reservoir characterization of coals in the powder river ... that on average one injection well was...
TRANSCRIPT
mD
16m
800m
N
48443934292520151061
mD
48443934292520151061
152138123109948065513621
mD
a) b) c)
7
Reservoir Characterization of Coals in the Powder River Basin, Wyoming, USA, to Test the Feasibility of CO2 SequestrationHannah E. Ross1* and Mark D. Zoback11Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2215, *[email protected]
The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of sequestering CO2 in unmineable coalbeds of the Powder River Basin (PRB), Wyoming, through geomechanical and geologic reservoir characterization and simulations. We are particularly interested in whether hydraulically fracturing the coal will increase injectivity and improve sequestration capacity, and whether enhanced coalbed methane recovery (ECBM) will offset the cost of sequestration.
We found that gravity and buoyancy were the major driving forces behind gas flow within the coal, and that coal matrix swelling resulted in a slight reduction in injectivity. However, hydraulically fracturing the coal close to its base helped mitigate the negative effect of permeability reduction on injection rate.
Our simulations show that after 6 years of CO2 injection, ~95% of the total CO2 injected into the Big George coal would be sequestered and that CH4 production would be ~7 times greater with CO2 injection than without. We found that on average one injection well was able to sequester ~23 kt of CO2 a year. Based on this injection rate, it would take ~2,300 injection wells (each with a lifetime of ~6 years) to sequester the current CO2 emissions for the State of Wyoming. Since there have already been ~15,000 CBM wells drilled in the PRB, and ~50,000 more projected to be drilled in the next decade, utilization of 2,300 wells for CO2 sequestration is quite feasible, especially in light of the potential for significant cost recovery through enhanced methane production.
Summary
Reservoir Characterization Preliminary Results for CO2 Injection and CH4 Production
2) 3D ModelOur 3D model was built in an area where Colmenares and Zoback (AAPG, in press) found horizontal hydraulic fractures. Vertical hydraulic fractures may penetrate the overlying strata creating potential leakage points for CO2. We used 5 PRB CBM wells to construct our model.
We used the Computer Modelling Group’s ECBM simulator GEM.Cleat spacing = 10 cm.Initial reservoir pressure gradient = 7.12 kPa/m (0.315 psi/ft) (ARI, 2002). All simulations were run with and without matrix shrinkage and swelling modeling. Base case: primary production for 11 years.Injection case: injection begins at 1800 days. Simulations were run with an injector BHP constraint of 4000 kPa (580 psi). This is set below S3 (6200 kPa (900 psi)) so no hydraulic fractures are created.Injection with hydraulic fracture case: a horizontal hydraulic fracture was placed at the base of the injection well. The hydraulic fracture has a radius of 60 m, permeability of 1000 mD, and porosity of 30%.
If S3 = Sv then horizontal hydraulic fractures form
Simulation Setup
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
CO2 adsorptionCO2 desorptionCH4 adsorptionCH4 desorptionN2 adsorptionN2 desorption
T=22°C
Gas
Ads
orpt
ion
(SC
F/To
n)
Pressure (psia)
CO2
CH4
N2
Adsorption/Desorption Isotherms for Dry Coal
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
CO2, Swi=0 CO2, Swi=8.47%CH4, Swi=0 CH4, Swi=8.67%N2, Swi=0 N2, Swi=8.54%
Gas
Ads
orpt
ion
(SC
F/To
n)
Pressure (psia)
T=22°C
N2
CH4
CO2
Adsorption Isotherms for Moist CoalClosed symbols = dry coalOpen symbols = moist coal
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800Pressure (psi)
Dep
th (f
eet)
SvPhyd
S3 Big George Coal
nx dx 20 m ny dy 20 m nz 6 dz 3x4 m a n d 3x1.3 m
4241
CBM wells in the PRB are routinely hydraulically fractured through water enhancement tests. In some areas the hydraulic fractures propagate horizontally, whereas in other areas they grow vertically (Colmenares and Zoback, AAPG, in press).
4) Adsorption IsothermsWe used adsorption/desorption isotherms from lab experiments conducted on dry and moist PRB coal samples by the SUPRI-A group, Department of Petroleum Engineering, Stanford University (courtesy of A. Kovscek and T. Tang).
The initial cleat permeability and porosity values came from the literature, and we used geostatistical techniques to populate our model with multiple, equiprobable cleat permeability distributions. We further constrained the cleat permeability and porosity values through history-matching the water production from CBM wells in our study area (WOGCC).
1) State of Stress
a) Horizontal face cleat permeability. b) Horizontal butt cleat permeability. c) Vertical face cleat permeability. This figure shows our 3D model populated with cleat permeability values for realization 1. The heterogeneity and anisotropy in coal cleat permeability is modeled using geostatistical techniques. The horizontal face cleat permeability is higher than in the butt cleat and vertical directions (Laubrach et al., 1998). Depth to the top of the coal varies from 315-360 m.
The PRB contains the fastest growing CBM play in the United States (there are currently ~15,000 CBM wells in the PRB and ~50,000 more to be drilled).Wyoming has a number of point sources for CO2 capture, which emitted 52 megatons of CO2 in 2000 (EPA, 2005). Wyoming has a CO2 pipeline network, with a proposed extension to the PRB (Nummedal et al., 2003).
We focused our study on the Big George Coal, part of the Wyodak-Anderson coal zone of the Paleocene Fort Union Formation.The average depth of the coal is 335 m and coal thickness varies from 14 to 62 m (Flores and Bader, 1999).
Powder River Basin
Big George Coal
Source for CO2 pipelines location: http://www.corporateir.net/ireye/ir_site.zhtml?ticker=apc&script=411&layout=0&item_id=439732
109W
109W
108W
108W
107W
107W
106W
106W
105W
105W
104W
104W
103W
103W
42N 42N
43N 43N
44N 44N
45N 45N
46N 46N
47N 47N
0 50 100
km
Big Horn Mountains
Buffalo
Sheridan
Gillette
MontanaWyoming
Wyo
min
g
North Dakota
Sout
h D
akot
a
Black Hills
N
DouglasCasper
Belle F
ourch
e Rive
r
Powde
r Rive
r
Tong
ue R
iver
Existing CO2 pipelines
Possible future extension
To Shute Creek Plant
0 50 100
km
Coal Bed MethaneDevelopment Area
Study Area
Powder River Basin
Location map of the Powder River Basin, Wyoming, and our study area. Our 3D model is located in the southern part of our study area.
Sensitivity Analysis
Injection well (inject pure CO2)
Production well
CH4/CO2 front
Five Spot Pattern
Tota
l Vol
ume
of C
O2
Inje
cted
(ton
ne)
020000400006000080000
100000120000140000160000180000
Injection, no S&S
Injection withhydrofrac, no
S&S
Injection,with S&S
Injection withhydrofrac,with S&S
Total Volume of CO2 Injected
Total Volume of CH4 Produced
0
100000
200000
300000400000
500000
600000
700000
95% of CO2 sequestered100% of CO2 sequestered
Injection, no S&S
Injection withhydrofrac, no
S&S
Injection,with S&S
Injection withhydrofrac,with S&S
Tota
l Vol
ume
of C
H4
Pro
duce
d (M
SC
F)
Total Volume of CO2 Injected
020000400006000080000
100000120000140000160000180000
95% of CO2 sequestered100% of CO2 sequestered
Injection, no S&S
Injection withhydrofrac, no
S&S
Injection,with S&S
Injection withhydrofrac,with S&S
Tota
l Vol
ume
of C
O2
Inje
cted
(ton
ne)
Total volume of CO2 injected and total volume of CH4 produced after 11 years. Hydraulically fracturing the coal at the base of the injection well increased the total volume of injected CO2 by ~30%. With ECBM there was a ~7 fold increase in CH4 production. Hydrofrac stands for hydraulic fracture and S&S stands for matrix shrinkage and swelling.
ECBMPrimaryProduction
Total Volume of CH4 Produced
Tota
l Vol
ume
of C
H4
Pro
duce
d (M
SC
F)0
100000200000300000400000500000600000700000
PrimaryProduction
Only
Injection, no S&S
Injection withhydrofrac, no
S&S
Injection,with S&S
Injection withhydrofrac,with S&S
Cleat spacing,cm
InjectorBHP, kPa
Cleat compressibility,
1/kPa
Young’smodulus,
kPa
Poisson’sratio
Volumetric strain
for CH4
Volumetricstrain
for CO2
Exponent
Total Volumes Injected and Produced from Sensitivity Analysis
050000
100000150000200000250000300000
Base
Half
Double
Hom
ogeneous
High vert
Half
Double
0.1
5.0
200 in vert
3000.0
5000.0
1.00E-08
1.00E-04
0.1
8.0
Hydrostatic
1.45E-07
6.50E-06
1.45E-05
5.80E-05
8.70E-05
1.10E-04
1.380E+06
5.510E+06
0.23
0.30
0.43
CH
4 0.001
CH
4 0.01
CH
4 0.05
CH
4 0.1
CO
2 0.001
CO
2 0.007
CO
2 0.05
CO
2 0.1
1.0
2.0
4.0
0100000200000300000400000500000600000700000800000
Base
Half
Double
Hom
ogeneous
High vert
Half
Double
0.1
5.0
200 in vert
3000.0
5000.0
1.00E-08
1.00E-04
0.1
8.0
Hydrostatic
1.45E-07
6.50E-06
1.45E-05
5.80E-05
8.70E-05
1.10E-04
1.380E+06
5.510E+06
0.23
0.30
0.43
CH
4 0.001
CH
4 0.01
CH
4 0.05
CH
4 0.1
CO
2 0.001
CO
2 0.007
CO
2 0.05
CO
2 0.1
1.0
2.0
4.0
CleatporosityCleat permeability
Gas diffusion,cm2/s
Thickness, m
Pressure, kPa
Tota
l Vol
ume
of C
O2
Inje
cted
(ton
ne)
Tota
l Vol
ume
of C
H4
Pro
duce
d (M
SC
F)
Total volumes of CO2 injected and CH4 produced due to changes in the model and input parameters for the fluid flow simulations. Cleat compressibility, Young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio, matrix volumetric strain and the exponent used to relate cleat porosity and permeability are all included in the Palmer and Mansoori (1996; 1998; GEM 2005) equation. The dark blue boxes correspond to the base case, and the values used for the parameters in the base case are listed in Table 1 of our GHGT-8 paper. All of these simulations incorporate matrix shrinkage and swelling, but no hydraulic fracture.
95% of CO2 sequestered100% of CO2 sequestered
95% of CO2 sequestered100% of CO2 sequestered
Total volumes of CO2 injected and CH4 produced if injection is stopped at the first sign of CO2 breakthrough (100% of the total CO2 injected is sequestered), compared to the total volumes at the end of 6 years of injection, where only 95% of the total CO2 injected is sequestered. In our simulations, the first sign of CO2 breakthrough is at ~3,000 days, after ~3 years of injection. ECBM would still be profitable after only 3 years of CO2 injection, with CH4 production increasing by a factor of 5 over primary production. The CO2 injection rate would drop to ~21 kt per year compared with ~23 kt. And the number of injection wells needed to sequester the current CO2 emissions for the state of Wyoming would increase to ~2,500 wells, each with a lifetime of 3 years, compared to ~2,300 wells, each with a lifetime of 6 years.
3) Geostatistical Characterization and History-match of Cleat Permeability and Porosity
Powder River Basin, Wyoming
CO2/CH4 front
315
330
0
10
200
CO2/CH4 front
Production Well Injection Well
CH4 CO2Coal
Dep
th (m
)
CO2/CH4 front
Horizontal hydraulic fracture
(Modified from Colmenares and Zoback, 2004)