request for letters of intent - audubon connecticut · letters of intent will be evaluated, and...
TRANSCRIPT
REQUEST FOR LETTERS OF INTENT - CT Wetland Mitigation In Lieu Fee Program Letter of Intent Package March 2019
1
REQUEST FOR LETTERS OF INTENT
Connecticut Wetland Mitigation In Lieu Fee Program Grant
March 12, 2019
Background
The National Audubon Society, Inc., through its Connecticut program (Audubon Connecticut) is the sponsor of the Connecticut In Lieu Fee (ILF) Program for aquatic resource compensatory mitigation required by Department of the Army authorizations. This program was established by the New England District, Corps of Engineers (Corps) and Audubon Connecticut on Aug. 21, 2013.
The Connecticut ILF Program has accrued funds available for the preservation, restoration and enhancement of wetland and watercourse resources and associated upland buffers in the State of Connecticut.
The program receives its funds from applicants who have applied for permits under the Corps’ Regulatory process and agree to use the program for mitigation of impacts resulting from their approved work. After the applicant avoids and minimizes the impacts to the extent possible, the Corps may approve the use of the ILF by the applicant. The Corps then determines the number of credits the applicant will need to purchase. The fees for the ILF credits are paid by the permittee to Audubon Connecticut and tracked by service area (Connecticut River, Housatonic, Thames, South-central Coastal, Southeast Coastal, and Southwest Coastal). These funds are eventually made available, through a competitive grant process, to conservation entities seeking funding for wetland preservation, enhancement, restoration and creation projects.
The ILF program’s purpose and goals are to:
• Provide an alternative to permittee-responsible compensatory mitigation that will effectively replace functions and values of aquatic resources lost through permitted impacts;
• Substantially increase the extent and quality of restoration, enhancement, creation and preservation of natural resources over that which is typically achieved by permittee-responsible mitigation for activities that impact wetlands, significant wildlife habitats and other waters within Connecticut;
• Reduce the extent of cumulative adverse impacts to aquatic resources that are regulated by the Corps permit program, and provide applicants for permits from the Corps greater flexibility in compensating for adverse impacts to protected natural resources; and
• Achieve ecological success on a watershed basis by directing Audubon Connecticut ILF funds to natural resource types and functions that are appropriate to the geographic service
REQUEST FOR LETTERS OF INTENT - CT Wetland Mitigation In Lieu Fee Program Letter of Intent Package March 2019
2
area, and by integrating Audubon Connecticut ILF projects with other conservation activities whenever possible.
Application Process
As sponsor, Audubon Connecticut continues to administer a competitive grant funding program, and is soliciting Letters of Intent (LOIs) for wetland and watercourse preservation, enhancement, restoration, and/or creation. To be eligible to receive Connecticut ILF funding, a project applicant must first submit the Letter of Intent.
Due Date
All Letters of Intent must be submitted online to Audubon Connecticut’s agent at the following address: [email protected] and all submissions must be received by 5:00 pm EST on April 26th, 2019.
The Letter of Intent is comprised of the following:
1) A Summary Form to outline the proposed project and determine if it meets the Connecticut ILF core requirements; and
2) A map of the project location.
Letters of Intent will be evaluated, and applicants will be notified by early May 2019 as to whether or not they will be invited to submit a Full Proposal* for their project. For the complete timeline for the upcoming grant cycle, see Appendix B. For a listing of the funds available for award in each “service area”, see Appendix C.
*Note: Full Proposals will require more detailed information including but not necessarily limited to engineering concept designs, where applicable.
Review Process
Letters of Intent (LOIs) are screened by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and Audubon Connecticut. The Corps and Audubon Connecticut will then determine which submittals represent projects that are appropriate for compensatory mitigation. For those projects that are deemed appropriate, Applicants will be invited to submit Full Proposals.
Invited Full Proposals are then evaluated by the Project Advisory Committee (PAC) composed of representatives of the Corps, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (CTDEEP), Audubon Connecticut, and three other rotating members representing other non-governmental environmental organizations, academia, or both. Those highest scoring full proposals that meet or exceed applicable review criteria may be recommended by the PAC to the Inter-Agency Review Team (IRT), which makes final allocation decisions. The IRT is composed of members of the Corps, EPA, USFWS, National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS), and CTDEEP.
Audubon Connecticut administers the review process and is responsible for ensuring that approved funds are awarded and that projects are executed.
REQUEST FOR LETTERS OF INTENT - CT Wetland Mitigation In Lieu Fee Program Letter of Intent Package March 2019
3
Special Considerations
While the Connecticut ILF Program process is designed to include a review and approval of prospective projects via a process similar to that of other state and federal grant programs, it remains a compensatory mitigation program that must comply with relevant state and federal regulations. As such, there are several aspects of this program that should be considered fully before a potential applicant submits a Letter of Intent:
Preservation projects are eligible for Connecticut ILF funding and strongly encouraged. However, preservation-only projects must clearly explain the potential threat of degradation to the aquatic resources on the project site over the next 20 years in the absence of conservation. Sites that are mostly or all wetland need to pay especially close attention to these requirements as those sites are usually protected by current laws and may not be under direct development threat.
Invasive species management to protect aquatic resources is eligible for ILF funding as part of a project’s long-term management costs but cannot be the sole objective for a project to be considered as restoration or enhancement. Projects requesting ILF funds for invasive species management will be required to complete an invasive species control plan as part of their long-term management plan.
ILF-funded projects must be conserved in perpetuity. Applicants awarded funds from the Connecticut ILF program are required to sign a Project Agreement and to record a notice of that agreement with the land records for the property where the funded project takes place. Also, ILF funds may not be used to preserve property that is currently owned by a conservation entity or to reimburse the costs of prior acquisitions, but wetland restoration on already-preserved lands (would need to be preserved for conservation in perpetuity, not just in a town's ownership) is encouraged.
Active property uses, including forest management, habitat management or recreational activities, must not compromise the ecological health or function of the natural resources that the proposal intends to protect. Projects that contemplate active forest or habitat management, recreational activities, or other active property uses will be asked to describe these proposed activities in subsequent submissions should the Applicant be invited to submit a Full Proposal. Where such activities would occur on the property would need to be indicated on a map, so their compatibility can be evaluated as part of the review process. Projects proposing less active management will generally be more competitive.
Conservation easements funded through the ILF Program must prohibit any activities that would adversely affect the protected natural resources.
REQUEST FOR LETTERS OF INTENT - CT Wetland Mitigation In Lieu Fee Program Letter of Intent Package March 2019
4
Connecticut ILF funds may not be eligible to match federal funding sources. According to the federal Mitigation Rule [33 CFR 332.3(j)(2)], “federally-funded aquatic resource restoration or conservation projects undertaken for purposes other than compensatory mitigation, such as the Wetlands Reserve Program (NRCS), Conservation Reserve Program (NRCS), and Partners for Wildlife Program (USFWS), cannot be used for the purpose of generating compensatory mitigation credits.” Please follow up with the applicable agency if you are uncertain about the matching requirements for a particular grant program.
Projects involving multiple parcels under different ownership must submit multiple Letters of Intent. A single proposal for multiple parcels under different ownership will not be accepted unless a clear and convincing case can be made for why the different transactions are linked (e.g., one landowner formally negotiating on behalf of two or more separate owners).
To discuss how any of these program elements may affect a potential project, or any other questions related to Connecticut ILF Program, please contact Anthony Zemba at [email protected] or via telephone at (860) 321-9018.
All interested applicants must use the form provided in Appendix B of the original “Final Instrument for the Audubon Connecticut In-Lieu Fee Program Sponsored by National Audubon Society, Inc.” Dated August 21, 2013, a copy of which can be found here (along with further instructions for completing the form and sources of additional information to assist in preparation of the form):
http://www.nae.usace.army.mil/Portals/74/docs/regulatory/Mitigation/CTILFProgramInstrument.pdf
APPENDIX A
MAP OF THE CONNECTICUT ILF PROGRAM SERVICE AREAS
Long Island Sound
§̈¦84
§̈¦395§̈¦91 §̈¦84
§̈¦95
§̈¦95§̈¦91 §̈¦395
§̈¦291
§̈¦384
§̈¦691
An do v e rAn do v e r
An so n iaAn so n ia
Ash fo rdAsh fo rd
Av o nAv o n
Ba rkh a m st edBa rkh a m st ed
Be ac o nBe ac o nFa l l sFa l l s
Be r l i nBe r l i n
Be tha n yBe tha n y
Be the lBe the l
Be thle h e mBe thle h e m
Bloo m f ie ldB loo m f ie ld
Bo lt onBo lt on
Bo zra hBo zra h
Bra n fo rdBra n fo rd
Br id g ep o r tB r id g ep o r t
B r id g ew a terB r id g ew a ter
B r i st olB r i st ol
B ro o kf ie ldBro o kf ie ld
Bro o kly nBro o kly n
Bu r l i ng to nBu r l i ng to n
Ca n aa nCa n aa n
Ca n ter b ur yCa n ter b ur y
Ca n tonCa n ton
Ch a pl inCh a pl in
Ch e sh i reCh e sh i re
Ch e ste rCh e ste r
C l in tonC l in ton
Co lch e s te rCo lch e s te r
Co leb r oo kCo leb r oo k
Co lum b iaCo lum b ia
Co rn wa l lCo rn wa l l
Co ve n t ryCo ve n t ry
Cro m we l lCro m we l l
Da n bu ryDa n bu ry
Da r ie nDa r ie n
De e p R iv e rDe e p R iv e r
De rb yDe rb y
Du rh a mDu rh a m
Ea st fo rdEa st fo rd
Ea stEa stGra n b yGra n b y
Ea st Ha d d a mEa st Ha d d a m
Ea stEa stHa mp to nHa mp to n
Ea st Ha r t fo rdEa st Ha r t fo rd
Ea stEa stHa ve nHa ve n
Ea stEa stLym eLym e
Ea sto nEa sto n
Ea stEa stWin d s o rWin d s o r
E l li n g to nE l li n g to n
En f ieldEn f ield
Ess e xEss e x
Fa i r f ie ldFa i r f ie ld
Fa r min g to nFa r min g to n
Fr a nk l i nFr a nk l i n
Gla st on b u ryGla st on b u ry
Go s he nGo s he n
Gra n b yGra n b y
Gre e n wic hGre e n wic h
Gr is wo ldGr i s wo ld
Gro to nGro to n
Gu i l fo rdGu i l fo rd
Ha d da mHa d da m
Ha md e nHa md e n
Ha mp to nHa mp to nHa r t fo rdHa r t fo rd
Ha r t l a n dHa r t l a n d
Ha rw in to nHa rw in to n
He b ro nHe b ro n
Ke ntKe nt
K i ll i n g l yK i ll i n g l y
K i ll i n g wo r thK i ll i n g wo r th
Le b a n o nLe b a n o n
Le d y a rdLe d y a rd
Lis b o nLis b o n
Li tc h f ie ldLi tc h f ie ld
Lym eLym e
Ma d iso nMa d iso n
Ma n c he s te rMa n c he s te rMa n s f ieldMa n s f ield
Ma r lb o ro u g hMa r lb o ro u g h
Me r id e nMe r id e nMid d le bu ryMid d le bu ry Mid d le f i eldMid d le f i eldMid d le tow nMid d le tow n
Mi l fo rdMi l fo rd
Mo n ro eMo n ro e
Mo n tv i l l eMo n tv i l l e
Mo rr i sMo rr i s
Na u ga tu c kNa u ga tu c k
Ne wNe wBr i ta inBr i ta in
Ne wNe wCa n aa nCa n aa n
Ne wNe wFa i r f ie ldFa i r f ie ld
Ne wNe wHa r t fo rdHa r t fo rd
Ne w H a ve nNe w H a ve n
Ne win g to nNe win g to n
Ne wNe wLo n d o nLo n d o n
Ne w M i l fo rdNe w M i l fo rd
Ne wto wnNe wto wn
No r fo l kNo r fo l k
No r thNo r thBra n fo rdBra n fo rd
No r thNo r thCa n aa nCa n aa n
No r thNo r thHa ve nHa ve n
No r thNo r thS to nin g to nS to nin g to n
No rwa lkNo rwa lk
No rw ic hNo rw ic h
Old Ly m eOld Ly m eOldOld
Sa yb ro o kSa yb ro o kOra n g eOra n g e
Ox fo rdOx fo rd
P lain f i e ldP lain f i e ldP lain v i l l eP lain v i l l e
P lym o u thP lym o u th
Po mfre tPo mfre t
Po r t l a ndPo r t l a nd
Pre sto nPre sto nPro sp e c tP ro sp e c t
Pu tna mPu tna m
Re d din gRe d din gR id ge f ie ldR id ge f ie ld
Ro ck yRo ck yH i l lH i l l
Ro xb u ryRo xb u ry
Sa le mSa le m
Sa li s b u rySa li s b u ry
Sco t la n dSco t la n d
Se ym o u rSe ym o u r
Sh ar onSh ar on
Sh el to nSh el to n
Sh er ma nSh er ma n
S ims b u ryS ims b u ry
So me rsSo me rs
So uth b u rySo uth b u ry
So uth in g to nSo uth in g to n
So uthSo uthWin d s o rWin d s o r
Sp ra gu eSp ra gu e
S ta ffo rdS ta ffo rd
S ta mfo rdS ta mfo rd
S te r l i ngS te r l i ng
S to nin g to nS to nin g to n
S t ra t fo rdS t ra t fo rd
Su ff i e ldSu ff i e ld
Th o m a sto nTh o m a sto n
Th o m p so nTh o m p so n
To llan dTo llan d
To rr ing tonTo r r ing ton
Tru mb u l lTru mb u l l
Un ionUn ion
Ve rno nVe rno n
Vo lun to wnVo lun to wn
Wa ll i n g fo rdWa ll i n g fo rd
Wa rre nWa rre n
Wa sh in g to nWa sh in g to n
Wa ter bu r yWa ter bu r y
Wa ter fo rdWa ter fo rd
Wa ter to wnWa ter to wn
We s tb ro okWe s tb ro ok
We s tWe s tHa r t fo rdHa r t fo rd
We s tWe s tHa ve nHa ve n
We s to nWe s to n
We s tp or tWe s tp or t
We th e rs f i eldWe th e rs f i eld
Wi l l i n g to nWi l l i n g to n
Wi l to nWi l to n
Win c h e ste rWin c h e ste r
Win d h a mWin d h a m
Win d s o rWin d s o r
Win d s o rWin d s o rLo c k sLo c k s
Wo lc ot tWo lc ot t
Wo o d br idg eWo o d br idg e
Wo o d bu r yWo o d bu r y
Wo o d sto c kWo o d sto c k
Connecticut Major and Regional Water Basins
Major Water Basins
LegendMajor Water Basins
ConnecticutHousatonicSouth Central CoastSoutheast CoastSouthwest CoastThames
New Yo rk New Yo rk
Ma ss ac hus se t tsMa ss ac hus se t ts
Rhode Rhode Is la ndIsla nd
APPENDIX B
Connecticut ILF PROGRAM PROPOSAL AND AWARD PROGRAM 2019 TENTATIVE SCHEDULE
Stage Deadline Request for Letters of Intent Released
March 11, 2019
Letters of Intent Deadline
April 26th
LOIs screened, applicants of appropriate projects sent letters to request full proposals
April 22nd – early May
Deadline for Invited Parties to submit Full Proposals
June 7th
PAC Reviews Plans, conducts site visits, and ranks projects
June
PAC Meeting to select finalists
by early July
Provide finalists to IRT
By July 14th
IRT Meets and Reviews Full Proposals
July – August
IRT selects finalist
End of August
Notification Letters to finalists
Early September
Finalize Project Agreements for Approved Projects
October
APPENDIX C
FUNDS AVAILABLE PER SERVICE AREA
(as of March 7th, 2019)
Service Area Available Funding Connecticut River $277,404 Housatonic River $13, 778
South-Central Coast $213,696 Southeast Coast $1,638 Southwest Coast $79,300
Thames River $11,359
APPENDIX D
WETLAND ILF PROGRAM
LETTER OF INTENT FILLABLE FORM
Audubon Connecticut In-lieu Fee Instrument
Appendix B Letter of Intent for Mitigation Projects/ Instructions
Total Project Cost:
Fund Request:
Other Funding Sources:
Name:
Organization:
Address:
Phone:
Email:
3. Project Location:Watershed:
Coordinates:
Town:
County:
4. Project Description (brief overview of project context, goals and readiness):
5. Preliminary Estimated Project Cost:
Application Date:
Project Title:
Project Sponsor:
Service Area:
Address:
7. Types of Mitigation Project Acres 8FUMBOE���8BUFSDPVSTF�3FTPVSDF�5ZQF��
Enhancement and restoration (w/ preservation)
Restoration (w/ preservation)
Enhancement (w/ preservation)
Creation (w/ preservation)
Preservation of uplands serving as buffer toaquatic resources (in addition to preservation of restored, enhanced areas)
Preservation only
Total Project Acreage:
� 1MFBTF�TFF�XXX�GXT�HPW�XFUMBOET�EBUB�NBQQFS�IUNM
6. Priority of Project Site:
Within or adjacent to an Audubon Priority Focus Area - (see www.ct.audubon.org/ILF for locations):
Focus area name:
Within or adjacent to existing public or private conservation lands:
Site Name: Owner:
Within or adjacent to other natural resource priority areas (e.g., identified in regional or municipal plan, land trust strategic plan, etc.)
Area Name:
Brief Description:
Contains natural resources of significant value and/ or rarity (http://www.cteco.uconn.edu/map_catalog.asp):
Habitats, species:
"EE�BEEJUJPOBM�TIFFUT�BT�OFFEFE�GPS�BOZ�PG�UIF�BCPWF�SFRVFTUFE�JOGPSNBUJPO��-BCFM�BEEFE�TIFFUT�CZ�UIFJS�BQQMJDBCMF�TFDUJPO�OVNCFS�