regular council - 06 nov 2018 - fruitvale

VILLAGE OF FRUITVALE

REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA

Council Chambers

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2018 4:00 PM A. CALL TO ORDER

B. ADOPTION OF AGENDA C. DELEGATIONS, PRESENTATIONS & RECOGNITIONS

a) Resident of 1918 Caughlin Road -- Bob Bradford requesting plowing for

Halifax Laneway. A policy change is required to meet this request.

RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council considers the request as per the Procedures Bylaw 889, 2018 and within the context of the Village's Snow

Removal and Ice Control Policy PW - 2012-01.

D. ADOPTION OF MINUTES

a) Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting held on October 1, 2018.

RECOMMENDATION: THAT the minutes of the Regular Council meeting held

on October 1, 2018 be adopted as presented. b) The Minutes of the Special Meeting of Council held on October 25, 2018

RECOMMENDATION: THAT the Minutes of the Special Meeting of Council

held digitally on October 25, 2018 be adopted as presented.

E. CONSENT AGENDA

a) UBCM Letter on Gas Tax Grant payment

RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council receive the letter. b) Letter from The Ministry of Attorney General

RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council receive the letter. c) Woodland Caribou Recovery

RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council receive the letter and press release from

the FPAC.

of 60

d) Building Permit Report

RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council receive the report. e) Teck Report

RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council receive the Teck report. f) Beaver Valley Youth Coordinator Report

RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council receive the report. F. STAFF REPORTS

a) Development Variance Permit Application 72 Laurel Ave

There is a Public Comment opportunity prior to the discussion by Council on

the application.

THAT Council not approve the Development Variance Permit request for 72 Laurel Ave to increase the maximum fence height from <1.3 m to 1.8 meters in the front yard setback.

b) CAO General Update

RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council receive the report. G. COUNCIL MEMBER AND COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS 2. COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE RECOMMENDATIONS

H. CORRESPONDENCE REQUIRING ACTION

a) Gladys and Jack Todd from 79 Elm Ave -- Staff have followed up. The property owner will be notified if the property is not cleaned and

maintained, with a stepped procedure for enforcement.

RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council receive the letter and staff update. b) Request from the BC Yukon Legion Command

RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council consider the request.

of 60

I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS J. NEW BUSINESS

K. BYLAWS/POLICIES

a) Subdivision and Servicing Bylaw Amendment

RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council provide the first three readings to Bylaw 895, 2018 amending the Village’s Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw 561, 1979.

b) Mountain Side Zoning Bylaw Amendment

RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council provide the first and second readings to Amending Bylaw 896, 2018, amending Zoning Bylaw 846 (2013); AND FURTHER THAT Council direct staff to schedule a Public Hearing for December 3, 2018.

L. OPEN DISCUSSION (10 MINUTE LIMIT) M. NOTICE OF MOTION N. QUESTIONS FROM THE MEDIA/PUBLIC RELATED TO AGENDA ITEMS

O. IN CAMERA SESSION P. ADJOURNMENT

of 60

From: camaro69To: Bobby; [email protected]; [email protected]: Re: Halifax Lane AccessDate: Thursday, November 1, 2018 1:43:38 PM

To the Village of Fruitvale Mayor and Council:

Please be advised that due to the the new sidewalk along Davis Avenue and Caughlin Roadand the limited parking available on Caughlin Road, we are respectfully requesting that theVillage of Fruitvale plows the alley access at Halifax Lane through the winter months. Thiswill allow for more parking of vehicles and greater access.

We are already very concerned about where we will dispose of our snow this winter and wehave lost both parking and access, due to these changes. We respectfully request that youconsider our request, as we believe it is a necessity for the safety of residents of CaughlinRoad, particularly. We are requesting this access in order to ensure that we can follow the newest bylaws thatstate that we are not to block access to the new sidewalks.

Thank you for your consideration of this important issue affecting the safety and well-being ofthe residents of Caughlin Road.

Best Regards,Bob and Shawna Bradford

Sent from my Bell Samsung device over Canada's largest network.

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Resident of 1918 Caughlin Road -- Bob Bradford requesting plowing for Ha... of 60

mailto:[email protected]




Minutes of the Regular Council meeting of the Council of the Village of Fruitvale held on October 1, 2018 in the Council Chambers. Council Present: Mayor: Patricia Cecchini

Councillors:

James Ellison Bert Kniss Steve Morissette Tabatha Webber

Staff Present: CAO: Michael Maturo

Media Present:

N/A Gallery: 2 Public

CALL TO ORDER

Mayor Cecchini called the meeting to order at 4 pm.

ADOPTION OF AGENDA 2018-10-01-01 MOVED Ellison / SECONDED Webber

THAT the October 1, 2018 Council meeting agenda be adopted as presented.

CARRIED

DELEGATIONS, PRESENTATIONS & RECOGNITIONS

ADOPTION OF MINUTES a Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting held on September 17, 2018 2018-10-01-02 MOVED Morissette / SECONDED Kniss

THAT the minutes of the Regular Council meeting held on September 17, 2018 be adopted as presented.

CARRIED

CONSENT AGENDA a. Community in Bloom September 2018 Newsletter

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting held on October 1, 2018. of 60

Regular Council Meeting October 1, 2018 Page 2

2018-10-01-03 MOVED Webber / SECONDED Ellison THAT Council receive the CiB September 2018 Newsletter.

CARRIED b. BC Cannabis Retail Store Licensing Handbook 2018-10-01-04 MOVED Webber / SECONDED Ellison

THAT Council receive the document.

CARRIED c. Press Release on Sulphuric Acid Spill on September 22, 2018 2018-10-01-05 MOVED Webber / SECONDED Kniss

THAT Council receive the update.

CARRIED d. September 14, 2018 UBCM Resolutions Debate Decisions 2018-10-01-06 MOVED Webber / SECONDED Morissette

THAT Council receive the UBCM information.

CARRIED e. Syringa Wildfire Update 2018-10-01-07 MOVED Webber / SECONDED Morissette

THAT Council receive the update.

CARRIED f. IHA Invitation to November 5th & 6th Symposium 2018-10-01-08 MOVED Webber / SECONDED Ellison

THAT Council receive the invitation with the 2018 election inauguration and Council meeting as priority competing events.

CARRIED

AGENDA ITEM #a)



STAFF REPORTS a. CAO September 28, 2018 General Update 2018-10-01-09 MOVED Webber / SECONDED Ellison

THAT Council receive the report.

CARRIED b. September 2018 Report from the Age-Friendly Coordinator 2018-10-01-10 MOVED Morissette / SECONDED Webber


CARRIED c. Beaver Valley Youth Report for August & September 2018 2018-10-01-11 MOVED Morissette / SECONDED Ellison


CARRIED

COUNCIL MEMBER AND COMMITTEE REPORTS

Council Member Reports Councillor Webber cited the value of the UBCM sessions. Councillor Kniss noted the Lower Columbia Affordable Housing Society's efforts to acquire residential properties through lease or purchase in Fruitvale. Councillor Morissette noted his attendance at a labour meeting and his completion of a leadership course, targeted to non-profit organizations, at Selkirk College. Mayor Cecchini highlighted her place-making efforts on Davis Ave and Caughlin Road through the successful securing of various donations (of materials, labour and machinery) from local contractors and employers for trees, benches and landscaping elements. She also cited the application to MOTI in which SPL has been nominated for the Community Service Award for its efforts in Fruitvale.

AGENDA ITEM #a)



Committee of the Whole Recommendations

CORRESPONDENCE REQUIRING ACTION a. Thrift Shop request for garbage collection

Tabled pending additional information.

b. Rural and Northern Communities Program Guide 2018- 19 Intake 2018-10-01-12 MOVED Webber / SECONDED Ellison

THAT Council direct to identify a short-list of critical infrastructure projects that may qualify for 100% grant funding.

CARRIED

UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Verbal update by the CAO on stormwater conveyance on Robin Street 2018-10-01-13 MOVED Webber / SECONDED Ellison

THAT an update report be sent to Jan Clayton.

CARRIED

NEW BUSINESS

BYLAWS/POLICIES a. Snow Removal and Ice Control Policy for Davis Ave and Caughlin Road 2018-10-01-14 MOVED Morissette / SECONDED Ellison

THAT Council add the Davis Ave & Caughlin Road multi-modal path as a priority route, #13, in Appendix B of the Snow Removal and Ice Control Policy, PW 2012-01.

CARRIED

OPEN DISCUSSION (10 MINUTE LIMIT)

AGENDA ITEM #a)



The Mayor raised the Council meeting time (of 4 pm) as that issue had been noted in the all-candidates forum on September 28, 2018. The Mayor noted that through an earlier unanimous vote of Council in the spring of 2018, there was a change to the start time from 6:30 pm to 4:00 pm. The possibility for attendance by a broad spectrum of the residents was also discussed, with a general agreement that the 4:00 pm start time does allow both seniors and working families an opportunity to attend the meeting prior to the dinner hour and the various responsibilities that parents with younger children face after 6:00 pm. The discussion of the meetings' start times did not lead to a motion to change them.

NOTICE OF MOTION

QUESTIONS FROM THE MEDIA/PUBLIC RELATED TO AGENDA ITEMS

A resident attending the Council meeting expressed concern on the absence of paper copies of the agenda at the meetings. The CAO noted that two paper copies had been provided for some time, but those attending had not been interested in them. A copy will again be provided. Communication of Council issues and/or local events like the All-candidates' forum was also noted, with the concern that digital communication, particularly Facebook, is not everyone's preference. Councillors emphasized that the Village attempts to make information available to all residents through the most effective ways possible, agreeing that the Newsletter is still popular with residents. Events not organized by the Village can change and not be noted in time for residents to adjust.

IN CAMERA SESSION

ADJOURNMENT 2018-10-01-15 MOVED Morissette / SECONDED Ellison

THAT the meeting adjourn at 5:23 pm. CARRIED

Certified Correct: Chief Administrative Officer

Mayor

AGENDA ITEM #a)


THE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF FRUITVALE

In the “HEART OF THE BEAVER VALLEY”

Date: October 30, 2018 To: Jaymie Fowler, Age-Friendly Coordinator From: Mike Maturo, Village of Fruitvale CAO SUBJECT: Special Meeting of Council Resolution: Age-Friendly Grant Support

At the Special Meeting of Council held on October 25, 2018, the following resolution was proposed: “THAT Council resolves to support the Age-Friendly Coordinator’s grant submission for the 2019 Stream 2 Age-Friendly Projects Grant through UBCM for the amount of $15,000 by providing the Village’s administrative services for grant management.” Moved: Mayor Cecchini Seconded: Councillor Ellison CARRIED As the Village of Fruitvale Corporate Officer, I can confirm the processing and recording of the Council decision on October 25, 2018.

Michael Maturo, Chief Administrative Officer/Corporate Officer

AGENDA ITEM #b)

The Minutes of the Special Meeting of Council held on October 25, 2018 of 60

can:

0232

m.m

o.m

_<_m

<o._u

mio

_m08

3.3.

<__

_mm

m9.

_uE

=<

m_m

mox

So

.u_.

:=<

m_m

_m

o<

oo_

:.o

Um

mq

_<_m

<o_

._u

m=

._n_

mO

moo

:_:_

_

mm

"9.

6._

.>X

>m

mm

m_s

mz.

_.O

O_<

=<

_CZ

_._.

<<

<O

J_A

mm

czu

_u>

<_s

mz4

_ m3

Em

mm

mq8

mas

mm Em

.cm

o_<

__m

S:8

Eoo

mw

w2

%:_

u5_=

mE

mm

moo

za 9.E

5O

o33:

:=<

<<

o_.x

w_u

Ea

AO

<<

_uV um

<3m

3m8w

2mom

_m

ozam

oa.>

3m

_mo2

o:_o

:m:m

8q2

eum

_8_.

mm

_wm

xnm

?mq

8oo

oca

<<

=:_

::5

:mx»

moq

m<

m.._

.:mm

m

nm<

_,:m

3wm

am38

5.3

moo

oaw

sow 2:

:=

8um

<3m

3mo:

mQ

:_m

mm

»9:

.3<

9:O

<<

_u>

n8m

3o3

5::

cmo_

<_A

mm

mmm

ozos A

3<

05.

>m

$m3m

:c.

0<<

_n8

33¢

m<

m=

mU

_m8

w_c

_m_o

om_ m

o<m

33m

_.:m

3=

6Q

o<m

33m

2Q

.O

mzm

amuc

acm

a82.

5>

a3_3

_m:m

=<

m>

m.,m

m3m

3o:

Em

_nm

amS

_Q

mm

._.m

x «E

a

3m

am:oo

_:3u

_m..

_uE

a=a

czam

qE

mu8

m_.

m3

3m<

cmo_

:mo8

o_8

88.

E§=

_¢m

Em

»a_

_<

<=

_.._

: ozm

9.=

8m

_6__

u_m E08

0»om

?moo

zmm

.

_n::

:m«

am8_

_mw

mm

mai

u:mm

2O

<<

_um

ag_o

3_.m

o_ 16.

5E

m6

o:=

_:m

a5

<9:

O<

<_u

>o_

.mm

3m3

man

$5.5

0:=

8m

mzm

émq

mum

._.m

x >o$

m3m

3om

:um

8:38

o:9:

émum

smE

<<

<<

<<

.:co3

.om

.

_no«

E23

9_:

8==

m=

o3.

Em

mm

m8382

0mm

._.m

x 3om

E3

mm

iom

m3

m-3

m__

2

mm

m..m

x®:u

o3.o

m2

3.25

.6m

.mm

o.w

mm

-ma.

r

<m

QU

mm

r

®§

>_.

._:3

mic

:cm

o_<

__u

$mE

m:..

_uo_

_<__

o:m

m_ _<

_mE

8.0:

8‘>

a3_:

_m=

.m:<

m02

89m

m m__

<m

©.

8.:

as._.-

_u<

232

m.:_

_:0u

_:=

_Eu

roan

.mo<

2==

§_.

AGENDA ITEM #a)

UBCM Letter on Gas Tax Grant payment of 60

,*8

w?d

mm

norc

zwry

Oo8

_...a

nA

.No;

2E2

mam 0

9:5:

35%

omF.

::<

m:a

HV

Owow

So

mE

:<m

_ow

e<

oQF

e

U9:

Ego

n28

09.5

0:”

#45

wao

inoo

2E3

min

8im

am:8

3;w

ow So

88:

mm

?omso

:-B

a&om

_nw

sbm

gmon

cam

moa

Oo?

ovm

a 3V

N3

m.m

am <<

Om

anon

ion»

?8

25w

nono

mm

owm

mm

omm

wam

:5w

wvm

owm

osm

83rm

<a

coo:

mcg

s?m

m8

cm.

OE

.oo

bmcz

wao

sm2:

:89

:m

o<o§

BQ

:m3&

§&vs

:£88

98

@35

8E

3:5

:02:

cmv5

5‘no

:5E

:Eam

$88

oosm

?ona

m mm 3

3ow

Ea

mom

nmm

smE

ooom

m.¢<

o€o

:EE

88

E8

9%.

oEuo

::E

Q8

2655

En

m?c

o?w

aBE_o

om_ m

o<a3

BQ

:m5%

Eom

ssm

imzo

osm

mbm

.

525

co5.

82%

B:E

o€m

:Q8

mo?

dism

R25

£53

_8:-

8a&

m_

omss

mgm

cm:

38.

988

€399

.:

585

8u1

<m

.8S.m

o<9.

=B

aEm

?onn

m.

owm

3983

cm.8

8.

058

msm

wcm

omm

obW

magza

cm:5

Eo<

8om

m_ m

o<Q

.=B

o3E

5:

a@

833

8oo

s8_.

b2.

5m

omin

oaEw

ondw

aon.Ea

wao

isoo

<3:

:25

:8B

mvo

om<

m_o

ow_ m

o<Q

.:BoE

onm

amag

Sro

aoE

aE

ovom

omm83

a88

.88.

CH

5:H

0096

”ombo

son.

89:

mo<

o~E

.:o=

.aom?

onr

oom

o :38

Bm

wa u

bw50

3883

20:

5H

amua

on3,3.

”m

ww

mom

mon

w: w

nmsb

w?m

88:

m8~

om

oono

oA

208”

:5$5

2598

mzo

osoa §

._§a

o=8

unom

mom

mw

onw

smo

90_u

8<8o

a

8859

Em

ma m

zaos

oo 5.3

%:5

82:

mo<

md.

::o3m

w<

omw

com

§<a

Eoo

?n?b

mm

mob

:5»

80m

ooso

nca35

3o

owoo

ma

8S

E8

noB

BoE

mm

am 8oo

BB

a=am

mod

w8R

mua

o»cm

as%

E§a

2_m

om mom

nbm

im88

:m

nonn m

oabo

o.

bu$5

83:

mo<

oBB

a§E

ww

omw

aooo

igas

mm

aos

8Q

0535

muv

mom

mos

:5:

En

Eoi

soo

35%

:3E

mm

a Ea

moo

soo.

mam R

.m38

3535

88

mm

<oE

omE

am

ww

mom

nos

Wm B

398n

::5

wao

?aoa

rmmm

mm

onom

os25

32ca

:98

wm

mca

Ea

zoos

oo.

E:

Bum

?oo

nm?o

a 25

80%

mo<

oBB

a3.m8o

oBB

o=n_

mm

o=8

30am

nion

23:2

8am

mo

wso

asoo

.

.. .\M

3:53

.am

.O

mm

nacm :5

zuzm

nm.>

n_nr

dmn

A.n

_nv_

.o:? N

me w

w?m

mm

>3=

n=o%D

o=o_

.w_

>:o

_.:o

<On:

o:.._

~80w

axno

:m

an 53

D9:

m»n

mE

:_Q

mo8

3$:

<52

;m

oS

EQ

2%E

:u:_

>O

.~<

:..:8

_.®

mo<

.rn‘

nu.<

nrm

:?.5

</<

.mc<

.¢n‘

nm>

.m

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Letter from The Ministry of Attorney General of 60

Em

woaE

5O

osso

mw

mm

aN

:3w

noib

oaS

E:2

538

:m

o<Q

.=B

oBm$9

:m

cvzo

wao

smE

:603

9.93

Saw

Ed

com

bing

mm o

oBE

o8..H

Ema

cmcn

om:5

»V

5:ca

: rm

<om

: :5E

mon

amm

obw

aszo

om8

com

?<

05E

ooom

mow

aw?n

mm ~ao

oBB

o:m

wm

oP

¢<a

20:5

Em

o E8

833

3E

0»:

mo<

a3B

oEmE

m» 9

%5.

5%m

?om

maEa

5038

833:

man

ic:

.8m

am?

¢<o

538

V5:

8R

ioé

:5os

iom

omH

on?

Qo<

Q.=

BoE

.mW

085

Coo

smm

smOmbb

mgm

Noa

m:

m?o

aomw

on%§_

&E

mo?

smao

d33

ca: 5

;.V

5:dm

iwm

?oEa

~ooo

BB

o:m

w:o

:E

ooam

m.E

swan

noia

égm

:d.m

E25

25:

V5:

TW

<0 m

sw€8

35.

Eom

moSaw

:O

msb

mim

.Coa

=m

5m®

mo<

._uo

.om

.

53%

V5:

3.V

55no

bmm

moa

mm

ob5

sum W

sdon

wa

59¢

wno

nam

m.

<o_

.:m?c

an

.K

1,-

$54

Um

<Em

g.00

3:8

mas

sonr

>no

:5<

Q03

33Z

mim

?ncm

5::

mam

a?S

Em

a?a.

Qos

an?

ms?

omcn

o

won

03%

>%

_§w

§9a

om._

§35

5$zm

gao

AGENDA ITEM #b)


Juid

mz

ro:;

._w

_>

_.on

m_ m

o<m

..:_.

:m3m

.w

o_m .

3_.

.nm

:m.:mzo

:-_<

_m&

nm_

n2=

a_%

:2»:

m3.

.mm

=n <o

:Em

<m m

:<nc

mm

zozm

mac

... 2%

nooc

amzr Em

mm

m33

3$E

m:a

:o_.

man

n2_§

_._m

xmm

smzo

zE

ase:

3__.

?mm

mnH

amN

ewbi

e.9.

m3m

=8=

=w

E...

Sm

o<.c

n.8.

zoqm

._._

:m 3n:

3m3

<5:

cm_§

_..:&

#03

E.:m

3:..

:mm

mm.E

Eo:

m_

_:3:

:m:o

:m

::.o

::&

:mE

m«m

m:_

3o2.

4m3m

<<

o11o

_.83

3%$3

:m

m_m

mcm

noam

mw

<m

__m

c_m

.2.

3»%

%§_

Nm

w2.

.m3_

.2.

~38

zo:.3

m.=

nm_

nmzs

mzm ..m

3==

nm:n

m

Em

vaos

znm

<1:

cm.m

m:_

_..m

=nm

:nm

m3.

._.

_o:.3

m&

8_83

3%_.

mS

=m

3..m

m. >

nmss

mzm 33

:m

noxm 3

cm"

cmm

mS

_am

_o:m

ccnz

mm

m.

Ea

__nm

:nm a

mni

qmm:6

5m

anm

uom

E<

m_.m

no=

==

m=

gm:o

_._

3.03

m_o

nm_ m

o<m

2_3m

..:S

sEom

m,..

=m

mE

mua

ouom

ma

m3«

m_m

_onm

»mn.

Em

u3<

_:nm

_.m

now

=_~

mm

Em

_3uo

_.nm

:nm3

m:m

:_._

:mnm_.

m..:

__<

amm

im?m

am

nnm

mm

3:o

:.3m

.=nm

_nm

:=m

Em3

m: ma

m».

..2E

mv8

<_:

nm.

._..n

_:a=

:m..c_.

m_ mqm

mm

.

>m

1.33

5..

Em

u8<

_:nm

<<

=_ c

um: o

uuon

csim

m3m

uu_< 3

....m

w_.

__m

_._.

m3.

=om

=nm

m.

Oan

mE

m_.

mm

_o=

m_

%:§

:_o=

1_.

mE

=_.

.o:-

:..m

.=8_

nm:=

mE

mm3_

.mm

_m.5

055.

Em

u3<

_:nm

<<

___ no

:mE

m.._

mm

:_=

m__

nm:n

mm 3

mm

_.<

_nm 2.

3.on

..m:..

onm m

..mm

mE3

mam

=2

.a.:$

n_m

=~_

<$.2

3a<

mxw

zsm

«mam

:8:3

3m

3_.m

m.

Em

..o_m

0*33

.no

<m

..:3m

3mE

Em

nm::

mE

mB

3:m

3«m

=nm

:u.:m Ed

nmm

m

>uu

__nm

:$3a

m:o

:.3m

&nm

_nm

::m

Em3

3m

3«m

=nm

:nm

3:2

233:

m__

mm

:nm m

uu=

nm:o

:3

Em

56.

<<

Em

: m:m

n.u_

_nm

:o:

Wqm

nm_<

ma.

Em

_.nz

w<

3::2

5E

m_o

nm_ w

o<m

33m

3om

Em

3mm

<E

m_.

mE

mE

ouom

ma

m3.

.m<

5:cm

_onm

:ma.

cue:

_.m

nm.E9

.so

znm

._o

nm_ m

o<m

_....

3m:G

8:”

. Eoo

mm

:23

326

m:<

..mno

33m

=am

:o=

.2qm

mum

o?oT

Em

muu

__nm

1o:3

«m

333%

.“_.

m8_

_w

3_.m

=nm

:nm A20

3“E

_m29

.3m

i.m

__nm

:mm m

E._

_nm

:o:3

Eom

wm

mm w

mnm

cmm

Em

5683

:2_m

m:m m

__nm

:nm:=

_m.n

.m Em

_onm

_ mo<

m33

m3m

_<m

m Em

56m

vom

§<m

_.m

no33

m=

nmzo

_..

Em

»E

m=

nm:n

mam$2

3o

Eoo

mm

331

3no

:=:m

3m2a

_.m

oo33

m=

nm:o

:m_:

«mm

umnn0

3...

muv

znm

zoz

3..

mnm

zsm

cw_.mS

__

m3_

.m=

nm=

nm.

22m

Em

n0

:Em

_oom

_ mo<

m_.

:3m

:nE

oom

mm 3

3%»

mno

33m

_.:m

man

«mno

33m

:mm

:o=

o:E

m__

nm:m

mm

.mm

uu_.

nm2o

: 3E

mS

am.:

3:3

mm

Em

_. Em

smsa

o?_.

mm

Em

:$

o:

332

6“m

«mno

3=_m

=n_

m:o

:3

.52

Em

m3.

__nm

:o: E

m:

Em

Em

a3m

<=

2.3

5E

m=

nm=

nm.

02"

=3&

3m

«mno

3_.=

m:._

m:o

:_:

..m<

oE.o

3:m

muu

znm

zo?Em

:E

mE

mu

Em

mEm

nnm

zoz

sEm

Em

_.ow

:23

_&_.

.mE

m=

nm:n

m.

9..

35"

8.2%

..E

m_o

nm_ m

o<m

..:3m

..:.m

_.m

no33

m:n

_m:o

:.

AGENDA ITEM #b)


..onm

_ mo<

m33

m:$

.3:=

.n.n

m..:

mm

._m

m.o

:m_

...m

$.nG

oq.m

_m:..

m $5»

.93.

1.2%

no:=

=.z

mm

m.

:m<

mmoa

mcu

m.. 2

Em

..o..o

<<

.=m

_mm

:.m3_

.< coé

mw

m.3

«mm

umnn2

8:3?

83..

?oum

..nm

:nm

mu

o.3

uom

m_.m

m:.n

:o:m

.:.3

No=

.=m3.

2;«m

mm

_d.:w

Em

.033

:o.

83.3

%1m

8..m

3«m

m

om

mm

_.__

m:o

:9.

c:m

.:mm

m.:E

:.n.u

m..:

mwo:.<

.u.c<»m

_.3m

man

.no:n

..:o:

m .:.3

wcm

imm

m_.nm

:u.:m c

<_m

<<

_m

3::.n

.cm

..n< 3m

<=

3."

Em

Eoc

?E

m»

8=_.

_mc.

m33

..un

oqm

mnu

:ou

mnz

mon.3

nom

moEm

«

no:..

.:o:m

man

: mum

n?nm

zozm

_.m

mm

:..:m m?s

mm

mu

nsm

ww

mE

mm

.ov_

.nm

3 ?mm

m2E

oom

im3

mm

mm

mm

msm

uu_.

nm...

.o:.

Em

£55

Edn

mm

mmuu

..mm

3m

__ _.m

.onm

:o:m

2m

xwss

mnu

zsm

cw 83.

.?o

qmm

.

mm

Em

...:m_.m

mE

m..:

m. <

.m<

<m

2E

m.o

nm.

mo<

m_.

=3m

3_.

..mna

mm 8

no:m

Em

_,E

mzo

znmo

. m2.

..nm

:o=m

an 8u«

o<E

mno

33m

:$m

amqm

noaa

mzm

mm

ozm m

m8E

m.o

nmzu

= 3E

muq

ocom

mn.

_.m

~m..

m3_

.m.=

3:3

mm

Em

«Em

<.m

2m3

«mm

.....m

3mom

Em

mqm

m2

Em

_onm

:o:

2E

m...

=o.

...om

mn

m3.

.m_.

:m<3

.2.

:mm

E<um

mam

z?.:

3m<

mm

Em

«_,m

mE

m3.

m<

.m<

<w c<

:m.=

mo:

mon

3o_.

m3

Em

mo_

.o<

<.:m:._

mE

oam

u. w

mnm

.<.:m

sinm

:no

33m

=n

.:w

mm

uozm

m8

mu:

_u..n s

oznm

9.E

mm

E._

.nm

:o:

. no.

a,§.

=m

m.u

:c_.

n Em

mzz

m.:«m

mnm

nn0*

Em

mou

.._nm

:o:

. .._

o....

:m m_.

m¢m

_,m

:a:3

.oq

.cm

.:mm:o

Em

«=

.mE

o..

Em

.onm

. mo<

m..:

3m38

3:3

mu.

u_.o

u1m

~m.

:.m

nono

Em

.onm

. mo<

m2.

3m:n8

n.m

»m:=

._._

mE

mm

..mm

...m

.m:<

mnoE

m..n

m:m

mm

.mm

.,..u

..nm

:o=

.sE

m«m

«mm

Em

:».m

<.m

<<

u.3

5cm

mm

Em

«mn.

Em

mm

m:29

omE

m1=

mEm<

.msa

2..m

mE

m=

Gom E

mm

..mm

\u_.

o<...

.=m

m~m

no:=

:m:..

m:o

:.8

Em

563:

2cm

::...

:mH

om

an: u_

6<.:n

.m_..

nm:n

mmuu

_.nm

:o:. .=

oEm

..22

%.

umm

.qm

no33

m_.

amn.

o:m

8:39

amcm

mn. .:

m:9

2..o

m:m

.:m.u

_.on

mm

m.

mun

:=a._<

a_§_

muu

_._n

m:o

=35

"cm

no=

mE

m_.

m..

mm

uma:

m.<

c<E

m.o

nm.

mo<

m_.

:=._

m_.

:.

<.=

_mn 3

:2E

m.o

nm.

mo<

m_,

:3m

:».m

qmno

:=:m

=..m

:o:

.:n.:.

.m~

...E

m«m

no33

m:..

m.n

.o_.

.m2:

.no

33m

:$E

m.o

nm.

mo<

m33

m:»

u3<

.n.m

mnoE

mR

am35

:o

cm.3

<s.

.::m .E

.m:3

2o.

‘3m

<:3

cm.:

Em

33.

o.“ m

38.5

.03.

oE

92E

m:E

m_o

nm. m

o<m

33m

:nEm

mno:

m.q

m_,

m.. Em

.onm

n.o:oq

Em

Eou

omm

gm

.8_.

m

u.=

n_..:

.mE

m<

.m<

<m

2E

m.o

nm.

mo<

m_.

=3m

:~o:

Em

mm

amqm

..3

.um

nno:

Em

no=

==

c=.n

<: E

mm

.uu.

.nm

n.o=

.mm

.ou_

.o<

mn.

o.=

n.E

.mE

m<

.m<

<m

9.qm

mam

sa..“

Em

.o8.

mo<

m_.

:3m

:nE

mu m

mE

m..m

aqm

mam

z?.

<.m

<<

m.

mag

mom

mQ

.E.o

:om:9

2E

m<<<

m_,

mm

mE

m«m

ao

.=n.

=n.

mE

m.o

nm_ m

o<m

E3m

=n.

mw

mno

aam

smm

zoa

mm3

sEm

Em

.. Em

muu

..nm

:o:

Eon

...cm

m32

.o<

mn.

Q.

3.83

..3:

.u3

<.a

mEm

amm

moz

m cue

:SE

EE

m«m

no=

==

m=

..m:o

:.m

cmm

ma.

.

Em

.onm

.m

o<m

:._3m

:.”E

on...

m_m

o ....3

<...

m m:<

m:E

.o_4

.:w..o

n:3m

:$«m

..m_.

m:n

m..

.3E

m:

no33

m=

$.

<55

»= E

m.0

3.m

o<m

33m

:...ao

mm :2

Em

s...

nou.

.o<

...m

m..m

no33

m:n

mn.

o:~

2m

.03.

wo<

m_,

:3m

.:Q

omm s

o»E

ms»

nom

nnm

unE

m:o

:nm

1m

un..n

mn.

o:m

amE

.o<

Emm

_.m

mo3

3m=

..mn.

o:

+0.

‘ Em

vnou

omm

n_.

m$.

..o

nm:o

:. Em<E

oci

32.?

Em

Bxm

.>__

8=n1

Sm

325%

$8..

mno

qm<

<... :

2cm

.mm

:mn.

<<

.EoS

muo

m.n

.<m

_.m

no33

m:n

.m:o

=39

.:m

_o8.

mo<

m33

m:n

.:m

qmm

uozm

m.m:3

«mnm

.<m

...S

am5.

..=

0"no

:m.o

.m_. E

mm

uu_.

nm:o

:m

:<E

_\E

m«.

AGENDA ITEM #b)


SE

2... Em—.m

no3:

.m=

n.m

:o:m

omm

:2E

mm

aE

m..m

m=

.m..o

..<.,m

n....

..m3m

=$w

... Emqmno3=

.m=

nm...

o:ao

mm so»

3mm

»E

m_‘

mm

:.m8.

.< ..m

..:.=

m..:

m=

»m.

Em

Raw

<<

=_ m

m:

Em

_onm

.

mo<

m3=

.m:n8

u..o

<.n

.m:m

<<

owm

amsm

mn

ao:.3

m3m

Em

."2.0

.33

o:$$

:a.:m

wm

cmm

.

.._o<

<_o

:nno

mm Em

.onm

. no<

m3:

.m:n

Em

<mn

o ...3

<.%

no33

m:$

...

C:_

..8.2

Em

unon

mm

m3.

...n

co.. ..n

m:m

.:m.

.onm

_ mo<

m..:

:.m:.m

mam

:2«m

n:.q

m..

3u8

<...

mm..m

no33

m:o

.m:o

: o:

mnm

=:m

—...

m8.

8..

mno

..m mu.

o_.n

m».

o..<

...E

.:mm

.om

n.=

n33

mam

mo.

..E

mm

mm:0

8E

m.

n.m

.m<

m.=

Em

mE

...nm

n.o=

uqon

mm

w mm

:_.m

<m m

,m.m

:.2nm

3 .332

onE

mm

ou..n

m:..

..:E

mm

.ou.

.nm

:».m E

m«m

mm

o:.2

Em

mm

.m<

...c.

mm

mm

:25

Em

5a.

2E

mm

uu_.

83.m

so.”

2<.:m

8:.o

<m

mam

E...

nm:o

:*o

_.<

<m

.....

Em

m.u

u..n

m:o

:am

:am

nm:n

m._

mn.

9:.

Em

.onm

_ no<

m:.3

m:n

«mno

:...:.

m:..m

.uu.

.o<

m.

m:E

mn.

n3

nmzm

...no

:...»

.o:m

~.

.:m

o=.m

n...n

c3m

.m:n

mm

.E

m.0

8.m

o<m

..:3m

..:om:.

.mno

:..3m

:..E

m"E

mE

a.m

uu..o

<mEm

mou

_.8:

o:m

m .o:m

mmn

m_4

m.=

«mm

:.nn.

o...m

.m.m

.E

o:..m

3ou

mqm

zos. m..m

Em

nmn.o:

Em

..nm

:nm

.... Emmm m.E

m:o

=m

.E

m..m

no3=

.m.a

mn.

o:E02

...n.

mm

«.<m

xu.m

.=E

m..m

:o:m

.m «oxu.

mn.

...m

«mm

.Q.n

:o:.n

..

: Em

_onm

. mo<

m33

m:n.

:»m

:..m

8qm

ncm

mn

Em

"Em

Raw

.330

833

.52.

..no

=...

:o=

m o:m..n

m:n

m.

.o...

o.,

nom

mzo

imEn:

m.,m

no=

.3m

:..m

:o:

Em

_onm

. mo<

m:.=

.m:.

Eoc

...no

smcz <

<.E

Em

56m

o Em

»E

mR

awm

m:

n.m

»m..3

.=m

<.E

mE

m.... EmmEm

m.._

Eo«

=<

no.=

.oom

mE

mxm

ncm

mnm

a.m

_.3m

ms.

.. no:..

.:o:m

cmm

oqm 2:

m..N

.:mEm

...no

..a.:o

:m. «m

no..:

:.m:..

m:o

:.

._...

m .08

.m

o<m

_..:3

m3 3m

<m

.mo ..m

<m Em

m...

_.2 3

.3uo

mmo

Em

..ou

maw

zzw

:..m

m o:E

muw

ouom

mo.

?oam

Eqo

cmr

Em

335

2...

no=

...».

o:m

3E

mm

.uo.

.nm

3.m

a:m

...m

mm

..nm

...nm

.~o

:.:mo..

3.22

.Em

_onm

.

mo<

m33

m:»

.m«m

m...

.o:m

.w_m

3.,

m=

3.‘n

.:mEm

mm:

..mm

.

Eoo

qE

msm

>E

.....n

m:»

m3.5

953:

mzo

o.E

m:..

<.E

Em

:...

nm:n

m muc

..nm

.n.o

:.2

mu.

o..o

<m

.no

Em

5....

8:...

m:E

.<wno

..mm

mm

wcn

mm

mun

: mm m

ama.

mno

qmm

m2:

.am

_.<

m.<mq

mm

m. c

=_.

..12

mo3

m.«

_:..m

o?..n

:o_.

. ..nm

:nm mE

.._.n

m2o

=m

..onm

.m

o<m

E3m

:.Gm

_,m

=2

«mn:

._.m

a.3

.u3<

...mo

nnco

msn

.om

o. «$33

onm

.uu_

,o<

m Em

muc

_.nm

:n.m

28..

o_m

:m mu

cm:3

Em

.o..o

<..:

n.m

...n

m:m

.:mE

dnm

mm3

..nm

=:m

¢.m

..mS

..m

noqm

m.

>3:

:.n.o

m.n

o::n

..o.,

«mn.

o:m

...=

mn.

..nn

.982

.am

:n.

m.m

mm

nmm

:Eo.

..n<3

Em

...m

um:

nou.

.o<

....m

no3:

.m...

$2:

.m

«mno

:...:m

:..m

n.o:

noE

mS

aw

>3:

:.n.u

m.n

o:=

n._

o.. .

mn.

o:m

.m

ain»

..8:.

=.m

<..m

.mm

mnm

.$uo

ém?

2...

0.2.

33

.o_,

o<am n

o3:.m

:~m

man

mqm

no=

==

m=

...m

..o: 3

Em

56..m

mm

.....=

wm

nmsa

mcw..m

»m._

mno

am_.n

m:n

m mou

_.nm

:o:. :m

no::

n.. on

com

}.E

mm

n.m

.mw

m.m

..E

.mm

:Eo«

=<

.m

nm::

mE

m33

..m

3..m

mE

...nm

:n .3m

<8.

10..

no33

m:$

2...

..mno

:.=.m

:..m

:o:m

385

3.am

.mm

Bm

..2%

3cm

..mno

:mE

m«m

..3.

Em

_onm

. mo<

m3=

.m3.

AGENDA ITEM #b)


mm

smm

um

€.2=

.§N

o._ m

no::

n=m

m%.._

=2.

.3E

m<

m:n

o:<

m_.

nsm

qnm

n

>95

5...

mm.

_a_=

2_.:

:3<

n:no

:<m

»Q

ilm

...nr

oom

mzm

noam

_mm

2m8

.3S

m:

3:2

mm

.BE

_m:

vqoo

mnc

qmm

3..

m«m

oo:m

Em

_.m

2o:

0*no

azzm

snmE

aw

mno

aam

znm

zosm

33¢

c<nm

_mm

m$m

52.

.:n_E

:=m

.52

m

nm::

mE

m33

:?o

xmm

E._

.nm

33m

<25

.12

..m8:

mE

m_.

m:o

:._:

.__a

3s_%

mm

..mno

:mE

m_.

m:o

:.E

m95

5..

<5:

:m<

m Em

33¢

m::

.o«=

<m

m:am

_mm

m$a

8M

31.

EE

1..m

no:m

Em

_.m

:o:"

_um

_mm

m..m

g_o

nm_ m

o<m

_,:3

m:n

mam

:3:

3m

._<

_mm Em

82.3

;33

:m

noqm

znm

anm muu

__nm

32.2

Sm

mE

.__n

m:.n

:8E

m1%

:on«m

no:m

Em

_.m

:o:

2E

m?u

id_.

mno

33m

:am

:o:

3:5

no::

n=9.

_u_o

w_d

.

:92

.03.

o<m

..=..:

m=

nm.=~o

_.=

.. ...:m5

63

._m

_mm

acs”

>.0

8.m

o<m

_,:3

m:n

:3»

:3m

m_m

mm

:..d

m:§

o1.<

noS

um26

:5m

msa m

831

:._mam

_mm

m:o

=8

Em

563

nm::

mE

m.:n

m:m

.=o<

.cn.

nm.

AGENDA ITEM #b)


Forest Products Association of Canada

Suite 410–99 Bank Street. Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6B9

September 6, 2018 The Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, P.C., M.P. Prime Minister of Canada 80 Wellington Street Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5K9 Re: Forest Products Sector Launches Report to Advance Caribou Recovery Solutions Dear Prime Minister, Canada’s forest sector has a long-standing history of actively and sustainably managing Canada’s renewable forest resources and preserving and enhancing habitat for wildlife, including woodland caribou. Investing in Our Forests and Our Communities For decades, the forest sector has invested in and lead numerous initiatives, and has also partnered with Indigenous communities, local municipalities, environmental organizations, all levels of government, and academia to support healthy forests, while providing the economic base necessary to sustain 230,000 family-supporting jobs in over 600 forestry communities across the country. Forest Management Guided by Research and Science Using research and science as our guide and conducting our planning for multiple values in 150+ year cycles, Canada’s forest sector has demonstrated that healthy forest ecosystems and responsible harvesting of a renewable resource can co-exist and must co-exist for the benefit of Canadians and our environment. Today, we are pleased to share with you our national report Forest Sector Contributions to Woodland Caribou Recovery a compendium of projects and initiatives currently ongoing as part of our cross-country forest management planning efforts to support caribou recovery. https://www.fpac.ca/forest-sector-contributions-to-woodland-caribou-recovery/

AGENDA ITEM #c)

Woodland Caribou Recovery of 60

https://www.fpac.ca/forest-sector-contributions-to-woodland-caribou-recovery/

2



Canadian Forestry Competes to Win in Global Markets On the global stage, Canada’s forest products sector fiercely competes against other forestry powerhouses like Russia, the United States, Brazil, and Scandinavia and we can be very proud of how our track record compares in how carefully and sustainably we manage our working forests here at home. Committed to Supporting Healthy Forests and Caribou Recovery FPAC, FPAC members, technical experts (e.g. National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, FPInnovations and fRI Research), as well as Natural Resources Canada’s Canadian Forest Service (CFS), and our provincial governments have demonstrated long-term and sustained leadership in investigating forest ecosystem health, and making improvements to forest sector practices for a multitude of forest health indicators, including the recovery of woodland caribou in Canada. Examples of these long-standing research projects include:

- Researching nutritional ecology of caribou, exploring the opportunities for forest harvesting methods to help generate plant communities that will enhance the landscape’s nutritional value for caribou

- Working with Indigenous, academic, and industrial partners to support maternal penning projects to help assist the Southern Mountain Klinse-Za herd recovery efforts by protecting pregnant cows and calves in temporary maternal pens to avoid excessive predation during the calving season

- Investing in research to determine how caribou respond to linear features at different stages of re-vegetation.

- Assessing prevalence of pathogens and establishing health baselines in ungulate species to track future changes under alternate climate scenarios

- Assessing climate change adaptation considerations for land-use planning for caribou conservation

- Caribou collaring projects to investigate how different management landscape patterns affect caribou behavior and populations dynamics.

This important work is being done on top of the integrated planning we are doing in our forests under provincially-mandated and approved forest management plans with consideration for the over 500 other mammals, birds, and fish living in our forests; protecting our watersheds; preserving our wetlands; mitigating carbon; and preventing and managing fires and pests.

AGENDA ITEM #c)


3



Additional Regional Projects to Accelerate Progress In addition to these long-standing projects, FPAC has shared with the federal government a collection of regional woodland caribou projects underway with partners, referred to as ‘Adaptive Examples’. This collection of projects aims to document systematically, the various forest management planning regulations, voluntary operational practices, and forest certification programs and how they relate to land use planning and caribou recovery. You can read more about these ‘Adaptive Examples’ in our report. These projects take place in multiple jurisdictions and are done in collaboration with multi-interest parties, with a focus on caribou recovery planning and implementation. We have a real opportunity to expand and enhance these efforts to further support caribou recovery across the country. FPAC has shared detailed descriptions of each of these projects with the federal government (Environment and Climate Change Canada and Natural Resources Canada), and we would appreciate your support so we can work together to accelerate these initiatives. Focusing on Solutions-based Outcomes To help support the viable implementation of Canada’s Species at Risk Act (SARA) and Recovery Strategies (Boreal and Southern Mountain Caribou), FPAC recommends that the federal government recognize and use the following approaches:

1. Recognition and use of the most recent and complete science and knowledge in caribou plans and further commitment to address knowledge gaps.

2. Regional flexibility should be acknowledged in caribou planning (e.g. disturbance thresholds, buffer widths and habitat definitions).

3. Recovery Strategy implementation requires that a thorough socio-economic assessment

be done with the engagement of impacted parties, as well as integrated approaches that balance needs of other species on the landscape.

4. Recognition of progressive recovery contribution to date, including the utilization of

more tools within SARA, which could include the use of Conservation Agreements, and

AGENDA ITEM #c)


4



codes and standards to support caribou recovery and allow for greater certainty for our sector to make important community investment decisions.

5. Inclusion of the forest sector, Indigenous communities, practitioners, and municipalities

in the development of caribou plans.

Healthy Ecosystems and Vibrant Communities for the Long Haul Canada’s forests and forestry workers create real environmental, social, and economic opportunities for our country. Caribou recovery planning is just one part of this important web of work we undertake in our forests every day. We believe it is critical to recognize solutions that consider all wildlife species living in our forests, including caribou. Our made in Canada approach to forest management is rooted in planning for the entire forest ecosystem. This comprehensive approach ensures we can secure and enjoy healthy forests for generations to come, and sustain the important family-supporting jobs that are the backbone of our rural and northern forestry communities. If you have any questions, or would like to discuss this information further, please contact Kate Lindsay at FPAC, at (613) 563-1441 x412 or [email protected]. We will be sure to follow up with your office to further the conversation in the next couple of weeks. Thank you, in advance, for your attention to this. Sincerely,

Derek Nighbor Kate Lindsay Chief Executive Officer VP, Sustainability and Environmental Partnerships Forest Products Association of Canada Forest Products Association of Canada

AGENDA ITEM #c)



5



cc. Mr. Michael Wernick, Clerk of the Privy Council of Canada Mr. Gerald Butts, Principal Secretary to the Prime Minister Ms. Katie Telford, Chief of Staff to the Prime Minister Mr. Mike McNair, Executive Director (Cabinet & Legislative Affairs), PMO Ms. Sarah Goodman, Policy Advisor to the Prime Minister Hon. Catherine McKenna, Minister of Environment and Climate Change Hon. Amarjeet Sohi, Minister of Natural Resources Canada Mr. Stephen Lucas, Deputy Minister of Environment and Climate Change Mme. Christyne Tremblay, Deputy Minister of Natural Resources Canada Mr. Marlo Raynolds, Chief of Staff to Minister McKenna

Ms. Zoe Caron, Chief of Staff to Minister Sohi All MPs Members of the Canadian Council of Forest Ministers (CCFM) FPAC Board of Directors Encl.

AGENDA ITEM #c)




FPAC RELEASES REPORT TO ADVANCE CARIBOU RECOVERY SOLUTIONS

NEWS RELEASE For Immediate Release September 6, 2018 – Halifax, Nova Scotia: Forest Products Association of Canada (FPAC) released a comprehensive report today that highlights efforts in support of caribou recovery across the country – along with a series of recommendations to the federal government that will help inform solutions to further preserve and enhance habitat for caribou and other species that inhabit Canada’s forests. Forest Sector Contributions to Woodland Caribou Recovery was released today by FPAC CEO Derek Nighbor in conjunction with the annual meeting of the Canadian Council of Forest Ministers in Halifax. The report includes a compendium of projects and initiatives taking place across the country as part of the Canadian forest products sector’s active efforts to support caribou recovery. The report highlights multiple factors impacting caribou populations, and the unique position Canada’s forestry professionals are in to support caribou recovery with science, research, and by advancing on the ground partnerships. Canada forest products sector is recognized globally as a model for sustainable forest management. Professional foresters across the country plan harvests through the lens of 150+ year timeframes to ensure we can enjoy our Canadian forests for generations to come. They also consider several forest values including fire risk mitigation, protecting watersheds, and preserving wetlands, in addition to maintaining habitat for the over 500 mammals, birds, and fish who call the forest home. “Caribou recovery planning is one part of this important web of work we undertake in our forests every day,” said FPAC CEO Derek Nighbor. “Today’s report provides insights into a number of the activities that are making a difference in supporting caribou recovery while recognizing it is important to find solutions that consider all wildlife species living in our forests, including caribou. Our made in Canada approach to forest management is rooted in planning for the entire ecosystem which will help us keep our forests healthy for generations to come, and will help us sustain rural and northern communities and family-supporting jobs across Canada,” he added. To help support the viable implementation of Canada’s Species at Risk Act (SARA) and Recovery Strategies (Boreal and Southern Mountain Caribou), FPAC is committed to continuing our work with federal and provincial governments on the following recommended approaches:

1. Recognition and use of the most recent and complete science and knowledge in caribou plans and further commitment to address knowledge gaps

2. Regional flexibility is acknowledged in caribou planning (e.g. disturbance thresholds, buffer widths and habitat definitions)

3. Recovery Strategy implementation requires that a thorough socio-economic assessment be done with the engagement of impacted parties as well as integrated approaches that balance needs of other species on the landscape

AGENDA ITEM #c)




4. Recognition of progressive recovery contribution to date, including the utilization of more tools within SARA, which could include the use of Conservation Agreements, and codes and standards to support caribou recovery and allow for greater certainty for our sector to make important community investment decisions

5. Inclusion of the forest sector, Indigenous communities, practitioners, and municipalities in the development of caribou plans

“Canada’s forests and forestry workers create real environmental, social, and economic opportunities for our country,” said Nighbor. “This report and its recommendations reflect an ongoing commitment from the dedicated professionals in our sector to work with all levels of government, Indigenous communities, researchers and scientists, and local community groups to support caribou recovery across Canada,” he concluded. The efforts and initiatives within Forest Sector Contributions to Woodland Caribou Recovery have been undertaken in partnership with a host of leaders from various communities including provincial goverments, Indigenous communities, scientists, environmental groups, worker groups, and local municipalities. “I see the multiple factors impacting caribou in and around my community and the commitment of our forestry workers to do their part to support caribou recovery. Complex problems require creative solutions. These solutions must consider impacts on multiple-species and other values like mitigating fire risks, while supporting good natural resource and tourism jobs in B.C.” - Mayor Merlin Nichols District of Chetwynd, B.C.

“We are concerned that the role of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) has largely been absent from Environment and Climate Change Canada caribou policy development. Our Indigenous communities and rights holders within Ontario are taking on an increasingly important leadership role in the management of Ontario’s Crown forests. Our communities are investing in the sector and even becoming the forest manager and license holder. If, through a Federal emergency order or Conservation Agreement, the Federal Government steps into traditional and provincial lands to propose how our forests will be managed, there is a high risk that the progress we have made will be lost.” - Chief Wawia of Red Rock First Nation “The National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI) caribou research results to date show that nutritional limitations, particularly in summer, are important and should be considered in the design of caribou conservation programs. The results of our decade-long research program will be helpful to both government and industry as they seek ways in which to manage landscapes more effectively to enhance caribou population dynamics.” - Kirsten Vice, Vice President, Sustainable Manufacturing & Canadian Operations, Montreal, QC “Our community and region believes that local solutions are needed to support caribou recovery. Throughout Alberta, we are seeing real benefits from a number of the innovative and diverse caribou programs which are being led by our province’s forestry experts in conjunction with elected officials, the energy sector, and multiple other stakeholders. We must continue to support these initiatives, as a cookie cutter approach will not work. Collaboratively we can ensure the long term recovery of caribou, and support the economic and social growth of forest based communities across Canada.” - Mayor Maryann Chichak of Whitecourt, AB

AGENDA ITEM #c)




“The recovery of the boreal caribou is a very complex issue. I am very impressed with the engagement of our foresters who are working on solutions which take into account local considerations. I believe that when proactive plans are being developed, communities must be consulted to find the best solutions and understand the impact of the plans on our communities.” – Mayor Pascal Cloutier of Dolbeau-Mistassini, Quebec

“Canada’s forestry workers are proud stewards of our working forests. We need governments to support caribou recovery in a way that looks comprehensively at all factors and doesn’t unfairly threaten family-supporting Canadian jobs.” - Jerry Dias, National President of Unifor the Union. Forest Sector Contributions to Woodland Caribou Recovery report can be found here.

-30-

FPAC provides a voice for Canada’s wood, pulp, and paper producers nationally and internationally in government, trade, and environmental affairs. The $69-billion-a-year forest products industry represents 2% of Canada’s GDP and is one of Canada’s largest employers operating in more than 600 communities and providing 230,000 direct jobs across the country. For more information contact: Cheryl Miltimore Director, Communications and Labour Policy Forest Products Association of Canada [email protected] 613-563-1441 x303 Follow us on Twitter: @FPAC_APFC Dale Steeves 778-875-3521 [email protected]

AGENDA ITEM #c)


https://www.fpac.ca/forest-sector-contributions-to-woodland-caribou-recovery/


TOTAL SEARCHES TO DATE:

RECEIVEDOCT-5 2018

I-uglonuDlllrklol

TOTAL TO DATE VILLAGE OF FRUITVALETO THE END OF SEPTEMBER, 2018

Kdhlonay Boundary

NUMBER OF PERMITS TO DATE: 20

PERMIT FEE VALUE TO DATE: $6,946

PERMIT FEE VALUE TO DATE (MINUS SEARCH FEES):1

$6,858

2018 ACTUAL BUILDING VALUE TO DATE: $1,014,710

2017 ACTUAL BUILDING VALUE TO DATE: $773,380

2017 TOTAL PERMITS TO DATE: 20

PERMIT FEE # UNIT # ACTUAL PERMIT VALUE

NEW (SFD) $5,461 4 $798,000

NEW (MFD) $0 0 0 $0

NEW (MH) $0 0 0 - $0

ADDITION I ALTERI REPAIR $1,434 14 0 $181,610

ACCESSORY BUILDING $0 0 0 $0

ADDITION IALTERI REPAIR $0 0 0 $0

COMMERCIAL $0 0 0 $0

ADDITION IALTERI REPAIR $51 1 0 $100

INDUSTRIAL $0. 0 0 $0ADDITION IALTERI REPAIR $0 0 0 $0

INSTITUTIONAL $0 0 0 $0ADDITION I ALTERI REPAIR $0 '

» 1 0 $35,000

TOTAL $6,946 20 4 $1 ,014,71 0

AGENDA ITEM #d)

Building Permit Report of 60

From: Read Sandra TRAIL on behalf of Public RelationsTo: Undisclosed recipients:Subject: External Release 18-39-TR: Teck Reports Unaudited Third Quarter Results for 2018Date: Thursday, October 25, 2018 9:13:47 AM

Please be advised that the following external news release has been issued and is also available atwww.teck.com. For the full text of the Q3/2018 Report, please click here. For Immediate Release Date: October 24, 201818-39-TR

Teck Reports Unaudited Third Quarter Results for 2018

Vancouver, BC – Teck Resources Limited (TSX: TECK.A and TECK.B, NYSE: TECK) (“Teck”) reportedprofit attributable to shareholders of $1.3 billion ($2.23 per share) and adjusted profit attributable toshareholders of $466 million ($0.81 per share) in the third quarter compared with profit of $584 million($1.01 per share) and adjusted profit of $605 million ($1.05 per share) a year ago. “We continued to advance our key growth initiative and strengthen our financial position by receivingregulatory approval for our Quebrada Blanca Phase 2 project, closing the $1.2 billion Waneta Dam saleand reducing our outstanding notes by US$1 billion,” said Don Lindsay, President and CEO. “Ouroperations continued to perform well, although commodity prices for all our key products declined duringthe third quarter, resulting in lower adjusted earnings and EBITDA compared with the second quarter ofthis year.” Highlights and Significant Items · Profit attributable to shareholders was $1.3 billion ($2.23 per share) in the third quarter compared

with $584 million ($1.01 per share) a year ago. Adjusted profit was $466 million ($0.81 per share) inthe third quarter compared with $605 million ($1.05 per share) in the third quarter of last year.

· EBITDA was $2.1 billion in the third quarter compared with $1.4 billion in the third quarter of 2017.Adjusted EBITDA was $1.2 billion in the third quarter compared with $1.4 billion in the same period ayear ago.

· Gross profit was $1.0 billion in the third quarter compared with $1.1 billion a year ago. Gross profit

before depreciation and amortization was $1.4 billion in the third quarter compared with $1.5 billion inthe third quarter of 2017.

· Plant performance at Fort Hills has exceeded expectations and we expect full year production to be

near the high end of our guidance for 2018. · We received regulatory approval for our Quebrada Blanca Phase 2 (QB2) project in late August with

a unanimous vote from Chilean authorities, a major step forward in advancing the project. Our searchfor an additional partner for QB2 continues to advance and our objective is ultimately to hold a 60–70% interest in the project. We are encouraged by our progress and continue to consider that atransaction may be announced in the fourth quarter of 2018.

· In July, we completed the sale of our two-thirds interest in the Waneta Dam to BC Hydro for $1.2

billion cash. We recorded a pre-tax gain of $888 million, with no cash taxes payable on thetransaction.

· In August, we purchased US$1.0 billion principal amount of our near-term debt maturities, reducing

the outstanding balance to US$3.8 billion. We recorded a CAD$26 million pre-tax charge on thetransaction.

· Customer sales in steelmaking coal in the third quarter were strong and would have significantly

exceeded our guidance of 6.8 million tonnes. However, reduced volumes due to operating problemsat Westshore Terminals once again negatively affected deliveries by approximately 250,000 tonnesand our revenues by approximately $55 million.

· The Red Dog concentrate shipping season is expected to be complete in late October. We expect to

AGENDA ITEM #e)

Teck Report of 60



mailto:Undisclosed recipients:

http://www.teck.com/

http://www.teck.com/media/Q3-18-News-Release.pdf

ship approximately 1.05 million tonnes of zinc concentrate and 175,000 tonnes of lead concentrate,representing all of the concentrate available to be shipped from the operation.

· In early October, we received regulatory approval to renew our normal course issuer bid allowing us

to purchase up to 40 million of our Class B subordinate voting shares during the period startingOctober 10, 2018 and ending October 9, 2019.

· For the ninth straight year, we have been named to the Dow Jones Sustainability World Index,

indicating that our sustainability practices are in the top 10% of the 2,500 largest companies in theS&P Global Broad Market Index.

· Our liquidity remains strong at over $5.7 billion inclusive of $1.8 billion in cash at October 24, 2018

and US$3.0 billion of undrawn, committed credit facilities. · We have updated our guidance for certain production items, unit costs and capital expenditures.

Further details are located in the Guidance section. Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking StatementsThis news release contains certain forward-looking information and forward-looking statements asdefined in applicable securities laws (collectively referred to in this news release as “forward-lookingstatements”). All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements.Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which maycause the actual results, performance or achievements of Teck to be materially different from any futureresults, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements, including under the headings “Outlook,” that appear in various placesin this release, include estimates, forecasts, and statements as to management’s expectations withrespect to, among other things, anticipated global and regional supply and demand for our commodities,production, sales and unit cost guidance and forecasts for our products and individual operations, capitalexpenditure guidance, capitalized stripping guidance, mine lives and duration of operations at our variousmines and operations, our statement that we are well positioned for ongoing profitability and strong cashflows, our expectation that coal production volumes can be adjusted to reflect market demand, potentialto extend the mine life at Cardinal River, planned 2018 capital spending relating to the Elk Valley WaterQuality Plan and timing of recommissioning of the West Line Creek Active Water Treatment Facility,potential of our R&D projects to significantly reduce capital and operating costs for water treatment in theElk Valley, anticipated completion date for the D3 mill project at Highland Valley, timing of developmentand partnering decisions for Quebrada Blanca Phase 2, Quebrada Blanca Phase 2 mine life andproduction capacity projections, expected spending and activities on our Project Satellite properties, thetiming of a decision statement regarding the Frontier Project, costs, timing and mill throughput benefit ofthe Red Dog VIP2 project, impact of certain accounting initiatives and estimates, all guidance appearingin this presentation including but not limited to the production, sales, unit cost and capital expenditureguidance under the heading “Guidance”, the sensitivity of our profit and EBITDA to changes in currencyexchange rates and commodity price changes, the expectation that our efforts have helped insulate ourcompany from the effects of price volatility and the statement that there is a positive outlook for thecompany, the expectations regarding the number of Class B shares that might be purchased under thenormal course issuer bid and demand and market outlook for commodities and our products. Theseforward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties and actual resultsmay vary materially. These statements are based on a number of assumptions, including, but not limited to, assumptionsregarding general business and economic conditions, the supply and demand for, deliveries of, and thelevel and volatility of prices of, zinc, copper and steelmaking coal and other primary metals and mineralsas well as oil, and related products, the timing of the receipt of regulatory and governmental approvals forour development projects and other operations, our costs of production and production and productivitylevels, as well as those of our competitors, power prices, continuing availability of water and powerresources for our operations, market competition, the accuracy of our mineral reserve and resourceestimates (including with respect to size, grade and recoverability) and the geological, operational andprice assumptions on which these are based, conditions in financial markets, the future financialperformance of the company, our ability to attract and retain skilled staff, our ability to procure equipmentand operating supplies, positive results from the studies on our expansion projects, our steelmaking coaland other product inventories, our ability to secure adequate transportation, including rail and portservice, for our products, assumptions that rail and port services perform adequately, our ability to obtainpermits for our operations and expansions, and our ongoing relations with our employees, businesspartners, joint venturers and communities in which we operate. Assumptions regarding Quebrada Blanca

AGENDA ITEM #e)

Teck Report of 60

Phase 2 are based on current project assumptions and the final Feasibility Study. Assumptions regardingthe benefits of SRF and R&D efforts to reduce water treatment costs are based on the assumption thattechnologies will work on a wide scale. Assumptions regarding the costs and benefits of the VIP2 projectinclude assumptions that the project performs as expected. Our Guidance tables include footnotes withfurther assumptions. The foregoing list of assumptions is not exhaustive. Events or circumstances couldcause actual results to vary materially. Announcement of any partnering transaction regarding QB2 willdepend on several factors, including, but not limited to, status of negotiations and reaching an acceptableoutcome in those negotiations. Factors that may cause actual results to vary materially include, but are not limited to, changes incommodity and power prices, changes in market demand for our products, changes in interest andcurrency exchange rates, acts of governments and the outcome of legal proceedings, inaccurategeological and metallurgical assumptions (including with respect to the size, grade and recoverability ofmineral reserves and resources), unanticipated operational difficulties (including failure of plant,equipment or processes to operate in accordance with specifications or expectations, cost escalation,unavailability of materials and equipment, government action or delays in the receipt of governmentapprovals, industrial disturbances or other job action, adverse weather conditions and unanticipatedevents related to health, safety and environmental matters), union labour disputes, political risk, socialunrest, failure of customers or counterparties (including logistics suppliers) to perform their contractualobligations, changes in our credit ratings, unanticipated increases in costs to construct our developmentprojects, difficulty in obtaining permits, inability to address concerns regarding permits of environmentalimpact assessments, and changes or further deterioration in general economic conditions. Our Fort Hillsproject is not controlled by us and schedules and costs may be adjusted by our partners, and timing ofspending and continued development is not in our control. Current and new technologies relating to ourElk Valley water treatment efforts may not perform as anticipated. Purchases of Class B shares under thenormal course issuer bid may be affected by, amount other things, availability of Class B shares, shareprice volatility, and availability of funds to purchase shares. Statements concerning future production costs or volumes are based on numerous assumptions ofmanagement regarding operating matters and on assumptions that demand for products develops asanticipated, that customers and other counterparties perform their contractual obligations, that operatingand capital plans will not be disrupted by issues such as mechanical failure, unavailability of parts andsupplies, labour disturbances, interruption in transportation or utilities, adverse weather conditions, andthat there are no material unanticipated variations in the cost of energy or supplies. Statements regardinganticipated steelmaking coal sales volumes and average steelmaking coal prices depend on timely arrivalof vessels and performance of our steelmaking coal-loading facilities, as well as the level of spot pricingsales. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements except as required under securities laws.Further information concerning risks and uncertainties associated with these forward-looking statementsand our business can be found in our Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2017,filed under our profile on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and on EDGAR (www.sec.gov) under cover of Form40-F, as well as subsequent filings that can also be found under our profile. Scientific and technical information regarding our material mining projects in this quarterly report wasreviewed, approved and verified by Mr. Rodrigo Alves Marinho, P.Geo., an employee of Teck. Mr.Marinho is a qualified person, as defined under National Instrument (NI) 43-101.Webcast

Teck will host an Investor Conference Call to discuss its Q3/2018 financial results at 11:00 AM Easterntime, 8:00 AM Pacific time, on Thursday, October 25, 2018. A live audio webcast of the conference call,together with supporting presentation slides, will be available at our website at www.teck.com. Thewebcast will be archived at www.teck.com.

AGENDA ITEM #e)

Teck Report of 60

http://www.sedar.com/

http://www.sec.gov/

http://www.teck.com/webcast-registration



THE CORPORATION OF

THE VILLAGE OF FRUITVALE In the “HEART OF THE BEAVER VALLEY”

REPORT:

Date: October 2018 To: Councillor Youth Liaison Portfolio

From: Tammy Gallamore, Youth Coordinator SUBJECT: Beaver Valley Youth Club (BVYC)

The following is a summary report of the BVYC for October 2018

Date Event Key Outcomes

# Youth

# Volunteers

October 1st & 2nd

2018

CBT – Community Youth Network Coordinator’s Sessions. Community

Youth Networks around the Basin for skill building, professional development and networking.

Introduction to Youth Leadership

Journey. The First Steps – BV Youth

Coordinator ran pilot July 2018.

10/09/18 Created and started implementing Beaver Valley Teen Interest Survey.

Helps us understand what life is like for youth and help us learn about what youth want.

Beaver Valley Youth Club plan

the activities and events that are most important

to youth.

60

10/12/18 Beaver Valley Glow Skate Youth Activity 28 0

10/17/18 Youth Action Board – Brainstorm session.

Youth discussed and planned

Halloween Event

7 1

10/24/18 2st JL Crowe Meeting – Youth

information. Trail, Rossland and Beaver Valley CBT Coordinators meet at JL Crowe.

Interact and

network with local youth. Distributed

Beaver Valley Youth Club

Halloween Flyer.

N/A N/A

10/26/18 Beaver Valley Youth Halloween Party

Event. Held at Fruitvale Memorial Centre – bouncy castle, games, costumes, food, & fun. Parent

volunteers. The new Village CFO Kelli Tuttle helped at event to get an

understanding of the BVYC program and youth in the area.

Executed and

facilitated Halloween Party as planned by

the Youth Action Board.

35 3

AGENDA ITEM #f)

Beaver Valley Youth Coordinator Report of 60



Date: November 1, 2018 To: Mayor & Council From: Mike Maturo, CAO SUBJECT: Request for Decision – Application for a Development Variance Permit at

72 Laurel Ave: to vary the Village’s zoning bylaw to increase the maximum height of the front yard fence .5 m (19.6”) from <1.3 m (4.2’) to 1.8 meters (6’)

Introduction and Analysis: This report speaks to an application for a Development Variance Permit (DVP) to “vary” the maximum fence height in the front yard for this zone – RU1/Single and Two-Family Housing -- from less than 1. 3 meters to 1.8 meters (4’ to 6’) at 72 Laurel Ave. The Village of Fruitvale Zoning Bylaw 846 (2013) requires that a fence higher than <1.3 meters can be erected only outside of the front yard setback area, starting at a distance of 6 meters from the front lot line. The proponent therefore has an option to erect a fence at the requested height on some 70% of the property, that portion outside of the front yard setback area. The application proposes to allow an additional 241 sq. m. (2600 s.f.) - the full front yard setback area - to be enclosed by the 1.8-m high fence, rather than the allowable height prescribed by the Zoning bylaw 846, Section 8.5.3.

“Fencing which is less than 2.0 m in height may be sited on any portion of a lot provided that it is less than 1.3 m in height when sited closer to any street than the building setbacks for the zone in which the fence is located.”

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Development Variance Permit Application 72 Laurel Ave There is a Public ... of 60

2

The application seeks to enclose the full front span of 39.6 m / 130’ of the front lot, which also includes two 6-m lengths of the flanking interior lot lines; some 42% of the total perimeter 128 linear meters (420 linear feet) of the whole property. For zoning bylaws, DVPs for property development are typically provided in cases where the land’s topographical features create challenges (i.e. hardship) for siting, or, in situations in which a building’s siting is legally non-conforming (the building having been built before the current regulations), creating compliance challenges just to repair or renovate. The property at 72 Laurel Ave fits into neither of these categories, featuring neither hardship nor legal non-conformity. The photos provided as part of this report show that the posts alone on the front lot line contrast strongly with the neighbouring properties and are non-compliant with the bylaw. While a 1.8-m high fence would presents a striking contrast to the surrounding neighbourhood, Council should be aware that a DVP for an increase in fence height in the front yard setback should not:

• result in inappropriate development of the site • substantially affect the use and enjoyment of adjacent lands • defeat the intent of the bylaw

https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/local-governments/planning-land-use/land-use-regulation/zoning-bylaws/board-of-variance

In this situation, the application presents relevant challenges to three bullet points (drawn from the Government of British Columbia web site). The DVP application is neither a minor variance to the bylaw nor one due to hardship based on land characteristics, or, pre-regulation siting. Additionally, a DVP is registered on the land and does not run with ownership; sales of property do not remove a DVP. A significant change (as presented and proposed) to the property’s development envelope would result in an outstanding inconsistency in the neighbourhood. Distorting the look of a neighbourhood street is also inconsistent with the Village of Fruitvale OCP, Schedule A, which speaks to the importance of preserving the integrity of its neighbourhoods. As the proponent has already placed posts and rails, this

AGENDA ITEM #a)





3

development’s physical contrast with the existing settlement pattern can easily be seen. Fruitvale’s zoning bylaw, adopted in 2013, and the OCP, adopted in 2011, are relatively recent documents that each required 1 – 2 years to draft and adopt; that involved extensive public input; and that broadly reflect citizens’ viewpoints. The OCP informs the zoning bylaw. There is input-based rationale for a shorter front yard maximum fence height in the zoning bylaw drawn from the drafting and & adoption of it in 2012 – 2013. The zoning bylaw stipulates a distinction between the heights of fences allowed in the rear of a parcel versus those allowed in the front of a parcel. Given that the proponent has the option to erect a fence of up to 2 meters in height along a perimeter outside of the front yard setback area and that the property does not feature topographical challenges nor legal non-conformity for siting, there is inadequate rational for a DVP. A review of this DVP application within the context of the Village’s Zoning Bylaw 846 (2013), OCP Bylaw 835, 2011, and physical site characteristics leads to a conclusion to not recommend in favour. Additionally, as the property owner has already erected posting and rails, this development currently presents itself as a bylaw contravention rather than a DVP application. Recommendations: THAT Council not approve the Development Variance Permit request for 72 Laurel Ave to increase the maximum fence height from <1.3 m to 1.8 meters in the front yard setback. Alternatives: a) THAT Council approve the Development Variance Permit application. b) THAT Council defers the decision.

AGENDA ITEM #a)


4

72 Laurel Ave with illustrative outline of affected front yard area

AGENDA ITEM #a)


5

72 Laurel Ave with front streetscape in foreground and background, posts for proposed fence along front lot line. (October 22, 2018)

AGENDA ITEM #a)



CAO GENERAL UPDATE REPORT

October 31st for the November 6th, 2018 Regular Meeting of Council Finance • Meetings and discussions with the auditors to follow-up on the 2017 audit and prepare for the 2018 audit

took place over the last two weeks. Preliminary audit preparation is underway. • Mid-year budget analysis provided insight into 2018 spending, with a conclusion from the CFO that future

budget outlays will be constrained, pending revenue increases. A budget review and presentation is planned for the November 19 CoW.

• The November 2017 “Asset Management Financial Plan” continues to inform administrative budget planning for 2019. The report, one of a series of infrastructure/facilities/equipment documents, is also available on the Village’s website. The “Asset Management Financial Plan” contains numerous analytical observations on the Village’s assets, mostly linear infrastructure but also including facilities and equipment; there is a heavy emphasis on sanitary sewer. The report’s findings provide details on each asset category, with emphasis on life-cycle expiration, costs of re-investment through renewal and replacement, and the financing for a ~$14-m deficit.

• The November 2016 “Asset Management Investment Plan” directs attention to life-cycle costing with more of a breakdown on each infrastructure category. A general situation summary (with pie chart) on page 9 states:

“Approximately 60% of Fruitvale’s infrastructure is made up of Road and Sanitary assets which means that the majority of the total long-term expenditures should be on these assets. On average, Fruitvale’s assets are considered to be in fair to poor condition with an average expected remaining life of 35% and there are assets ($13.8 m) that have passed their theoretical service life which should be inspected in the field prior to investing in their replacement. In the twenty-year horizon there are approximately $22 m forecasted in assets that may need to be renewed.”

The qualifier on the Stormwater assets, which form a large part of the remaining 40% of Fruitvale’s linear infrastructure assets, is that in some areas of Fruitvale, there are near total or total absences of conveyance systems. A thorough report by CTQ “Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan Update 2010,” is still relevant, with most of the then prioritized projects (14 of 16) still outstanding. Other projects which did not then attract concern have also since become high priorities; the collapsed stormwater line on Kootenay Ave stands as one example. As part of the forthcoming 2019 budgeting process, Council is advised to become familiar with the findings of all of the Village’s infrastructure reports. All Councillors should have a complete set of reports.

Administration & Operations • Sewer headworks project ongoing – Headworks lift station construction underway. • Davis Ave and Caughlin Road Reconstruction Project:

o Davis Ave water main installation completed with service lines being installed. o Most of MMP completed with flatwork crews expected to pour last three sections the week of

November 5. o Grading and paving crews are due on site week of November 5, weather permitting, to fine tune grade

on Caughlin Road and Davis Ave and pave. o Update letters have been sent to residents. Key message is “Do not salt the concrete.”

• The Rural Dividend Program Grant Application response still pending.

AGENDA ITEM #b)

CAO General Update of 60

General Update Report November 6, 2018 Page 2 of 3

• SRWs along drainage below Davis Ave to be explored after completion of construction. Incentives, like partial tax exemptions, over a set period of time, can encourage property owners’ cooperation.

• MuniSight has begun the onboarding process to gather the Village’s spatial data and start creating a digitized mapping system. A local consultant, VIVID Consulting, is assisting with the transition. The absence of a modernized spatial data system inhibits the Village’s ability to record, assess, estimate and plan/schedule improvements to linear infrastructure deficiencies along with complicating infrastructure performance reviews/requirements, particularly during subdivision or development applications. Modernizing the spatial data mapping system also facilitates implementation of the Asset management Plan.

• Old Note for New Council: The CAO met with YRB, the new highway contractor, to be briefed on the degree of maintenance for Highway 3 during winter and the areas of concern on roads that run along the Village boundary. Stormwater on Kootenay Ave South; sight lines at Bluebird Road during winter snow accumulation; and management of snow and road surface on Bluebird Road and all boundary roads were noted. PW will communicate with YRB on issues that have historically involved the Village crews. YRB’s muster site in Waneta should reduce the need for Village crews to respond to weather related road conditions.

Human Resources • A new Manager of Finance and Corporate Services, Kelli Tuttle, began duties on October 1, 2018.

Public Works • Facilities, Equipment and Parks

o Sewer lines and blockages being addressed. o Roof repairs completed on the Public Works building after a three-year leak. The new roof has a 10-year

warranty. o Construction of new pipe bridge crossing from Barret Drive to sewer lagoons will start this fall. o RNC Grant opportunity under review. o WorkSafe confined space drill took place on October 11 at the Beaver Lift Station. The Village is meeting

four WorkSafe orders, primarily focused on hazard assessment and confined spaces. o Due to injury, the Water Works Foreman has been relieved and is replaced by the Lead Hand. o PW are challenged by the increasing labour demands of the Sanitary Sewer Treatment Plant, which on

average requires 4 hours daily. Ongoing improvements to the STP will likely lead to a Level 2 classification, which in turn will demand additional supervisory and reporting requirements.

Other/Bylaw • Encroachments from private property onto Village right-of-way have been a historic issue. While the Village

can sometimes produce survey documentation to determine property line locations, property owners have a responsibility to know the location of their property boundaries. For fence siting in particular, and for building permits in general, amendment(s) to the zoning bylaw could make a recent surveyor’s certificate of location a requirement.

• Bylaw Enforcement: slow, steady and consistent reports of unsightly premises. Some DVP applications and non-conforming siting issues to appear before Council.

Sanitary Sewer • Work on the pipe bridge due to start shortly. Headworks building construction underway. • The summer algae outbreak in the lagoons abated slightly and re-surged based on temperatures. • A pontoon supported work platform with a hoist remains a key missing tool for repairs of lines in the lagoons;

such a tool was cited in an earlier study on the STP. Council can expect to see this appear as a budget line request for 2019.

AGENDA ITEM #b)


General Update Report November 6, 2018 Page 3 of 3

• Selkirk College’s Pete Holton, an instructor for the School of Geomatics, Integrated Environmental Planning, has assigned his students to select specific components of the Village’s OCP for research and reporting. Pete and his students visited the Village’s office on October 23rd for a brief on various Village responsibilities and initiatives. Council can expect to see and hear more about the various reports throughout the 2019 spring semester.

Water • Future infill initiatives within the VoF boundaries will need to be balanced by reduced water consumption,

especially during summer months. • Annual budget submitted with more detailed forecasting and understanding of budgeting being explored

between RDKB and VoF staff.

Respectfully submitted,

Michael Maturo, CAO

AGENDA ITEM #b)


¢€¢al:;¢ and ?acé 7aala!.7? 56m,4uemce,

7mé£m€e, 3.6.October 11, 2018

The Village of Fruitvale Council,Box 370,1947 Beaver Street,Fruitvale, B.C.VOG 1L0

RE: Fire Damaged House on Elm Avenue

Our home is adjacent to the fire damaged house on Elm Avenue. I am veryconcerned that the debris from the fire has not been dealt with and I am worried that it’sgoing to be left in this state for the winter.

As a responsible citizen of the village I take pride in keeping my yard lookinggood. Being the closest neighbour the sight and smell are extremely unpleasant, andwhen the wind blows debris flies into our yard. We should not have to live with thismess.

l would be extremely happy if the Village would insist that those legallyresponsible for the house clean up this site before winter. A heavy snow load is onlygoing to collapse this already weakened structure and leave us with a mess for manymonths to come.

Kindly reply to our concern.

Sincerely yours, ~

é?wwawGladys Todd

RECEIIVEDOCTH 2018

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Gladys and Jack Todd from 79 Elm Ave -- Staff have followed up. The prop... of 60

_:m

o-

<=

_mm

0+m

:._#<

m_m

3.0:

:>

:c=

m<

<no_m

Am

oo_m

©83

Um

6:-o

Enm

.no3

vm

ms?

asca

qmvsO

?ocm

qm

m.

Noa

m58

>2.

._.c

u_Z

mO

©<

___m

mm

.:::<

m_m

‘Un.

nm

m:E

mnn

wh.

\<

58:

9332

5w

o<m

_9.

3%:

$90:

>:m

n_:.:

m=

?n_m

£m:w

:m:m

m.U

%

I.xm

am:man

00:3

0:_<

_m3v

m«m

E

._.:m

:x<

0:8«

Eas

em

3o3m

28

?m<

_m<

< 9:

?mgc

mm

?8a<

9:E

sqm

sa03

.2.8

mcv

con.

_u_m

mm

m23

m:o

_om

ma E

m_m

:m?

mag

68m

smm

? EE

<0:

?mnc

mm

?ma

amm

maw

smE

mm

o <58

:00

3325

_um

m_o

:.w$5>

:::m

__<

_=:m

=<

mm

asom m

moo

msa

osw

oox.

«Em

m::

:m_

v:_u

__om

:_o:

_:o_

:n_m

m Eon

cam

mmag

m8:

mm

Q. 3

m:<

2w

owm

an. Em

<:_

8:_m

v$<

m

<m

»m_.

m:m

sEo

_._m

<m $2

502

mo

3:0:

+2

Em

.4m

mo_

o3m

Em

?<

<mm

2.o<8

qm<

.._

.:o:m

m:Q

mo?

oo_u

_mm

<5:

cmQ

_mE

_uS

ma

:mm 2

o:m

6m8

m__

_.m

m8:

wa5

o:m

wm

agm

a<m

_.:m

mam

_m

m_m

o.Hm

o:oo

_mm

ag_E

E1m

m_m

agm

mm_m

o cmm

<m

=m

c_m o

:-_E

m8

<_m

<< ow

U23

.

?rm

§§.m

a\m

m::

.mm mm

oom

s?osmo

o».m

m:3

3E

uc?m

89:

<m

»mS

:mm

ag_m

m:

E<

m_:

mU

_m

wm

moc

aom8

9:.

<o:

:@um

o_o_

m_

sEow

mE

amm

ago:

m$o

8q,2

cm9.

558

3_m

m3E

n~8

9:E

m<

m€

3602

2:88

u_m

<m

a 3or

:<

m»m

$:m

_E

m_»

o<m

_om

zmam

z_:m

m_o

:_ man

. Emoo

:EcS

_o:m

2m

m3m

:._cm

am

ugm

cvco

nmqm

.

_u8o

mm

amsa

g.4

03E

5m

:::m

_om

3_um

_m:m

_mo n

8<E

m3.

355

8«E

mcm

:mE

3<

m.m

_.m

:mm

ag_<

___:

m_.

<m

m2_

om_u

mao

::m

_E

o_ca

_:o

U_6

m83

m..o

1Ec:

,_m

man

. vom

3B:3

m:o

mqm

wm E

_.::

mw

33o

n_m

3Q

m<<m

.mS

:mE

man

go:

8m

cvuo

asm

Em

_.m

o_o:

_m Oo3

3::=

<>

o~_<

Em

mE

Em

308

Em

:E

mG

ooo

33c:

Em

mE

m”E

m<m

m2m

E8:

©_.

8Em

omag

Em

<58

?

<<

m <<

ocE

___m

8E

58E

m<

Fh>

®m

omE

wS

H<

>H

m8

.03

cmE

m:o

<<

E@m

cnuo

:m

agm

E2m

o_m

:o: m

©m

EE_m

<m

m:.8..

9:<

m8_

.m:m

3<

<m

<2m

uosm

ozso

ms

mg

39:

smxw 8

.3%

.O

SE

o?bo

uim

qm

_Nm

q 3E

mmm

_<<

m<

mU

mm

: 9:nc

mzm

aU

mm

m_E

S0*

ooca

mm

:<_m

<m

_ 2m

cvvo

:_m

m_.

mm

.n_<

m_o

_,.:m

o.m

»ma.

Imqm

_mm

832

<9.

..§m

<_o

_._m

E:o

9:m

.om

_.&

mcu

con

mg.

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Request from the BC Yukon Legion Command of 60

On

GE

ES

.3.

Em

mos

ses.

mE

E3.

.mm

mmam

$037

.3E

mm

a Em

:ea

$.oE

m=

Ban

3..

E.

wc.

....E

:Em

E&%

_.._

Q :3w

mm

mm

m" E

u5

Sm

m.S

?.£n

.§m

Eo_

.§

n,m

=:.m

%a3

.&8

Em

<?m

_.m

§3,

9:.

no=

EE

EQ

$.30

Ezd

$33

9E

nn.

m=

.._n_

E= m

oanw

w.

:<

0::m

<m m

:<ac

mm

zozm

Soo

:om

3m_

Em

mm

mno:2

zmaa

a8

ooim

?S

m.

wm

m...

m?m

mw

am.

Lzq

wm

s.?l

m>

Q<

m3.

.£.:©

mm

?\§.S

mJ\

mm

iom

mm

eom

sioam

oo»

_wO

\<:_

3=Q

.==

E:a

-3§_

02:2

3»:

Han

g:O

aué?

wu

058

$~.w

%-w

m?S

3

TL

=.»

=3;

.no_

35.8

5

..mn.

.o=

<<

<<

<...

_mu.

o:.u

n<:_

3:.n

m

AGENDA ITEM #b)


..mn.

.o=

<<

<<

<<

._m

u_o:

_un<

:_3:

.nm

man

?03

:53»

\<:_

3=O

onzs

msa

.58

Nev

a:03

5%»:

Han

na:

é§.~

..E§

h?in

m-m

8.w

:~.:.

e=wan»

:

Dam

p.22

2933

“

.255

»V

5:3.

.V

55.

E§.

§5

En

wO

\M~:

_S:

9352

:.\

.55

Nov

a:O

muw

?uu

—._

amF

=. na

waa

mas

msm

wan

?O

o_:~

:Ew

mam

Em

<:r

o=.m

<¢8

~.w

=m

.E

mm

ma m

oon?

mam

$2.3

m:

25:8

»3.

<9:

mcw

woa

rm

m can

9:.

3005

9E

owro

sooo

=<

Q.m

m:o

:.

OE

.w

O\<

:_5=

Oo:

::m

=m

Fam

rim

m <aQ

E25

8ca

mad

manm

aom

?qE

x;oo

umm

mom

9:.

>55

5::_

<::

»wJ.

max

ing

mw

anom

izczm

oor..

.§§

_=_g

_m

owuor

wm

wa

cwW

n?a?

cam

aoa

U3.

NS

?8

wow

.:5

5m

an. ~.oo

omB

Na

SE

Q3.

En

§.m

<a

<£S

.m:m

omw

_.am

_, Oo_

S.:E

mm

an25

<58

:2:

0m

9.<

8_9:

.09

.33

mo

$5:

mca

sm$38om

man

»:83

:2.

.9:

m=

::m

_ U:¢

:om

mo:

meo

wm_o

:m«<

38

saw:5

bom

wo:5

one

_.o_

u mm

2.6

:wA

aa_w

a_.mom

Wm

anic

wm

uno.

..mo

93so

sa3.

.cm

mom

ma»E

mm

m?o

wmo

onav

snos

m 3%

3oc

n

<a8

~.w

=m

.

¢<o

35:5

E8

833

V55

onm

ms?

mm

osvm

225:

mowm

amW

mna

?caw

soo

E.o

_.n3

3m

wos

moa

smm

sm

n_<

o_.:m

oBo:

»m

ww

oa59:

.:?

E:u

..%$2

.8—

~mno

m:5

c:wee

r...w

nooo

omm

a:&

$03

$5§.

£.ao

.am

=o¢

<cm

8m

§_E

auz

znsmo

wm

amcs

?ca

ucw

mow

mos

SB

:33

05O

o?am

sa8

E.6

8<n

oE.

woi

hoam

8<

m»m

_.u=

mm

an:8

39.0

Em

:so

ooB

=:S

Eam

EN

::8

m?é

o::

.o:m

=oS

wan

:O

oEB

Em

wan

=8

<:_

8:.

$5?n

mw

o:mm H

aoom

iwaam

mos

mS

eO

msw

amw

_m_.

mom

.h :OoB

:E:E

\$.

38

Oam

msm

gnos

mx.

man

98E

dm

sw

=.8

m_.

m_

E5

om2.

5oo

::.::

:Eom

<<

wm

Q.<

o.?a

w38

.09

asm

?dm

Ea

rom

asd

oona

szoa m

cooa

mm:

._n3

<§:

mm

ama <a

J\20

3323

20m

aaio

am.

Em

mm

oma

osgo

mon

. m38

£82

3..

V55

.m

oia?

. «L

oam

2:3

mm

cww

o?w

wH

39.

o:E

E:m

En

SE

Qoo

3_.::

:5\

mo:

<E

omom

oE.

o<o_

.?b

ooW

oman§a

Sv9

.mE

2.5

_wO

\<=

_S=

Oci

iuam

.€5

59.

mo:

man

mgn

800

35.8

89%

20:3

3;8.

322.

<<

o:E

3m

aam

zw€2

85?

_uo_

. 25:2

Em

oa?m

mod

Em

mm

ooo

imo?

wO

\<=

_$=

Q=

==

.Ea

Om

mna

8:$8

2_-

m3.

wm

..-S

3.

Hrm

swV

5:3.

.u5

_:.

no:m

Em

_.m

:o=

2.33

m=

E.o

~.».

m_.

_=o2

.%.

\§...

$\W

\0.

2.:

125$

_.:a

%_:

3._w

O>

,\:_3

=O

oiim

umS

.H

roW

c%u_

Om

:wn:

w= E

mm

i:

AGENDA ITEM #b)


..mn.

.o=

<<

<<

<<

._m

n_o:

_oo<

:_3=

.nm

ma?

a:C

c_=

=.c

:Z5:

3:O

o::E

:E12

5W

oua:0

35%

»:Fa

ng:

:>$.

~..E

§,§

:.Ra§

s...=

_.a.

..:3%

..

>m

<a1

mm

m=

mw

lnam

>..

mam

Com

»E

._.o

.m_

_u:_

_ 029

:.O

?mam

mm

oxoo<

m_.

§_$m

..:+

33¢

n2_

2a.o

o_:

mE

mm

nozz

wm

ox oo<

m..:u

:__ 0

20::

3.29

3+

$3.3

u2.

13.8

1::

Oo_

o_.=

.n-

_um

mmw_o

_.m

mo_

3a_8

.8+

£38

n3.

Bm

.oo

_u:=

_um

um:u_

.___ 00

.0.5

1.X

m...

..¢.m

..§.

m1_

.3+

$3.3

u§.

m8.

oo

_u:_

_ 3%

1.X

Pum

a:?.

o?.m

~+

93.3

n§.

3o.8

S3%

:u:_

_ oo_

o::

1.X

.23.

.3°

93+

$3.3

u«m

ambo

.\»_u

mm

o1.

X._

.3m

..33

.2+

23.3

n«m

ambo

S_u

81_:

___

020:

:w

.?m

..X

53..

$83

+$8

.8u

mm

ombo

S_u

mm

m33

..X

._.1

..m..

$5.3

+3»

:n

?aw

oo.:.

_otm

mm A

wcm

imw

mO

m3_

-_u:

__0.

0.0:

...?o

pmw

+m

._ 93

n?n

mbo

‘.39

_um

mm

Aw

:m_:

mw

m 02.

5u.

w:..

..x3u

m..

??bo

+2

98n

Suw

oo

D.m

.H.. _

~£§:

&..=

nW;

as.$

5

>=

Qca

m?n

smB

E_3

5_:

orm

amom

Ed

€2.5

2.5

:839

561

8?

>oc

Eu=

Eo:

:.~.%

SE

NS

.2%

«sw

imcs

cmnm

aou

$5an

_.ae

2<2_

3m

: E32

23:

usao

rmm

mum

man

naon 3

3ca

n»B

a5.

.E

oum

£5.

an?

amga

om>

E:6

nE:o

=D

65:8

wO

\<=

_S=

Ooi

imsm

.

?m>

mm

§>W

m..

nzm

ocmE/<

>E

.mH

O”

wO

\<:_

3=O

o::=

u=m

I.5

3W

owiQ

uasi

»:Fa

mm

o:Q

90?

W05

.§_

aE_m

._93

5I

w0

wow

mm

mm

<m

=ao

=<

m5W

0«a

wA

wm

AGENDA ITEM #b)


mQ

<=

_6=

no=

._3m

:n_

38I

dma

mm >

<m

::m

m:2

m<

\mm<

35.

Am

: So»

.?.

n..m

§o

mm

x”ac

em

d.m

m~o

3mo®

_mm

_o:_

un<

:_8:

.nm

Em

a:m

azdz

noE

zu_s

\<c:

o2_m

m.o

:cn

<=

_8:.8

S§§

2u

Um

mz.<m

_:m

m mcu

uozm

s?s

sx<

0:<

m..<E

co:

*2<

9:E

mgm

mcm 2

25:

o." .:

.mm

n>E

_8:

wo<

m_ nm

:m&

m:

_.m

m8:

.m_<

:_:m

2mm

2_nm

xmoo

maz

ozm

eow _u

3_.m

Q...._

.:_mm

:::m

__o

:c__

nm:o

:qm

nom

snm

mE

m<

m.n

m_.

m:m m

anmm

_.<

_nm 1m

3o::

m_o

;nm

an.

Em

<58

:.5

6:m

<mm

o:o

:o:B

c_<

mm

«<m

g9:

.8:

::.<

.._

.E_mw

mm

umm

xmco

ox:m

_uw cm

no«m

3m3c

m_.

Em

:m

m=

.._m

mm

nozi

cczo

zm.

<05

<=

m_ £

5m

m:m

_.o:

mnoz

iccz

ozB

mxm

m:uo

mai

m83.

33.

8no

?mm2

Em

3%:.m

m 2E

mqm

m 3%

3§_$

8no

33c:

_:m

.n.

E3:

m:o

Ean

mag

Em

<58

?

:5xo

<m

_nmaa

a:_.

mm

_o:

u_m

<m m

sm

n:<

m_‘o

_m.3

no:._

3::E

mm

Eqo

cmro

cnm

am:o

_ Em

<58

?._

.:m_.

m _m

cm_.

m_< m

22$:

<<

_3

9:no

aam

sm<

.Eom

m:3

H3.

»35

3..

w<._

.:mxo

<m

_n2§_

_2.

_.m

m_o

:.0m

m:

:3m

mE

m23

.:W

24m

<<

m_.

moT

Em

mxn

mi

9.05

<<

o1n

<<

:oE

mm

..mm

ag:5

2no

55no

...

._._

._m xo

<m

_nm:m

m_m

: _.m

m_o

:_.

mnm

_<m

m soQ

o<m

33m

3+

::n_

_:m 3.

.9:

.ou

mw

mzo

zm.

Em

3?o:

o:«

3m3¢

m_.

.m

ncm

m.

aosm

zosm $9

....

Em

u:c_

.n ea

_:.:o

:mm

E:o

_E_m

_:m m

m:<

mm

. Em

o<m

_.?b

oo_.

mm

.o:

3m=

Em

_.m

_:

mQ

<c_

8:m

am._

_3_8

§_8

§_&

=m

<m

~mE

:mE

a_o

8_83

3::

_m..r

_._m

_,m mxm

mca

m<

<m

<m

<<

mm

.<m3%

. B.8

o.8o

833=

3m3

.8m

uosm

owEm<

m~m

_.m

:m.

.=.m

:m_:

o:m

an .3:

3mno

::m

m=

:mu3

m_.

m3

mec

an3.

.<

m»m

$sm

.. :

5_.

mm

_o:

Em

m8=:_

_§8_

3E

mm

acnm

zos

0*o<

m_.

Bo

::m

_33

__<

mon

noqm

Ew

ocm

rcmnQ

5:an

_nm

3=<_

u_.m

m:n

m.

. mm

mob

oono33

_::m

33

u3<

E_:

mm

n_:n

mao

: :.m

:m:_

o:$3

812

<m

nmS

:m2

mn_

._..

. O<

m«

mm

oobo

oo_

o:m

nmo_ m

=::

m__

< 3..

<m

?m3:

m.:o

mu:

m_m E

am

x?m

sgm

a83

Rn

.o<

m_.m

wm

oboo%E

§_3

<oc

E3o

mS

:._m

.m

uozm

ozzm

m<

m1m

22m

uonmnm

mam

.. 9

3B

abes

3m

cam

zmmmag

mE

o_m

G::

um.

. muo

amoqo<

m_.

mbo

o2%

.m

noc?

mca

mm

eanm

gm. m

qocu

m.

. mm

mbo

om

osm

nma

m:=

Em

__<3

mm

sg<

o:E

mE

_m~m

m8

2303

.>

E_m

_n93

3..

o<2

mw

oobo

o:63

uouu

<33%

3o_

=m

2m

ma?

msm

m8

<m

~mS

:mB

aE

m...

amum

zgm

im3

smm

m.

>m

m_=

.E

m2.

2;<

9.S

q<

2:m

cozm

oazv

eam

cuuo

n13.

...<

m2

_3uo

:m_:

u3_.

mQ

.933

2E

m_.

mm

_o:

3a<

oSnE

m1$

Em

m. Em

.<o_:

3mm

_.%

_8:.:

__:m

mE

am

<m

_._3.

.m

mam

a»E

mnm

.8E

mm

a:m

<<

Em

sgm

sEm

:<

o:_.

o_: m

m m3m

:._U

m_,

a<2_

1._2

a_<

_onm

_ cE:n

:_

m_:

nm«m

_‘

§I\K

x\n\

m_m

::xo

gmm

.33

.3:

2m

Q<

=_8

= 933

23o3

.:m.3

5.93

%..

_.m

m.

um. 25

%oi

9:ow

mm

s?m

nos

m.n

E<

<<

<._

mm

_o:_

un<

:_8:

.mm

am_<

_m_<

_mm

w

AGENDA ITEM #b)


AGENDA ITEM #b)




Date: November 1, 2018 To: Mayor & Council From: Mike Maturo, Village of Fruitvale Approving Officer SUBJECT: Request for Decision – Provide First Three Readings to Amending Bylaw

895, 2018

Introduction and Analysis: The Village of Fruitvale’s Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw 561 (1979) (aka the SDS bylaw) requires the full installation of all servicing infrastructure prior to subdivision approval. From Section 3.6 “Level of Service:”:

“Unless otherwise approved by a Development Variance Permit or Development Permit issued by the Council pursuant to the Municipal Act, all subdivisions and developments shall be provided with service as prescribed in Schedule A of this Bylaw. The service levels may be different for different zones within the Village in accordance with the provisions of Schedule A of this Bylaw.”

Section 3.14 Bonding and Development Agreement Required allows an alternative approach:

“All works and services to be constructed and installed to serve any proposed subdivision of any lands shall be constructed and installed as prescribed in Schedules A to H hereto at the expense of the Applicant prior to the approval of such subdivision by the Approving Officer. A plan of subdivision may be finally approved prior to the completion of the construction and installation of the required works and services where the Applicant deposits with the Village of Fruitvale the security as specified in the Standard Development Agreement Document and enters into a form of agreement with the Village as contained in the Standard Development Agreement Document for subdivisions pursuant to the

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Subdivision and Servicing Bylaw Amendment of 60

2

Land title Act of the Province of British Columbia, to do all things required to carry out and construct the necessary works and services.”

These two sections of the bylaw protect the Village from the risk of servicing deficiencies (and installation cost burdens) after the approval of subdivision. In fielding a recent subdivision application, the Village’s Approving Officer notes that both of these options present potential disincentives (due to up-front costs for property owners who do not wish to physically develop the land but do wish to subdivide it. As the Village’s Official Community Plan and Zoning bylaw both support infill within the Village’s existing service area to increase property tax revenues, consideration for a third option, registration of a Restrictive 219 No-Build Covenant, is being proposed as a textual amendment to the SDS bylaw as another means to secure subdivision approval prior to the installation of infrastructure. The proposed bylaw amendment would affect Section 3.14 by changing the title to “Bonding and Development Agreement, or, Restrictive 219 Covenant, Required” and then: 3.14 Bonding and Development Agreement, or, Restrictive 219 Covenant, Required

All works and services to be constructed and installed to serve any proposed subdivision of any lands shall be constructed and installed as prescribed in Schedules A to H hereto at the expense of the Applicant either prior to, or, after the approval of such subdivision, by the Approving Officer. A plan of subdivision may be finally approved prior to the completion of the construction and installation of the required works and services where the Applicant either: a) Deposits with the Village of Fruitvale the security as specified in the Standard

Development Agreement Document and enters into a form of agreement with the Village as contained in the Standard Development Agreement Document for subdivisions pursuant to the Land title Act of the Province of British Columbia, to do all things required to carry out and construct the necessary works and services within a set timeline not to exceed two years;

AGENDA ITEM #a)


3

OR

b) Registers a Restrictive 219 “No-Build” covenant pursuant to the Land Title Act of the Province of British Columbia on the parcel being created through subdivision, obliging the future developer, after approval of subdivision, to install the construction and installation of the required works as prescribed by the Village of Fruitvale’s Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw 561 (1979) (and all other bylaws) prior to any building permit issuance, or, “use” of any type for the site.

While sub-section (b) defines the 219 option, section (a) has also been adjusted to include a new requirement: upon deposit of security with the Village, the works must be completed within two years. This wording allays the risk of the security deposit becoming financially obsolete over time due to inflation. At the end of the two-year period, the Village would hypothetically use the deposit to complete the works. The utilization of restrictive 219 covenants is well documented. The Approving Officer cites British Columbia Planning Law and Practice (William Bulhozer, 2017) that speaks to the matter: “The Land Title Act permits provisions that the land is to be built on in accordance with the covenant (an obvious positive covenant); that land is not to be built on; and that land is not be built on expect in accordance with the covenant.” The Land Title Act, Section 219 (2)(b) states:

“(2) A covenant registrable under subsection (1) may be of a negative or positive nature and may include one or more of the following provisions:

(b) that land (i) is to be built on in accordance with the covenant, (ii) is not to be built on except in accordance with the covenant, or (iii) is not to be built on;”

While the Village’s SDS bylaw does not currently utilize this option as provided by the Land Title Act, the use of it would allow current property owners a more reasonable

AGENDA ITEM #a)


4

option for subdivision while still ensuring that the future owner/developer of the land remains fully responsible for the installation of infrastructure as per the SDS bylaw. The immediate benefit to the Village is the additional parcel being created and the additional tax revenue being secured. Risk is allayed similarly to the bonding option but instead through the registration of the restrictive “no-build” covenant. The 219 offers a less capital intensive option for property owners who simply wish to sell off a portion of their property without the full financial obligation to service it prior to subdivision approval. All others procedural charges and responsibilities for subdivision approval still apply, while all SDS bylaw requirements apply at the time of the physical development of the land.

Recommendations: THAT Council provide the first three readings to Bylaw 895, 2018 amending the Village’s Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw 561, 1979. Alternatives: a) THAT Council does not provide the first three readings to the bylaw.

AGENDA ITEM #a)


THE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF FRUITVALE BYLAW 895, 2018

A Bylaw to Amend the Village of Fruitvale

Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw 561, 1979

WHEREAS it is deemed expedient and necessary to amend the “Village of Fruitvale Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw 561, 1979”, (hereinafter referred to as Bylaw 561); NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Village of Fruitvale, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows: 1. THAT Section 3.14 of Bylaw 561, be amended as follows:

3.14 Bonding and Development Agreement, or, Restrictive 219 Covenant, Required

All works and services to be constructed and installed to serve any proposed subdivision of any lands shall be constructed and installed as prescribed in Schedules A to H hereto at the expense of the Applicant either prior to, or, after the approval of such subdivision, by the Approving Officer. A plan of subdivision may be finally approved prior to the completion of the construction and installation of the required works and services where the Applicant either: a) Deposits with the Village of Fruitvale the security as specified in the Standard

Development Agreement Document and enters into a form of agreement with the Village as contained in the Standard Development Agreement Document for subdivisions pursuant to the Land title Act of the Province of British Columbia, to do all things required to carry out and construct the necessary works and services within a set timeline not to exceed two years; OR

b) Registers a Restrictive 219 “No-Build” covenant pursuant to the Land Title Act of the Province of British Columbia on the parcel being created through subdivision, obliging the future developer, after approval of subdivision, to install the construction and installation of the required works as prescribed

AGENDA ITEM #a)


Subdivsion and Development Servicing Amendment Bylaw 895, 2018 Page 2

by the Village of Fruitvale’s Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw 561 (1979) (and all other bylaws) prior to any building permit issuance, or, “use” of any type for the site.

2. THAT this Bylaw shall be cited for all purposes as “Village of Fruitvale Subdivision

and Development Servicing Bylaw 561, 1979, Amendment Bylaw 895, 2018”. READ a first time this 6th day of November, 2018. READ a second time this 6th day of November, 2018. READ a third time this 6th day of November, 2018. RECONSIDERED, FINALLY PASSED AND ADOPTED this ___ day of December, 2018. Mayor Chief Administrative Officer CERTIFIED a true copy of Bylaw 895 cited as “Village of Fruitvale Subdivision and development Servicing Bylaw 561, 1979, Amendment Bylaw 895, 2018.” DATED this __ day of December, 2018. Chief Administrative Officer

AGENDA ITEM #a)




Date: November 1, 2018 To: Mayor & Council From: Mike Maturo, CAO SUBJECT: Request for Decision – Provide the first two readings to Amending Bylaw

896 (2018) to amend the Village of Fruitvale Zoning Bylaw 846 (2013) and to schedule a Public Hearing for December 3, 2018

Introduction and Analysis: The ongoing development of duplexes at Mountain Side does not conform to the existing zoning, RM2 – Medium Density Multiple Housing. The RM2 – Medium Density Multiple Housing zoning for the land witnessing duplex development does not list “duplexes” as a permitted use. Although a title search reveals a front setback variance and although there has been approval of building plans by resolution of Council in October, 2017, neither of those decisions affected the zoning regulations for the land. The duplexes that have been constructed have been non-compliant with the Village of Fruitvale Zoning Bylaw 846 (2013). While this can be seen as an administrative glitch, it is not appropriate to advance the project until the correction has been made. A cross reference of the Definitions section in the Zoning bylaw shows no allowance for duplexes on this land and as well all zones that do allow duplexes list the term “Duplexes” as a permitted use. The provincial legislation is clear that neither “density” nor “use” can be varied and that both can only be changed through a zoning bylaw amendment. The earlier resolution of Council to approve building plans in 2017 cannot lead to a contravention of another bylaw, hence the correction being proposed. The proposed zoning amendment would create a new comprehensive development zone, “RM2D – Medium Density Multiple Housing/Duplexes” that includes “duplexes” as a permitted use (along with all other uses of the RM2 - Medium Density Multiple

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Mountain Side Zoning Bylaw Amendment of 60

2

Housing zone) and allows the proponent to continue constructing on the remaining lots. The land being proposed for the zoning amendment does not encompass the whole of the Mountain Side lands but only those on which the duplexes have been built and are being planned for future construction. The remainder of the parcel will retain the RM2 – Medium Density Multiple Housing designation. Additional amendments to the bylaw are also being included to bring the ongoing development into compliance and to allow any future re-development a more compatible, transitional fit with the existing, neighbouring single-family residential neighbourhood:

• Maximum heights have been reduced from 12.5 meters to 10 meters; • Bonus heights have been reduced from 16.5 meters to 12.5 meters; • Required minimum street frontage has been reduced • Required setbacks for front, rear and side have been reduced.

As part of the due diligence for this report, the CAO has contacted legal counsel for an opinion and has also been in contact with the proponent who is relying on a zoning amendment to facilitate the issuance of building permits and continue with the construction of duplexes. Recommendations: THAT Council provide the first and second readings to Amending Bylaw 896, 2018, amending Zoning Bylaw 846 (2013); AND FURTHER THAT Council direct staff to schedule a Public Hearing for December 3, 2018. Alternatives: a) THAT Council directs staff to retain the existing zoning.

AGENDA ITEM #b)


3

b) THAT Council directs staff to provide additional information.

AGENDA ITEM #b)


THE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF FRUITVALE BYLAW 896, 2018

A Bylaw to Amend the Village of Fruitvale

Zoning Bylaw 846, 2013

WHEREAS it is deemed expedient and necessary to amend the “Village of Fruitvale Zoning Bylaw 846, 2013”, (hereinafter referred to as Bylaw 846); NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Village of Fruitvale, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows: 1. THAT Section 14 Urban Housing Zones of Bylaw 846 be amended by the addition of

section 14.7 RM2D – Medium Density Housing/Duplex Mountain Side as follows 14.7 RM2D – Medium Density Housing/Duplex Mountain Side

Purpose:

The purpose is to provide a zone primarily for duplexes, medium density apartments and compatible secondary uses on serviced urban lots at Mountain Side.

Principal Uses:

a) apartment housing

b) duplexes

c) boarding and lodging houses

d) congregate housing

e) four dwelling housing

f) group home, major

g) multiple dwelling housing

Secondary Uses:

a) care centres, major

b) home occupation

c) utility services, minor impact

AGENDA ITEM #b)


Zoning Amendment Bylaw 896, 2018 Page 2

Buildings and Structures Permitted:

a) apartment housing

b) fourplex housing

c) row housing

d) stacked row housing

e) accessory buildings and structures

Subdivision Regulations:

a) WIDTH:

The minimum lot width is 15.0 m.

b) DEPTH:

The minimum lot depth is 30.0 m.

c) AREA:

The minimum lot area is 550 m².

Development Regulations:

a) FLOOR AREA RATIO:

The maximum floor area ratio is 1.0, except it is up to 1.3 where the developer has provided an amenity in compliance with the density bonusing provisions contained in Section 7.15. Where parking spaces are provided totally beneath habitable space of a principal building or beneath useable common amenity areas providing that in all cases, the parking spaces are screened from view, an amount may be added to the floor area ratio equal to 0.2 multiplied by the ratio of such parking spaces to the total required parking spaces, but in no case shall this amount exceed 0.2. Where a Housing Agreement is provided pursuant to the provisions of Section 7.9, an amount of 0.1 may be added to the floor area ratio.

AGENDA ITEM #b)



b) SITE COVERAGE:

The maximum site coverage is 40%, provided that the maximum site coverage of buildings, driveways, and parking areas is 60%.

c) HEIGHT:

The maximum height is the lesser of 10 m or 3 storeys, except it is 4.5 m for accessory buildings and structures. This height is increased to the lesser of 12.5 m or 4 storeys where the developer has provided an amenity in compliance with the density bonusing provisions contained in Section 7.15.

d) FRONT YARD:

The minimum site front yard is 4.5 m.

e) SIDE YARD:

The minimum site side yard is 4.5m for a portion of a building not over 2½ storeys, and 5 m from a flanking street.

f) REAR YARD:

The minimum site rear yard is 4.5 m. It is 2 m for accessory buildings.

g) SETBACK FOR ACCESSORY BUILDINGS:

The setback requirements for an accessory building containing recreational amenities for the use of all residents shall conform to the setback requirements for principal buildings.

Other Regulations:

a) PRIVATE OPEN SPACE:

A minimum area of 7.5 m² of private open space shall be provided per bachelor dwelling, congregate housing bedroom or group home bedroom, 15.0 m² of private open space shall be provided per 1 bedroom dwelling, and 25.0 m2 of private open space shall be provided per dwelling with more than 1 bedroom.

AGENDA ITEM #b)



b) BUILDING FRONTAGE:

No continuous building frontage shall exceed 40.0 m for a 3 or 4 storey building, or 65.0 m for a 2-storey building. If the frontage is interrupted by an open courtyard equivalent in depth and width to the building height, the maximum continuous 3-storey building frontage may be 80.0 m provided that no building section exceeds 40.0 m. The building must be designed so the portion adjacent to neighbouring development is no more than ½ storey higher. ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS: In addition to the regulations listed above, other regulations may apply. These include the general development regulations of Section 7 (accessory development, yards, projections into yards, lighting, etc.), the landscaping and fencing provisions of Section 8, the parking and loading regulations of Section 9, and the specific use regulations of Section 10.

c) DEVELOPMENT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS:

Development Permit Guidelines contained in the Village of Fruitvale Official Community Plan are applicable to this zone.

2. THAT this Bylaw shall be cited for all purposes as “Village of Fruitvale Zoning Bylaw

846, 2013 Amendment Bylaw 863, 2015” and affects the land as highlighted in the Schedule A (map) that forms part of this bylaw..

READ a first time this 6th day of November, 2018. READ a second time this 6th day of November, 2018. PUBLIC NOTICE given as required by Section 892 of the Local Government Act the -- and -- days of November, 2018. PUBLIC HEARING held as required by Section 890 of the Local Government Act the 3rd day of December, 2018. READ a third time this __ day of December, 2015.

AGENDA ITEM #b)


Zoning Amendment Bylaw 896, 2018 Page 5 RECONSIDERED, FINALLY PASSED AND ADOPTED this ___ day of December, 2018. Mayor Chief Administrative Officer CERTIFIED a true copy of Bylaw 896 cited as “Village of Fruitvale Zoning Bylaw 846, 2013 Amendment Bylaw 896, 2018”. DATED this 3rd day of December, 2018. Chief Administrative Officer

AGENDA ITEM #b)



RM2D – Medium Density Housing/Duplex Mountain Side

Schedule A of Zoning Amendment Bylaw 896 2018

AGENDA ITEM #b)


regular council - 06 nov 2018 - fruitvale

Documents