Guascor SFGLD 560 (1 025 kW) generator, complete with heat recovery
Ofces across South Africa, Botswana, Ghana, Guinea and Mozambique.
Tel: +27 11 254 4800 | [email protected] | www.golder.com
Golder analyses the risk prole of your waste stream and proposes remediation actions. We develop waste processing and treatment infrastructure, in order to minimise waste production and improve waste reuse, thereby providing an alternative to disposing waste at landlls. Our specialists compile Waste Management Plans in accordance with the new Waste Act. Every solution starts with actively listening to our clients needs and working closely with regulators.
The results are sustainable and compliant.
Engineering Earths Development, Preserving Earths Integrity
How does your company turn waste into a resource?
JUST ASK GOLDER.
-
Air Pollution
Global 500 companies not doing enough
CARBON EMISSIONS REDUCTION
PwCs report on the carbon disclosure of the Global 500 companies shows that the carbon-intensive nature of business has not changed much, or as much as it should have. Yanna Erasmus reports.
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) re-cently released its research into the carbon disclosure of the Global 500. The research, conducted on behalf of 655
investors representing around US$78 tril-
lion (R672.2 trillion) in assets, showed that
less than half of the respondents reported
a decline in carbon emissions solely due to
emission reduction activities. Some 31% of
the respondents did not report any reduction
in carbon emissions, and the average of the
long-term reduction targets of these compa-
nies is around 1% per annum. This, of course,
is too low to achieve the limit in warming of
2C. For this reduction to be achieved, the re-port states that absolute emission reduction
must be 4% per year, between the years 2020
to 2050. Companies appear to be making
short-term decisions for operations, but there
is no long-term capital investment.
The research showed that 82% of the
Global 500 companies had set emission
targets and while this appears to be posi-
tive, long-term targets are lacking. Only
20% set their targets to 2020 or beyond.
As with most of the COP (Conference of
the Parties) meetings, Durban too has not
translated into government policy. On a
more positive note, 2012 has seen a 10%
increase year on year for companies that
have included climate change into their over-
all business strategies.
There has been a 13.8% reduction in
reported greenhouse gases from 3.6 bil-
lion tonnes in 2009 to 3.1 billion tonnes
in 2012. This is equivalent to the closure
of 227 gas-fired power stations or remov-
ing 138 million cars off the road. The
failure of absolute reduction appears to
be linked to legislation. Almost half, 49%,
of the respondents said that regulation is
an important driver of corporate action.
Emission reduction in the past year has
occurred due to the credit crunch and
economic climate, which has affected pro-
duction levels. While this is positive, it is
for the wrong reason. It appears to be a
catch-22 situation. Reductions in emissions
on this level are set to continue as increas-
ing erratic weather conditions will seriously
affect markets, causing financial damage.
Long-term investments are therefore critical
to company resilience and shareholders are
putting increasing pressure on these compa-
nies to demonstrate this.
The report states that the new normal is
a period of high uncertainty, subdued growth
and volatile commodity prices. Regulatory
certainty must come soon or business
ability to act and plan around energy and
elements such as supply chain risk could be
anything but normal.
The primary conclusion drawn from the
research is that some companies are dem-
onstrating awareness of strategic opportuni-
ties in acting on climate change, but few
are setting the needed targets or invest-
ing in the long-term. Climate change risks
are physical in nature and are tangible,
The average of the long-term reduction targets of these companies is around 1%. This, of course, is too low to achieve the limit in warming of 2C
26 RSource November 2012
-
RSource November 2012 27
but capital is hard to come by for these
changes. PwC is of the opinion that capital
investments will be made if plans and strat-
egies are structured over three years and
more. Only a fifth of companies reported
that they have a dedicated budget for low
carbon production research and develop-
ment, and these companies, with a good
position on climate change, will generate
better stock performance.
The carbon marketThe Clean Development Mechanism (CDP)
driven by the United Nations also seems to
be slowing down and research into better
managing it has recently been completed.
The bottom line, however, is that due to cli-
mate change initiatives, the growing of the
global consciousness of the importance of
environmental responsibility and the global
economic downturn, a reduction in emis-
sions has taken place, whether by capping
or simply economics. Thus, although this
initiative has seen more than R215 billion
in investments in 75 projects worldwide,
with a total reduction in emission of a
billion tonnes of carbon, carbon credits
are simply not being bought the way they
used to. Valli Moosa, the chair of the CDP
board, urges countries to restore their faith
in global carbon markets, saying that the
system has improved markedly in the past
years and has mobilised the private sector
to combat climate change. But, the current
level of mitigation ambition is simply not
sufficient, writes Crispian Olver in the Mail
& Guardian.
Global mitigation to achieve the 2C target will require an enormous effort to
restructure our economies on a low-carbon
footing. This will impose a heavy burden in
terms of costs and job losses. It is vital for
the world that we are able to find the least
costly way of cutting emissions. Inevitably,
the negotiated system of national emission
reductions, which will impose some form
of caps on emissions of the major emitting
countries, will be an imperfect solution
some countries will face a much higher cost
of reducing emissions than others. South
Africa is one of those countries.
Regulation and corporate actionIf regulation drives corporate action then
South Africa is on the right track with
the planned carbon tax to take off in
the 2013/14 financial year. The tax was
announced by minister of Finance, Pravin
Gordhan, during this years budget speech.
The proposal currently stands at R75 per
tonne of carbon dioxide emissions, which
could amount to almost R7.79 billion for
the top 40 companies in the country. South
Africa relies heavily on fossil fuels to drive
the economy, and measures to change this
are critical. Part of this is the carbon tax.
But South African companies are not
happy. They question the implementation
of such a tax in the context of a develop-
ing country, and while the government has
reiterated that it is open to negotiation, it
correctly states that the potentially cata-
strophic effects of climate change must
be addressed. The status quo cannot be
maintained as productivity will be impacted
in the near future. As was demonstrated by
the PwC research, companies that do com-
ply and manage carbon could draw benefit
from this tax
and its conse-
quences, and
subsequently
also compete
better and
grow their mar-
ket share.
At the end
of the day,
there is only
one thing that
is important.
We must cut
emissions and
slow the rate
of climate change and global warming. This
in spite of whatever companies may say and
how difficult it is to change production sys-
tems and power generation, whatever legis-
lation governm