remote sensing for flood hazard studies.adpc.net/casita/course modules/flood vulnerability... ·...
TRANSCRIPT
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 1
1
REMOTE SENSING FOR FLOOD HAZARD STUDIES.
OPTICAL SENSORS.OPTICAL SENSORS.
DRS. NANETTE C. KINGMA
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 2
2
Optical Remote Sensing for flood hazard studies.
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 3
3
Floods & use of remote sensing.
Floods often leaves its imprint or ‘signature” on the surface in the form of soil moisture anomalies (increase), standing water bodies, soil scours, stressed vegetation, debris, and other indicators.⇒ reduced reflectivity.
⇒Use RS imagery a few days after the flood event upto 2 weeks.
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 4
4
Floods & use of remote sensing.
Major drawback optical sensors cannot penetrate cloud;Instead combine with cloud penetrating radar.
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 5
5
Remote Sensing for Flood Hazard Studies.
Different applications;Different approaches;Different platforms;
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 6
6
Remote Sensing for Flood Hazard Studies: applications.
Mapping spatial distribution of inundated areas;Mapping spatial distribution of flood effects;Indirect mapping to make flood susceptibility maps using flood indicators;Flood hazard zonation using sequential imagery and or integrating different types of imagery;Damage assessment post flood;Planning of emergency & relief operations;
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 7
7
Remote Sensing for Flood Hazard Studies: applications.
Monitoring for early warning;sequential inundation stage mapping; Generating DEM’s for modelling etc.;Combining DEM with areal extent map to find flood depth map (if DEM detailed enough).
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 8
8
Types of Sensors
1. Space-borne imaging sensors:A. Multi-spectral sensors:
– Landsat MSS, -TM, SPOT, IRS, JERS (OPS),IKONOS, ASTER. B. Radar systems (SAR):
– ERS, JERS, RadarsatC. Environmental sensors:
– NOAA (AVHRR) 2. Air-borne imaging sensors:
A. Aerial photography B. Multi-spectral airborne sensorsC. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)D. Video mapping
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 9
9
Spaceborne Optical Sensors
A. Panchromatic and multi-spectral sensors:– LANDSAT-MSS, Thematic Mapper, Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus.– SPOT-XS and SPOT-Panchromatic– India Remote Sensing Satellite (IRS) – Japan Earth Resources Satellite (JERS - OPS)– ASTER
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 10
10
Common Spectral Bands
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 11
11
Multi-spectral scanners
Advantages of multi-spectral scanner data:high spectral resolution;moderate temporal resolution;good processing software on the market;different sensors spectrally good compatible.
Disadvantages of multi-spectral scanner data:recent data relative expensive;( * ASTER)long ordering time;cloud coverage.
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 12
12
Landsat TM
Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM-4 & -5)
Large areas covered by one scene (185 * 185 km)Temporal resolution: 18 daysOrbit nearly polar and sun-synchronic (705 km high)Good spectral resolution: 7 bands (0.45 - 2.35 um)Average spatial resolution:
- Spatial resolution bands 1 - 5, 7: 30 m- Spatial resolution band 6: 120 m
No stereo capabilities
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 13
13
Landsat TM
Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM 7 ETM+)
Large areas covered by one scene (185 * 185 km)Temporal resolution: 16 daysOrbit nearly polar and sun-synchronic (705 km high)Good spectral resolution: 7 bands (0.45 - 2.35 um)Average spatial resolution:
- Panchromatic band: 15 m- Spatial resolution bands 1 - 5, 7: 30 m- Spatial resolution thermal band 6: 60 m
No stereo capabilities
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 14
14
Landsat TM
Landsat Thematic Mapper bands
Band 1 .45 - .52 um - maximum penetration of waterBand 2 .52 - .60 um - reflection peak of vegetationBand 3 .63 - .69 um - chlorophyll absorption bandBand 4 .76 - .90 um - mapping of waterbodiesBand 5 1.55- 1.75 um - moisture content of the soilBand 6 10.4-12.50 um - thermal IRBand 7 2.08 -2.35 um - hydrothermally altered rocks
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 15
15
Landsat TM for Flood Hazard studies -1
Landsat Thematic Mapper band combinations:
Mapping upto 1 : 50.000;FCC: Bands: 4 / 3 / 2 or Bnd 4 / 3 / 1 ; RGBTM-Band 4 Separation of land and water.TM-Band 5 Moisture content of soil and vegetation.Other: Bands: 1 / 3 / 5 soil and sediment studiesTasseled cap transformation; optimize data viewing for vegetation studies: brightness image, greenness-image , and wetness-image.
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 16
16
Landsat TM example
Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM -4 & -5)Example of flooding in Caprivi, Zambezi-river and Chobe-river,
Namibia.– Date: 12 March 1989; resolution: 30 m– Processing Color Composite: R/G/B: 5 ,4 ,3.
Chobe river
Zambezi river
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 17
17
Comparing TM Band 4 and TM Band 5.
Example from Caprivi, Namibia.Date: 02/07/1989
band 4 (land water boundaries) band 5 (humid soils &veget.)
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 18
18
Band comparison.
Mississippi flood 1993.
Band 4 TM Band 5 TM
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 19
19
Landsat TM example
Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM -4 & -5)Example of flooding in Caprivi, Zambezi-river and Chobe-river,
Namibia.– Date: August 19, 1989. Resolution: 30 m.– Processing Color Composite: R/G/B: 4 / 5 / 3
High soil moisture content
Zambezi river
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 20
20
Caprivi Flood Hazard Map.
VL
VH
MH
L
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 21
21
Detecting land and water boundaries.
Band 4 of TM: Example of the Missouri river pre-and post flood 1993.
Original (left) and stretched (righthand side) ; band 4.
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 22
22
Selecting band combinations for detecting land – water boundaries.
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 23
23
Geomorphological effects of the 1993-flood
hills
floodplain
TM images: bands 7, 5, and 3 (R,G,B).
Missouri River Floodplain, Glasgow, Missouri, USA.
http://edcwww2.cr.usgs.gov/moberly/preflood.gif
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 24
24
Totally inundatedfloodplain.
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 25
25
Sand deposits, from levee breaches.
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 26
26
Flash flood in an arid country.
⇒ only mapping of flood effect possible.
Yemen, June 1997 flood.
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 27
27
SPOT
– Area covered by one scene 60 * 60 km– Temporal resolution:
- vertical look angle: 26 days- oblique look angle: 4 days
– Orbit nearly polar and sun-synchronic (823 km high)– Average spectral resolution:
- 3 bands in XS mode (0.50 - 0.89 um)- 1 band in panchromatic mode (0.50 - 0.75 um)
– Average spatial resolution:- XS mode : 20 m- Panchromatic mode: 10 m
– Stereo capabilities
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 28
28
SPOT
– Spectral resolution:3 bands in XS mode (0.50 - 0.89 um):
SPOT band 1: 0.5 - 0.6 µ m ( green light);SPOT band 2: 0.6 - 0.7 µ m ( red light);SPOT band 3: 0.8 - 0.9 µ m ( near infra-red light)
SPOT band 3: separation land - water.SPOT band 1: water-sediment studies.SPOT FCC flood effects, damage assessment etc.SPOT stereo image interpretation
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 29
29
Spot band versus band .
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 30
30
SPOT XS example
Example of the 1988 Flood in Bangladesh:– SPOT-XS of 10 October 1988. Resolution: 20 m– Processing FCC: Red, Green, Blue: bands 3, 2, 1
Ganges
Meghna
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 31
31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 32
32
Monitoring geomorphological change.
.Bangladesh SPOT, TM imagery
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 33
33
SPOT PAN example
Example of Missouri river near St-Louis in the 1993 flood, USA.– SPOT PANCHROMATIC, 23/07/1993– Resolution: 10 m
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 34
34
Mapping land and water boundaries.
Example from Bangladesh using SPOT.Processing: in SPOT band 3 density slicing.
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 35
35
Cross operation of sliced images.
Jan 87(dry), Nov 87 (mfl), Oct 88.
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 36
36
Flood affected frequency analysis.
No hazard zone
Low “hazard” area
Medium “hazard” area
High “hazard” area.
From: GIS Development 2000
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 37
37
Multi-temporal image.
R/G/B:
Feb89 /Oct88 / Jan87
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 38
38
IRS-1C
Indian Remote Sensing satellite (IRS)– Linear Imaging Self-scanning (LISS) system– Temporal resolution 22 - 24 days: – Orbit nearly polar and sun-synchronic (904 km high)
Sensor Bands Spectral Res.Spatial Res.
LISS I 4 0.45 - 0.86 um 72.5 m LISS II 4 0.45 - 0.86 um 36.3 mLISS III 2 0.52 - 0.77 um 23.3 m (visible)
2 0.77 - 1.77 um 70.5 m (RIR)PAN 1 0.50 - 0.75 um 5.8 mWiFS 2 0.62 - 0.75 um 188 m(Wide field sensor)
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 39
39
JERS-1 SAR/OPS
Japanese Earth Resource Satellite (JERS-1)Launched November 1995
Optical Sensor (OPS)– Area covered by one scene 75 * 75 km– Temporal resolution: 44 days – Orbit nearly polar and sun-synchronic (568 km high)– Spectral resolution:
- 2 bands visible 0.52 - 0.60 :m (green) 0.63 - 0.69 :m (red)- 4 bands Refl. IR 0.76 - 0.86 :m (near IR) 1.60 - 1.71 :m (mid IR) 2.01- 2.12
:m , 2.13 - 2.25 :m, 2.27 - 2.40 :m (mid IR)
– Spatial resolution: 20 m – Stereo capabilities (band 4 off-nadir look angle)
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 40
40
JERS-1 OPS example
Jamuna river
Ganges river
1998 /07/27
Band combination:321
Resampled: to 25 x 25 m.
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 41
41
Aster characteristics.
High spatial resolution;Wide spectral range of visible, near IR , short wave IR and thermal IR;Stereo view in the same orbit.
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 42
42
ASTER.
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 43
43
LANDSAT versus ASTER.
Maastricht
Meuse river north of Maastricht.
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 44
44
Case study Tanaro river- Italy.
Precipitation 3 days : 350 mmintensity max: 54 mm/h
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 45
45
Tasseled cap transform.
Tasseled cap transform is a way to optimize data viewing for vegetation studies.
Crist et al 1986, Crist & Kauth 1986.
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 46
46
Tasseled cap transform-1.
Brightness:a weighted sum of all bands, defined in the direction of the principal variation in soil reflectance;Greenness; orthogonal to brightness, a contrast between the near infra-red and visible bands; strongly related to the amount of green vegetation in the scene.Wetness: relates to canopy and soil moisture.
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 47
47
Tasseled cap transform-2.
Brightness = 0.3037(TM1) + 0.2793(TM2) + 0.4743(TM3) + 0.5585(TM4) + 0.5082(TM5) + 1.865(TM7).Greenness = -0.2848(TM1) - 0.2435(TM2) -0.5436(TM3) + 07243(TM4) + 0.840(TM5) -0.1800(TM7)Wetness = 0.1509 (TM1) + 0.1973 (TM2) + 0.3279 (TM3) + 0.3406 (TM4) - 0.7112 (TM5) - ).4572(TM7).
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 48
48
Tasseled cap transform-3.
Shadow areas
Post-flood imagery of the Tanaro river, Italy.
Brightness, greenness and wetness, in red, green and blue displayed.
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 49
49
DAEDALUS /ATM SPECTRAL RESOLUTIONS.
CHANNEL WAVELENGTHFROM
TO
1 0.42 0.452 0.45 0.523 0.52 0.604 0.60 0.625 0.63 0.696 0.69 0.757 0.76 0.908 0.91 1.059 1.55 1.7510 2.08 2.3511 8.50 13.012 8.50 13.0
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 50
50
DAEDALUS /ATM SPECTRAL RESOLUTIONS.
Post-flood imagery of theTanaro river, Italy.
Daedalus/ATM; FCC;
visible spectrum:
Channel 5-3-2
Medium-high altitude flight: 3000m ; mean ground resolution 7.5 m.
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 51
51
DAEDALUS /ATM SPECTRAL RESOLUTIONS
Post-flood imagery of the Tanaro river, Italy.
Daedalus/ATM; FCC
Channel 8-9-10
Medium-high altitude flight: 3000m ; mean ground resolution 7.5 m.
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 52
52
Some examples of Aerial photography in flood studies.
Overbankflooding of Sinu river near, Lorica;
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 53
53
Flood effects-2: Meander chute cut-off.
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 54
54
Flood effects-3.
Small tributary devasting agricultural lands in Central Tunesia.
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 55
55
Monitoring inundation for emergency and relief.
Coltaro
Inundated areas
Po river embankement
Inundat6ions behind the levee, due to tributary flood water cannot be drained due to embankment.
Inundated area’s
2/20/2003N.C. Kingma 56
56
References/Further Reading
SPOT IMAGEhttp://www.spotimage.fr
RSI Internationalhttp://www.rsi.ca
ESAhttp://www.esrin.esa.it
Space Imaginghttp://www.spaceimage.com
NASAhttp://www.rspac.ivv.nasa.gov
NOAAwww.saa.noaa.gov
IRS-1www.euromap.de
NASDAwww.eoc.nasda.go.jp
Kramer, H.J., Observation of the earth and its environment: Survey of missions and sensors, Berlin etc. -Springer Verlag, 1996, 960 p. ISBN 3-540-60933-4.
http://www.itc.nl/~bakker/invdir.htmlLinks to Data Providers: