report to the planning commission - san diego · greater golden hill planning committee -on may...

57
THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION DATE ISSUED: OCTOBER 2,2104 REPORT NO. PC-14-060 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: SUMMARY Planning Commission, Agenda of October 9, 2014 SDCRAA Noise Monitoring Poles - PROJECT NO. 340611 PROCESS 4 SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY . (SDCRAA) . Issue(s): Should the Planning Commission approve a Site Development Permit to allow for the replacement and upgrade of eight noise monitoring poles within the public right- of-way in the following community plan areas: Peninsula, Uptown, Greater Golden Hill, and Balboa Park? Staff Recommendation: APPROVE Site Development Permit (SDP) No: 1197636. Community Planning Group Recommendations: Peninsula Community Planning Board - On March 20,2014, the Peninsula Community Planning Board voted 8-1-0 to recommend approval of Site #11(3412 Browning Street), Site #20 (1944 Plum Street), and Site #22 (5029 Lotus Street) within their planning jurisdiction. Uptown Planners - On Aplil1, 2014, the Uptown Planners voted 15-0-1 to recommend approval of Site #19 (1290 West Thorn Street) and Site #9 (1126 Redwood Street) within their planning jurisdiction. Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee - On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee voted 11-1-2 to recommend approval ofthe location of Site #2 (1328 Dale Street) and Site #16 (3385 B Street) within their planning jurisdiction. - 1 -

Upload: others

Post on 02-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO

REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION

DATE ISSUED: OCTOBER 2,2104 REPORT NO. PC-14-060

ATTENTION:

SUBJECT:

APPLICANT:

SUMMARY

Planning Commission, Agenda of October 9, 2014

SDCRAA Noise Monitoring Poles - PROJECT NO. 340611 PROCESS 4

SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY . (SDCRAA) .

Issue(s): Should the Planning Commission approve a Site Development Permit to allow for the replacement and upgrade of eight noise monitoring poles within the public right­of-way in the following community plan areas: Peninsula, Uptown, Greater Golden Hill, and Balboa Park?

Staff Recommendation: APPROVE Site Development Permit (SDP) No: 1197636.

Community Planning Group Recommendations:

Peninsula Community Planning Board - On March 20,2014, the Peninsula Community Planning Board voted 8-1-0 to recommend approval of Site #11(3412 Browning Street), Site #20 (1944 Plum Street), and Site #22 (5029 Lotus Street) within their planning jurisdiction.

Uptown Planners - On Aplil1, 2014, the Uptown Planners voted 15-0-1 to recommend approval of Site #19 (1290 West Thorn Street) and Site #9 (1126 Redwood Street) within their planning jurisdiction.

Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee - On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee voted 11-1-2 to recommend approval ofthe location of Site #2 (1328 Dale Street) and Site #16 (3385 B Street) within their planning jurisdiction.

- 1 -

Page 2: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

Balboa Park Committee - The Balboa Park Committee is aware ofthe project, but declined a presentation. Additionally, the City's Park and Recreation staff reviewed and approved the project.

Environmental Review: The City of San Diego has determined pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that the action is exempt pursuant to Section 15302 (c) [Replacement or Reconstruction] and Section 15303 [New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures] of the State CEQA Guidelines. The opportunity to appeal this determination expired on July 21,2014.

Fiscal Impact Statement: The cost of processing this application is paid through a deposit account funded by the applicant.

Code Enforcement Impact: There are currently no open code enforcement cases.

Housing Impact Statement: There are no residential units proposed to be added or removed, therefore there is no impact to the number of housing units.

BACKGROUND

Under the provisions of Title 21 ofthe California Noise Standards, the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority (SDCRAA - "Airport Authority"), owner/operator ofthe San Diego International Airport (SDIA), is mandated to provide continuous monitoring of the SDIA noise impacts on surrounding communities. This mandate is implemented through a network of 23 monitoring poles, or remote monitoring terminals (RMT), as part ofthe Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System - Geographic Information System (ANOMS- GIS). The California Noise Standards establish that the acceptable level of aircraft noise for persons living near airports is a Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of65 decibels (dB).

Since the late 1970's the Airport Authority has measured SDIA's noise impacts using the RMTs. This data is measured and compiled for reports required by the State of California, Division of Aeronautics. The ANOMS-GIS helps staff monitor noise levels and aircraft flight tracks. It is also used to enforce the departure "Curfew", respond to aircraft noise complaints from community members, and to generate noise contour maps.

Because the 65 dB CNEL noise contours and the location of these noise contours change over time due to airport operations, the Airport Authority has periodically reconfigured its network of the monitoring poles to correctly measure the existing noise environment. In 2002, the Port District, then owner/operator of SDIA, embarked on a project to upgrade the noise monitoring capabilities of its system to provide more accurate community monitoring of SDIA noise impacts, and to reconfigure the locations of the monitoring poles. The Airport Authority, which became SDIA proprietor in 2003, subsequently commissioned a noise monitoring study authored by an acoustical consultant that recommended adding two new stations, and relocating eight stations within the SDIA noise impact area. All locations received upgraded noise monitoring equipment. The Airport Authority received its original permits from the City and completed

- 2 -

Page 3: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

work by 2007.

The proposed project will upgrade the existing eight wooden poles to metal and upgrade the monitoring equipment at each location. The project will relocate one of the monitoring poles; while the other seven poles would remain in or very near the existing locations which are within the Public Right-of- Way.

The proposed project requires a Site Development Permit (SDP), (Attachment 1), Process Four for encroachments into the public right-of-way. The Site Development Permit (SDP) findings for the public right-of-way encroachment are supported in the attached Resolution (Attachment 3).

On July 7,2014, the City of San Diego issued an Environmental Determination that the proposed project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guideline Section 15302 (c) [Replacement or Reconstruction] and Section 15303 [New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures]. The opportunity to appeal that determination ended July 21,2014. There were no appeals filed (Attachment 2).

DISCUSSION

Project Description:

The proposed project will upgrade eight existing wooden noise monitoring poles to metal poles; install solar panels on two of the poles; reconnect eight poles to existing utilities; and transfer noise monitoring equipment from existing poles to new metal poles. The eight poles are located in the public right-of-way (Attachment 5). Installation of utilities in the public right-of-way is compatible with the underlying base zones of the various locations. The proposed project will ensure continued compliance of 2417 noise monitoring, required by the State of California. The improvements include: the construction of two 20-foot high, hinged, square, steel poles; one 24-foot high, non-hinged, square, steel pole; and five 20-feet high, non-hinged, square, steel poles (Attachment 4). The noise monitoring equipment poles cannot be co-located on other poles (i.e. utility poles) or buildings due to provisions in Title 21 ofthe California Noise Standards that stipulate measures to prevent compromising aircraft noise monitoring data via electronic interference or acoustic reflection.

Two of the eight poles proposed will include solar panels. Those solar panels will be oriented due south to be most efficient. These two poles and solar panels have been oriented so the solar panels do not overhang any face of curb or any property line. The solar panels will be self­sufficient, with no additional power hookups or street tunneling necessary to underground utilities. The remaining six poles will be reconnected to the existing utilities. All poles proposed will have an equipment cabinet mounted approximately four feet off ofthe base of the pole to enclose the noise monitoring equipment and backup batteries. The enclosures attached to the poles contain the remote monitoring stations (RMS) that transmit noise monitoring data to a server located at the San Diego County Regional Airport via a wireless data modem. The RMS collect data via a microphone that is mounted above the pole. The microphone must be free of

- 3 -

Page 4: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

obstructions and mounted at a minimum height above the ground in order to accurately record aircraft overflights, therefore preventing the noise monitoring equipment from being located underground.

All proposed sites were selected primarily due to unobstructed line-of-sight access to SDIA arriving or departing aircraft. All eight poles have been reviewed to determine there are no potential public right-of-way safety conflicts for pedestrians or vehicles. Installation contractors are required to maintain a minimum ten-foot horizontal edge-to-edge and minimum one-foot vertical edge-to-edge separation between all proposed poles, foundations, and grounding rods and all existing public underground sewer and water utilities. (Attachment 8)

Since October 2013, the Airport Authority staff has been consulting with the following community planning boards to achieve consensus on the locations and design of eight poles within respective planning jurisdictions (Attachment 7):

• Balboa Park Committee - 1 location Site #1: Balboa Park Drive/8th drive (Solar Panel)

• Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee - 3 locations Site #2: 1328 Dale Street Site #16: 3385 B Street (Solar Panel)

• Uptown Planners - 2 locations Site #9: 1134 West Redwood Street Site #19: 1290 West Thorn Street

• Peninsula Community Planning Board - 3 locations Site #11: 3413 Browning Street Site #20: 1944 Plum Street Site #21: 1625 Froude Street

After initially consulting with all of the above community planning boards/committees, the Airport Authority staff made recommended modifications to the design and energy source used at several pole locations. Once the modifications to the design were complete, staff returned to the above community groups for approval to recommend the proposed project. All Community Planning Boards except for the Balboa Park Committee, who are aware of the project but declined a presentation, approved the revised locations and energy sources (Attachment 6).

Community Plan Analysis

Each of the locations has been reviewed for consistency with the community plans. In general, the community plans encourage undergrounding of utilities and recognize the need to minimize

- 4 -

Page 5: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

installation of new above-ground utilities. The utilities cannot be placed underground because the noise monitoring equipment must be able to record aircraft overflights. The Airport Authority considered, but rejected the alternative of installing the noise monitoring stations on existing structures. The equipment cannot be mounted on existing buildings or other utilities due to data quality objective as specified in Title 21 , section 5080.3 of the California Noise Standards, "Performance Specifications" and section 5080.5 , "Environmental Precautions and Requirements: regarding vibration, acoustic noise, and electrostatic/magnetic interference. The pole location within the public right-of-way was presented to and approved by the local community planning groups, except the Balboa Park Committee, taking into account local environmental factors such aesthetics, functionality, and public safety.

CONCLUSION

Staff has reviewed the proposed Site Development Permit (SDP) No. 1197636 and found it to be in conformance with the applicable sections of the San Diego Municipal Code (SDMC). Staff has also determined that the required findings can be made as the project meets applicable SDMC regulations and recommends approval of the proposed project.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Approve Site Development Permit (SDP) No. 1197636 with modifications; or

2. Deny Site Development Permit (SDP) No. 1197636 if the findings cannot be affirmed.

Respectfully submitted,

Mike Westlake Assistant Deputy Director Development Services Department

Attachments:

~,~ ngeIa ~no Development Project Manager Development Services Department

1. Draft Site Development Permit with Conditions 2. Environmental Exemption and Notice of Right to Appeal (NORA) 3. Draft Permit Resolution with Findings 4. Project Site Planes) 5. Location Photos 6. Community Planning Group Minutes 7. Location Table: zoning, community group, addresses 8. Project Location Map

- 5 -

Page 6: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY OF SAN DIEGO

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PERMIT INTAKE, MAIL STATION 501

WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO PROJECT MANAGEMENT

PERMIT CLERK MAIL STATION 501

ATTACHMENT 1

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE INTERNAL ORDER NUMBER: 24004089

SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1197636 SDCRAA NOISE MONITORING POLES PROJECT NO. 340611

PLANNING COMMISSION

This Site Development Pennit No. 1197636 is granted by the Planning Commission of the City of San Diego, to the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority (SDCRAA), Permittee, pursuant to San Diego Municipal Code [SDMC] section 126.0502. The eight poles are located within the public right-of-way and within the following communities: Peninsula, Uptown, Greater Golden Hill, and Balboa Park and summarized as follows:

• • • • • • • •

Site #1: Balboa Park Drive/8th drive Site #2: 1328 Dale Street Site #9: 1134 West Redwood Street Site #11: 3413 Browning Street Site #16: 3385 B Street Site #19: 1290 West Thorn Street Site #20: 1944 Plum Street Site #21: 1625 Froude Street

Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Pennit, permission is granted to Permittee to replace eight noise monitoring poles from wooden to metal poles with two of the poles changing from electrical to solar panels (ranging from 20-24 feet in height), in eight different locations along the airport flight path described and identified by size, dimension, quantity, type, and location on the approved exhibits [Exhibit "A"] dated October 9,2014, on file in the Development Services Department.

The project shall include:

a. Upgrade eight of the existing wooden noise monitoring poles to metal poles;

Page 1 of5

Page 7: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 1

b. Install solar panels on two of the poles and reconnect six poles to existing utilities;

c. Transfer noise monitoring equipment from existing poles to new metal poles; and,

d. The construction oftwo (2) 20-foot high, hinged, square, steel poles; one (1) 24-foot high, non-hinged, square, steel pole; and five (5) 20-feet high, non-hinged, square, steel poles.

STANDARD REQUIREMENTS:

1. This permit must be utilized within thirty-six (36) months after the date on which all rights of appeal have expired. If this permit is not utilized in accordance with Chapter 12, Article 6, Division 1 of the SDMC within the 36 month period, this permit shall be void unless an Extension of Time has been granted. Any such Extension of Time must meet all SDMC requirements and applicable guidelines in effect at the time the extension is considered by the appropriate decision maker. This permit must be utilized by October 23,2017.

2. No permit for the construction, occupancy, or operation of any facility or improvement described herein shall be granted, nor shall any activity authorized by this Permit be conducted on the premises until:

a. The Permittee signs and returns the Permit to the Development Services Department; and

b. The Permit is recorded in the Office of the San Diego County Recorder.

3. While this Permit is in effect, the subject property shall be used only for the purposes and under the terms and conditions set forth in this Permit unless otherwise authorized by the appropriate City decision maker.

4. This Permit is a covenant running with the subject property and all of the requirements and conditions ofthis Permit and related documents shall be binding upon the Permittee and any successor( s) in interest.

5. The continued use ofthis Permit shall be subject to the regulations ofthis and any other applicable governmental agency.

6. Issuance of this Permit by the City of San Diego does not authorize the Permittee for this Permit to violate any Federal, State or City laws, ordinances, regulations or policies including, but not limited to, the Endangered Species Act of 1973 [ESA] and any amendments thereto (16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq.).

7. Construction plans shall be in substantial conformity to Exhibit "A." Changes, modifications, or alterations to the construction plans are prohibited unless appropriate application(s) or amendment(s) to this Permit have been granted.

Page 2 of5

Page 8: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 1

8. All ofthe conditions contained in this Permit have been considered and were determined-necessary to make the findings required for approval of this Permit. The Permit holder is required to comply with each and every condition in order to maintain the entitlements that are granted by this Permit.

If any condition of this Permit, on a legal challenge by the Permittee of this Permit, is found or held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, unenforceable, or unreasonable, this Permit shall be void. However, in such an event, the Permittee shall have the right, by paying applicable processing fees, to bring a request for a new permit without the "invalid" conditions(s) back to the discretionary body which approved the Permit for a determination by that body as to whether all of the findings necessary for the issuance of the proposed permit can still be made in the absence of the "invalid" condition(s). Such hearing shall be a hearing de novo, and the discretionary body shall have the absolute right to approve, disapprove, or modify the proposed permit and the condition(s) contained therein.

9. The Permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, actions, proceedings, damages, judgments, or costs, including attorney's fees, against the City or its agents, officers, or employees, relating to the issuance of this permit including, but not limited to, any action to attack, set aside, void, challenge, or annul this development approval and any environmental document or decision. The City will promptly notify Permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and, ifthe City should fail to cooperate fully in the defense, the Permittee shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City or its agents, officers, and employees. The City may elect to conduct its own defense, participate in its own defense, or obtain independent legal counsel in defense of any claim related to this indemnification. In the event of such election, Permittee shall pay all of the costs related thereto, including without limitation reasonable attorney's fees and costs. In the event of a disagreement between the City and Permittee regarding litigation issues, the City shall have the authority to control the litigation and make litigation related decisions, including, but not limited to, settlement or other disposition of the matter. However, the Permittee shall not be required to payor perform any settlement unless such settlement is approved by Permittee.

ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS:

10. The project proposes to export 14 cubic yards of material from the project site. All excavated material listed to be exported, shall be exported to a legal disposal site in accordance with the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (the "Green Book"), 2009 edition and Regional Supplement Amendments adopted by Regional Standards Committee.

11. Prior to the issuance of any construction permit, the Permittee shall obtain a Public Right­of-Way permit for the proposed work in the Public Right-of-Way, satisfactory to the City Engineer.

12. Prior to the issuance of any construction permit, the Permittee shall remove the existing non-standard guard post and barricade and extend the existing City Standard guard post and

Page 3 of5

Page 9: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 1

barricade with current City Standard M-9 guard post and barricade, in the Plum Street Right-of­Way (Site #20), satisfactory to the City Engineer.

13. Prior to the issuance of any construction permit, the Permittee shall incorporate any construction Best Management Practices necessary to comply with Chapter 14, Article 2, Division 1 (Grading Regulations) of the San Diego Municipal Code, into the construction plans or specifications.

14. Prior to the issuance of any construction permit, the Permittee shall submit a Water Pollution Control Plan (WPCP). The WPCP shall be prepared in accordance with the guidelines in Appendix E of the City's Storm Water Standards.

INFORMATION ONLY:

• The issuance of this discretionary use permit alone does not allow the immediate commencement or continued operation of the proposed use on site. The operation allowed by this discretionary use permit may only begin or recommence after all conditions listed on this permit are fully completed and all required ministerial permits have been issued and received final inspection.

• Any party on whom fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions have been imposed as conditions of approval of this Permit, may protest the imposition within ninety days of the approval of this development permit by filing a written protest with the City Clerk pursuant to California Government Code-section 66020.

• This development may be subject to impact fees at the time of construction permit issuance.

APPROVED by the Planning Commission of the City of San Diego on October 9, 2014 and [Approved Resolution Number].

Page 4 of5

Page 10: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 1

SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT No. 1197636 Date of Approval: September 25,2014

AUTHENTICATED BY THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT

Angela Nazareno Development Project Manager

NOTE: Notary acknowledgment must be attached per Civil Code section 1189 et seq.

The undersigned Permittee, by execution hereof, agrees to each and every condition of this Permit and promises to perform each and every obligation of Permittee hereunder.

NOTE: Notary acknowledgments must be attached per Civil Code section 1189 et seq.

San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Permittee

By __________________________ ___ Sjohnna Knack PROGRAM MANAGER

Page 5 of5

Page 11: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION ATTACHMENT 2 (Check one or both) TO: X RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK

P.O. BOX 1750, MS A-33 1600 PACIFIC HWY, ROOM 260 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-2422

___ OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH 1400 TENTH STREET, ROOM 121 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814

FROM: CITY OF SAN DIEGO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 1222 FIRST AVENUE, MS 501 SAN DIEGO, CA92101

PROJECT-NQ.; 3406-11------ ~.------ PROJECT TITLE: SDCRAA Noise Monitoring Poles

PROJECT LOCATION-SPECIFIC: The project consists of 11 noise monitoring poles at the following locations: • 4669 Larkspur Street and 5037 Lotus Street within Council District 2 and the Ocean Beach community planning

area;

• 3413 Browning Street, 1944 Plum Street, and 1625 Froude Street within Council District 2 and the Peninsula community planning area;

• 1328 Dale Street, 3385 B Street, and 2651 A Street within Council District 3 and the Greater Golden Hill community planning area;

• 1132 West Redwood Street and 3408 Union Street within Council District 3 and the Uptown community planning area; and

• Balboa Park Drive/8th Drive within Council District 3 and Balboa Park.

PROJECT LOCATION-CITY/COllNTY: San Diego/San Diego

DESCRIPTION OF NATURE AND PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT: The San Diego County Regional Airport Authority (SDCRAA) has multiple noise monitoring stations strategically placed around the airport designed to monitor noise generated by aircraft. This project would upgrade eleven of the noise monitoring stations. The upgrade would include removing the existing wood pole and footing; disconnecting the existing power source for the poles that will be solar powered, installing a new steel pole and concrete footing; transferring the noise monitoring equipment from the old pole to the new pole; and adding solar panels to three of the new poles (the poles at 3385 B Street, 2651 A Street, and Balboa Park Drive/8 th Drive).

NAME OF PUBLIC AGENCY ApPROVING PROJECT: City of San Diego

NAME OF PERSON OR AGENCY CARRYING OUT PROJECT: San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Contact: Sjobnna Knack, P.O. Box 82776 San Diego, CA 92138 (619) 400-2639

EXEMPT STATUS: (CHECK ONE) () MINISTERIAL (SEC. 21080(b)(I); 15268); () DECLARED EMERGENCY (SEC. 21080(b)(3); lS269(a»; () EMERGENCYPROJECT(SEC.21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c) (X) CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION: (SEC. 15302(c) [REPLACEMENT OR RECONSTRUCTION]; SEC. 15303 [NEW

CONSTRUCTION OR CONVERSION OF SMALL STRUCTURES]) () STATUTORY EXEMPTION:

REASONS WHY PROJECT IS EXEMPT: The City of San Diego conducted an environmental review and determined the project meets the categorical exemption criteria set forth in the CEQA State Guidelines, Section 15302(c) [Replacement or Reconstruction] and Section 15303 [New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures]. Section 15302(c) allows for the replacement or reconstruction of existing utility systems andlor facilities involving negligible or no expansion of capacity. Section 15303 allows for the construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures. The existing noise monitoring poles would either be replaced-in-place or relocated to a site in close proximity to the existing pole. None of the exceptions listed in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 would apply.

LEAD AGENCY CONTACT PERSON: REBECCA MALONE TELEPHONE: (619) 446-5371

Page 12: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 2

IF FILED BY APPLICANT: 1. ATTACH CERTIFIED DOCUMENT OF EXEMPTION FINDING. 2. HAs A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION BEEN FILED BY THE PUBLIC AGENCY APPROVING THE PROJECT?

( ) YES ( ) No

IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED THAT THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO HAS DETERMINED THE ABOVE ACTIVITY TO BE EXEMPT FROM CEQA

,'-".-,_-u'f, a.A..A...- SENIOR PLANNER

(X) SIGNED By LEAD AGENCY

( ) SIGNED BY APPLICANT

July 8, 2014 DATE

DATE RECEIVED FOR FILING WITH COUNTY CLERK OR QPR:

Page 13: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO

Date of Notice: July 7, 2014

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO No. 24004089

PROJECT NAMEINUMBER: SDCRAA Noise Monitoring Poles / PTS No. 340611

COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: Ocean Beach, Peninsula, Greater Golden Hill, Uptown, and Balboa Park

COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 and 3

LOCATION: The project consists of 11 noise monitoring poles at the following locations:

• 4669 Larkspur Street and 5037 Lotus Street within Council District 2 and the Ocean Beach community planning area;

• 3412 Browning Street, 1944 Plum Street, and 1625 Froude Street within Council District 2 and the Peninsula community planning area;

• 1328 Dale Street, 3385 B Street, and 2651 A Street within Council District 3 and the Greater Golden Hill community planning area;

• 1132 West Redwood Street and 3408 Union Street within Council District 3 and the Uptown community planning area; and

• Balboa Park Drive/8th Drive within Council District 3 and Balboa Park.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The San Diego County Regional Airport Authority (SDCRAA) has multiple noise monitoring stations strategically placed around the airpolt designed to monitor noise generated by aircraft. This project would upgrade eleven of the noise monitoring stations. The upgrade would include removing the existing wood pole and footing; disconnecting the existing power source for the poles that will be solar powered, installing a new steel pole and concrete footing ; transferring the noise monitoring equipment from the old pole to the new pole; and adding solar panels to three of the new poles (the poles at 3385 B Street, 2651 A Street, and Balboa Park Drive/8th Drive).

ENTITY CONSIDERING PROJECT APPROVAL: City of San Diego

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA State Guidelines Sections 15302(c) [Replacement or Reconstruction] and Section 15303 [New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures].

Page 14: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ENTITY MAKING ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: City of San Diego Development Services Department

STATEMENT SUPPORTING REASON FOR ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of San Diego conducted an environmental review and determined the project meets the categorical exemption criteria set forth in the CEQA State Guidelines, Section l5302( c) [Replacement or Reconstruction] and Section 15303 [New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures]. Section l5302(c) allows for the replacement or reconstruction of existing utility systems and/or facilities involving negligible or no expansion of capacity. Section 15303 allows for the construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures. The existing noise monitoring poles would either be replaced-in-place or relocated to a site in close proximity to the existing pole. None of the exceptions listed in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 would apply.

DEVELOPMENT PROJECT MANAGER: MAILING ADDRESS:

PHONE NUMBER:

Angela N azareno 1222 First Avenue, MS 301 San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 446-5277

On July 7,2014, the City of San Diego made the above-referenced environmental determination pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This determination is appealable to the City Council. If you have any questions about this determination, contact the City Project Manager listed above.

Applications to appeal CEQA determination made by staff (including the City Manager) to the City Council must be filed in the office of the City Clerk within 10 business days from the date of the posting of this Notice and therefore the appeal period would end on July 21,2014. The appeal application can be obtained from the City Clerk, 202 'C' Street, Second Floor, San Diego, CA 92101.

This information will be made available in alternative formats upon request.

Page 15: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

PLANNING COMMISSION SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1197636

SDCRAA MONITORING POLES PROJECT NO. 340611

ATTACHMENT 3

WHEREAS, SDCRAA, Permittee, filed an application with the City of San Diego for a permit to replace 8 noise monitoring poles from wooden to metal poles with two of the poles changing from electrical to solar panels. The monitoring pole heights range from 20-24 feet in 8 different locations along the airport flight path. The eight poles are located in the Public Right-of-Way (as described in and by reference to the approved Exhibits "A" and corresponding conditions of approval for the associated Site Development Permit No. 1197636);

WHEREAS, the project sites are located within the Public Right-of-Way at: Site #1: Balboa Park Drive/8th drive; Site #2: 1328 Dale Street; Site #9: 1134 West Redwood Street; Site #11: 3412 Browning Street; Site #16: 3385 B Street; Site #19: 1290 West Thorn Street; Site #20: 1944 Plum Street; and Site #21: 1625 Froude Street in the following communities: Peninsula, Uptown, Balboa Park & Greater Golden Hill Community Plan areas;

WHEREAS, site location #21 is located within the City of San Diego permit jurisdiction of the California Coastal Overlay Zone however, the site is exempt from a Coastal Development Permit per SDMC Section 126.0704;

WHEREAS, on October 9, 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of San Diego considered Site Development Permit No. 1197636 pursuant to the Land Development Code of the City of San Diego;

WHEREAS, on July 7 the City of San Diego, as Lead Agency, through the Development Services Department, made and issued an Environmental Determination that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code section 21000 et. seq.) under CEQA Guideline Section 15302 (c) [Replacement or Reconstruction] and Section 15303 [New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures]. The opportunity to appeal that determination ended July 21,2014. There were no appeals filed; NOW, THEREFORE,

BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of San Diego as follows:

That the Planning Commission adopts the following written Findings, dated October 9, 2014.

FINDINGS:

Site Development Permit - Section 126.0504

A. Findings for all Site Development Permits

1. The proposed development will not adversely affect the applicable land use plan. The proposed development is to replace eight noise monitoring poles from wooden to metal poles with two of the poles to include solar panels. The monitoring pole heights range from 20-24 feet in eight different locations along the airport flight path. The eight poles are all located within the public right-of-way. Installation of utilities in the public right-of-way is compatible with the underlying base zones ofthe various locations, and this project involves replacing existing noise monitoring poles, not installing new

Page 1 of4

Page 16: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 3

poles. These utilities cannot be located underground because the noise monitoring equipment must be able to record aircraft overflights and must be located a minimum distance above ground. The equipment cannot be mounted on existing buildings or other utility poles due to data quality objectives as specified in Title 21, section 5080.3 of the California Noise Standards, "Performance Specifications" and section 5080.5, "Environmental Precautions and Requirements" regarding vibration, acoustic noise, and electrostatic/magnetic interference. While the Peninsula, Uptown, and Greater Golden Hill Community Plans generally support the elimination of overhead utilities, it is not feasible to underground or co-locate the equipment to be installed on the noise monitoring poles. The noise pole locations were selected to facilitate locating maximum extent of the noise impact boundary. Noise monitoring data will be used to help determine the noise contours which are used to help determine noise compatible land uses. Therefore, the proposed project will not adversely affect the applicable land use plan.

2. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. The proposed development is to replace eight noise monitoring poles from wooden to metal poles with two of the poles to include solar panels. The monitoring pole heights range from 20-24 feet in eight different locations along the airport flight path. The eight poles are all located within the public right-of-way. The monitoring sites assist SDIA staff in responding to noise complaints, enforcing departure curfews, and determining eligibility for its Quieter Home Program, a residential sound attenuation program in the highest noise-impacted neighborhoods surrounding SDIA. The proposed encroachments would not pose any danger to pedestrians using the public right-of-way or vehicular travel through the right-of-way. The permit will include specific conditions that would ensure the noise monitoring poles are maintained in a safe manner (visibility and public right-of-way access for pedestrians would not be obstructed) including a traffic control plan for installation and maintenance activities. Therefore, the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety, and welfare.

3. The proposed development will comply with the applicable regulations of the Land Development Code, including any allowable deviations pursuant to the Land Development Code. The proposed development is to replace eight noise monitoring poles from wooden to metal poles with two of the poles to include solar panels. The monitoring pole heights range from 20-24 feet in eight different locations along the airport flight path. The eight poles are all located within the public right-of­way .. The proposed public right-of-way encroachment is permitted with an approved Site Development Permit, as stated in Section 126.0502 ofthe San Diego Municipal Code. Therefore, the roadway land use per City circulation Element of the General Plan will not be affected or altered. The proposed encroachments would not violate any other municipal code provision or any other local, state, or federal laws. The project would allow the San Diego Airport Authority to comply with State Law - Title 21 of California Noise Standards. Therefore, the proposed development will comply with the regulations of the Land Development Code.

o. Supplemental {"mdings-Public Right-of Way Encroachments

1. The proposed encroachment is reasonably related to public travel, or benefits a public purpose, or all record owners have given the applicant written permission to maintain the encroachment on their property. The proposed development is to replace eight noise monitoring poles from wooden to metal poles with two of the poles to include solar panels. The monitoring pole heights range from 20-24 feet in eight different locations along the airport flight path. The eight poles are all located within the public right-of-way. The project benefits a public purpose by monitoring aircraft noise from San Diego International Airport (SDIA) to ensure compliance with Title 21 of the California Noise

Page 2 of4

Page 17: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 3

Standards, which mandates continuous aircraft noise monitoring of SDIA operations. The monitoring sites assist SDIA staff to ensure compliance with Title 21, respond to noise complaints, enforce departure curfews, and determine eligibility for its Quieter Home Program, a residential sound attenuation program in the highest noise-impacted neighborhoods surrounding SDIA. Therefore, the proposed encroachment benefits a public purpose.

2. The proposed encroachment does not interfere with the free and unobstructed use of the public right-of way for public travel. The proposed development is to replace eight noise monitoring poles from wooden to metal poles with two of the poles to include solar panels. The monitoring pole heights range from 20-24 feet in eight different locations along the airport flight path. The eight poles are all located within the public right-of-way. The proposed encroachments would not interfere with the free and unobstructed use of the public right-of-way for public travel because all improvements are designed and conditioned to prevent conflicts with vehicular or pedestrian traffic. The equipment boxes are designed and located so as to avoid conflict with public use of the sidewalks and roadways. Additionally, prior to the issuance of any construction permit, the applicant shall obtain a Public Right­of-Way Permit for the proposed work in the public right-of-way, satisfactory to the City Engineer.

3. The proposed encroachment will not adversely affect the aesthetic character of the community. The proposed development is to replace eight noise monitoring poles from wooden to metal poles with two of the poles to include solar panels. The monitoring pole heights range from 20-24 feet in eight different locations along the airport flight path. The eight poles are all located within the public right-of-way. The aesthetic character of the communities where the existing noise monitoring poles are located will not be affected by the replacement of the poles. The replacement poles have been designed to be compatible with existing utility poles in the neighborhoods. The proposed encroachment will not adversely affect the aesthetic character of the community because the pole colors were carefully selected to blend with the surrounding urban environment. Additionally, the locations of some of the replacement poles have been shifted from their original locations to minimize impacts to the communities where feasible.

4. The proposed encroachment does not violate any other Municipal Code provisions or other local, state, or federal law. The proposed development is to replace eight noise monitoring poles from wooden to metal poles with two of the poles to include solar panels. The monitoring pole heights range from 20-24 feet in eight different locations along the airport flight path. The eight poles are all located within the public right-of-way. The proposed development is permitted within the public right­of-way with an approved Site Development Permit. The proposed encroachments would not violate any other Municipal Code provisions or any local, state or federal laws. Approval ofthe project would allow the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority to comply with State Law - Title 21 of the California Noise Standards.

Page 3 of4

Page 18: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 3

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, based on the findings hereinbefore adopted by the Planning Commission, Site Development Permit No. 1197636 is hereby GRANTED by the Planning Commission to the referenced Permittee, in the form, exhibits, terms and conditions as set forth in Permit No. 1197636 a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof.

Angela N azareno Development Project Manager Development Services

Adopted on: October 9,2014

Internal Order No. 24004089

Page 4 of4

Page 19: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY SITE INFORMA TION

REQUIRED ZONING AND GEOLOGIC 10 APN OWNER NAME ADDRESS PER~rrs/APPROVALS OVERLAY HAZARD

DESIGNATIONS CATEGORY AO.W:[NT TO IWBIlo\ DIM:

N/A - wmtN 8l1.OOo\ (ElIISMl aT\' Of

1JQONEI); ~ 01 aT\' Of SAIl DGO SAN IltllO PN!K sm: 0EY!l.0PII0IT PaMT IJ/52 PNe< NIl! REC 1Ifl1Ot( Mrf).

IlDG/FClRWER f1RE .<LIllI 51A11OII)

RS-1-7:_

HIA - PUlJC AO.W:[NT TO I J2a 1Ifl1Ot( N1V< 02 AD.iIWIT TO SJ9-414-fJ11 sm:~PaMT _T_ 52 RICHT_Y IW£mw P_ TRNiSII

Mrf).

HIA - PUlJC .t.D.IACEHTT0 1114 IICCPlHIIH5QO; 011 AD.iIWIT TO 451- _ W R£DWOOO STREET sm:~PaMT _1Ifl1Ot( 52 RICHT-j)f-WAY Mrf).

RS-1-7:_

II AO.W:[NT TO 450-094-07 HIA - PUlJC ADJACENT TO 3413 sm: ~ PERIIIT 1Ifl1Ot( N1V< 52 RICHT-(If-WAY BROWNING STET COASTAL tD:IiT

LIlT

HIA - PUlJC AO.W:[NT TO .llII5 ciiio-GH-JOOO: II AO.W:[NT TO 539-m-G!l sm:~PERIIIT _1IIfUJEla 52 RICHT -(If- WAY B mw Mrf).

AD.iIWIT TO 451-471-07 HIA - PUlJC AD.lACEHT TO 1210 sm:~PERIIIT

I~IIR...JOOO: 52 Ii W_STEET _1IIfUJEla RICHT -(If-WAY Mrf).

RS-1-7:_

20 AD.iIWIT TO 5JO-JIJ-05 N/A - PUlJC AO.W:[NT TO IM4 sm:~ PERIIIT

IIIfUJEla N1V< 52 RICHT -(If-WAY PUIImw CIlAST~ tD:IiT LIlT

HIA - PUlJC AO.W:[NT TO 1625 RS-I- 7:_ 21 AO.W:[NT TO 448-121 - 15 sm: DEWlDPIIIIfT PERIIIT IIIfUJEla N1V< 52 RICHT-(If-WAY fROUlE SIR£EI

CIlAST~ ZOf€

'GRADING DA T A TABLE ElCPtIIII" 00IHI1T5 FeR

sm:o P!IIlPOSED fOOTIIGS (CUIIC YNIlSl

01 1.2(;(

02 1.2(;(

09 1.2(;(

" 1.2(;(

II 1.2 (;(

Ii 1.2 (;(

211 1.2(;( l 21 1.2(;( ~ 2 f*~=1 96CY :l ;;

I J ~ ~

II

~ i I ~

I ~

" ~ ~ ~

I -; c

KEY MAP NO SCAlE

SITE LOCA TlONS IIffER 10 ICE\' IW' FeR SIT!: lllC.\IDIS:

A sm: 01-art Of Wl1I8lO PNIKS NO RECAEAlIOII _ ON IWSOo\ ORM. IWBIlo\ -. WI 1I8lO. CA 92101

B sm: 02-1.12&5 IW£ SIR£EI. SAN 1ltllO. CA 92102

SIT!: 09- 11J4.5 • • REDIIOOO SIR£EI. WI 1ltllO. CA 92103 SIT!: II -J4135 _ mw. WI DGO. CA 92106

I sm: IV- i2iO.5 • IlOIH SIIIEET. WI DGO. CA noll J SIT!: 20-1944.5 PUll SIR£EI. WI 1I8lO. CA 92101 K SIT!: 21-1625 f1IlWE SIR£EI. S/ff DGQ, CA 92107

SHEET INDEX SIT!: OO(l(N)lT f'£lI:IIT.11lI£ SIW . _r PWI.Dll£ sm _ TPWI.N01[S. . ate. IUALS SIfEI' ... ate. IUALS SIfEI' .. .. _r PWIS: $1E. QI~ /II! II/IIfIO\£JIENT PWIS: $1E. 02,-QALE ST. _TPWIS: $1E. ..... .RfI!I!)(I).S1 _r PWIS: $1E. (J-If/OIIIIIC 51

_r PWIS: $1E. ~11! _ ST _r PWIS: $1E. 2IH!lM ST. II/IIfIO\£JIENT PWIS: $1E. 1/.,F1!(ME 51

(SIfEI' lIMBERS R£Sa!IfD FOR F.U/IIIE Ir.Z) S1RUCIUIIAL IUALS "JIOTES •

T-QI m.tr-/-D m.tr-2- 0 m.tr-J-O m.tr-+a m.tr-5-D m.tr-6-0 m.tr-7-0 m.tr-&-O

m.tr-/o-D

m.tr-/Z-D m.tr- /J-/I m.tr- /f-O

m.tr- /6 TO 2lJ-O m.tr-29-0

SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT CONDITIONS 1. PER INFORUI<nON BUU£TIN In. THE PERIiITTEE SlfALI. OBTAIN A PUBUC RIGHT-Of WAY PERUIT

FOR TRAFRC CONTROL 'IItiEN THERE 'MLl. BE I< TBlPORARY ENCROACHIoiENT Of I< PORlION Of THE PUBUC AllEY OR PUBUC SlDEWAU< \\HEN THE IoIONITORING POlE IS LOWERED.

2. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE Of ANY CCNSTRUClION PERloIIT. THE OYlNERft'ERIIlTTEE SHALl. INalRPORA TE ANY CONSTRUClION BEST IIANACDiENT PRAClICES NECESSARY TO COIIPl Y 'MTH CHAPTER I • • ARTICLE 2. OI I.1S1ON 1 (GRADING REGliLAlIONS) Of THE SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAl COO£. INTO THE CONSTRUC1ION PLANS OR SPECIFlCA.lIONS.

3. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY CONSTRUClION PEJUjJT THE OYlNERjl>£RUITTEE SlfALI. SUBlolIT A WI< TER PCUUTION CON TROL PLAN (I'IPCP). THE WPCP SHALl. BE PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE 'MTH THE CUloruNES IN APPENDIX E Of THE C/TY'S STORII WATER STANDAROS.

4. THE APPlICANT SHALl. 08TAlN I< PUBUC RIGHT-oF-WAY PERIIlT FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUClION WORK IN THE alY Of SAN DIEGO RIGHT-OF- WAys'

ATTACHMENT 4

DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY SCOPE OF WORK 11£ P!IIlPOSED I'IIOET 1M1\tS 11£ RII'VCaIDfT Of • ElQSlIIC wooo HD1SE

WOIITORIHC PIUS WI!H NEIl IIETII. POlES.

P!IIlPOSED 1NfII(M)oIIIIS IHQ.IU 11£ CXl<STIM:11OII Of TWO zo° tIGIi, III«D. SQ.WIE, SlID. PIUS. ONE Z4' tIGIi, III«D. SQ.WIE, SlID. POlES. NO FIVE 24' tIGIi, HOIH.aD. SQ.WIE, SlID. FCl£.

All POl£S IlJ. BE IIIMD fIIIlII IIU! QJRIIOO' UlCAlDIS TO _ 11£ _ Of 111: 11£ HD1SE WOIITORIHC ElllFIIElfT 'ft1. BE M Of

SDMCE. (11£ NEW PIUS IlL BE CXlIISlIIlJCtm -....E 11£ IlD PIUS RDWH tI SElMCE.)

SOlJil P-.s Wl1. BE JOOED TO 11£ PIUS AT SI1!5 01 ANO 16 TO ENSURE CCIIlIUD OOII'IJNICE Of ~17 HD1SE WOIITORIHC REW11£D BY 11£ STATE Of CAI.FORIIA. 11£ SOlJil PNflS IlL \WI[ 11£ HD1SE IIOIIlllRS SW"-stmCIDIT tmt NO IOOIT1OIW. POWER HOOI(tJ>S NO NO mw 1U1Hl.I«l HECtSS/I!r TO UIIl£R(;RO(H) IIIIJIES. ElIISMl rucTIIICIoI. POWER TO 11£ PIUS Ill!. BE IISCOHlIUIl NO 0ISC0NNtCltI).

11£ PIIO.IEl:IED NVo Of 11£ SOlJil PoI.'«lS IS __ my 2' -I'1i X 5" •

TIlE NEW POl£S HAVE SfE}j LOCATED ANO 11iE S01.AA PAHI3.S ORIENTED so 11iE SOlAR PAHE1.S00 NaT OVERliAHDAHY FACE OF CURB OR PROPERTY UNE. TIlE POlE AT SITE " WIll. TBIPORARll Y ENCROACII I< PORTION OF 11iE EXISTING SIDEWAlK WIlEN 11iE POlE IS t.O'>VERED. THE POlEI<T SITE 11 WILl. TElIPORAII!lY ENCROACH A PORI1ONOF11iE SIDEWAlK WIlEN TIlE POlE IS lOWERfO.

~ IICHTllIIING PIUS IIEllIIRE A sm: IIE\tl.IlPWOO' PaMT (PROCESS 4).

PROJECT TEAM OIIN£R/N'!'UCNIl' SAN IltllO !XlIHTI' AECIlIW. _ oIII1HOQI1Y

P.o. IIQl( 12776 S/ff DGO. CA 92111 CONIo\Cf, s.IJIIII!. KN!CI(

(619) 400-2SJ8 -.e.g

CI'<'L EIQEER IIlJI!(fJT t IQII; EIQIEERS 3434 4TH_ S/ff 1ltllO. CA 92103 CONIo\Cf: oIIIRlSE WONG. PE. QSI) (iii) m-555D awoogtIutoIII-

SIlIUCT\JIIl EIQEER IIlJI!(fJT t IQII; 9IIHIRS 3434 4TH_ SAN 1ltllO. CA 92103 CONIo\Cf: QWUS 01ll.WI. S£ (51i) m-555D --rucTIIICIoI. EIQEER PBS EIQIEERS 2750 IQIl£ 1lO0IO. SW£ 104 So\N DGO. CA 92UII! CONIo\Cf, NISI! PATEl. (ate) 221-l1li7 .... 22 ... pII ..... com

TYPE OF CONSTRUCllON HIA

OCCUPANCY HIA

ClASSIFlCAllON EXISTING/PROPOSED USE HD1SE 1IJIIOIaHG PIUS NO ASSOCIIoTED ElllFIIElfT wmtN 11£ PUlJC RIQIT-(If-WAY OR __ AI[ &.sOIElIIS.

LEGAL DESCRIPllONS HOT !I'PI.JCIaE FeR SI1!5 wmtN 11£ PUlJC RIQIT-(If-WAY (01. D2. 09. 11. 15, Ii. zo. & 21). 11£ l£CAl. DESCIII'1lONS FeR 11£ TIfIfE SIT!:S wmtN I'IWAI[ t.ISDo1EN1S /iI£ AS RlUDIIS:

GROSS SITE AREA. FLOOR HI A

AREA AND FLOOR AREA RAllO EXISTING AND PROPOSED sm: 01: aT\' Of so PARI( NO RECAEA110II UDtIG. IWBIlo\ PNII<

USES sm:s D2. 09. 11. 11. Ii. 211. a: 21, PUlJC ROlT-(If-WAY

YEAR CONSTRUCTED HIA

LANDSCAPE AREA SQUARE HIA

FOOTAGE

(i BURKETT~~ ENGIflEERS & SlIIVEYORS

34J.4 Fou1h Ale. s.. Diogo CA. 92103-5704' (619) 29!1-S550

A.W.

1128QJ.1.DD

104164

\!<Err TI::.:'Tl£=-______ 1

9'{fT I or 17

T-01

Page 20: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

GENERAL NOTES

1. APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS BY THE CITY ENGINEER DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK TO BE PERFORMED UNTIL A PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED.

2. UPON ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT. NO WORK WILL BE PERMITTED ON WEEKENDS OR HOliDAYS WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.

3. THE APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN OR ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BY THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO DOES NOT AUTHORIZE THE UTlLlTY COMPANY TO <1OlATE ANY FEDERAL. STATE OR CITY LAWS. ORDINANCES. REGULATlONS. OR POLICIES.

4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESlPONSlBLE FOR SURVEY MONUMENTS AND/OR VERTlCAL CONTROL BENCHMARKS 'M<ICH ARE DISTURBED OR DESTROYED BY CONSTRUCTlON. A LAND SURVEYOR MUST FlELD LOCATE. REFERENCE. AND/OR PRESERVE ALL HISTORICAL OR CONTROLLING MONU>.IENTS. IF DESTROYED. SUCH MONUMENTS SHALL BE REPLACED WITH APPROPRIATE MONUMENTS BY A LAND SURVEYOR. A CORNER RECORD OR RECORD OF SURVEY. AS APPROPRIATE. SlHALL BE FlLEO AS REQUIRED BY THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT. SECTlDN 8171 OF THE BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE OF THE STATlE OF CALIFORNIA. IF ANY VERTlCAL CONTROL IS TO BE DISTURBED OR DESTROYED. THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO FIELD SURVEY SlECTlON MUST BE NOTlFIED. IN """TlNG. AT LEAST 3 DAYS PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTlON. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COST OF REPLACING ANY VERTlCAL CONTROL BENCHMARKS DESTROYED BY THE CONSTRUCTlON.

5. IMPORTANT NOTlCL SlECTlON 4216 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE REQUIRES A DIG ALERT IDENTlFlCATlON NUMBER BE ISSUED BEFORE A "PERMIT TO EXCAVATE" WILL BE VALID. FOR YOUR DIG ALERT 1.0. NUMBER. CALL UNDERGROUND SER<1CE ALERT. TOlL FlREE '-800-422-4133. TWO DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG.

6. CONTRACTOR SlHALL BE RESlPONSlBLE FOR THE POTHOLE AND LOCATlNG OF ALL EXISTlNG UTlLlTlES THAT CROSS THE PROPOSED TRENCH LINE 'M<ILE MAINTAINING A l' MINIMU>.I VERTlCAL CLEARANCE.

7. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE OR REPAIR ALL TRAFFle SIGNAL LOOPS. CONDUIT, AND LANE STRIPING DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTlON.

8. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTlFY CITY OF SAN DIEGO FIELD DI<1SION AT (858) 627-3200 A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK.

9. THIS PROJECT WILL BE INSPECTED BY ENGINEERING AND CAPITOL PROJECTS DEPARTMENT. FlELD ENGINEERING DIVISION.

10. AS-BUILT DRAWINGS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY RE$lOENT ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE ACCEPTANCE OF THIS PROJECT.

11 . "PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT SUBJECT TO DESUETUDE OR DAMAGE: IF REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF SUCH PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IS REQUIRED. THE unuTY COMPANY SHAll OBTAIN THE REQUIRED PERMITS FOR WORK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. SATlSFACTORY TO THE PERMIT ISSUING AUTHORITY.

12. PRIOR TO ANY DISTURBANCE TO THE SITE. EXCLUDING UTlLlTY MARK-OUTS AND SURVEYlNG. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL >.lAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR A PRE -CONSTRUCTlON MEETlNG WITH THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO FIELD ENGINEERING DI<1SION (858) 627-3200.

13. MANHOLES OR PULL BOX COVERS SlHALL BE LABELED "NAME OF COMPANY".

14. CONTRACTOR SlHALL IMPLEMENT AN EROSION CONTROl PROGRAM DURING THE PROJECT CONSTRUCTION ACTl<1TlES. THE PROGRAM SHALL >.IEET THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE WATER RESOURCE CONTROL BOARD.

IS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE EMERGENCY MATlERIALS AND EQUIPMENT ON HAND FOR UNFORSEEN SITUATlONS. SUCH AS DAMAGE TO UNDERGROUND WATER. SEWER. AND STORM DRAIN FACILI Tl ES 'M<EREBY FLOWS MAY GENERATlE EROSION AND SlEDiMENT POLLUTlON.

TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTE lliE CONTRACTOR SHAlL SUBMIT A TRAff1C CONTROl PlAN (11"1<17") FOR APPROVAl. PRIOR TO STARTNG WORk. lliE PlAN SHOULD IJ[ SUBWTTEO TO THE TRAffiC CONTROl PER\lIT COU>mR. 3RD flOOR. BOOTH 22. Il€'UDPIIENT SERV1CES CENTER. 1222 nRST AVENUE. SAN O!EGO. (619) <46-5150. CONTRACTOR SHAll OBT~N A TRAffiC CONTROl P!J<I,IIT A MINIMUM OF 1WQ (2) 'NORKING DAYS PRIOR TO STARnNG 'NORK. AND A MINIMUM OF FNE (5) DAYS IF 'NORK WIll AffiCT A BUS STOP DR AN EXISTlNG TRAffiC SIGNAl. OR IF WORK WIll REOUIRE A R!Wl OR ALL.'Y CLOSURE

TRUCK HAUL NOTES

THE CONTRACTOR SHAlL SUBMIT A mucK HAUL ROUTE PlAN (1I"1<17) FOR APPflOVAL PRIOR TO STARTlNG EKPORT OR IMPORT OF MAT£RIAL. THE PlAN SHOULD IJ[ SUBMrmo TO lliE TRAff1C C()IIIROl PERMIT COUNT£R. JRD flOOR. BOOTH 22. BUILO!NG. SAITIY & CONSTRUCTlON DMSION. DEVl'LOPMENT SERVlCES CE>mR. 1222 nRST AVENUE. SAN DIEGO (619) <46-5150. CONnRACTOR SHALL OBT~N A TRAffiC CONTROl PERMIT A MINIMUM Of FNE (5) 'NORKING DAYS PRIOR TO STARnNG 'NORK.

CONSTRUCTION CHANGE TABLE WARNING

OAJ[ [FFECTED OR AlJOEO Slur NUIIBERS APPROVAl. NO.

IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:

UPGRADE NOISE MONITORING POLES J ~ \

.J \ -- -::.y. fJ' II' ....... 1 ..•. r, ......

'='--- .. of:""'- . ~ ....... \

~- -- ,'\::;:: • J

.......... \ If

--

KEY MAP NOSCAl£

DECLARA TlON OF RESPONSIBLE CHARGE I HEREBY DEClARE /HAT I AJi /HE ENGINEER OF IItWK Fal /HIS PRo.EeT, /HAT I HAlf EXERCISED RESPONSl8l£ O/ARGE OI£R /HE DESIGN OF lHE PROJECT AS Off/NED IN sccnON 670J OF /HE 8USINfSS ANO PIIOFfSSlONS COOf. AND /HAT /HE D£SIGH IS CONSISIDIl III/H OURRENT STANDARDS.

I UN/JfRSTANO /HAT /HE o/ECK OF PRo.ECT ORAIIINGS AND SPEOF1CAnONS BY /HE orr OF SAN DIEGO IS COOFlNfJ) TO A Rru£W 0I1l Y AND OOfS NOT REVG£ UE. AS ENGINEER OF IItWK. or MY RESPONSIBIUnES Fal PRo.Eer OCSIGN.

BURKfTT .t I!O'/G ENGINEERS

. .... ,~

J4J4 4/H AIUIUE. SAN DIEGO. CA 92103

" 619.299.55S0

F: 619.299.9934

C: tfW'Of'IgCI)trlefl-lrMg.COffl AJiBROSC T. II()tIG R.C.£. NO. C6B965 DIP. 12-J/-IJ DATE

OWNER/APPLICANT SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY P.O. BOX 82776 SAN DIEGO. CA 92138 CONTACT: SJOHNNA KNACK ( 619) 400-2639 sknockCson.org

REFERENCE DRA WINGS NONE

SITE LOCA TIONS REFER TO KEY MAP FOR SITE lOCATlONS:

A SITE 01 - OlD nR£ ALARM BUllDUNG ON BALBOA DRM. BALBOA PARK. SAN O!EGO. CA 92101

SITE 02-1328.5 IlALE STREET. SAN DIEGO. CA 92102 SITE 06- HUE OlY AVENUE AT UID'NAY AVENUE, UCRD. SAN D<EGO. CA 92101

(NOT INClUDED FOR CITY Of SAN IJIEGO RE<1E'N BUT TO IJ[

INCLUOED IN CONTRACTOR'S BlD) SITE 09- 1134.5 W. REDNOOD STREET. SAN DIEGO. CA 92103 SITE 11- 3413.5 BROWNING SnREET. SAN DIEGO. CA 92106 SITE 13- 4669.5 LARKSPUR SnREET. (AU£Y) SAN DIEGO. CA 92107

(APN <48-551 - 04-00. PRIVATE EASEMENT) SITE 16-3385.5 '8' STREET. SAN OlEGO. CA 92102 SITE 17- 2651.5 'A' STREET. (AillY) SAN O!ECO. CA 92102

(APN 534-162-11-00. PRIVATE EASEMENT) SITE 19- 129O.S W THORN S1RE[l. SAN DIEGO. CA 92013 SITE 20- 19'4.5 PLUM STREET. SAN DIEGO. CA 92106 SITE 21-1625 FROUD[ SnREET. SAN DiEGO. CA 92107 SITE 22- 5029.5 LOTUS STREET. (AillY) SAN DIEGO. CA 921 07

(APH <48-m-{)7 -00. PRIVATE EASEMENT)

SHEET INDEX nTl£ SHEEr NOlfS

=-'-0 XXXXX-Z-O

ow. OCTAII.S ow. OCTAII.S

. .lOIXXX-J-O

WPROl£lIENr PUJISo .Sl.TE DI-BA!80A 011 /JIPROI£lIENT PlANs. SI.TE 02~DAl£ ST WPROI£lIENT PUJISo .SlTE D9-;v. REQ1'I()(() ST /JIPROl£lIENr PlANs. .SlTE /1-BR01!N1NG ST

XXXXX-4-0 .lOIXXX-~O

XXXXX-6-D = - 7-0 XX.lOlX-&-O

/JIPROI£lIENT PlANs. SITE lJ- UVlK.SPUR .ST (ALlEY. PVT £S1Jr) =-9-0 /JIPROI£llENT PWlS SIT( 16-8 ST /JIPROl£lIENr PLINS: SI.T( 17-A Sf IJIPROI£llENT P!.AN5. SI.TE .geW T/jalN Sf IlIPROl£lIENr PWlS SI.T( 2O.-PLUII ST =-'J-O IJiPROlfJJfNr PWI5. SIT( 2'cFROIjD£ ST . . WXX-'4-0 IJIPROIlEN£NT P!.AN5. SI.TE 22~lOlllS ST (All£Y. Pvr ES1JT) El.£CTI?/C.>L GENERAl NQTES. lEGEND .t A88R£II~nONS El.£eTI?/C.>L SlJ[ f'(,4N. I1JIS7/ . El.£CT1IICAl SITE f'(,4N R.US-2 El.£eTRICAl SlJ[ f'(,4N RJlS- 9 El.£CTRICAl SlJ[ f'(,4N. I1JIS711 El.£CTRICAl SITE PLAN I1JIS-/J El.£CTRlCAl SITE f'(,4N RlIS-'6 ELECTRICAl SlJ[ f'(,4N. RlIS7/7 El.£CT1IICAl SITE f'(,4N RlIS-'9 El.£CTRlCAl SlJ[ f'(,4N RlIS-20 El.£C1TIICAl SlJ[ f'(,4N RlIS72} El.£C1TI.CAl SITE PIAN RlIS-22 El.£CTRlCAl DETAiLS STRUCllJRAl ocrAILS .t NOTES

XXXXX-I5-0 .lOIXXJH6-0 .lOIXXX-'7-0 XXXXX-18-0

=-'9-0 .lOIXXX-2D-0 =-2'-0 =-22-0 XXXXX-ZJ-O =-2<-0 xxxxx-ZS-O =X-26-0 XX.lOlX-Z7-0 XXXXX-Z8-D .lOIXXX-Z9-0

STREET DATA TABLE (CONTINUEDI

ClASS/FICA nON SPEED AOT S1TIEET NAJ,/[ (MPH) ( 'IfJ11D.ES)

PlUI.4 STREET 1---

FROUDE STREET

STREET DATA TABLE

S1T/EEr NAME '/2 CITY OF SAN DIEGO ! ! ClASSlFlCAnoN SPITO

(JIPH) ADT

(I£IfCl£S) R/W (FT)

~~~ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT lliEN 0RAWlNG 15 NOT TO SCALE

OALE ST WEST REDWOOD STRE£! BROWNING STREET 34TH sTREET ., B STREET WEST THORN STREET

RjW (FT)

ATTACHMENT 4

WORK TO BE DONE IHf IMPROIflJEN15 COOSiSI OF /HE FOUOIIING IItWK TO 8£ DOllE ACCORDING TO IHfSE PL4NS AND 1/1[ SPEOFICA nONS AND STANDARD ORA"'NGS OF /HE OTY OF SAN DIEGO.

REJlO\£ EX1SnNG NOISE UOIIJTalING POI.£S & REPlACf "'/H sJ[a PDI.£S 1111/1 SIXAR PANaS.

STANDARD SPffiDCAnoos: ~ PiTS070112-01

PfTS070112-02

PfTS070112-04

PIlS070112-D6

STAHDARD DRA",NGS;

~ P1TS070112-OJ

PITSD70112-05

LEGEND

~ STANDARD SPEOnCATIONS FOR PUBlIC WORKS CONSTRUCTlON (GREENBOOK). 2012 EDlnCH

CITY OF SAN O!EGO STANDARD SPEC1ncATlONS FOR PUBUC WORKS CONSTRUCTION (WHITEBOO1<). 20 I 2 EDIT10N

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION MANUIAL OF UNIFORLI TRAffiC CONTROl DE<1CES. 2012 EDITlON

CAUFORNIA OEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAnCH U.S CUSTOMARY STANDARD SPEC1nCAnOHS. 2010 EOITlON

~ CITY OF SAN DIEGO STANDARD DRAWINGS FOR PUBUC 'NORKS CONSTRUCTlON. 2012 EO!TION

CALlFORMA DEPARTUENT OF TRANSPORTAnOH U.S OUSTOMARY STANDARD PlANS. 2010 EornoN

EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS

~ RIGHT -OF-WAY PROPERlY UNE CENTERlINE SE'NER MANHOlE SE'NER CLEANOUT WAT£R MmR WA!tR VALVE 20' HIGH WOOO POlE TREE/1REE STUWP STREET SIGN BOLlARD CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCRETE OURB CURB & GUTTER DRIVEWAY FENCE/GATE ruCTR1C PUll BOX

STANDARD oJtGS.

CMRHEAO ruCTR1C, TELEPHONE & COWMUNlCAnON

UNDERGROUND El.£CTR1C (MARK-ouT) UNOERGIlOUND CQUMUNlCAnOH (MARK-OUT) REMOTE MONITORING STATlON POWER POlES JOINT POlE

PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS

mIm ...B~_'L

_PA_ -E~_

® sroo ~

,,"0

~ SrANDARD OI!GS. mIm srm. POlE A/ 3 (20' HINGED). B/3 (24' HINGED). A/4 (24') SWING OF TOP OF POlE SW1I'G OF BOTTOM OF POlE - - ...; PROTEcnOH POSTS WloHl4

SOlA~ PANEL 59.4'W X 53.375"1< x 2i EOUIPWENT ENClOSURE 24.7'W X JO.2"1< x 14.S"IJ

CONCRETE FOOTING

PER ruc D'NGS

PER El.£C OII'GS

PER STRUCTURAL D'NGS

ENGlNE£R1NG PERlilT NO: _____ _

COOS1TIuenON SITE srORAl WA!Dl PRJORITY' __ "W",w,--_

PflfVA rr: CONTRACT

TITLE SHEET FOR:

Ii 0 0-Ct. ~ oJ 4 Z 0 i= 4 z Ct. W ... ?;

0 t3 0 Z 4 (f)

UPGRADE NOISE MONITORING POLES

,. .. ii 0 J: ... ~ ~ 0 0. 1% :( .J < z 0

~ 1% ,. .. z :> 8 0

~ is z ~

CITY OF SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA OfI£lOl'llENr SERWCfS O£PARrl/ENr

SIiEET I OF )(}(SllEErs

1.0. NO. ____ _

fM drY tNGlHffR

OCSCRIPTION BY 0/IIQNAl. 81lC

AS-_15 CONT1lACrtJ? IHSP£C1I)l _

PRa.ECT NO. ___ _

DA1f DAT[ flUIEO

DATE STARTfD VA J[ WIPl£1fD __ xxxxx- 1-D

Page 21: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

TRENCH DETAIL NOTES

I. TRENCH MUST BE COVERED FOR A MINIMUM OF SE'IEN DAYS WI11l A SKJD RESlSTANf STEEL PLATE. TO THE SATISFACTIDN OF THE CllY OF SAN DIEGO INSPECTOR.

2. PRIOR TO REMOVAL OF THE STEEL PLATE, THE CONCRETIE SLURRY MUST REACH A MINIMUM STRENGTH THAT IS SATISFACTORY TO THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO INSPECTOR.

3. CONTRACTOR SHAlL PROVlDE AS-BUILT INFORMATION TO AN ACCURACY OF A TIEN1H OF AN INCH FROM THE NEAREST CURB. THE VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL LOCATION OF THE FAClUT1ES. MEASUREMENTS SHAlL BE TAKEN EVERY 100 FEET AS WELL AT POINTS WliERE THE FACIUlY OR THE CURB UNE DEPARTS FROM B£lNG PARALLEL TO THE ROJoJJWAY CENnERUNE.

4. TRENCH EXCAVATIONS GREATIER THAN AVE (5') IN DEPTH SHALL BE ADEDUATELY SHORED PER OSHA CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY STANDARDS.

5. CONTRACTOR SHAlL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 10 FOOT HORIZONTAL EDGE TO EDGE SEPARATION BETWEEN ALL PROPOSED ABER OPTIC CONDUITS AND ALL EXISTING PUBUC SEWER MAINS ANO SEWER LATERALS. AND A MINIMUM 5 FOOT HORIZONTAL EDGE TO EDGE SEPARATIDN BETWEEN ALL PROPOSED A8ER OPTIC CONDUITS AND ALL EXISTING PUBUC WAnER MAINS AND WATIER SERVlCES.

6. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 12· SAND CUSHION ABOVE OR BELOW ALL WATER AND WASlEWAnER MAINS AND SERVlCE LATIERALS AT ALL CRDSSINGS.

EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES

TIEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL. PRIOR TO COMPlETION OF ANAL IMPROVEMENTS. SHAlL BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR OR QUAUAED PERSON AS INil1CA11EO BROW:

1. ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF SAN mEGO "lAND DEVELOPMENT MANUAL. STORM WAnER STANDARDS· MUST BE INCORPORATED INTO THE OESlGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PUBUC IMPROVEMENTS CONSISTENT WITH THE EROSION CONTROL PlAN AND/OR WAnER PDLLUTION CONTROL PlAN (WPCP). IF APPUCABl£

2. FOR STORM DRAIN INlETS. PROVlDE A GRAVEL BAG SILT BASIN IMMroATELY UPSTREAM OF INlET AS INDlCA11EO ON DETAILS.

3. THE CONTRACTOR OR QUAUAED PERSON SHAlL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANUP OF SilT AND MUD ON ADJACENT STREET(S) AND STORM OIRAIN SYSTEM DUE TO CONSTRUCTiON AC11Vl1Y.

4. THE CONTRACTOR SHAlL REMOVE SlLT AND DEBRIS AlFTIER EACH MAJOR RAINFALL

5. EQUIPMENT AND WDR1<ERS FOR EMERGENCY WORK SHALL BE J.lAOE AVAIlABLE AT ALL TIMES DURING THE RAINY SEASON.

6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL EROSlON/SEDJMENT CONTROL DEVICES TO WORKING ORDER TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER OR RESIDENT ENGINEER AlFTIER EACH RUN-OFF PRODUCING RAINFALL

7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AOOmONAL EROSION/SErnMENT CONTROL MEASURES AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE RESIDENT ENGINEER DUE TO UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES. WHICH MAY ARISE.

B. ALL EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES PROVlOEO PER THE APPROVEO IMPROVEMENT PlAN SHALL BE INCORPORA11EO HEREON. ALL EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL FOR INTERIM CONOmONS SHALL BE DONE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE RESIDENT ENGINEER.

9. ALL REMOVABLE PROTIECTlVE DEVlCES SHOWN SHAlL BE IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY WHEN RAIN IS IMMINENT.

10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE FOR WEEKLY MEETINGS OURING OCTOBER 1ST TO APRIL 30TH FOR PROJECT TIEAM (GENERAL CONTRACTOR. QUAUREO PERSON. EROSION CONTROL SUBCONTRACTOR IF ANY. ENGINEER OF WORK. OWNER/OEVELOPER ANO THE RESIDENT ENGINEER) TO EVALUATIE THE ADEQUACY OF THE EROSlON/SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES AND OTHER RELATIED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVlTIES.

(i) BURKETT~~ ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS

~~~~~o/';~~6r~t2~~~A.

ATTACHMENT 4

PRlVAl[ ComllACT

NOTES FOR:

UPGRADE NOISE MONrrORING POLES

CITY OF SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA DEVELOPMENT SfRWCES OEPARIIIENT

SHEer 2 OF XXS/iEEfS

FOR aN ENGINEER DESCRIpnON BY APPRQVfJl DAl[ FlL!I£I)

1.0. NO. __ ~~~_

PRo.£CT NO.~~~_

~OR_'_GlN_AL ___ BIIt: r-.--.-.---.---t--+---Ir-------~__I -_._- _._----_._ .. -_ .. _------- -

NAD8J COORIIiNA 1ES - -+ 1-------1 A$-BUILrs

.. --1----------- .~- --- -

Page 22: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

I I r± -'v- - - ~c~c:7

OVERHEAD lliCTRIC llU[

PER lliC OWGS AT SITES 02,

2' - 6· 09, 11,20 & 2'

9' I 2' ~6' SOlAA PAN~~

i

t

\1'

UOUNT (25Ibs) PER Elfe O'NGS

AI SITES 01, 06. 16 & 17

I L

--

NSf AU SAlVAGED I.IICROPHONE & MISCEllANEOUS 'HEATHER EOOIPUENT (ASSUME 20Tbs 1.TAlT) DurO NEW POLE

·_ V INCE l ~~STALl MOOW }.Nl[NNA [p' PER £lEC OWGS

24 .7~ ENCLOSURE (1 57Ibs± WITH BATTERY, ASSU" E AN ADDITIONAL 13lbs OF EQUIP"ENT) PER lliCDWGS

~ORCEO CONCR£Tl rOOTINC PER SfRUClUIW DR."'IWIo'GS

.---..... +---1 ~ "" =

I

I

i t{=

(A\ 20' MSNH2050ABHSP

HIGH HINGED STEEL POLE & ATTACHMENT LOCATIONS NO SCAl£

, ..... ~"'to. __ ~,~..:ono.,.. ,,,,,(,,,,,,,,c~(IIt"(,,,~·')_a ..... ...... ~·O'-~·-)_'-1'~~

'~;A6J'~.~':r.<I \_fII'''~MSf""".~''o«flU::~''''':J'I

.')...."...

MSNH2050ABHSP

- .... ?tP .

I f"-F.o 1"0.1: ftJ" eM "'NlI SID[ IO.Nf

DRlll. [It I'Q...{ ' lP rnu<

or

I &: tr.4JSCELLANEOUS WEATHER EQUIPMENT (ASSUME 201bs MAX)

J,! ~STN..l SALVAG£D IoIICROPHONE r-f-L;

V--D«MI

- - - -~T ONTO NEW POLE RECONUEC!J

OVERHEAD ElECTRIC LINE

PEH HIC OWGS

,,.

-j------- f--- / 'NGE

13'

4---"v-

-

c=

~ ./~STAll MOO[LI ANTENNA It=J PER mc OWGS

24. i "w ENCLOSURE

6' 5W'I'£ / (IS llb" WITH 1-' Pa.£ ~TT':-m~~!.AE

l31bs Of

f..-- 14.s' - [QUIP"ENT) PER I me DWGS

D., TYP or 4 1.25- 7 .S~ &: \3.3-

.. ' r

~

1- ~ n ' ~ .......

J ......

.... _ ........ u.t

/ l Tl.is' j SOIJARE

ANCHOR BOlTS PE~CI=IL....----,1 ~~ STRUCIURA.L DWGS, VAR;ES 8£T1Nt:EN ,I

---,--' BASE \ I f PlANTER OR .¢t==~ . PAVEMENT PER PL""

'-- i q:::: 3" ~ , I BASE

!

I i i

f ! ;

I i 1

~fORCm CONCREIT . room-tG PfR STRUCiURA!.

I ORAWlNGS

v----1

-''''''' "'F' ~ ""

rt j I

"""-,

MSNH2460ABHSP 24' HIGH HINGED STEEL POLE & ATTACHMENT LOCAnONS

(j BURKETT~~ ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS

NO SCAl£ 34~rriOU:of~{6~9) ~£A.

ATTACHMENT 4

~ > I-

0 i!i 0

0- x ct. ~ :« .J Ii <{ 0

0. Z tt. 0 4 i= -' « <{ z Z 0 ct. ~ L1I tt. ~ > £; I-

Z

0 ;) 0

lil u 0

2:; lil z is <{ z « CI') ..

• PRIVATE CCWTRAcr

CIVIL DETAILS SHEET FOR:

UPGRADE NOISE MONrrORlNG POLES

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CAI1FORNIA /J£I£LCHlEHI 5Vl\fC£S IlU'AR1IV/1

Sl£fT 3 rT XICSHECTS

Fal OTY £NGINf.ER DfST1/1PJIOH BY

CCWITIACn:'R IHSI'fCn:'R

DATE DATE FI.JIED

!lATE SIAl/lED !lATECOIA£1Bl

1.0. NO.

PRO.Ecr NO.

LlJEifRI COORO' WES

xxxxx- 3-D

Page 23: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

.,--- - - t-:--i or "" co 11

;

I .,' ....

+- ...l- - REcoNI/Eel' (NERH(}.O

ELECTRIC UNE p(R [LEe OWGS

NSTA,!.! ... SAlvAGED I,IlCiIDPHON£ EOU,PM[tff (ASSUME 1mbs WJ<) OtHO NEW POLE

! I , , , i

'\ I!

I ,I , i I

'i , I

I' I l."l~·:r'.. toll ~, ... 11

I ; ~ 1 J

lA,r-

r+-

L /"NSTALl )J.OOHt ANTENNA ~ PER ELEe owes

- r6'"~

Cf== ~

:14TW ENCLOSURf (i57'bs' . WITH a,nEIlY, >SSWE . .\N ~--1 .!..5·~ AOOmoNAll3lbs Of ! I EOUIPMENT) PER ELEC owes

30.2' TOP OF 80X

SHAll BE NO HIGHER THAN 44 5~

q==I~ 1 ANCHOR BOLTS PE, +

STRUCTURAl owes, rfP CF 4

I / l

I I I , I

i

l_

11.25· SOUARE

BASE

VARIES BETWEEN 1.25~ 75-

1& 13.3"

BASE

.r-, I~ 3'

i I

I

i

~[lNFORCEO CONCRETE

~\ PL-\NT£R OR / PAVEI.AEUT PER PI.,AN

r FOOTING PER STRUCTURAL I DRAWlNCS

_ J MSN2460ABHSP

24' HIGH STEEL POLE & ATTACHMENT LOCATIONS

..... _. .., .. . ....... ,.

..."..._ ... _..-,goa

, ..... _"'O_GI<_lO~ .... 11'Q • ....-.~lIO.CIIl_~.o..QS 14L\.~~~~_OOI...,..::urt

'_"'OIII"'_"'~_~'" '0_. I ...... 'IWCI.uD a&aCII~ I ... ~.-.ttO ~_ C "0$_ a ~~l'$J 0 CII,' g :4(A" a :.-:. g .~:: ~l~ g ::

cn~ 1 Wll lOUA. tp(CAtA-..t

MSN2460ASHSP

.. BURt<ETT~~ ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS

34:'~:04A~(i;f~ =A.

ATTACHMENT 4

~ > I-

0 a 0

£\. x ct ~ ::c( ...J Ii 4: 0

"-Z 0<

0 • j:: -' « 4: z Z 0 ct S UJ 0< I- > ~ I-

Z

0 :> 0

~ U UJ 0 0 lil z is

4: z « Co1 .,

• PRlVA T( CCJiTRACT

CIVIL DETAILS SHEET FOR:

UPGRADE NOISE MONITORING POLES

CITY OF SAN DIEGO. CAUFORNIA Df\flC1'llEllT SlRIfCCS OfPARTll£HT

SHff7 4 IT XXSHf.f1S

FOR orr _"fER DfSCR1P1K»I BY

A5-BVI.1S

OA1£ OA1£ F1LAIEO

OAT( STARrro OA1£ COfIA.ETfD

I.a NO.

PRo.£CT NO.

NIJ)8J CO(R)IHA rrs

L<JJIlERT COORD/HA1FS

XXXXX-4-D

Page 24: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

oPl

w > 0: o <C o III -l <C III

t~f;i ~g~:~S_16. DP OF 4

PROTECT EX 7'HIGH --------

WROUGHT IRON FENCE\ I >-6'~9'--'l I

SEE CONSTRucno) NOn: 4~--- I SEE CONSriUCTION NOTE 21' ~PROTECT E', r = 'r== I CONC Mlr '"

'cNEW WHEEL STOPS. SEE CONSTRU:nON NOTE , l'rP OF 2 I ~

II \ \.SEE CONSTRUCnON ~'OTE 5

\ I LDISCONNECT [';( UNDERGROUNO

SEE ENLARGEMENT BELOW - - ~~s\i1~~N~R:r/-.EC

RMS# 01 - PROPOSED CONDI71ONS

MOUNT EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE TO POLE\

PER ELEe DWGS &

CONDUIT IN PLACE. PATCH TO MATCH EX CONe PVMf

OETNL A/3 \ ,.!-NEW POLE, sE'IT3'

f- 0 8~ -=-2sNf~_ - --r n~MOUNT SOLAR PNNEL

T .1~ - -r -.! ~~~O~ ;~,CL;J3 ° 0.63 T" ° r- 0

3.0'

=1==1 I I

r '" J 1 __ ~ SOLAR PANEL + EQUIPMENT

ENCLOSURE ORIENTATION

ATTACHMENT 4

RMS+ 01 132.9'

\TREE

\TREE \TREE \TREE l

15' WROUGHT IRON Ft:NCE I W :i j---, __ ! -, ~I' , , · , , -l~~~--BU3H > II J -~I! I I I ~'"'' r "i I i I \~(:J" ~

I ~ ~ II' J xi ~'i .' ~ >1 I ; I kl_ ~\ TREES

l ui ~ 0 I'II)~ I ~ ! I I' I I I <C Illii.1 20" TRT i N ·• .. ,1 ,I I I Ie r , "I ~ ~ KEtyL PA~G:n:i ~~~~R750;'E~ -I 9 SO· ~l ~l .:;:,:~~,:50' I 833' 85~0'; 7//[ a \\~~ct 01

I <C '-.....,?o~ "Do I_Jj~ ~ ~~ ~\~ _ _. ~OCATION III I - '---' 1 n - ~ ~PVM' JO'NT -- \ I ONLY [';( WHIT[ NND BLUE UNutRGROUND /, '

I PARKING STRIPING ARE SHOWN E! rCTRIC i ~IR!:'NCHV J' ( \ I I ~ 'J,,' DPII/!:'VVAvi ON THIS PLA~. YELLOW d:. \ Li . J , ~" -I - --l-..1 - ~I.:.. '~~-~ IS NOT SHOWN /,,// .I'i '0".

I - - CONCRETE.~ _

I I \ i

II ii Ii \ \ - (~) AoCU.,{/ ,I

mil 5f--. 'i!1 '- ~~~~ N G ~ [:/::: q 0 I

II 15' 31 So b< LANDSCAPED V / ~ ~

• .. • il ~ g i,i.l\ ARE/>. C5 j/ /' EXIST. SAN DIEGO

II Cl.. (j) V /' PARK & REC. BLDG '

(OLD ,LIRE ALARM STfo.TiON) P.L 1144

MM 36 PUEBLO LANDS

RMS# 01 - EXISTING CONDmONS

CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. SALVAGE All EXISTING NOISE MONITORING EQUIPMENT FROM EX1S1lNG POLE. SALVAGE [,;(ISIING BATIERIES AND RETURN TO THE

OWNER. DISPOSE Of EXISTING NOISE MONITORING EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE AND BATTERY ENCLOSURE. REMOVE EXlsnNG POLE lo FOOTING TO l' BELOW GIlADE. PATCH HOLE WITH NEW 520-C-2500 CONCRETE TO BE FlUSH WJ1H AND TO MATCII [';(ISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT.

2. CONSTRUCT NEW POLE PER DETAIL A/3. REATTACII ALL SALVAGED NOISE MONITORING EQUIPMENT ONTO NEW POLE PER QETNLS.

J. CONSTRUCT THE NEW HINGED POLE WITH THE SWNG IN THE TRUE EAST-WEST ORIENTATION. CONSTRUCT SOLAR PANELS SQUARE TO THE POLE, FACING TRUE SOUTH.

4. CONSlRUCT CONCRETE POLE FOOTING PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS.

5. REMOVE EXISTING BOllARDS. PATCH HOLES WITH NEW 520-C-2SOO CONCRETE TO BE FlUSH WITH AND TO MATCH [';(ISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT.

GENERAL NOTES 1. THE LOCAnONS OF UNDERGROUND unUTIES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON RESEARCH OF RECORD UTlUTY DRAWINGS NND

vlSUAI. OBSERVATION OF AT -GIlADE STRUCTURES NND SURFACE EVIDENT INDICATIONS OF SUCH unUTIES. NO UTlUTY MARK-OllIS WERE PERFORMED OR EXCAVATIONS MADE TO LOCATE BURIED UTlUllES/STRUCTURES DURING THE PROCESS OF CREAnNG THE UNDERLYING TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY. THE LOCAnONS or UNDERGRQUND UTILInES/STRUCTURES MAY VAR'I FROM THE LOCATIONS SHOWN NND AODmONAL BURIED UTlUllES/STRUCTURES MAY BE ENCOIlNTERED.

2. THE CONIRACTOR SHALL ~ELD VERIFY THE LOCAnONS OF All EXISllNG UTIUnES. SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS, PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRucnON. THE CONiRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL [';(ISTING UTILITIES/STRUCTURES TO REMAIN. WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS.

3. MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF TIME THE NOISE MONITORING EQUIPMENT IS OUT OF SERVICE ~URING CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW POlE. CONSTRUCT THE NEW POlE, FOOTING NNO SOLAR PNNELS PRIOR TO SALVAGING [';(ISTING EQUIPMENT AND REMO;,NG THE EXISTING POLE I< FOOTING.

4. THERE ARE NO EXISnNG OR PROPOSED BUS STOPS AlJJACENT TO THIS SCOPE OF WORK.

JUNIPER ST.

VICINITY MAP NO SCAI£

P",VA TE CDN1fIACT

IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR: 5. A MINIMUM OF THREE WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING FOR THE BALBOA PARK NOISE MONITORING STATION. THE CONTRACTOR SNAll CONTACT DISTRICT MANAGER BRUCE MARTINEZ AT 619.235.1124 TO ENSURE THAT THE APPROPIMTE PARK I< RECREATION STAFF ARE IfMTED TO TNE MEETING.

UPGRADE NOISE MONITORING POLES

(ill £IURKETT~ ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS

34:'6~~~~(6~~n~~£A

SITE 01: OLD ARE ALARM BUILDING ON BALBOA DRIVE. BAlBOA PARK. SAN DIEGO. CA 92101

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CAUFORNIA D£IaOPUENT SERWC£S D£PJoRTlfENT

SHEET 5 Of XXSHE£TS

FOR CITY ENGINEER DESCRlP_ BY

AS-BUllS CCW1flACTOR INSI'£CTIJR

APPROVfO

DATE STARTED DATE COlIPLE1fV

1.0. NO. PROJECT NO ..

xxxx-xxxx f{1./[8HX11JIlliiNATES

xxx-xxxx !AUBERT' COiJROINATts·

XXXXX-5-D

Page 25: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

RMS+ 02 _C __________ ~H_S~ __ '_~ t

DISCONNECT E): OVERHEAD_ I t .~ I ElEC UNE PER me DWGS L----.... ~ i i

T SEE ENLARGEMENT ~ I ~ ~ ~ - - - "BELowl «( I "'t:<

Pi! 13: 1 Q ~~o - - - -- - - --'''-. - -- - - -- - -II! J-----

1

PROTECT EX CURB ~z

SEE CONSTRUCTION NOTE S ------- I

SEE CONsrnUcnON II \ ~ 1 NOTE52St31 I,"

SEE CONsrnUCTION~1 1 ..,..-YROTECT EX AC P'IMT

NOTE'&3~ ~ PROTECT EX: .. ! I L'NDSCAPE I F ~"'T--r-;---------+------'-

DETACH EX OVERHfAIl - -'- LD TELE UNE fROM POLE II I' x 10

P /L PER flEe owes ~ 0 - - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -.: __ ~_ .J ~~ PROTECT EX 6.8' F . :l':: WIDE SlDEWJ>LK • --f

T I

~ "A" ST. I -----------------------------------~

I MOUNT EQUIPMENT

I /ENCLOSURE TO POLE PER £LEe DWGS &

NfN POLE~_ DET.AJL 8/3

~ C J w

I ~-~

I ~ ..L I I

__ 'O, __ JMOVEL ! , 2' ~

LJ __________________________ ~

EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE ORIENTA TlON

RMSI 02 - PROPOSED CONDmONS

Jl ~

CONSTRUC17ON NOTES I. SALVAGE AlL EXISTING NOiSE MONITORING EQUIPMENT FROM EXISTING POLE. SALVAGE EXISTING BATTERIES AND RETURN TO THE

OWNER. DISPOSE OF EXISTING NOISE MONITORING EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE AND BATTERY ENCLOSURE. REMOVE EXISTING POLE & FOOTING TO l' BELOW GRADE. RLL HOLE & REPlANT TO MATCH EXISTING LANDSCAPING.

2. CONSTRUCT NEW POLE PER DETAIL A/3. REATTACH AlL SAlVAGED NOISE MONITORING EQUIPMENT mHO NEW POLE PER DETAILS. RECONNECT OVERHEAD ElECTRIC UNE PER ElECTRICAL DRAWINGS. REPLANT Mf( LANDSCAPING DAMAGEQ OURING CONSTRUCTION TO MATCH EXISTING.

3. SAlVAGE AlL EXISTING WEATHER MONITORING EQUIPMENT ON EXISTING POLE AND REATTACH ONTO NEW POLE.

4. CONSTRUCT THE NEW HINGED POLE WITH THE SWNG IN THE TRUE NORTH - SOUTH ORIENTATION.

5. CONSTRUCT CONCRETE POLE FOOTING PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS.

GENERAL NOTES I. THE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASEO ON RESEARCH OF RECORD UTIUlY DRAWlNGS AND VISUAl

OOSERVATION OF AT-GRADE STRUCTURES AND SURFACE EVIDENT INDICATIONS OF SUCH UTILmES. NO UTIUTY MARK-OUTS WERE PERFORMED OR EXCAVATIONS MADE TO LOCATE BURlEO UTIUTIES/STRUCTURES DURING THE PROCESS OF CREATING THE UNDERLYlNG TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY. THE LOCATIONS OF UNOERGROUND UTILmES/STRUCTURES MAY VAIRY FROM THE LOCATIONS SHOWN AND AODmONAl BURIED UTILITES/STRUCTURES MAY BE ENCOUNTERED.

2. THE CONTRACTOR SHAlL REll VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF AlL EXISTING UTIUTIES, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWlNGS, PRIOR TO THE STAIRT OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHAlL PROTECT AlL EXISTING UTILITIES/STRUCTURES TO REM.AJN. WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS.

3. MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF TIME THE NOISE MQNllORING EQUIPMHrr IS OUT OF SERVICE DURING CONSTRUcnON OF THE NEW POLE. CONSTRUCT THE NEW POLE AND FOOTING PRKlR TO SAlVAGING EXISTING EQUIPMENT AND REMOVING THE EXISTING POLE AND FOOTING.

4. THERE ARE NO EXISTING OR PROPOSED BUS STOPS ADJACENT TO THIS SCOPE OF WORK.

ATTACHMENT 4

PLANTER

EXiSTiNG O.H. TELEPHONE

LOT 9

SOUTH PARK ADDITION MAP 623 BLOCK 30

LOT 8 ," ..

PLANTER ~

-OH/ETC' . I', 3 kri O.H. iRc~

- - - __ - - __ P/!o.. - __ - - __ - - ---j' .i-,~~ -IV[S ___________ , •• -~ OIi/trc

~., 4 4 ~ ..

I RMS# 02 .,..J". i POLE

LOT 7 < . <1 I, LOCATiON

___ ~ _______________ "A" ST. ____ PLANTE~ ~

RMSI 02 - EXISTING CONDfTIONS

RMS 02 SITE LOCATIO

GOLDEN HILL

~ w w ~ Ul ASH

~ "

VICINITY MAP NO SCALE

PR/VA n; CON1RACT

IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:

Ix 0 0-t:I. « .J « Z 0 i= « Z t:I. IJJ I-~ 0

!3 0 z « 0

UPGRADE NOISE MONITORING POLES

"BJRKETT~ ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS

34~6~~Y(6~~ ~~A.

SITE 02: 1328.5 DAlE STREET, SAN DIEGO, CA 92102

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA O£lfLOPM£IIT SER~CES OEPARTI.I£IIT

SHEET IS Of XXSHEETS

FOR CITY ENGINEER DESCRJPUON BY APPROVED

ORIGINAL BIlE

AS-BfJIl.TS

I.a NO.

PROJECT NO.

> .... ti 0 :I: .... iii Ii 0 Q.

!l! « .J « z 0

~ IX

> .... z :> 8 0 li! 2i z ~

COI/1RACTOR INSP[CTOR

DAn; STARlfO DAlf COIIPtElfO XXXXX-6-D

Page 26: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 4

RMS* 09

tv!IDDLETOWN

~ ~ ~ ~

I /SEE CONSTRUCTION I I ~~4 1

__ lR..il...!'L- ~.::--=-=-_~.:-J _ _ _ PROTECT EX WALL , - r ,

x T h ~lsEE CONSTRUCTION

~ ~ ~ PROTECT EX I ~. I NOlE 2 /iROTECT EX tcl 3: e5 WATER METER't J=. -- _ OVERHEAD b~Q r P:;=6'~-;-'_ I me UNE

I BLOCi< i 23 I .3 ~ 4 I~ ~ 5 I r-- _lR..il...!'L- _ _ ___ i ~ j 1 jl

STEPS II WALL il t ----: T " . . .

~ ,

, .iWJ Wlvj,

I I

j <.>

I"": ".

NOTE P10-;;T ;- - - BELOW '\.PROT[CT g; -'i:.s: CONSTRucnON~11' ~ EN~R;:ENTI\ . I~

10 Z ::>

I \ CURB I I.f'> 0 RMS# 09 / '\ \' 1'0. Z-! CONC PVMT EX CURB

NEAREST FIRE HYDRANT IS iSO'± ' I POLE ~ ~ !...OCAT,O\J \ 111.0' 'I I; ::>

NEAREST FIRE HYDR/INT ,5 1SO'± \. I Ii 1 ---1y---- sourHWEST ON THE SOUTH SIDE -----i I

OF WEST REDWOOD STREET --"v - SOUTHWEST ON THE SOUTH SIDE - ,

OF WEST REDWOOD STREET \ J WEST REDWOOD ST. ~.

-------~-------------- , -c-~T R~D;,:'~ ST. - -\- - ,-tJ ~ ~ I .

DISCONNECT EX", OVERHEAD me & TElE ,

LINES PER me OWGS ~ \11/ \ll~ qp

OH/EfC------OHjETC --J-O-IN-I-T-P-iOLE

I

-- - -R~ - - --- - - --- - - --- - - --- - - --- - - - '---- - -R~ - - --- - - --- - - --- - - -.L - - --- - - -RMS# 09 - PROPOSED CONDmONS RMS# 09 - EXISTING CONDmONS

T-ROW-

;" 1

BACK OF [SIDEWI>J.K

::l [MOVE 1;-' MOUNT EQUIPMEIH

I J' ':i (ENCLOSURE TO POLE

N[N 1 PER mc oWGS & l. POLf' ,v DETAIL BJ3 r - '--{\f\, -

.. I

- --,"-PROTECT EX

CURB

EOUIPMENT ENCLOSURE ORIENTATION

CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. SAlVAGE I>J.L EXISTING NOISE MONITORING EQUIPMENT FROM EXISTING POLE, SAlVAGE EXISTING BATTfRIES AND RETURN TO THE

OWNER. DISPOSE OF EXISTING NOISE MONITORING EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE AND BAmRY ENCLOSURE, REMOVE EXISTING POlE & FOOTING TO I' BROW GRADE. PATCH HOLE WITH NEW 520-C-2500 CONCRETE TO BE R.USH WIlIl AND TO MATCH EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT.

2. CONSTRUCT NEW PCLE AND FoonNG PER WAlL A/3. REATTACH I>J.L Sl>J.VAGED NOISE MONITORING EQUIPMENT ONTO NEW PCLE. RECONNECT OVERHEAll mCTIRIC UNE PER ELECTIRICAL DRAWINGS.

3. ROTATE THE SWlNG Of THE NEW HINGED POLE 30'00'00' FROM TRUE SOUTH.

4. CONSTIRUCTION CONCRETE POLE FoonNG PER STIRUCTURAL DRAWING,

GENERAL NOTES 1. ruE LOCAnoNS OF UNDER(;RO\JND unUTIES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON RESEARCH OF RECORD unulY DRAWINGS AND VlSUI>J.

OBSERVATION OF AT-GRADE STRUCTURES AND SURFACE EVDENT INDICAnoNS OF SUCH unllTIES. NO unulY IoIARK-OUlS WERE PERFORMED OR EXCAVATIONS MADE TO LOCATE BURlED UTIUTIES/STIRUCTURES DURING THE PROCESS OF CREAnNG THE UNDERLYING TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY, THE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND unLmES/STRUCTURES MAY VIJN FROM ruE LOCATIONS SHOWN AND ADDmoNAI. BURIED unllTIES/STRUCTURES MAY BE ENCOUNTf:RED,

2. THE CONTRACTOR SHAll. 8M VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF I>J.L EXISTING UTIlITIES, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON ruESE DRAWINGS, PRIOR TO THE STARr OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT I>J.L EXISTING UTIlITIES/STRUCTURES TO REMAIN, WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS,

J, MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF nME ruE NOISE MONITORING EQUIPMENT IS OUT OF SERVICE DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW POLE. CONSTRUCT THE Nfll PCLE AND FOOTING PRIOR TO Sl>J.VAGING EXISTING EQUIPMENT AND REMOVING THE EXISTING POLE AND FoonNG.

4, THERE ARE NO EXISTING OR PROPOSED BUS SToPS ADJACENT TO rulS SCOPE OF WORK.

"BURKETT~~ ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS

34~63'.~~Y(6~~n~~~A

VICINITY MAP NO SCAlE

PRIVA TE COIIJRACT

IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:

UPGRADE NOISE MONITORING POLES SIT[ 09, 1134,5 REDWOOD STREET, SAN DIEGO, CA 92103

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CAUFORNlA DfI£LOPAIENT SERWC!'S DfPARJIIENT

SlIfEr 10F XXSHEETS

FOR CITY £IiGINEER DfSCRlPITOli BY

ORIGINAl 811£

AS-BfJ/LTS COliTlIACroR INSPECTOR

DATE APPIWIW DATE fiLMED

DATE STARTEil . DATE C!1/oIPI.£TEil

I.D. NO. _ ...

PROJECT NO • ......

xxxx-xxxx -IlMJan:OOlllllllATES

=-IO(XX LAlJB£RnA/()f1D1NA TES

XXXXX-l-D

Page 27: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 4

RMSi 11

! BROWNING ST.

i --t- - NEAREST nR~~RANr IS ZOO; --- - --- - --- - --- -~ - -­

---"y--- WEST ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF -----1

! BROWNING ST. r-- - -t- - NEAREST fIR~:YDRA", IS ZOO; --- - --- - -. - --- -~ - --

"" ~ In

~ 10

jd I

1 I

I I

1 I

I

~I I

I I

I I

+-1 I

~I

GROWNING STREET

~PROTECT EX,-CONC ;VM.2... -:::: _____ /PRO::::; EX CURB

SEE CONSTRUCTION NOTE 1 I 1oROTECT EX 6· : .

N lWIDE SIDEWALK

I PROTECT EX~Jt-- g. ~ I LAtlOSCAPE ~-_ .-J,-6·~ I

./ I SEE CONSTRUCTION NOTE z~---I I DISCONNECT EX OVERHEAD

PROTECT EX lRIT I ) mc L,NE PER mc DWCS\ ROW SEE CONSTRUCTION NOTE 4 -I- R 0 IV

-----ISIT~~GEMENT ----1- J ----------~ - - - BELOW - - - ~PROTEC' EX CH~N I

LINK FENCE

I I I I

~ I I I

\ I 1: ~,.

I .... o. I I

I ~ I

1

RMS# n - PROPOSED CONDmoNS

CONSTRUCTION NOTES

----' '/ WEST ON THE soum SIDE OF I i '-____ --'/,' BROWNING STREET I - I r V • lOa

J I lo u) I "'ulO"'.1

~ In

~ o jd I

1 I

1

I

1 I

I

I - ni . 1

1 . CURB ! ! CURB -:vc. =====T==4===~==~~~~======~==~~~rt===i====~,====~~~F=~=====

~p __ ~,~I~'_t'L·_+II_~ ____ • ____ ' ____ -+I_'_~ _____ ~il __ ~l _____ ~ __ d __ ' __ d ____ d~ vn II! QI i ~"

I 12 TREE 0 I "0 i o£~o~ LiNES ~./" STUMP PLANTER i,! il "OC ~ i OVC"R'EA" j 0 )TREE

---"~ >-1 L-R 0 w I I'-....J ~O£ R 0 IV

-~ ~ i RM~# 11~ x --;--r x -\ x --~O(---r--{)

II!., ~II .1 ~8~~TION ROSEV!Li_E I ~4' CHAiN I

9

1 i Mi\P 305 ~' LINK FENCE i BLOC< 229

I I

\\ ,~

"?,

• 8

LOM'!\ PORTAL ELEM SCHOOL

7

RMS# n - EXISTING CONDmONS

-0. I

~ j

1. SAlVAGE All EXJSTING NOISE MONITORlNG EQUIPMENT FROM EXISllNG POLE. SAlVAGE EXISTING BATTERIES AND RETURN TO THE OWNER. DISPOSE OF EXISTING NOISE MONrrORING EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE AND BATTERY ENCLOSURE. REMOVE EXISTING POLE .1< FOOTING TO l' BELOW GRADE. AU. HOLE .1< REPlANT TO MATCH EXISTING lANDSCAPING.

MOVE ______ --;

I ZO.[ EN~~~:JR~Q~6P~~~\ . .., PER me owes II< (NEW POLE ~ ____ OETAll 813 I i

< --- -- IZ~, Ln~~.~/q,~ __ ----------T

Z. CONSTRUCT NEW POlE PER DETAIL A/3. REATTACH All SAlVAGED NOISE MONrrORING EQUIPMENT ONTO NEW POlE. RECDNNECT OVERHEAD ElECTRIC UNE PER ElECTRK:AI. DRAWINGS.

3. ROTATE THE SWING OF THE HINGED POLE 45·oo·OD" FROM TRUE NDRTH .

4. CDNSTRUCT CONCRETE POI£ FOOTING PER STRUCTURAl DRAWINGS.

RMS 11 SITE LOCATIO,,) .

CURTIS }~I I STREET

I I :;;STREET\ C!) I BROWNING

GENERAL NOTES

---{

1" A~ LOMA PORTAL 15

~ LOMA PORTAL ELEM. :::I SCHOOL;; ,.

ZOlA ~ ~ STREET '3 <.> a..

~-- 1 1. THE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTllITlES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASEO ON RESEARCH Of RECORD UTlUTY DRAWINGS AND VlSUAl

DBSERVATION OF AT-GRADE STRUCTURES AND SURFACE EVIDENT INDICATIONS OF SUCH UTIlITIES. NO IITIUTY MARK-OUTS WERE PERFORMED OR EXCAVATIDNS MADE TO LOCATE BURIED UTIlITIES/STRUCTURES DURING THE PROCESS OF CREATING THE UNDERLYING TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY. lHE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTIlITIES/STRUCTURES MAY V/Iiff FRDM THE LOCATIONS SHOWN AND ADDmON.Al BURIED UTUlIES/STRUCTURES MAY BE ENCOUNTERED.

EOUtPMENT ENCLOSURE ORIENTATION Z. THE CDNTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF All EXISTING UTlUflES. SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS.

PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSlRUCflON. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT AlL EXISllNG IITILmES/STRUCTURES TO REIIAIN. WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE ORAWINGS.

3. MINIMIZE THE MlDUNT OF TIME lHE NOISE MONrrORING EQUIPMENT IS OUT OF SERVICE DURING CONSTRUCTION OF lHE NEW PDLE. CDNSTRUCT lHE NEW POLE AND FOOTING PRIOR TO SAlVAGING EXISTING EQUIPMENT AND REMOVNG lHE EXISTING POlE "'~D FOOTING.

4. THERE ARE NO EXISTING OR PROPDSED BUS STOPS ADJACENT TO lHIS SCOPE OF WORK.

.£lURKE1T~

VICINITY MAP NO SCALE

PRIVATE CONlRACT

IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:

UPGRADE NOISE MONITORING POLES SITE 11: 3413.5 BROWNING STREET. $O.N DIEGO. CA 92106

CITY OF SAN DIEGO. CAIJFORNIA DE\£LOPMfJlT SERI'lCES QEPARlMfJlr

SHEET 8 OF XXSHf.ElS

FOR C1/Y ENGINEER DATE OESCRtPnON BY APPROVfD DATE f1I.MEO

ORIGINAl 811£

1.0, NO.

PROJ£cr NO.

xxxx-xxxx NAD8J CllOROINA TES

..

ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS 3434 Fourth Ave. San Diego CA.

92103·5704 "(619) 299·5550 AS-BVllS

XXX-NXXX W.tetRrCOORDtNATES

COOlRAClVR INS/'fCl1J(/

DATE STARTEll. DAlf COUPUlfD xxxxx- 8-0

Page 28: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 4

RMS* 16 iPOWERPOLE >? LOCATION

:)O'N~j~ J~Jtl"!

.F _\}C"'T~ON

,

1

~1 1

I B STREET __________ 'L _, ______ +- • _____ _

ttl 1

1

~PROTECT EX ~ ':::E~~;~S~' Vl

! rP~~c~R~~/ '~'I" -~,;~E'" ,,~ ~ :'i~'G i ,- ~ b ~~~: - PROTECT EX "'t

,"'.'i4.~__;;;;6TECT EX STRill~"'"«' ~~,'::.~.-,,':, /'iCURB & GUTTER CV')

--------~---...:..s, IGN (MU,T~D 03-1)'+, --~,' ,:9'/,-'IS SEE~E CONSTRucnON J PROTECT EX 80lLARD~ '- . ~'. ~ NOTE 1

'" I, ' ", --;: '--::-,~DISCONNECT EX OVERH ; / WI: i ~'~ ,j mIC LINE PER mc DWGS , PRorECT EX BOLlARD/ )-:::: "CO" PROTECT EX 5' I

I : '. 'Y::-::~ I WIDE SIDEWAlK I SEECONSTRucnON "', ~PROIECT EX OVERHEAD

, NOTE 2 I I I mc LINE SEE CONSTRUCTION I 1 NEAREST FiRE HYDRANT IS 70' ± -A.

I PROTECT EX \J>IJ.OSCAPEJ SE~ ENLAR~ENT:: 1

/1 if I / '

/ ,fij

o M

/ I

i B STREET I ~ -------I~-- /1-[ --1

'6 ! I' !u: ! / I" / _____ ~l~~ET ~

CURB I I RMSe 16 i !. r8~A IrON I

! SIDEWALK!

I: ! 0 I Ir-v I ! 0

I::';, / II I 321

1 / !\': ~I ~ R I q

R 0 VI ' I I

,

I

~I 1

ttl 1 ~I

~I ;;!;I

I

1 / "'1~i'.l!iill ~ -' 0 ~ Ii ;;:; CL .,.1 74' !_4T5'H-· ___ -"'8"'.~"_'· _ __I

I I

1- - ---R-O.:ff

T -.1'OTE 4 _ ;;;;/-d ___ .:.J EAST ON IHE EAST S,DE OF 341H sr ,-

-,I -' ~I BELO~ I ;;:; a. .,.1 . '0 I :C"';=c "'C::,;:CII I~--- ,-- "",

\.4,1,-

RMSf 16 - PROPOSED COND/TIONS

ji ~~~~

SOLAR PANEL + EOUIPMENT ENCLOSURE ORIENTATION

CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. SALVAGE ALL EXISDNG NOISE MONITORING EQUIPMENT FROM EXISTING POLE. SALVAGE EXISDNG BATTERlES AND RETURN TO

THE OWNER. DISPOSE OF EXISDNG NOISE MONITORING EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE AND BATTERY ENCLOSURE. REMOVE EXISDNG POlE I< FOO~NG TO l' BElOW GRADE, ALL HOLE & REPLINT TO MATCH EXlSDNG IN<DSCAPlNG.

2, CONSTRUCT New POLE PER DETAIL A/3, REATTACH ALL SALVAGED NOISE MONlnDRING EQUIPMENT ONTO New POLE.

3. ROTATE THE SWING Of THE HINGED POLE 45'00'00· FROM TRUE NORTH, CONSTRUCT THE SOlAR PANELS AT A 45'00'00' ANGlE TO THE POLE FACING TRUE SOUTH.

4, CONSTRUCT CONCRETE POLE FOO~NG PER STRUClURAL DRAWINGS,

GENERAL NOTES 1. THE LOCA~ONS or UNDERGROUND UTiUTIES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON RESEARCH or RECORD UTIUlY DRAWINGS AND VISUAl.

OBSER\lA~ON OF AT-GRADE STRUCTURES AND SURFACE E\1DENT INDICA~ONS OF SUCH UTIlITIES. NO UTIUTY MARK-OUTS WERE PERFORMED OR EXCAVA~ONS MADE TO LOCATE BURIED UTIlITIES/STRUCTURES OURING THE PROCESS OF CREA~NG THE UNDERLYlNG TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY. THE LOCA~ONS OF UNDERGROUND UTilITIES/STRUClURES MAY VNf( FROM THE LOCA~ONS SHOWN AND ADOIllONAl BURIED UTIlITIES/STRUCTURES MAY BE ENCOUNTERED.

2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AELO VERIFY THE LOCATIONS or ALL EXISDNG UTILmES, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. PRlOR TO THE START Of CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR Sf'ALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTIUTIES/STRUCTURES TO REMAIN, WHEIliER SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS.

3. MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF ~ME THE NOISE MONITORING EQUIPMENT IS OUT or SERVICE OURING CONSTRUCTION or THE New POLE, CONSTRUCT THE New POLE, FOO~NG AND SOlAR PANELS PRIOR TO SALVAGING EXISDNG EQUIPMEHT AND REMOVING THE EXISTING POLE I< FOO~NG,

CHOA TES ADDITION

BLOCK 148 ",lAP 167

f I

i \ II i '" '" !

RMS# 16 - EXISTING CONDITIONS

I-,t;; '" t:I-go go RMS 16 <f) <f) SITE LOCATION 0

'" "' "' C ST

VICINITY MAP NO SCALE

PRIVATE CONmACT

IMPROVCMENT PLANS FOR:

1

~ IJ(f

~ > I-

0 ii 0

0- ::t: tt. I-

:c{ ~ oJ Ii « 0

0. Z ~ 0 j:: .J

.( « z Z 0 tt. m IJJ IX I- > ~ I-

Z

0 :>

C> 8 IJJ 0 0 :3 z is « z (I) ~

4, THERE ARE NO EXlSDNG OR PRCPOSED BUS STOPS ADJACENT TO THIS SCOPE OF WORK.

UPGRADE NOISE MONITORING POLES

(i)~ ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS

~~Ct':D4A~'M~r~

SITE 16: 3385,5 's' STREET. SAN DIEGO, CA 92102

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CAUFORNIA DEVEI.OPMENT SER~CES DEPARTMENT

SI-IEET 10 CF xXSI-Irrrs

FOR orr ENGINEER DA1f

DESCRIPTION BY foJ'PROVED DATE ALMED

1,0. NO. _~ __ _

PRO.£CT NO, __ ~

I--.=OR=IGN=A1.'--FBI!£=--t __ ~---'-I---+--~~--C::)()(:::)()(::-_XC:C)()(C::X:----I NAOBJ COORD/NA TES

AS-BUftrs

XXXXX-10-D CONmACTVR _ . __ DA TE STARTED __ 1HSPfCT1J// ___ ~~ ___ DATE CIJjJPLETED_~._~

Page 29: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

RM8:ft: 19

ATTACHMENT 4

LOT 6 BLOCK 138 M!DDLETOW~j

PROTECT EX RETAINING WAlL~

(28"±H)

L __ - - - T-------YJJ'/-PROTECT E; I

I I~' ~ : I ASPHALT 'II'~ t-------------R.QJ'/-

\ ~ II : L,ANDSC;\PED AREA I \ ~ ~ ~/: CHAiN Ui'iK ~E: JCE

I p" "0;1 iii, ~ RM,j 1~ pnL~ I

I

n" -<{4 , : I \ i : r,'C~A!JL\ I ;f,~" l. '\ / I Ul

1883'/CHAlN LINK I FENCE I

I SEE ENLARGEMENT I BELOW r - i~~T/~N5TRUCiiON- I

i-! VI

PROTECT EX CUR8-L, / ~ ___ ~ . .!:'~_,2 ~ . . I P" -SEE CONSTRUCTION I

& GUTTER I)' L-,"+8'--i -~PRGTECT EX

uj "'~ ~ !, - / ~,LV ,vii \ I -

i-! 0;1;' i \ /l;f"b(LLARD V 1/ t ~ 40'

I ~ o

PROTECT EX 8.63' I LANDSCAPE WIDE SIDEWAlK ~: \ "'-PROTECT EX I VI /p , :t \ !' i S no c:"A~' I i

~ I ~~~'d~~V_,_r __ 0_'_J_'_'L' ______ ~ _____________ I

Q l '0 ?' /i+J' EDGi:. OF PAVEMENT ~ J~ _ /1 ~ ~ I ,,"-' OJ

. I ~~.r ~p~~fc{l~ BOllllRD I , pRoTEer EX~':'" _ _ _ ___ .J j

AC F'I"T FROTECT EX ! ~ I / I N_ ASPhA_-:-

----~ -~--CL~-- ____ -1 __ _

NEAREST RRE"YO ~ IS 270' t SOUTHWEST AT THE

WATER VAlVE ~~~ C~NSTRUCTION _____ --'IL __ _ ----"---~--<t----- _____ -1

------'\ C:r-J NEAREST RRE HYDRANT IS 270' ± SOUTHWEST AT THE_

W. THORN ST. I I NORTll COR'ER OF WEST THORN '" STATE STREETS -

~DISCONNECT EX OVHD ELEe UNE PER [LEC owes

// W. THORN ST.

i/' /<3 //

"", //

-d OH/ETC --------------OH!ETC --------~--JOINT POLE

RMS# 19 - PROPOSED CONDITIONS RMS# 19 - EXISTING CONDITIONS

NEW POLE MOUNT EQUIPMENT

llAOYE ( /ENCLOSURE TO POLE PER

2 / ElEe owes &: DETAil AJ4

. 1'\ I ----! ( ,.:-- -- -- -I

I ~:~, I ... ,J.._,

~ TEMPORARY 9.35'

ENCROACHMENT WHEN POLE IS

LOWERED

EOUIPMENT ENCLOSURE ORIENTA TlON

CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1.

2,

3,

4,

SAlVAGE ALL EXISTING NOISE MON[ORING EQUIPMErIT fROM EJOSTING POlL SAlVAGE EXISTING BAllERIES AND RETURN TO THE OWNER. DISPOSE OF EXISTING NOISE MON[ORING EQUIPMErIT ENClOSURE AND BAllERY ENCLOSURE. REMOVE EXISTING POlE '" FOOTING TO l' B!'LOW GRADE, PATCH HOLE WITH NEW S20-C-25OO CONCRETE TO BE flUSH WITH AND TO MATCH EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT,

CONSTRuer NEW POLE PER DETAIL B/3, REAlTACH ALL SAlVAGEQ NOISE MONffOmNG EQUIPMENT OrITO NEW POLE, RECONNECT OVERHEAD ElECTRIC UNE PER ElECTRiCAl DRAWINGS,

ROTATE THE SWING Of THE HINGED POLE 52'35'03" fROM TRUE NORTH,

CONSTRuer CONCRETE POlE FOOTING PER STRUCTURAl DRAWINGS,

GENERAL NOTES 1.

2,

3,

4,

THE LOCAT'.ONS OF UNDERGROUND UTIUT1ES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON RESEARCH OF RECORD UTIUTY DRAWINGS AND VlSUAl OBSERVATION OF AT-GRADE STRUCTURES AND SURFACE EVlDErIT INDICATIONS OF SUCH UTIUT1ES, NO UTIUTY MARK-OUTS WERE PERFORMED OR EXCAVATIONS MADE TO LOCATE BURIED UTIUTIES/STRUCTURES DURING THE PROCESS OF CREATING THE UNDERLYING TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY, THE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTIUT1ES!STRUcruRES MAY VARY FROM 1I<E LOCATIONS SHOWN AND AODmDNAl BURIED UTlUTIES/STRucruRES MAY BE ENCOUNTERED.

THE CONTRACTOR SHAlL AElO VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTlUTIES, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS, PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALl EXISTING UTiUTIES/STRUCTURES TO REMAN, WIlETHER SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS,

MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF TIME THE NOISE MON[ORING EQUIPMErIT IS OUT OF SERVlCE DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW POlE, CONSTRUCT THE NEW POLE AND FOOTING PRIOR TO SAlVAGING EXISTING EQUlpMErIT AND REMOVlNG THE EXISTING POLE AND fOOTING.

mERE ARE NO EXISTING OR PROPOSED BUS STOPS ADJACENT TO THIS SCOPE OF WORK,

_BJRKETT~

ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS 3434 Fourth Ave. San Diego CA.

92103,5704' (619) 299·5550

RMS 19 /SITE LOCATION

~~~-~"~~-'~~;

~ THORN§ t!> /: "" z Ul "

--~~~~--~ST'-/

VINE Sf.

>-' ~I

Ul

« « w, iD

0 '" 2':: d u

SASSAFRAS

VICINITY MAP NO SCALE

PRIVA rr; Co/l1RACT

IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:

UPGRADE NOISE MONITORING POLES SITE 19: 1290,5 W THORN STREET, SAN DIEGO, CA 92103

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CAllFORNIA O£\fiOPMENT SfRWCES DEPARTMENT

SHEET nor XXSHffTS

FOR OTY ENGINEER DESCRfpnON BY

ORIGINAL BV£

AS-BUILTS

COII1RACTDR INSPfCTOR

DArr; APPRO;ro DArr; FILMED

GArr; STAR1fO DA rr; COUPLErr;D

1.0. NO. ____ _

PR()'£CT NO,

XXXXX-12-D

Page 30: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

MOUNT EQUiPMENT

\ /

ENCLOSURE TO POLE PER ELEe OWGS &: DErAIL 8/3

\ I ,NEW POLE

/ / \ J ~

/.' ~

10'

EOUIPMENT ENCLOSURE ORIENTATION

ATTACHMENT 4

RMSi 20 I 35'

LOT 5 ~ / BLOCK '150 ! Iff ~V'l' I / ROSEVILLE If; .". /

I tf' & "<>"'s> MAP 305 r o~ ~Q., rl #..~e;."'s",,,~

STANDARD WOOD I ~ = ~~~~~ 1 I I ~ '~~'" ~'O" ... ",

BARRICADE ~'~ (lCD &f;"~ 0" , i [Y '" tti"'~"

TOP OF SLOPE:-1'\. '1\ ,;=; ",<:J~s ~ 2'1.9' ~.::.s

BRUSH ~\' I-\ .. -----..y QUIMBY ST. BY ST. ___ -::~:__::_. ~ ~ . r"'-I--- - 4- --- --- ___ rf-t

CLOSED NON-ST.4NDARD 1 \ ' t

L __

WOOD BARRICADE • \ RMS# 20 uJ!

P~E nl LOCATION I

I SODI CHAINLINK SIDEv'ALK

-----OH/ETC ------- ,C

r- --___ R _Q._W __ _

1

CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. SAlVAGE All EXISTING NOISE MONITORING EQUIPMENT fROM EXISTING POlE. SALVAGE EXIS1ING BAnERlES AND RETURN TO THE

OWNER. DISPOSE OF EXIS1ING NOISE MONITORING EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE AND 8A11ERY ENCLOSURE. REMOVE EXISTING POlE I< FOOTING TO I' BElOW GRADE. ALL HOlE .It REPLANT TO MATCH EXIS1ING LANDSCAPING.

2. CONSTRUCT NEW POLE PER DETAIL A/3. REATTACH All SALVAGED NOISE MONITORING EQUIPMENT ONTO NEW POLE. RECONNECT ElECffilC UNE PER ElECTRICAL DRAWINGS. REPLANT Nff LANDSCAPING DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MATCH EXISTING.

3. CONSTRUCT THE NEW HINGED POlE WITH THE SWING IN THE TRUE NORTH - SOUTH ORIENTATION.

4. CONSTRUCT CONCRETE POlE FOOTING PER STRUCTURAl DRAWINGS.

5. REJ,f()V[ EXISTING NON-STANDARD GUARD POST AND BARRICADE. CONSTRUCT NEW GUARD POST AND BARRICAIlE PER SDRSD M-9.

GENERAL NOTES 1. THE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON RESEARCH OF RECORD UTIUlY DRAWINGS ANO VISUAL

OBSERVATION OF AT-GRADE STRUCTURES AND SURFACE EVIDENT INDICATIONS OF SUCH UllUTIES. NO UllUlY MARK-QUlS WERE PERFORMED OR EXCAVATIONS MADE TO LOCATE BURIED UTIUTIES/STRUCTURES DURING THE PROCESS OF CREATING THE UNDERL'I1NG TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY. THE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES/STRUCTURES MAY VMN FROM THE LOCATIONS SHOWN AND ADDmONAL BURIED UTIUTIES/STRUCTURES MAY BE ENCOUNTERED.

2. THE CONTRACTOR SHAlL RELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS or AlL EXIS1ING UTILITIES. SlIDWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS, PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCllON. THE CONmACTOR SHAlL PROTECT All EXISTING UTIUTIES/STRUCTURES TO REMAIN. WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS.

3. MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF TIME THE NOISE MONITORING EQUIPMENT IS OUT OF SERVICE OURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW POLE. CONSTRUCT THE NEW POLE AND FOOTING PRIOR TO SAlVAGING EXISTING EQUIPMENT AND REMOVNG THE EXISTING POLE AND FOOTING.

4. THERE ARE NO EXISTING OR PROPOSED BUS STOPS ADJACENT TO THIS SCOPE OF WORK.

BLOCK 135

LOT 5 \ .. "'I °1 ~I

U I

""":JI-O en w w w(f)

2 CLO :::::> 1--1 n'lcnu

I 1

~I

RMS# 20 - EXISTING CONDITIONS

(It euRt<£TT~~ ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS

34~6~.'#ofY(6~~)n~£A.

>-' '" o z

TENNYSON

STERNE

ROSEVILLE >-' RUSSEt'

"

ST.

ST.

ST.

« UIMBY go :3 Q ST.

en • RMS 20

\ '*.t,.; ~ v~o SITE LOCATION

VICINITY MAP NO SCALE

PRIVATE CataRACT

IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:

UPGRADE NOISE MONITORING POLES SITE 20: 1944.5 PLUM SffiEET. SAN DIEGO. CA 92106

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA DEVELOPMENT SER~C£S DEPARTllENT

SHEET 131lf JlXSHEETS

FOR aTY ENGINEER DESCRIpnON BY

ORIGINAL 811£

AS-BU/lTS CONlRACTOR INSPfCIOR

DATf APPROW DATf AlliED

OATf STARIW OA Tf COOIP!£IW

I.a NO.

PROJECT NO •.

xxxx-xxxx IIMJ8:nXX)lIfJlNATfS

xxx.:xxxx (lJ./B£RrCtJliROINAl'ES .

XXXXX-13-D

Page 31: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. SAlVAGE AlL EXISTING NOISE 1.tDNIT000NG EQUIPMENT FROM EXlSTING PDLE. SAlVAGE EXISTING IlIITIERIES AND RETURN TO lHE

OWNER. DISPOSE OF EX1S11NG NOISE UONITORING EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE AND IlIITIERY ENCLOSURE. REMDVE EXISTING POlE I< FOOTING TO l' BElOW GRADE. fill HOlE I< REPlANT TO MATCH EXISTING lANDSCAPING.

2. CONS1lRUCT NEW POlE PER OETAlL A/J. REATIACH AlL SAlVAGEO NOISE MONITORING EQUIPMENT ONTO NEW POLE. RECONNECT ELECTRIC UNE PER ELEcmlCAi. DRAWINGS.

J. ROTATE !HE SWING or mE HINGED POlE 45'00'00· FROM mUE NORm,

4. CONSmUCT CONCRETE POlE rOOTING PER SmUCTIURAl DRAWINGS.

GENERAL NOTES lHE LOCATIONS or UNDERGROUND UlIlITES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON RESEARCH OF RECORD UlIUlY DRAWINGS AND VISUAl OBSERVATION OF AT-GRADE smUCTIURES AND SURFACE EVIDENT INDICATIONS OF SUCH UlIUTIES. NO UlIUlY MARK-OUTS WERE PERFORMED OR EXCAVATIONS IOOE TO LOCATE BURIED UlIlITES/S1lRUCTIURES DURING THE PROCESS OF CREATING lHE UNDERLYING TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY. lHE LOCATIONS Of UNDERGROUND UlIlITES/STRUCTIURES MAY VARY FROM lHE LOCATIONS SHOWN AND ADDmONAl BURIED UTIlITES/S1lRUCTIURES MAY BE ENCOUNTERED.

2. lHE CONTRACTOR SHAll fiElD VERIFY !HE LOCATIONS or AlL EXISTING UlIlITES, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON !HESE DRAWINGS, PRIOR TO !HE START or CONS1lRUCTION, lHE CONTRACTOR SHAll PROTECT AlL EXISTING UTIUTIES/S1lRUCTIURES TO REMAlN, WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON !HESE DRAWINGS.

3. MINIMIZE lHE AMOUNT Dr TIUE lHE NOISE MONITORING EQUIPMENT IS OUT or SERVICE DURING CONSmUCTIDN OF !HE NEW POLE. CONSlR\JCT lHE NEW POLE AND rOOTING PRIDR TO SAlVAGING EXISTING EQUIPMENT AND REMOVING !HE EXISTING POLE AND FOOTING.

4. !HERE ARE NO EXISTING OR PROPOSED BUS STOPS ADJACENT TO !HIS SCOPE OF WORK,

-1-0.11'

~ I MOUNT EQlJIPMEm

ENCLOSURE TO POLE PER\ I mc owes I< DETAIL BI3

,;. -:;, NEW POLE ~'-. /1

I I

-L

~ L,J(.

J \'e), J ~

9'91"-l EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE

ORIENTA TION

CORONADO AVE RM8* 21

ROW ---,

I , :130

'

""'I ~ ,--" -tft.; :~~ PROTECT EX lANDSCAPE----".. . -.

r pR'im:cr:::--

kf..1..

, ,'.' SEE CONSTRUCTION 1 ' EX CURB r, ' NOTE 2

I I 9' I I' SEE CONSTRUCTION

PROTECT EX I '-' I ,-.: ~TE_4 __ ..!:A.. __ ..

('~iLj,i;ci :: ! IEfENJARGftENi - "

I ~~ ~: ~'""i , :1 ~~

z< I 0 0 ,

~~ .:J:~

~i~I' ~~ -w

~ z§

w i~ I

~ ~; 1 LU t38

§ ~§ , l' ~ ~l-r-------- ' I' '~L ___ R_O_W ---

~SEi: CONSTRUCTION

, NOTE 1 ALLEY -------, -+--:..-----------OVERHEAD me lINE-"""""""

PER ElEe DWGS ............

1

DISCONNECT EX

,

I ", 0, "'I

RMS# 21 - PROPOSED CONDITIONS

R 0 w ----I

.,t. , ,

I " , 0 , '"

I 01

Lfl ~ N U 0 I-.-l 0 co .-l

__ R_O_W

.q-G;

I- , 0 ....J

,

I ", :' I

ATTACHMENT 4

CORONADO AVE

I II t Ii w ,

W~

II xz

20«

1

0 0

II ~~ I~

,I ~8

:~1 II iI ~~ II §2 m~

l:u ~:::: II =::J

~~ I IIU I.J.I

Ii ~ ~~ 1 ii ~eJ

ii I.n

t!ig§ I.J.I d a ~:: II :::;, zl5 .1 0 ) e:

<3 0..

l--Z 6 -0

d •

~ - ---,,- - --- - -

l---'

l--

0 .-l

ill <r: a: :r: =::J 0.. U (.f)

<r:

~ > .... 0 i2

0 Il. J:

<>l

RMS# 21 - EXISTING CONDmONS t:t. ~ ::(

(j euRK£TT~~ ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS

~~6~_~~~:y(6~~n~~g,A

VICINITY MAP NO SCAlf

PRlVA1C CON1RACT

IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:

UPGRADE NOISE MONITORING POLES SITE 21: 1625 FROUDE S1lRffi, SAN DIEGO, CA 92107 (AllEY)

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CAUFORNIA D£Ifl.OI'IIENT SERWCES DEPARTMENT

SHEET UDF XXSHEEIS

FOR CITY ENGINEER D£SCRIprrON BY

ORIGINAL Br£

AS-BUIl.IS CON1RAC1l)l/ INSPfCl1JI1

DA1C APPROVfD DA1C FILMED

OATf STARltlJ DA IF CO!IPtflEll

1,0. ND.

PROJfCT NO,

xxxx-xxxx 'lI},Dd.fClJ"ORDiNA1CS

XXX-IC(XX [AUB!J/,CDOROIfiA rts

XXXXX-14-D

Page 32: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

CONCRETE LAP SPLICES PER ACI318 (INCHES)

BAR SIZE ! LAP CLASS rc=3000 psi I

3 I B 24

4 ! B 29 !

5 i B 36

6 I B 43

7 ! B 63

8 I B 72

9 I B 81

10 I B 91

11 ! B 101

NOTES: 1. TABULATED VALUES ARE FOR NORMAL WEIGHT CONCRETE. MULTIPLY BY 1.3 FOR USE

IN LIGHT WEIGHT CONCRETE. 2. TABULATED VALUES ARE FOR UNCOATED OR ZINC-COATED REINFORCEMENT. 3. TABULATED VALUES REQUIRE CLEAR COVER OF ATLEAST 1 BAR DIAMETER AND

CLEAR SPACING OF AT LEAST 2 BAR DIAMETERS. 4. FOR HORIZONTAL REINFORCEMENT WITH MORE THAN 12" OF FRESH CONCRETE CAST

BELOW THE BARS, MULTIPLY VALUES BY 1.3. 5. BARS LARGER THAN #11 SHALL NOT BE LAP SPLICED. 6. BUNDLED BARS ARE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND SHALL NOT BE

USED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD.

CONCRETE LAP SPLICE SCHEDULE ('3) ~

H ' '1-/

R=3DFOR#8BARS ' AND SMALLER I I

R=4DFOR#9THRU L.. 4D #11 BARS > >C 2-1/2" MIN

STANDARD HOOK

r6D AT (#3, #4, #5) ./ 12D AT (#6, #7, #8)

12D r , j U.O,~

STANDARD HOOK

rMAXIMUM SLOPE / (SEE NOTE)

6 I rl Z 0:1 ~

45' 0/

~ .. .5:).4-'- v:~

<? <b .

BEAM STIRRUPS

COLUMN OR BEAM TIES

S1 ~ NON_CONTACT",\OFFSET

~ ~ SPLICE '-, -­CONCRETEl

CONTACT SPLlCP/ oi

oi , ~

(4) 1" dia. A.B. ~

It BY MANUFACTURER \\ rI­!

1-1/2" NON-SHRINK GROUT • No::: SLOPE ~ d r- (E) GRADE OR FINISH L

M

(5)#3 TIES @3"o.c. TY~

!' r~ i Nrit--tt--t

I :r:W li:af gj ~ V~#3 TIES@12"0.c. TYP

~~ n. I 2'-0" dia. CONC. DRILLED PIER i ":!'h::_6) #,5 EQ. SPACE & CONT.

I,! IL-~======~_+-(~ - \ \0J

J~

. .. .,. ... :.-3" CLR.

:,.- :.

-----0

POLE FOOTING (TJ "--J

I DEPTH OF PIER ! i FINISH AROUND

I d, DEPTH I POLE HEIGHT POLE FOOTING OF FOOTING i

I UP TO 24' CONCRETE ! 7'-6" I

I I UP TO 24' I OTHER I 10'-6"

!

NOTES: 1. IF CONCRETE IS PRESENT, IT MUST BE COMPLETELY

SURROUNDING FOOTING AND BE TIGHT TO NEW FOOTING TO USE DEPTHS AS NOTED

2. DESIGN LOADS ARE BASED ON MAXIMUM REACTION FROM POLE EQUAL TO: 220 KIP-IN MOMENT AND 899 LB SHEAR

I

FOOTING TABLE f,:;\ 1----------------------1~i

TYPICAL REINFORCEMENT BAR BENDS (4:

ITEMS REQUIRING SPECIAL INSPECTION:

1. STRUCTURAL CONCRETE PER CBC SECTION 17D4.4AND TABLE 1704.4.

GENERAL SPECIAL INSPECTION NOTES:

1. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS, STRUCTURAL TESTS, AND STRUCTURAL OBSERVATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 17 OF THE 2010 CBC.

2. THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR MUST BE CERTIFIED BY THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, IN THE CATEGORY OF WORK REQUIRED TO HAVE SPECIAL INSPECTION.

3. THE SPECIAL INSPECTIONS IDENTIFIED ON PLANS ARE IN ADDITION TO AND NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR THOSE INSPECTIONS REQUIRED TO BE PERFORMED BY A CITY BUILDING INSPECTOR.

4. A PROPERTY OWNER'S FINAL REPORT FORM FOR WORK REQUIRED TO HAVE SPECIAL INSPECTIONS, TESTING AND STRUCTURAL OBSERVATIONS MUST BE COMPLETED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER, PROPERTY OWNER'S AGENT OF RECORD, ARCHITECT OF RECORD OR ENGINEER OF RECORD AND SUBMITTED TO THE INSPECTION SERVICES DIVISION.

5. THE FABRICATOR SHALL SUBMIT AN "APPLICATION TO PERFORM OFF-SITE FABRICATION" TO THE INSPECTION SERVICES DIVISION FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF FABRICATION.

6. THE FABRICATOR SHALL SUBMIT A "CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR OFF-SITE FABRICATION" TO THE INSPECTION SERVICES DIVISION PRIOR TO THE ERECTION OF FABRICATED ITEMS AND ASSEMBLIES.

7. THE CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORY MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, FOR TESTING OF MATERIALS, SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS AND EQUIPMENT.

8. WHERE MATERIALS OR ASSEMBLIES ARE REQUIRED BY THE BUILDING CODE TO BE LABELED, SUCH MATERIALS AND ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE LABELED BY AN AGENCY APPROVED BY THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CBC SECTION 1703. PRODUCTS AND MATERIALS TO BE LABELED SHALL BE TESTED, INSPECTED AND LABELED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURES SET FORTH IN CBC SECTIONS 1703.5.1 THROUGH 1703.5.3. IDENTIFY ON PLANS THE NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE TESTING 1 INSPECTION AGENT.

DESIGN CRITERIA:

1. APPLICABLE CODES: CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, 2010 EDITION AASHTOLTS-5-M, 2011 EDITION

2. WIND DESIGN CRITERIA: V=90M.P.H. WIND EXPOSURE C 1= 1.0 GCpi=±0.18 P = qh (GCp - GCpi) qh = 20.73psl

COMPONENTS AND CLADDING: GCp=SEEASCE 7-05 FIGURE 6-11 THROUGH 6-17 ,AS APPLICABLE

MAIN WIND FORCE RESISTING SYSTEM: Cp = SEE ASCE 7-05 FIGURE 6-6, AS APPLICABLE G=I.14 P = q(GCp - GCpi)

ATTACHMENT 4

GENERAL:

1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS BEFORE STARTING WORK AND NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES THAT ARE FOUND.

2. DO NOT SCALE DETAILS OR DRAWINGS. SEE OTHER DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONS WHERE REQUIRED.

3. SPECIFIC NOTES AND DETAILS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER GENERAL NOTES AND TYPICAL DETAILS.

4. WHERE NO CONSTRUCTION DETAILS ARE SHOWN OR NOTED FOR ANY PART OF THE WORK, THE DETAILS USED SHALL BE THE SAME AS FOR OTHER SIMILAR WORK.

5. WHEN A DETAIL IS IDENTIFIED AS TYPICAL, THE CONTRACTOR IS TO APPLY THIS DETAIL IN ESTIMATION AND CONSTRUCTION TO EVERY LIKE CONDITION WHETHER OR NOT THE REFERENCE IS REPEATED IN EVERY INSTANCE.

6. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE 2010 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC) AND OTHER REGULATORY AGENCIES WHO MAY HAVE AUTHORITY OVER THE WORK.

7. THESE DRAWINGS REPRESENT THE STRUCTURE IN ITS FINAL CONFIGURATION. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR FOR ALL MEANS AND METHODS ASSOCIATED WITH ACHIEVING THIS FINAL CONFIGURATION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SHORING, BRACING OR SOILS EXCAVATIONS.

8. MATERIAL NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS ON THESE DRAWINGS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE SPECIFICATIONS IN THE CASE OF A DISCREPANCY.

9. ALL REFERENCED CODES AND STANDARDS SHALL BE THE LATEST APPROVED EDITION, U.O.N.

FOUNDATION:

1. SOILS ARE ASSUMED TO BE CLASS V (SANDY CLAY, CLAY, SILTY CLAY) OR BETTER. CBC VALUES PER TABLE 1806.2 HAVE BEEN USED FOR DESIGN,

2. THE ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE IS 1500 psI A TlSOLA TED 1 COLUMN FOOTINGS AND AT CONTINUOUS WALL FOOTINGS, THE ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURES MAY BE INCREASED BY ONE THIRD WHEN CONSIDERING LOADING OF SHORT DURATION SUCH AS WIND OR SEISMIC FORCES.

3. FOOTINGS SHALL EXTEND TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 1'-6" BELOW LOWEST ADJACENT SOIL GRADE. ALLOWABLE LATERAL BEARING PRESSURE IS 100 psllft

CONCRETE:

1. CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 2a-DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AS FOLLOWS:

W/CRATIO A. FOUNDATIONS ........................................................................ 3OO0psi. 0.55

2. CEMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH ASTM C1S0, TYPE II. CLASS F FLY ASH MAY BE SUBSTITUTED UP TO A MAXIMUM OF 20% BY WEIGHT OF CEMENTITIOUS MATERIALS IN NORMAL WEIGHT CONCRETE.

3. NO PIPES OR DUCTS SHALL BE PLACED IN CONCRETE COLUMNS, WALLS, OR SLABS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY DETAILED ON STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS.

4. REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE SECURELY SUPPORTED IN POSITION PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE.

5. WALLS AND COLUMNS SHALL BE DOWELED FROM SUPPORTS WITH BARS OF THE SAME SIZE AND SPACING U.O.N.

6. SPLICE CONTINUOUS REINFORCING WITH 2'-0" MINIMUM LAP U.O.N. PER 3/-. BARS SPLICED WITH NON-CONTACT LAP SPLICES SHALL NOT BE SPACED ' TRANSVERSELY FARTHER APART THAN'THE SMALLER OF ONE-FIFTH THE REQUIRED LAP SPLICE LENGTH AND 6". STAGGER SPLICES AT SLAB ON GRADE.

7. ALL REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE DETAILED AND PLACED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE "BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE" (ACI 318,LATEST APPROVED EDITION) AND THE "MANUAL OF STANDARD PRACTICE" BY CRSI, AS MODIFIED BY THE PROJECT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS.

8, PROVIDE BAR BENDS PER 4/-, TYPICAL CONCRETE COVER FOR REINFORCING:

CONCRETE CAST AGAINST EARTH .......................................................... 3" EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER

#6 AND LARGER ........................................................ 2" #5 AND SMALLER ...................................................... 1 1/2"

UNEXPOSED COLUMNS, BEAMS, & GIRDERS ......................................... 11/2" UNEXPOSED SLABS .................................................................................... 1· WALLS (INTERIOR) ..................................................................................... 1·

9. REINFORCEMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH ASTM A615, GRADE 60, EXCEPT THAT REINFORCEMENT TO BE WELDED SHALL COMPLY WITH ASTM A706.

PRIVAT( CQNTRACT

STRUCTURAL NOTES AND DETAIlS FOR;

UPGRADE NOISE MONITORING POLES

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CAlJFORNIA DEVCWPH£NT SERVICES DfPARTMENT

SHErr 29 ur JD SHEETS

fUR CITY ENGIN££,~ DArE DESCRIPTJDN BY APPRDVED DATE FILMED

(j BURl<£TT~~ ORIGINAL BWE

ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS 3434 Fourth Ava. San Diego CA.

92103-5704' (619) 299-5550 AS-BUILTS

CllNTRACTllR INSJ'[CTUII "

DATE STARTED DATE COMPLETER "

I,a. Na,

PRaJECT NO.

U1HBERT CODRD[NATES

p<XXXX-29-D

Page 33: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

OJ >

''::: o

.<: "'00 ........

OJ >

''::: o ~ .... ttl Q.

ttl o ..c ttl a:l I

.-I OJ ..... Vi

ATTACHMENT 5

Page 34: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

... QJ QJ ... ... VI QJ

ta C 00 N ~ .... I

N QJ ... in

ATTACHMENT 5

Page 35: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 5

Page 36: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 5

Page 37: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 5

Page 38: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 5

.... QJ QJ .... .... III c: ... 0

J:: I-

3 0 en N .... I

en , .... QJ r .... in

Page 39: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 5

Page 40: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

-(lJ (lJ ... -In (lJ

"'C ~ o ... u.. Ion N I.e .-1

I .-1 N (lJ

.~ In

ATTACHMENT 5

Page 41: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

.J.J-.J..J~ -I..J.J..J..J ...J..J-.J-I.J \j...J -.J -.J .J -.J.J-.J.J.J

ATTACHMENT 6

UPTOWN PLANNERS Uptown Community Planning Group

AGENDA

April 1, 2014 Meeting Minutes

Meeting Place: Joyce Beers Community Center Joyce Beers Community Center, Uptown Shopping District

Meeting called to order at 6:00 p.m. by past Chair Wilson

Present: Tablang, Ward, Bonner, Grinchuk, Fox, Naskar, Pesqueira, Wilson, Daniel, Mullaney, Butler, Ferrier, Winney, Jaworski, Winter, Bonn, Mellos (late)

Approximately 30 people were in attendance.

Board Meeting: Parliamentary Items! Reports:

Election of Officers:

Motion by Bonn; seconded by Jaworski, to appoint Wilson as Chair, approved by 16-0 vote;

Motion by Ferrier, sec~nded by Daniel, to appoint Jaworski as Vice Chair, approved by a 16-0 vote;

No nominations for Secretary; Wilson and Jaworski agreed to be Co-Acting Secretaries;

Motion by Jaworski, seconded by Pesqueira, to appoint Tom Fox as Treasurer, approved by a 16-0 vote;

Adoption of Agenda:

Chair Wilson indicated two potential agenda items were inadvertently left off the agenda; both involved the replacement of eXisting noise monitoring poles with newer metal poles. Wilson indicated he had left messages for the individuals who had inquired about the project that the item would be added to this meeting's agenda:

Motion by Naskar, seconded by Butler, to add the following two items to the agenda; motion passed by a 15-0-1 vote, with non-voting chair Wilson abstaining.

3408 UNION STREET ("SOCRAA NOISE MONITORING POLES SOP") - Bankers Hill/Park West - Process Four - Site Development Permit to replace an existing wood noise monitoring pole to metal pole with solar panels ranging from 20'-24' in height close to same location. The pole is located adjacent to 3408 Union Street along the airport flight path.

1126 REDWOOD STREET ("SOCRAA NOISE MONITORING POLES SOP") - Bankers Hill/Park West - Process Four - Site Development Permit to replace an existing wood noise monitoring pole to metal pole with solar panels ranging from 20'_24' in height close to same location. The pole is located adjacent to 1126 Redwood Street along the airport flight path.

1

Page 42: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 6

Motion to approve the agenda, as amended, by Winney, seconded by Butler, approved by a 15-0-1 vote, with non-voting chair Wilson abstaining.

Approval of Minutes:

Motion by Ferrier, seconded by Grinchuk, to approve the February 2014 minutes; motion approved by a 15-0-1 vote, with non-voting chair Wilson abstaining.

Treasurer's Report:

Treasurer Fox reported there was $185.80 in the Uptown Planners bank account.

Chair/CPC Report

Chair Wilson indicated that Mayor Faulconer will attend a public forum in Hillcrest on April 22, 2014 at the GLBT Center; the forum will be for Third City Council District residents.

He also announced that Adrianna Martinez will be the new representative for Uptown from the Third City Council District.

Public Communication: Non-Agenda Public Comment;

Kara Kong gave an update on the Rock and Roll Marathon, which will take place on Sunday, June 1st. The 2013 event utilized a different route, traveling through North Park, Normal Heights and the Mid-City area; the new 2013 routes were favorable received. There has been an adjustment to the route through Hillcrest for the 2014, because of traffic concerns.

In 2013 there were a total of 22,000 runners in the half-marathon, and 8,000 runners in the full marathon. Uptown Planners will vote on a letter of support for the event at its May meeting.

Leo Wilson reported the Bankers Hill Craft Beer and Art Festival had over 500 in attendance; the event was co-sponsored by the Bankers Hill Business Group and Metro San Diego CDC.

Representatives of Elected Officials:

Toni Duran, representing Assembly Speaker-elect Toni Atkins, spoke of several pending bills before the State Assembly, which addressed issues regarding transgender rights, residential care facilities, and establishing community benefit districts in San Diego. Atkins will be the first Speaker of the Assembly from San Diego, and first lesbian to serve in that position.

Chris Ward, representing State Senator Marty Block, spoke regarding several pending bills involving combating human trafficking, expanding voting rights, and allowing community colleges to award BA degrees, which is done in other states. He provided more details on the proposed community benefit district bill for San Diego.

Informational Items:

None

UPTOWN COMMUNITY PLAN UPDATE - Report on University Heights community plan update meetings; scheduling future Uptown Community Plan update meetings.

1. University Heights Plan Update:

Chris Ward provided an update on two University Heights meetings pertaining to the Uptown Plan update process, as it applies to University Heights. On March 6, 2014, Marlon Pangilinan spoke at the monthly

2

Page 43: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 6

University Heights Community Association meeting; approximately 90 people were in attendance. On March 13, 2014, Ward facilitated a special plan update meeting attended by about 15 people.

Ward prepared a two page written summary of the outcome of the meetings, which is attached as Exhibit "A" to these minutes. Ward provided an overview of the summary to Uptown Planners. Butler expressed concern over whether property owners would be noticed about any proposed land use or zoning changes to their property; a member of the University Heights Historic Society requested further information about University Heights plan update meetings. Ward indicated that his report was just informational; and discussions regarding the issues raised in his summary would take place at future meetings.

Naskar and Jaworski raised issues regarding the summary's reference to possible CUP's for alcohol licenses. Naskar inquired of Pangilinan how much a community had discretion over the conditions and time limits of CUPs.

2. Scheduling of Future Uptown Plan Update Meetings:

The Uptown Planners board, operating as a committee of the whole, called the Uptown Plan Update Committee into session; Roy Dahl and Don Liddell were seated as members of the committee.

Chair Wilson indicated that the board had been reviewing draft elements of the Uptown Plan update over the last several months, and recommended the board set a schedule of which components of the draft plan to review over the next two months. Board members expressed a variety of opinions how to move forward to review the unofficial draft.

City Planner Pangilinan indicated that a draft Mobility Element had not been written, as further traffic analysis and other necessary studies were still being completed. Also, the Historic Resources Element was delayed, due to issues raised by the state over the Golden Hill and North Park historic surveys, and that city staff would need to complete the Uptown Historic Survey. Nevertheless, Pangilinan indicated the official draft of the plan update was scheduled for completion by the end of July 2014.

After further discussion, a motion was made by Naskar, and seconded by Bonn, to request the city extend the time for the completion and release of the final draft Uptown Plan update for four additional months; the motion passed by a vote of 15 -1 -1, Winter voted against the motion, and non-voting chair Wilson abstained. During public comment on the proposed motion Barry Hager spoke in favor of its passage.

The board further agreed to the following tentative schedule for review of the draft Uptown Community Plan; (1.) at its May 5,2014 meeting, Uptown Planners would review the City's CUP policies as they applied to Uptown; and mobility; (2.) at a May special meeting, tentatively scheduled for May 20, 2014, Uptown Planners would discuss urban design; (3.) At its June 3, 2014 meeting Uptown Planners would finish urban design, and review the University Heights land use recommendations, and historic preservatio n.

At the June meeting, the Uptown Planners Plan Update Committee would decide what the next steps would be in the plan update process.

I. Potential Action Item: Planning:

1. 120 ELM ("SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION - CUP AMENDMENT") - Bankers Hill/Park West - Process Three -- Conditional Use Permit to amend conditions on CUP No. 8673 (PTS 1826) and add a childcare center to include 30 children and 10 staff to an existing transitional housing and emergency shelter for the San Diego Rescue Mission on a 1.38-acre lot located at 120 Elm Street. The site is in the NP-3 zone.

Herb Johnson, CEO of the Rescue Mission, spoke regarding the proposed CUP amendment. The first part of the proposed amendment would be to add a child care center for 30 children at the Rescue

3

Page 44: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 6

Mission; half the children were residents of the facility along with their parents; and half would be children of parents who utilize the Rescue Mission during the day.

In addition, two conditions would be removed: (1.) The requirement for a Neighborhood Advisory Committee, which meets once a year would be deleted; (2.) and the requirement that the Rescue Mission submit a litter and loitering control plan to the city each year would also be deleted.

The Neighborhood Advisory Committee, which has met only once a year, has been poorly attended. Its members suggested it be abolished. The controversies and lawsuit which took place 10 years ago were now resolved; and the neighbors are now supportive of the facility.

The Rescue Mission would still comply with the terms of its initial CUP and settlement agreement, and provide cleaning and security for the areas adjacent to the facility. During the last 10 years, crime and fallen and property values had risen in the eight block area around the Rescue Mission.

Public comment was made by Sharon Gehl in support of the project; and Jim Mellos indicated Greg Hinchy, who had played a major role in the lawsuit against the project 10 years ago, was supportive of the proposed amendment.

Butler made a motion to approve the addition of the child care center to the CUP, but opposed the removal of the conditions requiring a Neighborhood Advisory Committee; and removal of the requirement for the annual litter and loiter control plan report Bonner seconded the motion. The motion failed on a vote of 4~11~1, with Butler, Bonner, Grinchuk and Naskar voting in favor; Ward, Tablang, Bonn, Mullaney, Fox, Winter, Pesqueira, Jaworski, Ferrier, Winter and Daniel voting against; non-voting Chair Wilson abstained

Ferrier proposed segmenting the project into three separate motions:

(1.) Ferrier made a motion, seconded by Ward, to support the addition of the child care facility to the Rescue Mission CUP; motion passed by a vote of 14-0-1, with non-voting Chair Wilson abstaining.

(2.) Ferrier made a motion to delete the requirement for a Neighborhood Advisory Committee from the CUP, seconded by Winter; motion passed by a 9-6~1 vote; voting in favor, Winter, Ferrier, Tablang, Ward, Winney, Fox, Daniel, Bonn, Mullaney; voting against, But/er, Bonner, Grinchuk, Jaworski, Pesqueira, Naskar. Non-voting Chair Wilson a~stained.

(3.) Ferrier made a motion to delete the requirement for an annual litter & loitering report from the Rescue Mission CUP, seconded by Winter, the motion passed by an 11-4-1 vote; voting in favor, Winter, Ferrier, Tablang, Ward, Winney, Fox, Jaworski, Daniel, Bonn, Pesqueira, Mullaney; voting against, Butler, Bonner, Grinchuk, Naskar; non-voting chair Wilson abstained.

Board member Mellos arrived during the Rescue Mission presentation; and became part of the quorum at the conclusion of the item.

2. 1243 CYPRESS COURT NDP ("RAGLAND RESIDENCE") - Process Two­Neighborhood Development Permit for Environmentally Sensitive Lands for a first floor addition to an existing garage and 700 sq. ft. companion unit above on a 0.26 acre site with an existing single family residence at 1243 Cypress Court in the RS-1-7 Zone; FAA Part 77; Residential Tandem Parking.

Gary Taylor spoke for the applicants, who were present at the meeting. This was a previously approved project that had its permit expire. The applicant had to make a new submittal as recently enacted regulations were now applicable; and applicant had to update the project's geological, biological, brush management, and storm water management reports. The historic report, prepared approximately five years ago, also needed to be reSUbmitted. The project was for the addition of guest living quarters to a single family residence.

4

Page 45: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 6

During public comment, Roy Dahl raised the issue of whether a previous parking issue involving a driveway cut had been resolved; the applicant indicated it had.

Motion by Daniel, seconded by Winter, to approve the project as presented. The motion passed by a 15-1-1 vote; Bonn voted against the project, and non-voting Chair Wilson abstained. Bonn voted against the project based on there not being an updated historic report.

3408 UNION STREET ("SDCRAA NOISE MONITORING POLES SDP") - Bankers Hill/Park West - Process Four - Site Development Permit to replace an existing wood noise monitoring pole to metal pole with solar panels ranging from 20'-24' in height close to same location. The pole is located adjacent to 3408 Union Street along the airport flight path.

1126 REDWOOD STREET ("SDCRAA NOISE MONITORING POLES SDP") - Bankers Hill/Park West - Process Four - Site Development Permit to replace an existing wood noise monitoring pole to metal pole with solar panels ranging from 20'-24' in height close to same location. The pole is located adjacent to 1126 Redwood Street along the airport fl ight path.

Both items were taken together. Project would replace existing wood monitoring polls with steel poles, with solar panels No public comment.

Applicant indicated the solar panels were removed, as there had been comments about the panels being bulky and unsightly from other community groups. Project was now a replacement of wood poles with steel poles of approximately the same size. The new poles would be hooked to the electric source of the existing poles.

Although an informational item, Marlon Pangilinan indicated it could be made an action item by a 2/3 vote of the board, given the short time frame the project was operating under. Motion by Ward, seconded by Bonner, to make the two noise monitoring pole projects an action item; motion passed by a vote of15-1-1; with Naskar voting no, and non-voting Chair Wilson abstaining.

Motion by Butler, seconded by Ferrier, to approve the project as presented, with the solar panels removed from the poles; motion passed by a vote of 15-0-2, Naskar and non-voting chair Wilson abstaining.

II. Community/Board Reports: Possible Facebook Page

The board discussed creating a Facebook page for Uptown Planners; the majority of members indicated opposition; however, many board members were receptive to establishing a Facebook page as an informational source, with public comment not allowed because of potential legal issues. The Chair agreed to write a leUer to the City Attorney to inquire if there were any legal issues involving Uptown Planners establishing a Facebook page.

Adjournment:

Motion to adjourn by Ferrier; approved by a voice vote at approximately 9:00 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,

Leo Wilson Acting Secretary

5

Page 46: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

Peninsula Community Planning Board March 20, 2014

Meeting Minutes

Meeting Called to order at 6:40 by Julia Quinn

ATTACHMENT 6

In attendance: Dominic Carnevale, Bruce Coons, Shannon Osborne, Mike Ryan, Julia Quinn, Paul Webb, Peter Nystrom, Jay Shumaker, Bruce Cook, Patricia Clark, Mark I<rencil<, and Jarvis Ross.

Approval of Agenda: Qu inn requested that Item #4 (approval of letter to City attorney regarding run-off from PLNU) be tabled until next meeting so that Joe Watkins, representative of PLN U, can respond to the letter before being sent to the City Attorney. Motion by P. Webb, seconded by P. Nystrom, to approve agenda subject to tabling action item #4 to the April meeting. All in favor; Carnevale, Coons, Osborne, Burgess, Webb, Nystrom, Ryan, Shumaker, and Cook. None opposed. Motion passes.

Approval of January Minutes: Motion by P. Nystrom, seconded by P. Webb, to approve January minutes. All in favor: Burgess, Carnevale, Coons, Ryan, Webb, Nystrom; Abstained B. Cook and J. Shumaker (was not present) and S. Osborne (didn't have access to minutes). None opposed. Motion passes.

Approval of February Minutes: Motion by M. Ryan, seconded by B. Cook, to approve February minutes. Voting in favor: Burgess, Carnevale, Coons, Ryan, Webb, Nystrom, Shumaker, Cook. None opposed. Osborne abstained (didn't have access to minutes). None opposed. Motion passes.

Secretary's Report - nothing to report

Treasurer's Report - nothing to report (Treasurer working the election table).

Chair Report -In regards to Sunset Cliffs Natural Park, Planning commission meeting has been moved to March 27,2014. March 2014 PCPB Elections - Polls close at 8pm.

Non-Agenda Public Comment:

Dr. Fred Simon - Republican candidate for 52nd Congress wanted to introduce himself to the community.

Jim Gilhooly - Discussed Navy Storage Project; concerned with traffic on Rosecrans during construction.

Don Sevrens - Sent letter to City of San Diego about alleged PCPB violations of Brown Act from moving discussion items to action items. City of San Diego response, suggesting members attend Community Orientation Workshop.

Vicky (anonymous last name)- Feedback on Remodeling code

Jerry Lohla - Plum and Lowell - house has been left incomplete. Violation has been given.

Nicole Burgess - mentioned SANDAG 1-8 Corridor Study; Nimitz being resurfaced, Ciclosdias #2

Bruce Coons - running for interim for District 2

Page 47: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

Government Reports Tracy Cambre - District 2 District 2 Appointment will be April 14j15 Oversized Vehicle Ordinance - back at City Attorney

ATTACHMENT 6

Marijuana Dispensary - city map shows possible locations where it may be possible US Open - coming in 2021 Ciclosdias.org - Sunday March 30 th in Pacific Beach Faulconer's staff has all moved to Mayor's office, except for Thyme Curtis

City Attorney- Howard Guess, Criminal Division - setting up community courts

New/Old Business Plum Street Vacation, Project No. 321105 - Project Review voted to approve vacation of street. Mike Brensil< presented in favor of project. Motion by P. Webb, seconded by D. Carnevale, to approve proposed road vacation. Discussion: M. Krencik speaks in favor and suggested the vacation of additional ROW at Plum Street and Avenida De Portugal{Addison St.) be reviewed by Park Planning to improve our deficiency in park acreage. P. Nystrom opposes proposal. Vote: In favor: Burgess, Osborne, Krencik, Coons, Carnevale, Webb, Cook. Opposed: Ryan and Nystrom. Shumaker abstained as there are too many unknowns offuture residents. Motion passes.

Peeling Appeal to City Council, Project No. 239065, J. Shumaker discusses supporting appeal on basis of Double Front Ordinance. Appeal will be held on April 29. No action taken.

Action Items:

San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Noise Monitoring Poles, Project No. 340611, presentation by Sjohnna Knack. Project to construct 3 replacement poles in Peninsula.

Heather Nelson completely opposes design. Karen Robertson also opposes poles. Sandi May spoke as a, representive of neighbors around Plum Street and is against the project.

P. Nystrom motion that noise monitoring pole project be accepted with the exception that the solar panels not be included, and have the pole on Browning as close as the current pole as possible. Second by Paul Webb. All in favor: Nystrom, Webb, Carnevale, Coons, Osborne, Ryan, Burgess, and Cool<. Opposed: Shumaker. Motion passes.

Carides Residence, Project No 342622, 921 Harbor View Drive presented by Ryan Ahmadi. P. Webb recommends approval of project. P. Nystrom seconds motion. All in favor: D.Carnevele, B. Coons, S. Osborne, P. Clark, N. Burgess, M. Ryan, P. Webb, P. Nystrom, J. Shumaker, B. Cook. Motion passes.

Letter of Support for Safe Routes to Schools Application: N. Burgess presented proposed letter to support City's application for Safe Routes to Schools in the Peninsula. Motion by J. Shumaker, seconded by P. Nystrom, to approve support letter. Voting in favor: D.Carnevale, B. Coons, S. Osborne, P. Clark, N. Burgess, M. Ryan, P. Webb, P. Nystrom, J. Shumaker, B. Cook. Motion passes.

Approval of Letter to City of San Diego Attorney Regarding Runoff from PLNU to Sunset Cliffs Natural Park -tabled until next month to allow PLNU to respond.

Page 48: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

Subcommittee Reports Airport Authority - nothing to report Environmental/Water- nothing to report Form Based Long Range Planning - nothing to report

ATTACHMENT 6

Liberty Station - Building 271- plans have been submitted to city, progress being made Parks and Recreation - Smoke machine is killing gophers at Robb Field Project Review - noth ing to report Traffic - nothing to report North Bay Community Planning Group - nothing to report

Meeting adjourned by Julia Quinn at 8:42pm,

Page 49: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 6

Meeting was called to order at 6:30 by chair Ruchell Alvarez.

Present: Ruchell Alvarez, Richard Baldwin, Cheryl Brierton, Susan Bugbee, Ashley Christensen, Janice Davis, John Kroll, Richard Santini, David Strickland, David Swarens, Angela Vasconcellos

David Swarens agreed to take minutes for the meeting.

Motion to approve minutes for the meeting of February 12th; Motion by David Strickland, second by Richard Santini. Approved with Davis and Baldwin abstaining (neither present at that meeting)

Reports:

Chris Ward, from the office of Senator Marty Block, spoke, and passed out copies of "Around the Block." Gavin Deeb, from Congresswoman Susan Davis' office spoke and distributed "Davis Dispatch." Molly Chase, new rep for Council President Todd Gloria, introduced herself to the group, and committed to providing an update from the City Attorney on the possibility of enterprise funding application for development of the multi modal corridor connecting the golf course and community. She was also asked to explore ADA issues, and the appropriateness of enhancing existing roadways to non current standards relative to this corridor. She also distributed copies of "District Three Dialogue"

Non agenda Public Comment: David Skillman inquired about the availability of the Sign in Sheet for meetings; future meeting will make a point of announcing the sign in process.

Jerry Raye expressed concerns about vandalism and crime associated with taverns and business patrons, including trash cans damaged and displaced, litter, parking, and other problems.

Doug Kipperman expressed concern about proposed development along the paper extension of 28th street, and its impact on the community, park/open space, and bike routes.

Chair's report: Received memo from Andrew Rice re update on SR 94 project status and environmental review. Committee members received copies of this via email.

Action items:

, , . , mJjjl\!'fI.MJ1~M~iliRJ.lii_llwmllJJIJ.U~~ au~~~t5~Il~_.tI •• ~lJIlltlIftmd~ •• f.WlW_ml~![iIiRE~~~. ~~RcliMti~~1lIiJ. ... mRitmB:wmI~_ !fmiTl!~lDmfml!ml'lmil'li!b,.1t"~~lI~: - , . m, i' ~lItE~~Bllmtl®II'ilif,illR1tg_UEI1lI~

l~~~~~D~

Page 50: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

Elections: Nominations presented by Angela Vasconcellos: Susan Bugbee Ashley Christensen Janice Davis Kelly Sanderson Pat Shields David Skillman David Strickland.

ATTACHMENT 6

All of the above spoke, with the exception of Sanderson, who was not in attendance.

Current member Richard Baldwin was "termed out," and was not eligible to run.

Ballots were distributed, collected, and counted All of the above were elected to the GGHCPC.

A "write in" candidate whose attendance qualifications had not been documented was not elected. The Planning Committee committed to make certain that the sign in sheet would be more clearly available to avoid this issue in the future.

Staff Report by Bernie Turgeon; alternate land use plan for enhanced density in Plan update.

Mr. Turgeon distributed a three page handout of maps; "25th St.& Broadway Golden Hill", "25th

Street Commercial Golden Hill", and "20th & B City Ops Facility". City staff proposed these as sites for increased density in the plan update, going from 29 or 30 dwelling units per acre to possible 44 d.u.a ..

Mr. Turgeon addressed questions from the February meeting, particularly re Historic resources and constraints on Park development. An economic analysis is the next step, and should be available in April. The planning group discussed the proposal.

A motion was made by the Chair, Ruchell Alvarez, and seconded by Cheryl Brierton, to support the City staff proposal to plan for increased density at these sites. 3 in favor 6 opposed 2 abstain Motion failed.

Historic subcommittee meeting noticed/announced, last Wednesday of the month, (03/26/14) 6:30, Golf Course Clubhouse. Update on South Park and Golden Hill Historic Districts is a standing agenda item.

Meeting was adjourned at 8:40

Page 51: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 6

Meeting was called to order at 6:30 by chair Ruchell Alvarez.

Present: Ruchell Alvarez, Michael Burkart, Cheryl Brierton, Susan Bugbee, Ashley Christensen, Janice Davis, John Kroll, Kelly Sanderson, Richard Santini, Pat Shields, David Skillman, David Strickland, David Swarens, Angela Vasconcellos.

Motion to approve April minutes, by A Chrisensen, second by K Sanderson; 7 in favor, 3 abstentions (Brierton, Davis, Santini).

Governmental reports: Community Service Officer, SDPD, Kevin Vasquez, reported, and took inquiries re graffiti in the community and marijuana dispensaries.

Chris Ward, office of Marty Block, distributed "Around the Block" and reported on Toni Atkins's Speakership and the State budget.

Gavin Deeb, from the office of Congress member Davis, presented and distributed the Davis Dispatch. Davis supports "net neutrality" and he answered an inquiry re federal housing support for lower income people.

Aida Castaneda, Assembly member Lorena Gonzalez's office, provided information re upcoming small business resource fair, a proposal to require paid sick leave, and a program providing diapers for needy families.

Molly Chase, of Council President Todd Gloria's staff, reported on the wild fires around the county and fire safety, the Mayor's 2015 draft budget, including restoriation ofGity services and reinvestment in infrastructure, and the upcoming budget forums.

She also shared her office's request for a City Attorney's formal opinion on use of enterprise funding for the multi modal links in the Balboa golf course project.

Public comment: John Kroll inquired about legality of in home "hotel" short term rentals, (e.g. "Air B&B), which he feels are destructive to community stability.

Cheryl Brierton shared information on Airport Authority development, air pollution from freeways, and inquired about sewer group project impact on the 32nd Street canyon. Chair Alvarez will follow up on the potential canyon impact.

David Strickland reported, as rep to Balboa Park Committee, on the proposed expansion of "Houses of Pacific Relations," and on the interest fountains and other water features in Balboa Park.

Chair's Report: There has been no contact yet from the developer of the Fir Street project, re Planning group agenda for review.

Page 52: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 6

Proposal for realignment of parking (straighten current diagonals) in front of the "wounded warrior" project on 28th between "N & "B" Chair pulled item, with a request for more information and review of the block's traffic and parking.

DECO bike program in Golden Hill community, information presented by board member Christensen, on design and locations.

Concerns about both the program and project specifics, including proposed locations, were shared with the City.

Council rep Chase reported that one location, at Grape Street (in front of "So Childish" & "Big Kitchen") would probably be modified (for the better) and requested members to contact her office with any specific concerns regarding sites.

Motion, C Brierton, 2nd Christensen, to express concern that the DECO bike program was not brought to GGH Planning Group prior to adoption by the City.

Passed unanimously.

Election of officers: Motion by Brierton, 2nd by Strickland, R Alvarez as Chair Unanimously carried

Motion by Brierton, 2nd by Strickland, P Shields as Vice Chair Unanimously carried

Richard Santini, by acclamation, was selected as "Media Chair" P. Shields, with D Strickland, as committee reps to CPC, also by acclamation.

Membership representative; Vasconcellos.

Unanimous, Alvarez abstaining.

Swarens reported that the "Historic" subcommittee would not meet on the last Wednesday in May, as scheduled, as neither of the co chairs, himself or Bugbee, would be available. That schedule should resume in June.

Adjourn 8:15

Page 53: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

Talley Fernanda

Subject: RE: !;3alboa Park- NOlse Monitoring Pole

From: Knack Sjohnna Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 4:03 PM To: Martinez, Bruce Cc: Llanos III, Mario R; Mayer Craig; Talley Fernanda Subject: RE: Balboa Park - Noise Monitoring Pole

ATTACHMENT 6

Great, thank you so much for your rapid response. I will ensure we keep Mario's contact information so that he will be contacted during the permit process.

Have a great weekend!

Sjohnna Knack Program Manager Airport Noise Mitigation/ Quieter Home Program P: 619.400.2639

From: Martinez, Bruce [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 09,20144:02 PM To: Knack Sjohnna Cc: Llanos III, Mario R Subject: RE: Balboa Park - Noise Monitoring Pole

Sjohnna,

tb~r~.l~'nq·n~~9'!9;ne}.ifY,'.\fjf~f\~~1,,~.mj4~iJ9~'t~}~eR~r~!J.Qn~i.l§~u;e,t;YRgW'I(R~.~~~~;ll~ht~f",~iit[tf,~c~-rmItt4~,~,f~~,~~) ~i'i~,hgq~:,)IYe£t2!1g!~Y~P:tgia~,ttY'1 Or if you have some type of easement document that may satisfy the authorization to do work on City property, please provide us a copy.

Once you are ready to start the permit process contact Mario Llanos @ 235-1124. He will be able to assist you in getting the Right of Entry Permit. Please be mindful a permit may take up to six weeks to obtain. Thanks and take care.

Bruce Martinez Interim Deputy Director Developed Regional Parks (619) 235-1157 "We Enrich Lives Through Quality Parks and Programs"

From: Knack Sjohnna [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 09, 20143:08 PM To: Martinez, Bruce Cc: Mayer Craig; Talley Fernanda Subject: FW: Balboa Park - Noise Monitoring Pole

Good afternoon Bruce,

1

Page 54: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 6

Were you able to confirm with the Balboa Park Committee that we do not have to present in front of them? We are getting close to resubmitting to the City after meeting with all our local planning groups and want to make sure we have your concurrence that we do not need to hold a separate meeting for the Balboa Park site.

Thank you in advance for your help!

Sjohnna Knacl{ Program Manager Airport Noise Mitigation! Quieter Home Program P: 619.400.2639

--------- ---------.------------------------From: Martinez, Bruce [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 9:15 AM To: Knack Sjohnna Cc: Llanos III, Mario R Subject: RE: Balboa Park - Noise Monitoring Pole

Hello Sjohnna,

I hope all is well. I do concur with the statement you will need a Right of Entry permit to do work on City property. As for going before the Balboa Park Committee, that will most likely not be necessary unless Develop Services Department permitting explicitly requires you to. I see this more of an operations issue to relocate and reduce visual impact of an existing amenity within a secured non public space. City staff can provide a project update to the Committee in their staff report. We will confirm with the Committee's Chairperson and get back to you. Thanks and take care.

Bruce Martinez Interim Deputy Director Developed Regional Parks (619) 235-1157 "We Enrich Lives Through Quality Parks and Programs"

From: Knack Sjohnna [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 9:26 AM To: Martinez, Bruce Cc: Talley Fernanda; Mayer Craig; Deisher, Helene ([email protected]); Nazareno, Angela Subject: Balboa Park - Noise Monitoring Pole

Mr. Martinez,

We spoke back in February regarding the Airport Authority's intention to replace the existing noise monitoring pole located at Balboa Park (inside the gate at the Park and Recreation office).

During that conversation, you mentioned a couple of things I wanted to follow up on:

• You indicated the Airport Authority would not be required to present the proposed project to the Balboa Planning Group because you didn't believe there were any objections to the replacement pole and corresponding equipment, and there we no concerns with visual or historical impacts. Is that accurate?

2

Page 55: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 6

• You asked if there would be any liability to your organization with the installation and maintenance of the new noise monitoring pole. My staff has spoken with Helene Deisher at the City and she confirmed we would require a Right of Entry permit to work on the site. This permit would protect your organization from any liability. Ms. Deisher suggested you call her if you have any questions. Her number is 446-5223. I also copied her on this email.

Please let me know if there are any additional items we need to discuss. If what I presented above is agreeable to you, please indicate so (by replying to this email) and we will proceed as planned. Of course, we will continue to coordinate with you and your staff as we move closer to construction.

Thank you,

Sjohnna Knack Program Manager Airport Noise Mitigation/ Quieter Home Program P: 619.400.2639

3

Page 56: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

ATTACHMENT 7

- _.- . ~~. . - . ~. . .. u ~ ~ ___ •

., , ,. Energy Source

RMTNo. Community Planning Board Meeting Date Attended " ~'. Decision " ,

"i

Approved

The Balboa Park Committee declined a presentation of the project.

1 Balboa Park Committee N/A An upgraded solar-powered steel pole will replace the existing Solar

electric-powered wooden pole.

Greater Golden Hill Planning March 12, 2014 GGH Planning approved the upgraded steel pole at the 5/14/14

2 meeting as presented; an electric-powered steel pole in the same Electric Committee May 14,2014

location as the existing wooden pole.

Uptown Planners approved both poles at the 4/1/14 meeting as

9 Uptown Planners April 1, 2014 presented; upgraded electric-powered steel poles in locations Electric

adjacent to existing wooden poles.

Peninsula Community Planning February 20, 2014 Peninsula approved all three upgraded poles at the 3/20/14

11 March 13, 2014 meeting as presented; electric-powered steel poles in locations Electric Board

March 20, 2014 adjacent to existing wooden poles.

Greater Golden Hill Planning GGH Planning approved the upgraded steel pole at the 3/12/14

16 March 12, 2014 meeting as presented; a solar-powered steel pole in a location Solar Committee

adjacent to the existing wooden pole.

19 Uptown Planners April 1, 2014 Uptown Planners approved both upgraded electric-powered steel

Electric poles in locations adjacent to existing wooden poles.

Peninsula Community Planning February 20, 2014 Peninsula approved all three upgraded poles at the 3/20/14

20 March 13, 2014 meeting as electric-powered steel poles in locations adjacent to Electric Board

March 20, 2014 existing wooden poles.

Peninsula Community Planning February 20, 2014 Peninsula approved all three upgraded poles at the 3/20/14

21 March 13, 2014 meeting as electric-powered steel poles in locations adjacent to Electric

I

Board March 20, 2014 existing wooden poles.

Page 57: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - San Diego · Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee -On May 14,2014, the Greater Golden Hill ... The proposed project will upgrade the existing

SOIA Noise Monitor (RMTs) Locations that would require a pole upgrade.

4000 o 4000 8000 Feet -

N W+E ATTACHMENT 8

s