research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics timothy...

25
research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela . edu

Upload: pearl-george

Post on 17-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

research traditions: rationality, structure,

and culture

foundations of comparative politics

Timothy C. LimCalifornia State University, Los

[email protected]

Page 2: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

research traditions: an introduction to rational choice

micro-levelmicro-level

Page 3: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

3

rational choice perspective

what does it mean to act in a rational manner?

how does rationality help explain humanbehavior and larger social, political, and

economic phenomena?

is the concept of rationality too simplistic?

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

theory in comparative politicsresearch traditions

Page 4: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

4

rational choice perspective

what is self-interest and why is it a central concept in rational choice?

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

theory in comparative politicsresearch traditions

Page 5: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

5

self-interest: key points

self-interest is not the same as “selfishness”

self-interest in rational choice theory is premised on the idea that all individuals have specific (“reasonable”)

goals and that they behave in way that best enables them to achieve those goals

self-interest is context dependent: the goal of a politician, for example, is to win or hold on to political office; a shareholder wants to maximize short-term gains;

self-interest, in other words, is based on individual preference

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

theory in comparative politicsresearch traditions

Page 6: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

6

other key concepts in rational choice

preferences and utility maximization

strategic calculation and strategic interaction

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

theory in comparative politicsresearch traditions

what is utility maximization and why is it important? how does it help us understand human

behavior?

what is strategic calculation and interaction? what do these concepts tell us about the

decision making process?

Page 7: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

7

summing up thus far

rational choice is much more than simply asserting people are self-interested actors

Instead, preferences, utility maximization, strategic calculation and strategic interaction makes “rational decision-making” more complex than it appears on the

surface

At the same time, the key principles of rational choice dramatically “simplify” a very, very complex

reality

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

theory in comparative politicsresearch traditions

Page 8: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

8

a simple exercise

rational choice tell us to begin with the assumption of rationality:

we are all rational actors

yet some decisions and some actions appear irrational: for example, what was rational about saddam’s decision to stand up to the the united states prior to the 2003

invasion? wasn’t he risking certain death?

how could his actions be considered rational? discuss.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

theory in comparative politicsresearch traditions

adopting a rationalist perspective helps us undercover the rationality of seemingly irrational decision. in retrospect, we can see how rational

saddam really was. consider the following video …

Page 9: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

9

video removed intentionallysee coursesite

Page 10: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

10

a simple exercise: saddam as a rational actor

but didn’t saddam ultimately make a bad decision? doesn’t

that make him an irrational actor? dicuss.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

theory in comparative politicsresearch traditions

remember: rational actors don’t have perfect information. they can only base decisions on the

information they have

moreover, decisions are made in particular environments (the strategic environment):

environmental conditions don’t allow us to do whatever we want; we are often constrained

Page 11: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

11

rational choice and constraints

what are the two major types of constraints rational actors face?

why are constraints important? what do they do?

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

theory in comparative politicsresearch traditions

Page 12: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

12

rational choice analysis: key questions

who are the main actors?

how are their interests or preferences defined?

what is the nature of the interaction betweenor among actors?

what information is available to them?

what type of constraints do they face?

how do constraints influence their actions?

what are other elements of the strategicenvironment?

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

theory in comparative politicsresearch traditions

Page 13: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

research traditions: an introduction to structural approach

macro-levelmacro-level

Page 14: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

14

the structural approach

what are structures and how do they shape human behavior?

what are the most important structures and how do they work?

is the concept of structure too deterministic or too simple to fully explain the social world?

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

theory in comparative politicsresearch traditions

Page 15: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

15

the structural approach and chess: consider the parallels

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

theory in comparative politicsresearch traditions

Page 16: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

16

the structural approach: key assumptions

structures are enduring, but not permanent (e.g., feudalism)

structures contain specific logic and dynamic

structures create particular relationships (e.g., peasant-lord, master-slave, worker-capitalist,

dominant country-subordinate country)

the fates of individuals, groups and societies are largely determined by their positions within a

structure

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

theory in comparative politicsresearch traditions

Page 17: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

17

the structural approach: key questions to ask

what is the overarching structure and what are thekey relationships within that structure?

how does the structure work or operate? what isthe internal logic and basic dynamic of the structure?

what are the key structural rules of the game, andwho are they key players and what are their roleswithin the structure?

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

theory in comparative politicsresearch traditions

Page 18: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

research traditions: an introduction to cultural approach

meso-levelmeso-level

Page 19: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

19

the cultural approach: key points

culture is a shared, learned, and symbolic system of values, beliefs, ideas, and attitudes that

shapes and influences our perceptions and behavior

culture must be constantly transmitted and reproduced

culture is inherently and unavoidably intersubjective: it exists within our collective minds

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

theory in comparative politicsresearch traditions

Page 20: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

20

the cultural approach: key points

the intersubjective nature of culture means, to repeat, that culture has no concrete existence: culture is, to large extent, what wethink it is (or want it to be)

this means culture can bemanipulated, redefined or re-shaped; it can also be co-opted

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

theory in comparative politicsresearch traditions

Cultur

e is h

ere

Cultur

e is h

ere

Page 21: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

21

despite its intersubjective nature ..

culture has power

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

theory in comparative politicsresearch traditions

Page 22: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

22

culture has power

the ideas, beliefs, values and identities of culture have power

at both the individual and collective levels

they can compel individuals and whole peoples to act and behave in certain ways, to make profound

sacrifices and even give up their freedom or their very lives

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

theory in comparative politicsresearch traditions

Page 23: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

23

… suicide terrorists and peace activists, soldiers and conscientious objectors, freedom fighters and pro-democracy protestors: all represent the power of culture to motivate people and shape human society

one particularly memorableexample of how ideascan motivate actionindividual action occurred in china in 1989 …

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

theory in comparative politicsresearch traditions

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 24: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

24

the power of culture/the power of ideas

watch these scenes from v for vendetta: both provide very clear illustrations of the power of culture/ideas

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

theory in comparative politicsresearch traditions

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 25: Research traditions: rationality, structure, and culture foundations of comparative politics Timothy C. Lim California State University, Los Angeles tclim@calstatela.edu

25

the power of culture

the power of culture gives it huge potential as a political resource or asset: the is of particular interest to students of

political science

significantly, the power of an ostensibly single culture can be harnessed or co-opted by opportunistic leader and others to achieve self-serving goals: consider bosnia, rwanda, islamic

terrorism

on the other hand, culture can serve as rallying cry, a force for broad-based mobilization and progressive change: people power in

the philippines, poland and the ukraine; the anti-apartheid movement in south africa; the u.s. civil rights movement

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

theory in comparative politicsresearch traditions