report on farmers’ field school (ffs) farmers’ field day

34
Ministry of Water Resources Bangladesh Water Development Board Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) & Farmers’ Field Day (FFD) (Year: 2018- 2019) AGRICULTURE Institutional Strengthening and Project Management Consultant Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project-AF September 2019

Upload: others

Post on 18-Nov-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

Ministry of Water Resources

Bangladesh Water Development Board

Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS)&

Farmers’ Field Day (FFD)(Year: 2018- 2019)

AGRICULTURE

Institutional Strengthening and Project Management ConsultantSouthwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and

Management Project-AF

September 2019

Page 2: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

FOREWORDS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

It is my pleasure to publish this report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) and Farmers’ Field Day (FFD)

conducted during the year 2018-19. This is important for the reason that this was the first attempt ofimplementation of technology transfer to the farmers’ level by Southwest Area Integrated Water

Resources Planning and Management Project (SAIWRPMP), Phase-2 and it was very much successful toachieve the objectives.

To Boost up Agricultural production through removal of drainage congestion with necessary controlmechanism of flood, drainage and retention of water for irrigation through people’s participation, is one of

the main objectives among others. For the purpose, provision of Demonstration, Training, FFS, FFD,Workshop, etc. as extension tools have been kept in DPP of the project with necessary fund support.

Accordingly, in the first year 45 demonstrations and 45 FFSs were conducted on the latest ModernVarieties of Rice released from BRRI. Through this programs we could convey the message to 6,659

farmers directly which created an impulse throughout area. The program will be continuing regularly up tothe end of the project duration (2022).

The program was conducted with the technical support of DAE as per MoU signed between BWDB andDAE. I extend my heartfelt thanks to Deputy Director, DAE, Faridpur Mr. Kartic Chandra Chakroborty and

Mr. Md. Zahidul Amin, Deputy Director, DAE, Magura for their keen cooperation and active participationfrom very beginning of this program. Thanks is also due to Upazilla Agriculture Officer (UAO) of Faridpur

Sadar, Saltha, Boalmari, Alfadanga, Bhanga, Sadarpur and Shalikha Upazilla for their direct participationand duly deputation of well-trained Sub-Assistant Agriculture Officers for taking class of the FFS.

I am grateful to the Project Director, Mr. Md. Anisul Islam who all time kept the program under his

intensive monitoring and advised to make the program a success.

I recognize the great contribution of Mr. Md. Masud Karim, Principal Extension Officer and Head of theWMO Development Unit of PMO, BWDB, Faridpur who with his Officers implemented the total program incollaboration with DAE. Special Thanks is due to Mr. Md. Hafizur Rahman, Deputy Chief Extension

Officer, PMO, BWDB, Faridpur for his untiring effort to implement all the sequences of the program duly.The remarkable and sincere services rendered by Mr. Abdur Razzak, Asstt. Chief Sociology and Mr. Md.

Amimul Ehsan, Asstt. Chief Fisheries, PMO, BWDB, Faridpur are highly appreciated. I remember Dr.Mahtab Hossain, Executive Engineer, Specialized Division, BWDB, Faridpur with thanks who would grace

most of the functions by his Spontaneous presence.

My heartiest gratitude to the Team Leader, Mr. Robert Roostee and Deputy Team Leader, Mr. Ataul Haq,ISPMC, SW project for their continuous support and advice whenever and wherever felt necessary.

Sincere appreciation is expressed to my colleague consultants of ISPMC for their boundless inspiration

and support in implementation of the program. The remarkable and untiring services rendered by SFs

and CFs are highly appreciated.

The report is published mainly for extension personnel; however I believe it will be useful to concernedstakeholders engaged in crop production system.

Md. Abul HashemAgriculture Extension Specialist

Page 3: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

Abbreviations:

AF : Additional Financing

AESA : Agro-ecosystem analysisACS : Assistant Chief Sociology

ACF : Assistant Chief FisheriesBBT : Ballot Box TestBWDB : Bangladesh Water Development BoardCF : Community FacilitatorCARE : Cooperation of American Relief EverywhereDPP : Development Project ProformaDAE : Department of Agricultural ExtensionDCEO : Deputy Chief Extension OfficerDD : Deputy DirectorDTO : District Training OfficerFFD : Farmers’ Field DayFFS : Farmers’ Field SchoolFAO : Food and Agriculture OrganizationFCDI : Flood Control Drainage & IrrigationHYV : High Yielding VarietyIPM : Integrated Pest ManagementISPMC : Institutional Strengthening and Project Management ConsultantLGI : Local Government InstituteMoU : Memorandum of UnderstandingPMO : Project Management OfficePEO : Principal Extension OfficeSF : Senior FacilitatorSAIWRPMP : Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management ProjectSAAO : Sub-Assistant Agriculture OfficerUAO : Upazilla Agriculture Officer

WMO : Water Management Organization

WMG : Water Management GroupXEN : Executive Engineer

Page 4: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Contents Page no.

Abbreviations

1. Introduction 1

1. 1 Agricultural Objectives 1

1. 2 Agricultural Technology Transfer 1

2. Farmers’ Field School (FFS) 2

2. 1 Background of FFS 2

2. 2 Key Principles of Farmers’ Field School 3

2. 3 How does FFS Benefit the Farmers 3

2. 4 Implementation of Farmers’ Field School 3

2. 4. 1 Steps of Farmer Selection 4

2. 4. 2 Farmer Selection Criteria for FFS 4

2. 5 Course Administration 5

2. 6 Course Curriculum and Session Plan 5

2. 7 Course Evaluation 5

2. 7. 1 Ballot Box Test (BBT) 5

2. 7. 2 Procedures of Ballot Box Test (BBT) 6

2. 7. 3 Post Evaluation 9

3. Dissemination of FFS Learnings 9

3. 1 Farmers’ Field Day (FFD) 10

3. 2 Objective of FFD 10

3. 3 Arrangement of FFD Events 11

3. 4 Activities of the Day 11

3. 5 Guests of the Day 12

3. 6 Presentation of Learning Experience by the FFS Participants 12

3. 7 Open Discussion 12

3. 8 Guests’ Opinion 13

4. Conclusion 14

Pictures of Interview with the Media Persons 10

Paper Cuttings 14-15

Some Pictures of Crop Cutting 15-16

Some Pictures of FFS/FFD 17, 25-27

Page 5: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

Contents Page no.

Tables

Table-1: Sub-project wise no. of FFS and Participants 3

Table-2: Curriculum/Session Plan of Farmers’ Field School 7-8

Table-3: Post Evaluation Result 9

Table-4: Awareness campaign on FFS Learnings 9

Table-5: Sub-project wise FFD Participants 10

Annexures

Annex.-1. List of Demonstration and FFS under Beel Sukunia Sub-project 18

Annex.-1. 1 List of Demonstration and FFS under Chatlar-Fakurhat Sub-project 19

Annex.-1. 2 List of Demonstration and FFS under Kalidaskhali-Arpara Sub-project 20

Annex.-1. 3 List of Demonstration and FFS under Alfadanga-Boalmari andDaduria-Kandur Beel Sub-project

21

Annex.-2. Crop Cutting Report 22-24

Page 6: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

1

Report on Farmers Field School (FFS) and Farmers Field Day (FFD)

1. Introduction

The Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project (SAIWRPMP)

started working from June 2017 with a target to implement 9 sub-projects commanding an area of

83,996 ha. The impact of the project will be enhancement of economic growth and reduced poverty in

the rural areas in the selected districts of southwest area of Bangladesh. The outcome will be enhanced

productivity and sustainability of the selected existing FCDI systems, which could contribute to

increasing incomes and livelihood standards of disadvantaged groups, including women.

Uptil December 2019, nine Sub-unit areas of 5 Sub-projects have been made ready for work within the

Participatory Framework. Demonstration and Farmers’ Field School (FFS) as technology transfer tools

to the farmers level have been first started from the Rabi Season of the year 2018-19 with a view to

enhance productivity and increase income of the people of the project area.

1.1 Agricultural Objectives

To attain the outcome of the project the following objectives are undertaken:

Change in Land Type through project intervention thereby increase in flood free cultivable land

which create opportunity for more crop cultivation.

Modern Technology transfer to the Farmers’ level.

Increase in HYV Crop area.

Change in Cropping Pattern and increase in Cropping Intensity.

Increase in total agricultural production.

1.2. Agricultural Technology Transfer

To improve the existing agricultural conditions and to transfer the modern technology to the farmers’

level, the following development programs have been undertaken for enhancement of agricultural

productivity of the project areas envisased in the DPP of the project.

Training

Demonstration

Farmers’ Field School (FFS)

Farmers’ Field Day (FFD)

Workshop/Fair

Motivational Tour

The project already started implementation of technology transfer activities through the different

agricultural enhancement programs. Upto June 2019, 1175 farmers have been given class room

training on crop production technology and high value crops. During the year 2018-19 in Rabi Season

45 demonstrations were conducted in 5 sub-projects, with a FFS in each demonstration site (Table-1 &

Annex.-1) to educate the farmers by seeing and doing technique in each stage of the crop development

cycle from seed to seed.

Page 7: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

2

2. Farmers Field School (FFS)FFS is a group-based adult learning approach that teaches farmers how to experiment and solve

problems independently. Sometimes called “schools without walls”. In FFS, groups of farmers meet

regularly with a facilitator, observe, talk,

ask questions, and learn together. The

FFS approach is an innovative,

participatory and interactive learning

approach that emphasizes problem

solving and discovery based learning. It

aims to build farmers’ capacity to

analyze their production systems,

identify problems, test possible solutions,

and eventually encourage the

participants to adopt the practices most

suitable to their farming systems. FFS

can also provide an opportunity for farmers to practice and test/evaluate sustainable land use

technologies, and introduce new technologies through comparing their conventional technologies

developed with their own tradition and culture.

FFS is usually a time bound activity (generally one agricultural production cycle or a year), involving a

group (commonly 20-30) of farmers. It is facilitated by extension staff or – increasingly – by farmer

facilitators (FFs). The method emphasizes group observation, discussion, analysis, presentation, and

collective decision making and actions. Such process builds self-confidence, particularly for women,

poor.

Our farmers are mostly less educated or illiterate. Class room and institutional training has been proved

to be unsuccessful for rapid expansion of modern technology and skill development of the farmers

within the expected time effectively. This is why Farmers’ Field School technique of training and

education is being popular day by day. This technique helps develop farmers’ knowledge and expertise

on improved modern technology by doing in field through experimental and practical learning activities

that motivate them to accept the new tehnology very quickly with confident, whereas in traditional

farmers training and motivation system farmers shows very slow and steady mode in acceptance and

shows a doubtful attitude. It is a horaizontal learning system where knowledge spreads from farmer to

farmer. The neighboring farmers are also become motivated observing long term practical process of

training in their own environment. FFS is a experience-based and field-centered training process.

Southwest project helps in increasing knowledge and skill of the farmers through implementation of

FFS to boost up the agricultural production of the project area.

2.1. Background of FFSIt is known that FFS was first started in Indonasia during ninetees. With the help of FAO of United

Nations’ Organization (UNO), Agriculture Department of Indonasia first started FFS among the rice

farmers under the IPM program. CARE, Bangladesh, first introduced this program in the INTER FISH

and NOPEST project under their NAR Sector. Subsequently, they started this FFS system in other

Page 8: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

3

projects of NAR Sector and Homestead Programs. At present, Department of Agriculture Extension

(DAE) is working on FFS as their regular program. Other countries in Asia like Phillipines,Vietnam,

Nepal, China, some countries of Africa and Central Africa, America started this system of farmers

education and learning. As per FAO report, by 2009, the FFS approach has been practiced in more

than 92 countries of the world. Now, FFS has become a popular system of Farmers’ training in the

world and Bangladesh as well. Southwest Project introduced the FFS concept in the first phase from

the year 2009-10 and it is still continuing in the Second Phase (AF) and started implemention from the

Rabi season of the year 2019. Two hundred eighty seven (287) FFSs have been planned to implement

during the project period as per provision of DPP.

2.2 Key Principles of Farmer Field School

The field is the learning place.

Facilitation, not teaching.

Hands-on and discovery-based learning.

The farmer as expert.

Equity and no hierarchy.

Integrated and learner-defined curriculum.

Comparative experiments

Agro-ecosystem analysis (AESA).

Demand driven Special topics.

Team building and social animation.

Participatory monitoring and evaluation.

2.3 How does FFS Benefit the Farmers

1. Strengthening observation capability and increasing knowledge ownership through discovery

based learning.

2. Building self-confidence and enhancing decision-making capacity.

3. Minimizing risks in experimenting with new practices.

4. Changing deep-rooted beliefs, prejudices and practices.

5. Developing problem-solving capabilities.

2.4. Implementation of Farmers’ Field School

During the year 2018-19 in Rabi Season 45 demonstrations were conducted in 5 sub-projects, with aFFS in each demonstration site (Table-1). The no. of farmers participants of an FFS was 30 fromneighboring Water Management Groups (WMGs). A total of 1350 farmers (male 898 and female 452)were imparted training under this program (Annex.-1).

Table-1: Sub-project wise no. of FFS and Participants

Sl. no. Name of Sub-projectsNo. ofFFS

No. of Participants (FFS Students)

Male Female Total

1. Beel Sukunia Sub-project 13 256 134 390

2. Chatlar-Fukurhat Sub-project 12 235 125 360

3. Kalidashkhali-Arpara Sub-project 13 260 130 390

4. Alfadanga-Boalmari Sub-project 4 80 40 1205. Daduria-Kandur Beel Sub-project 3 67 23 90

Page 9: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

4

Total: 45 898 452 1350

The Senior Facilitators (SFs) and Community Facilitators (CFs) selected the member farmers in

consultation with the concerned WMGs with the help of Project Management Office (PMO) and ISPMC

Consultants of the project.

The following were the steps and criteria for selection of Farmers for the FFS.

2.4.1 Steps of Farmer Selection:

1. An initial meeting with the WMG Committee where the the criteria for farmer selection are

discussed.

2. Household visits by SFs & CFs to identify most suitable candidates with their resouces.

3. Finalize the the final list of 30 participants in consultation with the WMG.

2.4.2 Farmer Selection Criteria for the FFS:

1. Number :The FFS will have a total of 30 farmers. Only 1 (one) person per farming family tobe selected.

2. Gender : FFS participants will be mixed of both men and women. The men/women ratiowill depend on the topics of the FFS, but at least 40% of the participants should bewomen.

3. Relevance :The participants should be selected considering the modules in the FFS, whichshould be relevant for them. For example, for an FFS with agriculture module, weneed participants who have suitable land for the selected crop. For fish module,we need participants who have a pond. For a beef module we need participantswho have a cow. Those who are directly involved in WMO-managed CollectiveAction (CA) like fish pond or crop production too, could be selected (WMO cannominate).

4. Farm size : Give priority to poor and landless farmers. It may be useful to have one or twomore experienced farmers in the group, but emphasis should be on smaller,poorer farmers who can increase their production and income.

5. Education : Do not select only literate people. Because also illiterate farmers should betrained in the FFS. In fact, for an illiterate farmer it is even more important to getthe possibility to attend an FFS. The training aims at empowerment of farmers.

6. Location : An FFS with farmers who live very close together is easier to organize. But if youselect farmers who are spread out over the entire WMG area there will be moreopportunity for horizontal learning (as more other farmers get exposed to the FFSactivities). If Criteria favors, select farmers from each of the villages of a WMGproportionately. So, try to find a good balance.

7. Attitude : Select enthusiastic and dynamic persons who will be interested in the FFS topicsand who will be willing to attend all sessions and to share their experiences withother farmers (horizontal learning). Explain that each FFS farmer is expected toshare what s/he learned with 2 or 3 other farmers.

8. Experience : Select farmers with no previous FFS or similar training experience.

9. Age : Select preferably younger farmers, at least below the age of 50.

Page 10: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

5

2.5 Course Adminstration

As per Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between BWDB and DAE, implementation of agriculture

development program is being done with technical support of District and Upazilla level officials of DAE.

The consultant and the PMO Officers (PEO & DCEO) did several meetings with the concerned Deputy

Director (DD) and Upazilla Agriculture Officers (UAO) to materialize the MoU and implementation of

agricultural programs. DAE took over the the responsibility for implementation of FFS and

Demonstration. They deputed two Sub Assistant Agriculture Officer (SAAO) with IPM and FFS skill for

each FFS. DD and UAO frequently visited the the activities. Monitoring was done by both PMO and

ISPMC Consultants.

2.6 Course Curriculum and Session Plan

The course curriculum was designed as per discussion with DAE officers. There were 11-weeks’

session plan with two sessions a day in each week i.e. 22 sessions were held in 11 weeks in weekly

basis. Each week out of two sessions, first session was assigned to UAO and the second session was

assigned to SAAO. The 11-week program is mentioned in Table-2. The Training Module was prepared

accordingly.

2.7 Course Evaluation

. The target group of FFS are mainly illiterate and poor farmers. Evaluation of such a group of

partipants are very difficult. Considering this, a pictorial and multiple choice system test called Ballot

Box Test (BBT) was adopted, which the trainees enjoyed much. Through Ballot procedure both pre-test

and post-test were done

2.7.1 Ballot Box Test (BBT)To test farmers at the beginning of an FFS we use a “Ballot Box Test”. It is not really about testing the

farmers’ knowledge, but rather a way of showing them the gaps in their knowledge as a way of

preparing them for what they can expect to learn during the coming FFS sessions. Similarly, after

completion of the course, a post evaluation is done to understand how far the knowledge gap has been

minimized. Usually a test consists of about 10-20 questions. Farmers answer each question by

choosing between 3 answers. They select their answer by putting a piece of paper containing their ID

no. in the ballot box. In the pre-test, individual score is not impotant rather we want to find out how

many farmers knew the correct answer and how many did not. The results of the test can then

imm

edia

tely

be

use

d to

Page 11: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

6

start discussions about these topics. In the post-test individual score/mark is recorded.

2.7.2 Procedures of Ballot Box Test (BBT)

Set 10 questions with 3 answers following thecourse contents and prepare 10 set of ballot boxwith one question in each.

Explain the BBT to the participants detail.

Show Ballot Box and say, one answer to be selectfor vot from 3 alternative answers.

Hang the Ballot Box with tree, wall of a house or apillar at a distance 6-8 meter by thread/rope.

Give 10 small ballot papers bearing ID/Roll no. toeach participants.

One participants can give one vote for eachquestion.

Each participants will be allowed 50 seconds time toanswer a question and after that the Facilitator willgive whistle to move forward.

Page 12: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

7

Page 13: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

8

Table-2: Curriculum/Session Plan of Farmers’ Field School

Name of FFS: Place/Venue :

Session Day Date Time Session Topics ResourcePersons

1 3.00 to 5.40 PM

InaugurationPre-test by Ballot Box Test (BBT)

Rules and regulation of FFS, Group formation, Group Leader selection and

Naming the GroupUAO

Characteristics of good seeds, Seed selection and germination test. Preparation of

an ideal seed bed, taking care of a seed bed. Collection of Inputs jointly.Duties and responsibilities of Farmers sub-committee

Evluation of the day and inform the next session topics.

SAAO

2 3.00 to 5.40 PM

Land preparation, Basal dose of fertilizers, Technique of seedling transplantation| UAO

Functions of different fertilizers and symptoms of fertilizer deficiency, Importance

and use of organic manure.Evaluation of the day and declare the next session topics.

SAAO

33.00 to 5.40 PM

Seedling uprooting, carrying, methods of transplantation and water management.

Integrated Pest Management (IPM).UAO

Use of organic and herbal insecticides for control of insect pest. adverse reactionof insecticides. Evaluation of the day and declare the next session topics.

SAAO

43.00 to 5.40 PM

Growth Phase and Stages of a Rice plant. UAOWhat is Agro-ecosystem analysis (AESA)? Why and how it is done? Evaluation ofthe day and declare the next session topics

SAAO

53.00 to 5.40 PM

Irrigation, weed control and field observation. UAO

Pest management of field crops (stem borer insect and blast diseasemanagement)Evaluation of the day and declare the next session topics

SAAO

3.00 to 5.40 PMCrop field observation, beneficial insect preservation and fostering. Prepare insect-

pest museum.UAO

Page 14: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

9

Session Day Date Time Session Topics ResourcePersons

6 Pest management of field crops (Case warm insect and Sheath blight diseasemanagement)Evaluation of the day and declare the next session topics

SAAO

7 3.00 to 5.40 PM

Pest management of Field crops (Brown plant hopper and Bacterial leaf blightdisease management)

UAO

Crop field observation, collect, sorting and identification of beneficiary and harmful

insect.Evaluation of the day and declare the next session topics.

SAAO

8 3.00 to 5.40 PM

Familiar with AWD method and discuss on importance of AWD method to saveirrigation.

UAO

Pest management of Field crops ( Rice bug pest and false smurt diseasemanagement)Evaluation of the day and declare the next session topics.

SAAO

9

3.00 to 5.40 PM

Pest management of Field crops (Ear cutting caterpillar pest and tungro diseasemanagement).Mouse control.

UAO

Discussion on seed production technology and roughing.Evaluation of the day and declare the next session topics.

SAAO

103.00 to 5.40 PM

Role and importance of woman in Agriculture.Post-test by Ballot Box Test (BBT)

UAO

Discuss on Soil health protection( strategy against nutrition loss and nutritionconservation)Evaluation of the day and declare the next session topics.

SAAO

113.00 to 5.40 PM

Crop cutting and result analysis. Seed collecting, processing and storage. UAO

Pest management of grain storage SAAONote: Day & date have not been mentioned in the table. Because, the program was conducted in different dates in different places.

Page 15: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

10

2.7.3 Post Evaluation

Post-evaluation was done by BBT in each FFS

following an awareness campaign (Closing event /

Farmers’ Field Day (FFD). FFDs were done in larger

dimension. In the closing event, neighboring farmers

and social elites were invited to desssiminate the

FFS learnings. The post evaluation result is

mentioned below in table-3.

Table-3: Post-Evaluation result

Sl.no.

Name of Sub-projectsMarks obtained

No. ofParticipants

> 80 > 60 > 40 < 40

1. Beel Sukunia Sub-project99(25)

125(32)

63(16)

103(26)

390(100)

2. Chatlar-Fukurhat Sub-project36(10)

37(10.3)

130(36)

157(44)

360(100)

3. Kalidashkhali-Arpara Sub-project39(10)

343(88)

8(2)

0390

(100)

4. Alfadanga-Boalmari Sub-project120

(100)0 0 0

120(100)

5. Daduria-Kandur Beel Sub-project90

(100)0 0 0

90(100)

Total:384(29)

505(37)

201(15)

260(19)

1350(100)

oNote: Figures in the parentheses indicate percentages

3. Dissemination of FFS LearningDuring the year 2018-19, 45 FFSs and 45 Demonstrations were conducted in the Rabi season. Ineach FFS, there were 30 farmer participants. All the programs were successfully implemented. EachFFS was ended with a closing ceremony with the participation of local stakeholders. Of these, 13

Farmers’ Field Day (FFD) were observed in a befitting manner with ceremonious display andexhibition of different agricultural technologies with active participation of all WMG members of the

area, local elites, teachers, officials of the Line Agencies, ISPC Consultants and concerned BWDBofficials. In the awareness campaign of FFS (32 Closing Events and 13 FFDs) a total 6,659 peoplewere participated including 3,930 female participants (table-4).

Table-4: Awareness Campaign on FFS Learnings

Sl.no.

Name of Sub-projectsNo. ofFFS

AwarenessCampaign

No. of Participants

Closing Events FFD Male Female Total

1. Beel Sukunia Sub-project 13 10 4 860 1187 2047

2. Chatlar-Fukurhat Sub-project 12 9 3 663 1101 17643. Kalidashkhali-Arpara Sub-project 13 10 3 700 1067 1767

4. Alfadanga-Boalmari Sub-project 4 2 2 302 348 650

5. Daduria-Kandur Beel Sub-project 3 2 1 204 227 431

Total: 45 33 13 2729 3930 6659

Page 16: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

11

3.1 Farmers Field Day (FFD)FFD is the most useful method of Extension to disseminate

technology in a broad spectram of local stakeholders. Among

the 45 FFSs, 13 FFDs were arranged, one for each variety of

demonstration in a sub-project (Table-5). A total of 3,023

participants of different categories attended in the FFD. On an

average 232 participants attended per FFD. The Journalists

and media persons published news in some local and national

Daily Papers, and broadcast in Channel i and Boishakhi

Channel. Photocopy of some Paper cuttings and some

photos of FFD observation are shown in last pages.

3.2 Objective of FFDField day is one of the most important vital and effective

methods which disseminates modern technology at the

shortest possible time. It helps the people of the surrounding

areas as well as farmers to know the latest technologies. Field

day also creates a liaison with other development organizations.

Table-5: Sub-project wise FFD Participants

Sl. no. Name of Sub-projectNo. ofFFD

No. of Participants

Male Female Total

1. Beel Sukunia Sub-project 4 425 622 1047

2. Chatlar-Fukurhat Sub-project 3 312 486 798

3. Kalidashkhali-Arpara Sub-project 3 227 285 512

4. Alfadanga-Boalmari Sub-project 2 221 229 450

5. Daduria-Kandur Beel Sub-project 1 108 108 216

Total: 13 1293 1730 3023

Average: 99 133 232

Page 17: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

12

Interview with the Media Persons : Md. Abul Hashem, Agriculture Extension Specialist (Left) andMd. Abdur Razzak, Asstt. Chief Sociology, BWDB (Right)

3.3 Arrangement of FFD Events

Booth-1 : Identification of Fertilizers

Booth-2 : Ideal Seed bed, Line Sowing & PerchingBooth-3 : Components of IPM/IPM plot vs. Non-IPM plot

Booth-4 : Beneficial Insects conservation & Insect

MuseumBooth-5: Environmental Impact of using excess fertilizers

/harmful impact of InsecticidesBooth-6 : Survey and AESABooth-7 : Ideal One Farm, One House

Besides, different types of posters, photos and flip chart were arranged to understand thetechnology easily.

Participants showed their interest and encouraged during

booth visit, specially surrounding farmers of FFS showed

keen interest and asked different questions seeing the

arrangement of the booth. Representative of booths (FFS

participants) answered to the question properly and try to

clear their ideas. Guests like DD, DTO, UAO of DAE, PMO

officials and consultants wanted to know about the demonstrated booth and meaning of display, and

howfar they could understand the concepts. They narrated their individual booth and its practical

impact. Having known their idea, the DAE personnel and other experts explained the technology for

broadening their knowledge. It was really a seeing, sharing and learning process for addressing a

huge community people.

3.4 Activities of the DayConcerned SF invited the participants to take seats and started the FFD activities. WMG presidentpresided over the FFD session. The following discussion/ activities were conducted.

a) SF described the objectives of the FFD.b) Described the activities of FFS and its achievement.c) Described the result of Variety under Demonstration.d) Distribution of leaflet describing production technology of

the Variety.e) Guests visited the booth and, got description and

meaning of display and exhibition from the assigned FFSrepresentatives of individual booth.

f) Observed demonstration plot.g) Discussion on sharing their knowledge and opinion of

FFS and FFD.h) Declared the best performers of FFS who stood first,

second and third.i) Distributed the prize among the best 3 performers

through honourable guest ( WMG president; DD, DTO,

Page 18: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

13

UAO of DAE; XEN, PEO, DCEO, ACS of PMO and ISPMCs).K) End the session with vote of thanks and distributed light snacks among the whole

Participants.

3.4 Guests of the DayConcerned Deputy Director (DD), District Training Officer (DTO), Upazilla Agriculture Officers (UAO),

Sub-Assistant Agriculture Officer (SAAO) of DAE attended the FFD function. Mr. Kartic Chandra

Chakroborty, DD, DAE, Faridpur attended in some remarkable functions, as out of 45 FFSs, 32 FFSs

were under his jurisdiction. DTO, DAE, Magura attended the FFD. Representatives of the Local

Government Institution (LGI) were also attended the FFD ceremony. Mr. Masud Karim, PEO and

Head of the WMO development Unit of PMO, Faridpur; Dr. Mahtab Hossain, XEN, Specialized

Division, SW project, Faridpur; Mr. Md. Hafizur Rahman, DCEO, PMO, SW project, Faridpur; Mr. Md.

Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO, SW project, Faridpur; Mr. Md. Amimul Ehsan, ACF, PMO, SW project,

Faridpur and among the ISPMC Consultants Mr. Kamalur Rahman Talukder, Co-ordinator, Mr. Md.

Abul Hashem, Agriculture Extension Specialist, Mr. Md Hurmuj Ali and Mr. Md. Maksudur Rahman,

WMO Specialist, Mr. Md. Gias Al Hasan, Junior Agriculture Extension Specialist made the success of

the Day attending and role playing in the FFD Festival.

3.5 Presentation of Learning Experience by the FFS

Participants

Firstly, concerned Sub-Assistant Agriculture Officer (FFS Trainer)

reviewed all session/ activities in brief to recall in mind of the participants

which was done by trials and demonstration operation. Then, The FFS

participants explained their views and learnings. They expressed their

satisfaction and proud of being an FFS student. They demand such

more arrangements in future. They told that that was for the first time

they could learned such an exceptional and practical farming activities in

their own environment near at farm level.

3.6 Open discussion

The floor was open for audience to discuss on their views and share

their experience and needs if any. Invited participants from all level

(men and women) shared their opinion and experience from their

activities. They wanted more FFS in their areas. Every body expressed

their profound satisfaction pleasure attending such an learning Exhibition and Fair.

Page 19: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

14

3.7 Guests Opinion

Concerned Deputy Director, District TrainingOfficer, Upazilla Agriculture Officers of DAEdelivered their lecture on the latest agriculturaltechnology and invited the farmers to come closerto the Agriculture officers for quick agriculturaldevelopment and crop diversification. Mr. KarticChandra Chakroborty, DD, DAE Faridpur in hisspeech expressed his satisfaction and extendedthanks to the BWDB for creating such anopportunity to work together through theSouthwest Project. He urged the audience to comeforward to make the project a success. He alsomade the people awared on the background, thepresent status and future plan of agriculture of

Faridpur district. He said, “The Southwest project is a strongsupport for us for total development of our area”. Mr.Sohrab Hossain, District Training Officer, DAE, Maguraexpressed in a FFD at Kalidaskhali-Arpara sub-projectthat it is an opportunity to talk with a big mass of peopletogether. He assured all sorts of help from DAE, Magurato make the project a success. Mr. Md. Masud Karim,Principal Extension Officer and Head of of the WMODevelopment Unit, PMO, BWDB, Faridpur said thatSouthwest project is a complete agriculture developmentapproach wherein Engineers, Agriculturist, Socialscientists, Fisheries and Enviromental Expert are workingtogether with

the Department of Agricultural Extension andDepatment of Fisheries for livelihood improvement ofthe project area and the project would be implementedthrough People’s participation. He said that formation ofWater Management Group (WMG) of batch-1 of ourprogram has already been completed. So, it is the hightime to start our work and he urged the participants towork as per advice of SFs/CFs working in their areas tomake the project a success. Dr. Mahtab Hossain,

ExecutiveEnginneer, Specialised Division, PMO, BWDB, Faridpurexpressed his deep satisfaction to be a part of such abig gathering and appealed the people to please come

Page 20: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

15

forward with us. He said, ‘We are working for removal of drainage congestion of your areas by re-excavating of Chennels/Khals, repairing of gates, regulators and embankment for bringing more areaunder double and triple crop production”. He further added that after completion of the project,management of the sub-project to be handed over to the concerned WMOs. Mr. Md. HafizurRahman, DCEO and Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO, Faridpur also addressed the meeting andprovided motivational speech to the audience. Among the ISPMC consultants Mr. Md. KamalurRahman Talukder, Mr. Md. Abul Hashem, Mr. Md. Hurmuj Ali, Mr. Md. Gias Al Hasan shared theirexperience and provided necessary advice to the farmers for project development. Chairmen of theFFD functions (Chairmen of the concerned WMGs) expressed the profound pleasure and satisfactionto see happening such a farmers’ Fair/Exhibition which they did not see ever before. They assured allsorts of cooperation from their side for successful implementation and development of the project.

4. Conclusion

The agricultural devlopment program of the project adopted during the year 2018-19 has been fruitful.

It was the first year of program implementation. Through the 45 FFSs and 45 demonstrations in 5

Sub-projects and subsequent awareness build up program, the project could dessiminate the

agriculture technology by arranging Farmers’ Field Day to 6,659 Local Stakeholders and farmers

directly. This created an impulse throughout the project areas. Participation of the people was

noticeable and they enjoyed much the display and exhibition of agricultural technology arranged in the

FFD. Local and Naional Jurnalist published the news in some Local and national Dailies, and Media

persons broadcast the news with special attention. We hope the project will be successful to transfer

the agriculture technology to the farmers’ level through implementation of the different agricultural

enhancement Program with help of diffent Stakeolders.

Page 21: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

16

Page 22: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

17

Some Pictures of Crop Cutting

Page 23: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

18

Page 24: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

19

Some Pictures of FFS/FFD

Page 25: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

20

Annex.-1

Page 26: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

21

Annex.-1.1

Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning & Management Project-AFList of Demonstrations and FFS under Chatlar-Fakurhat Sub-project (Batch-1) during Boro Season, 2018-19.

Sl.No

WMG Name WMGNo.

SIP No. Farmers’ Name Upazila Village CropName

Variety No. of FFS Farmers

Male Female Total

01 Kaligang 03 1 Jamal Sarder Bhanga Dharmodi Rice BRRI Dhan -81 20 10 30

02 Hamirdi 06 1 Johir Shah Bhanga Hamirdi Rice BRRI Dhan -50 19 11 30

03 Kanabil 08 1 Sheik Abu Bhanga Akon Briya Rice BRRI Dhan -50 21 09 30

04 Chatul Bil 10 1 Abu Shake Bhanga Barra Rice BRRI Dhan -50 20 10 30

05 Gojaria 14 1 Atiyer Rahaman Bhanga Gojaria Rice BRRI Dhan -81 20 10 30

06 BSA WMG 19 2 Sumon Mollik Sadarpur Saresath Rosi Rice BRRI Dhan -50 18 12 30

07 Babur Chor 21 2 Md. Delowar Khan Sadarpur Chor kumaria Rice BRRI Dhan -50 20 10 30

08 Bhubonesshor 22 2 Md. Babul Hossain Sadarpur Doshhazar Rice BRRI Dhan -58 19 11 30

09 Alekharkanda-Moulovidangi

28 2 Md. Abdur Rahim Bapary Bhanga Alekharkanda Rice BRRI-Dhan -58 19 11 30

10 Motra Poraron 30 3 kader Shake Bhanga Motra Rice BRRI Dhan -81 20 10 30

11 Shakepura Khal 31 3 Md. ShafiuddinMatubbor

Bhanga Shakepura Rice BRRI Dhan -81 21 09 30

12 Bomonkanda 36 3 Mosarof Matubbor Bhanga Bamonkanda Rice BRRI Dhan -50 18 12 30

Total FFS Farmers : 235 125 360

Page 27: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

22

Annex.-1.2

Page 28: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

23

Annex.-1.3

Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Management and Planning Project-AFList of Demonstration and FFS under Alfadanga-Boalmari and Daduria-Kandur Beel Sub-project (Batch-1) during Boro Season, 2018-19

Sl.No

WMG Name WMGNo.

Farmers’ Name Upazila Village Crop Variety No. of FFS Farmers

Male Female Total

01 BanarKhal 2 Md. AtiarRahman Alfadanga Bana Rice BRRI dhan58 20 10 30

02 Tona Mouzar Khal 3 Rajob Ali Sheikh Alfadanga Uthuli Rice BRRI dhan81 20 10 30

03 Shirgram-Barashia 5 Syed Liakot Ali Alfadanga Shirgram Rice BRRI dhan58 20 10 30

04 Trimokhi WMG 13 Sayad Jahidur Rahman Alfadanga Baro Bag Rice BRRI dhan58 20 10 30

05 Samnagor Khal WMG 4 Md. AzizulHaqueSardar Boalmari Bajidpur Rice BRRI dhan81 27 03 30

06 BaikhirWMG 5 Md. Nayem Khan Boalmari Baikhir Rice BRRI dhan50 20 10 30

07 C N D WMG 6 Md. Sirajul Islam Boalmari Chatul Rice BRRI dhan58 20 10 30

Total FFS Farmers : 147 163 210

Page 29: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

24

Annex.-2

Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning & Management Project-AFCrop Cutting Report

Season: Boro, 2018 - 2019

Sl.no.

Name of WMGSIPno.

Location of Demonstration Plot

Name of Farmer Village Upazilla & Distrct GPS LocationCrop &Variety

CropCuttingResult

(ton/ha.)

Beel Sukunia Sub-project

1 Domrakandi-Bodorpur-1 1 Mr.Ali Domrakahdi Sadar, Faridpur N 23ₒ34'19.1'' E 089

ₒ48'06.3" BRRI dhan58 6.8

2 Muraridoho 1 Mrs.Nilufa Begum Muraridoho Sadar, Faridpur N 23ₒ34'07.2'' E 089

ₒ47'59.4" BRRI dhan50 6.9

3 TulagramKhal 1 Mr.Habibur Rahman Tulagram Sadar, Faridpur N 23ₒ33'42.9'' E 089

ₒ49'04.8" BRRI dhan50 5.6

4 Tambulkhana 1 Mrs.Ruma Begum Tambulkhana Sadar, Faridpur N 23ₒ32'54.2'' E 089

ₒ48'33.7" BRRI dhan81 7.0

5 KendorKhal 1 Mr. Lutfor Rahman Betbaria Sadar, Faridpur N 23ₒ32'15.0'' E 089

ₒ48'38.1" BRRI dhan58 8.0

6 Sachai-Kaoijuri 1 Mr. Zakir Hossain Sachai Sadar, Faridpur N 23ₒ32'51.1'' E 089

ₒ49'05.8" BRRI dhan50 6.9

7 Vatpara-Mangolkot 1 Mr. Kawsar Mangolkot Sadar, Faridpur N 23ₒ31'21.9'' E 089

ₒ50'19.4" BRRI dhan58 7.0

8 Kujurdia 1 Mr. Nowab Ali Kujurdia Sadar, Faridpur N 23ₒ31'31.2'' E 089

ₒ48'24.4" BRRI dhan81 5.7

9Chormongolkot-Beelnalia

1 Mr. moffazel Beelnalia Sadar, Faridpur N 23ₒ30'37.5'' E 089

ₒ50'25.6" BRRI dhan81 7.0

10 Poshora 1 Mr. Achiruddin Poshora Sadar, Faridpur N 23ₒ33'34.7'' E 089

ₒ50'47.3" BRRI dhan81 6.7

11 Bakhunda 1 Mr. Malek Mia Bakhunda Sadar, Faridpur N 23ₒ32'52.0'' E 089

ₒ50'21.3" BRRI dhan50 7.1

12 Joyararabeel 1 Mr. Gofur Maubbor Mirergotti Saltha, Faridpur N 23ₒ28'33.4'' E 089

ₒ49'26.7" BRRI dhan58 5.7

13 Katakhal 1 Mr. Amzed Zhunakhali Saltha, Faridpur N 23ₒ29'09.5'' E 089

ₒ49'30.4"

Onion(Taherpuri)

13.0

Alfadanga-Boalmari Sub-project

14 Banar Khal 2 Md. Atiar Rahman Panditbana Alfadanga, Faridpur N 23ₒ19'31.914'' E 89

ₒ38'12.09" BRRI dhan58 6.2

15 TonaMoujar khal 2 Md. Razab Ali Sheikh Utholi Alfadanga, Faridpur N 23ₒ20'44.472'' E89

ₒ39'24.636" BRRI dhan81 6.4

16 Shirgram Barshia 2 Syed Liakat HossainSouth

ShirgramAlfadanga, Faridpur N 23

ₒ20'33.449''E 89

ₒ40'15.582" BRRI dhan58 6.3

17 Trimokhi 3Sahyed JahidurRahman

Barovugh Alfadanga, Faridpur N 23ₒ14.932'E 89

ₒ42.972' BRRI dhan58 5.4

Page 30: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

25

Sl.no.

Name of WMGSIPno.

Location of Demonstration Plot

Name of Farmer Village Upazilla & Distrct GPS LocationCrop &Variety

CropCuttingResult

(ton/ha.)

Daduria-Kandur Beel Sub-project

18 Shamnagar Khal 3Md.Azizul Haque

SarderBajidpur Boalmari, Faridpur N 23

ₒ21.752' E 89

ₒ42.775' BRRI dhan81 6.1

19 Baikhir 3 Md. Akther Hossain Baikhir Boalmari, Faridpur N 23ₒ21.193' E 89

ₒ41.661' BRRI dhan50 6.0

20 CND 3 Md. Sirajul Islam Dhulpukuria Boalmari, Faridpur N 23ₒ21.924' E 89

ₒ42.624' BRRI dhan58 7.3

Kalidashkhali-Arpara Sub-project

21 KanudarKhal 2 Md. Mohobbat Ali Gopalgram Shalikha, Magura N 23ₒ21'26.519''E 89

ₒ22'04.892" BRRI dhan50 6.2

22 Dighi 2 Md. Kofil Uddin Dighi Shalikha, Magura N 23ₒ20'44.270''E 89

ₒ22'24.511" BRRI dhan50 6.5

23 ShatakhalipurboPara 2 Uzzal Kumar Mondol Shatakhali Shalikha, Magura N 23ₒ19'56.008''E 89

ₒ20'45.091" BRRI dhan81 7.1

24 ChoyghoriaBagdanga 2 Md. Abul Hasan Choyghoria Shalikha, Magura N 23ₒ19'59.339''E 89

ₒ20'19.695" BRRI dhan50 6.1

25 Kotoli WMG 2 Md. Jakir Hossain Katoli Shalikha, Magura N 23ₒ19'29.758''E 89

ₒ21'56.954" BRRI dhan50 6.6

26 Shapla WMG 2 Robindranath Pal Boyra Shalikha, Magura N 23ₒ18'16.368''E 89

ₒ22'21.987" BRRI dhan50 6.3

27 Fotki WMG 2 Md. Basir Hossain Arpara Shalikha, Magura N 23ₒ33'17.3'' E 89

ₒ47'55.4" BRRI dhan81 7.1

28 PukuriaAnandanagar 2 Md. Kazi Rasel Pukuria Shalikha, Magura N 23ₒ21'53.4'' E 89

ₒ23'31.6" BRRI dhan58 6.3

29 KumarkataSreehatto 2 Md. Jamirul Biswas Kumarkata Shalikha, Magura N 23ₒ21'18.8'' E 89

ₒ22'29.9" BRRI dhan58 6.6

30 Junari WMG 2 Shohor Ali Sarder Junari Shalikha, Magura N 23ₒ20'12.9'' E 89

ₒ22'46.8" BRRI dhan81 6.2

31 Boroichara Dhawasima 2 Nimay Biswas Boroichara Shalikha, Magura N 23ₒ21'12.2'' E 89

ₒ23'55.8" BRRI dhan58 7.1

32 Hatbaria WMG 2 Md. Mahfuz Hatbaria Shalikha, Magura N 23ₒ19'52.4'' E 89

ₒ26'25.5" BRRI dhan81 7.6

33 Bunagati WMG 2 Md. Soriful Molla Bunagati Shalikha, Magura N 23ₒ18'41.1'' E 89

ₒ25'01.1" BRRI dhan50 6.7

Chatlar-Fakurhat Sub-project

34 Kaligang (3) 1 Jamal Sarder Dharmodi Bhanga, Faridpur N 23ₒ25'34'' E 89

ₒ58'37" BRRI dhan81 5.4

35 Hamirdi (6) 1 Johir Shah Hamirdi Bhanga, Faridpur N 23ₒ25'5'' E 89

ₒ58'9" BRRI dhan50 6.0

36 Kanabeel (8) 1 Sheik Abu Akhon Baria Bhanga, Faridpur N 23ₒ27'29'' E 089

ₒ59'59" BRRI dhan50 6.1

37 Chatul Beel (10) 1 Abu Shake Barra Bhanga, Faridpur N 23ₒ26'4'' E 90

ₒ02'40" BRRI dhan50 6.1

Page 31: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

26

Sl.no.

Name of WMGSIPno.

Location of Demonstration Plot

Name of Farmer Village Upazilla & Distrct GPS LocationCrop &Variety

CropCuttingResult

(ton/ha.)

38 Gojaria (14) 1 Atiyer Rahaman Gojaria Bhanga, Faridpur N 23ₒ24'58'' E 89

ₒ58'12" BRRI dhan81 6.2

39 BSA (19) 2 Sumon Mollik Saresath Rosi Sadarpur, Faridpur N 23ₒ27'14'' E 90

ₒ01'4" BRRI dhan50 6.0

40 Babur Chor (21) 2 Md. Delower Khan Chor Kumaria Sadarpur, Faridpur N 23ₒ28'53'' E 90

ₒ02'55" BRRI dhan50 5.5

41 Bhubonesshor (22) 2 Md. Babul Hossain Choddo Rosi Sadarpur, Faridpur N 23ₒ27'59'' E 90

ₒ02'29" BRRI dhan58 5.9

42 Setero Rosi (24) 2 Rejaul Karim Satero Rosi Sadarpur, Faridpur N 23ₒ27'20'' E 90

ₒ02'2" BRRI dhan58 5.7

43 Motra Poraron (30) 3 Kader Shake Motra Bhanga, Faridpur N 23ₒ24'20'' E 90

ₒ02'12" BRRI dhan81 7.2

44 Shakhpura Khal (31) 3 Md. Saifuddin Shakepura Bhanga, Faridpur N 23ₒ24'30'' E 90

ₒ03'14" BRRI dhan81 6.3

45 Bomokanda (36) 3 Mosarof Mtubbor Bamonkanda Bhanga, Faridpur N 23ₒ22'50'' E 90

ₒ00'22" BRRI dhan50 5.9

Page 32: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

27

Some more Pictures of FFD

Page 33: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

28

Some more Pictures of FFD

Page 34: Report on Farmers’ Field School (FFS) Farmers’ Field Day

29

Some more Pictures of FFD