republic of uzbekistan fergana valley water...

1

REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources

Projects Implementation Unit for Water Infrastructure

Fergana Valley Water Resources Management Project - Phase I

REPORT ON LAND ACQUISITION ACTIVITIES UNDER THE PROJECT IN 2012-2014

November 2015

SFG2022P

ublic

Dis

clos

ure

Aut

horiz

edP

ublic

Dis

clos

ure

Aut

horiz

edP

ublic

Dis

clos

ure

Aut

horiz

edP

ublic

Dis

clos

ure

Aut

horiz

ed

2

Contents Page

1 Objectives and Tasks of the Report 3

2 Project Description 3

2.1 Background of Fergana Valley Water Resources Management Project 3

2.2 Project Area 3

2.3 Project Area Population and People Affected by the Project 4

2.4 RAP and LAAP prepared under the Project 5

3 Assumed consequences 5

3.1 Components of the Project and types of work which caused land acquisition 5

4 Land acquisition and compensation 10

5 M&A of land acquisition and compensation payment efficiency 16

6 Grievance mechanism 16

7 ANNEXES 16

3

Objectives and Tasks of the Report

Objective of the Report is to demonstrate compliance of land acquisition and compensation processes to

Operational Policy (OP) 4.12 of the World Bank (WB), RPF (prepared in 2009) and RAP (prepared in

2011) due to lack of RAP covering period from 2012 to 2015

The Project Description

Background of Fergana Valley Water Resources Management Project

Fergana Valley Water Resources Management Project was initiated by Ministry of Agriculture and Water

Resources of Uzbekistan with funding from the WB.

The Project is designed to increase the agricultural production and decrease the damage to the infrastructure

as a result of waterlogging, as well as improvement of I&D systems and strengthening of WUAs and water

institutions.

As stated in final FS (September 2008), the main Project objectives include:

(a) Promotion of the sustainable irrigated farming, employment growth and generating income of

the farm enterprises in Fergana Valley (FV) by improvement of I&D systems and the overall

water resources management;

(b) Lowering damage to the infrastructure regardless of its proprietary form, improvement of

environmental and health conditions by combating the waterlogging. This, in turn, will lead to

rising of living standards;

(c) Introduction of joint operation of irrigation systems on the base of WUAs, the advanced

techniques of farming and irrigation, and activities contributing to cost-effectiveness of farming

in the Project area;

(d) Strengthening of institutional capacity of the water organizations and organizations responsible

for I&D

Enhancement of operating efficiency of the water sector, i.e. maximizing performance per unit of water

use, can be achieved by improvement of I&D systems (both on-farm and inter-farm), better WT control,

provision of support to the agricultural producers and local self-governing bodies.

General improvement of the water resources management sphere can be seen (based on water balance

analysis) by growth in volume and reliability of flow in the Syr Darya River basin. Fulfillment of the Project

tasks will also contribute to implementation of Country Assistance Strategy in terms of increase in

agricultural production, provision of employment and income, rising of living standards and improvement

of environmental condition.

The Project Area

The Project area is located in the central part of FV and covers most of Bagdad, Rishtan and Altiaryk

districts of Fergana oblast (FO). The total Project area is about 67 000 ha of which 48 000 ha are cultivated.

The total population in this area is 554 000 people.

Income of the most population, in many ways, depends on agriculture. FV has a high population density as

compared to the other parts of a country.

Agriculture is a basic source of income for the local population. The main crop grown in this area is cotton

which ensures a profit from export for the government. Other crops are wheat, rice, potatoes, fruits, grapes,

melons, oil crops and vegetables.

The main sources of surface water in FV are the Naryn, Kara Darya and Syr Darya Rivers, the latter is

formed as a result of confluence of the first two rivers. Besides, there are numerous rivers and mountain

sais flowing down to the Valley north, east and south.

4

Irrigation network in the Project area has three main canals: South Fergana Canal (SFC), Big Fergana Canal

(BFC) and Big Andijan Canal (BAC).

Drainage system has two main collectors – Achikkul and North-Bagdad which collects the drainage flow

formed in the Project area, and transports it to the Syr Darya. There are also many vertical drainage wells

which are used mainly north of BFC and in west of the Project area.

Territorially and administratively, the Project area covers most of Bagdad district (except territory very

south and east), half of north end of Rishtan district and middle territory of Altiaryk district, as well as

Bagdad, Rishtan and Altiaryk towns (Fig. 1). Survey area is limited north – North Bagdad Collector and

Central Kyzyltepa; west and east – by borders of Bagdad and Altiaryk districts; south – Burgandi massif of

Kyrgyzstan.

Map 1. Project Area

The Project Area Population and People Affected by the Project

According to Statistics Department of Fergana oblast as of 1 January 2014 there were 562.4 thousand people

in the Project districts that up to 17.8 thousand people greater than in 2011. Share of urban and rural

population in the Project districts practically did not change as compared with 2011, staying at the same

level: 35.5% rural and 64.5% urban.

Population density has, naturally, increased from 471.7 people/ km2 in 2011 to 487.6 people/ km2 in 20131.

In 2011, there were 1089 members in 21 WUAs of 3 districts, of which 881 farm enterprises (FE) and 208

others, including dekhkan farms (DF), kitchen gardens, etc. Results of the baseline study show that 19 207

ha are under cotton, 18 001 ha are under wheat, and remaining 19 010 ha are under other crops.

1 Interim report of M&A Consultant, 2014

5

In 2013, there were already 2016 members in 25 WUAs of the Project districts, including 915 farm

enterprises cultivating main crops (cotton and wheat), 981 other farms (orchards, stock-raising, etc.) and

120 rural and mahallya citizens meetings (tomorka).

The total service area of all WUAs in the Project districts is 74 135 ha, being increased up to 17 916 ha as

compared with the baseline data for 2011. Increase in WUA members (up to 927 members as compared

with 2011) and service area is attributed to inclusion of 3 WUAs («Kyzyltepa tongi», «O.Musulmonkulov»

and «Yangiobod movy osmoni») to works on WUA development, as well as engagement of the other farm

enterprises which previously were not WUA members.

Of total irrigated area, 66.2 % of cultivated land accounts for the farmers, 16.3 % dekhkans and 17.6 %

mahallya. All Project construction and rehabilitation works were executed in the farmers’ lands. These

lands are publicly owned. There were no works in plots belonging to dekhkan farms, including in tomorka.

Thus, the Project negative impact on crops and plants did not guaranteedly affect dekhkan farms in the

three Project districts.

RAP and LAAP prepared under the Project

Two documents related to resettlement were prepared under the Project: Resettlement Action Plan (RAP)

and Land Acquisition Action Plan (LAAP). One of the first segments of this Project was construction of

open collectors. Initial Resettlement Action Plan was prepared in 2008 by Consultant on Social Assessment

in close cooperation with the PIU. In 2011, at the beginning of the Project, RAP was revised by the PIU

and prepared according to the detail design and optimization of farm enterprises with clarification of

Affected People (AP). Consequently, number of AP remained the same (37), of which 31 farm enterprises,

4 dekhkan farms, one college and one school. LAAP provides the guidelines and methodology of land

acquisition and compensation as provided by the WB Resettlement Policy and applicable domestic

legislation.

LAAP (2011) was approved by the WB. All subsequent calculations of land acquisition and compensation

were made based on methodologies described in this document. Under other segments of the Project, large-

scale works on repair and restoration of I&D systems are being executed which are described in more detail

in the next sections.

Assumed consequences

Components of the Project and types of work which have caused land acquisition

This section describes all works under the Project and description of approach applied for calculation of

compensation. The Project firstly addresses an improvement of I&D systems infrastructure, most of which

is on the balance of government organizations and in public ownership. The Project does not provide for

any investment at the concrete farms level. Project includes the following components:

Component A: Improvement of I&D systems. This component is directed to resolve the problem

of high water table (WT) by financing the physical improvement of I&D systems,

as well as installation of the vertical drainage wells.

Component B: Institutional and agricultural development support comprising institutional

strengthening of the public and private agencies involved in the water sector

management, I&D systems maintenance and agricultural production in the Project

area. Component will finance the trainings and study tours, establish demonstration

plots and furnish them with field equipment, laboratories, computers, office

equipment, etc., as well as the Consultants.

Component C: Project Management and Audit, M&A including operating cost of the Project

Management, Consultancy Services on Audit and M&A, and preparation of future

projects.

6

Component A is the largest by value and the only one relevant to the WB Operation Policy on Involuntary

Resettlement 4.12.

Main works under Component A, and their potential linkage with OP 4.12 of the WB are presented in Table

1. Data on total number of AP for the period under review (2011-2014) are presented in Table 6.

Table 1. Works on constructed and restored waterworks and their relation to land acquisition and

resettlement

Proposed Construction / Rehabilitation

Potential/Probability

Farmers/Households Land

Acquisition Resettlement,

Structural

Damage Temporary Permanent

Improvement of drainage network

1 Rehabilitation of on-farm open horizontal

drainage (870 km) No Yes No

2 Rehabilitation and construction of structures on

on-farm collectors (169 nr.) No No No

3 Construction of new subsurface horizontal

drainage (SHD) (100 km) No No No

4 Rehabilitation of interfarm collectors (170 km) No Yes No


interfarm collectors (107 nr.) No No No

6 Rehabilitation of interdistrict collectors (65 km) No Yes No


interdistrict collectors (20 nr.) No No No

8 Construction and restoration of cutoff drain (25

km) No Yes No


cutoff drain (46 nr.) No No No

10 Construction of observation wells (34 nr.) No No No

11 Construction of pressure relief wells (1411 km) No No No

12 Construction of artesian wells (10 nr.) No No No

13 Repair of vertical drainage wells on PSA balance

(242 nr.) No No No

14 Repair of vertical drainage wells on

Komundrenaj balance (33 nr.) No No No

15 Deep ripping (6000 ha) No No No

Rehabilitation of on-farm canals

16 Rehabilitation of earth and concrete canals (15

km) No No No

17 Rehabilitation of flumes (240 km) No No No

18 Rehabilitation and construction of regulators (207

nr.) and construction of culverts (788 nr.) No No No

19 Rehabilitation and construction of hydroposts

(1159 nr.) No No No

Rehabilitation of interfarm canals

20 Rehabilitation of earth canals (15 km) No No No

7

Proposed Construction / Rehabilitation

Potential/Probability

Farmers/Households Land

Acquisition Resettlement,

Structural

Damage Temporary Permanent

21 Rehabilitation of concrete canals (140 km) No No No

22 Rehabilitation and construction of culverts (192

nr.) No No No

23 Rehabilitation and construction of hydroposts

(535 nr.) No No No

24 Laser levelling (3200 ha) No No No

25 Rehabilitation and flushing-out of SHD (230 km) No No No

26 Demonstration plots for drip irrigation (301.8 ha) No No No

As above Table shows, implementation of the Project did not necessitate a physical resettlement, however

crops were subjected to possible negative impact.

Major impact took place during construction and rehabilitation of: (i) interfarm, on-farm and interdistrict

I&D systems, (ii) cutoff drain and (iii) SHD. Works on the remaining Project components, which constitute

the majority, were associated neither with permanent, nor with temporary impact on SHD farm land or

available crops.

Damages to SHD farmers resulting from the Project works were calculated by methods described in LAAP.

Formula for calculation of compensation is given below (Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers No.146 `

2011):

Extent of farming loss in case of permanent land acquisition is identified under the following formula:

Fl = [(CI х AI)+(CRF х ARF) + (CI х AIL х 0.1)+

(CRF х ARFL х 0.1) + (CHP х AHP)] х CL х IC + NP, where:

Fl - farming loss in case of seizure of agricultural land for permanent use, thousand UZS;

CI - cost of irrigation and reclamation of equivalent new land instead of seized 1 ha of irrigated

agricultural land (excluding irrigated layland) is accepted according to Clause 31 of this Regulation,

thousand UZS;

CRF - cost of irrigation and reclamation of equivalent new land instead of seized 1 ha of rain-fed

field and non-irrigated perennial plantings, is accepted according to Clause 32 of this Regulation, thousand

UZS;

CHP - cost of irrigation and reclamation of equivalent new land instead of seized 1 ha of hayfield

and pasture is accepted according to Clause 34 of this Regulation, thousand UZS;

AI - area of seized irrigated agricultural land (excluding irrigated layland), ha;

ARF - area of seized rain-fed field and non-irrigated perennial plantings, ha;

AIL - area of seized irrigated layland, ha;

ARFL - area of seized rain-fed layland, ha;

AHP - area of seized hayfield and pasture, ha;

CL - coefficient considering location of seized plot is accepted according to Clause 36 of this

Regulation;

IC - indexation coefficient of farming loss is accepted according to Clause 48 of this Regulation;

NP - net profit from seized plot for the last four years is identified according to Clause 35 of this

Regulation, thousand UZS.

Sum of net profit from seized plot for period of four years is additionally added to farming loss required

for loss recovery during the design, irrigation and land reclamation, their amelioration and other crop-

engineering works.

8

Net profit per 1 ha for one year in case of activity on irrigated land with similar ball-bonitet is identified by

division of average annual profit in the farm for the last 3 years to area of irrigated land.

Where there is irrigated land with several ball-bonitet is identified average net profit attributable to 1 ha of

irrigated land with identified ball-bonitet.

For this purpose, total ball-bonitet/ha of the farm is identified under the formula:

BS = (S1 х B1) + (S2 х B2) +… = (Sn х Bn), where:

S1, S2 and Sn - area of plot with appropriate ball-bonitet, ha;

B1, B2 and Bn - ball-bonitet of respective plots

Net profit of the farm attributable to 1 ball-bonitet/ha is identified under the formula:

NP.bs = NP / BS, where:

NP - average annual net profit of farm, thousand UZS;

Average annual net profit per 1 ha of seized plot is identified under the formula:

NP = NP.bs х Bn х Sn

Net profit additionally added to farming loss is identified by multiplication of average annual margin of

profit per 1 ha of seized plot by 4 (number of years) and seized area.

9

Name of

land owner

Are

a o

f a

cqu

ired

la

nd

(h

a) including, (ha)

Yea

rs

Cotton and Wheat(ha) Orchards and vineyards (ha)

An

nu

al

net

pro

fit

rece

ived

fro

m 1

ha

(h

a)

Av

era

ge

net

pro

fit

rece

ived

fro

m e

xem

pte

d l

an

d (

sum

)

To

tal

am

ou

nt

of

loss

pro

fit

fro

m a

cqu

ired

la

nd

(mu

ltip

lied

by

4)

Cro

pp

ed a

rea

Orc

ha

rds

Mu

lber

ry

Oth

er c

ro

ps

Cotton Wheat Orchards Vineyards

Are

a (

ha

)

An

nu

al

inco

me

(su

m)

Net

pro

fit

(ha

)

Are

a (

ha

)

An

nu

al

inco

me

(su

m)

Net

pro

fit

(ha

)

Are

a (

ha

)

An

nu

al

inco

me

(su

m)

Net

pro

fit

(ha

)

Are

a (

ha

)

An

nu

al

inco

me

(su

m)

Net

pro

fit

(ha

)

Farmer

entity

3.5

9

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10

)

(11

)

(12

)

(13

)

(14

)

(15

) (16)

(17

)

(18)=

((8)+(11)+

(14) +

(17))/((6)+

(9)+(12)+(

15))*1000

(19)=am

ount

(18)*(1)

*(2)/3

(20)=(19)*4

3.1

3

0.4

6

20

08

6.0

12

104

47

5

17

.0

19

042

18

5

10

.0

12

04

40

5

6.0

48

3

14

2

30

949

59

843

9

23

937

56

20

09

6.0

91

70

60

0

17

.0

25

716

12

50

10

.0

67

87

19

33

6.0

60

0

20

0

10

212

8

20

10

4.5

10

200

95

81

17

.0

31

210

46

07

10

.0

57

44

19

01

6.0

12

60

43

0

44

050

7

To

tal

3.5

9

3.1

3

0.4

6

16

.5

31

474

10

656

51

.0

75

968

60

42

30

.0

13

735

42

39

18

.0

23

43

57

358

4

10

Information on the total number of persons were effected during the period of the project (2011-

2014) mentioned in Table 6.

The total number of persons affected by the project amounted to 513 farm enterprises, of which

373 farms have received full compensation for the loss of crops during the rehabilitation and

construction works. 36 farmers will receive compensation after submission of correct banking

details and 104 farmers were not harmed, as the work was carried out before planting and after

harvest of crop.

Changes of requisites of 36 farms have occurred as a result of optimization of farm enterprises.

Payments to these farms were taken into account in the final Decree of Khokim of Fergana region,

and will be paid after the issuing of this Decree.

Detailed description of the land acquisition and compensation mechanism mentioned in the

Section 4 of this report. Methods of calculating of compensation for the losses that farmers have

suffered in connection with the implementation of project activity is fully consistent with the

method described in the document Land Acquisition Activities under the Project and with using

the calculation formula provided above.

It should be noted that certain compensation payments to farmers were made during the

construction work. It is against the rules, but that farmers treat this with understanding, without

complaints about delays in the payment of compensation. Reasons for the delay of payments

described below.

During the preparation of project, PIU have conducted several workshops for the farmers of each

district, where was provided explanations on subject how the acquisition of lands will be carry out,

how compensation payments will be determined, and how farmers might use the complaint

mechanism.

Detailed the mechanism of complains is described in Section 6 of this report.

Calculation of land acquisition and compensation of crop loss owing to rehabilitation and

construction works on the cutoff drains is described in detail in LAAP (2011). Calculation tables

based on which compensation was identified are included in the resolutions of Fergana oblast

Khakim (Annex 6). All resolutions are included in Annex 7. All compensations for crop loss to

persons whose land was allotted in 2011-2014 are paid within the range of 93-100%. The rest of

payments for the previous years and 2015 were not made due to delay in reallocation of funds set

aside for this item in the Project FS.

Originally, it was foreseen to implement the temporary and permanent land acquisition related to

construction and rehabilitation which is of immense complexity and requires different kinds of

heavy equipment. It was expected that use of such equipment within the boundaries of existing

farm enterprises would lead to inevitable but minimum damaging of crops. Such impact was,

mainly, connected with construction of SHD which assumed installation of the close drains that

would lead to land improvement in the considerable part of the Project area.

During execution of construction works prior to sowing or when there were crops on the fields

these works’ impact on affected farms was supposed to be high. Though land above the drainage

will be leveled and can be used for agricultural purposes, construction of SHD thereby should have

to mean to the affected farmers temporary land acquisition and lost profits for one season.

However, after a number consultations held by close drains PIU with the officials of district water

organizations and the leaders of mahallya committees, it was decided to execute the Project works

11

which would require the temporary land acquisition during off-season by adjusting Construction

Work Plan to the work of the farm enterprises.

Decision on starting of the Project works was taken following immediate information on

completion of harvesting received from the farmers and collected by the PIU officials on the

ground.

Such approach has excluded a crop loss related to the temporary land acquisition. It was achieved

by planning of construction and rehabilitation works in the period when there was no crops in the

field, or the contractors in conjunction with the PIU had informed the farmers beforehand about

upcoming works and did not begin those works until the farmers fully took in the harvest from the

Project plot.

In cases of land acquisition, the farm enterprises during the Project construction and rehabilitation

of the interfarm, on-farm and interdistrict I&D systems, the rules, guidelines and mechanisms

described in LAAP of 2011 were applied. Among them were: land acquisition procedure with due

regard to briefing of the land users about the planned Project works, calculation of compensation

for damage and work MRJ.

The Project was implemented in line with the guidelines described in LAAP:

a. Construction or rehabilitation of I&D systems which might cause resettlement is

unacceptable; damage of houses and infrastructure must be avoided during construction

and rehabilitation;

b. During design, permanent land acquisition should be minimized;

c. Temporary negative impact on land should be minimized by careful execution of

construction/rehabilitation; additional measures on informing farmers should be taken to

minimize damage of crops;

d. It is essential to use best efforts to minimize construction and repair works and prevent

an impact on the dekhkan plots (located both within and beyond villages). If it is

impossible to avoid works in dekhkan farms beyond settlements, damage to the fields,

crops and plantings should be compensated;

e. Size of compensation to the farmers and the dekhkans for damage to crops and

plantings will be identified on the basis of retail market prices;

f. Compensation to the farmers should have a wide coverage; whereby, amongst the other

stakeholders, WUAs might be engaged;

g. Farmers also should have the opportunity to claim and take action aimed at getting

compensation;

h. Implementation of LAAP will be internally monitored by the PIU, and externally

monitored by an independent expert group consisting of three members.

The last clause of the mentioned guidelines established that «Compensation will be fully provided

to affected parties before commencement of any construction or rehabilitation works». However,

according to existing national regulations, compensations to the farmers are paid based on

corresponding Resolution of Fergana oblast Khakim, which has to be prepared within 3-4 months.

It is quite difficult to prepare Plan of Project works to be executed in the course of a year in

advance, wherefore, there were delays in compensation payment to the farmers prior to start of the

construction works.

Taking into account large area where the Project works were executed, and manpower restriction

in the PIU, it was not possible to conduct an ongoing monitoring. As a rule, payments are made in

a lump sum within 14-20 days after issuance of Resolution of Khakim and depending on the

number of APs.

12

Compensation payments were made during construction works, which had been accepted

understandingly by the farmers, there were no complaints concerning delays in payment.

1 Land acquisition and compensation

Land acquisition and calculation of compensation payment are made in line with LAAP (Section

5) and Land Code of Uzbekistan (1998), and Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers (RCM) No.

246 of 1992, which were used as core documents during preparation of LAAP (2011). Stepwise

scheme of measures for land acquisition and compensation is presented below.

For commencement of land acquisition procedure the PIU in Rishtan sends a letter to Land

Cadaster of Fergana oblast (FO) to carry out works on land acquisition. The PIU submits the work

papers with data on collectors where the Project works will be executed.

After signing a Contract between the PIU and Land Cadaster of FO, Land Cadaster implements

land acquisition procedure with identification of persons to be affected by the Project works.

Contract includes the fixation of size of the temporary and permanent land acquisition, drawing

up of cartographic documents for each land user to show alienation borders. For that, based upon

design drawings submitted by the PIU, officials of Land Cadaster check the plots to be allotted,

meet with the leaders of farm enterprises and jointly measure the plots. At that, each FE leader is

explained the methodology of land acquisition with provision of regulatory documents, namely

RCM No.246 of 2011.

After completion of calculations, the leader of FE holds a general meeting with the members of

FE at which minutes and resolution on «Consent with permanent allotment of calculated plot (ha)

for water supply» are issued. The same minutes make reservations for necessity in modification of

the plot’s plan to stop repayment of land tax for allotted plot (Annex 1).

In accordance with the same Resolution No.246, Oblast Land Cadaster on the basis of bidding

identifies an independent consultant licensed to conduct such types of works for fixing the size of

damage to the land users.

Calculation of land is also made under the scheme described in Resolution No. 246. It must be

noted that as provided by Article 87 of the Land Code, compensation for land allotted for execution

of hydraulic works, land improvement is not envisaged. Nevertheless, in accordance with Loan

Agreement between Government of Uzbekistan and the WB, compensation to the farm enterprises

for prevented damage will be paid.

Comparison of calculation of compensation has shown the compliance with procedure proposed

in LAAP (Table 9-11). Thus, comparison of calculation of compensation given in Annex 1 to the

resolutions of districts and Fergana oblast khakims has shown that information presented in

Resolution is more detailed; mechanism of calculation fully corresponds to the formula proposed

in LAAP.

Calculations of land acquisition and damage size have to be approved by resolutions of district

and oblast khakimiats. All resolutions contain the summary tables with indication of total area of

the farm in ha, size of allotted plot, types of crops, and plot’s ball-bonitet.

Each resolution is supported with package of documents for each farm land to be allotted. Package

of documents consists of above mentioned minutes of meeting of FE, contour map of the whole

plot of FE distinguishing the plot to be allotted and other regulatory documents on FE.

Based upon resolutions of oblast khakim, the PIU makes payment to the land users for sustained

loss. Information on land acquisition and compensation payment is given in the next sections.

13

4.1. Compensation for 2012

In 2012, Contract No.19 dated 15.03.2012 in the amount of UZS 112 031 067, Contract No.10

dated 11.06.2012 in the amount of UZS 28 599 788, Contract No.13 dated 11.12.2012 in the

amount of UZS 298 772 226 were signed for alienation of land and identification of damage to

189 land users on 455.07 km drainage and land acquisition equaled to 515.25 ha (Table 2).

According to Resolution of Fergana oblast Khakim No.250 of 13.12.2013, damage size of 189

farm enterprises was UZS 611 791 000 and UZS 512 663 126 were paid to 155 land users.

Of 34 farmers, there was no damage to 10 farm enterprises due to cancellation of part of collectors

during detail design and payment was not made. Damage to the remaining 24 farm enterprises was

covered but due to incorrectly furnished bank accounts money came back.

Table 2: Information on alienated land for construction works in 2012

# District Total,

ha

Including

Crop area Orchard Vineyard Mulberry Other land

1 Bagdad 229.74 139.7 90.2

2 Rishtan 112.1 77.7 34.4

3 Altiaryk 173.42 116.78 56.63

Total for oblast 515.25 157.65 181.24

More detail information on payments in the farm enterprises breakdown is presented in Annex 2,


In 2013, Contract No. 5 dated 07.10.2013 in the amount of UZS 161 396 578, Contract No. 19 dated

25.11.2013 in the amount of UZS 120 762 220 were signed for land alienation and identification of damage

to 128 land users on 115.8 km drainage and land acquisition equaled to 358 ha.

In accordance with Resolution of Fergana oblast Khakim No.35 of 15.02.2014, damage size to 62 farm

enterprises equaled to UZS 127 215 230 and UZS 126 246 030 were paid to 60 land users.

Damage to the rest 2 farm enterprises was covered but due to incorrectly furnished bank accounts money

came back. In 66 farm enterprises included in Resolution, damage comprised UZS 0.00 due to lack of

income from allocated land because of low land capacity.


# District Total,

ha

Including


1 Bagdad 54.67 27.47 0.20 0.27 26.37

2 Rishtan 236.99 5.42 0.22 121.09

3 Altiaryk 42.86 19.92 0.72 0.20 0.64 21.38

Total for oblast 334.51 157.65 6.34 0.20 1.13 169.20

More detail information on payments in the farm enterprises breakdown is presented in Annex 3.


In 2014, contract No. 3 dated 11.03.2014 in the amount of UZS 19 016 351 was signed for land alienation

and identification of damage to 159 land users on 247.96 km drainage and land acquisition equaled to

334.52 ha (Table 4).

14

According to Resolution of Fergana oblast Khakim No.94 of 15.04.2014, damage size was UZS 375 699

and UZS 235 988 691 were paid to 121 land users. Of remaining 38 land users, there was no damage to 28

land users during construction, and money to 10 land users came back due to incorrectly furnished bank

accounts.

More detail information on payments in the farm enterprises breakdown is presented in Annex 4.


# District Total,

ha

Including


1 Bagdad 54.67 27.47 0.20 0.27 26.37

2 Rishtan 236.99 5.42 0.22 121.09

3 Altiaryk 42.86 19.92 0.72 0.20 0.64 21.38

Total for oblast 334.52 157.65 6.34 0.20 1.13 169.20

In 2014, Contract No. 8 dated 04.06.2014 in the amount of UZS 210 485 294 was signed for land alienation

and identification of damage to 75 land users on 130.09 km drainage and land acquisition equaled to 226.57

ha.

According to Resolution of Fergana oblast Khakim No.313 of 25.12.2014, damage size was UZS

494 989 548. Payment under this Resolution was not made due to above mentioned necessity of reallocation

of funds under FS.

Under Resolution of the President of Uzbekistan No.PP-1265 of 19.01.2010, USD 887.3 thousand (UZS

1 997 million in equivalent) were envisaged for land alienation and compensation to the land users.

Considering all contracts, amount equal to USD 1277 thousand (UZS 3 002 million in equivalent) is

required. In January of the current year, the PIU has requested the Inter-Agency Council under the Cabinet

of Ministers to allow to cover deficient amount from «Unallocated Amount». By protocol resolution of

23.09.2015 No. 174 it was allowed to cover deficient funds from «Unallocated Funds».

Aggregate information on the farmers to be compensated for 2012-2014 is presented in Table 5.


Presently, identification of damage to the land users for 2015 is underway and at the same time bank

accounts of the land users, who could not be compensated previously due to incorrectly furnished bank

accounts, are being clarified.

According to preliminary estimates, damage size in 2015 is UZS 436.35 million. Total damage under the

Project was UZS 1 918 million including UZS 937 803 509 were paid in 2011-2014, UZS 980 473 630 are

due to be paid for till the end of 2015.


# District Total,

ha

Including


1 Bagdad 126.34 86.38 3.72 1.34 1.03 33.84

2 Rishtan 8.86 5.81 0.65 2.4

3 Altiaryk 62.29 43.49 3.08 15.72

Total for oblast 197.49 135.68 6.34 1.34 1.03 51.96

Aggregate information on in payments in districts breakdown and in the Project area and their status for

2011-2014 is presented in Table 6.

15

Table 6: Summary of compensation payment for 2012-2014

# Supporting

Document District Name

Total Land per

Resolution

Due Amount per

Resolution Paid FE

Payout Amount,

UZS

Compensation

Payment Date

Payment

Period

1

Resolution of

Khakim No.192

of 10.10.2011

Bagdad 21 42 300 698 21 42 300 698

10.10.2011 28.10.11 -

30.11.2011

Rishtan 5 6 698 603 5 6 698 603

Altiaryk 11 13 906 361 11 13 906 361

Total 37 62 905 662 37 62 905 662

2

Resolution of

Khakim No.250

of 13.12.2013

Bagdad 91 221 391 000 76 171 477 355

13.12.2013 25.12.2013 -

10.05.2014

Rishtan 57 239 456 000 45 204 334 113

Altiaryk 41 150 944 000 34 136 851 658

Total 189 611 791 000 155 512 663 126

3

Resolution of

Khakim No.35 of

15.02.2014

Bagdad 44 28 444 320 19 28 522 610

15.02.2014 07.07 2014 -

10.07.2014

Rishtan 36 73 322 690 28 72 280 220

Altiaryk 48 25 448 220 13 25 443 200

Total 128 127 215 230 60 126 246 030

4

Resolution of

Khakim No.94 of

15.04.2014

Bagdad 29 23 137 071 23 18 990 857

15.04.2014 19.05.2014 -

26.08.2014

Rishtan 98 199 644 603 74 170 352 929

Altiaryk 32 48 594 025 24 46 644 905

Total 159 271 375 699 123 235 988 691

Total: 513 373 937 803 509

16

2 M&A of land acquisition and compensation payment efficiency

The PIU together with M&A Consultant conducted the monitoring of resettlement. For verification

of compensation payment to the persons whose land was temporarily or permanently allotted due

to the Project works, M&A consultants had series of meetings with the farmers and people who

were compensated in 2011-2014.

The first meeting was organized at the office building of Altiaryk district. Brief overview of

surveyed farmers is presented in Table 4.1.

Table 5. Brief overview of surveyed farmers

Farm enterprise name Farm enterprise type Farm area Compensated person

Altiaryk district

Husanboi Orchard (apple) 36 hundred square

metres Bahtiejon

Hujanberdiev Orchard 1.8 hundred square

metres Hujanberdiev U

Tepa Cotton/wheat 20 hundred square

metres Parmonkulova G

Osim ali Davron Cotton/wheat Sharofitdinov H

Bagdad district

Temirov Z Cotton/wheat 10 ha Temirov Y

Rishtan district

Hamidjon ugli Bahtiejon Cotton/wheat 5 ha Hairullaev G

Compensated farmers were given a talk about, how the calculation and compensation payments

were carried out. Farmers acknowledged the noticeable positive changes in places where the

Project works were executed.

It has been stated that houses and auxiliary buildings began to require less repairs as WT had

significantly lowered and there is no need for annual repair of houses or construction of new

buildings.

Farmers expressed gratitude for additional works not included in the Project, such as construction

of bridges, excavation of small canals.

Grievance Mechanism

Grievance mechanism is established and functioning under the Project. For this purpose, a book

of complaints was introduced at the PIU in Rishtan. It registers all complaints, opinions and

requests received from population of the Project districts both in written and oral (by telephone)

form (Annex 8).

In the accounting period (2012- 2015), 72 citizens requests were registered in the book of

complaints. Most requests were attributed to provision of additional assistance in cleaning of on-

farm collectors (not included into the Project), construction/acceleration of construction of bridges

over the cleaned collectors. One complaint was concerning farmer’s disagreement with the area of

land to be allotted. There were several requests for installation of drip irrigation systems.

M&A consultants in conjunction with the PIU officials investigated a complaint received on 4 July

2015 from «Abdumato Mamarajab ugli» FE in Rishtan district concerning wrong land acquisition.

For redressing of grievance, a recurrent measurement was conducted in the presence of officials

from district office of Uzgiprozem (organization dealing with preparation of land acquisition

documents), the PIU officials in Rishtan and the farmer himself which showed correctness of

measurements.

The PIU officials have come up with response to all requests; the applicants had been notified

about outcomes of requests within one month from the date of request submission. Farmers have

17

raised a question about land acquisition dates and quantities of wheat to be supplied under the state

order.

It emerged that some farmers were using old quota in supplying wheat, without deduction the land

already allotted for the Project works.

Officials of company dealing with land acquisition and PIU pointed out to the farmers on the need

to reapprove the plan for wheat. However, those farmers did not reapprove the plan and supplied

wheat using old quota that, to some extent, affected a total gain. Therefore, the farmers were

recommended to promptly reapprove the plan, and the PIU officials to intensify efforts on

explanation of land acquisition procedure and associated changes in state order for wheat and

cotton.

18

3 ANNEXES

Annex 1. Minutes of meeting of FE on land acquisition contract

19

Annex 2: Compensation payment for 2012 according to Resolution of Fergana oblast Khakim No.250 of 13 .12.2013

# Name Calculated

Amount

Paid Amount Outstanding

amount

Date of

Payment

Compensation for

land, fruit tree,

lost harvest (list)/

Reasons for the

delays, if any

Expected date of payment

Bagdad district

1 A.Madaminov FE 315 555 315 555 0 27.01.2014

2 Abduvali Hoji FE 2 702 265 2 702 265 0 23.01.2014

3 Abdugaffor ota FE 5 665 855 5 665 855 0 23.01.2014

4 Abdujalol ota Hamidov FE 682 595 682 595 0 22.01.2014

5 Abdumanon Abdumital ugli FE 683 067 683 067 0 27.01.2014

6 Bagdad Agrostar FE 1 036 557 1 036 557 0 20.01.2014

7 Bagdad janati faizi FE 698 027 698 027 0 08.01.2014

8 Bagdad pahtazori FE 764 070 764 070 0 20.01.2014

9 Bagdad Rasulov A FE 401 870 401 870 0 08.01.2014

10 Bagdad Shermat ota FE 1 466 153 1 466 153 0 20.01.2014

11 Baht Nur FE 3 809 922 3 809 922 0 23.01.2014

12 Bogi Muborak hoji FE 1 549 743 1 549 743 0 20.01.2014

13 Bogishamol ipakchi FE 1 536 423 1 536 423 0 20.01.2014

14 Bogishamol faiz FE 3 408 330 3 408 330 0 23.01.2014

15 Gofurov T FE 1 943 214 1 943 214 0 23.01.2014

16 G Chuli Chamani FE 587 898 587 898 0 20.01.2014

17 D Anvarov FE 604 628 604 628 0 20.01.2014

18 Etmishboi hoji ota FE 629 709 629 709 0 20.01.2014

19 Jabarali Pahtasi FE 1 901 031 1 901 031 0 20.01.2014

20 Jahongir FE 341 238 341 238 0 23.01.2014

21 Jurabek ugli Abbosbek FE 1 339 192 1 339 192 0 20.01.2014

22 J Gofurov FE 3 346 835 3 346 835 0 27.01.2014

23 Zamin Bagdad FE 18 980 587 18 980 587 0 23.01.2014

24 I Nazarov FE 939 427 939 427 0 27.01.2014

25 Ilmjon pahtazori FE 5 346 379 5 346 379 0 20.01.2014

20

26 I Azamov FE 612 902 612 902 0 20.01.2014

27 I Botirov bogi FE 51 150 51 150 0 20.01.2014

28 I ugli Muminjon eri FE 6 723 227 5 896 454 826 773 24.01.2014 not paid owing to decrease of

damage amount

29 Yigit FE 587 083 587 083 0 27.01.2014

30 Kimebuvi Bagdad FE 1 401 034 1 401 034 0 27.01.2014

31 Kosim Tukai FE 4 983 593 1 986 666 2 996 927 27.01.2014 not paid owing to decrease of

damage amount

32 L Kosimova FE 518 151 518 151 0 20.01.2014

33 M.Kuchkarov FE 4 445 285 4 445 285 0 24.01.2014

34 M.Usarov FE 1 391 133 1 391 133 0 23.01.2014

35 M Hursanov bogi FE 2 202 626 804 426 1 398 200 20.01.2014 not paid owing to decrease of

damage amount

36 Mamadaliev FE 1 398 456 1 398 456 0 22.01.2014

37 M Kurbonov FE 3 611 514 2 863 135 748 379 23.01.2014 not paid owing to decrease of

damage amount

38 Mehrigie Gulhae FE 253 264 253 264 0 27.01.2014

39 M Jurabek ugli FE 3 198 780 3 198 780 0 20.01.2014

40 Mirzabobo FE 1 078 687 1 078 687 0 20.01.2014

41 Mirzakarim ota FE 14 661 766 14 661 766 0 23.01.2014

42 Mirzabod Zarshunosi FE 1 386 420 1 043 640 342 780 23.01.2014 not paid owing to decrease of

damage amount

43 Muidin ota FE 3 346 978 3 346 978 0 23.01.2014

44 Mukadas Ehromi FE 157 675 157 675 0 22.01.2014

45 Mul hosil FE 2 363 601 2 363 601 0 27.01.2014

46 Murod Mirzo Hakimzoda FE 2 336 287.00 1 912 345.00 423 942.00 08.01.2014 not paid owing to decrease of

damage amount

47 Muhamad U FE 1 141 880 1 141 880 0 27.01.2014

48 Nasiba FE 2 672 644 2 036 503 636 141 23.01.2014 not paid owing to decrease of

damage amount

49 Nematjon bogi FE 167 369 167 369 0 23.01.2014

50 N Nodirhon FE 2 345 421 2 345 421 0 20.01.2014

21

51 N Tursunova FE 491 393 491 393 0 20.01.2014

52 O pahtazori FE 3 245 681 3 245 681 0 20.01.2014

53 Omadli Z FE 8 482 353 8 482 353 0 23.01.2014

54 O Yuldoshev FE 870 689 870 689 0 23.01.2014

55 Osim ali Davron FE 1 584 564 648 640 935 924 27.01.2014 not paid owing to decrease of

damage amount

56 Ohunjon FE 2 678 024 2 678 024 0 20.01.2014

57 S ota Abdurahman FE 5 201 992 5 201 992 0 22.01.2014

58 Serhosil Chulikarim FE 2 254 785 1 172 613 1 082 172 23.01.2014 not paid owing to decrease of

damage amount

59 Sultongozi ota bogi FE 2 558 899 2 558 899 0 20.01.2014

60 Tanzilahon Mukadashon FE 2 496 277 2 496 277 0 23.01.2014

61 Turgunboi hoji FE 415 289 415 289 0 20.01.2014

62 Unsinaya Bagdad FE 636 667 636 667 0 20.01.2014

63 Uchkun FE 1 414 254 1 414 254 0 23.01.2014

64 F Sufi ota FE 3 609 636 3 609 636 0 23.01.2014

65 Dov B FE 183 833 183 833 0 23.01.2014

66 Feruzbek T FE 2 795 514 1 330 874 1 464 640 27.01.2014 not paid owing to decrease of

damage amount 67 Hamdam pahtazori FE 1 706 920 559 110 1 147 810 08.01.2014

68 Hilola FE 2 878 133 2 878 133 0 20.01.2014

69 Hudoerhon bogi FE 3 298 670 2 740 433 558 237 27.01.2014 not paid owing to decrease of

damage amount 70 H Nuriddinov FE 3 841 599 1 144 854 2 696 745 20.01.2014

71 Chulpon FE 4 469 826 4 469 826 0 08.01.2014

72 Chultepa oidin kugli FE 1 613 314 1 613 314 0 23.01.2014

73 Shark Yulduzi FE 351 745 351 745 0 20.01.2014

74 Sheraliev M. FE 2 671 847 2 044 496 627 351 08.01.2014 not paid owing to decrease of

damage amount 75 Bagdad Shermat ota FE 1 318 179 0 1 318 179

76 Ergashev Y FE 810 523 810 523 0 27.01.2014

77 Y Bekzod FE 3 083 453 3 083 453 0 20.01.2014

78 Al-beh FE 3 499 127 0 3 499 127 Incorrect bank

accounts are

20.12.2015 to 30.12.2015

79 Bagdad durdonalari FE 4 065 155 0 4 065 155

22

80 Islamjon ota ugli Umarhon FE 372 950 0 372 950 provided, after

clarification of

accounts

everything will be

paid

81 Shirinsuv jilgalari FE 161 723 0 161 723

82 O Kuchkarov FE 165 678 0 165 678

83 College 114 420 0 114 420

84 Husanbaev M FE 625 978 0 625 978

85 Sahovatli M eri FE 5 020 596 0 5 020 596

86 Nurmuhamad bogi FE 4 771 359 0 4 771 359

87 Gani ota FE 3 389 374 0 3 389 374

88 S Ortikboi bogi FE 1 769 381 0 1 769 381

89 Bagdad duri Durmonchi FE 1 146 920 0 1 146 920

90 S Zarshunosi FE 1 925 600 0 1 925 600

91 Bagdad olma bogi FE 2 693 961 0 2 693 961

92 Bekzod Bagdad FE 181 565 0 181 565

93 A Rahmonaliev FE 2 053 979 0 2 053 979

94 U Azizov FE 751 616 0 751 616

94 Total for district 221 390 937 171 477 355 49 913 582

Altiaryk district

1 Adolatfaiz Altiaryk FE 853 960 853 960 0 10.02.2014

2 Adolathon bogi FE 3 896 820 3 896 820 0 21.02.2014

3 Abdurahim ugli FE 453 426 453 426 0 28.12.2013

4 Adhamhoji FE 4 024 000 4 024 000 0 21.02.2014

5 Azamjon FE 1 721 440 1 721 440 0 28.12.2013

6 A Abdugani ugli FE 596 640 596 640 0 28.12.2013

7 Povulgon Faiz biolaboratory 748 880 748 880 0 28.12.2013

8 D Rahmonov FE 2 999 519 2 999 519 0 21.02.2014

9 Juravoi Altiaryk FE 1 702 400 1 702 400 0 10.02.2014

10 Ismail Nazim Obod FE 7 511 209 7 511 209 0 04.02.2014

11 Istiklol Yangiobod FE 2 046 706 2 046 706 0 21.02.2014

12 M Ahmedov FE 598 100 598 100 0 28.12.2013

23

13 O Kosimov FE 11 510 270 11 510 270 0 23.04.2014

14 Olmos A FE 2 812 480 2 812 480 0 28.12.2013

15 Patilohon faiz FE 2 661 605 2 661 605 0 10.02.2014

16 Poloson Boky Tola FE 5 471 040 5 471 040 0 21.02.2014

17 R Ismatov FE 965 426 965 426 0 04.02.2014

18 Rustam obod zamin FE 7 598 360 7 598 360 0 25.02.2014

19 S Ortikboi ugli FE 1 283 920 1 283 920 0 28.12.2013

20 Sardor Urmon FE 4 196 366 4 196 366 0 04.02.2014

21 Tojiboi Obod FE 9 413 171 9 312 467 100 704 25.02.2014 not paid owing to decrease of

damage amount

22 Tojihon Nigora Tamara FE 6 410 460 6 410 460 0 04.02.2014

23 Toshobod Povulgon FE 3 913 820 3 913 820 0 25.02.2014

24 Turgun baraka faiz FE 4 328 460 4 328 460 0 04.02.2014

25 Hikmatilo T FE 19 576 388 19 576 388 0 04.02.2014

26 H Tolib FE 2 661 080 2 661 080 0 25.02.2014

27 Holmatjon FE 4 547 340 4 547 340 0 28.12.2013

28 Homidova Y FE 100 800 100 800 0 28.12.2013

29 Shahimardon FE 11 416 978 10 170 593 1 246 385 21.02.2014 not paid owing to decrease of

damage amount 30 T Hujamov FE 6 590 960 5 195 216 1 395 744 25.02.2014

31 Ergashev Kodiraliobod FE 2 221 940 1 416 781 805 159 21.02.2014

32 E Eshon FE 2 660 499 2 660 499 0 26.05.2014

33 Yangi horiston Vahob FE 2 753 987 2 753 987 0 28.12.2013

34 Yahshi niat FE 151 200 151 200 0 25.02.2014

35 Faizi obod dieri FE 5 794 375 0 5 794 375 Incorrect bank

accounts are

provided, after

clarification of

accounts

everything will be

paid

20.12.2015 to 30.12.2015

36 Bio Otarulov faiz FE 1 475 573 0 1 475 573

37 U Ibrahim Ugli FE 631 100 0 631 100

38 S Otajalov FE 378 720 0 378 720

39 Abdumutal Suleiman FE 1 108 187 0 1 108 187

40 G ugli Nomojon FE 741 840 0 741 840

41 Ali ota sohib FE 414 393 0 414 393

24


Rishtan district

1 Abrorjon Narimonov eri FE 894 656 894 656 0 28.12.2013

2 A Dekhkan ugli FE 11 845 600 11 845 600 0 30.12.2013

3 Adham ugli Abbos FE 883 680 883 680 0 16.01.2014

4 A Ulmas FE 910 747 910 747 0 16.01.2014

5 Ahadjon M FE 1 564 768 1 564 768 0 15.01.2014

6 Ahmad ota FE 8 181 984 8 181 984 0 16.01.2014

7 Ahmad FE 1 684 400 1 684 400 0 30.12.2013

8 Barkamol Pahtazori FE 6 880 941 6 880 941 0 15.01.2014

9 Bekzod unumdor erlari FE 4 469 893 4 469 893 0 16.01.2014

10 Bobodekhkan Zamini FE 3 400 848 3 400 848 0 16.01.2014

11 E ugli Shamsidin FE 15 118 372 13 900 623 1 217 749 30.12.2013

12 Jahonobodlik Elmurod eri FE 3 910 261 3 910 261 0 15.01.2014

13 Z Komil Saodat FE 2 089 045 2 089 045 0 30.12.2013

14 Zohid G Gilosi FE 8 025 900 8 025 900 0 30.12.2013

15 Zohid Duru Gavhari FE 7 019 791 7 019 791 0 30.12.2013

16 I ota Ruzibaev FE 794 488 794 488 0 14.01.2014

17 Katayul Gavhari FE 3 006 432 3 006 432 0 30.12.2013

18 Kahramon FE 2 226 624 2 226 624 0

19 M Mahsim FE 2 683 181 2 683 181 0 15.01.2014

20 M Azimjon bogi FE 910 747 910 747 0 16.01.2014

21 M kizi Nurafjon FE 409 613 409 613 0 30.12.2013

22 Mahsuldor FE 6 155 520 6 155 520 0 30.12.2013

23 Mjonobod FE 9 953 499 883 680 9 069 819 16.01.2014

24 N Yuldashev FE 17 249 984 16 683 136 566 848 30.12.2013

25 Odil Zamini FE 1 891 656 1 891 656 0 28.12.2013

26 Otahon bogi FE 4 666 757 4 666 757 0 30.12.2013

27 O Kodirjon eri FE 6 038 879 6 038 879 0 14.01.2014

28 Rahim Rashidoni FE 1 492 160 1 492 160 0 15.01.2014

25

29 Saifidin G ugli FE 7 521 177 7 521 177 0 14.01.2014

30 S Zamini FE 4 576 624 4 576 624 0 15.01.2014

31 S Sahovati FE 957 640 957 640 0 16.01.2014

32 S ugli Nuridin FE 6 309 536 6 309 536 0 16.01.2014

33 S Hoji FE 420 368 420 368 0 16.01.2014

34 Sohibov Hasan Husan FE 1 909 584 1 909 584 0 14.01.2014

35 Tursunali A FE 5 467 845 5 467 845 0 30.12.2013

36 Un oga ini FE 11 987 410 11 987 410 0 30.12.2013

37 Furkat FE 1 309 765 1 309 765 0 15.01.2014

38 Hasanboi Muhamad Solih FE 8 085 920 8 085 920 0 30.12.2013

39 Hojidada Sahovati FE 4 291 172 2 295 755 1 995 417 16.01.2014

40 H ugli B FE 10 468 292 10 468 292 0 30.12.2013

41 Hurshid Samandar FE 12 428 389 12 428 389 0 30.12.2013

42 Hushnud FE 1 368 179 1 368 179 0 15.12.2014

43 Sharofathon Alisher kizi FE 2 190 760 2 190 760 0

44 Elbek FE 178 411 178 411 0 16.01.2015

45 E ugli Sherali FE 3 352 448 3 352 448 0 30.12.2013

46 Rahmonov O FE 5 788 719 0 5 788 719 Incorrect bank

accounts are

provided, after

clarification of

accounts

everything will be

paid

20.12.2015 to 30.12.2015

47 Jahonobod Hondurdonasi FE 1 607 776 0 1 607 776

48 Ahrorjon FE 2 277 936 0 2 277 936

49 Tukai Sahovat Invest 1 269 056 0 1 269 056

50 Muzafarjon Yunusjon eri FE 1 369 973 0 1 369 973 not paid owing to decrease of

damage amount 51 Tuda Husan FE 2 245 866 0 2 245 866

52 S ugli Ahlidin FE 1 264 817 0 1 264 817

53 Bekzod unumdor erlari FE 5 754 134 0 5 754 134

54 Katayul Gavhari FE 693 792 0 693 792


189 Total 611 790 790 512 663 126 99 127 664

26

Annex 3: Compensation payment for 2013 according to Resolution of Fergana oblast Khakim No.35 of 15.02.2014 # Name Calculated

Amount


amount

Date of

Payment

Compensation for

land, fruit tree,


Reasons for the delays,

if any

Expected date of

payment

Bagdad district

1 A.Madaminov FE 9 554 120 9 554 120 0 10.07.2014

2 Abduvali Hoji FE 37 570 37 570 0 03.07.2014

3 Baht Nur FE 11 667 570 11 667 570 0 03.07.2014

4 Gofurov T FE 352 400 352 400 0 03.07.2014

5 Zamin Bagdad FE 1 268 490 1 268 490 0 03.07.2014

6 Mailavoi bogi FE 9 000 9 000 0 03.07.2014

7 Mailavoi pahtazori FE 258 870 258 870 0 03.07.2014

8 Mirzabod Zarshunosi FE 47 220 47 220 0 03.07.2014

9 Muidin ota FE 988 190 988 190 0 03.07.2014

10 Mul hosil FE 1 270 540 1 270 540 0 03.07.2014

11 Nasiba FE 104 640 104 640 0 03.07.2014

12 Nurmuhamad bogi FE 352 400 352 400 0 10.07.2014

13 Onajon FE 222 860 222 860 0 03.07.2014

14 S Mirzali eri FE 251 640 251 640 0 03.07.2014

15 Temirov Z FE 1 095 320 1 095 320 0 03.07.2014

16 Uchkun FE 412 540 412 540 0 03.07.2014

17 Fazilov B.M. FE 6 720 6 720 0 04.07.2014

18 Hasanov M bogi FE 42 180 42 180 0 03.07.2014

19 Hilola FE 580 340 580 340 0 03.07.2014

19 Total for district: 28 522 610 28 522 610 0

Rishtan district

1 A Akramjon FE 4 287 400 4 287 400 0 04.07.2014

2 A Nov FE 3 940 120 3 940 120 0 04.07.2014

3 Gulobod yurt FE 1 458 820 1 458 820 0 08.07.2014

4 Davron hoji paikali FE 356 190 356 190 0 08.07.2014

5 Z Komil Saodat FE 2 468 040 2 468 040 0 08.07.2014

6 Kahramon FE 138 240 138 240 0 08.07.2014

7 Kodir Sodik FE 1 502 830 1 502 830 0 08.07.2014

8 M kizi Nurafjon FE 4 630 920 4 630 920 0 08.07.2014

27

9 Mahsuldor FE 780 190 780 190 0 08.07.2014

10 Mirishkor ok er umidi FE 593 920 593 920 0 08.07.2014

11 Muzafar Yunusjon ugli FE 1 360 450 1 360 450 0 08.07.2014

12 Murodali Rahmonov FE 795 200 795 200 0 08.07.2014

13 N Abdurahim ugli FE 2 051 810 2 051 810 0 08.07.2014

14 Odil Zamini FE 1 610 560 1 610 560 0 08.07.2014

15 Oidin kechalari FE 103 070 103 070 0 08.07.2014

16 S Zamini FE 1 369 640 1 369 640 0 08.07.2014

17 S Sahovati FE 1 393 540 1 393 540 0 04.07.2014

18 T ota Tursunov FE 1 065 730 1 065 730 0 04.07.2014

19 Tuda husan FE 8 073 220 8 073 220 0 04.07.2014

20 Tursunali A FE 7 715 810 7 715 810 0 08.07.2014

21 Uzbekistan 10 yilligi FE 964 000 964 000 0 08.07.2014

22 Un oga ini FE 7 284 800 7 284 800 0 08.07.2014

23 Fazirat Bahodir zamini FE 2 417 400 2 417 400 0 08.07.2014

24 H Davron FE 1 452 290 1 452 290 0 08.07.2014

25 Sharofat Alisher kizi FE 5 184 290 5 184 290 0 08.07.2014

26 Shokir ota ugli Alijon FE 3 372 180 3 372 180 0 04.07.2014

27 Kier Jasur FE 222 900 222 900 0 08.07.2014

28 E ugli Sherali FE 5 686 660 5 686 660 0 04.07.2014

29 H Obidjon zamin FE

(Rishtan)

964 170 0 964 170

Incorrect bank accounts

are provided, after

clarification of accounts

everything will be paid

20.12.2015 to

30.12.2015

29 Total for district: 73 244 390 72 280 220 964 170

Altiaryk district

1 Adhamhoji FE 12 525 090 12 525 090 0 09.07.2014

2 G ugli Nomojon FE 43 170 43 170 0 09.07.2014

3 Ismail FE 343 690 343 690 0 09.07.2014

4 Kayum Sohib Sahovati FE 2 399 280 2 399 280 0 09.07.2014

5 Obod Altiaryk sevinch FE 1 946 770 1 946 770 0 09.07.2014

6 R Ismatov FE 1 846 840 1 846 840 0 09.07.2014

7 S Gofurova FE 104 360 104 360 0 09.07.2014

8 S Ortikboi ugli FE 1 995 050 1 995 050 0 09.07.2014

9 Tutlkunboi FE 1 401 840 1 401 840 0 09.07.2014

28

10 Hamid R Hamdam FE 1 175 580 1 175 580 0 09.07.2014

11 H Tolib FE 1 421 930 1 421 930 0 09.07.2014

12 Husanboi H FE 35 580 35 580 0 09.07.2014

13 Shokirboi FE 204 020 204 020 0 09.07.2014

14 Yuldoshari ugli R FE

(Altiaryk)

5 030 0 5 030

Incorrect bank accounts

are provided, after



20.12.2015 to

30.12.2015

14 Total for district: 25 448 230 25 443 200 5 030

62 TOTAL: 127 215 230 126 246 030 969 200

29


Amount/


amount

Date of

Payment

Compensation for

land, fruit tree,

lost harvest (list)


if any

Expected date of

payment

Bagdad district

1 Azamat Rustam Bagdad FE 322 283.00 322 283.00 0 26.08.2014

2 Anvar H FE 758 986.00 758 986.00 0 22.08.2014

3 Bagdad kueshi FE DF 514 890.00 514 890.00 0 25.08.2014

4 Gani ota FE 637 142.00 637 142.00 0 22.08.2014

5 Z Mustafikul 2 265 279.00 2 265 279.00 0 30.07.2014

6 Ilgor FE 1 052 430.00 1 052 430.00 0 18.08.2014

7 I ugli Muminjon eri FE 386 938.00 386 938.00 0 22.08.2014

8 Madaminbek FE 41 954.00 41 954.00 0 22.08.2014

9 Mehrigie Gulhae FE 216 992.00 216 992.00 0 26.08.2014

10 Muidin ota FE 4 764 127.00 4 764 127.00 0 03.07.2014

11 Nasiba FE 308 304.00 308 304.00 0 06.08.2014

12 O Yuldosh Bagdady FE 576 805.00 0 576 805.00

13 S Bahrom FE 15 256.00 15 256.00 0 22.08.2014

14 S Ortikboi bogi FE 164 199.00 164 199.00 0 22.08.2014

15 Toirov J Mirzo FE 3 723 490.00 0 3 723 490.00

16 Umarali tutzori FE 2 400 680.00 2 400 680.00 0 22.08.2014

17 Umridin chorva servis FE 463 786.00 463 786.00 0 25.08.2014

18 Uchkun A FE 1 139 352.00 1 139 352.00 0 03.07.2014

19 Feruzbek T FE 142 862.00 142 862.00 0 22.08.2014

20 H ota Yusupov FE 1 570 104.00 1 570 104.00 0 25.08.2014

21 Hamdam pahtazori FE 251 514.00 251 514.00 0 06.08.2014

22 H Bagdad FE 186 886.00 186 886.00 0 22.08.2014

23 S Mirzaev FE 301 379.00 301 379.00 0 25.08.2014

24 Ergash ota siymosi FE 525 100.00 525 100.00 0 26.08.2014 Incorrect bank accounts

are provided, after



20.12.2015 to

30.12.2015 25 Y Bekzod FE 560 414.00 560 414.00 0

26.08.2014

25 Total for district: 23 291 152.00 18 990 857.00 4 300 295.00

Rishtan district

1 A Mamarajab ugli FE 2 770 987.00 2 770 987.00 0 17.07.2014

30

2 Abror Abbos yangi bogi FE 1 222 541.00 1 222 541.00 0 17.07.2014

3 Aziz Nodir Elbek Habibulo FE 937 972.00 937 972.00 0 20.06.2014

4 Al Rashidoni FE 594 801.00 594 801.00 0 25.06.2014

5 A Hidirov FE 733 230.00 733 230.00 0 19.06.2014

6 B Muhamad FE 2 232 054.00 2 232 054.00 0 16.07.2014

7 Bilolodin B FE 2 697 261.00 2 697 261.00 0 25.06.2014

8 Bobotosh zamin FE 3 527 809.00 3 527 809.00 0 20.06.2014

9 Bonu U FE 3 531 931.00 3 531 931.00 0 16.07.2014

10 Bunedkorlik sari bogi FE 3 732 792.00 3 732 792.00 0 16.06.2014

11 B Faruh erlari FE 1 734 655.00 1 734 655.00 0 19.06.2014

12 Vodi bogdonlar bogi FE 492 511.00 492 511.00 0 19.05.2014

13 Vodi FE 917 451.00 917 451.00 0 25.05.2014

14 Galakor Uali FE 993 444.00 993 444.00 0 19.05.2014

15 Galakor Shuhrat eri FE 2 745 901.00 2 745 901.00 0 19.05.2014

16 Gulobod yurt FE 1 231 547.00 1 231 547.00 0 25.06.2014

17 Dier Abdulhai eri FE 2 764 778.00 2 764 778.00 0 25.06.2014

18 Dilshod Dier orzusi FE 1 860 875.00 1 860 875.00 0 23.06.2014

19 E Mahkamova FE 1 316 790.00 1 316 790.00 0 27.06.2014

20 Jasur Invest FE 565 983.00 565 983.00 0 19.06.2014

21 Jumaev zamini FE 3 328 029.00 3 328 029.00 0 20.06.2014

22 Zarinabonu erlari FE 1 401 352.00 1 401 352.00 0 25.06.2014

23 Zohid Nur zamin FE 3 224 692.00 3 224 692.00 0 19.06.2014

24 Zohid M erlari FE 2 145 144.00 2 145 144.00 0 25.06.2014

25 Z Hamrokulov FE 1 333 839.00 1 333 839.00 0 27.06.2014

26 I Ibrahim zamini FE 4 359 536.00 4 359 536.00 0 17.07.2014

27 I ota Ruzibaev FE 2 767 738.00 2 767 738.00 0 25.06.2014

28 Ihtier Islam Ikbal bogi FE 407 226.00 407 226.00 0 19.05.2014

29 Ihtier SMIK FE 5 133 590.00 5 133 590.00 0 16.07.2014

30 Laitmas boglari FE 2 703 006.00 2 703 006.00 0 19.05.2014

31 Kahramon ota Sahovati FE 3 834 798.00 3 834 798.00 0 26.06.2014

32 K hoji ota FE 3 578 869.00 3 578 869.00 0 17.07.2014

33 Madad ildizi FE 6 507 744.00 6 507 744.00 0 17.07.2014

34 M Mahsim FE 321 881.00 321 881.00 0 25.07.2014

35 M Odiljonov FE 887 444.00 887 444.00 0 23.06.2014

36 Mujizakor Hosildor bogi FE 2 949 452.00 2 949 452.00 0 19.06.2014

31

37 Muhamad ugli Mirzanazar FE 1 127 266.00 1 127 266.00 0 25.06.2014

38 Nodirbek FE 796 527.00 796 527.00 0 25.06.2014

39 N Abdurahim ugli FE 1 959 587.00 1 959 587.00 0 16.07.2014

40 Obod Bog Bogboni FE 2 918 993.00 2 918 993.00 0 27.06.2014

41 O Faiz Invest FE 1 807 401.00 1 807 401.00 0 20.06.2014

42 Ok Bulok FE 134 398.00 134 398.00 0 25.06.2014

43 Ok er pahtazori FE 1 351 933.00 1 351 933.00 0 17.07.2014

44 Otanazar A Ugli FE 4 300 116.00 4 300 116.00 0 25.06.2014

45 Pandigoh Duri Gavhari FE 7 237 160.00 7 237 160.00 0 16.07.2014

46 Pandigoh chuli FE 523 882.00 523 882.00 0 25.06.2014

47 Pandigoh Abdurahman Faruh FE 5 739 362.00 5 739 362.00 0 16.07.2014

48 Pahta kainar FE 2 038 926.00 2 038 926.00 0 17.07.2014

49 Pahtakor I Orzusi FE 4 602 123.00 4 602 123.00 0 19.06.2014

50 Rahim Rashidoni FE 2 848 399.00 2 848 399.00 0 20.06.2014

51 Rishtan Ravnaki FE 2 867 080.00 2 867 080.00 0 17.07.2014

52 Rishtan faiz Agrosanoat college 1 284 789.00 1 284 789.00 0 17.07.2014

53 S Zamini FE 1 424 232.00 1 424 232.00 0 17.07.2014

54 Sohib Sardor FE 1 302 163.00 1 302 163.00 0 23.06.2014

55 STOL A.O. FE 986 542.00 986 542.00 0 25.06.2014

56 Sultan Y FE 1 170 553.00 1 170 553.00 0 16.07.2014

57 T ota Tursunov FE 2 463 674.00 2 463 674.00 0 25.06.2014

58 Tuhfabegim bogi FE 407 226.00 407 226.00 0 19.06.2014

59 Yirat erlari FE 3 749 850.00 3 749 850.00 0 16.07.2014

60 F Kurbanova FE 1 927 913.00 1 927 913.00 0 19.06.2014

61 Hamidjon ugli B FE 100 784.00 100 784.00 0 16.07.2014

62 Hoji dada Sahovati FE 504 060.00 504 060.00 0 23.06.2014

63 H Sultanov FE 1 455 468.00 1 455 468.00 0 20.06.2014

64 H FE 5 198 822.00 5 198 822.00 0 23.06.2014

65 Hujaev A eri FE 3 772 897.00 3 772 897.00 0 16.07.2014

66 Humyn Mirzo Hamdam M FE 1 679 446.00 1 679 446.00 0 19.07.2014

67 Chaman gul obod bog FE 318 741.00 318 741.00 0 17.07.2014

68 Shavkat FE 3 267 983.00 3 267 983.00 0 19.05.2014

69 S ugli Ahlidin FE 2 930 834.00 2 930 834.00 0 19.05.2014

70 Shomurod Elmurod FE 1 270 636.00 1 270 636.00 0 25.09.2014

32

71 Shuhrat Sherzod Bekzod bogi FE 2 797 019.00 2 797 019.00 0 19.06.2014

72 Yuldash ota bolalari FE 3 214 369.00 3 214 369.00 0 27.06.2014

73 Yangi Asr kahramoni FE 4 608 729.00 4 608 729.00 0 25.06.2014

74 Yashil Yaprok Plus FE 2 773 393.00 2 773 393.00 0 19.06.2014

75 Zar Zamin FE 337 008.00 0 337 008 Incorrect bank accounts

are provided, after



20.12.2015 to

30.12.2015

76 Zohid Kosim Pahtakor FE 736 364.00 0 736 364

77 Abdulaev A U FE 1 586 387.00 0 1 586 387

78 Imloniat FE 799 759.00 0 799 759


Altiaryk district

1 A hoji ugli Abduvali hoji FE 16 609 302.00 16 609 302.00 0 18.08.2014

2 Bibi Omina FE 859 895.00 859 895.00 0 11.08.2014

3 Gofurova S FE 368 000.00 368 000.00 0 07.08.2014

4 G ugli Nomojon FE 161 771.00 161 771.00 0 07.08.2014

5 Ismail Nazim Obod FE 538 081.00 538 081.00 0 18.08.2014

6 K Nizomov FE 6 511 301.00 6 511 301.00 0 18.08.2014

7 Madmusaev E FE 1 429 256.00 1 429 256.00 0 07.08.2014

8 Mamadalieva O FE 34 188.00 34 188.00 0 14.08.2014

9 Mamasadikov R FE 407 667.00 407 667.00 0 07.08.2014

10 Murodil T FE 4 117 408.00 4 117 408.00 0 14.08.2014

11 Muhamad Y FE 80 586.00 80 586.00 0 18.08.2014

12 Nodir Altiaryk FE 1 517 793.00 1 517 793.00 0 14.08.2014

13 Odijon-2 FE 3 861 076.00 3 861 076.00 0 14.08.2014

14 O Kosimov FE 1 236 660.00 1 236 660.00 0 14.08.2014

15 Ota FE 816 529.00 816 529.00 0 14.08.2014

16 Ruzaliev A FE 268 293.00 268 293.00 0 14.08.2014

17 T Jurabek Mirzabod FE 729 523.00 729 523.00 0 11.08.2014

18 Tojiboev T K FE 254 551.00 254 551.00 0 12.08.2014

19 Tojihon Nigora Tamara FE 1 012 345.00 1 012 345.00 0 18.08.2014

20 Turgun baraka faiz FE 350 024.00 350 024.00 0 18.08.2014

21 Tursunali Yuz Altiaryk FE 617 874.00 617 874.00 0 12.08.2014

22 U Yulchi Yulduzi FE 2 653 718.00 2 653 718.00 0 12.08.2014

23 Faiziobod obod dieri FE 1 434 821.00 1 434 821.00 0 18.08.2014

24 Shahimardon FE 774 243.00 774 243.00 0 11.08.2014

33

25 Jalilobod FE 193 451.00 0 193 451 Incorrect bank accounts

are provided, after



20.12.2015 to

30.12.2015

26 Farmland of 9229 military unit 93 240.00 0 93 240

27 Imamov M FE 1 102 318.00 0 1 102 318

28 A ugli obod zamini FE 560 112.00 0 560 112


131 Total 245 697 625.00 235 988 691.00 9 708 934.00

34


Amount


amount

Date of

Payment

Compensation for

land, fruit tree,



if any

Expected date of

payment

Bagdad district

1 Bagdad Shermat ota FE 4 026 625 4 026 625 0 18.11.2011

2 M Hursanov bogi FE 940 362 940 362 0 11.11.2011

3 Sheraliev M FE 903 934 903 934 0 17.11.2011

4 Hamdam pahtazori FE 641 168 641 168 0 17.11.2011

5 Anvar H FE 1 586 007 1 586 007 0 11.11.2011

6 S Firdavsi bogi FE 107 063 107 063 0 09.11.2011

7 H Nuriddinov FE 3 178 727 3 178 727 0 09.11.2011

8 Ergash ota siymosi FE 5 249 676 5 249 676 0 28.10.2011

9 Muhamad ota bogi FE 2 114 970 2 114 970 0 28.10.2011

10 Mehrigie Gulhae FE 591 887 591 887 0 30.11.2011

11 Feruzbek T FE 829 372 829 372 0 09.11.2011

12 S Ortikboi bogi FE 1 573 746 1 573 746 0 09.11.2011

13 Gani ota FE 2 393 756 2 393 756 0 09.11.2011

14 Nasiba FE 225 188 225 188 0 17.11.2011

15 S Zarshunosi FE 3 872 552 3 872 552 0 17.11.2011

16 Temirov Z FE 3 753 487 3 753 487 0 14.11.2011

17 Yigit FE 2 732 864 2 732 864 0 09.11.2011

18 Osim ali Davron FE 1 853 414 1 853 414 0 14.11.2011

19 Ergashev Y FE 165 223 165 223 0 09.11.2011

20 Bagdad duri Durimacha FE 759 153 759 153 0 09.11.2011

21 Abduvaliev Y DF 4 801 524 4 801 524 0 09.11.2011

21 Total for district: 42 300 698 42 300 698

Rishtan district

1 Rahmonov O FE 209 310 209 310 0 10.11.2011

2 Tuprogi unumdor Roshidov FE 1 278 190 1 278 190 0 17.11.2011

3 Kime FE 710 016 710 016 0 10.11.2011

4 Shahzoda Anvar Haftiyak FE 3 891 900 3 891 900 0 10.11.2011

5 Chinor Yuli FE 609 187 609 187 0 10.11.2011


35

Altiaryk district

1 Yuldashali ugli R FE 5 349 642 5 349 642 0 10.11.2011

2 G ugli Nomojon FE 1 020 479 1 020 479 0 10.11.2011

3 O ugli Murod FE 5 162 370 5 162 370 0 10.11.2011

4 B Jumaev FE 343 177 343 177 0 10.11.2011

5 Mamatisaev U FE 156 294 156 294 0 10.11.2011

6 Husanboi H FE 318 473 318 473 0 10.11.2011

7 Altiaryk Agrosanoat college 1 362 704 1 362 704 0 10.11.2011

8 Secondary school No.11 10 398 10 398 0 10.11.2011

9 P Apandiev Altiaryk Agrobank 34 029 34 029 0 22.11.2011

10 Oronboev R Altiaryk Halk 108 527 108 527 0 22.11.2011

11 Umaraliev Y Rishtan Agrobank 40 268 40 268 0 22.11.2011


37 Total: 62 905 662 62 905 662

republic of uzbekistan fergana valley water...

Documents