report - vpa

28 April 2014

PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

Redstone Hill, Sunbury

REP

OR

T

Report Number. 147613021-001-R-Rev1

Distribution:

1 copy - Golder Associates Pty Ltd 1 copy - Villawood Properties Pty Ltd

Submitted to:Villawood Properties Pty Ltd Level 1, Riverside Quay Southbank, VIC 3006

PHASE 1 ESA - REDSTONE HILL

28 April 2014 Report No. 147613021-001-R-Rev1 i

Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................ 1

2.0 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................................................... 1

2.1 Site Description............................................................................................................................................. 1

2.2 Proposed Site Development ......................................................................................................................... 1

2.3 EES (2013) Assessment of Contamination Risks ......................................................................................... 2

3.0 ADDITIONAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION .............................................................................................................. 3

3.1 Aerial Photograph Review ............................................................................................................................ 3

3.2 Site Inspection .............................................................................................................................................. 5

3.2.1 675 Sunbury Road .................................................................................................................................. 5

3.2.2 40 Redstone Hill Road and 80 Redstone Hill Road ................................................................................ 8

4.0 POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION RISKS AND ACTIONS ........................................................................................ 10

5.0 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................................................... 13

6.0 LIMITATIONS .......................................................................................................................................................... 13

TABLES

Table 1: Summary of EES Contamination Risks ................................................................................................................. 2

Table 2: Summary of EES Risk Mitigation Measures .......................................................................................................... 3

Table 3: Summary of Aerial Photograph Review ................................................................................................................. 4

Table 4: Summary of Potential Uses and Potential Contaminants .................................................................................... 10

Table 5: Recommended Further Assessment ................................................................................................................... 12

FIGURES

Figure 1: Site Location Plan

Figure 2: Site Layout

Figure 3: Areas of Potential Risk

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A Limitations


28 April 2014 Report No. 147613021-001-R-Rev1 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION Villawood Properties Pty Ltd (Villawood) engaged Golder Associates Pty Ltd (Golder Associates) to undertake a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (Phase 1 ESA) of three parcels of land located in the Redstone Hill area of Sunbury. The Phase 1 ESA was conducted in general accordance with Golder Associates proposal P47613030-001-P-Rev0 dated 17 March 2014.

The three parcels of land (refer Figure 1) are general described as:

40 Redstone Hill Road, Sunbury,

80 Redstone Hill Road, Sunbury and

675 Sunbury Road, Sunbury.

We understand that Villawood are in the initial phases of the redevelopment of the three parcels of land for residential purposes. Villawood is looking to refine the findings of the draft report prepared by Environmental Earth Sciences (EES) titled Land Capability Assessment for the Sunbury South Precinct Structure Plan, Sunbury Victoria” (reference 213066_PSP74, dated December 2013).

The objectives of this scope are:

To reduce the uncertainty and spatial extent regarding the potential for contamination to exist across the site as identified in EES’s 2013 report

Provide a management strategy for areas of the site where contamination is identified.

We understand that the report will be submitted to the Metropolitan Planning Authority (MPA) to refine the contamination risk rating presented in the draft land capability assessment.

2.0 BACKGROUND

2.1 Site Description The site is located on the south side of Sunbury Road in Sunbury, approximately 30 km north west of Melbourne’s Central Business District. The site location map is included as Figure 1. The site comprises three parcels of land, 675 Sunbury Road, 40 Redstone Hill Road and 80 Redstone Hill Road. The three site in general forms an irregular parcel of land bounded to the north by Sunbury Road, the south by Jacksons Creek, the east by Shepard Lane and the North by Redstone Hill Road which also runs through the centre of the site. A number of smaller parcels of land within the general site boundary as shown in Figure 1 are not included in the Villawood site.

Current surrounding land use in the vicinity of the site is largely of a rural / agricultural nature including grazing or pasture land. A number of scattered farm residences/dwellings are associated with these farming properties. The general area also includes areas of residential properties to the north west of the site indicative of the current redevelopment of the broader area for residential purposes. To the north east of the site is the Bulla Tip and Quarry located on the alternate side of Sunbury Road.

2.2 Proposed Site Development Villawood propose to develop the site into residential lots including associated open space and a town centre along the Sunbury Road boundary.



2.3 EES (2013) Assessment of Contamination Risks The three parcels of land subject to this review form part of the Sunbury South Precinct Structure Plan. These sites were assessed to identify issues or considerations that pose a contamination risk for the future urban development of the precinct. The assessment included consideration of:

Geology

Soil

Topography

Surface water

Hydrogeology

Protected areas

Biodiversity Conservation Strategy

Heritage Considerations

Geotechnical considerations

Historical Review including

Aerial images

Titles

EPA records

Local government records

Licenced activities

Site Inspection

The information gathered was then used to undertake an environmental risk assessment (ERA) based on the source-pathway-receptor relationship. To assign the risk of each of the identified features a risk matrix was applied which made consideration of the consequence and likelihood. The draft report prepared by EES noted the following contamination risks in relation to the Villawood sites. It should be noted that the ranking has been applied by EES at a property level and was not refined through specific assessment of identified individual features considered to be a risk.

Table 1: Summary of EES Contamination Risks

Property Risk Issues Consideration Ranking

675 Sunbury Road

Asbestos Asbestos containing material identified on site

High

Storage of fuels/agricultural chemicals

Potential for uncontrolled storage and potential spillage of pesticides and herbicides fuels, oils and solvents

High

Machinery storage and maintenance

Use and possible leakage of small amounts of fuel, oil, grease and solvents during machinery maintenance activities.

Moderate

40 Redstone Hill Road

Deep Excavations

Historic mine shafts located within the rural conservation zone adjacent to property, although barricaded, remain open and represent a hazard.

High



Property Risk Issues Consideration Ranking


Agricultural Activities Historic and current agricultural activities including cropping and the use of herbicides and pesticides.

Low



Moderate


Agricultural Activities Historic and current agricultural activities including cropping and the use of herbicides and pesticides.

Low



Moderate

EES recommended the following mitigation measures based on the assigned risk:

Table 2: Summary of EES Risk Mitigation Measures

Risk Rating Mitigation Recommendations

Extreme Immediate intervention required to eliminate or reduce risk.

High Essential to eliminate or reduce to a lower level with the implementation of control measures.

Moderate Management may be required via monitoring or response to procedures; however risk should be appropriately quantified.

Low Manage potential risk by routine procedures, unlikely to require further action.

3.0 ADDITIONAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION To further assess the potential contamination risks posed by the site as identified by EES, Golder undertook a more focussed review of the identified issues by undertaking the following additional tasks using specialists in contaminated land assessment:

Aerial Photograph review

Site Inspection

Review of Contamination risks

3.1 Aerial Photograph Review A review of aerial photographs was undertaken for the period from 1960 to present. Historical photographs were obtained from Department of Environment and Primary Industries. A summary of the observations made during the aerial photograph review are presented in Table 2.



Table 3: Summary of Aerial Photograph Review

Date 675 Sunbury Road 40 Redstone Hill Road 80 Redstone Hill Road Surrounding Area

1960 The site appears to be being used for farming activities. A number of farm buildings can be seen in the area of the current farm house and buildings. No other buildings can be seen on the site.

The site appears to be being used for farming activities. A farm house and associated buildings is located to the east of the current farm house. The current farmhouse is absent.

The site appears to be being used for farming activities. No evidence of any buildings on the site.

The surrounding land appears to be being used for farming activities. Farmhouses and associated buildings are located on Redstone Hill Road and the alternate side of Sunbury Road.

1971 The site appears relatively unchanged.

No aerial image was available for the site.


The surrounding land use appears to be relatively unchanged. A “new” farmhouse has appeared to the west of 675 Sunbury Road.

1982 An additional shed is present in the area of the farmhouse. A new house is noted on the Redstone Hill Road boundary of the site. The configuration of the paddocks in the vicinity of the old farmhouse has changed with smaller paddocks with shelters now noted.



The surrounding land use appears to be relatively unchanged.


The current farmhouse and associated buildings are now present along with the original farmhouse. A trotting track is present to the east of the older farmhouse.

The site appears unchanged.

The surrounding land use appears to be relatively unchanged.


The site appears relatively unchanged with the exception of the trotting track which has now gone.

A second dam to the south of the existing dam appears to have been excavated. The northern corner of the site is being used for grape production.

An olive grove to the north and east of 80 Redstone Hill Road has been planted and a number of buildings constructed.

2014 The site appears relatively unchanged. A silo in the vicinity of the old farmhouse has been demolished.

The older farmhouse located to the east of the current farmhouse has been demolished together with the associated buildings. A building to the north of the farm shed has been demolished.

The site appears unchanged.

The surrounding land uses appear unchanged.



The aerial photograph review has identified a number of buildings of potential interest on the 40 and 80 Redstone Hill and 675 Sunbury Road properties. The identified features of interest are shown on Figure 2 and include:

675 Sunbury Road

A pre 1960 farmhouse on the Sunbury Road boundary.

Farm buildings on the Sunbury Road boundary.

A pre 1982 farmhouse on the Redstone Hill Road boundary.


A pre 1960 farmhouse (now demolished).

A pre 1991 farmhouse.

Farm buildings to the south of the existing farmhouse.


Two small sheds located on the eastern side of the property.

3.2 Site Inspection Golder Associates undertook a site inspection on the 19 March 2014. During the site inspection, Adam Davidson of Villawood was present. As summary of the findings for each of the sites is provided below:

3.2.1 675 Sunbury Road During this site walkover one of the owners of 675 Sunbury Road Alex Koroneos was interviewed. The current site configuration is provided in Figure 2 attached. A summary of the findings is provided below:

Mr Koroneos together with his parents and brother has owned the site for 22 years having bought the site from the bank who had repossessed the site from the previous owner. The previous owner had used the site for horse agistment.

During their ownership of the site, the Koroneos’s have used the site for raising cattle, sheep, alpacas and deer.

The farmhouse was tenanted until a couple of years ago and the secondary farmhouse on Redstone Hill Road was used by his parents, although it has been vacant for the past few years.



A number of buildings (refer Figure 2) are located in the vicinity of the original farmhouse these include:

Four sheds

Shed 1 is metal and is constructed with an elevated wooden floor. The shed has not been used by the Koroneos family and currently contains a small amount of disused furniture including desk chairs, bookshelves and a domestic clothes dryer.

Shed 2 is constructed of besser blocks and a metal roof, the floor of the shed is unpaved. The shed has not been used by the Koroneos family and is generally empty with building waste and empty drums being stored within.

Shed 3 is a two sided shed constructed of metal with a dirt floor. Shed 3 is used for general farm activities including sheep drenching and shearing. A small chemical store was located in the north west corner of the shed with small (less than 5L) of farm associated chemicals located in this area.



Shed 4 is a three sided shed constructed of metal with a dirt floor. Shed 4 is used for the storage of farm equipment and hay.

Stables – these are currently unused and contain general building waste.

Chicken coop – the chicken coop has not been used by the Koroneos family and is a wooden construction with a metal roof. The coop currently contains scrap fencing.

A water tank

Garage – the garage is constructed of metal and is vacant.

The AST identified by EES during their site walkover (refer Figure 2) had been removed at the time of the site visit. Mr Koroneos indicated that the AST was 2000L and had been disused for at least 10 years. No surface staining was evident in the vicinity of the former AST location.

Three IBCs were located near Shed 4. Mr Koroneos indicated that they belonged to a neighbour and have only ever been used for water storage (refer Figure 2).



A number of 44 gallon drums marked as being aviation turbine fuel were located in the general area of the shed. Mr Koroneos indicated that these had been brought to the site empty by the previous tenant of the original farmhouse who used them for water storage.

Two former oil heating tanks were located at the rear of the original farmhouse. Mr Koroneos indicated that these tanks were not used at the site and had been brought in by the former tenant who used them for rain water collection.

Asbestos containing material as identified during the EES site walkover was not noted during the Golder Associates site walkover.

The site walkover identified the following features of potential interest on the 675 Sunbury Road site (refer Figure 2):

Shed 3 used for general farm activities including sheep drenching and chemical storage.

Location of a former AST.

Empty 44 gallon drums located around and in the buildings.

3.2.2 40 Redstone Hill Road and 80 Redstone Hill Road Both 40 and 80 Redstone Hill are currently owned by a Villawood subsidiary and managed by Ian Barclay. The sites are both currently used for cropping and grazing. The current farm manager of 40 and 80 Redstone Hill Road was unavailable at the time of the walkover, but Golder communicated with him via email on 24 March 2014. During the site walkover the following observations were made:

Two sheds are located on the 80 Redstone Hill site, both of these sheds are used for machinery storage. All chemicals used on the site are stored on the 40 Redstone Hill Road property.



On the 40 Redstone Hill property two sheds and a storage container were located to the south of the existing farmhouse.

Shed 1 was constructed of metal and is primarily used for machinery storage. A small chemical store was located along the eastern side of the shed. The chemical store contains approximately 200 litres in total of herbicides such as Roundup and Grazon.

Shed 2 was constructed of metal and is primarily used for machinery storage.

On the 40 Redstone Hill an AST was located between the storage container and Shed 2. The AST was empty at the time of the inspection and was indicated by the Farm Manager to have not been used for a number of years. No surface staining was evident in the vicinity of the AST.



On the 40 Redstone Hill a storage container was located at the north end of Shed 2. The storage container is used to store household furniture.

The Farm Manager also indicated that the former farmhouse located on 40 Redstone Hill Road was demolished in the past year. The former farmhouse included a number of out buildings including a garage and chicken coop.

Two dams are located in the south eastern corner of the 80 Redstone Hill property.

The site walkover identified the following features of potential interest on the 40 Redstone Hill site (refer Figure 2):

Shed 1 used for general farm activities including chemical storage.

A disused AST located to the north of Shed 2.

4.0 POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION RISKS AND ACTIONS The table below presents a summary of the highlighted potential contamination issues at the site and potential contaminants that may be associated with the issues. Table 4 also provides details on together with an assigned risk based on the EES risk rankings details in their report and summarised above in Section 2.3. A figure showing the areas is presented as Figure 3.

Table 4: Summary of Potential Uses and Potential Contaminants

Property Issue Description Potential Contaminants

Contamination Risk

675 Sunbury Road

Former AST Localised impacts due to spillage from onsite storage of fuel.

TRHs, PAHs and MAHs. Low

44 Gallon Drum Storage

Localised impacts from leakage from drums. TRHs, PAHs and MAHs.

Low

Shed 3

Localised impacts to soil from the storage and use of chemicals within Shed 3, including the drenching of sheep.

Broad range of potential contaminants, including, insecticides, fungicides, OCPs and OPPs, TRH, PAHs and MAHs.

Low

Original Farmhouse and associated

Localised impacts to soil from the use of the site, including potential for filling and possible farm

Broad range of potential contaminants, including, metals, OCPs and OPPs, TRH, PAHs and

Low



Property Issue Description Potential Contaminants

Contamination Risk

buildings machinery maintenance. MAHs


AST Localised impacts due to spillage from onsite storage of fuel.

TRHs, PAHs and MAHs. Low

Shed 1 Chemical Store

Localised impacts to soil from the storage of chemicals within Shed 1.

Broad range of potential contaminants, including, Insecticides, fungicides, OCPs and OPPs, TRH, PAHs and MAHs.

Low

Former Farmhouse

Localised impacts to soil from the use of the site, including potential for filling and possible farm machinery maintenance.

Broad range of potential contaminants, including, metals, OCPs and OPPs, TRH, PAHs and MAHs

Low

Current Farmhouse and associated buildings



Low


Sheds



Low

Notes. OCP organochlorine pesticide PAH Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon OPP Organophosphate pesticide MAH Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon TRH Total Recoverable

Hydrocarbons

All of the identified issue relate to the potential for soil contamination. None of the issues are considered to present an elevated risk of groundwater contamination. The risk of contamination on the site outside of these identified areas in Table 4 is considered to be very low to low.

These rankings are in general lower than the risk rankings assigned by EES. It is recognised that as these risk rankings are subjective, further works are recommended to confirm the low risk associated with the contamination by the above features. These works should include soil sampling for the contaminants of interest at the location of each of the identified features and management of currently unidentified residual risks on the remainder of the site through implementation of a development protocol. A summary of the recommended further actions are provided below in Table 5.



Table 5: Recommended Further Assessment

Property Issue Description

Timing of Assessment

675 Sunbury Road

Former AST Assessment of the soil in the area of the AST, to confirm level of impact, if any.

Can be undertaken now or prior to development.

44 Gallon Drum StorageAn assessment of soil in the area of each set of drums to confirm the level of impact, if any.

Following Removal

Shed 3

An assessment of the soil under Shed 3 to assess the potential for impact from the chemical store and drenching activities.

Following Demolition

Original Farmhouse and associated buildings

A due diligence assessment of the site at approximately five locations to confirm site status.



AST Assessment of the soil in the area of the AST, to confirm level of impact if any.

Following Removal

Shed 1 Chemical Store An assessment of the soil in the area of the chemical store, to confirm level of impact if any.


Former Farmhouse A due diligence assessment of the site at approximately three locations to confirm site status.

Can be undertaken now or prior to development.

Current Farmhouse and associated buildings

A due diligence assessment of the site at approximately five locations to confirm site status.



Sheds A due diligence assessment of the site at approximately two locations to confirm site status.


There will remain a level of uncertainty in relation to past activities on the remainder of the site. As such it is recommended that the uncertainty in this residual risk of contamination is managed via a general soil management protocol to be adopted during the development of the site. The protocol would require:

Should any stained or odourous soils or soils containing waste be identified that these are assessed by an Environmental Consultant;

All material suspected of being asbestos containing material should be assessed by a suitably qualified practitioner. Any asbestos containing material should be handled and disposed of by a suitably qualified and licenced asbestos contractor.

Any soil brought to site as fill are confirmed as meeting the EPA requirements for Fill Material.

Any soil taken offsite meet the EPA requirements for the offsite disposal of soils.



5.0 CONCLUSION Golder has undertaken a Phase 1 ESA for three parcels of land located at 675 Sunbury and 40 and 80 Redstone Hill Roads, Sunbury, Victoria. The works were undertaken to support development of the site for residential use. The assessment has indicated that the contamination risk at the site is very low to low. A number of features at the site have been identified for further assessment following demolition of the existing buildings and prior to redevelopment (refer Table 5 and Figure 3) to confirm the low risk associated with contamination. In addition, there will remain a level of uncertainty in relation to past activities on the remainder of the site. As such it is recommended that the uncertainty in this residual risk of contamination is managed via a general soil management protocol as outlined in Section 4.0 to be adopted during the development of the site.

6.0 LIMITATIONS Your attention is drawn to the document - “Limitations”, which is included as Appendix A of this report. The statements presented in this document are intended to advise you of what your realistic expectations of this report should be. The document is not intended to reduce the level of responsibility accepted by Golder Associates, but rather to ensure that all parties who may rely on this report are aware of the responsibilities each assumes in so doing.


28 April 2014 Report No. 147613021-001-R-Rev1

Report Signature Page

GOLDER ASSOCIATES PTY LTD

Natalie McKay Ian Kluckow Senior Environmental Engineer Principal

NRM/IMK/nrm

A.B.N. 64 006 107 857

Golder, Golder Associates and the GA globe design are trademarks of Golder Associates Corporation.

\\golder.gds\gap\melbourne\jobs\env\2014\147613021 - sunbury\correspondence out\147613021-001-r-rev1.docx



FIGURES

Info

rmat

ion

co

nta

ined

on

thi

s d

raw

ing

is th

e c

opyr

ight

of

Go

lde

r A

sso

ciat

es

Pty

. Lt

d.

Un

auth

oris

ed u

se o

r re

pro

duc

tion

of t

his

pla

n e

ithe

r w

holly

or

in p

art

with

out w

ritt

en p

erm

issi

on

infr

ing

es c

opy

right

. ©

Gol

der

Ass

ocia

tes

Pty

. Ltd

.

File Location: J:\Env\2014\147613021 - Sunbury\Technical Doc\GIS\Project\147613021-001-R-F0001-Rev1.mxd

DATUM GDA 94, PROJECTION MGA Zone 55

1:15,000SCALE (at A3)

1. Cadastre, water and roads data © The State of Victoria, Department of Environment and Primary Industries 2013.2. Aerial Imagery © 2012 NearMap Pty Ltd.

COPYRIGHT

1. Cadastre, water and roads data sourced from Vicmap, 2013.2. Aerial Photograph sourced from Nearmap, date of capture 05/02/2014.

NOTES

LEGENDSite Boundary

Watercourse

Dams

Cadastre

SITE LOCATION PLAN

VILLAWOOD PROPERTIES PTY LTD

SUNBURY: REDSTONE HILL

0 200 400 600 800100 metres

FIGURE 1PROJECT:

CHECKED:

DATE:DRAWN:

NMTPC28 APR 2014147613021

Lennox Ct

Queens Ct

Clydesd

aleWay

Hammersmith Ct

White

chap

elWa

y

Belleview Dr

HighdaleCl

Fenton

hillPd

e

TowerbridgeRise

Stratf

ord ClRose

berry

Av

Nottinghill

Rise

Norman AvLa

nce R

d

Palom

ino D

r

TheStrand

ChestnutWay

Dunc

ans

Lane

Pinto Way

Circular Dr

Buckley Rd

Redston

e Hill R

d

Eighnane Valley Way

Crinn

ion R

d

Watsons Rd

Fox H

ollow

Dr

Harke

r St

Sheph

erds L

ane

LANC

EFIEL

DRO

AD

BULLA-DIGGERS

REST ROAD

SUNBURY ROAD

300,000

300,000

301,000

301,000

302,000

302,000

303,000

303,000

304,000

304,000

5,834

,000

5,834

,000

5,835

,000

5,835

,000

5,836

,000

5,836

,000

5,837

,000

5,837

,000±

SUNBURY

MELBOURNE

Site Location

Info

rmat

ion

co

nta

ined

on

thi

s d

raw

ing

is th

e c

opyr

ight

of

Go

lde

r A

sso

ciat

es

Pty

. Lt

d.

Un

auth

oris

ed u

se o

r re

pro

duc

tion

of t

his

pla

n e

ithe

r w

holly

or

in p

art

with

out w

ritt

en p

erm

issi

on

infr

ing

es c

opy

right

. ©

Gol

der

Ass

ocia

tes

Pty

. Ltd

.



1:10,000SCALE (at A3)

LEGEND1 Former Mining Activity

Buildings

Chemical Store

Site Areas

Site Boundary

Watercourse

Dams

Cadastre

GENERAL SITE LAYOUT



0 100 200 300 400 50050 metres

FIGURE 2PROJECT:

CHECKED:

DATE:DRAWN:

NMTPC28 APR 2014147613021

11

11

111

Redston

e Hill R

d

Sheph

erds L

ane

LANCEFIELD

ROAD

SUNBURY ROAD

80 RedstoneHill Road

675Sunbury

Road


OriginalFarmhouse &

Buildings

Pre 1982Farmhouse

Farmhouse

FarmBuildings

OriginalFarmhouse Former

VineyardShed 1

Shed 2

301,000

301,000

302,000

302,000

303,000

303,000

5,835

,000

5,835

,000

5,836

,000

5,836

,000

±

SUNBURY

MELBOURNE

Site Location

Shed1

Shed2

StorageContainer

ChemicalStore AST

Stables

DisusedHouse

Shed 1

ChickenCoop

Shed 2

Garage

Shed 3Chemical

Store

WaterTank

FormerSilo

FormerAST

Shed 4 IBCs


COPYRIGHT


NOTES

Info

rmat

ion

co

nta

ined

on

thi

s d

raw

ing

is th

e c

opyr

ight

of

Go

lde

r A

sso

ciat

es

Pty

. Lt

d.

Un

auth

oris

ed u

se o

r re

pro

duc

tion

of t

his

pla

n e

ithe

r w

holly

or

in p

art

with

out w

ritt

en p

erm

issi

on

infr

ing

es c

opy

right

. ©

Gol

der

Ass

ocia

tes

Pty

. Ltd

.



1:10,000SCALE (at A3)

LEGEND1 Former Mining Activity

Buildings

Chemical Store

Site Areas

Site Boundary

Low Contamination Risk

Watercourse

Dams

Cadastre

AREAS OF POTENTIAL RISK



0 100 200 300 400 50050 metres

FIGURE 3PROJECT:

CHECKED:

DATE:DRAWN:

NMTPC28 APR 2014147613021

11

11

111

Redston

e Hill R

d

Sheph

erds L

ane

LANCEFIELD

ROAD

SUNBURY ROAD


675Sunbury

Road


FormerVineyard

OriginalFarmhouse &

Buildings

Pre 1982Farmhouse

Farmhouse

FarmBuildings

OriginalFarmhouse

Shed 1

Shed 2

301,000

301,000

302,000

302,000

303,000

303,000

5,835

,000

5,835

,000

5,836

,000

5,836

,000

±

SUNBURY

MELBOURNE

Site Location

Shed1

Shed2

StorageContainer

ChemicalStore AST

Stables

DisusedHouse

Shed 1

ChickenCoop

Shed 2

Garage

Shed 3Chemical

Store

WaterTank

FormerSilo

FormerAST

Shed 4 IBCs


COPYRIGHT


NOTES



APPENDIX A Limitations

LIMITATIONS

This Document has been provided by Golder Associates Pty Ltd (“Golder”) subject to the following limitations: This Document has been prepared for the particular purpose outlined in Golder’s proposal and no responsibility is accepted for the use of this Document, in whole or in part, in other contexts or for any other purpose. The scope and the period of Golder’s Services are as described in Golder’s proposal, and are subject to restrictions and limitations. Golder did not perform a complete assessment of all possible conditions or circumstances that may exist at the site referenced in the Document. If a service is not expressly indicated, do not assume it has been provided. If a matter is not addressed, do not assume that any determination has been made by Golder in regards to it. Conditions may exist which were undetectable given the limited nature of the enquiry Golder was retained to undertake with respect to the site. Variations in conditions may occur between investigatory locations, and there may be special conditions pertaining to the site which have not been revealed by the investigation and which have not therefore been taken into account in the Document. Accordingly, additional studies and actions may be required. In addition, it is recognised that the passage of time affects the information and assessment provided in this Document. Golder’s opinions are based upon information that existed at the time of the production of the Document. It is understood that the Services provided allowed Golder to form no more than an opinion of the actual conditions of the site at the time the site was visited and cannot be used to assess the effect of any subsequent changes in the quality of the site, or its surroundings, or any laws or regulations. Any assessments made in this Document are based on the conditions indicated from published sources and the investigation described. No warranty is included, either express or implied, that the actual conditions will conform exactly to the assessments contained in this Document. Where data supplied by the client or other external sources, including previous site investigation data, have been used, it has been assumed that the information is correct unless otherwise stated. No responsibility is accepted by Golder for incomplete or inaccurate data supplied by others. Golder may have retained subconsultants affiliated with Golder to provide Services for the benefit of Golder. To the maximum extent allowed by law, the Client acknowledges and agrees it will not have any direct legal recourse to, and waives any claim, demand, or cause of action against, Golder’s affiliated companies, and their employees, officers and directors. This Document is provided for sole use by the Client and is confidential to it and its professional advisers. No responsibility whatsoever for the contents of this Document will be accepted to any person other than the Client. Any use which a third party makes of this Document, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, is the responsibility of such third parties. Golder accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this Document.

GOLDER ASSOCIATES PTY LTD GAP Form No. LEG 04 RL 1

Golder Associates Pty Ltd

Building 7, Botanicca Corporate Park

570 – 588 Swan Street

Richmond, Victoria 3121

Australia

T: +61 3 8862 3500

report - vpa

Documents