reprinted from mvcologia, vol. lxvi, no. 3, pp. 499-506, may...

8
...14-/Cacx__ €42 Reprinted from MvcoLoGIA, Vol. LXVI, No. 3, pp. 499-506, May-June, 1974 Printed in U. S. A. FUNGAL SUCCESSION ON NEEDLES AND YOUNG TWIGS OF OLD-GROWTH DOUGLAS FIR MARTHA SHERWOOD 1 AND GEORGE CARROLL Department of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 91-103 SUMMARY The pattern of presence and abundance of fungi on needles and twigs of old-growth Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menciesii) in the Oregon Cas- cades exhibits a well-defined successional sequence which was documented by counting thalli and fruiting bodies under a dissecting microscope. De- tailed information on the distribution of fungi in this habitat suggests that their mode of nutrition has yet to be elucidated. Because of their short life cycles and minimal requirements for living space fungi have often been the subject of successional studies; however, such studies have usually dealt with successions on dead material (Web- ster, 1956; Hudson and Webster, 1958; Kendrick and Burges, 1962; 1\Iacauley and Thrower, 1966) and less frequently with those associated with living plants. The leaves and twigs of evergreen plants in a sea- sonal temperate climate provide an ideal substrate on which to study fungal succession since leaves are produced at defined intervals and per- sist for many years ; in a single year of observation 8-15 yr of sucession are observed. MATERIALS AND METHODS The principal study site is an old-growth Douglas fir [Pscudotsuga (Mirb.) Franco] stand located at an elevation of 500 m in the H. T. Andrews Experimental Forest, Lane County, Oregon. A single living tree, rigged for nondestructive sampling by a team of climbers by the method outlined by Denison et al. (1972), was selected for detailed study. In addition, two smaller trees from an adjacent area clearcut in 1952 and a number of saplings 2-10 yr old were examined superficially to determine whether a significant difference existed between the fungal flora of old-growth and younger trees. 1 Contribution number 84 to the International Biological Program Conif- erous Forest Biome. Present address: Plant Pathology Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. 14859. 499

Upload: others

Post on 31-Dec-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Reprinted from MvcoLoGIA, Vol. LXVI, No. 3, pp. 499-506, May …andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/pubs/pdf/pub1995.pdf · 2011. 3. 29. · ...14-/Cacx__ €42 Reprinted from MvcoLoGIA,

...14-/Cacx__ €42

Reprinted from MvcoLoGIA, Vol. LXVI, No. 3, pp. 499-506, May-June, 1974Printed in U. S. A.

FUNGAL SUCCESSION ON NEEDLES AND YOUNGTWIGS OF OLD-GROWTH DOUGLAS FIR

MARTHA SHERWOOD 1 AND GEORGE CARROLL

Department of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 91-103

SUMMARY

The pattern of presence and abundance of fungi on needles and twigsof old-growth Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menciesii) in the Oregon Cas-cades exhibits a well-defined successional sequence which was documentedby counting thalli and fruiting bodies under a dissecting microscope. De-tailed information on the distribution of fungi in this habitat suggests thattheir mode of nutrition has yet to be elucidated.

Because of their short life cycles and minimal requirements for livingspace fungi have often been the subject of successional studies; however,such studies have usually dealt with successions on dead material (Web-ster, 1956; Hudson and Webster, 1958; Kendrick and Burges, 1962;1\Iacauley and Thrower, 1966) and less frequently with those associatedwith living plants. The leaves and twigs of evergreen plants in a sea-sonal temperate climate provide an ideal substrate on which to studyfungal succession since leaves are produced at defined intervals and per-sist for many years ; in a single year of observation 8-15 yr of sucessionare observed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The principal study site is an old-growth Douglas fir [Pscudotsuga(Mirb.) Franco] stand located at an elevation of 500 m in the

H. T. Andrews Experimental Forest, Lane County, Oregon. A singleliving tree, rigged for nondestructive sampling by a team of climbers bythe method outlined by Denison et al. (1972), was selected for detailedstudy. In addition, two smaller trees from an adjacent area clearcutin 1952 and a number of saplings 2-10 yr old were examined superficiallyto determine whether a significant difference existed between the fungalflora of old-growth and younger trees.

1 Contribution number 84 to the International Biological Program Conif-erous Forest Biome.

Present address: Plant Pathology Department, Cornell University, Ithaca,N.Y. 14859.

499

Page 2: Reprinted from MvcoLoGIA, Vol. LXVI, No. 3, pp. 499-506, May …andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/pubs/pdf/pub1995.pdf · 2011. 3. 29. · ...14-/Cacx__ €42 Reprinted from MvcoLoGIA,

500 YcoLoo11, VoL. 66, 1974

5

FIG. 1. Microhahitats on a Douglas fir twig. 1. Sooty mold on young twig.2. Node and r out scales. 3. Massarina on young bark. 4. Lower surface of needle.5. Upper surface of needle.

Bratichlets, defined for purposes of the stud y as material less than4 cm in than. were removed front the tipper, middle, and lower canopvlavers, the lower laver being defined as the interval between the lowestliving branch and the point at which branches became regularly spaced,about 40 in ;fl y ive ground level. The uppermost branch was collectedat the top of the climbing path. a9 ni above the ground. Later thebranclic-s on this tree were numbered in conjunction with a stud y of treebiomass and we received material front branches a I24 nu, 7 (26 nt).33 (47 m). and 61 ( 33 110.

Initiall y . the main axis of each of the liranchlets received was selectedfor detailed stud y . This axis was divided into yearl y increments, and.where needles were present, 20 of them were removed and inonntedbetween glass microscope slides. The exclusive use of the main axis ap-peared to introduce a bias into the sampling, since the main axis isthicker than the laterals at a given age, so we subsequentl y divided allmaterial on a branchlet into yearl y increments and drew samples ran-doml y from bags of uniform age material.

Needles and twigs were examined at 25 and 50 x magnification usinga Leitz dissecting microscope, and all thalli visible and identifiable at thismagnification were recorded. Doubtful specimens were mounted inlactophenol-cotton blue and examined under a compollod microscope for

gs

Page 3: Reprinted from MvcoLoGIA, Vol. LXVI, No. 3, pp. 499-506, May …andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/pubs/pdf/pub1995.pdf · 2011. 3. 29. · ...14-/Cacx__ €42 Reprinted from MvcoLoGIA,

1

i I ER \VDU!) AND CAI:R( )1.1, : I : Ni S,I:CCESSItrY 5111

veritication. Voucher specimens of fungi noted have been deposited inthe Oregon State University Herbarium (OSC.).

Upper and lower surfaces of needles and twigs, and twig nodes withtheir accompanying bud scales were treated as separate microhabitats(FIG. 1). Upper surfaces receive more light and water than lowerstfrfaces, and stomata are confined to the underside of needles. Nodesand bud scales are highly resinous. Insects and insect damage werenoted when they occurred: howeYer, in the Andrews Forest insectsappear to be rare on old-growth Douglas fir branchlets. Sooty-moldcolonies were dispersed and plated on tap-water agar. Further attemptsto survey fungi by cultural methods were abandoned when it was foundthat man y of the common visible fungi would not grow on any media.This study did not attempt to document the numerous sterile hyphae,algae. and bacteria unrecognizable under a dissecting microscope. Rareorganisms were scored for presence or absence: the most common or-ganisms were rated according to cover or abundance classes.

A list of fungi occurring on younger tree. and the approximate ageof the organ on which the y occurred, was compiled, but no quantitativesampling was attempted.

RES U LTS

Although Douglas fir twigs and needles are an exposed. harsh habitatfor fungi, a surprising number of forms fruit there. Fungi NV1110 -1 01111(1

he positively identified are listed in TAnr.F. T colonizer; of dead materialare omitted. The last seven taxi in the table were isolated repeatedlyfrom sooty-mold colonies; young trees were not investigated.

N EE1)1.1F.S.

\eedles of old-growth Douglas fir at tUis study site are ge:.eraikfree fr1,111 obvious disease s y mptoms altlo >ugh the y support a iargc

1111111bCr of fungi. The number of needles per centimeter of twig; de-creases to half its original value after (') vr and few needles persist longerthan S y r. On young plantation-grown Douglas fir the percez:tagefoliage less than 4 vr old is estimated at ("_i c-",; (Silver. 1 °16?_ _ and inold-growth trees 4 1 c/ic (M. Sherwood and 1. Perl:ins, unpublished data ^.Parasites of older needles would therefore he expected to have moreeffect on old-growth trees.

..-Itichia sp. and trace amounts of sterile crustose lichens are presenton the upper surface of 5—S- y r-old needles. At lower eleyatiols in theWillamette valley these organisms become much more abundant.Schifothvrium sp. (undescribed, according to E. Milner) al pears on

Page 4: Reprinted from MvcoLoGIA, Vol. LXVI, No. 3, pp. 499-506, May …andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/pubs/pdf/pub1995.pdf · 2011. 3. 29. · ...14-/Cacx__ €42 Reprinted from MvcoLoGIA,

502 vcoLocdA, Vol- 66, 1974

TABLE I

FUNGI OCCURRING ON NEEDLES ANT) TWIGS OF OLD—GRO\VTI( DOUGLAS FIRE

Fungus

Young trees Old-growth trees

Needles Twigs Needles Twigs

LT I. U L X L7 I. 1.: I, NEpipolaeum pseudolsugae

(Mill. & Bonar) Shoem. XPhaeocryptopus gaeumanii

(Rohde) Petr. XSchizothyrium sp. XAtichia sp. X X X X X XA ureobasidium pultulans

(de Bury) Ant. X X X X X X XLophium sp..Scolecobonaria lithocar pi

(Mill. & Bonar) Bat. NDiapo •the pitya Sacc. X XCaliciopsis pseudotsugae Fitzp. XStrigopodia batistae Hughesreichosporbut sp.

XX

Massarina cf. corticola(Flickel) Holm

Trinte • ia caerulea (Ell. & Ev.) Berl. &Vogl. XMetacopoolium sp. : X X X XAntennatula sp. :XXX X X XBactrodesmium cf. obliquum Sutton X X X XEpicoccom porporascos

Ehrenb. ex Schlecht. X X X XLecidea erratica Korb XChulosporium oxvsporum Berk. & Curt. X XCladosporium cladosporioid:'s

(Fresen.) de Vries X XCladosporium herb3 • um (Pers.) Link X X.Vigrospora sp. X XUlociadium botrytis Prvuss

yalolendron sp.X XX X

Ceptello';poritem Sp. X X

I = 1.1111Wr surface: I. = lower surface; and bud scales.

the lower surface of needles after 2 yr. On older needles up to 100pseudothecia of this minute loculoascomycete were encountered, and onsome twigs 10070 of the needles were infected. Intensity of infection didnot increase predictably with age or canopy level ; however, some ageclasses Nvere more severel y infected than others, and the 7- and 8-vr ageclasses were almost uninfected, suggesting that parasitized needlesdropped off prematurely ( F IG. 2). Phacocryptopus gacumanii occurredoccasionally on trees of all ages. Needles 4 and 5 yr old were most com-monly affected. Epipo/acion pscudotsugae caused a severe needle caston young saplings but was absent on older trees.

Douglas fir trees do not mature a crop of cones every year. Since

Page 5: Reprinted from MvcoLoGIA, Vol. LXVI, No. 3, pp. 499-506, May …andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/pubs/pdf/pub1995.pdf · 2011. 3. 29. · ...14-/Cacx__ €42 Reprinted from MvcoLoGIA,

SHERWOOD AND CARROLL : FUNGAL SUCCESSION 503

z0

NEEDLE AGE (YEARS)

FIG. 2. Per cent of needles infected with Schif.othyrium sp. in four branch systems.Branchlet 33-1 arose near the trunk; 33-2 near the tip of branch system 33.

cones are shed the year after the y are produced, the onl y cones availablefor study were those produced in the spring of 1972 and these were tooyoung for successional observations.

TWIGS

Twigs remain smooth barked and photosynthetic until after theneedles arc shed. Thereafter the bark thickens and becomes sharply dif-ferentiated into an upper, lichenized zone and a lower zone which receive,little moisture and is sparsely colonized by liverworts and sooty molds.Twig fungi occur in two distinct associations : the sooty molds (Cap-nodiaceae) and fungi that inhabit sooty-mold colonies. and parasiticbark-inhabiting loculoascomycetes. Both groups are eventuall y displacedby crustose lichens. Resin deposits at the nodes support distinctive fungi.

Soot y molds are most abundant on small-diameter twigs 3-8 yr oldtoward the upper canopy of older trees, but are present on trees of allages. Hyphae of Metacapp odium and Antenmititla appear in the secondyear and occasionally cover the entire twig. We did not observe asco-carps of either fungus. Atichia sp., Aureobasidiunb pullulans. and nu-merous algal cells (Protococcus sp. and Trcntcpohlia sp.) were fre-quentl y encountered in the association. Heavily colonized twigs showedno evidence of insect infestation and their position in the canop y renders

Page 6: Reprinted from MvcoLoGIA, Vol. LXVI, No. 3, pp. 499-506, May …andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/pubs/pdf/pub1995.pdf · 2011. 3. 29. · ...14-/Cacx__ €42 Reprinted from MvcoLoGIA,

25 I

0

33-2

,■•• 63

••-■■■■28

100

7533 1

50•

1.4

5

3. Lichen cover

10

TWIG AGE (YEARS)

on 1/1.11) • 1' Surfaces of twig, ill four branch systems.

50-1 1\1ycoko(Ni, Voi.. 66, 197-1

unlikel y the h y pothesis that in,ect exudate., trout other trees were itsource of nutrients.

Strigopodia batistue is a characteristic inhabitant of resin. Teicho-sporina sp. occured on resinous bud scales of younger trees. Scolcco-bonaria lithocarpi, occasionally abundant on twigs of young saplings.(Ines not occur on older tree ,.. Old bud scales and twig epidermis arecolonized by a thin network of Aurealwidiam hYphae.

.A number of parasitic loculoascomvcetes inhabit living bark: theirver y diversity precluded adequate documentation when duplicate speci-mens could not be obtained. Hassarina cf. corticola, the most abundantsuch fungus. occurs at all canopy levels on all but the youngest saplings.Twigs which are rapidl y enlarging are more suceptible: hence, youngtrees, healthy branches, and main axes support large populations ofillassarina. It occurs primarily on twigs 10-15 vr old, i.e., immediatelyafter the needles have been shed. Less abundant but equall y ubiquitousis Winteria earl-idea which favors slightl y younger twigs. A lichententativel y identified as Lecidea erratica appeared after 3 yr and con-sistentl y occupies approximately 25% of the upper surface of twigs5-20 yr old with its thin inconspicuous thallus. Apothecia were rare.

In the upper canopy, crustose lichen cover rose rapidly from traceamounts at year S to 50-60% b y year 15 (Fm. 3). This sequence was

Page 7: Reprinted from MvcoLoGIA, Vol. LXVI, No. 3, pp. 499-506, May …andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/pubs/pdf/pub1995.pdf · 2011. 3. 29. · ...14-/Cacx__ €42 Reprinted from MvcoLoGIA,

SHERWOOD AND : FUNGAL SVCCESSION 505

:lelayecl in the lower canop y I I vpophloedal crustose lichens grow under-neath lfassarina,11'intcria, and Lecideo. Soot y molds and resit, fungipersist at lower levels in cracks in older hark. 1)etails of lichen successionon older branches are given by Pike et al. i 1974).

DISCUSSION

The needles and twigs of Douglas fir support a large and diversepopulation of fungi which differs in several respects from that found byother authors on temperate trees. Health y living leaves of herbs anddeciduous trees rarel y support sporulating fungi (Apinis. Chesters, andTaligoola, 1973) and have usually been surveyed for fungi b y culture-and incubation. Aureobasidium, and Clculustorium spp., seen frequentlyhere, have been recorded on ragus (Hogg and TIlidson. 19661. Pisuni(Dickinson. 1967), Nothologus (Ruscoe, 1971) alai Accr tscmlothitanusI.. (Pugh and Buckley , 1971) and are probabl y nearl y ubiquitous onplant surfaces. Since the present stud y was conducted in the summer andlitter was not examined, fungi fruiting on senescent or recentl y castneedles, corresponding to group 1 in Webster's (1956 , classificationscheme, were not sampled.

Sooty molds dominated b y members of the. Capnodia.ceite are morecharactersitic of tropical than of temperate forests. Fraser 1 1936. 1937concluded that Australian Capriodiaceae and Atichiace.te derived theirnutrition from insect exudates. \Ve found no evidence f•,r this in theAndrews Forest, Resin , leachates, and algal exudates are pi ssiblecandidates for a nutrient source. 11 these ill1112;i 'heir nutritionfrom leachates the y nlaN be important in forest mineraI cycling.

The richness of the communit y in this restricted 1,ahitat suggeststhat, as in sun. hi( rierelnialinn among Iiiorph(logicl y simi-lar organisms and their production of antimicrobial .'1=ti.1!1Ce.,.provide a promising- source of antibiotics.

AC 1:NOWLE1.11; NI.Es-rs

The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of I )ianne Trac y and"loin Denison in obtaining samples, and of S. J. Hughes. I). Reynolds,and Emil Miller in identif y ing, specimens. This sturd y was supportedb y National Science Foundation grant #G1320963 a the ConiferousForest Biome, Ecosy stems analysis studies, C.F. and he a grantfrom the Research Corporation to the second author (G.C.C.).

Page 8: Reprinted from MvcoLoGIA, Vol. LXVI, No. 3, pp. 499-506, May …andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/pubs/pdf/pub1995.pdf · 2011. 3. 29. · ...14-/Cacx__ €42 Reprinted from MvcoLoGIA,

506 AlycoLoGIA, VOL. 66, 1974

LITERATURE CITED

Apinis, A. E., C. G. C. Chesters, and H. K. Taligoola. 1973. Microfungi colo-nizing submerged standing culms of Phragmites communis Trin. in water.Nova Iledwigia 23: 473-480.

Denison, W. C., D. Tracy, F. Rhoades, and M. Sherwood. 1972. Direct,nondestructive measurement of biomass and structure in living old-growthDouglas fir, pp. 147-158. In J. F. Franklin, L. J. Dempster, and R. H.Waring [eds.], Proceedings—research on coniferous forest ecosystems—asymposium. Pacific Northw. Forest and Range Exp. Sta., Portland, Ore.

Dickinson, C. H. 1967. Fungal colonization of Piston leaves. Canad. J. But.45: 915-927.

Fraser, L. 1936. Notes on the occurrence of the Trichopeltaceae and Atichiaceaeof New South Wales and on their mode of nutrition, with a description ofa new species of Atichia. Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales 61: 277-284.

---. 1937. The distribution of sooty mould fungi and its relation to certainaspects of their physiology. Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales 62: 35-56.

Hogg, B. M., and H. J. Hudson. 1966. Micro-fungi on leaves of Fagussylvatica. I. The micro-fungal succession. Trans. Brit. 34,7°1. Soc. 49:185-192.

Hudson, H. J., and J. Webster. 1958. Succession of fungi on decaying stemsof Agropyron repel's. Trans. Brit. ill y col. Soc. 41: 165--177.

Kendrick, W. B., and A. Burges. 1962. Biological aspects of the decay ofPilots syk .cstris leaf litter. Nova I Ieckeigia 4: 313-342.

Macauley, B. J., and L. B. Thrower. 1966. Succession of fungi in leaf litter ofEucalyptus regnans. Trans. Brit. .11-yro1. Soc. 49 : 165-177.

Pike, L., W. C. Denison, D. Tracy, M. Sherwood, and F. Rhoades. 1974. Afloristic survey of epiphytic lichens and bryophytes grown on trunks, branches,and twigs of living old-growth conifers in western Oregon. Bryologist77' (In press).

Pugh, G. J. F., and N. G. Buckley. 1971. The leaf surface as a substrate forcolonization by fungi, pp. 431-445. In 'I'. F. Preece and C. H. Dickinson[eds." Ecology of leaf surface microorganisms. Academic Press, London.

Ruscoe, Q. W. 1971. Mvcoflora of living and dead leaves of Nothofagnstroneata. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 56: 463-474.

Silver, G. T. 1962. The distribution of Douglas fir foliage by age. Forest. Chron.38: 433-438.

Webster, J. 1956. Succession of fungi on decaying Cocksfoot culms. J. Ecu!.44: 517-544.

Accepted for publication September 7, 1973