report on mission 12 to uttar pradesh · report on mission 12 to uttar pradesh(u p~ 1 2.) sector:...

III\II

I

II

Iiiii;iii

R 8 2 2

IN.UT 8 5

INDIAReport on mission 12 to Uttar Pradesh (U P~ 1 2.)

Sector: Rural Water SupplyPurpose: - Progress evaluation of rural water supply projects under

Sub-Projects I and III- Technical appraisal of proposed water supply schemes

for Sub-Project IV

Commissioned by: Development Co-operation Department Asia andMultilateral Financial Development Matters (DAL) of theNetherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs

April 1985

water supply

II R 82.2-^0'}

Composition of mission UP -12:

R. Trietsch - DHV Consulting Engineers, leader of the missionA.K. Sen Gupta - Asstt. Adviser (PHE), CPHEEOJ.A. Speets - Water Supply Coordinator, Royal Netherlands Embassy

I).1 , 1)1,

I

ii.i

t*(i

iIiiIu.] •i,VI

,(:'|

I

Fiiii .

!'.

ii <tI

I INDIAReport on mission 1 2 to Uttar Pradesh ( U P~ I 2.)

I

| Sector: Rural Water SupplyPurpose: - Progress evaluation of rural water supply projects under

•Sub-Projects I and III

- Technical appraisal of proposed water supply schemesfor Sub-Project IV

• Commissioned by: Development Co-operation Department Asia and™ Multilateral Financial Development Matters (DAL) of the

Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs

I

I

I

I

IApril 1985

j Edited by:

R. Trietsch - DHV Consulting Engineers - Amersfoort, The Netherlands

I

11IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE

LIST OF RURAL WATER SUPPLY REPORTS, UTTAR PRADESH 4

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 5

1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 6

2. SUB-PROJECT I (UP EAST) 9

2.1. Physical progress 92.1.1. General aspects 92.1.2. Progress of schemes in Rae Bareli District 102.1.3. Progress of schemes in Allahabad District 112.1.4. Progress of schemes in Varanasi District 112.2. Public standposts and private connections 122.2.-1. Present public standpost situation 122.2.2. Private connections 122.2.3. Estimate of required numbers of public standposts 142.2.4. Comparison of required and realized numbers

of standposts 152.2.5. Conclusions 192.3. Power supply 192.4. Supply hours 212.5. Project duration 222.6. Project costs 23

3. SUB-PROJECT III (HAND PUMP SCHEMES) 26

3.1. Status of Sub-project III 263.2. Procurement procedures and quality control

measures 26

4. SUB-PROJECT IV (UP EAST) 27

4.1. General aspects 274.2. Design criteria 284.3. Population projections 294.4. Implementation schedule 344.5. Approval procedure 34

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

5. MISCELLANEOUS ASPECTS 37

5.1. Hydrogeological cell 375.2. Additional activities 375.2.1. Additional provisions-under Sub-Project I 375.2.2. Computer equipment 38

ANNEXES: A. Terms of Reference for Review and Appraisal Mission UP-12B. Itinerary of missionC. List of authorities visited/senior staff

involved in implementation of the schemesD. Conclusions and Recommendations of the Indo-Dutch Review

Mission (UP-12) of April 1985 to Uttar Pradesh(Sub-Projects East I, III, IV)

E. Scheme-wise break-down of required numbers of publicstandposts

F. Scheme-wise summary of data (Sub-Project East-I)G. Report for pre-appraisal of Sub-Project II(East)(revised),

Instalment IH. Scheme-wise summary of data (proposed schemes, Sub-Project

East IV)

11111111111111111I111

LIST OF RURAL WATER

Report DatedNo.

UP-1 November 1978

UP-2 March 1979

UP-3 November 1979

UP-4 April 1981

UP-5 December 1981

UP-6 March 1982

UP-7 May 1982

UP-8 February 1983

UP-9 October 1983

UP-10 October 1984

UP-11 March 1985

UP- 11 May 1985

4

SUPPLY REPORTS, UTTAR PRADESH

Subject

Appraisal

Appraisal

Reappraisal

Progress evaluationReappraisal

Progress evaluationReappraisal

Hydro-geological appraisal 2,Preliminary Report,

Progress evaluation

Comprehensive review andappraisal

Progress evaluation

Progress evaluation

Work plan for sanitation,drainage and healthActivities

Progress evaluationAppraisal

Sub-Project

East-I

West-I

East-I

East-IWest-I

East-IEast-II

West-I

East-I, -II

East-I, -IIWest-I, -II

East-I

East-I, -II, -IIIWest

East-I, III, IVWest

East-IEast-III, -IV

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

ACAECECICPHEEO

DCPEEE&MESRGo IHCHDPEIpcdO&MPAPHCPHEPHMechCPHPCPHSSubDivPHWDivPPRDPRRCCSC/STSESEBTWUPUPJNVT

asbestos cementassistant engineerchief engineercast ironCentral Public Health & Environmental EngineeringOrganizationDutch Credit Progammeexecutive engineerelectrical and mechanicalelevated service reservoirGovernment of Indiahouse connectionhigh-density polyethylenelitres per capita and per dayoperation and maintenancepersonal assistantPublic Health CirclePublic Health EngineeringPublic Health Mechanical CirclePublic Health Project CirclePublic Health Sanitary Sub-DivisionPublic Health Works DivisionProject Preparation, Research and Developmentpublic relationsreinforced (cement) concretescheduled castes/scheduled tribessuperintending engineerState Electricity BoardtubewellUttar PradeshUttar Pradesh Jal Nigamvertical turbine


1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

Indo-Dutch Review Mission UP-12 visited Uttar Pradesh in April 1985.The aim of this mission, which consisted of Mr. R. Trietsch (DHV Consult-ing Engineers), Mr. A.K. Sen Gupta (Asstt. Adviser, CPHEEO) and Mr. J.A.Speets (Water Supply Coordinator at the Royal Netherlands Embassy in NewDelhi) was threefold (see also the Terms of Reference, in Annex A).

First, the mission was to evaluate the progress of the implementation ofthe so-called Dutch Credit Programme (DCP) schemes in Uttar Pradesh,which are situated in the easterly districts of Rae Bareli, Allahabad andVaranasi.Secondly, the status-quo of the proposed hand pump schemes under Sub-Project III was to be reviewed.Finally, a technical appraisal was to be carried out of newly proposedschemes that had been selected as a replacement for the former Sub^-Project II schemes.

As was mentioned in report UP-10 of October 1984, the schemes that hadoriginally been proposed under Sub-Projects West-I and East-II had afterall not been included in the Dutch-financed projects, as a result ofwhich these Sub-Projects were in fact no longer included in the DCPpackage. In order to prevent any misunderstandings, it was decided,therefore, to refer to the newly proposed schemes as Sub-Project IVrather than Sub-Project II (new).

After preliminary discussions in New Delhi (see "Itinerary of Mission",Annex B) the mission departed for Lucknow on April 16, 1985.There the mission had discussions with the Managing Director and seniorstaff of the Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam, and then departed for field visitsin the Rae Bareli, Allahabad and Varanasi Districts.A total of 11 schemes under Sub-Project I (East) were visited, as well asa few villages in the area to be covered by the newly proposed schemes(Sub-Project IV). In all districts the progress of the schemes under Sub-Project I was discussed with the field staff (see Annex C for a list ofpeople involved).In addition, the demographic and technical basis for the newly proposedschemes was discussed extensively, both in the field and in Lucknow.

At the end of the field visits, the mission members returned to Lucknowto discuss the mission's findings, as laid down in the "Conclusions andRecommendations of the Indo-Dutch Review Mission (UP-12) of April 1985to Uttar Pradesh" (see Annex D).

After the mission's return to New Delhi a debriefing took place at theMinistry of Works and Housing, with the Adviser (PHEE), CPHEEO.

The main conclusions of the mission may be summarized as follows:

a. Although during the previous mission's visit it was indicated that -with a few exceptions - all schemes would be completed by the end of1984, and be fully commissioned, including increased numbers of

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

standposts, by March 1985, the mission found that actual progresshas again lagged behind expectation.It is now expected that many of the schemes will not be fullycommissioned before July-September of this year, and possibly notbefore the year 1986.

Notwithstanding earlier commitments, the number of constructedIstandposts has still not been raised to the agreed level. In addi-tion, most of the standposts are still not of the agreed so-called'vandal-proof design.

Chapter 2.2. of this report calculates in detail the numbers ofpublic standposts that should be included in the DCP schemes. Itiappears that the so-called 'increased number of public standposts'(is based on predicted 1981 population figures rather than actualpresent population, let alone future population. As a result ofthis, the number of presently constructed public standposts is notsufficient to cater for those people that do not have a privateconnection. Much emphasis should thus be given to constructing thebalance of the required standposts.

The mission feels that there is a lack of incentive within the U.P.Jal Nigam to commission the schemes in time, and concludes thatprobably too much attention has been directed towards other schemes(that appear to have been commissioned in record time). The Dutchmission members therefore propose that such incentive be created byipromising to withhold reimbursements for expenditures incurredbeyond the present year, with the exception of the Udari scheme,where compelling reasons caused earlier delays.

Progress with the implementation of the so-called exempted feedershas been disappointing. In 9 cases exempted feeders were either notyet commissioned or inoperable due to theft of wires or too low ortoo high voltages. It is recommended that the U.P. Jal Nigam contactthe State Electricity Board in order to ascertain a speedy implemen-tation, as well as voltages within an acceptable range.

Pending the exchange of side letters on Sub-Project III (hand pumps)no further activities have been undertaken by the U.P. Jal Nigam.

The mission received a summary report on 9 out of 11 proposedschemes under Sub-Project IV, and analyzed 8 of the correspondingproject reports. Although in general the set-up of the schemes isaccording to that used in Sub-Project I (East), in the mission'sopinion the proposed design population was far too low.

After extensive discussions it was agreed that the technical designcriteria for all projects and the demographic dat for the Bairi Bisha,Inargaon and Hathi Barni schemes were acceptable to the mission. Higherdesign populations, however, should be adopted for the remainingschemes.


In addition, the implementation schedule for the schemes should bebased upon more realistic assumptions than mentioned in the reports(start by mid-1986 at the earliest; construction period at least 3years).

The U.P. Jal Nigam promised to have the relevant project designreports adapted, as well as processed internally and by the U.P.State Government, by June 1985. The Ministry of Works and Housing inNew Delhi would be able to process the reports within one month'stime.

All parties concerned urged the Indian and Netherlands Governmentsto have the procedures regarding the approval of the Sub-Projectterminated within as short a period as possible, as the rural areafor which the schemes are intended suffers from severe drought.

During the discussions and field visit it appeared that there is a needfor more reliable and field-tested design data on which to base thedesigns for rural water supply schemes. Especially the fact that inIpractice such schemes are operated differently (e.g. during less hours'per day) than according to the design criteria, has to be taken intoaccount, as this may have far-reaching effects on the effectivity of theschemes themselves.

Important parameters that need to be investigated in more detail (includ-ing their effect on financial/economical viability of operation andmaintenance of the schemes under rural circumstances) are:

design period (10, 15 or 30 years, including feasibility ofphased implementation)population growth rates to be adopted (linear or exponentialgrowth rate; extrapolation of census figures, etc.)per capita water demand (40, 50, 55, 70, 90 Ipcd?)water consumption pattern of rural population under conditions ofplentiful water availability; effect of reducing supply hourscattle watering provisions (necessary, feasible?)effect of selected design period and per capita water provisionson possibility of private connectionsearning capacity of rural population and willingness to pay forwaterfeasibility of private connections under rural Indian circumstan-cesdesirable number of standposts for the population including sche-duled castesrevenue earning capacity of schemes as function of design capaci-ty/per capita water demand


2. SUB-PROJECT I (UP EAST)

2.1. Physical progress

2.1.1. General aspects

During the visit of Mission UP-10 to Uttar Pradesh the commissioning ofthe various schemes was expected to be as follows:

- Udari scheme (Rae Bareli) : September 1985all other schemes : March 1985

The mission, on its arrival in Uttar Pradesh, thus expected to see allschemes except Udari completed, and the Udari scheme in an advanced stageof completion. In fact, however, the progress of schemes, especially inthe Rae Bareli district, has been far from satisfactory:

- water sources have been completed in 18 out of 22 schemes- distribution systems have been completed in 18 schemes- elevated water reservoirs have been completed in 16 schemes

i- the required numbers of public standposts have been constructed" in 2 schemes (!)- 472 out of a total of 2101 completed public standposts have been

constructed in accordance with the agreed criteria for a so-called 'vandal-proof design9 schemes out of a total of 19 have been provided with exemptedfeeders (the remaining 3 schemes either depend on a power sub-station that has not yet been constructed, or do not requireexempted feeders for other reasons)in 3 of the commissioned exempted feeders the voltage is fre-quently outside the range that is suitable for running the pumps

' (over/under-voltage) or the system is repeatedly out of order dueto theft of wires or other reasons

As can be seen from the above list, especially the number of publicstandposts that has been constructed is far below the required minimum.The main reason for this is that the directive from the U.P. Jal Nigam.management, to temporarily 'freeze' the numbers of public standposts in'order to boost the number of private connections, that was to be with-drawn as a result of the discussions of mission UP-10, was in fact stillin force.More details about the public standpost situation will be given in para-graph 2.2.

As presently anticipated, most schemes will be commissioned in the periodbetween mid-1985 and end-1985. A number of schemes have been commissionedalready, albeit without the required number of public standposts, and notalways with exempted feeder. The latter is generally out of the controlof the U.P. Jal Nigam, however.


10

2.1.2. Progress of schemes in Rae Bareli District

During its field trip the mission visited the DCP schemes Udari, Banna-mau, Ralpur, Govindpur, Ferozpur and Bhojpur, and discussed the progressof all schemes with the Rae Bareli field staff.

At the time of the mission's visit the water sources (tubewells or cavitywells) had been constructed in all schemes, although TW No. 3 of Jagatpurand TW No. 3 of Behtakalan still had to be developed, and the respectivepumps procured and/or installed.

Of the 10 overhead reservoirs, 4 had been completed at the time of themission's last visit. Presently, 4 OHT have been commissioned, one isunder testing, two have been completed for 90%, and the remaining threehave been completed for 60% (Thulendi), for 45% (Ashrafpur) and for 20%(Udari).

The slow progress of the OHT construction at Thulendi is attributed toithe fact that this structure is still being constructed by a contractor(in most other cases contracts have been rescinded), under the old rates(which - because of the rising costs - are less than attractive for thecontractor involved).

In Ashrafpur the lack of progress was attributed to the fact that thejsite is almost unapproachable for approx. 6 months per year (although(this should hold true for the period March-September rather than theperiod since the last mission's visit).

In Udari the construction of the OHT was deferred until sufficientlypromising water sources had been found. In addition, delays were incurredbecause the soil proved to be aggressive, so that so-called 'soil treat-ment' became necessary: the foundation plate/raft for the OHT has beencast on a foundation of lean concrete with plastic sheeting to preventcontact between the soil/ shallow groundwater and the structure itself.Similarly a brick retaining wall has been built around the raft, againwith a plastic membrane to prevent direct contact between the structureand the surrounding soil.

Commissioning of the OHT at Bannamau and Behtakalan (90% progress) wasexpected in May 1985.

The distribution systems have been virtually completed in all schemes butUdari, where approximately two-thirds of the system has been laid.

Exempted feeders have been commissioned in Thulendi, Jagatpur and Banna-mau. In Bannamau, however, over-voltage problems were experienced (at thetime of the mission's visit the Volt meter indicated 435-445 V). Accord-ing to the Jal Nigam field staff these problems will soon be over,however.In Ferozpur, Ralpur, Govindpur, Bhojpur and Behtakalan commissioning ofthe exempted feeders was expected to take place in the month of April1985 itself, whereas for Ashrafpur commissioning was expected in May


11

1985. For Udari not even a target date for commissioning had been givenby the State Electricity Board, so that commissioning before the end ofthe year is highly unlikely.

A total of 1059 public standposts had been constructed, or: approx. 57percent of the calculated requirements (1842 standposts). 310 of theseare of the so-called 'vandal-proof type.

Final commissioning of the schemes in Rae Bareli District is expected inthe period May-September 1985, with the exception of Udari (expectedcommissioning in March 1986).

Detailed, scheme-wise data on the progress of the individual schemes isgiven in Annex F.

2.1.3. Progress of schemes in Allahabad District

The mission visited the Nidura scheme and discussed the progress of theDCP schemes in Allahabad District with the UP Jal Nigam field staff.

Except for the public standposts and the exempted feeder in Pratappur theschemes have all been commissioned. In Pratappur the month of commission-ing of the exempted feeder can not be predicted with accuracy; it isexpected somewhere between the end of 1985 and mid-1986. For Urwa noexempted feeder is required.

The total number of constructed public standposts amounts to 248 or: 38percent of the requirements according to the revised scheme set-up (649public standposts in total). A total of 162 standposts were reported tobe 'vandal-proof .

Detailed, scheme-wise data are given in Annex F.

2.1.4. Progress of schemes in Varanasi District

In Varanasi District progress has been the most pronounced of the threedistricts. Whereas at the time of the mission's last visit a number ofOHT were still under construction, these have all been completed by now,as have the distribution systems.

Exempted feeders have been commissioned in all schemes except Harhua(back-up power by means of a gen-set) and Vyasnagar (railway crossingstill to be approved). In Mirzamurad and Biraonkot the exempted feedershave been re-commissioned, but in the former there is trouble again, dueto the presence of dacoits in the area.In Kandwa the exempted feeder does not provide power for more than 6 - 7hours a day. According to the Jal Nigam field staff this situation isexpected to improve in the near future, however.


12

The total number of public standposts according to the revised projectset-up is 1868. Of these, a total of 794, or: 43 percent, has beenconstructed, none of which are of the so-called 'vandal-proof type.Detailed, scheme-wise data on the progress of the individual schemes isgiven in Annex F.

2.2. Public standposts and private connections

2.2.1. Present public standpost situation

As can be deducted from the above paragraphs on the physical progress ofthe DCP schemes, public standposts are the major item where progress isunsatisfactory.In the mission's report UP-10 it was already indicated that the manage-ment of the U.P. Jal Nigam had issued a directive to temporarily 'freeze'the numbers of constructed public standposts, in order to boost thenumber of applications for private connections. The reason for this is

1 the fact that private connections are the only important revenue earners'in a rural water supply scheme, and in this way it was hoped to attain atleast some degree of financial viability of the operation and maintenanceof the schemes.

The U.P. Jal Nigam policy to (temporarily) restrict the number of publicstandposts was aimed at boosting the number of applications for privateconnections. Presently, the situation regarding private connections inthe DCP schemes is as indicated in table 2.1.

However understandable this might be, duringlthe visit of mission UP-10it was agreed that this directive would be withdrawn, and that therequired numbers of public standposts would be constructred without &, <JM « J ,3further delay. cxr\rV

During the visit of mission UP-12 it became clear, however, that the UPJal Nigam field staff was as reluctant as ever to construct the addition-ally required numbers of standposts, and that the earlier mentionedmanagement directive had not been withdrawn either. As a result, thenumber of constructed public standposts had increased from a total of1276 at the time of mission UP-10, to 2101 at present, whereas the totalrequired number according to the revised project set-up amounts to 4411.|The degree of realization of the target is thus less than 48 percent.This does not even take into account, that the required number of publicstandposts has been based on estimated, rather than actual populationdata, and not on the target population or immediate population, not evenon the present population, but on the population at the time of therevision of the scheme, i.e. 1981. Actual required numbers of publicstandposts may thus be even higher!

2.2.2. Private connections


13

Table 2.1 - Private connections in DCP schemes

Scheme name:

FerozpurRalpurGovindpurBhojpurThulendiJagatpurAshrafpurUdariBannamauBehtakalan

RAE BARELI

SaidabadNiduraPratappurUrwa

ALLAHABAD

MirzamuradTikriSewapuriHarhuaBiraonkotVyasnagarRohaniaKandwa

VARANASI

SUB-PROJECT EAST I

r that especially in.ranasi District, the

Private connectionsTarget RealizedNos. Nos. Percent

3805364765567517356336879841205

6943

337300416290

1343

580410215550600550600555

4060

12346

Allahabadtargeted

1309710730025704009085

944

384384120355

1243

554450160550300300644245

3203

5390

Districtnumber of

34%18% -22%54%3%10%6%0%9%7%

14%

114%128%29%122%

93%

96%110%74%100%50%55%107%44%

79%

44%

, and to a lesser eprivate connection

almost been reached, and in several schemes even surpassed. Hardly anyreasons exist, therefore, to continue with the policy of restricting thenumbers of public standposts, apart even from the fact that such policyhad been promised to be abolished already at the time of mission UP-10'svisit.

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

14

I1

2.2.3. Estimate of required numbers of public standpostsV H K _ _ _ _ V M _ _ _ _ _ « _ _ _ _ « W W « W « K M _ _ _ _ « W W « W « « W B « « « K « K « « M * W M « _ _ « ~ « V

The numbers of public standposts as required according to the abovemen-tioned 'revised project set-up1 have been calculated in district-wise"Statements of Standposts", that were handed over to the mission on May5, 1982. These reports showed a break-down of each revenue village in therespective schemes into hamlets and core villages, indicating also thenumbers of SC/ST and other population for each of these habitations.

According to the agreed criteria:

at least one standpost for the SC/ST population and one for theremaining population, at each viLljige or hamletnot more than 250 people per tap (with the possibility of multi-tap standpostsmaximum walking distance of 150 meters

the numbers of public standposts as required per scheme were calculated,with the following results:

Table 2.2 - Numbers of standposts according to revised set-up

District

Rae BareliAllahabadVaranasi'

TOTAL

Projectedpopulation

21255593459302115

608129

Public standpostsoriginal revisedestimate estimate

841179400

1420

18596771875

4411

The projected population, when compared with the scheme-wise populationprojections, appears to be the 1981 population, rather than the targetpopulation or even the population at the expected time of commissioningof the scheme.

In order to assess the numbers of public standposts that would be re-quired to cater for the present or expected population under the samecriteria as mentioned earlier, a new calculation has been carried out inthis report, using the population break-down given in the "Statements ofStandposts".

Using the tehsil-wise growth rates in the period 1971-1981 the 1981population of the individual schemes had already been calculated inreport UP-8 of February 1983 (Table 2.1 , page 13-14).

As a rule these calculated population totals differ from those mentionedin the "Statements of Standposts" of May 1982. Therefore, the populationdata per village or hamlet have been adjusted, with a constant factor per

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIt

15

IIII

scheme, in order to bring the total 1981 population at the level men-tioned in report UP-8.Thereafter, the required numbers of public standposts have been calcu-lated, according to the criteria as mentioned before.

Using the annual growth rate as following from the tehsil-wise growthover the period 1971-1981, the total population per scheme has also beencalculated for the year of the expected commissioning of the schemes(situation 1986), for 1991, and for the original target year 2011. As nodetailed data are available, it has been assumed that each hamlet andvillage in a particular scheme grows at the same rate. Although theactual situation will undoubtedly be different, it is felt that thisapproximation is warranted, especially in view of the limited data avail-able.

Table 2.3 shows the results of these calculations. As could be expected,the total number of public standposts required at commissioning of theschemes is larger than according to the so-called revised estimate, viz.1631 + 3078 = 4709 rather than 4411. It is also clear that, due to therelatively large number of small habitations, the number of requiredpublic standposts grows considerably slower than the population of theschemes: whereas the population is expected to grow with a factor 2.02between 1981 and 2011, the total number of standposts grows with a factorof not more than 1.50. As a result, the average number of people perpublic standpost would grow from 138 in 1981 to 186 in the year 2011.

Table 2.3 also shows that at all times the average number of people perstandpost is smaller for the SC/ST population than for the rest of thepeople. This may be explained by the fact that the SC/ST people as a rulelive in smaller habitations.This is also shown by the fact that between 33 and 35 percent of thetotal number of public standposts is planned in SC/ST quarters, althoughtheir contribution to the total population is lower: approx. 28 percent.

2.2.4. Comparison of required and realized numbers of standposts

In order to compare the number of standposts that had been constructed atthe time of the mission's visit, with the required number according totable 2.3, the requirements per 1986 have been taken as the basis forcomparison.

Table 2.4 indicates the 1986 requirements, per scheme, and for the SC/STand remaining population separately. It also indicates the actual numbersof public standposts (PS) and house connections (HC) as realized at thetime of the mission's visit.

In order to calculate the actual requirements it had to be taken intoaccount that a part of the population is served by private connections,so that the actually required number of standposts is lower than indi-cated for 1986 in table 2.3. A correction of this number was thus deter-mined, by first estimating the number of people that is served by theprivate connections, and 'translating' that number into numbers of public

Table 2.3 - Determination of required numbers of public standposts

Year:

Scheme name:

198]

PEOPLE: STANDPOSTS:SC/ST rest SC/ST rest

1986

PEOPLE: STANDPOSTS:SC/ST rest SC/ST rest

1991 2011

PEOPLE: STANDPOSTS: PEOPLE: STANDPOSTS:SC/ST rest SC/ST rest SC/ST rest SC/ST rest

FerozpurRalpurGovindpurBhojpurTlmlendiJagatpurAshrafpurUdariBannamauBehtakalan

RAE BARELI


ALLAHABAD

TikriSewapuriHArhuaBiraonkotMirzamuradRohaniaVyasnagarKandwa

VARANASI

DCP TOTAL:

People/SP:

3897549255215632764663485319692295005451

6172830%

6651365561635595

2206424%

143406286128691390013000724490046092

8273527%

16652728%

SC/ST108

9736115881265314539124451734010685102831875124384

14240470%

16939166952310814672

7141476%

2641015203256252819125671344273165532078

21926073%

43307872%

rest154

519144478197828610173

75341%

51494256

19831%

8939969383496969

58731%

153835%

71110687710516598118128149

108959%

11896131106

45169%

11878140168181185157254

128169%

282165%

Total138

4313 107766038 127406541 149916138 158458588 139787028 191977051 141657796 1158110330 203896102 27297

69925 16095830% 70%

8234 209714272 195137610 285347209 18906

27326 8792424% 76%

17528 322817263 1756515412 3069016688 3384615586 307788698 4133710252 360447315 38516

98742 26105627% 73%

195992 50993C-28% 72%

SC/ST rest120 165

529246478397868710274

76640%

57494564

21529%

1074310210992557270

65032%

163135%

791148383110170106119133163

116060%

130108156132

52671%

14189162190190200171258

140168%

308765%

Total150

4660 116436524 137657067 161976632 171209371 152527593 207427858 157858688 1290611161' 220296593 29494

76147 17493330% 70%

9408 239604782 218418695 326008345 21885

31230 10028624% 76%

19686 362568157 1972817311 3446918743 3801417505 345689769 4642811314 397768215 43259

110700 29249827% 73%

21877 56771728% 72%

SC/ST rest128 173

529248478698868910575

77839%

61505164

22628%

1264610811397597572

69632%

170034%

801158991114170112124142173

121061%

145122172137

57672%

15998174203198219184261

149668%

328266%

Total158

6352 158698890 187599632 220759039 2333313284 2162110349 2826912119 2434513400 1990615211 300238986 40196

107262 24439631% 69%

16029 408237506 3428514813 5554114985 39295

53333 16994424% 76%

31327 5769512981 3139427546 5485129827 6049227856 5500715546 7388216779 5898913073 68839

174935 46114928% 72%

335530 87548928% 72%

SC/ST rest158 199

58 92100 13158 10957 11397 135105 192103 140103 141114 17782 210

877 144038% 62%

84 20258 16575 26490 217

307 84827% 73%

174 24364 145149 253168 307134 25981 32590 26185 317

945 211031% 69%

2129 439833% 67%

Total186

Table 2.4 - Comparison of required and actual numbers of standposts

1986 requirementsNon-SC/ST

PEOPLE :

Scheme name:

FerozpurRalpurGovindpurBhojpurThulendiJagatpurAshrafpurUdariBannamaufiehtakalan

RAE BARELI


ALLAHABAD

TikriSewapuriHarhuaBiraonkotNirzarouradRohaniaVyasnagarKandwa

VARANASI

DCP TOTAL:

SC/ST

43136038654161388588702870517796103306102

6992530%

8234427276107209

2732624%

1752872631541216688155868698102527315

9874227%

195992

rest

10776127401499115845139781919714165115812038927297

16095870%

20971195132853418906

8792476%

3228117565306903384630778413373604438516

26105673%

509938

STANDPOSTS :SC/ST

529246478397868710274

76640%

57494564

21529%

1074310210992557270

65032%

1631

rest

791148383110170106119133163

116060%

130108156132

52671%

14189162190190200171258

140168%

3087

total

131206129130193267192206235237

1926100%

187157201196

741100%

248132264299282255243328

2051100%

4718

mintotal

1001818890156243167192207168

1592

143108126157

534

13479173207146114121120

1094

3220

Actualpeople perPS

13611218119112711313497153167

139

161181183143

167

229197189178162207211149

186

165

HC

7777777777

7

7777

7

77777777

7

7

PS

481055684651606018240223

1059

77705546

248

956013011012910070100

794

2101

1985HC

1309710730025704009085

944

384384120355

1243

450160550300554644300245

3203

5390

CorrPS

551116095661646218244227

1102

94856063

302

1096615012215312280111

913

2317

required Pace. to

calc.

42%54%47%73%34%61%32%9%

104%96%

57%

50%54%30%32%

41%

44%50%57%41%54%48%33%34%

45%

49%

min.

55%61%68%106%42%67%37%9%

118%135%

69%

66%79%48%40%

57%

81%84%87%59%105%107%66%93%

83%

72%

Percentage of Number ofhabitationswith non-ST/SCpopulation

48894243731468110510594

826

86598193

319

2736719854594950

444

1589


18

standposts. For estimating the number of people served by private connec-tions, the household size was fixed at 7 persons. For calculating thecorresponding reduction in required numbers of public standposts, theaverage number of people per standpost for the respective scheme, and forthe nOn-SC/ST population was taken. The reason for this is that there arerelatively large differences in this number, as well between the indi-vidual schemes, as well as between the SC/ST and non-SC/ST population.This can easily-be seen from the eighth column of table 2.4, where theaverage number of people per public standpost ranges from a minimum of 97(Udari scheme) to a maximum of 229 (Tikri).

From table 2.4 it appears that the realized numbers of private connec-tions are equivalent with 216 public standposts, thus bringing the totalequivalent number of standposts at 2317, rather than 2101. It must beemphasized, however, that this calculation may be rather optimistic.Although the effect of smaller habitations on the less than proportionalvariation of the number of standposts has already been partly accountedfor by using scheme-wise averages for the population per standpost, theeffect of reducing the population to be served by discounting those witha private connection might in individual cases be next to negligible(e.g. when that population is spread evenly over the entire population).

IIAssuming that those who can afford a private connection will live in moreor less the same area, the approach followed may still be considered a

'I realistic one, albeit resulting in minimum requirements.

Comparing the thus calculated required number of public standposts showsthat the presently constructed number of standposts is only 49 percent ofthe required (corrected) total.

According to the policy of temporarily restricting the numbers of publicstandposts as earlier advocated by the U.P. Jal Nigam, and according to

I the explications given to the mission then, all SC/ST population should'be provided with standposts according to the agreed criteria (hardly anyprivate connections are expected in this group anyhow), whereas for the

I remaining population at least one public standpost should be erected inleach habitation, regardless of its size.

When this approach would be adhered to (which is not the case, as ex-plained earlier), the required number of standposts would be those forthe SC/ST population (column 3 of table 2.4) plus the number of vil-lages/hamlets where non-SC/ST population is living (last column of table2.3), resulting in a total of 3220 public standposts.

Even though the thus calculated number of standposts would constitute thebare minimum, it appears that the actually realized number is even lower:only 72 percent of this, with the lowest percentages being shown forAllahabad District.

I

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

19

2.2.5. Conclusions

From the above it will be clear that constructing the remaining publicistandposts according to the revised project set-up is strictly necessary,land that in fact the number should still be higher, to take into accountthe increase in population since 1981.

In view of the attitude of the U.P. Jal Nigam field staff it may beexpected that no extension of the number of public standposts will takeplace in the near future, so that the presently ongoing implementation[should preferably result in a number of standposts that is sufficientjalso for the near future. It seems highly unlikely that that can berealized, however.

Taking the above into account, the mission strongly recommends that bothfthe Indian and the Netherlands Governments emphasize the importance of| constructing the agreed numbers of public standposts. It also suggeststhat no further delays in implementing the DCP schemes under Sub-ProjectI (East) are agreed with, by deciding to withhold reimbursement of claimsrelated to implementation activities after January 1, 1986.In view of special circumstances, exceptions could be made for the Udarischeme and for the commissioning of some exempted feeders, however.

2.3. Power supply

In chapter 2.2 for each of the districts the situation regarding theexempted feeders is mentioned. From that information it is clear that inRae Bareli, where only 3 schemes had been provided with exempted feedersby the time of the mission's visit, for 5 schemes such feeders wereexpected to be commissioned in the month of April itself, and for onemore scheme in May (Ashrafpur). Only in one case no specific month forcommissioning the feeder could be given (Udari).

In Allahabad 3 out of 4 schemes require exempted feeders, 2 of which havebeen commissioned. Only for the Pratappur scheme such a feeder is stillrequired. The probable month of commissioning of that feeder could not bedetermined more accurately than to be within the period end of 1985 -mid-1986.

For Varanasi, out of 7 schemes, 6 were to be provided with exemptedfeeders, as the remaining scheme (Harhua) has been provided with a back-up generator set. For 5 schemes the feeders have been commissioned; intwo of these even re-commissioned after problems caused by theft ofwires. Similar problems still exist in Mirzamurad.In Vyasnagar commissioning of the exempted feeder awaits permission fromthe Railway Authority for a railway crossing. The second tubewell of thisscheme has power for more than 22 hours daily because of its proximity toa fertilizer factory, however.

Power supply through rural feeders continues to be a problem: in thePratappur scheme over-all power availability during March 1985 was 380.5hours, or 12.3 hours per day. Because of problems with either too high or


20

too low voltages, or because of power on a single phase only, the effec-tive number of hours during which pumps could be run was considerablysmaller: 95.9 hours, or: 3.1 hours/day.

Similarly, the availability of power amounted approx. 6 hours/day for theHarhua scheme, 4.2 hours/day for the Bhojpur scheme, and 5.1 hours/dayfor the Ferozpur scheme.

Problems with incorrect voltages or limited power supply appear not to berestricted to rural feeders, however: also several exempted feedersexperienced problems.In Kandwa the total number of power hours in the month of March 1985, viaan exempted feeder, amounted to only 480 (15.5 hours/day), of which onlyduring 258 hours (8.3 hours/day) the power was of the correct voltage.In Rohania the availability of power over the exempted feeder was 458.5hours per month in March 1985, or: 14.8 hours/day.In Mirzamurad power over the exempted feeder was available for only 291hours in March 1985 (9.4 hours/day), of which only during 224 hours (7.3hours/day) at the correct voltage.In Nidura power over the exempted feeder was available for only 564.5hours.during the month of March 1985, or: 18.2 hours/day.

Although the power situation is undoubtedly better when an exemptedfeeder is available, it is still far from the uninterrupted supply it issupposed to be. Also the fact that over- and under-voltages render thepower unsuitable at times for running the pumps is to be taken intoaccount.

This also means that the design conditions of a maximum of 16 hours'pumping per day cannot be met by the majority of DCP schemes, even whenprovided with exempted feeders. Although this is not as bad as it mightappear (16 hours' pumping per tubewell is normally not required beforethe second half of the design period of the schemes) it is a factor to betaken into account when the feasibility of various ways of ascertainingpower supply (e.g. by means of back-up gen-sets) is determined.

It is strongly recommended that the U.P. Jal Nigam maintain frequentcontacts with its counterparts of the State Electricity Board, to ascer-tain as uninterrupted a power supply to the rural water supply schemes aspossible. Setting up committees on a district level in which all partiesconcerned participate (e.g. also the Railway Authority, being the autho-rity to approve railway crossings of pipes and power lines) might be animportant step in that direction.

According to information obtained from the U.P Jal Nigam, on April 14,1985 a task force has been formed by the Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister, inwhich representatives of the Jal Nigam, the Jal Sansthans and the StateElectricity Board participate. According to directives from the ChiefMinister, as soon as a site for a tubewell to be used for water supplyhas been selected, power should be made available by the S.E.B. within 24hours(!).


21

Although the latter appears to be wishful thinking rather than realistic,it appears that at least a start has been made with improving the powersupply conditions for rural water supply schemes.

2.4. Supply hours

The number of supply hours for the rural water supply schemes is, bydefinition, influenced by any constraints in the availability of powerand hence in pumping hours.

In the Kandwa scheme, pumping hours were thus restricted to 258 hours inMarch 1985, or: 8.3 hours/day. The total volume of water supplied wasapprox. 32502 m3, or: approx. 26 litres per head and per day.

In the Rohania scheme, the total number of pumping hours amounted to 300in March 1985, which resulted in 135 supply hours, or: 4.35 hours/day. Atotal volume of approx. 60000 m3 was supplied, which is equivalent toabout 39 Ipcd.

In Mirzamurad, the total number of pumping hours (for both tubewellstogether) amounted to 245 for March 1985. The- supplied volume of water,27930 m3, was equivalent to approx. 26 Ipcd.

Not all restrictions in the number of supply hours are caused by limitedavailability of power at the correct voltage, however: in many cases thenumber of supply hours is purposely limited, for a number of reasons.These often have to do with the way in which the schemes are operated,which sometimes is by twice daily filling the overhead reservoir andthereafter allowing water to be abstracted during a period of 3 to 4hours, one in the early morning and one in the afternoon.

Other reasons given are the fact that water supplied during these limitedperiods is sufficient, and quite acceptable to the population, providedthat water is available at regular times.

Insufficient data is available to either prove or reject these assump-tions. It is a fact, however, that they are not in conformity with thedesign criteria mentioned in the project reports as well as in the"Manual on Water Supply and Treatment" from the Ministry of Works andHousing in New Delhi. That does not necessarily mean that for that reason

*" I Ithey are not correct, but it is at the very least inconsistent to design v ?-.t'|r *"°schemes on the basis of criteria that are not valid or followed in "practice.

It is recommended, therefore, that investigations of a more fundamentalnature are carried out on design criteria to be used for rural watersupply schemes, as mentioned in the "Introduction and summary" (Chapter1) of this report.


22

It is also recommended that, pending the establishment of other designcriteria, those that have been used in the designs are adhered to, alsoduring operation and maintenance of the schemes. In that way it can beprevented that sizes and capacities of components of the schemes becomeincompatible with the method of operating the schemes.An example to that effect may be the size of the overhead reservoirs,that would become insufficient if the number of supply and/or pumpinghours would be reduced but the per capita water demand retained.This aspect has been delt with in more detail in earlier mission reports,e.g. in report UP-8 of February 1983 (paragraphs 2.10 and 2.11).

2.5. Project duration

In spite of the U.P. Jal Nigam's assurance that the estimated months ofcommissioning of the schemes as mentioned to Mission No. 10 were realis-tic, and that no more delays were anticipated, commissioning of mostschemes will again be later than was estimated at that time.

The main reason for delays has been the backlog in construction of publicstandposts which, as has been explained before, is due to a Jal Nigammanagement decision rather than physical constraints during construction.In addition, the delay in commissioning the exempted feeders has delayedthe final commissioning of a number of schemes that could otherwise becommissioned.

Table 2.5 shows that most of the schemes are now expected to be commis-sioned by September 1985, weheras the Udari scheme is expected to takeuntil March 1986 to be completed.

The indicated months of commissioning include most but not all of theadditional works such as laboratories, inspection house, etc.

IIIIIIIIiiiiiiiiiiiii

23

Table 2.5 - Estimated commissioning of DCP schemes

District Scheme

Probable month of commissioningas estimated per:

Original October 1984 April 1985

RAE BARELI

ALLAHABAD

VARANASI

FerozpurRalpurGovindpurBhojpurThulendiJagatpurAshrafpurUdariBannamauBehtakalan


MirzamuradTikriSewapuriHarhuaBiraonkotVyasnagarRohaniaKandwa

3-823-823-823-823-823-823-823-823-823-82

3-823-823-823-82

3-823-823-823-823-823-823-823-82

3-853-853-853-853-853-853-859-853-853-85

3-853-853-853-85

3-853-853-853-853-853-853-853-85

7-857-857-857-859-857-859-853-865-856-85

7-857-857-85*)7-85

9-859-859-859-859-859-859-859-85

-*)•-*)~'O•*)-*)-*)-*)-*)

Note: *) commissioning except for exempted feeder**) assuming that construction of remaining standposts is started

forthwith

The mission was disappointed to establish that commissioning of theschemes had again been delayed for most of the schemes and requested theUP Jal Nigam to do its utmost to prevent any further delays.

2.6. Project costs

The quarterly report covering the progress up to March 1985 was not yetavailable at the time of the mission's visit. As a result of this onlythe actual expenditures up to January 1985 could be obtained, as shown intable 2.6 below.

The U.P. Jal Nigam promised to make available the financial details ofthe quarter ending March 1985, as well as a revised disbursement schedulefor the remainder of the project implementation period by mid-May 1985.

II1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

24

Although expenditures during the last two quarters of the year 1984 haveundoubtedly increased as compared to the quarter ending June 1984, actualexpenditures have lagged behind those foreseen at the time of mission UP-10 (Rs 6.7 million for the quarter ending September 1984, and Rs. 12.77million for the quarter ending December 1984). This reflects the delaysin physical implementation of the projects described in earlier para-graphs of this report.

Actual expenditures as well as expenditures expected by the time of thelast mission's visit, are shown graphically in Fig. 2.1.

Table 2.6. - Expenditures Sub-Project I (East)

Claimdated

../../..10/09/8118/09/8105/12/8120/04/8215/06/8201/10/8221/12/8209/03/8326/03/8303/06/8303/10/8309/12/8313/02/8402/04/8419/05/8424/08/8415/11/8415/03/8501/05/85

ClaimNo.

1234567891011121314151617181920

Periodending

Dec'80Mar'81Jun'81Sep'81Dec'81Mar'82Jun'82Sep'82Dec'82Feb'83Mar'83Jun'83Sep'83Dec'83Feb'84Mar'84Jun'84Sep'84Dec'84Mar'85

Claimed(Rs.)

23,874,003.3220,626,368.347,237,917.756,151,065.865,276,059.2510,371,068.297,634,362.728,147,685.135,036,836.793,044,948.719,043,650.962,665,345.714,377,681.784,358,212.735,613,486.944,546,211.711,420,427.153,911,116.396,069,167.388,214,949.32

Cumulative(Rs.)

23,874,003.3244,500,371.6651,738,289.4157,889,355.2763,165,414.5273,536,482.8181,170,845.5389,318,530.6694,355,367.4597,400,316.16106,443,967.12109,109,312.83113,486,994.61117,845,207.34123,458,694.28128,004,905.99129,425,333.14133,336,449.53139,405,616.91147,619,566.23

The mission scrutinized reimbursement claims for the periodending December 1984 and found no inconsistencies with thephysical progress of the schemes.

IIIIIIIIIIIIII

III

II

200 -

150 -

100 -

enCC.

§

XO)

.2rsEo

50 -

0

25

actual expendituresanticipated in June'84progress report

10

1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985

Fig. 2.1 . Expenditures Sub-Project I (East), Uttar Pradesh


26

3. SUB-PROJECT III (HAND PUMP SCHEMES)

3.1. Status of Sub-Project III

The mission was informed that in all villages covered by the proposedhand pump schemes under Sub-Project III (East and West Uttar Pradesh) oneor two hand pumps had been placed in each village, as an immediate reliefmeasure. These hand pumps are no part of the proposed Sub-Project, whichaims to saturate the respective villages with hand pumps, according tothe agreed criteria.

Pending the official approval and exchange of side letters on this Sub-Project, no further action has been taken by the U.P. Jal Nigam.

3.2. Procurement procedures and quality control measures

For the procurement of hand pumps the following procedures are followedby the U.P. Jal Nigam:

only pumps made according to Indian standard ISI 9301-1984 ("Spe-cification for deep-well hand pumps (Second revision)" are pur-chased, from manufacturers that are entitled to carry the ISImark. This means that random sampling is carried out by ISIofficers, at the manufacturer's worksAccording to a UNICEF circular "Qualified Suppliers of India Mk-II hand pumps and spare parts" the ISI mark is not necessarilysufficient proof of a guaranteed quality of the pumps. Hence anadditional inspection is carried out by UNICEF-appointedagencies, in this case first Crown Agents, and presently SGS(Societe Generale de Surveillance) of SwitzerlandUpon recipt on site a visual check is carried out by the U.P. JalNigam field staffInstructions will be given to pay additional attention to thegalvanization of the various materials.

Formerly, pre-delivery checks were carried out by Jal Nigam officers atthe manufacturer's works, but since there is no guarantee that the samegoods that have been checked are sent to the field, this kind of checkwas replaced by a check upon delivery on-site.

For other materials almost the same procedure is followed, with thedifference that no pre-delivery check by a UNICEF-appointed agency iscarried out, but that samples of received materials are sent to testinginstitutes for quality checks.

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIa

27

4. SUB-PROJECT IV (EAST)

4.1. General aspects

During earlier contacts between the U.P. Jal Nigam and the Water SupplyCoordinator at the Royal Netherlands Embassy, a summary proposal for 11rural water supply schemes was handed over, covering the followingschemes:

Varanasi District:

Gyanpur Tehsil: Inargaon scheme-2°Kasidaha scheme^- >'Rohi scheme ——— Bairibisa scheme-—l'}-Biranpur scheme —17

Varanasi Tehsil: Jansa scheme ———. ,Hathi Barni scheme-^ InAwajapur scheme -i|b\Mahadapur scheme — 7 J

Allahabad District:^

Manihanpur Tehsil: Chhekawa scheme -—— |iKosam Khiraj scheme— ?

Mission Up-12 received a "Report for Pre-appraisal of Sub-Project II(East)(revised), Instalment-I for Varanasi and Allahabad Districts" ofApril 1985, a copy of which is attached to this report as Annex G.

The report covers the earlier mentioned schemes in Allahabad and Varanasidistricts, with the exception of the Mahadapur and Kosam Khiraj schemes,of which the project reports could not be completed in time.

Salient features of the proposed schemes are indicated below:

Table 4.1 - Main data of proposed schemes under Sub-Project IV

No.

123456789

Scheme

InargaonKasidahaRohiBairibisaBiranpurJansaHathi BarniAwajapurChhekawa

Villagescovered

201135171724

. 261611

Design population(2017)

365003263038942366802680025415258601990026530

Project costs(Rs millions)

7.9657.2318.9647.8867.2886.2956.3136.2219.023

Total: 202 319600 67.206

I1IIIII1IIIIIII

28

I

I

4.2. Design criteria

The design criteria used for preparing the proposed schemes are similarto those used in Sub-Project I (East), viz.:

design period 30 yearsdesign population: to be discussed separately (paragraph 4.3)per capita water demand: 70 Ipcdwater source: at least 2 tubewells per scheme; no tubewell to runfor more than 16 hours per day. Tubewells bored in the area, bothby the U.P. Jal Nigam and the Irrigation Department, are of rea-sonable depth (100 - 150 m), giving a safe discharge of 1400 -2200 litres/minute. The water quality is reported to be withinsafe limitstreatment of the water restricted to safety chlorinationpumping plant of the submersible typepower supply: based on a feasibility study for the individualschemes, in all cases power supply through exempted feeder provedthe most economical. Negotiations with the State ElectricityBoard on the provision of such exempted feeders have been startedalreadycentralized storage in overhead reservoirs at the headworkssites, with a minimum capacity equivalent to at least 8 hours'supplysupply from the OHT to be under gravity, using a simple,branched, distribution networkto prevent delays in implementation, distribution networks havebeen laid out in such a way that railway crossings could bepreventeddistribution mains calculated for a peak factor of 2.4, and usingthe Hazen-Williams formula with C-factors of 100 for galvanizedor cast iron pipes, and 120 for asbestos-cement or PVC pipesresidual water pressures at the periphery of the schemes to be atleast 6 m wenumbers of public standposts based on one standpost per 250persons. These are to be provided to the scheduled caste popula-tion and the 'weaker section of society1 in each village/hamlet,even if the population is less than 250 persons, while ensuringthat the users do not have to walk more than 150 m to fetch waterfrom standposts.

This criterion does not exactly conform with those agreed on (butnot yet fully implemented) for Sub-Project East I, in that itleaves open the possibility that the non-SC/ST population in ananuet or village is not provided with a seyafraTe~~s~CatTo!pos'i:rTn a

, UAVYN smaller village or hamlet (bL'/ST population provided with one orW* .v.'.rKr/ymore standposts; total number of people less than 250 per stand-

post, but no standposts for the non-SC/ST people)..Although thissituation, even if it would occur, would not necessarily beproblematic, it might have undesirable effects. A more precisedescription of the way in which the required number of public

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

standposts is determined may thus have to be included in therelevant side letter.all public standposts are to be of the 'vandal-proof pillar type

Summarizing, the proposed schemes are according to the proven design thatis also used in Sub-Project I (East). Only the required numbers of publicstandposts and the population projections used need to be adapted.Population projections are discussed in the next paragraph.

4.4. Population projections

The determination of the design population to be taken into account forthe proposed schemes has been a subject of lengthy discusssions thatstarted even before the end of the year 1984.At that time Mr. A.K. Gupta, Manager Appraisal, U.P. Jal Nigam, met withMessrs. A.K. Sen Gupta (Asstt. Adviser, CPHEEO) and J.A. Speets (WaterSupply Coordinator at the Royal Netherlands Embassy) in New Delhi, todiscuss the way in which the target population for the schemes was to bedetermined.It was argued that extrapolating the growth experienced in the decadebetween the 1971 and 1981 census would lead to unrealistically highpopulation figures, and reasons were presented at that time (though notlaid down in writing) for adopting a lower growth rate.

It was, therefore, proposed to accept a linear extrapolation of thepopulation growth on the basis of the 1971 and 1981 census data. As nomore detailed data were said to be available, tehsil-wise growth figureswere to be used as the basis for this forecast. It was further shownthat, even when the compound (annual) growth rate following from the 1971and 1981 census data were to be used, the design populations calculatedwith the linear-growth method would result in minor reductions in life-time of the schemes, i.e. from 30 years to approx. 25 years.

On the basis of this information it was agreed to accept the proposedmethod (see also letter No. 133/JS/hm, of January 4, 1985, from the RoyalNetherlands Embassy to the Managing Director of the U.P. Jal Nigam).

During the discussions of April 1985 in Lucknow, the mission receivedinformation that prompted it not to accept the earlier agreed method.

First, Mr. A.K. Gupta was on leave, and the argumentation presented byhim in December 1984 could not be reproduced by any of the other membersof the Appraisal Wing of the U.P.Jal Nigam.

Secondly, it appeared that the calculations that had shown that theresulting lifetimes of the schemes were still in the order of 25 years,even when using the compound growth rate, actually referred to remaininglifetime after the year 1981, so in fact showed a picture that was 4 to 5years optimistic.


30

Finally, it appeared that for each of the villages in the proposedschemes census data for 1981, 1971, 1961 and in most cases also for 1951were available, so that more accurate population growth rates than basedon tehsil-wise totals could be calculated.

The mission therefore decided to check the influence of adopting thesepopulation growth rates on the design population of the schemes, or,conversely, to check what effect adopting the proposed target populationswould have on the expected lifetimes of the schemes.

Table 4.2 shows the population of the area to be covered by the proposedschemes, in the years 1951, 1961, 1971 and 1981, in as far as data wereavailable at the time of the discussions in Lucknow. As this was not thecase for the Chhekawa scheme (Allahabad), this scheme is not includedhere.For each of the three decades 1951-1961, 1961-1971 and 1971-1981 theannual growth rate (compound method) has been calculated. For comparisonthe tehsil-wise decade growth and the resulting annual growth rate overthe last decade have been added.

The table shows that for 5 out of 8 schemes the scheme-wise annualpopulation growth rate over the period 1971-1981 is higher than thataccording to the tehsil-wise population figures, thus warranting arecalculation of the target population.

Table 4.2 - Growth rates based on scheme population or tehsil

Scheme

Scheme-wiseCensus population

1951 1961 1971 1981

Scheme-wiseAnnual growth rate

Tehsil-wisegrowth rate'71-'81 annual

RohiKasidahaBirampurBairibisaInargaonAwajapurHathi BarniJansa

?6693565684187275688581996190

1026471636674102379899793788457743

1261510267770212946123748884105979900

1763514774121291661116393112581329413057

0113102

9

.68%

.67%

.98%-13%.43%.76%.26%

2 . 08%3.67%1.44%2 . 38%2.26%1.13%1 . 82%2.49%

3.41%3.71%4.65%2.52%2.85%2 . 40%2 . 29%2.81%

3333333333212626

.56%

.56%

.56%

.56%

.56%

.29%

.26%

.26%

2.94%2.94%2.94%2.94%2.94%1 . 95%2.36%2.36%

In table 4.3 the actual growth rates used in the project reports havebeen calculated and compared to growth rates following from the censusfigures for the villages included in the various schemes.

In order to check the possible influence of extraordinary high populationgrowth in the last decade only, scheme-wise annual growth rates have beencalculated for the last 10, 20 and 30 years preceding the 1981 census.Again it is clear that the annual growth rates following from the pro-posed scheme designs are lower than whatever growth rate is calculatedfrom the census figures, in all but one case (Hathi Barni scheme whencompared with the average growth over the period 1951-1981).

tIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

•\

31

Table 4.3 - Comparison of growth rates used

Census Design population Compound growth rate according topopulation project report designs census

Scheme 1981 1987 2002 2017 '81-' 17 '71-'81 '6l-'81 !51-'81

RohiKasidahaBirampurBairibisaInargaonAwajapurHathi BarniJansaChhekawa

176351477412129166111639311258132941305713746

211871776014570199601970012700154001512015877

3005425190206752832028000163002063020275N.A.

389423263026800366803650019900258602541526530

2 . 22%2 . 23%2 . 23%2 . 22%2 . 25%1.59%1.87%1.87%1.84%

3.41%3.71%4.65%2.52%2.85%2.40%2.29%2.81%

9

2.74%3.69%3.03%2.45%2.55%1.76%2.06%2.65%

7

2.67%2.58%2.29%2.75%1.65%1.62%2.52%

What the influence of adopting the proposed target population would be onthe remaining lifetime of the scheme (after commissioning in 1986), whenthe actual annual population groth would remain constant at the level ofthe last 10, 20 or 30 years (calculated from 1981 onward), is shown intable 4.4. It appears that only for the Bairibisa, Inargaon and HathiBarni schemes the resulting lifetime after commissioning would be in theorder of 25 years or more, whereas that of the other schemes would beconsiderably lower, and thus unacceptable, also when the criteria asdiscussed in December 1984 would be applied.

Table 4.4 - Remaining technical lifetime of schemes

Scheme

Resulting number of years after 1986based on annual growth rate

RohiKasidahaBirampurBairibisaInargaonAwajapurHathi BarniJansa

18.616.812.526.823.519.124.319.1

24.316.921.527.726.727.627.720.5

N.A.25.026.230.024.629.836.321.8

Lengthy discussions then followed, in the field as well as in Lucknow, abouta realistic population growth rate to be adopted. It was argued that thehigh population growth rates over the last census decade could not con-tinue forever, as effects of family planning were bound to leave theirmark. In addition, it was said, the hinterland of the individual villagescould not sustain such growth in all cases.

On the other hand, no specific information could be shown that indicatedcertain restrictions in development potential of the villages. Also, itwas argued, providing a better service level in the rural areas (electri-fication, but also providing water) would curb the migration of rural


32

I)population to the cities, and thus even cause an increase in rural popu-lation growth. Villages along major roads also were considered to have amore or less unlimited development potential.

Finally, the census figures show that so far population growth per decadehas been rising continually, so that it is impossible to predict when, ifat all in the near future, a reverse in growth trends would occur.

Taking into account the above arguments, the mission decided on strikinga balance between adopting an exponential and a stagnating growth trend.It was agreed that target populations would be calculated by taking t.oe_arithmetic average between the population projection using the compoundgrowth method on~tRe basis ot~t:h'e~T9Tl-iy»i annual growth7..a_nd_the_JJ.neargrowth, again based on the 1971 and 1981 census populations..

Table 4.5 shows the calculated 1989 and 2019 populations, on the basis ofthe compound and the linear growth methods, as well as the selectedarithmetic average. The last two columns further show the target popula-tion mentioned in the project reports and the difference between theselected averages for 2019 and these target populations, expressed aspercentages of the selected averages. The years 1989 and 2019 have beentaken as the most likely year of commissioning of the schemes, and thetarget year, 30 years thereafter.

Table 4.5 shows that only for the Bairibisa scheme the difference betweenthe selected average and the target population proposed is negligible.For the Inargaon and Hathi Barni schemes this difference is 8% and 6%,respectively, whereas for the remaining schemes it ranges from 17% (Awa-japur scheme) to 45% (Birampur scheme).

On this basis the mission decided to approve the design populations forthe Bairibisa, Inargaon and Hathi Barni schemes only. For all otherschemes, including the Chhekawa scheme in Allahabad, the design will haveto be recast, taking the selected average for the year 2019 (table 4.5)as the design population.

The U.P. Jal Nigam, recognizing the urgency of having rural water supplyschemes implemented in the area covered by the proposed Sub-Project IV,undertook to have the revised project reports ready and appraised, aswell as processed by the Uttar Pradesh Government, by June 1985. TheMinistry of Works and Housing, in its turn, agreed to have the reportsprocessed wi-thin one month after receipt.

iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

33

Table 4.5 - Selection of des ign popu la t ion

Scheme

RohiKasidahaBirampurBairibisaInargaonAvajapurHathi BarniJansa

1971pop.

1261510267770212946123748884105979900

1981pop.

1763514774121291661116393112581329413057

compound 1989 populationannual selectedgrowth compound linear average

3.41%3.71%4.65%2.52%2.85%2.40%2.29%2.81%

2305519767174422027720529136061593816293

2165118380156711954319608•131571545215583

2235319073165561991020069133821569515938

2019 populationselected

compound linear average

6298458899681194263447733276893146737380

3671131901289523053831665202792354325054

4984845400485353668639699239842750531217

Targetpopulationreports

3894232630268003668036500199002586025415

Difference

-22%-28%-45%0%-8%

-17%-6%

-19%

Table 4.6 - Summary of salient features of proposed schemes

Scheme name No. of No. of Design Capital Number of Capitalvillages scarcity population cost public private cost

villages (millions stand- connec- per headof Rs.) posts tions (Rs.)

VARANASI DISTRICTRohiKasidaha'BirampurBairibisaInargaonAwajapurHathi BarniJansa

ALLAHABAD DISTRICTChhekawa

TOTAL

3511171720162621

11

174

1211177

16?

2621

8

118

3894232630268003668036500199002586025415

26530

269257

8.9467.2317.2887.8667.9656.2416.3136.295

9.023

67.188

16010418

131106639482

83

841

16691398115715721564853

11001090

1137

11540

230222272215218314244248

340

250


34

4.4. Implementation schedule

The proposed schemes have a design period of 30 years, with assumedbeginning in 1987 and target year 2017. In view of the fact that not eventhe internal appraisal by the U.P. Jal Nigam had been carried out, letalone processing by the Governments of Uttar Pradesh and of India, afterwhich the procedure with the exchange of side letters between the Govern-ments of India and of The Netherlands would still have to follow, anyassumed start of the implementation of the projects before raid-1986 isoverly optimistic.

The mission therefore proposed to assume a start of the project notearlier than mid-1986, and an implementation period of 3 to 3.5 years.The U.P. Jal Nigam staff argued that implementation of the newly proposedschemes should be much faster than under Sub-Project I, for a number ofreasons:

the field staff has gained much experience with executing thiskind of schemes, including those where OHT are executed depart-mentallytenders for the execution of OHT are combined in packages thatmay be attractive also for larger contractors, thus resulting inbetter qualified contractors executing the works, in a shorterperiodexempted feeders for the various schemes have been applied foralready, to save timethe schemes have been grouped together in such a way that railwaycrossings have been prevented, as these have caused delays in thepastfinancing of the DCP schemes has been removed from the DistrictPlans and once again included in the State Plan. In this waydelays in the allocation of funds may be largely prevented.

For speeding up the implementation of DCP schemes even further, theManaging Director of the U.P. Jal Nigam contemplated to change the orga-nization in such a way that a Project Manager would be responsible solelyfor these schemes, without any other tasks. In that way, it was felt,implementation of the works could be carried out within a period of 2years.

After some discussions it was agreed that for the sake of calculating thedesign populations of the proposed schemes commissioning by the year 1989would be assumed.

4.5. Approval procedure

On the basis of the available project documents a pre-appraisa|l wasconducted, as indicated in the previous paragraphs, in line with theterms of reference of the Mission (see als Annex A).


35

Before the relevant detailed project documents could be made available,short descriptions of each project were presented before the discussionson bilateral assistance between the Governments of India and of TheNetherlands, in February, 1985.

The mission studied the reports and paid a few field visits to projectareas where without exception severe drought conditions were encountered,a nd was ~told that tHis adverse ._s_i.tjiaj:l a_ls...nQ_t LAlseasojiaL-Pature. butgradually

As is indicated in paragraph 4.3 the main observation point of the mis-sion was created by the non acceptable reduction in the lifespan of theschemes, due to the low population figures adopted. This point, however,was satisfactorily settled, though several projects will have to berevised and project estimates recalculated accordingly.

During the field visits and prolonged discussions with the U.P. Jal Nigamstaff, the mission arrived at the opinion that good reasons were avail-able for its recommendation to the Netherlands Government to consider thefinancing of these projects on the basis of this appraisal only.

Notwithstanding the fact that the mission recognizes that this proposedprocedure may deviate from current and previous practice, the missionbelieves that prevailing specific conditions do justify this recommenda-tion in many respects .

In particular the following aspects were appreciated:

1. All projects do comprise so-called "problem villages" for which itis essential that a speedy implementation can be accomplished, inview of the adverse position of the population.For this reason all projects are classified by the U.P. Governmentas first preference projects, and in principle eligible for accommo-dation in e.g. the Minimum Needs Programme

2. The project locations are scattered within the boundaries of thesame districts as applies for the ongoing (almost completed) Sub-Project I (East).This implies that the (technical) nature and set-up of the newprojects will be identical to adjacent schemes. The Jal Nigam staffclaims to have sufficient experience to complete this kind ofproject in time (see also paragraph 4.4)

3. Design criteria and cost estimate procedures of all new schemes arein compliance with the previously adopted strategy (see also para-graph 4.2)

4. The documents for five projects are being recast regarding popula-tion figures to be applied in the design

5. Two years ago the Comprehensive Review and Appraisal Mission (UP-8)intensively studied all relevant aspects of rural water supply inthis area. It is felt, not only by the mission, that many elementsof this study are transferable to the new projects and therefore nosimilar exercise should be contemplated.


36

Several recommendations of the UP-8 mission have been implemented,such as:

improvement of geo-hydrological survey (see also paragraph 5.1)siting of public taps has improvednumber of public taps has been increaseda work plan on sanitation, drainage and hygiene education hasbeen formulated and could be implemented simultaneously with thenew projects

6. Problems with saline or brackish water are not to be expected,contrary to experiences in U.P. West

7. The anticipated construction period is estimated to be not less than3 years (see also paragraph 4.4). Any additional activity within theframework of this programme can be identified and implemented withinthis time period, if so desired.

The mission is convinced that a positive decision for an acceleratedapproval procedure in this case will contribute significantly to theimpetus of the water supply programme in this area.


37

5. MISCELLANEOUS ASPECTS

5.1. Hydrogeological cell

As has been mentioned in the "Report on mision 10 to Uttar Pradesh (UP-10), a hydrogeological cell had been formed within the U.P. Jal Nigamorganization, in conformity with the recommendations of the ComprehensiveReview and Appraisal Mission UP-8.

Two electric loggersjiad been purchased, and a hydrogeologist (on deputa-~tion from the Central~0roundwatt;i Buard) had joined the organizationalready by that time. During the discussions of April 1985 it transpiredthat the appointment of the geophysicist (also on deputation from theCentral Groundwater Board) had been approved, and that he was expected tojoin in the second half of April 1985.

An appraisal report "Purchase of Electric Loggers under Indo-Dutch Re-ap-praisal Mission Scheme" had been prepared, and would be submitted to theNetherlands Government through the Governments of Uttar Pradesh andIndia, in the month of April itself. The cost of the items mentioned inthis report may be summarized as follows:

Table 5.1 - Cost of geohydrological equipment

No.

123456

Item

Electric loggers, 2 unitsTaxes and Excise DutyVans, 2 unitsFabrication of 2 bodiesRegistrationContingencies

Estimated costs

Rs 1,000,00090,000172,00064,000

-32,280

Actual costs

Rs 1,050,000144,000180,00088,00010,00032,280

Total Rs 1,314,280 Rs 1,514,280

5.2. Additional activities

5.2.1. Additional provisions under Sub-Project I

Apart from the purchase of spare pump sets, etc. it had earlier beendecided to provide mobile laboratories for the three districts covered bythe sub-project. At the time of the mission's visit one mobile van hadbeen purchased and the laboratory equipment ordered. The remaining twovans would be purchased as soon as the laboratory equipment would havearrived.


38

5.2.2. Computer equipment

The mission visited the computer equipment that had recently been in-stalled at the U.P. Jal Nigam's headquarters. It consists of a minicomputer with punch card processing and printing equipment, with a numberof terminals. The U.P. Jal Nigam intends to use the equipment for manage-ment, administrative and technical purposes.

A - 1

ANNEX ARURAL WATER SUPPLY PROJECTS IN

UTTAR PRADESH(NETHERLANDS ASSISTED PROGRAMME)

T E R M S O F R E F R E N C E F O R R E V I E W - A N DA P P R A I S A L M I S S I O N UP-12

1. OBJECTIVES OF THE MISSION

The mission will evaluate all relevant progress and development inthe Netherlands Assisted Water Supply Schemes under execution inthree districts in Uttar Pradesh East (UP East I piped supplies).

Analysis of the situation with respect to the actual status of theproposed hand pump programme (UP East/West III) will be carried out(side letter pending).

To conduct an appraissal of new projects as far as their technicalviability is concerned, in two districts of Eastern Uttar Pradesh.

2. TASKS OF THE MISSION

The mission will be of an exploratory and informative nature underthe following tasks:

a. Discuss the former mission results, with reference to thereport UP-10, October 1984.Specifically of interest will be:- progress made with the implementation of the so-calledvandal-proof standposts

- the siting of the standposts- the achievements regarding the planned number of house con-nections and experience so far with the financial resultsthereof

- the actual situation concerning the finalisation of theproject with regard to assumptions made during the mission'slast visit.

b. To investigate the position of the additional activities asindicated in report UP-8, viz. the procurement of equipmentfor, and staffing of a geohydrological section.

c. Review the disbursement claim(s) since the preceding mission.

d. To compare and analyse the financial predictions for the on-going projects UP East I during the last mission against theactual achievements.


A - 2

e. An examination into the status of the proposed hand pumpprojects UP III, in view of the progress made with the imple-mentation of pumps by the Jal Nigam organisation in the dis-tricts concerned.The mission will provide its view and advise on any significantchanges which are likely to be encountered as a result of thedelay incurred.

i. A detailed write-up to be given concerning the quality controlmeasures presently imposed by the Jal Nigam on procurement andinstallation of hand pumps, taking into account the recentlyissued Government Specifications Standard.If desirable in the opinion of the mission, recommendationshave to be drafted in which way and by which means an improvedquality control system can be developed.Field visits willbe necessary.

g. The undertaking of a pre-appraisal for the following projects,recently proposed via the Ministry of Works and Housing to theNetherlands Government.

Name of district______nr. of schemes nr. of villages

Varanasi 9 179Allahabad 2 23

The aim of this appraisal is mainly to provide a first impres-sion and to examine the essentials of the technical feasibili-ty, which results can serve as a proper guideline for a moreextensive appraisal to be conducted hereafter.This task for the mission will be carried out on the basis offield visits, discussions with staff members and study ofproject reports, to be made available by the Jal Nigam Organi-sation.Exerpts of the above project reports are available with theWater Supply Coordinator, New Delhi.

The pre-appraisal will at least comprise:

- village selection procedure- design criteria- population growth figures (with reference to correspondenceon this subject)

- technical design features (especially the water sourceproposed)

- geohydrological aspects (incl. water quality)- cost estimates- timing/phasing of the project(s)

h. To table any other subject in the context of the UP projectsdeemed useful in the opinion of the mission.


A - 3

COMPOSITION OF THE MISSION

Mr. R. Trietsch Mission leader.Senior Water Supply Engineer,DHV Consulting Engineers,The Netherlands

Mr. A.K. Sen Gupta Asstt. Adviser CPHEEO,Ministry of Works and Housing,New Delhi

The Water Supply Coordinator at the Royal Netherlands Embassy in NewDelhi will accompany the mission part time.

4. DURATION OF THE MISSION

The mission is estimated to last for 10 days, from 15 April up tilland including 24 April, 1985, and is programmed as follows:

15.4 - arrival mission leader in India16.4 - preparatory discussions in Delhi and transfer to Lucknow17.4 - 22.4 - discussions with Government of U.P., Jal Nigam and

possible other institutions; field visits23.4 - report drafting and final round of discussions Lucknow24.4 - return to New Delhi

5. REPORTING

The mission will draft preliminary conclusions and recommendationsand will have these discussed with the UP Government and Jal NigamOrganisation, as well as with any other local authority concerned,before leaving Uttar Pradesh.

The results of the mission will then be subjected to discussions inNew Delhi.

After approval of the draft report, final reporting to the Develop-ment Cooperation Department Asia and Multilateral Financial Develop-ment Matters of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the Netherlandsis expected not later than eight weeks after leaving India.The approved report will be submitted to the Government of India.


B - 1

ANNEX B

ITINERARY OF MISSION

Sunday, April 14, 1985

Departure of Mission leader, Mr. R. Trietsch, from the Netherlands.

Monday, April 15. 1985

Discussiona at Royal Netherlands Embassy with Water Supply Coordinator,Mr. J.A. Speets.Discussions at UNICEP (Mr. Bo Elding) and at Ministry of Works and Hous-ing (Messrs. V. Venugopalan, A.K. SenGupta and R. Sethuraman).

Tuesday, April 16, 1985

Departure of Mission, consisting of Messrs. R. Trietsch, J.A. Speets andA.K. SenGupta, by plane from New Delhi to Lucknow (Uttar Pradesh).Discussions with Managing Director and senior staff of Uttar Pradesh JalNigam in Lucknow.

Wednesday, April 17, 1985

Continuation of discussions with M.D. and senior staff of U.P Jal Nigam.

Thursday, April 18, 1985

Continuation of discussions with M.D. and senior staff of U.P Jal Nigam.Transfer by car from Lucknow to Rae Bareli.Visit to ARP scheme Ichauli and DCP scheme Udari.Discussion of progress of DCP schemes in Rae Bareli District with U.P.Jal Nigam field staff.

Friday, April 19, 1985

Visit to DCP schemes Bannamau, Ralpur, Govindpur, Ferozpur and Bhojpur.Transfer by car from Rae Bareli to Allahabad. On the way visit to DCPscheme Nidura in Allahabad District.Discussion of progress of DCP schemes in Allahabad District with U.P JalNigam field staff in Allahabad.

Saturday, April 20, 1985

Transfer by car from Allahabad to Varanasi. On the way visit to DCPschemes Pratappur, Mirzamurad and Kandwa in Varanasi District, as well asvillages Dhanapur (Allahabad District) and Pilkhuna (Rowi group ofvillages; Varanasi District).Discussion of design reports for new schemes under Sub-Project IV, withAllahabad and Varanasi field staff and Lucknow design staff, in Varanasi.


B - 2

Sunday, April 21, 1985

Visit to DCP scheme Rohania, and to Sarnath.Discussion of progress of DCP schemes in Varanasi with field staff.

Monday, April 22, 1985

Drafting of Mission's "Conclusions and Recommendations".Meeting with Commissioner, Varanasi District.Return to Lucknow by air.

Tuesday, April 23, 1985

Discussion of Mission's "Conclusions and Recommendations" with ManagingDirector and senior staff of U.P. Jal Nigam.Lunch with Chairman, Managing Director and senior staff of U.P. JalNigara.Return of Mission to New Delhi by plane.

Wednesday. April 24, 1985

Discussions at Royal Netherlands Embassy.Preparations for mission to Gujarat.

Thursday, April 25, 1985

Discussions at UNFPA (Mr. Lap Le), IBRD (Mr. John R. Hansen) and atMinistry of Works and Housing (Mission members, with Messrs. Venugopalan,Shankaran and Sethuraman).

April 26 - May 4, 1985

Mission to Gujarat.

Sunday, May 5, 1985

Departure of Mission leader from New Delhi.

111111iiiiiiiiiiiiiii

ANNEX C

LIST OF AUTHORITIES VISITED /THE SCHEMES

NEW DELHI

Ministry of Works and Housing

Mr. V. VenugopalanMr. T.G. ShankaranMr. A.K. SenGupta

UNICEF

Mr. Bo Elding

UNFPA (United Nations Fund for

Mr. Lap Le

World Bank

Mr. John R. Hansen

UTTAR PRADESH

Lucknow

Mr. Kamal Pandey

Varanasi District

Mr. D.S. Bagga

Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam

Lucknow

Mr. Indra Mohan SahaiMr. S.K. SharmaMr. V.S. ChauhanMr. Rajendra DayalMr. R.P. KhareMr. R.M. NigamMr. D.P. Singhal

C - 1

SENIOR STAFF INVOLVED IN IMPLEMENTATION OF

- Adviser (PHEE) , CPHEEO- Deputy Adviser (PHEEO) , CPHEEO- Assistant Adviser (PHE) , CPHEEO

- Regional Water and Sanitation Officer

Population Activities)

- Program Officer

- Senior Economist,New Delhi Resident Mission

- Secretary to Government, Housing &Urban Development, Lucknow

- Commissioner, Varanasi Division

- Chairman- Managing Director- Chief Engineer (I)- Chief Engineer (II)- Zonal Chief Engineer (West)- Zonal Chief Engineer (East)- Addtl.C.E. (PPRD)

IIIIIIiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

Mr. K.N. KhandelwalMr. V. SinghMr. A. TripathiMr. V.K. GuptaMrs. Hira SharmaMr. D.D. SaxenaMr. A.C. NagarMr. R.N. GuptaMr. A.K. GuptaMr. A.C. Saxena

Rae Bareli

Mr. S.H. ZaheerMr. N.C. SaxenaMr. R.P. PandeMr. Akbar HusainMr. A.L. Taneja

Allahabad

Mr. S.R. DikshitMr. Vijay KumarMr. S.C. JainMr. G.K. Pandey

Varanasi

Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.

R.K.S.R.B.P.N.N.B.K.A.K.R.K.V.P.

SharmaSharmaGoelAgrawalSrivastavaGhosalAgrawalGupta

C - 2

Finance DirectorChief Accounts OfficerSecretary (Administration)Secretary (Management)Manager MonitoringDeputy Manager AppraisalDeputy Manager AppraisalManager TrainingManager Appraisal (on leave)Manager Appraisal

S.E.E.E.E.E.E.E.E.E.

XX circle, FaizabadI Constr.Div., Rae BareliII Constr.Div., Rae BareliE&M Div., Rae BareliII Constr.Div., Sultanpur

(hand pump programme)

S.E., II Circle, AllahabadS.E., Temp. Project Circle, AllahabadS.E., Mech. Circle, AllahabadE.E., Constr. Division, Allahabad

S.E., VII Circle, VaranasiS.E., XVI Circle (E&M), VaranasiS.E., Project Circle, VaranasiE.E., VI Constr. Div., VaranasiE.E., IV Temp. Constr. Div., VaranasiE.E., V Temp. Constr. Div., VaranasiE.E. (E&M), II Constr. Div., VaranasiE.E., III Temp. Constr. Div., Varanasi

II1IIIIII1IIIIIIIIIII

D - 1

ANNEX D

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE INDO-DUTCH REVIEW MISSION (UP-12)OF APRIL 1985 TO UTTAR PRADESH (Sub-Projects East I, III, IV)

A. SUB-PROJECT EAST I

1. Commissioning of the schemes

The Mission appreciates that, with the exception of the "vandal-proof"public standposts and some exempted feeders, all DCP schemes in Allahabadand Varanasi Districts have been completed.

The Mission was especially pleased with the fact that all OHT in VaranasiDistrict that were still under construction by the time of its lastvisit, had been commissioned now.In Rae Bareli District, apart from the Udari scheme (for which commis-sioning was planned by September 1985), progress on water sources hasbeen lacking in 2 schemes and on OHT in 4 schemes, whereas a relativelylarge number of exempted feeders had not yet been commissioned. TheMission was informed that for 5 schemes commissioning of these exemptedfeeders is expected within the month of April 1985 itself.

The Mission strongly recommends the UP Jal Nigam to ensure that:a. all OHT and water sources for the DCP schemes are commissioned

before September 1985;b. the Udari scheme is fully commissioned by December 1985;c. all exempted feeders are commissioned and in good working order by

September 1985 (apart from Pratappur, where a SEB sub-station isstill to be constructed). The UP Jal Nigam is requested to do itsutmost to ascertain the required cooperation from the SEB and Rail-ways authorities, and to promote setting up working committees atthe District level, in which all relevant parties are represented,to iron out any practical difficulties in this respect.

The Mission requests that monthly summary progress reports be prepared onthe implementation of the DCP schems, and forwarded directly to theGovernment of India (Ministry of Works & Housing) and of The Netherlands(Royal Netherlands Embassy).

The Mission feels that where progress of the DCP schemes has been delayedtoo often already, whereas the UP Jal Nigam has demonstrated to have theability of implementing projects much faster, no further extension of thedeadline for commissioning the DCP schemes should be allowed.The Dutch members of the Mission therefore recommend to the NetherlandsGovernment that no funds for reimbursing expenditures of Sub-Project EastI be released after January 1, 1986 unless all DCP schemes have beencompleted in all respects by the time limits mentioned under A.I.a andA.1.b above.

1IIIIIIIIIIIIIiiiiiii

D - 2

2. Expenditures

The Mission noted that again there have been major discrepancies betweenplanned and actual expenditures. For the quarters ending September 1984and December 1984 these discrepancies were approx. 50%.At the risk of repeating itself, the Mission therefore once more requeststhe UP Jal Nigam to adapt its financial planning and accounting proce-dures in such a way that reliable prognoses are obtained.

3. Public standposts

The Mission found that the directive from the Management of the UP JalNigam on freezing the numbers of public standposts has not yet beenofficially lifted, and that only in two schemes in Rae Bareli Districtthe target number of public standposts has been achieved. As a result ofthis, the present number of public standposts is generally far fromadequate.The Mission wishes to reiterate that according to commitments given bythe UP Jal Nigam all public standposts (with the exception of those inthe Udari scheme) should have been completed by March 1985.

It is stressed that the required number of public standposts refers tothe number of taps rather than standposts. In case the population densitywarrants such, multiple-tap standposts may be constructed, thereby pro-portionally reducing the total number of standposts required.

The Mission noted that so far existing public standposts have not beenreplaced by "vandal-proof" ones, and that even a part of the new stand-posts, erected after the Mission's previous visit, was still of the oldtype.The Mission was pleased, however, to have seen at least one "vandal-proof" standpost with a Jayson-type self-closing tap (as agreed uponearlier) during its field visits.

The Mission agrees with UP Jal Nigam's proposal that existing standpostswill be converted into "vandal-proof" ones only when they need majorrepairs. In addition, all taps of existing standposts will immediately bereplaced by Jayson-type self-closing taps.Emphasis will be on constructing the remaining public standposts, whichwill all be of the "vandal-proof" type.

4. Exempted feeders

The Mission found that, apart from the Udari scheme, in 9 cases exemptedfeeders were either not yet commissioned or inoperable. In addition itwas found that power supply through exempted feeders is often renderedineffective because of too high or too low voltages. The Mission alsoreceived indications that in other cases SEE staff is allowing illegalconnections to such exempted feeders, thereby jeopardizing the verycharacter of such feeders, and an uninterrupted supply of power to thewaterworks concerned.

IIItIIIIII1IIIIIIIIII

D - 3

The UP Jal Nigam is requested to use its good offices with the SEE andother relevant authorities, to accomplish a speedy implementation of theexempted feeders, as well as an uninterrupted supply of power, at theright voltage, through these feeders (see also A. I.e.).

B. SUB-PROJECT III (Hand pump schemes)

The Mission has assessed the situation with regard to the status of theongoing hand pump programme, and found that no pumps under the proposedSub-Project III have been erected either in UP East or UP West, pendingthe approval of the project by the Indian and Netherlands Governments.

C. SUB-PROJECT IV (Replacing old Sub-Project II)

1. The Mission received a summary report on 9 out of 11 schemes asproposed by the UP Jal Nigam for replacing the original Sub-ProjectII schemes in UP East and UP West. In addition the Mission scruti-nized the relevant 8 project reports and discussed their contentswith the Jal Nigam staff.

2. The Mission agrees in principle with the designs of the schemes,especially since their lay-out is based on the same design criteriaas adopted for the ongoing schemes (Sub-Project I).The Mission requests that the following changes be made, however:

a. design period to remain 30 years, without exceptionb. population growth to be based on the arithmetic average of the

linear growth method and the compounded growth method, bothrelated to the scheme-wise population for the years 1971 and1981 (population census).

After comparison of the target populations following from the abovemethod and those used in the project reports, it appeared that thetarget populations used in the project reports could be retained forthe Bairi Bisha, Inargaon and Hathi Barni schemes. The financialstatements should be modified, however, to take into account a startof the projects by mid-1986, and commissioning by the end of theyear 1989.

For the remaining schemes the project set-up will have to be re-vised, and to be based on the following population projections:

Scheme Target population1989 2019

Rohi 22,353 49,848Kasidaha 19,076 45,438Birampur 16,559 48,586Awajapur 13,384 24,002Jansa 15,941 • 31,241

IIIIIIIIIIIIiitiiiiii

D - 4

For the Chhekawa scheme in Allahabad District not enough data wereavailable to allow the Mission to calculate the relevant targetpopulations. The UP Jal Nigam is requested to apply the arithmeticaverage of the linear and compounded growth methods (as indicatedabove) also in this case.

In all cases the projects should be based on an implementationperiod from mid-1986 to the end of 1989.

3. The Mission urges the Governments involved to ascertain a speedyimplementation of the schemes, as the area concerned is a drought-stricken area, where relief from water supply schemes is badlyneeded.

The UP Jal Nigam undertakes to prepare a final appraisal report forthese schemes on as short a notice as possible, and have it scruti-nized by the UP State Government by June 1985, whereas the Ministryof Works & Housing undertakes to have the project cleared within onemonth thereafter.

The Governments of India and of The Netherlands are requested to usetheir good offices to expedite an exchange of side letters on theproject, preferably before the end of the year 1985.

4. The Mission requests the UP Jal Nigam to provide at least 7 (seven)copies of the appraisal report to the Governments of India and ofThe Netherlands to expedite matters.

The Mission wishes to express its gratitude to the UP Jal Nigam and otherofficials involved, for their hospitality and cooperation.

The Indo-Dutch Review Mission,April 1985.

IIiiiiiiii

E - 1

ANNEX E

SCHEME-WISE BREAK-DOWN OF REQUIRED NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS

iiii

Legend:

I SC/ST : number of scheduled caste/scheduled tribe populationrest : remaining populationPS1 : number of public standposts required for SC/ST population

^ PS2 : number of public standposts required for remaining population

I

I

I

I

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIItIIII

E - 2

DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS FEROZPUR

Year:

Village:

BondaChabulhaFerozpurFuranpurlUsbabadaluNisigarDudhwariSaidapurJaghnothpurMathurpurHalauliDei pur aRaipurkalanRa*atpurkalanftlipurSaraikhara

SC/ST

182758107177156440325176202221241585502640

218

1981rest

278107531096

25111571218587320734272235

134479693970

PS1

351313311521

16204

PS2

272226732621

18416

SC/ST

201839118196173509360195222461371756092920

241

1986rest

308119034310627812811348650354812301260

1488881103

1074

PS1

7

6131331152116204

PS2

372227832732

IB517

SC/ST

218906128212187550389210242651481896583160

261

1991rest

3321286371115300138414577023838783252811607952111

1160

PS1

361313311521

16204

PS2

37222783273219517

SC/ST

2971235174288254750530287333622022588964300

355

2011rest

4531752505156409188619859575221196443383

21911297152

1581

PS1

36132442152216304

PS2

383229104373220619

Sub-totals: 3897 9736 51 71 4313 10776 52 79 4660 11643 52 80 6352 15869 58 92Grand total: 13633 122 15089 131 16303 132 22220 150

Year: Population:

1971 11962 Brottth rate: 1.016 (per annual1981 139651986 150891991 163032011 22220

IIIIIIIIIIIiIIiiiiiii

E - 3

DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS RftLPUR

Year:SC/ST

Village:

BheetaSagarkhedaDeokheraRaiaipurkhurdBhajiapurSaidapurBeruaSahanipurChakgorChablahaswayaiRalpurSidhokharaKanjasSepal ikhedaPanditkapuraaRaigaonKalihegaonPusapurDibiaUdaharBeruaharChakchourahiF'otapurHaibatpur

77.400321899124646016312443

62124637612035714116048617433143234246330

19B1rest

3479528532918154195959918387

19651041244450347144740806285185210291163454

PS1

14113210111

217443137411145

PS2

26123312311

2310453157411246

SC/ST

85440352081002705061791364768327041313239215517653419136157257270363

1986rest

381104793362199595

105465920196

21601144268495381158814886313203231320179499

PS1

141132

10111

217443137411245

PS2

26123313311

2410453t6841t246

SC/ST

91475382241082925461941475173829244714342416719057720739170278292392

1991rest

41211311013912156431139712217103

23341237290535412171879957339220249346194539

PS1

141132

10111

217443137411245

PS2

271233

13311

2410453168411246

SC/ST

1256485230614739874526420170

100539860919457822825978728253

231379398534

2011rest

5621541138533293876

1552970296141

3181168539572856223311981305461299340471264735

PS1

151233

11211

217544137411246

PS2

38137•j

414421

2512463179422247

Sub-totals: 5492 11588 91 110 6038 12740 92 114 6524 13765 92 115 8890 18759 100 131Total: 17080 201 ' 18777 201 20288 201 27649 201

Year; Population:

1971 14887 Browth rate: 1.016 (per annum)1981 173791986 187771991 202882011 27649


E - 4

DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS 60VINDPUR

Year:

Village:

EovindpurPattikheraHurdipur8ha*anipurChaimikheraDhurikheraRanikheraPasankheraNeebiHaieergaonBadhupurBithauliDulapuraRaipurBahadurpurTejqannJhaipurHathnasaDaribapur

SC/ST

6254381010

10215621013539151422088383340270765114414255

1981rest

4851455500218134269893255676128720025379369195115044891454146

PS1

5620111I25113225I32

PS2

3921124237124448281

SC/ST

7405191200

121185249160463609261104454403320906135490302

1986rest

575172459225815931910583028011525237300940819112717825791723173

PS1

5620111125213225142

PS2

41032125247I265693101

SC/ST

BOO5611290

131200269173501658282113490435346979146530326

1991rest

6211863640279172344

11433268651647256324

1015885121719256261861187

PS1

5620112170

5213225142

PS2

4113212524922656113101

SC/ST

10907641760

1782723662366828973841546685934711335199722445

2011rest

8462538872380234469155844511792245349441

13831206165926248532537255

PS1

6620122136213437153

PS2

51442127251122767144122

Sub-totals: 5521 12653 44 48 6541 14991 46 83 7067 16197 48 89 9632 22075 58 109Total: 18174 112 21532 129 23265 137 31707 167

Year: Population:

1971 17070 Growth rate: 1.016 (per annual1981 199281986 215321991 232652011 31707

E— 5

DETERhlNATlON OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS BHOJPUR

Year:SC/ST

Village:

KathakaMagalpurBisayahpurPathakpurPathakkheraHandapurBosaikheraHakhopurPurshottaipurBhupatpurBhojpurDalipurDandiTasbaHohanpurKodariKashikheraJai SopalqanjTiwari KalanTixari KhurdLadaikheraRajapurKaibatpurkhurdChitakheraJhulpurKhenankheraChahetarPathak BharuDurajanpurGahrauliHaripurDaulatpurSadap'jrChakati

Sub-totals:Total:

459142"13912811949270368022852177830

12612783037773810

1661221771223822598387314122076

563220171

1981rest

2531056392372392305164496166

2998666189410

87843013823517742322642140835733277719222517544594071460

14539

PS1

31111125025I1011102120111121132101

47124

PS2

21311115121431104212121222241182210

77

SC/ST

50015515113913053

294401024929193900

1371389004084

4150

18313319313341627107422342133083

613821982

1986rest

27611469625826025156702105181

3267726206450

95746915025619346124645944538936284720924519125004441590

15845

PS1

3111112502511011102120111121132101

47130

PS2

2132221512163110421212122214.

41192210

83

SC/ST

54016716415114058

318433026

1003208980

14815098044914490

19814420814445029

115456370144089

6632-23752

1991rest

29812475227928127160758113195

3530784223480

103450616227720849826649648042039191522626520655404791720

17120

PS1

311111250251I011102120111121132101

47138

PS2

21422215121641105310L.

12222*>A.

241•\L

103210

91

SC/ST

73722822320519179433591035

13672841330

2022041330591246110

270196284196613401576215041960

122

903932372

2011rest

406169

102638038436982

1034154266

48111069303660

1409690221377284679363676655573533124730836128157376532340

23333

PS1

4111112502821011102130212131133101

57170

PS2

2152221712

21521063122323333522127\i

310

113

Year: Population:

1971 174271^81 203451986 219S21991 237522011 32372

Growth rate: 1.016 (per annul)


E - 6

DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDFASTS THULENDI

Year:

Village:

ThulendiBujarpurRasulpurBahadurpurUiarpurHal purBharaipurPandirakhurdfthsan JagatpurflanikpurJaipurRaipur Hoh,PeethanKaranpurPanasaUdariPander akal anKilagarhiHasva

Sub-totals:Total:

SC/ST

10A1.27548790488488236143

104215437224026961462640023075356

764620091

1981rest

2997695093467001003357293

11282695573092101485101551936189229

12445

PS1

62316881

121222378423

81186

PS2

142427116213237w

1698523

105

SC/ST

1169331547101548548265161

117017341827030269070344925884400

858322566

1986rest

3366785723897861127401329

126730262634723616681140583405100257

13978

PS1

62416881

121322378423

83193

PS2

1624271182132431799523

110

SC/ST

1276362597110598598289175

127718945629433075376749028292436

937124623

1991rest

3673856244248581229438359

138233068337925718201244636442109281

15252

PS1

70t.

416881

131322478423

86200

PS2

1724271282132432899523

114

SC/ST

1809513846156848848410248

181026864641746710671088695400130618

1328434905

2011rest

520712088460112161743620509

196046796853736525801763902627155398

21621

PS1

107V

4161081

142322588424

97232

PS2

232538138316253211119623

135

Year: Population:

1971 17370 Bro»th rate: 1.018 (per annua)1981 206811986 225661991 246232011 34905

E - 7

DETERHlNftTION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS JA6ATPUR

Year:SC/ST

Village:

OnikaiauSanboopuauJagpatti Dai.Jagpatti Kesh.JagiadipurJagatpurZingnaIbrahiipurR. BokulpurR. BheebhanshahJ. BodhiharR. TikariaPoorabgaonHouaharganjShanbaspurShyaibuxpurwaHextaha N.NaNabganjJo*adiSidhorKotiaUiariBhatauliUdnaDalautpurSughapurBichchiya BadiTaughariDhobhahabhurdSati Sri NinasParasu RaapurHarpur Halla

Sub-totals:Totals:

249211B864104321291751850

2359231421792091861451611261007311569344184390174377560

169565

634823688

1981rest

47129311989260236565243745245215014641178474436129263546543640230557420213863982703004571470

307535

17340

PS1

431128213041034421241242633431036

972A2

PS2

431141974433151265863423721053461145

165

SC/ST

27fc2349771115355321942050

26010221571982312061611781391118112776381204432193417620

187625

702826224

1986rest

52132413299288261872248450050016616211304525483143070351548344533863522415344412993325061577

340592

19197

PS1

431128213041034421241242633431036

97267

PS2

47•J

1

1

41974533151265863524721253461145

170

SC/ST

29825210577124384352092210

28111041702142502221731931511208713883411220467208451670

202676

759328335

1991rest

563350142106311282978052354154117917511409567522154576055652248136568724216584763233595471784

367640

20742

PS1

431128213041034421241242633441036

98268

PS2

4311419745331512658635247iL1253461145

170

SC/ST

406344143104170523472853020

3831505231292341303236262205163119187112561300636284615910

276921

1034938618

2011rest

768478194145424385610637127377372452387192077371121061035758711655497936329226064944048974523114500872

28269

PS1

431128223041234431241242734441037

105297

PS2

5411424845331813661075534721453461146

192

Year: Population:

1971 207901981 242711986 262241991 233352011 38618

Broxth rate: 1.016 (per annual

E - 8

DETERfllNATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS ASHRAFPUR

Year:

Village:

ftshrafpur(UrchahaarKol*aBarkhurdarpurKajipur T.BheliaKantaHajipurBanniSaraiMagdaiyapurKasiipurDighaKurhaftrsadpurPurey NinajJaiiaharganjTahirpurChakcalehraTarapur

Sub-totals:Totals:

SC/ST

920.4843716451854223514523630423630529253020227020

158

531916004

1981rest

1280136778936112780870537550468638447044310603601431504330267

10685

PS1

818188814514613130101

82180

PS2

919498924624615231112

98

SC/ST

12206457921768771931219231340331340438770327301030

209

705121216

1986rest

1697180

103112411494107193549766890950962358714054771901995740354

14165

PS1

919188814524614130101

86192

PS2

101

105108925635715231112

106

SC/ST

13597164624276580134721434944934945143178330335030

233

785823643

1991rest

189120111491383166511941042554745101356769465415665322112226444394

15785

PS1

91918881452461413010I

86198

PS2

101

106109935735716331112

112

SC/ST

209610999637411801235535330538693538695665120846517050

360

1211936464

2011rest

291631017732133256818411606854114815638751071100924158203263429866608

24345

PS1

121

10299925635715140102

103243

PS2

152

11914101047947717432113

140

Year: Population:

1971 15330 Growth rate: 1.022 (per annum)1981 190381986 212161991 236432011 36464

E - 9

DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS UDARI

Year:

Village:

TanduaBasauniKaitpur MaxaiaJaialpur HariaKahafttadpur N.Bhadaiya H.UdariNigohaChak BhurBagheriKharoliChak BheshanaHa»ai AlaspurChakiactaBajhi BholaiauNasirabadJayasstiayai

Sub-totals:Totals:

SC/ST

65311939341014146720458461573252430

7B50

75137126

692217205

1981rest

1702511677315639120388515741683156270

635260170313289

10283

PS1

1346436

1612133080331

86204

PS2

237746121618124082332

118

00000000

00

0

00

SC/ST

73513444346215952623039531773662740

884084154142

779619377

1986rest

1917576762355720135599717731893557060

715293191353325

11581

PS1

134643617121330B0331

87206

PS2

237746121618134082332

119

00000000

00

0

00

SC/ST

820149493515177586256710621974083050

9850

94172158

868821594

1991rest

21366418503958021510111119762113957870

797326213393363

12906

PS1

1346436181214308033I

89213

PS2

238746131618135092342

124

00000000

00

0

00

SC/ST

1264230761794273904395916383046294700

15200

145265244

1340033306

2011rest

32959891311610

12372329171330473256101214

01229503329606559

19906

PS1

144653823132440100331

103244

PS2

2588581516222360107V

343

141

Year: Population:

1971 140011981 173881986 193771991 215942011 33306

6rowth rate: 1.022 (per annual

E - 10

DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS BANNAMAU

Year:SC/ST

Village:

UgabadDhanabadRani purAlaipurChandaRasgaonYusufpurBannatauTaudhakpurTrivedipurFlohatudiauDatauliJaiubabaSaistabadHustafabadChanda TikarFakhruddinpurRajauliGovindpur I).Sak.hsapurKan flauBahaiSondassiChichihaSanatpurSoiulRishalpur L.

268-16937722031518026421435019114335B902402B35051775302000

21825275552166850

225

19B1rest

55656437671345072096275935019227711725903201442939196609657307215343B1192404515593241

PS1

324434422125136827101

216•3303

PS2

43362666212632109273212084343

SC/ST

291184410239343196287233381208155389982613085491925762170

23727486032357450

245

19B6rest

607613409775489783104682538120930112746423481568102121366271433423437381296439560645262

PS1

3244344221251368271012263303

PS2

43362676212a3210927321

2194343

SC/ST

3151994432583702113102514112241684211062823325932086232350

25629696522548050

264

1991rest

656663442838529846113089241122632513776933761694110323071577236125340391400475605697283

PS1

324434422125I368271022363403

PS2

44463677212833109274222394343

SC/ST

4292716043525042834233435603062295731443844538092838493200

34940468893461097

0360

2011rest

8939036021142721115315401215560307444187794551223091503314975105249234455051909647825949386

PS1

3244344232251369282022573503

PS2

64473787323126314102752231114653

Sub-totals: 9500 18751 101 128Totals: 28251 229

10330 20389 102 13330719 235

11161 22029 105 14233191 247

15211 30023 114 17745233 291

Year: Population:

1971 243541981 284311986 307191991 331912011 45233

Bronth rate: 1.016 (per annual

111111111111111111111

DETERMINATION OF NUMBERSt*m»tim*t*H*ft*mt

Year:

Village:

HatehnaKhanpur K.6ahri(khas>BarahaHaripur (khas)Purey OreeDhanipurSarai KurilRewari P.BandaiBehtakalanShajpurMaheshkheraPratappurBahraipurSolhaiauBanqarkheraUdwaiauSar.diJagatpur N.ChaipatpurBetauraJhabra H.DayalpurHalpurAlaipurDhanabadMubarakpurSatanpurHaduriPurey BhanwaniKuirauraDostpurNarsinghpur

Sub-totals:Totals:

Year:

19711981198619912011

SC/ST

1207558095805010080160448755400

1201330

30703021075120802dO1004040210120390806200

200

545129B35

1981rest

515" 752340104073145046561263014423735418984105430200504161351285435145494021538210022536015451045105995255270

24384

PS1

2173212235810110I21522111122141601

73222

PS2

41

1654224410192512114110384121237718T

2

149

E - 1 1

OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS BEHTAKALAN>m}4t~ifm*mmmt*}ft*i*tmmmtm}*mt*t»***mmi*t{*mt*4

SC/ST

13484

6491069056

11290179502845450

1341490

34783423584134902241124545235134437906940

224

610233399

1986rest

57784

2620116481850452168570516144181468

11021184812245646615114394871628105224142811225240317301170118

1114285302

27297

PS1

2173212236810110121522111122141601

74237

PS2

4I

1874344510232512I1411039512I23771822

163

SC/ST

145917021159760

12197194542913480

1451610

36853625491145972421214848254145472977500

242

659336087

1991rest

62391

2830125888454456274076217444518506119012752024260503163155452617591137260462121272435186912641271204308327

29494

PS1

2183212236810110I2152211I122141601

75248

PS2

41

197534451023361311411039522 '123981922

173

SC/ST

198124956157132821651322647391245660

1982190491154934612419813233016566663461986431321022

0330

898649182

2011rest

849124

3857171412057427671009103923776157689162217370933082686223211871723971550354630165371593254717231731640420445

40196

PS1 PS2

2 61 18 223 82 61 32 42 53 66 1310 281 30 81 11 30 21 12 41 15 132 42 121 72 21 31 12 23 41 115 101 17 110 22 2

82 210292

Population:

2647930912333993608749181

Growth rate: 1.015 (per annun)

E - 12

DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS SAIDABAD

Year:SC/ST

Village:

AsepurBinda Chak MukicSaraidisuChak Budh BhartiZirayat R.J. LalpurPatti ParvatSangrai PattiAnjanaBijhauniyanHakic PattiSaidabadSarai HansurDasautinahuadihBhiskiBaderaBajhan BishranDhokn Upahar

Sub-totalssTotals:

3605925240

54830

2672405391931762928304443750

4541228

665123590

1981rest

132014089211401618873805731270321237178415875090658522016363282

16939

PS1

2330110233415543029

51169

PS2

98622724843104451031017

118

SC/ST

4467336490671030

33129766723921836210285504640

5621520

823429206

1986rest

163417431140173199109847070915723972932209196929112272427220254063

20971

PS1

34401102334156430310

57187

PS2

1010622724943124471031021

130

SC/ST

5098377410761170

37833976227324941311746285300

6421737

940833367

1991rest

1867199213031982281255537810179645433525232231061128282731123144642

23960

PS1

344011023441565403

11

61206

PS2

101262283510431346B1031125

145

SC/ST

86814271263

01302000

6435781299465424704200010709040

10942959

1602956852

2011rest

3181339322203373882138916138130617745714299381180721B3141053039437910

40823

PS1

57601103464259650515

84286

PS2

15181122

114715441948101041836

202

Year: Population:

1971 19584 Bro«th rate: 1.027 (per annul)1981 255631986 292061991 333672011 56352

E - 13

DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS NIDURA

Year:

Village:

NiduraLal BopalganjDaniyalpurKatalpurPiyari IH B.Akhrajpur U.Akhrajpur K.Patna Kacharflirjabhan K.(Urjabhan U.Patna UpraharShyaipurKasupur J.Chak Jaghubir P.Chak Noti Rai 0.BhikhacpurOhanpurDhanpur Singh.ftrrichakBhadapurIbraliiipurChak R. Urf Ahl.KhanjahanpurRaoanParsanandpurAndhiyariChak Shah Hacid

Sub-totals:Totals:

Year:

19711981198619912011

SC/ST

1013636026757515400042

200182711680

118000

1611301101451233700

365520350

1981rest

43303074679757

1614370000

130560901741002500

3949600

4826049684145491060

0

16695

PS1

171136200011111I010002I11250

49145

PS2

271334103000131111021003341L

3100

96

SC/ST

1184747031267218000049234213213790

138000

1881521291691444320

427223785

1986rest

506135937948851886432000

1526551052031172920

46011200

563706

11314846421239

0

19513

PS1

1711362000111111010002111250

49157

PS2

3115461040001311120210033523100

108

SC/ST

1325827834975220100055262243514890

154000

2111701441901614840

478226623

1991rest

56654022888990

2111484000

1707331182281313270

51512600

631790

12665427181387

0

21841

PS1

171136200012111101000211t250

50172

PS2

3317461340001311120310044634110

122

SC/ST

2080129123548

118131600086

4113755231400

242000

3312672262982537600

750641790

2011rest

88926313139415553314760000

26711501853572055130

80919700

9901240198885011272177

0

34285

PS1 PS2

t19 431 261 63 78 183 50 00 00 01 22 51 11 21 11 30 01 40 10 00 03 52 51 82 42 65 130 0

58 165223

Population:

1696021249237842662241790

Growth rate: 1.022 (per annuc)

E - 14

DETERMINATION OF NUK8ERS OF PUBLIC STftNDPOSTS PRATAPPUR

Year: 19B1 1986 1991 2011SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2

Village:

ShurdauliDidonaSarain HariraiPrathakurainfchagwaraJanuwadihKandharpurBibipur U.PaiypurHirzapurSultanpurSaron SultanpurKhanpurThanapurThataWalhipurSoraonHeerpurSeudh SoronKatehriBabupur BelonBarasta KhurdUgapurSossesipurBirapurBarasta KalanBhupurHavasabadVikra«shad B.UdgiNevadbasana

Sub-totals:Totals:

30.93681450

3111050

231296161141865411817558

83111613820

410942021435955612016112811859

616329271

54815801040 '205

13142901321475652546941412

1536646659192

233150553010846019905001292541115643441580909128

23108

2I\0210221113111411I21111311111

42173

396182194343834I

1334735312632442

131

3824541790

3841300

2853661991741066682249372

1026143170255061162491777368714819915814673

761036145

677195112842531623358163206880567411625091897798814237287862465413397421222b!715931413777945457161122158

28534

22102I022I1t41115I1131111311111

45201

4108282

' \10435310441

1644756412943462

156

4365192050

4391480

32641822719912176325510682

1172164195285781332852028378416922718116683

869541295

77322291467289

185440918623639207701328581216791193027132897127481529848139770518235815739076228181282181

32600

2310210221114211511141211511111

51223

41282931

125464

11452

1744956412943462

172

7438853490

7482520

5557113873392071300435180139

199727933248985226486344142

1336288387308284142

1481370354

131737982500493

3158697317402615671312226299036921553158446156031214127426051445238012023106112680154510601394218530B

55541

342032033221621I922151221622221

75339

71813214321876105177722666128

1162315757102

264

Year: Population:

1971 24238 Growth rate: 1.027 (per annul)1981 316371966 361451991 M2952011 70354

111111111111111111111

DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS»**i»*mmm*tmtm

Year:SC/ST

Village:

ChaukhataAchchola U.KothariSarai KalanSarai KhurdIialia KalanChaukata GauraKextahiLehandiSikraAkodaSonbarsaBhoghaChorbanaAuntaMonaiSonaiKhainiaZeraPatti Nath RaiArazi AkodaNarnar UparharDighia Part.

Sub-totals:Totals:

Year:

19711981198619912011

2352208B4814344366

2851103471081948996864139224473668202

85

559520267

1981rest

1362' 814

14714694

1122594194

1350366787369433554246695639944447798465334215

14672

PS1

51222411213221843134121

56162

PS2

851228318353351778238121

106

E - 15

OF PUBLIC STANDPOETS URWAMmfi4}ttm»O**f*tH*i»m*4mim*t'm*t*it4ttmt**tmtt}*tftmi

SC/ST

3032831136218457188

367142447139250115

124782650531609861263

110

720926115

1986rest

17551049189188121

1446765250

1740472

1014475558714

31781232514572615126884430277

18906

PS1

52222511214221863146121

64196

PS2

127122941

103734522118349122

132

SC/ST

35132813172

21366199

425164518161289133

144495658536706996303

127

834530230

1991rest

203212142192181401674886289

2014546117455064682636781426595662711146897498321

21885

PS1

5222251I214221863146121

64201

PS2

137J22942

11373452211B3410132

137

SC/ST

6295892361293831186

1616

76329592928952023825931717105064

12671789545

228

1498554280

2011rest

3648218039439125230051591520

3616980210898811601484660525601069118912782635174895576

39295

PS1 PS2

5 183 122 22 22 27 161 81 34 202 56 112 54 71 10

14 389 165 81 56 69 151 12 41 3

90 217307

Population:

16B36225602611530230542BO

Growth rate: 1.030 (per annus)

111111111111111111111

DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS»ttmttmm*tmtmt

Year:

Village:

ft*-*™

Chhitt^urShir SohardhanDap'11

NarcttampurRaw aTiknSarai DagiTarapcr

Kurhuax-HhviT

BiliO'irChsitiiii

FhaxiiDurKb ana*BetwrKa'saraBachhawnftud'ieRaapurAsra

Nuwaonfithari

Sub-totals:To ta l s :

Year:

19711981198619912011

SC/ST

450.500750650

1000750500

1200600350550350100150200300

0200350900

1000250340800600500

1000

1434040750

1981rest

175017603230

400760770

22501500880530

1110570430200920620170660600800

2350560

010801380

720410

26410

PS1

223345263232212204247544456

89207

PS2

78

1324496435321431334

10305632

118

E - 16

OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS TIKR1imtmmi m*m*»imtt*»mm**tm*mttmmm»m**»*»*tm»fi

SC/ST

550611917794

1222917611

1467733428672428122183244367

0244428

11001222306416978733611

1222

1752849808

1986rest

213921513948

489929941

275018331076

6481357697526244

1125758208807733978

2872684

013201667

880501

32281

PS1

346485463332212204267546456

107248

PS2

99

16244

118536331641434

12306743

141

SC/ST

618686

1030892

13731030686

1647824480755480137206275412

0275480

12361373343467

1098824686

1373

1968655942

1991rest

240224164434

54910431057308920591208

7281524783590275

1263851233906824

10983226

7690

14831894

988563

36256

PS1

4466854

126353212204387546457

126285

PS2

101018

355

13953743I641445

13406843

15?

SC/ST

98310921638142021851638109226211311765

1202765218328437655

0437765

19662185

546743

1748131110922185

3132786225

2011rest

382338457056

87416601682491532771922115824251245939437

20101354371

14421311174851341223

0235930151573896

57694

PS1 PS2

5 166 169 297 4

12 710 76 20

12 146 84 56 104 52 42 22 94 60 24 64 6

10 713 215 54 0

10 108 137 7

12 4

174 243417

Population:

3515544347498085594289022

6ro*th rate: 1.023 (per annu»)

E - 17

DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS SEHAPUR1

Year:

Village:

BanauliDubeypurBhoshilaOderhaIsarwar(lajhiyarRagunathBajardihaTarapurHarbhanpurVirhar8hag»atipurBopalpurKapsettuBiratpurBaradihJagitpurBazar KalikaUperwarKhillopurBhitkuriDanoopurF'asulahaHarauyanHitapurHaharajpurBaharparBisahupurPachwarP.adhopurLhackasilah

SC/ST

5001003505003001503501000

400100200503500

4002000

25010010000

2000

55038635030000

1981rest

440' 2006701105703136262342857532003072373541013253569936921888233908723713024820

1460990830

PS1

2122212102111203201110010323200

PS2

2131323124121327353142422207410

SC/ST

5781164045783471734041160

462116231584040

4622310

28911611600

2310

63544640434700

1986rest

SOB231774127659362723270329870231355278494741531411114780021795145110074293495570

1687114496o

PS1

3123212102111203202110010333200

PS2

314132321f.

4121428364142522308510

SC/ST

6491304546493891954541300

519130260654540

5192600

32413013000

2600

71450145438900

1991rest

5712608691437404068123043709772603983095453217194621289898244106850611324813926250

189512851080

PSl

3123212103121203202I10020333200

PS2

324132422422143936415350«.

2309610

SC/ST

103320772310336203107232070

8262074131037230

8264130

51620720700

4130

113679772362000

2011rest

9094131384227

11776461293483589155541363447

1518847273673520511429388169980518017666249950

301520441710

PSl

5135323104121305203110020544300

PS2

4261536237231741241062749434014910

Sub-totals: 6286 15203 39 78Totals: 21489 117

7263 17565 43 8924827 132

8157 19728 46 9827885 144

12981 31394 64 14544375 209

Year: Population:

1971 175231981 221051986 248271991 279852011 44375

SroKth rate: 1.024 (per annuc)

IIIII

E - 18

DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS HARHUA

Year: 1981 1986 1991 2011SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2

Village:^^m

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

ftushanpurPandeypurChakkaKarotaDuniapurNaipuraSur*aBarxaBokulpurAnauraBajalpattiDhanasariLuchhaipurBhatauliSahtalpurSarai S*a«iBosainpurBhagatupurHansapurDasipurAsiqpurNahadeopurHarishankarpattiSarai KaziNarainpur6or«aKailhatKoirajpur KhasHarhuaRai SinghpurSinghapurVishnupurDeonathpurChandipattiHohanpurWarBall purBesahipurf aapurPachhispurSatibuddinpurChanraonScr.cS^purJaitapattiRellhaBa:;purM-r-apurIdilpyrPratap PattiBahetipurBachhia

3362510939500182292510992

•672250210

3662618904

47164761300

62914812041112

12116615515500

2536552539?582751160

174148310

10940

84157718520131642926544119852219792925524475202786720

12612311312245110

11529512423660

3103093233891991713091522560

6560

294677208'89339350212

3 •1120011201I110I021101111104I11110i.

111001I1321L

I02110

504j11222213142113230115130641202n

27

1121ni

03(i2321221

40230

13147300222743010

1192802690250

438312260556196911560

7531797244131414519913618600

30378629478693291390

208177370

13100

1007m222241378514317528237625236111330529566233338050

151147

13552686120

138011392904380

3713703874662382053701823070

7860

352811249107406419254

311200122011120102110111110411111211100217

14.

1

2102110

605411232313152113240116230752202227

1

1

212o40i.

42122L.

4523414753100

243083380

1333903030280

4923525405632211021750

84619109274151616322320820800

34087706537783701560

234199420

14720

1131776249270425577356593266702265125034332636993749040

16916515213016870

155012793264920

4174164345232682304162043440

8820

395911280120456471285

3I1300122011120102120111110411211211100213312102110

605412232323252113240117230762202227

21212040i.

4212nL

2

7195423384600394905370

2124

1434820

' 450

7835640509

1013511632780

134630173437242625935533233200

542139

11248541245892430

372317660

23420

180012353964306769185679444241117422198954651101

11135951438

027026324214791094

0246620365187830

6646616918334263646613255480

14040

6291449445191726749454

3114001230111201041201121206112112222007O

15413103210

100B62234342528311536022102501193403334223230603621332

E - 19

DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STAHDPOSTS HARHUA

Year:

Village:

1981SC/ST rest PS1 PS2




AiaxarRaisipattiNatandipurJaysipattiBasudeopurSabhaipurKharagpurShaiahapurBhagwanpurKaunapurSikanderpurftshapurHariharpurSirsanafladhopurJaialpattiHadhaipur U.R.KhariBhobhiHariraapurBira»pattiChuppepurJaipurKot KhasUndiIndoarKoi ranAhiranPurabnurSanyaTulsipatti

Sub-totals:Totals:

IB16400

3130

348262324117810

181325248570

1302380

65540015910499273905864188450

1286938494

36047900

1491057603004821611890

10659444900

2292420

103668320020010030800

23915638

25625

110020222110121I0I•)£

0321112441Ti,

0

96236

2200214221101320011053111200111

140

2219600

3750

417314368140970

217389297680

1562850

78447919012511932710841035225540

1541246102

43157400

1781269103595771932260

12771153800

2742900

124181824024012036900

28618746

30690

1100202221101221012042111255120

102264

2300214231101330022054111200211

162

2422100

4210

4683524361571090

243437334770

1753200

88153821414013336712171162253610

1731151780

48464400

200141

10224046482172540

14379960400

3083260

139491926926913541400

32121051

34469

1100202221101221012043111255220

1082E2

2300215231201430022064221200211

174

3935100

6700

7455616942501730

3876965311220

2785090

140285634022321258419371849402960

2754682397

7711025

00

319225162764210323454050

227127196100

4905180

2218146242842821465900

512334Bl

54851

1200403332102331023064211388nL

20

149402

4500217352201640023096221300321

253

Year: Population:

1971 32539 6ro*th rate:1981 410471986 461021991 517792011 82397

1.023 (per annual

E - 20

DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS BIRADNKOT

Year: 1981 1986 1991 2011SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 ' 5C/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2

Village:

Sarxan 531 1327 5 9 638 1593 5 10 716 1789 5 10 1139 28*7 7 15Hahiipur 501 994 3 7 601 1193 4 8 676 1340 4 8 1075 2133 5 12Chanbankat 0 96 0 1 . 0 115 0 1 0 129 0 1 0 204 0 1Akorha 765 616 4 4 918 740 5 4 1032 831 6 5 1642 1322 8 7Rasulah 590 878 3 4 708 1054 4 5 796 1184 4 5 1266 1884 7 8Dandupur 1652 992 8 6 1983 1191 9 8 2228 1338 10 8 3545 2129 17 13Telxar 236 299 1 2 283 359 2 2 318 403 2 2 506 642 3 3Koilar 236 406 2 3 283 487 2 3 318 547 2 4 506 871 3 5Saripur 0 243 0 1 0 292 0 2 0 328 0 2 0 521 0 3Nazgaxan 118 135 1 1 142 162 1 1 159 182 1 1 253 290 2 2Hazgawan Kalan 295 608 2 3 354 730 2 4 398 820 2 4 633 1305 3 6Chakia 0 266 0 2 0 319 0 2 0 359 0 2 0 571 0 3Siahra 47 147 2 1 56 176 2 1 63 198 2 1 101 315 2 2Sainpur 242 471 3 3 291 565 3 3 326 635 3 3 519 1011 3 5Tilari 41 119 1 2 49 143 1 2 55 160 1 2 88 255 1 2Hadhu Makia K. 509 830 3 4 611 996 3 5 686 1119 3 6 1092 1781 5 8Kuru 596 765 5 6 716 918 5 6 804 1032 6 6 1279 1642 7 9Kodai 326 649 2 4 391 779 2 4 440 875 2 4 700 1393 4 7Barnapur 0 90 0 1 0 108 0 1 0 121 0 1 0 193 0 1Hasanpur 415 992 3 5 498 1191 3 5 560 1338 3 7 891 2129 5 10ChangNar 354 952 4 6 425 1143 4 7 477 1284 4 7 760 2043 5 11Pater 118 420 1 4 142 504 1 4 159 566 1 4 253 901 2 6Sajapur 34 177 1 4 41 213 1 4 46 239 1 4 73 380 1 4Ish*arpur 89 265 1 2 107 318 1 2 120 357 1 2 191 569 1 3Biraonkot 0 798 0 4 0 958 0 5 0 1076 0 5 0 1712 0 8Sarwanipur 0 188 0 1 0 226 0 1 0 254 0 2 0 403 0 2Balraapur 590 930 3 5 708 1117 5 6 796 1254 5 6 1266 1996 8 9Phulwaria 0 334 0 3 0 401 0 3 0 450 0 3 0 717 0 3Chaturpur 0 450 0 3 0 540 0 3 0 607 0 3 0 966 0 4Bhita 0 578 0 3 0 694 0 4 0 779 0 4 0 1240 0 6Vishnathpur 332 649 2 4 399 779 2 4 448 875 2 4 712 1393 4 6Neaada 0 350 0 2 0 420 0 2 0 472 0 2 0 751 0 4Sonahi 0 127 0 1 0 152 0 1 0 171 0 1 0 273 0 2Khararia(biraon) 0 347 0 2 0 441 0 2 0 495 0 2 0 783 0 4Khararia 472 1418 3 7 567 1702 4 7 636 1912 4 9 1013 3043 6 14Balua 661 1114 5 6 794 1337 6 9 891 1502 6 9 1418 2390 10 15Kan:ar 826 1843 4 9 992 2213 5 10 1114 2485 5 12 1772 3955 9 18Baulia 184 517 2 3 221 621 2 3 248 697 2 4 395 1109 3 5HarhhN 4 5 1 1 8 1 1 5 4 1 4 2 1 1 6 1 1 5 9 1 1 9 7 2 5 3 1 2Chilbila 648 1062 4 5 778 1275 4 6 874 1432 4 6 1390 2279 7 11U'ibhapur 386 300 2 2 463 360 3 2 521 405 3 2 828 644 4 3Dir.ipur 100 343 I 2 120 412 1 3 135 463 1 3 215 734 1 4fundi 1076 2361 7 12 1292 2835 9 14 1451 3164 10 15 2309 5066 13 24rususra 472 471 2 2 567 565 4 3 636 635 4 3 1013 1011 6 5Itha 0 590 0 3 0 708 0 3 0 796 0 4 0 1266 0 6f-atehpur 413 546 2 3 496 656 3 4 557 736 3 4 886 1172 5 6

Sub-totals: 13900 28191 93 168 16668 33846 109 190 18743 38014 113 203 29827 60492 168 307Totals: 42091 261 50534 299 56758 316 90319 475

E - 21

DETERHINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS BIRAONKOT

Year; 1981 1986 1991 2011SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2

Year: Population:

1971 35667 Bro»th rate: 1.023 (per annui)1981 449931986 505341991 567582011 90319

E - 22

DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS KIR2ft«URftD

Year:

Village:





EajepurShiriharaNarayanpurShaibhoopurHatukaKakrahnanPratappurChaklolaRaidihBhikhaipurKathurwaArjunpurAdtanpurPuranderpurNonkharaKatwarupurSarangpurKheiapurBorainSuierpurKardhanaDoianpurRaiathaunaLalpurLeruaiKharagraipurDandrahiaSheoraapurthakarpanpurMughalbirLallapurBurudaspurBadipurBharharaflaiihukarshahpurLakshapurNayapurBhihpurfhriaiurad (6.)KhillispurhJiniKhalipur

Sub-totals:Totals:

2-751002032383000

67656316010502257407001500470

45650571

21582011753316030225100373000

15014090329800

330270568911

1300038671

50171432248486535123971846995010643463718616210142542849378

283327816240444653244223040232826943647179157748747447

3653908

11491588

25671

2131204415233101033191322111200012122021i.

44

83264

331323

15525227311232I

132322432ni.

44342nL

133206T/

17

181

3301202432853600

81067519212592708878391800560

54760585

25872412103977236270120447000

1801661083949fc0

3963247051092

1558646364

601656382975836411485861562113912752076422319412151051359194

339733321848453563853027648239332352356595188897896536

43801089137B1904

7.0778

21322044162441010431

111322121200012222020i.

45

92282

341333155352373113331

1423234322443422747

206717

190

3701352733204040

91075821514143039969432020630

6146BO96

29062712364468140

303135502000

2021891214431080

4443647921227

1750552073

6759614333465472016689676321279143584858250218136572576664105

381537424554460171659531054144236258763410621110071006602

4919122315472138

34568

21322054163441010431

1223221217*/

0001222202245

97295

341333

1553623731.1333I

1623334323444422753

206817

198

5892144355106430

144912063432250482158615003210

1010

9771082152

462443137570912964482214799000

3213001937051710

70757912601952

2785682863

107415306953110411146265515391005203622793013653993472169119171056167607059639086695611409474938617035769341009169336160316019587828194624623403

55007

31333066293762010551

19233212140002223203368

134393

5717*j

55167592473214451

2533445424445522874328

1117

259


E - 23

DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS HIRZAKURAD


Year: Population:

1971 32724 Broxth rate: 1.023 (per annua)1981 412801986 463631991 520732011 82B62

E - 24

DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS ROMANIA

Year:

Village:

ParsanandpurUadirajpurKholaspurHaniyaripurTundiyaLakahpurBhulanpurPandeapurNathupurUnchagaonDaudpurRairaipurBhasahapurLachhitanpurDayapurTulachakShahababadHanharpurBhataipurBishunpurPilkhiniNerurEaliraipurFatehgungBhatthiBasantpattiEopalpurKarotaDarekhuRohaniaBovindpurHarpalpurKesaripurKarkatpurWaheshpurChandapurChandpurKandulikhurdSheodaspurPratappattiKansaraiHifinsroralandiaChakdarsant-'araichaBikapurrirabanChakdinEh it an

SC/ST

553•0

144000005721237000

139930

150821111976700

4101200

4072900253255981834471702351507480

70o00

2353401190

530

1981rest

1369509429956537597890258651831416465732308

145584627220460912238720214464

117512063041337187461836116682002564

1295311

1454897

18310

8290

1700

205150203169481

PS1

3010000011100011021111002102301341311130100012103

PS2

103354351410224261322513125527114291046ni8680401011113

SC/ST

6640

173000006825544000

1671120

180981332378000

4921440

489348030390718220537204282180898084000

2824081430

636

1986rest

16446115151148645717

106930

10392199500558879370

17471017532645521095286865257557

141114483651605225074243320032404677

1555373

174610772199

09950

2040

246180244203578

PS1

3010000012100011021111002102301341412140100022104

PS2

103354351510234271423524236627

11429

1247iA.

8690401011113

SC/ST

7460

194000007728650000

1871250

2021111502669000

5531620

5493910

344388062476032293172021009

094000

3174591600

715

1991rest

18466865791289724805

120034

11672469561627987415196211384629762012303219712896261585162641018032527833487224927007611746419

196112102469

01118

02290

276202274228649

PS1

30100000121000110211210031033013414t2150I000*>4.

2104

PS2

10T«.'

364451511334281423624237729

12421012482961005010r\L

1

214

SC/ST

11870

30900000

12245579

. 000

2982000

32217623842314400

8802580

873622054697

1283393959365504322

16050

150000

5047302550

1137

2011rest

29381092921205211521281191054

18563929893998

1571661

3123180

134647298719575111545459996252225886522869402213267753580429612102779667

312019253929

01779

03650

440322.4363631032

PS1

5'020000012100021021121004204401462523270100033205

PS2

12549568t817447313162493724

1111312186415195123149160802022225

Sab-totals: 7244 34427 49 185 8698 41337 55 200 9769 46428 59 219 15546 73882 81 325Totals: 41671 234 50035 255 56197 278 89428 406

IIIII

E - 25

DETERH1NATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS ROMANIA


Year: Population:

* 1971 35315 Growth rate: 1.023 (per annul)1981 44549

1 1986 500351991 561972011 89428

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

E - 26

DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS VYASNABAR

Year:SC/ST

Village:

KabirpurSultanpurSorayanNathupurBakhraKatheriaDahiaParorwaDariyapurChahia6ovindpurHannapurKhuthaFatehpurSaidpurVyasnagarChanditaraNibupurJeodhipurSinghitaliBharsariaEkauniAiriAiri KaialapurKhzurgaonBhoznaBaghiRasulpurHundikhurdBhanar.ipurBhaisaundiHatherxaHridayapurPurainiMahabalpurMuhanadpurSatpolhrihalokharfundHalaHalhiafilandihChaMaiaterpurDJranaClMttaipurbobariyaSeehupurChandasiBighauliKa^.ankarpurTandiya

22784.152681400

24117400222544433700

4731200

1060908

1243440

794200

5801511230

40210017418029634600

4352225851110

407079

327

1981rest

276612135858816754173124526500

3783508323936397949273245156732400

97314283130

14440

12292105785035182395509365741620

1866401151912176

2301234021802289

PS1

112110120012I2002102011120I10041202112320021i.

4103012

PS2

2314441520022433£»42312004141606133313431013541

1010142

SC/ST

25896173771590

27419800252895038400

5391370

1210

1029

1413920904800

6601721400

45811419820533739400

4952536661260

463090

372

1986rest

314697154977929859197

141830200

43039994744772890410563695867636900

110816294634

16440

13992396585735902726261066654184o

212729131110382002620266424913329

PS1

212110220012120031020111201100412021123200224107•j

012

PS2

231444162000i.

1433652312005141707133323531o13651

1111142

SC/ST

285106191851760

30321900283195542300

5941510

1330

113101564320

995300

7291901550

50512621922637243500

5472797351390

511099

411

1991rest

34776917010781025947217156433300

475440104549480399811654076478440700

1223178

104438

18140

154426472663265130069111767212040

23480414461146221

2891294026

1008363

PS1

21211022001212003102011I2011004120311232003T1.

4107

01T4.

PS2

2415541720022534652312005151807 '2337\f

23531014651

121215nL

SC/ST

4231572831272610

44932400

414738262800

8812240

1980

16815

2316410

1477800

10812812290

74918632433555264500

811414

10902070

7580

147609

2011rest

5141140252159915211405322232049400

704652155073211911480172760496012560400

1813265

154956

26910

2290391

1077937965445

1025174410703020

3471193214517003284288436139

1495539

PS1

212120220012130041020111301100522031223300425104013

PS2

352776210200337356734130082•71

110102544257520259721818163

E - 27

DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS VYASNA6AR

Year:

Village:

LeduaBhojpurMahioodpurHinauli

Sub-totals:Totals:

SC/ST

IBS.13

827329

900440659

1981rest

13820

1187672

31655

PS1

2142

69226

PS2

6053

157

SC/ST

21415

942375

1025246297

1986rest

15740

1352765

36044

PS1

2142

72243

PS2

7064

171

SC/ST

23616

1039413

1131451090

1991rest

17370

1492844

39776

PS1

2152

75259

PS2

7064

184

SC/ST

35024

1541613

1677975767

2011rest

25750

22121252

58989

PS1

2173

90351

PS2

11096

261

Year: Population:

1971 34450 Growth rate: 1.019 (per annul)1981 419531986 462961991 510902011 75767

1111111111111111111II

E - 28

DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS KANDHAt*M*fw«imtommmMm*«MW«fHm*»****m*m»«»*fm*»*»«**»*HM**Hmt»*»***<

Year:

Village:

HisirpurHansapurSaghatNaxapurKhusipurKadirpurSadalpurLathiaJafarabadNakainHaraonPahariBaneshpurKandxaAvelashpurNasirpurPura UsarKakariattaBhikharipurKanchanpurChitaipurPongalpurKaraundiJagatpurBakhaniHardattpurKarnadandiBairxanPanditpurBansipurDhol apurKilki ChuckDhanpalpurDalhnaBhadwarBandapurKhali IpurDecratashipurSjursfcaif'UrJjQardeopurbancapurDeora ChucktNadrasiKiduraFandpur

SC/ST

120341257677860171200

2812650

217961730

19925016800

3783740

653181953677189128293911553326

143124151180

1310

1200

149

1981rest

115826885986575168795316723450123411722442327629625309358159865236925448193929411351310104469991524812572409215181269171560616563496846464197341165446

PS1

211212231022022102330023033212122212111210OL

0L.

01

PS2

10275693265610312554486346837855648564937545524424

SC/ST

144411468809472205240

3373180

2611152080

23930020200

4544490

78421711443922271543521091863997

172149181220

1570

1440

179

1986rest

1390322103110399028251143798685401482140729327947557503714301919783443305578112735313631573125483910992981509268110662215242056727406765961016557237409198536

PS1

21121223102202210233002304321212221211I21020201

PS2

10275693265610314554486346837865648564937545534424

SC/ST

1624616779010581231270

3793570

2931292330

26833722700

5105040

881244128491042551733951232094488

193167204240

1770

1620

201

1991rest

15623611158116710139261284269756071664158132931388488434174832155879498343649126639615311767140894312343341695324124269917112317558317596691141626

' 266460223601

PS1

21121223102202210233003304321222221211121020201

PS2

1027569326571031555449634683786564B564937545534424

SC/ST

2587326122144167129367430

6035690

4662063710

42753636100

8118030

14013882047716540627562919533371213307266324390

2810

2580

320

2011rest

24855751843185616121474204678155296626482515524499413501341663768342913997925451032201563124362811224015001964532269851519761112272336712021322120810641816996423732354957

PS1

2112122T

1

033022202330044063212223223i222102020L

PS2

10388793375

111132266441464469310129684

11585

1137655844424

E - 29

DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS KANDHA

Yesr: 1981 1986 1991 2011SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2

Village:

Lal ChuckAiarpurMasi ChuckNai Pura

0000

0000

0000

0000

0000

0000

0000

0000

0000

0000

0000

0000

0000

0000

0000

0000

Sub-totals: 6092 32078 69 254 7315 38516 70 258 8215 43259 72 261 13073 68839 85 317Totals: 38170 323 45830 328 51475 333 81913 402

Year: Population:

1971 32347 6ro»th rate: 1.023 (per annul)1981 408051986 458301991 514742011 81912

IIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIII

F - 1

ANNEX F

SCHEME-WISE SUMMARY OF DATA (Sub-Project East I)

SCHEME NAME:TARGET POPULATION:

TUBEWELLS :

PUMP HOUSES :

PUMPS :

CHLORINATORS :

RISING MAIN :OVERHEAD TANK :

DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVILLAGES COVERED :PUBLIC STANDPOSTS :PRIVATE CONNECTIONS

FEROZPUR ( Rae Bareli District )20,600

No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: VT pump/installedNo.2: VT pump/installedNo.1: installedNo.2: installed500 ra laid, out of a total of 500 mvolume: 350 mstaging: 21 mprogress: 100 % (commissioned)51.5 km laid, out of a total of 51.5 km16 out of 1648 constructed, out of a total of 124130 made, out of an estimated total of 380

CHLORINE DOSAGE : 0.8 mg/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.2 - 0.8 mg/1, depending on

distance between samlping point and headworks

POWER SUPPLY :EXEMPTED FEEDER

approx. 5 hrs/day on rural feederto be commissioned within month of April, 1985

PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME: July 1985(commissioned except for increased number of public standposts)

1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

F - 2

SCHEME NAME :TARGET POPULATION :

TUBEWELLS :

PUMP HOUSES :

PUMPS :

CHLORINATORS :



RALPUR ( Rae Bareli District )32,000

No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: submersible pump/installedNo.2: submersible pump/installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed375 m laid, out^of a total of 375 mvolume: 500 mstaging: 22 mprogress: 100 % (completed)88.8 km laid, out of a total of 88.8 km24 out of 24105 constructed, out of a total of 20197 made, out of an estimated total of 536


distance between sampling point and headworks


3 to 6 hrs/day on rural feederlines have been drawn; to be energized before endof April 1985

PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : July 1985(commissioned except for increased number of public standposts)

F - 3

SCHEME NAME :TARGET POPULATION

TUBEWELLS :

PUMP HOUSES :

PUMPS :

CHLORINATORS :

RISING MAIN:OVERHEAD TANK


GOVINDPUR ( Rae Bareli District )29,890

No.l: constructed (discharge less than anticipated)No.2: constructedNo.3: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.3: constructedNo.1: VT pump/ins tailedNo.2: submersible pump/installedNo.3: to be procuredNo.l: installedNo.2: installedNo.3: procured375 m laid, out of a total of 375 mvolume: 500 mstaging: 20 mprogress: 100% (completed)82.5 km laid, out of a total of 82.5 km19 out of 1956 constructed, out of a total of 112107 made, out of an estimated total of 476




2 to 6 hrs/day ( average: 4.5 hrs/day)lines have been drawn; to be energized before endof April 1985



F - 4


TUBEWELLS :

PUMP HOUSES :

PUMPS :

CHLORINATORS :



BHOJPUR ( Rae Bareli District )30,547

No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: VT pump/installedNo.2: submersible pump/instailedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed375 m laid, outgOf a total of 375volume: 500 mstaging: 20 mprogress: almost 100% (under testing)76 km laid, out of a total of 77.3 km34 out of 3484 constructed, out of a total of 124300 made, out of an estimated total of 556

m

CHLORINE DOSAGE : 0.8 mg/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.4 - 0.8 rag/1, depending on



approx. 4 hrs/day on rural feederlines have been drawn; to be energized before endof April 1985



F - 5


TUBEWELLS :

PUMP HOUSES :

PUMPS :

CHLORINATORS :



EXEMPTED FEEDER :

THULENDI ( Rae Bareli District )29,911

No.1: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: VT pump/installedNo.2: submersible pump/installedNo.l: installedNo.2: procured375 m laid, out3of a total of 375 ravolume: 500 mstaging: 21 mprogress: 60 % (staging for tank wall underprogress)77 km laid, out of a total of 78.25 km19 out of 1965 constructed, out of a total of 18625 made, out of an estimated total of 751

commissioned

PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : September 1985


F - 6


TUBEWELLS :

PUMP HOUSES

PUMPS :

CHLORINATORS

RISING MAIN :OVERHEAD TANK


JAGATPUR ( Rae Bareli District )35,800

No.l: constructedNo.2: constructed (has been abandoned; new TW to be

constructed)constructed (not yet developed)constructedwill not be constructednot yet constructedVT pump/instailed

.3:

.1:

.2:

.3:

.1:

NoNoNoNoNoNo.2: -No.3: -No.l: installedNo.2: -No.3: -50 m laid, out of a total of 375volume: 650 mstaging: 20 mprogress: 100% (completed)125 km laid, out of a total of 136.15 km32 out of 32160 constructed, out of a total of 26570 made, out of an estimated total of 735

m

CHLORINE DOSAGE : 0.8 rag/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.2 - 0.6 mg/1, depending on



4.5 to 17 hrs/day ( average: approx. 10 hrs/day)commissioned



F - 7


TUBEWELLS :

PUMP HOUSES :

PUMPS :

CHLORINATORS :



EXEMPTED FEEDER :

ASHRAFPUR ( Rae Bareli District )26,460

No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: submersible pump/ installedNo.2: submersible pump/ installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed25 m laid, out of a total of 550 mvolume: 500 mstaging: 21 mprogress: 45 % (staging completed)64 km laid, out of a total of 69 km20 out of 2060 constructed, out of a total of 18040 made, out of an estimnated total of 633

to be commissioned by mid-May 1985 (permissionfor railway crossing has been obtained)

PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : September 1985

F - 8


TUBEWELLS :

PUMP HOUSES :

PUMPS :

CHLORINATORS :



UDARI ( Rae Bareli District )25,030

No.l: constructed (cavity well)No.2: constructed (cavity well)No.3: constructed (cavity well)No.l: temporary onlyNo.2: temporary onlyNo.3: temporary onlyNo.l: submersible pump/ installedNo.2: submersible pump/ installedNo.3: submersible pump/ installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installedNo.3: installed340 m laid, out-of a total of 350 mvolume: 500 mstaging: 20 mprogress: 20 % (foundation under construction)65 km laid, out of a total of 91.5 km16 out of 1618 constructed, out of a total of 2040 made, out of a total of 687

CHLORINE DOSAGE : 0.6 mg/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.6 mg/1 (so far measured at

headworks only; sampling procedure will be changedshortly)

POWER SUPPLY :'EXEMPTED FEEDER

6 hrs/day (rostered) through rural feederSEE has not started any activity yet

PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME(Direct pumping started in March 1985.)

March 1986


F - 9


TUBEWELLS :

PUMP HOUSES :

PUMPS :

CHLORINATORS :



BANNAMAU ( Rae Bareli District )41,945

No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: submersible pump/installedNo.2: submersible pump/installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed400 m laid, out.of a total of 400 m.volume: 800 mstaging: 24 mprogress: 90% (top dome completed)139.5 km laid, out of a total of 139.5 kra27 out of 27240 constructed, out of a total of 24090 made, out of an estimated total of 984


distance between sampling point and headworksEXEMPTED FEEDER : commissioned; high-voltage problem

PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : May 1985

I*. "IIIiiiiIiiIiiiiiiiii

F - 10


TUBEWELLS :

PUMP HOUSES :

PUMPS :

CHLORINATORS :

RISING MAIN :OVERHEAD TANK


CHLORINE DOSAGE :RESIDUAL CHLORINE :

POWER SUPPLY :EXEMPTED FEEDER :

BEHTAKALAN45,600

( Rae Bareli District )

No.l: constructed (has been abandoned)No.2: constructedNo.3: constructed (to be developed)No.l: constructed (to be used as storage)No.2: constructedNo.3: to be constructedNo.l: submersible pump/ removed and used elsewhereNo.2: VT pump/instailedNo.3: not yet procuredNo.l: not yet procuredNo.2: installedNo.3: procured400 m laid, out of a total of 400 mvolume: 800 rastaging: 22 raprogress: 90% (top dome completed)125.7 km laid, out of a total of 125.7 km34 out of 34223 constructed, out of a total of 22385 made, out of an estimated total of 1205

0.6 to 0.8 mg/10.6 to 0.8 mg/1 (measured near pump house!)

2.5 to 8.5 hrs/dayto be commissioned by end of April 1985

PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : June 1985

II1I1IIIIIIIIIIIIII1I

F - 11


TUBEWELLS :

PUMP HOUSES :

PUMPS :

CHLORINATORS :



SAIDABAD ( Allahabad District )23,600

No.l: constructedNo.2: constructed under previous programmeNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: submersible pump/installedNo.2: submersible pump/installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed423 m laid, out-of a total of 423 mvolume: 650 mstaging: 16 mprogress: 100 % (completed)71 km laid, out of a total of 65 km19 out of 1977 constructed, out of a total of 168384 made, out of an estimated total of 337

CHLORINE DOSAGE : 1.0 to 1.2 mg/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.2 - 1.0 mg/1, depending on


EXEMPTED FEEDER commissioned

PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : Mid-1985(commissioned except for increased number of public standposts)

F - 12


TUBEWELLS :

PUMP HOUSES :

PUMPS :

CHLORINATORS :



NIDURA ( Allahabad District )20,400

No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: submersible pump/installedNo.2: submersible pump/installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed380 m laid, out3of a total of 380 mvolume: 650 mstaging: 20 mprogress: 100 % (completed)66 km laid, out of a total of 53 km20 out of 2070 constructed, out of a total of 145384 made, out of an estimated total of 300



EXEMPTED FEEDER commissioned


II1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

F - 13


TUBEWELLS :

PUMP HOUSES :

PUMPS :

CHLORINATORS :



CHLORINE DOSAGE :

PRATAPPUR (Ghurdauli Zone) ( Allahabad District )24,200

No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: VT pump/installedNo.2: submersible pump/installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed360 m laid, out^of a total of 360 m.volume: 800 mstaging: 20 raprogress: 100 % (commissioned)104 km laid, out of a total of 104 km31 out of 3155 constructed, out of a total of 174120 made, out of an estimated total of 416

0.5 - 0.6 mg/1 (?)

RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.2 - 0.6 mg/1, depending ondistance between sampling point and headworks

POWER SUPPLY :EXEMPTED FEEDER :

average of 13 hrs/dayto be commissioned by end of 1985/mid-1986 ?

PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : Mid-1985 (except forexempted feeder)


F - 14


TUBEWELLS :

PUMP HOUSES :

PUMPS :

CHLORINATORS :



EXEMPTED FEEDER :

URWA ( Allahabad District )20,300

No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: VT pump/installedNo.2: submersible pump/installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed350 m laid, out^of a total of 350 mvolume: 500 mstaging: 14 mprogress: 100 % (completed)69 km laid, out of a total of 64 km.23 out of 2346 constructed, out of a total of 190355 made, out of an estimated total of 290

because of power availability of 20 - 24 hrs/dayno exempted feeder applied for

PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : Mid-1985(commissioned except for increased number of public standposts)

JIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

F - 15


TUBEWELLS :

PUMP HOUSES :

PUMPS :

CHLORINATORS :



MIRZAMURAD57,920

( Varanasi District )

No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: submersible pump/installedNo.2: submersible pump/installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed380 m laid, out of a total of 380 ravolume: 1000 mstaging: 22 mprogress: 100% (commissioned)100.6 km laid, out of a total of 100.3 km50 out of 50129 constructed, out of a total of 266554 made, out of an estimated total of 580




approx. 4-5 hrs/dayre-commissioned by December 1984; trouble again(dacoit-infested area)

PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : September 1985 ?(commissioned except for increased number of public standposts)

II

F - 16


TUBEWELLS :

PUMP HOUSES :

PUMPS :

CHLORINATORS :



CHLORINE DOSAGE :RESIDUAL CHLORINE


IN

TIKRI ( Varanasi District )61,560

No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: VT pump/instailedNo.2: VT pump/installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed235 m laid, out-of a total of 235 mvolume: 1200 mstaging: 22 mprogress: 100% (commissioned)61.4 km laid, out of a total of 61.4 km27 out of 2795 constructed, out of a total of 209450 made, out of an estimated total of 410

0.6 mg/1DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.2 - 0.6 mg/1, depending on


18-20 hrs/daycommissioned


IIII1IIIIIIII1iIf1III

F - 17


TUBEWELLS :

PUMP HOUSES :

PUMPS :

CHLORINATORS :



SEWAPURI ( Varanasi District )32,200

No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: VT pump/installedNo.2: VT pump/instailedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed250 ra laid, out of a total of 250 mvolume: 600 mstaging: 16 mprogress: 100% (completed)46.5 km laid, out of a total of 46.5 km30 out of 3060 constructed, out of a total of 117160 made, out of an estimated total of 215




18-20 hrs/daycommissioned in January 1984


IIIItIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

F - 18


TUBEWELLS :

PUMP HOUSES :

PUMPS :

CHLORINATORS :



HARHUA ( Varanasi District )57,585

No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: submersible pump/installedNo.2: VT pump/installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed350 m laid, out_of a total of 350 mvolume: 1000 mstaging: 18 mprogress: 100% (commissioned)129.2 km'laid, out of a total of 129.5 km.75 out of 75130 constructed, out of a total of 236550 made, out of an estimated total of 550

CHLORINE DOSAGE : 0.6 - 0.8 mg/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.2 - 0.6 mg/1, depending on


POWER SUPPLY : Generator set installed and commissioned(Average of 6 hours' supply on rural feeder)


IIIIiiIiiiiiiiiiiiiii

F - 19


TUBEWELLS :

PUMP HOUSES :

PUMPS :

CHLORINATORS :



BIRAONKOT63,130


No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: submersible pump/installedNo.2: VT pump/installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed370 m laid, out_of a total of 380 mvolume: 1000 mstaging: 18 mprogress: 100% (commissioned)132.4 km laid, out of a total of 132.4 km46 out of 46110 constructed, out of a total of 264300 made, out of an estimated total of 600

CHLORINE DOSAGE : 0.4 - 0.8 mg/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.1 - 0.3 mg/1, depending on



12-14 hrs/dayre-commissioned


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIII

F - 20


TUBEWELLS :

PUMP HOUSES :

PUMPS :

CHLORINATORS :



VYASNAGAR61,238


No.1: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: VT pump/installedNo.2: VT pump/instailedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed1300 m laid, out of a total of 1300 (350) m.volume: 1000 mstaging: 18 mprogress: 100 % (completed)86.8 km laid, out of a total of 90 km.52 out of 5270 constructed, out of a total of 226300 made, out of an estimated total of 550

CHLORINE DOSAGE : 0.7-0.9 mg/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.1 - 0.7 mg/1, depending on



6 hrs/day (I); 18-20 hrs/day (II)not yet commissioned because of railway crossing(for TW No. 1; TW No. 2 already has power forapprox. 20 hrs/day due to vicinity of fertilizerfactory)



F - 21


TUBEWELLS :

PUMP HOUSES :

PUMPS :

CHLORINATORS :


DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM:VILLAGES COVERED:PUBLIC STANDPOST:PRIVATE CONNECTIONS:

ROHANIA ( Varanasi District )62,507

No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: VT pump/installedNo.2: VT pump/procuredNo.l: installedNo.2: procured250 m laid, out3of a total of 250 ravolume: 1000 mstaging: 18 mprogress: 100% (completed89.1 km laid, out of a total of 23441 out of 41100 constructed, out of a total of 234644 made, out of an estimated total of 600

CHLORINE DOSAGE: 0,8 mg/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: 0.2 - 0.6 mg/1, depending on


POWER SUPPLY:EXEMPTED FEEDER:

22-24 hrs/daycommissioned in March 1984



F - 22


TUBEWELLS :

PUMP HOUSES :

PUMPS :

CHLORINATORS :



KANDWA ( Varanasi District )57,255

No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: VT pump/instailedNo.2: VT pump/installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed300 m laid, out.of a total of 350 mvolume: 1000 mstaging: 18 mprogress: 100% (commissioned)91 km laid, out of a total of 110 km48 out of 48100 constructed, out of a total of 323245 made, out of an estimated total of 555



EXEMPTED FEEDER : commissioned, but power available for only 6-7hrs/day (will be increased in near future)


G - 1

ANNEX G

INDIA

UTTAR PRADESH RURAL WATER SUPPLY PROJECT

DUTCH CREDIT PROGRAMMEREPORT FOR PRE APPRAISAL OF

SUB PROJECT-KEAST) (REVISED)

INSTALMENT-1

FOR

NARANASIAND ALLAHABAD DISTRICTS

APRIL 1985

UTTAR PRADESH JAL NIGAM

G - 2

IIIII

UTTAR PRADESH JAL NIGAM

_ " REPORT

• ON PRE-APPRAISAL OF RURAL WATER SUPPLY SCHEMES

I UNDER DUTCH CREDIT PROGRAMME

ISUB PROJECT - II - EAST ( Revised )

INSTALLMENT - I

II DISTRICTS VARANASI & ALLAHABAD

IApril 1985

IIIIIII

G - 3

TEAM -

: PREPARED BY :

Er. R^DAYAL

Er. A.C.SAXENA

Er. A.K.GUPTA

. A.C.NAGAR

I CHIEF ENGII II

S MANAGER ( APPRAISAL )

: MANAGER ( APPRAISAL )

DY, MANAGER ( APPRAISAL )

: Typed By :

Mrs. REETA DEY KIRTY: STENOGRAPHER

: Drawings By :

Sri RASHID MOBIN : COMPUTOR

Sri WALIULLAH DRAFTSMAN,

G - 4

PKADESHREH)RT ON FRE-APPKAISAL OF RURAL WATER SUPPLY

III• . PROJECT UNDER DUTCH CREDIT PKOGHAKME SUB_ PROJECT II - EAST (Revised)-Installment II IN DISTRICTS VARANASl AND AI.fAHABAD

| 1.0 INTRODUCTION

Under "Che Dtrcch credit programme sub projecrc-II

• (east) was originally prepared for 5 rural water supply

• schemes covering 137 villages and costing Rs. 340 lacsin April 1981 and submitted to the Dutch Govt* In

I January 1982 as per latest directions of the Govt, of

India, the proposals: were reconsidered and it was

8 decided to install hand pumps, wherever feasible« inplace of piped water supply schemes-. Consequently

• original proposals were recasted and the villages to

• . be covered with hand pumps were included in sub-project-

III (east & west) and only one piped water supply

| scheme covering 25 villages of Allahabad diatt, and

_ another 2 schemes of Raebareli district covering 28

• villages were included in sub-Project -II (east)and

• these proposals were still under consideration of

Dutch Govt, till recently. However for the reasons:

• of urgancy, these schemes have been executed under

other programmes of Govt. of India and Govt, of U.P,

• During the discussions held with Mission -10

• (U.P.) at Lucknow on October 10th & 11th, 1984, itwas agreed upon that U.P.Jal Nigam will put up sjome

I fresh proposals under subproject II-£ast (Revised)

II

G - 5

IIII

to an amount of the same order as originally proposedg for sub project-II (See. Mission report- U.F.-10_ page 22). Latter on the Dutch Mission indicated that• this amount can be further increased by an equal• amounts

Accordingly two packages of projects were

• proposed and submitted aa forecast of cast in

February 1985 and March 1985 respectively. The first• package was christiuaed as Installment-I Covering two

• . districts viz* Varanasi & Allahabad. In Varanasi• districts, 9 schemes were suggested covering 179 villages

• at am tentative cost of Rs. 591.16 lacs and 2 schemes

were suggested in Allahabad district covering 23 villages

I at am tentative cost of Rs. 140,00 lacs.

M The second package to be christened as Install-ment -II was proposed with 15 schemes of Varanasi

fl district duly covering 230 villages at am tentativecost of Rs. 766.1? lacs.

I Meanwhile detailed projects for only 8 schemes

• - of Varanasi district, covering 166 villagea at an• estimated cost of Rs 581.83 lacs and 1 scheme of.

• Allahabad district, covering 11: villagea at an estimated

cost of Rs. 90.23 lacs have been prepared and proposed

• to be included in Installment-I. These projects are

under appraisal of U.P.Jal Nigam appraisal cell and

• slight variations may be expected in their final costs,

• which can not be ruled out at this stage as a result

of an going appraisal of these schemes*

I

II G - 6

• A table showing variation in forecast of coat

• submitted earlier and the detailed projects is enclosed

as annexure I for easy reference.

| As regards the preparation of detailed projects, of

schemes under Installment II, the work is being started

• and is expected to be completed in the due course

• . of time.

2.0 PROCEDURE FOR SELECTION OF VILLAGES

• The scarcity/problem villages as included in the

declared list of scarcity villages as per 1972 assessment

• and those± included in the declared list of scarcity/

• problem villages by the. District Magistrates of the

respective districts in 1984—85, have been selected to

I be included in the proposed piped water supply scheme.

The non-scarcity/problem villages lying with in the

| economical grouping have also been included,

_ In some villages few hand pumps were installed,

• But due to the fact that the quality of water available

• from these Hand Pumps is not safe for long term human

consumption and also due to be reason that the general

• water table in the area goes down below fiO to 59 metresbelow ground level, these hand pumps can not be relied

• upon as a permanent solution to the water scarcity

• problem especially during the lean summer months.

Consequently, instead of going for the saturation of

• villages with hand pumpa, piped water supply schemes

are proposed, as it will be clear from the forth-coming

II

G - 7

paras that deep tubewellsr. apart trom delivering a

|| a good quality of water, can given required quantity of

potable water and thus. we can find a listing solution

™ of the drinking water problem.

• The villages included in these projects are

therefore, selected and included the basis of above

• criteria.

| 3.0 DESIGN CRITERIA

• 3»1 Design Period

The projects are designed to cater the needes of

| the population for a period of 30 years. The base year

• being taken as 1987 and design year 2017.

3.2 Design Population

li The design populations if projected on compound

growth rate basis for the last decades, increases; very

• high and becomes unrealistic. Therefore the future

• population growth rate was based as those which

emerges out from the census of 1971 for the respective

• tehsils and applied an a linear basis but under the

condition that the technical life spaTja of each project

• will not be less than 20 years in ease the so called

• compound growth rate is calculated for. This was

• confirmed by Mr. J.A.Speets; water supply coordinator of

• Royal Motherlands Embassy, New Delhi vide his letter

no. 133/JS/hm dated January 4, 1985*

II

G - 8.

III• 3»3 Rate of Water Supply

I The rate of water supply for individual village

is taken as 70 l.p.c.do

3,4 Source of water supplyI Tubewells are taken as source of water supply

as these are successful in the area*

| It is assumed that it will run for not more than_ 16 houres a day. Min-ipniin 2 numbers of tubewells are

• provided even if the requirement is less and is wholly

• met from one tubewell only.

3*5 Treatment

• The source of water being tubewell and water

• available is normally safe and potable. Hence only

chlorination is proposed for disinfection of water.

W 3*6 Pumping plants

M Electric driven borehole vertical turbine /

™ submersible pumping plants are proposed to be installed

• over the tubewells for the requirement of 15 years only.*O Q&a&KK.

I 3.7 POWER SUPPLY

• Three alternatives were explored to find an economic

solution of power supply to pumping plants as detailed

• below :-

£ 1 . Power obtained from separate exempted feeder• 2. Power taken from rural feeder and increasing• number of tubewells.. and storage capacity of• clear water.

I

G - 9

III• 3« Power from rural feeder and generators.

• A power feasibility report has been prepared

for each scheme and attached with its; detailed estimate,

I The most economical alternative has been found in

alternative I i.e. power obtained from separate feeder,

| in each of the schemes under this sub project.

• 3*8 Rising Main

Economical size of rising main from tubewellL

• to storage reservoir is worked out by calculating

the cost of pipes including laying and capitalising

m • the cost of its repairs, maintenance and power• consumption charges for different sizes of pipes and

depreciation. C. I, pipes- upto first 200 in length

I from tubewell have been used and A.C. «*f pipes: for the

rest of the lengths.I•' 3,9 Storage reservoir

• The minimum storage provided is not less than

8 hours of daily supply at the end of design period

I as the draw off pattern in rural areas is not very

defenite.

3*10 Distribution mainI These are designed for peak flow cquivelant to

2,4 times the average flow, on the baias of Hazen &

| William formula allowing the variation in hydraulic

• head at any Hode to be maximum of 60 cm. The value of

• Hazen william coefficient 'c1 is taken as 100 for G.I,

• and C.I, pipes and 120 for A.C, and P.V,C. pipes.

I

G - 10

III•' Since the ground conditions are favourable, A,C. & P.V.C

• pipes have been preferred over C,I,pipes on account of

their lower cost, easy availability, transportation and

I handling. Rigid P.V.C. pipes upto 225 mm outer dia and

A.C. pipes of 250 to 300 mm inner dia pipes have been

I used* For higher diameters C.I. pipes are to be used.

M The minimum size of pipe is kept as 32 mm outer dia.

3#11i Terminal pressure

I As the buildings in the area are mostly single

storeyed, a minimum terminal pressure of 6 metres has

p been kept.

_ 3.12 Stand posts;

™ Vandal proof pillar type stand posts are proposed

• at the rate of ane stand post per 250 persons.. These are

invariably & sepexately provided to the scheduled caste

w population and the weaker section of society in each

village / hamlet even if the population is less than

• 250 persons. It. has also been ensured that the users

• have not to walk more than 150 m to fetch water

from stand posts.

I 4.0 POPULATION PROJECTION

_ Population has been projected for 1987 and

• 2017 inaccordance with para 3.2, of this report. The

• last decadal growth in Varanasi tehsil is 26.36#, in

Gyanpur tehsil 33~.56# and in Chandauli tehsil 21.29# so

• far as the Varanasi district is concerned. In case of

Allahabad district the last decadal growth in ManihanpurI tehsil is 25.84%.

I

G - ! I

The present and design population have been

projected on the basis of linear projection of last

decadal growth is the tehsi} concerned for rural

areas through 1971-81.•

5.0 TECHNICAL DESIGNS

The schemes have feeen designed strictly in

| accerdance with design criteria diftAribed in para 3.0.of this report.

6.0 GEOHYDROLOGICAL ASPECTS

I As already stated in para 3.4. of this report,tubewells are successful in the area according to

I the information gathered from the Central Ground Water

_ Board. Ihe tubewells already bored in the area by

J.al Nigam for other drinking water supply schemes are• normally 100 to 150 m deep giving a\ safe discharge from

1400 l.p.m. to 2200 l,p,m. The irrigation dept-t.

| tubewells are giving a bit more discharge in sane areas.

_ The water quality of th se tubewells is also reported

• - to be with in safe limits*

I It is -therefore, clear that tubewells can safely

be proposed as reliable source of water supply for these

I schemes.

. 7.0 PROJECT COST ESTIMATE

According to the forecast of cost already

• submitted the tentative cost of sub project II- East

(Revised) Installment -I was proposed as below :-

II

G - 12

IIII• Varanasi district - Ra. 591.16 lacs (9 schemes)

• Allahabad district - Ra. 140.00 lacs: (2 schemes)

• total : Rs* 731*16 lacs

I ' So far only 8 detailed schemes of Varanasi

district andlscheme of Allahabad district could be

ft proposed and are now being proposed under Installment-

• !• There cost estimates are as below :-

Varanasi district Rs » 581,83 lac (8 scheme)

I Allahabad district Rs. 90.23 lac (1 scheme)

Ra. 672.06 laca

• These schemes are still under appraisal of the

U.P.Jal Nigam appraisal cell and slight variation

• in their costa can not be ruled out art the stage as

• . a result of the appraisal.

8.0 TIMING AND PHASING

^ 8.1 It is expected that the final appraisal report

• to sub project II East (Revised) Installment-I

including 8 schemes of Varanasi district and 1 scheme

• of Allahabad district, will be submitted to Dutch Govt,

for approval sometimes in May 1985 and green signalI to start the execution of these schemes will be

• available by July 1985.

It is, therefore, proposed to start the work

I on these schemes in July 1985 and is proposed to be

completed by the end of December 1987.

I

G - 13

IIII - 10 -

I• 8.2 The works are proposed under various

phases as per essential constructional activities

I and requirements. The disbursement of funds

shall be proposed accordingly in the final

m Appraisal report*

IIII1IIIIIIII

UTTAR PRADESH RURAL V/ATER SUPPLY PROJECT

SUBPROJECT

UNDER DUTCH CREDIT PROGRAMME

II (EAST) (Revised) INSTALMENT- I

DISTRICT VARANASI & ALLAHABAD

Table showing variation in forecast of cost and detailed

No. of village s coveredSINo

in C20. Mane of Scheme fore cast of Detailed Design/[p• cost Project of schem

HY)opulatione ire

project

Total Project costEstimate in(Lac.Rs.)

fore cast Detailed forecast Detailedof cost Project of cost Project

1. 2 3 4 5 6 7

DISTRICT - VARANASITehsil i Cyanpur

1.

2.

3.

4.5.

6.

7.

Inargaon gr.of vill.W/Sscheme

Kasldaha gr.of vill.W/Sscheme

Rohi gr. of vill. W/Sscheme

iairi bisa " «'Biranpur " "

Tehsil : Varanasi

Jansa gr.of

Hathi Barni

vill. ¥/SScheme

gr*of Vill W/S

20

It-

351717

24

26

20

11

351717

24

26

36500

32630

389423668024800

25400

25860

36500

32630

389423668026800

25415

25860

74

67

827462

63

64

.51

.34

.97

.45

.00

.50

.65

79

72

897872

62

63

a

o

.65 -.0

•31

.64

.86

.88

.95

.13Scheme

Contd..........2

•1 2

Tehsil t Chandauli

8. Awajapur gr.of vill«W/SScheme

* W9. Mahadapur gr.of vill.Vf/SScheme

Total Jbr-Varanasi DistrictDISTRICT -ALLAHABADTehsil Manihanpur '

1 . Chhekwa group pofvillages. W/S scheme

* *2. Kosam Khiraj group ofvillages W./S scheme

Total for Allahabaddistrict

Grand Total for thesub project

3 4

16 16

13

179 t66

11 11

12

23 11

202 177

5

19900

20788

263500

26530

29570

561:00

319600

fc

19900

-

242727

26530

-

26530

269257

7

49.75

51 .97

591.16

66.00

74.00

140.00

731.16

8

62.21

-

581 .83

oiUl

90.23

-

90.23

672.06

* * Detailed project not prepared and not included in Installment - I.

MASTER PLAN OF DISTRICT VARANASJm. .1 • LEV. 4 ?

UMDER DUTCH CREDIT 5t"B PROJ E.CT-U tASTINSTALLMtNT -I -

1 INARGAOHZ K.A3ICU.MA5A

5 BIRAMPUR6. JANSA7- MATMIfl.

NATIONAL HIGHWAYRAILWAY L I N L B-Q

3CWIMI UMOU t«CUT»N

ALNIGAM

oI

\ o•»

I ° ' s * R i c r

5 —

fi\W\\Iliuniis s j l S f l ! ?a ^ < i i i § uI S 5 l 5 ? f ? R*• f 1 ! - - » . » ,

/!i!fiin


H - 1

ANNEX H

SALIENT FEATURES OF SCHEMES PROPOSED FOR REPLACEMENT OF OLD SUB-PROJECTII (EAST), NOW SUB-PROJECT IV (design population not yet adapted)

Scheme name

BlockTehsilDistrictNo. of villages

Population

ROHI

Rate of water supplyNature of sourceSourceTreatment

Overhead tank:

GyanpurGyanpurVaranasi35 inhabited + 5 uninhabited12 scarcity + 23 non-scarcityinitial stage (1987) : 21187intermediate stage (2002): 30054final stage (2017) : 3894270 litres per capita and per daygroundwater

: tubewell: safety chlorination (bleaching powder solution)dosing capacity: minimum 0.5 mg/1

maximum 2.0 mg/1material: reinforced concretecapacity: 1000 m3

20 mstaging :Distribution system:

peak demand rateterminal pressure

Public standpostPrivate connections (target)

Estimated capital cost:Per capita cost

Annual maintenance costs

Per capita maintenance costs

Cost of water per 1000 litres

: 2.4 times average demand: minimummaximum

198720022017

198720022017198720022017198720022017198720022017

6.00 m19.33 m160 Nos.182 Nos.

1074 Nos.1669 Nos.Rs. 8.946 millionRs. 423Rs. 298Rs. 230Rs. 151,600Rs. 215,300Rs. 298,300Rs . 7. 15 per annumRs. 7. 16 per annumRs. 7.66 per annumRs. 0.37Rs. 0.37Rs. 0.40


H - 2

Scheme name


Population


KASIDAHA

GyanpurGyanpurVaranasi11 inhabited, of which:11 scarcityinitial stage (1987) : 17760intermediate stage (2002): 25190final stage (2017) : 3263070 litres per capita and per daygroundwatertubewellsafety chlorination (bleaching powder solution)dosing capacity: minimum 0.5 rag/1

maximum 1.0 mg/1Overhead tank: material: reinforced concrete

capacity: 750 m3staging : 18 m

Distribution system:peak demand rate : 2.4 times average demandterminal pressure:

Public standpostPrivate connections (target)

Estimated capital cost:Per capita cost

Annual maintenance costs

Per capita maintenance costs

Cost of water per 1000 litres

: minimur

198720022017

198720022017198720022017198720022017198720022017

n: 6.00 ra104 Nos.152 Nos.900 Nos.

1398 Nos.Rs. 7.231 millionRs. 407Rs. 287Rs. 222Rs. 130,600Rs. 200,100Rs. 278,800Rs. 7.35 per annumRs . 7.94 per annumRs . 8.54 per annumRs. 0.38Rs. 0.42Rs. 0.45


H - 3

Scheme name


Population


BIRAMPUR

Gyanpur and SuriyawanGyanpurVaranasi17 inhabited, of which:17 scarcityinitial stage (1987) : 14570intermediate stage (2002): 20675final stage (2017) : 2680070 litres per capita and per daygroundwatertubewellsafety chlorination (bleaching powder solution)dosing capacity: minimum 0.5 mg/1


capacity: 750 m3staging : 20 m

Distribution system:peak demand rate : 2.4 times average demandterminal pressure: minimum: 6.00 m

Public standpostPrivate connections (target) : 1987

20022017

Estimated capital cost:Per capita cost : 1987

2002: 2017

Annual maintenance costs : 198720022017

Per capita maintenance costs : 198720022017

Cost of water per 1000 litres : 198720022017

18 Nos.125 Nos.740 Nos.

1157 Nos.Rs. 7.288 million

500353272107,000163,800237,8007.34 per annum7.92 per annum8.87 per annum0.380.410.46

Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.


H - 4

Scheme name


Population


BAIRIBISA

DeeghGyanpurVaranasi17 inhabited + 8 uninhabited7 scarcity + 10 non-scarcityinitial stage (1987) : 19960intermediate stage (2002): 28320final stage (2017) : 3668070 litres per capita and per daygroundwatertubewe11safety chlorination (bleaching powder solution)dosing capacity: minimum 0.5 mg/1maximum 1.0 mg/1

Overhead tank: material: reinforced concretecapacity: 1000 m3staging : 20 m

Distribution system:peak demand rate :terminal pressure:

Public standpostPrivate connections (target) : 1(

2<21

Estimated capital cost:Per capita cost : 1!

21: 21

Annual maintenance costs : 1!212(

Per capita maintenance costs : 1!2121

Cost of water per 1000 litres : 1!

2.4 times average demandminimum

870217

870217870217870217870217

6.00 m131 Nos.171 Nos.

1011 Nos.1572 Nos.Rs. 7.886 millionRs. 395Rs. 278Rs. 215Rs. 145,700Rs. 221,500Rs. 304,200Rs. 7.30 per annumRs. 7.82 per annumRs. 8.29 per annumRs. 0.38Rs. 0.41-Rs. 0.43


H - 5

Scheme name : INARGAON

GyanpurVaranasi20 inhabited + 16 uninhabited16 scarcity + 4 non-scarcityinitial stage (1987) : 19700intermediate stage (2002): 28000final stage (2017) : 3650070 litres per capita and per daygroundwatertubewellsafety chlorination (bleaching powder solution)dosing capacity: minimum 0.5 mg/1


capacity: 1000 m3staging: 20 m

Distribution system:peak demand rate: 2.4 times average demand

TehsilDistrictNo. of villages

Population


terminal pressure: minimumPublic standpostPrivate connections (target) : 1987

20022017


20022017




6.00 m106 Nos.169 Nos.

1000 Nos.1564 Nos.Rs. 7.965 million

404284218143,100219,100303,600


.26

.83

.32

.38

.41

per annumper annumper annum

0.43


H - 6

Scheme name

BlockTehsilDistrictNo. of villagesPopulation


AWAJAPUR

DhamapurChandauliVaranasi16 inhabited + 1 uninhabitedinitial stage (1987) : 12700intermediate stage (2002) : 16300final stage (2017) : 19900

: 70 litres per capita and per day: groundwater: tubewell: safety chlorination (bleaching powder solution)dosing capacity: minimum 0.5 mg/1

maximum 1.0 mg/1


Distribution system:peak demand rate m: 2.4 timesterminal pressure: minimum


20022017


20022017 '




average demand6.00 m63 Nos.109 Nos.582 Nos.853 Nos.Rs. 6.241 millionRs. 491Rs. 383Rs. 314Rs. 113,500Rs. 167,800Rs. 235,200Rs. 8.94 per annumRs. 10.29 per annumRs. 11.82 per annumRs. 0.46Rs. 0.54Rs. 0.62


H - 7

Scheme name


Population


HATHI BARNI

SewapuriVaranasiVaranasi26 inhabited + 2 uninhabited26 scarcityinitial stage (1987) : 15400intermediate stage (2002) : 20630final stage (2017) : 2586070 litres per capita and per daygroundwatertubewellsafety chlorination (bleaching powder solution)dosing capacity: minimum 0.5 mg/1

maximum 1.0 mg/1




20022017


20022017




average demand6.00 m94 Nos.132 Nos.736 Nos.1100 Nos.Rs. 6.313 millionRs. 410Rs. 306Rs. 244Rs. 112,500Rs. 164,900Rs. 213,600Rs. 7.30 per annumRs. 7.99 per annumRs. 8.26 per annumRs. 0.30Rs. 0.41Rs. 0.43


H - 8

Scheme name


Population


JANSA

SewapuriVaranasiVaranasi21 inhabited + 3 uninhabited21 scarcityinitial stage (1987) 15120intermediate stage (2002) 20275final stage (2017) 2541570 litres per capita and per daygroundwatertubewe11safety chlorination (bleaching powder solution)dosing capacity: minimum 0.5 mg/1

maximum 1.0 mg/1

Overhead tank: material: reinforced concretecapacity: 750 m3staging : 18 ro



20022017


20022017




average demand6.00 m82 Nos.130 Nos.725 Nos.

1090 Nos.Rs. 6.295 million

416310248118,000171,400215,5007.80 per annum8.45 per annum


8.48 per annum0.400.440.44


H - 9

Scheme name


Population


CHHEKAWA

KaushambiManihanpurAllahabad11 inhabited, of which:8 scarcity + 3 non-scarcityinitial stage (1987) : 15877final stage (2017) : 2653070 litres per capita and per daygroundwatertubewe11safety chlorination (bleaching powder solution)dosing capacity: minimum 0.5 mg/1

maximum 2.0 mg/1



maximumPublic standpostPrivate connections (target) : 1987

20022017


20022017




average demand17.14 m6.00 m83 Nos.136 Nos.757 Nos.1137 Nos.Rs. 9.023 million

568425340113,700170,500233,9007.16 per annum


8.04 per annum8.82 per annum0.280.310.35

report on mission 12 to uttar pradesh · report on mission 12 to uttar pradesh(u p~ 1 2.) sector:...

Documents