replacement and improvement standards

Upload: edwin-rivas

Post on 08-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    1/59

    Replacement and Improvement Standards

    Replacement Standards Guidelines............................................................................................................ 3

    Improvement Standards Guidelines........................................................................................................... 4

    Replacement Standards

    Audiovisual: Electronic Audio and Video Units ...................................................................................... 7Audiovisual: Sound Systems .................................................................................................................... 8Ceiling Acoustical Tile (glued on)............................................................................................................. 9

    Computer Hardware MLS (Local Unit) Computers ............................................................................. 10

    Countertop ............................................................................................................................................... 11Doors with hardware, interior ................................................................................................................. 12

    Door, storefront ....................................................................................................................................... 13

    Drapes ..................................................................................................................................................... 14

    Fascia ...................................................................................................................................................... 15Fencing and Gates: Chain Link ............................................................................................................... 16

    Flooring: Carpet ...................................................................................................................................... 17

    Flooring: Tile Ceramic or Quarry......................................................................................................... 18Floors: Hardwood ................................................................................................................................... 19

    General Site: Trees................................................................................................................................... 20

    General Site: Shrubs & Groundcovers..................................................................................................... 21General Site: Lawns................................................................................................................................. 22

    General Site: Irrigation Systems .............................................................................................................. 23

    Gutters and Downspouts ......................................................................................................................... 24HVAC: Air Cooled Condensing Units .................................................................................................... 25

    HVAC: Air Handling Unit with Coils ..................................................................................................... 26

    HVAC: Chiller......................................................................................................................................... 27

    HVAC: Cooling Tower............................................................................................................................ 28HVAC: Digital Thermostat...................................................................................................................... 29

    HVAC: Duct Furnace .............................................................................................................................. 30

    HVAC: Forced Air Furnace (Packaged).................................................................................................. 31HVAC: Hot Water or Steam Boiler......................................................................................................... 32

    Irrigation System, Residential.................................................................................................................. 33

    Lighting: Interior/Exterior ...................................................................................................................... 34Millwork: Under 12 in width ................................................................................................................. 35

    Organ: Electronic ..................................................................................................................................... 36

    Partition Accordion, Folding ................................................................................................................... 37

    Paving: Asphalt........................................................................................................................................ 38Paving/Sidewalks/Stairs/Curbs: Concrete ............................................................................................... 39

    Piano: Upright.......................................................................................................................................... 40

    Roofing: Built-up Asphalt or Bitumen .................................................................................................... 41Roofing: Composition Shingles............................................................................................................... 42

    Roofing: Concrete Tile ............................................................................................................................ 43Roofing: Metal Shingles .......................................................................................................................... 44

    Roofing: Single-ply Rubber Membrane (EPDM) Ballasted................................................................. 45

    Roofing: Single-ply Rubber Membrane (EPDM) Fully Adhered......................................................... 46Roofing: Standing Rib or Metal Panels ................................................................................................... 47

    Roofing: Wood or Shake Shingles........................................................................................................... 48

    Seating: Non-upholstered......................................................................................................................... 49

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 1 of 59

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    2/59

    Seating: Upholstered................................................................................................................................ 50

    Soffits....................................................................................................................................................... 51Stall, Toilet: Partitions............................................................................................................................. 52

    Wall covering: Sisal................................................................................................................................. 53

    Wall covering: Vinyl/Fabric .................................................................................................................... 54Wall tile: Ceramic.................................................................................................................................... 55

    Windows and Skylights ........................................................................................................................... 56

    Improvement Standards

    Building Interior: Reconfigure Space or Change Room Use .................................................................. 57

    General Site: Landscaping Replacement or Upgrade ............................................................................. 58

    HVAC: System Upgrade.......................................................................................................................... 59

    Guiding Principles:

    "Older buildings are architectural examples of their time and need not be remodeled to look likemodern meetinghouses."

    (Facilities Management Guidelines for Meetinghouses and Other Church Property, 6)

    Standards communicate the desired appearance of facilities as established by the presiding

    councils of the Church and ensure consistency throughout the world. When properly used,

    standards empower facilities managers to make more decisions at the local level.

    The "life cycle" of a component is sometimes used as the reason for replacement. This is

    inaccurate and wasteful. The only criteria used for replacing a component should be when it

    meets the written standards for replacement and is validated by onsite inspection. The life cycle

    of a component is used for evaluation purposes only.

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 2 of 59

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    3/59

    Replacement Standards Guidelines

    The purpose of theReplacement and Improvement Standards is to ensure that the desired level of qualityapproved by presiding councils of the Church is achieved but not exceeded in our facilities. When items arereplaced before they meet the replacement criteria, costs increase and the replacement is no longer defensible. For

    this reason, facilities managers are not authorized to replace items that do not meet the replacement criteria.

    A certain amount of wear and tear is to be expected in our facilities and is acceptable. When this amount becomesexcessive and generally distracting, the item should be considered for replacement. Replacement standards havebeen created for inventory items which are more costly to replace. If a replacement standard does not exist for anitem, the facilities manager should determine whether another replacement standard could be applied. Forexample, a replacement standard does not exist for kitchen cabinetry. However, the replacement standard forMillwork could be used to evaluate whether to replace kitchen cabinetry. Some standards may not apply ordescriptions may need to be adapted for the Area. As facilities managers apply theReplacement and ImprovementStandards, they should use good judgment and common sense to ensure work is needed.

    As facilities managers apply theReplacement and Improvement Standards to determine whether to replace an

    item, the following guidelines should be considered.

    Evaluating the Condition of an Item:

    1. Consider the following questions to assess the reliability of an item: How well does the item serve its originally designed purpose? How often does the item require repairs? How often is this item in use?

    2. Consider the following questions to assess the appearance, noise level, or comfort level of an item: Has the noise or comfort level of the item become a distraction? If the style or color of the item is outdated, does the item meet the standard for

    replacement? If not, it should not be replaced.

    Determining What Action to Take:

    1. Consider arepair in the following situation: If individual components of a system are failing but can be repaired. However, if major

    repairs persist, do a cost breakdown analysis in order to compare repair costs withreplacement costs. In some cases, parts may be obsolete and replacement will be necessary.

    2. Consider aretrofitin the following situations: If a cost breakdown analysis shows that it is cost effective. If new technology for a component will extend its useful life.

    3. Consider apartial replacementin the following situations: If sections of the inventory item can be replaced with a similar color, pattern or texture, this

    type of replacement is justified if the item meets the standard for replacement.

    4. Consider a full replacement in the following situations: If individual components of a system cannot be replaced due to obsolescence. If after conducting a cost breakdown analysis it is found that the inventory item is no longer

    cost effective to continually repair.

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 3 of 59

    Back to Table of C

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    4/59

    Improvement Standards Guidelines

    Definition:

    Improvements are defined as work that: extends the life of components or systems increases functionality of the facility, system, or component increases the quantity of an inventoried component

    Application:

    When determining whether to make an improvement, facilities managers should apply theReplacement andImprovement Standards. Some standards may not apply or descriptions may need to be adapted for the DTAArea. As facilities managers apply theReplacement and Improvement Standards, they should use good judgmentand common sense to ensure work is needed. If additional quantity is being added or new space is beingreconfigured, the facilities manager should verify that work complies with the standard plan boundaries andguidelines. For information regarding standard plans, contact the area A&E representative.

    The following guiding principles and improvement guidelines should be reviewed before identifying, verifying,and performing improvement work.

    Guiding Principles:

    1. Older meetinghouses are architectural examples of their time and need not be remodeled to look likemodern meetinghouses.

    2. If exceptional circumstances dictate modification, the results should be in harmony with the character ofthe original building.

    3. When properly maintained, most older meetinghouses continue to be attractive and comfortable andportray the desired image of dignity and reverence without extensive remodeling.

    4. Reasonable wear is acceptable when buildings show evidence of appropriate maintenance, cleanlinessand care.

    (Facilities Management Guidelines for Meetinghouses and Other Church Property)

    Improvement Guidelines:

    1. ConsultantsConsultants may be used to assist the FM or PM in developing project scope, cycle time, and estimatedcosts. Once the scope has been approved, consultants should use Church standard specifications in all

    design work. Designs should be consistent with the cost per square foot established by the DTA Area forR&I and new space work. Consultants should also be familiar with theReplacement and ImprovementStandards and apply them in their work.

    2. AdditionsAdditions and reconfiguration of existing space may be made when an existing facility no longer providesfor the functional needs of the local units. This is determined by applying theMeetinghouse AdequacyStandards O&M-PS-0006. For instructions on applying these standards, see Determining MeetinghouseAdequacy O&M-PS-0007.

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 4 of 59

    Back to Table of C

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    5/59

    When there is a defensible need to add new space to an existing building, standard plan additions shouldbe applied where appropriate. Non-standard additions should be designed in consultation with theArchitecture Engineering and Construction Division at Church headquarters or the DTA Area architectureand engineering staff.

    Additions and other improvements should be consistent with the existing architecture of the building.Existing finishes, fixtures, and components should not be replaced to match the addition unless they meet

    the established criteria for replacement in theReplacement and Improvement Standards.

    3. Interior FinishesExisting interior finishes such as face brick or painted concrete block walls should not be upgraded withplaster and paint or sisal wall covering.

    4. SeismicBefore performing any seismic work, the Seismic Strategy found in the Operations & MaintenanceStrategies O&M-PS-0002 should be reviewed. Seismic upgrades should only be performed when otherR&I work creates an opportunity to optimize economic timing and to minimize the impact on occupyingunits. Full building seismic upgrades require PFAC approval.

    5.

    HVACAir conditioning may be added to existing meetinghouses per the HVAC System Upgrade ImprovementStandard found in theReplacement and Improvement Standards. It is important to ensure that all HVACequipment is functioning as intended so that the original design for outdoor ventilation air is achieved.

    6. Site WorkRetaining walls, benches, decorative planters and landscape islands in parking areas should not be addedunless required by local code. For most sites, future expansion areas should be left undeveloped with nounnecessary grading or landscape improvements.

    7. ParkingTo determine the appropriate number of parking spaces for a facility, see Standard Plans Change

    Boundaries A&E-NSP-0003 .

    8. LandscapingBefore replacing or upgrading landscaping, the followingReplacement and Improvement Standardsshould be reviewed and applied:

    General Site: Landscaping Replacement or Upgrade Improvement Standard General Site: Trees Replacement Standard General Site: Shrubs and Groundcovers Replacement Standard General Site: Lawns Replacement Standard General Site: Irrigation Systems Replacement Standard

    Drought tolerant landscape should only be installed on existing buildings when the landscape meets thestandard for replacement or when required by local code. Landscape irrigation systems should not beadded if similar facilities in the area are not commonly irrigated.

    9. Parking LightingParking lighting should illuminate stalls close to the building or as needed for safety and to meet localjurisdiction requirements. Do not provide accent, ornamental, seasonal, or other special lighting andrelated exterior power outlets on existing buildings.

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 5 of 59

    Back to Table of C

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    6/59

    10.FlagpoleIf requested by local leaders, a flagpole may be installed at a meetinghouse. The cost of the flagpole andinstallation is a local unit expense. The flagpole can usually be placed in a front lawn area and should notrequire additional concrete walks.

    11.FencingIf fencing is required, chain link fencing should be installed. Plastic slats may be added when needed for

    screening. Other fence types are permitted only when required by local jurisdictions.

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 6 of 59

    Back to Table of Co

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    7/59

    Replacement Standards Audiovisual: Electronic Audio and Video Units

    This replacement standard is to be applied by facility managers during R&I needs identification inspection and by membersof the verification team during the R&I verification inspection.

    This standard is used to evaluate cassette tape recorders/players (CR), compact disk players(CDP), televisions (TV), videocassette recorders/players (VCRs), combination TV-VCRs, television projectors (TVP), and television cameras. Eachelectronic audio and video unit should be evaluated independent of all other units.

    A conscientious and consistent program of scheduled preventive maintenance work to each item will maximize its useful life.

    Condition Definition Action

    1. Excellent. The unit functions asdesigned.

    The unit delivers high quality soundand/or picture without distortion.Controls operate properly.

    Do not consider replacement under

    these conditions.

    2. Very Good. Necessary adjustmentskeep the unit functioning as designed.

    The unit delivers high quality soundand/or picture without distortion with

    slight adjustments to the manualcontrols.

    Do not consider replacement under

    these conditions.

    3. Good. The unit continues tofunction with regular maintenance andintermittent repairs.

    (It should be possible with propermaintenance and timely repairs, toextend the useful life of the unit formany years.)

    The unit delivers good quality soundand/or picture. Occasional repairs mayhave to be made to the electronics orthe manual controls to keep it in goodoperating condition. The unit is stillreliable.

    Replacement of the item is not

    justified but should continue to beevaluated annually. Make necessaryrepairs and parts replacements asneeded. It is not yet time to replacethe unit.

    4. Fair. The unit no longer functionsas designed and will not without major

    repairs.

    The sound and/or picture qualityproduced detracts from the message

    being presented. The quality may notbe improved without serious repairs.The unit cannot be relied on tofunction upon demand.

    Replace this unit.

    5. Poor. The unit no longer functionsas designed and delivers inadequatesound and/or picture quality.

    The sound and/or picture qualityproduced seriously detracts from themessage being presented, or does notoperate at all. Repair costs havebecome intolerable.

    This unit is over-due for

    replacement.

    Replacement Directives

    1. Replace only with items found in Master Commodity Reference (MCR).

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 7 of 59

    Back to Table of Co

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    8/59

    Replacement Standards Audiovisual: Sound Systems

    Condition Definition Action

    1. Excellent. The system functions atthe original design levels.

    Occupants can hear clearly. There isno distracting noise.

    The system is totally reliable.

    Necessary balancing and otheradjustments keep the systemfunctioning at design levels.

    Do not consider replacement under

    these conditions.

    2. Good. The system continues tofunction with intermittent componentrepairs, replacements, and minorsystem improvements.

    Occupants can hear clearly. There isno distracting noise.

    Some components have failed andhave been replaced.

    Others are approaching the end of theiruseful lives.

    Make necessary repairs and parts

    replacements as needed.

    It should be possible with proper

    repairs and maintenance to extend

    the life of the sound system without

    replacement of the entire system.

    3. Poor. The overall sound system issubject to constant breakdowns anddelivers inadequate sound quality.

    Occupants are distracted by thefailures of the sound system and noise.

    The components are old andundependable.

    The technology is out of date.

    Repair costs have become intolerable.

    The sound system is over-due for

    replacement.

    Replacement Directives

    1. Church approved consultants, drawings, specifications and details should be used when replacing sound systemparts and components.

    2. Existing sound system components such as speakers, speaker cans, speaker cable, microphones, pulpit controls, etc.that are in good condition should be maintained wherever possible.

    3. Ensure that an asbestos survey and report is on file for meetinghouses built prior to 1988. Follow asbestosabatement and management practices outlined in the Church Asbestos Program Handbook when replacing the soundsystem.

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 8 of 59

    Back to Table of C

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    9/59

    Replacement Standards Ceiling Acoustical Tile (glued on)

    This replacement standard is to be applied by the facility managers during R&I needs identification inspection and bymembers of the verification team during the R&I verification inspection.

    A conscientious and consistent program of scheduled preventive maintenance work can maximize the useful life of the entirearea covered by ceiling tile.

    Ceiling tile replacement may include all of the tile in a meetinghouse, or the tile may be replaced in homogeneous wear zonesas preferred by the stake leaders, Wear zones may be identified as

    1. Foyers and hallways2. Classrooms and offices3. Chapel and overflow4. Cultural hall

    Condition Definition Action

    1. Excellent. Tile is new or like newcondition.

    There is no permanent soiling, staining or,discoloration. There are no visible dents,cracks or chipped surfaces.

    Do not consider replacement under theseconditions.

    2. Very Good. Tile in the area beinginspected is only beginning to showdefects.

    Slight discoloration may be present in agingtile or around return air ducts. Spot cleaningand minor repairs to prevent sagging andremove marks have been made to maintainthe condition of the tile. 75% to 95% of thetile in the area being inspected is still inexcellent condition.

    Do not consider replacement under these

    conditions.

    3. Good. Tile is showing defects, but iswithin acceptable limits.

    (It should be possible, with proper andtimely repairs and preventivemaintenance, to extend the life of theceiling tile in this condition for manyyears. This does not take vandalism intoconsideration.)

    The tile is showing slight yellowing anddiscoloration. Regular spot cleaning haskept the tile attractive. Repairs and

    replacements have been made to correctsagging, fading, dented, chipped and brokentiles. 75% to 95% of the tile in the areabeing considered is still in very goodcondition.

    Replacement is not yet justified

    Evaluate the tile annually until replacement isrequired.

    4. Fair. The tile is showing considerablecracks marks and defects.

    More than 70% of the area covered isshowing discoloration, sagging, cracks andmarks. Cleaning and other restorationprocesses are having minimal effect on thetile. Repairs are needed often to correctsagging, cracking, and denting. Less than75% of the tile is in good condition.

    Replace the tile.

    5. Poor. The tile is showing serious andextensive discoloration and defects.

    Most of the tile is sagging, dented, broken,chipped, cracked and disfigured. Extensivemarking and disfiguration detracts from theappearance of the tile. Damage isirreversible.

    The ceiling tile is over-due for replacement.

    Replacement Directives

    1. It may be necessary to replace an area, subject to considerable vandalism, with a product that is more resistant.2. The addition of new space does not necessarily justify the replacement of ceiling tile in existing space.

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 9 of 59

    Back to Table of C

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    10/59

    Replacement Standards Computer Hardware MLS (Local Unit) Computers

    All MLS (Local Unit) computers and printers will be replaced together on a five-year cycle. The stakephysical facilities representative works with the FM group during the fourth year of the computers lifeso headquarters budget funds can be set aside to replace both the computer and printer during the fifth

    year. See the Policy and Guidelines for Computers Used by Clerks for Church Record Keeping forspecific questions.

    Computers that have hardware failures within the first three years of life are considered under warrantyby the manufacturer. If a computer malfunctions and is out of warranty but not yet scheduled forreplacement, the unit should contact the assistant stake clerk assigned to manage Church computers anddetermine if the computer can be repaired for less than $150. If it can be repaired for less than $150, theassistant stake clerk makes the necessary arrangements and codes the expense in stake MLS to Other:Authorized Computer Repairs. These repair funds will be reimbursed to the stake. If the repairs willcost more than $150, the stake physical facilities representative should contact the FM group to order areplacement. The FM group will replace the computer using operational funds.

    New Computer Hardware Standards

    Current Requirements for all new computers as of 1 January 2008:

    Pentium Dual Core 1.8 gigahertz processor 2 GB of RAM 60 GB of Hard disk capacity DVD-ROM drive Network card Internal modem Windows XP Professional with service pack 2 6+ USB ports Stakes must have Symbol Technologies barcode reader scanner Laser Printer HP Laserjet P2015d Church Communications Network equipment (where approved) 512 MB Flash drive Multimedia speakers attached to a 17 Flat Screen Monitor Mouse/Keyboard

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 10 of 59

    Back to Table of C

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    11/59

    Replacement Standards Countertop (R&I #36)

    This replacement standard is to be applied by the facility managers during R&I needs identification inspection and by members of theverification team during the R&I verification inspection.

    A conscientious and consistent program of scheduled cleaning and preventive maintenance work can maximize the useful life of thecountertop.

    Condition Definition Action

    1. Excellent. The countertop is in new orlike new condition and functions asdesigned.

    The countertop has no chips, dents orscratches. The finished surface is not wornor faded. There is no discoloration on thesurface. All corners and side pieces aretight.

    Do not consider replacement under these

    conditions.

    2. Very Good. The countertop is beginningto show wear. Regular cleaning keeps thecountertop in good condition.

    The countertop may have some scratches orsmall chips at this point. The surface is notseriously dented or scratched. There is nofading or discoloration present.All corners and side pieces are tight.

    Do not consider replacement under these

    conditions.

    3. Good. The countertop is showingdefects, but is within acceptable limits.The countertop continues to serve itspurpose with regular cleaning and minorrepairs.

    (It should be possible, with proper andtimely repairs and preventive maintenance,to extend the life of the countertop in thiscondition for many years. This does nottake vandalism into consideration.)

    The countertop may have some minordents, chips and scratches. The finishedsurface is beginning to fade and wear.Some discoloration may be present, but thecountertop is still usable. Some of thecorners or side pieces may need to be re-adhered or replaced.

    Replacement is not yet justified

    Evaluate the countertop annually untilreplacement is required. Make necessaryrepairs and section replacements as needed.

    4. Fair. The countertop is showingconsiderable wear and defects. It no longerserves its purpose as originally designed.Colors may be outdated.

    The countertop has many scratches, dentsand chips. The finish surface is faded andwearing thin. Discoloration is present andside and corner pieces are loose or broken.

    Replace the countertop.

    If only one section of the countertop is inbad shape, try and get a match in materialsand replace only that one part.

    5. Poor. The countertop is showing seriousand extensive discoloration and defects.

    The countertop has several scratches, dentsand chips. The surface is severely fadedand discolored. Corner and side pieces arebroken or missing.

    The countertop is over-due for

    replacement.

    Replacement Directives

    1. Use only Church approved consultants, specifications and/or details when replacing a countertop.2. Wherever possible, continue to use existing sections or components that are in good condition, such as corner pieces, side pieces

    or entire sections of countertop. This may not be possible if a color or design match cannot be made.

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 11 of 59

    Back to Table of C

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    12/59

    Replacement Standards Doors with hardware, interior

    This replacement standard is to be applied by the facility managers during R&I needs identification inspection and bymembers of the verification team during the R&I verification inspection.

    A conscientious and consistent program of scheduled preventive maintenance work to each component of the Interior Door

    will maximize its useful life.

    The replacement standard provides direction to facility managers for replacing the entire door or door system, notindividual components or parts of a system.

    Condition Definition Action

    1. Excellent. The door functions asoriginally installed. There are no signs ofsagging, chips, splintered areas, scratches,warps or hardware that does not functionproperly.

    The operation of the door is totally reliable.All components including glass, veneer,finish, locks, seals, frames and hardware areintact and fully functioning with no visibledefects.

    Do not consider replacement under these

    conditions.

    2. Very Good. Necessary adjustments and

    minor parts replacement may be necessary.Only minor scratches and wear on thehardware and veneer are evident. The doorfunctions as originally installed.

    The operation of the door is totally reliable.

    Adjustments and minor parts replacementwill maintain the integrity of door. 85%-95% of the surface area of the door, door-frame and hardware are in originalcondition. The hardware is showing onlyslight wear.

    Do not consider replacement under these

    conditions.

    3. Good. The door continues to functionwith intermittent component repairs,replacements.

    (It should be possible, with proper andtimely repairs, maintenance and necessaryreplacements, to extend the life of the door

    for many years without replacement of theentire door system.)

    The door functions adequately.Some components have failed and havebeen replaced. Others are approaching theend of their useful lives. 85%-95% of thesurface finish of the door, door -frame andhardware are still in very good condition.The door may have a slight amount of warp.

    Replacement of the entire door assembly

    is not justified but should continue to be

    evaluated annually. Make necessaryrepairs and parts replacements as needed.It is not yet time to replace the door.

    4. Fair. The door no longer functions asdesigned and will not without major repairs.

    Hinges, locks and panic hardware no longerfunction as original. Less than 75% of thesurface finish of the door, door - frame andhardware are in good condition. The doorshows some warp, but can still be adjustedto latch properly

    Make a cost analysis to determine

    whether to replace faulty, cracked,

    chipped, peeled, warped or otherwise

    failed components of the door assembly

    or replace it entirely.

    5. Poor. The overall door assembly issubject to constant breakdowns and deliversinadequate quality. The appearance is nolonger acceptable.

    Door sags from hinge failure. Lockingsystem is inoperable. More than 40% of thesurface finish of the door and hardwareshows evidence of peeling, scratches,splintering, chips The door is warped to the

    point that it cannot be adjusted to latchproperly. Panic hardware is inoperable andnew panic hardware is incompatible withthe old door.

    The door is over-due for replacement.

    Replacement Directives

    1. Replace with equal veneer selection, stain colors and specifications as closely as possible.2. When partial replacement occurs, maintain consistency in styles and ratings of doors and components.3. When replacing door in entire building or building section, replace with church standard specified products.

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 12 of 59

    Back to Table of C

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    13/59

    Replacement Standards Door, Storefront

    This replacement standard is to be applied by the facility managers during R&I needs identification inspection and by members of theverification team during the R&I verification inspection.

    A conscientious and consistent program of scheduled preventive maintenance work to each component of the Storefront Door willmaximize its useful life.

    The replacement standard provides direction to facility managers for replacing the entire Storefront Door System not individualcomponents or parts of a system.

    Condition Definition Action

    1. Excellent. The system functions asoriginally installed. There are no signs ofdiscolored or fading aluminum, crackedor broken glass, sagging doors, ordeteriorated weather stripping.

    The system is totally reliable.The door operates smoothly. All

    components including glass, locks, rubberseals, frames and hardware are intact. Thedoor is functioning properly and is secure.

    Do not consider replacement under

    these conditions.

    2. Very Good. Necessary adjustments

    and minor parts replacement may benecessary. Some fading of anodizedaluminum is prevalent.

    The system is totally reliable.

    Adjustments and minor parts replacementwill maintain the integrity of door system.75% or more of the anodized area, andhardware surfaces, on a particular storefrontdoor assembly are still in excellentcondition.

    Do not consider replacement under

    these conditions.

    3. Good. The system continues tofunction with intermittent componentrepairs, replacements.

    (It should be possible, with proper andtimely repairs, maintenance andnecessary replacements, to extend the lifeof the Storefront Door for many years

    without replacement of the entire doorsystem.)

    The door functions adequately.Some components have failed and havebeen replaced. Others are approaching theend of their useful lives. 75% of theanodized area, and hardware surfaces, on aparticular storefront door assembly are stillin very good condition. The door is stillsecure.

    Replacement of the entire door

    assembly is not justified but should

    continue to be evaluated annually.Make necessary repairs and partsreplacements as needed.It is not yet time to replace the

    Storefront Door.

    4. Fair. The Storefront Door no longerfunctions as designed and will notwithout major repairs.

    Hinges, locks and panic hardware are notfunctioning as originally designed. Minorglass chips and cracks may be evident. Lessthan 75% of the aluminum anodized areas,and hardware surfaces, are in goodcondition. It may not be possible to fullysecure the door,

    Make a study and life cycle cost

    analysis to determine whether to

    replace faulty, cracked or faded

    components of the door assembly or

    replace it entirely.

    If the door cannot be secured it should

    be replaced.

    5. Poor. The overall door assembly issubject to constant breakdowns anddelivers inadequate service.

    Door sags from hinge failure. Lockingsystem is inoperable. More than 40% of theanodized areas and weather stripping isgone. Panic hardware is inoperable and newpanic hardware is incompatible with the olddoor.

    The storefront door system is over-due

    for replacement.

    Replacement Directives

    1. Use only recommended professional glazing contractors when replacing an entire system.

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 13 of 59

    Back to Table of C

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    14/59

    Replacement Standards Drapes (R&I #32)

    This replacement standard is to be applied by the facility managers during R&I needs identification inspection and by members of theverification team during the R&I verification inspection.

    A conscientious and consistent program of scheduled cleaning and repair work can maximize the useful life of drapes.

    Condition Definition Action

    1. Excellent. The drapes are new or likenew condition and they function asdesigned.

    Drapes have no loose threads. Hems aresecure and seams tight. If liners are present,the stitching is tight. There are no tears.Hardware functions smoothly and has nobroken or missing parts.

    Do not consider replacement under these

    conditions.

    2. Very Good. The drapes are beginning toshow wear. Cleaning and repairs help keepthe drapes in good working condition.

    Drapes have a slight amount of loosethreads. Hems are secure and seams tight.If liners are present, stitching is tight. Thereare no tears. Hardware functions smoothlyand has no broken or missing parts.

    Do not consider replacement under these

    conditions.

    3. Good. The drapes are showing defects,but are within acceptable limits. The drapescontinue to serve their purpose with regularcleaning and repairs.

    (It should be possible, with proper andtimely cleaning and repairs, to extend thelife of the drapes in this condition for manyyears. This does not take vandalism intoconsideration.)

    Drapes have some loose threads. Thesunlight is starting to weaken the fibers inthe material. Hems are secure and seamstight. If liners are present, stitching is tight.There are no tears. Hardware functionssmoothly and has few broken or missingparts.

    Replacement is not yet justified

    Evaluate the drapes annually untilreplacement is required. Make necessaryrepairs and replace damaged or brokenhardware.

    4. Fair. The drapes are showingconsiderable wear and defects. The drapes

    no longer function as designed and will notwithout several repairs, to the point wherethe repairs are noticeable and distracting.

    Drapes have considerable loose threads.The sunlight has caused the material to

    become fragile and weak. Hems or seamsare coming un-sewn or are loose. Linersmay be coming unstitched and stained(from condensation). There may be sometears. Hardware does not function smoothlyand has some broken or missing parts.

    Replace the drapes.If the liners are stained and the hardware is

    bad, but the rest of the drapes are in goodcondition, consider replacing only the linersand hardware.

    5. Poor. The drapes are showing seriousand extensive discoloration and defects.The drapes no longer serve their purpose.

    Drapes have several loose threads. Damagein the form of holes and tears are present,due to the fragility of the material. Hems orseams are coming un-sewn. Liners may behanging loose. There may be tears.Hardware does not function and may haveseveral broken or missing parts.

    The drapes over-due for replacement.

    Replacement Directives

    1. Use only Church approved contractors, specifications and/or details when replacing drapes.2. Blackout drapes may need to be put in places where broadcasts are shown, such as in a stake center.

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 14 of 59

    Back to Table of C

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    15/59

    Replacement Standards Fascia

    This replacement standard is to be applied by the facility managers during R&I needs identification inspection and by members of theverification team during the R&I verification inspection.

    A program of scheduled preventive maintenance work can maximize the useful life of the entire building fascia.

    Condition Definition Action

    1. Excellent. The fascia is in new or likenew condition and is functioning asdesigned.

    Fascia has no dents or loose sections. Thereis no discoloration.

    Do not consider replacement under these

    conditions.

    2. Very Good. The fascia is beginning toshow slight signs of wear. Cleaning mightbe necessary to keep the fascia in thiscondition.

    Fascia is slightly dented, but has no loosesections. There is slight discoloration.

    Do not consider replacement under these

    conditions.

    3. Good. The fascia is showing wear, but is

    within acceptable limits.

    Fascia has some dents and has a few loose

    sections. There is some discoloration.

    Replacement is not yet justified

    Evaluate the fascia occasionally untilreplacement is required. Make necessaryrepairs and replace sections accordingly.

    4. Fair. The fascia is showing aconsiderable amount of wear. The fascia isdetracting from the appearance of theexterior.

    Fascia has many dents and has some loosesections. Discoloration is evident.

    Replace the fascia.

    5. Poor. The fascia is showing serious andextensive wear.

    Fascia has several dents and has some loosesections. Discoloration detracts from thebuildings exterior appearance.

    The fascia is over-due for replacement.

    Replacement Directives

    1. Use only Church approved specifications and details when replacing a buildings fascia.

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 15 of 59

    Back to Table of C

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    16/59

    Replacement Standards Fencing and Gates: Chain Link (R&I #139)

    This replacement standard is to be applied by the facility managers during R&I needs identification inspection and by members of theverification team during the R&I verification inspection.

    A conscientious and consistent program of scheduled preventive maintenance work can maximize the useful life of the chain link fence.

    Condition Definition Action

    1. Excellent. The fence is in new or likenew condition. It functions at its originaldesign level.

    Chain link fence is straight and tight, withno sagging or bent mesh. All wire ties arepresent. Supporting posts are straight. Allslats in privacy fences are present and arenot cracked, broken or missing.

    Do not consider replacement under these

    conditions.

    2. Very Good. The fence is beginning toshow wear. Necessary adjustments allowthe fence to continue its designed purpose.

    Chain link fence is straight and tight, withslight bending and / or sagging mesh.Supporting posts are straight. Privacy slatsare all in tact, but may be starting to crack.

    Do not consider replacement under these

    conditions.

    3. Good. The fence is showing defects, butis within acceptable limits. The fencecontinues to function with regularmaintenance and intermittent repairs.

    (It should be possible, with proper andtimely repairs and preventive maintenance,to extend the life of the fence in thiscondition for many years. This does nottake vandalism into consideration.)

    Chain link fence could be bent in someareas due to cars, snow removal, or people(climbing on it). Sections of mesh mayneed to be replaced. Some privacy slats arebroken or missing. Supporting posts arestill straight.

    Replacement is not yet justifiedEvaluate the fence annually untilreplacement is required. Make necessaryrepairs and replace parts as needed.

    4. Fair. The fence is showing considerable

    wear and defects. The fence no longerfunctions as designed and will not withoutmajor repairs.

    Chain link fence has bent areas of mesh.

    Many of the supporting ties are missing.Several privacy slats are cracked, broken, ormissing. Supporting posts are bent fromcars running into them. Fence is no longertight or straight

    Replace the fence.

    If there are only a few sections of fence thatare damaged, consider replacing only thearea of damaged mesh

    5. Poor. The fence is showing serious andextensive discoloration and defects. Thefence is continually breaking or damaged.It is no longer useful and does not functionas designed.

    Chain link fence is no longer straight andhas several areas of bent mesh. Manysupporting posts are bent and several wireties are missing. Most of the privacy slatsare missing. Trees and bushes may havegrown into the fence, bending and distortingthe mesh. The fence no longer serves itsoriginal purpose.

    The fence is over-due for replacement.

    Replacement Directives

    1. Use only Church approved consultants, specifications and/or details when replacing chain link fencing.2. Wherever possible, use existing components that are in good condition, such as supporting posts. If the old fence does not have

    privacy slats, and the new fence will have privacy slats, use a thicker gage steel support post, buried at least two feet deep.

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 16 of 59

    Back to Table of C

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    17/59

    Replacement Standards Flooring: Carpet(R&I #14)

    This replacement standard is to be applied by facility managers during R&I needs identification inspection and by members of the verification team duringthe R&I verification inspection.

    A conscientious and consistent program of cleaning and scheduled preventive maintenance work will maximize the useful life of the entire carpet.

    A carpet replacement may include all the carpet in a meetinghouse, or the carpet may be replaced in homogeneous wear zones as preferred by the stake

    leaders. Wear zones may be identified as:

    1. Chapel and overflow2. Cultural hall3. Foyers, hallways and stairs4. Classrooms and offices

    Condition Definition Action

    1. Excellent. Carpet is in new or like-newcondition.

    There is no permanent soiling, staining, orfading. There is no visible frizzing, fraying,seam separation, bubbling, backing separation,matting, or tearing.

    Do not consider replacement under these

    conditions.

    2. Very Good. Carpet in the area beinginspected is only beginning to show wear.

    Slight matting or fading may be present in areasof heaviest traffic. Regular spotting andcleaning have maintained the carpets attractive

    appearance. Small repairs may have been madeto correct some snagging, or fraying. There isno visible seam separation, bubbling, backingseparation, or tearing. 75% to 95% of the carpetin the area being inspected is still in excellentcondition.

    Do not consider replacement under these

    conditions.

    3. Good. Carpet is showing wear, but is withinacceptable limits

    (It should be possible with proper and timelyrepairs and preventive maintenance to extend thelife of the carpet in this condition for manyyears.)

    The areas of heaviest traffic are showing mattingor fading. Regular spotting and cleaning havekept the carpet looking attractive. Repairs havebeen made to correct frizzing, fraying, seamseparation, backing separation, bubbling, ortearing. 75% to 95% of the carpet in the areabeing considered is still in very good condition.

    Replacement is not yet justified. Evaluate thecarpet annually until replacement is required.

    4. Fair. Carpet is showing considerable wear. Many places are showing matting or fading.

    Regular spotting and cleaning are havingminimal effect on appearance. Repairs areneeded often to correct snagging, frizzing,fraying, seam separation, bubbling, backingseparation, or tearing. It is no longer possible toeliminate all frizzing. Less than 75% of thecarpet is in good condition.

    Replace this carpet.

    5. Poor. Carpet is showing serious andextensive wear.

    Most of the carpet is showing matting or fading.Frizzing is irreversible. Regular spotting andcleaning has little or no effect on appearance.Repairs must be made constantly to correctsnagging, fraying, seam separation, bubbling,backing separation, or tearing.

    This carpet is over-due for replacement.

    Replacement Directives

    1. New carpet colors have been designed such that the carpet does not prematurely trigger the replacement of other items. The color of the replacementcarpet should be chosen to compliment other existing meetinghouse components and not be a reason to replace them. Such components include(but are not limited to) existing carpet, pew fabric, opera chair fabric, foyer furniture, chair color, counter tops, window sills, toilet partitions, orportable partitions.

    2. The addition of new space does not necessarily justify the replacement of carpet in existing space.3. Relief Society Room carpet replacement should not be different from standard carpet in the meetinghouse.4. If the wall base must be replaced, carpet wall base is the standard.

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 17 of 59

    Back to Table of C

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    18/59

    Replacement Standards Flooring: Tile Ceramic or Quarry (R&I #9)

    This replacement standard is to be applied by the facility managers during R&I needs identification inspection and by members of theverification team during the R&I verification inspection.

    A conscientious and consistent program of scheduled cleaning and preventive maintenance work can maximize the useful life of the tilefloor.

    Condition Definition Action

    1. Excellent. The tile floor is new or likenew condition.

    The floor has no discoloration or wornsurface. There are no chipped, cracked, orbroken tiles. There are no loose or missingportions. Grout is uniform in color andappearance.

    Do not consider replacement under these

    conditions.

    2. Very Good. The tile floor is beginningto show wear. Regular cleaning andpreventative maintenance keepappearance clean and new.

    The floor has no discoloration or wornsurface. There may be slight cracks, withno chipped or broken tiles. There are noloose or missing portions. Grout is uniformin color and appearance.

    Do not consider replacement under these

    conditions.

    3. Good. The tile floor is showingdefects, but is within acceptable limits.The tile surface continues to serve itspurpose with regular cleaning andintermittent repairs.

    (It should be possible, with proper andtimely cleaning, repairs and preventivemaintenance, to extend the life of thefloor in this condition for many years.This does not take vandalism intoconsideration.)

    The floor has no discoloration or wornsurface. There may be some hairline cracksor chips, but no tiles are broken. There areno loose or missing portions. Grout mayshow variation in color or appearance.

    Replacement is not yet justified

    Evaluate the tile floor annually untilreplacement is required. Make necessarygrout repairs and individual tile replacementas needed.

    4. Fair. The tile floor is showingconsiderable wear and defects. The floorno longer serves its purpose. Theappearance of the tile is distracting.

    Floor has slight discoloration or wornsurface present. There may be some cracksor chips with no broken tiles. There are noloose, broken or missing portions. Groutmay show some variation in color andappearance. A small amount of grout isloose or missing.

    Replace the tile floor. If only one sectionof tile has been damaged or worn due toheavy traffic, consider only replacing thattile area. This may not be possible if a tilematch cannot be made.

    5. Poor. The tile floor is showing seriousand extensive wear and defects. Thefloor no longer serves its purpose. Theappearance of the tile is severely

    distracting.

    Floor has some discoloration and a wornsurface. There are cracks and/or chipspresent with some tiles broken. There aresome loose, broken or missing portions.

    Grout shows obvious variation in color andappearance. Some grout is loose ormissing.

    The tile floor is over-due for

    replacement.

    Replacement Directives

    1. Use only Church approved contractors, specifications and/or details when replacing a tile floor.2. Wherever possible, find matching tile and only replace tile that is in fair to poor condition.3. When replacing a tile floor, make sure to buy extra tiles and store them for future repairs and replacements.

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 18 of 59

    Back to Table of C

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    19/59

    Replacement Standards Floors: Hardwood(R&I #11)

    This replacement standard is to be applied by the facility managers during R&I needs identification inspection and by members of theverification team during the R&I verification inspection.

    A conscientious and consistent program of scheduled repairs and preventive maintenance work can maximize the useful life of thehardwood floor.

    Condition Definition Action

    1. Excellent. The floor is new or likenew condition. Floor functions atoriginal design purpose.

    Floor has no scratches, gouges,discoloration, finish build-up. There is nochipping or peeling of the finish. There areno broken, loose or missing planks. Floorhas adequate finish in all areas.

    Do not consider replacement under these

    conditions.

    2. Very Good. The flooring is beginningto show wear. Cleaning and routinemaintenance keep the floor in goodcondition.

    Floor has slight scratches, but no gouges,discoloration or finish build-up. There is nochipping or peeling of the finish. Finish isslightly worn in high traffic areas only.There are no loose, broken or missing

    portions.

    Do not consider replacement under these

    conditions.

    3. Good. The flooring is showingdefects, but is within acceptable limits. Itcontinues to function as originallydesigned with regular maintenance.

    (It should be possible, with proper andtimely repairs and preventivemaintenance, to extend the life of thefloor in this condition for many years.This does not take vandalism intoconsideration.)

    Floor has some scratches and/or gouges.There is discoloration and finish build-up.There may be some chipping and peeling ofthe finish. Finish shows some wearthroughout. There are no loose, broken ormissing portions.

    Replacement is not yet justified.Evaluate the floor annually untilreplacement is required. Refinish floor andmake any other necessary repairs.Hardwood floors can be sanded 3 to 4 timesbefore they need to be replaced.

    4. Fair. The flooring is showingconsiderable marks and defects. Floor isextensively worn. The surface no longerfunctions as designed and will notwithout major repairs.

    Floor has considerable scratches gouging ispresent. There is discoloration and finishbuild-up. There is chipping and peeling ofthe finish. Planks have been sanded severaltimes and are wearing thin. Water damagemay be present, causing the planks to cupand buckle, which causes uneven sections.Separation of planks has caused many areasto squeak when stepped on.

    Replace the floor.

    The floor may last a few more years bymaking the necessary repairs and plankreplacements as needed.

    5. Poor. The flooring is showing seriousand extensive discoloration and defects.Floor is extremely worn.

    Floor has extensive scratching and aconsiderable number of gouges are present.There is obvious discoloration and finishbuild-up. There may be considerablechipping and peeling of the finish. There

    may be some loose, broken or missingportions. Finish shows extensive wearthroughout. Planks are cracking andseparating. Boards are thin from sandingand refinishing.

    The floor is over-due for replacement.

    Replacement Directives

    1. Use only Church approved consultants, specifications and details when replacing an entire wood floor.2. When replacing a cultural hall floor, take off the basketball rims in order to prevent people from playing on the floor too early.

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 19 of 59

    Back to Table of C

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    20/59

    Replacement Standards General Site: Trees

    The replacement standard is to be applied by the Facility Manager during the R&I needs identification inspectionand by members of the verification team. A conscientious and consistent program of scheduled preventivemaintenance work to each tree will maximize its useful and sustainable life.

    Selective removal of trees as they reach maturity is justified if they are no longer meeting the design criteria ormaintenance and replacement standards established by the original or modified planting plan. Consult with theauthorized Landscape Architect designated by the Regional FM Manager to assist in this evaluation. .

    Each tree should be inspected and recommendations reported annually to the verification team by the experiencedcertified arborist or assigned specialist selected to maintain the tree. Replacement should be evaluated against thefollowing criteria:

    Condition Definition Action

    1.Excellent. The tree is in a thriving,healthy condition.

    The tree is generally undamaged ormarred by poor maintenance practices,natural forces or insects.

    Do not consider replacement under

    these conditions.

    2. Very Good. The tree has sustainedsome damage, but generally is in ahealthy condition.

    Poor maintenance practices, naturalforces or insects/pests have damagedthe tree.

    Do not consider replacement underthese conditions. Provide preventativemeasures of maintenance as directed bythe certified arborists annual report.

    3. Good. The tree is showingimprovement from previous damagesustained earlier in its life.

    Growth and development of the tree iscontinuing though hindered by poormaintenance practices, natural forces orinsects/pests that affected its earliergrowth. Most damage has been stoppedor altered enough to extend the life ofthe tree.

    Replacement of the tree is not

    justified but should continue to be

    evaluated annually. Follow therecommendations presented by thecertified arborists annual report.

    4. Fair. The tree is showingconsiderable signs of deterioration.

    30%-50% of the limbs have died orshow considerable signs of altered

    growth. Extensive damage to thegrowth areas of the tree has occurreddue to insects/pests infestation or othernatural forces.

    Determine whether continued

    upkeep can extend the life of the tree.

    Only perform correctivemaintenance to those areas that may

    result in possible life or safety

    situations. If the tree cannot be savedand the analysis justifies replacement,do not repair any damaged areas.Follow recommendations presented bythe certified arborists annual report.

    5. Poor. The tree is showing seriousor extensive wear and/or damage.

    50%-75% of the tree has died.Deterioration and/or poor growth hascaused concern for safety andprotection of surrounding plants,surfaces, buildings, etc. Messiness andcleanliness are significant concerns.

    This tree should be replaced.

    Replacement Directives

    1. Use only Church approved specifications and details when replacing trees on site.2. Schedule replacement during cool or dormant seasons so that there is not a significant impact on the tree during

    installation.

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 20 of 59

    Back to Table of C

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    21/59

    Replacement Standards General Site: Shrubs & Groundcovers

    The replacement standard is to be applied by the Facility Manager during the R&I needs identification inspectionand by members of the verification team. A conscientious and consistent program of scheduled preventivemaintenance work to each plant will maximize its useful and sustainable life.

    Selective removal of shrubs and ground covers as they reach maturity is justified if they are no longer meeting thedesign criteria or maintenance and replacement standards established by the original or modified planting plan.Consult with the authorized Landscape Architect designated by the Regional FM Manager to assist in thisevaluation.

    Each shrub and area of ground cover should be inspected and recommendations reported annually to the verificationteam. Replacement should be evaluated against the following criteria:

    Condition Definition Action

    1.Excellent. The shrub or

    groundcover is in a thriving, healthycondition.

    The shrub or groundcover is generally

    undamaged or marred by poormaintenance practices, natural forces orinsects/ pests.

    Do not consider replacement under

    these conditions.

    2. Very Good. The shrub orgroundcover has sustained somedamage, but generally is in a healthycondition.

    Poor maintenance practices, naturalforces or insects/pests have slightlydamaged the shrub or groundcover.Long-term effects are negligible.

    Do not consider replacement under

    these conditions. Provide preventativemeasures of maintenance as directed bythis section of the Management Plan.

    3. Good. The shrub or groundcover isshowing improvement from previousdamage sustained earlier in its life.

    Growth and development of the tree iscontinuing though hindered by poormaintenance practices, natural forces orinsects/pests that affected its earliergrowth. Most damage has been stoppedor altered enough to extend the life of

    the shrub or groundcover.

    Replacement of the shrub or

    groundcover is not justified but

    should continue to be evaluated

    annually. Follow therecommendations presented in thissection of the Management Plan.

    4. Fair. The shrub or groundcover isshowing considerable signs ofdeterioration.

    30%-50% of the limbs have died orshow considerable signs of alteredgrowth. Extensive damage to thegrowth areas of the shrub orgroundcover has occurred due toinsects/pests infestation or other naturalforces.

    Determine whether continued

    maintenance can extend the life of

    the tree. If the shrub or groundcovercannot be saved and the analysisjustifies replacement, do not repair anydamaged areas. Replace the plant.

    5. Poor. The shrub or groundcover isshowing serious or extensive wearand/or damage.

    50% or more of the shrub orgroundcover has died. Deteriorationhas caused concern for safety andprotection of surrounding plants,surfaces, buildings, etc. Neatness &

    cleanliness are significant concerns.

    This shrub or groundcover should be

    replaced.

    Replacement Directives

    1. Use only Church approved specifications and details when replacing shrubs or groundcover on site.2. Schedule replacement during cool or dormant seasons so that there is not a significant impact on the shrub or

    groundcover during installation.

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 21 of 59

    Back to Table of C

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    22/59

    Replacement Standards General Site: Lawns

    The replacement standard is to be applied by the Facility Manager during the R&I needs identification inspectionand by members of the verification team. A conscientious and consistent program of scheduled preventivemaintenance work to each lawn area will maximize its useful and sustainable life.

    Selective removal of lawn areas as they reach maturity is justified if they are no longer meeting the design criteria ormaintenance and replacement standards established by the original or modified planting plan. Consult with theauthorized Landscape Architect designated by Headquarters to assist in this evaluation. .

    Each lawn area should be inspected and recommendations reported annually to the verification team by theauthorized Landscape Architect or assigned specialist selected to evaluate the lawn areas. Replacement should beevaluated against the following criteria:

    Condition Definition Action

    1.Excellent. The lawn area is in athriving, healthy condition.

    The lawn area is generally undamagedor marred by poor maintenancepractices, natural forces or insects/pests.

    Do not consider replacement under

    these conditions.

    2. Very Good. The lawn area hassustained some damage, but generallyis in a healthy condition.

    Poor maintenance practices, naturalforces or insects/pests have damagedthe lawn area.

    Do not consider replacement underthese conditions. Provide preventativemeasures of maintenance as directed inthis section of the Management Plan.

    3. Good. The lawn area is showingimprovement from previous damagesustained earlier in its life.

    Growth and development of the lawnarea is continuing though hindered bypoor maintenance practices, poor soilconditions, natural forces orinsects/pests. Most damage has beenstopped or altered enough to extend itslife.

    Replacement of the lawn is not

    justified but should continue to be

    evaluated annually. Follow therecommendations presented in thissection of the Management Plan.

    4. Fair. The lawn area is showingconsiderable signs of deterioration.

    30%-50% of the lawn has died orshown considerable signs of altered

    growth. Extensive damage to thegrowth areas of the lawn has occurreddue to insects/pests infestation or othernatural forces.

    Determine whether continued

    maintenance can extend the life of

    the lawn. If the lawn area cannot besaved and the analysis justifiesreplacement, do not repair anydamaged areas. Replace the lawn.

    5. Poor. The lawn area is showingserious or extensive wear and/ordamage.

    50% or more of the lawn has died.Deterioration has caused concern forsafety and protection of surroundingplants, surfaces, buildings, etc.

    This lawn area should be replaced.

    Replacement Directives

    1. Use only Church approved specifications and details when replacing lawn areas on site.2. Schedule replacement during cool or dormant seasons so that there is not a significant impact on the tree during

    installation.

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 22 of 59

    Back to Table of C

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    23/59

    Replacement Standards General Site: Irrigation Systems

    The replacement standard is to be applied by the Facility Manager during the R&I needs identification inspectionand by members of the verification team. A conscientious and consistent program of scheduled preventivemaintenance work to each component of the system will maximize its useful and sustainable life.

    The replacement standard provides directions for replacing an entire system and not individual components or partsof a system. Replacement should be evaluated against the following criteria:

    Condition Definition Action

    1.Excellent. The system functionsat fully adequate levels.

    The system is totally reliable.Sprinkler heads are at proper levels.All turf and planting areas areevenly watered (no dry spots).

    Do not consider replacement

    under these conditions.

    2. Very Good. Necessaryadjustments and minimal headreplacements keep systemfunctioning at fully adequate levels.

    The system is totally reliable.Adjustments may need to be made tomaintain the system.

    Do not consider replacement

    under these conditions. Providepreventative measures ofmaintenance as directed in thissection of the Management Plan.

    3. Good. The system continues tofunction with intermittentcomponent repairs, replacementsand minor system improvements (itshould be possible, with proper andtimely repairs, maintenance andnecessary replacements, to extendthe entire irrigation system for manyyears without replacement of theentire system).

    Turf and planting areas areadequately covered. Somecomponents have failed and havebeen replaced. Others areapproaching the end of their usefullives. Adjustments need to be made.A small number of components needreplacement.

    Replacement of the entireirrigation system is not justified,

    but should continue to be

    evaluated annually. Makenecessary repairs and partsreplacements as needed. It is notyet time to replace the irrigation

    system.

    4. Fair. The system no longerfunctions adequately and will notwithout major alterations.

    A lack of coverage due to lowpressure caused by leakage and orextensive expansion of the system.

    20% of the system does not functionadequately due to:

    Poor coverage. Blocked pipes. Inadequate pipe sizes. New Landscape layouts. Additions to Buildings. Change in water

    pressure/quantity/quality

    Make a study and life cycle cost

    analysis to determine whether to

    replace faulty components of the

    irrigation system, retrofit theexisting system, or replace the

    system entirely.

    5. Poor. The overall irrigationsystem is subject to constantbreakdowns and delivers inadequatequality.

    Complete lack of coverage to turfand plantings due to low pressurecaused by leaks, worn and brokensprinkler heads, and extensive

    expansions of the system.

    This irrigation system is over-due

    for replacement.

    Replacement Directives

    1. Use only approved specifications and details when replacing irrigation system components.

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 23 of 59

    Back to Table of Co

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    24/59

    Replacement Standards Gutters and Downspouts (R&I #160)

    This replacement standard is to be applied by the facility managers during R&I needs identification inspection and by members of theverification team during the R&I verification inspection.

    A conscientious and consistent program of scheduled repairs and preventive maintenance work can maximize the useful life of a gutterand/or downspout.

    Condition Definition Action

    1. Excellent. The gutters anddownspouts function at original designlevels.

    There are no leaks, loose joints, cracks orsplits in the material. Gutters are not bentor loose. All seams are tight.

    Do not consider replacement under these

    conditions.

    2. Very Good. The gutters anddownspouts are beginning to show wear.

    There a few areas that leak and have loosejoints, but are not split or cracked. Guttersare not bent or loose.

    Do not consider replacement under theseconditions. Make necessary repairs andreplacement of parts as needed.

    3. Good. The gutters and downspoutsfunction with regular maintenance andintermittent repairs.

    (It should be possible with properpreventive maintenance and timelyrepairs, to extend the useful life of thegutters and downspouts for many years.)

    There are some areas that leak and haveloose joints. Some areas are split and/orcracked. Sections of gutters are bent orloose.

    Replacement of the gutters and

    downspouts is not justified but should

    continue to be evaluated annually. Makenecessary repairs and parts replacements asneeded.

    4. Fair. The gutters and downspouts nolonger functions as designed and will notwithout major repairs.

    There are many areas that leak and haveloose joints. Many areas are split and/orcracked. Many sections of gutters are bentor loose.

    Replace the gutters and downspouts.

    5. Poor. The gutters and downspouts nolonger function as designed.

    There are several areas that leak and haveloose joints. Several areas are split and/or

    cracked. Several sections of gutters arebent or loose.

    The gutters and downspouts are over-due

    for replacement.

    Replacement Directives

    1. Use only Church approved consultants, specifications and details when replacing gutters and downspouts.

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 24 of 59

    Back to Table of Co

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    25/59

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 25 of 59

    Replacement Standards HVAC: Air Cooled Condensing Units

    Condition Definition Action

    1. Excellent. The building zone iscooled effectively.

    The condensing unit is new or operateswith near new reliability.

    Do not consider replacement.

    2. Good. The building zone is cooledeffectively with regular maintenanceand intermittent repair of thecondensing unit.

    Some components may need to berepaired or replaced. Refrigerant leaksmay need to be repaired. Thecondensing unit is reliable providedthat annual inspections reveal potentialfailure of the individual components toallow timely repair.

    Do not consider replacement.

    3. Poor. The condensing unit breaksdown during operation.

    The condensing unit is unreliable.Parts and technology are obsolete.

    Refrigeration piping should bereviewed for proper installation by aprofessional consultant.

    Replace the condensing unit onlyafter it has been determined that therefrigeration piping is correct and

    does not contribute to pre-maturecompressor failure.

    Replacement Directives

    1. Church approved guidelines, drawings, specifications and details should be used when replacing air cooledcondensing unit components.

    2. Professional mechanical engineering consultants should be used when replacing air cooled condensing unitcomponents.

    Back to Table of Co

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    26/59

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 26 of 59

    Replacement Standards HVAC: Air Handling Unit with Coils

    Condition Definition Action

    1. Excellent. The blower sectiondelivers heating and cooling aireffectively to the building zone.

    The air handling unit is new or operatesat near new reliability.

    Do not consider replacement.

    2. Good. The blower section deliversheating and cooling air adequately tothe building zone with regularmaintenance and intermittent repair tothe blower and coil sections.

    Some components may need to berepaired or replaced. The air handlingunit is reliable provided annualinspections reveal potential failure ofindividual components to allow timelyrepair.

    Do not consider replacement.

    3. Poor. The air handling unit failsduring operation.

    The structural frame and/or the steelsheet metal cabinet frame is failingbecause of corrosion or operational

    stress.

    Replace the air handling unit.

    Replacement Directives

    1. Church approved guidelines, drawings, specifications and details should be used when replacing an air handlingunit.

    2. Existing duct work and other parts that are still in usable condition should be re-used whenever possible.3. Professional mechanical engineering consultants should be used when replacing an air handling unit.

    Back to Table of C

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    27/59

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 27 of 59

    Replacement Standards HVAC: Chiller

    Chiller:

    Condition Definition Action

    1. Excellent. The chiller generatessufficient chilled water to cool thebuilding zone.

    The chiller is new or operates withnear new reliability.

    Do not consider replacement.

    2. Good. The chiller generatessufficient chilled water to cool thebuilding zone with regularmaintenance and intermittent repair.

    Some components may need to berepaired or replaced. The chiller isreliable provided that annualinspections reveal potential failure ofindividual components to allow timelyrepair.

    Do not consider replacement.

    3. Poor. The chiller breaks downduring operation.

    The chiller is unreliable. Parts andtechnology are obsolete.

    Perform an engineering evaluation

    to determine the feasibility of

    replacing the chiller with individual

    air cooled condensing units for each

    of the zone air handling units or

    replace the chiller.

    Distribution Piping:

    Condition Definition Action

    1. Excellent. Chilled water isdelivered effectively to all air coils foreach building zone.

    The piping and control valves do notleak. The pumps function with routinemaintenance. Water treatment iscurrent.

    Do not replace the piping.

    2. Good. Chilled water flow to all aircoils is adequate to cool each buildingzone.

    Minor leaks need repair and some partsneed replacement over time. Watertreatment is current.

    Replace terminal control valves if

    obsolete or not functioning. Replace

    pump seals and gaskets if leaking.

    3. Poor. Chilled water is deliveredinadequately to air coils and thebuilding zone is not cooled adequately.

    Water treatment is not current. Pipewall thickness is near failure(measured by cutting open the pipesection at an elbow).

    Replace piping, pumps, and all other

    piping accessories.

    Replacement Directives

    1. Church approved guidelines, drawings, specifications and details should be used when replacing a chiller ordistribution piping.

    2. Professional mechanical engineering consultants should be used when replacing a chiller or distribution piping.

    Back to Table of Co

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    28/59

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 28 of 59

    Replacement Standards HVAC: Cooling Tower

    Cooling Tower:

    Condition Definition Action

    1. Excellent. The cooling towerfunctions effectively to ensure reliable

    chiller operation.

    The cooling tower is new or operateswith near new reliability.

    Do not consider replacement.

    2. Good. The cooling tower functionsadequately to ensure reliable chilleroperation with regular maintenanceand intermittent repair.

    Some components may need to berepaired or replaced. The coolingtower is reliable provided that annualinspections reveal potential failure ofindividual components to allow timelyrepair.

    Do not consider replacement.

    3. Poor. The cooling tower breaksdown during operation.

    The cooling tower is unreliable. Partsand technology are obsolete.

    Replace the cooling tower. This

    assumes that the existing chiller

    remains in service.

    If the chiller is being replaced with a

    new chiller, an engineeringevaluation should be performed to

    determine capacity match. If the

    existing cooling tower capacity

    matches the new chiller, then the

    cooling tower should remain.

    If the complete chilled water plant is

    abandoned, then the cooling tower

    should be abandoned.

    Condenser Water Piping:

    Condition Definition Action

    1. Excellent. Condenser water iseffectively delivered to the coolingtower to allow reliable chilleroperation.

    The piping and control valves do notleak. The pumps function with routinemaintenance. Water treatment iscurrent.

    Do not replace the piping.

    2. Good. Condenser water isadequately delivered to the coolingtower to allow reliable chilleroperation.

    Minor leaks need repair and some partsneed replacement over time. Watertreatment is current.

    Replace terminal control valves if

    obsolete or not functioning. Replace

    pump seals and gaskets if leaking.

    3. Poor. Condenser water is deliveredinadequately to the cooling tower and

    does not allow reliable chilleroperation.

    Water treatment is not current. Pipewall thickness is near failure

    (measured by cutting open the pipesection at an elbow).

    Replace piping, pumps, and all other

    piping accessories.

    Replacement Directives

    1. Church approved guidelines, drawings, specifications and details should be used when replacing a cooling tower ordistribution piping.

    2. Professional mechanical engineering consultants should be used when replacing a cooling tower or distributionpiping.

    Back to Table of C

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    29/59

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 29 of 59

    Replacement Standard HVAC: Digital Thermostat

    Condition Definition Action

    1. Good. All features and functions areoperational.

    The thermostat is new or operateswith near new reliability.

    Do not consider replacement.

    2. Poor. One or more functions failintermittently or continuously.

    The thermostat does not reliablyactivate the heating and coolingequipment or maintain settings.

    Replace the thermostat.

    Replacement Directives

    1. Replace only with the thermostat found in the O&M Specifications.

    Back to Table of C

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    30/59

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 30 of 59

    Replacement Standards HVAC: Duct Furnace

    Condition Definition Action

    1. Excellent. The furnace

    generates sufficient heat toeffectively heat the building zone.

    The furnace is new or operates at

    near new reliability.

    Do not consider replacement.

    2. Good. The furnace generatessufficient heat to effectively heatthe building zone with regularmaintenance and intermittent repair.

    Some minor components such ascontrols, wiring and gas valve mayneed to be repaired or replaced.The furnace is reliable providedannual inspections reveal potentialfailure of individual components toallow timely repair.

    Do not consider replacement.

    3. Poor. The furnace breaks downduring operation.

    The furnace is unreliable, parts and

    technology are obsolete. Measuredcarbon dioxide levels may indicatea potentially dangerous crackedheat exchanger.

    Replace the furnace.

    Replacement Directives

    1. Church approved guidelines, drawings, specifications and details should be used when replacing a ductfurnace.

    2. Existing duct work and other parts that are still in usable condition should be re-used whenever possible.3.

    Professional mechanical engineering consultants should be used when replacing a duct furnace.

    Back to Table of C

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    31/59

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 31 of 59

    Replacement Standards HVAC: Packaged Forced Air Furnace

    Condition Definition Action

    1. Excellent. The furnace heats thezone effectively with regularmaintenance.

    The furnace is new or operates withnear new reliability.

    Do not consider replacement.

    2. Good. The furnace heats the zoneeffectively with regular maintenanceand intermittent repairs.

    Some components may need to berefurbished or replaced. The furnace isreliable provided annual inspectionsreveal potential failure of individualcomponents to allow timely repair.

    Do not consider replacement unless

    the heat exchanger has failed. If the

    heat exchanger has failed but the

    other components are functioning,

    perform a life cycle cost analysis to

    determine whether to replace the

    heat exchanger or the entire furnace.

    3. Poor. The furnace breaks downduring operation.

    The furnace is unreliable. Parts andtechnology are obsolete.

    Replace the furnace.

    Replacement Directives

    1. Church approved guidelines, drawings, specifications and details should be used when replacing furnacecomponents.

    2. If add on cooling is existing or being considered as part of the upgrade or replacement, a professional mechanicalconsultant should be used.

    Back to Table of C

  • 8/7/2019 Replacement and Improvement Standards

    32/59

    O&M-PS-0003 Date Revised: 17 April 2008 Page 32 of 59

    Replacement Standards HVAC: Hot Water or Steam Boiler(R&I #199 & 200)

    This replacement standard is to be applied by facility managers during R&I needs identification inspection and by membersof the verification team during the R&I verification inspection.

    This standard is used to evaluate cast iron and steel boilers.

    A conscientious and consistent program of scheduled preventive maintenance work to each component and part willmaximize the useful life of the boiler.

    Condition Definition Action

    1. Excellent. The boiler functions atthe original design levels.

    The boiler operates at designed hotwater or steam outputs.

    Do not consider replacement under

    these conditions.

    2. Very Good. Necessary adjustmentskeep the boiler functioning at theoriginal design levels.

    The boiler operates economically.Through effective maintenance (watertreatment, thorough cleaning, smallleak repair, and scale removal) theboiler is still producing at designlevels. Adjustments to boiler controls,valves, burners, and safety devicesmay be necessary to operate asefficiently as possible. Operatingnoise is not noticeable.

    Do not consider replacement under

    these conditions.

    3. Good. The boiler continues tofunction with regular maintenance andintermittent repairs.

    (It should be possible with properpreventive maintenance and timely

    repairs to extend the useful life of theboiler for many years.)

    The boilers efficiency may be slightlydiminished, affecting the economy ofoperation. The boilers structure andcomponents are still