report of redbridge dpulo workshop, august 2010
DESCRIPTION
Over the last 18 months, a group of organisations and Redbridge Council have worked together to establish a Disabled People's User-Led Organisation (DPULO) in the area. This report summarises a workshop where everyone came together to discuss establishing the DPULO.TRANSCRIPT
NOTHING ABOUT US WITHOUT US
A WORKSHOP TO EXPLORE HOW WE CAN WORK TOGETHER TO PUSH FOR CHANGE
PROMOTING INDEPENDENCE, INCLUSIVE LIVING
AND A CREDIBLE VOICE FOR EVERYONE WHO USES SERVICES IN REDBRIDGE
AUGUST 2010
Table of Contents
Executive Summary 2
Jargon Buster 5
Introduction 7
Background 7
Purpose of the Workshop 7
The national policy context: Transforming Adult Social Care 7
Creating a User Led Organisation: What has happened so far? 10
The Purpose of the workshop 11
Workshop Summary 13
Key Recommendations from the Workshop: 13
The Guest Speakers 15
Question and Answer Session 16
Possible roles for the User Led Organisation 18
Appendix 1: 20
Organisations who attended 20
Appendix 2: Documents 21
Appendix 3: Equality, Diversity and Evaluation of Event 22
Appendix 4: Redbridge User Led Organisation Road Map 24
1
Executive Summary
The Vision
P r o m o t i n g i n d e p e n d e n c e ,
inclusive living and a credible
voice for everyone who uses
services in Redbridge
The Key Messages
1. The Role of User Led Organisation.The express wish of attendees was that the
User Led Organisation should have a
prominent ‘engagement’ role in Redbridge.
This is compatible with a brokerage type of
function.
2. Tell people what the User Led Organisation is doing
The User Led Organisation should have its
own website to publicise all decisions and
activities.
3. Involve more service usersGreater involvement of users of services is
essential. This might be achieved via the
Redbridge User Reference Group. Users of
services must have greater influence upon
decisions made by the Steering Group.
4. Go out and meet peopleConnect with individual organisations to
explain the User Led Organisation process
and the reasons for it. This should include
minority groups and groups supporting
people with learning difficulties.
5. Language we use Other groups, carers, older people, minority
organisations, must feel more involved in
this process. For example, the term ‘user of
services’ might be misleading.
Social care is an issue that can touch the
lives of every family whether we are carers,
old or young, disabled people, experiencing
mental health conditions or from a black
and ethnic minority group. People who use
local services and their families want and
expect choice, control, dignity, respect and
equality to be at the heart of service
provision. People also quite rightly insist on
the right type of support and care. All these
elements are essential to ensure that
everyone has the opportunity to make the
most of their chances in their life as well as
to lead fulfilling, flourishing and purposeful
lives.
The journey for the Redbridge community
started back in June 2009 when Adult
Soc ia l Ca re and loca l g rass roo ts
organisations in Redbridge agreed to
2
explore the potential of setting up a User
Led Organisation (ULO) in Redbridge. Over
the last year, the ULO Steering Group has
talked to a wide range of people and
organisations culminating in the Workshop
at the end of April 2010: ‘Nothing about us
without us’
The event received wide support. 81
people attended of which over half identified
themselves as users of local services. There
were also representatives or users from over
30 different organisations including: social
care; the NHS; independent; third sector
and service user organisations. A wide and
diverse range of people turned up including:
carers; older people; people with a learning
disability; people with mental health
cond i t i ons ; phys i ca l and senso r y
impairments; long term chronic conditions;
young and old and people from minority
communities.
The Purpose of the workshop
The purpose was, first, to inform them of
the progress that had been made in
Redbridge towards developing a User Led
Organisat ion. Second, was to ask
participants what roles a User Led
Organisation should play in Redbridge.
These objectives are in line with the
Transforming Adult Social Care initiative.
From April 2011, “anybody who receives
social care support will have genuine choice
and control over the services they receive
and the way they receive them.”
The Guest Speakers
The first part of the day was given over to
three main speakers. They were John
Powell, the Director of Adult Social Services
in Redbridge, Nick Danagher, a member of
Equality 2025, UK Government Network on
Disability Equality and Neil Nerva, part of the
London Division of the Department of
Health. Each spoke about how important
this development is and how committed
they were to establishing a ULO & Centre
for Independent Living in Redbridge it.
Indeed, it should be remembered that
without Transforming Adult Social Services
funding to support this process from the
London Borough of Redbridge it is unlikely
we could have got to this point in the User
Led Organisation’s development.
The Role of the User Led Organi-sation
The rest of the day was given over to the
Workshop participants. They were first
asked for their opinions about the progress
so far. In the second part participants were
asked to select the roles they wanted the
User Led Organisation to play in Redbridge.
Overwhelmingly, the participants wanted it
to be a “Campaigning organization” that
gives a louder voice to people that may not
be able to express their needs as individuals
and a One-stop shop that could provide
services including Brokerage
3
Strategic Direction
Having listened to the views of local people
we are now ready to take the next step
towards independence. This report
summarises our vision for the future based
on the findings from the workshops and the
discussion and debates we have had with
various stakeholders, local service users
and policy makers over the last year.
• It must be controlled and run by the people using its services
• It must be a universal service that anyone, experiencing barriers, serv-ice user or not, will be welcome to use
• Empower people to have greater control over their lives, by helping them make meaningful choices
• give people a louder voice to influ-ence decisions that affect their lives
• take forward issues voiced by the membership including those raised at the workshops
• Provide advice, information and bro-kerage support
• Use and promote plain language• Build on the work already provided
by the voluntary sector, to provide a unique service, across service user and carer groups based on individual needs ;
• Let people know what it is doing and involve more seldom heard citizens using a range of methods including an internet website, easy read and translated material etc
• Promote greater inclusion, inde-pendence and health and well being
• Work with local organisations to as-sist with the delivery of local strategic priorities.
• It must meet its obligations and commitments to funders
4
User Led Organisation Steering Group Members
Age Concern Redbridge - London Borough of Redbridge - Redbridge Carers Support
Service - Redbridge Concern For Mental Health - Redbridge LINk - Redbridge Disability
Association - Redbridge Forum for People with a Learning Disability - Redbridge People
First - RUN-UP - The Daffodil Advocacy Project - RADAR (The Royal Association for
Disability Rights) - Refugee and Migrant Forum for East London - Redbridge Children &
Young People's Network
Jargon BusterIt is helpful to set out some definitions of
words and phrases used in this report.
User Led Organisation
User-led organisations are those where the
people who the organisation represents or
provides a service to, have a majority on the
Management Committee or Board, and
where there is clear accountability to
members and / or service users.
Brokerage
The scope of the Broker’s role includes
helping people to identify the changes they
want to make to their lives; find support
services and community opportunities that
the person requires; negotiate with
providers and prepare community resources
as necessary; cost and write a support plan
and identify and obtain funding.
Centre for Independent Living
Centres of independent living are grass
roots organisations run and controlled by
people who use local services. Their aims
are that people who use services should
have control over their lives and achieve full
participation in society. They work towards
these aims by representing peoples views
both nationally and locally, and by providing
services which promote independent living.
Commissioning
The process by which local authorities
decide how to spend their money to get the
best possible services for local people.
Direct payments
These are monthly payments given to
service users as the means of controlling
their own care - allowing more choice and
flexibility. They enable people to purchase
their own care rather than use council
services.
Individual budgets
Individual budgets (IBs) give a clear
allocation of cash to an individual to control
the way money is spent to meet his or her
care needs. IBs can bring together a variety
of income streams from different agencies
as well as social care. People can use
individual budgets to 'buy' services from
public, private and voluntary sectors.
Independent living
Means having choice and control over your
life.
Inclusive living
Means being ful ly included in your
community.
Outcomes
The end results or impact something has on
a service user's life eg. Improved quality of
life
5
Personal budget
This is an individual budget made up solely
of social care funding.
Personalisation
The process by which state provided
services can be adapted to suit service
users. This means everyone having choice
and control over the shape of their support
along with a greater emphasis on prevention
and early intervention.
Putting People First
The Government's shared vision and
commitment to the transformation of adult
social care
ReSURG
ReSURG is the Redbridge Service User
Reference Group. It was set up to provide
service user and carer input into the work
that Adult Social Services are doing to
develop more personalised social care. This
is a role that the ULO will carry out in the
future. However, as the ULO Steering Group
is busy setting up the new organisation, it
was decided to set up ReSURG as an
interim measure, with a plan for it to merge
with the ULO when the time is right.
Self-Directed Support
This is the name given to the change in the
way the whole social care system operates
to give service users the choice, control and
power over the support they receive. It will
replace the current care management
process over the next three years
Service users
Service user means people who need
support and / or equipment in order to go
about their daily lives and who use services
that are provided as part of the welfare
state.
User-led Groups
Are groups run by and for the people they
speak up for. The group is managed and
controlled by its members
The social model of disability
Says that the problem is not someone’s
impairment, illness, frailty or learning
disability but instead, the problem is that
they don’t have the support, equipment or
housing they need and they don’t have
choice and control over their daily lives.
Although the social model of disability was
initially developed by people with physical
impairments, it is just as relevant to people
with a learning disability, older people, and
people with mental health support needs.
6
Introduction
BackgroundThis is a Report of the views and
conc lus ions o f se rv ice use rs and
organisations that attended the ‘Nothing
about us without us’ Workshop on Tuesday
27th April 2010. This event was essential to
ensure that people locally learnt about what
had happened so far. Also, it was important
that people are involved in all future
decisions about the role a User Led
Organisation would have in Redbridge.
Purpose of the WorkshopThere were two reasons why we asked
people who use local services to attend this
Workshop. First, it was to inform them of
the progress that had been made in
Redbridge in developing a User Led
O rgan i sa t i on . One o f t he cen t r a l
requirements identified by the Department
of Health Strategy “Putt ing People
First” (see Appendix 1); Transforming Adult
Social Care, is to develop ways of ensuring
people can exercise choice and control over
their lives. To help give them a voice on
service development through advocacy and
b ro k e r a g e s u p p o r t l i n k e d t o t h e
development of a User Led Organisations in
each region.
The second reason for this Workshop was
to ask the participants what roles a User
Led Organisation in Redbridge should
have? The purpose of a User Led
Organisation is to help the London Borough
of Redbr idge meet i ts agenda for
Transforming Social Care (TASC) locally.
The national policy context: Transforming Adult Social Care There has been a gathering pol icy
momentum leading to local authority and
health service reform. A number of key
7
messages and themes have emerged in
particular that public sector services will
have to change the way they look after
people. In particular by putting service users
at the heart of the process; enabling them
to decide what care, support or service will
meet their needs in the best way possible,
how it should be provided with an emphasis
on supporting people to live independently
and to have choice and control over the
way they wish to live their lives
In January 2005, in Improving the life
chances o f d i s ab l ed peop l e , t he
Government set out an ambitious vision that
“By 2025, disabled people in Britain should
have full opportunities and choices to
improve their quality of life and will be
respected and included as equal members
of society.”[1] Promoting independent living
and the active participation of disabled
people in the design, del ivery and
monitoring of resources and services are
recognised as being fundamental to the
process of improving their life chances.
Improving the life chances of disabled
people also made the recommendation that
“By 2010, each locality (defined as that area
covered by a Council with social services
responsibilities) should have a user-led
organisation modelled on existing Centres
for Independent Living”[see appendix 2].
Putting People First (December 2007) has
an objective “Support for at least one local
user led organisation and mainstream
mechanisms to develop networks which
ensure people using services and their
families have a collective voice, influencing
policy and provision”.[see appendix 2]
The March 2009 Transforming Adult Social
Care local authority circular (LAC) states that
a core component should be “An enabling
framework to ensure people can exercise
choice and control with accessible
advocacy, peer support and brokerage
systems with strong links to user led
organisations. Where ULOs do not exist, a
strategy to foster, stimulate and develop
user led organisations locally.”[Appendix 2]
The Local Authority intends to change the
way services are provided to adults in
Redbridge. From April 2011 “anybody who
receives social care support will have
genuine choice and control over the
services they receive and the way they
receive them. (see Appendix 1 for link)
8
A User Led Organisation is an organisation that is run and controlled by people who use support services including people with physical and/or sensory impairments, mental health service users, people with a learn-ing difficulty, older people, and their families and carers.
Social Care Institute for excellence (2009) ”
“
There are four areas in which this will be
achieved.
The four areas are:
• UNIVERSAL SERVICES. This
means creating general support and
services available to everyone locally
(universal services). These services
including things like transport, leisure,
education, health, housing, community
safety and access to information and
advice.
• E A R LY I N T E R V E N T I O N &
PREVENTION SERVICES. This is
about the support available to assist
people who need a little more help, at an
early stage to stay independent for as long
as possible. For example, support to
recover from the effects of illness or help
to manage a long- term condition from
someone with experience of a similar
condition. It can even be job training,
gardening or exercise.
• CHOICE AND CONTROL. This
about self-directed support. This means
having services available to meet people’s
needs rather than people having to fit in
with the things on offer. People who need
support should be able to choose who
provides that support, and control when
and where the services are provided.
• SOCIAL CAPITAL. This is key and
means engaging with people to show
them how they can influence the decisions
that affect their lives. People who have
support needs, their carers and others
who find support difficult to access need
to be encouraged to be part of those
discussions about community life.
How The User Led Organisation
helps this
A User-Led Organisation will play an
important role in transforming the way
services are delivered. It will be a vehicle
through which people can make their views
know. The User-Led Organisation will also
deliver unique services that people want
and cannot be easily run by smaller
organizations. Finally, it will be the place
where advice and information can be easily
found.
Redbridge began the process of creating a
local User Led Organisation in March 2009
with a Report to the Redbridge Health &
Social Care Advisory Committee (Appendix
1). Since then a number events have taken
place, which have lead to where we are
today.
9
Creating a User Led Organisation: What has happened so far?
DATE EVENT
April 2009 Public meeting about how TASC will inform the Commissioning Strategy
June 2009 Developing a User Led Organisation in Redbridge Workshop: This began
discussions with service users and existing user led organisations about
how to become a User Led Organisation – (see appendix 2 for doc).
September 2009 Workshop to Develop a model for User and Carer involvement. From this
Workshop the Redbridge User Reference Group was established
(ReSURG) – (see appendix 2 for doc).
October 2009 The Voluntary Sector produced their ‘ROAD MAP” to the establishment
of a ULO – (see appendix 1 for Road Map link)
November 2009 London Borough of Redbridge accepted the Report and Road Map as
the route to be taken to establish a ULO in Redbridge.
January 2010 First meeting of User Led Organisation Steering Group. This group is
charged with creating the User Led Organisation.
March 2010 ReSURG met and endorsed progress so far.
April 2010 Stakeholder Group met and chose structure of the User Led
Organisation.
10
The Purpose of the workshop
The first aim of the workshop was to ask
participants for their views about the
progress made so far towards establishing a
User Led Organisation in Redbridge. The
second aim was to ask attendees to state
their preferred choice of role a User Led
Organisation might have in Redbridge. The
choices were set within Transforming Adult
Social Care Agenda. They also had an
opportunity to raise any “burning issues”
that they had and which would be recorded
and taken up at a later date. Finally,
evaluation forms were handed out at the
end of the event to give participants the
opportunity to comment on the quality of
the Workshop and also to suggest ways in
which to improve communication and
subsequent involvement..
The Visual Journey
To aid the recording of the
event, a graphic artist (Ryan
Jones) was commissioned to
capture people’s views in a
graphical representation. Quite,
simply this provided a visual
representation of everything that
happened at the Workshop. This picture
was in the form of a journey. This allowed
people to follow the proceedings visually,
and enabled the artist to capture all the
presentations, the responses of the
attendees, and feedback at the event.
Limitations
The scope of the Workshop was to provide
information about the progress of the User-
Led Organisation’s development and, more
important ly, to g ive at tendees the
opportunity to influence the next steps in its
development. Its aim was also to encourage
greater involvement in this process. There
were no pre-meetings to better inform
attendees. This did place some at a
disadvantage. Nor did we distinguish
between employees of organisations and
service users when we asked for people’s
11
views. It is estimated that more than half of
those who attended were made up of
people who use services. Finally, attendees
were asked to choose the role they wished
to see the User Led Organisation adopt in
Redbridge. They were reminded that the
role of the User Led Organisation has yet to
be determined. Their views would not be
binding and the User Led Organisation
might do other things. However, their
opinions stated at this Workshop will
significantly influence what the User Led
Organisation will eventually do.
Despite widespread publicity, it is likely that
many people were unaware of this event or
could not attend. This Workshop is only one
smal l part of the engagement and
involvement of users of services in
Redbridge. There will be many subsequent
meetings and events, large and small, to
maintain the momentum begun at this
Workshop.
12
ULOs are local and driven by what their users know works for them. With the right level of resources they could be a power-house for social change towards full participation for all as equal citizens because their voice is authentic.
Maynard-Campbell 2007 ”
“
Workshop Summary
The workshop involved 81 participants.
These included service users and voluntary
sector organisations. The purpose of the
event was to, first, inform them of the
progress that had been made in Redbridge
in developing a User Led Organisation. The
second was to ask the participants what
roles the User Led Organisation in
Redbridge could potentially take on.
Key Recommendations from the Workshop:
1. The Ro le o f User Led
Organisation
The express wish of attendees was that the
User Led Organisation should have a
prominent ‘engagement’ role in Redbridge
and to act as a forum where users of local
services can voice their views and opinions
in effect to be a ‘coalition of voices’ .
This clearly ties in with the transformation
programme set out by Department of Health
Local Authority Circular (March 2010 - see
appendix 2 for reference) based on the
principles of “nothing about us without us”.
According to the Circular: “This is a phrase
widely used by those users and carers who
want to contribute to the transformation of
services. At the heart of personalisation are
the principles of empowering customers to
take more control over their lives, and to
assist them in making choices as to how
and when their care and support needs are
met. It is expected that not only will all
service users understand what the changes
will mean for them but also that those who
want to contribute to the development of
new services and new ideas can do so
alongside the local authority as partners in
delivering the local transformation.”
This is also clearly compatible with a
brokerage type of function.
13
2. Tell people what the User
Led Organisation is doing
The User Led Organisation should have its
own website to publicise all decisions and
activities.
3. Involve more service users
Greater involvement of users of services is
essential. This might be done via the
Redbridge User Reference Group. They
must have greater influence upon decisions
made by the Steering Group.
4. Go out and meet people
Meet with individual organisations to explain
the User Led Organisation process and the
reasons for it. This should include minority
groups and groups supporting people with
learning difficulties and a learning disability.
5. Language we use
Other groups, carers, older people, minority
organisations, must feel more involved in
this process. For example, the term ‘user of
services’ might be misleading.
14
A lot of thought is going into forming a User Led Organisa-tion which will co-ordinate many issues that other smaller organisations either struggle or cannot cope with. In es-sence to give a stronger voice to people with a disability so they do not remain invisible.
”
“
The Guest Speakers
John Powell, Director of Adult
Social Services
John reminded us of the London Borough
of Redbridge’s great commitment to choice
and control for all users of services. Also,
how important a User-Led Organisation will
be to the Local Authority in helping it deliver
better services in Redbridge.
We would like to take this opportunity to
thank the London Borough of Redbridge for
the many thousands of pounds they have
committed to this Project.
A special thanks, also, to John for finding
the time to attend, despite being delayed
abroad by the Icelandic Volcanic Ash!
Nick Danagher, member of
Equality 2025, UK Government
Network on Disability Equality
NICK DANAGHER was also a guest
speaker. Nick reminded us of the historic
context of the struggle disabled people have
had to gain control of their lives. The title
‘nothing about us, without us’ is
symbolic of the purpose of a User Led
Organisation. It is to empower disabled
people and help them exercise choice and
control over their lives.
Neil Nerva, London Division of the
Department of Health
Like John Powell, NEIL NERVA kindly
reprised his role as guest speaker, a role he
undertook at the June 2009 Workshop. Neil
spoke of the hope to see more adventurous
services supported by Local Authorities. He,
also, recognised the difficulties that might
be faced when establishing a User Led
Organisation. However, he applauded the
‘coalition’ model approach Redbridge has
chosen to ensure User Led Organisation
representation. He saw it as accountable
and representative, both key to ensuring
that the voices of users of services are
heard.
We would like to thank all the speakers for
taking the time to attend the Workshop.
15
Supporting people to become active citizens would be part of providing in-formation. There’s no point in just having information for information’s sake. There are lots of elements on this list which could be put together.
”“
Question and Answer Session
This session followed a description of what
had taken place over the last year in
developing the User-Led Organisation.
People were invited to ask questions in
response to what they had heard. Below is
a summary of the themes that came from
those questions.
Confusion about the ULO’s role
and how we can get involved
Many people felt they or their organisation
had not had an opportunity to get involved.
It was suggested that those responsible
should have smaller meetings with individual
groups to explain what had happened.
The User Led Organisation could
be the interface between a union
of small organisations, users and
the local authority
It was felt that services and service user
groups were very fragmented. That,
participation of users and their organisation
were always after the decisions had been
made. Users were merely asked to ‘rubber
stamp’ decisions already made.
The ULO must be accessible to all
There was a concern that key information
would only be web based. Many users and
families did not use information technology.
They would be penalised. The User Led
Organisation should ensure all had equal
access to information.
Some also felt the language used in the
workshop was far too complex and
excluded many who attended. It was
suggested that smaller meetings to explain
the issues more clearly would be very
useful.
Concerns raised about what a
User Led Organisation would be
like
A large User Led Organisation that
represented everybody would lose the
‘spontaneity’ of a smaller organisation.
There was little trust in a very conservative
Local authority to be innovative with
services. Can we believe in all this ‘user
control’ rhetoric? The view was that there
was no outcome-based accountability when
performance measures fail to be delivered.
“Whose measures do we accept? What
about the outcomes that the users have?”
How it relates to us: Real Life
A few users gave examples of being bullied
and harassed by children or neighbours
because of their disability or beliefs. They
wanted a User Led Organisation that
considered wider social issues to be
important, not just social care issues.
They considered early intervention and
prevention to be vital. A User Led
16
Organisation should use and support the
existing voluntary sector to have area
meetings especially to break down stigma
at grass-roots level.
The User Led Organisation and
children and carer’s of disabled
children
People who are carers of disabled children
wanted to know whether the User Led
Organisation would represent them?
It is important to state here that all the focus
is on adult social care. The funding of the
User Led Organisation and the people it will
be expected to assist will be adults who use
adult social care services. It is not yet clear if
this will include young people in ‘transition’
or not.
17
When you look at the feedback people gave, most of the points made were about individual rights. We need to be able to advo-cate for our communities. Our voices need to be heard first – who is campaigning for you? It’s not campaigning where you tie yourself to railings but about having clear representation to the local authority.
”
“
Possible roles for the User Led Organisation
We asked the participants what roles they
thought a User-Led Organisation should
have? To assist this process, the attendees
were given a list of 5 options to choose
from.
The list from which people were asked
to select from were:
1. A One-Stop Information Shop.
2. A centre to help people to plan and
find the care and support services
they need (Brokerage).
3. A campaigning organisation.
4. Supporting people to be active
citizens (community engagement).
5. Building and supporting community
network
The Most Popu lar Cho ice : A
campaigning voice that empowers and
engages local service users
Of this, attendees said:
“When you look at the feedback people
gave, most of the points made were about
individual rights. We need to be able to
advocate for our communities. Our voices
need to be heard first – who is campaigning
for you? It’s not campaigning where you tie
18
yourself to railings but about having clear
representation to the local authority.”
Also:
“Are we reinventing the wheel with
some of these ideas? It would be
useful to capacity build the existing
organisations to provide the best care,
but the campaigning issue is the most
important potential function of a ULO.
Is there an issue of not actually being
able to campaign if you are in receipt
of public money? You can’t criticise
the local council if they are funding
you.”
Second most popular choice: One stop
shop and a Brokerage service
The majority of attendees agreed that both
a one-stop shop and brokerage and advice
are services they would like the User Led
Organisation to run.
“There was a concern of what you
mean by a one stop shop. If it’s just a
leaflet drop then forget it. But if it
offered brokerage and campaigning
we could accept that. But we thought
a ULO should incorporate all the
options and no one could exist without
the other. So we thought the ULO
should be a hub which actually
undertakes the campaigning on behalf
of individuals, but the overriding thing
about it is for it to maintain its
independence and autonomy.”
Also:
“Our organisation is isolated because
we are faith based. It makes it harder
for us to be integrated with the wider
r a n g e o f g r o u p s , w h i c h h a s
implications for our funding.”
19
“Supporting people to become active citizens would be part of providing in-formation. There’s no point in just hav-ing information for information’s sake. There are lots of elements on this list which could be put together.”
”
“
Appendix 1: Organisations who attended
Air Football
Department of Health
Indigo Project - Transition Group
Intake and Brief Intervention Team
Interface Redbridge
Jewish Care's Mitkadem Centre for Wellbeing
London Borough of Redbridge
NHS Redbridge
North East London NHS Foundation Trust
Pensioner's Forum
People's Platform
Redbridge Carers Support Service
Redbridge Concern For Mental Health
Redbridge CVS
Redbridge Disability Association
Redbridge Forum for People with a Learning Disability
Redbridge Indian Welfare Association
Redbridge Link
Redbridge Music Lounge
Redbridge People First
Redbridge Resource Centre
Redbridge Transport
Refugee & Migrant Forum of East Lon-don (RAMFEL)
Re-Start (working with ex-offenders)
Richmond Fellowship Employment Service Redbridge
RUN-UP
Sikh Community Care Project
Springboard
The Daffodil Advocacy Project
The Royal Association for Disability Rights
Thinkarts
Uniting Friends
Thanks to:
Maddy Edwards, BASIS Coach
Maggie and her team at the Blue River Cafe
Ryan Jones, the graphic artist
The Parish Church & Community Centre of
St Paul's Goodmayes for use of the venue.
Chris Wyatt and the Redbridge Music
Lounge
Roxanne Keynejad, for taking the notes and
collating them
Elliott Tucker for producing a film of the
event
20
Appendix 2: Documents
Developing a model for Service User and Carer Involvement in the Transforming Adult Social
Care Programme, Sept 2009. http://www.redbridge.gov.uk/ (Search on ‘transforming‘)
accessed May 6, 2010
Developing a User Led Organisation in Redbridge, June 2009http://www.redbridge.gov.uk/
(Search on ‘transforming‘) accessed May 6, 2010
Putting people first: a shared vision and commitment to the transformation of adult social
care; DH (2007) http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/
PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_081118 accessed May 6, 2010
Put t i ng Peop le F i r s t : Trans fo rm ing Adu l t Soc ia l Ca re webs i t e : h t tp : / /
www.puttingpeoplefirst.org.uk/ accessed May 6, 2010
Redbridge User Led Organisation Update to REDBRIDGE HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE
ADVISORY COMMITTEE, March 2009. http://www.redbridge.gov.uk/ (search on
‘transforming‘) accessed May 6, 2010
Road Map - Redbridge ULO Roadmap Stakeholder Event October 22nd Endorse Report
Accountability to users of ULO Relationship to stakeholders Next Step. http://
www.redbridge.gov.uk/ (Search on ‘Road Map’) accessed May 6, 2010
Local Authority Circular LAC (DH) (29 March 2010) 1, TRANSFORMING ADULT SOCIAL
CARE – the Social Care Reform Grants, http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/
dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh_114790.pdf
21
Appendix 3: Equality, Diversity and Evaluation of Event
22
44%
2%15%
2%
21%
4%
12%
ChristianHinduJewishMuslimNoneSikhDid not Respond
Faith
2%10%
6%
4%
62%
4%
2%2%
2%6%
Black AfricanBlack CaribbeanIndianMixed EthnicityWhite BritishWhite IrishBrown BritishChineseJewishDid Not Respond
Ethnicity (Some of the categories below reflect self-defined identities)
2%10%
6%
4%
62%
4%
2%2%
2%6%
Black AfricanBlack CaribbeanIndianMixed EthnicityWhite BritishWhite IrishBrown BritishChineseJewishDid Not Respond
23
12%
47%
19%
8%
8%
6%
25 to 3435 to 4950 to 6565+Under 25Did not respond
Age
15%
47%
13%
19%
6%
Strongly agree
Agree
Disagree
Don't know
Did not answer
I found out all Iwanted to know
Appendix 4: Redbridge User Led Organisation Road Map
24
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
! !"#$%&'(!)*%+!*,!-.++/'(0!1/*2$!
!
-+.!'.3!4&353!!
"(6*/3+!7+#.!-.+$!
!
-8&6*9!
:*&/6!
;$$*'(.!<8'+,!"#+=2.'>+!?,,'=+/!*,!
@3+/!A+6!?/0&('3&.'*(!!
"3.&B%'38!)+6B/'60+!@3+/!A+6!
?/0&('3&.'*(!!
!
-8&6*9!
:*&/6!'3!
6'33*%>+6!
"#./&*/6'(&/C!
D++.'(0!.*!
+%+=.!@A?!
:*&/6!
?=.*
B+/!E
FGF!
H+=+DB+/!E
FGF!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
"#$%&'(!)(*%&+!!
,--%.#+/0121+3!+%!.'(&'!%4!567!!
)(2/+1%#'81*!+%!'+/9(8%2$(&'!!
:(;+!<+(*!
<+/9(8%2$(&!
"=(#+!
7-+%0(&!
>>#$!
)(-%??(#$/+1%#'!
)($0&1$@(!
6%-/2!
,.+8%&1+3!
!
567!
<+/9(8%2$(&'!
:(;+!<+(*!
AB!"C./21+3!D?*/-+!,''(''?(#+!
>B!E.021'8!F.#$1#@!D#4%&?/+1%#!
GB!H1?(+/02(!4%&!567!('+/021'8?(#+!
AB!)(*%&+!+%!I(?0(&'!
>B!"'+/021'8!5'(&!6($!<+((&1#@!J&%.*!
GB!<+((&1#@!@&%.*!+%!$(-1$(!567!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!'+&.-+.&(K!+(&?!%4!&(4(&(#-(!(+-B!
!
<(&=1-(!5'(&!
"#$%&'(?(#+!
"=(#+!
L(-1'1%#'!/+!"#$%&'(?(#+!"=(#+!
7-+%
0(&!>
MMN!
L(-(?0(&!>
MMN!%&!O/
#./&3!>MAM!
,*&12!>
MAM!
25
Produced and published by Redbridge Concern for Mental Health
To discuss the report please contact:
Jon Abrams
020 8925 2435
Equality
Dignity
Support
Respect
Choice
Voice
Control