rendered to sunview patio doors limited 500 zenway blvd ......glazing method: both panels were...

of 40

This report is for the exclusive use of Intertek’s Client and is provided pursuant to the agreement between Intertek and its Client. Intertek’s responsibility and liability are limited to the terms and conditions of the agreement. Intertek assumes no liability to any party, other than to the Client in accordance with the agreement, for any loss, expense or damage occasioned by the use of this report. Only the Client is authorized to permit copying or distribution of this report and then only in its entirety. Any use of the Intertek name or one of its marks for the sale or advertisement of the tested material, product or service must first be approved in writing by Intertek. The observations and test results in this report are relevant only the sample tested. This report by itself does not imply that the material, product or service is or has ever been under an Intertek certification program.

Intertek Testing Services NA, Ltd. SD 12.1.3 (10-Sept-2010) Informative

REPORT NUMBER: 101308865TOR-002A ISSUE DATE: March 11, 2014

EVALUATION CENTER

Intertek Testing Services Ltd. 6225 Kenway Drive

Mississauga, Ontario L5T 2L3

RENDERED TO

Sunview Patio Doors Limited 500 Zenway Blvd,

Vaughan, Ontario L4H 0S7

PRODUCT EVALUATED Buckingham Patio Door

EVALUATION PROPERTY

Physical Tests

Report of Testing on a Buckingham Patio Door conducted in accordance with the applicable test methods outlined in the following standard: AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-11 “NAFS North American Fenestration Standard/Specification for windows, doors, and skylights” and CSA A440S1-09, Canadian Supplement.

TE

ST

RE

PO

RT

Sunview Patio Door Limited March 11, 2014 Report Number 101308865TOR-002A

Intertek Testing Services NA, Ltd. SD 12.1.3 (10 Sept 2010) Informative of 40

1 Table of Contents

1 Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................. 2

2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 3

3 Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 3

4 Test Samples ........................................................................................................................................ 4

4.1. SPECIMEN AND ASSEMBLY DESCRIPTION ........................................................................... 4

5 Testing and Evaluation Methods .......................................................................................................... 9

DEVIATION FROM THE TEST STANDARD ............................................................................... 9

5.1 OPERATING FORCE TEST ........................................................................................................ 9

5.2 AIR LEAKAGE RESISTANCE TEST ......................................................................................... 10

5.3 WATER PENETRATION RESISTANCE TEST ......................................................................... 10

5.4 UNIFORM LOAD TESTS ........................................................................................................... 10

5.5 FORCED-ENTRY RESISTANCE TEST .................................................................................... 11

5.6 DEGLAZING TEST .................................................................................................................... 12

5.7 THERMOPLASTIC CORNER WELD TEST .............................................................................. 12

5.8 INSECT SCREEN SERVICEABILITY TEST ............................................................................. 12

6 Testing and Evaluation Results .......................................................................................................... 13

6.1. OPERATING FORCE TEST ...................................................................................................... 13

6.2. AIR LEAKAGE RESISTANCE TEST (75 Pa) ............................................................................ 13

6.3. AIR LEAKAGE RESISTANCE TEST (300 Pa) .......................................................................... 13

6.4. WATER PENETRATION RESISTANCE TEST ......................................................................... 14

6.5. UNIFORM LOAD TESTS ........................................................................................................... 14

6.6. FORCED ENTRY RESISTANCE TEST .................................................................................... 15

6.7. DEGLAZING TEST .................................................................................................................... 15

6.8. THERMOPLASTIC CORNER WELD TEST .............................................................................. 15

6.9. INSECT SCREEN SERVICEABILITY TEST ............................................................................. 15

7 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................... 16

8 Appendix A: Drawings ........................................................................................................................ 17

9 Revision Page .................................................................................................................................... 40



2 Introduction

Intertek has conducted performance testing for Sunview Patio Door Limited on a Buckingham Patio Door for the Intertek Certification program.

The sliding door was submitted by the client to the Intertek laboratory in Mississauga, Ontario on September 24, 2013. Testing was conducted and evaluated in accordance with AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-11 “NAFS North American Fenestration Standard/ Specification for windows, doors and skylights” and CSA A440S1-09, Canadian Supplement”. This evaluation began September 25, 2013 and was completed January 27, 2014.

Test results reported herein, also comply with the 2008 edition of the NAFS test standard, AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08, “NAFS–North American Fenestration Standard Specification for windows, doors, and skylights”.

3 Summary

Manufacturer: ● Sunview Patio Door Limited, 500 Zenway Blvd, Vaughan, Ontario L4H 0S7

Type: ● Sliding Door

Model: ● Buckingham Patio Door (787)

Primary Designator:

● Class LC – PG55 – Size Tested: 2205 × 2100 mm – SD

Secondary Designator:

●

Positive Design Pressure (DP) = +2640 Pa (+55 psf) Negative Design Pressure (DP) = -2640 Pa (-55 psf)

Water Penetration Test Pressure = 400 Pa (8.25 psf) Canadian Air Infiltration/Exfiltration Level = A3

Test Completed Date:

● January 27, 2014

(Refer to the information contained herein for complete test specimen description and detailed test report.)



4 Test Samples

4.1. SPECIMEN AND ASSEMBLY DESCRIPTION

Condition: ● New and undamaged

Overall Size: ● Width – 2205 mm (86-13/16")

Height - 2100 mm (82-11/16")

The tested size is that largest for which compliance is sought

Installation: ● Installation: Each jamb was fastened to the wood buck with twelve #8×2-1/2″ pan head screws; three at each the interior jamb track and exterior jamb track of both jambs, spaced approximately 838 mm (33″) apart. The frame was fastened to the wood buck with; three at each the interior track and exterior track with six #8×2-1/2″ pan head screws spaced approximately 762 mm (30″) apart. Silicone was applied on the interior and exterior perimeter.

Frame: ● Main frame consisted of extruded vinyl frame members. Header and jamb profiles were reinforced with SPF wood block

● Corners: Butt-joined with adhesive foam gasket at the interface of the joined members. The ends of the jamb were fastened to the header and sill with four #8×2-1/2" pan head screws into the screw port of the horizontal member.

● Fixed Panel Support: A 1034 mm long extruded rigid PVC extrusion inserted into the grooves of the sill track. It was fastened to the sill with five #10×3" pan head screws located 51 mm, 419 mm, 762 mm, 895 mm, and 1010 mm with silicone applied at both ends.

● Fixed Panel Support end block: Rigid PVC fixed panel support end block was fitted to the exterior sill track, butted against the fixed panel support. It was fastened to the sill with two #10×3" pan head screws through two 54 mm × 16 mm × 6 mm acrylic shims. The fixed panel was sealed with silicone to the sill along the exposed perimeter.

● Jamb Cover: Extruded rigid vinyl jamb cover was installed into the interior track of the fixed panel jamb.

● Anti-lift block: Extruded rigid vinyl anti-lift block was installed at the mid span of the header track fastened to the header with two #8×1" screws. An adhesive-backed pile dust plug was attached to the block.

● Panel Stop: Two extruded 64 mm (2-1/2") rubber stops installed on the head and sill adjacent to the fixed jamb.

● PVC sill extension was clipped onto the sill. Wood jamb extension was installed on the jambs and the head and held in with silicone.

The Buckingham Patio Door was tested with a 7,87 sill configuration (refer to page 19 for information on various sill configurations). The sill configurations have no effect on the physical performance of the Buckingham Patio Door. Therefore it is Intertek professional opinion that all four sill configurations (5,875, 7,375, 7,87 and 9,37) would be covered by this test report.

A 16.38 mm x 1.52 mm vinyl shim was inserted between the panel support upstanding legs along its length. A 24.14 mm x 18.24 mm x 1.68 mm track was applied on top of the upstanding legs. The track legs were glued to the panel support.



Part Supplier Section / Part Number

Main Frame - Sill Vision Extrusions Limited 2691

Main Frame - Head Vision Extrusions Limited 107A05

Main Frame - Jamb Vision Extrusions Limited E107A04

Jamb and Header Reinforce-ment - Wood

Vision Extrusions Limited W107C01

Fixed Panel Support Vision Extrusions Limited 107A07

Fixed Panel Support End Block Vision Extrusions Limited 107I01

Jamb Cover Vision Extrusions Limited 2837

Anti-lift S.I.L Plastic SUNFPS

Anti-lift carpet NOR. ARCH DPRP1250-63-GYST 0875

Sill Gasket -- 107G02

Head Gasket -- 107G01

Sill Extension Vision Extrusions Limited E107A37

Panel Stop Alku Plastic --

Panel (Both): ● Operable and Fixed Panel stiles: Extruded rigid PVC jamb stile and extruded rigid PVC interlock stile.

● Operable and Fixed Panel rails: Extruded rigid PVC rail.

● Panel Corners: Slot mortise and tenon joint, held with a #10×1-1/2″ pan head screw and glued at both sides of the overlap. The inside joint of the corner was sealed with silicone.

● Fixed Panel Assembly: The fixed panel was secured to the jamb with five #8×1" flat head screws.

Reinforcement: ● Both stiles of the operable panel and the jamb stile of the fixed panel were reinforced with 16 Ga U-shaped galvanized steel stiffener, inserted into the cavity spanning the entire length. The ends of the reinforcement were caulked to the vinyl stile

Part Supplier Part Number

Panel Rails Vision Extrusions Limited 107A03

Panel Stiles Vision Extrusions Limited 107A01

Panel Interlock Stiles Vision Extrusions Limited 107A02

Galvanized steel stiffener Vision Extrusions Limited 107F01

Panel Sizes: ● Interior Size: Width: 1092 mm (43") Height: 2005 mm (78-15/16")

● Exterior Size: Width: 1092 mm (43") Height: 2005 mm (78-15/16")



Glazing Method: ● Both panels were channel glazed into the stiles, head and sill rails. The IG unit was retained by two pairs of co-extruded flexible fins in the upstanding leg of the channel cavity.

Glazing: ● Factory sealed glazing unit having two sheets of nominally thick 4 mm tempered glass and a hybrid spacer with a 16.8 mm air gap. The glass was inscribed with the following: “SGCC 2177 CIG-5 4MM 09/04/13 Tempered UA 16 CFR 1201 II ANSI Z97.1 2009”. Overall IG thickness was 24.6 mm.

Drainage: ● Panel glazing cavity is drained to the sill by two slots measuring 12.7 mm × 3 mm (1/2" × 1/8") located on 20 mm from each stile.

● The innermost interior track cavity was drained to a cavity by two drain slots each measuring 26 mm × 4.7 mm located adjacent to the jamb.

● The cavity in the frame was drained to a forward cavity by notches cut into the sill frame wall. The notches measured 26 mm × 4.7 mm were located adjacent to each jamb.

● The outer interior track was drained to the below cavity by a 25 mm × 3.2 mm slot located 64 mm from the fixed jamb panel jamb.

● The anterior frame cavity was drained to the exterior by two drain slots each measuring 25 mm × 6.5 mm were located 63 mm from each jamb. Weepgate covers were affixed to each of the drain slots.

● The screen sill track was drained to the exterior by a drain slot measuring 35 mm × 3.5 mm was located at the mid span. The screen track was also notched 9.5 mm at each end.


Weepgate covers S.I.L. Plastics 109



Hardware: ● Lock and Handle: Handle and lock on the operating panel was located at the mid-span of the lock stile. A single corresponding keeper was located on the lock jamb

● Keeper: A single corresponding keeper was located on the lock jamb fastened with two #8×2" pan head screws.

● Rollers: The operating sash travelled on two adjustable tandem rollers fitted into the channel in the sill rail located 89 mm (3-1/2") o.c. from the panel edge.

● Operable Panel Stiles: Head and sill rails were notched 19 mm wide by 35 mm high (3/4"×1-3/8") slot to clear the track. Sliding covers at the ends of the interlock stiles closed the gap between the stile notch and the track.

Part Supplier Part Number Fastening

Lock and Handle Fasco 9300 Series two #10×3/4 flat head screws

Keeper Fasco ACRP-13.5 two #8×2" pan head screws

Roller Fasco 21000N one #8×1/2” pan head screw

Weather-stripping: ● Both interior and exterior channels of each frame jamb was quadriple weather-stripped with kerf-inserted single-finned pile located on each leg of the interior and exterior channels. Two kerf-inserted flexible vinyl hollow bulbs were located in each jamb channel.

● Panel top and bottom rails were double weather-stripped with kerf-inserted single-finned pile weather-strip.

● Interior and exterior interlock stiles were single weather-stripped with kerf-inserted finned pile type weather-strip.

● An adhesive-backed, woven pile dust plug measuring 63.5 mm × 25.4 mm (2-1/2" × 1") was adhered to a block located towards the exterior midspan of the sill. An adhesive-backed pile dust plug (19 mm high (3/4") pile height) measuring 67 mm by 32 mm (2-5/8" × 1-1/4") was affixed to the anti-lift block installed at the head.


Bulb Seal ANPLEX AP 387

Weather Stripping UltraFab W23211NW

Anti-lift Carpet (Dust Plug) NAP DPRP1250-63-GYST 0875



Screen: ● Size: 1092 mm x 2020 mm

● Frame: Extruded aluminum screen members, each corner was held in by a #8×1" self-tapping pan head screw located 40 mm from each stile. A single plastic wheel roller assembly was inserted into each end of the stile and fastened with a #8×1" pan head screw located 101 mm from the end.

● Mesh: Fibreglass mesh retained by a round plastic spline.

● Lock: A lock system was located in the jamb stile at mid height and secure with two #8×1/2" flat head screws. A single corresponding keeper was installed on the lock jamb with two #8×1/2" pan head screws.

● Installation: The screen travelled on the upstanding leg of the aluminum screen track. The screen head is inserted into the frame header track.

Drawings: ● Cross Section: Sunview Patio Doors Drawing titled:

Buckingham Patio Door – Triple Glazing– Cross Section XO, dated Feb 28, 2014

● Member Details: Vision Extrusions Limited Drawing No.: NONE, titled “Buckingham Patio Door – Sill Options”, dated Aug 01, 2013

E107B01, titled “New Patio Door Sill – (V & B)”, dated 03-04-2010 Rev C1 E107A04, titled “Patio Door Jamb”, dated 02-21-2008 Rev E1 E107A05, titled “Patio Door Header”, dated 11-01-2008 Rev C1 E107A58, titled “V&B Fixed Panel Support”, dated 01-31-2014 Rev A1 I107I01, titled Fixed Panel Support”, dated 04-04-2008 Rev C1 E107A37, titled “2.00” Sill Extension”, dated 07-20-2008 Rev A1 E107A01, titled “Extruded Vertical Sash”, dated 05-08-2008 Rev D1 E107A02, titled “Interlocking Sash”, dated 05-08-2008 Rev F1 E107A03, titled “Patio Door Rail”, dated 02-09-2008 Rev A1 S107F01, titled “Patio Door Sash Reinforcement”, dated 03-18-2008 Rev B1 F107G29, titled “Handle and Lock Set Sash Reinforcement –Steel- (Single Point Lock)”, dated 11-02-2011 Rev F1 DWG_NO, titled “Sill Gasket” dated 10-7-2013 Rev 2 H107G01, titled “Patio Door-Header Gasket”, dated 02-14-2008 Rev A1 E107A08, titled “Screw Cover”, dated 02-09-2008 Rev A1 E107C19, titled “Jamb Pocket Cover”, dated 28-06-2010 Rev A1 -W107C01, titled “Jamb & Header Reinforcement”, dated 02-25-2008 Rev A1

● Member Details: Can Art Aluminum Extrusions Inc. Die No.: ES16134, titled “Screen Track”, dated 10-18-2010 Rev A1

● Member Details: Ancaster Plastic Extrusions Inc. Die No.: AP-387, titled “Offset Bulb”, dated Oct. 19, 2013

● Member Details: Sill Track Rail, untitled, undated

● Member Details: Ultrafad Weatherstrip Division Drawing No.: No Drawing No., title “W23211W”, date 12/1/11



5 Testing and Evaluation Methods The sliding door (SD) system was tested to the LC performance class requirements of AAMA/ WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-11 which shows equivalency in test methods of AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08 for LC performance class. Hence, the results obtained in this report can also be used for AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08. The Buckingham Sliding Door as described in this report was tested to the LC Performance Class as follows: The sliding door met the Gateway Performance Requirements by virtue of meeting the higher (optional) performance grades to which it was tested:

Minimum Gateway Test Size: 2200 mm × 2100 mm Maximum Allowable Air Leakage: 1.5 L/s·m² (0.3 cfm/ft²) Minimum Water Pressure: 180 Pa (2.9 psf) Minimum Design Pressure: 1200 Pa (25 psf) Minimum Structural Pressure: 1800 Pa (37.5 psf)

The sliding door system was tested for compliance to the above test criteria in order to achieve the Gateway Performance Designation of Class LC-PG25 / Class LC-PG1200. The sliding door system tested had an overall size of 2205 mm × 2100 mm, which satisfied the minimum Gateway test size. Performance testing was conducted in order to meet the overall Optional Performance requirements as follows:

Optional Water Pressure: 400 Pa (12 psf) Optional Design Pressure: 2640 Pa (55 psf) Optional Structural Test Pressure: 3960 Pa (82.5 psf) Canadian Air Infiltration/Exfiltration Level: A3

DEVIATION FROM THE TEST STANDARD

Testing was not initiated at the minimum Gateway grade levels for the SD-LC class of sliding doors. The sliding door system was tested to the Optional Performance Grades of AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-11. By default, the minimum Gateway requirements were met by virtue of meeting the requirements at higher test levels.

5.1 OPERATING FORCE TEST

The Operating Force test was performed on the panel and latch in accordance with Clause 9.3.1 in conjunctions with ASTM E2068-00, “Standard Test Method for Determination of Operating Force of Sliding Windows and Doors.” The forces required to initiate motion of the operable panel from both the fully open and fully closed positions, as well as the force required to maintain motion to the opposite limits of travel, were measured. The forces required to open and close the latches were also recorded.



5.2 AIR LEAKAGE RESISTANCE TEST

With the door closed and latched, the Air Leakage Resistance test was performed in accordance with Clause 9.3.2 in conjunction with ASTM E283-04, “Standard Test Method for Determining Rate of Air Leakage Through Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, and Doors Under Specified Pressure Differences Across the Specimen.” Air infiltration and exfiltration tests were performed using test pressures of 75 Pa (1.57 psf). The air leakage rate was calculated and compared to the allowable air leakage.

5.3 WATER PENETRATION RESISTANCE TEST

With the door closed and latched, a four-cycle Water Penetration Resistance test was performed in accordance with Clause 9.3.3 in conjunction with ASTM E547-00 “Standard Test Method for Water Penetration of Exterior Windows, Skylights, Doors, and Curtain Walls by Cyclic Static Air Pressure Difference.” The test was performed using the specified pressure differential and a water spray rate of at least 204 L/m² per hour (5.0 US gal/ft² per hour). Each cycle consisted of five minutes with the pressure applied and one minute with the pressure released, during which the water spray was continuously applied.

5.4 UNIFORM LOAD TESTS

5.4.1 Uniform Load Deflection Test

A Uniform Load Deflection test was conducted in accordance with Clause 9.3.4.2 and ASTM E330-02 "Standard Test Method for Structural Performance of Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, and Doors by Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference," Procedure A. After a 10 second preload (50% of test load), followed by 1 minute with the pressure released, the Uniform Load Deflection test was conducted at the specified test pressures for a time of 10 seconds. The test was performed in both the positive and negative directions. Deflection measurement, including residual deflection, was taken at the mid-span and at both ends of the top and bottom rail. After the test loads were released, the sliding door was inspected for failure or permanent deformation of any part of the sliding door system that would cause any operational malfunction.

5.4.2 Uniform Load Structural Test

A Uniform Load Structural test was conducted in accordance with Clause 9.3.4.3 and ASTM E330-02 "Standard Test Method for Structural Performance of Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, and Doors by Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference," Procedure A. After a 10 second preload (50% of test load), followed by 1 minute with the pressure released, the sample was subjected to a Uniform Load Structural test using a specified test pressure for a time of 10 seconds. The test was performed in both the positive and negative directions. After the test loads were released, the permanent deflections were recorded as well as the sliding door was inspected for failure or permanent deformation of any part of the sliding door system that would cause any operational malfunction.



5.5 FORCED-ENTRY RESISTANCE TEST

The Forced Entry Resistance Test was conducted and evaluated in accordance with Clause 9.3.5 in conjunction with ASTM F842-04 "Standard Test Methods for Measuring the Force Entry Resistance of Sliding Door Assemblies, Excluding Glass Impact".

5.5.1 Disassembly Test Using the disassembly tools listed below, all members and/or fasteners that could readily be removed from the exterior within a time limit of five minutes were removed carefully so as not to cause collateral damage to the specimen.

- Putty knife – 0.6 mm thick by 20 mm wide by 90 mm long (0.024” × 0.78” × 3.5”) - Philips or straight non-powered screwdrivers – 150 mm (6”) long - Standard slot-type pliers – 150 mm (6”) long to 175 mm (7") long overall

5.5.2 Type A and Type D Sliding Door Assembly Tests The specimen was tested to a Grade 20 performance level (T1 = 5 minutes). All test loads were applied at a rate of 45 N/s (10 lbf/s) and held for a period of 60 seconds. The test loads used were as shown in the following table:

Grade 20 Loads

Load ID Load (N) Load (lbf)

L1 2224 500 L2 890 200 L3 222 50 L4 222 plus panel weight 50 plus panel weight

Test A1 With the panel in the closed position, a concentrated load of L1 was applied from the

exterior to the jamb (lock) stile within 75 mm (3") of the lock in a direction parallel to the plane of the glazing in an opening direction, the load evenly distributed between the interior and exterior sides of the locking device so as to minimize rotation.

Test A2 Test A1 was conducted in conjunction with a load of L2, applied at the jamb stile at the lock, in a direction perpendicular to the plane of glazing towards the interior side of the door.

Test A3 Test A1 was conducted in conjunction with a load of L2, applied at the jamb stile at the lock, in a direction perpendicular to the plane of glazing towards the exterior side of the door.

Test A4 Test A2 was conducted in conjunction with a lifting load of L4, applied at the mid-span of the sill rail, in a direction parallel to the plane of glazing vertically lifting the panel to the uppermost limit within the confines of the frame.

Test A5 Test A3 was conducted in conjunction with a load of L4, applied at the mid-span of the sill rail, in a direction parallel to the plane of glazing vertically lifting the panel to the uppermost limit within the confines of the frame.

Test A6 (Inside Sliding Panel) Test A4 conducted in conjunction with a load of L3, applied at the corner of the panel meeting stile at the sill rail, to the sill rail within 75 mm (3") of the corner, in a direction perpendicular to the plane of glazing towards the interior of the door.

Test D1 A concentrated load of L1 was applied to the fixed panel from the exterior to the jamb (lock) stile within 75 mm (3") of the lock in a direction parallel to the plane of the glazing in an opening direction.

Test D2 Test D1 was conducted in conjunction with a load of L2, applied at the interlock stile, in a direction perpendicular to the plane of glazing towards the interior side of the door.

Test D3 Test D2 was conducted in conjunction with a lifting load of L4, applied at the mid-span of the sill rail, in a direction parallel to the plane of glazing vertically lifting the fixed panel to the uppermost limit within the confines of the frame.



5.5.3 Hardware Manipulation Test Using the tools for hardware manipulation listed below, an attempt was made to gain entry by inserting each tool and tool combination so as to contact the locking device from the exterior. The lock manipulation test was conducted for a time of T1 by one technician in a manner so as not to cause collateral damage to the specimen.

- Putty knife – 0.6 mm thick by 20 mm wide by 90 mm long (0.024” × 0.78” × 3.5”) - Black annealed 16 ga. wire long enough to reach from point of insertion to locking device

5.5.4 Panel Manipulation Test An attempt was made to open the door, lift, push, pull or otherwise manipulate by hand from the exterior, the panel to the full confines of the frame. The panel manipulation test was conducted for a time of T1.

5.6 DEGLAZING TEST Deglazing test was conducted in accordance with Clause 9.3.6.3 in conjunction with ASTM E987 “Standard Test Methods for Deglazing Force of Fenestration Products,” Test Method A. The test sample was supported, with the side to which manual force is normally applied to the operating panel facing upward, on two 2×4 wooden supports, located under the glazing within 25.4 mm (1") of each of the parallel panel members and of sufficient length to extend within 25.4 mm (1") of each perpendicular panel member. A mechanical stop was used at each corner, placed no more than 12.7 mm (0.5"), of the test sample to prevent movement when under load. The hydraulic ram was installed in such a way that it was perpendicular and so the contact shoe of the ram is within 12.7 mm (0.5") to the panel member being tested as well as making sure the centreline of the contact shoe corresponds to the centreline of the panel member. A deflection gauge was placed under the center of the panel and the glazing bite, the contact point of where the shoe ill make contact with the panel member, is marked. The test load is then applied for 30 seconds, making sure the time to apply the required load did not take more than 15 seconds. The deflection was recorded and the test load was released. The panel member that was under the test load was removed and the distance from the glazing bite to the edge of the glazing material, was measured and recorded. 5.7 THERMOPLASTIC CORNER WELD TEST The sliding door frame and panels were not welded at the corners therefore this test is exempted from the requirements of the Thermoplastic Corner weld test. 5.8 INSECT SCREEN SERVICEABILITY TEST The Insect Screen test was conducted and evaluated in accordance with Section 5.1 of CSA A440S1-09 Canadian Supplement. With the sliding door mounted in a test frame, a S1 force of 60 N (13.5 lbf) was applied to the insect screen (perpendicular to the plane of the screen and in an outward direction) through a 300 mm (12") diameter, rigid, circular platen centered on the insect screen, and held for a period of 60 seconds. After the test load was released, the screen was inspected for deformation or damage



6 Testing and Evaluation Results

6.1. OPERATING FORCE TEST

Operable Panel Force applied to handle of sash

Maximum measured force to initiate opening 80 N

Maximum measured force to initiate closing 43 N

Maximum measured force to maintain motion 22 N

Maximum allowable force to initiate motion: 135 N

Maximum allowable force to maintain motion 90 N

Latch Force applied to latch

Maximum measured force to operate latch: 78 N

Maximum allowable force required to open/close latch: 100 N

The sliding door system MET the (Canada and US) performance requirements for Operating Force as specified in AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-11 for the LC performance class.

6.2. AIR LEAKAGE RESISTANCE TEST (75 Pa)

Air Infiltration – 75 Pa

Total Sliding Door Area 4.63 m²

Infiltration rate: 0.2 L/s•m²

Air Exfiltration – 75 Pa


Exfiltration rate: 0.2 L/s•m²

Maximum allowable air leakage rate: 1.5 L/s•m²

The sliding door system MET the performance level specified (as well as A3 Canadian Infiltration/Exfiltration Levels) in AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-11 for Air Leakage Resistance.

6.3. AIR LEAKAGE RESISTANCE TEST (300 Pa)



Infiltration rate: 0.5 L/s•m²



Exfiltration rate: 0.6 L/s•m²

Although not required by AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-11 for an LC rated product, the sliding door was measured for air leakage at 300 Pa pressure differential. Results are reported in the table above.



6.4. WATER PENETRATION RESISTANCE TEST

During the 24-minute test period, using a pressure differential of 400 Pa, there was no water leakage observed, nor was there trapped water in the sliding door assembly following completion of the test.

The sliding door system MET the minimum Gateway Water Penetration Resistance requirement at 180 Pa, and the Optional Performance requirement for at 400 Pa as specified in AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-11 and CSA A440S1-09, Canadian Supplement.

6.5. UNIFORM LOAD TESTS

Uniform Load Deflection Test

Member Interlock Stile

Span Length 1962 mm

Allowable Deflection Report only

Test Pressure Positive Load Negative Load

+3240 Pa* -3240 Pa*

Maximum Net Deflection 44.41 mm 49.68 mm

Note: * Deflections were measured at ±3240 Pa instead of ±2640 Pa

Post-test Details After the test loads were released, the sliding door was inspected and there was found to be no failure or permanent deformation of any part of the sliding door that would cause any operational malfunction.

Uniform Load Structural Test

Member Interlock Stile

Span Length 1962 mm

Allowable Deflection (0.4% × span) 7.85 mm

Test Pressure Positive Load Negative Load

+3960 Pa -3960 Pa

Residual Net Deflection -0.25 mm 0.56 mm

Post-test Details After the test loads were released, the sliding door was inspected and there was found to be no failure or permanent deformation of any part of the sliding door that would cause any operational malfunction.

The sliding door system MET the minimum Gateway Uniform Load Structural Test (150% of Design Pressure) performance requirements at 1800 Pa by virtue of meeting the Uniform Load Structural optional performance requirement at 3960 Pa as specified in AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-11.



6.6. FORCED ENTRY RESISTANCE TEST

The sliding door was installed into a wood test buck. The test unit was subjected to a Grade 20 measured performance for a Type A and Type D sliding door system in accordance with the procedure outlined in ASTM F842-04.

Disassembly Test Within 5 minutes, nothing was removed from the sliding door and entry was not gained.

Type A Sliding Door Assembly Tests Test Comments

A1 No entry

A2 No entry

A3 No entry

A4 No entry

A5 No entry

A6 No entry

Type D Sliding Door Assembly Tests (fixed Panel only)

D1 No entry

D2 No entry

D3 No entry

Hardware Manipulation Test During time T1 entry was not gained.

Panel Manipulation Test During time T1 entry was not gained.

The sliding door achieved met the Grade 20 measured performance rating for Forced Entry Resistance for Type A and Type D sliding door as specified in ASTM F842-04.

6.7. DEGLAZING TEST

Panel Member Load Measured Deglazement Maximum Allowable

Head Rail 230 N 2.21 mm

90% of glazing bite 11.43 mm

Sill Rail 230 N 2.17 mm

Interlock 320 N 6.68 mm

Lock Stile 320 N 5.72 mm

The panel members did not move from its original position, in relation to the glazing material, by more than 90% of the original glazing bite. There was no glazing breakage and the sliding door system was not damaged in any way that it would inhibit its normal operation.

The sliding door MET the Deglazing Test performance requirements specified in AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-11.

6.8. THERMOPLASTIC CORNER WELD TEST

The sliding door frame and panels were not welded at the corners therefore this test exempted from the requirements of the Thermoplastic Corner weld test.

6.9. INSECT SCREEN SERVICEABILITY TEST

After the test load was released, the screen was inspected and showed no signs of failure or permanent deformation. The sliding door system PASSED the performance requirements for Insect Screen Serviceability Test



7 Conclusion The Buckingham Patio Door described in this report and tested to the requirements in accordance with AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-11 “NAFS North American Fenestration Standard/Specification for windows, doors, and skylights” and CSA A440S1-09, Canadian Supplement and achieved the following Performance Designations:

Primary Designator

Class LC – PG55 – Size Tested: 2205 × 2100 mm – SD

Secondary Designator

Positive Design Pressure (DP) = +2640 Pa (+55 psf) Negative Design Pressure (DP) = -2640 Pa (-55 psf) Water Penetration Test Pressure =400 Pa (8.25 psf) Canadian Air Infiltration/Exfiltration Level = A3

The sliding door also MET the requirements for Forced Entry Resistance (Grade 20).

Test results reported here in also comply with the 2008 edition of the NAFS test standard, AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08, “NAFS–North American Fenestration Standard/Specification for windows, doors, and skylights”. Tested by: Claudio Sacilotto, Ryan Huynh and Allan Lawrence INTERTEK TESTING SERVICES NA LTD. Reported by: Ryan Huynh Technical Analyst, Building Products Reviewed by: Claudio Sacilotto, P.Eng Senior Project Engineer, Building Products



8 Appendix A: Drawings

(Drawings – 22 pages)



Inside

Outside

BUCKINGHAM

Horizantal Section Scale 1:1Vertical Section

Scale 1:2

Cross Sections−XO

Buckingham Patio Door−Triple Glazing


Intertek Testing Services NA, Ltd. SD 12.1 of 40

9 Revision Page

Revision No.

Date Changes Author Reviewer

0 March 11,

2014 First Issue

Ryan Huynh

Claudio Sacilotto

END OF DOCUMENT

of 40



REPORT NUMBER: 102506471TOR-001 ISSUE DATE: March 14, 2016

EVALUATION CENTER



RENDERED TO

Sunview Patio Doors Ltd. 500 Zenway Blvd,


PRODUCT EVALUATED OXXO Buckingham 16080 Sliding Door

EVALUATION PROPERTY

Physical Tests

Engineering Evaluation for Sunview Patio Doors on the OXXO Buckingham 16080 Sliding Door conducted in accordance with the applicable test methods outlined in the following standard: AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-11 “NAFS North American Fenestration Standard/Specification for windows, doors, and skylights” and A440S1-09, Canadian Supplement.

EN

GIN

EE

RIN

G E

VA

LU

AT

ION

Sunview Patio Doors Ltd. March 14, 2016 Report Number 102506471TOR-001

Intertek Testing Services NA, Ltd. SD 12.1.3 (10 Sept 2010) Informative Page 2 of 40

1 Table of Contents

1 Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... 2

2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 3

3 Test Samples ..................................................................................................................... 3

4 Reference Documents ........................................................................................................ 9

5 Evaluation Method .............................................................................................................10

6 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................12

7 Appendix A: Drawings .......................................................................................................13

8 Revision Page ...................................................................................................................40



2 Introduction

Intertek has conducted an engineering evaluation for Sunview Patio Doors (Sunview) on the 4 panel (OXXO) Buckingham 16080 Sliding Door, to evaluate its physical performance. The evaluation has been conducted to determine if the 4 panel (OXXO) Buckingham 16080 Sliding Door will maintain compliance with AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-11 “NAFS North American Fenestration Standard/Specification for windows, doors and skylights” and CSA A440S1-09, Canadian Supplement”.


3 Test Samples

The evaluation is based on testing of a Victorian 16080 unit containing a transom. Where applicable, some results of testing with transom are reported. In such cases as Air Leakage Resistance testing, separate tests were conducted removing the transom from the scope of testing. The transom was excluded from the scope when determining the performance designators.

SPECIMEN AND ASSEMBLY DESCRIPTION

Overall Size: ● 4-Panel Sliding Door (Excluding Transom): Width – 4800 mm (189") Height - 2426 mm (95 1/2") The tested size is that largest for which compliance is sought

Installation: ● Sliding Door System: Each jamb was fastened to the wood buck with ten #9×2-1/2″ pan head screws; five at each of the interior jamb tracks 22" apart, 3 in the center track and 2 in the exterior track. The sill was fastened to the wood buck with two #8×2-1/2" pan head screws at each of the interior track interlocks. The sliding door header was fastened to the steel stiffener at the horizontal mullion with six #9×2-1/2" pan head screws, two fasteners above each meeting stile.

● Overall: Silicone was applied to the interior and exterior perimeter between the frame and wood buck.

Frame: ● Main frame consisted of extruded vinyl frame members. Header and jamb profiles were reinforced with SPF wood reinforcement

● Corners: Butt-joined with adhesive foam gasket at the interface of the joined members. The ends of the jamb were fastened to the header and sill with four #8×2-1/2" pan head screws into the screw port of the horizontal member.

● Fixed Panel Support: A 1155 mm long extruded rigid PVC extrusion was inserted into the grooves of the sill track. It was fastened to the sill with five #10×3" pan head screws located 51mm, 375mm, 1050mm, and 1120 mm from the corners.



Frame (Cont’d): ● Fixed Panel Support end block: ABS fixed panel support end block was fitted to the exterior sill track, butted against the fixed panel support. It was fastened to the sill with two #10×3" pan head screws through two 54 mm × 16 mm × 6 mm acrylic shims. The fixed panel was sealed with silicone to the sill along the exposed perimeter and an adhesive backed dust plug was places on the interior side.

● Sliding Panel Support: A rolled stainless steel cap was fitted to the interior sill track.

● Anti-lift block: A rigid vinyl anti-lift block was installed at the mid span of the header track fastened to the header with two #8×1" screws.

● Panel Stop: Two extruded 64 mm (2-1/2") rubber stops installed on the head at each end of the operable track.

The Buckingham Patio Door was evaluated with a 5,875 sill configuration (refer to page 17 for information on various sill configurations). The sill configurations have no effect on the physical performance of the Buckingham Patio Door. Therefore it is Intertek professional opinion that all four sill configurations (5,875, 7,375, 7,87 and 9,37) would be covered by this engineering evaluation.

Horizontal Mullion ● A horizontal mullion was installed over the sliding door, which supported the transom (not within scope of this report) and supported the header. A steel stiffener was installed inside the horizontal mullion and secured to the wood buck with five #12×3" flat head screws per side.

● Steel Stiffener: Rectangular A36 steel tube measuring 5"×3" by 3/16" wall thickness. 4"×4"×1/4" steel angle cut to 4-1/4" was welded to the inside of the steel beam thus providing a fastening location to the wood buck.

Part Supplier Part Number Die / Drawing No.

Main Frame - Sill Vision Extrusions 2691 E107B01

Main Frame - Header Vision Extrusions 1196 107A05

Main Frame - Jamb Vision Extrusions 1195 107A04

Jamb and Header Reinforcement - Wood

Vision Extrusions 107C01 W107C01

Fixed Panel Support Vision Extrusions 4646 E107A58

Fixed Panel Support End Block S.I.L. Plastics SUN-FPS I107101

Anti-lift block S.I.L. Plastics SUN-HD --

Sill Gasket AM Rubber 107G02 --

Head Gasket AM Rubber 107G01 --

Screen Track Can-Art ES-16134 60-10-5065

Panel Stop Anplex AP387



Panel (Both): ● Operable and Fixed Panel rails and stiles: Extruded rigid PVC jamb stile and extruded rigid PVC interlock stile. Operable lock stile contained an astragal.

● Astragal: Extruded rigid PVC fastened with three #8×1-3/4” pan head screws and two #10×1-3/4″ pan head screws (which also fastened the corners). An extruded rigid vinyl mullion cover was then inserted into the astragal.

● Panel Corners: Slot mortise-and-tenon joint, held with a #10×1-3/4″ pan head screw and glued at both sides of the overlap. The inside joint of the corner was sealed with silicone.

● Fixed Panel Assembly: The fixed panel was secured to the jamb with 18 #8×1″ flat head screws. The exterior exposed screws in the top and bottom rail corners were covered with a PVC plate

Reinforcement: ● Both stiles of the operable panel and the jamb stile of the fixed panel were reinforced with 12 Ga U-shaped galvanized steel stiffener measuring 1-1/2″ × 1-1/2″, inserted into the cavity spanning the entire length.

Panel Sizes: ● Fixed Panel and Lock Operable Panel:

Width: 1216 mm (47 7/8″) Height: 2334 mm (91 7/8″)

● Operable Panel Lock:

Width: 1245 mm (49″) Height: 2334 mm (91 7/8″)


Panel Jamb Stiles / Centre Meeting Stiles

Vision Extrusions 1192 E107A01

Panel Interlock Stiles Vision Extrusions 1193 E107A02

Panel Top and Bottom Rails Vision Extrusions 1194 E107A03

H-Bar Astragal Vision Extrusions 1232 E107A21

Mullion Cover Vision Extrusions 1229 E107A18

Galvanized steel stiffener-lock stile Cargowall 60-10-0080 PD1204G0707750-80Y

Galvanized steel stiffener-stile Cargowall 60-10-0079 PD1204G0707750-1-80Y

Glazing: ● Door Panels: Factory sealed glazing unit having two sheets of nominally thick 4 mm tempered glass and a Quanex Super Spacer™. The glass was inscribed with the following: “ANSI Z97.1-2009 16 CFR 1201 II SAFETY TEMPERED SGCC 2260 5/32UA CAN/CGSB 12.1-Ms. Overall IG thickness was 25 mm.

Glazing Method: ● Door Panels: Channel glazed into the stiles, head and sill rails. The IG unit was retained by two pairs of co-extruded flexible PVC fins in the upstanding leg of the channel cavity.



Drainage

(Sliding Door): ● Panel glazing cavity is drained to the sill by two slots measuring 12.7 mm × 3 mm (1/2" × 1/8") located on 20 mm from each stile.

● The innermost interior track was drained to a cavity by two drain slots each measuring 26 mm × 4.8 mm located adjacent to the jamb.

● The cavity in the frame was drained to a forward cavity by notches cut into the sill frame wall. The notches measured 26 mm × 4.8 mm were located adjacent to each jamb.

● The anterior frame cavity was drained to the exterior by two drain slots each measuring 25 mm × 6.5 mm were located 63 mm from each jamb. The slots were covered with weepcover flaps.

● The screen sill track was drained to the exterior by three drain slots measuring 40 mm × 4 mm was located at the mid span and at each interlock.

Part Supplier Part No.

Weepcover with flaps S.I.L. Plastics 109

Hardware: ● Lock and Handle: Handle and lock on the operating panel was located at the mid-span of the lock stile. A single corresponding keeper was located on the lock jamb inside the astragal

● Keeper: A single corresponding keeper was located on the lock jamb fastened with two #8×1 1/2" pan head screws.

● Rollers: The operating sash travelled on two adjustable tandem rollers fitted into the channel in the sill rail located 89 mm (3-1/2") o.c. from each panel edge.

● Operable Panel Stiles: Head and sill rails were notched 19 mm wide by 35 mm high (3/4"×1-3/8") slot to clear the track. A dust plug covered the gap between the stile and the gap.

Part Supplier Part Number Fastening

Lock and Handle Roto Fasco 9300 Series two #10×3/4 flat head screws

Keeper Roto Fasco 9057257 two #8×2" pan head screws

Roller Roto Fasco 21000N one #8×1/2” pan head screw



Weather-stripping: ● Both interior and exterior channels of each frame jamb were double weather-

stripped with kerf-inserted single-finned pile located on each leg of the interior and exterior channels. A bulb gasket was also held in the interior and exterior channel.

● Panel top and bottom rails were double weather-stripped with kerf-inserted single-finned pile weather-strip.

● Interior and exterior interlock stiles were single weather-stripped with kerf-inserted finned pile type weather-strip.

● Astragal cavity was single weather-stripped with kerf inserted single finned pile type weather strip.

● An adhesive-backed pile dust plug was attached to the anti-lift block and at the ledge of the fixed panel support end block.


Bulb Seal Anplex AP387

187-210 Pile weather-stripping UltraFab W23211NW

Dust Plug-top N.A.P. DPRP1250-63-GYST 2625

Dust Plug-bottom N.A.P. DPRP2375-63-GYST 0875

Screen: ● Size: 1203 mm × 2346 mm

● Frame: Extruded aluminum screen members; each corner was held in by a #6×2" pan head lag screw. A single plastic wheel roller assembly was inserted into each end of both stiles. Pile weatherstrip was inserted into the kerf of the interlock stile.

● Mesh: Fibreglass mesh retained by a round plastic spline.

● Lock: A lock system was located in the jamb stile at mid height and secured with two #7×5/8" flat head screws. A single corresponding keeper was installed on the lock jamb with two #6×1/2" pan head screws.

● Installation: The screen travelled on the upstanding leg of the aluminum screen track. The screen head is inserted into the frame header track.


Screen Assembly ProMax 60-30-1023 (OX) 60-30-1024 (XO)

47-3/8×92-3/8 UC114860

187×630 Pile weather-strip UltraFab W13631NK0000B --



Drawings: ● Elevation View: Sunview Patio Doors Drawings titled

BUC15A-RG16080-E01, titled “OXXO Buckingham 16080 – Elevation View”, dated Dec 11, 2015

● Cross Section: Sunview Patio Doors Drawing titled:

BUC15A-RG16080-X01, titled “OXXO Buckingham 16080- Horizontal Cross Section”, dated Dec 11, 2015 BUC15A-RG16080-X02, titled ‘OXXO Buckingham 16080 – Vertical Cross section”, dated Dec 11, 2015

● Member Details: Vision Extrusions Limited Drawing No.:

E107A01, titled “Extruded Vertical Sash” dated May 08, 2008, Rev D1 E107A02, titled “Interlocking Sash”, dated Aug 28, 2009, Rev F1 E107A03, titled “Patio Door Rail”, dated Feb 09, 2008 E107A04, titled “Patio Door Jamb”, dated Feb 20, 2009, Rev E1 E107A05, titled “Patio Door Header”, dated Nov 1, 2008, Rev C1 E107A08 titled “Screw Cover”, dated Feb 09, 2008 E107A09, titled “PVC Patio Door Jamb”, Feb 20, 2009 E107A10, titled “PVC Patio Door Header E107A18, titled “Mullion Screw Cover”, dated Feb 25, 2008 E107B01, titled “New Patio Door Sill”, Apr 04, 2010, Rev C1 E107A58, titled “V & B Fixed Panel Support(G2)”, dated Jan31, 2014 E107A21, titled “4Panel Mullion”, Feb 25, 2008 NONE titled “Sill Gasket”, dated Jul 10, 2013 H107G02, titled “Patio Door Header Gasket”, dated Nov 14, 2008 I107101, titled “Fixed Panel Support”, dated Feb 29, 2008 W107C01, titled “Header & Jamb Reinforcement”, dated Feb 25, 2008, Rev A1

● Member Details: Sunview Patio Doors Drawing No: 15110601, titled “8 ft Vic/Buck Sash Reinforcement W/STD Height Lock Punchout”,

dated Nov 7, 2015 15110602, titled “8 ft Vic/Buck Sash Reinforcement W/O Lock Punchout”, Dated

Nov 7, 2015 Buckingham Patio Door Sill Options, dated Aug 1, 2013

● Member Details: Cargowall LTD Die No: DT2601SS titled “Door Track”, May25, 2015

● Member Details: Can Art Aluminum Extrusions Inc. Die No.: ES16134, titled “Screen Track”, dated 10-18-2010

● Member Details: Ancaster Plastic Extrusions Inc. Die No.: AP-476, titled “Bumper”, dated Nov. 12, 2015

● Member Details: Ultrafab Weatherstrip Division Drawing No.: No Drawing No., title “W23211NW”, date 12/1/11


Intertek Testing Services NA, Ltd. Page 9 of 40

3 Reference Documents

As part of this evaluation, Intertek has directly or indirectly used the following reference documents:

- AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-11 “NAFS North American Fenestration Standard/ Specification for windows, doors and skylights” (NAFS)

- CSA A440S1-09, Canadian Supplement”. Test reports:

Tested by Report Number Report Issue Date

Standard Covered Comments

Intertek 3156800TOR-004D AAMA08 SGD January 23, 2009 AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08

Physical Testing on 6’ Victorian Patio Door

Intertek 3156800TOR-0012D AAMA08 SGD May 25, 2009 AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08

Physical Testing on 6’ Buckingham Patio Door

Intertek 102238297TOR-002 December 31, 2015

AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-11 & CSA A440S1-09

Physical Testing on 8’ LC OXXO Buckingham 16080 Patio Door



4 Evaluation Method

The purpose of this evaluation is to determine the designation & ratings of the OXXO Buckingham 16080 Sliding door in accordance with AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-11 and CSA A440S1-09.

Due to the variables that exist from project to project and the fact that each evaluation requires review of the most current existing data and information, this evaluation is not to be used as justification for any other opinion nor used for any other project, without the express written consent of Intertek. This report should serve as Intertek’s opinion regarding the use of the certified product in the conditions described herein. The materials used on the project, which are applied in compliance with Intertek Design Listings, must bear the Intertek listing mark. All certified products must be installed in accordance with the details contained in Intertek's Directory of Listed Building Products.

Sunview’s OXXO Buckingham 16080 Sliding door shares a lot of similarities to Sunview’s OXXO Victorian 16080 Sliding door. The main difference between the two specimens is the Victorian Patio Door consists of an all-vinyl header and jamb frame and the Buckingham Patio Door consists of a vinyl-clad wood header and jamb frame. Both frame profile outlines are identical. Both models were initially physically tested in 2009 to NAFS-08 and are referenced in Intertek reports 3156800TOR-004D & 3156800TOR-0012D. These reports demonstrate that the 6′ patio doors exhibit similar deflection properties and identical performance grades with respect to Structural tests using uniform load.

Since 2009, Sunview modified both the 6′ Victorian and 6′ Buckingham Sliding doors. In 2015, Sunview tested their OXXO Victorian 16080 patio sliding door in accordance with AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-11 and CSA A440S1-09. The details are referenced in Intertek test report 102238297TOR-002. The door panels are identical with respect to the drainage, fasteners, weatherstrip, glazing, sill and hardware. The difference between the 8′ Buckingham and 8′ Victorian door frame are outlined in the table below:

Due to the similarity between the two sliding doors, the performance of the Buckingham Patio Door was evaluated based on the test conducted on the Victorian Patio Door. The evaluation of the test results are as follows:

● Operating Force

Factors that affect the Operating Force of the door include 1) Weatherstrip details, 2) Roller hardware, 3) Interlocking details These above-mentioned factors that affect Operating Force are identical with the vinyl-clad Buckingham Patio Door frame and the all-vinyl Victorian Patio Door frame. The panels of both doors are also identical. Therefore, the Operating Force performance of the Victorian Patio Door can be applied to the Buckingham Patio Door.

● Air Leakage and Water Penetration Resistance

Since both frame profiles of the vinyl-clad Buckingham Patio Door frame and the all-vinyl Victorian Patio Door frame are identical, including the drainage holes and weatherstrips, the water leakage performance of the Victorian Patio Door can be applied to the Buckingham Patio Door.

Buckingham Patio Door Victorian Patio Door

Frame Jamb is comprised of a rigid vinyl extrusion (Vision Extrusions Limited Part no. E107A04) and a SPF wood reinforcement (Vision Extrusions Limited Part no. W107C01 ) Frame Header is comprised of a rigid vinyl extrusion (Vision Extrusions Limited Part no. E107A05) and a SPF wood reinforcement (Vision Extrusions Limited Part no. W107C01 )

Frame Jamb is comprised of a rigid vinyl extrusion (Vision Extrusions Part no. E107A09) Frame Header is comprised of a rigid vinyl extrusion (Vision Extrusions Part no. E107A10)



● Uniform Load The Victorian Patio Door and the Buckingham Patio Door use identical panels, hence the Uniform Load Wind Load Resistance performance of the Victorian Patio Door can be applied to the Buckingham Patio Door provided that the frame members are firmly affixed to the wood buck with #9 × 2-1/2" screws.

● Forced Entry Resistance

The Victorian Patio Door and the Buckingham Patio Door use identical panels, hence the Forced Entry Resistance performance of the Victorian Patio Door can be applied to the Buckingham Patio Door provided that the keeper is affixed to the vinyl frame and into the wood buck with #8 × 2-1/2" screws and that the panel brackets are affixed with #8 × 1" screws into internal (concealed) vinyl web (indicated by the screw locator).

● Deglazing

The frame detail of a sliding door has no influence on the Deglazing test. The Victorian Patio Door and the Buckingham Patio Door use identical panels and therefore the test results achieved with the Victorian Patio Door can be applied to the Buckingham Patio Door.

Based on the information presented in this evaluation, it is Intertek professional judgment that the OXXO Buckingham 16080 Patio Door can achieve identical ratings and designations as the OXXO Victorian 16080 Patio door as evaluated to the test requirements of AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-11 and CSA A440S1-09. Refer to Section 6 for the ratings.


Intertek Testing Services NA, Ltd.Page 12 of 40

5 Conclusion

Intertek has conducted this engineering evaluation for Sunview Patio Doors on the OXXO Buckingham 16080 sliding patio door to evaluate its physical performance in accordance with AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-11 and CSA A440S1-09. Test results reported here in also comply with the 2008 edition of the NAFS test standard, AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08, “NAFS–North American Fenestration Standard/Specification for windows, doors, and skylights”.

Based on the information contained and referenced herein, it is Intertek’s professional judgment based on sound engineering principles that the OXXO Buckingham 16080 Sliding Patio Door will achieve the following Primary and Secondary Designators:

Physical Ratings - AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-11 and CSA A440S1-09

Primary Designator

Class LC – PG35 – Size Tested: 4804 x 2426 mm – SD

Secondary Designator

Positive Design Pressure: +1680 Pa (+35 psf)

Negative Design Pressure: -1680 Pa (-35 psf)

Water Penetration Test Pressure: 260 Pa (5.25 psf)

Canadian Air Infiltration/Exfiltration Level: A3

(infiltration: 0.5 L/s·m²)

(exfiltration: 0.5 L/s·m²)

Additional Test

Forced Entry Resistance: Grade 20

The conclusions of this test report may be used as part of the requirements for Intertek product certification. Authority to Mark must be issued for a product to become certified.

INTERTEK TESTING SERVICES NA LTD.

Reported by: Scott Hallam Technical Analyst, Building Products

Reviewed by: Vern W. Jones Senior Technologist, Building Products



7 Revision Page

Revision No.


0 Mar 14, 2016 First Issue Scott Hallam Vern Jones

END OF DOCUMENT

of 16



REPORT NUMBER: 101308865TOR-002B ISSUE DATE: March 11, 2014

EVALUATION CENTER



RENDERED TO

Sunview Patio Doors Limited 500 Zenway Blvd,


PRODUCT EVALUATED Combination system comprised of

Sliding Door with Transom and two Sidelites

EVALUATION PROPERTY Physical Tests

Report of testing on a Combination system comprised of a Sliding Door, Transom and two Sidelites conducted in accordance with the applicable test methods of the following standard: AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08 “NAFS North American Fenestration Standard/Specification for windows, doors, and skylights” and CSA A440S1-09, Canadian Supplement.

TE

ST

RE

PO

RT

Sunview Patio Door Limited March 11, 2014 Report Number 101308865TOR-002B


1 Table of Contents

1 Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................. 2

2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 3

3 Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 3

4 Test Samples ........................................................................................................................................ 4

4.1. SPECIMEN AND ASSEMBLY DESCRIPTION ........................................................................... 4

5 Testing and Evaluation Methods .......................................................................................................... 6

DEVIATION FROM THE TEST STANDARD .............................................................................. 6

5.1 AIR LEAKAGE RESISTANCE TEST ........................................................................................... 6

5.2 WATER PENETRATION RESISTANCE TEST ........................................................................... 6

5.3 UNIFORM LOAD TESTS ............................................................................................................. 7

5.4 FORCED-ENTRY RESISTANCE TEST ...................................................................................... 7

5.5 THERMOPLASTIC CORNER WELD TEST ................................................................................ 7

6 Testing and Evaluation Results ............................................................................................................ 8

6.1 Air Leakage Resistance Test ....................................................................................................... 8

6.2 Water Penetration Resistance Test ............................................................................................. 8

6.3 Uniform Load Tests ..................................................................................................................... 9

6.4 Forced Entry Resistance Test ................................................................................................... 10

6.5 Thermoplastic Corner Weld Test ............................................................................................... 10

7 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................... 11

8 Appendix A: Drawings ........................................................................................................................ 12

9 Revision Page .................................................................................................................................... 16



2 Introduction

Intertek has conducted performance testing for Sunview Patio Door Limited on a combination Buckingham Patio Door with two sidelites and one transom for the Intertek Certification program. The scope of this report does not cover the sliding door. It only covers the sidelites and transom and the mulled portions of the assembly.

The combination assembly was submitted by the client to the Intertek laboratory in Mississauga, Ontario on September 24, 2013. Testing was conducted and evaluated in accordance with AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08 “NAFS North American Fenestration Standard/ Specification for windows, doors and skylights” and CSA A440S1-09, Canadian Supplement”. This evaluation began November 29, 2013 and was completed December 4, 2013.


3 Summary


Type: ● Transom

Primary Designator:

● Class LC – PG30 - Size Tested: 2830 × 920 mm – TR


● Positive Design Pressure (DP) = +1440 Pa (+30 psf) Negative Design Pressure (DP) = -1440 Pa (-30 psf)

Water Penetration Test Pressure = 400 Pa (8.25 psf) Canadian Air Infiltration/Exfiltration Level = Fixed


● December 4, 2013



Type: ● Sidelite

Primary Designator

● Class R – PG30 - Size Tested: 513 × 2020 mm – SLT


● Positive Design Pressure (DP) = +1440 Pa (+30 psf) Negative Design Pressure (DP) = -1440 Pa (-30 psf)

Water Penetration Test Pressure = 400 Pa (8.25 psf)

Canadian Air Infiltration/Exfiltration Level = Fixed


● December 4, 2013




4 Test Samples

4.1. SPECIMEN AND ASSEMBLY DESCRIPTION

A sliding door / sidelite / transom assembly combination product was submitted for testing to the AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08 requirements for sidelites, transom and mulled products. The sliding door was not tested. A similar sliding door, the Buckingham Patio Door conforming to LC performance class was tested and is reported in Intertek Test Report 101308865TOR-002A, dated March 11, 2014. Transom Size: ● Width - 2830 mm Height - 920 mm Sidelites Size: ● Width - 513 mm Height - 2020 mm Patio Door Size: ● Width - 1804 mm Height - 2020 mm (Patio Door is not included in the scope of this report) Elevation: (Arrows indicate anchor locations) Installation: ● The window and door assembly unit consisted of a Buckingham patio door with

two directly glazed sidelites, and one directly glazed transom. ● The entire assembly was installed into a wood buck and secured with twenty-four

#8×2-1/2″ pan head screws. Each sidelite was fastened to the wood buck with two screws at the sill located 38 mm from each jamb and three screws at the jamb located 25 mm from each head and sill and one at the mid span. The transom was fastened to the wood buck with eleven screws; three on each jamb located 25 mm from the top and bottom and one at the mid span; and five screws at the header spaced 610 mm apart. The patio door sill was fastened to the wood buck with three screws located 25 mm from each jamb and one at the mid span.

● The assembly was sealed to the wood buck on the interior and exterior with caulking.

Transom

Sidelite

Patio

Door

Sidelite



Joinery: ● The transom sill was fastened to the patio door and sidelites with five screws spaced 610 mm apart. Each sidelite was fastened to the patio door with four screws 635 mm apart

● A continuous bead of silicone caulking was between the sidelite/transom frame extrusions and the wood reinforcement of the Buckingham patio door. Silicone was also into the cavity housing the coupler, prior to the installation of the coupler. Flush mount couplers were pressed into the kerf on the transom/sidelite/patio door frame applied.

Frame: ● Extruded rigid vinyl frame member. The corners were mitred and welded.

Part Supplier Part/Die Number

Frame Vision Extrusions 107A28

Flush Mount Coupler Vision Extrusions 50006

Reinforcement: ● None

Drainage: ● The transom glazing cavity was drained to the anterior cavity with four drain slots measuring 12.7 mm x 1.5 mm located 108 mm and 1200 mm from the left jamb, and located 108 mm and 721 mm from the right jamb.

● The anterior cavity was drained to the exterior with four drain slots measuring 12.7 mm x 3.2 mm located directly exterior of the glazing cavity drain slots.

● Each sidelite glazing cavity was drained to the anterior cavity with two drain slot measuring 12.7 mm x 1.5 mm located 38 mm from each jamb.

● The anterior cavity was drained to the exterior with two drain slots measuring 12.7 mm x 3.2 mm located directly exterior of the glazing cavity drain slots.

Glazing: ● Factory sealed glazing unit having two sheets of nominally thick 3 mm glass with

a 18.9 mm wide gap with a hybrid spacer. The IG unit was sealed to the glass with butyl and was backed with polysulphide. Overall IG unit thickness measured 25.1 mm. The IG unit was spacer marked “Sunview Patio Doors Ltd. IGCC ® 2013”.

Glazing Method: ● Each IG unit was laid-in glazed from the interior on double sided foam tape measuring 12.2 mm x 3.4 mm.

● Silicone heel bead was applied along the perimeter of the glass.

● Rigid vinyl glazing stops, complete with two co-extruded flexible vinyl fins retained the IG unit in the frame on the interior.

Part Supplier Part/Product Number

Glazing Stop Vision Extrusions 50004

Foam Tape -- --

IG Unit -- --

Drawings: ● Member Details: Vision Extrusions Limited Drawing No.:

E107A28, titled “Transom/ Sidelight Jamb”, dated 06-23-2008 Rev B1 E50004, titled “1 – 1 1/8” Glass Stop”, dated 10/23/08 Rev C1 E50006, titled “500 Series – 0° - 45° Flush Mount Coupler”, dated 10/23/08 Rev B1



5 Testing and Evaluation Methods

AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08 Gateway Requirements

Transom Sidelites

Performance Class

Minimum Gateway Test Size:

Maximum Allowable Air Leakage:

Maximum Allowable Air Leakage:

Minimum Water Pressure:

Minimum Structural Pressure:

LC

1800 mm × 400 mm

1.5 L/s·m² (US)

0.2 L/s•m² (FIXED Canadian)

180 Pa

1800 Pa

R

400 mm × 2000 mm

1.5 L/s·m² (US)

0.2 L/s•m² (FIXED Canadian)

140 Pa

1080 Pa

Both products met the Gateway Performance Requirements by virtue of meeting the higher (optional) performance grades to which it was tested: Performance testing was conducted on the transom and sidelites in order to meet the overall Optional Performance requirements as follows:

Optional Water test Pressure: 400 Pa Optional Design Test Pressure: 1440 Pa Optional Structural Test Pressure: 2160 Pa Canadian Air Infiltration/Exfiltration: Fixed

DEVIATION FROM THE TEST STANDARD

Testing was not initiated at the minimum Gateway grade levels for the R and LC class of windows. The transom and sidelite were tested to the Optional Performance Grades of AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08. By default, the minimum Gateway requirements were met by virtue of meeting the higher (optional) performance grade requirements at higher test levels.

5.1 AIR LEAKAGE RESISTANCE TEST

The Air Leakage Resistance test was performed in accordance with Clause 9.3.2 in conjunction with ASTM E283-04, "Standard Test Method for Determining Rate of Air Leakage Through Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, and Doors Under Specified Pressure Differences Across the Specimen." Air infiltration and exfiltration tests were performed using test pressures of 75 Pa (1.57 psf). The maximum air leakage rate was calculated and compared to the allowable air leakage.

5.2 WATER PENETRATION RESISTANCE TEST

A four-cycle Water Penetration Resistance test was performed in accordance with Clause 9.3.3 in conjunction with ASTM E547-00 "Standard Test Method for Water Penetration of Exterior Windows, Skylights, Doors, and Curtain Walls by Cyclic Static Air Pressure Difference." The test was performed using the specified pressure differential and a water spray rate of at least 204 L/m² per hour (5.0 US gal/ft² per hour). Each cycle consisted of five minutes with the pressure applied and one minute with the pressure released, during which the water spray was continuously applied.



5.3 UNIFORM LOAD TESTS

5.3.1 Uniform Load Deflection Test A Uniform Load Deflection test was conducted in accordance with Clause 9.3.4.2 in conjunction with ASTM E-330-02 "Standard Test Method for Structural Performance of Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, and Doors by Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference," Procedure A and evaluated in accordance with clause 9.3.4.2 of AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08. After a 10 second preload (50% of test load), followed by 1 minute with the pressure released, the Uniform Load Deflection test was conducted at the specified test pressures for a time of 10 seconds. The test was performed in both the positive and negative directions. Deflection measurements were taken at the horizontal and vertical mullion. After the test loads were released the maximum net deflections were recorded as well as the sidelites and transom were inspected for failure or permanent deformation of any part of the system that would cause any operational malfunction.

5.3.2 Uniform Load Structural Test A Uniform Load Structural was conducted in accordance with Clause 9.3.4.3 in conjunction with ASTM E330-02 "Standard Test Method for Structural Performance of Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, and Doors by Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference," Procedure A. After a 10 second preload (50% of test load), followed by 1 minute with the pressure released, the sample was subjected to a Uniform Load Structural test using a specified test pressure for a time of 10 seconds. The test was performed in both the positive and negative directions. After the test loads were released, the permanent deflections were recorded as well as the sidelites and transom were inspected for failure or permanent deformation of any part of the system that would cause any operational malfunction.

5.4 FORCED-ENTRY RESISTANCE TEST

The Forced Entry Resistance Test was conducted and evaluated in accordance with Clause 9.3.5, in conjunction with ASTM F588-07 "Standard Test Methods for Measuring the Force Entry Resistance of Window Assemblies, Excluding Glass Impact".

5.4.1 Disassembly Test Using the disassembly tools listed below, all members and/or fasteners that could readily be removed from the exterior within a time limit of five minutes were removed carefully so as not to cause collateral damage to the specimen.

Tools for Disassembly Putty knife – 0.6 mm thick by 20 mm wide by 90 mm long Straight or Philips head non-powered screwdriver – 150 mm long Standard slot-type pliers – 150 mm long

5.4.2 Type D Window Assembly Test The Sidelites and transom were tested to a Performance Grade 20 performance level (T1 = 5 minutes). No locking devices were present on the window therefore no test loads were applied.

5.4.3 Sash Manipulation Test An attempt was made to open the window, lift, push, pull or otherwise manipulate by hand from the exterior, the sash panel to the full confines of the frame. The sash manipulation test was conducted for a time of T1.

5.5 THERMOPLASTIC CORNER WELD TEST

Corner weld tests were conducted in accordance with Clause 9.3.6.2 of the AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08. Each corner sample was mounted in a test fixture as per Figure 9.3 of the standard. The frame corners and the sash corners were loaded as per Figure 9.3 with a gradually increasing load until breakage of the corner occurred. When loaded to failure, the break shall not extend along the entire weld line.



6 Testing and Evaluation Results

6.1 Air Leakage Resistance Test


Transom and Sidelite Area 4.67 m²

Infiltration rate: 0.0 L/s·m²


Transom and Sidelite Area 4.67 m²

Exfiltration rate: 0.0 L/s·m²

Maximum allowable air leakage rate (US infiltration only): 1.5 L/s·m²

Maximum allowable air leakage rate (Canadian Fixed): 0.2 L/s·m²

Since the transom and sidelite are similar in its design the air leakage will be averaged for both. Each the sidelites and transom satisfied the Air Leakage Resistance (as well as the FIXED Canadian Infiltration/Exfiltration performance level) requirement as specified in AAMA/ WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08.

6.2 Water Penetration Resistance Test

During the 24-minute test period, using a pressure differential of 400 Pa, there was no water leakage observed, nor was there trapped water in the sliding door assembly following completion of the test.

The sliding door system (with transom and two sidelites) MET the minimum Gateway Water Penetration Resistance requirement at 140 Pa (at 180 Pa for LC), and satisfied the Optional Performance requirement for at 400 Pa as specified in AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08 and CSA A440S1-09, Canadian Supplement.



6.3 Uniform Load Tests

Uniform Load Deflection Tests at Design Pressure

Member Horizontal Mullion (Transom) Vertical Mullion (Side Lite)

Span Length 2820 mm 2015 mm

Allowable Deflection Report only Report only

Test Pressure Positive Load Negative Load Positive Load Negative Load

±720 Pa 10.53 mm 16.38 mm 1.06 mm 1.08 mm

±960 Pa 13.39 mm 20.43 mm 1.38 mm 1.30 mm

±1080 Pa 15.66 mm 24.73 mm 1.58 mm 0.98 mm

±1200 Pa 18.22 mm 27.57 mm 1.81 mm 1.09 mm

±1440 Pa 22.19 mm 37.85 mm 2.52 mm 4.57 mm

±1680 Pa 26.29 mm 49.22 mm 3.05 mm 6.72 mm

±1800 Pa 28.55 mm 49.54 mm 3.25 mm 6.77 mm

±2160 Pa 53.12 mm 65.12 mm 5.31 mm 9.95 mm

Post-test Details After the test loads were released, the sliding door/transom/sidelite assembly was inspected and there was found to be no failure or permanent deformation of any part of the system that would cause any operational malfunction.

Uniform Load Structural Test

Member Horizontal Mullion Vertical Mullion

Span Length 2820 mm 2015 mm

Allowable Residual Deflection (L × 0.4%)

11.28 mm 8.06 mm

Test Pressure Positive Load Negative Load Positive Load Negative Load

±720 Pa 0.08 mm 0.01 mm 0.04 mm 0.03 mm

±960 Pa 0.25 mm 0.45 mm 0.02 mm 0.31 mm

±1080 Pa 0.14 mm 0.81 mm 0.07 mm 0.24 mm

±1200 Pa 0.29 mm 0.70 mm 0.09 mm 0.51 mm

±1440 Pa 0.49 mm 2.47 mm 0.18 mm 0.00 mm

±1680 Pa 0.86 mm 2.49 mm 0.24 mm 0.11 mm

±1800 Pa 0.86 mm 1.83 mm 0.18 mm 0.09 mm

±2160 Pa 1.56 mm 3.71 mm 0.53 mm 1.45 mm

Post-test Details After the test loads were released, the sliding door/transom/sidelite assembly was inspected and there was found to be no failure or permanent deformation of any part of the system that would cause any operational malfunction.

The horizontal and vertical mullion combination system MET the overall minimum Gateway performance requirements for Uniform Load Structural (150% of Design Pressure) at 1080 Pa for the Sidelite and 1800 Pa for the Transom by virtue of meeting the Optional Performance requirements at 2160 Pa for Uniform Load Structural as specified in AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08.



6.4 Forced Entry Resistance Test

The sliding door system (with transom and two sidelites) was installed into a wood test buck as supplied by the manufacturer. The test unit was subjected to a Grade 20 measured performance for a Type D window system in accordance with the procedure outlined in ASTM F588-07.

Disassembly Test Within 5 minutes, nothing was removed from the sliding door system and entry was not gained.

Sash Manipulation Test During time T1 entry was not gained.

The sliding door system (with transom and two sidelites) met the Grade 20 measured performance requirements of ASTM F588-07 for Forced Entry Resistance for Type D window.

6.5 Thermoplastic Corner Weld Test

Frame- Break did not extend along entire weld line.

The sliding door system (with transom and two sidelites) MET the performance requirements specified in AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08 for thermoplastic corner weld test.



7 Conclusion

The Transom and Side Lite described in this report was tested to the requirements of AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08 “NAFS North American Fenestration Standard/Specification for windows, doors, and skylights” and CSA A440S1-09, “Canadian Supplement” and achieved the following Performance Designations: TRANSOM Primary Designator

Class LC – PG30 - Size Tested: 2830 × 920 mm – TR Secondary Designator

Positive Design Pressure (DP) = +1440 Pa Negative Design Pressure (DP) = -1440 Pa Water Penetration Test Pressure = 400 Pa Canadian Air Infiltration/Exfiltration Level = Fixed

SIDELITE Primary Designator

Class R – PG30 - Size Tested: 513 × 2020 mm – SLT Secondary Designator

Positive Design Pressure (DP) = +1440 Pa Negative Design Pressure (DP) = -1440 Pa Water Penetration Test Pressure = 400 Pa Canadian Air Infiltration/Exfiltration Level = Fixed

HORIZONTAL MULLION Class R – PG30 – MA: Size Tested 2830 mm span/1.4 m²

VERTICAL MULLION Class R – PG30 – MA: Size Tested 2015 mm span/0.77 m²

INTERTEK TESTING SERVICES NA LTD. Tested and Reported by: Ryan Huynh Technical Analyst, Building Products Reviewed by: Claudio Sacilotto, P.Eng Senior Project Engineer, Building Products


Page 12 of 16

Intertek Testing Services NA, Ltd. SD 12.1.3 (10 Sept 2010) Informative




Page 16 of 16

Intertek Testing Services NA, Ltd. SD 12.1.3 (10 Sept 2010) Informative

9 Revision Page

Revision No.


0 March

11, 2014 First issue Ryan Huynh Claudio Sacilotto

END OF DOCUMENT