report on msw management impact on ghg emissions for ghana, south africa & nigeria

Upload: felix-amankwah-diawuo

Post on 03-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    1/35

    I

    I

    NSTITUT

    UPERIO

    ECNICOST

    WAST

    O

    R

    ,

    TOENE

    EPOR

    HGE

    IGERI

    RGY(ME

    ON

    MISSI

    E) |FE

    SW

    NSFO

    IX AMA

    ANAG

    GHA

    KWAH

    EMENT

    A,SO

    Janua

    IAWUO

    IMPA

    THAF

    ry2013

    TON

    RICA

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    2/35

    Reporto

    Table

    Tableo

    Listof

    Listof

    Listof

    Executi

    SECTIO

    AFRICA

    1.1G

    1.2M

    1.2.

    1.2.

    1.2.

    1.2.

    1.3M

    1.3.

    1.3.

    1.3.

    1.3.

    1.4M

    1.4.

    1.4.

    1.4.

    1.4.

    1.5M

    SECTIO

    2.1G

    2.2H

    2.3A

    SECTIO

    REFERE

    APPEN

    MSWManage

    ofConte

    Contents.

    igures.......

    ables.........

    bbreviatio

    eSummar

    1:MSW

    &LAGOS

    neralIntro

    SWinAccra

    2WasteGen

    2WasteColle

    3Recyclinga

    4WasteDisp

    SWinCape

    1WasteGen

    2WasteColle

    3Recyclinga

    4WasteDisp

    SWinLagos

    1WasteGen

    2WasteColle

    3Recycling...

    4WasteDisp

    SWCompar

    2:MSW

    neralIntro

    wSolid

    Wa

    alysisofGH

    3:CONCL

    NCES.........

    ICE...........

    mentImpacto

    nts

    .................

    .................

    .................

    s..............

    y...............

    ANAGEM

    NIGERIA)..

    uction.......

    Ghana......

    ration...........

    ctionandTra

    dCompostin

    sal................

    own,Sout

    ration...........

    ctionandTra

    dCompostin

    sal................

    Nigeria.....

    ration...........

    ctionandTra

    ......................

    sal................

    tiveAnalys

    NDITSIM

    uction.......

    steImpacts

    GsfromMS

    USION.......

    .................

    .................

    nGHGEmissi

    .................

    .................

    .................

    .................

    .................

    NTPRACT

    .................

    ...................

    ...................

    ......................

    nsfer..............

    g....................

    ......................

    Africa........

    ......................

    nsfer..............

    g....................

    ......................

    ...................

    ......................

    nsfer..............

    ......................

    ......................

    isforAccra,

    LICATION

    ...................

    onClimate

    WCompari

    .................

    .................

    .................

    nsforGhana,

    .................

    .................

    .................

    .................

    .................

    CESFORA

    .................

    ...................

    ...................

    ......................

    ......................

    ......................

    ......................

    ...................

    ......................

    ......................

    ......................

    ......................

    ...................

    ......................

    ......................

    ......................

    ......................

    LagosandC

    ORCLIMA

    ...................

    hange........

    gGhana,Ni

    .................

    .................

    .................

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    .................

    .................

    .................

    .................

    .................

    CRA(GHA

    .................

    ..................

    ..................

    ......................

    ......................

    ......................

    ......................

    ..................

    ......................

    ......................

    ......................

    ......................

    ..................

    ......................

    ......................

    ......................

    ......................

    apeTown...

    TECHANG

    ..................

    ..................

    geriaandS

    .................

    .................

    .................

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    ................

    ................

    ................

    ................

    ................

    A),CAPE

    ................

    ...................

    ...................

    ......................

    ......................

    ......................

    ......................

    ...................

    ......................

    ......................

    ......................

    ......................

    ...................

    ......................

    ......................

    ......................

    ......................

    ...................

    ................

    ...................

    ...................

    uthAfrica..

    ................

    ................

    ................

    T|FelixAman

    .................

    .................

    .................

    .................

    .................

    OWN(SO

    .................

    ..................

    ..................

    ......................

    ......................

    ......................

    ......................

    ..................

    ......................

    ......................

    ......................

    ......................

    ..................

    ......................

    ......................

    ......................

    ......................

    ..................

    .................

    ..................

    ..................

    ..................

    .................

    .................

    .................

    wahDiawuo

    ............1

    ............2

    ............3

    ............4

    ............5

    TH

    ............6

    ..............6

    ..............9

    .................9

    .................9

    ...............11

    ...............12

    ............14

    ...............14

    ...............15

    ...............15

    ...............16

    ............18

    ...............18

    ...............19

    ...............20

    ...............20

    ............22

    ..........24

    ............24

    ............25

    ............26

    ..........30

    ..........31

    ..........34 1

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    3/35

    Reporto

    Listo

    Figure1

    Figure1

    Figure1

    Figure1

    Figure1

    Figure1

    Figure

    Figure1

    Figure1

    Figure1

    Figure1

    Figure1

    Figure1

    Figure1

    Figure2

    [20]......

    Figure2

    Figure2

    Figure2

    MSWManage

    Figures

    .1:Flowdia

    .2:Graphof

    .3:Graphof

    .4:Graphof

    .5Dumpsite

    .6:Graphof

    .7:Grapho

    .8:Graphof

    .9:Graphof

    .10:Grapho

    .11:Grapho

    .12:Graph

    .13:Grapho

    .14:Grapho

    .1Simplifie

    ...................

    .2:Graphof

    .3:Graphof

    .4:GHGPro

    mentImpacto

    ramofInte

    Waste%Co

    WasteGen

    Percentage

    AreawithS

    Percentage

    WasteGen

    Waste%Co

    recyclingR

    fAverage

    fMSWperc

    verageGen

    fWastesPe

    fPerCapita

    schematic

    ...................

    LevelsofG

    GHGfrom

    ortionsfro

    nGHGEmissi

    ratedMS

    mpositioni

    ratedvs.Co

    ofRecycling

    cavengers[

    ofWasteDi

    erationper

    mposition,

    te(%),Cape

    asteTonna

    entage,Lag

    eratedWas

    rcentageCh

    Collection

    fwastema

    ..................

    G(Gg)from

    SW............

    Waste,ex

    nsforGhana,

    System[1].

    Accra........

    llectedper

    andcompo

    ]................

    posal,Accr

    earvs.GD

    apeTown...

    Town.........

    eGenerate

    s................

    evs.Collect

    aracteristics

    Populatio

    agements

    ...................

    allSectors.

    ...................

    ludingLUC

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    ..................

    ..................

    earvs.GDP

    stinginAccr

    ..................

    .................

    ,CapeTow

    ..................

    ..................

    d/year,Lag

    ..................

    edperyear

    ..................

    Indicators.

    stemandG

    ..................

    ..................

    ..................

    .................

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    ...................

    ...................

    Accra........

    a................

    ...................

    ...................

    ..................

    ...................

    ...................

    s................

    ...................

    vs.GDP,La

    ...................

    ...................

    HGemissio

    ...................

    ...................

    ...................

    ...................

    T|FelixAman

    ...................

    ...................

    ...................

    ...................

    ...................

    ...................

    ...................

    ...................

    ...................

    ...................

    ...................

    os...............

    ...................

    ...................

    s(inurban

    ...................

    ...................

    ...................

    ...................

    wahDiawuo

    .............7

    .............9

    ...........10

    ...........11

    ...........12

    ...........12

    ...........14

    ...........15

    ...........16

    ...........18

    ...........19

    ...........20

    ...........22

    ...........23

    SWM)

    ...........25

    ...........28

    ...........28

    ...........29

    2

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    4/35

    Reporto

    Listo

    Table1.

    Table1.

    Table1.

    Table1.

    Table1.

    Table1.

    Table1.

    Table1.

    Table1.

    Table1.

    Table2.

    Table2.

    Source/

    Table2.

    Table2.

    MSWManage

    Tables

    1:Informati

    :Thewast

    :Volume&

    :WasteM

    :Volumeo

    6:Thewast

    7:Volumeo

    :Thewast

    :Natureof

    10:PerCapi

    1:Summary

    :Aggregat

    inkCatego

    :Breakdo

    : Breakdo

    mentImpacto

    nonAfrica

    typeandc

    Dailytonn

    nagement

    Solidwast

    typeandc

    Solidwast

    typeandc

    solidwaste

    aMSWgen

    ofPotential

    Emissions

    y,including

    nofEmissi

    nofEmissi

    nGHGEmissi

    andWaste

    mpositioni

    geofwaste

    ptionsinA

    generation

    mpositioni

    generation

    mpositioni

    disposalin

    erationand

    ClimateCh

    ndRemova

    andexcludi

    ns(excludin

    nsinWast

    nsforGhana,

    anageme

    theAccra

    collectedin

    cra,Ghana

    inCapeto

    theCapet

    inLagosNi

    LagosNig

    typicalNig

    Household

    ngeandth

    lsofCO2,C

    gLUCF(Gg

    gLUCF)for

    (excluding

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    tinAfrica[

    etropolita

    Accraover

    [8]..............

    nSouthAfr

    ownSouth

    eria[13]...

    ria[13]......

    erianCity[1

    ollection(Y

    irImpacts[

    4andN2Oi

    andPercen

    hreeGases

    LUCF)forth

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    ,23]..........

    areaGhan

    hepast6ye

    ...................

    ca[9].........

    frica[7].....

    ...................

    ...................

    4]...............

    ar,2000)[1

    1]..............

    CO2Equiva

    age)[22]....

    (Year,1994)

    eeGases(Y

    T|FelixAman

    ...................

    a[6]............

    ars[7].........

    ...................

    ...................

    ...................

    ...................

    ...................

    ...................

    5,23]..........

    ...................

    lentbyMaj

    ...................

    [22]............

    ear,1994)[

    wahDiawuo

    .............8

    .............9

    ...........10

    ...........13

    ...........14

    ...........17

    ...........18

    ...........19

    ...........21

    ...........22

    ...........26

    r

    ...........27

    ...........27

    2].......29

    3

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    5/35

    Reporto

    Listo

    CCWL

    CFCs

    CDM

    CO2

    CH4

    CMA

    Gg

    GDP

    GHG

    GWP

    HFCs

    IPCC

    IEA

    LAWMA

    LCA

    LUCF

    MBT

    MSW

    MLC

    N2O

    OECD

    PPM

    PFCs

    SF6

    UNFCC

    MSWManage

    Abbrev

    mentImpacto

    ations

    nGHGEmissi

    City

    Chlo

    Clea

    Carb

    Met

    Cape

    Giga

    Gros

    Gree

    Glob

    Hydr

    Inter

    Inter

    Lago

    Life

    Lan

    Mec

    Mun

    Mun

    Nitr

    Org

    Parti

    Perfl

    Sulp

    Unit

    nsforGhana,

    Country

    ofluorocar

    Developm

    ondioxide

    ane

    Metropolit

    grams

    sDomestic

    nhouseGas

    alWarming

    ofluorocarb

    governmen

    nationalEn

    sStateWas

    ycleAnalys

    usechang

    anicalBiol

    icipalSolid

    icipalLocal

    usOxide

    nisationfor

    clesPerMil

    uorocarbon

    urHexaflu

    dNations

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    asteLimite

    ons

    ntMechani

    anArea

    roduct

    Potential

    ons

    alPanelon

    rgyAgency

    teManage

    s

    andForest

    gicalTreat

    aste

    ouncils

    EconomicC

    ion

    ride

    ramework

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    sm

    ClimateCha

    entAuthor

    y

    ent

    operation

    onventionf

    T|FelixAman

    nge

    ty

    andDevelo

    rClimateC

    wahDiawuo

    ment

    ange

    4

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    6/35

    Reporto

    ExecuEven th

    estimat

    justami

    thefact

    allthee

    andma

    Eventh

    benefits

    difficult

    composi

    andind

    In deve

    decades

    populati

    maydou

    increase

    Inallth

    those o

    practice

    waste c

    environ

    commu

    manage

    Thisrep

    African

    Practice

    compar

    emissio

    MSWManage

    tiveSuough, waste

    dtobewith

    noraspecto

    thatproper

    missions in

    ufacturings

    ugh,LCAst

    of various

    to analyze

    tionandma

    strialcontin

    loped coun

    , reaching a

    onsandlivin

    bleinvolum

    inwastege

    seanalyses

    developin

    slead

    to

    m

    ould be rec

    ent. There

    ity sectors

    ent

    ortseeksto

    Continent n

    in terms

    tiveanalysi

    levels

    and

    i

    mentImpacto

    mary manageme

    in35%ofh

    fglobalemi

    treatmenta

    alltheothe

    ectors.

    dieshavep

    aste mana

    the full ma

    nagementa

    uestoincre

    ries, per ca

    level five t

    gstandards,

    einthecur

    erationby

    , itbeenes

    nations ar

    reanaerobi

    ycled by th

    is a need

    work toge

    establishth

    amely; Gha

    of Waste

    ofMSWm

    tspotential

    nGHGEmissi

    nt sector c

    umancause

    ssionstobe

    nddisposal,

    sectorsof

    rovidedextr

    gement opt

    nitude of t

    ndinaccura

    seworldwi

    pita waste

    six timesh

    wastegene

    entdecade.

    heyear202

    ablishedth

    e anticipate

    c,methane

    e urban po

    to develop

    ther to de

    ewastecon

    na, Nigeria

    Generation,

    nagement

    orthe

    Clim

    nsforGhana,

    ntribution

    emissions,

    omingacri

    theprevent

    theeconom

    emelyusefu

    ions, but y

    hese emissi

    iesinemiss

    eintandem

    generation

    igher than

    rationinde

    Ifcurrenttr

    5.

    tOECDcou

    d to increa

    producingc

    r generatin

    an integra

    elop local

    tributionto

    and South

    Collection,

    ouldbelin

    teChange.

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    to Greenho

    oweverthe

    icalandcru

    ionandrec

    including;

    lanalyseso

    t still the u

    ons in term

    ionsmodels

    withgrowt

    increased n

    hat in devel

    elopingcou

    endscontin

    ntriesgener

    se significan

    onditionsin

    g income f

    ted approa

    solutions p

    GHG inthre

    frica by an

    Recycling

    edtotheir

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    se Gas (G

    wastesecto

    ialsaverof

    veryofwas

    energy, fore

    thepotent

    navailability

    s of world

    .Wastegen

    inconsum

    arly three

    oping coun

    ntriesisalso

    e,theworld

    atethehigh

    tly as bett

    landfills.A

    r themselv

    h where t

    omoting s

    e(3)differe

    alyzing thei

    Composti

    correspondi

    T|FelixAman

    G) is mino

    rcanmove

    emission.Th

    tereducess

    stry,mining

    ialclimatei

    of real dat

    ide waste

    eration,bot

    tion.

    old over th

    ries. With i

    increasingr

    mayseeaf

    est levelso

    r waste m

    highpropor

    es and prot

    e public, p

    stainable s

    ntcountries

    r Waste M

    ng and La

    gcontributi

    wahDiawuo

    , which is

    rombeing

    isisdueto

    ignificantly

    , transport

    pactsand

    a makes it

    eneration,

    domestic

    e last two

    creases in

    apidly,and

    ive(5)fold

    methane,

    nagement

    tionof

    the

    ecting the

    rivate and

    lid waste

    withinthe

    nagement

    dfilling. A

    onofGHG

    5

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    7/35

    Reporto

    SECTI

    TOW

    1.1Ge

    Municip

    owner,

    of wast

    other. T

    depend

    inhabita

    factor.

    waste

    arrange

    Putresci

    eyesore,

    smellw

    process.

    The lev

    with sci

    compar

    industriwastes i

    has ther

    impact

    thisbyh

    1.2.3.4. I5.

    Even th

    generall

    Manage

    &comp

    some c

    approac

    various

    MSWManage

    ON1:M

    (SOUT

    neralInt

    alSolidWas

    serorprod

    produced

    he content

    hugelyonth

    ntsbut it is

    SW inanu

    nd

    can

    beents, they

    ble are the

    e.g. of whi

    ilestheno

    ls of these

    ntific facts

    dtothede

    l

    areas

    posesverycritic

    eforeneces

    fthesewas

    ierarchically

    Prevention(

    Reuse

    Recycleand

    Incineratoru

    Landfilling

    ugh many

    accepted

    mentappro

    stingappro

    untries in

    handeven

    tagesofwa

    mentImpacto

    WMAN

    AFRICA

    oduction

    te(MSW) is

    ucer.TheM

    in urban ar

    characteriz

    epopulatio

    very import

    rbandescri

    categorizecould be

    one that ea

    ch is food

    fermentab

    categories a

    that, the de

    elopednati

    s

    some

    envilfortheen

    sitated the

    tematerials

    stipulatingt

    Wastesourc

    composting

    se

    countries h

    sthebest

    chseeksto

    achwhileso

    frica are

    atimesope

    temanage

    nGHGEmissi

    GEMEN

    )&LAG

    canbedefi

    SWisusuall

    as, in whic

    tion and q

    ,GrossDo

    nttoackno

    tion isdivid

    d

    into

    Hazsubdivided i

    sily decomp

    aste. The f

    letriestor

    nd its comp

    veloping co

    ons.Sinceth

    ronmental

    atiresustaina

    eed to imp

    .Countries

    hebestprac

    ereduction)

    ve not bee

    aytobring

    berealized.

    mecountrie

    oving up t

    nlyburning/

    entpractic

    nsforGhana,

    PRACT

    S(NIGE

    edasanys

    atermoft

    its nature

    antity of

    esticProdu

    wledgethe

    ed intoco

    rdous

    and

    nto Putres

    ses rapidly

    ermentable

    sistdecom

    ositionvary

    ntries tend

    ese,waste

    nd

    health

    ribilityofbot

    lementsom

    lloverthe

    ticestoado

    able to ad

    tobearthe

    Manycoun

    sinAsiastil

    e ladder b

    combusting

    s.

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    CESFOR

    IA)

    craporsoli

    nusedinc

    or composit

    SW genera

    ct(GDP),livi

    factthatth

    ponentsref

    Nonhazar

    ible, ferme

    and usually

    also decom

    ositionand

    fromdevel

    to have hi

    eneratedfr

    ks

    and

    therhumansa

    e goodman

    orldhave

    tstartingfr

    opt the pri

    optimizatio

    trieswithin

    ladopttheI

    ut still ther

    thesewaste

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    ACCRA(

    materialw

    ntextofhe

    ion varies f

    ted in a pa

    ngstandard

    regionsre

    erredtoas;

    ous

    wastetable and

    gives an u

    poses but

    henceslow

    ped countr

    h proportio

    mresidenti

    fore

    properdenviroec

    agementski

    doptedsom

    om;

    cipal goal

    n levelstha

    Europeado

    ncineration

    e is still th

    s.TheFigur

    T|FelixAman

    GHANA)

    hich isdisca

    terogeneou

    om one re

    rticular regi

    andthelife

    sources isal

    Organican

    .

    Within

    thnonfermen

    pleasant sm

    ithout the

    downtheb

    to develo

    ns of organi

    alareasthro

    managemeologicalexis

    ll tocurb th

    estrategies

    f Preventio

    the Integra

    ttheReuse

    approach.E

    landfilling/

    e1.1below

    wahDiawuo

    CAPE

    rdedby its

    collection

    ion to the

    on though

    tyleofthe

    soamajor

    Inorganic

    e

    Organic

    table. The

    ell and an

    npleasant

    reakdown

    ing nation

    c waste as

    ughtothe

    nt

    of

    these

    tence.This

    enegative

    intackling

    , but it is

    tedWaste

    ,Recycling

    enthough

    dump site

    showsthe6

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    8/35

    Reporto

    Solid w

    industri

    The ava

    poor o

    substan

    at pres

    that wa

    the con

    Withint

    theirwa

    Africa. F

    countrie

    Africa)

    necessit

    of Clim

    general

    MSWManage

    aste genera

    l developm

    ilability and

    nonexiste

    ially in ma

    ntthere is

    ste manage

    tinent.

    hisreport,t

    stecomposi

    urthermore

    s would be

    ue to the

    atedforsom

    te Change

    overviewof

    mentImpacto

    Figure1.1tion rates

    ent, waste

    quality of

    nt [2,3]. T

    y African t

    a lack of

    ment activi

    hree(3)diff

    ionsandth

    for the di

    analyzed,

    fact that,

    eplanningr

    and most i

    somestatist

    nGHGEmissi

    :Flowdiagand compo

    manageme

    data on so

    he collecti

    erritoriesdu

    comprehen

    ties vary si

    erentcountr

    irmanagem

    cussion of

    hich includ

    odern set

    eformstom

    portantly

    icswithinth

    nsforGhana,

    ramofIntesition vary

    nt system

    lid waste g

    n of wast

    ring the la

    ive waste

    gnificantly

    ieswithinA

    entsituatio

    MSW, som

    s; Accra (G

    lement has

    anagetheh

    ublic healt

    Africanco

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    gratedMSacross Afri

    and lifestyl

    eneration a

    e related

    t decade,

    data for Af

    ithin indivi

    fricahaveb

    ;thesecou

    populous

    hana), Lago

    drifted to

    ugewasteg

    related iss

    tentingene

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    System[1ca in relati

    applicable

    d manage

    ata and st

    .g. Republi

    rica [4]. It

    dual territo

    enchosen

    triesareGh

    rban cities

    s (Nigeria)

    the Urban

    nerationth

    ues. The Ta

    ral.

    T|FelixAman

    ]n to local

    to each c

    ent in Afri

    tistics has

    of South

    is also ack

    ries, let al

    oranalysis i

    ana,Nigeria

    within thes

    nd Cape to

    centres an

    athasagre

    ble 1.1 bel

    wahDiawuo

    economy,

    ountry[2].

    ca is very

    improved

    frica; but

    owledged

    ne across

    ntermsof

    andSouth

    e selected

    wn (South

    d this has

    tpotential

    w gives a7

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    9/35

    Reporto

    Table1

    Catego

    Noofco

    Populat

    MeanG

    Populat

    Populat

    Populat

    Rural

    Urban

    Averag

    Percent

    CH4glo

    CH4co

    CH4gen

    WasteP

    Urbano

    MSWw

    MSWty

    Foodw

    Papera

    Textile

    Plastic

    Grass/

    Leather

    Rubber

    Glass

    Metal

    Other

    TotalInert/n

    Organic

    MSWManage

    .1:Informa

    y

    untries

    on

    ossDomes

    onofGhan

    onofSouth

    onofNiger

    forAfrica

    ageofAfric

    alwarmin

    tentoflan

    eratedpert

    roductionp

    rganicMS

    stecompo

    e

    ste

    dcard

    ood

    ncombust

    /biodegrad

    mentImpacto

    tiononAfr

    icProduct

    ,GDP

    Africa,GD

    a,GDP

    onGHGin

    potential(

    fillgas

    onneofwet

    ercapita

    wastepro

    ition

    Av

    ble

    ble/combu

    nGHGEmissi

    icaandWa

    Pop

    Greenhou

    theworldL

    WP)

    MSW

    W

    uctioninA

    rageAfric

    stible

    nsforGhana,

    steManag

    Qu

    61

    934

    $4,

    25

    50.

    162

    lationPer

    60

    40

    segas(GH

    1.3

    6%ndfillGas

    21x

    50

    243

    steProdu

    292

    rica 50

    58

    nUrbanM

    Me

    48.

    10.

    2.1

    8.4

    6.7

    0.8

    1.4

    3.5

    2.6

    15.

    100

    17.

    56.

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    mentinAf

    ntity

    ,046,079

    86

    illion,$391

    Million,$40

    .5Million,$2

    entage

    )emission

    tCO2equiv

    ata

    CO2GWP

    m3

    tion

    kg/capita/y

    t/annum

    organic

    SWCompo

    n

    .0

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    rica[5,23]

    9.7Million

    8,236.80Mil

    43,985.8Mil

    s

    lentperca

    ar

    sition

    T|FelixAman

    lion

    lion

    ita/year

    wahDiawuo

    8

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    10/35

    Reporto

    1.2MTheMS

    Compos

    1.2.2W

    Theesti

    theesti

    around

    compos

    dumpsit

    constitu

    represe

    Table1

    WasteT

    Proporti

    These s

    industri

    andtrop

    1.2.2W

    Solidwa

    The300

    wastec

    MSWManage

    WinAccmanagem

    t

    and

    Waste

    asteGener

    mationoft

    ationofin

    1,500 tons

    ing plant a

    e. In the co

    te the high

    tationindic

    .2:The

    wa

    ype Or

    &

    on(%) 65

    atistics give

    lizedcountr

    icalareash

    asteCollec

    stecollectio

    ,000tonsof

    llection in

    1.

    3.

    mentImpacto

    a,Ghanantisstudie

    Disposal

    tion

    tal wasteq

    estmentne

    per day [6]

    d 300 tons

    mposition o

    st percenti

    tethisasse

    tetype

    an

    ganici.eFo

    Plant

    Figure an affirma

    yintermso

    vehugecoll

    ionandT

    nisaprobl

    solidwaste

    ccra involv

    67

    5

    3

    .5

    17.1

    nGHGEmissi

    inAccraG

    uantitiesan

    eds. Itisest

    , approxim

    is left unco

    f the waste

    le proporti

    rtion.

    compositi

    d Paper

    6

    .2:Graphtion to the

    ftheircomp

    ectionofpla

    ansfer

    minAccra

    collectedp

    s removal

    1.2

    ofwast

    nsforGhana,

    ana,based

    quantities

    imatedthat

    tely 200 to

    llected whil

    generated,

    n of about

    onin

    the

    A

    Textile

    1.7

    fWaste%

    varying dif

    ositionsand

    ntdebrisac

    hereatlea

    ryearalon

    fwaste fro

    65

    Compo

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    ontheWast

    percapita i

    theaverage

    ns of orga

    the remai

    there is an

    65% [6].

    ccrametro

    Plastic Gl

    3.5 3

    Compositio

    erences in

    againthef

    ontributoro

    st42%ofp

    represent

    neighborh

    ition,Acc

    O

    P

    T

    P

    G

    I

    O

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    eGeneratio

    required f

    wastequan

    ic waste is

    ing 1,000 t

    indication t

    he Table 1

    politanar

    ss Metal

    2.5

    ninAccradeveloping

    ctthatcou

    ftheorgani

    oplepractic

    nly60%of

    oodsandtr

    ra

    rganici.eFoo

    aper

    extile

    lastic

    lass

    etal

    ert

    thers

    T|FelixAman

    ,Collection

    rplanning

    titygenerat

    directed in

    ons is trans

    at the orga

    .2 and the

    aGhana

    [6

    Inert

    17.1

    country and

    trieslocate

    wastelevel

    eopenwast

    wastegener

    ansportto

    d&Plant

    wahDiawuo

    Recycle&

    ffortsand

    dinAccra

    to Accras

    erred to a

    nic wastes

    Figure 1.2

    ]

    Others

    1.2

    that of a

    dinhumid

    s.

    edisposal.

    ated.Solid

    discharge

    9

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    11/35

    Reporto

    pointat

    requirin

    equipm

    smaller

    andthe

    Table1

    Year

    1998

    1999

    2000

    2001

    2002

    2003

    City&C

    isdeter

    ofthen

    trucks,

    entranc

    Fromth

    made in

    posesso

    MSWManage

    thedumpsi

    over 70%

    nt capital c

    amountthat

    effortsmad

    .3:Volume

    A

    75

    96

    16

    17

    17

    18

    ountryWast

    inedtoma

    ewmillenni

    bulldozers,

    totheland

    Figure1.3

    eFigure1.3

    collectinge

    mechallen

    0

    100000

    200000

    300000

    400000

    500000

    600000

    700000

    800000

    900000

    mentImpacto

    e.Thisisth

    of the total

    ost, runnin

    ofequipm

    inthecolle

    &Dailyto

    erageton

    0

    0

    50

    00

    20

    00

    eLimited(C

    ethemetr

    m.Theinve

    a tanker t

    ill[7].

    Graphof

    above,ther

    specially th

    esespeciall

    1998 19

    Aver

    nGHGEmissi

    mostexpe

    solid waste

    costs of fu

    nt.TheTab

    ctionofthes

    nageofw

    agegener

    CWL)isthe

    poliscleane

    ntoryofCC

    uck, a tipp

    asteGene

    eexistsom

    widening

    insituation

    9 2000 20

    geTonna

    nsforGhana,

    nsiveparto

    manageme

    el, spare p

    le1.3below

    ewasteon

    stecollect

    ted/day

    newlyappoi

    randsafert

    Lequipme

    r truck, a r

    atedvs.Co

    difference

    ifferences

    swheremu

    01 2002 2

    geGen./

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    thesolidw

    t budget [7

    rts, tires, e

    showssom

    dailybasis.

    dinAccra

    Averaget

    450600

    600800

    12001500

    13001500

    13001500

    13001500

    ntedwaste

    oaidgoodh

    nt includes

    efuse comp

    llectedper

    inthewast

    s the year

    chofthewa

    003

    ollected

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    astemanag

    ]. Main cos

    tc. Labor co

    estatistics

    overthep

    onnagecol

    anagemen

    ealthbythe

    2compact

    actor, and

    earvs.GD

    that isgen

    asses byas

    stecontent

    sGDP

    Averageton

    generated/y

    Averageton

    collected/ye

    GDP(0.0000

    T|FelixAman

    mentsyste

    t componen

    st constitut

    fthewaste

    st6years

    ected/day

    tcompanyf

    endofthef

    rtrucks,15

    weight bri

    ,Accra[A2

    eratedand

    against the

    isorganica

    age

    ar

    age

    r

    $Million)

    wahDiawuo

    inAccra,

    ts includes

    es a much

    generated

    7]

    rAccra.It

    irstdecade

    rollon/off

    dge at the

    ]

    theefforts

    GDP; thus

    dhashigh

    10

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    12/35

    Reporto

    potentia

    rodents

    Neverth

    accessib

    oncapit

    collectio

    wheret

    trucks,

    thosew

    disposal

    thedisp

    threeti

    1.2.3R

    With th

    activitie

    undermi

    garbage

    leveling

    sold to

    wastefl

    bottles,

    addition

    recyclab

    toeithe

    AccraM

    200ton

    thisneg

    MSWManage

    l for possib

    suchasrat.

    eless,the

    C

    ility,roadco

    al,andcoop

    nvehiclesa

    eresidents

    uch as skip

    ereresiden

    containers

    osalsitean

    esperday.

    cyclingan

    eUrbancit

    in this fiel

    ne smallsc

    trucks, bef

    andcompre

    the recyclab

    w.Themat

    plastic con

    allycollecte

    les.TheFigu

    recycleorc

    Figur

    etropolitan

    perdaysin

    tivelyaffect

    mentImpacto

    le fermenta

    CWLhas

    op

    nditions,tr

    erationfrom

    reopentip

    usehouseh

    and arm rol

    tsaretoop

    reaccessibl

    replacedb

    Composti

    ,Accraunr

    d are poorl

    le recovery

    ore and im

    ssingthen

    le waste bu

    erialiskept

    tainers, me

    onsiteand

    re1.4belo

    ompost.

    1.4:Graputhority(A

    eitsoperat

    theproduc

    %o

    nGHGEmissi

    tion after 2

    timizedthe

    fficspeeds,

    residents

    ertrucksa

    ldgarbage

    l trucks are

    ortoprocu

    eforreside

    theempty

    ng

    gulateddu

    stimulated

    activities. I

    mediately a

    wlydispose

    yer. There i

    awayfromt

    tal cans, et

    soldforas

    represents

    ofPercentA)operate

    ioneversinc

    ioncapacity

    40

    152

    Recyclin

    nsforGhana,

    4hrs of not

    costof

    colle

    distanceof

    ithcollectio

    drearloadi

    binswhicht

    also in use

    reanduseh

    tswithout

    one. Inso

    pingseem

    and suppo

    Accra, wa

    fter unloadi

    dwaste.Pic

    s only a lim

    ewasteat

    c., are salv

    allprofitto

    thepercent

    ageofRec

    sacomposti

    e1974anda

    .

    90

    andCo

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    collection

    ctionby

    an

    collectionz

    ncontainers

    ngcompact

    otaling20,0

    for commu

    ouseholddu

    harge.Whe

    eplaces,co

    tobe the

    rted by loc

    te pickers s

    ng. They o

    ked itemsa

    ited proport

    thehouseho

    aged and

    theinterm

    gesofwast

    clingandcngplanttha

    resultofits

    posting,

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    nd also be

    lyzingthe

    f

    nestodisp

    andschedu

    iontrucks f

    0acrossAc

    al service t

    stbins.Inth

    nthecontai

    ntainersar

    heapestm

    l governme

    ort through

    ten preven

    restoredo

    ion of reco

    ldlevelwhe

    ept for do

    diarymen

    compositio

    ompostingthasanope

    age,itbrea

    Accra

    T|FelixAman

    omes a fee

    ollowingfac

    osalsite, int

    les.Themo

    rdoortod

    cra[7].Cont

    o inaccessibl

    eseplaces,l

    nerisfull,it

    pickedup

    ansofwast

    nts. Munici

    refuse fro

    the comp

    sideofthe

    erable mat

    resuchitem

    mestic use.

    hooccasion

    nsthathave

    inAccrarationalcap

    sdownfreq

    Metal

    Paper

    Organic

    Plastic

    Glass

    wahDiawuo

    dstock for

    tors:roads

    erestrates

    tcommon

    orservice

    ainerhoist

    le areas or

    argewaste

    istakento

    softenas

    edisposal,

    al policies

    incoming

    ctor from

    roaduntil

    rial in the

    sasempty

    They are

    allycollect

    beenable

    cityof

    uently;

    11

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    13/35

    Reporto

    1.2.4W

    Asemic

    operate

    compac

    measur

    withso

    Thedu

    manage

    duetot

    MSWManage

    asteDispo

    ontrolleddu

    withsomef

    ionandthe

    stomitigat

    escavenge

    psite isthe

    ent, ifun

    epossibilit

    mentImpacto

    al

    mpisthefir

    rmofinspe

    application

    otherenvir

    stryingtoc

    Figu

    onlyopen,

    anagedwel

    oftherele

    Figure1.6:

    51.

    11.6

    4.

    nGHGEmissi

    ststageint

    ctionandre

    fsoilcover.

    onmentali

    ollectsome

    e1.5Dumemicontrol

    lcanposea

    seofleacha

    GraphofP

    19.

    0.7

    %ofWa

    nsforGhana,

    ecountrys

    cordingofin

    Operatedd

    pacts.Figur

    ecyclablem

    siteArea

    ledsolidwa

    greatenvir

    teandlandfi

    ercentage

    12.2

    steDispo

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    effortstoup

    comingwas

    mps,howe

    e1.5illustra

    aterials.

    ithScavenstedisposal

    nmentalef

    llgasespeci

    fWasteDi

    sal,Accra

    Wa

    Bur

    Pu

    Du

    Bur

    Ot

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    gradelandfi

    e,thepract

    er,implem

    testhenatu

    ers[7]facility inA

    ectalongsid

    allyduringr

    posal,Acc

    stecollected

    nedbyhouse

    licdump

    pedelsewh

    iedbyhouse

    ers

    T|FelixAman

    lls.Controlle

    iceofextens

    ntonlylimi

    reofthedu

    cra.Thetyp

    ehealthrel

    inyseasons

    a

    byagents

    hold

    re

    old

    wahDiawuo

    ddumps

    ivewaste

    ed

    psite

    eofwaste

    tedissues

    .

    12

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    14/35

    Reporto

    TheFigu

    are prac

    really a

    alongsid

    treatme

    thesoil

    Table1

    Dispos

    Wastec

    Burned

    Publicd

    DumpeBuried

    Others

    Metal

    Paper

    Organic

    Plastic

    Glass

    MSWManage

    re1.6abov

    ticed as of

    arcade wa

    e with haz

    nt can have

    swell.

    .4:Waste

    lmeans

    ollectedby

    byhouseho

    ump

    elsewhereyhousehol

    mentImpacto

    andtheT

    now. The m

    y of managi

    rdous wast

    some unple

    anagemen

    gents

    d

    d

    nGHGEmissi

    ble1.4belo

    ost dangero

    ng waste d

    e such as b

    asantsituat

    tOptionsi

    Recycl

    nsforGhana,

    wgiveana

    us of all th

    e to its ser

    atteries. A

    ionofmixin

    Accra,Gh

    Pe

    19.

    12.

    51.

    11.4.4

    0.7

    ingandCo

    90

    40

    15

    2

    5

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    ccountofth

    burning/co

    ious health

    ain burying

    g withgrou

    ana[8]

    centage (

    posting

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    ewastema

    mbustion o

    implication

    some of t

    nd water an

    )

    T|FelixAman

    nagemento

    these was

    especially

    ese wastes

    dagain con

    wahDiawuo

    tionsthat

    e which is

    hen burnt

    with pre

    taminating

    13

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    15/35

    Reporto

    1.3MThe MS

    Collectio

    1.3.1W

    The wa

    commer

    could ri

    existing

    basedo

    Figure1

    levels;

    Table1

    Year

    1996

    2001

    2004

    Thepro

    The Fig

    weight

    20%con

    resident

    than20

    MSWManage

    WinCapW manage

    n,

    Recycle

    asteGener

    te quantity

    cial activitie

    se with eco

    andplanned

    yearonst

    .7belowrep

    .5:Volume

    Figureortionofco

    re 1.8 belo

    onsistsofo

    sistsofpap

    ial and com

    byweight.

    20000

    40000

    60000

    80000

    100000

    120000

    140000

    160000180000

    200000

    mentImpacto

    eTown,Sent is stu

    Compost

    a

    tion

    estimates p

    s and the t

    nomic grow

    wastedisp

    tistics,due

    resentsom

    ofSolidw

    1.7:Graphmponentsf

    w indicates

    rganicwast

    erandcard

    mercial was

    2

    000

    2

    001

    nGHGEmissi

    outhAfriied for Ca

    d

    Waste

    Di

    er capita va

    pe of com

    th and risin

    salfacilities

    tothepopu

    forecasted

    stegenera

    ofWasteGundinthe

    that nearly

    suchaskit

    oard.Thes

    te stream,

    2

    003

    2

    004

    2

    005

    Waste

    nsforGhana,

    cae TownSo

    posal

    ry across C

    unity. The

    g standards

    inCapeTo

    lationrisea

    annualwast

    ioninCap

    To

    650

    107

    215

    nerationpastemater

    30% of the

    chenandga

    threecom

    ith glass,

    2

    006

    2

    007

    2

    008

    eneratio

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    uth Africa,

    pe Town, d

    major conc

    of living a

    n.Wasteg

    dinfluxof

    egeneratio

    etownSou

    nageofW

    000

    9014

    8523

    eryearvs.ialhastheO

    residential

    rdenwaste,

    onentsacc

    etal, textile

    2

    010

    2

    011

    nvsGDP

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    based on t

    epending o

    rn is that

    d quickly e

    nerationha

    ouristactivi

    levelsand

    thAfrica[

    steGener

    DP,Caperganicpart

    and comm

    nearly20%

    unt forapp

    s and timbe

    Tonnag

    Generat

    GDP($M

    T|FelixAman

    e Waste

    the conce

    aste gener

    xceed the

    sbeenont

    ties.TheTa

    thecorrespo

    ]

    tion/year

    own[A1]sthehighes

    rcial waste

    consistsof

    roximately

    r accountin

    ofwaste

    ed

    illion)

    wahDiawuo

    eneration,

    tration of

    tion rates

    apacity of

    eincrease

    le1.5and

    ndingGDP

    tsegment.

    stream by

    plasticand

    0%ofthe

    for more

    14

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    16/35

    Reporto

    With th

    10billion

    levelof

    1.3.2W

    Collectio

    Councils

    collectio

    private

    Generall

    some o

    relativel

    anearb

    Station,

    baled a

    municip

    1.3.3R

    The pri

    SouthA

    glass.A

    special

    country

    Aluminu

    theseco

    MSWManage

    tourist ind

    Rand(aso

    nmanaged

    asteCollec

    nofsolidw

    (MLC).Coll

    n trucks. C

    astehauler

    y, mixed w

    the inform

    closetoth

    landfillsite

    whichdeals

    nd hauled

    alitiesandst

    cyclingan

    ary reason

    rica,theth

    depositsyst

    arkedcont

    hasasizeabl

    m is proces

    mponentst

    mentImpacto

    Figure1.ustry, that

    year,2000)

    astegener

    ionandT

    asteinthe

    ctionisperf

    llection is

    s.

    ste and ga

    al areas be

    pointsof

    fordisposa

    strictlywit

    y rail to t

    illservingth

    Composti

    for the hig

    eemajorm

    misusedt

    ainersarep

    etinmining

    sed for use

    atarerecyc

    1

    7.16

    6.8

    .72

    3.25

    %o

    nGHGEmissi

    :Graphofttractsboth

    ,itwouldb

    ation.

    ansfer

    apeMetrop

    ormedlarge

    conducted

    den refuse

    ing served

    astegenera

    l.There iso

    aportiono

    he Cape M

    em[10].

    ng

    recycling r

    aterials that

    oencourage

    ositionedat

    andprocess

    in beverage

    led.

    .51

    10.76

    fWasteC

    nsforGhana,

    Waste%C

    local and f

    suicidalfor

    olitanArea

    lyatcurbsid

    ither direct

    is collected

    y skips. Be

    tion,mosto

    nlyone larg

    fCapeTow

    unicipal Co

    ate of indus

    arerecycle

    thereturn

    GreensDe

    ingindustry

    containers.

    ompositi

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    mposition,

    reign touri

    thecityto

    (CMA)isar

    ethroughou

    ly by the

    using black

    cause many

    thewastet

    etransferst

    nswaste.U

    uncils land

    trial waste

    d inthe ind

    fbottles,ti

    potsforth

    withadem

    The Figure

    31.17

    18.63

    n,Cape

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    CapeTowtwith ana

    allowitselft

    sponsibility

    ttheCMAb

    unicipality

    bags or sta

    of the exis

    hatiscollec

    ation,theA

    nsortedwa

    ill at by t

    aterials is

    strialsecto

    andalumi

    dropoffo

    andforthe

    1.9 represe

    own

    T|FelixAman

    nual turno

    obeswallo

    oftheMun

    ymeansofc

    or contract

    ndardsized

    ting dispos

    edishauled

    thloneRefu

    tefromthe

    eir respecti

    that it is pr

    raremetal,

    umcans.A

    bottlesan

    ecycledmat

    nts the pro

    Organic

    Plastic

    Paper

    Glass

    Metal

    Textile

    Timber

    Other

    wahDiawuo

    er ofover

    edbythe

    icipalLocal

    ompacting

    d through

    bins, with

    l sites are

    directlyto

    eTransfer

    Athlone is

    ve former

    fitable. In

    paperand

    ditionally,

    cans.The

    erial,since

    ortions of

    15

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    17/35

    Reporto

    Recyclin

    and pap

    account

    recyclin

    estimat

    arecycli

    year20

    Therec

    (CMA) i

    that

    are

    waste

    commer

    material

    unhealt

    respons

    recyclin

    Compos

    Compos

    theindu

    major w

    domesti

    80% of

    remaind

    1.3.4W

    More th

    mostwi

    landfills,

    MSWManage

    g of materi

    er, compos

    for appro

    occursint

    d6.5%oft

    ngrateof2

    0[11].

    clingofresi

    done largel

    led

    by

    any

    aterials at

    cial waste s

    fromwaste

    ycondition

    to theuse

    beingincor

    ting is a sm

    tingisnots

    stryis

    still

    i

    aste reducti

    candcomm

    the compo

    eroccurring

    asteDispo

    an 95% of

    delyusedm

    mostly ow

    mentImpacto

    Figurels from do

    ing of dom

    imately 24

    eindustrial

    ewasteisr

    to25%oft

    dentialand

    y inan info

    level

    of

    go

    the Bellville

    tream is dri

    occursona

    ,andthrou

    of recycled

    poratedasp

    allscale acti

    enasaviab

    aprimary

    on or resou

    ercialsolid

    ting occurs

    attheMitc

    al

    omestic, tr

    ethod inSo

    ed and op

    nGHGEmissi

    .9:Graphestic, com

    estic waste,

    of the to

    sector.Oft

    ecycled.Wit

    hedomestic

    commercial

    malway,m

    ernment

    a

    compostin

    enby pove

    fairlylarges

    ghmeansth

    materials a

    artofthee

    vity in Sout

    lewastedis

    tage.Altho

    rce recover

    astesarec

    at two fac

    ellsPlainfa

    de, industri

    thAfricaan

    rated by m

    45

    6

    ecycling

    nsforGhana,

    frecycling

    ercial and

    and the b

    tal solid wa

    etotalresi

    hsignificant

    andcomm

    wastethat

    eaningther

    thorizing

    b

    facility. Re

    rty and as a

    cale,butis

    atarenotn

    sa "raw ma

    erydaylifes

    h Africa, an

    osaloption

    ghexpansio

    option. Ap

    mpostedat

    ilities locat

    cilityadjace

    al and haza

    dstillthec

    unicipalities

    10

    0

    ate (%),

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    Rate(%),Cindustrial w

    neficial reu

    ste stream

    dentialand

    mandatesa

    rcialwastei

    akesplace

    isnounde

    dy.

    One

    no

    cycling of

    means of s

    ftenunorga

    ecessarilye

    terial" is gr

    yle.

    performed

    .Thereison

    nis

    taking

    p

    proximately

    severalco

    d in Bellvil

    ttotheSw

    dous waste

    eapestopti

    . Many of t

    7.5

    Cape To

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    apeTownstes, such

    e of waste

    in Cape To

    ommercial

    ndprogram

    sexpected

    ithintheC

    lyingpolicy,

    table

    excep

    aterials fro

    urvival. The

    nizedandc

    vironmenta

    ater than a

    mostly by

    lyalimited

    lacein

    this

    41,000 ton

    postingfaci

    le and Par

    rtklipdispo

    is landfilled

    on.Therea

    hese are lo

    n

    Paper

    Glass

    Metal

    Plastic

    Organi

    T|FelixAman

    s metal, pl

    ater treat

    n while m

    astestrea

    sinplacefo

    obeachiev

    apeMetrop

    mandateo

    ion

    is

    the

    r

    m the resid

    retrieval of

    nductedin

    llysound.T

    nymoveme

    private entr

    arketforc

    rea,it

    is

    no

    per year o

    litiesinthe

    w (Radnor)

    salsite[11].

    , and this r

    eapproxim

    ated on sit

    wahDiawuo

    stic, glass,

    ent plant

    ost of the

    s,onlyan

    rrecycling,

    blebythe

    litanArea

    programs

    ecovery

    of

    ential and

    recyclable

    unsafeand

    eindustry

    t towards

    epreneurs.

    ompost,as

    tseen

    as

    a

    f collected

    CMA.Over

    , with the

    mains the

    tely1,200

    es such as

    16

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    18/35

    Reporto

    abando

    of the c

    legislati

    onlyaf

    producti

    develop

    landfill

    Just like

    unfence

    may ref

    Addition

    persona

    agency

    characte

    Table1

    Materi

    Organic

    Plastic

    Paper

    Glass

    Metal

    TextileTimber

    Other

    Year

    1998

    Materi

    Paper

    Glass

    Metal

    PlasticOrganic

    MSWManage

    edquarries

    urrent probl

    n,butinth

    w landfills i

    on,LFGreco

    ingworld.T

    asmanage

    in most co

    d.Operating

    lect the abs

    ally, large

    l value. The

    operating

    t

    risticsinCa

    .6:Thewa

    l

    V

    l

    mentImpacto

    andravines.

    em with m

    oversight

    ndevelopin

    veryforene

    eminimum

    ent.Therei

    untries on

    practicesg

    ence of ap

    umbers of

    returns fro

    he

    facility.

    etownSou

    tetypean

    lumeofS

    nGHGEmissi

    Only214(1

    nagement o

    ndlackofe

    countries

    rgyproducti

    requiremen

    snolandfill

    frican cont

    nerallydon

    ropriate eq

    waste pick

    the sale o

    The

    Table

    thAfrica.

    compositi

    lidwaste g

    nsforGhana,

    8%)sitesha

    f solidwast

    forcement

    urrentlyrec

    onmayhav

    ts institute

    asmanage

    inent, South

    otincludec

    uipment or

    rs may sco

    f these mat

    1.6

    below

    onintheC

    Pe

    31.

    18.

    17.

    7.1

    6.8

    4.73.2

    10.

    eneration

    Ave

    190

    ecyclingR

    Per

    10

    7.5

    45

    6

    0

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    velicensesa

    e appears t

    ofexistingl

    overthe lan

    morewide

    inSouthA

    entinthe

    Africa also

    mpactiono

    other resou

    ur the land

    erials go to

    gives

    some

    apetownS

    centage (

    7

    3

    1

    6

    nCapeto

    ragetonnag

    02000

    ate

    centage (%)

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    ndareduly

    bedueno

    wsandreg

    dfillgas(LF

    spreadappli

    ricaoffero

    MA.

    has most

    theapplica

    rces to car

    ills for ma

    the waste

    summary

    outhAfric

    )

    nSouthA

    egenerate

    T|FelixAman

    permitted.

    tso much t

    lations[12].

    )forflarin

    cationsthro

    ly limitedg

    f the existi

    tionofdaily

    y out these

    erials of ec

    ickers, and

    of

    statistics

    [7]

    rica

    /day

    wahDiawuo

    largepart

    o a lack of

    Currently,

    orenergy

    ughoutthe

    idanceon

    g landfills

    cover.This

    practices.

    onomic or

    not to the

    of

    waste

    17

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    19/35

    Reporto

    1.4MTheMS

    &

    Comp

    1.4.1W

    Thetren

    thirdwo

    upona

    situatio

    1985 w

    showed

    Table1

    Year

    1982

    1985

    1990

    2000

    Thecom

    ofhighe

    showth

    MSWManage

    WinLagmanagem

    ost

    and

    Was

    asteGener

    dsinsolid

    rldcountrie

    nualbasis.

    inLagos. It

    s not that

    thefactthe

    .7:Volume

    A17

    19

    21

    28

    Figur

    positionof

    rproportion

    characteris

    200,0

    400,0

    600,0

    800,0

    1,000,0

    1,200,0

    mentImpacto

    s,Nigerientisstudie

    te

    Disposal

    tion

    astesource

    s.Theavaila

    Asperthe

    couldbe r

    igh, but wi

    anthropoge

    ofSolidw

    erageton

    00

    00

    00

    00

    1.10:Graastealsosh

    srepresenti

    ticsnature

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    1982

    nGHGEmissi

    adonLagos

    s,generatio

    blestatistic

    able1.7an

    alized thet

    th the wide

    icnatureof

    stegenera

    agegener

    hofAveraowsthat,th

    gabout56

    fthewaste

    1985

    Average

    nsforGhana,

    igeria,base

    andcharac

    indicatest

    theFigure

    hat the cha

    increase in

    manhasre

    ioninLag

    ted/day

    eWasteT

    eorganicw

    oftheenti

    content.

    1990

    Tonnage

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    dontheWa

    teristicsin

    atwastege

    1.10below,

    geordiffer

    population

    llycontribu

    sNigeria

    Averaget

    450600

    600800

    12001500

    13001500

    nnageGenstewhicha

    recontent.

    2000

    enerate

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    steGenerat

    igeriaaresi

    nerationin

    representth

    encebetwe

    area over t

    edtothisin

    13]

    onnagecol

    erated/ye

    elikelyfoo

    heTable1.8

    Averag

    generat

    T|FelixAman

    ion,Collecti

    milartotho

    hisregionk

    etruenatur

    en theyear

    e few follo

    cliningstage

    ected/day

    r,Lagosandplantd

    andtheFig

    tonnage

    ed/year

    wahDiawuo

    n,Recycle

    seofother

    eepsgoing

    eofwaste

    1982and

    ing years

    .

    ebrisare

    re1.11 18

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    20/35

    Reporto

    Table1

    WasteT

    Proporti

    (%)

    1.4.2W

    Effortst

    of multi

    depots,

    Manage

    ofwast

    division

    particip

    andoth

    some c

    services

    transpor

    efforts

    wasteg

    withthe

    andpro

    MSWManage

    .8:Thewa

    ype Org

    Foo

    on 56

    asteCollec

    ostimulate

    ple collecti

    curbside bi

    mentAutho

    on thestr

    of labor.

    tion(PSP)is

    rwellesta

    ses where

    to

    various

    tedinthisc

    ut, it is aw

    nerationan

    factthath

    idinggroun

    mentImpacto

    tetypean

    nici.e

    &Plant

    Figu

    ionand

    T

    ffectivecol

    n strategie

    , bulk loadi

    rity(LAWM

    et. In the

    AWMA col

    activelyinv

    lishedpriva

    he landfill

    households

    sewiththe

    ully inadeq

    dcollection

    geproporti

    sfornight

    nGHGEmissi

    compositi

    Paper Tex

    14.0

    e1.11:Graansfer

    lectionofw

    s in Lagos

    ng and indu

    ) installed

    etropolisof

    lects from

    olvedindo

    tesectorpa

    r dumping

    and

    receiveaidoftheir

    ate becaus

    istoowide.

    nofthisw

    odents.

    Perc

    nsforGhana,

    oninLago

    tile Plast

    4

    phofMSW

    stewerefa

    etropolis.

    strial collec

    astecollec

    Lagos,coll

    commercial

    esticwaste

    rticipantsus

    site is not

    their

    pay

    pullingopen

    with regar

    Thusprom

    steareput

    ntage(%)

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    Nigeria[

    ic Glas

    3

    percentag

    vourablych

    The metho

    tion system.

    ioncontain

    ctionandt

    and indust

    scollection.

    etrucksan

    ar, some pr

    irectly

    frombedcart.Ev

    ds to the Fi

    tingsomee

    escibleinn

    ,Lagos

    O

    P

    T

    P

    G

    O

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    3]

    Metal

    4.0

    ,Lagos

    nneledtow

    s are hous

    In most ar

    rtoavoid i

    ansportatio

    rial centers

    Onalarges

    compactor

    ivate indivi

    their

    cust

    enthought

    gure 1.12 b

    nvironment

    tureandsu

    rganici.eFoo

    aper

    extile

    lastic

    lass

    etal

    thers

    T|FelixAman

    Others

    19

    ardstheest

    etohouse,

    ea, Lagos St

    ndiscriminat

    nofMSW is

    while priv

    calesituatio

    sfortransp

    uals render

    mers.

    The

    ereseems

    low, the di

    alchallenge

    bjecttoearl

    d&Plant

    wahDiawuo

    blishment

    communal

    ate Waste

    edumping

    totallyon

    ate sector

    n,LAWMA

    rtation.In

    collection

    astes

    are

    obesome

    ference in

    especially

    ydecaying

    19

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    21/35

    Reporto

    Fig

    1.4.3R

    In Lago

    activitie

    Theinfo

    collecte

    devices

    obsolet

    monitor

    addition

    containi

    cityofL

    collectio

    containi

    tothew

    1.4.4W

    Disposal

    advance

    and (or)

    dangero

    willcon

    dispose

    issues.

    20

    40

    60

    80

    1,00

    1,20

    MSWManage

    ure1.12:Gcycling

    , due to th

    are largely

    rmalwaste

    wastetoge

    for small a

    andnonre

    and100Nai

    , there are

    ngwastesa

    agos istoo l

    n system

    ngwastesa

    orkersared

    asteDispo

    of solid w

    dtechnologi

    receding.

    us.

    Thisis

    b

    tituteadir

    atanauth

    0

    ,000

    ,000

    ,000

    ,000

    ,000

    ,000

    mentImpacto

    aphAverae huge mar

    organizeda

    ollectors(al

    therwithot

    ounts of m

    pairableeq

    ra(US$0.67

    also collec

    dtherefore

    argetoeasil

    akes use o

    emanually

    iscardedoni

    al

    ste genera

    es,disposal

    he open du

    ecausethe

    ctrisktoh

    rizedarea,

    982

    Average

    nGHGEmissi

    eGeneratket of elect

    roundthe

    soreferred

    hermetals

    oney from

    ipmentvar

    )foronefri

    ors that du

    focusonw

    ybringthe

    f many sm

    dismantled,

    rregulardu

    ed in a co

    ispreceded

    mp method

    leachateeff

    manhealth

    hichisreall

    1985 Ye

    enerate

    nsforGhana,

    dWastevonic stuffs,

    ainsources

    oasscaven

    ontainingw

    usinesses o

    greatlybut

    georoned

    e to sever

    atisfreely

    collectedm

    all and me

    assorted,st

    psitesorb

    munity is

    byengineer

    of solid w

    ct(i.e

    the

    . Table1.9

    yasourceo

    1990ar

    vsColle

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    .Collectedthe electro

    ofobsolete

    gers)move

    astes.Mostl

    r private ho

    rangearou

    sktopPC(

    financial l

    vailable,e.

    terialstoa

    diumsized

    oredandso

    rned.

    the ultimat

    ingactivitie

    ste disposa

    hemicalan

    showsthat

    fconcernfo

    2000

    tedpery

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    eryearvs.nic waste c

    electricala

    allaroundL

    y,thesecol

    useholds. T

    d50Naira

    ithoutmoni

    imitations,

    .onroadsid

    centralrecy

    scrap meta

    ldtotrader

    step in a

    suchassor

    l is conside

    biological

    thehighest

    renvironme

    earvsGD

    Ave

    gen

    Ave

    coll

    GD

    T|FelixAman

    GDP,Lagoollection an

    delectroni

    agoswithh

    lectorsbuy

    e collection

    (US$0.34)f

    torandperi

    annot pay

    ewastedu

    clingsite,th

    l yards, wh

    .Fractions

    SWM syste

    ting,volum

    ed as both

    ontaminant

    percentage

    ntalandhe

    P

    ragetonnage

    erated/year

    ragetonnage

    ected/year

    (0.0001*$Mi

    wahDiawuo

    [A3] recycling

    products.

    ndcartsto

    uchwaste

    prices for

    roneCRT

    herals).In

    for metal

    ps.Asthe

    is informal

    re metal

    fnovalue

    . In the

    reduction

    naive and

    inwastes)

    fwaste is

    lthrelated

    llion)

    20

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    22/35

    Reporto

    Table1

    Typeo

    REMAS

    Authori

    Unauth

    Burnin

    Person

    Atthei

    not eng

    constru

    LagosSt

    MSWManage

    .9:Nature

    dumping

    Bbin

    zeddumpsi

    rizedempt

    lbin

    nceptionof

    ineer landfil

    tion,andar

    ate.

    mentImpacto

    fsolidwa

    eposit

    te

    plot

    astemana

    l sites but

    elaterturn

    nGHGEmissi

    tedisposa

    gementinL

    pen dump

    d intodum

    nsforGhana,

    inatypic

    Fre

    3.7

    16.

    66.

    3.7

    13.

    gosstate,t

    d turned t

    ingsite. A

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    lNigerian

    quency(%

    5

    5

    5

    herearesev

    dumping

    of1990,th

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    ity[14]

    )

    eraldisposa

    ite. Most a

    erewereei

    T|FelixAman

    lsites. The

    re evacuati

    ht(8)ofth

    wahDiawuo

    esitesare

    n site for

    sesites in

    21

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    23/35

    Reporto

    1.5MTheMS

    waste

    gprovide

    Fromth

    proporti

    thelow

    itsindus

    Another

    collectio

    takingpl

    Table1

    Countr

    Ghana

    Nigeria

    SouthA

    MSWManage

    WCompmanagem

    eneration,

    previously,

    eFigure1.1

    onsofcomp

    stcontento

    trialbase,th

    indicatorfo

    n.TheTable

    aceaspert

    .10:PerCa

    Ci

    Ac

    La

    rica Ca

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    mentImpacto

    rativeAentofthese

    ollection,

    rsomecomp

    , itisclear

    ositionofor

    fOrganic,b

    enfollowed

    Figure1.1assessmen

    1.10andth

    eindicators

    itaMSWg

    yName

    ra

    os

    etown

    rganic

    Wa

    nGHGEmissi

    alysisfoUrbancitie

    ecycling

    &

    arativeanal

    thatthelev

    ganicwaste

    thighlevel

    byLagosNi

    :Graphofwouldbet

    eFigure1.1

    given.

    eneration

    PercapitMSWgeneratio

    kg/day

    0.4

    0.3

    2.0

    lastic P

    stePerce

    nsforGhana,

    Accra,Lshavebeen

    composting

    sisisbeing

    lofecono

    intheentir

    ofPlastic,P

    eriaandlas

    WastesPe

    eirpercapi

    givessome

    ndHouse

    n

    HowiCol

    60

    8.0

    76

    per Gl

    tage(%)

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    gosanddiscussedt

    and

    waste

    madetoas

    icdevelop

    wastecont

    aper,Glass

    tlyAccraGh

    centageChtawastegen

    ideaastow

    oldcollect

    seholdshGarbagelection(%

    ass Me

    haracter

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    CapeTooroughlym

    disposal.

    Bertainthel

    entreallyh

    ent.CapeT

    ndMetal,

    ana.

    aracteristi

    eration,pop

    hatalevelo

    ion(Year,

    PopulaMillion

    1.7

    8.0

    2.45

    tal

    istics

    A

    C

    L

    T|FelixAman

    nostaspects

    ased

    on

    thvelsofdev

    assomeimp

    wninSouth

    hichisanin

    sulationand

    fmanageme

    000)[15,

    tion>0.5

    ccra

    peTown

    gos

    wahDiawuo

    inareasof

    statistics

    lopments.

    actonthe

    Africahas

    dicationof

    garbage

    ntis

    3]

    GDP($Billion)

    4.9775

    45.9834

    132.8776

    22

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    24/35

    Reporto

    Even th

    Capeto

    with Ac

    whenit

    Accra a

    environ

    composthisdev

    challeng

    timeco

    mightb

    has bee

    MSWap

    In movi

    alwayst

    intothe

    thecost

    technol

    that the

    importa

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    g

    MSWManage

    Figu

    ugh, Lagos

    n,whichm

    ra having t

    comestow

    d then Ca

    ental chall

    ing,it

    evide

    lopmentca

    ewhen itc

    bustsome

    hazardous

    n made into

    proach.

    ng forward,

    hegovernm

    MSWmana

    ofmanagin

    gythatreal

    y are also

    taspectsof

    PercapitaMS

    enerationkg/

    MSWP

    mentImpacto

    e1.14:Grhas the lar

    eansthatca

    e leastof

    stecollecti

    e town. T

    enges asso

    ntthat,

    Cap

    nalsobeat

    mestowas

    ofthesewa

    andposesh

    waste coll

    strategies

    entbeingth

    ementsch

    especiallyt

    lysolvesthe

    stakehold

    helpingred

    W

    day

    Househ

    Gar

    Collect

    erCapita

    nGHGEmissi

    phofPerCest populat

    petowngen

    aste gener

    n,withthe

    is is a seri

    iated with

    etown

    has

    ributedtot

    tedisposal,

    ste intheo

    althchallen

    ction/waste

    like capitali

    esolestake

    methrough

    hewastecol

    entireprob

    r in this se

    ucesource

    ldswith

    age

    ion(%)

    P

    Househ

    nsforGhana,

    pita,Colle

    ion, but the

    eratesmore

    tion. The st

    lowestcolle

    us concern

    this kind o

    nviablesuc

    egrowtho

    inwhichall

    enair,with

    ges.Thisca

    disposal an

    ation or pr

    holder.The

    properpoli

    lectionsect

    lem,butals

    ctor throug

    asteandag

    pulation>0.5

    Million

    ldWaste

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    ction&Pop waste gene

    wastethan

    aggering tru

    ctionoutof

    for MSW

    behavior.

    essstory

    as

    thecountr

    stillusesop

    outconside

    beattribut

    d again ine

    ivatization o

    informalse

    iessincethi

    r.Moreove

    pushingm

    massive e

    ainencoura

    ($Billio

    GDP

    Collectio

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    ulationIndration per

    therestoft

    th is that, L

    thewhatis

    managemen

    In the pra

    compared

    withhigh

    endumpin

    rationtoth

    edtothefa

    fective in a

    f these sec

    tor(scaven

    ssectorcan

    ,itisnoton

    neyintom

    ducation. T

    inghouseh

    n)

    ,Popula

    T|FelixAman

    icatorserson was

    hetwo(2)u

    agos has a

    enerated,f

    t concern

    ctice of rec

    oLagos

    and

    DP.Allofth

    strategies

    factthatt

    tthatleasti

    opting the

    tors could a

    ers)canbe

    contributei

    lypumping

    kingtheciti

    is is one o

    ldwastese

    ion,GDP

    hanaAccra

    igeriaLagos

    outhAfricaC

    wahDiawuo

    ighest for

    rbancities,

    ad record

    llowedby

    ue to the

    ycling and

    Accraand

    emhavea

    ndevena

    esewaste

    nvestment

    Integrated

    ssist, than

    integrated

    nreducing

    oneyinto

    zenrealize

    the most

    aration.

    apetown

    23

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    25/35

    Reporto

    2.1Ge

    Theind

    dioxide

    CO2hav

    in prei

    145%an

    such as

    sulphur

    andare

    Accordimethan

    of carb

    increase

    Ghanaa

    Develop

    disposal

    Climate

    change

    composicompar

    the sun

    generati

    inGHGt

    risenby

    yearint

    Therate

    landfill.

    requires

    showsa

    compos

    MSWManage

    ECTION

    neralInt

    strialrevolu

    ndothergr

    risenbya

    dustrial tim

    dthoseofn

    chlorofluor

    hexafluoride

    generatedal

    g

    to

    recent

    emissions[

    n dioxide [

    in the co

    ndNigeria,

    ment Mech

    asoneofth

    Changeasd

    of climate

    tion

    of

    the

    bletimepe

    s warmth,

    onandimpr

    hereforerai

    about0.6d

    he142thye

    ofwasted

    ecausethe

    modellingo

    schematica

    ingthrough

    mentImpacto

    2:MSW

    oductiontionofthe

    eenhouseg

    proximatel

    es, which w

    itrousoxide

    carbons (C

    (SF6)have

    mostexclus

    estimates,

    16]andmet

    17]. Waste

    ing decade

    ecauseoft

    anism (CD

    esectorside

    efinedbyU

    which is a

    lobal

    atmosriods[19].

    the additio

    operwaste

    sestheglob

    egreeCelsiu

    rofglobali

    gradationi

    durationof

    fwastedis

    rrangement

    tothepoint

    nGHGEmissi

    NDITS

    9thcentury

    sesintheat

    30%toafi

    as around 2

    (N2O)by15

    Cs), halons,

    enteredthe

    ivelybyanth

    the

    waste

    shanecontri

    sector emi

    especially

    eincreasei

    ) establishe

    ntifiedforg

    itedNation

    ttributable

    phere,

    whicSincesome

    nal GHG ge

    managemen

    ltemperatu

    soverthela

    strumentat

    landfillsde

    CH4generati

    osalpriort

    ofwastese

    whereitisl

    nsforGhana,

    MPLICA

    markedasi

    mosphere.

    ureof370p

    80ppm, whi

    .Tocomp

    perfluoroc

    atmospheri

    ropogenica

    ector

    contriutiontocli

    sions have

    in developi

    npopulatio

    d by Kyoto

    eenhouseg

    sFramewor

    irectly or

    is,

    in

    additilreadyexist

    nerated as

    tcausesso

    resbecause

    st100year

    ionrecordin

    pendsonw

    onisseveral

    theyearw

    missionofG

    ndfilled.

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    IONFO

    nificantcha

    enowlive

    pm(particle

    lst those of

    undthepro

    rbons (PFC

    equation.

    ctivities.

    butes

    aboutatechange

    grown stea

    g and eme

    andGDP[1

    Protocol i

    asreduction

    Conventio

    indirectly t

    on

    to,

    naturingGHGsh

    a result of

    eimbalanc

    studiesreve

    ,withthey

    g.

    stecompos

    decades,es

    hoseemissi

    HGcyclicall

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    CLIMA

    ngeinthec

    inaworldw

    permillion

    methane (

    blem,anu

    s), hydroflu

    hesegases

    onefifth

    o

    isabouton

    dily globally

    rging econo

    8].Inrecog

    1997, rec

    .

    forClimate

    human a

    al

    climate

    vsthepoten

    human ac

    inthenatu

    althat;the

    ar,1998be

    ition,climat

    timationof

    onsareof i

    fromwast

    T|FelixAman

    ECHAN

    oncentratio

    hereconcen

    )compared

    H4) have in

    berofnew

    rocarbons (

    donotoccu

    global

    ant

    thirdtoa

    and are e

    mic countri

    itionofthis

    gnized was

    Change(U

    tivity that

    riability

    obstialofholdi

    tivities such

    ralsetup.T

    lobaltemp

    ingthesingl

    eandcondit

    missionsfr

    terest. The

    collection,

    wahDiawuo

    E

    ofcarbon

    trationsof

    withlevels

    reased by

    substances

    HFCs) and

    r innature

    ropogenic

    alfofthat

    pected to

    es such as

    ,theClean

    te and its

    FCC)isa

    alters the

    erved

    over

    gsomeof

    as waste

    eincrease

    raturehas

    ewarmest

    ionsinthe

    mlandfills

    Figure2.1

    ecycling&

    24

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    26/35

    Reporto

    Figur

    2.2HoEven be

    removin

    product

    potentia

    Energy

    transpor

    energyf

    Methan

    greenho

    Carbon

    carbon

    remain

    helpmi

    impacts

    reduces

    byprev

    MSWManage

    e2.1Simpl

    wSolidfore a mate

    g and proc

    to market

    ltogenerat

    Consumptio

    ting materi

    romfossilfu

    Emissions:

    usegas.

    Storage: Tre

    equestratio

    tandingin

    t

    imizeclima

    on energy

    greenhouse

    ntingtheco

    mentImpacto

    fiedschem

    asteImrial or prod

    ssing raw

    , and using

    GHGthrou

    n: Extracti

    ls and prod

    els.

    Whenorga

    es absorb c

    .Wastepr

    heforest,

    echangei

    consumptio

    gasemissio

    nsumption

    nGHGEmissi

    aticofwas

    actsonCct become

    aterials, m

    the energy

    ghoneorm

    g and pr

    ucts to mar

    icwasted

    arbon dioxi

    ventionand

    herethey

    c

    pacts.Diffe

    n, methane

    nsbypreve

    fenergyfor

    nsforGhana,

    emanageMSWM)[2

    imateCh a solid wa

    anufacturin

    to operate

    reofthefo

    cessing ra

    kets all gen

    composes i

    e, a GHG f

    recyclingof

    ancontinue

    rentwastes

    emissions,

    tingmetha

    extractinga

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    entsyste]

    angeste, it goes

    the produ

    the produc

    llowingmea

    w material

    rate green

    landfillsan

    rom the air

    woodand

    toremove

    andwaste

    and carbo

    eemission

    ndprocessin

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    andGHGe

    through a l

    t, transpor

    t. Each of t

    ns:

    s, manufac

    ouse gas e

    ddumps, it

    and store i

    aperprodu

    arbondioxi

    anagement

    storage. F

    from landfi

    grawmate

    T|FelixAman

    missions(i

    ng cycle th

    ing the ma

    hese activiti

    turing prod

    issions by

    generates

    in the wo

    tsallowmo

    defrom

    the

    activitiesh

    or example

    llsoropen

    ials.

    wahDiawuo

    nurban

    at involves

    terials and

    es has the

    ucts, and

    consuming

    ethane,a

    d through

    retreesto

    air,which

    vevarying

    , recycling

    umpsand

    25

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    27/35

    Reporto

    Table2

    CliVari

    Temper

    Precipit

    CloudC

    Humidi

    Sealeve

    2.3AnAs per

    (UNFCC

    Energy,

    energyi

    forcoun

    the

    Indgenerati

    the two

    differen

    typesof

    MSWManage

    .1:Summa

    ateble

    ature A

    10

    M

    se

    N

    es

    M

    cy

    ation Pr

    se

    ver Re

    y Sp

    du

    l M

    ab

    ex

    by

    alysisofthe statisti

    ), the gree

    Industry,Tr

    shighestin

    trieslikeGh

    strial

    sectoonstatistics

    other coun

    sectors of

    theGHG.

    mentImpacto

    yofPoten

    Potenti

    nual warmi

    Cand50C

    ore hot da

    asons

    mber of

    peciallyduri

    ore frequen

    clones.

    ecipitationi

    asons

    ductioninc

    ecifichumid

    ringrainys

    ean sea lev

    ove itscurr

    pansionand

    the2080s.

    HGsfros gathered

    nhouse gas

    nsport,Agri

    ermsofthe

    naandNig

    .

    Expectedlisabithigh

    tries. The T

    the econom

    nGHGEmissi

    ialClimat

    lClimate

    ng by 2080

    s, especiall

    cold days

    ngtherainy

    t stagnant s

    tensityincr

    loudcover

    ityincreases

    asons

    el will be

    nt level,du

    natural

    lan

    MSWCfrom Unit

    (GHG) com

    culture,Wa

    GHG.TheG

    riabecause

    ,

    that

    of

    Serthanthat

    ble 2.2 and

    y amongst

    nsforGhana,

    Changea

    hange

    of betwee

    in the dr

    decrease

    seasons

    ummer anti

    asesinrain

    ,especially

    p to 86 c

    eto therm

    movement

    mparinged Nations

    es from th

    teandothe

    HGthatco

    eventhep

    uth

    Africa

    ofWaste,

    Table 2.3

    he three co

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    dtheirIm

    Imp

    Increase

    andsite

    y Decline

    negative

    groups.

    , Impacts

    compost

    Increase

    distributi

    y I

    I

    Risk to

    associat

    sunshine

    Impacts

    l

    s

    Flooding

    andIncr

    Ghana,NFramework

    different s

    rsectors.T

    esfromthe

    rcentageof

    is

    quite

    diffecausethe

    ive accoun

    untries und

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    acts[21]

    actsonWa

    water de

    perations.

    in air qu

    impacts o

    nbiological

    ing,anaerob

    risk of

    onofvermi

    ncreased ri

    roundwater

    ndseasurf

    mpactsonb

    xample, c

    igestion,et

    workers

    d with in

    duringwor

    noutdoor

    of waste

    asederosio

    igeriaanConventio

    ectors of t

    ePercenta

    Wasteisal

    GHGfrom

    rent,

    becaare industr

    of the GH

    er study an

    T|FelixAman

    steManag

    and for bo

    lity and s

    n heat of

    processesf

    icdigestion,

    fines ch

    andpests.

    sk of floo

    , surface w

    ces.iologicalpro

    mposting,

    of skin

    creased ex

    ingoutdoor

    iologicalpr

    managemen

    nofcoastal

    SouthA for Clima

    e economy

    ethatcome

    osignifican

    asteoutwei

    se

    the

    induialisedasco

    generatio

    again the

    wahDiawuo

    ment

    h workers

    ubsequent

    vulnerable

    rexample

    etc.

    anges in

    ing from

    ater, tidal,

    cesses,for

    anaerobic

    conditions

    osure to

    s.

    cesses.

    t facilities

    reas.

    fricate Change

    including;

    sfromthe

    especially

    ghsthatof

    strial

    GHG

    mparedto

    from the

    proportion

    26

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    28/35

    Reporto

    Table2

    Source

    Country

    Ghana

    Nigeria

    South

    Africa

    ***LUC

    Table2

    Ghana

    Nigeria

    SouthA

    ***LUC

    TheFigu

    usecha

    isSouth

    sectors.

    highest

    (Crude

    MSWManage

    .2:Aggreg

    SinkCateg

    Year

    En

    (G

    1994 65

    (5

    1994 14

    61

    (61994 29

    57

    (7

    F=Landuse

    .3:Breakd

    ountry

    rica

    F=Landuse

    re2.2repre

    geandFore

    withmuch

    The second

    opulationa

    il)resource

    mentImpacto

    teEmissio

    ory,includ

    ergy

    ,%)

    Indu

    Proc

    (Gg,

    67.80

    .2%)

    281.

    (2.2

    6361.

    .3%)

    176

    (0.7

    7566.

    .3%)

    303

    (8.0

    hangeand

    wnofEmi

    CO2(

    3329.

    11481

    31595

    hangeand

    sentstheac

    stry(LUCF).

    oftheirGH

    largest of

    ndpopulati

    andalsoagr

    nGHGEmissi

    sandRe

    ingandex

    Sector

    strial

    ess

    %)

    Agri

    e

    (Gg,

    80

    )

    5255

    (41.

    .87

    )

    5049

    (20.

    6.22

    )

    3545

    (9.3

    Forestry;Gg

    ssions(exc

    Em

    g)

    0

    5.82

    7.24

    Forestry;Gg

    cumulation

    Thereisani

    contributi

    HG is Nige

    ndensity,b

    iculturepro

    nsforGhana,

    ovalsofC

    ludingLU

    ultur

    %)

    Wa

    (Gg

    .70

    )

    473

    (3.8

    8.55

    %)

    440

    37

    (18.5.52

    )

    164

    07

    (4.3

    =Gigagram

    udingLUC

    issions(ex

    CH4

    396

    591

    205

    =Gigagram

    fGHGfrom

    ndicationth

    nscoming

    ria, it reflec

    utthecontri

    uction.

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    2,CH4and

    F(Ggand

    Total

    witho

    LUCF

    (Gg)

    ste

    %)

    .09

    %)

    1257

    9

    04.

    1%)

    2426

    40

    29.

    %)

    3798

    38

    ***

    F)forthre

    ludingLU

    (Gg)

    .95

    2.16

    7.44

    ***

    allthesect

    at,thecoun

    romtheEn

    ts the situa

    butionfacto

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    N2OinCO2

    ercentage

    ut

    LUFC

    (Gg)

    .3

    19472.

    6. 10500

    8

    7.

    18615.

    Gases(Ye

    F)forthre

    N

    2

    1

    6

    rsoftheEc

    trywithhig

    rgy,Agricul

    tion, even t

    rstotheirG

    T|FelixAman

    Equivalent

    [22]

    Total(

    LUCF)

    (Gg)

    67

    6894.

    .9 347636

    8

    96

    361221

    2

    r,1994)[

    eGases

    2O(Gg)

    .94

    1.79

    6.69

    onomyexclu

    estgenerati

    tureandth

    hough Nige

    DPrelyont

    wahDiawuo

    byMajor

    ith %of

    LUCFin

    Total

    GHG

    (%)

    8

    154.

    8

    .3 43.3

    .4 4.9

    2]

    dingLand

    onofGHG

    Industrial

    ia has the

    eirrichOil

    27

  • 7/28/2019 REPORT ON MSW MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON GHG EMISSIONS FOR GHANA, SOUTH AFRICA & NIGERIA

    29/35

    Reporto

    Again,t

    manage

    theprev

    TheFigu

    waste s

    collectio

    daywas

    themat

    challeng

    MSWManage

    eGHGcont

    entskillsis

    iousChapte

    re2.3, indic

    ctor. With

    nwasapro

    closetoabo

    eristhatw

    e in their w

    0

    0

    5000

    10000

    15000

    20000

    25000

    30000

    35000

    40000

    45000

    50000GHG(G

    mentImpacto

    Figure2.ributionsfro

    reallymaki

    inmind.

    atesthatNi

    eference to

    blem,becau

    ut60%(ref

    astecontrib

    aste dispos

    1000

    L

    )

    nGHGEmissi

    :GraphofmtheirMS

    ganysignifi

    Figure2.3:geriahasth

    the MSW

    setheperc

    rencingfro

    tiontoGH

    l approach,

    00 200

    velofGH

    GH

    nsforGhana,

    evelsofGwouldbe

    cantdiffere

    GraphofGHighestle

    iscussion in

    ntdifferen

    analysism

    withinallt

    where ope

    000 300

    G(Gg)fro

    Gfrom

    SouthAfrica

    InstitutoSup

    G(Gg)fronalysedtoc

    cewiththe

    GfromMelorpropo

    the previo

    eofwaste

    adeonLago

    hesecountr

    dumping

    000 40

    mallSec

    aste

    Nigeria

    riorTecnico,I

    allSectorheckwheth

    analysisma

    WtionofGHG

    s chapter, i

    enerateda

    Urbanarea

    iesarehigh,

    till exist wit

    0000

    ors

    So

    Ni

    Gh

    Gh

    Ni

    So

    T