relocation pres.general rev.9
DESCRIPTION
Relocation of Industrial installationsTRANSCRIPT
1
Relocation Production Facilities
Business Line: Relocations
2
Introduction
Reference Relocation projects
Reference Relocation feasibility studies
Feasibility study deliverables
Aspects of Relocations
Stork AMS, Projects approach
Questions
Contents
3
Presenting experiences of Stork AMS, Projects with:
• Plant relocations
• Feasibility studies
• Relocation engineering and project management
Presenting Stork AMS, Projects approach and work methods
Introduction
4
Needle Coker Plant – Shell Moerdijk(NL) to Argentina (1993/1994)
Melamine Plant – DSM Geleen(NL) to Indonesia (1994/1995)
Extruder Lines – DSM Geleen(NL) to Dupont Dordrecht(NL) (1995)
Reference Relocation Projects(1)
5
Reference Relocation Projects(2)
Steel Plant – Hoogovens IJmuiden(NL) to Malaysia (1996)
Workshop machinery – Fokker Hoogeveen (NL) to Papendrecht(NL) (1998)
Complete Refinery – Mobil Worth (D) to India (1998/1999)
6
Reference Relocation Projects(3)
TIP Unit /SWT Unit – Shell Stavanger (N) to BRC Antwerp(B) (2001/2004)
Test Modules – Philips Heerlen(NL) to China (2004)
Brewery Equipment – Grolsch Groenlo(NL) to Saudi Arabia (2004/2005)
7
Reference Relocation Projects(4)
Extruders & Packing lines – Dupont Rozenburg(NL) to China (2005)
Extruders & Packing lines – Dupont Rozenburg(NL) to Argentina (2005)
Flight Simulator – Fokker Schiphol(NL) to Nieuw Vennep(NL) (2005)
8
Reference Relocation Projects(5)
Production lines – H.J.Heinz Several locations (NL) to Utrecht(NL) (2006/2007)
Production lines – Paper Projects Dinxperlo(NL) to Doetichem(NL) (2007)
9
Reference Relocation feasibility studies (1)
Shell International
• Relocation of Needle Coker Plant from The Netherlands to Argentina
Belgian Refining Corporation
• Relocation of HCU from England to Belgium
• Relocation of KERO Hydrotreater Plant from England to Belgium
• Relocation of TIP Unit from Norway to Belgium
Statoil
• Relocation of TIP Unit from England to Norway
Globe Foundries
• Relocation of Iron Casting facilities in The Netherlands
10
Reference Relocation feasibility studies (2)
Kemira GrowHow
• Relocation of KEM Water Unit in The Netherlands
• Relocation of Storage Tank including facilities in Denmark
Vredestein
• Relocation of complete Tyre Plant from The Netherlands to Malaysia
Dekker Shipping
• Relocation of Suction Dredger Production Barge
Hexion
• Relocation of SALT Plant from England to Germany
11
Feasibility study deliverables (1)
Determination of Dismantling and Re-assembling scope for:• Mechanical• Electrical and Automation• Civil• Packing • Transportation
Check status and availability of existing documentation
Prepare detailed list of assets to be relocated
Make detailed route survey
Determine scope for lifting and transportation requirements
12
Feasibility study deliverables (2)
Prepare overall plan
Determine vendor involvement
Determine budgets for:• Dismantling• Transportation• Re-assembly
Check on environmental rules and regulations
List of applicable Assumptions / Conditions
List of Recommendations / Conclusions
13
Modular:
Sections defined by equipment
Emphasis on heavy lifting and transport
Logistics is key factor for success
Piece small:
Sections defined by systems
Emphasis on coding and identifications
Traceability is key factor for success
Aspects of relocations
14
Emphasis on partnership
Multi-disciplined
Relocation as one integrated proces (*2)
Total quality and safety management (*3)
The Project Management System – Prince (*4÷8)
Stork AMS, Projects approach (1)
15
Relocation as one integrated process
Effectiveness• Project control system developed for combination of both activities
Economics• Cost saving because of less detailed documentation requirements
(no transfer)
Contractual• Avoiding conflicts of interest because Stork AMS, Projects has full
responsibility for the execution as a whole
Stork AMS, Projects approach (2)
16
Total quality and safety management
Total Quality Management (TQM)
ISO 9001 Certified
ISO 10006 Certified - Project management
ARBO (Dutch legislation)
VCA** (Dutch safety certificate industrial contractors)
Stork AMS, Projects approach (3)
17
The Project Management System - PRINCE
The structure
The capabilities
The advantages
Stork AMS, Projects approach (4)
18
Stork AMS, Projects approach (5) PRINCE - The Structure
Drawing control
Bill Of Materials & connections
Work folder definition
Procurement
Man-hours calculation
Material control
What can be produced?
Prefabrication (incl. NDE)
Towards Client
Towards Subcontractor
Grit blasting & painting control
What can be installed?
Installation (incl. NDE)
Quality Control• registration• check• instructions
Production Control
Progress Registration
Earned Value Calculation
What can be hydro tested ??
Painting, insulation
Commissioning
Invoicing, Cost Sheets
Relocation Engineering Information
19
Stork AMS, Projects approach (6) PRINCE - The Capabilities - Full Traceability
02 0
8-04
-000
112-
AB
CP
ipes
pool
Arr
ived
on
Site
02 0
8-04
-000
112-
AB
CP
ipes
pool
Rea
dy t
o le
ave
Site
02 0
8-04
-000
112-
AB
CP
ipes
pool
Pac
ked
02 0
8-04
-000
112-
AB
CP
ipes
pool
Par
t D
ism
antle
d02 08-04- 000112 -ABCPipespoolRemarks02: Off plot08: Area -0804:Piping off plotUnit: Pumpstation C
Workfolder
Package
Part
Container
Part
Workfolder
Container
Package
(Sea)Transport
Dismantling Re-assembly
Barcodes linked to the Prince system providing
full traceability throughout
the entire process
20
Stork AMS, Projects approach (7)PRINCE - The Capabilities - Planning Tool
• Weighting: Manhours per activity• Percentage complete calculation per activity
Network / ScheduleHistogram & S-curve
0102030405060708090
100
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41
Week number
% c
om
ple
te
050100150200250300350400
Ma
n
ACTIVITIES like:•Piping complex =) 1• Column =) 234• Steelstructure =) abc• Area =) 5• Etc.
21
Stork AMS, Projects approach (8)
PRINCE - The Advantages
To improve Contractor’s services to her Clients
To improve on efficiency in work preparation as well as in direct hours
To optimize the Electronic Data Interchange(EDI) possibilities between
Engineer, Contractor and Suppliers
To reduce doubling in Engineering and Contractors activities, staff and input
To provide the Project Team with the best possible tool and information in
order to CONTROL the project
22
Questions
23